Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Superellipse

A superellipse, also known as a Lamé curve, is a defined by the Cartesian equation \left| \frac{x}{a} \right|^r + \left| \frac{y}{b} \right|^r = 1, where a > 0 and b > 0 are the semi-axes lengths, and r > 0 is an exponent parameter that generalizes the shape beyond the standard (which corresponds to r = 2). This equation was first introduced by French mathematician Gabriel Lamé in 1818 as part of his work on solving geometric problems through series expansions. (Note: This is a placeholder for the original Lamé book; actual URL to digitized version if available, e.g., from Gallica or .) The superellipse encompasses a family of curves whose appearance varies significantly with the value of r: for r > 2, the shape becomes increasingly rectangular with rounded corners, approaching a as r grows large; for $0 < r < 2, it pinches inward toward the axes, resembling a cross or astroid at r = 2/3; and at r = 1, it forms a diamond (rhombus). When a = b, the curve is rotationally symmetric, yielding special cases like the squircle at r = 4, a rounded square used in design and displays. The area enclosed by a superellipse is given by A = 4 a b \frac{\left[\Gamma\left(1 + \frac{1}{r}\right)\right]^2}{\Gamma\left(1 + \frac{2}{r}\right)}, involving gamma functions, which reduces to the elliptic area \pi a b when r = 2. Although mathematically described over a century earlier, the superellipse gained prominence in the mid-20th century through Danish polymath , who popularized it in the 1960s as a practical "superellipse" with r = 5/2 for compromising between circular and rectangular forms in architecture and furniture design—such as the Sergels Torg fountain in Stockholm (with aspect ratio a/b = 6/5) and mass-produced tables (aspect ratio $3/2). Hein's advocacy led to widespread adoption in consumer products, including kitchenware and vehicle wheels, due to its ergonomic and aesthetic balance. In 2003, extended the concept into the "superformula," a polar-coordinate generalization \left| \frac{\cos^{m_1}(\theta/4)}{a} \right|^{n_2} + \left| \frac{\sin^{m_2}(\theta/4)}{b} \right|^{n_3} = 1 that unifies diverse natural and geometric shapes, from flowers to shells, enabling applications in biology, computer graphics, and engineering.

Definition

Cartesian Equation

The Cartesian equation of a superellipse in the plane is given by \left| \frac{x}{a} \right|^n + \left| \frac{y}{b} \right|^n = 1, where a > 0 and b > 0 represent the lengths of the semi-axes along the x- and y-directions, respectively, and n > 0 is the positive real exponent that governs the 's overall shape. This form generalizes the ellipse equation introduced by Gabriel Lamé in , originally without absolute values for specific rational exponents, but the modern notation with absolute values ensures a closed, bounded for all n > 0. The parameter n controls the curvature and flatness of the superellipse: when n = 2, the equation simplifies to the standard ellipse \left( \frac{x}{a} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{y}{b} \right)^2 = 1; as n \to \infty, the curve approaches a rectangle with vertices at (\pm a, \pm b); and as n \to 0^+, it degenerates into a cross consisting of the line segments along the axes from (-a, 0) to (a, 0) and from (0, -b) to (0, b). Due to the absolute values, the superellipse exhibits fourfold about the origin and across both the x- and y-axes, making it symmetric in all four quadrants. The curve is bounded within the [-a, a] \times [-b, b], with points satisfying the lying entirely inside or on the boundary of this region. This can be derived by starting with the unit superellipse |u|^n + |v|^n = 1 and applying linear scaling transformations x = a u and y = b v, which stretch the unit curve by factors a and b along the respective axes to produce the general form.

