Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ten-code

Ten-codes, also known as 10-codes or APCO Ten Signals, are a set of numeric brevity codes prefixed with "10" that are used primarily by law enforcement, , and fire departments to transmit routine messages concisely over radio communications. These codes enable quick exchanges of information, such as status updates or incident reports, thereby reducing airtime on busy channels and minimizing the risk of misinterpretation in high-stress environments. Common examples include 10-4 for "" or "," 10-20 for "," and 10-33 for "emergency traffic" requiring immediate assistance. The ten-codes originated in the early amid the advent of public safety radio technology, which was limited by single-channel systems and frequent congestion. They were formally established in 1937 as one of the earliest projects of the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO), with significant development led by Charles "Charlie" Hopper, communications director for the Illinois State Police. Adapted from earlier naval procedure symbols, the codes were proposed by APCO in 1935 to promote standardization and efficiency in procedures. By 1940, APCO had published the first official list, which evolved over time but retained its core numeric format. Despite their widespread adoption for over eight decades, ten-codes lack a true national standard, leading to variations across jurisdictions—such as the integration of local penal codes in some departments (e.g., 187 for ). This inconsistency has caused critical communication failures during multi-agency responses, including the 1982 crash, the , 2001 attacks, and in 2005. In response, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the recommended in 2006 that agencies phase out ten-codes in favor of to enhance and clarity. While many departments have transitioned, others retain them due to tradition, training challenges, and concerns over officer safety, with some retaining a limited subset for specialized operations.

Origins and History

Development in Early Radio Communications

The Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO), founded in , played a pivotal role in the early development of brevity codes for radio communications amid the constraints of emerging voice technology. In the June 1935 issue of The APCO Bulletin, APCO proposed the first list of brevity signals, adapted from U.S. Navy procedure symbols and the Association of American Railroads' codes, to facilitate concise transmissions in public safety operations. These initial "ten-signals" were designed primarily for but laid the groundwork for voice adaptations as departments transitioned from to (AM) voice radio in the 1930s. A key figure in advancing these codes for practical police use was Charles "Charlie" , communications director for the Illinois State Police, who in 1937 began developing a set of numeric brevity codes to address the limitations of early systems. , a skilled operator since 1938, recognized that the single-channel AM frequencies allocated by the in 1933—often shared across entire metropolitan areas—created severe bandwidth constraints, leading to frequent and delays in critical dispatches. Prior to widespread capability, one-way broadcasts from dispatch to patrol cars in the late lacked acknowledgments, prompting the need for quick numeric phrases once bidirectional communication became feasible around 1933. Early ten-codes, such as 10-4 for ("") and 10-20 for location inquiry, directly addressed these one-way limitations by enabling rapid confirmations and status updates without lengthy verbal exchanges, thereby minimizing airtime on congested channels. APCO refined and expanded Hopper's list into the official "Ten Signals" by , promoting their adoption to standardize brevity across agencies while conserving the narrow spectrum available for voice transmissions.

Evolution and Standardization Attempts

Following , the ten-codes, initially standardized in the January 1940 APCO Bulletin as a set of brevity signals for communications, underwent expansions to accommodate increasing inter-agency coordination needs. These codes, originally designed for efficient voice transmissions amid limited radio technology, saw adaptations as public safety operations grew more complex, with agencies incorporating additional signals for scenarios like traffic control and dispatching. In the 1970s, the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials-International (APCO) intensified efforts toward national standardization to mitigate widespread variations that hindered . APCO Project 2, completed in 1967, integrated the ten-codes into the "Public Safety Standard Operating Procedures Manual," providing a foundational framework for uniform procedures across departments. This was followed by Project 4 in 1973, which produced "Ten Signal Cards" as training aids to promote consistent radio terminology and reduce transmission errors. A pivotal advancement came with APCO Project 14 in 1974, which revised the Ten-Signal code into a recommended national standard featuring a numeric-only format prefixed by "10" for enhanced brevity and clarity. The project included a "Ten Signal Comparison" analysis documenting discrepancies among regional implementations, such as differing meanings for codes like 10-1 (signal weakness in some areas versus receiving poorly in others), underscoring the urgency for unification to improve response times and training efficiency. Despite these initiatives, full adoption remained elusive due to local preferences, leading to persistent adaptations. The codes also evolved technically across eras, with pre-1950s versions reflecting teletype-influenced brevity suited to early radio systems, while post-1950s revisions optimized them for direct voice communications, as seen in updated definitions from 1940 to 1974 that shifted emphases toward real-time operational clarity. In the 1980s, (FCC) rules on spectrum efficiency for private land mobile services indirectly bolstered the use of such brevity codes in public safety radio, emphasizing concise transmissions before broader federal recommendations in later decades favored for .

