Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Altruism

Altruism denotes behavior or motivation directed toward benefiting others, often involving a net cost to the actor's own welfare or resources, without expectation of equivalent reciprocal benefit.^[1] The concept, formalized in the 19th century by philosopher Auguste Comte as altruisme—derived from the Latin alteri meaning "to the other"—contrasts with egoism by prioritizing others' interests.^[2]^[1] Philosophical inquiry into altruism grapples with whether genuine self-sacrifice exists or if all ostensibly altruistic acts stem from underlying self-interest, as argued in psychological egoism, which posits that ultimate motivations invariably serve the actor's desires for personal satisfaction or avoidance of discomfort.^[3] Empirical psychological research yields inconclusive results: while experiments reveal empathy-induced helping that persists even when self-benefits like reputation are minimized, critics contend such actions still yield intrinsic rewards, undermining claims of pure altruism.^[3]^[4] From an evolutionary standpoint, biological altruism—defined by fitness costs to the actor and benefits to recipients—evolves not through individual selflessness but via gene-level mechanisms like kin selection, where Hamilton's rule (rb > c, with r as relatedness, b benefit, and c cost) predicts aiding genetic relatives propagates shared genes, or reciprocal exchanges that yield long-term mutual gains.^[5]^[6] These frameworks reveal that apparent altruism often aligns with causal self-propagation at the genetic level, challenging intuitive notions of boundless other-regard.^[5] Contemporary applications, such as the effective altruism initiative, seek to quantify and optimize prosocial impacts using data-driven analysis, though debates persist over measurement validity and unintended consequences of utilitarian prioritization.^[7]

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Historical Origins

Altruism denotes behavior or a motivational state directed toward increasing the welfare of one or more other individuals, typically at some cost or risk to oneself, where the ultimate aim is the benefit to the recipient rather than indirect self-gain such as reputation or reciprocity.^[1] This contrasts with egoistic actions, where the primary goal remains personal advantage, even if others incidentally benefit.^[1] Philosophers distinguish effective altruism—measured by tangible outcomes—from pure motivational altruism, which emphasizes intent independent of results.^[1] The term "altruism" was coined by French philosopher Auguste Comte around 1851–1852 in his Système de politique positive, deriving from the Italian altrui ("of others" or "someone else"), rooted in Latin alter ("other").^[2]^[8] Comte positioned altruism as the foundational principle of his positivist "Religion of Humanity," advocating systematic devotion to others' good as a counter to egoism and theological individualism, grounded in observed social instincts like maternal care.^[9] He viewed it as essential for societal order, influencing later ethical and sociological debates by framing morality as collective over individual interest.^[8] Preceding Comte, concepts akin to altruistic concern emerged in ancient philosophy, though without the modern emphasis on self-sacrifice as a supreme duty. Aristotle, in Nicomachean Ethics (circa 350 BCE), described friendship (philia) in its highest form as desiring and acting for the friend's good for their own sake, yet integrated with self-love and mutual eudaimonia (flourishing), rejecting pure self-abnegation.^[1] Plato similarly explored other-regard in dialogues like the Symposium, linking it to eros and communal harmony, but subordinated to the soul's pursuit of the good.^[10] These ideas influenced medieval Christian notions of caritas (charity), as in Thomas Aquinas's synthesis of Aristotelian virtue with agapeic love, prioritizing divine and neighborly benevolence without the secular, anti-egoistic framing Comte later systematized.

Philosophical Skepticism: Psychological Egoism and the Debate over True Altruism

Psychological egoism posits that all human actions are ultimately motivated by self-interest, such that even apparently altruistic behaviors serve the agent's own welfare, whether through pleasure, avoidance of pain, reputation, or other personal gains.^[11] This descriptive theory, distinct from ethical egoism which prescribes self-interest as morally right, traces roots to thinkers like Thomas Hobbes, who in Leviathan (1651) described humans as driven by appetites and aversions aimed at personal preservation and power, implying actions arise from what one perceives as beneficial to oneself.^[12] Proponents argue that benevolence reduces to self-regard, as aiding others yields indirect benefits like social approval or emotional satisfaction, rendering pure other-directed motivation illusory.^[11] Critics contend that psychological egoism commits fallacies, such as conflating the causes of actions with their motives or assuming all desires must trace to self-benefit without evidence.^[11] Joseph Butler, in his Fifteen Sermons Preached at the Rolls Chapel (1726), distinguished particular passions—like benevolence toward specific individuals—from the general appetite of self-love, arguing that the former can operate independently and that reducing all to egoism leads to absurdity, as it would equate unrelated drives like hunger with self-preservation.^[13] David Hume further dismantled strict egoism in A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–1740) and An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals (1751), positing sympathy as a natural mechanism producing disinterested concern for others' happiness, independent of personal utility, and critiquing Hobbes for overlooking evidence of genuine benevolence in everyday sympathies that oppose pure self-love.^[14] These arguments highlight that egoism's tautological reformulation—claiming any apparent altruism secretly serves the self—lacks falsifiability and ignores cases where agents act against their interests, such as self-sacrifice without prospect of reward.^[11] The debate over true altruism hinges on whether motivations can be purely other-regarding, free from self-interested contaminants. Psychological egoism denies this, interpreting all actions through a self-benefit lens, but empirical and conceptual challenges undermine it: for instance, studies on relational desires suggest agents can prioritize others' welfare intrinsically, as in parental care or anonymous donations where no personal gain is evident or anticipated.^[15] Philosophers like Joel Feinberg (1958) exposed egoism's arguments as non-empirical and circular, failing to prove that desires for others' good are mere means to one's own rather than ends in themselves.^[11] While some evolutionary accounts align with egoism by framing apparent altruism as kin or reciprocal self-interest, they do not preclude genuine cases, and psychological egoism remains philosophically contested without robust empirical vindication, as self-reports and behavioral data often reveal motivations blending but not reducible to egoism.^[15] Thus, true altruism—action motivated solely by concern for another's sake—appears defensible against egoist skepticism when motives are analyzed independently of outcomes.^[11]

Biological and Evolutionary Perspectives

Evolutionary Explanations and Challenges

Kin selection, formalized by W. D. Hamilton in 1964, posits that altruism evolves when the genetic relatedness between actor and recipient, multiplied by the fitness benefit to the recipient, exceeds the fitness cost to the actor, as expressed in Hamilton's rule: r b > c, where r is relatedness, b is benefit, and c is cost.^[16] This mechanism explains behaviors like alarm calls in ground squirrels or eusociality in hymenopteran insects, where workers sacrifice reproduction to aid close kin, thereby propagating shared genes indirectly.^[5] Empirical support includes observations in Belding's ground squirrels, where females, with higher relatedness to nearby kin due to philopatry, emit alarm calls more frequently than males.^[16] Reciprocal altruism, proposed by Robert Trivers in 1971, accounts for cooperation among unrelated individuals through repeated interactions where initial costly help is repaid later, provided mechanisms like memory, recognition, and punishment of cheaters prevent exploitation.^[17] Preconditions include long lifespans, low dispersal, and the ability to detect non-reciprocators, as seen in vampire bat blood-sharing or grooming in primates, where partners exchange aid proportionally to past contributions.^[18] Game-theoretic models, such as the prisoner's dilemma iterated over time, demonstrate how reciprocity stabilizes cooperation, with strategies like tit-for-tat outperforming pure selfishness or altruism in simulations.^[19] Group or multilevel selection offers an alternative, arguing that altruism spreads if groups with more altruists outcompete selfish groups, even if altruists fare worse within groups, as defended by Elliott Sober and David Sloan Wilson in their 1998 book Unto Others.^[20] Proponents cite microbial experiments where cooperative strains dominate in structured environments and human tribal warfare hypotheses where cooperative groups historically prevailed.^[21] However, this view remains contentious, with critics like Richard Dawkins contending that between-group benefits are swamped by within-group selection favoring free-riders unless migration is negligible and group extinction rates high.^[5] Challenges to these explanations center on the free-rider problem, where selfish individuals reap benefits without costs, eroding altruism via individual-level selection; in large, unstructured populations, reciprocal systems collapse without costly enforcement like altruistic punishment.^[22] Kin selection applies narrowly to relatives, failing to explain broad human altruism toward strangers, while reciprocity demands improbable cognitive sophistication in non-social species and breaks down with anonymous or one-shot interactions.^[5] Group selection faces empirical hurdles, as field studies often attribute apparent group benefits to kin or reciprocity, and theoretical models show altruism requires implausibly strong group-level forces to overcome individual defection.^[20] Altruistic punishment, which imposes costs on free-riders to sustain cooperation, evolves under group selection but demands second-order altruism, complicating causal chains.^[23] These issues highlight that while inclusive fitness frameworks explain much observed altruism, unexplained variance persists, particularly in humans where cultural evolution amplifies genetic predispositions.^[24]