Parametric Equations

The parametric equations for a superellipse, which provide an explicit way to generate points along the curve, are given by x(\theta) = a \left| \cos \theta \right|^{2/n} \operatorname{sgn}(\cos \theta), \quad y(\theta) = b \left| \sin \theta \right|^{2/n} \operatorname{sgn}(\sin \theta), where a > 0 and b > 0 are the semi-axes lengths, n > 0 is the exponent parameter, \operatorname{sgn}(\cdot) is the sign function defined as \operatorname{sgn}(z) = 1 if z > 0, \operatorname{sgn}(z) = -1 if z < 0, and \operatorname{sgn}(0) = 0, and the parameter \theta ranges over [0, 2\pi) to trace the full closed curve. The exponent $2/n in these equations arises from the requirement that substitution into the underlying Cartesian form \left| x/a \right|^n + \left| y/b \right|^n = 1 yields \left| \cos \theta \right|^2 + \left| \sin \theta \right|^2 = 1, confirming the parameterization's validity across the curve. The inclusion of the absolute value and sign function handles the correct quadrant placement by preserving the sign of the trigonometric functions while ensuring the power operation is applied to a non-negative base, thereby avoiding discontinuities as \theta varies continuously through regions where \cos \theta or \sin \theta changes sign. This form is well-suited for numerical evaluation and computational generation of curve points, particularly for non-integer values of n, since the absolute value guarantees a positive argument for the fractional exponent $2/n < 1, enabling stable real-valued calculations in graphics and modeling applications.

Specific Cases

Concave and Star-Shaped Forms (n < 2)

When the exponent n in the superellipse equation satisfies $0 < n < 2, the resulting curve deviates from the smooth convexity of an ellipse, exhibiting non-convex geometries that can include concavities, cusps, or star-like features. These forms, first explored by Gabriel Lamé in 1818 as generalizations of conic sections, contrast with the rounded profiles for n > 2 by emphasizing sharper transitions and potential indentations along the curve. The parametric equations x = a \cos^{2/n} t, y = b \sin^{2/n} t for t \in [0, 2\pi] can be used to plot these shapes, revealing their evolution as n varies. For $0 < n < 1, the superellipse adopts a cross-like or four-cusped star configuration with concave sides, where self-intersections become possible as n decreases toward 0, leading to increasingly pinched and indented profiles near the axes. Specifically, for n < 2/3, the curve exhibits self-intersections, creating a star shape with crossing arms, while at n = 2/3 it has cusps without intersections. The concavity intensifies with smaller n, transforming the curve into a four-armed star that appears to fold inward, distinct from the convex boundaries seen in higher exponents. As n approaches 0, the shape degenerates toward two perpendicular line segments crossing at the origin, marking the extreme limit of this regime. At n = 1, the superellipse degenerates into a diamond, or rhombus, bounded by straight lines connecting the vertices at (\pm a, 0) and (0, \pm b), providing a linear boundary without curvature. This case represents a transitional form between the star-like concavities below and the smoother profiles above, serving as a polygonal approximation in geometric modeling. For $1 < n < 2, the curve remains convex but exhibits a pinched appearance at the axial intercepts, with elevated curvature near (\pm a, 0) and (0, \pm b) that creates a subtle narrowing effect as it transitions from the rhombus at n=1 toward the ellipse at n=2. This regime produces shapes that are less rounded than an ellipse yet avoid the indentations of lower n, offering intermediate forms useful in applications requiring controlled sharpness. A prominent example occurs when a = b and n = 2/3, yielding the astroid, a four-cusped hypocycloid with the equation x^{2/3} + y^{2/3} = a^{2/3}. Originating as the roulette trace of a point on a circle rolling inside another circle of four times the radius, the astroid features sharp cusps at its axial vertices and concave arcs connecting them, embodying the star-shaped aesthetic of superellipses in this range. Visually, as n decreases below 2, the superellipse displays growing concavity adjacent to the axes, culminating in distinct cusps precisely at n = 2/3 for the symmetric case, which accentuate the star-like indentation while maintaining a closed boundary. This progression highlights the versatility of in generating non-convex variants that bridge algebraic curves and classical .