Core Ten-codes and Meanings

Standard Codes for General Emergency Use

The ten-codes standardized for general emergency use originated from efforts by the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials-International (APCO) to streamline radio transmissions amid limited bandwidth in the , with the core framework established between and 1940 and revised in the 1974 APCO Project 14. These codes enable brief, coded exchanges between dispatchers and responders in , , and medical services, reducing airtime while maintaining clarity during high-stress operations. Over time, the general codes have shown strong historical consistency in their primary meanings, particularly for basic acknowledgments and urgent alerts, fostering interoperability across North American agencies despite localized adaptations. For example, codes like 10-4 (acknowledgment) and 10-33 (emergency traffic) are widely upheld without alteration, while others, such as 10-50 (typically denoting a vehicle accident), may be tweaked in practice—sometimes interpreted as a request for a wrecker in widespread but non-standard usage. This balance of uniformity and flexibility has sustained their role in multi-agency responses, though the Federal Communications Commission has encouraged plain language since the 1980s to mitigate confusion from variations. While the following list reflects the primary meanings from the 1974 APCO Project 14, actual usage varies by jurisdiction. The codes are functionally categorized to cover communication status, operational movements, administrative tasks, traffic incidents, and emergencies, allowing responders to convey complex situations succinctly. Below is the core APCO list of ten-codes from 10-1 to 10-99, reflecting their primary, standardized meanings for general emergency contexts.
CodeMeaning
10-1Unable to copy—change location
10-2Signal good
10-3Stop transmitting
10-4Acknowledgment (OK)
10-5Relay
10-6Busy—stand by unless urgent
10-7Out of service
10-8In service
10-9Repeat
10-10Fight in progress
10-11Dog case
10-12Stand by (stop)
10-13Weather/road report
10-14Prowler report
10-15Civil disturbance
10-16Domestic problem
10-17Meet complainant
10-18Quickly
10-19Return to ...
10-20Location
10-21Call ... by phone
10-22Disregard
10-23Arrived at scene
10-24Assignment completed
10-25Report in person (meet) ...
10-26Detaining subject; expedite
10-27Driver's license information
10-28Vehicle registration information
10-29Check for wanted
10-30Unnecessary use of radio
10-31Crime in progress
10-32Man with gun
10-33Emergency
10-34Riot
10-35Major crime alert
10-36Correct time
10-37Suspicious vehicle
10-38Stopping suspicious vehicle
10-39Urgent—use light/siren
10-40Silent run—no light/siren
10-41Beginning tour of duty
10-42Ending tour of duty
10-43Information
10-44Permission to leave ... for ...
10-45Animal carcass at ...
10-46Assist motorist
10-47Emergency road repair at ...
10-48Traffic standard repair at ...
10-49Traffic light out at ...
10-50Accident (fatal, injury, property damage)
10-51Wrecker needed
10-52Ambulance needed
10-53Road blocked at ...
10-54Livestock on highway
10-55Intoxicated driver
10-56Intoxicated pedestrian
10-57Hit and run (fatal, injury, property damage)
10-58Direct traffic
10-59Convoy or escort
10-60Squad in vicinity
10-61Personnel in area
10-62Reply to message
10-63Prepare to make written copy
10-64Message for local delivery
10-65Net message assignment
10-66Message cancellation
10-67Clear to receive net message
10-68Dispatch information
10-69Message received
10-70Fire alarm
10-71Advise nature of fire
10-72Report progress on fire
10-73Smoke report
10-74Negative
10-75In contact with ...
10-76En route ...
10-77Estimated time of arrival (ETA)
10-78Need assistance
10-79Notify coroner
10-80Chase in progress
10-81Breathalyzer report
10-82Reserve lodging
10-83Work school crossing at ...
10-84If meeting ..., advise ETA
10-85Delayed due to ...
10-86Officer/operator on duty
10-87Pick up/distribute checks
10-88Present phone number of ...
10-89Bomb threat
10-90Bank alarm at ...
10-91Pick up prisoner/subject
10-92Improperly parked vehicle
10-93Blockade
10-94Drag racing
10-95Prisoner/subject in custody
10-96Mental subject
10-97Check (test) signal
10-98Prison/jail break
10-99Wanted/stolen indicated

