Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Surrogate partner

Surrogate partner therapy (SPT) is a triadic therapeutic approach in which a trained surrogate partner works alongside a licensed sex therapist and a client—typically an unpartnered individual experiencing sexual dysfunction—to foster intimacy skills through progressive, experiential exercises that may encompass emotional bonding, sensual touch, and, under therapeutic guidance, sexual activity.^[1]^[2] Originating from the behavioral techniques pioneered by William Masters and Virginia Johnson in the 1960s and 1970s for treating sexual disorders, SPT emphasizes addressing root causes such as performance anxiety, trauma, or inexperience via structured sessions focused on client education and boundary-setting rather than mere gratification.^[2]^[3] The International Professional Surrogates Association (IPSA), founded in 1973, serves as the primary certifying body, enforcing ethical standards like informed consent, regular therapist consultations, and termination protocols to distinguish the practice from commercial sex work.^[4]^[1] Proponents report high anecdotal success rates in enabling clients to form future relationships, with some analyses citing resolution in over 80% of cases, though rigorous, large-scale empirical studies are scarce, limiting claims of broad efficacy.^[5] Critics highlight persistent ethical challenges, including fragile professional boundaries, risks of client dependency or surrogate burnout, and legal ambiguities where sexual elements blur lines with prohibited prostitution, prompting calls for greater regulation amid reports of misuse in unregulated settings.^[1]^[6]^[7]

Definition and Principles

Core Concept and Objectives

Surrogate partner therapy involves a collaborative triadic model comprising a licensed therapist, a client experiencing difficulties with intimacy or sexuality, and a professionally trained surrogate partner who facilitates experiential learning through structured physical and emotional interactions. This approach, rooted in the sensate focus techniques developed by William Masters and Virginia Johnson in the 1960s and 1970s, emphasizes gradual progression from non-sexual touch and communication exercises to potentially more intimate activities, with the goal of building self-awareness and relational skills rather than mere sexual performance.^[2]^[8] The surrogate partner, certified by organizations such as the International Professional Surrogates Association (IPSA), models effective communication, emotional vulnerability, and boundary-setting while operating under the therapist's oversight to ensure therapeutic integrity.^[2] The primary objectives of surrogate partner therapy are to alleviate barriers to healthy intimacy, such as performance anxiety, body image issues, trauma-related inhibitions, or physiological dysfunctions like erectile difficulties or vaginismus, by fostering comfort with sensuality and physical contact in a controlled, consensual environment. Sessions typically aim to enhance the client's ability to form emotional connections, improve sensory awareness, and develop practical skills for future partnerships, with genital-genital intercourse considered optional and secondary to broader relational growth.^[2]^[8] While anecdotal reports and small-scale studies, such as one comparing surrogate therapy to couple therapy for vaginismus (reporting 100% success in achieving intercourse versus 75%), suggest potential benefits, the practice lacks robust empirical validation through large randomized controlled trials, with pioneers Masters and Johnson themselves providing limited published outcome data.^[9]^[7] This evidentiary gap underscores the need for caution in its application, prioritizing ethical supervision over unverified efficacy claims. Surrogate partner therapy differs from prostitution and sex work in its structured therapeutic intent and oversight by a licensed sex therapist, forming a triadic relationship focused on fostering client skills in emotional intimacy, communication, and sensual awareness rather than transactional sexual gratification. Physical interactions, including potential genital contact, are determined by therapeutic necessity and comprise only a minor portion—approximately 13% involving sexual techniques—prioritizing healing from issues like anxiety or dysfunction over release. Surrogates adhere to professional ethical codes, such as those from the International Professional Surrogates Association (IPSA), and the engagement terminates upon meeting predefined goals, unlike ongoing paid sexual services.^[2]^[10]^[11] In distinction from traditional sex therapy, which relies on talk-based interventions, education, and self-directed exercises to address sexual concerns, surrogate partner therapy incorporates direct, supervised physical and relational practice with the surrogate to overcome experiential barriers, such as touch aversion or performance anxiety. This hands-on approach complements but does not replace the therapist's role in processing insights and ensuring progress.^[2]^[10] Surrogate partner therapy bears no relation to gestational or traditional surrogacy in reproductive medicine, where a surrogate carries a pregnancy for intended parents via in vitro fertilization or artificial insemination, with the emphasis on procreation and genetic arrangements rather than sexual or intimacy remediation. The term "surrogate" in partner therapy derives from substituting for a relational partner in skill-building, not biological substitution.^[2]

Historical Development

Origins in Mid-20th Century Sex Research

Surrogate partner therapy emerged from the empirical sex research conducted by William H. Masters and Virginia E. Johnson at Washington University in St. Louis, where they initiated systematic observation of human sexual physiology in 1957.^[12] Their early work emphasized laboratory-based studies of sexual response cycles, involving over 10,000 complete cycles from diverse participants, which laid the groundwork for therapeutic interventions targeting dysfunctions such as impotence, premature ejaculation, and anorgasmia.^[13] By the late 1950s, Masters and Johnson recognized limitations in their primarily dyadic (couple-based) model, prompting the incorporation of surrogates to address unpartnered clients, particularly unmarried men deemed "sexually incompetent" due to performance anxieties or skill deficits.^[14] The practice began in 1959, with Masters and Johnson training female surrogates—selected from volunteers—to collaborate in supervised sessions facilitating behavioral desensitization and skill acquisition.^[14] These interventions typically spanned two-week intensives, progressing methodically from non-sexual touch to genital stimulation and intercourse, integrated with techniques like sensate focus to reduce anxiety and promote mutual responsiveness.^[13] Over the subsequent decade (1959–1970), they applied this triadic model (therapist-client-surrogate) to cases where traditional therapy failed, reporting that surrogates enabled outcomes unattainable without direct experiential practice, with relapse rates under 25% in treated cohorts.^[14] Masters and Johnson first detailed these methods publicly in their 1970 book Human Sexual Inadequacy, framing surrogacy as a pragmatic extension of their research-driven approach to human sexuality, which prioritized physiological data over psychoanalytic speculation.^[14] This innovation occurred amid broader mid-20th-century shifts, including the Kinsey Reports (1948–1953) and emerging behavioral therapies, but stood apart by endorsing structured sexual contact as therapeutic, despite ethical scrutiny over consent, boundaries, and potential exploitation in an era of conservative sexual norms.^[13] Their self-reported success metrics—such as sustained erections in over 75% of coital attempts for men—relied on follow-up data from hundreds of cases, though independent verification was limited at the time.^[14]

Key Figures and Institutionalization

William H. Masters and Virginia E. Johnson, prominent sex researchers, pioneered the use of surrogate partners in therapeutic settings as early as 1959 through their clinical work at what would become the Masters and Johnson Institute.^[14] Their approach involved trained surrogates engaging in structured physical and emotional interactions with clients under therapist supervision to address sexual dysfunctions, drawing from behavioral modification techniques observed in their laboratory studies of human sexual response.^[7] This method was first detailed publicly in their 1970 book Human Sexual Inadequacy, where they described surrogates as temporary partners facilitating desensitization and skill-building for individuals unable to involve real-life partners.^[5] Masters and Johnson's framework emphasized empirical observation over psychoanalytic interpretation, treating sexual issues as learned behaviors amenable to direct intervention rather than deep-seated pathologies.^[3] They reported success in case studies involving surrogates for conditions like impotence and frigidity, though their work relied on unpublished clinical data from their St. Louis clinic, limiting independent verification at the time.^[15] Institutionalization advanced with the founding of the International Professional Surrogates Association (IPSA) in 1973, established by early surrogate practitioners to standardize training, ethics, and referral protocols based on Masters and Johnson methodologies. IPSA formalized surrogate partner therapy as a triadic professional practice—client, licensed therapist, and certified surrogate—requiring surrogates to undergo rigorous screening, ongoing supervision, and adherence to boundaries against exploitation.^[16] By providing certification and a code of conduct, IPSA aimed to distinguish ethical surrogacy from unregulated prostitution, though it has faced ongoing scrutiny for lacking large-scale randomized trials to validate efficacy claims.^[17] The organization remains the primary body overseeing surrogate training worldwide, with programs emphasizing consent, emotional safety, and integration with psychotherapy.^[18]

