Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Transactivation

Transactivation is the biological process by which a trans-acting factor, such as a transcription factor, increases the rate of transcription of a target gene encoded elsewhere in the genome (in trans), often at a distant locus, through interactions (direct or indirect) with regulatory DNA sequences or the transcriptional machinery, facilitating the assembly of the transcriptional apparatus. Transactivation is distinct from cis-activation, which involves regulatory elements acting directly on adjacent genes without diffusible factors.^[1] In molecular biology, transactivation primarily occurs through the action of transactivation domains (TADs) or activation domains (ADs), which are modular protein regions—often 10–80 amino acids long and intrinsically disordered—within transcription factors that interact with coactivators like Mediator, TFIID, or histone acetyltransferases such as CBP/p300. These interactions lead to chromatin remodeling, recruitment of RNA polymerase II, and enhanced initiation of transcription at promoters. TADs are classified into categories based on amino acid composition, including acidic (e.g., rich in aspartic and glutamic acids, as in the VP16 protein from herpes simplex virus), glutamine-rich, proline-rich, and serine/threonine-rich domains, with acidic TADs being the most potent and historically first identified. The functional versatility of TADs allows for precise regulation of gene expression in response to cellular signals, such as hormone binding in nuclear receptors or developmental cues.^[1] Key mechanisms of transactivation include direct DNA binding to enhancers or promoters, protein-protein tethering without DNA contact, and synergistic interactions with other factors to form enhanceosomes. For instance, in nuclear receptors like the farnesoid X receptor (FXR), ligand binding induces conformational changes that release corepressors and recruit coactivators, enabling simple or composite transactivation of genes involved in lipid metabolism. In eukaryotes, this process is conserved, as demonstrated by the Gal4 transcription factor from yeast activating reporters in mammalian cells via its AD. Transactivation is crucial for diverse biological functions, including cell differentiation, immune responses, and viral replication; disruptions can lead to diseases such as cancer, where aberrant transactivation drives oncogene expression.^[2]^[1] A notable example is the transactivation mediated by the Tat protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), which binds the transactivation response (TAR) element in nascent viral RNA to recruit cellular factors like P-TEFb, dramatically boosting viral transcription from the long terminal repeat (LTR) promoter—up to 100-fold—and enabling efficient viral replication.^[3] Beyond transcription, the term transactivation also describes receptor crosstalk in signal transduction, such as G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-induced activation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) via metalloprotease shedding of ligands, which propagates signals in pathways linked to cell proliferation and cardiac function. However, the transcriptional context remains the foundational and most broadly studied application in biology.^[2]

Overview and Definition

Definition

Transactivation refers to the process by which trans-acting factors, such as proteins, increase the rate of gene transcription by interacting with distant regulatory DNA sites, in contrast to direct binding at the promoter of the target gene.^[4] These factors, often transcription factors, diffuse through the nucleus to modulate expression of genes not immediately adjacent to their encoding sequences.^[5] In receptor signaling, transactivation describes the indirect activation of a receptor, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), through signaling crosstalk from a heterologous receptor, like a G protein-coupled receptor, without the involvement of the primary ligand.^[4] This mechanism enables rapid and integrated cellular responses to diverse stimuli. Central to transactivation are the distinctions between trans-acting elements, which are mobile regulatory proteins capable of influencing multiple genes across the genome, and cis-acting elements, which are fixed DNA sequences that serve as binding sites for those proteins within the vicinity of the regulated gene.^[4] The term originated in 1980s virology studies examining viral protein effects on host and viral gene expression; it was coined to describe the induction of lambda phage late gene expression by the lambda gene Q protein, which blocks transcription termination.^[6] Transactivation encompasses both transcriptional regulation in gene expression and signaling amplification in receptor pathways, providing a foundational concept for understanding indirect regulatory control in biology. Transactivation refers to the process by which diffusible trans-acting factors, such as transcription factors, bind to specific DNA sequences to upregulate gene expression at distant or heterologous genomic loci, often on different chromosomes or alleles. In contrast, cis-activation involves regulatory elements like promoters and enhancers located on the same DNA molecule as the target gene, exerting effects locally without requiring diffusible mediators, thereby limiting their influence to the same chromosomal allele.^[7] This distinction highlights how transactivation enables broader, non-local coordination of gene expression across the genome, while cis-activation provides allele-specific or proximal control.^[8] A key differentiation exists between transactivation and transrepression, both of which rely on trans-acting factors but produce opposing outcomes: transactivation promotes transcriptional upregulation, whereas transrepression inhibits or downregulates expression through mechanisms like interference with coactivators or direct binding to repress target genes.^[9] For instance, in glucocorticoid receptor signaling, transactivation drives metabolic side effects via gene upregulation, while transrepression mediates anti-inflammatory actions by suppressing proinflammatory pathways.^[10] This functional divergence allows trans-acting factors to toggle between activation and repression depending on context, ligand binding, or cellular state.^[11] Related concepts include autotransactivation, where a transcription factor directly upregulates its own gene expression to form a positive feedback loop, as seen in hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) self-amplification under low oxygen conditions.^[12] This variant illustrates the application of trans-acting mechanisms to autoregulation within regulatory networks.

