Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Support group

A support group is a gathering of individuals who share common experiences, challenges, or conditions, such as chronic illness, addiction, grief, or mental health difficulties, convened to provide mutual emotional, informational, and practical support through shared discussion and empathy.^[1]^[2] These groups typically operate on principles of reciprocity, where participants draw strength from collective resilience rather than relying solely on professional intervention, fostering reduced isolation and enhanced coping mechanisms.^[3]^[4] Support groups manifest in varied forms, including peer-led mutual aid assemblies, which emphasize unstructured sharing without directive advice, and clinician-moderated variants that incorporate therapeutic elements akin to group psychotherapy.^[5]^[6] Common applications span illness-specific contexts like cancer or fibromyalgia, addiction recovery programs such as twelve-step models, and mental health forums addressing anxiety, depression, or trauma, often convening in person, virtually, or through hybrid means.^[7]^[4] Originating from early 20th-century mutual aid initiatives, including the Oxford Group and Alcoholics Anonymous founded in 1935, these structures gained prominence post-World War II amid growing acknowledgment of communal solidarity's role in personal fortitude, evolving into formalized services by the late 20th century.^[8] Empirical assessments reveal support groups confer modest benefits, including incremental gains in self-efficacy, personal recovery orientation, and symptom alleviation for conditions like mental illness or chronic disease self-management, though effects on clinical outcomes like symptom severity remain inconsistent and contingent on factors such as group facilitation quality and participant commitment.^[9]^[10]^[11] Unlike formalized psychotherapy, their peer-driven nature prioritizes experiential validation over expert-led analysis, potentially amplifying empowerment but risking unverified advice or groupthink in unstructured settings; rigorous studies underscore the need for adjunct professional oversight to maximize utility while mitigating dependency.^[12]^[13]

Definition and Purpose

Core Definition

A support group consists of peers who voluntarily assemble to offer mutual emotional and practical assistance, centered on shared experiences with specific challenges such as chronic illness, addiction, or bereavement, through exchanging personal stories, coping strategies, and encouragement rather than professional clinical interventions.^[2]^[14]^[1] These gatherings emphasize experiential knowledge derived from members' direct encounters, fostering a non-hierarchical environment distinct from casual social interactions, which lack the focused commonality of burdens or structured mutual aid.^[5] Unlike group therapy, which is led by licensed mental health professionals employing evidence-based techniques for diagnosis, symptom management, and behavioral modification, support groups are typically peer-facilitated or self-managed, prioritizing validation and solidarity over therapeutic directives or confidentiality-bound sessions.^[6]^[15]^[16] Fundamentally, support groups function by normalizing individual struggles through observable commonality—reducing perceived aberration in one's condition—alleviating isolation via interpersonal bonds and social validation, and promoting accountability as members articulate goals and progress within a collective narrative, thereby reinforcing self-directed resilience without reliance on expert authority.^[11]^[3]^[17]

Objectives and Psychological Mechanisms

The primary objectives of support groups include providing emotional validation by affirming that participants' struggles are shared and normative, thereby reducing isolation and stigma associated with personal challenges.^[2] They also enable the dissemination of practical coping strategies through peer-to-peer skill-sharing, allowing members to learn adaptive behaviors tailored to common adversities.^[5] A further goal is to cultivate motivation and collective resilience by highlighting observable recoveries among members, which empirically counters perceived helplessness by illustrating causal pathways to improvement, such as sustained adherence to behavioral changes despite setbacks.^[3] These aims prioritize tangible social exchanges over abstract therapeutic ideals, with evidence indicating modest reductions in distress rather than comprehensive symptom resolution.^[9] Underlying psychological mechanisms operate through social learning, wherein participants imitate successful coping modeled by peers, fostering behavioral adoption via direct observation of outcomes like relapse avoidance in shared contexts.^[18] Reciprocity reinforces engagement by creating mutual obligations for support and self-improvement, as members experience altruism in aiding others while receiving equivalent aid, which sustains group cohesion and personal accountability.^[19] Cognitive reframing emerges from collective input challenging distorted perceptions, such as overgeneralized self-blame, through interpersonal feedback that normalizes experiences and redirects causal attributions toward modifiable factors.^[20] These processes adapt elements of Yalom's therapeutic factors—originally identified in clinical group psychotherapy—to non-professional settings, including universality (realizing commonality of issues) and instillation of hope (via peer exemplars), though self-help applications yield smaller effect sizes on recovery metrics compared to therapist-led interventions.^[21] Empirical studies confirm that such mechanisms contribute to incremental gains in self-efficacy and reduced depression via enhanced group identification, but outcomes vary by group fidelity and participant commitment, underscoring the limits of peer dynamics absent professional oversight.^[18]^[22]

Historical Development

Early Origins

The earliest documented instances of peer support practices emerged in late 18th-century France, particularly at Bicêtre Hospital under superintendent Jean-Baptiste Pussin, who from 1784 onward permitted patients on psychiatric wards to assist one another in daily tasks and recovery efforts, fostering mutual aid without professional oversight or formalized therapy.^[23] This approach predated the moral treatment reforms of Philippe Pinel in the 1790s and reflected an intuitive reliance on interpersonal encouragement among patients, rather than institutional intervention, aligning with emergent human tendencies toward reciprocal help in confined, vulnerable settings.^[24] Such practices underscored the organic nature of support networks, where individuals drew on shared experiences to mitigate isolation and promote basic self-management, independent of emerging psychiatric paradigms. By the 19th century, mutual aid societies proliferated in the United States amid rapid industrialization, urbanization, and waves of immigration, serving as ethnic-based self-help organizations that addressed labor hardships, health crises, and burial needs for groups like Irish, German, and Italian newcomers lacking state welfare.^[25] These voluntary associations, peaking from the mid-1800s, pooled resources for sickness benefits, unemployment relief, and community solidarity, often operating through fraternal lodges or benevolent groups that emphasized collective responsibility over charity dependency.^[26] African American mutual aid networks similarly formed in urban centers, providing aid against systemic exclusion and economic precarity, demonstrating how such groups arose from practical necessities of survival in transforming societies rather than top-down designs.^[27] An early 20th-century precursor appeared with the Oxford Group, initiated by Lutheran minister Frank Buchman following his personal spiritual experiences around 1908, though formally organized in the 1920s as a Christian movement promoting practices like personal moral inventory, public confession of faults, and guided surrender to divine principles.^[28] Unlike later medicalized interventions, the group's methods focused on ethical self-examination and interpersonal accountability within informal gatherings, drawing participants from diverse backgrounds to address personal failings through voluntary sharing, without reliance on clinical expertise or pathological framing.^[29] This evangelical approach highlighted innate social mechanisms for moral rectification and mutual reinforcement, prefiguring structured support but rooted in religious conviction and group dynamics.