Genetic Influences and Neurobiological Correlates

Twin studies indicate that altruism and related prosocial behaviors exhibit moderate to high heritability, with estimates ranging from 30% to 50% based on analyses of monozygotic and dizygotic twins.^[25] ^[26] For instance, a study of over 500 twin pairs using questionnaires on altruism, empathy, and nurturance found heritability around 50%, consistent with additive genetic influences explaining a substantial portion of variance after accounting for shared environment.^[27] These findings persist across self-report and behavioral measures, though estimates can vary due to measurement specificity and potential overestimation from untested assumptions in twin models, such as equal environments for identical versus fraternal twins.^[28] Candidate gene studies have identified polymorphisms in genes related to social neuropeptides and neurotransmission as potential contributors to individual differences in altruism. The oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) rs53576 variant, for example, correlates with prosocial traits like empathy and generosity, with the G allele linked to higher maternal sensitivity and trust behavior in economic games.^[29] ^[30] Similarly, the COMT Val158Met polymorphism influences dopamine catabolism, where the Val allele—associated with faster breakdown—is tied to greater altruism in donation tasks, possibly via enhanced reward processing for prosocial acts.^[31] However, these associations are modest, often require replication, and interact with environmental factors, underscoring that genetic effects on complex traits like altruism likely involve polygenic influences rather than single variants.^[32] Neuroimaging research reveals that altruistic decisions engage regions implicated in reward valuation, empathy, and social cognition. Functional MRI studies show increased activation in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) during choices to benefit others, particularly when predicting recipients' emotional responses, suggesting altruism partly stems from vicarious reward processing.^[33] ^[34] Meta-analyses of fMRI data from over 2,800 participants confirm consistent involvement of the nucleus accumbens and striatum in altruistic giving, differentiating it from strategic prosociality by stronger limbic reward signals.^[35] ^[36] The neuropeptide oxytocin modulates these neural processes, promoting prosocial tendencies through enhanced empathy and trust, as evidenced by intranasal administration increasing donations in economic paradigms.^[37] Yet, empirical findings highlight context-dependency: oxytocin boosts in-group favoritism and social altruism but can reduce ecological responsibility or amplify self-serving biases in competitive settings.^[38] ^[39] These effects align with oxytocin's role in amplifying theory-of-mind activations, facilitating altruistic punishment or cooperation, though outcomes vary by individual genetics like OXTR variants.^[40] Overall, neurobiological correlates underscore altruism as an emergent property of integrated genetic, hormonal, and cortical systems, rather than isolated mechanisms.

Psychological and Sociological Perspectives

Psychological Mechanisms of Altruistic Behavior

Empathic concern, an other-oriented emotional response to perceived need in another person, has been proposed as a primary mechanism driving altruistic motivation. According to the empathy-altruism hypothesis developed by C. Daniel Batson, this form of empathy produces a motivational state aimed at benefiting the recipient for their sake, rather than solely reducing the empathizer's own distress.^[41] Experimental paradigms, such as those inducing empathy via perspective-taking instructions followed by opportunities to help or escape, demonstrate that participants experiencing high empathy continue to aid victims even when easy escape eliminates personal aversive arousal, contradicting pure egoistic accounts.^[42] Meta-analyses of such studies affirm a positive link between empathy and altruistic behavior, with effect sizes indicating empathy's role in motivating costly help beyond self-interest.^[43] Alternative egoistic mechanisms, however, explain some prosocial actions through self-benefit maximization. The negative-state relief model posits that observing suffering arouses distress, prompting help as a means to alleviate one's own negative affect, as evidenced by increased helping when personal mood improvement is accessible.^[3] Reciprocal altruism operates via conditional cooperation, where individuals provide aid expecting future repayment, supported by observations in economic games where cooperation persists under iterated interactions but declines in one-shot anonymity.^[44] These mechanisms align with evolutionary pressures favoring indirect fitness gains, though they fall short of explaining non-reciprocal, high-cost helping observed in empathy manipulations.^[45] Developmentally, altruistic tendencies emerge early but remain selective and context-dependent. Infants as young as 19 months exhibit spontaneous helping behaviors, such as handing desired objects to adults, independent of external rewards, suggesting innate prosocial predispositions shaped by social experience.^[46] By preschool age, children show increased instrumental helping linked to emotional responsiveness to others' fear cues, though motivations blend egoistic elements like affiliation desires with emerging empathy.^[47] Longitudinal data indicate altruism strengthens with cognitive maturation, including theory-of-mind development, enabling perspective-taking that enhances empathic accuracy and helping intent.^[48] Acute stress can amplify altruism in school-aged children via autonomic arousal, but early behaviors favor familiar or previously kind individuals, challenging notions of indiscriminate benevolence.^[49]^[50] Inhibitory psychological processes further modulate altruism, particularly in group settings. The bystander effect demonstrates reduced individual helping probability as group size increases, attributed to diffusion of responsibility—where observers assume others will intervene—and pluralistic ignorance, misinterpreting inaction as non-emergency signals.^[51] Field and lab studies, including post-1964 Kitty Genovese analyses, quantify this: in pairs, helping rates exceed 60%, dropping below 20% in crowds of six or more.^[52] Embarrassment aversion and audience inhibition exacerbate non-intervention, with trait embarrassability predicting lower help in public scenarios.^[53] These mechanisms highlight altruism's sensitivity to perceptual and social cues, often overriding motivational drives under ambiguity or evaluation apprehension.^[54]