Specialized Codes for Law Enforcement

In contexts, ten-codes have been adapted to address -specific scenarios, emphasizing procedural efficiency during patrols, investigations, and tactical operations. These specialized codes facilitate rapid communication over radio channels, particularly in high-stakes situations where brevity is essential to maintain operational security and response times. Unlike general emergency codes, variants focus on incident types common to law enforcement, such as disturbances, arrivals at scenes, and status updates for personnel. The Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) expanded these in the 1930s and 1940s to standardize communications amid growing radio use in policing. Key police-specific ten-codes include those for handling civil disturbances and suspicious activities. For instance, 10-15 signals a civil disturbance, often used to report gatherings that could escalate into riots or public order issues, prompting coordinated responses. 10-23 indicates arrival at the scene, allowing officers to confirm their presence and initiate on-site assessments without lengthy descriptions. Similarly, 10-37 denotes a suspicious , alerting dispatch to potential threats requiring . Off-duty signals, such as 10-7 for out of service, mark an officer's temporary or permanent unavailability, often used at shift ends or during breaks.
CodeMeaning in Law Enforcement ContextExample Use
10-15Civil disturbanceReporting a crowd or altercation at a public event.
10-23Arrived at sceneConfirming presence during a response to a call.
10-37Suspicious Notifying of a vehicle requiring .
10-7Out of serviceIndicating end of availability, e.g., for lunch or .
Tactical applications of these codes are prominent in dynamic operations, such as pursuits and closures. 10-23, meaning arrived at , is frequently employed in vehicle pursuits to signal an officer's position relative to a , enabling coordination among units. 10-24, denoting completed, confirms the resolution of an operation, such as securing a perimeter or apprehending a , allowing dispatch to assign new tasks. Related codes like 10-80 for chase in progress further support tactical brevity during high-speed engagements. Variations exist in retirement and off-duty protocols across North agencies, reflecting local adaptations of APCO standards. While 10-7 universally signifies out of , 10-42 specifically denotes end of shift or , often used in formal s to acknowledge an officer's career conclusion. Some departments combine these, such as issuing 10-7 followed by 10-42, to differentiate routine breaks from permanent off-duty status. Era-based shifts in ten-code usage highlight their evolution from early 20th-century foot patrols to modern vehicle-centric policing. Pre-1960s, codes like 10-23 were applied in beats for routine scene arrivals during foot patrols, emphasizing localized responses in areas. By the late , with the rise of motorized patrols post-World War II, tactical codes such as 10-23 and 10-80 became integral to vehicle pursuits, adapting to faster, multi-unit chases on highways and streets. This transition underscores how ten-codes evolved to match technological and operational changes in .

Variations and Regional Adaptations

North American Agency-Specific Variations

Ten-codes exhibit significant variations across North American agencies, primarily due to local adaptations for operational needs, resulting in non-standardized interpretations that complicate interoperability. For instance, the assigns 10-15 to mean "prisoner in custody," while the standard Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) interpretation of 10-15 denotes a "civil disturbance." Similarly, 10-13 can signify "officer needs assistance" in some departments but "request wrecker" in others, highlighting how agencies modify codes to suit regional priorities. These differences stem from the lack of a universal standard, as each historically developed systems to enhance brevity and security in radio transmissions. State and provincial agencies further illustrate these inconsistencies. In , the Provincial uses 10-88 to request a unit, whereas other agencies interpret it as "advise telephone number" or, in some cases, an urgent call for supervisor assistance. The employs a core set of ten-codes similar to APCO standards. These agency-specific modifications, while efficient internally, often arise from unique environmental demands, like high-volume traffic enforcement in or cross-border activities in . Such variations have led to notable inter-agency communication challenges, particularly during multi-jurisdictional responses in the 1990s, when mismatched codes delayed coordination in joint operations like disaster relief and pursuits spanning agency boundaries. For example, differing interpretations of codes like 10-88—meaning "officer needs help" in one agency but a routine request in another—could result in critical delays or misunderstandings in mutual aid scenarios. These issues were exacerbated by the proliferation of localized codes without national oversight, contributing to broader interoperability failures observed in events like the 1982 Air Florida Flight 90 crash, where 19 agencies' unique protocols hindered effective response.

International Usage and Modifications

Outside , ten-codes have seen limited but notable adoption in emergency services, often adapted to local communication needs and hybridized with indigenous brevity systems. While originating from U.S. practices, these codes have been modified in various regions to accommodate linguistic, operational, and cultural contexts, though full standardization remains rare due to preferences for or alternative protocols. In radio communications have incorporated a simplified version of ten-codes since at least the mid-20th century, primarily for indicating unit status and procedural messages, retaining core U.S.-inspired elements like affirmative acknowledgments while aligning with British-influenced emergency response frameworks. The employ a basic set of these codes within their Computer Assisted Dispatch system, such as 10-0 for "off duty," 10-1 for "broadcast to all units," 10-2 for "en route to job," 10-3 for "available," and 10-4 for "repeat last message." This adaptation emphasizes brevity in high-volume radio traffic, with some codes like 10-5 ("out of service") marked as obsolete since 1997 to streamline procedures further. The represents a more integrated adoption, where the () officially employs APCO ten-codes as part of its standardized radio communication protocol for and coordination with fire services. These codes facilitate rapid reporting across the archipelago's dispersed units, with examples including 10-4 for acknowledgment and 10-33 for emergency traffic. Complementing this, the volunteer-led TxtFire has incorporated ten-codes into its SMS-based fire alert system since its inception in the early 2010s, enabling civilians and responders to report incidents via text messages for faster mobilization in urban and rural areas. Adoption elsewhere in and has been sporadic and often partial, with ten-codes hybridized alongside local systems rather than fully replacing them. In other Asian contexts beyond the , such as parts of , ten-codes appear in informal or training materials for police and fire units but are typically blended with national brevity phrases, with no widespread standardization reported. International modifications of ten-codes frequently arise from cultural and linguistic barriers, necessitating adjustments to ensure clarity in multilingual or non-English-dominant environments. For instance, in the , protocols have been extended to include context-specific additions for tropical hazards like typhoon-related fires, diverging from core U.S. sets to address local disaster patterns. Such adaptations highlight broader challenges, including translation inconsistencies that can lead to miscommunication during joint operations and the need for training to bridge phonetic differences in radio transmissions. These factors have contributed to systems in regions like and , where ten-codes supplement rather than supplant to mitigate risks of ambiguity.