Molecular Mechanisms

Transcription Factors and Domains

Transcription factors (TFs) are modular proteins that regulate gene expression by binding to specific DNA sequences and recruiting the transcriptional machinery to promoters or enhancers. These proteins typically consist of a DNA-binding domain (DBD) that recognizes and binds to cis-regulatory elements, such as promoter-proximal sequences, and an effector domain that modulates the activity of RNA polymerase II and associated complexes. In the context of transactivation, trans-acting TFs, which are diffusible proteins acting on distant or heterologous DNA sites, initiate activation by occupying target sites and facilitating the assembly of the pre-initiation complex.^[13]^[14] Central to this process are transactivation domains (TADs), which are intrinsically disordered regions within TFs that mediate interactions with co-regulatory proteins to promote transcription. These disordered regions can drive liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), forming biomolecular condensates that concentrate TFs, co-activators, and RNA polymerase II at regulatory sites, thereby enhancing transcriptional efficiency and selectivity through orthogonal molecular interactions involving hydrophobic and electrostatic forces.^[15] TADs are classified based on their amino acid composition, including acidic TADs enriched in negatively charged residues like aspartic and glutamic acid, glutamine-rich TADs featuring polyglutamine stretches, and proline-rich TADs containing proline motifs that often form extended structures. These motifs enable TADs to function as scaffolds for binding general transcription factors and co-activators, thereby bridging DNA-bound TFs to the basal machinery without requiring inherent enzymatic activity.^[16]^[17]^[18] The structure-function relationships of TADs reveal their adaptability, as they often adopt ordered conformations only upon target binding. For instance, the TAD of the herpes simplex virus VP16 protein forms amphipathic α-helices when interacting with host factors, with hydrophobic faces engaging binding pockets on partners while acidic residues stabilize the interface through electrostatic interactions. This induced helical structure enhances binding affinity and specificity, underscoring how TADs transition from disordered states to functional conformers during transactivation.^[19] The discovery of TADs emerged in the 1980s through pioneering studies on the yeast GAL4 transcription factor, which demonstrated that activation function resides in separable, modular domains distinct from the DBD. Experiments fusing GAL4 fragments to heterologous DBDs showed that the C-terminal region alone could confer transcriptional activation, establishing TADs as portable motifs capable of functioning across contexts. These findings revolutionized understanding of eukaryotic gene regulation by highlighting the combinatorial nature of TF activity.^[20] TADs interface with the Mediator complex, a multi-subunit co-activator that bridges TFs to RNA polymerase II, primarily through hydrophobic and electrostatic contacts rather than strict sequence specificity. This promiscuity allows diverse TADs to engage multiple Mediator subunits, such as MED25 or MED17, enabling flexible recruitment without rigid primary sequence requirements. Such interactions propagate activation signals to the core machinery, amplifying gene expression in a context-dependent manner.^[21]^[22]^[23]