20th Century Milestones

Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) was founded in 1935 in Akron, Ohio, when stockbroker Bill Wilson met physician Robert Smith, marking the establishment of the first sustained mutual-aid group for alcoholics using a peer-led approach emphasizing spiritual principles and abstinence.^[30] This model proved scalable, with AA groups proliferating across the United States by the late 1930s and internationally after World War II, driven in part by heightened alcoholism rates linked to wartime stress and trauma.^[31] The 12-step framework, formalized in AA's 1939 foundational text, became the archetype for subsequent support groups, adapting to address the physiological and psychological dependencies observed in addiction.^[32] By mid-century, the 12-step model extended to other behavioral addictions, reflecting growing recognition of shared recovery mechanisms across substance and compulsive disorders. Narcotics Anonymous (NA) held its inaugural meeting on October 5, 1953, in Sun Valley, California, adapting AA's steps for drug dependency amid post-war surges in heroin use.^[33] Gamblers Anonymous (GA) followed in January 1957 in Los Angeles, founded by two individuals who applied AA principles to pathological gambling after personal failures with isolated efforts.^[34] These adaptations demonstrated the model's versatility, with groups emphasizing anonymity, confession, and sponsorship to foster accountability without professional intervention. Support groups also penetrated medical domains, particularly for chronic illnesses, as patients sought communal coping amid limited clinical options. The Reach to Recovery program, initiated in 1952 by breast cancer survivor Terese Lasser, connected newly diagnosed women with trained peers for practical and emotional guidance, later integrating with the American Cancer Society in 1969 to expand nationally.^[35] This peer visitation model addressed isolation and misinformation, scaling through volunteer networks in response to rising cancer incidence and survivorship needs post-1940s diagnostic advances. In the 1970s, mental health peer support emerged as a counter to institutional psychiatry's dominance, fueled by deinstitutionalization and critiques of coercive treatments. Self-organized groups of psychiatric survivors formed to challenge professional monopolies, prioritizing experiential knowledge over medical authority and advocating for rights-based recovery.^[8] These movements, rooted in the late-1960s civil rights ethos, evidenced efficacy in reducing stigma and promoting autonomy, though empirical validation lagged behind addiction groups due to contested definitions of mental illness.^[36]

Post-2000 Expansion

In the early 2000s, support groups expanded beyond clinical and recovery-focused origins to address rising chronic disease prevalence and societal stressors, with proliferation evident in community and workplace integrations. By 2022, over 2,000 U.S. mental health facilities incorporated peer support programs, many operating for years and adapting to local needs like chronic illness management.^[11] This growth paralleled increased recognition of peer models in handling non-acute conditions, though data on exact group counts remain fragmented due to decentralized operations. Workplace-based support groups surged as employers integrated them into wellness programs, particularly after the 2008 recession, to mitigate employee stress from economic uncertainty and job insecurity. Large firms adopted peer-led sessions within employee assistance frameworks, aiming to foster resilience amid layoffs and financial strain, with participation tied to broader wellness offerings that covered half or more of U.S. employers by the late 2010s.^[37] Community variants similarly diversified, embedding groups in neighborhood centers for issues like diabetes or cancer, reflecting adaptation to aging populations and persistent health disparities. Healthcare systems formalized support group roles, as seen in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, which by the 2010s embedded peer support into protocols for posttraumatic stress disorder through trained veteran specialists. The VA's 2010 Patient-Aligned Care Team model prioritized peer involvement in outpatient settings, expanding access for returning service members facing combat-related trauma.^[38] Such integrations highlighted peer groups' utility in resource-strapped public health, yet longitudinal tracking of program scale shows gaps in quantifying sustained proliferation. Globally, support groups disseminated to low-resource contexts, with international bodies endorsing peer-led formats for scalable mental health aid. The World Health Organization's frameworks implicitly backed these in resource-poor areas via community-based strategies, enabling growth from localized pilots to widespread adoption by 2020.^[39] Metrics indicate thousands of operational groups across developing regions, driven by cost-effectiveness in addressing epidemics like HIV or depression, though empirical documentation of total numbers lags, underscoring uneven data collection.^[40]

Organizational Structure

Management Approaches

Peer-led management in support groups emphasizes participants' shared lived experiences to cultivate authenticity and egalitarian dynamics, prioritizing mutual empathy over expert authority. This approach fosters a sense of community and empowerment through informal exchanges, with studies indicating peer-led formats can enhance self-efficacy and informal helping networks.^[41]^[42] However, reliance on untrained facilitators introduces risks of inconsistent boundary enforcement, potentially permitting unchecked dissemination of personal anecdotes that lack verification and may perpetuate unexamined cognitive distortions or groupthink, undermining causal accountability in recovery processes.^[42] In contrast, professionally managed groups incorporate oversight by clinicians or certified moderators trained in therapeutic techniques, enabling structured interventions that set clear norms for discourse and mitigate emotional escalation. Empirical comparisons demonstrate that such models yield superior gains in psychological functioning and symptom reduction relative to purely peer-driven ones, attributable to facilitators' ability to redirect maladaptive patterns and ensure evidence-based content integration.^[43]^[44] This oversight correlates with diminished group volatility, as trained leaders preempt dominance by vocal members or derailment into non-therapeutic venting, though direct causation requires further longitudinal data beyond short-term outcome metrics.^[9] Hybrid models, blending peer authenticity with professional safeguards, have gained traction for addressing scalability challenges in resource-limited settings, often mandating verifiable certification like that outlined in national peer support standards to standardize facilitation skills. Co-led configurations, for instance, show moderate boosts in both personal recovery and clinical outcomes when peers collaborate under expert supervision, balancing experiential rapport with rigorous training to prioritize empirical efficacy over anecdotal purity.^[10]^[45] These approaches underscore the causal role of structured accountability in sustaining long-term group viability, with emerging protocols emphasizing measurable competencies to counter variability in peer-only systems.^[46]

Formats and Operational Practices

Support groups commonly convene in in-person or hybrid formats, with meetings held weekly and lasting 1 to 2 hours to balance accessibility and depth of interaction.^[47]^[48] In-person gatherings emphasize physical presence for nonverbal cues and immediate rapport, while hybrid models integrate remote participation via video to accommodate scheduling constraints, though facilitators must enforce consistent ground rules to prevent fragmentation.^[49] Operational norms prioritize structured interaction to foster equitable participation and trust, including mandatory confidentiality agreements where members pledge not to disclose shared information outside the group.^[50]^[48] Turn-taking protocols, such as timed speaking slots or talking sticks, ensure no individual dominates, thereby sustaining a causal sequence of listening and response that reinforces mutual support without devolving into unstructured venting.^[51] Routine practices like opening check-ins—where participants briefly share current status—and structured storytelling rounds promote group cohesion by ritualizing vulnerability and reciprocity, drawing on the psychological principle that repeated, predictable exchanges build relational bonds over time.^[52]^[53] These elements operate through reinforcement of attendance norms, where consistent application correlates with perceived procedural fairness among members.^[54] Retention poses logistical hurdles, with dropout rates often reaching 30-50% within the first few months due to unmet expectations around emotional intensity or mismatched group dynamics.^[55]^[56] Facilitators mitigate this by clarifying formats upfront and monitoring engagement, as unaddressed mismatches in interaction style can erode the routine causality that underpins sustained involvement.^[57]

