Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Stirling cycle

The Stirling cycle is a thermodynamic cycle that operates as a closed regenerative heat engine or refrigerator, consisting of two isothermal processes and two isochoric processes, and was invented by Scottish clergyman Robert Stirling in 1816 as a safer alternative to steam engines.^[1]^[2] In its ideal form, the cycle involves isothermal compression of a working gas (typically an ideal gas like helium or air) at the cold temperature T_L, followed by isochoric heat addition via a regenerator to raise the gas temperature to the hot temperature T_H, then isothermal expansion at T_H, and finally isochoric heat rejection through the regenerator back to T_L.^[3]^[4] The regenerator—a key feature enabling near-perfect internal heat recovery—stores heat during the isochoric cooling and releases it during heating, minimizing external heat input and rejection.^[2] This configuration yields a theoretical thermal efficiency identical to the Carnot cycle, given by \eta = 1 - \frac{T_L}{T_H}, making it highly efficient for converting heat from low-temperature sources (e.g., solar or waste heat) into mechanical work.^[2]^[4] Historically, the cycle gained renewed interest in the 20th century for cryogenic applications, with developments in 1938 by Philips Laboratories for generators and in 1946 for cooling systems, evolving into modern uses in space propulsion, combined heat and power (CHP) systems, and cryocoolers operating at frequencies around 25 Hz with helium as the working fluid. As of 2025, ongoing research includes NASA's development of Stirling simulators for space power applications and projected market growth to USD 1,494 million by 2032, driven by advancements in solar-powered and waste heat recovery systems.^[1]^[5]^[6] Practical implementations, such as alpha, beta, and gamma engine configurations, achieve efficiencies of 13–40% depending on scale and conditions, though challenges include sealing high-pressure gases and material costs for high-temperature operation.^[4] The cycle's reversible processes and external combustion nature allow quiet, low-vibration operation without valves, distinguishing it from Otto or Diesel cycles while enabling applications in waste heat recovery for automotive and marine engines.^[2]^[3]

Overview and History

Definition and Basic Principles

The Stirling cycle is a closed regenerative thermodynamic cycle that operates on a fixed mass of gas as the working fluid, comprising two isothermal processes and two isochoric processes.^[2] In this cycle, heat is added and rejected isothermally during expansion and compression, respectively, while the isochoric processes involve heat transfer through a regenerator to store and reuse thermal energy, enabling reversibility in the ideal case.^[7] Thermodynamic cycles like the Stirling represent idealized sequences of heat addition, work transfer, and heat rejection in heat engines, providing a framework for analyzing energy conversion efficiency without specifying mechanical details.^[2] The fundamental components of a Stirling cycle system include the expansion space, where the working fluid absorbs heat and expands; the compression space, where it rejects heat and compresses; the regenerator, a porous matrix that temporarily stores heat during isochoric cooling and releases it during isochoric heating; the heater, which supplies external heat to the expansion space; and the cooler, which dissipates heat from the compression space.^[2] These elements work together in a sealed system to maintain the fixed mass of gas, typically an ideal gas such as helium, hydrogen, or air, which facilitates efficient heat transfer due to its compressibility and thermal properties.^[7] In Stirling engines, the cycle converts heat energy into mechanical work through the cyclic compression and expansion of the working fluid, driven by an external heat source rather than internal combustion.^[8] This external heating distinguishes it from internal combustion cycles like the Otto or Diesel, which rely on fuel burning within the engine and are inherently irreversible due to rapid combustion processes; in contrast, the ideal Stirling cycle is fully reversible, achieving theoretical efficiency comparable to the Carnot cycle based solely on temperature ratios.^[8]

Historical Development

The Stirling cycle was invented by Scottish clergyman Robert Stirling in 1816 as a safer alternative to steam engines, which were prone to explosions due to boiler failures.^[9] Stirling, motivated by parish accidents involving steam technology, patented his hot air engine that year, introducing the regenerator—a porous matrix to store and release heat—for improved thermal efficiency in a closed-cycle system.^[10] This innovation allowed the engine to operate externally on any heat source without direct combustion inside the working fluid. Robert Stirling collaborated with his brother James, an engineer, to build the first practical engine in 1818 at a quarry near Kilwinning, Scotland, where it pumped water using about two horsepower from a low-temperature heat source like burning coal or waste.^[11] Early installations, such as the 1843 Dundee Foundry engine producing 45 horsepower at 18% efficiency, demonstrated potential superiority over contemporary steam engines in safety and fuel flexibility.^[12] However, 19th-century development stalled due to metallurgical limitations; available materials could not withstand the high temperatures (over 800°C) required for maximum power and efficiency, resulting in poor regenerator performance and frequent mechanical failures like air vessel ruptures.^[7] These issues, coupled with the emergence of compact and higher-power internal combustion engines in the late 1800s, led to the Stirling engine's decline, confining it to niche, low-power applications by the early 20th century.^[12] Interest revived in the late 1930s at Philips Research Laboratories in Eindhoven, Netherlands, where engineers adapted the cycle for modern uses, emphasizing beta-type configurations with a single cylinder housing both power and displacer pistons for compact, vibration-free operation.^[10] By the 1940s–1950s, Philips developed prototypes like the MP1002C (50 cm³ displacement, up to 10% efficiency at 12.4 bar) and the 1-98 engine (98 cm³, achieving 50% indicated efficiency or about 75% of Carnot efficiency at 850°C heater and 100°C cooler temperatures), building over 100 units and licensing designs to firms like MAN and United Stirling for industrial generators.^[10] A key milestone was the 1970s emergence of solar Stirling prototypes, such as dish-concentrator systems producing 25–50 kWe, which integrated parabolic mirrors to focus sunlight for renewable power generation.^[13] In the 1980s, NASA advanced free-piston Stirling technology at its Lewis (now Glenn) Research Center for space applications, developing radioisotope Stirling generators (RSGs) to convert plutonium-238 decay heat to electricity with up to four times the efficiency of traditional radioisotope thermoelectric generators.^[14] Prototypes like the GPU-3 (4.47 kW at 27% efficiency) and collaborations under the Automotive Stirling Engine Development Program tested high-speed designs for multifuel vehicles and deep-space missions.^[15] As of 2025, the Stirling cycle has seen renewed focus in cryocoolers for infrared sensors and medical imaging, with market growth driven by compact, vibration-free designs achieving cooling below 80 K.^[16] Applications in renewable energy include micro-combined heat and power (micro-CHP) systems, where Stirling engines convert biomass or solar heat to electricity and usable warmth, offering 80–90% overall efficiency in residential settings.^[17] Efficiency gains stem from advanced materials, such as high-porosity regenerators, enabling better heat transfer in low-temperature differentials for sustainable energy integration.^[12] As of November 2025, NASA continues to advance Stirling technology for space, including the KRuS-K generator concept for efficient radioisotope power in deep-space missions, potentially offering up to 30% efficiency.^[18]