Therapeutic Framework

The Triadic Model

The triadic model in surrogate partner therapy constitutes a collaborative therapeutic framework involving three essential participants: the client, a licensed mental health professional (typically a sex therapist), and a trained surrogate partner. This structure ensures that experiential interventions with the surrogate are integrated with psychological oversight from the therapist, aiming to address barriers to intimacy and sexual functioning. The model originated from mid-20th-century developments in sexology but was formalized through organizations like the International Professional Surrogates Association (IPSA), emphasizing supervised, goal-oriented interactions rather than independent sexual encounters.^[2]^[19] In this model, the therapist conducts initial assessments to identify the client's needs, such as anxiety-related erectile dysfunction or aversion to touch, and establishes treatment objectives before referring to a surrogate. The surrogate partner, certified through programs requiring extensive training in body awareness, boundary setting, and emotional processing, engages the client in progressive exercises ranging from non-sexual touch to, if appropriate, sexual intimacy, all documented and debriefed post-session. Communication among the triad—via joint meetings, phone consultations, or written reports—prevents boundary violations and aligns interventions with therapeutic goals, with the therapist retaining ultimate clinical responsibility. For instance, sessions often alternate between one-on-one surrogate-client work and therapist-client talk therapy, fostering integration of cognitive and somatic experiences.^[20]^[21]^[1] The model's efficacy hinges on clear role delineation to mitigate risks like dependency or ethical breaches; surrogates do not provide therapy independently, and all interactions require informed consent and periodic evaluation. Empirical descriptions from clinical guidelines highlight its distinction from prostitution by focusing on therapeutic outcomes, such as improved self-esteem or relational skills, rather than transactional sex, though legal ambiguities persist in unregulated jurisdictions. Training for surrogates, often spanning 100+ hours including supervised practice, underscores the model's professional rigor, with organizations like IPSA maintaining standards since 1973.^[22]^[19]^[23]

Phases of Intervention

Surrogate partner therapy typically unfolds in a structured progression of four phases, coordinated within the triadic model involving the client, surrogate partner, and supervising therapist, with each phase building on the previous to foster emotional, sensual, and sexual competence.^[5] The process emphasizes gradual escalation tailored to the client's readiness, prioritizing non-sexual intimacy development before any genital or intercourse-related activities, which constitute only about 12.7% of total surrogate-client interactions according to empirical observation.^[5] Sessions, often lasting 1-3 hours, occur 1-3 times weekly or in intensive formats, with post-session debriefs ensuring therapeutic alignment and addressing any emotional responses.^[2] The first phase centers on establishing emotional connection and bonding through verbal and non-physical communication, where the surrogate models vulnerability, active listening, and emotional honesty to build trust without touch.^[5] Activities include shared discussions on personal histories, goal-setting, and relaxation techniques like guided breathing to reduce anxiety and enhance self-awareness, laying the groundwork for interpersonal safety.^[2] This initial rapport-building, often spanning several sessions, mirrors foundational elements of attachment theory by facilitating secure relational dynamics empirically linked to improved intimacy outcomes.^[5] In the second phase, interventions shift to bodywork and sensate focus exercises, introducing non-genital touch to cultivate comfort with physical proximity and sensory awareness.^[5] Clients and surrogates engage in reciprocal touching of clothed or partially exposed areas—such as hands, arms, or back—emphasizing mindful sensation over performance, derived from Masters and Johnson's sensate focus protocol adapted for individual therapy.^[2] Nudity may be incorporated gradually to address body image distortions, with activities like mutual massage promoting desensitization to vulnerability; progress is monitored via client feedback and therapist integration to prevent overwhelm.^[5] The third phase, if clinically indicated, incorporates sexual intimacy, progressing to genital touching, arousal exercises, and potentially intercourse, always framed as skill-building rather than recreational.^[5] Interventions focus on mutual consent, communication during arousal, and addressing performance blocks, with surrogates providing real-time feedback to rewire inhibitory patterns; this phase remains optional and brief, reserved for clients with persistent physiological or relational barriers unresponsive to prior stages.^[2] The final phase involves closure, where the surrogate-client dyad processes achievements, grief over ending the relationship, and transference of learned skills to real-world partnerships, often through reflective exercises and role-playing future scenarios.^[5] The therapist facilitates integration, ensuring sustained gains via follow-up talk therapy, with termination occurring once the client demonstrates independent intimacy capacity, typically after 20-50 total hours.^[2] This structured wind-down mitigates dependency risks, aligning with evidence that explicit boundary dissolution enhances long-term autonomy.^[5]

Surrogate Training and Certification

The training of surrogate partners primarily occurs through structured programs offered by specialized organizations, with the International Professional Surrogates Association (IPSA) serving as the longstanding authority since its inception in the 1970s. IPSA's program is divided into two phases designed to build theoretical knowledge, self-awareness, and practical skills in human sexuality, intimacy, and therapeutic intervention. Phase I consists of a 100-hour didactic and experiential course covering topics such as human sexuality, sex therapy principles, surrogate partner techniques, communication, and personal intimacy development, delivered through lectures, discussions, and exercises in either a 12-week format or a 12-day intensive, incorporating both online and in-person elements.^[18] Phase II entails a multi-year supervised internship involving direct work with clients under the guidance of licensed therapists and IPSA mentors, with trainees paying an honorarium for consultations (typically $15 per session) while potentially earning fees from clients as they progress.^[18] Eligibility for IPSA training emphasizes personal attributes over formal credentials, requiring applicants to demonstrate emotional maturity derived from life experiences, comfort with nudity and sexuality, and a history of personal therapy or growth work to handle intimate client relationships effectively; no specific academic degrees or prerequisites are mandated, though applications are vetted by a committee assessing readiness via detailed personal essays on sexual evolution and interviews.^[24] The application process involves submitting a comprehensive packet, including essays on background and preferences for client gender and location (primarily Southern California for in-person components), followed by committee review and potential interviews, with training sessions held 2-3 times annually.^[24] Phase I tuition is $3,000, excluding additional costs for materials, travel, and lodging.^[18] Certification by IPSA is granted upon successful completion of both phases, submission of documentation verifying training, supervisor evaluations, a self-assessment, and a letter detailing professional experience and ethical commitments, followed by potential interviews and peer review to confirm clinical, educational, and ethical competence.^[25] Certified surrogates must maintain annual membership ($75 fee), adhere to IPSA's Code of Ethics, participate in continuing education, and undergo periodic peer reviews, with lapses resulting in decertification.^[25] An alternative program is provided by the Surrogate Partner Collective, which includes a prerequisite 5-day in-person workshop on embodied intimacy and consent ($2,500), followed by 12 weeks of virtual specialized training on ethics and client diversity ($1,500), and an 8+ month supervised apprenticeship with mentor oversight (15% honorarium from client fees), culminating in SPC certification after application, interviews, and demonstrated proficiency at each step.^[26] These programs ensure surrogates operate within a triadic therapeutic model under licensed supervision, though the field remains niche with limited certified practitioners worldwide.^[18]^[26]