Sociological Patterns and Cultural Variations

Sociological patterns of altruism reveal systematic variations tied to social structures and demographics. In urban environments, helping behaviors toward strangers are less frequent than in rural areas, as evidenced by a meta-analysis of 65 studies showing a small but significant effect where rural residents exhibit higher rates of prosocial actions, attributable to greater interpersonal familiarity and lower diffusion of responsibility.^[55] Socioeconomic status influences the form rather than the incidence of altruism; higher-SES individuals donate larger absolute amounts to charities, while lower-SES groups often allocate a greater proportion of income to informal aid within networks, reflecting resource constraints and immediate community needs.^[56] Gender differences persist across contexts, with women demonstrating higher altruism in low-cost scenarios like dictator games, where they allocate more to recipients when the "price" of giving is minimal, though men may exceed women in high-stakes or competitive settings.^[57] Cultural variations in altruism manifest prominently in the targets and motivations of prosocial acts. Individualistic cultures, prevalent in Western societies, prioritize helping unrelated strangers and anonymous donations, whereas collectivist cultures in Asia emphasize aid to kin and in-groups to maintain relational harmony; empirical cross-cultural experiments confirm this, with individualistic participants showing greater stranger-directed generosity in economic games.^[58] A study across 23 large cities worldwide found stark differences in spontaneous helping, such as assisting with a dropped object or directions, ranging from 93% in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to 40% in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, with higher rates in smaller, slower-paced locales and cultures valuing interpersonal responsiveness.^[59] Religion emerges as a pivotal cultural driver, with intrinsic religiosity positively correlating with altruism across diverse samples, and religious individuals 25 percentage points more likely to donate than secular counterparts; cross-national data link higher charitable giving to predominantly Christian or religiously observant societies, independent of economic development.^[60]^[61]^[56] These patterns underscore how altruism adapts to societal incentives: reputation and reciprocity amplify it in cohesive groups, while anonymity in diverse or secular settings diminishes stranger aid, challenging universalist assumptions of prosociality.^[62]

Religious and Ethical Frameworks

Altruism in Major Religions

In Christianity, altruism manifests through commandments to love one's neighbor as oneself (Matthew 22:39) and care for the poor, widows, and orphans, as instructed in James 1:27, reflecting Jesus' model of selfless service such as healing the sick and feeding multitudes without expectation of reciprocity.^[63] These teachings frame giving as an imitation of divine agape love, distinct from mere reciprocity, though early church practices like communal sharing in Acts 2:44-45 integrated mutual aid with eschatological motivations.^[64] Judaism emphasizes tzedakah, derived from the root for "justice" or "righteousness," as an obligatory act of providing for the needy to uphold social order, with the Torah mandating leaving gleanings for the poor (Leviticus 19:9-10) and medieval scholar Maimonides ranking eight levels of giving, prioritizing anonymous aid that enables self-sufficiency.^[65] Unlike voluntary philanthropy, tzedakah is framed as a covenantal duty correcting economic imbalances, with rabbinic texts like the Mishnah (Pe'ah 1:1) specifying tithes equivalent to 10% of produce for communal welfare.^[66] In Islam, zakat constitutes one of the Five Pillars, requiring able Muslims to donate 2.5% of accumulated wealth annually to specified categories including the poor and debtors, as prescribed in Quran 9:60, functioning as both purification of assets and systemic redistribution to foster equity.^[67] This obligatory altruism extends to voluntary sadaqah, with prophetic traditions (hadith) like Sahih Bukhari 2:24:486 urging giving to mitigate divine reckoning, though empirical studies link zakat compliance to heightened workplace altruism among payers.^[68] Buddhism promotes dana, the virtue of generosity, as the first of the ten paramitas (perfections) essential for bodhisattva enlightenment, involving selfless giving of material aid, teachings, or fearlessness to cultivate non-attachment and merit, as detailed in the Anguttara Nikaya's enumeration of recipients from monastics to all beings.^[69] This practice counters greed (lobha) through intentional renunciation, with Theravada texts emphasizing dana's role in karmic progression without inherent expectation of immediate return, though it accrues positive rebirth outcomes.^[70] Hinduism integrates dana as a core dharma (duty), encompassing gifts to Brahmins, guests, and the destitute outlined in texts like the Manusmriti (4:226-231), which prescribes graduated giving based on capacity and recipient status to accrue punya (merit) and avert sin.^[71] Vedic rituals and epics such as the Mahabharata portray dana as balancing self-interest with cosmic order (rita), often tied to varna-specific obligations, while bhakti traditions extend it to universal compassion akin to ahimsa.^[72] Across these faiths, doctrines encourage prosocial acts like charity and aid, yet often embed them in frameworks of divine reciprocity or karmic causality, prompting scholarly debate on whether such motivations undermine purely selfless intent compared to secular altruism.^[73] Empirical analyses of Abrahamic versus Indic traditions reveal shared emphases on in-group solidarity but divergent scopes, with monotheistic faiths prioritizing justice-oriented redistribution and dharmic ones focusing on detachment from outcomes.^[74]

Ethical Theories Balancing Altruism and Self-Interest

Aristotle's virtue ethics provides a foundational framework for reconciling altruism with self-interest by conceptualizing generosity (eleutheriotēs) as the mean between the vices of prodigality and stinginess, where the virtuous agent gives resources proportionate to their means and the recipient's merit, thereby fostering personal flourishing (eudaimonia).^[75] In the Nicomachean Ethics (circa 350 BCE), Aristotle argues that such balanced giving benefits the recipient while enabling the giver to achieve rational activity in accordance with virtue, which constitutes true happiness rather than mere pleasure or external goods.^[76] This approach avoids pure self-sacrifice by tying altruistic acts to the agent's character development, as excessive giving depletes resources needed for self-maintenance, while withholding harms communal bonds essential for human thriving.^[77] Stoic philosophy similarly harmonizes altruism and self-interest by equating virtue— including justice toward others—with the sole intrinsic good, rendering aid to fellow humans a rational extension of one's own welfare rather than a sacrifice. Epictetus (circa 50–135 CE) and Marcus Aurelius (121–180 CE) emphasized that cosmopolitan duties, such as benefiting society, align with personal tranquility because humans are inherently social and interdependent, making isolation or indifference detrimental to inner peace.^[78] Marcus Aurelius, in Meditations (written circa 170–180 CE), instructs that viewing others' advancement as akin to one's own promotes mutual progress without emotional entanglement, as the Stoic sage pursues virtue for its own sake, which inherently satisfies self-regard.^[79] Empirical alignment is evident in Stoic practices like premeditatio malorum, which prepares individuals for communal resilience, suggesting that altruistic restraint from passion serves long-term self-preservation.^[80] Adam Smith's moral sentimentalism in The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759) bridges self-interest and altruism through the mechanism of sympathy, whereby individuals imaginatively adopt others' perspectives to approve actions that harmonize personal gain with impartial judgment.^[81] Smith posits that self-interest, moderated by the "impartial spectator," generates benevolent outcomes, as pursuing one's advantage while considering social approbation fosters reciprocity and mutual benefit, evidenced by his observation that even self-regarding trades underpin commercial societies' prosperity.^[82] This contrasts with reductive egoism by integrating other-directed concern as a natural sentiment that refines self-love, avoiding the instability of unchecked altruism; for instance, Smith notes that excessive self-denial invites resentment, while sympathy ensures balanced propriety in conduct.^[83] The concept of enlightened self-interest, articulated in ethical discourse since the 18th century, further illustrates this balance by asserting that advancing others' welfare strategically enhances one's long-term prospects, as in cooperative exchanges where reciprocity yields sustained gains over isolated pursuit.^[84] Proponents, drawing from Smithian influences, argue this avoids the pitfalls of naive altruism—such as exploitation—by grounding aid in rational foresight, supported by game-theoretic models showing iterated Prisoner's Dilemmas favor cooperative strategies for mutual utility maximization.^[85] Unlike psychological egoism, which denies genuine altruism, enlightened self-interest accommodates empirical instances of voluntary sacrifice when causally linked to reciprocal social structures, as seen in professional ethics where patient prioritization yields reputational and communal returns.^[86]

