Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Parallel running

Parallel running is a conservative in information systems implementation where both the legacy (old) and new systems operate simultaneously for a specified period, enabling direct comparison of outputs and verification of the new system's reliability before fully transitioning operations. This approach, also known as parallel adoption or parallel conversion, minimizes disruption risks by maintaining the old system's functionality as a fallback while live data processes through both setups. One of the primary advantages of parallel running is its low risk profile, as discrepancies or errors in the new can be identified and corrected without interrupting operations, making it suitable for mission-critical applications such as financial or healthcare . It facilitates thorough testing under real-world conditions, including accuracy and processing efficiency, which enhances user confidence during the changeover. However, this method is resource-intensive and costly, requiring duplicate , additional hardware, personnel, and maintenance efforts to sustain dual operations, which can strain budgets and timelines. Furthermore, it may lead to inefficiencies, such as issues or increased workload for staff who must manage outputs from both . Parallel running is typically employed in scenarios demanding high reliability, such as (ERP) migrations or large-scale IT upgrades, where the cost of failure outweighs expenses. Unlike direct , which abruptly replaces the old system, or pilot running, which tests in a limited scope, parallel running prioritizes stability over speed, often extending the overall project duration by weeks or months. Successful application requires meticulous , including clear criteria for ending the parallel phase, such as high levels of output matching and resolution of all identified bugs.

Fundamentals

Definition

Parallel running is a system changeover strategy in which the (old) system and the new system operate simultaneously, processing the same live inputs to produce and compare outputs for validation prior to full implementation of the new system. This approach ensures that the new system's performance can be rigorously assessed against the established reliability of the before committing to the switchover. Key characteristics of parallel running include its dual-operation phase over a defined , during which outputs from both systems are compared for accuracy and , often using separate files with bidirectional tools to maintain integrity. It also incorporates a fallback mechanism, allowing reversion to the if discrepancies or failures occur in the new one, thereby minimizing operational risks. Unlike testing, which employs hypothetical or test in controlled environments, parallel running processes actual operational to confirm real-world functionality and stability. The strategy originated in the 1960s-1970s amid transitions, where it facilitated software updates by enabling concurrent execution and output comparison to ensure continuity. In modern contexts, parallel running remains prevalent in (ERP) implementations and cloud migrations, supporting side-by-side operation to troubleshoot issues and verify equivalence before decommissioning legacy infrastructure.

Context and Applications

Parallel running is commonly applied in IT system upgrades, where organizations maintain both and new infrastructure to validate functionality during transitions, minimizing disruptions to ongoing operations. In implementations, parallel running allows real-time comparison of outputs from both environments to ensure and process alignment before full cutover. For HR transitions, parallel running is standard in payroll system overhauls, enabling multiple cycles of processing in both old and new platforms to verify accuracy in employee data and compliance reporting. In the banking sector, parallel running supports core system upgrades, as seen in implementations of , where the new banking platform operates alongside the incumbent system to reconcile daily transactions and postings, ensuring seamless continuity. As of 2025, parallel running has adapted to agile practices for software deployments, where it is used as a changeover method alongside techniques like deployments. In hybrid cloud environments, it enables organizations to run on-premises legacy systems alongside cloud instances during migrations, allowing gradual and workload shifting to optimize costs and performance across distributed architectures. Effective parallel running presupposes a legacy system capable of independent operation and compatible data formats that support seamless between platforms, often requiring prior and to avoid errors.

Implementation Process

Preparation

Preparation for parallel running in system implementation involves meticulous upfront planning to ensure both the legacy and new systems can operate concurrently without disruption. This phase begins with assessing the stability of the , which requires thorough audits to confirm its reliability under dual-operation stress, including to verify it can handle continued production alongside the new system. Mapping data flows between the systems is equally critical, entailing detailed documentation of input sources, processing paths, and output destinations to identify points and potential bottlenecks. follows, encompassing hardware provisioning for dual environments, staffing with skilled personnel such as IT specialists and project managers, and budgeting for additional operational costs. Success criteria must be defined explicitly, such as achieving at least 95% accuracy in output matching between systems during validation tests. Data preparation constitutes a core element of this phase, focusing on establishing synchronization mechanisms to maintain consistency across systems. Tools like or Talend are often employed for real-time data replication and , ensuring inputs are duplicated accurately without manual intervention. Duplicate input mechanisms, such as automated feeds or , are configured to feed identical transaction data into both systems simultaneously. Baseline testing is conducted to establish a reference point, involving controlled runs of sample data to detect initial discrepancies in processing logic or formatting before full-scale parallel operations commence. Timeline planning is essential to balance thoroughness with efficiency, allowing sufficient validation without excessive dual-operation overhead. Budgeting accounts for the costs of maintaining two active systems, including licensing, , and personnel time. Risk identification targets issues unique to preparation, such as incompatibilities arising from differing schemas between and new platforms, which could lead to failures if not addressed through schema mapping and conversion scripts. Early mitigation strategies, like pilot conversions, help quantify these risks and refine protocols.