Co-Activators and Chromatin Interactions

Co-activators are multiprotein complexes that enhance transcriptional activation by serving as molecular bridges between DNA-bound transcription factors and the basal transcription machinery, particularly RNA polymerase II (RNAPII).^[24] Prominent examples include the CREB-binding protein (CBP) and its paralog p300, which possess intrinsic histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity capable of acetylating all four core histones (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) within nucleosomes.^[25] This acetylation, occurring on multiple lysine residues such as H4 K5, K8, K12, and K16, destabilizes chromatin structure, promoting an open configuration that facilitates access for regulatory factors and RNAPII initiation.^[25] CBP/p300 are recruited to enhancer or promoter regions through direct interactions with the activation domains of transcription factors, acting as adaptors to integrate signals and assemble the pre-initiation complex.^[25] The Mediator complex represents another essential co-activator, functioning as a large multisubunit hub that relays regulatory inputs from transcription factors to RNAPII and general transcription factors (e.g., TFIIA, TFIIB, TFIID, TFIIE, TFIIF, TFIIH).^[24] Composed of head, middle, tail, and kinase modules, Mediator's tail module interacts with activator-specific domains via key subunits like MED1 (targeted by nuclear receptors) and MED15 (involved in lipid metabolism regulation), while its head and middle modules directly engage RNAPII to promote pre-initiation complex assembly and transcription initiation.^[24] The kinase module, containing CDK8 and MED12/13, can modulate these interactions, often fine-tuning elongation or repressing activity in certain contexts. Mediator can also participate in phase-separated condensates, where its disordered regions facilitate LLPS to concentrate activation signals at super-enhancers.^[15]^[24] Chromatin remodeling and modification are integral to co-activator function, enabling the displacement of nucleosomes to expose DNA for transcription. The SWI/SNF complex, an ATP-dependent remodeler, is recruited by transcription factor activation domains independently of promoter sequences or RNAPII holoenzyme, leading to nucleosome mobilization and enhanced gene accessibility.^[26] This energy-driven process repositions or evicts nucleosomes near regulatory sites, facilitating RNAPII progression.^[27] Complementing this, histone modifications such as trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 4 (H3K4me3) mark active promoters and transcription start sites, recruiting reader proteins like TAF3, CHD1, and BPTF via their PHD or chromodomains to stabilize the pre-initiation complex and promote RNAPII pause-release for elongation.^[28] H3K4me3 deposition by SET1/MLL complexes antagonizes repressive marks like H3K27me3, maintaining open chromatin states conducive to activation.^[28] The overall mechanism of co-activator-mediated transactivation proceeds stepwise following transcription factor binding to enhancers or promoters. Initially, bound factors recruit co-activators like CBP/p300 and Mediator, which acetylate histones and assemble multi-protein scaffolds to modify local chromatin.^[25]^[24] This is followed by ATP-dependent remodeling via SWI/SNF, which displaces nucleosomes to increase DNA accessibility, often in coordination with H3K4me3 enrichment that recruits additional factors for pre-initiation complex formation.^[26]^[28] Finally, chromatin looping brings enhancers into proximity with promoters, mediated by architectural proteins like CTCF and cohesin through loop extrusion, enabling co-activator transfer, RNAPII recruitment, and sustained transcription; this process ensures specificity within topologically associated domains while supporting dynamic enhancer-promoter contacts.^[29]

Natural Transactivation

Endogenous Cellular Examples

In endogenous cellular contexts, the tumor suppressor protein p53 exemplifies transactivation by directly binding to response elements in the promoters of pro-apoptotic genes, such as BAX and PUMA, to induce their expression in response to DNA damage and stress signals. This transcriptional activation promotes mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization and subsequent apoptosis, thereby maintaining genomic integrity and preventing tumorigenesis. For instance, p53-mediated upregulation of BAX, a pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family member, facilitates cytochrome c release and caspase activation in stressed cells. Similarly, PUMA (p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis) is rapidly transactivated by p53, amplifying the apoptotic cascade independent of other pathways in colorectal cancer cells and beyond. The transcription factor NF-κB plays a central role in immune homeostasis by transactivating genes encoding proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β, upon activation by pathogens or inflammatory signals. In macrophages and other immune cells, NF-κB dimers, particularly p65/RelA-containing complexes, relocate to the nucleus following IκB degradation, binding κB sites to drive rapid cytokine production essential for innate immune responses and inflammation resolution. This process ensures coordinated defense against infections while preventing excessive tissue damage through feedback mechanisms. Dysregulation of NF-κB transactivation can lead to chronic inflammation, underscoring its tight regulation in normal physiology.^[30] Signal-induced transactivation via the JAK-STAT pathway illustrates dynamic cellular responses to cytokines like interferons, where receptor ligation triggers JAK-mediated phosphorylation of STAT proteins, enabling their dimerization and nuclear translocation to activate interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs). For example, IFN-γ phosphorylates STAT1 at tyrosine 701, allowing it to bind gamma-activated sequences (GAS) and transactivate ISGs such as IRF1 and GBP1, which bolster antiviral states and immune modulation during development and homeostasis. This pathway maintains cellular vigilance against stressors, with STAT1 phosphorylation serving as a key checkpoint for precise gene induction.^[31] In cell cycle regulation, the proto-oncogene c-Myc transactivates multiple proliferation-associated genes, including cyclins D1, D2, and E, as well as E2F1, to drive G1/S progression and biomass accumulation in growing cells. Myc-Max heterodimers bind E-box motifs in target promoters, recruiting co-activators to enhance transcription during mitogenic stimulation, thereby supporting tissue development and repair. Aberrant Myc overexpression disrupts this balance, promoting uncontrolled proliferation.^[32] Dysregulation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway exemplifies pathological endogenous transactivation in cancer, where stabilized β-catenin accumulates in the nucleus and, with TCF/LEF factors, transactivates oncogenes like c-Myc and cyclin D1, fueling tumorigenesis in colorectal and other cancers. In normal homeostasis, this pathway governs stem cell maintenance and differentiation, but mutations in APC or β-catenin lead to constitutive transactivation, enhancing proliferation and invasion without external ligands. Such dysregulation is a hallmark in over 90% of colorectal cancers, highlighting its role in oncogenic transformation.^[33]