Idealized Thermodynamic Cycle

The Four Stages of the Cycle

The idealized Stirling cycle consists of four reversible thermodynamic processes that enable efficient heat-to-work conversion through the use of a regenerator.^[10] These stages assume an ideal gas as the working fluid, perfect regeneration with no heat losses, and negligible pressure drops, ensuring the cycle returns to its initial state after completion.^[19] The regenerator, a porous matrix or matrix of metallic mesh, stores heat during one stage and releases it in another, minimizing external heat input and maximizing efficiency.^[10] In the first stage, isothermal expansion occurs at the high temperature T_H, where the working gas absorbs heat from an external heater and expands while performing work on the piston.^[19] This process maintains constant temperature through continuous heat addition, driving the mechanical output of the cycle.^[20] The second stage involves isochoric cooling at constant volume, during which no work is exchanged as the gas transfers heat to the regenerator without volume change.^[10] The regenerator absorbs this thermal energy, storing it for later use and facilitating the temperature drop from T_H toward the low temperature T_C.^[19] The third stage is isothermal compression at the low temperature T_C, where the gas is compressed by the piston while rejecting heat to an external cooler.^[20] This maintains constant temperature through heat removal, completing the work input portion of the cycle.^[10] Finally, the fourth stage entails isochoric heating at constant volume, with no work performed as the gas absorbs heat from the regenerator to raise its temperature back to T_H.^[19] The regenerator releases the previously stored heat, enabling near-perfect internal heat recovery and closing the cycle reversibly.^[10]

Thermodynamic Analysis

The idealized Stirling cycle assumes an ideal gas as the working fluid, with the processes occurring reversibly and a perfect regenerator that stores and returns heat without loss during the constant-volume stages. The cycle operates between a hot temperature T_H and a cold temperature T_C, with maximum and minimum volumes

V_\max

and

V_\min

, respectively, where the compression ratio

r = V_\max / V_\min > 1

. The state points are defined as follows: state 1 at

V = V_\max

, T = T_C, pressure

P_1 = n R T_C / V_\max

; state 2 at

V = V_\min

, T = T_C,

P_2 = n R T_C / V_\min = P_1 r

; state 3 at

V = V_\min

, T = T_H,

P_3 = n R T_H / V_\min = P_2 (T_H / T_C)

; state 4 at

V = V_\max

, T = T_H,

P_4 = n R T_H / V_\max = P_3 / r = P_1 (T_H / T_C)

. Here, n is the number of moles and R is the gas constant.^[21]^[22] The thermodynamic analysis applies the first law of thermodynamics, \Delta U = Q - W (with W as work done by the system), to each process, assuming constant-volume molar heat capacity C_v for the ideal gas and the ideal gas law PV = nRT. For the isothermal compression (1→2) at T_C, the internal energy change is \Delta U_{12} = 0 since T is constant. The work is

W_{12} = \int_{V_\max}^{V_\min} P \, dV = n R T_C \ln(V_\min / V_\max) = -n R T_C \ln r

, so the heat rejected is Q_{12} = W_{12} = -n R T_C \ln r, and the magnitude of heat rejection is |Q_C| = n R T_C \ln r. For the isochoric heating (2→3) at

V_\min

, W_{23} = 0, \Delta U_{23} = n C_v (T_H - T_C), and Q_{23} = \Delta U_{23} = n C_v (T_H - T_C), supplied by the regenerator.^[21]^[22] For the isothermal expansion (3→4) at T_H, similarly \Delta U_{34} = 0 and W_{34} = n R T_H \ln r, yielding the heat input Q_{34} = W_{34} = n R T_H \ln r = Q_H. For the isochoric cooling (4→1) at

V_\max

, W_{41} = 0, \Delta U_{41} = n C_v (T_C - T_H) = -n C_v (T_H - T_C), and Q_{41} = \Delta U_{41} = -n C_v (T_H - T_C), absorbed by the regenerator. The regenerator heat transfer is thus Q_\text{regen} = n C_v (T_H - T_C) during heating and the negative during cooling, resulting in zero net loss with perfect regeneration. The net work over the cycle is the enclosed area in the P-V diagram, W = Q_H + Q_{12} = Q_H - |Q_C| = n R (T_H - T_C) \ln r, since the isochoric contributions cancel.^[21]^[22] The thermal efficiency is \eta = W / Q_H = [n R (T_H - T_C) \ln r] / [n R T_H \ln r] = 1 - T_C / T_H, matching the Carnot efficiency due to the reversible isothermal heat transfers and perfect regeneration, which eliminates entropy generation in the constant-volume processes. This derivation highlights the cycle's theoretical equivalence to the Carnot cycle under ideal conditions, though practical implementations deviate due to finite regeneration effectiveness.^[21]^[22]

Graphical Representations

Pressure-Volume Diagram

The pressure-volume (P-V) diagram of the idealized Stirling cycle illustrates the thermodynamic path followed by the working fluid, typically an ideal gas, during one complete cycle. For an ideal gas, the diagram features two hyperbolic curves corresponding to the isothermal processes at the hot temperature T_H and cold temperature T_C, connected by straight vertical lines representing the isochoric processes at maximum volume V_{\max} and minimum volume V_{\min}. This configuration forms a closed loop that approximates a rectangle but with curved isothermal segments due to the relationship PV = nRT at constant temperature, where pressure decreases hyperbolically as volume increases during expansion and vice versa during compression.^[23] The cycle path begins at point 1 (low volume V_{\min}, high pressure at T_H) and proceeds counterclockwise: from 1 to 2 along the isothermal expansion at T_H, where the gas absorbs heat while volume increases from V_{\min} to V_{\max} and pressure decreases; from 2 to 3 via isochoric cooling at constant V_{\max}, where heat is rejected and pressure drops; from 3 to 4 along the isothermal compression at T_C, where volume decreases back to V_{\min} and pressure rises as heat is expelled; and from 4 to 1 via isochoric heating at constant V_{\min}, where pressure increases as heat is added. These processes align with the four stages of the cycle, emphasizing reversible heat transfer without phase changes.^[23]^[24] The area enclosed by the P-V loop quantifies the net work output W per cycle, calculated as the cyclic line integral \oint P \, dV, which equals the difference between the work during expansion and compression. This area scales with the compression ratio r = V_{\max}/V_{\min}, as the isothermal work contributions include a logarithmic term nRT \ln r, highlighting how higher ratios enhance performance under ideal conditions.^[23] The idealized P-V diagram assumes perfect reversibility, with isothermal processes maintained exactly at constant temperatures, isochoric lines free of volume changes, and no mechanical losses such as hysteresis or friction in the pistons or displacer. These assumptions enable the cycle to achieve Carnot efficiency limits but are approximations not fully realized in practical engines.^[23]