Varieties of Support Groups

Health and Medical Conditions

Support groups for health and medical conditions primarily address physical ailments through peer-led sharing of practical experiences in symptom management, treatment navigation, and daily coping strategies, distinct from professional medical consultations by relying on lived experiential input rather than clinical directives.^[2] These groups facilitate discussions on logistical challenges, such as adapting to medication side effects or coordinating care, without offering diagnoses or prescriptions, thereby complementing rather than replacing evidence-based medical treatment.^[5] Prominent examples include cancer support networks like Gilda's Club, which opened its first location in New York City in 1995, inspired by comedian Gilda Radner's experiences with ovarian cancer, to provide no-cost programs for patients and families focused on education, networking, and emotional reinforcement during disease progression.^[58] By 2009, Gilda's Club merged with The Wellness Community to form the Cancer Support Community, expanding to over 50 locations worldwide emphasizing peer validation for treatment adherence amid physical tolls like chemotherapy fatigue.^[59] In chronic pain cohorts, peer groups have demonstrated roles in rehabilitation by enabling members to exchange strategies for functional adaptation, with qualitative analyses showing sustained participation post-formal programs aids in maintaining self-management skills without delving into therapeutic prescriptions.^[60] For organ transplant recipients, groups such as those facilitated through transplant-specific forums provide experiential guidance on post-surgical recovery, including immunosuppression regimen hurdles, though empirical data on their isolated efficacy remains tied to broader peer support models.^[61] Empirical studies link participation in such peer groups to enhanced medication compliance in chronic physical conditions; for instance, peer-facilitated interventions across diseases like hypertension yielded statistically significant improvements in regimen adherence rates, attributed to motivational reinforcement from shared success narratives.^[62]^[63] Systematic reviews of peer support for chronic illnesses further corroborate modest gains in behavioral adherence, particularly where groups emphasize accountability mechanisms like check-ins, though causality is inferred from observational designs rather than randomized controls isolating group effects from concurrent therapies.^[64]

Addiction and Behavioral Issues

Support groups for addiction and behavioral issues primarily consist of recovery-oriented mutual-aid organizations modeled on the 12-step framework, which emphasizes admitting powerlessness over the addiction, seeking higher power guidance, making amends, and ongoing peer accountability through sponsorship and regular meetings.^[65] Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), founded in 1935, and Narcotics Anonymous (NA), established in 1953, exemplify this approach for alcohol and drug dependencies, respectively, with NA conducting nearly 76,000 meetings weekly across 143 countries as of recent reports.^[66] These programs promote total abstinence as the goal, relying on structured steps to disrupt habitual substance-seeking behaviors reinforced by environmental cues and internal cravings.^[67] Empirical studies indicate variable long-term abstinence rates for 12-step participation, with a Cochrane review of randomized trials finding 42% continuous abstinence at one year for AA/12-step facilitation (TSF) interventions compared to 35% for alternative clinical treatments, though benefits wane over longer periods and do not consistently exceed 13% sustained abstinence in some longitudinal cohorts of problem drinkers.^[68]^[69] Meta-analyses confirm AA/TSF yields comparable outcomes to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or other individual therapies in reducing substance use, with no clear superiority, but higher engagement correlates with better remission rates, suggesting efficacy stems from frequent attendance rather than the steps alone.^[65]^[70] For behavioral addictions, groups like Gamblers Anonymous (GA), founded in 1957, and Overeaters Anonymous (OA), started in 1960, adapt the 12-step model to compulsive gambling and overeating, incorporating sponsorship for daily accountability inventories to monitor triggers and prevent impulsive actions.^[71] Participation in GA has been linked to significant reductions in gambling severity and improved psychosocial functioning in observational studies, though randomized evidence remains limited and shows associations with readiness for change rather than guaranteed abstinence.^[72] OA offers potential for managing binge eating through peer-supported abstinence from trigger foods, but controlled trials are scarce, with qualitative data indicating feasibility yet calling for rigorous efficacy testing against evidence-based therapies.^[73] These groups facilitate relapse reduction primarily through social monitoring mechanisms, where sponsorship and meeting attendance provide external reinforcement against habitual relapse cues, outperforming isolated self-management by leveraging peer observation to interrupt automatic behavioral sequences more effectively than willpower alone, as evidenced in studies of mutual-help outcomes.^[74] However, meta-analyses of group versus individual interventions reveal no overall edge for 12-step formats in sustaining abstinence beyond standard therapies, underscoring that benefits accrue from consistent social accountability rather than inherent superiority of the model.^[75]^[76]

Mental Health and Emotional Challenges

Support groups addressing mental health and emotional challenges typically convene individuals experiencing conditions such as depression, anxiety, or bipolar disorder, often facilitated by peers rather than clinicians to emphasize shared experiences and practical coping mechanisms like stress management techniques and daily routine adjustments.^[8] These gatherings prioritize non-diagnostic discussions, where participants exchange strategies for symptom navigation without formal therapy, aiming to foster a sense of commonality that reduces isolation. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials found that peer support interventions for depression yielded statistically significant symptom reductions compared to usual care alone, with effect sizes indicating modest clinical improvements.^[77] For anxiety disorders, group formats similarly demonstrate efficacy in alleviating symptoms through collective validation and behavioral skill-sharing, with systematic reviews confirming comparable outcomes between mixed-diagnosis peer groups and professionally led sessions.^[78] In bipolar disorder contexts, organizations like the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (DBSA) host peer-led meetings that correlate with enhanced functioning and reduced relapse risks via community reinforcement of medication adherence and mood tracking, though structured psychoeducation shows no superior efficacy over unstructured peer interaction.^[79] ^[80] Grief and trauma-focused circles, such as those for bereavement following loss, provide venues for narrative sharing that yield short-term elevations in mood and grief intensity reductions, as evidenced by meta-analyses of group interventions showing immediate psychosocial benefits without extending to long-term prevention of prolonged grief disorder.^[81] These groups risk inadvertently pathologizing transient emotional responses by framing normal distress as chronic identity markers, potentially hindering adaptive resolution through overemphasis on shared affliction rather than individual agency, a concern underscored by the modest and symptom-specific limitations in broader peer support efficacy reviews.^[9] Empirical data thus highlight normalization's value in mitigating acute isolation while cautioning against therapeutic overreach that may entrench rather than resolve emotional challenges.^[82]