Client Indications

Psychological and Physiological Conditions Addressed

Surrogate partner therapy primarily addresses psychological conditions that manifest as barriers to intimacy and sexual functioning, including fear and avoidance of emotional or physical closeness, often rooted in past sexual, physical, or emotional trauma.^[1] Clients frequently seek treatment for social anxiety disorders that extend to interpersonal and sexual interactions, as well as negative body image exacerbated by physical disfigurement or medical conditions affecting self-perception.^[2] These interventions aim to rebuild trust and self-efficacy through experiential learning, distinguishing them from purely cognitive therapies by incorporating direct, consensual physical engagement under therapeutic supervision.^[5] Sexual dysfunctions with significant psychological components form a core focus, such as erectile dysfunction, premature or delayed ejaculation in men, and anorgasmia or lack of sexual desire in both genders, where anxiety, performance fears, or conditioning play causal roles rather than isolated organic pathology.^[27] For women, conditions like vaginismus or dyspareunia linked to fear-based muscle tension or trauma responses are targeted, emphasizing desensitization and sensory retraining.^[27] Therapy is deemed unsuitable for dysfunctions stemming purely from physiological causes, such as hormonal imbalances or neurological damage without behavioral overlays, as the approach relies on learned relational patterns rather than medical correction.^[14] Broader mental health issues intersecting with sexuality, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and generalized anxiety manifesting as sexual avoidance or hypervigilance, may be addressed when standard talk therapy proves insufficient for somatic integration.^[28] Empirical case reports indicate efficacy in fostering adaptive responses, though rigorous randomized trials remain limited, with outcomes attributed to the triadic model's facilitation of real-time feedback on arousal cues and boundary negotiation.^[1] Conditions like inhibited orgasm or low desire are approached holistically, integrating physiological arousal mapping with psychological reframing to counter avoidance cycles.^[2]

Demographic Patterns and Selection Criteria

Clients of surrogate partner therapy are predominantly heterosexual adult males experiencing sexual dysfunctions such as erectile difficulties, premature ejaculation, or ejaculatory inhibition.^[2]^[1] In one retrospective study of 151 cases, all participants were male, highlighting the prevalence of male clients in archival data from professional surrogate practices.^[29] Female clients constitute a minority, estimated at 30-40% in certain clinics, often presenting with orgasm difficulties or relational intimacy barriers.^[3] Requests from gay, lesbian, or queer individuals remain rare, with practices almost exclusively serving heterosexual clients.^[3] Age demographics are not systematically documented across large cohorts, but clients typically range from young adults to middle-aged individuals, with issues stemming from inexperience, trauma, or medical conditions rather than age-specific decline alone.^[1] Common precipitating factors include negative body image, fear of emotional or physical intimacy, sexual inexperience, or post-injury rehabilitation needs, often persisting despite prior conventional sex therapy.^[1]^[3] Selection criteria emphasize referral from a licensed sex therapist as a prerequisite, ensuring clients have exhausted talk-based interventions without resolution.^[3] Candidates must demonstrate psychological stability, absent acute disorders like psychosis or severe personality pathology that could undermine the triadic process, and a genuine commitment to structured sessions averaging 15-30 meetings.^[14] Matching prioritizes surrogate-client compatibility in personality, age proximity, and scheduling, sometimes favoring initial absence of sexual attraction to minimize performance pressure.^[30]^[3] Ethical protocols require informed consent to escalating intimacy levels and ongoing therapist oversight to mitigate risks like dependency.^[5]

Evidence Base

Clinical Studies and Outcomes

Clinical studies evaluating surrogate partner therapy (SPT) are limited in scope and rigor, with no randomized controlled trials identified in peer-reviewed literature as of 2025.^[7] Pioneering work by Masters and Johnson in the 1960s and 1970s incorporated surrogates into sensate focus techniques but relied on case reports rather than controlled designs, yielding anecdotal reports of improved intimacy without quantifiable metrics or follow-up.^[31] Subsequent research has consisted primarily of small-scale, retrospective, or comparative studies, often focused on specific conditions like vaginismus or erectile dysfunction, precluding generalizable conclusions about efficacy across broader populations.^[30] A 2007 comparative study examined SPT outcomes in vaginismus, involving 16 women treated with male surrogate partners versus 16 treated with their own partners under similar protocols.^[32] All surrogate-treated participants achieved successful penile-vaginal intercourse, compared to 75% in the partner-treated group (P=0.1, not statistically significant).^[9] The surrogate group reported higher satisfaction and fewer dropouts (0% failure-related discontinuation versus 12% in the partner group, with an additional 19% separating), suggesting potential advantages in overcoming penetration avoidance through desensitization and trust-building absent relational conflicts.^[33] However, the non-randomized design, small sample, and short-term assessment limited causal inferences, as self-selection and therapist enthusiasm may have influenced results. A retrospective review of 150 SPT participants (133 male, 17 female) across various sexual dysfunctions found 73% reported improved sexual functioning six months post-therapy, based on self-assessments of intimacy skills and relational capacity.^[30] Participants commonly cited gains in body awareness, communication, and reduced performance anxiety, aligning with the triadic model's emphasis on experiential learning.^[5] Yet, reliance on unblinded self-reports introduces bias, and the absence of validated scales or control groups undermines reliability; long-term durability remains unexamined, with potential relapse risks in transitioning to non-therapeutic relationships unaddressed.^[31] Methodological constraints pervade the evidence base, including ethical barriers to randomization (e.g., withholding intervention from controls), surrogate variability without standardized protocols, and conflation of SPT with sex therapy outcomes.^[7] Reviews consistently note that while therapist surveys endorse SPT for refractory cases—70% deeming it valuable for intimacy barriers—empirical support lags behind modalities like cognitive-behavioral sex therapy, which boast stronger trial data.^[32] Alternative interpretations attribute reported benefits to non-specific factors like therapeutic alliance or placebo effects rather than surrogacy-specific elements, highlighting the need for prospective, controlled research to validate claims of superior outcomes.^[30]

Methodological Limitations and Alternative Interpretations

Existing research on surrogate partner therapy (SPT) is constrained by small sample sizes and absence of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), limiting generalizability and causal inference. For instance, a comparative study of 16 women with vaginismus reported 100% success in achieving penile-vaginal intercourse via SPT versus 75% in couple therapy, but acknowledged methodological weaknesses including its retrospective design, lack of standardization, and insufficient power to detect differences reliably.^[9] Broader reviews highlight that most evidence derives from case reports or uncontrolled series rather than rigorous experimental designs, with no large-scale RCTs identified to isolate SPT's effects from confounding variables like client motivation or therapist involvement.^[31] Reliance on self-reported outcomes further undermines validity, as improvements in sexual function or intimacy may reflect subjective biases or social desirability rather than objective change. Anecdotal success rates, such as 89% resolution in an unreplicated survey of 501 clients or 69% complete success in 407 participants, originate from non-peer-reviewed sources affiliated with the International Professional Surrogates Association (IPSA) and lack independent verification, control groups, or blinded assessments.^[5] Long-term follow-up is rare, raising questions about durability; partial or transient gains could stem from novelty effects rather than sustained therapeutic mechanisms. Alternative interpretations posit that observed benefits arise from non-specific factors, such as intensive attention, physical touch, or behavioral exposure, which could be replicated via less invasive modalities like standard sex therapy or mindfulness-based interventions without interpersonal sexual contact. Critics argue SPT's triadic model may amplify placebo responses through expectation of intimacy, akin to findings in broader sex therapy where behavioral techniques yield 50-80% short-term improvements irrespective of surrogacy.^[34] Selection bias in client recruitment—favoring highly motivated individuals able to afford extended sessions—may inflate outcomes, while ethical overlaps between surrogates' roles and potential emotional transference complicate attribution to therapeutic specificity over paid companionship.^[31] These gaps underscore the need for prospective, controlled studies to discern if SPT confers unique advantages or merely operationalizes general principles of desensitization and relational practice.

