Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

They

They is the subjective form of the third-person plural in , denoting two or more persons or things distinct from the speaker and addressee, with corresponding them and their. Borrowed from þeir around 1200 CE during the period, it displaced the native hīe or hie by circa 1400, providing clearer phonological distinction from singular he amid sound shifts that merged forms. Historically employed in singular constructions since at least 1375 for indefinite antecedents—as in "Hastely hi arose... for thei had a greet affray" from the medieval romance William and the Werewolf—singular they appears in literature by Chaucer, Shakespeare (e.g., "There's not a man I meet but doth salute me / As if I were their well-acquainted friend"), and Austen, serving generic purposes like "someone lost their hat" without specifying gender or number precisely. Its contemporary extension to definite singular reference, particularly for individuals rejecting binary sex-based pronouns, has provoked contention between descriptive linguists observing usage trends and prescriptive grammarians upholding number agreement as a core syntactic rule, citing ambiguities in verb conjugation (e.g., "they is/are"), reflexives (themself vs. themselves), and contextual clarity. Eighteenth-century grammarians first condemned such singular they for violating antecedent-pronoun concordance, a critique echoed in formal style guides like Chicago and MLA that favor alternatives to avoid logical inconsistency, even as dictionaries like Merriam-Webster have descriptively endorsed it amid cultural shifts. This evolution reflects not mere organic change but ideological advocacy prioritizing perceived inclusivity over established grammatical utility, with critics arguing it erodes precision without historical precedent for known specific referents.

Etymology and Forms

Morphological Structure

The English pronoun they derives from the Old Norse nominative plural þeir (or ðeir), borrowed during the settlements and integrated into around the 12th to 13th centuries, displacing the native third-person hīe or hēo. This influence reflects phonetic and morphological assimilation, with they adopting the role of nominative subject for third-person reference. Morphologically, they functions as the nominative (subjective) case in the third-person plural paradigm, inflecting for case, possession, and reflexivity but not for gender or number in its base form. The oblique (objective) form is them, used for accusative and dative functions; the possessive adjective is their, modifying nouns; the independent possessive pronoun is theirs; and the reflexive forms are themselves for plural or themself in singular-compatible uses. These inflections exhibit analytic rather than synthetic marking typical of pronouns, relying on distinct lexical roots rather than affixation, which originated in the paradigm's own case distinctions. The morphology of they has prompted historical prescriptive concerns over number when extended to singular antecedents, as grammarians from the onward emphasized strict concord between antecedent number and pronoun form.

Declension and Variants

The third-person plural pronoun "they" follows a declension paradigm in modern English that distinguishes case through distinct forms, though English has largely lost inflectional endings compared to older .
Case/FormPlural
Nominative ()they
Accusative (direct object)them
Dative (indirect object/prepositional)them
Possessive adjectivetheir
Possessive pronountheirs
Reflexive/Intensivethemselves
In singular uses of "they," the reflexive form "themselves" is conventionally employed, but "themself" has gained limited traction as a morphologically consistent variant since the late , aligning with singular antecedents like "someone" or "themselves" in indefinite contexts; however, "themself" remains contested in prescriptive grammars favoring plural consistency. Phonetically, "they" is realized as /ðeɪ/ across standard varieties of English, while "them" appears as /ðɛm/ in stressed positions and /ðəm/ when unstressed or cliticized. Regional dialects exhibit minimal variation in these core forms, though some Southern U.S. varieties occasionally extend "them" to demonstrative functions (e.g., "them books" for "those books"), without altering the personal pronoun paradigm itself. Archaic Middle English variants included "þei" for nominative and "hem" for objective forms, derived from Old Norse influences that displaced native Old English "hīe."

Historical Development

Early Usage in English Literature

The earliest documented instance of singular "they" with an indefinite antecedent appears in the Middle English romance William and the Werewolf, composed around 1375 as a translation of the Old French Guillaume de Palerme. In this text, the construction refers to an unspecified individual in a generic sense, as in the line where each person considers their own counsel superior, predating formalized grammatical prescriptions and reflecting natural usage for avoiding gender specification. Geoffrey Chaucer employed singular "they" similarly in , written between approximately 1387 and 1400, to denote indefinite persons without specifying sex. A representative example occurs in "The Pardoner's Prologue," where the narrator states: "And whoso fyndeth hym out of swich blame, / They wol come up...," using "they" to refer back to an anonymous "whoso" (whoever) who escapes moral fault, illustrating its role in hypothetical or general scenarios. William Shakespeare incorporated singular "they" in several plays for generic singular references, notably in The Comedy of Errors (first performed around 1594), with the line: "There's not a man I meet but doth salute me / As if I were their well-acquainted friend." Here, "their" antecedents an indefinite "a man," emphasizing familiarity without gender markers, a pattern consistent across Elizabethan drama for neutral, non-specific antecedents. Such usages were commonplace in pre-18th-century English literature for indefinite or generic contexts, such as referring to "someone who loses their keys" or "a person and their belongings," prioritizing referential clarity over rigid number agreement.

Prescriptivist Opposition from the 18th Century

In the mid-18th century, English grammarian Ann Fisher, in her 1745 publication A New Grammar, first explicitly proscribed the use of singular "they" by declaring "he" to be the universal pronoun applicable to both sexes in generic contexts, thereby establishing a prescriptive preference for masculine forms over indefinite plural pronouns to maintain number agreement. This stance reflected emerging demands for grammatical consistency modeled on classical languages, where pronouns strictly matched antecedents in number and gender, with masculine forms serving as defaults for mixed or indefinite references. Lindley Murray reinforced this opposition in his widely influential 1795 English Grammar, which labeled constructions using "their" with singular indefinite antecedents—such as "every one...does their duty"—as examples of erroneous syntax due to the plural form disagreeing with a singular subject. Murray's text, reprinted over 50 times by 1800 and used in schools across and , popularized the rule that pronouns must agree precisely with antecedents, drawing analogies to Latin grammar's rigid rules to argue against what prescriptivists viewed as illogical deviations in English. This prescriptive framework prioritized formal analogy to inflected languages like Latin, where no equivalent to English's singular "they" existed, over the language's native analytic tendencies that historically tolerated such flexibility. The opposition persisted into the , as evidenced in William Strunk Jr. and E.B. White's 1959 revision of , which advised writers to avoid "their" with singular generics like "everyone," recommending instead rephrasing to plural subjects or using "his" to uphold strict agreement and clarity. Such guides maintained the 18th-century logic of number consistency, dismissing singular "they" as informal or imprecise despite its longstanding attestation in literature, thereby embedding the prohibition in formal writing standards.

20th-Century Revival for Generic Reference

By the mid-20th century, experienced renewed practical application for generic reference to indefinite persons in spoken English and informal writing, where prescriptivist rules against it were often ignored for convenience. This usage persisted in contexts requiring -neutral reference, such as describing unknown individuals in narratives; for instance, employed "they" to denote unidentified suspects or perpetrators until their gender was revealed, reflecting everyday linguistic efficiency over strict grammatical conformity. Corpus evidence from the Brown Corpus, a 1-million-word collection of 1961 American English texts across genres like fiction and journalism, documents instances of singular "they" with indefinite antecedents (e.g., "someone" or "anyone"), demonstrating its endurance in published writing despite formal style guides' endorsements of alternatives like generic "he" or rephrasing. This frequency, though not dominant, underscored a gap between prescriptive norms and actual usage, with singular "they" appearing naturally in about 1 in 300 potential epicene pronoun slots in mid-century prose. In the 1970s, feminist linguistic critiques targeted the generic "he" as perpetuating male-centric assumptions by rendering women invisible in indefinite references, prompting partial shifts toward gender-neutral options. Organizations like the issued guidelines around 1975 advocating "he or she" or restructuring sentences to avoid pronouns altogether, marking an incremental tolerance for non-male defaults without fully embracing in academic or formal prose due to lingering agreement concerns. These reforms, driven by empirical observations of language's causal role in , highlighted 's utility but prioritized conservative alternatives amid institutional resistance.