Viral Transactivators

Viral transactivators are proteins encoded by certain viruses, particularly complex retroviruses, that enhance the transcription of viral genes to facilitate replication and pathogenesis by hijacking host cellular machinery.^[34] These proteins often target viral promoters while also influencing host gene expression, contributing to immune evasion and oncogenic transformation.^[35] A prominent example is the Tat protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), which binds specifically to the trans-activation response (TAR) RNA element located at the 5' end of nascent viral transcripts.^[36] This interaction activates the viral long terminal repeat (LTR) promoter, dramatically increasing HIV-1 gene expression essential for efficient viral replication.^[37] Mechanistically, Tat recruits the positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb), comprising cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) and cyclin T1, to the elongating RNA polymerase II (Pol II) complex, leading to phosphorylation of the Pol II C-terminal domain (CTD) at serine 2.^[38] This phosphorylation promotes transcriptional elongation and overcomes promoter-proximal pausing, ensuring productive HIV-1 transcription.^[39] Another key viral transactivator is the Tax oncoprotein of human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1), which transactivates both viral and cellular genes to drive T-cell proliferation and transformation.^[40] Tax specifically upregulates host genes such as interleukin-2 (IL-2) and c-fos, promoting autocrine signaling and cell cycle progression in infected T cells.^[41] It achieves this by interacting with the CREB/ATF family of transcription factors, enhancing their binding to cyclic AMP-responsive elements (CREs) in target promoters without direct DNA binding by Tax itself.^[35] This mechanism contributes to HTLV-1 pathogenesis, particularly in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL), where persistent Tax expression drives oncogenic signaling and genomic instability.^[42] The functional conservation of such transactivators across retroviruses underscores their evolutionary importance for overcoming host transcriptional barriers. In complex retroviruses like HIV-1 and HTLV-1, these regulators have evolved to coordinately activate LTR-driven transcription, a strategy retained from ancestral lentiviruses and deltaretroviruses to ensure high-level viral gene expression.^[34]

