Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Tim O'Reilly


Tim O'Reilly (born June 6, 1954) is an Irish-born American publisher, author, and entrepreneur who founded in 1978, establishing it as a leading provider of technical books, platforms, and industry conferences that have advanced and .
O'Reilly popularized key concepts such as , , and the Maker movement, shaping industry paradigms through his writings, events like the O'Reilly Open Source Convention and Web 2.0 Conference, and early initiatives including the launch of Global Network Navigator (GNN), the first , in 1993.
As CEO and chairman of , he has authored influential works like WTF? What's the Future and Why It's Up to Us (2017), advocating for proactive governance in technology's societal impacts, and serves on boards including while investing via O'Reilly AlphaTech Ventures.
His efforts have emphasized knowledge-sharing and innovation ecosystems, from pioneering animal-covered technical manuals to fostering communities that propelled open standards and participatory web technologies, though he has reflected on business missteps in scaling such ventures.

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Family Background

Timothy O'Reilly was born on June 6, 1954, in , Ireland, to parents Sean O'Reilly and Anne Hillam O'Reilly. His family originated from in on his father's side and via his grandmother. O'Reilly's family immigrated to the when he was three months old, settling in , , where he was raised. He grew up in a household with three brothers and three sisters, the children of Irish immigrants who had pursued opportunities in America. His early family environment emphasized community involvement and outreach, reflecting values instilled by his parents who prioritized doing good for others. This background of modest immigrant roots and familial focus on service shaped his formative years amid adaptation to American life.

Academic Training and Early Intellectual Influences

O'Reilly attended Harvard College from 1973, graduating in 1975 with a Bachelor of Arts degree cum laude in classics. His coursework centered on the study of ancient Greek and Roman civilizations, including their languages, literature, and foundational texts. This education emphasized analytical dissection of complex ideas, drawing from primary sources to derive core principles rather than secondary interpretations. The classics curriculum exposed O'Reilly to and , traditions that prioritize logical argumentation and precise expression. He later described this background as integral to his "mental tool set," enabling rigorous evaluation of concepts through historical precedents like the exchange between Diogenes and Alexander the Great, which underscored creating value beyond immediate capture. Such influences fostered a capacity for clear, structured communication, distinct from the era's prevailing specialized jargons in emerging technical fields. Post-graduation, lacking formal STEM credentials, O'Reilly entered technical writing around 1977, authoring manuals for systems like Unix amid the mini-computer boom. This early freelance and contract work applied his humanities-honed skills to demystify computer operations, bridging classical analytical methods to practical documentation without reliance on empirical scientific training. He credited self-directed learning for proficiency, stating he became "a very good based simply on ."

Founding and Expansion of O'Reilly Media

Establishment of the Publishing Company

Tim O'Reilly established in 1978 as a consulting firm, initially providing services amid growing demand for resources. The company was incorporated in March 1983 and shifted to book publishing in 1984, targeting Unix systems with practical manuals designed for developers seeking vendor-independent guidance during the 1980s expansion. This focus addressed a market gap for concise, authoritative references that prioritized over lock-in, enabling early titles like Unix in a Nutshell to gain traction among systems administrators and programmers. By the mid-1980s, introduced its signature Nutshell Handbook series, emphasizing high-quality, developer-oriented content that capitalized on Unix's standardization and the PC boom's need for accessible technical knowledge. To distinguish these volumes in competitive bookstore environments, the firm adopted quirky 19th-century engravings for covers, selected to echo the eccentric terminology of Unix tools and enhance memorability. This branding strategy proved effective, as evidenced by the 1991 release of Programming , a comprehensive guide that sold widely and solidified 's reputation for reliable, market-responsive publications.

Development of Signature Publishing Formats and Conferences

O'Reilly Media distinguished itself through distinctive book cover designs featuring engravings of , a format initiated by Edie in the late to evoke the specialized, "wild" nature of emerging topics like Unix and programming languages. These covers, drawing from diverse species across the animal kingdom—including mammals, birds, , and —served as visual shorthand for high-quality, practitioner-focused content, aiding brand recognition amid the proliferation of technical manuals in the . This approach prioritized utility over mass-market appeal, aligning with a model that supplied targeted resources—"picks and shovels"—to developers navigating technology booms rather than chasing consumer trends. The company expanded into conferences to cultivate developer networks, beginning with the Perl Conference in 1997, which highlighted practical advancements in the programming language and drew early revenue from registrations while enabling knowledge exchange among engineers. This was followed by the inaugural O'Reilly Open Source Convention (OSCON) in 1999, held annually in , until 2019, which grew to attract over 3,000 attendees by its tenth edition in 2008 and served as a venue for announcing projects. Subsequent events, such as the Freeware Summit (later Open Source Summit), reinforced this strategy by fostering communities around collaborative software development, generating sustainable income through private sponsorships and fees without reliance on public funding. Adapting to , O'Reilly launched Safari Books Online in 2001 as a subscription-based in partnership with Pearson, providing on-demand access to technical titles and evolving into a comprehensive platform with video, interactive tools, and live events by the . In 2014, O'Reilly fully acquired the venture, rebranding it as O'Reilly online learning to emphasize self-directed skill-building for professionals. This shift sustained profitability by leveraging proprietary expertise in curating content for tech practitioners, mirroring the "picks and shovels" ethos that prioritized ecosystem-enabling tools over speculative ventures.