Applications in Emergency Services

Implementation in Police Operations

In police operations, ten-codes are integrated into routine dispatch sequences to facilitate efficient status updates and coordination among and dispatchers. For instance, an going off duty might transmit "10-7" to indicate being out of , followed by "10-8" upon returning to active , ensuring dispatchers maintain accurate tracking of available units without lengthy verbal explanations. During traffic stops, codes such as "10-37" for a suspicious or "10-29" for checking a plate allow to quickly request information while minimizing airtime on shared frequencies. In suspect handling, "10-15" may signal a civil disturbance or in custody, prompting immediate resource allocation like additional units for transport or containment. Emergency protocols leverage ten-codes to prioritize critical situations and clear communications channels. The code "10-33" is employed to declare an , instructing all non-essential to cease and directing full to the transmitting unit during active threats, such as pursuits or confrontations. Escalation occurs if an officer is incapacitated, often via "10-00" to alert all patrols of an officer-down scenario, triggering an all-units response for rapid backup and medical aid. These protocols ensure swift, unambiguous alerts that can save lives by reducing response times in high-stakes incidents. Training and guidelines for ten-code usage are outlined in APCO resources, emphasizing etiquette to prevent frequency overload and miscommunication. Officers learn brevity rules through manuals like the APCO Operating Procedure Manual, which stress concise transmissions—such as avoiding unnecessary acknowledgments beyond "10-4"—to keep channels open for urgent calls. Initial academy training includes simulations of dispatch scenarios, reinforcing proper sequencing and code application, while ongoing refreshers address local variations to maintain procedural consistency. Historically, the 1970s-1990s marked a pivotal shift in reliance on ten-codes as teletype systems gave way to voice radio dominance, driven by advancements in portable two-way radios that demanded faster verbal exchanges. Prior to this, teletype allowed written dispatches, but voice adoption necessitated codes for brevity amid limited and static-prone channels. APCO Project 14 in 1974 expanded the codes to standardize procedures, enhancing speed during the era's increasing urban patrols and multi-unit responses. This transition solidified ten-codes as essential tools for until concerns prompted later reforms.

Use in Fire and Medical Response

In fire departments and emergency medical services (EMS), ten-codes enable concise radio transmissions during incident response, allowing responders to convey critical details like alarm types, unit status, and scene conditions without lengthy descriptions. These codes are integrated into dispatch protocols to coordinate apparatus deployment, resource allocation, and on-scene operations, often alongside mutual aid agreements that facilitate inter-agency support during large-scale incidents. Fire-specific ten-codes, drawn from agency-adopted lists rather than uniform NFPA standards, include 10-70 to signal a alarm, 10-71 to report the of the (such as or involvement), and 10-82 to indicate a in progress, prompting immediate apparatus dispatch. Additional codes like 10-76 (en route) and 10-77 ( duty ) support coordination, while post-1980s adaptations in some departments incorporated codes for hazmat incidents to address chemical or hazardous material responses. Response procedures emphasize with 10-23 (arrived at scene) to position units safely before engagement, followed by 10-24 ( completed or all-clear) once the incident is resolved, ensuring orderly demobilization. In EMS integrations, ten-codes facilitate medical dispatches by specifying patient conditions and transport needs, such as 10-52 (ambulance needed) for urgent calls and 10-55 (intoxicated driver) to alert responders to potential behavioral or overdose scenarios requiring specialized handling. These are often combined with fire response in combined dispatch centers, where codes like 10-56 (intoxicated pedestrian or suicide) trigger integrated EMS-fire teams under mutual aid protocols to manage scenes involving medical emergencies alongside fire risks. An example of ten-code adaptation in resource-limited settings is the TxtFire system, which uses SMS-based alerts for rural response through volunteer networks; it employs -tailored codes like 10-70 ( alarm), 10-71 (nature/situation of ), and 10-73 (add apparatus/engine) to mobilize community responders via text, with operational guidelines restricting transmissions to emergencies, requiring clear English or usage, and limiting calls to three minutes unless ongoing. This approach enhances coordination in areas with poor radio infrastructure, integrating volunteer brigades under national frameworks.

