Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

TARGET2

TARGET2 (Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross settlement Express Transfer system) was the Eurosystem-operated (RTGS) system for processing large-value, euro-denominated payments between s and commercial banks across from its phased rollout in 2007–2008 until its replacement by the T2 system in March 2023. It facilitated instantaneous, irrevocable settlement in central bank , ensuring high and finality for transactions typically exceeding €1 million, and served as a cornerstone of the euro area's monetary infrastructure by integrating over 1,000 direct participants and handling daily volumes often surpassing €2 trillion. The system's single technical platform, managed jointly by the and national central banks such as the and , promoted efficient cross-border payments and supported the Eurosystem's implementation, including reserve management and interbank liquidity distribution. A defining feature emerged in the form of bilateral TARGET2 balances—net claims and liabilities among national central banks arising from payment flows—which ballooned during the 2010–2012 sovereign debt crisis and persisted thereafter, with creditor positions (e.g., Germany's exceeding €1 at peaks) offsetting debtor exposures in peripheral economies, reflecting capital reallocations amid divergent competitiveness and fiscal pressures. These imbalances, while ECB officials describe as inherent to an integrated RTGS and backed by collateralized without immediate default risk, have sparked debate among economists over their sustainability, with critics arguing they mask underlying divergences and expose the to potential fragmentation if trust erodes or a member exits.

System Fundamentals

Overview and Purpose

TARGET2, formally known as the Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross settlement Express Transfer system version 2, served as the Eurosystem's primary real-time gross settlement (RTGS) platform for euro-denominated payments from its phased rollout starting in November 2007 until its replacement by T2 on 20 March 2023. It consolidated the fragmented national RTGS systems of euro area countries into a single shared platform (SSP), operated jointly by the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks, to streamline processing and reduce operational redundancies. The core purpose of TARGET2 was to enable the immediate, irrevocable of high-value interbank transfers, operations, and customer payments in central bank , thereby ensuring transaction finality and minimizing in the euro area's financial infrastructure. By facilitating cross-border payments without reliance on correspondent banking networks, it promoted monetary union integration, supported ECB liquidity management, and handled urgent transactions requiring same-day finality, processing an average of over 350,000 payments daily at its peak. This RTGS mechanism underpinned financial stability by providing a secure channel for settling obligations arising from securities trades, , and derivatives, distinct from deferred net systems.

Key Features and Technical Specifications

TARGET2 functioned as a (RTGS) system, processing euro-denominated large-value payments on a gross basis with immediate and irrevocable finality, ensuring settlement in money held on participants' accounts at national s or the (ECB). This design minimized by avoiding netting and providing intraday liquidity options, such as overdrafts collateralized by eligible assets, to facilitate timely settlement without end-of-day constraints. The system's Single Shared (SSP) integrated core functionalities, including payment processing, reserve management, home accounting, and information/control modules, enabling harmonized operations across the Eurosystem's national central banks and select direct participants. Technical specifications encompassed high-capacity processing, with the platform designed to handle peak volumes exceeding 500,000 transactions daily, achieving average times of under five minutes through automated queuing and prioritization algorithms. Payments adhered to SWIFT MT message standards (e.g., , MT202), with support for bilateral limits and reservation mechanisms to optimize intraday fund usage. Operational parameters included fixed hours from 07:00 to 18:00 CET on banking days, excluding national holidays unless opted in, and dual-site redundancy across and another location for business continuity, ensuring 99.99% availability. Optional modules extended capabilities, such as the Liquidity Optimisation Tool for multilateral recycling of liquidity and the Spine service for contingency processing, though core RTGS remained mandatory for all participants. The platform's emphasized scalability and , with no support for deferred net , prioritizing settlement assurance over speed in conflict.

Historical Development

Establishment and Early Implementation

The Governing Council of the (ECB) decided on the strategic direction for , the successor to the original system, on 24 October 2002, aiming to consolidate the decentralized (RTGS) infrastructure into a more efficient, single shared platform to enhance payment processing across the . This decision followed evaluations of the existing TARGET system's limitations in handling growing cross-border transactions and sought to reduce operational fragmentation by migrating national RTGS components to a unified technical platform developed jointly by the ECB, , and . The initiative prioritized central bank money settlement for high-value payments to support implementation and minimize , with public consultations refining the principles and structure by late 2002. TARGET2 commenced operations on 19 November 2007, marking the initial migration of the first group of national central banks and their user communities, including , , , , , , , and . This launch established the single shared platform () for of euro-denominated payments, replacing disparate national systems while allowing parallel operation with the legacy to ensure continuity. Early implementation involved phased migrations, with Germany's Bundesbank fully transitioning its community to the SSP on the inaugural date under the component system TARGET2-Bundesbank. The process emphasized testing and readiness to maintain settlement efficiency, processing urgent payments in central bank money with finality. Subsequent migrations proceeded in waves, culminating in the complete decommissioning of the original TARGET on 19 May 2008, after which TARGET2 handled all euro RTGS traffic across the euro area. This early phase demonstrated the system's robustness, with initial volumes reflecting seamless integration despite the complexity of harmonizing diverse national infrastructures, and it laid the foundation for handling trillions in daily transactions. By mid-2008, participation extended to all eurozone central banks, solidifying TARGET2's role in the Eurosystem's payment ecosystem.

Operational Evolution and Expansions

TARGET2's operational framework evolved from its initial launch on 19 November 2007, which marked the start of a phased migration from the predecessor TARGET system, fully completed on 18 May 2008. This transition centralized payment processing on a single shared platform operated across three geographically dispersed sites in Frankfurt, Paris, and Rome, replacing the decentralized linkage of national real-time gross settlement systems to improve operational resilience, reduce costs, and enhance cross-border efficiency. The system's participant base expanded significantly post-launch, growing to connect around 1,000 direct participants from European Economic Area countries and select third-country institutions by the 2010s, enabling broader access for euro-denominated high-value payments and monetary policy operations. This growth was supported by harmonized access criteria and the platform's scalability, which handled increasing transaction volumes, with annual traffic rising to over 96 million payments by 2021, reflecting an 8.67% year-on-year increase. A key expansion integrated TARGET2 with TARGET2-Securities (T2S), launched on 22 June 2015, which centralized securities settlement in central bank money across 20 European countries' central securities depositories by 2023, linking cash legs in TARGET2 accounts to promote DvP settlement and reduce settlement risks. Operational enhancements during this period included refined liquidity management functions and adaptations to regulatory changes, ensuring sustained reliability amid evolving market demands.