Empirical Evidence on Efficacy

Supported Benefits

Peer support interventions for depression have shown efficacy in randomized controlled trials, with a meta-analysis of seven such trials reporting a pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of -0.59 (95% CI: -0.98 to -0.21) in reducing depressive symptoms compared to usual care alone.^[77] This effect size indicates a moderate benefit, surpassing minimal interventions but aligning with some structured therapies in magnitude. In perinatal populations, peer support groups have similarly reduced the incidence and severity of postpartum depression, as evidenced by systematic reviews synthesizing trials where participants experienced lower Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores post-intervention.^[83] Participation in groups like Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) correlates with decreased healthcare utilization, including lower hospitalization rates; one longitudinal analysis found that each additional AA meeting attended reduced overall healthcare costs by approximately 5%, primarily through fewer inpatient days for alcohol-related issues.^[84] A three-year comparative study further documented 45% lower per-person treatment costs ($1,826 savings) for AA participants versus those in outpatient programs alone, attributing gains to sustained abstinence and reduced acute care needs.^[85] Broader peer support models, per a 2019 Mental Health America analysis, enhance treatment engagement by lowering re-hospitalization rates and inpatient days while improving overall care continuity for individuals with mental health conditions.^[86] Digital peer support formats have contributed to reductions in loneliness, particularly post-2020 amid increased remote interactions; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials on digital interventions, including group-based peer elements, reported significant decreases in loneliness scores (SMD -0.35 to -0.50 across subgroups), with stronger effects in structured online communities fostering social connection.^[87] These outcomes extend to quality-of-life improvements, as meta-analyses of peer support for severe mental illness indicate modest gains in self-reported recovery domains, such as empowerment and reduced isolation, sustained over 6-12 months in trial follow-ups.^[88]

Limitations and Inconclusive Findings

A 2021 systematic review and meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials involving 2,131 participants found that group peer support interventions for mental health conditions yielded small improvements in overall personal recovery (with effects maintained up to six months post-intervention) but demonstrated no significant benefits for hope, empowerment, or reductions in clinical symptoms such as depression or global functioning.^[9] Six of the eight trials exhibited high or unclear risk of bias, including attrition and reporting issues, while heterogeneity across studies limited generalizability and precluded firm conclusions on causal mechanisms beyond potential nonspecific factors like participant expectation.^[9] High attrition rates further undermine causal inferences, as dropout often exceeds 20% in peer support trials, with imbalances between intervention and control groups exacerbating bias.^[9] In mutual aid contexts like 12-step programs for addiction, approximately 40% of participants drop out within one year, and up to 50% within the first three months, raising questions about whether observed short-term gains reflect the group's influence or self-selection of more motivated individuals who would improve regardless.^[89] ^[90] A 2023 meta-analysis of 49 randomized controlled trials with 12,477 adults confirmed small positive effects on personal recovery domains (standardized mean difference of 0.20) and minor reductions in anxiety symptoms, but little to no impact on other clinical outcomes like depression or hospitalizations.^[10] Most included studies carried high risk of bias, with insufficient high-quality evidence to establish superiority over alternatives such as individual self-management or pharmacological interventions; effects were often equivalent to treatment-as-usual, attributable potentially to placebo responses or baseline participant traits rather than group-specific processes.^[10] Long-term follow-ups remain scarce, leaving unresolved whether initial benefits persist or decay without ongoing engagement.^[10]

Criticisms and Risks

Individual-Level Drawbacks

Participants in support groups can encounter emotional exhaustion from repeatedly disclosing vulnerabilities, which may intensify feelings of exposure and fatigue rather than relief, as evidenced in reviews of negative group experiences where members reported discomfort and intimidation during sharing sessions.^[91] Qualitative accounts highlight how the obligation to contribute in group formats amplifies this drain, particularly when interactions devolve into unhelpful scrutiny or comparison, outweighing potential catharsis for some individuals.^[92] A further individual risk involves fostering dependency, wherein prolonged group immersion reinforces narratives of perpetual victimhood or helplessness, impeding the development of autonomous problem-solving skills.^[92] Empirical observations in group psychotherapy note fears of emotional fusion with the collective, where participants internalize group-dependent coping mechanisms, potentially prolonging reliance on external validation over self-efficacy.^[92] This dynamic has been linked to delayed personal agency, as members prioritize group affirmation amid shared pessimism, substantiated by analyses of adverse outcomes in therapeutic groups.^[92] Mismatched group compositions or dominant member influences can exacerbate anxiety, with studies showing that perceived incongruence in support needs correlates with heightened emotional distress rather than mitigation.^[93] Negative interactions within such settings often prove more detrimental than supportive elements are beneficial, amplifying individual anxiety through contagion of maladaptive behaviors or unresolved conflicts.^[94] For instance, exposure to overly pessimistic or controlling peers may instill doubt in personal recovery trajectories, as documented in examinations of group-based deteriorations where 60-65% of participants reported symptom worsening tied to interpersonal mismatches.^[95]

Systemic and Cultural Concerns

Critics of therapeutic culture, which extends into support groups, contend that these forums can cultivate echo chambers where participants reinforce narratives of perpetual victimhood, undermining personal responsibility and resilience in favor of collective commiseration. This dynamic, akin to broader societal shifts toward pathologizing everyday adversities, discourages "bootstraps" approaches evidenced in recovery models emphasizing individual agency, such as cognitive-behavioral self-management techniques that outperform group-dependent validation in long-term outcomes for conditions like addiction.^[96]^[97] Cultural barriers, including entrenched stigma against mental health disclosures in non-Western or collectivist societies, often render support groups ineffective by deterring attendance or fostering mismatched interventions that ignore ethnocultural norms. For example, in immigrant communities, language incongruities and historical distrust of institutional support exacerbate isolation, with studies showing lower engagement rates where groups fail to adapt beyond Western individualistic frameworks.^[98]^[99] Sustainability challenges have intensified post-2020, as pandemic-era emergency funding evaporated, leaving many nonprofit-led support initiatives with abrupt service reductions; federal relief terminations in 2023 correlated with a 28% drop in allocations for victim services, straining operational continuity amid rising demand. This vulnerability highlights reliance on transient grants over self-sustaining models, prompting scrutiny of groups as scalable solutions without addressing fiscal realism.^[100]^[101] Ideological tilts in support group facilitation, often shaped by academia's documented left-leaning predispositions toward communal affirmation, may prioritize emotional validation over empirical individualism, as seen in recovery data favoring personal accountability; mainstream sources, prone to such biases, underemphasize evidence from rugged self-reliance paradigms that yield higher abstinence rates in behavioral interventions.^[102]

