Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Tea Fire

The Tea Fire was a that ignited on November 13, 2008, in the above Montecito, , burning 1,940 acres before being fully contained on November 17. Fueled by strong and extreme drought, the blaze rapidly descended into affluent residential areas, destroying 210 structures—primarily homes—and damaging 9 others, with significant losses at including multiple campus buildings. The fire prompted evacuations of over 13,000 residents and highlighted the risks of urban-wildland interfaces in fire-prone regions, though no fatalities were reported. Investigations determined the cause as human activity, excluding accidental sources like power lines, leading to a public tip line for potential leads, though no arrests were publicly confirmed. As part of the broader California wildfire season, the Tea Fire underscored ongoing challenges in fire management, , and community preparedness in .

Background

Location and Environmental Context


The Tea Fire ignited on November 13, 2008, in the Cold Springs section of Montecito, an unincorporated community in Santa Barbara County, California, situated at the base of the Santa Ynez Mountains. The fire originated near the historic Mar y Cel Tea House, a defunct structure above East Mountain Drive and Coyote Road in the Montecito foothills, and rapidly spread downslope toward densely populated residential areas. The affected terrain consists of steep, rugged slopes in the wildland-urban interface, where urban development interfaces directly with undeveloped mountainous wildlands, facilitating rapid fire propagation due to elevation-driven spotting and channeling of winds along canyons. County's topography, marked by north-south trending mountain ranges and valleys, creates conditions where fires can accelerate downslope under prevailing wind patterns. Vegetation in the region is predominantly , a fire-adapted dominated by species such as chamise, , and , which produce dense, resinous fuels that accumulate over decades between burns, heightening flammability. This ecosystem thrives in the of coastal , characterized by prolonged dry summers, low humidity, and occasional wet winters that promote growth without frequent disturbance. Geological features, including fractured and thin soils on steep gradients, contribute to erosion-prone landscapes that exacerbate post-fire hazards but also influence pre-fire moisture dynamics, with south-facing slopes drying faster than north-facing ones. Periodic , originating from high-pressure systems over the interior deserts, further amplify vulnerability by delivering gusts exceeding 50 mph and relative humidities below 10%, conditions prevalent during the fire's ignition.

Pre-Ignition Weather Conditions

Prior to ignition on November 13, 2008, the Montecito area experienced unseasonably warm temperatures reaching the upper 80s (°F), which dried and heightened fuel flammability. These conditions were accompanied by low levels typical of late fall in , with no significant recorded in the preceding weeks, leaving and stands highly susceptible to ignition. The critical pre-ignition factor was the onset of in the late afternoon, characterized by strong katabatic downslope flows from the toward the coast. Gusts escalated to 70-90 mph as twilight approached, providing the aerodynamic force that reignited smoldering embers from an illegal bonfire started the previous evening in the Tea Gardens area. These winds, peaking between 5:00 PM and 8:00 PM , funneled northeast-to-southwest and over the coastal slopes, intensifying fire weather risks in the wildland-urban interface. Sundowner events like this are recurrent in the region during autumn, driven by diurnal heating contrasts and orographic effects, often resulting in rapid acceleration due to their timing with dropping solar angles and accumulating heat. On this date, the combination of high temperatures, , and extreme gusts created a for explosive behavior immediately upon rekindling, as documented in post-event analyses by fire agencies.

Ignition and Early Development

Human Causation Details

The Tea Fire ignited on November 13, 2008, near the intersection of East Camino Cota and property owned by the Vedanta Society in the foothills above Montecito, Santa Barbara County, California. Investigators from the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) and the Santa Barbara County Fire Department determined the point of origin and ruled out all non-human causes, including downed power lines, natural ignitions, or utility failures, concluding the blaze was human-related. The specific mechanism was an unattended constructed the previous evening, November 12, 2008, by a group of ten young adults, most of whom were students or recent graduates associated with . The group built the fire on restricted without a permit, using store-bought logs that produced flames up to three feet high; they claimed to have fully extinguished it with water before departing around midnight, but embers remained smoldering in the dry brush. Strong exceeding 50 mph reignited the remnants the following afternoon, rapidly spreading the fire downslope into populated areas. No criminal charges of or reckless endangerment were filed, as prosecutors determined insufficient evidence to prove intent or beyond building an illegal ; instead, all ten individuals—identified as Joshua Grant Decker-Trinidad, Casey James Lamonte, Stephen Reid, Lauren Vazquez, Hope Hansen, Mohammed Alessam, Fahad Al-Fadhel, and others—faced misdemeanor citations for trespassing and unlawfully starting a without permission. Several pleaded no contest, receiving fines of $550 each and 75 hours of . Civil lawsuits followed from fire victims seeking damages for property losses exceeding $200 million, though outcomes varied based on insurance recoveries and liability determinations.

