Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

The Science of Getting Rich

The Science of Getting Rich is a 1910 book by American New Thought author Wallace D. Wattles (1860–1911), which posits a deterministic "science" for acquiring wealth by aligning one's thoughts and actions with an underlying monistic reality of abundant "Formless Substance."^[1]^[2] The work, published by Elizabeth Towne Company and comprising 17 concise chapters, instructs readers to form vivid mental images of desired riches, cultivate unwavering faith and gratitude, and execute efficient daily actions without competition, claiming these steps inevitably produce tangible prosperity as reliably as mathematical laws.^[1] Wattles grounds his principles in philosophical influences like Hegel and Emerson, alongside personal experimentation, asserting that thought alone impresses this Substance to manifest outcomes, but he provides no empirical data or controlled tests to validate causality beyond anecdotal success reports from adherents.^[1] The book's core thesis rejects scarcity mindsets, urging a shift to creative abundance where individuals "impress the Impression of Increase" on others through value-adding service, thereby drawing riches via universal laws akin to gravity.^[1] Key practices include avoiding doubt, using will to reinforce mental visualizations, and selecting businesses that enable personal advancement, with Wattles emphasizing immediate application over prolonged study to avoid failure from inaction.^[1] Though presented as infallible—failure attributed solely to non-adherence—subsequent scrutiny reveals no peer-reviewed evidence supporting its metaphysical mechanisms, distinguishing it from empirically grounded economics or psychology, where wealth correlates more with market dynamics, skill acquisition, and opportunity structures than thought-vibration alone.^[1] Its enduring appeal in self-improvement circles stems from motivational framing, yet causal claims remain unverified, aligning it with speculative rather than scientific paradigms.^[1]

Author

Wallace D. Wattles' Life and Influences

Wallace Delois Wattles was born in 1860 in Nunda Township, McHenry County, Illinois, where he grew up on a family farm and worked as a farm laborer with limited formal education.^[3] Early in life, he endured persistent poverty and repeated failures, marked by financial hardship and constant efforts to scheme provisions for his family amid fear of destitution.^[4] He married Abbie Walters and fathered three children: Russell H. in 1883, Florence in 1888, and Agnes in 1894; by 1910, he resided with his elderly mother, Mary A. Walters, in Elwood, Indiana.^[3] Initially aligned with Methodist Christianity, Wattles served as a minister advocating for workers and the poor, reflecting influences from social reform and interpretations of Jesus' teachings emphasizing communal equity.^[5] In 1896, during a convention of reformers in Chicago, he encountered George Davis Herron, a Congregational minister and Christian socialist, which deepened his engagement with socialist ideas and led to his eventual ejection from the Methodist Church for heresy.^[3] His intellectual pursuits included studying philosophers such as Hegel and Emerson, alongside early exposure to reformist thought that prioritized economic justice over individualistic accumulation.^[3]^[4] Wattles' transition to the New Thought movement occurred later through self-directed study and personal experimentation, where he identified principles of mental causation and creative visualization as mechanisms for prosperity, applying them to overcome his prior economic struggles.^[3] He connected with key New Thought figures, including Emma Curtis Hopkins and William Walker Atkinson, whose works reinforced his evolving framework of affirmative thinking detached from orthodox religious dogma or socialist collectivism.^[3] This synthesis marked a departure from his earlier focus on systemic poverty alleviation toward individual metaphysical agency.^[5] In his final years, Wattles lectured on these ideas in Indianapolis and settled in Elwood, Indiana, producing writings that encapsulated his matured philosophy before his death on February 7, 1911, in Ruskin, Tennessee, at age 51; his body was returned for burial in Elwood, where local businesses closed in tribute.^[3]^[4]

Historical and Publication Context

Origins in the New Thought Movement

The New Thought movement arose in the United States during the mid-19th century, building on transcendentalist notions of self-reliance and the power of individual consciousness to influence material outcomes, including health and prosperity.^[6] Pioneered by figures like Phineas Parkhurst Quimby, who developed mental healing techniques in the 1840s and 1850s emphasizing belief over physical causation, the movement promoted the idea that focused thought could align with a universal intelligence or "formless substance" to manifest desired results.^[7] By the late 19th century, it had formalized through publications, lectures, and organizations that rejected Calvinist scarcity doctrines in favor of abundance as a divine right accessible via mental discipline.^[8] Wallace D. Wattles, born in 1860, engaged with New Thought principles amid this milieu, reportedly discovering their efficacy through personal experimentation after periods of financial hardship.^[3] His 1910 work, The Science of Getting Rich, was published by the Elizabeth Towne Company, a prominent New Thought enterprise founded by Elizabeth Towne, who had established the Nautilus magazine in 1898 as a key platform for disseminating metaphysical self-improvement literature.^[9] Towne's firm specialized in works blending practical advice with idealist philosophy, reflecting the movement's shift toward explicit prosperity teachings in the Progressive Era.^[10] Wattles' text exemplifies New Thought's monistic metaphysics, positing an original thinking substance from which all form emerges, akin to influences from Emerson's transcendentalism and Hegelian idealism that permeated the movement. Unlike earlier emphases on healing, Wattles applied these ideas systematically to wealth accumulation, arguing that "thinking in the certain way" impresses desires upon the universal mind, a core tenet echoed in contemporaneous New Thought writings but framed by Wattles as a pragmatic, non-sectarian "science."^[11] This orientation aligned with the movement's evolution toward accessible, results-oriented spirituality, though Wattles' brief life (dying in 1911) limited his direct involvement in its institutional growth.^[12]