Recent Developments

Digital Integration

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of digital platforms for support groups, with apps and online forums enabling peer interactions amid physical distancing mandates starting in 2020. For instance, digital mental health providers reported surges in usage, such as a 77% increase in new users for chat-based support apps like Wysa from February to March 2020 compared to the prior year.^[103] Similarly, searches for mindfulness and related apps rose by nearly 2,500% during the early pandemic phase, reflecting broader demand for virtual peer support to address isolation.^[104] These platforms, including forums on Reddit and dedicated apps like 7 Cups, facilitated scalable access, particularly for remote or mobility-limited participants, with studies noting their role in maintaining social capital through online engagement.^[105] Hybrid models blending in-person and virtual elements emerged post-2020 as a response to ongoing mental health demands, driven by the World Health Organization's estimate of over 1 billion people worldwide living with mental conditions requiring urgent service scale-up as of September 2025.^[106] Telehealth for group therapy, including support groups, saw utilization jump approximately 40% from early 2020 to mid-year, evolving into hybrid formats for substance use disorder and mental health sessions where participants join via video or in-person.^[107] ^[108] A 2025 scoping review identified growing implementation of such hybrids, allowing flexibility while preserving some face-to-face dynamics, though adoption varies by group type and region.^[108] Digital formats offer causal advantages like anonymity, which reduces perceived stigma and encourages disclosure among introverted or hesitant individuals, fostering trust in peer exchanges as evidenced in community mental health studies.^[109] This has buffered stress for some users by enabling convenient, judgment-free participation, with digital peer support interventions showing potential to enhance emotional well-being and meet unmet needs in employee programs.^[110] ^[111] However, the loss of nonverbal cues, such as facial expressions and gestures, limits empathy conveyance and rapport in virtual settings, potentially reducing therapeutic depth compared to in-person interactions, per analyses of teletherapy limitations.^[112] This trade-off highlights how digital integration improves accessibility but alters interaction quality, necessitating hybrid approaches to mitigate cue deficits.^[113]

Policy and Research Trends

In the United States, collegiate recovery programs incorporating peer support groups have proliferated between 2020 and 2025, with a May 2025 Boston University study documenting their expansion across campuses to foster inclusive environments for students addressing substance use and behavioral challenges.^[114] These initiatives, supported by organizations like the Association of Recovery in Higher Education, emphasize community-building and stigma reduction, yet face persistent funding volatility, as programs dependent on single revenue streams serve half as many participants as those with diversified sources.^[115] Policy advocacy in 2025 has intensified efforts to secure federal and institutional commitments, highlighting the risk of program contraction without stable allocations amid competing educational priorities.^[116] Internationally, the World Health Organization noted in September 2025 that psychosocial support integrations, encompassing group-based interventions, have become standard in over 80% of countries' emergency protocols, rising from 39% in 2020 amid heightened focus on mental health crises like those post-COVID-19.^[106] This evolution underscores policy recognition of support groups' scalability in resource-limited settings, though uneven adoption persists due to infrastructural gaps in low-income regions.^[117] Research from 2020 to 2025 has shifted toward youth-focused early interventions, with peer support models showing preliminary benefits in coping and access but revealing substantial evidence voids through meta-analyses.^[118] A 2021 systematic review of group peer support interventions identified modest gains in overall recovery metrics yet inconclusive effects on symptoms or empowerment, attributing limitations to heterogeneous designs and overreliance on non-randomized data rather than rigorous RCTs.^[22] Scholars in 2023 similarly critiqued the field's evidentiary base, advocating for causal inference methods to disentangle group dynamics from confounding factors like self-selection.^[119] Emerging trends prioritize outcome tracking in tailored frameworks, pressing for RCTs to validate personalization claims against advocacy narratives.^[120]