Shutdown and Transition to T2

The Eurosystem executed the shutdown of TARGET2 through a structured migration to its successor platform, , between 17 and 20 March 2023, marking the end of TARGET2's operations after nearly 15 years of service as the primary (RTGS) system for large-value s. This transition formed part of the broader TARGET2 and T2S consolidation project, aimed at integrating and securities settlement functionalities into a single, modernized infrastructure to enhance efficiency, reduce operational costs, and align with international standards such as for message formatting. The migration adopted a "big bang" strategy, involving simultaneous transfer of all TARGET2 participant communities—central banks, , and other eligible institutions—to T2 without extended , minimizing disruption risks while ensuring continuity of settlement services. T2, developed jointly by the (ECB) and national central banks of the , retained core RTGS capabilities but introduced enhancements like extended operating hours potential, improved resilience features, and richer data handling via , which TARGET2's legacy MT format could not support at scale. Post-migration, T2 processed its inaugural transactions on 20 March 2023, fully assuming TARGET2's role in settling interbank payments, central bank operations, and related euro-denominated flows. Preparation for the shutdown involved years of testing, including user acceptance phases and simulations, coordinated by the ECB to validate T2's capacity for handling TARGET2's peak volumes—averaging over 300,000 transactions daily pre-transition. Participants were required to update systems for compliance ahead of the cutover, with the ECB providing guidelines and support to mitigate adaptation challenges. The ECB reported the launch as successful, with no major incidents during the migration window, affirming T2's readiness to sustain the Eurosystem's payment infrastructure amid evolving demands for faster, more data-intensive settlements.

Participation and Governance

Eligible Participants and Access Criteria

Direct participants in TARGET2, who hold payment mechanism (PM) accounts for real-time gross settlement, are primarily credit institutions established in the (EEA). These include banks and branches of non-EEA credit institutions operating under EEA supervision, enabling direct submission and receipt of payment orders in central bank money. Eurosystem national central banks (NCBs) participate mandatorily via the single shared platform (), which connects all 20 euro-area NCBs and facilitates decentralized operation under home NCB oversight. Non-euro area EU NCBs, such as those from or , may opt in for participation, subject to agreements. Certain public sector entities, such as national treasuries or international organizations, can access PM accounts if approved by the relevant NCB and meeting equivalence standards for prudential supervision. Access criteria, harmonized across the per the TARGET Guideline (Annex I, Part I, Article 4), require entities to be legally established under EEA law, subject to adequate supervisory oversight, and capable of maintaining balances for . Applicants must demonstrate robust operational controls, including compliant with standards, timely reconciliation capabilities, and no unresolved compliance issues from prior assessments. Technical connectivity via or other certified interfaces is mandatory, with testing for required before activation. For "critical participants"—those processing over 1% of daily TARGET2 value or exhibiting systemic importance—enhanced criteria apply, including stricter on recovery plans and potential collateral requirements to mitigate default risks. Indirect participants, such as smaller credit institutions or non-eligible entities, access the system via direct participants' accounts, without holding PM accounts themselves, to settle via correspondent relationships. National central banks retain discretion to impose additional country-specific requirements, ensuring alignment with local prudential rules.

Governance Structure and Oversight

The governance of TARGET2 follows a three-level structure managed by the , comprising the (ECB) and the national central banks (NCBs) of euro-area countries. At the first level, the ECB's Governing Council holds ultimate responsibility for the system's strategic direction, overall management, control, and key policies, including the approval of common cost and pricing frameworks as outlined in ECB Guideline ECB/2007/2 of 14 November 2007. This body ensures alignment with Eurosystem objectives for implementation and . The second level is handled by the TARGET2 Operators Group (TOG), which supports the Governing Council by preparing decisions, coordinating operational aspects, and addressing user requirements through subgroups focused on technical standards, harmonization, and business continuity. NCBs contribute to this level by participating in decision-making on system enhancements and . The third level involves the operational execution by individual NCBs, which maintain and run the decentralized technical platforms (RTGS components) hosting TARGET2 ledgers, ensuring real-time processing across multiple sites for resilience. Oversight of TARGET2 is led by the ECB, designated by the Governing Council as the under a cooperative framework with NCBs, to safeguard systemic stability, efficiency, and compliance with international standards like the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures principles. In , the Governing Council identified TARGET2 as a systemically important , subjecting it to enhanced oversight requirements via ECB (EU) No 795/2014, including regular assessments of legal, operational, and financial risks. This oversight remains segregated from operational functions to maintain independence, with annual disclosure reports evaluating adherence to core principles for systemically important s.

Usage and Activity Metrics

![TARGET2 Processing Trends Graph from ECB Data](./assets/Target2_Graph_-ECB_Data$1 TARGET2 processed an average of around 350,000 payments per day in the period immediately preceding its shutdown in March 2023, with a corresponding daily value of approximately €1.8 trillion. In 2019, the system settled a total of 87,751,040 transactions, equating to a daily average of 344,122 payments. These figures underscore TARGET2's role as a high-capacity system handling the bulk of large-value payments. The volume of transactions in TARGET2 exhibited relative stability in its later years, hovering between 340,000 and 350,000 daily averages, though it maintained a dominant position by settling 92% of the total value among euro large-value systems in 2022. Value processed daily often approached €2 , with the system capable of settling payments equivalent to nearly the area's annual GDP every six days. Trends indicated gradual growth in transaction volumes from the system's 2007 launch, driven by increased cross-border financial integration, while values fluctuated in line with economic conditions and operations.
YearDaily Average Volume (payments)Notes
2019344,122Total annual: 87,751,040
2022~350,000Leading 92% of LVPS value
peaks occurred on days with high activity, such as month-ends tied to reserve requirements, though the system's design ensured consistent real-time settlement without significant disruptions in routine operations. Overall, TARGET2's metrics reflected its efficiency in supporting euro area transmission and prior to the transition to T2.