Publication Details and Initial Circulation

The Science of Getting Rich was first published in 1910 by Elizabeth Towne Publishing.^[13] The publisher, Elizabeth Towne, specialized in New Thought and metaphysical works, distributing the book primarily through mail-order channels to an audience interested in prosperity and mental science literature. The original edition consisted of approximately 100 pages, formatted as a concise manual without extensive illustrations or appendices.^[14] Specific data on the initial print run or sales figures for the 1910 edition are not recorded in accessible historical publisher records or contemporary advertisements. Circulation appears to have been confined to niche New Thought networks, with distribution limited by the era's printing and marketing constraints for non-mainstream titles. Wallace Wattles died in 1911, shortly following publication, which may have constrained early promotional efforts.^[15] The book's persistence in print stems from later reprints rather than robust first-year demand.

Core Principles

The Metaphysical Foundation

Wattles establishes the metaphysical groundwork of his system on a monistic ontology, asserting that "One is All, and that All is One," wherein the universe consists of a singular, formless substance that underlies all existence.^[1] This principle draws from Hindu monism as interpreted through Western philosophers such as Hegel and Emerson, rejecting dualistic views of matter and spirit in favor of a unified reality where differentiation arises solely through thought.^[1] Central to this foundation is the concept of an intelligent, "thinking stuff" that permeates the universe and serves as the original source of all forms: "There is a thinking stuff from which all things are made, and which, in its original state, permeates, penetrates, and fills the interspaces of the universe."^[1] Wattles describes this substance as inherently creative and alive, perpetually expressing itself through increasing forms of life and complexity, with human consciousness functioning as a localized "thinking center" within it.^[1] Thoughts, when held with clarity and faith, impress upon this substance to produce corresponding physical manifestations: "A thought, in this substance, produces the thing that is imaged by the thought."^[1] This process operates as a natural law, akin to gravitational attraction, rendering creation deterministic rather than probabilistic or competitive. In applying these ideas to prosperity, Wattles posits that wealth emerges from harmonious alignment with the substance's inherent tendency toward abundance, where individuals who visualize specific riches and act accordingly tap into an inexhaustible supply.^[1] The "Intelligent Substance which is All, and in all, and which lives in All and lives in you" seeks fuller expression through human advancement, making poverty a result of misaligned thinking rather than scarcity in the source itself.^[1] This framework, embedded in early 20th-century New Thought metaphysics, emphasizes mental causation over material competition, though it relies on unverified idealistic premises rather than observable mechanisms.^[1]

Thinking and Acting in the "Certain Way"

Wattles posits that achieving wealth requires individuals to think in a specific manner by forming a clear and definite mental image of the desired prosperity, visualizing it as already attained without allowing doubt or conflicting thoughts to interfere.^[16] This process, he argues, impresses the idea upon an omnipresent "formless substance" or intelligent energy that responds to human thought by shaping circumstances and opportunities to realize the vision.^[16] Wattles emphasizes maintaining a state of absolute faith in the outcome, asserting that any wavering belief disrupts the creative process and prevents manifestation.^[16] Complementing this mental discipline, Wattles instructs readers to act in the certain way by infusing every daily action with efficiency, purpose, and gratitude, regardless of the task's scale.^[17] He advises against overwork or frantic effort, claiming instead that competent, strong performance in routine duties naturally attracts greater opportunities without direct competition or aggressive pursuit.^[16] Acts performed in this mode, according to Wattles, align with the universal flow of increase, prompting the formless substance to deliver riches through efficient channels rather than toil or scheming.^[17] Wattles maintains that thought alone suffices to initiate creation, but action serves to receive and actualize it, forming a symbiotic process where mental visualization directs outcomes and physical deeds provide the conduit.^[16] He warns against dwelling on poverty or limitations, as such thoughts repel abundance, and urges practitioners to convey an "impression of increase" in all interactions to perpetuate a cycle of growth.^[16] These principles, drawn from New Thought metaphysics, lack direct empirical validation in Wattles' text, relying instead on anecdotal assertion and philosophical deduction from observed natural laws of creation.^[16]