Initial Fire Spread

The Tea Fire ignited in the rugged Tea Gardens area of the above Montecito at approximately 5:45 p.m. on November 13, 2008, initially appearing as a small glow of 1-2 acres. Within minutes, intense —downslope gusts originating from the mountains—accelerated the fire's growth, pushing flames beyond early suppression attempts by ground crews. These winds, averaging over 45 mph with gusts reaching 70-85 mph during a critical six-hour , drove embers and fire fronts downslope toward urban interfaces, fueling explosive rates of spread through dense fuels on steep terrain. The fire rapidly expanded westward into Mission Canyon, eastward along Cold Spring Canyon, and northward toward the Camino Cielo ridgeline, forming a jagged perimeter that threatened foothill communities by 7:30 p.m., when it was officially named and evacuations commenced. By 2 a.m. on November 14, the blaze had consumed over 1,500 acres, with spot fires igniting ahead of the main front due to wind-borne embers, complicating aerial and ground responses in the nocturnal conditions. The combination of low fuel moisture, extreme wind alignment with local topography channeling airflow, and limited initial access roads hindered containment, allowing the fire to establish a broad footprint in its first hours.

Fire Progression and Behavior

Influencing Factors

The rapid progression of the Tea Fire was driven by a combination of , particularly strong Sundowner winds gusting up to 85 mph (137 km/h), which descended from the and propelled flames downslope toward Montecito. These katabatic winds, prevalent in the region during autumn, compressed and heated as they funneled through canyons, exacerbating fire intensity by increasing flame lengths and spotting distances. Low relative humidity, often below 10% during the event, and warm temperatures further desiccated fuels, creating conditions for explosive fire growth from ignition on November 13, 2008, to over 1,000 acres burned within hours. Topography played a critical role, with the fire originating on steep slopes above 2,000 feet (610 m) in rugged, north-facing aspects of the , where upslope preheating and convection accelerated initial uphill runs before winds shifted the front downslope. Narrow drainages and limited road access in the wildland-urban interface constrained suppression efforts, allowing embers to spot ahead into developed areas. The complex terrain, including ridges and valleys, created erratic fire behavior, with wind-driven runs overwhelming aerial and ground resources. Fuel characteristics amplified the fire's severity, dominated by dense shrublands with continuous fine fuels like chamise () and , which had accumulated due to extended fire-free intervals exceeding 50 years in some areas. Arid conditions prior to ignition rendered these fuels highly flammable, with high surface fire rates of spread estimated at over 1 mph (1.6 km/h) under wind influence, transitioning to crown fires in heavier brush stands. Post-fire analyses noted that unmaintained wildland fuels adjacent to structures contributed to spotting and structure ignitions, underscoring the role of fuel continuity in the wildland-urban interface.

Containment Efforts

Firefighting operations for the Tea Fire emphasized aerial water drops and ground-based suppression to halt further downslope spread into developed areas of Montecito and . Initial efforts were hampered by gusty exceeding 70 mph, which propelled rapid uphill and lateral fire progression on November 13-14, 2008, limiting direct attack options. As winds subsided by , crews constructed containment lines using hand tools, dozers, and natural barriers, focusing on mopping up hotspots in rugged canyon terrain. By November 15, 2,235 firefighters were deployed, supported by seven helicopters conducting bucket drops in inaccessible upper elevations. This surge in resources enabled 40% containment that day, with operations prioritizing defense of structures along the fire's urban interface. Progress accelerated thereafter; containment reached 75% by November 16 and 95% on November 17, allowing most evacuation orders to be lifted as interior burning was secured. Full containment was declared on November 18, 2008, after suppressing remaining hotspots across the 1,940 acres scorched, at a suppression cost exceeding $4.9 million. These efforts prevented additional structural losses beyond the initial 210 homes destroyed, demonstrating effective scaling of interagency resources—including local, state, and federal units—once meteorological conditions permitted safer access.

Immediate Impacts

Human Injuries and Evacuations

The Tea Fire prompted the evacuation of approximately 5,400 residents from and surrounding areas, including neighborhoods in the upper and along the foothills from to . Evacuation orders were issued rapidly as the fire, driven by high winds, advanced downslope toward populated zones, with authorities establishing a perimeter to facilitate orderly exits; a shelter at housed up to 200 evacuees initially, though numbers dwindled to around 100 by the following morning as some returned or found alternative accommodations. By November 16, 2008, roughly 2,700 evacuees had been allowed back home as containment progressed. Human injuries totaled 25, primarily from (22 cases) and burns (3 cases), affecting both civilians attempting to flee and responding personnel. Among the most severe were burns suffered by a married couple during their evacuation from the upper Tract, highlighting risks from rapid fire encroachment and poor visibility. Two firefighters sustained , and one additional firefighter was injured by a falling tree, but no direct fire-related fatalities occurred. One death was reported indirectly linked to the incident: a 98-year-old evacuee, as determined by the county sheriff's assessment.