Promotion of Open Source and Collaborative Models

Early Advocacy for Open Source Software

In early 1998, O'Reilly Media hosted a strategy session in attended by leaders including Eric Raymond, Larry Augustin, and representatives from , where the term "" was formally adopted as a pragmatic rebranding of "" to appeal to businesses by focusing on collaborative development and practical benefits rather than ideological commitments to software freedom. This shift, proposed amid 's decision to release its , aimed to position as a superior model for innovation through shared codebases, contrasting with proprietary silos that stifled competition and raised costs. O'Reilly's role emphasized market dynamics, arguing that could commoditize infrastructure software, allowing firms to build value-added services atop stable, low-cost foundations rather than duplicating core efforts. Following the session, published Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution in January 1999, an anthology edited by and Sam Ockman featuring essays from pioneers like , , and , which documented early empirical successes such as the rapid adoption of kernels in enterprise servers and as the dominant software by late 1998, powering over 50% of websites. The book highlighted how these projects demonstrated 's efficiency in bug fixes and feature additions via distributed contributions, outpacing proprietary alternatives like Microsoft's IIS in reliability and . O'Reilly's foreword framed this as evidence of accelerating software , where common tools become inexpensive utilities, freeing resources for proprietary differentiation and reducing overall development costs industry-wide. This advocacy underscored 's strengths in fostering collaborative innovation, as seen in Apache's evolution from a volunteer patch project to a scalable handling billions of requests daily by , which empirically lowered barriers for web hosting and spurred in internet infrastructure. However, it also overlooked risks such as free-riding, where proprietary firms like integrated open source components without equivalent R&D contributions, potentially underfunding foundational work, and vulnerabilities arising from unvetted code submissions, as later evidenced by exploits in early distributions lacking rigorous auditing. Despite these trade-offs, positioned open source as a causal driver of market efficiency, prioritizing empirical outcomes like cost reductions over comprehensive safeguards against dependency on volunteer maintainers.

Inner Source and Bridging Open and Proprietary Worlds

coined the term "" in December 2000, describing it as the use of development techniques within corporations to manage code visible only internally. This approach sought to import 's collaborative efficiencies—such as distributed contributions, , and modular development—into enterprise settings, enabling faster innovation while maintaining control over . Through his role on the board of , a facilitating such internal practices, promoted as a means for companies to replicate 's velocity without full code externalization. O'Reilly advocated hybrid models in the early , where practices lower development barriers by encouraging cross-team contributions, but layers—such as custom extensions or hosted services—enable and address 's monetization challenges. He contended that pure often under-monetizes core innovations due to , whereas allows firms to build competitive moats atop shared internal foundations, as seen in adoptions that blend communal with restricted . This bridging countered critiques that unrestricted openness erodes incentives, instead fostering ecosystems where collaboration accelerates product evolution. Empirical studies of implementations report achievements like shortened development cycles through processes and early feedback, with organizations experiencing enhanced and reduced . For instance, adopters have documented faster iteration via dependency management akin to ecosystems, leading to measurable productivity gains in large-scale internal projects. However, critics note risks such as blurred governance lines, where expansive internal sharing could inadvertently dilute protections by normalizing broad access without robust controls. O'Reilly's emphasizes mitigating these via structured policies, prioritizing empirical outcomes over ideological purity.

Key Theoretical Contributions to Technology

Coining Web 2.0 and Participatory Platforms

Tim O'Reilly co-organized the inaugural Conference, held October 5–7, 2004, in with MediaLive International, where he and John Battelle presented initial principles framing as an evolutionary shift from the Web 1.0 era of static, publisher-controlled content. This event marked the term's popularization, originally brainstormed by O'Reilly and Dale Dougherty to describe emergent web applications that prioritized user participation and dynamic data over rigid document models. In his September 30, 2005, essay "What Is ," O'Reilly elaborated these ideas into a foundational framework, portraying as a revolution harnessing through user-generated value, such as Wikipedia's collaborative editing (launched January 15, 2001) and Flickr's photo-sharing community (launched February 2004). Unlike Web 1.0's one-way publishing, these platforms treated the web as a writable database, enabling scalability via network effects where user interactions amplified utility and refined services algorithmically. O'Reilly advocated the "perpetual beta" approach, evolving from open-source practices like "release early and release often," to keep applications in ongoing refinement with live users, as exemplified by Gmail's 2004 launch in status. Successes included the API's release on June 29, 2005, which spurred third-party mashups and demonstrated how open APIs unlocked ecosystem growth without top-down orchestration. Adoption stemmed from market-driven viral propagation—user recommendations and intrinsic incentives for participation—rather than policy interventions, yielding rapid scaling in consumer-facing tools. Critics contend that Web 2.0's data-centric model enabled surveillance capitalism, with platforms extracting behavioral surplus for profit, as analyzed by in her examination of instrumentarian power over users. Algorithmic also fostered echo chambers, reinforcing homogeneous content feeds that amplified over diverse exposure. While advocates emphasize participatory value creation as democratizing , this overlooks centralization risks in winner-take-all dynamics, where market successes concentrated control among few intermediaries despite initial rhetoric.