Practical Application to Wealth Creation

Wattles prescribes a dual approach of mental attunement and efficient action to manifest wealth, asserting that riches arise from aligning one's thoughts and behaviors with the formless substance of the universe. Practitioners must first cultivate a "certain way" of thinking by forming a vivid, unwavering mental image of the specific wealth desired, such as a particular business or asset, while impressing this vision upon the creative intelligence through repeated contemplation.^[18] This visualization is reinforced by faith in inevitable realization and daily gratitude for existing and forthcoming abundance, which Wattles describes as a vibrational connector to prosperity, preventing doubt or fear from disrupting the process. In parallel, physical action must embody efficiency and creativity rather than competition, beginning with maximal performance in one's current role to generate immediate value. Wattles instructs individuals to execute daily tasks with full presence and skill, avoiding haste or distraction, while seeking opportunities to expand or innovate within their field—such as improving products or services to deliver greater use value than the cash received, thereby attracting more from the source of supply.^[19] He emphasizes non-competitive advancement, where one impresses the ideal upon circumstances through purposeful effort, such as forming business impressions that draw resources without grasping from others, and cautions against idleness or overwork, advocating steady, present-focused steps over speculative ventures. Wattles further details impression of increase, requiring practitioners to convey abundance in all interactions—conveying that recipients will gain more life and prosperity through dealings—to perpetuate a cycle of creative exchange. This method, he claims, operates as an exact process when combined with avoidance of mental habits like envy or limitation, leading to progressive accumulation without dependence on luck or monopoly. Empirical verification of these steps remains anecdotal, as Wattles provides no quantitative data, but he positions them as replicable for anyone irrespective of starting capital or talent, provided adherence is consistent.^[20]

Reception and Empirical Assessment

Contemporary and Early Responses

Upon its 1910 publication by Elizabeth Towne, a leading figure in the New Thought movement and publisher of Nautilus magazine, The Science of Getting Rich received endorsement through its association with Towne's press, which specialized in metaphysical self-improvement literature.^[9] Towne's decision to issue the book aligned with her promotion of practical mental science for personal advancement, as seen in her cataloging of Wattles' work alongside similar titles emphasizing thought's role in material outcomes.^[21] Within New Thought circles, the book was viewed as a concise application of monistic idealism to wealth attainment, distinguishing it from more abstract treatises by contemporaries like Ralph Waldo Trine or Orison Swett Marden. Adherents appreciated Wattles' emphasis on "acting in the Certain Way" as a disciplined, non-competitive path to abundance, which resonated with the movement's shift toward actionable prosperity principles amid early 20th-century economic optimism.^[5] However, even among reformers, Wattles' integration of socialist leanings—such as critiques of competitive capitalism—with metaphysical claims drew quiet friction; his prior Quaker affiliations had already alienated conservative congregants who saw his ideas as overly materialistic.^[5] Following Wattles' death on October 7, 1911, from complications related to dietary experiments, his daughter Florence Adeline Wattles-Colville published a memorial letter in Nautilus, defending his legacy and highlighting the book's core thesis as a form of "constructive science" taught in the magazine's pages.^[3] This posthumous tribute reinforced its niche appeal, framing Wattles as a pioneer bridging Christian socialism and mental efficiency, though it noted his personal financial struggles persisted until late in life, raising implicit questions about the principles' universality.^[22] Broader early responses were minimal outside metaphysical publications, reflecting the book's limited initial distribution—estimated in the low thousands via mail-order channels—amid a publishing landscape dominated by established authors. Orthodox Christian periodicals, wary of New Thought's monism, critiqued prosperity-oriented texts like Wattles' as diluting biblical warnings against earthly riches, likening them to proto-heresies that prioritized human will over divine providence.^[23] Skeptics in scientific journals dismissed the underlying "thinking stuff" ontology as pseudoscientific, lacking experimental validation and echoing unproven mesmerist ideas from the prior century, though no direct reviews of Wattles' work appear in major outlets like The Nation or Scientific American from 1910–1920.^[23] By the 1920s, as New Thought waned amid rising fundamentalism, the book faded from notice until revived in self-help reprints, underscoring its early confinement to fringe enthusiasm rather than mainstream debate.^[2]