Decline and Modern Alternatives

Transition to Plain Language Protocols

The transition from ten-codes to plain language in emergency communications was driven primarily by the need for enhanced following the , 2001, terrorist attacks, which exposed significant communication barriers among responding agencies. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) emphasized eliminating like ten-codes to facilitate clearer exchanges during multi-agency operations, as variations in code meanings across jurisdictions often led to confusion. In 2005, federal guidelines tied to funding eligibility required to adopt , marking a key push amid reforms aimed at national standardization. By 2006, the (NIMS) Integration Center, under FEMA and DHS, issued a formal mandating the use of in multi-agency, multi-jurisdiction, and multi-discipline incidents to replace ten-codes and other brevity codes, citing their role in hindering effective coordination. This directive built on earlier efforts by the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials-International (APCO). The timeline of adoption accelerated with federal initiatives in the 2000s. By the early 2010s, widespread implementation took hold, with major agencies such as the Sheriff's Department in transitioning in 2010 to align with NIMS requirements. Most U.S. emergency services agencies had shifted to protocols by the mid-2010s, supported by DHS training resources and CISA guidelines. A primary benefit of this shift has been the reduction of errors in multi-agency responses, where differing interpretations of ten-codes previously caused delays and misunderstandings. For instance, during in 2005, out-of-state responders encountered code variations that complicated coordination, prompting FEMA to recommend to prevent such issues and enabling quicker reversion to direct speech for clarity. This change has improved and response times in joint operations, as eliminates the need for code training across agencies. Despite these advances, the transition remains incomplete as of 2025, with ten-codes lingering in some rural and systems due to from long-established practices and limited resources for retraining. agencies in smaller jurisdictions often retain codes for internal use, even as federal mandates prioritize for . Ongoing CISA guidance continues to encourage full adoption to address these holdouts.

Brevity Codes and Standardized Clear Text

In response to the limitations of ten-codes, the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) developed the Phrase Word Brevity Code (PWBC) in the late as a standardized set of short, plain-language phrases to facilitate clearer radio communications among public safety agencies. The PWBC aimed to reduce misunderstandings caused by varying interpretations of numerical codes across different jurisdictions, enabling faster integration of personnel and improved by replacing phrases like "10-4" with equivalents such as "Affirmative" or "Negative." Examples include "Use Caution" for situations requiring vigilance (corresponding to older 10-29), "Out of Service" for units going offline (10-7), and "Available" for ready status (10-24), promoting brevity while prioritizing comprehension over coded brevity. Although introduced earlier, the PWBC gained renewed emphasis in the as part of broader plain-language initiatives, influencing modern protocols in U.S. emergency communications. Complementing such efforts, the (ICS) under the (NIMS), established in 2004, mandates the use of clear text— without codes or —to ensure effective coordination during multi-agency incidents. This standard, reinforced in the 2008 NIMS update following lessons from , requires all organizational elements to communicate in clear text for interoperability, restricting messages to essentials and prohibiting agency-specific acronyms to avoid confusion in high-stress environments. A representative example is "All units stand by," used to halt transmissions and await instructions during emergencies, ensuring universal understanding across disciplines like , , and . ICS clear text also incorporates reinforcements such as the (e.g., "Alpha" for A) to clarify spellings or identifiers, enhancing accuracy in noisy or complex scenarios without relying on obsolete codes. Some regional systems retain limited signal-based brevity as transitional tools within clear-text frameworks; for instance, "Signal 1" denotes an needed in certain fire and operations, serving as a concise while aligning with plain-language mandates. of these brevity codes and clear-text standards has been widespread, driven by federal requirements for NIMS , with most U.S. states and territories implementing plain-language protocols by the early to improve response times and . Internationally, similar shifts emphasize plain English to mirror these advancements. In the , the rollout of the Airwave digital radio network beginning in 2001 prompted emergency services to abandon coded phrases in favor of , using nationally agreed terms for radio transmissions to enhance multi-agency collaboration. This approach, formalized in guidelines like those from the , requires "only and nationally agreed terms" during operations, influencing global standards such as those in the European Union's emergency communications frameworks.

Cultural and Broader Impact

Depictions in Media and Popular Culture

Ten-codes have been a staple in American television and film since the mid-20th century, often dramatized to heighten tension in police procedurals and action sequences. The 1950s series , starring , was among the first to incorporate ten-codes into broadcasts, introducing phrases like "10-4" () to a wide and embedding them in as authentic police lingo. Similarly, 1970s shows such as and frequently featured officers exchanging codes over radio during pursuits and routine calls, portraying them as essential for rapid, efficient communication amid chaos. These depictions emphasized brevity and urgency, with codes like "10-50" (accident) or "10-8" (in service) underscoring the high-stakes nature of . In cinema, ten-codes appear in high-action contexts to convey procedural realism. For instance, in (2007), protagonist deliberately misuses a ten-code over to expose an imposter dispatcher, highlighting their role in verifying authenticity during crises. Such scenes reinforce the codes' mystique, blending technical jargon with narrative suspense. In contemporary television, series such as The Rookie (2018–present) continue to depict officers using ten-codes in radio communications, maintaining their presence in portrayals of procedures. Beyond emergency services, ten-codes permeated broader pop culture through CB radio slang in the trucker subculture, immortalized in the hit song "" by and its 1978 film adaptation, where "10-4, good buddy" became a for affirmation among drivers evading authorities. This adoption spawned memes, merchandise, and casual usage in everyday speech, extending the codes' reach far beyond professional radio use. However, these portrayals have drawn for fostering inaccuracies. often presents ten-codes as universally standardized, ignoring regional and agency variations that can lead to real-world miscommunications, a concern amplified in analyses of public safety protocols pushing for alternatives. This dramatization contributes to public misconceptions, such as assuming all officers nationwide share the same code meanings, potentially complicating inter-agency responses.