Algorithmic Attention Rents and Economic Critiques

In the early , Tim O'Reilly co-developed the concept of "algorithmic attention rents" to analyze how dominant platforms leverage algorithms to control and monetize user attention, extracting economic value beyond competitive efficiencies. This posits that platforms, as attention aggregators, use opaque algorithms to allocate finite user attention toward content that maximizes platform revenue—often prioritizing high-engagement, viral material over user utility or societal benefit—resulting in rents akin to unearned profits from . For instance, algorithms on platforms like optimize feeds for metrics such as time spent and interactions, favoring sensational or divisive content that boosts ad impressions, even if it reduces overall platform usefulness. O'Reilly's emphasizes incentive structures in markets: platforms face pressure to degrade content visibility to insert more paid , as user is a scarce resource commodified for advertisers. On , for example, algorithms elevated sponsored results, with only four of the top 20 search outcomes being by the early , contributing to $37.7 billion in ad in 2022 alone. Similarly, Google's search algorithms increasingly prioritize , correlating with explosive growth in its advertising income—from $116.5 billion in 2018 to $237.8 billion in 2023—illustrating how control over allocation enables platforms to capture value from suppliers, users, and advertisers without proportional improvements in . This rent extraction intensifies with scale, as effects lock in users, raising switching costs and enabling subtle quality degradation. The framework's strength lies in spotlighting monopolistic dynamics, where algorithmic opacity shields from scrutiny, akin to historical resource monopolies but driven by data and behavioral nudges rather than physical barriers. By framing as a platform-controlled input, highlights causal pathways from algorithmic to economic distortion, such as reduced incentives for creators to invest in long-term value when virality trumps merit. However, critiques note that this analysis underplays user agency and market corrections: consumers voluntarily engage with viral for its intrinsic appeal (e.g., or validation), sustaining free services like search and connectivity that deliver broad utility funded by these rents—benefits not adequately weighed against harms. Moreover, competition persists, as evidenced by challengers like displacing incumbents through superior engagement algorithms, fostering innovation via iterative incentive alignment rather than inherent stagnation. 's co-authors, including from institutions favoring interventionist economics, may amplify regulatory-leaning interpretations, potentially overlooking how such rents partly reflect efficient capitalization on user-generated demand signals.

Policy Engagement and Government Initiatives

Government as a Platform and Open Data Advocacy

Tim O'Reilly advanced the concept of "Government as a Platform" in a 2011 article, arguing that governments should function as infrastructure providers enabling private sector innovation rather than delivering siloed services, drawing analogies to open standards like those in Unix and the . This built on his earlier promotion of "Gov 2.0" starting around 2009, which emphasized leveraging collaborative technologies for transparency, release, and citizen engagement to solve public problems more efficiently. O'Reilly's advocacy influenced initiatives like the U.S. Data.gov portal, launched on May 21, 2009, which aimed to provide public access to federal datasets to foster innovation, aligning with his calls for government data as "raw material" for private applications. He co-organized events such as the HHS Health Datapalooza to demonstrate open health data's potential, contributing to expanded dataset availability beyond the initial 47 at launch. Internationally, O'Reilly praised the UK's gov.uk platform in 2012 for its open data approach, which centralized services and released datasets to enable third-party tools, enhancing transparency in areas like public spending. Despite these efforts, O'Reilly's framework has faced scrutiny for underestimating bureaucratic resistance and implementation challenges, as evidenced by the troubled October 1, 2013, rollout of , which suffered technical failures, security vulnerabilities, and over $2 billion in costs despite incorporating platform-like data-sharing ambitions, highlighting persistent silos over modular evolution. Critics argue that such advocacy overlooks privacy risks from releases and causal evidence of private-sector superiority, such as Uber's 2009 launch enabling scalable ride-sharing via and user data far faster than comparable transport platforms, which often lag due to regulatory hurdles and lack of market incentives. Empirical outcomes suggest market-driven solutions more reliably deliver user-centric efficiencies without the inertia inherent in public bureaucracies.

Critiques of Government Intervention and Market Alternatives

Critics of O'Reilly's "Government as a Platform" framework argue that it risks entrenching state power by promoting centralized digital infrastructures that governments could exploit for or control, rather than genuinely decentralizing . This perspective highlights how models, while ostensibly enabling participation, may reinforce bureaucratic silos under a of , ignoring historical patterns of state overreach in tech-enabled . A related concern is regulatory capture, where tech industry lobbying influences open government platforms to prioritize corporate interests over public ones, as evidenced by extensive platform company efforts to shape EU digital policies through targeted advocacy. In the U.S., AI policy lobbying by firms hiring former regulators exemplifies how such dynamics can co-opt ostensibly neutral platforms, with over 100 ex-staffers influencing outcomes since 2023. Critics contend O'Reilly's model underestimates these risks, assuming collaborative ecosystems without accounting for empirical instances where incumbents like ride-sharing opponents lobbied to restrict innovators. Empirical assessments of data (OGD) initiatives reveal frequent failures to achieve reuse or innovation goals, with global surveys identifying structural barriers like poor and lack of incentives as primary causes, affecting over 70% of efforts. In the U.S., post-Obama commitments stalled, delivering minimal domestic impact due to implementation gaps despite initial enthusiasm. Early cases, such as the JURIS system, collapsed from inadequate , underscoring overoptimism in platform-driven reforms. Free-market alternatives emphasize voluntary private-sector openness, such as Twitter's pre-2023 , which freely enabled developer ecosystems and research without mandates, fostering apps and analytics through market incentives alone. mandates, by contrast, impose compliance costs—estimated at millions annually for —potentially stifling compared to profit-driven disclosures. While O'Reilly's advocacy yielded some civic tech pilots, like Data.gov expansions, stalled post-2016 adoptions highlight how market-led models avoided such bureaucratic drags.