Ellipse and Circle (n = 2)

When the exponent n equals 2 in the superellipse equation \left|\frac{x}{a}\right|^n + \left|\frac{y}{b}\right|^n = 1, the curve simplifies to the standard Cartesian equation of an ellipse: \left(\frac{x}{a}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{y}{b}\right)^2 = 1. This form describes a smooth, closed, convex curve centered at the origin, with semi-major axis a along the x-axis and semi-minor axis b along the y-axis, assuming a \geq b > 0. A special case occurs when a = b = r, reducing the ellipse to a of r, which can be viewed as a scaled x^2 + y^2 = 1. The represents the limiting scenario of zero , where the curve exhibits perfect . In general, the ellipse has a constant e = \frac{c}{a}, where $0 < e < 1 for non-circular cases, and the foci are located at (\pm c, 0) with c = \sqrt{a^2 - b^2} assuming a > b. This n=2 configuration serves as the baseline for the superellipse family, from which other values of n deviate by either pinching the curve toward a more diamond-like form (for n < 2) or approaching a rectangular shape (for n > 2). The parametric representation for this case aligns with the classical parametrization x = a \cos \theta, y = b \sin \theta for \theta \in [0, 2\pi). The ellipse itself predates the superellipse generalization introduced by Gabriel Lamé in 1818, serving as a foundational conic section studied since antiquity, and its inclusion here provides continuity within the broader family of curves.

Convex Rounded Forms (n > 2)

When the exponent n exceeds 2, superellipses take on convex, rounded forms that resemble box-like shapes with flattened sides and softly curved corners, distinguishing them from the more uniformly curved ellipse at n=2. These shapes are both convex and star-convex for n > 2/3, ensuring they remain simply connected and bulge outward from the origin without indentations. As n increases, the curve progressively flattens along segments parallel to the coordinate axes, visually evolving from a rounded ellipse through increasingly rectangular profiles toward the limiting rectangle [-a, a] \times [-b, b] as n \to \infty. For finite but large values of n, the sides approximate straight lines, while the corners transition to nearly quarter-circle arcs, providing a smooth yet angular appearance ideal for applications requiring balanced sharpness and softness. A notable example occurs when a = b and n = 4, yielding the defined by the equation |x|^4 + |y|^4 = a^4. This form offers a square-like with enhanced smoothness compared to a true square, making it popular in , user interfaces, and industrial aesthetics for its aesthetically pleasing intermediate between circular fluidity and stability. The equations for superellipses in this regime highlight the flattening effect, where the exponents less than 1 in the trigonometric parametrization cause the to hug closer to the bounding along the sides. In terms of , for $2 < n < \infty, the superellipse features minimal at the axis intercepts—where the profile is flattest—and maximal midway between them at approximately 45-degree orientations, corresponding to the rounded corner regions that sharpen as n grows. This distribution contributes to the shape's utility in modeling objects with pronounced edges yet avoiding discontinuities. The overall progression underscores the superellipse's versatility in bridging elliptical and rectangular geometries.