Related Radio Communication Systems

Q-codes, a set of three-letter abbreviations beginning with "Q," originated in 1909 when the British government developed them for use in radiotelegraph communications between ships and coast stations to ensure clarity in transmissions. These codes were later adopted by operators and services, with examples like QSL meaning "I acknowledge receipt" or "confirmation of communication." Unlike the numeric structure of ten-codes, which emphasize quick verbal numbering for brevity, Q-codes rely on alphabetic combinations for procedural and operational , facilitating efficient exchanges in noisy or environments. Prior to the widespread adoption of ten-codes in the , some U.S. fire departments employed signal codes or numbered response protocols to coordinate apparatus dispatch and incident types. Variants such as 12-codes emerged in regional public safety communications, particularly in and contexts, extending beyond the standard 10-series with additional numeric signals for routine status updates, though their use varied by agency and predated national standardization efforts. In the 1970s, during the Citizens Band (CB) radio boom fueled by the oil crisis and trucking culture, civilians adapted ten-codes for non-emergency use, extending the original police lexicon with informal additions suited to highway and personal communications. Popular examples included 10-200 to signal "police needed," reflecting a blend of official brevity with trucker slang that popularized terms like "10-4" in mainstream media. This civilian extension highlighted ten-codes' versatility beyond professional services, though it also led to inconsistencies as users improvised local variations. Modern relatives of ten-codes include the , standardized in 1956 for spelling clarity in and adopted universally for radio procedures, and tactical brevity words, which use concise terms like "" for missile launches in joint operations. Post-2000 updates to NATO's Allied Procedural Publication 7 (APP-7) integrated these with evolving technologies, such as secure digital comms, to enhance across multinational forces while maintaining brevity in high-stakes environments. These systems parallel ten-codes by prioritizing rapid, unambiguous exchanges but emphasize phonetic and procedural standardization over numeric coding.