Recent Work on AI and Future Technologies

Views on Generative AI Productivity and Risks

O'Reilly has critiqued claims of substantial productivity gains from generative , particularly in vendor-funded studies lacking empirical rigor. In a June 2025 discussion, he questioned a tech firm's analysis of developer boosts, recommending instead verifiable metrics like pre-ChatGPT ticket resolution rates to assess real impacts, as self-reported vendor data often inflates benefits without causal controls. He similarly referenced skepticism toward a study asserting a 26% output increase for -assisted coders, attributing enthusiasm to anecdotal "vibe coding" rather than broad, sustained efficiency, and noting 's limitations in handling legacy systems or complex feedback loops. Advocating human-AI over automation-driven replacement, O'Reilly posits that generative tools excel in augmenting tasks like code generation for bespoke , enabling on-demand customization that historically spanned decades. In August 2025, he classified as a "normal technology," comparable to or the , with diffusion constrained by behavioral inertia, infrastructure (e.g., GPU shortages), and low adoption rates—such as under 1% for advanced reasoning models among users—rather than inherent exponentiality. He opposed moratoriums on development or open-source restrictions, arguing that existential risks are overstated and addressable via conventional markets and regulations, without necessitating exceptional interventions. On risks, O'Reilly highlighted potential for inequality through economic rent-seeking, where AI platforms centralize value (e.g., via attention-manipulating algorithms mirroring social media's harms), potentially fostering a job if is misattributed to worker shortcomings amid executive-led layoffs predating widespread AI use. He urged causal focus on incentives—""—to redirect AI toward productive ends, cautioning against hype-driven bubbles that prioritize extraction over societal gains, yet emphasized historical evidence of adaptation: technologies prompt reskilling and institutional shifts, mitigating dystopian outcomes through competitive markets rather than presumed utopias or panics.

Copyright Conflicts with AI Firms and Open Protocols Advocacy

In April 2025, a study by researchers from the AI Disclosures Project—co-directed by and economist Ilan Strauss—presented empirical evidence indicating that trained its GPT-4o model on paywalled, copyrighted books published by without permission or licensing. The analysis employed area under the (AUROC) metrics, revealing GPT-4o's heightened accuracy in recognizing excerpts from non-public titles compared to equivalent public-domain or openly licensed texts, implying direct ingestion of restricted content during pre-training. , which specializes in technical publications, stated it holds no data-sharing or licensing agreements with , framing the findings as documentation of unauthorized extraction central to development. O'Reilly responded by promoting "copyright-aware AI" architectures that prioritize provenance tracking and creator compensation over indiscriminate scraping, such as retrieval-augmented generation () systems integrated at to generate derivative outputs while remunerating authors for usage. He argued that empirical violations like those evidenced in GPT-4o underscore the need for enforceable standards distinguishing transformative from wholesale data appropriation, rejecting blanket exemptions that erode property rights without reciprocal mechanisms. Parallel to these disputes, O'Reilly has advocated for open protocols in AI ecosystems to foster competition and mitigate monopolistic control by dominant firms, emphasizing designs that incorporate verifiable disclosures of training data sources and respect content ownership boundaries. Through the Disclosures , launched in 2024 under his co-leadership at the Social Science Research Council, he proposes auditable and protocol-based standards to enable modular AI markets, where commoditized models compete on transparency rather than proprietary data hoards, thereby balancing innovation incentives with accountability for sourcing. This approach draws on historical successes but adapts them to enforce causal traceability in AI supply chains, countering risks from opaque, centralized training pipelines. The positions have sparked debate: proponents of firms invoke U.S. precedents for model training as non-infringing transformation, while detractors highlight inconsistencies with 's prior open-source advocacy, suggesting selective enforcement that overlooks permissive licensing norms he once promoted. counters that open-source precedents applied to voluntarily licensed code, not covert extraction of commercial works, and that protocol-driven disclosures would resolve such tensions by institutionalizing opt-in compensation without stifling competition.

Personal Philosophy and Life

Family Dynamics and Personal Interests

O'Reilly was married to Christina O'Reilly, a poet and advocate for theater initiatives, from 1974 until their divorce; the couple raised two daughters together. He later married , founder of and former deputy in the Obama administration, with whom he has publicly referenced shared family life in professional contexts. O'Reilly has described his family as providing essential grounding amid his immersion in and publishing, crediting Christina's moral intuition for influencing his early decisions. Details about his children remain limited in , reflecting a deliberate low profile for matters that contrasts with his high-visibility role in discourse. His interests include extensive reading, rooted in his Harvard studies of classical literature from and , which he has cited as shaping his broader worldview on and . O'Reilly frequently recommends works across genres, from economics to history, underscoring a commitment to intellectual pursuits beyond digital trends.

Evolving Political and Economic Perspectives

O'Reilly's early economic thought drew from classical influences and a belief in decentralized, incentive-driven innovation, as evidenced by his promotion of in the late 1990s and early as a that leveraged voluntary collaboration to outpace proprietary models in creating value. This approach aligned with libertarian-leaning principles of and market experimentation, where participants captured value through network effects rather than top-down control, fostering tools like that powered global economic productivity without state subsidies. Empirical outcomes, such as the open source sector's contribution to growth via cost-free access to foundational technologies, demonstrated how private incentives could generate widespread prosperity absent redistributive mandates. By the 2010s, O'Reilly's perspectives shifted toward pragmatic critiques of market excesses, arguing in works like WTF? What's the Future and Why It's Up to Us? (2017) that platform economies created an "illusion of free markets" by initially expanding choice before extracting rents, necessitating rule changes to align private gains with common . He advocated creating "more value than you capture" as a guiding ethic for businesses, drawing on historical precedents where prosperity stemmed from shared abundance rather than zero-sum extraction, though this implied policy levers to curb monopolistic tendencies without abandoning market realism. This evolution reflected a departure from pure toward tempered by techno-optimism, prioritizing human-centric outcomes over unbridled efficiency. In May 2025, O'Reilly explicitly rejected the "cult of ," warning that AI-driven cost reductions treating humans as eliminable expenses undermined sustainable growth, and instead urged "AI-first" designs that augmented capabilities to build resilient economies. This stance critiqued short-term capitalist impediments to long-term innovation, yet overlooked causal evidence that government interventions often distort incentives— as seen in stalled public-sector tech adoptions versus 's organic scaling—favoring entrepreneurial for genuine through opportunity creation rather than enforced redistribution. O'Reilly's foresight in markets thus remains a testament to private-sector realism, where innovation thrives on aligned self-interests, countering interventionist biases that prioritize narratives over proven causal drivers of progress.