Ethical Dimensions

In surrogate partner therapy, boundary management emphasizes the triadic structure involving the client, surrogate partner, and supervising therapist to prevent blurring of professional and personal roles. The surrogate-client relationship is explicitly temporary and confined to therapeutic objectives, with surrogates required to maintain personal social and sexual relationships outside the practice to preserve emotional detachment and effectiveness. Surrogates must operate within the limits of their training, consulting the therapist before employing any additional methods, and are prohibited from initiating or sustaining non-therapeutic contact post-treatment.^[35]^[36] Consent protocols mandate informed, documented agreement prior to any interaction, with the therapist outlining the therapy's nature, goals, potential risks (including emotional dependency or health concerns), and benefits to ensure client comprehension. Clients must sign a consent form detailing these elements, and decisions to progress to physical or sexual intimacy require mutual affirmation from both client and surrogate, often after initial non-sexual sessions focused on building trust and skills. Consent remains revocable at any point, with surrogates trained to educate clients on exercising autonomy and avoiding coercion, fostering ongoing verbal check-ins during sessions to reaffirm boundaries.^[13]^[8]^[5] Therapist oversight is integral to boundary enforcement, including pre-session approvals for activities, regular debriefings, and interventions if boundaries appear fragile, such as through secrecy demands or emotional over-involvement reported in practitioner experiences. Protocols also address health risks, requiring precautions against disease transmission and unintended conception, with client education on these integrated into consent discussions. While these measures aim to mitigate exploitation, empirical accounts highlight persistent challenges in sustaining rigid boundaries due to the intimacy involved, underscoring the need for rigorous training and supervision.^[35]^[36]^[1]

Risks of Emotional Dependency and Exploitation

Clients engaging in surrogate partner therapy (SPT) face risks of developing emotional dependency on their surrogate partners, stemming from the therapy's emphasis on building intimacy through physical touch, emotional bonding, and vulnerability-sharing exercises. This dependency can arise because clients, often dealing with histories of trauma, anxiety, or intimacy avoidance, experience surrogate interactions as uniquely validating, fostering attachments that mimic romantic relationships rather than therapeutic ones. Such bonds may impede clients' ability to form independent connections post-therapy, as the surrogate's consistent availability during sessions contrasts sharply with real-world relational dynamics.^[5]^[10] Transference phenomena exacerbate this risk, with clients potentially projecting idealized emotions onto the surrogate, leading to unrealistic expectations for future partners and complicating emotional independence. Ethical analyses highlight that without rigorous oversight in the triadic structure (client, surrogate, therapist), these attachments can evolve into prolonged emotional reliance, particularly given surrogates' limited psychological training compared to licensed therapists. The International Professional Surrogates Association (IPSA) mandates boundary protocols to mitigate this, yet reported challenges indicate surrogates themselves grapple with reciprocal emotions, blurring professional detachment.^[5]^[30] Exploitation concerns in SPT primarily involve power imbalances inherent to the paid, intimate professional-client dynamic, where vulnerable individuals may be susceptible to manipulation or unnecessary session extensions for financial gain. Surrogates typically charge $75–$150 per hour, with therapies spanning weeks or months, creating incentives for prolongation absent strict termination criteria; the absence of standardized regulation across jurisdictions heightens this vulnerability, as does the surrogate's role in guiding deeply personal decisions. Critics argue this setup parallels exploitative sex work despite therapeutic intent, with legal ambiguities—such as potential prostitution charges in unregulated contexts—further risking client harm through unenforced consent or boundary violations. Empirical data on actual exploitation cases remains scarce, but ethical reviews emphasize the need for informed consent and therapist supervision to prevent abuse, noting that professional codes from bodies like the American Psychological Association do not explicitly endorse SPT referrals due to these unresolved tensions.^[10]^[37]^[5]

Legal Status

Regulatory Landscape in the United States

Surrogate partner therapy operates without specific federal regulation in the United States, existing in a legal gray area due to its undefined status under existing laws. No statutes explicitly prohibit or license the practice, distinguishing it from regulated professions like psychotherapy. The International Professional Surrogates Association (IPSA), founded in 1973, provides voluntary certification and ethical guidelines but holds no governmental authority.^[38]^[8] At the state level, no jurisdiction has enacted laws banning surrogate partner therapy, though interpretations of anti-prostitution statutes pose potential risks. Prostitution, defined as exchanging money for sexual acts, is illegal in all states except licensed brothels in certain Nevada counties; surrogate therapy is differentiated by its therapeutic framework, involving licensed therapist supervision, client consent protocols, and emphasis on intimacy-building exercises over sexual gratification. No prosecutions of surrogate partners have been reported by IPSA since its inception, though conservative states like Texas and Florida may scrutinize practices under broader sex work or professional misconduct laws.^[8]^[39]^[40] More permissive environments exist in states such as California and Oregon, where progressive mental health policies and historical acceptance of alternative therapies reduce barriers, including instances in California where therapist referrals to surrogates faced licensing board review but resulted in no disciplinary action. Major professional organizations, including the American Association of Sexuality Educators, Counselors and Therapists (AASECT), have not endorsed referrals to surrogate partners, citing ethical concerns over boundaries and efficacy, which may expose referring therapists to licensure risks despite the absence of legal penalties.^[40]^[39]

Global Variations and Prosecution Risks

Surrogate partner therapy lacks specific legal frameworks in the majority of countries, positioning it within a regulatory gray area often overlapping with prohibitions on compensated sexual activity. This undefined status stems from its distinction from prostitution—emphasizing therapeutic intent, supervision by licensed clinicians, and non-commercial boundaries—yet exposing practitioners to potential reinterpretation under anti-prostitution statutes. In nations with conservative moral or religious legal systems, such as those in the Middle East excluding Israel or parts of Asia, the practice faces implicit bans or severe restrictions, rendering it infeasible due to broader criminalization of paid intimacy.^[38]^[1] Israel represents a notable exception, where sexual surrogacy is legally accepted and institutionally supported, including through contracts between clinics and entities like the military for treating personnel with intimacy disorders. European variations show limited but emerging availability, with referrals possible in the United Kingdom, France, the Netherlands, and Switzerland via international networks, though uptake remains low and subject to national variances in sex work decriminalization. In the Netherlands and Germany, where regulated sex work provides a permissive environment, surrogate therapy benefits from reduced stigma, though it is framed separately as clinical intervention rather than commodified service; conversely, professional guidelines in the UK, such as those from the College of Sexual and Relationship Therapists, discourage therapist referrals to mitigate ethical and liability concerns.^[1]^[3]^[41] Prosecution risks, while theoretically present wherever prostitution is criminalized, have not materialized in documented cases against supervised surrogate partner activities, with over 50 years of practice in the United States yielding no successful legal challenges when protocols are followed. This absence of precedent underscores the therapy's insulation via triadic structure (client, surrogate, therapist) and emphasis on healing over gratification, yet individual practitioners risk charges if sessions deviate toward unstructured exchanges or occur without oversight, as courts may prioritize surface-level transactional elements. In high-risk jurisdictions like those enforcing strict vice laws, even therapeutic claims offer scant defense absent explicit exemptions, prompting most global operations to confine to low-enforcement or permissive locales.^[5]^[13]^[37]