Generic Singular They

Syntactic Roles and Examples

The generic singular they and its inflected forms (them, their, theirs) serve as pronouns referring to indefinite singular antecedents, functioning in syntactic roles such as subject, direct or indirect object, object of a preposition, and possessive determiner. In subject position, they pairs with plural verb agreement despite the singular antecedent, as in: "If a surgeon forgets their scalpel, they could endanger the patient." This construction appears in informal and some formal registers, though prescriptivists historically critiqued the number mismatch, favoring alternatives like he or she to align with singular verbs. As a direct object, them receives the action of the with an indefinite antecedent, exemplified by: "Anyone who arrives late must notify their or risk dismissal from them." In possessive role, their modifies a to indicate by the indefinite , such as: "A voter should check their registration status before ." These roles maintain anaphoric links to antecedents like someone, anyone, or a , preserving without specifying or number beyond the generic singular intent. This usage contrasts with distributive plural pronouns, where antecedents denote multiple entities and pronouns distribute over them individually, as in "The passengers boarded their flights," referring to each passenger's distinct flight. In generic singular they, the antecedent implies a single hypothetical individual from a broader category, avoiding collective or distributive plurality while still employing plural pronoun morphology for neutrality. Formal styles may sidestep this by rephrasing to enforce singular consistency, but empirical corpus data from modern English affirm its syntactic viability in indefinite contexts.

Semantic Functions in Indefinite Contexts

The generic singular "they" operates semantically as an indefinite pronoun that refers to an unspecified individual or class of individuals, functioning within referential frameworks to denote hypothetical or generalized human agents without presupposing particular identities. This usage parallels indefinite singulars in generic contexts, where the pronoun evokes a representative instance rather than a definite entity, as seen in constructions like "A driver should always check their mirrors before merging." Such referential indeterminacy allows "they" to serve as a neutral placeholder equivalent to "one" or an impersonal subject, facilitating discourse about arbitrary persons in normative or advisory statements. In sentences involving quantifiers, generic "they" anaphorically aligns with the scope of universal or existential operators, effectively distributing reference across potential referents in a manner akin to logical generics rather than strict universal quantification. For instance, "Everyone must respect their privacy" treats "they" as bound to the universal "everyone," conveying a generalized obligation applicable to any individual within the domain, distinct from explicit quantifiers like "all" that do not inherently license such pronominal resumption. This semantic role underscores "they"'s capacity to express habitual or normative truths about kinds, where the indefinite reference abstracts from specifics to emphasize typical behaviors or rules. Corpus-based examinations reveal that generic "they" prevails in hypothetical scenarios and proverbial-like generalizations, comprising a significant portion of indefinite pronoun occurrences in modern English texts and speech. In analyses of newspaper corpora from the late 20th century onward, singular "they" accounts for increasing instances of generic reference in conditional or advisory hypotheticals, such as "If a customer complains, they should be offered a refund," reflecting its entrenchment in expressing rules applicable to unspecified actors. Empirical surveys of pronoun usage further confirm its dominance over alternatives in contexts prioritizing referential flexibility, with singular "they" emerging as the modal choice for gender-unspecified generics in diverse registers.

Emergence of Specific Singular They

Shift to Known Individuals Pre-2010s

Prior to the 2010s, singular they occasionally referred to specific individuals whose gender remained undetermined, marking a pragmatic extension from indefinite generics into definite but ambiguous contexts, such as hypothetical persons or unidentified actors in legal and descriptive writing. A notable early instance appears in Lord Chesterfield's 1759 correspondence: "If a person is born of a... gloomy temper... they cannot help it," where "they" anaphorically resolves to the singular antecedent "a person" without specified gender. Such constructions treated the referent as a concrete individual while sidestepping binary pronouns due to informational gaps, though they were sporadic and often confined to less formal registers. This application persisted into the in domains like legal drafting and procedural accounts, where antecedents denoted particular but gender-obscured entities, as in references to "the offender" or "the " followed by they-forms when details were withheld. Unlike later identity-linked adoption, these pre-2010s instances lacked ideological motivation, prioritizing referential clarity over grammatical purity amid prescriptivist preferences for generic "he" or periphrastic alternatives. Linguistic scholarship before 1990 focused predominantly on epicene or indefinite uses, underscoring the niche status of definite specific references and their avoidance in rigidly formal prose. citations through the 1990s document analogous patterns, confirming restrained uptake without broader cultural framing.

Post-2010s Adoption in Identity Contexts

In the mid-2010s, the use of expanded to refer specifically to individuals identifying as or genderqueer, coinciding with increased advocacy for in media and public discourse. updated its style guide in December 2015 to permit for individuals who do not identify with traditional genders, marking an early institutional endorsement in major . This shift aligned with broader cultural visibility of identities, facilitated by platforms where users began specifying "they/them" pronouns in bios and profiles around 2015–2016. Public figures accelerated adoption by publicly requesting singular "they" pronouns. Singer announced on September 13, 2019, via that they identify as and would use "they/them" pronouns, citing a personal journey of reconciling after years of . This declaration, shared on (now X) and , garnered widespread media coverage and exemplified how celebrity endorsements normalized the practice among self-identified individuals. LGBTQ+ advocacy groups reinforced this trend through guidelines urging to employ singular "they" for people. GLAAD's reference resources, which recommend "they/them" as a gender-neutral option without connotations of , have been cited in journalistic training since at least the mid-2010s to promote accurate of transgender and identities. The similarly recognized singular "they" as its in 2015, highlighting its emerging role in discussions of . By 2019, dictionary lookup data quantified the surge: Merriam-Webster reported a 313% increase in searches for "they" compared to 2018, attributing this primarily to its singular non-binary usage for people whose gender identity falls outside the male-female binary. The publisher named singular "they" its Word of the Year for 2019, noting its addition to the dictionary as a non-binary pronoun definition amid rising cultural debates on gender. This metric reflected not just generic usage but targeted interest in identity-specific applications, driven by online discussions and advocacy campaigns.

Grammatical Analysis

Subject-Verb Agreement Challenges

The use of singular they introduces a mismatch in number agreement because the pronoun, despite referring to a singular antecedent, morphologically aligns with plural forms and thus pairs with plural verbs in standard English, such as "Someone left their keys here; they are on the table." This contrasts with the singular verb expected for the antecedent alone, as in "Someone is calling," creating a theoretical tension where semantic singularity clashes with grammatical plurality. Linguists observe that this plural verb dominance persists idiomatically, akin to the treatment of singular you, prioritizing morphological consistency over strict antecedent-verb alignment. In complex sentences, this agreement pattern can generate ambiguities, particularly when they coordinates with nouns or intervenes in structures requiring number , such as "A reader of this guide, along with several critics, believes they are mistaken." Here, the plural verb are attaches to they, but proximity to mixed-number subjects risks misattribution of , complicating comprehension without contextual cues. Dialectal variations mitigate this in some non-standard varieties, including (AAVE), where singular verbs occasionally pair with they to better reflect semantic singularity, as in "they is coming." Empirical descriptions of AAVE note such invariant or marginal subject-verb agreement, allowing forms like they is or they was that align verb number more closely with a singular , diverging from English's plural default. These patterns, documented in sociolinguistic corpora, highlight how agreement flexibility in AAVE reduces the theoretical conflict inherent in standard usage.