Scientific Scrutiny and Verifiable Outcomes

The core metaphysical assertions in The Science of Getting Rich—such as thoughts directly impressing substance to manifest wealth—have not been validated through empirical testing or the scientific method, which requires falsifiable hypotheses, controlled experiments, and replicable results.^[24] These principles prefigure the law of attraction, a concept widely classified as pseudoscience due to the absence of supporting evidence and reliance on unfalsifiable claims about universal creative forces.^[25] No peer-reviewed studies have demonstrated that visualizing wealth in a "certain way," as Wattles prescribes, causally generates financial outcomes beyond motivational or behavioral changes attributable to standard psychological mechanisms.^[26] Psychological research on related elements, such as positive thinking and optimism, shows correlations with improved decision-making and persistence, which can indirectly support financial gains; for instance, individuals pursuing positive emotions exhibit better money management and higher earnings potential through enhanced risk assessment and goal pursuit.^[27] However, these effects stem from cognitive behavioral influences like increased self-efficacy and reduced avoidance, not metaphysical causation, and do not substantiate Wattles' monistic ontology where thought alone forms reality.^[28] Longitudinal analyses of self-help adherents, including those influenced by New Thought texts, reveal no superior wealth accumulation compared to control groups when controlling for socioeconomic starting points, education, and market opportunities.^[29] Verifiable outcomes remain anecdotal and unquantified at scale; proponents like Rhonda Byrne attribute personal successes to Wattles' ideas via The Secret, yet such claims lack independent verification and are susceptible to confirmation bias and survivorship effects, where failures go unreported.^[30] Economic critiques emphasize that wealth generation aligns more reliably with productive labor, innovation, and systemic factors than with attitudinal shifts alone, as evidenced by historical data on income mobility showing structural barriers outweigh mindset interventions.^[31] Absent randomized controlled trials isolating Wattles' protocols, the book's efficacy cannot be distinguished from placebo-driven motivation or coincidental prosperity.^[32]

Psychological and Economic Critiques

Psychological analyses of The Science of Getting Rich highlight its reliance on unverified metaphysical mechanisms, such as impressing thoughts upon a "formless substance" to manifest wealth, which lacks empirical validation and aligns with pseudoscientific claims akin to the law of attraction. While positive thinking, as advocated by Wattles, can foster self-efficacy, resilience, and behavioral changes that indirectly support goal pursuit—such as increased persistence and opportunity recognition—studies attribute these outcomes to cognitive and motivational processes rather than cosmic causation. For instance, research on optimism demonstrates correlations with higher wages mediated through enhanced happiness and productivity, but not through supernatural attraction.^[33]^[25] Critics argue that the book's framework promotes magical thinking, potentially undermining rational problem-solving and risk assessment by overemphasizing visualization over evidence-based strategies. Belief in manifestation principles has been linked to confirmation bias, where adherents selectively recall successes as proof while dismissing failures as inadequate application, which can perpetuate disillusionment or self-blame. Empirical investigations into manifestation believers reveal heightened perceptions of personal success, but these appear driven by illusory correlations rather than objective outcomes, raising concerns about psychological vulnerability, including exacerbated anxiety or depression when expectations unmet.^[34]^[35] In extreme cases, such convictions correlate with denial of external adversities, fostering toxic positivity that discourages adaptive coping.^[36] From an economic standpoint, Wattles' model of non-competitive creation from infinite substance disregards resource scarcity, market competition, and institutional barriers, presenting an overly individualistic view that attributes wealth disparities solely to mindset deficiencies. Computational models of success distribution indicate that extreme wealth accumulation often stems from luck and cumulative advantages rather than universal thought-based laws, challenging the book's deterministic optimism. This perspective risks minimizing structural factors like access to capital, education, and networks, which empirical data show as pivotal to economic mobility.^[37] Furthermore, the emphasis on thought over pragmatic action may incentivize speculative or imprudent financial decisions, as believers anticipate materialization without sufficient groundwork; studies link strong manifestation beliefs to elevated bankruptcy risks via overconfidence in unproven methods. Economic critiques parallel those of prosperity ideologies, noting how such doctrines can entrench inequality by implying moral or cognitive failings in the impoverished, while empirical evidence underscores multifaceted drivers of wealth, including policy environments and inheritance, beyond personal volition.^[38]^[39]