Controversies

Efficacy Skepticism and Empirical Gaps

Surrogate partner therapy has been criticized for its paucity of rigorous empirical validation, with no randomized controlled trials establishing causal efficacy in treating sexual dysfunction or intimacy issues. Existing data derive primarily from retrospective, uncontrolled studies and case reports, which are prone to selection bias, subjective self-reporting, and lack of standardized protocols. For instance, a review of historical outcomes noted success rates ranging from 63% to 89% in small cohorts for conditions like erectile dysfunction and vaginismus, but these relied on short-term follow-ups with low response rates and no comparison to alternative interventions.^[30] ^[5] Proponents cite figures such as an 89.78% success rate in a 1988 analysis of 489 male participants with sexual dysfunction, tracked over three months, yet this study's retrospective design and absence of blinding or placebo controls undermine its reliability. Similarly, a 2007 Israeli study reported 100% pain-free intercourse achievement in 16 women with vaginismus via surrogate intervention, outperforming partner-based therapy (74%), but the tiny sample and lack of randomization preclude generalizability. Professional bodies, including the American Counseling Association and American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy, withhold endorsement due to insufficient collective evidence on long-term outcomes and potential harms.^[5] ^[30] Skeptics highlight confounding factors, such as the motivational effects of paid intimacy or the concurrent involvement of licensed therapists, which may mimic benefits attributable to non-physical modalities like cognitive-behavioral sex therapy. Ethical and legal constraints further impede large-scale research, perpetuating reliance on anecdotal endorsements from organizations like the International Professional Surrogates Association, whose claims lack independent verification. Psychologists have described the practice as unsupported by "a shred of evidence" for alleviating sexual anxiety, positioning it as potentially more akin to experiential catharsis than evidence-based treatment.^[42] ^[5] These gaps raise doubts about whether observed improvements stem from the surrogate's physical role or from broader therapeutic processes, underscoring the need for controlled trials to differentiate genuine efficacy from placebo or nonspecific effects.^[30]

Moral Critiques from Traditionalist Perspectives

Traditionalist critiques of surrogate partner therapy emphasize its conflict with longstanding religious and cultural norms reserving sexual intimacy exclusively for marriage, portraying the practice as a facilitation of fornication, adultery, or commodified lust rather than legitimate healing. Christian ethicists, drawing from biblical prohibitions against extramarital sex (e.g., Exodus 20:14 and 1 Corinthians 6:18), argue that therapeutic rationales cannot override divine commands for chastity, viewing surrogate interactions as inherently sinful acts that prioritize physical gratification over spiritual fidelity.^[43] From Catholic doctrine, sexual acts must be unitive and procreative within sacramental marriage, rendering surrogate partner engagements gravely immoral as they sever intimacy from its teleological purpose and mimic prostitution, which the Church condemns as a violation of human dignity (Catechism of the Catholic Church, nos. 2351–2356). Critics contend that such therapy exploits vulnerability, fostering dependency on paid surrogates instead of encouraging repentance, self-mastery, or marital reconciliation, potentially exacerbating spiritual alienation. Conservative commentators further highlight causal risks, including emotional bonding via oxytocin release during physical contact, which may lead to attachment disorders or disillusionment when surrogate "lessons" fail to translate to authentic relationships, underscoring a realist view that sex's bonding effects cannot be clinically detached from moral consequences. These perspectives prioritize eternal truths over empirical outcomes, dismissing efficacy claims as secondary to deontological prohibitions against treating bodies as instruments.^[5]

Societal Impact

Representations in Media and Culture

The 2012 independent film The Sessions, directed by Ben Lewin, dramatizes the real-life experiences of journalist and poet Mark O'Brien, who, paralyzed by polio and reliant on an iron lung, hired sex surrogate Cheryl Cohen Greene to help him lose his virginity in 1986 after 38 years.^[44] The film, starring John Hawkes as O'Brien and Helen Hunt as Greene, draws from O'Brien's 1990 article "On Seeing a Sex Surrogate" and emphasizes the clinical boundaries, ethical consultations with therapist and clergy, and emotional challenges of surrogate partner therapy, with Greene herself confirming its fidelity to the sessions' structure and intent.^[45] Critics noted its matter-of-fact portrayal of intimacy without sensationalism, though it prioritizes narrative drama over exhaustive clinical detail.^[46] In television, the Showtime series Masters of Sex (2013–2016) featured an episode titled "Surrogates" in its third season (2015), depicting William Masters initiating a surrogate partner program for clients with sexual dysfunctions, reflecting historical efforts by Masters and Virginia Johnson to formalize such practices in the 1960s.^[47] The portrayal aligns with the duo's documented research in their 1970 book Human Sexual Inadequacy, which first outlined surrogate involvement under therapist supervision, though the series dramatizes interpersonal tensions for entertainment.^[14] More recently, the 2025 Channel 4 reality series Virgin Island employed certified sex surrogates, including Kat Slade, to assist adult virgins in addressing intimacy barriers through guided physical and emotional exercises on a remote island, sparking public debate on the ethics of televised surrogacy but adhering to professional protocols like consent and post-session integration.^[48] Literature on surrogate partner therapy primarily consists of memoirs and professional accounts rather than fiction. Cheryl Cohen Greene's 2013 autobiography An Intimate Life: Sex, Love, and My Journey as a Surrogate Partner details her 40-year career, including the O'Brien case, framing surrogacy as a structured therapeutic tool for overcoming trauma and inhibition without romantic entanglement.^[49] Similarly, the 2014 anthology Sex Is the Least of It: Surrogate Partners Discuss Love, Life, and Intimacy compiles interviews with 25 practitioners, highlighting practical challenges like boundary maintenance over sexual aspects.^[50] These works, grounded in firsthand experience, contrast with rarer fictional treatments, underscoring surrogacy's niche cultural presence often tied to disability or dysfunction narratives rather than mainstream acceptance.^[51]

Broader Debates on Intimacy and Therapy Norms

Surrogate partner therapy challenges established norms in psychotherapy by incorporating deliberate physical and sexual intimacy as a therapeutic tool, prompting debates over the boundaries between professional healing and personal eroticism. Mainstream ethical codes, such as the American Psychological Association's (APA) Ethics Code Standard 10.05, explicitly prohibit psychologists from engaging in sexual intimacies with current clients or patients, emphasizing the inherent power imbalance that impairs objective beneficence and risks exploitation.^[52] This prohibition extends to former clients under Standard 10.08, with sexual relations discouraged indefinitely due to potential lingering dependency, reflecting a consensus that sexual contact undermines therapeutic neutrality.^[53] Proponents of surrogate partner therapy counter that it operates outside direct therapist-client dynamics, with surrogates functioning as supervised mentors rather than licensed clinicians, thereby circumventing these codes while fostering experiential learning in intimacy.^[7] Critics argue that even supervised physical intimacy blurs essential boundaries, fostering emotional vulnerabilities akin to transference in psychoanalysis, where clients may confuse therapeutic progress with genuine attachment. A 2024 study in the Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy highlighted surrogate partners' self-reported challenges in maintaining "fragile boundaries" during sensual and sexual contact, underscoring risks of unintended dependency despite triadic oversight involving a referring therapist.^[1] From a first-principles perspective, human intimacy involves neurochemical responses like oxytocin release that can amplify attachment irrespective of intent, potentially replicating the harms ethics codes aim to prevent; empirical data on long-term outcomes remains sparse, with no large-scale randomized controlled trials validating SPT's superiority over non-physical alternatives.^[54] Sources advocating SPT, often affiliated with organizations like the International Professional Surrogates Association, emphasize client consent and structured protocols, yet these lack independent peer-reviewed scrutiny, raising questions about self-interest in promoting the practice.^[19] Broader societal debates extend to the normalization of touch in therapy, where non-sexual physical contact—such as hand-holding or hugs—is permitted under codes from bodies like the American Counseling Association if therapeutically justified and consensual, but escalates ethical scrutiny when eroticized.^[55] Traditionalist perspectives, informed by evolutionary psychology, posit that commodifying intimacy for therapeutic ends erodes cultural norms viewing sex as a relational covenant rather than a skill-building exercise, potentially desensitizing participants to intrinsic relational risks.^[56] Conversely, some sexual medicine practitioners advocate integrating experiential elements under strict ethical standards, citing anecdotal successes for clients with severe intimacy disorders, though this invites critique for prioritizing subjective efficacy over rigorous evidence hierarchies.^[57] These tensions reflect ongoing causal questions: whether simulated intimacy causally heals root dysfunctions or merely provides temporary relief, with institutional biases in academia—often favoring progressive expansions of therapeutic modalities—potentially understating exploitation risks in power-asymmetric encounters.^[58]