Modern Manifestations

Effective Altruism: Origins, Methods, and Recent Controversies

Effective altruism (EA) originated in the late 2000s as a convergence of philosophical utilitarianism, rationalist communities, and evidence-based philanthropy, drawing intellectual foundations from Peter Singer's 1972 essay "Famine, Affluence, and Morality," which argued for strong moral obligations to aid distant strangers based on capacity to help. The modern movement crystallized between 2007 and 2012, with GiveWell founded in 2007 by Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld to evaluate charities via rigorous cost-effectiveness analysis, followed by Giving What We Can in 2009 by Toby Ord to promote long-term commitments to donate a portion of income to high-impact causes. The term "effective altruism" was coined in 2011, coinciding with the launch of 80,000 Hours by William MacAskill and others to guide career choices for maximum social impact.^[87] By 2012, these efforts formalized into a broader community emphasizing quantitative evaluation over intuitive giving.^[88] EA's methods center on impartial altruism, prioritizing interventions that maximize expected well-being across all sentient beings regardless of proximity or identity, guided by principles like cause neutrality—allocating resources to the highest-impact areas rather than fixed causes—and scope sensitivity, where scale of potential benefit (e.g., lives saved) outweighs smaller-scale efforts.^[7] Practitioners employ evidence-based tools such as randomized controlled trials, epidemiological data, and expected value calculations to assess cost-effectiveness; for instance, GiveWell recommends charities like the Against Malaria Foundation, estimating it averts a death for approximately $3,500–$5,000 in net costs due to bed net distribution preventing mosquito-borne transmission. Counterfactual reasoning evaluates opportunity costs, while "earning to give" encourages high-income careers to fund interventions, and organizations like the Open Philanthropy Project (founded 2014) apply these to grantmaking, directing billions toward global health, animal welfare, and existential risks like pandemics or artificial general intelligence misalignment. Longtermism, a prominent strand, extends these methods to safeguard humanity's long-term potential, arguing that influencing future trillions outweighs near-term gains.^[89] Recent controversies intensified after the November 2022 collapse of FTX, the cryptocurrency exchange founded by Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), a prominent EA proponent who pledged over 99% of his wealth via the Giving Pledge and donated tens of millions to EA causes, including $160 million to the FTX Future Fund for AI safety and biosecurity.^[90] Investigations revealed SBF's fraud, misusing $8 billion in customer deposits to prop up Alameda Research, leading to his conviction on seven counts of fraud and conspiracy in November 2023 and a 25-year sentence in March 2024; this exposed risks in EA's "earning to give" model, as SBF justified high-risk trading as a means to amass funds for altruism, though community leaders like MacAskill had received warnings about his ethics since 2018 but continued associations.^[91]^[92] The scandal eroded trust, with $400 million in EA-aligned funding lost and critiques that the movement's utilitarian calculus overlooked human frailties like greed, fostering over-reliance on unproven tech billionaires.^[93] Post-FTX scrutiny extended to EA's prioritization of speculative longtermist causes, such as AI risks, accused of diverting resources from immediate poverty alleviation; critics like Émile Torres argued this reflects a "moral myopia" favoring abstract futures over present suffering, while internal debates erupted over "effective accelerationism" (e/acc), a 2023 splinter advocating unchecked AI development against EA's safety focus.^[94] By 2024, reputational damage persisted amid broader philosophical challenges, including charges of elitism in decision-making concentrated among tech donors and philosophers, though EA organizations reported continued growth in evaluations and donations exceeding $1 billion annually pre-collapse.^[95] Despite these, empirical evaluations like GiveWell's persisted, recommending $700 million in grants in 2023 based on unchanged methodologies.

Digital Altruism and Online Behaviors

Digital altruism refers to prosocial actions facilitated by digital technologies, such as social media platforms, crowdfunding sites, and online search tools, where individuals extend help to others at minimal personal cost.^[96] This form emerged prominently with the rise of the internet in the early 2000s, enabling behaviors like sharing charitable appeals, donating via digital wallets, and participating in viral campaigns for causes.^[97] Research distinguishes three categories: everyday digital altruism, characterized by low-effort actions like using charity-linked search engines (e.g., Goodsearch, which donates a portion of ad revenue to user-selected nonprofits); creative digital altruism, involving innovative content creation such as awareness videos; and collaborative digital altruism, where groups coordinate via platforms like Reddit or Twitter for collective aid.^[96] Online behaviors exhibiting altruism include crowdfunding contributions, which raised approximately $30 billion globally on platforms like GoFundMe from its inception through 2023, often for individual emergencies or community needs.^[98] In the U.S., online donations constituted a growing share of total charitable giving, with Americans contributing $557.16 billion overall in 2023, including a notable portion via digital channels that accounted for about 9.5% of funds in prior years like 2018 (equating to roughly $37 billion then, with trends indicating sustained growth). Empirical studies on platforms reveal that 21% of online donations in a dataset exceeding $44 million were made anonymously, suggesting motivations beyond public recognition, though anonymity rates varied by cause visibility.^[99] Prosocial video games and social media interactions have also been linked to increased digital helping, with research showing reduced aggressive tendencies and heightened empathy in users exposed to cooperative online environments.^[100] However, digital altruism often faces scrutiny for superficiality, as low-cost actions like liking or sharing posts may substitute for substantive engagement, a phenomenon termed slacktivism. Empirical evidence on slacktivism is mixed: some field experiments indicate that public online endorsements can decrease subsequent donations or offline participation due to satisfied efficacy perceptions, supporting a slacktivism effect in contexts like cause-related petitions.^[101] Conversely, other studies find no consistent hindrance, with online activism sometimes amplifying real-world mobilization, particularly when perceived power dynamics favor collective impact over individual effort.^[102]^[103] For instance, video fundraising campaigns for organizations like Save the Children boosted donation revenue and frequency both during and for weeks after the effort, countering pure slacktivism claims.^[104] These findings underscore causal complexities, where digital tools lower barriers to entry but may not always translate to sustained, high-cost altruism without additional motivators like empathy or social accountability.

Extreme and Pathological Altruism

Pathological altruism refers to behaviors motivated by a sincere intent to benefit others but which result in harm to the recipient, the altruist, or both, often due to incomplete understanding of consequences or overgeneralized empathy.^[105] This concept, introduced by Barbara Oakley in her 2012 edited volume, encompasses actions where the pursuit of welfare promotion backfires, such as enabling addictive behaviors through repeated financial support that prolongs dependency rather than fostering recovery.^[106] Empirical analyses link it to mechanisms like altruism bias, where limited cognitive access to long-term outcomes leads to interventions that exacerbate problems, as seen in cases of codependency where one party's sacrifices reinforce the other's dysfunction without resolution.^[105]^[107] Extreme altruism, by contrast, involves prosocial acts that exceed typical norms, such as anonymous organ donation to strangers, which research associates with atypical neural responses, including reduced amygdala reactivity that diminishes fear of personal harm.^[108] Studies of such donors reveal motivations rooted in heightened empathy and lower self-preservation instincts, potentially linked to genetic or developmental factors influencing brain structure.^[109] However, when extreme acts cross into self-neglect, they can manifest pathologically; for instance, chronic over-helping in caregiving professions correlates with burnout and secondary trauma, as measured in nurses exhibiting "helper syndrome," where compulsive aid leads to personal health deterioration without proportional recipient gains.^[110] Causal effects of such altruism include perpetuated harm through moral hazard, where recipients anticipate rescue and reduce self-effort, as evidenced in familial enabling of substance abuse that delays rehabilitation.^[111] Quantitatively, scales assessing pathological tendencies show positive associations with agreeableness extremes and negative outcomes like increased anxiety in high-altruism individuals unable to set boundaries.^[112] In broader contexts, ideological applications—such as policies prioritizing immediate relief over structural incentives—have been critiqued for fostering dependency cycles, though individual-level studies emphasize psychological roots over systemic ones.^[105] These patterns underscore that unchecked altruism can undermine adaptive self-interest, prioritizing subjective good intentions over verifiable welfare improvements.^[113]