References

[1]
Support group - APA Dictionary of Psychology
Apr 19, 2018 · a group similar in some ways to a self-help group in that members who share a problem come together to provide help, comfort, and guidance.
[2]
Support groups: Make connections, get help - Mayo Clinic
Mar 27, 2025 · Support groups bring together people who are going through or have gone through similar experiences. For example, a support group may connect ...
[3]
The Value of Support Groups | Psychology Today
Sep 7, 2023 · A support group is a gathering of people, either in person or virtually, who have a common condition, issue, or life circumstance in order ...
[4]
What to Know About Support Groups - Verywell Health
Mar 23, 2025 · A support group, or social support group, is a group of people who come together with a goal of overcoming or coping with a shared problem.Support Group vs. Therapy... · Types of Support Groups
[5]
Support Groups: Types, Benefits, and What to Expect - HelpGuide.org
Aug 19, 2025 · Mutual support groups. Mutual support groups are peer-led groups. Facilitators receive training, but they don't give advice or act as ...
[6]
Understanding Group Therapy and Support Groups
Aug 31, 2022 · Typically, support groups are process-oriented, free-flowing sessions, especially if they are peer-led. If clinician-led, the conversation might ...
[7]
2 Types of Groups Commonly Used in Substance Abuse Treatment
Support groups. •. Interpersonal process groups. Each of the models has something unique to offer to certain populations; and in the hands of a ...
[8]
Peer Support in Mental Health: Literature Review - PMC
Jun 9, 2020 · In the 1990s, peer support was formally introduced as a service in community mental health care. However, there is evidence of its practice ...
[9]
A systematic review and meta-analysis of group peer support ...
Jun 23, 2021 · We found evidence that group peer support may make small improvements to overall recovery but not hope or empowerment individually, or to clinical symptoms.
[10]
The Effectiveness of Peer Support in Personal and Clinical Recovery
Feb 8, 2023 · The authors reviewed the effectiveness of peer support for both personal recovery and clinical recovery of adults with any mental illness.
[11]
The benefits and challenges of established peer support ... - NIH
Feb 1, 2022 · Studies of peer support for chronic disease self-management have shown positive effects on patient activation, self-efficacy, and self-care ...
[12]
The effectiveness of support groups: a literature review
The purpose of this paper is to update and consolidate the knowledge and the evidence for the effectiveness of mental health support groups.<|separator|>
[13]
The effectiveness, implementation, and experiences of peer support ...
Feb 29, 2024 · Conclusions. Peer support may be effective at improving some clinical outcomes, self-efficacy, and recovery. Certain populations, e.g. perinatal ...
[14]
Definition of support group - NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms
A group of people with similar disease or concerns who help each other cope by sharing experiences and information.
[15]
Support Groups vs Group Therapy: What's the Difference?
Sep 29, 2025 · Types of Group Therapy and Support Groups · Twelve-Step Programs: Such as Alcoholics Anonymous, focus on addiction recovery. · Cancer Support ...
[16]
Psychotherapy: Understanding group therapy
Oct 31, 2019 · While group members are a valuable source of support, formal group therapy sessions offer benefits beyond informal self-help and support groups.
[17]
Chapter 21., Section 2. Creating and Facilitating Peer Support Groups
A support group is a safe place for someone who needs to talk about intensely personal issues, experiences, struggles, and thoughts. Talking to a counselor or ...Examples · Checklist · PowerPoint · Tools<|separator|>
[18]
Unveiling the psychological mechanisms of mutual help groups for ...
May 29, 2024 · Social support enhances group identification, which leads to a stronger recovery identity, then increased self-efficacy, and indirectly, ...Social Support As A Driving... · Structural Model · Discussion
[19]
Group Therapy - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Oct 29, 2024 · Group therapy is a form of psychotherapy in which 1 or 2 therapists work with multiple clients simultaneously. The American Psychological ...<|separator|>
[20]
Identifying Yalom's group therapeutic factors in anonymous mental ...
Results: The results show that a large portion of the data can be interpreted through Yalom's therapeutic factors, such as Instillation of Hope, Group Cohesion, ...
[21]
Therapeutic Factors in Group Psychotherapy: A Study of Egyptian ...
Nov 15, 2010 · According to Yalom (1985), group therapy offers an opportunity for participants to discover “positive areas of themselves.” We presume that ...
[22]
A systematic review and meta-analysis of group peer support ...
Jun 23, 2021 · We found evidence that group peer support may make small improvements to overall recovery but not hope or empowerment individually, or to clinical symptoms.
[23]
[PDF] A Brief History of Youth Peer Support
The first record of official peer support was in 1784 when the superintendent of a psychiatric hospital ward just south of Paris, France, Jean Baptiste Pussin, ...
[24]
Peer support among persons with severe mental illnesses: a review ...
Actually, peer support has its roots in the moral treatment era inaugurated by Pussin and Pinel in France at the end of the 18th century, and has re-emerged at ...
[25]
A Multimedia Encyclopedia - Mutual Aid Societies - Sage Knowledge
Mutual aid societies were the forerunner to welfare and social services in the United States and peaked from the mid-19th century to the first ...
[26]
The Growth of Voluntary Associations in America, 1840-1940 - jstor
In virtually every city and town,. Americans have built dense, complex networks of voluntary as- sociations: churches, clubs, lodges, choirs, mutual-aid ...
[27]
A Short History of Urban Nonprofits - Vital City
Mar 5, 2025 · Likewise, in cities up and down the Eastern Seaboard, African Americans formed mutual aid societies, self-help associations, churches, schools ...
[28]
Frank Buchman and the Oxford Group | AA Agnostica
Nov 3, 2013 · AA World Services In 1938, the Oxford Group was renamed “Moral Rearmament” and continues today as “Initiatives of Change,” but its heyday is ...
[29]
Four Kinds of Moral Inventory (by James R.) - Stepstudy.org
Jul 12, 2008 · Oxford Group members discovered themselves to be sinners; they were dishonest, impure, selfish and unloving. They were broken people in need of ...
[30]
History of A.A. | Alcoholics Anonymous
85+ Years of Helping Alcoholics. How did a meeting between a New York stockbroker and an Akron surgeon lead to a global movement? How did the A.A. Fellowship ...
[31]
The Start and Growth of A.A. | Alcoholics Anonymous
One patient quickly achieved complete sobriety. These three men made up the nucleus of the first A.A. group (though the name Alcoholics Anonymous was not yet ...
[32]
History of The 12 Steps of NA and AA Where Did They Come From
Sep 19, 2018 · Ebby, it turned out, was a member of the Oxford Group, a Christian organization founded by Frank Buchman that believed “the root of all problems ...
[33]
October 5, 1953: The First Narcotics Anonymous Recovery Meeting
Oct 5, 2010 · In the middle of the twentieth century, more and more people with multiple addictions were going to Alcoholics Anonymous (A.A.) meetings to ...
[34]
History - Gamblers Anonymous
The fellowship of Gamblers Anonymous is the outgrowth of a chance meeting between two men during the month of January in 1957. These men had a truly baffling ...
[35]
The Reach to Recovery program in America and Europe - PubMed
Begun in 1952 by Terese Lasser, Reach to Recovery became part of the American Cancer Society in 1969. Many thousands of women in America have benefited from ...
[36]
A History of Peer Support — Love and Respect
Apr 12, 2025 · From its beginnings in the late 18th century all the way up to our current day today, look at how Peer Support came to be and how it's ...
[37]
Solving the Workplace Health Crisis
Now, well over half of all employers offer workplace wellness programs. Personal trainers, health coaches, dieticians, yoga instructors, and the many ...The Costs · The Response · What Companies Must Do
[38]
Peer Support Specialists' Unique Contribution to Veterans' Health
Peer Specialists in Primary Care In 2010, VA adopted the PACT (Patient-aligned Care Team) model of healthcare, which puts Veterans' goals and needs at the ...
[39]
[PDF] Global Evidence for Peer Support:
Peer support helps prevent and manage diseases, cope with stress, engages hard-to-reach populations, reduces unnecessary care, and is cost-effective. It is a ...
[40]
The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social ...
It is possible that the greatest gains in peer-to-peer connections among people with serious mental illness will be realised across low-resource settings.
[41]
Stigma and Peer-Led Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta ...
Jul 5, 2022 · Peer-led intervention can reduce self-stigma and stigma pressure and might improve recovery and empowerment. It increases self-efficacy and ...
[42]
Professional vs Peer Led Support Groups - Holden Counseling LLC