Temperature-Entropy Diagram

The temperature-entropy (T-S) diagram for the ideal Stirling cycle illustrates the thermodynamic processes in terms of temperature and specific entropy, providing insight into heat transfers and the cycle's reversibility. The diagram typically appears as a rectangle, with horizontal lines representing the isothermal processes at the high temperature T_H and low temperature T_C, and vertical lines representing the constant-volume (isochoric) regeneration processes, which involve entropy changes due to heat transfer and are often approximated as vertical for simplicity though strictly sloped for an ideal gas working fluid.^[2] The area enclosed by the cycle on the T-S diagram corresponds to the net work output, while the areas under the isotherms represent the heat additions and rejections.^[2] The cycle begins at process 1-2: isothermal expansion at T_H, where the working fluid absorbs heat Q_H from the hot reservoir, causing entropy to increase by \Delta S = nR \ln(V_{\max}/V_{\min}), with n as the number of moles and R the gas constant.^[25] This is followed by process 2-3: isochoric cooling, where entropy decreases by \Delta S = n C_v \ln(T_C / T_H) as heat is transferred to the regenerator, though imperfect regeneration introduces additional entropy change \Delta S due to irreversibilities.^[2] Process 3-4 involves isothermal compression at T_C, where entropy decreases by \Delta S = -nR \ln(V_{\max}/V_{\min}) and heat |Q_C| is rejected to the cold reservoir, with |Q_C| = T_C |\Delta S|.^[25] Finally, process 4-1 is isochoric heating, where entropy increases by \Delta S = n C_v \ln(T_H / T_C) recovering heat from the regenerator to return the fluid to T_H. For ideal gas, the entropy changes in 2-3 and 4-1 balance, \Delta S_{2-3} + \Delta S_{4-1} = 0.^[2] The regeneration process is visualized on the T-S diagram by the vertical paths for 2-3 and 4-1; minimal separation between these paths indicates low irreversibility and effective heat storage in the regenerator, ensuring that the entropy changes during cooling and heating are balanced without net external heat input for these stages.^[25] In the ideal case, the cycle's thermal efficiency matches that of the Carnot cycle, \eta = 1 - T_C / T_H, because both heat addition and rejection occur isothermally at the reservoir temperatures, maximizing reversibility.^[2]

Mechanical Configurations

Piston Motion Variations

The Stirling cycle can be realized through various mechanical configurations of pistons, primarily categorized as alpha, beta, and gamma types, each employing distinct arrangements of the power piston and displacer to achieve the necessary volume changes between the compression and expansion spaces. In the alpha configuration, two separate power pistons operate in independent cylinders—one in the hot space and one in the cold space—connected by a crankshaft with a 90-degree phase difference to facilitate the cycle's isothermal processes. This setup, first developed in early Stirling engines, allows for higher power density but requires precise synchronization of the pistons.^[26]^[27] The beta configuration utilizes a single cylinder containing both the power piston and the displacer piston, where the displacer shuttles the working fluid between hot and cold ends while the power piston extracts mechanical work from pressure variations. The displacer in this arrangement often moves via a linkage or freely under gas pressure, enabling compact design suitable for moderate power outputs, though it demands robust sealing between the pistons to prevent leakage.^[28]^[29] In contrast, the gamma configuration places the displacer in a separate cylinder connected to the power piston in its own cylinder, reducing the need for tight seals on the displacer side since only the power piston must maintain high-pressure integrity against the cyclic variations. This design simplifies fabrication and lowers sealing challenges, making it advantageous for low-temperature differential applications despite a somewhat reduced compression ratio compared to alpha or beta types.^[30]^[31] A key aspect across these configurations is the phase relationship, where the displacer typically leads the power piston by 90 degrees to ensure the working fluid is displaced before significant compression or expansion occurs, thereby separating the hot and cold processes effectively. This offset is achieved through crankshaft linkages, optimizing the cycle's thermodynamic efficiency.^[31]^[28] The motion of the pistons and displacer is generally kinematic, governed by sinusoidal variations derived from crankshaft rotation. For the displacer in beta and gamma types, the position from bottom dead center is approximated as y = r (1 - \cos \theta), where r is the crank radius and \theta is the crank angle, providing a near-sinusoidal displacement that aligns with the cycle's timing requirements. This equation simplifies modeling while capturing the essential harmonic behavior.^[32] Historically, piston motion in Stirling engines evolved from Robert Stirling's 1816 original design, which used basic linkage mechanisms for reciprocation, to the rhombic drive introduced by Philips in the mid-20th century for smoother, balanced operation in beta configurations, and further to modern free-piston designs pioneered by William Beale in the 1960s, where linear alternators replace crankshafts for reduced friction and maintenance.^[33]^[34]^[35]

Volume Variations

In the Stirling cycle, the total volume of the working fluid, V_{\text{total}}, is the sum of the expansion volume (V_{\text{exp}}), the compression volume (V_{\text{comp}}), and the regenerator volume (V_{\text{regen}}), where V_{\text{total}} = V_{\text{exp}} + V_{\text{comp}} + V_{\text{regen}}. This total volume varies cyclically over the engine cycle, typically in a sinusoidal manner in kinematic Stirling engines driven by crankshaft mechanisms. The regenerator volume acts as a fixed dead volume, while the expansion and compression volumes fluctuate due to piston and displacer motions, influencing the overall pressure and heat transfer dynamics.^[10]^[36] The expansion volume V_{\text{exp}} reaches its peak during the heat addition phase (isothermal expansion), where the working fluid absorbs heat at high temperature. This volume is primarily controlled by the displacer piston in beta- and gamma-type configurations, which shuttles the gas between the hot and cold spaces without significant compression work. In contrast, the compression volume V_{\text{comp}} is minimized during the heat rejection phase (isothermal compression), when the fluid releases heat at low temperature; this is managed by the power piston, which performs the net work output of the cycle. These volume changes ensure the phased separation of heating and cooling processes central to the Stirling cycle's reversibility.^[10]^[28] Volume variations differ across Stirling engine types due to their mechanical arrangements. In the alpha configuration, V_{\text{exp}} and V_{\text{comp}} vary independently, each driven by separate pistons in distinct cylinders connected to the crankshaft, allowing precise control of their phase difference (typically 90°). Beta- and gamma-type engines couple the volumes through a shared crankshaft, with the displacer modulating V_{\text{exp}} relative to the power piston's control of V_{\text{comp}}; in beta designs, both occur in a single cylinder, while gamma uses offset cylinders for reduced mechanical complexity. For a single-piston approximation in these kinematic models, the volume as a function of crank angle \theta is given by