Pricing Model and Economic Aspects

The pricing model for TARGET2's core services featured two participant options designed for cost recovery on a not-for-profit basis while accommodating different volumes. Option A imposed a monthly fixed fee of €150 per dedicated cash account alongside a flat €0.80 fee per (debit entry). Option B levied a higher monthly fixed fee of €1,875 per dedicated cash account with volume-tiered fees decreasing from €0.60 for up to 50,000 transactions to €0.125 for volumes exceeding 500,000 transactions monthly. Ancillary features incurred supplementary charges, including €1,000 monthly for ancillary system settlement under fixed fee structures and €100 per account for consolidated information tools. Indirect participants faced a nominal €20 monthly fee, while add-ons like multi-addressee access added €80 monthly. No fees applied to auto-collateralization transactions or intraday transfers within the system, mirroring principles for monetary policy-related operations. Economically, this low-cost framework supported efficient handling of large-value payments, settling an average €1.7 trillion daily across 344,120 transactions in 2019. The absence of charges for collateralized intraday credit reduced banks' liquidity management expenses, mitigating funding premia and enabling smoother transmission without additional systemic burdens. By fostering a level playing field across central banks, the model enhanced cross-border , lowered risks compared to net systems, and sustained high participation from over 1,000 institutions, thereby bolstering euro area amid varying economic conditions.

Operational Calendar and Holidays

TARGET2 operated on all calendar days except Saturdays, Sundays, and ECB-designated TARGET closing days, which were harmonized across participating central banks to ensure consistent settlement availability. These closing days included fixed public holidays observed by the ECB: 1 January (), 1 May (), 25 December (Christmas Day), and 26 December. Movable holidays tied to the Easter cycle, specifically and , were also TARGET closing days, with dates determined annually according to the used by the ECB. The ECB published indicative calendars for reserve maintenance periods and tender operations, marking these closures in red to guide participants on non-operational days. No additional national bank holidays disrupted operations unless explicitly aligned with ECB-defined closures, prioritizing system-wide uniformity over local variations. On operational days, processing followed a structured schedule: daytime hours from 07:00 to 18:00 CET for standard interbank transfers, with night-time settlement from 22:00 CET to 07:00 CET enabling cross-day liquidity management. This calendar supported real-time gross settlement while minimizing disruptions, though consultations prior to TARGET2's phase-out explored potential extensions to operating hours and days for enhanced flexibility.

Operational Mechanics

Daily Processing and Settlement Procedures

TARGET2 operated on a (RTGS) basis, processing euro-denominated payments individually and continuously throughout the business day, provided sufficient liquidity was available in the payer's account; otherwise, payments were queued and settled on a first-in-first-out () basis or prioritized by urgency levels (highly urgent, urgent, normal). Payments were submitted primarily via MT messages (e.g., for customer payments, MT202 for interbank), with settlement occurring in money across participants' single settlement accounts held at national s or the ECB. The daily cycle began with the start-of-day phase around 18:45 CET the previous evening, involving static data loading and system initialization, followed by provisioning from 19:00 to 19:30 CET to prepare dedicated cash accounts (DCAs) for ancillary systems. Night-time settlement (NTS) then ran from 19:30 to 07:00 CET, focusing on ancillary system (AS) transfers under procedures such as Procedure 6, with interruptions for maintenance between 22:00 and 01:00 CET; during this period, internet access for payments was limited, allowing only transfers. A brief business window from 06:45 to 07:00 CET prepared the system for the main day trade phase. The core day trade phase operated from 07:00 to 18:00 CET, Monday to Friday (excluding holidays), during which payments were accepted until 17:00 CET and payments until 18:00 CET. FileAct messages for procedures 3, 4, and 5 (e.g., multilateral AS settlements with simultaneous ) were processed in this window. Liquidity management features included immediate transfers, standing orders (processed by 18:00 CET), and automated reservations, with intraday credit available via repo or collateralized overdrafts against ECB standing facilities. For TARGET2-Securities (T2S) integration, a sweep at 17:45 CET transferred end-of-day balances from T2S DCAs to main TARGET2 accounts. End-of-day procedures commenced at 18:00 CET, rejecting any remaining queued payments and initiating : liquidity was transferred back from DCAs to accounts (with standing facilities available until 18:15 CET, or 18:30 CET on last reserve maintenance days), accounts were zeroed, and final statements were generated by 18:45 CET. Contingency protocols included the Enhanced Contingency Solution (ECONSI) for platform failures, supporting up to 40,000 transactions per day via manual processing, and mechanisms with intra-region within one hour. Participants were required to maintain business continuity plans with annual testing to ensure resilience.

Reliability, Outages, and Contingency Protocols

TARGET2 operates under stringent reliability standards aligned with international norms such as ISO 27001 and 27002 for and , as it supports core functions in euro payments settlement. The system's architecture employs a "two regions, four sites" model across geographically dispersed operational centers, with permanent staffing and rotated responsibilities to ensure redundancy and rapid , targeting in the secondary region within two hours of a primary site failure. Oversight expectations for business continuity were established by the ECB Governing Council on 31 May 2006, mandating systemically important payment systems like TARGET2 to maintain robust security and continuity frameworks. Despite these measures, TARGET2 has experienced significant outages. On 23 October 2020, a software defect in a third-party network device caused a nearly 10-hour disruption, halting real-time gross settlement and prompting an independent ECB review of business continuity, recovery testing, change management, and communication protocols, with findings published in Q2 2021. The review aimed to enhance financial market infrastructure reliability, underscoring vulnerabilities in third-party dependencies and internal network resilience. Its successor T2, operational since March 2023, faced a similar hardware malfunction outage on 27 February 2025, lasting approximately seven hours and delaying transactions worth trillions of euros, including salaries and welfare payments, which highlighted persistent challenges in disaster recovery execution despite contingency designs. Contingency protocols include tiered arrangements for failures at participant, , (NSP), or system levels. The Enhanced Contingency Solution (ECONS) enables processing of critical payments via a separate platform during outages, sustainable for multiple days, while exceptional functionality allows manual GUI inputs for participants and interventions on behalf of affected parties. For severe T2-level disruptions, backlog processing may extend into the next , with regular testing of procedures to validate efficacy. Participants must adhere to predefined communication channels and fallback procedures outlined in ECB guidelines, such as those in the TARGET2 Information Guide, to minimize delays.