Empowerment and Engagement: Peer support can enhance self-efficacy and empowerment, fostering a sense of community and belonging. Cons: Limited Training ...
[43]
The effectiveness of peer-led and professionally led groups to ...
Professionally led groups produced the greatest improvement in psychological functioning, and peer-led groups produced the greatest increases in informal ...Missing: management approaches
[44]
Therapist-Led vs. Peer-Led Groups: Key Differences
May 25, 2025 · Unlike the clinical focus of therapist-led groups, peer-led groups prioritize emotional support, shared understanding, and personal empowerment.
[45]
[PDF] SAMHSA's National Model Standards for Peer Support Certification
Peer support certification is the process to obtain an official document attesting an individual has the skills and knowledge for peer support services.Missing: hybrid | Show results with:hybrid
[46]
[PDF] A Hybrid Peer Support Training Model for Mental Health and ...
Jun 11, 2021 · State-approved Certified Peer Support Specialist (CPSS) programs offer 40-hour trainings to individuals with at least six months of recovery ( ...Missing: standards | Show results with:standards
[47]
[PDF] Counselor's Treatment Manual - SAMHSA Library
Social Support Group . ... □ Meeting format. Meetings are held throughout the day and evening and usually last 1 hour, with time before and after for ...
[48]
[PDF] Peer Support Groups: Starting and Growing Your Group
The Frequency of Peer Support Group Meetings & Check-ins ... It's important to maintain confidentiality within a peer support group. This means that ...
[49]
Virtual Hybrid Versus In-Person Administration of Transcending Self ...
May 26, 2024 · This particular hybrid form of telehealth treatment delivery may allow patients to reap the benefits of in-person interactions and support of ...Missing: practices | Show results with:practices
[50]
[PDF] PEER-LED SUPPORT GROUP MANUAL
Support Group Guidelines & Confidentiality Disclaimer. The peer host is responsible for reading the RESOLVE PLSG Introduction at the beginning of each ...
[51]
[PDF] Support - American Stroke Association
Starting a stroke support group takes a lot of work but can be very rewarding. ... A structured meeting format also makes it possible to create distinct ...<|separator|>
[52]
Questions for check-ins - The Circle Way
Jan 1, 2017 · A check-in question such as “Tell us the story of how you originally came into this work” will open the story space and would likely be a longer check-in.Missing: storytelling | Show results with:storytelling
[53]
Story Circles – Transforming Stories, Driving Change
A story circle is a group of people sitting in a circle sharing stories. Story circles can range from informal gatherings around kitchen tables, living rooms, ...
[54]
[PDF] Facilitator Guide - American Chronic Pain Association
Chapter 2 How to Start an ACPA Support Group ....................................................... 10. Chapter 3 Sharing Group ... Meeting Format .
[55]
The Challenges of Enrollment and Retention: A Systematic Review ...
The average retention rate at the end of follow-ups was 69% (range 16%–100%; median = 70%). The number of study arms, recruitment method, type of patient- ...
[56]
Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of peer support ...
Peer-led groups experienced significant improvements in psychological functioning, expansion of informal support networks, and positive personal changes in ...Review · 3. Results · 3.4. Type Of Peers
[57]
The Challenges Of Enrollment And Retention: A Systematic Review ...
Psychosocial behavioral interventions (PBIs) that target patients with cancer and their caregivers face challenges in participant enrollment and retention.
[58]
Mission and History – Cancer Support Community
1995: The first Gilda's Club opened in New York City, fulfilling Gilda Radner's dream to create a welcoming place for cancer support. · 2001: Gilda's Club ...
[59]
Our History & Mission - Gilda's Club Metro Detroit
In July 2009, The Wellness Community and Gilda's Club Worldwide joined forces to become the Cancer Support Community. By helping to complete the cancer care ...
[60]
The development and impact of a chronic pain support group
This study indicates that pain support groups can play a valuable role for people in pain, assisting with support and rehabilitation, and meeting needs.
[61]
Advancing Social Support for Transplant Patients with Technology
As an example, Liver Space and Kidney Space are Facebook-integrated health applications developed at Johns Hopkins which provide reliable information and a ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
[62]
Peers as Facilitators of Medication Adherence Interventions: A Review
Peer-facilitated interventions appear to enhance medication adherence as well as other healthful behaviors, such as exercise.
[63]
The Impact of Peer Support Program on Adherence to the Treatment ...
Conclusions: This study showed that peer support programs had a positive impact on adherence to the treatment regimen in patients suffering from hypertension.
[64]
Peer support for people with chronic conditions: a systematic review ...
Mar 31, 2022 · This systematic review of reviews indicates that peer support may be effective for people with chronic conditions. However, there are ...
[65]
Alcoholics Anonymous and 12-Step Facilitation Treatments for ...
Jul 6, 2020 · Meta-analyses showed that AA and facilitating use of AA ('TSF') produced similar benefits to other treatments on all drinking-related outcomes ...
[66]
About the NA Program - Narcotics Anonymous
Today, NA members hold nearly 76,000 meetings weekly in 143 countries. We offer recovery from the effects of addiction through working a twelve-step program, ...
[67]
Alcoholics Anonymous Effectiveness: Faith Meets Science - PMC - NIH
An earlier meta analysis focusing on moderating effects found that the evidence for AA effectiveness was stronger in outpatient samples, and that poorer ...
[68]
New Cochrane Review finds Alcoholics Anonymous and 12-Step ...
Mar 10, 2020 · The evidence suggests that 42 % of participants participating in AA would remain completely abstinent one year later, compared to 35% of ...
[69]
The 10 Year Course of AA Participation and Long-Term Outcomes
At no assessment did the rate of abstinence exceed 13%, a rate similar to other long-term investigations of problem drinkers (34). The proportion of ...
[70]
Alcoholics Anonymous most effective path to alcohol abstinence
Mar 11, 2020 · In one study, it was found to be 60% more effective. None of the studies found AA to be less effective. In the studies that measured outcomes ...
[71]
Gamblers Anonymous as a Recovery Pathway: A Scoping Review
Apr 4, 2016 · Founded in the 1950s (Browne 1994; Ferentzy et al. 2004a), Gamblers Anonymous is a mutual aid fellowship based on 12-step principles. GA has ...
[72]
Does Gamblers Anonymous work? Study suggests twelve-step ...
Apr 5, 2016 · Gamblers Anonymous participants demonstrated significant reductions in gambling symptom severity as well as improvements in psychosocial ...<|separator|>
[73]
Overeaters Anonymous: An Overlooked Intervention for Binge ... - NIH
Jul 8, 2021 · Overall, OA provides a promising option for binge eating disorder treatment that warrants clinical research on its feasibility and efficacy in a ...
[74]
Benefits of peer support groups in the treatment of addiction - PMC
Sep 29, 2016 · Residential and sober living. Since the 1960s, a variety of residential options have emerged to help people with alcohol and drug addictions.Missing: monitoring | Show results with:monitoring
[75]
A review of research-supported group treatments for drug use ...
Jun 21, 2021 · Studies examining group treatment for cocaine, methamphetamine, marijuana, opioid, mixed substance, and substance use disorder with co-occurring ...
[76]
Comparison of 12-step Groups to Mutual Help Alternatives for AUD ...
Many studies suggest that participation in 12-step groups contributes to better recovery outcomes, but people often object to such groups and most do not ...
[77]
Efficacy of Peer Support Interventions for Depression: A Meta-Analysis
The pooled results from randomized controlled trials indicate that peer support interventions improve depression symptoms more than usual care alone and that ...
[78]
Efficacy of group psychotherapy for anxiety disorders - PubMed
Conclusions: Our results support the efficacy of group psychotherapy for anxiety disorders. They indicate that mixed-diagnoses groups are equally effective as ...
[79]
Peer support for mood disorder: Characteristics and benefits from ...
Aug 1, 2019 · Peer-led groups like the Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance (DBSA) may help. Greater DBSA participation is associated with better functioning and well- ...
[80]
Clinical effectiveness and acceptability of structured group ...
Sep 26, 2016 · Structured group psychoeducation was no more clinically effective than similarly intensive unstructured peer support, but was more acceptable ...Introduction · Study Design And... · Discussion<|separator|>
[81]
Effects of bereavement groups–a systematic review and meta-analysis
Jun 5, 2020 · Prolonged grief disorder (PGD) is characterized by norm exceeding levels of separation distress (longing for or preoccupation with the deceased) ...
[82]
The effectiveness of peer support for individuals with mental illness