Criticisms and Empirical Realities

Evidence Against Pure Altruism

Empirical research in evolutionary biology indicates that behaviors classified as altruistic typically confer indirect benefits to the actor's genetic fitness rather than arising from motivation independent of self-interest. Kin selection theory, formalized by Hamilton in 1964, posits that individuals preferentially aid relatives to propagate shared genes, satisfying the condition rB > C where r is genetic relatedness, B the benefit to the recipient, and C the cost to the actor; this mechanism explains apparent self-sacrifice as an extension of self-preservation at the genetic level.^[18] Reciprocal altruism, as modeled by Trivers in 1971, further accounts for cooperation among non-relatives through expected future returns, underscoring that such acts hinge on anticipated personal gains rather than pure other-regard.^[114] Psychological experiments challenge claims of motivation solely to enhance others' welfare, supporting egoistic interpretations where helping reduces the actor's aversive states like empathic distress or guilt. In tests of Batson's empathy-altruism hypothesis, which asserts that empathy induces ultimate concern for the victim's welfare independent of self-relief, subjects often helped even when alternatives to escape distress existed; however, critics demonstrate that residual negative affect or self-image maintenance—egoistic drivers—persistently explain outcomes across paradigms, including those manipulating observability and escape options.^[115] Recent experiments reinforce psychological egoism by showing that seemingly prosocial choices, such as donations, correlate with personal mood elevation or avoidance of self-disapproval, even when anonymized to eliminate reputational incentives.^[116] Neuroimaging studies reveal that prosocial decisions activate brain regions associated with self-reward, such as the ventral striatum, mirroring responses to personal gains and suggesting intrinsic hedonic benefits undermine purity of intent.^[34] Economic field experiments on charitable giving similarly reject pure altruism, finding that donations exhibit "impure" motives like warm-glow utility—direct psychological satisfaction for the donor—evident in how contributions respond to personal tax incentives and decline without them, rather than scaling solely with recipient need.^[117] Anonymity manipulations in laboratory settings, such as dictator games, further show reduced transfers when self-interest cannot signal virtue or fairness, indicating social approval as a core driver.^[118]

Unintended Consequences and Causal Realities

Altruistic interventions, while motivated by benevolent intent, frequently yield unintended negative outcomes through mechanisms such as moral hazard, dependency reinforcement, and resource misallocation. In personal contexts, pathological altruism manifests when caregiving behaviors inadvertently perpetuate harm to recipients or exhaust the altruist, as seen in codependent relationships where enabling addiction or dysfunction delays recovery and fosters long-term reliance.^[119] Empirical analyses indicate that such patterns arise from empathy-driven actions that overlook causal feedback loops, leading to evolutionarily maladaptive results like sustained victimhood or altruist burnout.^[113] At the societal level, welfare programs designed to combat poverty can disincentivize self-sufficiency by creating intergenerational dependency. A study of Danish administrative data from 1991–2007 found that increases in welfare payments reduced employment among unmarried childless youths by altering labor market participation incentives, with effects persisting into adulthood.^[120] Similarly, cross-national evidence reveals that parental welfare receipt predicts child welfare use, amplifying dependency across generations via learned behaviors and economic disincentives rather than mere correlation.^[121] These dynamics illustrate how short-term relief undermines long-term capability development, as benefits structured without work requirements elevate effective marginal tax rates on earned income, trapping recipients in subsidized idleness.^[122] Foreign aid exemplifies macro-scale causal pitfalls, where altruistic resource transfers often bolster corrupt regimes and stifle local initiative. Research on aid inflows to conflict zones shows that untargeted assistance can finance political violence by providing rebels or governments with fungible funds, exacerbating instability rather than resolving it.^[123] In sub-Saharan Africa, aid dependency has been linked to governance erosion, with inflows exceeding 10% of GDP correlating with diminished tax collection efforts and entrenched patronage networks, per analyses of post-colonial data.^[124] Such outcomes stem from donors' failure to account for recipient-side incentives, where aid substitutes for domestic accountability, perpetuating underdevelopment cycles despite trillions disbursed since 1960.^[125]