Intra-System Balances

Mechanics of Balance Accumulation

TARGET2 balances, also known as net positions, arise from the settlement of cross-border payments in money within the Eurosystem's (RTGS) system. When a -denominated payment is initiated from a participant in one euro area country (country A) to a participant in another (country B), the national (NCB) of country A debits the payer's reserve account held at that NCB and simultaneously adjusts its own TARGET2 position by reducing its net claim on—or increasing its net liability to—the (ECB). Conversely, the NCB of country B credits the payee's reserve account and increases its net claim on the ECB. This adjustment occurs instantaneously during the RTGS process, ensuring finality without netting against other transactions. These bilateral adjustments between NCBs and the ECB accumulate over time as the net result of repeated cross-border flows, reflecting the overall redistribution of across the area. Positive balances (net claims) emerge in NCBs of countries experiencing net inflows—such as from export surpluses or imports—while negative balances (net liabilities) build in NCBs of countries with net outflows, often tied to import surpluses or exports. Unlike pre-euro bilateral systems with caps, TARGET2 imposes no limits on these positions, allowing unlimited extension of intraday backed by the Eurosystem's framework, which prevents forced reversals and enables persistent accumulation without immediate rebalancing. The mechanics are inherently linked to underlying balance-of-payments dynamics: transactions (e.g., trade in ) generate flows where net importers accumulate liabilities, while and financial account shifts—such as reallocations or withdrawals—amplify this through sudden surges in transfers. For instance, during periods of financial stress, from deficit countries to core economies results in rapid liability buildup for the former's NCBs, as entities shift deposits abroad, settled via TARGET2 without ECB intervention unless shortages arise. operations, including asset purchases under programs like the ECB's Asset Purchase Programme () from onward, can further influence accumulation by injecting unevenly, with purchases in certain jurisdictions altering net flows. However, these balances remain passive records of private and policy-driven transactions, not direct ECB lending, though they redistribute the Eurosystem's overall reserve base. In operational terms, the ECB's Single Shared Platform (SSP) for TARGET2 processes these settlements, maintaining a multilateral netting of positions at the end of each business day while individual transactions remain gross. Accumulation is thus path-dependent, with historical peaks—such as Bundesbank claims exceeding €1 trillion by 2012—stemming from cumulative deficits in southern euro area countries amid the sovereign debt crisis, financed implicitly through TARGET2 rather than private capital. This mechanism equilibrates payments internally but defers adjustment to fiscal or structural reforms, as balances carry no interest penalty and are backed by ECB capital keys in extremis.

Historical Patterns and Crisis Dynamics

TARGET2 balances among euro area national central banks (NCBs) remained limited prior to the global financial crisis, with net positions typically under €100 billion, reflecting balanced cross-border payments within the integrated monetary union. The onset of tensions in mid-2007 triggered initial accumulations, as shortages in markets prompted shifts toward funding and capital flows to safer assets. By the end of , the Bundesbank's TARGET2 claims had risen to approximately €200 billion, driven by withdrawals from peripheral banking systems and redeposits in core countries like . The euro area sovereign debt crisis from 2010 intensified these dynamics, with private from vulnerable economies accelerating imbalances. Peripheral NCBs, including those in , , , , and , recorded cumulative negative balances exceeding €500 billion by mid-2012, as domestic banks lost foreign funding and residents repatriated deposits. Correspondingly, core NCB claims, particularly the Bundesbank's, surged to over €800 billion by late 2012, peaking near €1 trillion in subsequent years amid ongoing fragmentation. This pattern was primarily fueled by capital flow shocks rather than fiscal deficits or trade imbalances alone, with TARGET2 facilitating automatic provision equivalent to an implicit lender-of-last-resort function by the ECB. Post-crisis stabilization efforts, including ECB's outright monetary transactions announced in September 2012, moderated but did not reverse the elevated levels, as balances reflected persistent and banking sector retrenchment. Renewed expansions occurred from 2015 onward, linked to asset purchase programs that redistributed geographically, pushing German claims above €900 billion by 2019. During the shock in 2020, balances fluctuated with emergency injections but stabilized at high levels, underscoring TARGET2's role in absorbing crisis-induced flows without triggering external adjustment pressures akin to fixed regimes. Empirical decompositions confirm that such dynamics stem predominantly from adjustments to perceived risks, rather than policies.

Economic Implications and Risk Assessments

Large TARGET2 balances within the enable the financing of persistent current account deficits in debtor countries, such as and , by channeling surplus savings from creditor nations like through balance sheets rather than market mechanisms. As of March 2025, Germany's Bundesbank held TARGET2 claims exceeding €1.07 trillion, while Spain's liabilities stood at approximately €444 billion, illustrating the scale of these intra-euro area exposures. This dynamic, amplified by ECB asset purchase programs since , has supported liquidity in peripheral economies during periods of market stress, but it also sustains economic divergences by obviating the need for immediate adjustments in competitiveness or . From a macroeconomic perspective, TARGET2 imbalances reflect underlying and reallocations, yet their perpetual nature—lacking maturity dates or collateral—effectively transforms the into a backstop for balance-of-payments imbalances, potentially distorting resource allocation across the euro area. In creditor countries, the accumulation of claims generates interest income for national central banks, but it ties up reserves that could otherwise fund domestic investment, contributing to subdued in core economies. Conversely, debtor positions facilitate without corresponding capital inflows from private investors, raising concerns over as governments and banks may delay reforms under the implicit guarantee of support. Risk assessments of these balances vary significantly, with the ECB asserting that no default exists so long as the monetary union remains intact, viewing claims as mutual, unlimited obligations settled indefinitely via the Eurosystem's consolidated . However, analyses highlight substantial tail risks in scenarios of area fragmentation or exit, where creditor central banks could face unrecoverable losses on unsecured claims, estimated in the hundreds of billions of euros for major holders like , absent negotiated settlements. Even without dissolution, critics contend that the ECB could resort to to service liabilities, diluting the real value of claims through and exporting adjustment costs to surplus countries. Systemic risks stem from the potential for large imbalances to erode confidence in the 's irrevocability, amplifying fears during crises and complicating transmission due to persistent fragmentation signals. Bundesbank analyses acknowledge that negative balances in exiting countries would crystallize losses for the , though mitigated by shared capital keys. Overall, while TARGET2 provides essential stability in the absence of fiscal union, its unchecked growth underscores vulnerabilities in the euro area's architecture, where private flows are supplanted by intermediation, heightening exposure to policy errors or exogenous shocks.