References

  1. [1]
    Police 10 codes vs. plain language: The history and ongoing debate
    Aug 19, 2016 · Police have used codes to communicate internal messages across public radio waves for more than 80 years. Where did these codes come from, and ...
  2. [2]
    Projects - APCO International
    One of the earliest Projects was the establishment of the familiar “10 Codes” in 1937. A standardized set of signals, or 10 Codes, were included in APCO Project ...
  3. [3]
    None
    ### Summary of APCO Ten Signals (10-Codes)
  4. [4]
    [PDF] 10-4 No More? Law Enforcement Agencies Are Phasing Out Old ...
    The use of 10-codes originated in the early 1920s, when public safety radio was in its infancy and officers rarely had to communicate with officers outside ...
  5. [5]
    Police Radio - The Radio Historian
    In 1933, the F.C.C. formally authorized a new public service band for two-way police and emergency communications, with AM systems operating in the “Ultra ...Missing: limitations bandwidth
  6. [6]
    Charles Hopper and the 10-Codes - PSC Magazine (PSCS)
    Oct 1, 2024 · Ten codes were first created to shorten radio transmissions, to help communications officers understand what was being said, and to help ...
  7. [7]
    News Flash • Washington County, NY • CivicEngage
    Feb 16, 2018 · An APCO Bulletin from January 1940 included a standardized set of ten codes. The Ten Codes (or Signals) were included in APCO Project 2 ...
  8. [8]
    The History Of 911 - Department of Emergency Services
    An APCO Bulletin from January 1940 included a standardized set of ten codes. The Ten Codes (or Signals) were included in APCO Project 2 (1967) and revised ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  9. [9]
    10 codes - The RadioReference Wiki
    Jan 30, 2016 · There are numerous variations of 10 codes (abbreviations used by ... 1974 APCO definition. 10-1, Receiving poorly. Signal Weak. 10-2 ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-168 1
    responsible for mobile and personal private radio standards. See http://www ... As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA),774 an ...
  11. [11]
    What are the 10-police codes? - Police1
    Mar 12, 2025 · Below is a fully comprehensive list of the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) 10 codes.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  12. [12]
    [PDF] 10 Codes - APCO CopRadar.com/tencodes
    10 Codes - APCO. Association of Police Communications Officers. 10-1. Unable to Copy -. Change Location. 10-18 Quickly. 10-35 Major Crime Alert. 10-52 Ambulance ...
  13. [13]
    Police 10 Codes APCO version
    The Association of Police Communications Officers (APC0) 10 Code set is the most extensive and widely used code version.
  14. [14]
    Expanded APCO 10 Codes - The RadioReference Wiki
    Dec 23, 2023 · This is a listing of the current Expanded APCO 10 codes used by most departments. These will vary in some areas. For a list of the older APCO ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] CHP 254 - AURAL BREVITY CARD - 01-2021 v2
    10-15 Prisoner in custody. 11-10 Take a report. Code 20 Notify press. 417 ... Code 33 Clear radio channels for emergency. 459 PC Burglary. 10-19 Return to ...Missing: meaning | Show results with:meaning
  16. [16]
    OPP 10 Codes - The RadioReference Wiki
    Jun 18, 2015 · 10-88 K9 Unit Required. 10-89 Tactical Unit Required. 10-90 Bank Alarm. 10-91 Armored Car. 10-92 Person In Custody. 10-93 Road Block. 10-94 ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Making the Transition from Ten Codes to Plain Language - CISA
    The advent of one-way police radio broadcasts to patrol cars in the mid to late. 1920s and the introduction of two-way police mobile communications in the early.Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
  18. [18]
    Department of Public Safety (TX) - The RadioReference Wiki
    Jun 9, 2025 · Ten Codes ; 10-15, Message Delivered, 10-59 ; 10-16, Reply To Message, 10-60 ; 10-17, En Route (To), 10-66 ; 10-18, Urgent, 10-70 ...Texas Department of Public... · Divisions · Maps · Ten Codes
  19. [19]
    Police Codes - RadioWiki
    Jul 25, 2021 · Radio Procedure (10) Codes. Radio Procedure codes are used to indicate unit status. 10-0 ~ Off duty. 10-1 ~ A message for all units on this ...Event Type Codes · Offences · Incidents · Services
  20. [20]
    Law Enforcement (NZ) - The RadioReference Wiki
    Nov 5, 2015 · ... New Zealand police use a 10 code system for status messages. However unlike the Americans, the NZ Police 10 code is very simple. 10-0 Off duty ...Missing: ten- | Show results with:ten-
  21. [21]
    PNP Official Apco Ten Codes and Alarm Codes | PDF - Scribd
    Rating 5.0 (2) The document contains a list of PNP official APCO ten codes used for communication, detailing various situations such as emergencies, traffic incidents, ...
  22. [22]
    10codes and Rules | PDF | Transport - Scribd
    Rating 5.0 (3) Key points include: Txtfire frequency is for emergency use only and uses official 10 codes; operatives must speak clearly and slowly and use English or Tagalog; ...
  23. [23]
    Our History - TXTFIRE PHILIPPINES
    By creating a system that could instantly alert volunteer firefighters and local fire stations via text message, TXTFIRE aimed to dramatically improve these ...Missing: reporting 10- codes
  24. [24]
    Does UK police have a 10 code (US) equivalent? : r/policeuk - Reddit
    Nov 17, 2023 · No, we don't. All we have is a very basic status system of State 0 through to State 10 to describe your availability at any given time and some forces don't ...Questions about police radio : r/policeuk - RedditDo police outside the US have their own versions of 10-codes or ...More results from www.reddit.com
  25. [25]
    Why do UK police use the code 10-4? - Quora
    Jul 10, 2022 · Ten codes are purely American. After they were invented by police to make radio communication clearer, they were taken up by users of CB radio.What does '10, 8' mean in UK Police speak? - QuoraWhy do police in Europe (namely the UK) wear their radio handsets ...More results from www.quora.com
  26. [26]
    (PDF) The Intercultural Challenges in the Transfer of Codes of ...
    PDF | On Dec 29, 2011, Christoph I. Barmeyer and others published The Intercultural Challenges in the Transfer of Codes of Conduct from the US to Europe ...
  27. [27]
    Radio Codes | City of Winston-Salem, NC
    Examples of radio codes include: 10-4 Affirmative, 10-10 Negative, 10-18 Urgent, 10-30 Danger, 10-50 Vehicle Accident, 10-62 Breaking and Entering, 10-73 ...