Anaphoric Reference and Resolvability

In discourse, anaphoric resolution of singular "they" depends on principles such as recency (proximity to the antecedent) and salience (prominence in context), which guide interpreters to link the pronoun to its intended singular referent. However, the inherent plural morphology of "they" complicates this process by predisposing resolvers—human or algorithmic—to favor plural antecedents or conjoined singulars, thereby increasing the risk of erroneous linkages when multiple entities are salient. This morphological mismatch often manifests in ambiguities, such as potential split-antecedent interpretations where "they" appears to conjoint two singulars introduced nearby. For instance, in "The politician met their supporter; they shook hands," the anaphor "they" may initially resolve to both the politician and supporter as a collective plural entity, requiring reanalysis to the singular supporter as intended. Such constructions exploit the pronoun's number-agnostic form but heighten resolvability demands, as the plural signal invites broader antecedent searches over singular specificity. Computational linguistics research quantifies these challenges through coreference resolution benchmarks, revealing markedly lower performance for singular "they" than for binary-gendered or unambiguous plurals. State-of-the-art systems, trained primarily on corpora with traditional pronoun-antecedent alignments, attain only 20-30% accuracy in identifying for singular personal "they," compared to 60-80% on standard datasets dominated by or plural they. These error rates stem from models' reliance on and number features, which falter without explicit singular markers, underscoring the pronoun's resolvability deficits in automated discourse processing.

Semantic and Cognitive Dimensions

Interpretation in Generic vs. Specific Uses

In generic uses, functions semantically as an indefinite or , referring to a hypothetical, non-specific or a class abstracted from particulars, without committing to a unique . This aligns with antecedents that are quantificational (e.g., "everyone"), indefinite (e.g., "someone"), or epicene (unknown ), as in "A should check their mirrors," where they distributes properties over potential instances of the rather than denoting a person. Such constructions avoid specification by treating the subject as non-referential, preserving semantic generality and compatibility with singular verb agreement through contextual . Specific uses of , by contrast, attempt deictic to a definite, known individual, often in contexts asserting , as in "Alex said they prefer the window seat," where they targets a singular with purportedly indeterminate . Semantically, this imposes a gender-neutral interpretation on the , signaling silence or absence of , but it strains the form's prototypical association with plurality or indefiniteness, potentially yielding underspecification for a expected to have determinate features. Linguistic analyses note that while innovative speakers extend they to such definite antecedents, fails with gender-marked nouns (e.g., "" blocks they due to feature mismatch), highlighting syntactic-semantic barriers to seamless . Philosophical scrutiny of specific they centers on potential reference failure when applied to biologically sexed individuals claiming status, as the pronoun's neutrality presupposes an decoupling from observable sex dimorphism, which may render ascriptions truth-conditionally defective if determines referential . For instance, using they to evade pronouns risks misrepresenting the referent's fixed biological , akin to applying a plural descriptor to a unitary object and inviting in claims. This tension underscores debates over whether such usage achieves accurate or instead embeds contestable metaphysical assumptions about .

Empirical Studies on Processing and Comprehension

A self-paced reading study published in Applied Linguistics in 2019 examined the online processing of singular "they" compared to "he" and "she" among learners of English as a second language, finding that singular "they" elicited longer reading times at the pronoun itself and subsequent regions when the antecedent lacked explicit gender cues, indicating initial disruption in resolving gender information during comprehension. Native English speakers in a related 2015 reading-time experiment demonstrated that singular "they" serves as a cognitively efficient alternative to generic "he" or "she" in indefinite, non-specific contexts, with no significant processing penalty relative to gendered pronouns for abstract or hypothetical referents. However, subsequent research on specific singular "they"—referring to a known individual—has revealed elevated processing costs, including slower reading times and reduced acceptability ratings, particularly when contrasting with plural "they," due to number ambiguity and the need for additional contextual inference to override default plural interpretations. Empirical surveys on comprehension attitudes highlight demographic variations in familiarity and ease. A 2019 Pew Research Center survey found that 61% of U.S. adults aged 18-29 reported being somewhat or very comfortable using gender-neutral pronouns like singular "they" when requested, compared to 44% of those aged 30-49 and 38% of those 50 and older, with comfort levels also differing by gender and political affiliation—higher among women (59%) than men (45%) and among Democrats (65%) than Republicans (39%). Overall, 52% of respondents expressed comfort with such usage, though only 18% personally knew someone preferring gender-neutral pronouns, suggesting limited real-world exposure contributing to comprehension gaps for older or less progressive groups. Cross-linguistic analyses underscore English's unique challenges with due to its system's sparsity—lacking dedicated singular neutral forms unlike languages such as ("") or (genderless pronouns)—which amplifies resolvability issues in anaphoric reference. studies in reveal that non-native English speakers experience heightened anticipatory processing demands for when cross-linguistic gender marking differs from their L1, leading to delayed neural integration compared to native-like gendered resolution. No experimental evidence links adoption to causal reductions in gender bias; processing studies focus on efficiency metrics without demonstrating broader attitudinal shifts from use alone.

Controversies and Criticisms

Grammatical and Logical Objections

Critics of singular they argue that English grammar requires pronouns to agree in number with their antecedents, a principle rooted in the language's morphological and syntactic systems where singular and plural forms are morphologically distinct to signal referential clarity. This objection traces to 18th-century grammarians, including Lindley Murray in his English Grammar (1795), who explicitly condemned the shift from singular "he" to plural "they" for indefinite antecedents as a violation of logical consistency in pronoun usage. Modern prescriptivist grammars echo this, asserting that using a morphologically plural pronoun for a singular referent undermines the systematic distinction between singular (he, she, it) and plural (they) forms, potentially eroding the precision of number marking in the pronominal paradigm. Logically, this mismatch introduces inconsistency because English verbs and other elements often inflect or contextually align with pronoun number; for instance, singular they lacks a corresponding singular verb form (unlike he/she/it with third-person singular -s), forcing reliance on context that can conflict with default plural interpretations. Psycholinguistic evidence supports claims of heightened referential ambiguity, as language processors use number agreement as a rapid cue for antecedent resolution; studies show that ambiguous or mismatched pronouns like singular they slow disambiguation in sentences with competing referents, increasing error rates in comprehension tasks compared to unambiguous singular forms. In bound-variable contexts, where they corefers to a quantified singular antecedent (e.g., "Every student thinks they passed"), processing demands additional inferential steps, as evidenced by longer reading times and reduced accuracy in eye-tracking experiments. Historical corpus analyses of formal English reveal consistent avoidance of in high-register texts from the 19th to mid-20th centuries, with grammars and style manuals prescribing singular alternatives to maintain number fidelity; for example, major guides like those preceding the 17th edition of the Chicago Manual of Style (pre-2017) recommended against it in edited writing to uphold traditional agreement rules. This pattern persisted despite earlier informal uses, reflecting a deliberate prescriptivist of logical number alignment until shifts in usage norms post-2010.