V(\theta) = V_{\text{dead}} + \frac{V_{\text{sweep}}}{2} (1 - \cos \theta),

where V_{\text{dead}} is the minimum clearance volume and V_{\text{sweep}} is the piston's swept volume, reflecting the sinusoidal motion.^[28]^[36] Dead volume, encompassing V_{\text{regen}} and clearance spaces in heat exchangers and manifolds, reduces the cycle's efficiency by lowering the effective compression ratio r, as it prevents full volume contraction and expansion. This trapped gas experiences incomplete temperature swings, diminishing the mean pressure and net work output compared to an ideal cycle without dead volumes. Minimizing dead volume through design optimization is thus critical for practical performance.^[10]^[7]

Dynamic Behavior

Pressure and Temperature vs. Crank Angle

In a rotating Stirling engine, the pressure profile as a function of crank angle θ exhibits a sinusoidal variation around a mean pressure, with peaks occurring at maximum compression and expansion volumes. This behavior arises from the cyclic volume changes in the compression and expansion spaces, approximated in isothermal models as P(\theta) = P_{\text{mean}} + \Delta P \sin(\theta + \phi), where P_{\text{mean}} is the cycle-averaged pressure determined by the total gas mass and effective temperatures, \Delta P represents the pressure amplitude influenced by the swept volumes and temperature ratio, and \phi accounts for the phase offset due to piston phasing. The Schmidt isothermal analysis provides a closed-form solution for this pressure expression, assuming perfect regeneration and instantaneous heat transfer, which simplifies the ideal gas law application across the engine spaces.^[37]^[10] The temperature profile T(\theta) in the idealized cycle features stepwise transitions between the hot-side temperature T_H and cold-side temperature T_C, with the expansion space maintaining approximately T_H during the expansion stroke (crank angles near 0° to 180°) and the compression space holding near T_C during compression (near 180° to 360°). The regenerator introduces a smoothing effect through its thermal lag, resulting in a linear temperature gradient from T_H to T_C that persists across the transfer processes, calculated as T_r = (T_H - T_C) / \ln(T_H / T_C) for the mean regenerator temperature. In practice, these profiles are derived from nodal thermodynamic models that track mass and energy balances at discrete crank angle increments.^[23]^[10] Phase relationships between pressure, volume, and temperature are critical to engine dynamics; in the idealized isothermal cycle, instantaneous heat transfer implies no significant phase shift, but adiabatic effects in real engines cause the pressure to lead the volume variation by approximately 90 degrees, enhancing net work output during expansion. This lead is evident in semi-adiabatic simulations where compression and expansion processes deviate from isothermality, with pressure peaking slightly before maximum volume due to rapid gas compression heating. Numerical simulations typically employ the ideal gas law PV = mRT integrated with volume functions V(\theta) from piston kinematics, such as V_c(\theta) = V_{clc} + V_{swc} (1 - \cos \theta)/2 for the compression space, to predict these profiles over a full 360° cycle.^[10]^[36] Deviations from the ideal profiles occur due to finite heat transfer rates in the heat exchangers and regenerator, introducing hysteresis in T(\theta) where temperatures lag behind the expected stepwise changes, leading to reduced pressure swings and efficiency losses. For instance, during heat addition, the gas temperature rises more gradually than in the ideal case, causing a phase lag in the thermal response relative to crank angle and contributing to shuttle heat losses. These effects are quantified in computational models that incorporate heat transfer coefficients and nodal temperatures, showing hysteresis loops in temperature-crank angle plots that widen with lower heat transfer effectiveness.^[38]^[39]

Particle and Mass Motion

In the Stirling cycle, the working fluid particles undergo cyclic shuttling between the hot and cold ends of the engine, primarily driven by the motion of the displacer piston, which displaces the gas without significant compression or expansion in ideal configurations. This motion ensures that particles traverse the heater, regenerator, and cooler in a controlled manner, with minimal mixing between hot and cold gas parcels under ideal conditions, thereby preserving the temperature gradient essential for regenerative heat transfer.^[10] The mass flow rate of the working fluid in the Stirling engine arises from the cyclic displacement induced by piston motion and can be expressed as \dot{m} = \rho A v_{\text{piston}}, where \rho is the fluid density, A is the cross-sectional area of the flow path, and v_{\text{piston}} is the piston velocity. This oscillatory mass flow varies sinusoidally with the engine cycle, reflecting the compression and expansion phases, and is critical for determining the overall gas inventory distribution across the engine components.^[10] Velocity components of the fluid particles include primarily axial oscillatory flow through the regenerator, modeled as a porous medium where the superficial velocity follows u_m = U_{\max} \sin(\omega t), with U_{\max} as the maximum velocity amplitude and \omega as the angular frequency. In the cylinders, the flow is also oscillatory but occurs in a less restricted geometry, leading to higher peak velocities compared to the regenerator's damped axial progression. These components ensure periodic transport of thermal energy without net directional bias over a full cycle.^[40] Residence time for gas particles traversing the heater, regenerator, and cooler is determined by the fluid displacement amplitude relative to the component length, often quantified via the relative amplitude A_R = 2 d R_{e_{\max}} / L, where d is the hydraulic diameter, R_{e_{\max}} is the maximum Reynolds number, and L is the length; shorter residence times enhance heat transfer rates but may limit regenerative effectiveness if below optimal cycle fractions. This time scale directly influences the thermal equilibration of particles with the matrix surfaces during passage.^[40] Ideal models assume laminar, non-turbulent flow with no recirculation, enabling simplified sinusoidal approximations for particle trajectories and uniform axial progression. In practice, real effects such as dead zones—regions of stagnation within the regenerator or flow paths—introduce losses by trapping gas parcels, reducing effective mass flow, and promoting uneven heat transfer, thereby increasing frictional and incomplete regeneration penalties.^[41]^[10] Fluid dynamics in the Stirling cycle are modeled using either Lagrangian tracking, which follows individual particle parcels to map trajectories and local heat interactions as described by Organ, or Eulerian field averages, which solve conservation equations over nodal volumes to capture aggregate flow fields and pressure gradients. The Lagrangian approach excels in revealing shuttling details and minimal mixing, while Eulerian methods, common in third-order analyses, efficiently handle porous media effects in the regenerator but may overlook parcel-specific dead volume impacts.^[10]