Property Destruction

The Tea Fire destroyed 210 structures, primarily residential homes, across Montecito and adjacent areas of . Nine additional structures sustained damage but remained standing. Preliminary damage assessments released on November 15, 2008, estimated 210 homes lost, with approximately 130 in the city of and 80 in unincorporated county areas including Montecito. Officials from County and the Montecito District compiled lists of affected properties along roads such as Canon View Road, Coyote Road, and East Mountain Drive, confirming widespread residential losses in upscale neighborhoods. The destruction targeted properties in the wildland-urban interface, where dense vegetation and high winds facilitated ember-driven spot fires that ignited homes despite some defensible space measures. Early containment failures allowed the blaze to consume high-value estates, with total structural losses concentrated during the initial overnight spread on November 13-14, 2008.

Damage to Key Institutions

The Tea Fire caused significant destruction to , a private Christian liberal arts institution located in the Santa Barbara foothills adjacent to the fire's origin point. Eight campus buildings were demolished, including residence halls such as Clark Apartments (affecting units M, S, and F) and other facilities, while approximately one-third of the campus vegetation was scorched. Fifteen faculty homes were also destroyed out of 41 on campus, displacing 62 students, 18 faculty members, and 9 staff. No structural damage was reported to major public institutions such as hospitals or government facilities in the affected areas of Montecito and . , the nearest medical center, managed incoming fire-related injuries without facility compromise, though the broader regional strain on emergency services was notable. Local government buildings, including those in downtown , remained intact, with impacts limited to evacuations and temporary operational disruptions rather than physical loss.

Emergency Response

Resource Deployment

The emergency response to the Tea Fire involved coordinated deployment from multiple agencies, including the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), Santa Barbara County Fire Department, Montecito Fire Protection District, and mutual aid from neighboring jurisdictions. CAL FIRE reported a total of 756 personnel assigned to the incident, supported by 62 fire engines, 23 hand crews, 3 water tenders, and 1 dozer for suppression activities. Numerous state-contracted air tankers were utilized for retardant drops to combat the fire's rapid uphill spread under high winds. Local resources were augmented by rapid mutual aid arrivals; Ventura County Fire Department dispatched 10 engines preemptively along Highway 101 without awaiting a formal request, arriving early on November 13 to bolster initial attack lines. Santa Barbara County deployed a fleet of water-dropping helicopters, which was later reinforced by additional aircraft from Los Angeles County Fire Department to target spot fires and structure threats in steep terrain. The Vandenberg Hotshot crew, a federal interagency hotshot team, was among the first ground resources on scene for direct fire suppression. Overall, more than 1,000 firefighters from various departments engaged the fire by , focusing on structure protection in Montecito and evacuation corridors amid limited initial access due to wind-driven embers and visibility challenges. Staging areas, such as Montecito Fire Station 2, served as hubs for and refueling. These deployments emphasized aerial and ground integration, though extreme conditions constrained full effectiveness until winds subsided on November 16.

Operational Challenges

The Tea Fire's explosive initial growth, driven by sundowner winds gusting to 70-90 mph, rapidly overwhelmed early firefighting efforts, spreading from a few acres to threaten thousands of structures within hours and complicating direct suppression tactics. Firefighters, numbering over 2,200 by November 15, 2008, relied on a mix of ground crews, air tankers, and hand tools, but the wind-fueled flames through dense eucalyptus stands and dry brush limited effective containment lines until winds subsided. Evacuation operations faced significant delays, with the notification system failing to alert some residents until 10 p.m. on —hours after flames had already consumed homes in affected neighborhoods—exacerbated by overloaded cell networks, downed phone lines, and traffic gridlock on narrow, semi-rural roads. Approximately 5,400 residents were displaced, but confusion from smoke, ashfall, and inconsistent agency coordination hindered timely egress, prompting post-incident critiques of the system's reliability in high-volume scenarios. Logistical strains included inter-agency resource staging amid clogged evacuation routes and media presence, with Montecito Fire Station 2 serving as a primary hub for incoming engines from Ventura County and hotshot crews from Vandenberg Air Force Base. Residents in some areas reported minimal visible firefighting apparatus during evacuations, raising concerns over patrol coverage and prioritization between life safety and structure protection in the fire's urban-interface path. These issues underscored broader challenges in scaling mutual aid responses—756 personnel and 62 engines ultimately deployed—for wind-driven fires in steep, residential terrain.