Execution

During the execution phase of parallel running, both the and systems operate concurrently, identical inputs and performing the same functions to enable comprehensive of the new system's . This simultaneous operation requires duplicating across both systems, followed by or periodic output comparisons to identify any deviations. Automated processes, often involving users or dedicated staff, facilitate the matching of results, while discrepancies and errors are systematically logged for further analysis and resolution. Monitoring during this phase relies on robust test plans that define objectives, scope, and timelines for ongoing evaluation, with serving as a core mechanism to detect variances between system outputs. Audit trails are maintained in both systems to provide , ensuring that all transactions and changes can be tracked and audited for accuracy and . These tools the of issues such as data inconsistencies or processing errors without disrupting business operations. The duration of parallel running is influenced by transaction volume and the of achieving reliable, consistent outputs, typically extending until predefined validation criteria are met, often lasting weeks to months depending on factors like transaction volume and , to balance cost and risk. Factors like reengineered business processes or legacy can prolong this period if extensive is needed. When variances occur, established protocols guide resolution, including detailed investigation of mismatches, re-execution of affected batches, and corrective actions such as data cleanup to align outputs. These steps prioritize maintaining operational integrity, with explanations provided to users to manage expectations and support confidence in the new system.

Transition and Cutover

The from parallel running to full of the new system, known as the cutover, is initiated once predefined criteria are satisfied, ensuring the new system's reliability and accuracy. These criteria typically include achieving consistent outputs between the old and new systems, verified through checklists and that confirm minimal discrepancies in , balances, and reports. For instance, in financial servicing implementations, this emphasizes daily transaction matching to build user confidence over 15 days to three months before cutover. The switch process involves either a or abrupt shutdown of the , depending on the organization's risk tolerance and operational needs. During this phase, final occurs, including comprehensive of all parallel run outputs, followed by archival of legacy data for compliance and audit purposes. Once validation confirms alignment, the is decommissioned, with inputs redirected exclusively to the new system; this may reference ongoing execution monitoring from the parallel phase to inform the timing. In financial servicing implementations, this process emphasizes daily matching to build confidence over 15 days to before cutover. Immediately post-cutover, organizations implement backup restoration plans as a contingency, detailing steps to revert to pre-implementation states if critical issues arise, alongside intensive 24- to 48-hour of and output accuracy. This includes of key metrics like times and error rates to detect any anomalies early. Such actions ensure rapid issue resolution and operational continuity. Challenges during cutover are particularly pronounced in high-velocity environments, such as trading systems, where data lag from synchronization delays between systems can lead to discrepancies in time-sensitive transactions. Maintaining precise data consistency in these scenarios requires robust reconciliation tools to mitigate risks like temporary processing halts or mismatched feeds.

Benefits and Drawbacks

Advantages

Parallel running significantly reduces operational risks during system transitions by allowing the to serve as a reliable fallback mechanism if the new system encounters failures or discrepancies. This approach ensures business continuity, as operations can seamlessly revert to the old system without substantial downtime. The method facilitates thorough validation of the new system's accuracy and through direct, side-by-side comparisons of outputs from both systems over an extended period. This is particularly beneficial for complex integrations, where discrepancies can be identified and resolved before full cutover, building organizational confidence in the new . Parallel running also provides a low-pressure environment for staff training, enabling users to familiarize themselves with the new system's functionalities in while relying on the proven processes for production work. This gradual exposure minimizes errors during the and enhances overall adoption without interrupting daily operations. In regulated industries like , parallel running supports requirements by simplifying auditing processes, as identical across both systems allows for verifiable consistency in financial reporting under standards such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (). This dual-operation setup ensures that all outputs can be cross-checked, reducing the potential for non-compliance penalties during the transition.

Disadvantages

Parallel running imposes substantial financial costs on organizations due to the necessity of maintaining both the and new systems concurrently, including dual licensing fees for software and as well as increased expenses. This duplication often doubles overall operational costs during the transition period, encompassing heightened personnel expenditures from required to manage and oversee both environments. The approach also extends project timelines considerably, as the parallel phase introduces additional duration for testing, , and validation, potentially prolonging the overall by a significant margin compared to direct or phased methods. Doubled requirements across systems amplify staff workloads, fostering an environment prone to input errors and necessitating extensive reconciliation efforts that consume further time and effort. These redundancies not only delay cutover but also heighten the risk of operational inefficiencies throughout the transition. In modern hybrid and cloud-based environments, parallel running exacerbates challenges, where in network transfers and concurrent updates can lead to discrepancies between systems, complicating . Furthermore, parallel running exhibits limitations, particularly with very large datasets, where the of reconciling voluminous streams becomes impractical and resource-prohibitive, rendering the method less viable for organizations handling massive-scale . This overhead often leads to unmanageable delays and errors in high-volume scenarios.