Alternatives

Conventional Sex and Couples Therapy

Conventional sex therapy emerged in the mid-20th century as a structured, behavioral approach to addressing sexual dysfunctions through talk-based interventions and prescribed exercises between partners, without any physical contact between the therapist and clients. Pioneered by William Masters and Virginia Johnson in the 1960s and 1970s, it emphasizes reducing performance anxiety and rebuilding intimacy via techniques like sensate focus, where couples engage in progressive, non-demand touching exercises—starting with non-genital areas—to prioritize sensory pleasure over intercourse or orgasm goals.^[59]^[60] This method, often conducted in short-term sessions of 10-15 meetings, integrates education on anatomy and physiology, cognitive restructuring to challenge myths, and homework assignments to foster communication and mutual satisfaction.^[61] Empirical evidence supports its efficacy for common issues like erectile dysfunction, low desire, and arousal disorders, with meta-analyses indicating significant improvements in sexual function for 70-90% of participants when combined with behavioral homework.^[62] Unlike surrogate partner therapy, which introduces a third-party physical practitioner, conventional sex therapy maintains ethical boundaries by limiting therapist involvement to guidance, relying on client-partner dyads for experiential practice and thereby avoiding dependency risks or relational complications.^[63] Recent adaptations incorporate mindfulness-based elements, enhancing outcomes for female sexual dysfunction by promoting present-moment awareness during intimacy exercises.^[62] Couples therapy complements sex therapy by targeting relational factors—such as unresolved conflicts or poor communication—that exacerbate sexual problems, using evidence-based models like Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT) or the Gottman Method to rebuild emotional bonds and negotiation skills.^[64] For instance, interventions focusing on sexual self-disclosure and joint problem-solving have demonstrated moderate reductions in distress and increases in satisfaction, with meta-analyses confirming psychological counseling's positive effects on marital and sexual domains post-treatment.^[65]^[64] These approaches prioritize dyadic collaboration, often yielding sustained benefits through skill-building rather than simulated experiences, though success depends on partner motivation and absence of severe individual pathologies requiring separate treatment.^[66] In cases like vaginismus, couple-based behavioral therapy has shown comparable resolution rates to more intensive methods, underscoring its viability as a first-line, non-invasive option.^[9]

Non-Physical Therapeutic Approaches

Non-physical therapeutic approaches to addressing sexual and intimacy issues emphasize psychological interventions, such as cognitive restructuring, behavioral modification through homework exercises, and mindfulness practices, without involving direct physical contact by a therapist or surrogate. These methods target underlying cognitive distortions, anxiety, trauma, or relational patterns that contribute to dysfunctions like erectile difficulties, low desire, or aversion to intimacy. Certified sex therapists, often adhering to guidelines from organizations like the American Association of Sexuality Educators, Counselors and Therapists (AASECT), deliver these via talk sessions, typically 8-12 weekly meetings, focusing on education, communication skills, and self-exploration exercises performed independently or with a partner.^[67]^[68] Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) stands as a primary evidence-based option, helping clients identify and challenge negative thoughts about sexuality—such as performance fears or body image concerns—that perpetuate avoidance or dysfunction. In CBT protocols for sexual disorders, therapists assign sensate focus exercises, where partners engage in non-genital, non-demand touch to reduce pressure and rebuild arousal pathways, alongside journaling to track progress and reframe beliefs. A 2022 review of behavioral therapies for female sexual dysfunctions found CBT increased intercourse frequency and reduced coital fear in women with penetration issues, with effect sizes comparable to pharmacological aids in short-term trials, though long-term data remains limited.^[69]^[70] Similarly, for male erectile dysfunction, CBT addresses anxiety cycles, yielding improvements in 60-70% of cases per meta-analyses, outperforming waitlist controls but requiring partner involvement for sustained gains.^[71]^[72] Mindfulness-based interventions integrate meditation and body awareness techniques to enhance present-moment focus during intimacy, mitigating distractions like worry or dissociation. These approaches, often adapted from mindfulness-based stress reduction, involve guided practices to foster acceptance of bodily sensations without judgment, showing promise for hypoactive sexual desire and arousal disorders. A 2019 analysis by the American Psychological Association highlighted mindfulness therapies' broad applicability, with randomized trials demonstrating significant reductions in female sexual distress scores post-8-week programs, attributed to decreased rumination rather than direct arousal training.^[62] A 2023 feasibility study confirmed acceptability and preliminary efficacy in couples, with participants reporting heightened emotional intimacy and fewer avoidance behaviors after sessions emphasizing mindful touch homework.^[73] Couples-oriented modalities, such as emotionally focused therapy (EFT), complement individual work by rebuilding attachment bonds eroded by intimacy avoidance, using dialogue to express vulnerabilities without physical escalation. Evidence from 2020s reviews indicates EFT resolves relational contributors to sexual issues in 70-75% of distressed pairs, prioritizing empathy-building over behavioral drills, though integration with sex-specific CBT yields higher specificity for dysfunction resolution. Psychoeducation on anatomy and myths further underpins these, with studies showing baseline knowledge gains correlating to 20-30% symptom relief independent of deeper therapy. Overall, while these methods boast stronger empirical backing than surrogate practices—via randomized controlled trials—their success hinges on client motivation and absence of severe organic factors, with dropout rates around 20% in outpatient settings.^[74]^[75]