References

  1. [1]
    Tim O'Reilly: Official Bio - O'Reilly Media
    Tim O'Reilly is founder and CEO of O'Reilly Media, thought by many to be the best computer book publisher in the world. Here is his biography.
  2. [2]
    Tim O'Reilly - NNDB
    Born: 6-Jun-1954. Birthplace: Cork, Ireland. Gender: Male Race or Ethnicity: White Sexual orientation: Straight Occupation: Publisher. Nationality: United ...
  3. [3]
    Tim O'Reilly: Short Bio
    Tim O'Reilly is founder and CEO of O'Reilly Media, thought by many to be the best computer book publisher in the world. Here is a short version of his ...
  4. [4]
    Tim O'Reilly explains the mistakes he made and the lessons he ...
    Sep 17, 2013 · Tim O'Reilly sets out six "failures" from his experience founding and running O'Reilly Media. It's a frank self-examination, and contains a ...
  5. [5]
    Tim O'Reilly - The Trend Spotter (#278) - Tim Ferriss
    Nov 8, 2017 · Sean O'Reilly (father) · Anne O'Reilly · Fred Blackwell · Jennifer Pahlka · Barack Obama · Sean O'Reilly · James O'Reilly · Frank O'Reilly ...
  6. [6]
    Tim O'Reilly - Irish America
    Tim was born in Cork, though his family is from Killarney on his father's side, and from County Mayo on his grandmother's.Missing: background | Show results with:background
  7. [7]
    Citizen Inc. Q&A: Tim O'Reilly | Springfield Business Journal
    Jun 20, 2022 · O'Reilly: It goes back to my upbringing. It's all I've ever known – my parents and family were very focused on community outreach and doing ...
  8. [8]
    How O'Reilly Media Helped Change The World By Sharing ... - Forbes
    Sep 21, 2023 · For the past 45 years he and his company provided the technical manuals, books and industry gatherings that helped codify and disseminate world ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  9. [9]
    Tech's Most Valuable Teacher Is A Harvard Classics Major - Forbes
    and he knows how to build up a team of capable writers and editors so that his business can scale. He did some ...Missing: University | Show results with:University
  10. [10]
    Tim O'Reilly, Founder, Chairman and CEO, O'Reilly Media | CXOTalk
    Tim graduated from Harvard College in 1975 with a degree in Classics. He began working as a technical writer, and soon began writing and publishing his own ...Missing: University major
  11. [11]
    O'Reilly Media, Inc. Company Profile | Santa Rosa, California
    Owner Tim O'Reilly founded the company as a technical writing firm in 1978. Read Less. Key Principal: Timothy O'reillyMissing: 1983 | Show results with:1983
  12. [12]
    Profile of O'Reilly & Associates, Inc.
    We've been in business since 1978, originally as a technical writing consulting company. In 1984, we recognized the possibilities in open systems and started ...Missing: Berkeley California
  13. [13]
    Tim O'Reilly - Founder, chairman and CEO - LinkedIn
    Founder and CEO, O'Reilly Media (formerly O'Reilly & Associates.) Technical book publisher who learned that the right way to market my books was to market ...
  14. [14]
    History from 1984 to the Present - O'Reilly Media
    O'Reilly started publishing books about programming and computer technology in 1984 and has been partnering with people to bring big ideas to life ever ...Missing: date 1983
  15. [15]
    Unix in a Nutshell, 4th Edition [Book] - O'Reilly
    Detailing all Unix commands and options, the informative guide provides generous descriptions and examples that put those commands in context.Missing: Tim 1978
  16. [16]
    A short history of the O'Reilly animals
    Apr 2, 2013 · O'Reilly used 19th-century animal engravings for book covers, matching them to Unix terms, and the quirkiness helped the books stand out. Many  ...Missing: 1990s | Show results with:1990s
  17. [17]
    Programming Perl (Nutshell Handbooks) - Amazon.com
    Book details ; Print length. 482 pages ; Language. English ; Publisher. O'Reilly Media ; Publication date. January 1, 1991 ; Dimensions. 6 x 1.17 x 9 inches.
  18. [18]
    Programming Perl, 4th Edition - O'Reilly Media
    Adopted as the undisputed Perl bible soon after the first edition appeared in 1991, Programming Perl is still the go-to guide for this highly practical language ...
  19. [19]
    History of O'Reilly Media - A Learning Company - StudySection Blog
    Mar 23, 2020 · The Perl Conference launched by O'Reilly in 1997 to promote Perl programming language. Open Source Summit (originally called Freeware Summit) in ...
  20. [20]
    O'Reilly's Tenth Annual OSCON Explores Open Source's Dynamic ...
    Aug 27, 2008 · Sebastopol, CA--More than 3,000 developers, entrepreneurs, and visionaries attended the 10th annual OSCON in Portland, on July 21-25, and they ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    The history behind Christine Peterson's term 'open source software'
    Feb 2, 2018 · More specifically, tomorrow marks the 20th anniversary of the term “open source.” ... Tim O'Reilly promoted it to businesses, she said. In ...
  22. [22]
    The Strange Case of the Disappearing Open Source Vendors
    Tim O'Reilly explains why open source is good for businesses even if it isn't always good for software vendors. Customer lock-in is the real enemy of ...
  23. [23]
    Voices from the Open Source Revolution - O'Reilly
    Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution. 1st Edition January 1999 1-56592-582-3, Order Number: 5823 280 pages, $24.95 ...
  24. [24]
    Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution
    Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution. 1st Edition January ... This group included Eric Raymond, Tim O'Reilly, and VA Research president Larry ...