Ideological Imposition and Compelled Speech

Critics contend that institutional mandates requiring the use of preferred pronouns, such as the singular "they," amount to compelled speech by obliging individuals to linguistically affirm a specific ideological framework on gender, potentially at the expense of free expression. In Canada, this issue crystallized during debates over Bill C-16, which received royal assent on June 19, 2017, and amended the Canadian Human Rights Act to include gender identity and gender expression as prohibited grounds for discrimination. Opponents argued the legislation's implications extended to enforcing pronoun usage, as refusal could be construed as discriminatory under human rights codes. University of Toronto psychology professor Jordan Peterson emerged as a prominent voice against the bill in 2016, producing videos and testifying that mandating pronouns like "they/them" for non-binary individuals would compel endorsement of a contested view detaching gender from biological sex, elevating non-compliance to potential hate speech under the Criminal Code. Peterson framed this as ideological overreach, asserting that truth claims about sex and gender should not be legislated into language, drawing on principles of voluntary discourse over state-enforced conformity. Post-enactment, Canadian human rights tribunals have upheld this practical effect: in a 2021 British Columbia case, a tribunal awarded $30,000 in damages against an employer for a co-worker's deliberate refusal to use a transgender colleague's preferred pronouns, ruling it constituted harassment and a human rights violation. Similar rulings, such as a 2024 federal tribunal decision finding persistent misgendering discriminatory, reinforce that workplaces must accommodate pronoun preferences or face penalties, regardless of the bill's lack of explicit pronoun language. In the United States, federal interpretations of have prompted analogous policies in educational and workplace settings, where refusal to use preferred s has led to discipline. Guidance from the Department of Education under the Biden administration, culminating in 2024 regulations expanding to cover , encouraged schools to adopt pronoun mandates, with non-compliance risking loss of funding or internal sanctions. A federal court vacated these rules nationwide in January 2025, citing overreach including elements, yet prior implementations affected institutions. Notable cases include a 2022 settlement where a paid $400,000 to resolve a from a professor disciplined for declining to use a student's pronouns in class, highlighting tensions between accommodation duties and expressive freedoms. Advocates for free speech maintain these mandates impose a substantive —positing as self-determined and ontologically prior to —rather than mere politeness, as using "they" for a specific signals of fluid categories unsupported by empirical on sex dimorphism. They argue such undermines causal , where should reflect observable realities like chromosomal and anatomical sex differences, and predict it engenders by prioritizing ideological over reasoned , though direct longitudinal studies on attitudinal shifts remain scarce. institutional sources often frame compliance as anti-discrimination, but critics, wary of biases in bodies toward expansive interpretations, view tribunal outcomes as evidence of de facto speech regulation.

Empirical Gaps in Claimed Benefits

Advocates for in identity contexts often assert psychological benefits, such as reduced and improved , from its use as a gender-neutral . Empirical support for these claims, however, reveals significant gaps, with most evidence limited to correlational associations rather than causal mechanisms. Systematic reviews of social gender affirmation, including pronoun usage, rely on self-reported surveys that show links to lower distress but fail to control for confounders like concurrent therapies or in gender-diverse samples. No high-quality randomized controlled trials or robust longitudinal studies establish that adopting —or preferred s generally—causally improves outcomes like anxiety or . predominates, and critiques highlight methodological weaknesses, including small samples and reliance on advocacy-influenced reporting, which inflate perceived benefits without isolating pronoun effects from broader practices. Cognitive processing studies further undermine neutrality claims, demonstrating that singular they does not eliminate gender biases in comprehension. Experimental work finds persistent male defaults, where neutral pronouns evoke masculine imagery even in genderless linguistic contexts, suggesting androcentric heuristics override intended inclusivity. Prioritizing singular they adoption carries opportunity costs, diverting resources from verifiable interventions for gender-related distress, such as treating underlying comorbidities. This focus coincides with post-2020 increases in detransition reports, where discontinuation rates for gender-affirming hormones reached 30-36% over four years in some cohorts, often linked to unresolved psychological factors rather than external pressures alone; such trends underscore needs for sex-based safeguards over linguistic reforms lacking proven efficacy.

Cultural and Institutional Reception

Style Guides and Media Policies

The Stylebook introduced guidance on singular "they" in 2017, permitting its use as a gender-neutral in limited circumstances, such as when rephrasing would result in awkward or clumsy alternatives, primarily for generic references where an individual's gender is unknown. By 2022, the Stylebook expanded this policy to recommend "they/them/their" for accurately describing individuals who self-identify with those s, reflecting a shift toward accommodating known preferences while prioritizing clarity. The Chicago Manual of Style's 17th edition, published in September 2017, acknowledged singular "they" as acceptable for generic antecedents in place of gendered pronouns but advised against it in formal writing, suggesting rephrasing or restructuring sentences to maintain singular agreement where feasible. This approach balanced historical grammatical norms with emerging usage, without mandating adoption for specific identities. The American Psychological Association's Publication Manual, 7th edition, released in October 2019, explicitly endorsed singular "they" for both generic third-person references and as the preferred for individuals who use it, requiring writers to respect self-identified pronouns to avoid in psychological and academic discourse. Among media organizations, incorporated singular "they" into its in 2015, allowing it as a gender-neutral option in editorial content. Mainstream outlets largely followed suit in subsequent years, but selective adoption persists, with some conservative publications adhering to traditional singular verb agreement and rejecting its application to known individuals, citing grammatical precision over identity-based claims.

Public Opinion and Demographic Variations

A 2019 Pew Research Center survey found that 52% of U.S. adults reported being somewhat or very comfortable using a gender-neutral such as "they" to refer to someone, while 46% expressed discomfort. Comfort levels varied sharply by political affiliation, with only 30% of Republicans indicating comfort compared to 65% of Democrats, implying approximately 70% unfavorable views among conservatives. Demographic patterns revealed higher acceptance among younger adults, as 65% of those aged 18-29 were comfortable, versus 44% of those 50 and older. residents showed modestly greater familiarity and acceptance than rural ones, with 59% of urban adults having heard at least a little about gender-neutral pronouns compared to 50% in rural areas. Religious affiliation correlated with resistance, particularly among white evangelical Protestants, where comfort levels trailed broader averages in subsequent surveys. By , a (PRRI) poll indicated 35% of felt comfortable with a friend using gender-neutral pronouns, down from earlier peaks, with 40% uncomfortable and divides persisting along ideological lines—64% of Republicans uncomfortable versus 18% of Democrats. Resistance remained elevated among those affirming binary sex distinctions, often overlapping with older, religiously conservative, and Republican-identifying groups, while younger cohorts, including 58% of older teen girls in a 2025 Pew survey, reported higher comfort. These patterns suggest limited growth in acceptance post-2019 amid ongoing cultural debates.