Investigation and Accountability

Cause Verification Process

The cause verification process for the Tea Fire began immediately after its ignition on November 13, 2008, with Santa Barbara County fire investigators establishing the point of origin near the abandoned Tea Gardens historic structure in the Montecito foothills. By November 16, 2008, investigators had eliminated all natural or accidental non-human ignition sources, such as or equipment failure, through on-site examination of burn patterns, fire behavior analysis under the prevailing , and absence of meteorological evidence for spontaneous ignition. This initial phase relied on standard wildland protocols, including documentation of the fire's spread from embers carried by 50-60 mph gusts from a remnant pit, corroborated by like unextinguished coals and surrounding scorch patterns. The Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office and District Attorney's Office then led a multi-agency probe, soliciting public tips via anonymous hotlines to identify human activity at the site, initially exploring but ruling it out due to lack of accelerants or deliberate ignition indicators. Investigative reports, described as voluminous, began reaching the DA's office by December 1, 2008, encompassing witness interviews, forensic analysis of the remnants, and reconstruction of events from the prior evening when a group had lit the fire without a permit on restricted property. The process confirmed the fire stemmed from inadequate extinguishment of the , with embers reigniting amid dry fuels and high winds, rather than any mechanical or . By February 13, 2009, the DA concluded the investigation, attributing the ignition to trespass and unauthorized fire-building by 10 individuals, primarily Santa Barbara City College students aged 18-22, who had partied at the site on November 12, 2008. Charges of misdemeanor trespassing and illegal campfire construction were filed, supported by evidence including participant admissions, physical traces, and wind modeling linking the pit to the fire's upslope advance. This determination held through subsequent court proceedings, where two defendants entered no-contest pleas in April 2009, affirming the causal chain without contesting the origin findings. The process underscored reliance on empirical fire dynamics over speculative narratives, avoiding premature arson attributions despite initial public appeals for information.

Legal Consequences

The Tea Fire originated from an unauthorized bonfire lit by a group of approximately ten individuals, primarily Santa Barbara City College students, during an off-campus party on private property known as the Tea Gardens in Montecito on November 13, 2008. Santa Barbara County District Attorney's investigators identified ten suspects and filed misdemeanor charges against them in February 2009, including trespassing and building a campfire without a required permit, but declined to pursue felony arson or involuntary manslaughter charges due to insufficient evidence of intent or gross negligence. Two of the charged individuals pleaded no contest to trespassing in April 2009, receiving probation and community service rather than jail time, while the remaining cases resulted in minimal penalties or dismissals focused on the misdemeanor violations. Civil litigation ensued primarily against the property owner, Mary K. Robinson, for alleged failures in securing the premises and preventing unauthorized access, with claims encompassing , premises liability, and . In April 2011, Judge Colleen Sterne overruled most of Robinson's motions, permitting the bulk of the plaintiffs' claims to advance. Severely burned victims Lance and Carla Hoffman, who suffered third-degree burns covering over 50% of their bodies while evacuating, reached a $6 million in May 2012 with Robinson, funded through her , resolving their that also targeted the party participants for . Other affected homeowners pursued similar claims, though specific outcomes beyond the Hoffman case remain less documented, with payouts covering many property losses without broader class-action consolidation. No criminal convictions led to restitution orders, leaving civil suits as the primary mechanism for victim compensation.

Aftermath and Recovery

Rebuilding and Economic Costs

The Tea Fire caused an estimated $500 million or more in total damages, primarily from the destruction of over 200 high-value homes in affluent areas like , where average property values ranged from $2 million to $3 million. Suppression costs for County alone exceeded $5.7 million in the immediate aftermath, with additional strains on local revenues due to razed structures. Rebuilding expenses per home were projected at approximately $300 per square foot, potentially totaling over $1 million for larger residences, though many claims involved disputes over full replacement values. Insurance coverage proved inadequate for numerous policyholders, with average shortfalls of $100,000 to $500,000 per underinsured homeowner, leading to prolonged legal battles and unbuilt lots. By late 2011, three years post-fire, only 41 rebuilding permits had been filed countywide, with 24 completions, hampered by bureaucratic delays despite expedited processing targets of 10 days. Economic ripple effects included short-term disruptions to local small businesses from evacuations and ashfall, offset partially by increased demand for construction materials and labor. Rebuilding faced geological and regulatory hurdles, particularly in slide-prone zones like Sycamore Canyon, where a 1997 city ordinance initially barred construction, classifying areas as high-risk for debris flows. Affected families endured multi-year litigation; a 2012 ruling deemed the ban an "unlawful regulatory taking," upheld by the State Court of Appeals in 2015, mandating permit issuance and costing the city around $600,000 in fees and settlements. Consequently, several owners, including those in Slide Mass C, sold unrepaired lots rather than rebuild, while others awaited final approvals. Early projections anticipated most repairs within two years, but actual timelines extended due to these disputes and insurance shortfalls. Beyond property, indirect costs included elevated medical expenses for burn victims, with individual cases surpassing $5 million in treatments involving over 100 surgeries.