References

[1]
Altruism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Aug 25, 2016 · Behavior is normally described as altruistic when it is motivated by a desire to benefit someone other than oneself for that person's sake.
[2]
Altruism - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating from French altruisme (1830) by Auguste Comte, altruism means unselfishness and devotion to others, derived from Latin alteri meaning "other."Missing: philosophy | Show results with:philosophy
[3]
Empirical Approaches to Altruism
Jan 6, 2020 · [A]ltruism need not be reduced to its opposition to egoism. In this chapter, altruism is discussed as a psychological basis for moral conduct ...Defining “Egoism” and... · The Egoism vs. Altruism... · Developmental and...
[4]
Psychological Egoism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
As we have seen (§1b), psychological egoism needn't hold that all our ultimate desires are selfish. But Feinberg's point is that we need to know what would ...Philosophical Arguments For... · Philosophical Arguments... · Biology and Egoism
[5]
Biological Altruism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jun 3, 2003 · Kin selection theory predicts that animals are more likely to behave altruistically towards their relatives than towards unrelated members of ...
[6]
Kin selection and altruism - ScienceDirect.com
Jun 3, 2019 · Although high relatedness favors altruism, potential conflicts persist in kin groups because group members are not genetically identical and may ...
[7]
What is effective altruism? | Effective Altruism
Effective altruism is the project of trying to find the best ways of helping others, and putting them into practice. We can roughly break the project of ...
[8]
Auguste Comte - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Oct 1, 2008 · Like the word 'sociology', the word 'altruism' was coined by Comte. ... –––, 2009, Auguste Comte and John Stuart Mill on Sexual Equality: ...Biography · The Formative Years: The... · The System of Positive Polity...
[9]
Demeure, B. (2020). Auguste Comte coined the word altruism
According to Auguste Comte, it arises from the “proven fact” of selfless maternal love. It is averse to egoism, and later, in Comte's philosophy, sexuality. It ...
[10]
Julia Annas, Plato and Aristotle on friendship and altruism - PhilPapers
Plato and Aristotle on friendship and altruism · Julia Annas · Mind 86 (344):532 ... Plato: Ethics, Misc in Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy · Plato ...
[11]
[PDF] Feinberg Psychological Egoism copy 2 - FIU MyWeb
No psychological egoist denies that people sometimes do desire things other than their own welfare-the happiness of other people, for example; but all ...
[12]
[PDF] PSYCHOLOGICAL EGOISM AND HOBBES
Many commentators think that Hobbes was committed to psychological egoism. Psy- chological egoism is a theory of human psychology claiming that all human ...
[13]
Butler's Argument Against Psychological Hedonism
I should clarify that in the short exposition of this section I do not mean to imply that Butler equates psychological hedonism with psychological egoism.
[14]
[PDF] Hume's Decisive Turn Away from Egoism
Nov 3, 2021 · The Treatise itself displays an awareness that egoism is not the whole story, and much of Hume's later case against it builds on points already.
[15]
[PDF] Relational Desires and Empirical Evidence against Psychological ...
The (psychological) egoism-altruism debate is a difficult one to settle. Consider a hypothetical case. Suppose Omar helps Kima, a complete stranger, by. Page ...
[16]
How Does Social Behavior Evolve? | Learn Science at Scitable
According to Hamilton's rule, altruism is favored when the benefits (B) of the altruistic act to the recipient, multiplied by the relatedness (r) to the actor, ...
[17]
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism | The Quarterly Review of Biology
Regarding human reciprocal altruism, it is shown that the details of the psychological system that regulates this altruism can be explained by the model.
[18]
A simple and general explanation for the evolution of altruism - PMC
The evolution of altruism poses a problem in evolutionary theory: how can natural selection favour individuals that carry helping traits, over those that carry ...
[19]
Evolution of Cooperation: Combining Kin Selection and Reciprocal ...
May 22, 2013 · We show how kin selection and reciprocal altruism can promote cooperation in diverse 2×2 matrix games (prisoner's dilemma, snowdrift, and hawk-dove).<|separator|>
[20]
Altruism and Group Selection | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Darwin suggests several mechanisms within a single group to explain the puzzle of the evolution of altruism – such as reciprocal reward and punishment – that ...
[21]
Eight Criticisms Not to Make About Group Selection - PMC - NIH
Groups with more altruists robustly outcompete groups with more selfish individuals, which can counterbalance the selective disadvantage of altruism within ...Missing: debate | Show results with:debate
[22]
The Free Rider Problem - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jul 4, 2025 · The free rider problem occurs when individuals have an incentive not to contribute to a group good, as their benefit is mainly from others' ...
[23]
The evolution of altruistic punishment - PNAS
However, here we show that group selection can lead to the evolution of altruistic punishment in larger groups because the problem of deterring free riders in ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
[24]
The evolution of altruism and the serial rediscovery of the role of ...
Nov 2, 2020 · Altruistic alleles (or memes) therefore spread through genetic (or cultural) kin selection. The most commonly cited alternative mechanism to kin ...
[25]
Investigating the genetic basis of altruism: the role of the COMT ...
Oct 28, 2010 · Findings from twin studies yield heritability estimates of 0.50 for prosocial behaviours like empathy, cooperativeness and altruism.
[26]
Genetic and Environmental Structure of Altruism Characterized ... - NIH
Jun 8, 2021 · Twin studies sometimes reported the “ACE model” as the best fit model, in which about 50% of total variance is explained by the additive genetic ...
[27]
[PDF] Behavior genetics of prosocial behavior - UCLA Stress Lab
Early research on this topic asked over 500 pairs of MZ and DZ twins to answer questionnaires designed to assess altruism, empathy, and nurturance (Rushton,.
[28]
Twin studies with unmet assumptions are biased towards genetic ...
Aug 28, 2020 · Twin studies are particularly susceptible to overestimation of genetic and non-shared environmental influences.
[29]
A common allele in the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) impacts ...
A common variant (rs53576) in the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) has been implicated in social-behavioral phenotypes, such as maternal sensitivity and empathy.
[30]
Oxytocin Receptor Genetic Variation Promotes Human Trust Behavior
Results. The rs53576 SNP of the OXTR gene was specifically associated with trusting behavior rather than a general increase in risk or trustworthy behaviors.Missing: COMT | Show results with:COMT
[31]
the role of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism - Oxford Academic
Results indicate that the Val allele representing strong catabolism of dopamine is related to altruism. Keywords: altruism; COMT Val158Met; dopamine; prosocial ...
[32]
Investigating the genetic basis of altruism: the role of the COMT ...
Oct 28, 2010 · First genetic association studies have successfully linked polymorphisms of the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) and the vasopressin 1a ...
[33]
Response of Dorsomedial Prefrontal Cortex Predicts Altruistic ...
May 30, 2012 · Neuroimaging can provide positive evidence to support the hypothesis that altruism derives—at least in part—from the tendency to consider others ...
[34]
Altruistic behavior: mapping responses in the brain - PubMed Central
The tendency to engage in altruistic behaviors is associated with greater activity within limbic regions such as the nucleus accumbens and anterior cingulate ...
[35]
Decoding the altruistic brain: An ALE meta-analysis of the functional ...
This study explores the neural substrates of altruistic giving through an ALE meta-analysis of 65 fMRI studies with 2,803 participants.
[36]
A comparative fMRI meta-analysis of altruistic and strategic ...
Altruistic and strategic prosocial decisions are not interchangeable in the brain. •. Reward and social cognition regions differentiate altruistic and strategic ...
[37]
Oxytocin and the Neurobiology of Prosocial Behavior
Sep 26, 2020 · In this review, we provide a conceptual overview of the neurobiology of prosocial behavior with a focus on oxytocin's modulatory role in human prosociality.
[38]
The Neuropeptide Oxytocin Induces a Social Altruism Bias - PubMed
Nov 25, 2015 · We show that heightened oxytocin system activity induces a social altruism bias at the cost of ecological responsibility.
[39]
Oxytocin Facilitates Self-Serving Rather Than Altruistic Tendencies ...
While the neuropeptide oxytocin can facilitate empathy and altruistic behavior, it may also promote self-serving tendencies in some contexts.
[40]
The Effect of Oxytocin on Third-Party Altruistic Decisions in Unfair ...
Feb 2, 2016 · Our findings indicate that OXT enhances prosocial-relevant perception by increasing ToM-related neural activations.
[41]
The empathy—Altruism hypothesis. - APA PsycNet