Practical Examples

Real-World Implementations

In the banking sector, parallel running has been a standard phase in core banking migrations using Oracle FLEXCUBE since the 2000s. For instance, Askari Bank in Pakistan implemented Oracle FLEXCUBE as its core banking platform with Techlogix as the partner, conducting parallel runs of the new system alongside legacy applications in branches to reconcile transactions, accounts, and reports before transitioning to live operations. This approach allowed for real-time comparison of outputs from both systems, minimizing risks during the migration from disparate legacy setups to a unified platform. In manufacturing, parallel running supports implementations by enabling verification of critical processes like inventory management.

Lessons from Case Studies

Case studies of parallel running in implementations underscore the critical role of thorough and cleansing in achieving successful outcomes. Organizations that invested in detailed data preparation during the parallel phase reported fewer integration issues and smoother verification of system outputs, as poor data handling often leads to delays and escalated risks. For example, in projects emphasizing upfront checks, teams avoided common pitfalls like mismatched dependencies, enabling more reliable comparisons between legacy and new systems. A notable pitfall identified in cloud migration case studies involves overlooked network latency, which can introduce discrepancies in real-time data processing between parallel environments. Such issues have prompted extensions to the parallel running period in affected projects, amplifying operational disruptions and testing overhead as teams debug performance variances. Adaptations in recent implementations, particularly those from 2024 and 2025, demonstrate the growing integration of tools for automated during parallel running. These technologies enable efficient matching of outputs across systems, reducing manual effort and minimizing in processes. Quantitative analysis across ERP case studies reveals that parallel running often incurs higher costs than phased approaches, with resource demands from dual-system maintenance contributing to budget overruns. This contrasts with phased methods, which typically allow for more controlled expenditures but at the expense of longer timelines.

Alternative Methods

Direct Changeover

Direct changeover, also known as the approach, involves the immediate shutdown of the and the simultaneous activation of the new system on a predetermined date, with no transitional period or overlap between the two. This method ensures a complete and abrupt transition, where all operations shift to the new system at once, minimizing dual-system maintenance costs but concentrating all risks into a single event. The process begins with rigorous pre-implementation preparation, including extensive testing of the new system—often spanning several months—to identify and resolve potential issues before the cutover. On the designated cutover date, the old system is deactivated, data is migrated in a final batch, and the new system is brought online, typically within a short window such as a weekend to avoid disrupting . Post-cutover, immediate monitoring and support are essential to address any unforeseen problems, as there is no fallback to the previous system. Unlike parallel running, which allows both systems to operate concurrently for validation, direct changeover provides no such , heightening the stakes of the single transition point. This approach is particularly suitable for small-scale or low-risk upgrades, such as replacing a simple or internal tool where the potential impact of failure is limited and manageable. It excels in scenarios with low system complexity, uniform processes across the organization, and where rapid deployment is prioritized over gradual adaptation, as failure in such cases is unlikely to cause widespread disruption. Direct changeover requires strong organizational coordination and thorough upfront validation to mitigate risks, making it less ideal for large, interconnected enterprise systems. Historically, direct changeover was commonly employed in the early 2000s for cost-effective implementations, as exemplified by Quantum Corporation's 2000 rollout of 17 modules across 23 global sites in a single week, leveraging the relative simplicity of systems at the time. With the increasing complexity of modern systems and integrations, direct changeover's perceived risks have grown, leading to a greater preference for incremental methods in larger deployments, though it remains useful for straightforward upgrades.

Phased and Pilot Approaches

The phased approach to system implementation involves rolling out the new system incrementally, typically by module, department, or business unit, allowing organizations to transition gradually without disrupting the entire operation at once. In (ERP) systems, for instance, implementation often begins with core financial modules such as the general ledger and before progressing to or components, enabling focused testing and refinement in each stage. This modular strategy minimizes widespread risk by isolating changes and applying lessons from early phases to subsequent ones. In contrast, the pilot approach tests the new system in a limited scope, such as a single department, location, or user group, before expanding to the full . This method is particularly useful in sectors like banking, where a new system might first be deployed in one branch to validate functionality, user acceptance, and with existing under real-world conditions. By confining the rollout, pilots facilitate early detection of issues like performance bottlenecks or compliance gaps, with data from the trial informing broader adjustments. Compared to parallel running, which requires simultaneous operation of old and new systems across the entire , both phased and pilot approaches offer lower resource consumption by avoiding full-scale duplication of efforts, such as double or dual . However, they may delay comprehensive validation, as the transition extends over time rather than occurring in a concentrated period, potentially prolonging exposure to partial inconsistencies between legacy and new components. In modern contexts, such as 2025 SaaS migrations, agile pilots have gained prominence for their iterative nature, often starting with low-risk data sets in environments to demonstrate value before scaling. For example, organizations migrating to platforms like those on AWS begin with pilot projects targeting high-value but non-critical workflows, incorporating agile loops to accelerate adoption while reducing upfront costs. This aligns with broader trends in strategies, where pilots enable agile teams to refine integrations iteratively.