Performance Metrics

Heat and Work Calculations

In the Stirling cycle, the instantaneous heat transfer rate to the working gas in the heater is given by \frac{dQ_H}{dt} = h A (T_H - T_{gas}), where h is the heat transfer coefficient, A is the heat exchanger surface area, T_H is the heater wall temperature, and T_{gas} is the instantaneous gas temperature.^[42] This rate is integrated over the expansion phase (typically corresponding to the hot-side isothermal process in the ideal cycle) to obtain the total heat input Q_H = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} \frac{dQ_H}{dt} \, dt, accounting for the dynamic temperature variations of the gas as it expands.^[42] Similarly, the heat rejection rate in the cooler follows \frac{dQ_C}{dt} = h A (T_{gas} - T_C), integrated over the compression phase.^[42] The cumulative work per cycle, W_{cycle}, is calculated as the line integral W_{cycle} = \oint P \, dV, which in practice is evaluated by summing contributions from the expansion and compression spaces over the crank angle \theta from 0 to $2\pi.^[42] For a kinematic configuration with sinusoidal piston motion, this involves integrating P(\theta) \frac{dV}{d\theta} d\theta for each space, capturing the non-isothermal effects during constant-volume regeneration.^[42] Over multiple cycles, the total work is simply the sum of individual cycle works, assuming steady-state operation where profiles repeat periodically. The energy balance for the cycle adheres to the first law: Q_{net} = W_{cycle} + \Delta U, with \Delta U = 0 over a complete cycle in steady state.^[42] Here, Q_{net} = Q_H - Q_C, but the regenerator plays a key role by storing heat during the isochoric cooling (from hot to cold temperature) and releasing an equivalent amount during isochoric heating, minimizing external heat input beyond the net requirement.^[43] In ideal conditions with perfect regeneration, Q_H = n R T_H \ln r and Q_C = n R T_C \ln r, where n is the number of moles, R is the gas constant, and r is the volume ratio, leading to Q_{net} = n R (T_H - T_C) \ln r.^[43] For non-ideal cases incorporating finite heat transfer rates and pressure drops, numerical methods such as trapezoidal or Simpson's rule integration are employed to compute W_{cycle} from discretized profiles of P(\theta) and V(\theta).^[42] These methods divide the cycle into small angular increments (e.g., 500 steps per cycle for accuracy within 0.3% error in energy balance) and approximate integrals like \int P \, dV \approx \sum P_i \Delta V_i.^[42] In an ideal Stirling cycle example with compression ratio r = 2, hot temperature T_H = 1000 K, and cold temperature T_C = 300 K, the net work is W_{cycle} \approx 0.693 n R (T_H - T_C), derived from \ln 2 \approx 0.693 and the isothermal work difference.^[43] This yields approximately W_{cycle} \approx 0.693 n R \times 700 K for the given temperatures. Realistic calculations must subtract losses such as shuttle heat, which arises from gas carryover between hot and cold zones via piston motion, effectively transferring heat Q_{shuttle} = K \pi D S \Delta T / (C L) from the heater to the cooler, where K is the thermal conductivity, D and S are piston dimensions, \Delta T = T_H - T_C, C is the specific heat, and L is the stroke length.^[42] This loss reduces the effective Q_H and thus Q_{net}, with typical values around 1-2 ft-lbf per cycle in scaled engine models.^[42]

Efficiency and Limitations

The theoretical efficiency of the ideal Stirling cycle equals the Carnot efficiency, expressed as \eta = 1 - \frac{T_C}{T_H}, where T_H and T_C are the absolute temperatures of the hot and cold reservoirs, respectively; this maximum is attainable only under the condition of perfect regeneration, where all heat rejected during the isochoric cooling process is fully recovered for the subsequent isochoric heating.^[4] In practical Stirling engines, thermal efficiencies typically range from 30% to 40%, significantly below the Carnot limit (typically 60–70% for common operating conditions with hot-side temperatures of 800–1000 K and cold-side around 300 K); this gap arises primarily from imperfect regeneration, characterized by a regenerator effectiveness \epsilon < 1, which leads to incomplete heat recovery and increased exergy losses.^[7]^[44] Key limitations of the Stirling cycle include high dead volume, which reduces the effective compression ratio r and thereby diminishes overall efficiency by limiting the pressure swing during operation. Additionally, slow heat transfer rates in the heater and cooler components constrain the engine's operating frequency, typically to below 80 Hz for low-power units, as insufficient time is available for complete thermal equilibration during each cycle. At elevated hot-side temperatures T_H, material creep becomes a concern, necessitating the use of alloys like Inconel 718 to mitigate deformation and fatigue under prolonged thermal cycling.^[45]^[46]^[47] Compared to the Ericsson cycle, which also approaches Carnot efficiency through regeneration but employs continuous rather than intermittent processes, the Stirling cycle offers similar theoretical potential yet faces greater challenges in achieving high effectiveness due to its discrete regeneration steps. Stirling engines generally exhibit lower power density than Otto cycle engines, as the distributed temperature profile of the working fluid results in less uniform pressure exertion compared to the rapid combustion-driven expansion in internal combustion systems.^[48]^[49] Optimization strategies for the Stirling cycle involve increasing the compression ratio r, which enhances efficiency by amplifying the mean pressure but simultaneously elevates mechanical stresses on pistons and seals, potentially leading to higher wear and failure rates. As of 2025, advancements include employing helium as the working fluid at elevated mean pressures (up to 10–20 MPa), which improves thermal conductivity and reduces viscous losses, thereby boosting overall performance in applications like solar thermal systems; recent developments feature NASA systems for space achieving over 40% efficiency and experimental solar prototypes reaching 38%.^[50]^[51]^[5]^[52] A representative figure of merit for Stirling engines is specific power, typically ranging from 10 to 50 W/kg in practical configurations, reflecting the trade-off between efficiency gains and the added mass of heat exchangers and regenerators.^[53]

Practical Considerations

Heat-Exchanger Pressure Drop

In Stirling cycle engines, pressure drops in heat exchangers arise from frictional and geometric losses, which degrade overall performance by reducing the mean cycle pressure and thus the net work output. These losses are particularly pronounced in the heater, cooler, and regenerator components due to the oscillatory flow of the working fluid.^[54] For the heater and cooler, which typically consist of tubular passages, the pressure drop \Delta P is calculated using the Darcy-Weisbach equation:

\Delta P = f \frac{L}{D} \frac{\rho v^2}{2}

where f is the friction factor, L is the pipe length, D is the hydraulic diameter, \rho is the fluid density, and v is the flow velocity. This formulation accounts for viscous shear losses along the flow path, with the friction factor f depending on the Reynolds number and surface roughness.^[54]^[55] In the regenerator, a porous matrix designed for high heat storage and transfer, the pressure drop \Delta P_{\text{regen}} follows Darcy's law for flow through porous media:

\Delta P_{\text{regen}} = \frac{\mu v}{k} L

where \mu is the dynamic viscosity, v is the superficial velocity, k is the matrix permeability, and L is the regenerator length. Permeability k is a key parameter influenced by the matrix geometry, typically on the order of $10^{-9} to $10^{-10} m² for common regenerators, and decreases with finer pore structures. This linear relationship holds for low-amplitude oscillatory flows but requires extensions like the Forchheimer term for higher velocities to account for inertial effects.^[56]^[57]^[58] These pressure drops collectively reduce the mean cycle pressure, leading to a work output loss of approximately 5-10% in typical Stirling engines, depending on operating conditions and design. Optimization strategies, such as using wire mesh or foil matrices in the regenerator, balance these losses by achieving higher permeability while maintaining effective heat transfer surfaces; for instance, stainless steel wire meshes with optimized wire diameters (around 50-100 μm) can minimize \Delta P without sacrificing regenerativity.^[59]^[60]^[61] A key trade-off in regenerator design involves the matrix fineness: finer structures, such as smaller wire diameters or denser meshes, enhance heat transfer coefficients (up to 20-50% improvement) by increasing surface area and reducing thermal resistance, but they simultaneously elevate pressure drop (often by 30-50%) due to lower permeability and higher frictional resistance. This necessitates careful selection of mesh density to avoid excessive pumping losses that could offset thermodynamic gains.^[62]^[63] Mitigation approaches include employing low-density working fluids like helium, which reduces kinematic viscosity by a factor of about 7 compared to air at similar temperatures, thereby lowering \Delta P across all exchangers. Recent advancements as of 2025, such as 3D-printed regenerators and heat exchangers with optimized microchannel geometries, have improved flow uniformity and reduced tortuosity, as validated in cryogenic Stirling prototypes.^[64]^[65] Pressure drops are commonly measured and analyzed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, which model oscillatory flows and correlate \Delta P directly to efficiency reductions; for example, CFD predictions show that a 10% increase in regenerator \Delta P can decrease indicated efficiency by 2-5% under nominal conditions. These simulations integrate porous media models with cycle thermodynamics to guide design iterations.^[66]^[67]

Real-World Applications

Stirling cycle engines find prominent use in solar thermal power generation, where dish-Stirling systems concentrate sunlight onto the engine's hot end to achieve solar-to-electric efficiencies exceeding 25%, with record performances reaching 31.4% in operational prototypes.^[68] These systems are deployed in utility-scale solar farms, leveraging the engine's ability to operate with variable heat inputs from parabolic dishes. In cryogenic applications, reversed Stirling cycle cryocoolers enable re-liquefaction of boil-off gas from natural gas (LNG) storage by achieving temperatures down to around 77 K, supporting boil-off gas recapture and small-scale LNG production plants.^[69] For waste heat recovery, Stirling engines integrate into combined heat and power (CHP) setups in industrial settings, converting low- to medium-grade heat (above 300°C) from processes like metalworking into electricity and usable heat, enhancing overall energy utilization in heavy industry.^[70] In biomass CHP systems, such as Denmark's 40 kW initiative, challenges like ash handling from solid fuels must be managed to maintain efficiency. In space exploration, the NASA Advanced Stirling Radioisotope Generator (ASRG), tested throughout the 2010s, powers deep-space missions with radioisotope heat sources, delivering electrical efficiencies around 30% and reducing plutonium usage by a factor of four compared to traditional radioisotope thermoelectric generators.^[71] As of 2025, NASA continues advancing Stirling convertors for radioisotope and fission power systems, with prototypes like the Sunpower Robust Stirling Convertor achieving 26% efficiency at 60 W output for lunar and Martian rovers.^[5] Key advantages of Stirling engines in these applications include quiet operation due to the absence of combustion explosions, multi-fuel flexibility allowing use of solar, biomass, or waste heat without internal modifications, and extended operational life exceeding 10 years with minimal maintenance.^[72] However, challenges persist, such as high initial capital costs from precision manufacturing, low power-to-weight ratios limiting automotive viability, and scaling difficulties for outputs above 100 kW, where mechanical losses increase disproportionately.^[70] Recent developments as of 2025 emphasize hybrid integrations, such as coupling Stirling engines with organic Rankine cycles (ORC) for enhanced waste heat recovery, boosting overall efficiency by 60% in biomass-fueled prototypes. Micro-Stirling engines are emerging for powering IoT sensors in remote environments, harvesting ambient heat for milliwatt-scale outputs. EU-funded projects, including Denmark's 40 kW biomass Stirling initiative, have demonstrated 35% electrical efficiency in solid-fuel CHP systems, promoting sustainable rural energy.^[73] Notable case studies include the WhisperGen micro-CHP units, which provide 1 kW electricity and 7 kW heat for residential use, reducing CO2 emissions by up to 1 tonne annually per household in UK trials. In solar applications, EU projects like BIO-STIRLING have deployed biomass-augmented Stirling systems in Scandinavian farms, achieving reliable off-grid power from local wood chips.^[74]^[75]