Alternatives and Comparisons

Traditional Pronouns and Rewording Strategies

In , the generic "he" served as the historical default for referring to an indefinite singular antecedent of unspecified , as codified by eighteenth-century grammarians and exemplified in foundational documents such as the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1787, which employs "he" to denote the in a gender-indeterminate capacity. This convention prioritized grammatical consistency in number and person over explicit inclusivity, reflecting a linguistic where masculine forms functioned as unmarked defaults without implying exclusion, though empirical tests later revealed it evoked male imagery in readers' minds more than neutral interpretations. For achieving referential neutrality without altering established singular forms, paired constructions like "he or she" or the indefinite "one" offer precise alternatives that preserve number agreement and syntactic clarity. "He or she" explicitly accommodates both sexes while adhering to singular verb forms, as recommended in formal style guides prior to shifts toward other options, ensuring unambiguous reference in legal and academic prose. "One," derived from impersonal constructions, avoids sexed pronouns altogether, as in "One must consider one's options," maintaining impersonality in philosophical and instructional texts where the antecedent's identity remains irrelevant. Rewording strategies further enable neutrality by restructuring sentences to sidestep pronouns, such as pluralizing the antecedent—"If a seeks , should consult their records"—which aligns pronouns with plural antecedents to eliminate ambiguity while retaining collective generality. Alternatively, repeating the substitutes for pronouns, e.g., "The voter must verify the voter's eligibility," reinforcing antecedent-pronoun links through and averting any form of grammatical innovation. These methods, endorsed in guides, uphold semantic precision without relying on contested pronoun reforms. Such traditional approaches confer advantages in formal contexts by safeguarding number clarity, as indefinite singular antecedents paired with "he," "he or she," or rephrased nouns avoid the referential overlap inherent in forms that blur singular-plural distinctions, which can introduce processing delays in comprehension tasks involving multiple referents. Reading-time experiments indicate that structures maintaining strict number agreement facilitate quicker resolution of antecedents than those permitting number underspecification, supporting efficacy in dense, analytical writing where misresolution risks interpretive error.

Neopronouns and Cross-Linguistic Equivalents

Neopronouns refer to invented gender-neutral pronoun sets beyond traditional forms, such as xe/xem/xyr, first proposed by Don Rickter in a 1973 Universalist . Another early set, e/em/eir (Spivak pronouns), drew from 19th-century suggestions like those by in 1890 but gained traction through 1977 proposals, including efforts by the Em Institute to promote em for common use by 1979. Despite periodic advocacy, neopronouns exhibit extremely low adoption in English, with linguistic corpora and surveys indicating usage rates below 0.1% in general texts and even among self-identified speakers, who predominantly favor singular they. Cross-linguistically, some languages inherently avoid gendered third-person pronouns, obviating the need for neologisms. employs as a singular neutral form without distinctions, while uses ő similarly, reflecting the absence of noun classes or pronoun gendering in . In contrast, introduced —coined in the by feminist groups and re-popularized in 2012—into its official dictionary (SAOL) in April 2015 alongside 13,000 other terms, yet it has sparked ongoing debates over forced inclusion and practical uptake. Empirical evidence underscores natural languages' preference for phonologically and morphologically entrenched pronouns, with novel forms like neopronouns elevating cognitive demands. Eye-tracking studies on Swedish hen reveal longer reading times and increased processing effort compared to gendered han/hon, signaling higher mental load from unfamiliar structures. Similar patterns emerge in English acceptability judgments, where neopronouns elicit variability and resistance, correlating with limited spontaneous integration into speech or writing. This aligns with broader psycholinguistic findings that pronouns function as low-load referential shortcuts, with innovations disrupting efficiency unless culturally normalized over generations.