Organizational Considerations

Staff Training

Staff training during parallel running emphasizes hands-on experience with the new system while it operates alongside the , particularly focusing on procedures and resolving discrepancies between outputs to ensure accuracy and build confidence. This approach allows personnel to practice operations without risking business continuity, as enter transactions into both systems and compare results to identify and correct variances. Common training methods include interactive workshops for foundational skills, simulations in environments to mimic operations, and shadowing experienced users for practical guidance. For ERP implementations, these sessions typically require 20-40 hours per user, depending on system complexity and user proficiency, enabling thorough practice of dual-system workflows. Training is customized by role, with end-users receiving targeted instruction on daily tasks like and , while IT administrators focus on system monitoring and troubleshooting during parallel execution. In larger organizations, e-learning platforms such as Docebo or Absorb LMS facilitate scalable, self-paced modules to accommodate diverse roles and schedules. The timing of integrates into the pre-implementation preparation phase, with initial sessions building core competencies before parallel running begins, followed by targeted refreshers during the execution to address emerging discrepancies and reinforce skills. This phased delivery minimizes overload and aligns with the gradual verification inherent in parallel operations.

Human Factors and Resistance

In parallel running implementations, employee resistance often stems from psychological concerns such as fear of errors arising from discrepancies between the legacy and new systems, as well as perceived threats to due to potential automation or process changes. For instance, in ERP transitions, 82% of chief officers identify employee as the primary barrier to , highlighting how dual-system operations can amplify anxiety over inconsistencies and workflow disruptions. To mitigate these challenges, organizations employ targeted strategies, including comprehensive communication plans that transparently outline benefits and timelines, active involvement of staff in testing phases to foster , and the development of user-friendly interfaces that minimize operational . These approaches help build trust and reduce perceived risks, with user participation in parallel testing particularly effective in addressing fears by allowing real-time validation of system reliability. From an ergonomic perspective, parallel running alleviates by providing gradual exposure to the new system alongside the familiar legacy one, in contrast to direct changeover's abrupt transition that can induce high and error rates due to sudden unfamiliarity. This phased familiarity supports better and reduces mental fatigue, enabling users to compare outputs without the shock of immediate full reliance on unproven .

Evaluation and Review

Post-Implementation Assessment

The post-implementation assessment in parallel running occurs 1-3 months after the cutover to the new system, allowing sufficient time for operational stabilization while capturing immediate feedback on the transition's effectiveness. This phase involves structured audits to verify and system alignment with parallel run outcomes, alongside user surveys to gauge adoption challenges. For instance, organizations often conduct these reviews within this window to balance recency of experience with accumulated usage data, ensuring actionable insights without undue delay. Key areas of evaluation include system performance, error rates, and user satisfaction. Performance is assessed through metrics such as response times and throughput, comparing them against benchmarks established during the parallel phase to confirm efficiency gains. Error rates are analyzed via logs and reconciliation reports from the parallel period to validate reliability. User satisfaction is measured using tools like (NPS) surveys, where scores exceeding 70 indicate strong endorsement and minimal friction in the transition. These evaluations highlight discrepancies, such as lingering issues from the parallel run, that could impact productivity. Methods employed encompass interviews with end-users and stakeholders, complemented by data analytics on post-parallel metrics like transaction volumes and anomaly detections. Interviews provide qualitative insights into workflow disruptions, while analytics tools process quantitative data from system logs to identify patterns in errors or slowdowns. This dual approach ensures a holistic view, with audits cross-referencing parallel run data for consistency. In government implementations, for example, such methods have been used to document user experiences and flag deviations early. Based on assessment findings, organizations implement minor adjustments, such as updates to address identified or tweaks to optimize performance. These interventions are typically low-risk and focused on refinement rather than major overhauls, drawing directly from recommendations to enhance . For instance, post-review have been applied in IT transitions to resolve discrepancies observed during operations, ensuring sustained alignment with business needs.