References

[1]
The Stirling Cycle - Stirling Cryogenics
The Stirling cycle is a thermodynamic closed cycle invented in 1816 by the Scottish minister Robert Stirling. It was used as an engine.
[2]
None
### Summary of Stirling Cycle
[3]
https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Thermodynamics_and_Statistical_Mechanics/Heat_and_Thermodynamics_(Tatum)/11%3A_Heat_Engines/11.03%3A_The_Stirling_Cycle
[4]
Stirling Cycle - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Thermodynamically, the ideal Stirling cycle consists of an isothermal compression, constant volume heat addition, isothermal expansion, and constant volume heat ...
[5]
Thermodynamics Performance Analysis of Solar Stirling Engines
Jul 5, 2012 · A Stirling cycle machine is a device, which operates in a closed regenerative thermodynamic cycle. In the ideal cycle of the Stirling engine, ...Missing: components | Show results with:components
[6]
Comparing Carnot, Stirling, Otto, Brayton and Diesel Cycles
Abstract: Comparing the efficiencies of the Carnot, Stirling,. Otto, Brayton and Diesel cycles can be a frustrating experience for the student.
[7]
[PDF] A Bulleted/Pictorial History of Mechanisms and Machines
Robert Stirling (1790 – 1878) was a Scottish minister who invented the Stirling Hot Air Engine in 1816, which is powered by any heat source, not only steam, ...
[8]
[PDF] Stirling Engine Design Manual
Mar 27, 1978 · Review of Stirling Engine Design Methods .............. 60. 5.1. Stirling Engine Cycle Analysis . 5.1.I. Stifling. Cycle,. Zero.
[9]
stirling engine
In 1818 Robert Stirling erected an air engine to his design to pump water from a stone quarry. In the 1820s he teamed up with his younger brother James who ...
[10]
[PDF] Thermodynamic analysis of Stirling engine systems - DiVA portal
The Dundee engine reflected the situation of the Stirling engine during the 19th century ... regenerator continues being a challenge for the Stirling engine ...
[11]
[PDF] A Compendium of Solar Dish/Stirling Technology - OSTI.GOV
The IAS-200 prototype engine is a free-piston Stirling. Figure 2-6. Stirling Thermal Motors 25-kWe solarpower engine with a single motor-driven displacer and ...
[12]
[PDF] Status of the NASA Stirling Radioisotope Project
May 14, 2007 · One of the most highly developed single cylinder generators was the GPU-3, developed by General Motors (GM) for the U.S. Army as a fully ...
[13]
https://www.osti.gov/energycitations/servlets/purl/10130410-xiVU1V/native/10130410.pdf
[14]
Stirling engine systems for small and micro combined heat and ...
The Stirling engine is an alternative solution to produce cleaner energy ... Micro-combined heat and power systems (micro-CHP) based on renewable energy sources.Missing: advancements 2020s cryocoolers nanostructured
[15]
[PDF] Chapter 5 Engines, Power, and the Anthropocene
The key difference between this and the Otto cycle is that combustion happens isobarically in the Diesel cycle and isochorically in the Otto cycle. Finally ...
[16]
Problem 3.2 - The Sunpower EG-1000 Stirling Engine/Generator
Jul 5, 2014 · Thus the ideal Stirling cycle consists of four distinct processes, each one of which can be separately analysed in accordance with the methods ...Missing: stages | Show results with:stages
[17]
[PDF] The Stirling Engine - Scholars Junction - Mississippi State University
Dec 10, 2010 · This investigation uses the first law of thermodynamics to obtain trends of total heat addition, net power output, and thermal efficiency with ...
[18]
Stirling Engine Ideal Isothermal Analysis (updated 12/28/2011)
Dec 28, 2011 · This isothermal assumption makes it possible to generate a simple expression for the working gas pressure as a function of the volume variations ...
[19]
[PDF] Reply to Comment on 'Coefficient of performance of Stirling ...
Aug 17, 2020 · The Introduction in [4] describes an idealized CCW Stirling cycle that 'undergoes two isothermal and two isochoric processes ... these processes ...
[20]
[PDF] ENGINEERING THERMODYNAMICS - A GRAPHICAL APPROACH
The ideal Stirling cycle and its thermal efficiency are analyzed immediately after introducing the First Law. In addition to the analysis of the traditional ...
[21]
Stirling Engine Configurations - updated 3/30/2013 - Ohio University
Mar 30, 2013 · Stirling engines are divided into Alpha, Beta, and Gamma configurations. Alpha has two pistons in separate cylinders, while Beta and Gamma use ...
[22]
[PDF] A Review of Design of Stirling Engines
Beta type engine and gamma type engine have a single power piston, whereas alpha type engine have two power pistons. Beta type Stirling engine has both power ...
[23]
Stirling Engine Configuration Selection - MDPI
Only gamma machines are suitable for low and ultra low temperature difference applications, which may include low or zero concentration ratio solar power, low ...
[24]
Configurations - 16.04.07: Thermodynamics - Yale University
The ideal Stirling cycle consists of four thermodynamic processes acting on the working fluid: Isothermal expansion. The expansion-space and associated heat ...Missing: stages idealized
[25]
[PDF] Experimental investigation of gamma stirling engine coupling to ...
Jun 14, 2022 · The Gamma Stirling engine has a lower compression ratio than the Alpha and Beta models, but because only its power piston needs to be sealed ...
[26]
Design and anylysis of gamma type Stirling engine
Conventional Stirling engines are divided into 3 types of alpha, beta and gamma, which phase difference of 90 degrees in the motion of the pistons is a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[27]
[PDF] arXiv:2005.02253v3 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 29 Jun 2020
Jun 29, 2020 · s(θ) ≡ r(1 − cosθ). (2) is the height of the power piston measured from the lowest position corresponding to θ = 0. An ideal Stirling ...
[28]
The History of the Stirling Engine
Robert Stirling founded the idea and was awarded a patent for the first Stirling engine in 1816. From there, his invention was first used as a cooling tool ...<|separator|>
[29]
[PDF] Stirling Engines - HAL-UPHF
Jul 8, 2022 · The regenerator efficiency increase leads to an increase of the exchanged thermal energy through it and consequently an amelioration of engine ...Missing: challenges limitations
[30]
A review development of rhombic drive mechanism used in the ...
Scottish priest Robert Stirling, two hundred years ago designed and manufactured the first Stirling engine that works according to the principle of external ...
[31]
[PDF] schmidt theory for stirling engines koichi hirata
The Schmidt theory is an isothermal calculation method for Stirling engines, based on the isothermal expansion and compression of an ideal gas.
[32]
Schmidt Analysis (updated 1/7/2012)
### Summary of Pressure in Schmidt Isothermal Analysis of Stirling Engine
[33]
[PDF] Heat Transfer Measurements for Stirling Machine Cylinders
The pressure and volume measurements were used to calculate area averaged heat flux, heat transfer hysteresis loss, and other heat transfer-related effects.<|control11|><|separator|>
[34]
[PDF] A review of Stirling engine mathematical models. - OSTI.GOV
This review identified 25 Stirling engine models, grouped into four categories: approximate, decoupled, nodal, and method of characteristics.
[35]
[PDF] A Survey of Oscillating Flow in Stirling Engine Heat Exchangers
During the hot blow, the gas expandsas it flows through the cooler and regenerator. DiJkstra (1984, p. 1886) proposed to model the compression of the.
[36]
[PDF] Fast Whole-Engine Stirling Analysis