Sep 6, 2022 · PSIs may be effective for the clinical and personal recovery of mental illness. Effects are modest, though consistent, suggesting potential efficacy for PSI.
[83]
Essential Reads: Peer Support Interventions for Perinatal Depression
Peer support interventions can reduce the incidence of postpartum depression and the severity of depressive symptoms.Missing: size | Show results with:size
[84]
Alcoholics Anonymous vs. Other Approaches: The Evidence Is Now In
Mar 11, 2020 · Alcoholics Anonymous not only produced higher rates of abstinence and remission, but it also did so at a lower cost, the Cochrane review found.
[85]
Reduced substance-abuse-related health care costs ... - PubMed
Over the three-year study, per-person treatment costs for the AA group were 45 percent (or $1,826) lower than costs for the outpatient treatment group. Despite ...
[86]
Expanding Peer Support - AAHD
May 30, 2024 · A 2019 brief from Mental Health America found that peer support helped reduce re-hospitalization rates, days inpatient, overall cost of ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
[87]
Digital bridges to social connection: A systematic review and meta ...
This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the impact of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on digital interventions to reduce loneliness and social ...
[88]
The effectiveness of one-to-one peer support in mental health services
Nov 11, 2020 · Meta-analyses were conducted for eleven outcomes, with evidence that one-to-one peer support may have a modest positive impact on self-reported ...
[89]
Dropout from 12-step self-help groups: Prevalence, predictors, and ...
Aug 6, 2025 · At 1-year followup 40% had dropped out. A number of baseline factors predicted dropout. Importantly, patients who initiated 12-step behaviors ...
[90]
Mutual Support Groups Support Recovery | CheckUp & Choices
AA's triennial (every 3 years) surveys have reported 50% dropout rates within the first 3 months of starting AA (Chappel). Clearly AA is not for everyone.
[91]
Negative experiences in support groups - PubMed
A review of the literature related to support groups, negative experiences in groups, and social support, as well as personal accounts of members and ...
[92]
Adverse Outcomes in Group Psychotherapy - NIH
Because of the dearth of empirical research on negative outcomes in traditional therapy groups, I have also here presented findings from growth groups and self- ...
[93]
Mismatch of desired versus perceived social support and ... - PubMed
Conclusions: The findings support the hypothesized match-mismatch model suggesting that lack of social support is only associated with emotional distress when ...
[94]
Social Support, Negative Social Interactions, and Psychological Well ...
Empirical evidence suggests that negative interactions can potentially be more harmful than social support is helpful.
[95]
Negative effects during multicomponent group-based treatment
Empirical literature on negative effects in group therapy is scarce. Schneibel et al. (2017) have found that 60-65% of all patients experienced deterioration ...
[96]
Samantha Boardman on Why Therapy Culture is Toxic
Jul 23, 2025 · Samantha Boardman explains why therapy culture or seeking treatment as a trend is dangerous and toxic.
[97]
Therapy Culture and Its Discontents - Meanjin
Furedi argues that therapy culture seeks to repress and exclude the challenges and conflicts that individuals and groups have previously had to deal with in ...
[98]
Understanding and Addressing Mental Health Stigma Across ... - NIH
May 26, 2023 · Furthermore, stigma across cultures impacts psychiatric care in various ways and can create significant barriers to effective treatment.
[99]
How cultural stigma impacts those seeking mental health services
Aug 4, 2020 · In many cultures, negative stigma about mental health symptoms or therapy services is a major obstacle to getting professional help. Research ...
[100]
Pandemic Relief Is Ending, and What It Means to Nonprofits and ...
Apr 13, 2023 · The termination of the two major pandemic federal emergency declarations and ending of enhanced relief programs for individuals mean that nonprofits can expect ...
[101]
Federal Funding Cuts Threaten to Leave 680,000 Women and ...
Jun 17, 2025 · The white paper reveals alarming statistics: federal funding for women's services decreased by 28% in 2023 alone, while demand for services has ...Missing: decline | Show results with:decline<|separator|>
[102]
Sudden End To Federal Pandemic-Related Grants ... - InDepthNH.org
May 6, 2025 · In the House's State Budget proposal, funding for the Division for Behavioral Health would decline by approximately $42.9 million (12.3 percent) ...
[103]
Digital Providers Surge to Support Global Mental Health During ...
Feb 10, 2021 · Wysa witnessed a 77% increase in new users during February to March 2020, as compared with the same period in 2019. Mentally Aware Nigeria ...Missing: growth statistics<|separator|>
[104]
The evolving field of digital mental health: current evidence and ...
May 15, 2025 · For example, during the COVID‐19 pandemic, one app curation service reported that searches for mindfulness apps rose by nearly 2,500% compared ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[105]
Support from Social Media during the COVID-19 Pandemic - NIH
The findings showed that active engagement on social media contributed significantly to maintaining social capital and collective resilience amidst social ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[106]
Over a billion people living with mental health conditions – services ...
Sep 2, 2025 · Over a billion people living with mental health conditions – services require urgent scale-up. 2 September 2025. News release. Geneva. Reading ...Missing: digital interventions
[107]
The Hybrid Model: New Normal or Unstable Transition Phase?
Sep 1, 2023 · Some data suggest mental health and substance use visits delivered via telehealth jumped about 40% from the start of the pandemic to mid-2020.Missing: rates | Show results with:rates
[108]
Hybrid Virtual Group Model for Substance Use Disorder Therapy
May 14, 2025 · This scoping review identified instances of SUD group therapy in which at least one participant attended in-person and at least one participated virtually.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[109]
Combining online and offline peer support groups in community ...
May 29, 2020 · The mutual self-disclosure in an anonymous and secure online environment appeared to reduce a sense of stigma and fostered the trust necessary ...
[110]
Exploring the Impact of Digital Peer Support Services on Meeting ...
Feb 25, 2025 · This study evaluates the integration of digital peer support (DPS) into an employee assistance program (EAP), testing 3 hypotheses.Missing: buffering | Show results with:buffering
[111]
The effects of digital peer support interventions on physical and ...
This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes evidence on the effectiveness of digital peer support interventions for enhancing physical and mental ...Missing: buffering | Show results with:buffering
[112]
Reduced therapeutic skill in teletherapy versus in‐person therapy ...
May 24, 2023 · Specifically, the lack of non-verbal cues and the impersonal nature of teletherapy may limit therapists' skills in expressing empathy and ...
[113]
The COVID Shift: Comparing Hybrid Telehealth to In-Person Group ...
The adoption of telehealth for group therapy, especially hybrid forms like the one used in this study, remains under-investigated in the mental health field in ...
[114]
Inclusive Peer Support Groups Are Expanding at US Colleges, but ...
May 7, 2025 · A new study found that collegiate recovery programs that have multiple sources of funding served twice as many students as programs with only one source of ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
[115]
Your Voice Matters: Help Protect Funding for Collegiate Recovery ...
May 9, 2025 · ARHE provides technical assistance to collegiate recovery programs nationwide and supports institutions seeking to build on-campus recovery support.Missing: groups policy 2020-2025
[116]
College Shouldn't Be a Relapse Risk: Why Collegiate Recovery ...
Jul 28, 2025 · Inclusive Peer Support Groups Are Expanding at US Colleges, but Stable Funding Is Needed. May 7, 2025. Explore Related Topics: alcohol · alcohol ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
[117]
Mental health in emergencies - World Health Organization (WHO)
May 6, 2025 · International guidelines recommend various activities for providing mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) during emergencies, ranging ...Missing: inclusions | Show results with:inclusions
[118]
Peer Support Programs for Youth Mental Health - NCBI Bookshelf
The authors of 2 randomized controlled trials we identified found that compared to no peer support, peer support may improve youth's attitudes toward disclosure ...
[119]
The effectiveness of peer support from a person with lived ... - NIH
Mar 24, 2023 · The peer support group demonstrated a greater reduction in depression scores compared to TAU, but not significantly different to CBT, suggesting ...
[120]
Effectiveness of online social support interventions for psychological ...
Sep 10, 2025 · This three-level meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessed the effectiveness of online social support interventions in ...