Metrics for Success

Evaluating the success of parallel running in system implementation requires a combination of quantitative and qualitative metrics that assess the strategy's effectiveness in minimizing risks while ensuring seamless transition. Key quantitative indicators include the accuracy rate of outputs between the and new systems during to verify reliability and . Parallel running allows the old system to operate uninterrupted, enabling a controlled switchover with minimal disruption. (ROI) is another critical metric, with ERP projects typically achieving cost recovery within 2-3 years depending on scale. ROI in parallel running is calculated using the standard formula: \text{ROI} = \frac{\text{Net Benefits} - \text{Implementation Costs}}{\text{Implementation Costs}} \times 100 where net benefits encompass savings from process improvements and avoided errors, offset by dual-system operating costs during the parallel period. This approach highlights the strategy's value in high-stakes environments, such as migrations, where parallel operation justifies upfront expenses by safeguarding revenue continuity. Qualitative metrics complement these by gauging user-centric outcomes, such as rates and on enhanced , often captured through surveys indicating reduced workloads. High correlates with overall project success, as low end-user engagement can undermine benefits, with over 70% of ERP initiatives failing to meet business goals due to such issues. To monitor these metrics, organizations employ dashboards that track real-time data on system performance and user interactions, integrated with tools like analytics platforms for ongoing evaluation. against industry standards provides context for successful parallel adoptions. Adoption analytics, including login frequencies and feature utilization rates, further quantify engagement, revealing overlooked gaps in training or design that impact long-term ROI.