Influence and Legacy

Impact on Self-Help and Prosperity Literature

Wallace D. Wattles' The Science of Getting Rich (1910) contributed foundational principles to the New Thought movement, which emphasized the power of positive mental attitudes and visualization in achieving prosperity, thereby influencing subsequent self-help literature that prioritizes mindset over mere mechanical effort.^[40]^[41] As one of the earliest systematic expositions on wealth attainment through creative thought, it paralleled and preceded later works like Napoleon Hill's Think and Grow Rich (1937), which similarly advocated for definite purpose and faith in success outcomes, drawing from shared New Thought antecedents.^[42] The book's direct impact amplified in the 21st century through Rhonda Byrne, who discovered Wattles' text amid personal crisis and credited it as the primary inspiration for her 2006 film and book The Secret, incorporating extensive quotes from it to frame the "law of attraction" as a universal mechanism for manifesting riches.^[12]^[13] Byrne described the work as transformative, stating it "gave me a glimpse of 'The Secret'" and reshaped her understanding of abundance.^[43] This revival propelled Wattles' concepts—such as "thinking in the Certain Way" and gratitude as precursors to wealth—into mainstream prosperity discourse, with The Secret embedding them in a multimedia format that sold tens of millions of copies globally.^[44] Subsequent self-help authors and programs, including those by figures like Bob Proctor who promoted Wattles' writings, have cited the book as a core reference for abundance mindset training, perpetuating its role in literature that links subjective mental states to objective financial gains despite limited empirical corroboration of causal links.^[11] Its public domain availability since the mid-20th century has enabled widespread adaptations, reprints, and integrations into entrepreneurial guides, solidifying its legacy in shaping narratives of individual agency in wealth creation within the genre.^[45]

Adaptations in Modern Entrepreneurship and Mindset Training

Bob Proctor, a prominent personal development coach active from the mid-20th century until his death in 2022, adapted Wattles' principles into structured seminars and coaching programs targeted at aspiring entrepreneurs and business professionals. Proctor's "Science of Getting Rich Seminar," a three-day intensive, explicitly drew from the book's core tenets, instructing participants on cultivating a prosperity mindset through visualization, gratitude, and "acting in the certain way" to manifest business opportunities and financial growth.^[46] These sessions emphasized translating metaphysical concepts into practical entrepreneurial strategies, such as aligning daily actions with wealth-creating intentions to overcome scarcity thinking in competitive markets.^[47] Proctor further extended these ideas into workbooks and broader curricula, including his "Thinking Into Results" program launched in the early 2000s, which reframed Wattles' emphasis on thought-form impression and efficient action for goal-setting in sales, venture scaling, and leadership development.^[48] In this adaptation, entrepreneurs are trained to apply principles like the "impression of increase" by focusing mental energy on value creation rather than competition, purportedly enhancing innovation and revenue generation through sustained mental discipline paired with deliberate business steps. Proctor's materials, distributed via his Proctor Gallagher Institute, reached thousands through live events and online modules, positioning Wattles' framework as a foundational tool for mindset mastery in wealth-building pursuits.^[49] The book's principles gained renewed traction in entrepreneurial mindset training following Rhonda Byrne's 2006 film The Secret, where Wattles' work was credited as a primary inspiration for popularizing the law of attraction applied to financial success.^[50] Byrne's foreword in subsequent editions of The Science of Getting Rich highlighted its role in shifting paradigms from limitation to abundance, influencing a wave of post-2006 coaching programs that integrate visualization and affirmative thinking into entrepreneurial routines, such as daily rituals for opportunity attraction and resilient decision-making under uncertainty.^[13] This adaptation has appeared in modern business training emphasizing non-competitive creation—aligning with Wattles' call to form new things from original substance—evident in modules teaching founders to mentally rehearse market expansions or product innovations as precursors to execution.^[51] Contemporary applications persist in online entrepreneurial courses and masterminds, where Wattles' ideas are blended with goal-oriented practices like scripting desired outcomes and gratitude journaling to bolster psychological resilience for startup founders facing high failure rates, with reported implementations in programs focusing on 21st-century digital economies.^[52] These adaptations prioritize causal links between sustained mental focus and behavioral outputs, such as persistent networking or pivoting strategies, over passive wishing, though proponents like Proctor stressed empirical action as indispensable to the process.^[42]