References

[1]
Being a Surrogate Partner: The Challenges of Fragile Boundaries
Mar 6, 2024 · Surrogate partner therapy is a type of treatment in which the surrogate partner (SP) works in a triadic setting with a sex therapist and a ...
[2]
About Surrogate Partner Therapy - SurrogateTherapy.org
Surrogate Partner Therapy is a form of therapy based on the successful methods of Masters and Johnson. In this therapy, a client, a therapist, and a surrogate ...
[3]
None
### Summary of Client Demographics and Selection Criteria in Sexual Surrogacy (AASECT Article, February 2013)
[4]
About IPSA - SurrogateTherapy.org
IPSA was founded in 1973 by a group of pioneering surrogate partners and therapists who were discovering and creating Surrogate Partner Therapy.<|separator|>
[5]
[PDF] Using Surrogate Partner Therapy in Counseling
Surrogate partner therapy is a treatment modality used in sex therapy to assist clients with a host of issues that relate to sexual wellness and intimacy.
[6]
Sexual Surrogate Partner Therapy: Legal and Ethical Issues
Oct 6, 2013 · In surrogate partner therapy many clients begin to accept their sexuality and begin to relate meaningfully only after some of their needs ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[7]
Surrogate Partner Therapy: Ethical Considerations in Sexual Medicine
While sex therapy is a well‐established intervention, the use of surrogates remains a controversial and fairly misunderstood practice, which has professional, ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[8]
Everything you should know about sex surrogate therapy
Apr 27, 2022 · Sex surrogate therapy is a three-way therapeutic relationship to help a person feel more comfortable with sex, sensuality, and sexuality.Definition · How it works · Vs. sex therapy · LegalityMissing: objectives | Show results with:objectives
[9]
Surrogate versus couple therapy in vaginismus - PubMed
Apr 13, 2007 · Surrogate therapy for vaginismus had 100% success in penile-vaginal intercourse, compared to 75% in couples therapy. Surrogate therapy was at ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
[10]
Surrogate Partner Therapy/Sexual Surrogacy-To Refer Or Not to Refer
This page provides definitions of Surrogate Partner Therapy (SPT) and outlines the main ethical and legal complexities, as well as standard-of-care questions.Missing: core objectives
[11]
What is a Sex Surrogate Partner and how is it different from a sex ...
Aug 18, 2023 · When the therapy goals have been met, sex surrogacy therapy ends. Unlike a sex surrogate partner, a prostitute's goal is providing sexual ...Missing: distinctions | Show results with:distinctions
[12]
Pioneering 'Masters Of Sex' Brought Science To The Bedroom - NPR
Oct 4, 2013 · William Masters and Virginia Johnson became famous in the 1960s for their groundbreaking and controversial research into the physiology of human sexuality.
[13]
Surrogate Partner Therapy
### Summary of Origins of Surrogate Partner Therapy in Masters and Johnson’s Work
[14]
The Evolution of Surrogate Partner Therapy
May 9, 2022 · The focus of Surrogate Partner Therapy is instead to address the root cause, which is typically some form of anxiety, past trauma, shame, or ...
[15]
30 YEARS OF PIONEERING IN SEX THERAPY - The New York Times
Oct 29, 1984 · ''Masters and Johnson devised a method of therapy the basic principles of which are the foundation for everything done since in this field,'' ...
[16]
About SPT - Embrace
Critically, a Surrogate Partner is also a trained, patient, nonjudgmental, ethical professional there to support the client's therapy on a time-limited basis.
[17]
SurrogateTherapy.org: Home
IPSA is the internationally recognized leading authority on. Surrogate Partner Therapy. ... A non-profit organization prioritizing client and student well ...Locate a Surrogate PartnerIPSA MissionAbout IPSAAbout IPSA TrainingFinding a Therapist
[18]
About IPSA Training - SurrogateTherapy.org
IPSA offers training in human sexuality, intimate relationships, sex therapy, and surrogate partner therapy.Missing: founding | Show results with:founding<|separator|>
[19]
Ethics & Legality - Surrogate Partner Collective
No statute prohibits the practice. After extensive research, we have not been able to find evidence of any case in which a surrogate partner or a collaborating ...
[20]
CLINICIAN ATTITUDES TOWARD THE TRIADIC MODEL ...
Apr 25, 2025 · The Triadic Model is an ongoing professional relationship between a clinician, client, and surrogate partner.
[21]
SPT - Surrogate Partner Therapy
Surrogate Partner Therapy (SPT) is a triadic model of therapy that includes a therapist, a trained surrogate and a client.
[22]
Collaborating with Surrogate Partners in the Triadic Model | AASECT
In this class, through lecture, real life examples, and an example experiential exercise, we illuminate the structure and general arc of this triadic modality.
[23]
What is the therapist's role in the surrogate partner therapy triad?
this means it involves the client, surrogate partner, and therapist.
[24]
Qualifications and FAQs | SurrogateTherapy.org
IPSA Professional Surrogate Partner Training Program is open to people who are comfortable with their own sexuality and nudity, who have evolved through ...
[25]
Surrogate Partner Certification - SurrogateTherapy.org
IPSA certification is available to individuals who have successfully completed both phases of professional surrogate partner training.
[26]
Training | Surrogate Partner Collective
The path to becoming an SPC-Certified Surrogate Partner consists of completing the following steps: Step 1: Fundamentals of Embodied Intimacy, a 5-day, In- ...
[27]
Surrogate Partner Therapy | Ananda Integrative Healing Group
OUR SURROGATE PARTNER THERAPY PROCESS. The first step in the process is an intake evaluation with our clinical therapist, during which we will answer any ...
[28]
Sex Surrogate Therapy: Definition, Techniques, Efficacy
Sex surrogate therapy is a type of therapy that gives literal hands-on help—including intercourse—to people struggling with sex and intimacy.Missing: core concept
[29]
(059) Surrogate Treatment- A Case Study of 151 male clients and ...
May 22, 2023 · Surrogate Treatment is also known as Sex Surrogate therapy/Partner Therapy was created in the 1960s by the Medical and Sex Research team of Dr. ...
[30]
[PDF] Surrogate Partner Therapy: Ethical Considerations in Sexual Medicine
Sex therapy pioneers Masters and Johnson introduced surrogacy in sex therapy; however, there is a lack of published evidence supporting treatment efficacy and ...
[31]
Surrogate partner therapy: ethical considerations in sexual medicine
SPT can be an effective intervention that may enhance sexual medicine practice. However, SPT must be offered according to legal, professional, and ethical ...
[32]
Surrogate Versus Couple Therapy in Vaginismus - ScienceDirect.com
Surrogate therapy had 100% success in penile-vaginal intercourse vs 75% in couples therapy, and 100% of surrogate patients completed therapy vs 69% in couples ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[33]
Surrogate Versus Couple Therapy in Vaginismus | Request PDF
Aug 7, 2025 · Twelve percent of the couples group ended the therapy because it failed, and 19% because the couples decided to separate. Treating vaginismus ...
[34]
The Question of Surrogates in Sex Therapy - SpringerLink
A large criticism of the work with surrogates that has been done so far is the absence of data on treatment effectiveness. The major question is whether or not ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy<|separator|>
[35]
IPSA Code of Ethics - SurrogateTherapy.org
1. The designation “surrogate partner” shall apply only in a therapeutic situation comprised of a client, surrogate, and supervising therapist.Missing: indications | Show results with:indications
[36]
Surrogate Partner Code of Conduct
The surrogate will ensure that the client has been educated about the objectives and boundaries of the therapy and has expectations consistent with the practice ...Missing: management | Show results with:management
[37]
Sexual Surrogate Partner Therapy: Legal and Ethical Issues
Aug 6, 2025 · Several studies addressing commercial sex 1 show the existence ... Using Surrogate Partner Therapy in Counseling: Treatment Considerations.
[38]
Legal Status - SurrogateTherapy.org
The legal status of surrogate partners is undefined in most of the United States and in most countries around the world. This means that there are generally no ...
[39]
What Is Sexual Surrogacy? - WebMD
Oct 18, 2024 · The International Professional Surrogates Association, a professional organization for those in the field of surrogate partner therapy, ensures ...