References

  1. [1]
    System Implementation (Cambridge (CIE) IGCSE ICT): Revision Note
    Oct 10, 2024 · Parallel running · Both old and new systems run simultaneously for a period before the old system is phased out · Used when a smooth transition ...
  2. [2]
    Implementation method. Parallel conversion - Types of SDLC - BZFAR
    Parallel conversion, also known as parallel adoption or parallel running, is a system implementation method in which both the old and new systems run ...
  3. [3]
    Changeover strategy: Better have one! - Modern Analyst
    Parallel adoption (a.k.a. Parallel running or Parallel operation): Involves running both systems until implementation of the new system is considered to be ...
  4. [4]
    Implementation Methods - Software Engineering - Ryan's Tutorials
    Disadvantages. Costly as you have to run both systems simultaneously. Extra workload for users as they have to generally perform tasks twice, once on both ...
  5. [5]
    Common ERP Implementation Strategies - Acumatica Partner
    May 22, 2025 · Also called parallel conversion, parallel running, or parallel cutover, parallel adoption is the least risky of the three implantation ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Parallel Running and Comparing the Behavior of Two Identical ...
    During parallel running, both the old and new systems are running side by side and their behavior are compared against each other until the users are certain ...
  7. [7]
    DOJ Systems Development Life Cycle Guidance Chapter 8
    Where the installed software product is replacing an existing system, the developer shall support any parallel running activities that are required. Ensure ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] planning a computer system
    during the late 1960s and 1970s and intro duced a variety of tools and ... requirement is for a period of parallel running with the old program, com.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Considerations for Transitioning Highly Available Applications to ...
    The shadowing with replication method is sometimes referred to as “parallel running”. This transition method supports the running of both the old and the ...
  10. [10]
    What is System Changeover? | Meaning & Definition | HR Glossary
    Parallel running: Both the old and the new systems run side-by-side, using live data, so that project managers can compare the efficiency and reliability of the ...
  11. [11]
    A Comprehensive Guide To Successful ERP System Migration
    Jan 23, 2025 · Parallel Runs: Run the new ERP alongside the legacy system to compare results and troubleshoot issues. Support Readiness: Have a dedicated ...Settings · Navigating Erp Selection And... · Enterprise Software...
  12. [12]
    Key considerations for successful database management during a ...
    Jul 23, 2024 · Options include parallel running systems, phased migration, or a complete cut-over. With parallel systems, you keep both the old and new ...Key Considerations For... · Compatibility And... · Data Governance FrameworkMissing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
  13. [13]
    How to Migrate to Cloud ERP Without Business Disruption - Innormax
    Sep 10, 2025 · Run Systems in Parallel: For a period of time, consider running your legacy on-premise system in tandem with your new Cloud ERP. This parallel ...
  14. [14]
    Run Parallelization and Concurrent Processing in Enterprise ...
    Apr 4, 2025 · To achieve true scale, enterprise automation must be able to run processes in parallel, a task where traditional RPA struggles.
  15. [15]
    What Is Parallel Run? | Papaya Global
    Parallel runs are typically used during the testing phase before fully transitioning to a new payroll system, ensuring that the new system is reliable and ...
  16. [16]
    Parallel Run - Oracle Help Center
    During a parallel run, the client will start using the system for its every day operations while retaining its existing system. Both the existing system and ...
  17. [17]
    Guide to Manufacturing Inventory Management Software - RFgen
    Jan 16, 2025 · To validate the accuracy of the data mapping, run parallel testing to compare data in both systems and identify any discrepancies before fully ...<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Parallel Accounting Using Parallel Ledgers - SAP Help Portal
    You can use parallel accounting by running parallel ledgers (standard ledgers) for different accounting principles. Then, depending on the type of posting ...
  19. [19]
    Parallel Testing in Software Testing | Expert Guide 2025 - ACCELQ
    Sep 23, 2025 · Parallel testing in software testing executes multiple test cases concurrently rather than sequentially. By distributing suites across machines, ...Missing: hybrid | Show results with:hybrid
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking
    May 1, 2020 · Reconcile the data in the source and target databases using the data reconciliation tool. Run a parallel EOD and reconcile the data again. (See ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Information Systems - Elsevier
    includes such steps as file conversion, system changeover, testing and training. ... Parallel running requires two systems to be operated alongside one another.
  22. [22]
    10 Step Guide to a Successful Accounting Systems Implementation
    Parallel Running. Parallel running is considered the safest approach to implementation. Users use both systems at the same time. In doing so, they can ...
  23. [23]
    SaaS ERP Implementation: A Practical Guide
    Aug 12, 2025 · Timeline: 6-12 months implementation; Cost: $300-800/user/month ... Week 11: Parallel running (old and new systems); Week 12: Full ...
  24. [24]
    The 10 Best Data Synchronization Tools in 2025 (and Beyond!)
    Oct 4, 2025 · Learn about data synchronization tools, how to pick one, and their role in keeping your systems consistent, accurate, and always up to date.
  25. [25]
    6 Key Phases of an ERP Implementation Plan - NetSuite
    Sep 8, 2025 · The six phases of an ERP implementation are: discovery and planning, design, development, testing, deployment, and support.
  26. [26]
    'Automated' data migration dreams - ERP Today
    Mar 11, 2020 · This is sometimes delivered through performing (typically) three months worth of payroll parallel running, post cutover. However, with the ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] System Changeover Policy and Precautions
    There are three main changeover methods used, phased implementation, direct changeover and parallel running, other two are extended of this. For any smaller ...