Controversies and Critical Perspectives

Debates on Imbalances as Hidden Transfers

Critics, notably German economist Hans-Werner Sinn, have contended that the accumulation of large TARGET2 imbalances during the European sovereign debt crisis constituted hidden transfers of from central banks, such as the Bundesbank, to central banks in peripheral countries, effectively circumventing treaty-based restrictions on monetary financing of deficits. Sinn argued that TARGET2 balances, which surged from negligible levels pre-2007 to over €1 trillion in net claims for by mid-2012, represented unsecured central bank credits extended via the ECB's policies like longer-term operations (LTROs), financing persistent current account and fiscal deficits in countries such as , , and without explicit fiscal union approval or equivalence to private lending. This mechanism, per Sinn, prolonged imbalances by substituting private capital outflows with intra-Eurosystem claims, exposing surplus nations to potential losses in the event of a breakup where peripheral national central banks might default on liabilities, akin to a stealth bailout estimated at up to 40% of German GDP in exposure. Proponents of this view emphasize causal links to ECB actions: from to , peripheral banks drew down €500-800 billion in ECB , mirrored by rising Bundesbank claims, which Sinn equated to balance-of-payments financing absent the adjustment pressures of fixed rates or capital controls in a monetary union. They highlight that these balances bypassed the no-bailout clause in Article 125 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the , as TARGET2 claims lack the strict haircuts or maturity limits applied to sovereign bond purchases, potentially undermining fiscal discipline by allowing s to persist via automatic central bank accommodation. Defenders, including ECB officials and economists associated with integrationist think tanks, counter that TARGET2 imbalances do not represent transfers or bailouts but rather automatic reflections of private from periphery to amid , with no net transfer of real resources or taxpayer funds. They note that balances are fully collateralized by assets pledged to the ECB, indemnified across the under its statutes, and receded post-2012 from €1.1 trillion peaks to around €600 billion by 2014 following stabilizing measures like outright monetary transactions (OMT), indicating responsiveness to market dynamics rather than policy-induced subsidies. Empirical decompositions attribute over 70% of the buildup to capital flow shocks, not ECB discretion, arguing that critics like Sinn overlook Germany's own pre-crisis lending excesses and surpluses that fueled peripheral inflows initially. In this framing, imbalances serve as a lender-of-last-resort function, preventing deeper recessions without implying fiscal transfers, as any breakup losses would be shared proportionally across the . The debate underscores tensions between monetary union design and national sovereignty: while empirical data shows TARGET2 facilitating €851 billion in net peripheral liabilities by April 2012, offset later by reduced fragmentation, unresolved questions persist on -sharing versus , with creditor nations bearing contingent liabilities exceeding €1 trillion as of 2017 despite partial hedges via declining private exposures. Source credibility varies, with ECB-aligned analyses often prioritizing systemic over national risk asymmetries, potentially understating scenarios, whereas skeptic perspectives grounded in balance-of-payments highlight causal choices amplifying imbalances beyond mere .

Euroskeptic and Sovereignty Concerns

Euroskeptics contend that TARGET2 imbalances effectively compel surplus countries to extend unlimited, unsecured credit to deficit nations through their national central banks, bypassing national parliaments and democratic consent. This mechanism, they argue, represents a covert transfer system that sustains fiscal profligacy in peripheral eurozone states without explicit guarantees or repayment enforcement, as evidenced by the accumulation of over €1 trillion in TARGET2 claims by creditor central banks like Germany's Bundesbank against debtors such as Italy and Spain by summer 2012. Economist Hans-Werner Sinn has described these balances as a "stealth bailout" financed by the ECB's monetary policy, where surplus countries' "printing presses" indirectly fund imports and capital outflows from crisis-hit economies, lacking the political legitimacy of formal aid programs. Such dynamics raise concerns, as central banks lose autonomous control over their sheets to the supranational ECB, potentially saddling domestic taxpayers with losses in the event of a fracture or default. For instance, Bundesbank President Jens Weidmann expressed alarm in a 2012 letter to ECB head , warning that uncollateralized TARGET2 exposures undermined the monetary union's stability and fiscal by transferring risks asymmetrically to prudent economies. Sinn highlighted this in 2011 analyses, noting that Germany's TARGET2 claims reached €543 billion by mid-2015, equivalent to public credit extended without voter approval, fueling debates on whether the system incentivizes and erodes member states' ability to pursue independent economic policies. Critics further assert that TARGET2's design perpetuates an imbalance in power, centralizing monetary authority in while peripheral governments exploit the system to defer structural reforms, as seen during the 2010-2012 sovereign debt crisis when liabilities in and ballooned amid . This has amplified Euroskeptic calls for mechanisms like annual settlements or collateralization to restore national oversight, arguing that the current setup resembles an undeclared fiscal union imposed without amendments. While ECB officials maintain that intra-Eurosystem claims pose no due to mutualization, skeptics like Sinn counter that this overlooks breakup scenarios where creditor losses—potentially amounting to trillions—would materialize as unrecoverable IOUs, directly challenging the of nations adhering to rules.

Systemic Risks and Policy Responses

Large TARGET2 imbalances, particularly those accumulated during the 2009-2012 euro area sovereign debt crisis, expose the to credit and default risks, as surplus countries' national central banks (NCBs) hold unsecured claims on deficit countries' NCBs that could become irrecoverable in the event of a member state's exit from the euro or . These claims, reaching peaks such as the Bundesbank's €746 billion exposure by mid-2012, reflect from to core economies, potentially amplifying financial fragmentation if confidence erodes suddenly, leading to strains across borders. Critics argue this mechanism fosters by enabling persistent current account deficits without market discipline, heightening systemic vulnerability to correlated shocks in quality and during crises. Beyond balance accumulation, TARGET2 faces operational and risks inherent to systems, including potential gridlock from participant insolvencies or high volatility in payment flows, as demonstrated in ECB-conducted stress tests simulating scenarios like the failure. The system's designation as systemically important by the ECB underscores the potential for if outages or cyber threats disrupt euro-denominated payments, which averaged €1.9 trillion daily in 2022. While intraday provision and buffers mitigate these, dependency on ECB oversight for recovery and resolution introduces a risk in extreme tail events. In response, the ECB has implemented oversight frameworks under Regulation (EU) No 795/2014, mandating risk controls, resilience testing, and business continuity protocols for TARGET2 without imposing balance caps, viewing persistent imbalances as a natural outcome of transmission and capital mobility rather than a flaw requiring limits. During crises, policy tools like long-term refinancing operations (LTROs) and the Asset Purchase Programme (APP) from 2015 onward stabilized flows but widened imbalances, with the Bundesbank's claims exceeding €1 trillion by July 2020 amid flight to safety. Bundesbank analyses emphasize monitoring over intervention, attributing post-2020 expansions to ECB policies rather than structural defects, though proposals for netting mechanisms or bilateral exposure limits have been rejected to preserve monetary union integrity.