Long-Term Lessons and Policy Critiques

The Tea Fire exposed vulnerabilities in wildfire within affluent wildland-urban interface communities, where dense and -driven ignitions overwhelmed inadequate defensible space around structures, resulting in the destruction of 210 homes despite rapid initial response efforts. A key lesson was the necessity of proactive reduction on private lands, as the 's rapid spread through untreated underscored how historical suppression policies have allowed loads to accumulate unnaturally, exacerbating intensity in California's Mediterranean ecosystems. Post-fire assessments emphasized that systematic , including shaded breaks and homeowner with clearance zones up to 100 feet, could mitigate attacks, a primary ignition source for 80-90% of structure losses in similar events. Policy critiques focused on regulatory barriers to preemptive fuel treatments, including environmental review processes under the that delayed clearing projects on steep terrains like those in Montecito, thereby perpetuating high-risk conditions despite known fire history. The incident revealed shortcomings in and land-use policies that permitted expansive development in fire-prone hillsides without mandatory incorporation of fire-resistant design elements, such as non-combustible roofing and venting, which were not uniformly enforced prior to 2008. Critics argued that state-level emphasis on post-fire recovery funding over sustained prevention investments contributed to recurring vulnerabilities, with California's expenditures reaching $1.4 billion nationally in fiscal 2008—half in the state—yet insufficient allocation for long-term ecosystem restoration. In the years following, Montecito implemented a comprehensive strategy, including a district-wide hazardous treatment network covering thousands of acres and updated building codes requiring ignition-resistant materials, which demonstrably reduced structural losses during the 2017 despite similar wind-driven conditions. These measures highlighted a broader imperative for integrating into local , critiquing prior reliance on reactive suppression rather than prescribed burns or mechanical thinning to restore natural regimes. However, ongoing challenges persist in scaling such localized successes statewide, where institutional biases toward preservationist policies have historically limited aggressive management on public lands interfacing with private developments.