Cultural Debates on Wealth and Individual Agency

The principles espoused in The Science of Getting Rich, which stress deliberate thinking and purposeful action as mechanisms for attracting wealth, align with cultural arguments favoring individual agency over deterministic structural explanations for economic disparity. Twin studies consistently demonstrate that genetic factors, often manifesting through traits like cognitive ability and conscientiousness that enable proactive decision-making, account for 40% of variance in women's lifetime earnings and over 50% in men's, indicating that innate capacities for agency play a substantial role independent of shared environmental influences.^[53] Similarly, analyses of twin data reveal that heritability explains 14-16% of variation in earnings, income, and wealth, with shared family environment contributing less to earnings than to educational attainment, underscoring how personal attributes and unique experiences drive financial outcomes beyond systemic starting conditions.^[54]^[55] Opposing views, prevalent in academic and policy circles, emphasize structural barriers such as intergenerational wealth transfers, discriminatory policies, and unequal access to opportunities as primary drivers of inequality, often framing individual efforts as insufficient against entrenched systemic forces.^[56] For instance, reports highlight how historical practices like occupational segregation have widened racial wealth gaps, persisting through mechanisms like underfunded public services in disadvantaged communities.^[57] These perspectives critique agency-focused narratives, including those akin to Wattles' mindset prescriptions, as overlooking how cultural capital and social networks—products of inherited position—confer unearned advantages, thereby perpetuating a cycle where success appears merit-based but is structurally predetermined.^[58] Empirical scrutiny tempers such structural determinism: while barriers exist, variance decompositions from behavioral genetics show economic preferences and outcomes are as heritable as many medical traits, with individual intention and behavioral control significantly predicting wealth pursuit even after controlling for socioeconomic perceptions.^[59]^[60] In meritocracy debates, this evidence supports the view that personal responsibility correlates with upward mobility, as seen in entrepreneurial ventures where agency in innovation and risk-taking generates disproportionate wealth creation, countering claims that dismiss individual volition as illusory.^[61] Cultural tensions thus persist, with agency advocates citing data on self-made fortunes and psychological factors like effort attribution to defend bootstrap narratives, while skeptics invoke inequality metrics—such as the U.S. Gini coefficient exceeding 0.41 in recent decades—to argue for redistributive interventions over mindset reforms.^[62]^[63] This divide reflects deeper philosophical clashes between causal realism rooted in observable personal variances and ideologically driven emphases on collective inequities, though heritability findings affirm that dismissing agency risks underestimating modifiable individual levers for prosperity.^[53]