  28. [28]
    Code 10 - Police Scanner
    Request criminal history; Pick up passenger; Armed robbery; Rescue call; Request officer; Drivers License Report. 10-44. Permission to leave patrol; I have a ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] APCO PROJECT - Office of Justice Programs
    May 8, 1975 · REVISED OFFICIAL APCO TEN SIGNALS. ----. Radio users are urged to incorporate the use of the APCO TEN. SIGNALS in their radio operating ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Voice Radio Communications Guide for the Fire Service
    Minimum channel bandwidth typically is limited by the state of technology and the bandwidth required to carry a given amount of information. Standard bandwidth ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Official Ten-Code List - NJSOA
    Ten-codes are used in public communications, such as 10-0 for 'Caution', 10-4 for 'Acknowledgement', and 10-36 for 'Correct time'.<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Police Codes (NH) - The RadioReference Wiki
    Aug 2, 2025 · Hazmat Problem. 10-47, Explosion, 10-92, Bank Alarm. 10-48, Fire, 10-93, Computer Down. 10-48A, Fire Alarm, 10-94, Prisoner in Custody. 10-49 ...
  33. [33]
    Police Radio Codes
    10-65 Missing person 10-66 Suspicious person. 10-67 Person calling for help. 10-68 Call for police made via telephone. 10-70 Prowler. 10-71 Shooting. 10-72 ...
  34. [34]
    TXTFIRE PHILIPPINES
    During the meeting, TXTFIRE presented its real-time fire alert system, incident reporting tools, and volunteer coordination network, while MMDA shared its ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Interoperability: Stop Blaming the Radio - Homeland Security Affairs
    ... post-9/11 era is the need to improve emergency scene radio communications.1 ... Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) posture that 10-codes and other.
  36. [36]
    Local emergency teams resist plain-language radio rules
    Aug 26, 2005 · Local emergency teams resist plain-language radio rules. To qualify for federal funds, first responders must agree to stop using codes like "10- ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Plain Language Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) - CISA
    On December 19, 2006, the NIMS Integration Center issued an alert requiring the use of plain language for multi-agency, multi-jurisdiction and multi-discipline ...Missing: NEMA | Show results with:NEMA
  38. [38]
    [PDF] The Florida 700 MHz Public Safety Interoperability Channel Plan
    Nov 23, 2010 · In the early 1990's public safety officials testified before the United States Congress ... To utilize “plain language” for all transmissions. • ...
  39. [39]
    Maine police dropping 10-code, switching to plain language - Police1
    Jan 1, 2010 · When Hurricane Katrina hit Louisiana, the dozens of responding agencies were told to revert to plain language to avoid misunderstanding ...Missing: miscommunication | Show results with:miscommunication
  40. [40]
    I 1.1 I - Office of Justice Programs
    PHRASE WORD BREVITY CODE. Standard plain langua~e phrasl's offer a means to improve the understandi,ng between agencies using differen', codes, In addition ...
  41. [41]
    https://chips-tv.com/wiki/CHP_Radio_Codes
  42. [42]
    [PDF] National Incident Management System (NIMS) - FEMA
    Dec 18, 2008 · organizational elements during an incident should be in plain language (clear text) to ensure that information dissemination is clear and ...
  43. [43]
    Police pursuits | College of Policing
    Oct 23, 2013 · Only plain language and nationally agreed terms should be used in radio transmissions and commentaries. See appendix B of the tactics ...
  44. [44]
    The History of 10-4 and 10-Codes | LGT Transport
    10-Codes come from, you need to know some background information. In 1896, Guglielmo Marconi invented the first rendition of the radio.Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  45. [45]
    CHP Radio Codes - CHiPs Wiki
    Jan 15, 2022 · 10 Codes · 10-0 Use Caution · 10-1 Receiving Poorly · 10-2 Receiving Well · 10-3 Stop Transmitting · 10-4 Acknowledgment · 10-5 Relay Message to___ ...10 Codes · 11 Codes · Other Codes
  46. [46]
    Live Free or Die Hard (Film) - TV Tropes
    Police Code for Everything: McClane ferrets out the fake "police dispatcher" by subverting it: using the wrong police 10-code to describe his situation. When ...
  47. [47]
    It was 10-4 to “Convoy” During CB-Obsessed '70s
    Suddenly, it wasn't just truck drivers who had their own “handle,” phrases like “catch you on the flip flop,” “Smokey” and “10-4 good buddy” were splattered ...
  48. [48]
    The 10 Codes or Plain Language: The Debate Continues
    Oct 19, 2023 · The invention of 10 codes is attributed to Charles "Charlie" Hopper, communications director for the Illinois State Police in the 1930s. Back ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  49. [49]
    Are All Police Codes The Same?
    The answer is a resounding no. While certain codes have achieved widespread recognition (particularly through media portrayals), the reality is a complex ...
  50. [50]
    How did the terms like QRZ, QTH, and other forms of ham shorthand ...
    Feb 1, 2019 · The original Q codes were created, circa 1909, by the British government as a list of abbreviations prepared for the use of British ships and coast stations.
  51. [51]
    On Fire
    Feb 1, 2010 · Critical information. The Fire Department of New York (FDNY) has used the signal 5-5-5-5 to announce the death of a member ...
  52. [52]
    Coos County (OR) - The RadioReference Wiki
    May 28, 2022 · 12 Codes. 12-01 In service 12-02 Out of service 12-03 Return to ... Fire Department which can be toned out by either Station 5 or North Bend.
  53. [53]
    The Complete List of CB 10 (Citizens Band Radio) Codes - eCapital
    Oct 13, 2022 · These CB radio codes were established to allow brevity and ease of messaging – a critical communication advantage for an industry facing the 1973 oil crisis.Missing: regulations | Show results with:regulations
  54. [54]
    The NATO phonetic alphabet – Alfa, Bravo, Charlie..., 20-Oct.
    Oct 20, 2016 · The NATO phonetic alphabet became effective in 1956 and just a few years later became the established universal phonetic alphabet.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] brevity - DTIC
    This publication standardizes air-to-air, air-to-surface, surface-to-air, and surface-to-surface brevity code words. The scope is limited to those brevity codes ...Missing: APCO PWBC 2009