Mathematical Properties

Enclosed Area

The area enclosed by a superellipse defined by the equation \left| \frac{x}{a} \right|^n + \left| \frac{y}{b} \right|^n = 1, where a > 0, b > 0, and n > 0, is given by A = 4ab \frac{\left[ \Gamma\left(1 + \frac{1}{n}\right) \right]^2}{\Gamma\left(1 + \frac{2}{n}\right)}, with \Gamma denoting the gamma function. To derive this formula, consider the symmetry of the superellipse across all four quadrants. The total area is thus four times the area in the first quadrant, where y(x) = b \left[ 1 - \left( \frac{x}{a} \right)^n \right]^{1/n} for $0 \leq x \leq a. The first-quadrant area is \int_0^a y(x) \, dx = b \int_0^a \left[ 1 - \left( \frac{x}{a} \right)^n \right]^{1/n} \, dx. Substitute u = \left( \frac{x}{a} \right)^n, so x = a u^{1/n} and dx = a \cdot \frac{1}{n} u^{1/n - 1} \, du. The limits remain u = 0 to u = 1, yielding \int_0^a y(x) \, dx = ab \cdot \frac{1}{n} \int_0^1 u^{1/n - 1} (1 - u)^{1/n} \, du = \frac{ab}{n} B\left( \frac{1}{n}, 1 + \frac{1}{n} \right), where B(m, k) = \int_0^1 t^{m-1} (1 - t)^{k-1} \, dt is the beta function. Using the relation B(m, k) = \frac{\Gamma(m) \Gamma(k)}{\Gamma(m + k)}, B\left( \frac{1}{n}, 1 + \frac{1}{n} \right) = \frac{\Gamma\left( \frac{1}{n} \right) \Gamma\left(1 + \frac{1}{n}\right)}{\Gamma\left(1 + \frac{2}{n}\right)}. Applying the gamma recurrence \Gamma\left(1 + \frac{1}{n}\right) = \frac{1}{n} \Gamma\left( \frac{1}{n} \right), this simplifies to \frac{ab}{n} \cdot \frac{\Gamma\left( \frac{1}{n} \right) \cdot \frac{1}{n} \Gamma\left( \frac{1}{n} \right)}{\Gamma\left(1 + \frac{2}{n}\right)} = ab \cdot \frac{1}{n^2} \frac{\left[ \Gamma\left( \frac{1}{n} \right) \right]^2}{\Gamma\left(1 + \frac{2}{n}\right)} = ab \frac{\left[ \Gamma\left(1 + \frac{1}{n}\right) \right]^2}{\Gamma\left(1 + \frac{2}{n}\right)}, since \left[ \Gamma\left(1 + \frac{1}{n}\right) \right]^2 = \left( \frac{1}{n} \Gamma\left( \frac{1}{n} \right) \right)^2 = \frac{1}{n^2} \left[ \Gamma\left( \frac{1}{n} \right) \right]^2. Multiplying by 4 gives the full area formula. This expression reduces to known areas in special cases. For n = 2, it yields A = \pi a b, the area of (or if a = b). As n \to \infty, the superellipse approaches a , and A \to 4 a b. For n = 1, the shape is a with A = 2 a b. For non-integer n > 0, the gamma function's analytic continuation enables numerical evaluation of the area using established computational methods, such as the Lanczos approximation or series expansions, ensuring accurate results even for fractional exponents.

Arc Length and Perimeter

The perimeter of a superellipse, denoted as L, lacks an elementary closed-form expression for general exponent n. It is computed via the arc length formula derived from the parametric equations x(\theta) = a \left| \cos \theta \right|^{2/n} \operatorname{sign}(\cos \theta) and y(\theta) = b \left| \sin \theta \right|^{2/n} \operatorname{sign}(\sin \theta), yielding L = 4 \int_0^{\pi/2} \sqrt{ \left( \frac{dx}{d\theta} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{dy}{d\theta} \right)^2 } \, d\theta. This integral exploits the fourfold symmetry of the curve. Due to the absence of a closed form, various approximations are employed, including series expansions and numerical integration techniques such as Simpson's rule. For the squircle (n=4), series expansions analogous to Ramanujan's approximations for ellipses provide accurate results when truncated appropriately. For large n, the perimeter approaches $4(a + b) with correction terms accounting for the rounded corners. Numerical methods implemented in software like MATLAB enable precise computation for specific parameters. Special cases admit simpler expressions. When n=2, the superellipse reduces to an , and L = 4a E(e) where E(e) is the complete of the second kind with eccentricity e = \sqrt{1 - (b/a)^2}. For n=1, it forms a ( shape) with L = 4 \sqrt{a^2 + b^2}. As n \to \infty, the shape becomes a , yielding L = 4(a + b). Historical approximations, such as Gauss's arithmetic-geometric mean series for the elliptic case (n=2), have been extended to general superellipses through numerical and series methods.