  25. [25]
    Voices from the Open Source Revolution - Amazon.com
    For the first time in print, this book presents the story of the open- source phenomenon told by the people who created this movement.
  26. [26]
    6 pivotal moments in open source history | Opensource.com
    Feb 1, 2018 · The term "open source" was coined by Christine Peterson to describe free software, and the Open Source Institute was later founded by Bruce ...1. Rms And The Printer · 3. The Writing Of The Gpl · 5. Open Source
  27. [27]
    Lessons from Open-Source Software Development
    Apr 1, 1999 · This collection of commentaries attempts to provide some perspectives on open-source software that can be applied by anyone developing software, ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  28. [28]
    Tim O'Reilly: Open Source Software
    OpenBusiness spoke with me about the evolution of the web and Web 2.0. In this interview, I re-emphasize the most important points of Web 2.0, talks about ...
  29. [29]
    An introduction to a 20-year-old concept: Inner source - Wipro
    Back in December 2000, Tim O'Reilly, the founder of O'Reilly Media, coined the term “inner source” in his response to Matt Feinstein on Open Source and OpenGL.Missing: promotion | Show results with:promotion
  30. [30]
    GGI: InnerSource - OSPO Alliance
    The term was first used by Tim O'Reilly in 2000, stating that Innersourcing is “[…] the use of open source development techniques within the corporation.Missing: promotion | Show results with:promotion
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Adopting InnerSource - PayPal Open Source
    O'Reilly books may be purchased for educational, business, or sales promotional use. Online edi‐ tions are also available for most titles (http://oreilly.com/ ...
  32. [32]
    Tim O'Reilly and Collaborative Software Community Receive ...
    Feb 22, 1999 · "The momentum behind Linux, the development of 'hybrid' business models ... O'Reilly also presented Open Source Developer's Day in August 1998 ...
  33. [33]
    Open at the Core: Moving from Proprietary Technology to Building a ...
    Sep 5, 2025 · Firms are increasingly moving away from proprietary technology to building commercial products on top of open source software.
  34. [34]
    The Business Impact of Inner Source and How to Quantify It
    Inner source development is closely incorporated into internal review cycles with early and frequent feedback, enabling close collaboration across ...
  35. [35]
    InnerSource and Enterprise : Win Win Collaboration - FINOS
    Oct 15, 2024 · Faster Iteration: The openness of the InnerSource model can lead to faster iteration and development cycles as dependencies on external teams ...Missing: empirical data
  36. [36]
    Inner Sourcing: The Ups and Downs - Salesforce Engineering Blog
    Inner sourcing benefits include decentralized expertise and less redundancy, but may require culture shifts and may not suit all teams.Missing: IP | Show results with:IP
  37. [37]
    Adopting InnerSource - O'Reilly
    InnerSource is an adaptation of Open Source practices to code that remains proprietary and can be seen only within a single organization.Missing: promotion | Show results with:promotion
  38. [38]
    The First Web 2.0 Conference Occurs - History of Information
    Oct 5, 2004 · The first Web 2.0 Offsite Link Conference Offsite Link was held in San Francisco on October 5-7, 2004.
  39. [39]
    What Is Web 2.0 - O'Reilly Media
    Sep 30, 2005 · Web 2.0 as a set of principles and practices that tie together a veritable solar system of sites that demonstrate some or all of those principles.Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  40. [40]
    Harnessing Collective Intelligence - What Is Web 2.0 - O'Reilly Media
    The Web 2.0 lesson: leverage customer-self service and algorithmic data management to reach out to the entire web, to the edges and not just the center.Missing: manifesto | Show results with:manifesto
  41. [41]
    What Is Web 2.0 - O'Reilly Media
    The open source dictum, "release early and release often" in fact has morphed into an even more radical position, "the perpetual beta," in which the product ...
  42. [42]
    15 years of collaboration: new features and what's next from Google ...
    Jun 15, 2020 · This month 15 years ago, just a few months after the Google Maps website rolled out in 2005, we launched the Google Maps API.
  43. [43]
    What Is Web 2.0 - O'Reilly Media
    Sep 30, 2005 · Oct. 2009: Tim O'Reilly and John Battelle answer the question of "What's next for Web 2.0?" in Web Squared: Web 2.0 Five Years On.
  44. [44]
    Harvard professor says surveillance capitalism is undermining ...
    Mar 4, 2019 · Surveillance capitalism's “means of behavioral modification” at scale erodes democracy from within because, without autonomy in action and in ...
  45. [45]
    3. Themes: The most harmful or menacing changes in digital life that ...
    Jun 21, 2023 · Without regulations, the Internet becomes too dangerous to use, because privacy and safety are not protected. More walled gardens emerge as safe ...
  46. [46]
    Algorithmic attention rents: A theory of digital platform market power
    Feb 2, 2024 · Algorithmic attention rents: A theory of digital platform market power. Volume 6; Tim O'Reilly (a1) (a2), Ilan Strauss (a2) and Mariana ...
  47. [47]
    Tim O'Reilly: Antitrust, Algorithms, and the Economy
    ... rent-seeking algorithms used by the big tech platforms. As part of the job, I gave a lecture to students at the UCL Institute for Innovation and Public ...