References

  1. [1]
    They - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    The Scandinavian source of they is from Proto-Germanic *thai, nominative plural pronoun, from PIE *to-, demonstrative pronoun (see that). From c. 1400 as " ...
  2. [2]
    A Brief History of Singular 'they' | Illinois - Blogs
    Jul 30, 2018 · The Oxford English Dictionary traces singular they back to 1375, where it appears in the medieval romance William and the Werewolf. Except for ...
  3. [3]
    The 600-Year History of the Singular 'They' - Mental Floss
    Jul 8, 2022 · The word has appeared as a singular, gender-neutral pronoun in English literature for centuries. The plural they originated around the 13th century.
  4. [4]
    The Tragedy of the Singular 'They' | Free Inquiry
    Singular they/them has deep roots in casual or nonstandard usage. Shakespeare employed it now and then. So did Jane Austen. In everyday conversation, almost ...
  5. [5]
    The hidden flaw in "singular they"—what to do about reflexive ...
    Dec 24, 2014 · The flaw is that "singular they" feels wrong with reflexive pronouns, like "themself," which is not considered a proper word by many, and is  ...
  6. [6]
    Why do some people think that using 'they,' 'them,' etc. as gender ...
    Jun 23, 2023 · The artificial use of plural third-person pronouns to refer to a known singular person does not have grammatical currency and causes confusion ...What are the reasons why some people dislike the singular 'they ...Is using they/them/their for a singular person incorrect grammar?More results from www.quora.com
  7. [7]
    Whence Did They Come? - Arrant Pedantry
    Nov 15, 2016 · The origin of they/them/their is fairly uncontroversial: these were apparently borrowed from Old Norse–speaking settlers, who invaded during the ...
  8. [8]
    “They”: Singular present, Scandinavian past - Mashed Radish
    Jan 9, 2016 · So close, in fact, that the Scandinavian form (think Old Norse) for they, þei, displaced Old English's hīe. (For its possessive and object forms ...
  9. [9]
    Cases of Pronouns: Rules and Examples - Grammarly
    The subjective (or nominative) pronouns are I, you (singular), he/she/it, we, you (plural), they and who. A subjective pronoun acts as a subject in a sentence.
  10. [10]
    Pronoun Types and Examples - Wordvice Writing Resources
    Reflexive pronouns are used to refer back to the subject of the sentence. Reflexive pronouns end in "-self" (singular) or "-selves" (plural). Myself, yourself, ...
  11. [11]
    A brief history of singular 'they' - Oxford English Dictionary
    The Oxford English Dictionary traces singular they back to 1375, where it appears in the medieval romance William and the Werewolf. Except for the old-style ...
  12. [12]
    Grammar and the Singular "They" - - The Steve Laube Agency
    Oct 9, 2017 · Eighteenth-century [male] grammarians decided that number was more important than gender, although the singular they had been in favor until ...
  13. [13]
    Pronouns: identification by paradigm? - Language Log
    Aug 25, 2018 · Everyone gives their preferences as three-element paradigm: she/her/hers, he/him/his, they/them/their. It's not like anyone is going to mix and match.Missing: declension | Show results with:declension
  14. [14]
    Chapter 1: Personal Pronouns
    Third Person Personal Pronouns Paradigm ; Nominative, he = he, hit = it, heo or hie = she, heo or hie = they ; Genitive, his = his, his = its, hire = hers, hira = ...
  15. [15]
    Reflecting on the reflexive pronoun 'themself' - Sentence first
    May 31, 2012 · If we allow the use of 'they'/'them'/'their' for referring to the singular, 'themself' seems more consistent than 'themselves'. We make use of ” ...
  16. [16]
    The unsung value of singular 'themself' - Sentence first
    Jan 23, 2014 · Grammatically, themself is no more objectionable than singular they, which is no more objectionable than singular you, which is now (but was not ...
  17. [17]
    they - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
    See also: They and þey. English. English Wikipedia has an article on: they · Wikipedia. Pronunciation. (Received Pronunciation, General American) enPR: thā, ...Will-they-won't-they · They hate us 'cause they ain't us · They-uns · As they say
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Pronoun History
    The third person plural forms always occasion comment in that the Modern English they, their, them are Scandina- vian (þei, þeir, þeim) replacements of the Old ...<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    A Short History of Singular 'They': From Medieval Times to Modern ...
    Oct 14, 2024 · The first recorded use of singular they dates back to 1375 in the medieval romance William and the Werewolf written in Middle English:.Missing: earliest | Show results with:earliest<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    [PDF] The Case for Singular They - Hawaii Pacific University
    Commonly cited as one of the earliest examples of singular they in literature is Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales, specifically some versions of "The Pardoner's ...
  21. [21]
    Shakespeare used <B><I>they</I></B> with singular antecedents so ...
    Jan 5, 2006 · ... Shakespeare's A Comedy of Errors, Act IV, Scene 3: There's not a man I meet but doth salute me. As if I were their well-acquainted friend.
  22. [22]
    'They': the singular pronoun that could solve sexism in English | Books
    May 5, 2016 · ... They wol come up…” Shakespeare followed in 1594, in The Comedy of Errors: “There's not a man I meet but doth salute me/As if I were their ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Androcentrism in Prescriptive Grammar - Stanford University
    This paper demonstrates that prior to the beginning of the prescriptive grammar movement in English, singular 'they' was both accepted and widespread.
  24. [24]
    Governing English: Prescriptivism, Descriptivism, and Change
    ... Lindley Murray's English Grammar, first published in 1795. Murray's fifth rule of syntax is “Pronouns must always agree with their antecedents, and the ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Murray Develops a Modern English Grammar Book - EBSCO
    Lindley Murray's "An English Grammar," published in 1795, marked a ... their children's linguistic skills to match those of the upper classes. Murray's ...Missing: error | Show results with:error
  26. [26]
    Thanks to the “Singular 'They'” | Learning for Justice
    Feb 25, 2016 · ... singular they fell out of favor in style guides in the early 20th century. For example, in their The Elements of Style, William Strunk Jr.
  27. [27]
    Sometimes Strunk and White are right - Language Log
    Jul 1, 2010 · The prescriptivists who warn you off it, telling you to avoid Everyone should bring their own drinks and say Everyone should bring his own ...
  28. [28]
    A corpus-based study of singular 'they' usage for nonhuman animals
    Feb 7, 2023 · This article traces the development and expansion of the use of singular 'they' in English, reviews the factors involved in pronoun selection ...
  29. [29]
    Brown Corpus - Wikipedia
    This corpus first set the bar for the scientific study of the frequency and distribution of word categories in everyday language use. Compiled by Henry Kučera ...Missing: 1960s | Show results with:1960s
  30. [30]
    IN SEARCH OF GENDER NEUTRALITY: Is Singular They a ... - NIH
    The results from these experiments support the contention that singular they is an acceptable substitution for gender-specific pronouns with nonreferential ...Missing: binary | Show results with:binary
  31. [31]
    Four Dimensions of Criticism Against Gender-Fair Language
    Jan 6, 2020 · In the 1970s, feminists considered the generic use of masculine pronouns and masculine occupational titles problematic and “both a symptom and a ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Terrebonne, Robert TITLE Feminist Criticism of Language - ERIC
    NOTE. 24p.; Paper is a revised version of a paper presented at the meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. (Tampa, Florida, July 25-27, 1975).
  33. [33]
    Gendered Pronouns & Singular “They” - Purdue OWL
    Common pronouns include they/them/theirs, she/her/hers, and he/him/his. Pronouns often indicate the gender of a person; traditionally, he refers to males while ...Missing: 1975 | Show results with:1975
  34. [34]
    What Is a Pronoun? Definition, Types & Examples - Grammarly
    Jan 16, 2024 · Pronouns are words (or phrases) you substitute for nouns when your reader or listener already knows which noun you're referring to.Subject and object pronouns · Relative pronouns · Personal pronouns
  35. [35]
    Singular “they” - APA Style - American Psychological Association
    Always use a person's self-identified pronoun, including when a person uses the singular “they” as their pronoun. Also use “they” as a generic third-person ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  36. [36]
    Some notes on singular they | Illinois - Blogs
    Sep 14, 2015 · But grammarians, editors, and usage critics have traditionally condemned singular they for pairing a plural pronoun with a singular antecedent.Missing: 20th | Show results with:20th
  37. [37]
    Singular They | Usage, Examples & History - Scribbr
    Dec 1, 2022 · Example: Gendered pronouns Nancy told Samuel that he should bring a bottle of wine to the party. She was bringing snacks. They is or they are?Singular they for a generic... · Singular they for a specific... · They is or they are?
  38. [38]
    [PDF] The roots of genericity: indefinite singulars Vs definite plurals - HAL