Curvature and Pedal Curve

The of a superellipse is computed from its equations using the standard formula for the of a curve: \kappa(\theta) = \frac{|x'(\theta) y''(\theta) - y'(\theta) x''(\theta)|}{\left( x'(\theta)^2 + y'(\theta)^2 \right)^{3/2}}, where the equations (for the first , extended by ) are x(\theta) = a \cos^{2/n} \theta and y(\theta) = b \sin^{2/n} \theta, with \theta \in [0, \pi/2]. An explicit for this is \kappa(n, \theta) = \frac{ab (n-1) \sin \xi \theta \cos \xi \theta}{\left( a^2 \sin^{\xi+2} \theta + b^2 \cos^{\xi+2} \theta \right)^{3/2}}, where \xi = 2(n-2)/n. The behavior of the curvature depends on the exponent n. For n=2, the superellipse is an ellipse, with curvature varying along the curve; it is constant if a=b (circle case), but otherwise exhibits elliptic variation with maxima at the ends of the minor axis and minima at the ends of the major axis. For n > 2, the curvature reaches maxima at the principal axes (corresponding to sharper rounding near the vertices) and minima midway between the axes (where the sides flatten). For n < 2, the curvature increases sharply near certain points, potentially leading to cusps with infinite curvature, as seen in the astroid (n=2/3). The pedal curve of the superellipse, taken with respect to the origin, is the locus of the feet of the perpendiculars dropped from the origin onto the tangent lines to the superellipse. For the symmetric case with equal exponents, for n=2, the pedal curve relates to the evolute properties of the ellipse, reducing to the original circle in the special a=b case. Examples include the astroid (n=2/3, a=b), whose pedal with respect to the center is a quadrifolium (a four-leaved rose curve, resembling a scaled variant in certain projections).

Generalizations

Higher-Dimensional Extensions

The superellipsoid extends the superellipse to three dimensions, defined by the implicit equation \left| \frac{x}{a} \right|^n + \left| \frac{y}{b} \right|^n + \left| \frac{z}{c} \right|^n = 1, where a, b, c > 0 are the semi-axis lengths along the respective coordinates and n > 0 controls the shape's squareness. This form generalizes the , recovering the standard equation \frac{x^2}{a^2} + \frac{y^2}{b^2} + \frac{z^2}{c^2} = 1 when n = 2. For n > 2, the surface becomes more box-like with rounded edges and corners, while $0 < n < 2 yields pinched or star-shaped forms, though convexity holds for n \geq 1. The volume of a 3D superellipsoid admits a closed-form expression involving the gamma function: V = abc \cdot 8 \cdot \frac{\Gamma\left(1 + \frac{1}{n}\right)^3}{\Gamma\left(1 + \frac{3}{n}\right)}, where \Gamma denotes the . This formula derives from integrating over the region using properties of the and symmetry across octants. For the special case n=2 with equal axes (a = b = c = r), it simplifies to the sphere volume \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3. In contrast, no closed-form expression exists for the surface area in general; it requires numerical approximation via methods like quadrature or Monte Carlo integration, though exact values are known for limits such as n \to \infty (approaching $2(ab + bc + ca)) or the spherical case ($4 \pi r^2). This concept generalizes further to d-dimensional space as the hypersuperellipsoid, given by \sum_{i=1}^d \left| \frac{x_i}{a_i} \right|^n = 1, where \mathbf{x} = (x_1, \dots, x_d) and a_i > 0 are semi-axes. The volume in d dimensions is V_d = \left( \prod_{i=1}^d a_i \right) \cdot 2^d \cdot \frac{\Gamma\left(1 + \frac{1}{n}\right)^d}{\Gamma\left(1 + \frac{d}{n}\right)}, extending the 3D case through multivariate integrals and the . For n=2, this recovers the volume of the d-, \frac{\pi^{d/2}}{\Gamma(1 + d/2)} \prod a_i. Surface "area" ( measure) in higher dimensions lacks closed forms beyond low d and is typically computed numerically. In applications, superellipsoids and their higher-dimensional analogs serve as primitives in for modeling smooth, rounded 3D objects like tools or body parts, offering compact parametric representations with intuitive shape control.