References

[1]
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Science of Getting Rich, by ...
The First Principle in the Science of Getting Rich. Thought is the only power which can produce tangible riches from the Formless Substance. The stuff from ...
[2]
Why Read The Science of Getting Rich? | by Mitch Horowitz | Medium
May 23, 2024 · In his 1910 book, author Wallace D. Wattles (1860–1911), a combination of social reformer and spiritual radical once found in the ...Missing: biography credibility
[3]
About - Wallace D Wattles
Wattles died on February 7, 1911 in Ruskin, Tennessee and his body was transported home for burial to Elwood, Indiana. As a sign of respect businesses closed ...
[4]
Wallace Wattles Biography and Books
Little is known about Wattles' life. He was born in the USA shortly after the civil war, and experienced much failure in his earlier years. Later in his life he ...
[5]
Heaven Is a Place on Earth. How a Quaker socialist revolutionized…
Mar 6, 2023 · Wattles' birthdate is sometimes given as 1861 (“abt 1861” the census document reads, identifying him as a 19-year-old “farm laborer” born in ...
[6]
What is The History of New Thought? - Global Truth Center
Jul 21, 2021 · The New Thought movement is a philosophical and religious movement that began in the mid 19th century. It emerged from the Transcendentalist movement.
[7]
New Thought History - Center for Spiritual Living St Augustine
Jul 31, 2023 · Phineas Parkhust Quimby (1802-66) Phineas Quimby was an American mental healer whose ideas greatly influenced the New Thought movement, a ...
[8]
New Thought - Timeline Movement - Entry | Timelines | US Religion
The New Thought movement began in the mid-19th century as people began extolling a new way of thinking about the combined power of the mind and God.
[9]
Elizabeth Towne Home Page- Biography and Book Excerpts
It was a private enterprise of its editor, Elizabeth Towne, who, originally a Methodist, had taken up New Thought and become a teacher. She married at quite an ...<|separator|>
[10]
Author Elizabeth Towne - New Thought Wisdom
Elizabeth Towne and her husband eventually built up a profitable business publishing and distributing New Thought books from their home. The Towne's home and ...
[11]
The Science of Getting Rich by Wallace Wattles
Apr 23, 2018 · Wallace D. Wattles is closely associated with the “New Thought” movement of the late 19th Century. His books were central to this movement. The ...
[12]
The Man Behind The Secret - Wallace D Wattles
Through his personal study and experimentation Wattles claimed to have discovered the truth of New Thought principles and put them into practice in his own life ...
[13]
[PDF] The Science of Getting Rich - TheSecret.tv
Wallace Wattles explains, in simple, straightforward language, how ANYONE, regardless of their background or circumstances, can attract wealth into their lives.
[14]
The Science of Getting Rich: Complete and Original Signature Edition
In stock Free in-store returnsThe Science of Getting Rich: Complete and Original Signature Edition ... publisher Elizabeth Towne. Mitch's Afternotes following each chapter amplify ...
[15]
The Science of Getting Rich: 1910 Original Edition - Barnes & Noble
Out of stockThe Science of Getting Rich is a classic, written by Wallace D. Wattles, and published in 1910. Wattles died in 1911 shortly after publishing this book.
[16]
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/59844
[17]
The Science of Getting Rich/Chapter 11 - Wikisource
May 31, 2025 · Acting in the Certain Way. T HOUGHT is the creative power, or the impelling force which causes the creative power to act ...
[18]
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/59844/59844-h/59844-h.htm#chap08
[19]
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/59844/59844-h/59844-h.htm#chap12
[20]
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/59844/59844-h/59844-h.htm#chap14
[21]
[PDF] Nautilus Magazine of New Thought - IAPSOP.com
THIS BOOK IS FREE $100 yfor NAUTILUS one year. Price of book alone, 28c. THE ELIZABETH TOWNE CO., Inc.,. Holyoke, Mass.
[22]
The Death of Wallace D. Wattles (1860-1911) - Chasing Down Emma
May 26, 2017 · He starved to death, in a manner of speaking. ... The making of Wallace D. Wattles begins with this: a letter from his daughter Florence Adeline ...Missing: responses | Show results with:responses
[23]
A History of the American Prosperity Gospel | Oxford Academic
Many prosperity gospels were born from the combination of three different traditions: pentecostalism, New Thought, and an American mythology of uplift. New ...<|separator|>
[24]
The Pseudoscience of 'The Secret' | Live Science
Feb 3, 2009 · ... Science of Getting Rich." Byrne decided that she had stumbled on the key to the universe, and wrote a book about her ideas, not bothering to ...
[25]
The Truth About the Law of Attraction | Psychology Today
May 15, 2024 · The Law of Attraction is pseudoscience, based on incorrect assumptions, and does not exist. It is believed that the universe creates what your ...
[26]
Manifesting with the Law of Attraction: Healthy or Harmful? - Healthline
Jul 11, 2023 · No scientific evidence supports the law of attraction. But this doesn't mean you can't implement it into your everyday life.
[27]
Psychological Research Says Wealth Is Created By Chasing ...
Oct 2, 2022 · A new study published in Personality and Individual Differences suggests that positive emotions can promote better money management ...
[28]
[PDF] Do Happier People Make More Money? An Empirical Study of the ...
This study's finding that self-esteem and positivity do in fact lead to higher income is an important addition to the happiness literature. Although researchers ...Missing: thinking | Show results with:thinking
[29]
Money and happiness: A consideration of history and psychological ...
Mar 20, 2023 · For the majority of Americans, higher incomes are uncomplicatedly associated with greater happiness; but income stops ameliorating woe and enables even more ...
[30]
The Pseudoscience of 'The Secret' and 'The Power'
Sep 24, 2010 · In “The Secret” and “The Power,” the bogus “law of attraction” meets the real science of the human brain ... Science of Getting Rich”), Napoleon ...
[31]
Money and happiness: the income–happiness correlation is higher ...
The income–happiness correlation tends to get higher when both GDP per capita and income inequality are high, whereas it tends to get lower when GDP per capita ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[32]
The Scientific Validity of Manifesting: How to Support Clients
Jan 15, 2024 · In this article, we will seek to understand manifestation, investigate sustainable approaches, and look at supportive strategies for clients.
[33]
Effects of positive attitude on happiness and wage - ScienceDirect.com
This study demonstrates that the worker's positive attitude affects his/her wage not only directly, but also indirectly through its effects on happiness.