  48. [48]
    93 Google Ads Statistics (2025) — Market Share & Revenue
    Aug 16, 2025 · Google Ads Revenue Statistics ; 2021, $209.49 billion ; 2020, $146.92 billion ; 2019, $134.81 billion ; 2018, $116.46 billion.
  49. [49]
    Government as a Platform | Innovations - MIT Press Direct
    Jan 1, 2011 · Government as a Platform Open Access ... Tim O'Reilly is the founder and CEO of O'Reilly Media, Inc., thought by many to be the best computer book ...
  50. [50]
    Gov 2.0: The Promise Of Innovation - Forbes
    Aug 10, 2009 · That's Government 2.0: technology helping build the kind of government the nation's founders intended: of, for and by the people. Tim O'Reilly ...
  51. [51]
    Tim O'Reilly: Government 2.0
    February 2010. Chapter One of the O'Reilly book on Open Government in which I expand on my thinking about government as a platform.
  52. [52]
    Hi Reddit- I am Tim O'Reilly, founder & CEO of O'Reilly Media, AMA
    Apr 22, 2014 · And that's why I'm involved in activism as well as just selling picks and shovels to the miners. E.g. I spend a lot of time with ...
  53. [53]
    Tim O'Reilly applauds the open data approach of the UK government
    Nov 12, 2012 · Tim O'Reilly is in the UK. You can tell, because he appears to be everywhere at once. The itinerary must be astonishing.Missing: advocacy | Show results with:advocacy
  54. [54]
    Why the “Open Data Movement” is a Joke - Tom Slee
    May 1, 2012 · Take Tim O'Reilly, who has thrown the phrase around for some time (see here for an example from a couple of years ago). Like others who use ...
  55. [55]
    The rise of data and the death of politics | Technology | The Guardian
    Jul 19, 2014 · Tim O'Reilly, an influential technology publisher, venture capitalist and ideas man (he is to blame for popularising the term "web 2.0") has ...
  56. [56]
    From open source to open government: A critique of open politics
    ... O'Reilly's contribution, “Government as a platform”, where he writes: What if… we thought of government as the manager of a marketplace? In The cathedral ...
  57. [57]
    Platform lobbying: Policy influence strategies and the EU's Digital ...
    Jun 26, 2024 · This paper examines how platform companies seek to lobby and otherwise influence policymakers during heated regulatory episodes.
  58. [58]
    Policy? Examining Regulatory Capture in AI Governance - arXiv
    Oct 16, 2024 · Many AI companies have hired lobbying firms with former congressional technology policy staffers to lobby the US government on AI issues R2 ...
  59. [59]
    Regulatory Capture: Navigating the Third Rail of Innovation - Paul Asel
    Nov 1, 2024 · As discussed further below, cities have repeatedly threatened to ban Uber, Lyft and AirBnB following intense lobbying from industry incumbents.
  60. [60]
    Why open government data initiatives fail to achieve their objectives
    Aug 7, 2025 · It may be inferred from the study that the OGD failure rootcauses are mainly associated with the structural and functional dimensions of the ...
  61. [61]
    Why the Open Government Partnership is failing to have a positive ...
    Sep 18, 2024 · The first step is in highlighting why OGP has failed to deliver the results domestically that former President Obama's “signature good ...
  62. [62]
    The failure of an early episode in the open government data ...
    JURIS campaign was an early episode of open government data social movement. · Study of a failed case reveals the complexity of open government data movement.
  63. [63]
    When is public private? Tweets, privacy and consent in health ...
    First, the Twitter Application Programming Interface (API) is open and accessible, enabling the easy extraction of large amounts of data. Researchers can search ...Missing: openness | Show results with:openness
  64. [64]
    Why open government data initiatives fail to achieve their objectives
    Why open government data initiatives fail to achieve their objectives: categorizing and prioritizing barriers through a global survey. Author links open ...Missing: failures | Show results with:failures
  65. [65]
    How Successful are Your Gov 2.0 Initiative(s)? » Community ...
    There are certainly more and more Government Agencies jumping on the band wagon to follow President Obama's directive for them to become more collaborative, ...
  66. [66]
    a conversation with Tim O'Reilly about Generative AI - Chelsea Troy
    Jun 25, 2025 · Tim had emailed me a blog post from a tech company purporting to quantify the productivity boost that AI tools give to their developers.Missing: views | Show results with:views
  67. [67]
    Takeaways from Coding with AI - O'Reilly Media
    Takeaways from Coding with AI. Tim O'Reilly. By Tim O'Reilly May ... Here's Chelsea's critique of the recent paper that claimed a 26% productivity increase for developers using generative AI.Missing: gains | Show results with:gains
  68. [68]
    Is AI a “Normal Technology”? - O'Reilly
    Is AI a “Normal Technology”? Tim O'Reilly. By Tim O'Reilly August 19, 2025 • 11 minute read. Share. Close LinkedInXFacebookThreadsBluesky.
  69. [69]
    To understand the risks posed by AI, follow the money - O'Reilly
    Apr 30, 2024 · The limits we place on algorithms and AI models will be instrumental to directing economic activity and human attention towards productive ends.Missing: views | Show results with:views
  70. [70]
    Researchers suggest OpenAI trained AI models on paywalled O ...
    Apr 1, 2025 · In ChatGPT, GPT-4o is the default model. O'Reilly doesn't have a licensing agreement with OpenAI, the paper says. “GPT-4o, OpenAI's more recent ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Beyond Public Access in LLM Pre-Training Data - AWS