[40]
Where Is Relationship Surrogacy Legal? Insights for Therapists and ...
Jan 22, 2025 · Practitioners need to navigate these boundaries carefully to avoid potential legal or ethical issues.
[41]
Locate a Surrogate Partner - SurrogateTherapy.org
How to locate Certified Professional Surrogate Partners. Below is a list of IPSA-Certified Surrogate Partners and information about how to receive referrals ...
[42]
Psychologists dub Virgin Island a 'public health danger' - Daily Mail
May 17, 2025 · Psychologists dub Virgin Island a 'public health danger' - warning that controversial 'Sex Surrogate' therapy is a disaster waiting to happen | ...
[43]
SEX THERAPY AND RELIGION - The New York Times
Mar 12, 1986 · However, surrogate sex partners for men or women having sexual difficulties would ''not be enthusiastically viewed by many Christian ethicists, ...Missing: moral critiques
[44]
Meet the Real Sex Surrogate Portrayed by Helen Hunt in ... - HuffPost
Jan 29, 2013 · One of my favorite movies of the year is The Sessions, based on the true story of sex surrogate Cheryl Cohen Greene and her work with Berkeley- ...
[45]
Interviewing Sex Surrogate Cheryl Cohen Greene
May 7, 2025 · Like you did with Mark O'Brien in The Sessions? Yes, the movie was accurate there. Sometimes afterwards a client will say, “Wow, you were there.
[46]
How 'The Sessions' Tells the Sweet, Awkward Truth About Sex
Oct 18, 2012 · But the sex scenes in The Sessions, the new drama starring John ... "Clinical accuracy is not the message of the movie," Lewin told me.
[47]
"Masters of Sex" Surrogates (TV Episode 2015) - IMDb
Rating 7.6/10 (362) Michael Sheen in Masters of Sex (2013). DramaRomance. As Johnson jets away to Las Vegas with Dan Logan, Masters uses her absence to begin his surrogacy program.
[48]
Virgin Island: A real-life sexual surrogate on helping people find ...
May 14, 2025 · Virgin Island: A real-life sexual surrogate on helping people find intimacy. Channel 4's experimental new series follows a group of virgins as ...
[49]
An Intimate Life: Sex, Love, and My Journey as a Surrogate Partner
Rating 3.9 (401) In this riveting memoir, Cohen Greene shares some of her most moving cases, and also reveals her own sexual coming-of-age.Missing: literature | Show results with:literature
[50]
Sex Is the Least of It: Surrogate Partners Discuss Love Life and ...
This book utilizes, in part, the approach of interviewing 25 current and former surrogate partners to examine, compare, and contrast their experiences. It seeks ...Missing: literature novels
[51]
Bibliography | Surrogate Partner Therapy - SurrogateTherapy.org
Abrams, P. (1979). The use of a “surrogate” partner in the treatment of single males with sexual dysfunctions. Unpublished masters thesis.
[52]
Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct
APA may impose sanctions on its members for violations of the standards of the Ethics Code, including termination of APA membership, and may notify other ...
[53]
Sexual involvements with former clients: A delicate balance of core ...
Dec 1, 2004 · The Ethics Code seeks to avoid harm and protect autonomy, informed by solid clinical thinking and good research.
[54]
[Ethical issues concerning surrogate assisted sex therapy] - PubMed
Surrogate sex therapy uses a surrogate as a mentor, raising ethical issues. The therapy involves a three-way team, and the relationship is terminated after.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[55]
To Touch or Not to Touch: Clinical and Ethical Considerations in ...
Touch in therapy is not inherently unethical. None of the professional organizations code of ethics (i.e., APA, ApA, ACA, NASW, CAMFT) view touch as unethical.
[56]
Sexual feelings and behaviors in the psychotherapy relationship
Sexual intimacies with clients are inappropriate. Rigid boundary rules may harm clients. A process for handling attraction and addressing vulnerabilities is ...Missing: physical | Show results with:physical<|separator|>
[57]
CME Information:Surrogate Partner Therapy: Ethical Considerations ...
However, SPT must be offered according to legal, professional, and ethical standards. Sexual medicine practitioners should consider SPT based on the ethical ...Missing: debates intimacy norms
[58]
The discipline of ethics and the prohibition against becoming ...
Jun 1, 2006 · A sexual involvement is unethical because you can no longer exercise beneficence in the professional relationship.Missing: physical | Show results with:physical
[59]
Sex Therapy With Sensate Focus - Verywell Mind
Nov 27, 2023 · Sensate focus is a couples-based intervention. It can be used for couples of all different ages, gender identities, and sexual orientations.Missing: progressive | Show results with:progressive
[60]
Masters & Johnson – their unique contribution to sexology
Aug 31, 2021 · Masters and Johnson were pioneers in observing and describing normal sexual function and consequently they provided unique insights into helping to understand ...
[61]
A Traditional Masters and Johnson Behavioral Approach to Sex ...
Mar 18, 2017 · The Masters and Johnson approach involves not only behavioral intervention through Sensate Focus exercises but also educational, attitudinal, cognitive, and ...
[62]
CE Corner: Sex therapy for the 21st century: Five emerging directions
Feb 1, 2019 · Mindfulness-based therapies are exciting because they are both effective and broadly applicable to many types of sexual problems, Peterson says.
[63]
A Beginner's Guide to Surrogate Partner Therapy - Healthline
Feb 27, 2020 · The IPSA calls out that comfort with one's own body and sexuality, warmth, compassion, empathy, intelligence, and nonjudgmental attitudes ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
[64]
The Effect of Psychological Interventions on Sexual and Marital ...
The results of meta-analysis demonstrated the effect of counseling-based psychological interventions on increasing sexual and marital satisfaction of couples.
[65]
Comparing the Effectiveness of Sexual Counseling Based on ...
Jan 18, 2021 · The findings confirm the effectiveness of the BETTER counseling model in increasing sexual self-disclosure after childbirth.
[66]
Feasibility of a Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy Intervention for ...
Apr 9, 2024 · Partners reported moderate and small improvements in sexual distress for post-treatment and 6-month follow-up, respectively. Results support the ...
[67]
Sex Therapy: Definition, Types, Techniques, and Efficacy
Talk therapy is the primary method of sex therapy. Couples can expect to work on their general communication skills, explain the points of sensitivity that they ...
[68]
What Is Sex Therapy? A Complete Guide to Sexual Health Counseling
Oct 8, 2025 · While some sex therapists encourage the use of surrogates for sexual encounters, surrogate partner therapy is not usually recommended and ...
[69]
Behavioral Therapies for Treating Female Sexual Dysfunctions
May 16, 2022 · When addressing female sexual dysfunctions, CBT has typically included other non-pharmacological strategies, such as directed masturbation ...
[70]
Unlocking Sexual Wellness: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT ...
Jun 5, 2024 · In the context of sex therapy, CBT helps individuals and couples address a wide range of sexual issues by modifying the cognitive distortions ...
[71]
Cognitive Behavioral Sex Therapy: An Emerging Treatment Option ...
Jun 24, 2020 · The CBST is considered an effective treatment approach not only for improving erectile functioning but also for addressing anxiety-producing ...
[72]
CBT Tools for Overcoming Erectile Dysfunction
Apr 25, 2024 · CBT enhances communication skills in sexual relationships by focusing on thoughts and perceptions and their impact on emotions and behavior, ...
[73]
Mindfulness in sex therapy and intimate relationships: a feasibility ...
Jul 14, 2023 · Results from this study support already existing evidence that mindfulness-based interventions are feasible and effective for targeting sexual dysfunctions in ...
[74]
Connection Breakdown? Couples Therapy Fixes It - MN, USA
May 27, 2025 · Therapy for couples offers evidence-based tools to navigate challenges and restore emotional intimacy. Choosing relationship counseling ...Couples Therapy: A Pathway... · Emotionally Focused Therapy... · Cognitive Behavioral Therapy...
[75]
Couple therapy in the 2020s: Current status and emerging ...
This paper provides a critical analysis and synthesis of the current status and emerging developments in contemporary couple therapy.