Variable Exponent Variants

Variable exponent variants of the superellipse, often referred to as generalized Lamé curves, extend the standard form by allowing distinct positive real exponents r and s for the x and y terms in the equation \left| \frac{x}{a} \right|^r + \left| \frac{y}{b} \right|^s = 1. This parameterization, a generalization of Gabriel Lamé's curves, introduces asymmetry in between the horizontal and vertical directions beyond mere axis scaling, enabling shapes with tilted or sheared appearances when r \neq s. The enclosed area of such a curve is given by the formula $4ab \frac{\Gamma\left(1 + \frac{1}{r}\right) \Gamma\left(1 + \frac{1}{s}\right)}{\Gamma\left(1 + \frac{1}{r} + \frac{1}{s}\right)}, where \Gamma denotes the ; this integral expression, derived via substitution and the properties of the , is more intricate than the equal-exponent case due to the independent roles of r and s. A representative example is the case r = 2, s = 4, which yields a form blending elliptical extension along the x- with the sharper, squircle-like corners along the y-. Curves of this type have found use in , such as in Waldo Tobler's hyperelliptical of , an equal-area pseudocylindrical based on superelliptical boundaries to minimize distortion in global representations. In contrast to the standard superellipse, significant differences in r and s disrupt the uniform quadrant in perceptual terms, and the may become non-convex for values where one exponent falls below $2/3, leading to inward-curving or star-like features in affected regions. The standard superellipse arises as the special case r = s = n.

Scaled and Anisotropic Forms

The anisotropic superellipse extends the standard form by incorporating non-uniform scaling along the coordinate axes, resulting in shapes with differing aspect ratios that deviate from circular symmetry. The defining equation is \left| \frac{x}{a} \right|^n + \left| \frac{y}{b} \right|^n = 1, where a and b represent the semi-axes lengths, and unequal values of a and b introduce anisotropy by elongating or compressing the curve along the x- or y-direction. This form arises naturally from applying a linear transformation to an isotropic superellipse (where a = b), such as scaling the y-coordinate by a factor k, which modifies the equation to \left| \frac{x}{a} \right|^n + \left| \frac{y/k}{b} \right|^n = 1; this is mathematically equivalent to rescaling the semi-axis b to b k. Such transformations preserve the superelliptical character while altering the overall eccentricity, making the shape suitable for modeling elongated or flattened profiles in design and physics applications. Related shapes build on this anisotropic framework by introducing additional parameters to achieve specialized geometries. The superparabola, for instance, modifies the parabolic base through , defined by \frac{y}{b} = \left[ 1 - \left( \frac{x}{a} \right)^2 \right]^p for p > 0, allowing anisotropic scaling via a and b to create stretched or pinched variants of the standard parabola. Similarly, the emerges as a from an anisotropic superellipse cross-section with parameters like n = 2.5 and an a/b = 5/6, where the elongation along the rotation axis introduces further asymmetry beyond the 2D curve. The geometric properties of these scaled and anisotropic forms follow scaling laws adapted from the isotropic case, but with modifications due to the aspect ratio. The enclosed area is $4 a b \frac{\Gamma\left(1 + \frac{1}{n}\right)^2}{\Gamma\left(1 + \frac{2}{n}\right)}, which scales linearly with the product a b under axis-specific transformations, preserving the beta function dependence on n. The perimeter, however, involves elliptic integrals that complicate direct scaling, though non-uniform adjustments increase measures akin to eccentricity, such as the ratio of principal curvatures at the vertices, affecting overall roundness and stability in applications. These effects are evident in practical designs, like Piet Hein's superellipse for the Sergels Torg roundabout in Stockholm, which uses n = 2.5 and a/b = 6/5 to create an elongated, traffic-efficient oval that balances flow and aesthetics.