  28. [28]
    5 Lessons Learned from Failed ERP Implementations - CLA Digital
    Jan 26, 2024 · Are they providing the right information? Parallel running of the two systems for a few months creates a safer, easier, and less problematic ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] JFMIP White Paper: Parallel Operation of Software - GAO
    The primary focus of this paper is on the replacement of the legacy core fmancial management system with a JFMIP qualified core financial management system.Missing: changeover | Show results with:changeover
  30. [30]
    (PDF) Information System Conversion Strategies: A Unified View.
    Aug 7, 2025 · This paper attempts to view the process holistically, from both the technical and human viewpoints, reecting the fact that information systems have both ...Missing: changeover execution reconciliation
  31. [31]
    https://erpsoftwareblog.com/2023/06/should-i-run-my-erp-system-in-parallel-answered/
  32. [32]
    System Acceptance and Post-Acceptance Development (Chapter 8) - A Practical Handbook for Software Development
    ### Summary of System Acceptance and Post-Acceptance Development
  33. [33]
    Appendix C-20 Implementation Plan.
    The plan contains an overview of the system, a brief description of the major tasks involved in the implementation, the overall resources needed to support the ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] A Survey of Educational Systems Development Methodologies
    However, parallel conversion can be an expensive choice because of the costs of running both systems at the same time along with the added support required ...
  35. [35]
    Parallel Systems ERP Implementation: 8 Reasons It Can Backfire
    Parallel Systems ERP Implementation: 8 Reasons It Can Backfire · 1. Resource Intensive: · 2. Data Integrity Concerns: · 3. Process Inefficiencies: · 4. Delayed ...Missing: advantages | Show results with:advantages
  36. [36]
    Running ERP Systems in Parallel - ERP Software Blog
    Jun 19, 2023 · Potential Issues and Drawbacks of Running in Parallel · A. Errors and Discrepancies · B. Increased Workload and Time Investment · C. Lack of System ...Missing: advantages | Show results with:advantages
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Evaluating performance and scalability of multi-cloud environments
    Running applications across disparate cloud platforms has latency issues, data synchronization problems, unplanned cost spikes, and so on, making parallel ...
  38. [38]
    Implementing FLEXCUBE: A Case Study | PDF | Oracle Corporation
    The first branchs Parallel Run started in January, 2010 and the branch was taken live in April, 2010. The Challenge In investing in a world-class Banking ...
  39. [39]
    9. Parallel Run - Oracle Help Center
    Parallel Run is the stage where the existing systems of the bank run concurrently with the new Oracle FLEXCUBE system.
  40. [40]
    SAP transformation: Deployment and S/4HANA upgrade in parallel
    The team decided to resolve the conflict with a completely revolutionary approach: they would upgrade to S/4HANA and deploy the new ERP in parallel.
  41. [41]
    How a Multinational Publishing House Pivoted to Digital
    Sep 20, 2023 · In this episode, McKinstry discusses how she successfully shifted the company's strategy to focus on digital products through strategic investments in product ...Missing: parallel | Show results with:parallel
  42. [42]
    ERP Implementation: 12 Valuable Lessons Learned | QAD Blog
    May 30, 2025 · Learn about the key tools, steps, training and onboarding resources available to help with effective and successful ERP implementation.Tools For A Successful Erp... · Erp Implementation Lessons... · 2. Stakeholder CommitmentMissing: parallel case studies
  43. [43]
    On-Prem to Cloud Migration: 8 Challenges & Proven Solutions ...
    Aug 13, 2025 · Migrating workloads to the cloud can sometimes result in increased latency and performance bottlenecks, especially for data-intensive ...Missing: pitfalls discrepancies
  44. [44]
    The Impact of AI and Automation in The Settlement ... - ResearchGate
    Jun 5, 2025 · The findings reveal that AI: Reduced errors by over 70%, improving accuracy and minimising financial discrepancies. Speeds up reconciliation ...Missing: parallel running
  45. [45]
    How Much Does ERP Really Cost? The Complete Budget Guide
    Jun 13, 2025 · Research shows that 44% of ERP projects experience significant cost overruns, often doubling or tripling initial budgets due to hidden expenses ...Missing: comparison | Show results with:comparison
  46. [46]
    Big Bang vs Phased ERP Implementation Strategies
    Jul 16, 2025 · This guide explores popular ERP implementation strategies—Big Bang, Phased, Parallel ... Parallel: Lowest risk, highest cost. Hybrid: Flexible, ...
  47. [47]
    Implementing ERP Systems: Big Bang versus Phased (Chapter 11)
    “Phased” and “big bang” are the two primary (and contrasting) approaches used to implement ERP systems. This chapter investigates what these terms mean.Missing: changeover | Show results with:changeover
  48. [48]
    Implementation method. Direct Changeover - Types of SDLC - BZFAR
    Nov 5, 2023 · ... approach or Direct Cutover, is one of the simplest system implementation methods. In this method, the organization switches off the old system ...
  49. [49]
    Big-bang or phased-in approach advantages disadvantages - PMI
    While the big-bang approach probably will come closer to the initial vision of the enterprise project management system, the phased-in approach has a good ...Missing: direct changeover
  50. [50]
    None
    ### Summary of Phased Rollout in ERP from Chapter 4
  51. [51]
    What Is Pilot Testing - A Complete Step-by-Step Guide
    Pilot testing is a type of Software testing that is performed by a group of end-users prior to the deployment of the software in production.
  52. [52]
    Guide to Pilot Testing - BugBug.io
    Sep 21, 2025 · 👉 Example: A mobile banking app in alpha testing uncovers that login crashes on Android 14. In a pilot with 50 selected customers, feedback ...
  53. [53]
    4 Key ERP Implementation Strategies - NetSuite
    Oct 6, 2020 · However, parallel adoption can be an expensive approach because it requires more staff time and resources to keep two systems running at the ...
  54. [54]
    Essential data migration strategies for SaaS applications - AWS
    May 20, 2025 · The execution phase starts with a pilot project using low-risk, high-value data sets to prove value and build confidence. Technical assumptions ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] managing stakeholders in enterprise resource planning (erp ...