References

  1. [1]
    What is T2? - European Central Bank
    T2 was launched in March 2023, when it replaced TARGET2, the previous RTGS system. The new system was developed after the Eurosystem reviewed its RTGS services ...
  2. [2]
    TARGET2: a global hub for processing payments in euro
    TARGET2 – the payment system owned and operated by the Eurosystem. It is used by both central banks and commercial banks to process payments in euro in real ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] TARGET2 is the real-time gross settlement (RTGS) system for the ...
    Operated by the Eurosystem, TARGET2 enables transactions to be settled using central bank money and with immediate finality, and offers the highest standards of ...
  4. [4]
    TARGET Services - European Central Bank
    TARGET2-Securities (T2S) is the Eurosystem's platform for securities settlement. It provides the European post-trade industry with a single, borderless and pan- ...
  5. [5]
    TARGET2 | Banco de Portugal
    TARGET2 is the second generation of the Eurosystem's real-time gross settlement (RTGS) system, where typically large-value euro-denominated payment orders ...
  6. [6]
    What are TARGET balances? - European Central Bank
    Jul 24, 2025 · TARGET balances are the accumulation of net money flows between countries, recorded on central bank balance sheets. A country has a negative ...
  7. [7]
    TARGET balances of participating NCBs - European Central Bank
    TARGET balances are positions on the balance sheets of all euro area countries' NCBs and the NCBs of non-euro area EU countries that have joined TARGET on a ...
  8. [8]
    Capital flows in the euro area and TARGET2 balances - ScienceDirect
    TARGET2 balances were mainly driven by capital flow shocks, and their build-up helped avoid deeper recessions in some euro area countries.
  9. [9]
    There Is No Normalization of Target Balances, Despite the ...
    Jul 15, 2023 · The total volume of Target imbalances is around 1.8 trillion euros. Hans-Werner Sinn (2020) has called the Target balances a trap. The Deutsche ...
  10. [10]
    Successful launch of new T2 wholesale payment system
    Mar 21, 2023 · Migration to the new system took place between 17 and 20 March 2023. T2 has replaced TARGET2 as the new RTGS system for settling payments ...Missing: establishment | Show results with:establishment
  11. [11]
    TARGET | Deutsche Bundesbank
    The TARGET system allows the Eurosystem central banks to operate a market infrastructure which, alongside markets and institutions, is a core component of the ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Overview of TARGET - European Central Bank
    TARGET2 will replace the decentralised technical structure of the current TARGET system by a single technical platform, the Single Shared Platform (SSP).
  13. [13]
    Introduction - European Central Bank
    TARGET2 is used to settle payments connected with monetary policy operations, as well as interbank payments, customer payments exchanged between banks.
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Information Guide for TARGET2 users - European Central Bank
    This is an information guide for TARGET2 users, version 13.0, including an introduction and fundamentals.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] TARGET2 - User Detailed Specification, book 1
    TARGET2 is a single shared platform with core services including Payments, Information and Control, Reserve Management, and Home Accounting Modules.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] TARGET2 - User Detailed Specification, book 2
    This document aims at presenting the User Detailed Functional Specifica- tions (UDFS) of the optional modules of the TARGET2 system. It comes in.
  17. [17]
    The long-term evolution of TARGET - European Central Bank
    Oct 24, 2002 · ... 2002. Today, the Governing Council of the ECB took a strategic decision on the direction of the next generation of the TARGET system (TARGET2).
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Public consultation, TARGET2: principles and structure
    Dec 16, 2002 · The October 2002 decision of the Governing Council focused on the guiding concept for TARGET2, leaving several aspects for further ...
  19. [19]
    TARGET2 successfully launched - European Central Bank
    Nov 19, 2007 · TARGET2 successfully launched. 19 November 2007. Today the Eurosystem launched successfully the single shared technical platform of TARGET2, the ...Missing: establishment | Show results with:establishment
  20. [20]
    TARGET2 | Practical Law - Thomson Reuters
    TARGET2 was the real time gross settlement (RTGS) payment system for the settlement of euro transactions within the eurozone that replaced TARGET on 19 May 2008 ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Short history of TARGET system - ISO 20022 payments
    TARGET2 was launched in November 2007 and fully replaced the previous system in May 2008, when the latter ceased operating. The biggest change was related to ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    History of the Eurosystem's real-time gross settlement systems
    TARGET2 operated smoothly for over a decade, ensuring safety and efficiency in European payments. However, payments changed significantly during this period due ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] TARGET2 analytical tools for regulatory compliance - EconStor
    To support regulatory compliance, the TARGET2 operator has developed a broad range of analytical tools, adequately reflecting the importance of TARGET2 for the ...
  24. [24]
    Target2 | Real-Time Gross Settlement System (RTGS)
    Oct 26, 2022 · To highlight the enormity with numbers: In 2021, there was a traffic of more than 96 Million Euro that covers an yearly increase of 8.67 %. More ...
  25. [25]
    TARGET2-Securities | Deutsche Bundesbank
    TARGET2 -Securities ( T2S ) is the Eurosystem service to offer harmonised and centralised settlement of securities in central bank money.
  26. [26]
    TARGET2-Securities Annual Report 2023 - European Central Bank
    The TARGET2-Securities (T2S) initiative was aimed at addressing the highly fragmented European securities settlement landscape. It was launched in June 2015 as ...
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    What is T2? | Deutsche Bundesbank
    In March 2023, T2 replaced TARGET2 , the platform previously provided by Eurosystem central banks for settling high-value payments in real time.Missing: milestones upgrades expansions
  29. [29]
    T2 replaces TARGET2 - Matheson
    T2, the new real-time gross settlement system (T2), went live on 20 March 2023 and has replaced the previous settlement payment system TARGET2.
  30. [30]
    TARGET2 market infrastructure changes - ING Wholesale Banking
    As of 20 March 2023 ING will be able to receive ISO20022 messages from FI clients to be settled on the T2 platform. ... migration process towards March 2023.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] TARGET2 Infoguide version 12.0 - European Central Bank
    This is an information guide for TARGET2 users, version 12.0, released in November 2018.<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    [PDF] terms and conditions - Deutsche Bundesbank
    The following types of entities are eligible for direct participation in TARGET2-BBk: (a) credit institutions established in the Union or the EEA, including ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Information Guide for TARGET participants - Part 1 – Fundamentals