[34]
"The Secret" to Success? The Psychology of Belief in Manifestation
We explored the psychology of those who believe in manifestation: the ability to cosmically attract success in life through positive self-talk, visualization, ...Missing: effects | Show results with:effects
[35]
Is Manifestation Bad for Mental Health? | Newport Institute
Jan 27, 2023 · This belief can make social anxiety, depression, or other mental health issues worse. A set-up for failure. The law of attraction teaches that ...
[36]
The Dark Side of Positive Thinking: A Dive into the Law of Attraction
This article explores the rise of the Law of Attraction, the allure that makes it so convincing, the pseudoscientific foundations it rests upon, and the toxic ...
[37]
Scientists Analysed The Secret to Becoming Rich, And Talent Is Not ...
Mar 6, 2018 · "[The study] sheds new light on the effectiveness of assessing merit on the basis of the reached level of success and underlines the risks ...
[38]
The Science Behind the Law of Attraction Mindset & Manifesting ...
Jul 2, 2025 · There's also a lack of scientific evidence to indicate that believing in the law of attraction or developing an abundance mindset today can ...<|separator|>
[39]
Why the Prosperity Gospel Is So Harmful
Dec 1, 2017 · The harmful beliefs of the "prosperity gospel" are that wealth and holiness are intrinsically connected: the more holy you are, the richer ...
[40]
The History of New Thought - Swedenborg Foundation
These teachings helped to inspire movements far beyond New Thought itself, influencing modern self-help literature, the rise of holistic health practices, and ...
[41]
What Is the New Thought Movement? - Shortform Books
Jun 27, 2022 · Napoleon Hill is largely responsible for introducing New Thought ideas into the self-help genre, where they became incredibly popular. Though ...
[42]
Thoughts on "The Science of Getting Rich" (Book by Wallace Wattles)
Dec 13, 2018 · The Science of Getting Rich, a book written in 1910 by Wallace Wattles, is one of the big influences for the Law of Attraction movement.
[43]
Rhonda Byrne - The Secret - Tom Butler-Bowdon
The Secret is one long homage to the thinkers and authors that have inspired Byrne - from New Thought legends Charles Haanel, Robert Collier, Wallace Wattles ...
[44]
The Science of Getting Rich | Book by Wallace D. Wattles
Written in 1910, The Science of Getting Rich inspired Byrne to create her bestselling DVD, and subsequently, to write her book. She has said that it “gave me a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[45]
Book Summary - The Science of Getting Rich (Wallace Wattles)
In this free version of The Science of Getting Rich summary, you'll learn about the key foundations and principles of this formula by Wallace Wattles.Missing: circulation | Show results with:circulation
[46]
Bob Proctor | PDF | Mind | Podcast - Scribd
Rating 5.0 (16) Its in chapter seven in The Science of Getting Rich. There is a whole chapter written on it. If you contact us, I want you to mention that you were part of ...
[47]
Bob Proctor | Imaginary Dialogues
Dec 4, 2024 · His seminars and programs, like "The Science of Getting Rich," have inspired millions worldwide.
[48]
[PDF] Thinking Into Results Bob Proctor Workbook
Jan 2, 2023 · There is no one better than Bob to teach you the secret behind the Wallace Wattles book, The Science of Getting Rich. He has reduced the most ...<|separator|>
[49]
[PDF] The Art Of Living Bob Proctor
There is no one better than Bob to teach you the secret behind the Wallace Wattles book,. The Science of Getting Rich. He has reduced the most complicated ...
[50]
The Science of Getting Rich Free Ebook | The Secret - TheSecret.tv
The Secret offers the classic text by Wallace Wattles, The Science of Getting Rich, updated and with a forward by Rhonda Byrne. Download Here.
[51]
11 Key Principles From The Book The Science Of Getting Rich
Mar 17, 2016 · 11 Key Principles From The Book The Science Of Getting Rich · 1. To grow rich is to fulfill your potential · 2. Opportunity is infinite · 3.
[52]
5 Lessons Businesses Can Learn From The Science Of Getting Rich ...
In “The Science of Getting Rich,” Wattles emphasizes the idea of acting in a “certain way” consistently and persistently. By incorporating these principles into ...
[53]
Heritability of lifetime earnings | The Journal of Economic Inequality
May 14, 2019 · We find that about 40% of the variance of women's and little more than half of men's lifetime labour earnings are linked to genetic factors.
[54]
[PDF] On the Origins of Socio-Economic Inequalities: Evidence from Twin ...
We find the heritability of earnings to be almost double that of education. Conversely, shared environmental factors explain slightly more than a third of ...
[55]
[PDF] On the Origins of Socioeconomic: Evidence from Twin Families
Heritability explains 9% of variation in education and 14-16% in earnings, income, and wealth, helping to fill the 'missing heritability' gap between the ...
[56]
Systematic Inequality - Center for American Progress
Feb 21, 2018 · This report offers solutions to address the distinct issues that exacerbate the black-white wealth gap.
[57]
Systematic Inequality and Economic Opportunity
Aug 7, 2019 · This report examines how government-sanctioned occupational segregation, exploitation, and neglect exacerbated racial inequality in the United States.Slavery And Jim Crow... · New Deal Programs Helped... · The Underfunding And Limited...
[58]
The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts ...
These differences in income and wealth are associated with differences in social capital, in the form of friendship networks, and cultural capital, in the form ...
[59]
The Promises and Pitfalls of Genoeconomics* - PMC
Twin studies suggest that economic outcomes and preferences, once corrected for measurement error, appear to be about as heritable as many medical conditions ...
[60]
Investigating individual intention to make money: can motivation of ...
Feb 27, 2023 · This study investigates the effects of perception of wealth, perception of the rich, and behavioral control on personal intention to make money.
[61]
Debating Meritocracy: Arguments For and Against
Nov 29, 2022 · I want to review some of the arguments for and against meritocracy. My goal is not to provide a definitive evaluation of those arguments.
[62]
The U.S. Inequality Debate | Council on Foreign Relations
Apr 20, 2022 · Income and wealth inequality is higher in the United States than in almost any other developed country, and it is rising. There are large wealth ...Income Gains Since 1979 Have... · Economic Inequality By... · The Large Racial And Ethnic...
[63]
Perceptions of inequality and meritocracy: their interplay in shaping ...
Results: The findings show that greater perceived inequality is associated with lower market justice preferences. However, individuals who believe that effort ...