    training for several salesmen in basic data entry and computers skills to enable them ... the parallel run, to enter transactions in both legacy and ERP system. A ...<|separator|>
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Implementation Oracle FLEXCUBE Universal Banking Release 11.3 ...
    The Parallel Run section explains how the postings on Oracle FLEXCUBE and the existing system (manual or otherwise) will be conducted, the callbacks and ...
  57. [57]
    A Research Study on the ERP System Implementation and Current ...
    Oct 1, 2020 · User Training: User training is based on ERP. software complexity, and employees ... Parallel Operation Approach: Users use old. and new systems ...
  58. [58]
    https://www.impactmybiz.com/blog/2021-enterprise-resource-planning-erp-stats-and-facts/
  59. [59]
    10 ERP Training Best Practices - NetSuite
    Oct 3, 2024 · This article explores these finer points of ERP training, the challenges businesses often confront and 10 best practices that will help businesses realize a ...Missing: shadowing | Show results with:shadowing
  60. [60]
    Epicor adds automation to its ERP tools for manufacturing and ... - CIO
    May 24, 2022 · ... in a few hours, but that a typical user might need 20 to 40 hours of training. Getting an automation production-ready would take longer, too ...
  61. [61]
    Solutions For Logistics: Top 15 ERP Compare Leading And Custom ...
    Nov 2, 2025 · Implementation timeline: 3–6 months for standard implementation; Training requirements: 20–40 hours per user, depending on role complexity ...
  62. [62]
    Best Corporate Learning Management Systems (LMS) of 2025
    Sep 4, 2025 · In this mega guide on the best corporate LMS, we'll look at 15 different learning platforms and outline their main features and how they compare against each ...Best LMS for Corporate Training · Docebo · Absorb LMS · Adobe Learning Manager
  63. [63]
    The 5 Best eLearning Platforms for Corporate Training - iSpring
    May 23, 2025 · Docebo is best suited for businesses and enterprise organizations that want to promote collaborative learning and foster organic knowledge ...Top eLearning Platforms... · The 5 Best eLearning... · Honorable Mentions...
  64. [64]
    ERP User Training & Onboarding: Best Practices - Whatfix
    May 20, 2024 · Explore ERP training best practices and tactics for enabling ERP users from onboarding to support to drive ERP adoption and ROI.Missing: parallel run shadowing
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Guidance on human and organisational factors aspects of ...
    However, more gradual approaches, such as phased introduction, reduction in workload, and/or parallel running of the new and old systems, may be appropriate in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  66. [66]
    2021 Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Stats and Facts
    Aug 27, 2021 · The biggest barrier to ERP adoption is employee resistance to change (82%), underlining the need for effective change management. Other ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  67. [67]
    (PDF) Resistance to change and ERP implementation success
    The main purpose of this paper is to test the impact of resistance to change on ERP's implementation success and how change management initiatives acts in the ...
  68. [68]
    How AI interfaces are redefining User Experience in 2025 - UX Planet
    Mar 26, 2025 · In 2025, AI-driven morphic interfaces are reshaping user experiences by adapting seamlessly to individual needs, behaviors, and environments.
  69. [69]
    What Is Post Implementation Review? - Atlassian
    Timing influences the effectiveness of your post-implementation review report. The ideal window falls between one to three months after project completion.Missing: 1-3 | Show results with:1-3
  70. [70]
    Post Implementation Review - Techno PM
    Oct 21, 2023 · A post-implementation review is the last step of the project cycle and the best time to conduct it is between 1 to 6 months after the project ...
  71. [71]
    DOJ Systems Development Life Cycle Guidance Chapter 10
    Parallel operations consists of running the old process or system and the new system simultaneously until the new system is certified.
  72. [72]
    Performance Testing Metrics: How to Track With Precision - TestRail
    Jun 12, 2025 · 1. Calculating Error Rate. The error rate measures the percentage of failed requests compared to the total number of requests handled by the ...Missing: analytics post- parallel
  73. [73]
    Net Promoter Score (NPS): The Ultimate Guide - Qualtrics
    Jul 14, 2020 · Net Promoter Score (NPS) is the gold standard of customer experience metrics. Read our in-depth guide written by customer experience experts ...What Is Nps? (net Promoter... · How To Run Surveys And... · Using Nps Survey Responses...
  74. [74]
    IT Change Management for SOC: Process and Best Practices
    Oct 18, 2023 · Post-implementation – A post-implementation review is performed to validate the change functions in production as expected. Communication ...Missing: adjustments | Show results with:adjustments
  75. [75]
    Divert the Flow - Martin Fowler
    Jan 20, 2022 · As an extra safety measure we can leave the Parallel Running in place for a period and with selective use of reconciliation tools, generate an ...
  76. [76]
    1.1.5 Installation Processes in Systems Development - TutorChase
    Parallel Running. Parallel running is a conservative and low-risk approach where the new system runs simultaneously with the old one for a specific period.
  77. [77]
    The ROI of ERP Systems | NetSuite
    Jun 26, 2022 · The formula to calculate ROI is as follows: (total value of investment - total cost of ownership) / total cost of ownership) x 100. The higher ...
  78. [78]
    Calculating the ROI of ERP - Oracle
    Mar 14, 2025 · ERP ROI is calculated as (total value of investment - total cost of investment) / total cost of investment x 100, where TCO includes purchase, ...
  79. [79]
    Latest Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Insights - Gartner
    By 2027, more than 70% of recently implemented ERP initiatives will fail to fully meet their original business case goals. · As many as 25% of these will fail ...
  80. [80]
    Predicts 2025: Revisit ERP Strategies to Prepare for the Future
    May 19, 2025 · The future of ERP is heading toward a more automated and adaptive experience, requiring organizations to significantly adapt their current strategies.