References

  1. [1]
    Tea Fire | CAL FIRE - CA.gov
    Nov 13, 2008 · Confirmed Damage to Property, Injuries, and Fatalities. 9. Structures Damaged. Residential, Commercial and Other. 210. Structures Destroyed.Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  2. [2]
    Fire History of Santa Barbara County
    The Tea Fire was controlled having burned 1,940 acres and destroyed 210 homes in a single burn period. On Cinco de Mayo, 2009, the Jesusita Fire started ...
  3. [3]
    The Brief but Violent Life of the Tea Fire - The Santa Barbara ...
    Nov 20, 2008 · On the Westmont campus, fire decimated nine structures, including Bauder Hall, the physics building, the old math building, and four of the ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  4. [4]
    [PDF] 2008 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WILDFIRES: - Cozen O'Connor
    The first to erupt was the Montecito Tea Fire, which began on Thursday, November 13, 2008, destroying 210 homes in the cities of Montecito and Santa Barbara, ...
  5. [5]
    Tea Fire rages from Montecito to Santa Barbara - SFGATE
    Nov 15, 2008 · The conflagration in Santa Barbara County - dubbed the Tea Fire - broke out Thursday at 5:45 p.m. in the Tea House, a historic and defunct tea ...Missing: context vegetation terrain
  6. [6]
    Tea Fire Perimeter (Santa Barbara County, CA), November 15, 2008
    Nov 15, 2008 · The Tea Fire burned from 2008-11-13 to 2008-11-17, Montecito, Cold Springs Creek and Hot Springs Road, Santa Barbara County.
  7. [7]
    Wildfire Risk in the Complex Terrain of the Santa Barbara Wildland ...
    Sep 18, 2022 · The main objective of this study is to provide a spatial analysis of regions at high risk of fast wildfire spread, particularly in the first two hours.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] City of Santa Barbara, California Community Wildfire Protection Plan
    Feb 1, 2021 · ... Fire Hazard Area (City of Santa ... As discussed, the topography, vegetation, climatic, and geological conditions in the Santa Barbara area ...
  9. [9]
    UCSB Geography and Chaparral Fires
    Chaparral is a shrubland prone to wildfires, often human-caused, and dependent on weather, especially Santa Ana winds, and living shrubs for fuel.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] A Defensible Community? - Amazon S3
    Oct 23, 2018 · The last significant wildfire activity in the chaparral plant community that surrounds Montecito occurred during the 2008 Tea Fire. Oak ...
  11. [11]
    Sheriff Says 10 People Thought to be Responsible for Tea Fire
    Nov 18, 2008 · By Thursday evening, the fire was raging, propelled by winds gusting to 70 mph and accelerated by temperatures in the upper 80s.Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  12. [12]
    Monthly Climate Reports | National Climate Report | November 2008
    Nov 1, 2008 · ... Santa Barbara to San Diego on the 13th - 17th. Wind gusts reached over 70 mph with temperatures in the mid 80's and low 90's accompanied by ...<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Update on Tea fire near Montecito - Wildfire Today
    A CalFire incident management team will assume command at 6 p.m. today. Los Angeles TV Channel 4 reported that a dozen faculty homes at Westmont College burned.
  14. [14]
    Tea Fire Sparked 13 Years Ago - edhat
    The Tea Fire was first reported at about 5:45 pm. Strong sundowner winds with gusts up to 85 mph reignited smoldering embers of an illegal bonfire.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] EXTREME NORTHEASTERLY WIND EVENTS IN THE HILLS ...
    These gusty northeast winds are often associated with “sundowner” events and can result in rapidly spreading wildfires such as the devastating “Tea Fire” of 13- ...
  16. [16]
    Characteristics of Sundowner Winds near Santa Barbara, California ...
    Mar 1, 2018 · For example, temperatures were 43°C during the 1990 Painted Cave fire, and wind speeds reached 25 m s−1 during the 2008 Montecito Tea fire and ...
  17. [17]
    Investigators Determine the Cause of Tea Fire to Be Human Related
    Nov 17, 2008 · The Fire Scene Examination Team has determined the cause of the fire was human related. The team also has established an area of origin on East ...Missing: ignition | Show results with:ignition
  18. [18]
    Sheriff: Bonfire led to Tea Fire | Local News | santamariatimes.com
    Nov 19, 2008 · The smoldering remains of a bonfire built by a group of college students has been identified as the cause of the ferocious Tea Fire, which destroyed 210 homes.Missing: exact | Show results with:exact
  19. [19]
    "Tea Fire Ten" Named - The Santa Barbara Independent
    Feb 18, 2009 · But no forensic evidence has been discovered indicating that gasoline helped ignite the blaze. Hansen said that the 10 were cooperative, telling ...
  20. [20]
    Montecito spark was bonfire - Los Angeles Times
    Nov 19, 2008 · A smoldering bonfire built by students on a ridge-top overlooking Montecito apparently sparked last week's disastrous Tea fire, Santa Barbara County Sheriff ...Missing: geography | Show results with:geography
  21. [21]
    DA Won't File Criminal Charges against 10 Linked to Tea Fire
    Feb 13, 2009 · DA Won't File Criminal Charges against 10 Linked to Tea Fire. Misdemeanor charges will be pursued but investigators conclude they can't prove ...Missing: arson | Show results with:arson
  22. [22]
    Two of Tea Fire Ten Plead No Contest to Trespassing
    Apr 9, 2009 · The two will each pay $550 in fines and must complete 75 hours of community service. ... The Tea Fire began burning the following day. Alessam, 28 ...Missing: arson | Show results with:arson
  23. [23]
    Couple burned in Tea Fire file suit | Local News | lompocrecord.com
    Nov 10, 2010 · The defendants accused of starting the fire are Mohammed Alessam, Fahad Al-Fadhel, Joshua Decker-Trinidad, Stephen Reid, Lauren Vazquez, Hope ...Missing: arson | Show results with:arson
  24. [24]
    2008 Tea Fire - Santa Barbara Bucket Brigade
    Dec 12, 2019 · The blaze started when strong sundowner winds reignited the smoldering remains of an illegal bonfire from the previous night. The first flames ...Missing: Santa Ana