Do we humans ever, in any degree, care about others for their sakes and not simply for our own? The empathy-altruism hypothesis offers an affirmative answer ...
[42]
[PDF] Is Empathic Emotion a Source of Altruistic Motivation?
This conception of altruism and of the distinction between it and egoism seem quite consistent not only with Auguste Comte's (1875) initial use of the term but ...Missing: coinage | Show results with:coinage
[43]
The empathy-altruism link revisited: a quantitative synthesis of ...
1) The Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis (Batson et al., 1991) posits that empathy evokes altruistic motivation, leading to selfless helping behavior.<|separator|>
[44]
Reciprocal Altruism - The Decision Lab
Reciprocal altruism occurs when an individual acts altruistically in hopes of equal-value repayment in the future.
[45]
[PDF] The psychology of reciprocal altruism Jeffrey R. Stevens and Juan F ...
Much of the data on reciprocal altruism involves correlations of altruistic behaviors between individuals.
[46]
Altruistic babies? Study shows infants are willing to give up food ...
Feb 4, 2020 · A new study by the University of Washington's Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences finds that very young children are willing to offer food and help others.
[47]
Children's altruistic behavior in context: The role of emotional ...
May 3, 2016 · The results revealed that increased altruistic behavior was associated with a greater responsiveness to fear faces (faster fixation), but not happy faces, in ...
[48]
Preschoolers' Helping Motivations: Altruistic, Egoistic or Diverse?
Apr 12, 2021 · Researchers argue that young children do not seem to express empathy or sympathy when providing instrumental help (Hepach, 2017). Accordingly, ...
[49]
Children's Altruism Following Acute Stress: The Role of Autonomic ...
Previous developmental research has shown that 9-year-old children, but not 6-year-old children, exhibit increased altruism following exposure to a natural ...
[50]
Not Noble Savages after all: Limits to early altruism - PMC - NIH
Early altruism is selective, favoring past kindness, familiar individuals, and ingroups. Babies and young children are more selfish than adults, and show ...
[51]
From Empathy to Apathy: The Bystander Effect Revisited - PMC - NIH
The bystander effect, the reduction in helping behavior in the presence of other people, has been explained predominantly by situational influences on ...
[52]
Bystander Effect - The Decision Lab
The bystander effect is a psychological phenomenon where individuals are less likely to offer help to a victim when other people are present.<|separator|>
[53]
Embarrassability and the inhibition of helping - ScienceDirect.com
These studies suggest that fear of embarrassment is a strong inhibitory factor in social helping situations, and that personality factors can predict who will ...
[54]
[PDF] Bystander inhibition and facilitation of helping responses
the effect of reward on altruistic (helping) behavior as follows: "If innate altruistic drives motivate people, then drive reduction should reinforce them ...
[55]
Helping Behavior in Rural and Urban Environments: A Meta-Analysis
Oct 9, 2025 · A meta-analytic review examined 65 tests of the hypothesis that country people are more helpful than city people.
[56]
[PDF] Cross-National Differences in Charitable Giving
Cultures can differ in values and ethnolinguistic diversity, but the key cultural difference related to charitable giving is that of religion. Charitable ...
[57]
[PDF] WHICH IS THE FAIR SEX? GENDER DIFFERENCES IN ALTRUISM
We study gender differences in altruism by examining a modified dictator game with varying incomes and prices. Our results indicate that the question.
[58]
Individualism, Collectivism, and Allocation Behavior - PubMed Central
Feb 14, 2023 · The extant cross-country/cross-culture literature has found that group or country differences are reflected in the allocation behavior in the ...
[59]
Cross-Cultural Differences in Helping Strangers - Sage Journals
Large cross-cultural variation in helping emerged, ranging from an overall rate of 93% in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to 40% in Kuala Lampur, Malaysia.
[60]
Cross-cultural assessment of altruism and its correlates
For most samples, measures of altruism were positively correlated with guilt, extraversion, and intrinsic religiosity while shame was negatively correlated with ...
[61]
Religious Faith and Charitable Giving - Hoover Institution
The differences in charity between secular and religious people are dramatic. Religious people are 25 percentage points more likely than secularists to donate ...Missing: cross- | Show results with:cross-
[62]
(PDF) Beyond Altruism: Sociological Foundations of Cooperation ...
Aug 9, 2025 · Here we review evidence for these rules, reputations, and relations, showing that they have powerful and pervasive effects on cooperation and prosocial ...
[63]
[PDF] Altruism: Biological Rationale vs. Christian Love Command
Then, we will explore altruism as it pertains specifically to humans: why altruism occurs; boundaries of Christian love and biological altruism; an.Missing: biblical | Show results with:biblical
[64]
Acts 2: An Example of the Divine Empowerment of Leaders
This paper explores the use of the gift of prophecy, through the Holy Spirit, to communicate God's divine empowerment of leaders in the early Christian church ...
[65]
Eight Degrees of Giving - Chabad.org
The Torah's word for the act of giving to the needy, tzedakah, although commonly translated as "charity," more accurately means "justice." G‑d selects certain ...
[66]
Tzedakah In the 21st Century - JSI
Tzedakah – a Hebrew word often translated as “charity,” but more accurately meaning “justice” or “righteousness” – stands as a cornerstone of Jewish life ...<|separator|>
[67]
Zakat: changing the framework of giving | Islamic Economic Studies
Feb 28, 2023 · Purpose. This paper aims to show that zakat solves the collective action problem by changing the framework of giving.
[68]
[PDF] The Relationship among Zakat Maal, Altruism and Work Life Quality
Sep 6, 2017 · ABSTRACT. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of zakat maal expenditure behavior on work altruism and quality.
[69]
Dana: The Practice of Giving - Access to Insight
Buddhism considers it a person's moral obligation to give assistance to all these types of people. In the Anguttara Nikaya the Buddha describes, with ...By Susan Elbaum Jootla · By Lily De Silva · Generosity: The Inward...
[70]
Compassion without pity: Buddhist dāna as charity, humanitarianism ...
Jul 19, 2020 · The pāramītas are practices which can help Buddhists gain merit and advance spiritual development. In both systems, the first pāramīta is dāna.
[71]
https://www.exoticindiaart.com/article/dana/
[72]
Why giving without getting anything in return is the gateway to ...
Nov 20, 2020 · Learning to give, and give without hopes of achieving anything in return, is therefore the gateway to real and enduring fulfillment.<|separator|>
[73]
Religion and Altruism - Oxford Academic
This article explores the relationship between religion and altruism, a research concern identified and pursued by classical sociologists including Max Weber.
[74]
Comparing Moralities in the Abrahamic and Indic Religions Using ...
The present article draws on this research to compare forms of religious morality in the Abrahamic traditions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) and the Indic ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[75]
[PDF] Altruism in the Good Life: An Archetype of Virtuous Friendship
Jan 14, 2022 · In the second chapter I will firmly place altruism within Aristotle's ethical theory as it appears in the virtues of generosity, magnificence, ...<|separator|>
[76]
[PDF] THE VIRTUE OF GENEROSITY
According to Aristotle, the generous person receives gifts from the generosity of others, with a view to supplying their own necessities and for passing any.
[77]
Aristotle on generosity
self-interest, the virtue of generosity is not involved. The virtue of generosity is giving to another person something that is yours without obligation and ...
[78]
Care For Ourselves, Others, And Our World – Can Stoicism Help Us ...
Nov 12, 2022 · I've suggested that Stoicism can help to supply a framework for helping us to combine and synthesise the claims of care for ourselves and others ...Missing: interest | Show results with:interest
[79]
Stoicism and Compassion: A False Dichotomy - Observer
Feb 1, 2017 · Stoicism advises us to be altruistic, acting in the service of others without desire for personal gain, recognition, or praise. It's about doing ...
[80]
Being Stoic is a Refined Kind of Selfishness - What Is Stoicism?
Sep 10, 2023 · By giving themselves the pleasure of pleasing others, the Stoics exhibited a more refined kind of selfishness.
[81]
Adam Smith and Three Theories of Altruism | Cairn.info
For Smith, the motive to satisfy self-interest and other-interest stems from the same general tendency of humans to sympathize–in one case with the self and in ...
[82]
[PDF] Reading Adam Smith: Understanding the Misinterpretations & the ...
According to Smith, a person can have both self- interested and altruistic motivations for his/her actions.<|control11|><|separator|>
[83]
[PDF] Adam Smith, Behavioral Economist - Carnegie Mellon University
4 Adam Smith would not be surprised by the finding that markets are often built on motivations of fairness, altruism and trust—rather than on self- interest ...
[84]
Get What You Give? An Examination of Enlightened Self-Interest ...