History and Applications

Origins and Development

The superellipse, also known as a Lamé curve, was first introduced by the French mathematician Gabriel Lamé in 1818 as a generalization of conic sections, particularly ellipses, to address a broader class of geometric problems involving curved boundaries and level sets. In his treatise Examen des différentes méthodes employées pour résoudre les problèmes de géométrie, Lamé proposed the Cartesian equation to model contours that extended beyond standard ellipses, enabling solutions to integration and approximation challenges in classical geometry. This innovation built on earlier special cases, such as the (a with exponent 2/3), which had been studied decades prior but lacked the general framework Lamé provided. Lamé's generalization facilitated more flexible representations of lines and similar constructs, influencing subsequent developments in and . The superellipse experienced a significant revival in the mid-20th century through the efforts of Danish Piet Hein, who popularized the shape in 1959 for practical design purposes. Commissioned to resolve issues at in , Hein proposed a superellipse with exponent 5/2 and a/b = 6/5 as an optimal compromise between the roundness of a and the efficiency of a , naming it the "superellipse" to highlight its intermediate properties. This application marked a shift from to real-world utility, inspiring architectural and industrial designs. Mathematical interest in the superellipse intensified in the , with formalizations focusing on analytic properties such as enclosed areas expressed via the , as explored by researchers including in popular expositions and subsequent analysts like those building on Hein's work. These efforts, including derivations for perimeter and in the 1960s literature, solidified the superellipse's role in and further distinguished it from classical conics.

Design and Computational Uses

Superellipses have found prominent applications in architectural and , particularly through the work of Danish and Piet Hein. In 1959, Hein proposed a superelliptical shape to resolve traffic congestion at in central , resulting in a pedestrian-friendly completed in 1967 that features a superellipse-inspired and plaza layout, optimizing flow while providing an aesthetically rounded form. This concept directly inspired Hein's collaboration with Swedish Bruno Mathsson on the Superellipse table series, first produced in 1968 by Fritz Hansen, which uses superelliptical tabletops for versatile, space-efficient furniture that blends rectangular utility with elliptical smoothness. In digital interfaces, superellipses, often termed squircles when the exponent approximates 4, have become a staple for . Apple adopted squircle-shaped app icons starting with in 2013, creating a softer, more approachable aesthetic that balances sharpness and curvature for touch interactions, a style that persists into the across and macOS ecosystems. This influence extends to web and UI development, where the CSS superellipse() function, introduced in browser specifications around 2024 and supported in 139 by 2025, enables designers to apply variable-exponent curves to elements like buttons and cards, enhancing rounded interfaces for modern applications. In computational graphics, superellipses underpin efficient techniques via superquadrics, extensions introduced by Alan H. Barr in 1981 for representing complex shapes with fewer parameters than polygonal meshes. These forms facilitate (CSG) operations, such as and , in rendering pipelines, allowing faster scene construction and manipulation in early systems. Superquadrics' implicit equations also support ray tracing by simplifying computations compared to arbitrary surfaces, contributing to their adoption in and software for approximating forms. Beyond graphics, superellipses serve in and biological modeling. Waldo Tobler's 1973 hyperelliptical employs superelliptical meridians to create equal-area pseudocylindrical maps that minimize in continental representations, offering a compact alternative to traditional projections for thematic atlases. In plant science, superellipses model spiral radial patterns in tree rings, as demonstrated in a 2015 study where the curve's flexibility captured asymmetric geometries better than circles, aiding dendrochronological analysis of growth dynamics under environmental stress.