  25. [25]
    Tea Fire Appears Close to an End - The Santa Barbara Independent
    Then, just as quickly as they had come up in early evening, the winds died down. Flames that minutes before been rushing up the ridge near St.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] MONTECITO - Santa Barbara County Fire Safe Council
    The Montecito Fire Protection District (District) completed their Montecito Community Wildfire. Protection Plan (CWPP) on February 22, 2016.
  27. [27]
    Homeowners attend forum about Montecito's Tea fire - Wildfire Today
    Fuel, aridity, steep terrain, limited access and near hurricane-strength winds all played into the combustible mix. “This fire, once it started, was going to ...
  28. [28]
    (PDF) Wildfire Risk in the Complex Terrain of the Santa Barbara ...
    A large number of modeled ignitions were located near the major-exit highway running north–south (HWY 154), resulting in more simulated wildfires burning in ...
  29. [29]
    Tea Fire 40 Percent Contained - The Santa Barbara Independent
    Nov 15, 2008 · The shift comes at the beginning of the third day of the Tea Fire, which has so far burned 1,800 acres and is now considered about 40 percent ...
  30. [30]
    Firefighters Closing In on Tea Fire Containment | Local News
    Nov 16, 2008 · Crews corral 95 percent of the $4.9 million fire; full containment is expected by 6 p.m. Monday.
  31. [31]
    Containment now at 95% for Tea Fire; believed to be >human caused?
    Nov 17, 2008 · The cause of remains under investigation, but was Bhuman caused,C according to Doug Lannon, a spokesman with the California Department of ...Missing: ignition | Show results with:ignition
  32. [32]
    Over 100 homes burn in Montecito fire - Los Angeles Daily News
    Aug 29, 2017 · Tea Fire: 2,500 acres burned;; 10 injuries, 2 firefighters injured;; 5,400 residents evacuated;; Over 100 homes destroyed;; 0% containment ...
  33. [33]
    County's Update on Tea Fire Statistics - The Santa Barbara ...
    Nov 14, 2008 · 5,446 homes evacuated. More than 500 firefighters. 10 injuries from smoke inhalation; 3 burn injuries. The evacuation shelter is at San Marcos ...
  34. [34]
    Victims of Tea Fire See Damage for First Time - NBC Los Angeles
    Nov 14, 2008 · More than 200 evacuees were there Thursday night. By breakfast on Friday, just 100 remained, many of them finally able to see what was left of ...<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Officials List Addresses Destroyed in Tea Fire | Local News
    Nov 15, 2008 · The fire ignited about 5:50 p.m. Thursday at the Tea House above East Mountain Drive near Coyote Road in the Montecito foothills. The cause of ...Missing: geography climate<|control11|><|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Fire destroys 100 homes in Montecito - 6ABC
    Nov 15, 2008 · Thirteen people have been injured. Ten suffered smoke inhalation, including two firefighters, and three others suffered burns. One firefighter ...
  37. [37]
    Fire that razed 210 homes 'result of carelessness'; progress in L.A. ...
    Nov 19, 2008 · The fire burned intensely into the weekend, chewing up 1,900 acres, destroying 210 homes and injuring more than two dozen people, including a ...Missing: destruction | Show results with:destruction<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    First List Of Homes Lost in Tea Fire - The Santa Barbara Independent
    Nov 15, 2008 · Properties in the Montecito Fire District And/or County of Santa Barbara with significant structural damage or total destruction: Canon View ...Missing: destroyed | Show results with:destroyed
  39. [39]
    https://www.sbbucketbrigade.org/timeline/2008-tea-fire/
  40. [40]
    Montecito fire consumes 111 homes - Los Angeles Times
    Nov 15, 2008 · ... destroyed at least three structures and scorched 100 acres, authorities said. The Montecito blaze destroyed 111 residences and damaged nine ...
  41. [41]
    Stronger Together: Courage and Kindness | Westmont College
    The Thomas Fire viciously stripped all vegetation from the mountains above Montecito, leaving behind a baked, barren moonscape highly susceptible to flooding ...
  42. [42]
    Westmont to Remember the Tea Fire
    Nov 10, 2009 · The blaze demolished eight Westmont buildings and 15 faculty homes, displacing 62 students, 18 faculty and nine staff members. Family, friends ...
  43. [43]
    Tea Fire: Hospital and Health Update - The Santa Barbara ...
    Nov 14, 2008 · The injuries treated so far include one dog bite, one asthma attack, one instance of smoke inhalation, one damaged eye, one anxiety attack, and ...
  44. [44]
    Looking Back at the Tea Fire, One Month Later | Local News
    Dec 23, 2008 · The focus has turned to the erosion problem in the burn area, and the investigation continues.Missing: government | Show results with:government
  45. [45]
    Fire roars through Montecito - Los Angeles Times
    A fast-moving brush fire driven by 50- to 70-mph winds erupted Thursday night in the hills above Montecito in Santa Barbara ...
  46. [46]
    Winds help overwhelmed firefighters battling Tea Fire
    Aug 29, 2017 · Earlier Friday, blistering winds gusting to 70 mph, dry brush and oil-rich eucalyptus trees helped turn an ordinary brush fire into an exploding ...
  47. [47]
    Tea Fire Forum Brings Out the Community in Montecito - Noozhawk
    Jan 27, 2009 · ... difficulties presented by the disaster. Some reported getting reverse notification calls through the 9-1-1 system at 10 p.m., hours after ...
  48. [48]
    State of Emergency in California as Blaze Rages - ABC News
    Four people were injured and about 5,400 of the community's 14,000 residents were evacuated, and more were expected possibly to be forced to flee today.
  49. [49]
    Tea Fire Questions and Answers at Montecito Forum
    Jan 29, 2009 · Attendees alleged Reverse 911 failings and complain of delay in naming the people who started the blaze.Missing: 2008 evacuation
  50. [50]
    Cause of Tea Fire in Montecito, Santa Barbara is Human Related
    Nov 16, 2008 · Santa Barbara County fire investigators have determined the fire's point of origin and that the cause of the fire was human related.Missing: ignition | Show results with:ignition