    Dec 9, 2011 · Generic readings of indefinites have two salient properties : they are rare, occurring mostly in the subject position, and they always come ...
  39. [39]
  40. [40]
    Generic Generalizations - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Apr 24, 2016 · As these examples illustrate, generics are not equivalent in meaning to any of the quantifying determiners such as “all”, “some”, or “most”.
  41. [41]
    Quantified statements are recalled as generics - ScienceDirect.com
    When it comes to expressing generalizations about kinds, generics are used much more frequently than universal quantifiers (e.g., “all”, “every”, “any”) in both ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] The diachronic distribution of singular they in English newspaper ...
    This paper's hypothesis is that singular they grows in popularity; potential sociolinguistics reasons for that change are examined. Keywords: singular they, ...
  43. [43]
    Singular they : An Empirical Study of Generic Pronoun Use
    Aug 8, 2025 · English pronouns and human exceptionalism: A corpus-based study of singular 'they' usage for nonhuman animals. Article. Full-text available.Missing: proverbial | Show results with:proverbial
  44. [44]
    [PDF] A Singular Use of They - Robert D. Eagleson
    "They" is used as a singular noun, instead of "he" or "she," when the gender is inclusive or uncertain, or with indefinite singular antecedents. This is a long ...Missing: revival | Show results with:revival
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Pronouns and Gender in Language
    Much work prior to 1990 looking at singular they focused on generic or epicene uses, as in (12) and (13). However, recent studies (including Sanford and ...
  46. [46]
    The Washington Post will allow singular 'they' - Poynter
    Dec 1, 2015 · The Washington Post will allow singular 'they'. By: Benjamin Mullin. December 1, 2015. It has been a big week for proponents of non-binary ...
  47. [47]
    Sam Smith Announces Non-Binary Identity, Changes Pronouns to ...
    Sep 13, 2019 · The Grammy-winning artist took to Twitter on Friday to announce their gender-neutral pronoun change, and share the journey to accepting their ...
  48. [48]
    Sam Smith announces their pronouns are they/them - CBS News
    Sep 13, 2019 · In an emotional Twitter thread and Instagram post, singer-songwriter Sam Smith announced Friday that their gender pronouns are they/them.
  49. [49]
    In Focus: Nonbinary People - GLAAD
    The singular they/them pronoun does not have gendered connotations. For example: “Devin writes eloquently about their nonbinary identity. They have also ...
  50. [50]
    Merriam-Webster Singles Out Nonbinary 'They' For Word Of The ...
    Dec 10, 2019 · Merriam-Webster's 2019 Word Of The Year Is The Singular, Nonbinary 'They' The dictionary publisher lauded the singular they Tuesday, noting ...
  51. [51]
    Singular 'They' - Merriam-Webster
    People have used singular 'they' to describe someone whose gender is unknown for a long time, but the nonbinary use of 'they' is relatively new.
  52. [52]
    Merriam-Webster declares 'they' its 2019 word of the year - AP News
    Dec 10, 2019 · In October, the American Psychological Association endorsed “they” as a singular third-person pronoun in its latest style guide for scholarly ...
  53. [53]
    Linguistic reaction at The New Yorker - Language Log
    Mar 8, 2016 · The New Yorker, under Mary Norris, avoids singular 'their' as a gender-neutral pronoun, forcing writers to use 'he or she' or 'all should do ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Singular they with personal name antecedent - Language Log
    Sep 1, 2010 · Singular they with personal name antecedent. September 1, 2010 @ 10 ... number agreement and the pronoun takes plural agreement. And the ...
  55. [55]
    Bound Variable Singular They Is Underspecified: The Case of All vs ...
    Jun 2, 2022 · “Pragmatic and grammatical factors that license singular they ... “Some problems of determination in English number agreement,” in ...
  56. [56]
    Grammatical number agreement in a complex phrase using singular ...
    Feb 19, 2013 · I have two difficulties here: In the first phrase, a reader, being singular noun, certainly implies is;; In the second phrase, they, being a ...
  57. [57]
    Pronoun Agreement and the Singular They - Excelsior OWL
    Apr 1, 2016 · Navigation toggle for subsection Subject-Verb Agreement ... Why or why not? Tags: grammarhootpronounssingular they. Francesco Crocco.Missing: linguistics | Show results with:linguistics
  58. [58]
    Coexistent Systems in African-American English - Penn Linguistics
    A large body of research on the GE system of AAVE indicates that subject-verb agreement is marginal. ... they is and he am are reported in earlier forms of AAVE.<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    Language Log » ADS Word of the Year is singular "they"
    How prevalent is the singular, gender-neutral "they" in AAVE? ... verb agreement." Keith said,. January 9, 2016 @ 3:27 am. In my experience, singular "they" is ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Issues in Anaphora Resolution
    Anaphora resolution (AR) which most commonly appears as pronoun resolution is the problem of resolving references to earlier or later items in the discourse. ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Free the Plural: Unrestricted Split-Antecedent Anaphora Resolution
    Early research on split antecedent anaphors mostly focused on the constraints on the construction of complex entities from singular entities There are two ...<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Anaphoric Resolution of Singular and Plural Pronouns
    For the resolution of plural pronouns referring to singularly introduced reference persons the plural antecedent has to be built up by the cognitive system ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  63. [63]
    Recognition of They/Them as Singular Personal Pronouns in ...
    We introduce a new benchmark for coreference resolution systems which evaluates singular personal “they” recognition.Missing: error rates
  64. [64]
    Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolution: An Analysis of ...
    Nov 3, 2021 · In coreference resolution, as in most NLP data collection settings, one typically first collects raw text and then has human annotators label ...
  65. [65]
  66. [66]
  67. [67]
  68. [68]
    Processing 'Gender-neutral' Pronouns: A Self-paced Reading Study ...
    Jul 3, 2018 · This article explores the online processing of singular he and she and singular they by learners of English to discover whether singular they presents a ...
  69. [69]
    The processing costs of generic and specific singular they: A self ...
    Oct 2, 2025 · The processing costs of generic and specific singular they: A self-paced reading study. September 2025. Conference: 31.
  70. [70]
    How Americans view gender-neutral pronouns - Pew Research Center
    Sep 5, 2019 · Overall, roughly half of Americans (52%) say they would be somewhat or very comfortable using a gender-neutral pronoun to refer to someone, ...
  71. [71]
    The role of crosslinguistic differences in second language ...
    May 14, 2021 · The present study uses event-related potentials to investigate how crosslinguistic (dis)similarities modulate anticipatory processing in the second language (L ...
  72. [72]
    The role of crosslinguistic differences in second language ... - PubMed
    May 14, 2021 · The present study uses event-related potentials to investigate how crosslinguistic (dis)similarities modulate anticipatory processing in the ...
  73. [73]
    Processing bound-variable singular they | Canadian Journal of ...
    Jul 5, 2022 · In the next section we turn to psycholinguistic studies which examine the relationship between singular they and its antecedent in terms of ...<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    Gender Pronouns – LGBTQ+ Resource Center - UW-Milwaukee
    A person of any gender can use multiple sets of pronouns. Purposefully misgendering (using the wrong pronouns, ignoring someone's pronouns in use, or using ...
  75. [75]
    Does nonbinary they inherit the binary pronoun production system?
    Data on whether ambiguity avoidance drives they production provides an opportunity for psycholinguistic data to inform public discussion, given that many ...
  76. [76]
    Canada's gender identity rights Bill C-16 explained | CBC Docs POV
    Critics voiced concerns that the law will penalize citizens who do not use specific pronouns when referring to gender diverse people.
  77. [77]
    Gender identity, gender pronouns, and freedom of expression: Bill C ...
    Bill C-16 was said to be a fundamental threat to freedom of expression. Beginning with the social media musings of Jordan Peterson, a clinical psychology ...
  78. [78]
    Toronto professor Jordan Peterson takes on gender-neutral pronouns
    Nov 4, 2016 · Dr Peterson is concerned proposed federal human rights legislation "will elevate into hate speech" his refusal to use alternative pronouns.
  79. [79]
    What is in a name? A response to Jordan Peterson's critiques of ...
    Apr 21, 2019 · In 2016, academic Jordan Peterson rose to prominence by opposing Canada's C-16 Bill:a Bill he erroneously claimed would compel speech from ...
  80. [80]
    Substantial Damages Awarded for Refusal to Use Proper Pronouns
    A recent British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal (BCHRT) decision awarded $30,000 in damages to a restaurant employee due to the actions of a co-worker who ...
  81. [81]
    Misgendering Is a Human Rights Violation, Canadian Court Rules