    The access criteria that apply for participation are the same across services and are set out in the TARGET Guideline (Annex 1, Part 1, Article 4). The ...Missing: eligible | Show results with:eligible
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Conditions for TARGET2-NL - 05-2022 - De Nederlandsche Bank
    May 1, 2022 · Participation in TARGET2 takes effect via participation in a TARGET2 ... (b) one or more of the participation criteria referred to in paragraph 1 ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Disclosure Report - TARGET2 Summary of the self-assessment ...
    TARGET2 is the real-time gross settlement (RTGS) system operated by the. Eurosystem. TARGET2 settles euro-denominated payments on an individual basis,.
  36. [36]
    [PDF] CHAPTER 7 TARGET2, the Eurosystem's RTGS system
    Dec 17, 2018 · TARGET was mainly intended to process large‑value payments in euro, in particular operations connected with the euro area's common monetary ...
  37. [37]
    Oversight - European Central Bank
    The Eurosystem promotes the safety and efficiency of payment, clearing and settlement systems under its oversight mandate.
  38. [38]
    ECB decision on identification of TARGET2 as a systemically ...
    Aug 21, 2014 · The Regulation lays down oversight requirements for operators of payment systems that have been identified by the ECB's Governing Council as ...
  39. [39]
    TARGET balances | Deutsche Bundesbank
    Before it was shut down in March 2023, the TARGET2 payment system, the predecessor of T2, processed an average of around 350,000 payments per day with a value ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] TARGET Annual Report 2019
    Traffic evolution in TARGET2. The Eurosystem has been carefully monitoring the development of TARGET2 volumes over time, especially given their relevance for ...
  41. [41]
    TARGET Annual Report 2022 - European Central Bank
    Central bank operations showed the greatest year-on-year increase at +10.3% (the increase in 2021 was +1.6% compared with 2020). The main contributor was ...
  42. [42]
    T2 facts and figures - European Central Bank
    * T2 replaced TARGET2 in March 2023. These charts include the statistics of both systems. Distribution of T2 transactions across value bands in 2024. (in ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] TARGET Services Pricing Guide, v1.0 - European Central Bank
    The purpose of this guide is to provide participants with a comprehensive overview of the pricing schemes for: • Central Liquidity Management (CLM);. • Real- ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] TARGET2 Pricing Guide v6.0 - Jimdo
    The purpose of this guide is to provide participants with a comprehensive overview of the pricing schemes for TARGET2 and T2S cash-related services and to ...
  45. [45]
    Liquidity distribution and settlement in TARGET2
    In 2019 TARGET2 settled an average of €1.7 trillion on a daily basis, corresponding to 344,120 transactions (see TARGET Annual Report 2019, ECB, Frankfurt am ...
  46. [46]
    What is TARGET2 - De Nederlandsche Bank
    TARGET stands for Trans-European Automated Real-Time Gross Settlement Express Transfer. Over 1,000 banks use T2 to carry out euro transactions, for themselves ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] TARGET Systems operating schedule - euro - European Central Bank
    Detailed technical descriptions of the business day for each TARGET settlement service can be found in the relevant UDFS chapters. Abbreviations. • TARGET ...
  48. [48]
    T2 and the settlement of gross payments - Banca d'Italia
    With the technical and functional consolidation project of TARGET2 and T2S, completed in March 2023, TARGET2 evolved into the T2 system, which integrates the ...On This Page · What Is T2? · T2 Objectives
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Information Guide for TARGET2 users
    Introduction. Information Guide for TARGET2 Users – ver. 11.0. 9. ECB-PUBLIC. The part on “Participation” in Chapter 3 describes the access criteria, the ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Information Guide for TARGET2 users - Deutsche Bundesbank
    4 SSP refers to the technical platform via which the TARGET2 related services are provided. ... holds an account with the ECB and receives and sends euro payments ...
  51. [51]
    ECB public holidays - European Union
    ECB public holidays. Working hours: Monday to Friday: 8:30 to 17:30 CET. Saturday, Sunday, and public holidays: closed.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Appendix 1.5 OPERATING SCHEDULE 1. TARGET2 is open on all ...
    TARGET2 is open all days except Saturdays, Sundays, New Year's Day, Good Friday, Easter Monday, 1 May, Christmas Day and 26 December. Daytime processing is 7: ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Indicative calendar for the Eurosystem's regular tender operations ...
    Notes: 1) TARGET2 holidays are indicated in red. 2) MRO stands for main refinancing operation; LTRO for the three-month longer-term refinancing operation; ...
  54. [54]
    TARGET closing days and reserve maintenance periods
    The ECB has defined holidays as TARGET closing days and has determined on which Austrian bank holidays TARGET2 operates.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Consultation paper on the extension of T2 operating hours
    Although the operating hours of the Eurosystem's real-time gross settlement (RTGS) system (T2) were already extended in 2023, the growing challenges faced ...
  56. [56]
    T2 business continuity management - European Central Bank
    The last two contingency arrangements aim to mitigate technical or operational failures at the level of a TARGET participant or a central bank. Most contingency ...Missing: protocols | Show results with:protocols
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Information guide for TARGET2 users
    If one senior official of the critical TARGET2 ... (b) a participant no longer meets the access criteria for the participation in the relevant TARGET2.
  58. [58]
    ECB announces independent review of payments system outage
    Nov 16, 2020 · The European Central Bank (ECB) will launch an independent review of an incident that affected its real-time gross settlement system TARGET2 on 23 October 2020.
  59. [59]
    ECB fixes outage in multi-trillion-euro payment system | Reuters
    Feb 27, 2025 · After a hiatus that lasted roughly seven hours, the ECB said around 1800 GMT that Target 2 (T2) was functioning normally although all the ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Information guide for TARGET2 users
    Table 1 Governance structure. 11. Table 2 Business day. 14. Table 3 Settlement procedures. 18. Table 4 Participation structure. 24. Table 5 TARGET2 directory.
  61. [61]
    What is driving the renewed increase of TARGET2 balances?
    Mar 6, 2017 · The net of such claims and liabilities is referred to as a "TARGET2 balance" because it is recorded as such in the main payment settlement ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] What TARGET balances are and how they emerge - KfW
    Oct 25, 2018 · All payments in the TARGET2 system are settled in central bank money, that is, through euro balances in central bank accounts, the reserves.
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Interpreting TARGET2 balances - Brandeis
    That is, TARGET2 is a balance of payments equilibrating mechanism inside the common currency area. With the current operational framework of the Eurosystem, ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] TARGET balances and the asset purchase programme