Oct 27, 2015 · We integrate enlightened self-interest theory and the theory of planned behavior to examine how enlightened self-interest influences ...<|separator|>
[85]
Enlightened Self Interest: Building a Resilient, Thriving Culture
Sep 30, 2019 · Enlightened self interest is a philosophy in ethics which states that persons who act to further the interest of others help themselves.
[86]
[PDF] CHARACTER, VIRTUE AND SELF-INTEREST IN THE ETHICS OF ...
In what follows, I will examine three questions about the current moral malaise of the professions: 1) What are the reasons for the erosion of virtue ethics and ...
[87]
Our history | Centre For Effective Altruism
2009 Giving What We Can, a community of effective givers, is founded in Oxford, UK. 2011 80000 Hours is founded to help people lead high-impact careers.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[88]
History of effective altruism - EA Forum
Many central EA organizations were founded during this period, and the name 'effective altruism' was first coined in 2011. In November 2009, Giving What We Can ...
[89]
Core EA principles | Centre For Effective Altruism
Core EA principles include scope sensitivity (prioritizing actions benefiting more lives), impartiality (helping those who need it most), scout mindset, and ...Missing: methods effectiveness
[90]
FTX's Sam Bankman-Fried believed in 'effective altruism'. What is it?
Oct 9, 2023 · In short, he claimed he wanted to make as much money as possible so he could give it away and change the world for the better. "Effective ...
[91]
How effective altruism let Sam Bankman-Fried happen - Vox
Dec 12, 2022 · It looks increasingly likely that Sam Bankman-Fried appears to have engaged in extreme misconduct precisely because he believed in ...
[92]
Effective Altruist Leaders Were Warned About Sam Bankman-Fried ...
Mar 15, 2023 · Leaders of the Effective Altruism movement were repeatedly warned beginning in 2018 that Sam Bankman-Fried was unethical, duplicitous, and ...
[93]
Effective Altruism and Sam Bankman-Fried Share a Fundamental Flaw
effective altruism.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[94]
Effective altruism's fundamental flaw - Fortune
Jan 4, 2024 · In 2023, one approach to impact had an Icarus-like rise and fall: effective altruism. Can the movement regain ground in 2024?Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[95]
Effective Altruism's Impact and Future Direction | Worth
Effective altruism movement faces reputational damage after FTX collapse. Critics question the focus on billionaire funders and long-term causes.
[96]
[PDF] Is the Internet Giving Rise to New Forms of Altruism?
In its most basic form digital altruism can be described as altruism mediated by digital technology, however, when evaluating the websites in terms of Gruber's ...
[97]
Is the Internet Giving Rise to New Forms of Altruism?
Nov 27, 2011 · Additional examples of everyday digital altruism include conducting web searches through sites such as Goodsearch (2011) and Ripple (2011); ...
[98]
Generosity Commission Report
GoFundMe, now the world's largest charitable crowdfunding platform, reports that it has raised some $30 billion in donations to individuals and nonprofits since ...
[99]
Examining charitable giving in real-world online donations - Nature
Sep 3, 2019 · In a dataset of more than $44 million in online donations, we find that 21% were made while opting to be anonymous to the public, with survey ...
[100]
Aggressive motivation mediates the influence of prosocial video ...
Jun 4, 2025 · ... studies on online prosocial behavior and digital altruism suggest that prosocial tendencies can extend into virtual spaces (Li, 2024; Pastor ...
[101]
Does a Low-Cost Act of Support Produce Slacktivism or ... - NIH
Apr 4, 2022 · Strong evidence for the slacktivism effect would be the observation that participants who had publicly displayed their support for a cause ...
[102]
The psychology of online activism and social movements: relations ...
Mar 21, 2020 · There is mixed empirical evidence that online protest prevents offline protests, resulting in ineffective slacktivism. Other evidence suggests ...Missing: altruism | Show results with:altruism
[103]
Can "slacktivism" work? Perceived power differences moderate the ...
This study provides counter-evidence to the 'slacktivism' critique, contributes to theories of collective action, power and their integration.Missing: altruism | Show results with:altruism
[104]
[PDF] Does online fundraising increase charitable giving? A nationwide ...
We found that (i) video fundrais- ing increased donation revenue and frequency to Save the Children during the campaign and in the subsequent five weeks; (ii) ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[105]
Concepts and implications of altruism bias and pathological altruism
Jun 10, 2013 · At the core of pathological altruism are actions or reactions based on incomplete access to, or inability to process, the wide range of ...
[106]
Pathological Altruism - Barbara Oakley
In fact, pathological altruism, in the form of an unhealthy focus on others to the detriment of one's own needs, may underpin some personality disorders.
[107]
(PDF) Codependency and Pathological Altruism - ResearchGate
Dec 6, 2020 · Pathological altruism is a construct describing the willingness of an individual to place the needs of others above him- or herself to the ...<|separator|>
[108]
Extreme Altruism | Psychology Today
Sep 20, 2018 · Extreme Altruism. Would you donate your kidney to a stranger? Posted September 20, 2018 | Reviewed by Gary Drevitch · Share on Facebook Share.
[109]
Analyzing altruism - Georgetown Today
Apr 8, 2024 · Marsh is studying what is known as “extreme altruism” in people who have donated their kidneys to strangers or have committed extraordinary ...
[110]
Helper Syndrome and Pathological Altruism in nurses - Frontiers
Oct 11, 2023 · Pathological Altruism is also defined by a compulsion to heal, save, and help others (Wong, 2020). Schmidbauer (2018) likewise describes Helper ...
[111]
[PDF] PATHOLOGICAL ALTRUISM—AN INTRODUCTION - Barbara Oakley
A working definition of pathological altruist (besides the obvious “a person who engages in pathological altruism”), might then be: “A person who sincerely ...
[112]
Healthy Selfishness and Pathological Altruism: Measuring Two ...
May 20, 2020 · Examples of pathological altruism range widely from genocide, suicide martyrdom, to codependency (Oakley et al., 2012). Early ...Introduction · Pathological Altruism · Current Studies · Discussion
[113]
Pathological Altruism—An Introduction - Oxford Academic
One simple way of defining pathological altruism is to say that it involves well-meaning efforts that worsen the very situation they mean to help. This is ...
[114]
Evolutionary Explanations for Cooperation - ScienceDirect.com
Aug 21, 2007 · Altruism: a behaviour that is costly to the actor and beneficial to the recipient. Cost and benefit are defined on the basis of the lifetime ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[115]
(PDF) New Experiments On Psychological Egoism - ResearchGate
Psychological egoism is the doctrine that all of our actions are ultimately motivated by self-interest, even including seemingly altruistic actions.
[116]
Nenad Natan Popovic, New Experiments On Psychological Egoism
Psychological egoism is the doctrine that all of our actions are ultimately motivated by self-interest, even including seemingly altruistic actions.
[117]
Why Do People Give? Testing Pure and Impure Altruism
This is the first empirical evidence that crowd-out depends on the output level where it is measured, and that the power to reject pure altruism depends on ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[118]
[PDF] Altruism in Experiments - University of Pittsburgh
Are women less selfish than men? Evidence from dictator experiments. Economic Journal 108, 726–35. Eckel, C. C., Grossman, P. J. and Johnston, R. M. 2005 ...Missing: egoism | Show results with:egoism
[119]
Concepts and implications of altruism bias and pathological ... - NIH
Presented here are the mechanistic bases and potential ramifications of pathological altruism, that is, altruism in which attempts to promote the welfare of ...
[120]
New Evidence on Welfare's Disincentive for the Youth Using ...
May 14, 2024 · We provide novel evidence on the employment response of the unmarried childless youths to an increase in welfare payments in Denmark.
[121]
Welfare dependence from one generation to the next - CEPR
May 29, 2018 · However, a potential risk of these benefit schemes is that they may create a culture of dependency within families. A snowball effect across ...
[122]
Fixing the Broken Incentives in the U.S. Welfare System - FREOPP
A better approach would be to establish “transitional benefits” to offset the loss in benefits that occurs as a recipient earns non-welfare income.Work, Poverty, And Welfare · Marginal Tax Rates And Work... · The Evidence<|control11|><|separator|>
[123]
When aid kills: How foreign assistance can fuel political violence
Sep 6, 2025 · Historical experiences and foreign aid efficacy: The unintended consequences of colonial medical campaigns in Central Africa · Eduardo Montero ...
[124]
Foreign Aid and Its Unintended Consequences - OAPEN Library
Foreign aid and international development frequently bring with it a range of unintended consequences, both negative and positive.
[125]
Foreign Aid and its Unintended Consequences | Dirk-Jan Koch
Foreign aid and international development frequently bring with it a range of unintended consequences, both negative and positive.