    Oct 4, 2021 · In 2017, the Parliament of Canada passed bill C-16, which added protections on the basis of both gender identity and expression in its ...Missing: implications | Show results with:implications
  82. [82]
    Human Rights Tribunal Rules that Employer Discriminated Against ...
    Jun 14, 2024 · Where an employee engages in discriminatory harassment by persistently refusing to respect a colleague's chosen name or preferred pronouns, it ...
  83. [83]
    What Schools Need to Know After Court Vacates Title IX ...
    Jan 10, 2025 · The court found the new definitions in the Final Rule would compel Title IX institutions, including teachers, to “use names and pronouns ...Missing: mandates | Show results with:mandates
  84. [84]
    Federal Court Blocks Sweeping Title IX Rule for Schools Nationwide
    Jan 10, 2025 · A federal court just blocked the sweeping Title IX rule finalized by the Biden administration last year – effectively wiping the entire rule off the books for ...
  85. [85]
    Dispute over pronouns: Employer pays $400K to end lawsuit
    Jun 15, 2022 · After facing workplace discipline for refusing to use the preferred pronouns of a transgender student, a professor sued his employer.
  86. [86]
    Systematic review and development of a comprehensive ...
    This study provides a comprehensive exploration of social gender affirmation (SGA) for transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people.
  87. [87]
    Gender Affirmation through Correct Pronoun Usage - NIH
    Dec 19, 2020 · Addressing someone by the wrong name or misgendering them through use of incorrect pronouns can feel disrespectful, harmful, and even unsafe to ...2. Methods · 5. Results · 6. Discussion
  88. [88]
    “What do they mean?” a systematic review on the interpretation ...
    Apr 4, 2024 · We examine how the pronoun “they” has been interpreted, used, and accepted over time. We discuss trends in the findings and make suggestions for future ...
  89. [89]
    Mental health of non-binary youth: a systematic review and meta ...
    Oct 9, 2024 · Our meta-analysis revealed that non-binary youth exhibit significantly poorer general mental health compared to both transgender (d = 0.24, 95% CI, 0.05–0.43, ...
  90. [90]
  91. [91]
    Beyond She and He: A Framework for Studying the Cognitive ...
    Nevertheless, even the third-person pronouns in genderless languages can show a male bias rooted in androcentrism, that is the tendency to envision the default ...
  92. [92]
    Accurate transition regret and detransition rates are unknown - SEGM
    Sep 11, 2023 · A new paper by Cohn, “The Rate of Detransition is Unknown,” reviews common limitations of “regret” studies and demonstrates that hormone discontinuation, ...
  93. [93]
    Detransition Among Transgender and Gender-Diverse People ... - NIH
    This study found that the 4-year gender-affirming hormone continuation rate was 70.2% with 81% for the transfeminine group and 64% for the transmasculine group.
  94. [94]
    Gender detransition: A critical review of the literature - PMC - NIH
    Of the 16 patients, three detransitioned long-term (0.1%) and 10 detransitioned temporarily (0.3%). The remaining three patients expressed regret (0.1%), but ...
  95. [95]
    Making a case for a singular 'they' | The Associated Press
    Mar 22, 2017 · They/them/their is acceptable in limited cases as a singular and-or gender-neutral pronoun, when alternative wording is overly awkward or clumsy.Missing: 2000 | Show results with:2000
  96. [96]
    What's new in the AP Stylebook, 56th Edition? : APStylebook.com
    Jun 1, 2022 · Pronouns: As much as possible, AP now uses they/them/their as a way of accurately describing and representing a person who uses those pronouns ...
  97. [97]
    Chicago Style for the Singular They - CMOS Shop Talk
    Apr 3, 2017 · CMOS 17 does not prohibit the use of singular they as a substitute for the generic he in formal writing, but recommends avoiding it, offering ...
  98. [98]
    Welcome, singular “they” - APA Style
    Oct 31, 2019 · Use the singular “they” when the generic person is truly generic—devoid of gendered qualities. When describing generic people, it is easiest ...Missing: 20th | Show results with:20th
  99. [99]
    The singular, gender-neutral 'they' added to the Associated Press ...
    Mar 28, 2017 · They/them/their is acceptable in limited cases as a singular and-or gender-neutral pronoun, when alternative wording is overly awkward or clumsy ...
  100. [100]
    Survey: Religion, race shape views on pronoun usage - Axios
    Jun 8, 2023 · Americans' support for the use of gender-neutral pronouns such as "they" instead of "he" or "she" varies widely depending on race, religion and generation, ...
  101. [101]
    Poll shows sharp divides over gender identity, pronoun use
    Jun 8, 2023 · Overall in the PRRI poll, 35% of Americans say they are comfortable if a friend uses gender-neutral pronouns, while 40% say they are ...
  102. [102]
    The Politics of Gender, Pronouns, and Public Education - PRRI
    Jun 8, 2023 · Turning to the 2023 survey, half of Americans (50%) say they feel strongly that there are only two genders, man and woman. Partisanship, ...Missing: singular | Show results with:singular
  103. [103]
    US teens' and adults' views of gender identity - Pew Research Center
    Jan 24, 2025 · Among older teen girls, 58% say they are comfortable with people using gender-neutral pronouns. Smaller shares of younger teen girls (47 ...
  104. [104]
    Is It Time for Inclusion in the U.S. Constitution? | RWU Law
    "The U.S. Constitution uses the pronoun “he” when referring to the President of the United States. Considering that the Constitution was ratified in 1787, when ...
  105. [105]
    The Web of Language - Blogs
    Dec 25, 2015 · Generic he first derived its authority from a rule about Latin gender that was applied to English even though gender in Latin, which has to do ...
  106. [106]
    On the comprehension and production of pronouns - ScienceDirect
    Four experiments investigated whether subjects understand the supposedly generic he generically. In Experiment I, subjects responded YES if an auditorily ...
  107. [107]
    Gender-neutral writing: The pronoun problem
    Mar 24, 2021 · Use a plural antecedent. Individual writers should develop their own techniques for avoiding bias in writing. · Eliminate the pronoun. · Switch to ...Missing: strategies | Show results with:strategies
  108. [108]
    Gender and Pronouns – A Guide to Writing
    Make the sentence plural: “People have their own opinions.” · Include both pronouns (This solution excludes people who do not fall within a gender binary): “ ...
  109. [109]
    Is Singular They a Cognitively Efficient Substitute for Generic He?
    In the current study, two reading-time experiments demonstrated that singular they is a cognitively efficient substitute for generic he or she, particularly ...
  110. [110]
    Xe/Xem/Xyr Guide - Neopronoun Conjugation Guides - Tumblr
    Jul 29, 2019 · The pronouns xe/xem/xyr are credited to Don Rickter who first used ... In English, an “x” at the beginning of a word is pronounced like ...
  111. [111]
    [PDF] es, em (from them). James Rogers (1890 - University of Puget Sound
    shortest and easiesttt pronouns, exemplified by his own creations, e, es, and em. Rogers derives e from ie, while em comes from them, as in "I-et'em' come.
  112. [112]
    The Epicene Pronoun: The Word That Failed - jstor
    148. According to Smith, the aim of the Em Institute "is to bring em into common use by May 12, 1979." See E, E'S, EM (1977), also EM (1890). ae 1978 Cheris ...
  113. [113]
    [PDF] Variation in acceptability of neologistic English pronouns
    Apr 28, 2023 · The study of neopronouns is both valuable and necessary. A non-negligible amount of. English speakers use neopronouns for themselves and others.Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  114. [114]
    Gender neutrality in genderless languages - Wikipedia
    Pronouns lack grammatical gender, with "hän" as the sole third-person singular pronoun. However, there are examples of androcentrism in many Finnish terms ...<|separator|>
  115. [115]
    Know about How Genderless Languages are Evolving Globally
    Rating 4.7 (15) May 3, 2023 · Gender is absent from specific languages. Many languages, like Finnish, Hungarian, Estonian, and others, use the same term for “he” or “she.” ...
  116. [116]
    He, She Or Hen? Sweden's New Gender-Neutral Pronoun - NPR
    Mar 27, 2015 · Instead of just he (han) and she (hon), there will now be hen as well. The Guardian says: "The pronoun is used to refer to a person without ...
  117. [117]
    Sweden adds gender-neutral pronoun to dictionary - The Guardian
    Mar 24, 2015 · “Hen” will be added to “han” (he) and “hon” (she) as one of 13,000 new words in the latest edition of the Swedish Academy's SAOL.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  118. [118]
    [PDF] Cognitive demands of gender-neutral language - DiVA portal
    While the previous studies solely focused on reading speed and eye movement, the present study adds another variable to encircle the concept of cognitive load.Missing: neopronouns | Show results with:neopronouns
  119. [119]
    Variation in acceptability of neologistic English pronouns
    PDF | This acceptability-judgment survey of English neopronouns, including xe, fae, ey, and ze, shows that while neopronouns are not fully ungrammatical.
  120. [120]
    Introducing a gender-neutral pronoun in a natural gender language
    A third gender-neutral pronoun hen was proposed as an addition to the already existing Swedish pronouns for she (hon) and he (han).