    In the interests of readability, however, the term “TARGET balances” is used here to describe the balances accumulated by central banks in both of those systems ...Missing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Euro area monetary policy and TARGET balances: a trilogy
    TARGET balances are accounting positions indicating how much less central bank reserves an NCB has received/sent to other NCBs. They are linked to excess ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] balances in the target2 payments system - ifo Institut
    The Target2 claims balance against the ECB, accumulated by the. Bundesbank before 31 July 2011, amounted to rough- ly 343 billion euros.4. Target2 payments ...<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    [PDF] TARGET2 balances of national central banks in the euro area
    This box briefly presents the TARGET2 balances of NCBs in the euro area, explains why some balances increased during the financial crisis and looks at how this ...Missing: sovereign | Show results with:sovereign
  68. [68]
    TARGET2 Imbalances and the ECB as Lender of Last Resort - MDPI
    The TARGET2 system is a settlement infrastructure that allows the smooth regulation of those payments linked to financial institutions transactions and monetary ...<|separator|>
  69. [69]
    [PDF] The increase in Germany's TARGET2 claims - Deutsche Bundesbank
    The Bundesbank's TARGET2 claims went up by €170 billion in 2016 to €754½ billion, hav- ing already risen by €123½ billion in the pre-.
  70. [70]
    TARGET (im-)balances at record level: Should we worry?
    Nov 4, 2017 · Target2 balances have re-increased since late 2014 in parallel with extraordinary monetary policy measures. At first glance, the ECB's asset ...
  71. [71]
    Germany DE: TARGET 2 Balance: Outstanding | Economic Indicators
    Germany DE: TARGET 2 Balance: Outstanding data was reported at 1,069,171.970 EUR mn in Mar 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1,080,832. ...
  72. [72]
    Spain ES: TARGET 2 Balance: Outstanding | Economic Indicators
    Spain ES: TARGET 2 Balance: Outstanding data was reported at -444409.440 EUR mn in Mar 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of -439969.500 ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Do Large TARGET2 Balances Bear Risks for the Euro Area?
    Depending on the outcome of exit negotiations and the operational handling, there can be direct risks in the form of default losses of TARGET2 balances and ...Missing: implications | Show results with:implications
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Target Risks without Euro Exits - Hans-Werner Sinn
    Dec 20, 2018 · “As long as no member state leaves the euro area, the TARGET2 claims are not subject to any default risk”. The Bundesbank's Target claims arose ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Notes on the Target2 Dispute - ifo Institut
    Hans-Werner Sinn's allusion to the dangers that are brewing in the Target2 system is fully warranted. Economically, Target2 balances are equivalent to.
  76. [76]
    Asset purchases have significant impact on TARGET2 balance
    Oct 5, 2018 · Eurosystem central banks purchase a significant proportion of the assets from credit institutions that are domiciled outside the euro area. Many ...
  77. [77]
    Euro area monetary policy and TARGET balances: A trilogy
    Our empirical model of TARGET balances shows that financial market stress and economic imbalances are no longer able to explain the dynamics of TARGET balances ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] TARGET2 and the European Sovereign Debt Crisis - EconStor
    The TARGET2 (T2) positions on the balance sheets of several euro-area national central banks increased considerably since the beginning of the.
  79. [79]
    The ECB's Secret Bailout Strategy by Hans-Werner Sinn
    Apr 29, 2011 · The amount of the ECB's “replacement lending” is shown by the so-called Target2 account, which measures the deficit or surplus of a country's ...Missing: imbalances | Show results with:imbalances
  80. [80]
    Target Balances - Hans-Werner Sinn
    Target Balances. Target balances September 2025. Huge balance-of-payment ... “Target Loans, Current Account Balances and the ECB's Rescue Facility”, ifo ...<|separator|>
  81. [81]
    [PDF] TARGET2: Symptom, Not Cause, of Eurozone Woes
    Aug 2, 2012 · In recent years, large positive and negative balances have arisen in TARGET2, the interbank settlement and payments system of the Eurozone.Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  82. [82]
    Germany's Hidden Risk - Bloomberg.com
    Dec 15, 2011 · The Target2 imbalances are an accounting reflection of those outflows. From 2008 to 2010, Sinn estimated in his paper, “Target credits financed ...<|separator|>
  83. [83]
    [PDF] The “secret bail-out system”: Is Target2 unlawful or unconventional?
    The impact of the financial instability of the system upon TARGET2 was of such gravity that it was considered a 'bail-out system'. 234 The ECB is prohibited ...<|separator|>
  84. [84]
    Professor Sinn misses the target - CEPR
    Jun 9, 2011 · The result has been a large net transfer of funds from, for example, Irish banks to German banks. Target2 is the Eurozones's “plumbing system” ...Missing: imbalances | Show results with:imbalances
  85. [85]
    TARGET2 Balances Mask Reduced Financial Fragmentation in the ...
    Jul 9, 2018 · As we write, the claims of the Bundesbank on the other euro-area national central banks (NCB) through the TARGET2 system are approaching €1 ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] TARGET (im)balances at record level: Should we worry?
    Nov 4, 2017 · Since 2007, the increasing risks for Germany associated with the Bundesbank's. TARGET2 balance have been offset to a large extent by a ...Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  87. [87]
    TARGET2 as a scapegoat for German errors - CEPR
    Nov 2, 2012 · Sinn (2012) asserts that TARGET2 “helped maintain and prolong structural current account deficits” of peripheral countries. The facts are that ...
  88. [88]
    Target 2 of the ECB vs. Interdistrict Settlement Account of ... - Bruegel
    Observers such as Hans-Werner Sinn have claimed that the US Federal Reserve had a fundamentally different (and presumably better and more stable) set up. We ...
  89. [89]
    Target Debate - Hans-Werner Sinn
    TARGET2 balances represent no independent risks for individual national central banks.” The Target analysis and the EEAGs recommendations perplexed politicians.
  90. [90]
    Analysis of Hidden Risks in Central Bank Accounts - DER SPIEGEL
    Mar 26, 2012 · Government experts argue that the Target system claims would remain even if a country were to leave the euro zone and introduce a new currency.
  91. [91]
    TARGET2 imbalances: causes, assessments and consequences
    Using a quantitative time series analysis, the paper examines and discusses the development of Target2 imbalances and the interrelationships of the European ...
  92. [92]
    [PDF] Stress-Testing of liquidity risk in TARGET2 - European Central Bank
    The paper reports the outcome of the stress-testing of liquidity risk in the TARGET2 payment system, with the study having been conducted by an ad-hoc group.
  93. [93]
    Coronavirus crisis pushes TARGET2 balance above €1 trillion
    Aug 10, 2020 · The Bundesbank's TARGET2 balance has been growing again significantly since March. It exceeded the €1 trillion mark in July.