    Apr 1, 2025 · Our AUROC scores show that GPT-4o, OpenAI's more recent and capable model, demonstrates strong recognition of paywalled O'Reilly book content ( ...
  72. [72]
    Study suggests OpenAI isn't waiting for copyright exemption
    Tech textbook tycoon Tim O'Reilly claims OpenAI mined his publishing house's copyright-protected tomes for training data and fed it all into its top-tier GPT-4 ...
  73. [73]
    OpenAI Accused of Training GPT-4o on Unlicensed O'Reilly Books
    Apr 1, 2025 · A new paper [PDF] from the AI Disclosures Project claims OpenAI likely trained its GPT-4o model on paywalled O'Reilly Media books without a ...
  74. [74]
    Copyright-Aware AI: Let's Make It So - O'Reilly
    By the time we get to GPT 4o, released in May 2024, the model seems to contain more knowledge of private content than public content.
  75. [75]
    Tim O'Reilly Says Open AI Stole His Company's Paywalled Book ...
    Apr 2, 2025 · Echoing a legal complaint by The New York Times, publisher Tim O'Reilly says that Open AI stole content from dozens of his books.Missing: conflicts | Show results with:conflicts
  76. [76]
    Protocols and Power - O'Reilly
    To fully enable open, healthy, and competitive AI markets, we need complementary measures that ensure protocols can access the full spectrum of ...Missing: advocacy | Show results with:advocacy
  77. [77]
    AI Disclosures Project - Social Science Research Council (SSRC)
    Led by noted technologist Tim O'Reilly and economist Ilan Strauss, the AI Disclosures Project focuses on addressing the potentially dangerous consequences ...
  78. [78]
    Year One - by Asimov's Addendum and Ilan Strauss - Substack
    Aug 28, 2025 · Our argument is that open and effective protocols, and auditable telemetry, are central to ingraining these principles into the software ...Missing: July | Show results with:July
  79. [79]
    Open Protocols Can Prevent AI Monopolies - The Living Library
    Article by Isobel Moure, Tim O'Reilly and Ilan Strauss: “Can we head off AI monopolies before they harden? As AI models become commoditized, incumbent Big ...Missing: advocacy | Show results with:advocacy
  80. [80]
    How to Fix “AI's Original Sin” - O'Reilly
    Jun 18, 2024 · The New York Times claimed that tech giants OpenAI and Google have waded into a copyright gray area by transcribing the vast volume of YouTube videos.Missing: conflicts | Show results with:conflicts
  81. [81]
    Disclosures. I do not think that word means what you think it means.
    Mar 27, 2025 · Disclosure should not be seen as a mandate from regulators, but an active topic for computer science research, AI deployment, and business model innovation.<|control11|><|separator|>
  82. [82]
    Tim O'Reilly On Power Ambition Glory - Forbes
    Jun 18, 2009 · My wife Christina. She's got a deep moral compass and a kind of intuitive sense of what matters. In our early years together, she had ...
  83. [83]
    Founder of Sebastopol's O'Reilly Media called a technological ...
    Mar 16, 2008 · Christina O'Reilly, a poet and theater backer, is clearly in harmony with the vibe of west Sonoma County. They have two daughters in their 20s, ...
  84. [84]
    I read my wife Jennifer Pahlka's book in pre-publication drafts many…
    Jun 13, 2023 · Tim O'Reilly's Post ... I read my wife Jennifer Pahlka's book in pre-publication drafts many times, but now I'm listening with delight to her own ...
  85. [85]
    My wife, Jennifer Pahlka , was on Bloomberg Technology yesterday ...
    Jun 21, 2017 · My wife, Jennifer Pahlka, was on Bloomberg Technology yesterday, talking about her decision to go to the White House meeting on modernizing government ...
  86. [86]
    Tim O'Reilly: 'Generosity is the thing that is at the beginning of ...
    Oct 22, 2017 · The 63-year-old CEO, born in Ireland and raised in San Francisco, is one of the most influential pioneers and thinkers of the internet age. His ...
  87. [87]
    67 books Tim O'Reilly recommended - Read This Twice
    (Updated 2024) The most up to date and comprehensive list of 67 verified book recommendations from Tim O'Reilly. Includes quotes and sources.
  88. [88]
    Open Source Paradigm Shift - O'Reilly Media
    by Tim O'Reilly June 2004. This article is based on a talk that I first gave at Warburg-Pincus' annual technology conference in May of 2003.
  89. [89]
    The Economic Impact of Open Source on Small Business - YouTube
    Dec 12, 2012 · While open source makes an enormous contribution to the economy ... O'Reilly Webcast: The Economic Impact of Open Source on Small Business.Missing: Tim foresight
  90. [90]
    Tim O'Reilly: From the WTF Economy to the Next Economy
    Tim O'Reilly takes aim at what he calls “the illusion of free markets,” in which platforms like Amazon and Google first increase our economic freedom, and then ...
  91. [91]
    Why Entrepreneurs Should Care Less About Disrupting and More ...
    Oct 16, 2017 · by Tim O'Reilly · 1. Work on something that matters to you more than money. · 2. Create more value than you capture. · 3. Take the long view. · 4.
  92. [92]
    Tim O'Reilly on X
    May 28, 2025 · But whether you call it “AI native” or “AI first,” it does not mean embracing the cult of “economic efficiency” that reduces humans to a cost to ...
  93. [93]
    Tim O'Reilly: It's Time to Rewrite the Rules of Our Economy
    Just to be clear: I am against guns as much as I am against the corporate influence in politics (especially the levels in the US are beyond belief). The ...