• identify areas of excessive flow losses due to unintended dead zones, recirculation zones, dissipative turbulence and other losses such as:47, 48, 49. 1 ...
[37]
[PDF] Computer Program for Stirling Engine Performance Calculations
Flow resistances and heat transfer coefficients are calculated for each control volume at each time step over the engine cy- cle. Within each gas volume the ...
[38]
[PDF] 4.2 Stirling Cycle (Regenerative Cycle) : - NPTEL Archive
Now we can write, Net work done = W = Qs - QR. Heat supplied = QS = heat ... R T ln r + 1 -. C T - T η η. Where, R η is the regenerator efficiency.
[39]
Efficiency Reduction in Stirling Engines Resulting from Sinusoidal ...
Oct 24, 2018 · Crank angles from 270 ∘ to 360 ∘ correspond to the work input by isothermal compression. In the ideal cycle, the working fluid would be isolated ...
[40]
Free-Piston Stirling Engine Generators - IntechOpen
This chapter presents an introduction to FPSE along with a brief review of the underlying thermodynamics and Stirling cycle analysis. The general engineering ...
[41]
[PDF] Free-Piston Stirling Engine Generators - IntechOpen
For low power engines the frequency is limited to 80 Hz while for high power engines the operating frequency does not exceed 60 Hz. The limitations on operating ...Missing: slow | Show results with:slow
[42]
[PDF] Design and Optimization of a 1 kW Stirling Engine - SciSpace
This dissertation presents the design and optimization of a 1 kW Stirling engine with the heater head and regenerator developed through AM. This work was ...
[43]
Comparison of the Net Work Output between Stirling and Ericsson ...
In general, the results demonstrate that Stirling engines produce more net work output at higher pressures and lower volumes, and Ericsson engines produce more ...
[44]
[PDF] Improving Free-Piston Stirling Engine Power Density
net work done on or by the displacer. Displacers are typically used on free ... ideal Stirling cycle work is a function of the four dimensionless ...
[45]
Basic Limitations on the Performance of Stirling Engines
Aug 5, 2025 · The performance of Stirling engines is subject to limitations resulting from power dissipation in the regenerator.Missing: creep | Show results with:creep
[46]
Multi-objective optimization in air-helium Stirling engine under ...
They explored a pressure range of 0.2 MPa to 0.9 MPa, a speed range of 150 rpm to 380 rpm, and a hot-source temperature range of 332°C to 516°C. Their findings ...
[47]
[PDF] Improving Free-Piston Stirling Engine Specific Power
Jul 28, 2014 · At these conditions the potential increase in specific power is between 37 and 56 percent.
[48]
Development of a Beta-Type Moderate-Temperature-Differential ...
Nov 18, 2020 · As a result, pressure drop across three heat exchangers can be estimated with the help of Darcy–Weisbach equation. In present model, average ...
[49]
Theoretical and experimental investigation of pressure drop and ...
In fluid flow, the Darcy Weisbach equation as given in equation (1), relates pressure drop due to friction (along a given length of pipe) to the average ...
[50]
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245353325_Basic_Limitations_on_the_Performance_of_Stirling_Engines
[51]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2307187724000889
[52]
Friction factor, permeability and inertial coefficient of oscillating flow ...
This suggests that Darcy's law is valid for small amplitude oscillating flows. When the piston amplitude becomes large, the response and therefore the ...<|separator|>
[53]
Effects of pressure-drop correlations on Stirling engine predicted ...
Aug 1, 1983 · Pressure-drop correlations for Stirling engine applications were studied from three perspectives: sensitivity studies of their effects on ...Missing: 5-10% work loss
[54]
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/22/6029
[55]
Stirling engine regenerators: How to attain over ... - ScienceDirect.com
Nov 1, 2019 · Does stacking wire meshes reduce the regenerator to a single sub-regenerator and limit its effectiveness to a maximum of 50%? In order to ...
[56]
Numerical Optimization of Metal Felt Regenerators with Axially ...
Jul 16, 2025 · In contrast, the regenerator with the finer mesh at the hot end yielded a lower efficiency and a higher pressure drop. These results were ...
[57]
Correlations Based on Numerical Validation of Oscillating Flow ...
The regenerator is the most crucial part of the Stirling refrigerator because it acts as a heat exchanger in the system. The regenerator absorbs heat from the ...
[58]
(PDF) 3D-Printed Helium-Based Regenerator for 4K GM and Pulse ...
Feb 22, 2019 · It was found that the value of the cycle-averaged pressure drop in the oscillating flow across the regenerator is two to three times higher ...Missing: Mitigation viscosity exchangers<|separator|>
[59]
Experimental and numerical study of a 3D-printed aluminium ...
The heat exchangers have successfully withstood pressure tests. The pressure drop has been measured at atmospheric and at higher pressure using helium and air ...Missing: Mitigation Stirling
[60]
Three-dimensional CFD study of a β-type Stirling Engine
Results include the time variation of mean pressure and pressure drop, mass flow-rate and heat transfer, as well as the time variation and spatial distribution ...
[61]
CFD Simulation of Stirling Engines: A Review - MDPI
An SE operates on the Stirling cycle, a highly efficient thermodynamic cycle with a theoretical efficiency equivalent to the Carnot cycle. The SE elements ...
[62]
Dish Engine | Department of Energy
CSP dish engines, which provide high solar concentration and are in use globally, currently hold the world record for solar-to-electric system efficiency at 31 ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[63]
The Core of Cryogenic Cooling Systems - Stirling Cryogenerators
Efficient Stirling Cryogenerators use the reversed-Stirling cycle for reliable, customized cryogenic cooling down to 20 K. Versatile for gas liquefaction or ...
[64]
Use of Stirling Engine for Waste Heat Recovery - MDPI
Aug 10, 2020 · Stirling engines are suitable for waste heat recovery, especially in heavy industry, and can utilize heat above 300°C, including from ...
[65]
[PDF] Advanced Stirling Radioisotope Generator (ASRG) Thermal Power ...
The ASRG efficiency could reach 28 to 32 percent, which results in reducing the required amount of radioisotope by roughly a factor of 4 compared to RTGs.
[66]
Dynamic Thermal Energy Conversion - NASA
Aug 6, 2025 · NASA advances Stirling power systems to deliver efficient, long-life energy for deep space and planetary missions, expanding science and ...
[67]
The advantages and applications of the stirling engine - ResearchGate
Aug 10, 2025 · They are superior to traditional heat engines, with high efficiency, low noise, and low pollution. Stirling engines may be found in various ...Missing: disadvantages | Show results with:disadvantages
[68]
[PDF] 40 kW Stirling engine for solid fuel - DTU Research Database
kW corresponding to the demand from the engine producing. 40 kW of shaft power at 35% engine efficiency. ... The project is funded by the Danish Energy Agency and.
[69]
Economic, energy and GHG emissions performance evaluation of a ...
The WhisperGen Stirling engine μ-CHP unit was the first commercially-available domestic μ-CHP unit available in the UK, primarily serving the residential market ...
[70]
Advances in green technology | BIO-STIRLING Project - CORDIS
A Stirling engine has been developed which uses environmentally friendly biomass for energy generation more effectively than ever before.