  51. [51]
    Tea fire contained, believed to be 'human-caused' - Santa Maria Sun
    Nov 19, 2008 · ... Montecito fire was believed to be “human-caused.” “The investigation team has eliminated all possible accidental, non-human causes,” said ...
  52. [52]
    The Unusual History of the Tea Fire's Point of Origin
    Nov 20, 2008 · The Tea Fire was definitely human-caused, with the specific point of origin being a bonfire-left behind by an as yet unnamed group of college students.Missing: determination | Show results with:determination
  53. [53]
    Officials Seeking 'Possible Arsonist' in Tea Fire - LAist
    Nov 17, 2008 · "We are calling it human-caused," he said. "We need the public's help in identifying any activity in or around the afternoon of November 13." ...
  54. [54]
    District Attorney: Tea Fire Investigation Is Ongoing
    Dec 4, 2008 · According to the release, the District Attorney's Office began receiving the “voluminous” Tea Fire investigation reports on Monday, December 1, ...
  55. [55]
    10 Charged with Misdemeanors in Tea Fire Investigation | Local News
    Feb 17, 2009 · 10 Charged with Misdemeanors in Tea Fire Investigation. Group will be arraigned March 2 on charges of trespassing and building a campfire ...Missing: arson | Show results with:arson
  56. [56]
    DA Names Tea Fire Suspects | The Daily Nexus
    Feb 18, 2009 · The Tea Fire was allegedly started after gale-force “sundowner” winds picked up embers from the aforementioned bonfire and deposited them on the ...
  57. [57]
    Tea Fire Investigation: 2 Plead No Contest, 8 Others Back in Court ...
    Apr 13, 2009 · Of the 10 people charged with misdemeanors as a result of the Tea Fire investigation, two have entered no-contest pleas through their attorneys.Missing: determination | Show results with:determination
  58. [58]
    Judge Rules in Favor of Tea Fire Victims - The Santa Barbara ...
    Apr 5, 2011 · Judge Colleen Sterne allowed their lawsuit against the owners of the property where the fire began to continue on almost fully intact.Missing: legal | Show results with:legal
  59. [59]
    Tea Fire Victims Continue Lawsuit Against Owners | The Daily Nexus
    Apr 8, 2011 · “The civil suits are still in the middle of litigation and from my knowledge they currently have found eight of ten students held responsible,” ...
  60. [60]
    Tea Fire Burn Victims Reach $6 Million Settlement | Local News
    May 1, 2012 · A Santa Barbara couple who were severely burned trying to escape the 2008 Tea Fire will receive a $6 million settlement from the owner of the property where ...Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome
  61. [61]
    Burned couple settles lawsuit for $6 million | Crime and Courts
    May 8, 2012 · Lance and Carla Hoffman, who were severely burned in November 2008 when the Tea Fire swept through the hills of Montecito, have settled a lawsuit for $6 ...Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome
  62. [62]
    Tea Fire Victims File Suit - The Santa Barbara Independent
    Nov 11, 2010 · The suit, filed Wednesday in Superior Court, alleges negligence, negligence per se, public nuisance, private nuisance, and premises liability.Missing: legal | Show results with:legal
  63. [63]
    Tea Fire: $500M and counting | Pacific Coast Business Times
    Nov 22, 2008 · Here's a closer look at the impact of the Tea Fire, which burned a total of 1,940 acres and injured 25 people before being fully contained Nov.Missing: assessment | Show results with:assessment
  64. [64]
    The Toll of the Tea Fire: Three years later, community struggles to ...
    Nov 15, 2011 · On November 13, 2008, a firestorm roared across the flanks of the Santa Ynez Mountains and changed many lives in Montecito forever.
  65. [65]
    Court Says Homeowners Can Rebuild - The Santa Barbara ...
    Apr 1, 2015 · The Tea Fire ravaged the Santa Barbara and Montecito foothills in November 2008, destroying more than 200 homes and heavily damaging the ...Missing: economic | Show results with:economic
  66. [66]
    Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire ...
    Apr 14, 2015 · This self-reinforcing action has caused the impacts of the original policy failure to gradually escalate over time. The self-reinforcing nature ...Missing: Tea | Show results with:Tea
  67. [67]
    [PDF] A Socio-Ecological Approach to Mitigating Wildfire Vulnerability in ...
    Feb 11, 2019 · Here we present a case report documenting wildfire vulnerability mitigation strategies undertaken by the community of Montecito, California, and ...
  68. [68]
    Wildfire Management in the United States: The Evolution of a Policy ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · This article explores the political processes that generated and reinforced this policy failure over time. The concepts of bounded rationality, ...Missing: Tea | Show results with:Tea
  69. [69]
    [PDF] A Defensible Community? - Amazon S3
    Oct 9, 2018 · Over 100 homes were lost in Montecito during the 2008 Tea Fire and thousands of people were evacuated during both the 2008 Tea and 2009.
  70. [70]
    Spending to fight California wildfires surpasses $1 billion
    Dec 31, 2008 · In fiscal 2008, half of the $1.4 billion that the U.S. Forest Service spent nationally on wildfire suppression was spent in California alone.
  71. [71]
    The California town that kept a record-breaking wildfire at bay - BBC
    Sep 10, 2024 · Long-term wildfire-mitigation measures in Montecito, California, paid off during the 2017 Thomas Fire (Credit: Kari Greer). In 2017, one of ...Missing: Tea 2008 critiques<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Fire and Rain - 99% Invisible
    Jul 8, 2018 · In 2008, three decades after the Sycamore Canyon Fire, Daryl Cagle's rebuilt house was threatened again by the Tea Fire. Once again, this blaze ...<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    West Coast Wildfires Reveal Massive Governance Failures - Forbes
    Sep 13, 2020 · Others point to problems at the local and state levels. Zoning laws allow communities to build deep inside forests, which makes them vulnerable ...Missing: Tea 2008 critiques