Receptor Transactivation

Signaling Crosstalk Mechanisms

Signaling crosstalk in receptor transactivation primarily occurs through ligand-dependent mechanisms where activation of one receptor, such as a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), leads to the proteolytic release of a ligand for a second receptor, exemplified by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In the core mechanism, GPCR stimulation triggers intracellular metalloproteases, notably ADAM17 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17), to cleave membrane-bound pro-heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (pro-HB-EGF), releasing soluble HB-EGF that binds and activates EGFR. This process enables heterologous activation of EGFR without direct binding of its canonical ligands, facilitating rapid signal integration between disparate receptor families.^[43]^[44]^[45] Several intracellular pathways mediate the activation of ADAM17 and subsequent EGFR transactivation following GPCR engagement. Src family kinases phosphorylate and activate ADAM17, promoting HB-EGF shedding, while protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms contribute by enhancing metalloprotease activity through Gq-coupled GPCR signaling. Calcium influx, often via Gq-mediated phospholipase C activation, plays a pivotal role by directly stimulating ADAM17 or amplifying Src/PKC pathways, leading to sequential steps: GPCR ligand binding induces G protein dissociation, second messenger generation (e.g., IP3-induced Ca²⁺ release), metalloprotease activation, ligand shedding, EGFR autophosphorylation, and recruitment of adaptor proteins like Grb2-Sos to initiate the MAPK/ERK cascade. These pathways underscore the modular nature of crosstalk, allowing fine-tuned downstream signaling such as proliferation or migration without EGFR's own ligand.^[46] ^[47] Key to this crosstalk is the concept of heterologous activation, where GPCR agonists indirectly engage EGFR tyrosine kinase activity, bypassing traditional ligand-receptor specificity to amplify signaling diversity. Temporally, this manifests as rapid, transient EGFR activation (within minutes) driven by G protein-dependent metalloprotease shedding, contrasting with sustained signaling (hours) via β-arrestin-mediated pathways that internalize the receptor complex for prolonged MAPK activation in cytosolic compartments. This temporal dichotomy allows cells to distinguish acute responses from chronic adaptations in signaling networks.^[44]^[45]

Pathophysiological Examples

Receptor transactivation plays a significant role in cardiac hypertrophy, where angiotensin II (AngII) stimulation of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R), a GPCR, induces EGFR transactivation, leading to pathological remodeling including cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and fibrosis.^[48] This process involves G protein-dependent release of EGFR ligands such as heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF), contributing to heart failure progression in animal models.^[49] Inhibition of EGFR signaling has been shown to mitigate these effects, highlighting transactivation as a therapeutic target in cardiovascular disease.^[48] In cancer, particularly breast carcinoma, protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) activation by thrombin promotes persistent EGFR and ErbB2/HER2 transactivation, enhancing tumor cell motility and invasion through sustained ERK1/2 signaling.^[50] This Gαi/o- and metalloprotease-dependent pathway is critical for invasive phenotypes in cell lines like MDA-MB-231, with PAR1-deficient xenografts exhibiting reduced tumor growth in vivo.^[50] Similarly, PAR1-EGFR crosstalk facilitates prostate cancer cell migration and invasion via matrix metalloproteinase-mediated ligand shedding.^[51] Physiologically, integrin-EGFR transactivation supports wound healing by regulating keratinocyte proliferation, migration, and attachment in skin repair processes.^[52] Integrins, as adhesion receptors, trigger EGFR activation without direct ligand binding, integrating mechanical cues with growth signaling to enhance innate immune responses and tissue regeneration.^[52] Therapeutic targeting of transactivation has shown promise in inflammatory conditions, where matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitors like GM6001 block EGFR transactivation induced by stimuli such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), reducing COX-2 expression and cell proliferation in enterocytes.^[53] This approach attenuates inflammation-associated responses, as MMPs mediate HB-EGF shedding essential for EGFR activation.^[54]

Artificial Transactivation

Experimental Techniques

Artificial transactivation is commonly studied using fusion proteins that combine a DNA-binding domain with a potent activation domain to induce targeted gene expression. A classic example is the GAL4-VP16 chimera, where the DNA-binding domain of the yeast transcription factor GAL4 is fused to the strong acidic activation domain of the herpes simplex virus VP16 protein, enabling robust transactivation in reporter assays across mammalian and yeast systems. This system has been widely adopted for dissecting transactivation mechanisms due to its high potency, often achieving up to 100-fold activation of minimal promoters in transient transfection experiments. More recently, CRISPR-based activator systems have revolutionized precise transactivation studies by leveraging catalytically inactive Cas9 (dCas9) fused to activation domains like VP64, a tetrameric repeat of the minimal VP16 activation motif. The dCas9-VP64 construct, guided by single guide RNAs (sgRNAs), recruits transcriptional machinery to specific genomic loci without altering the DNA sequence, allowing for endogenous gene activation with efficiencies reaching up to 10-fold for targets like the human IL1RN gene in HEK293 cells.^[55] These systems are particularly useful for multiplexed activation, where multiple sgRNAs target upstream promoter regions to enhance synergy. To quantify transactivation, reporter systems employing luminescent or fluorescent proteins under inducible promoters are essential. Luciferase reporters, such as firefly luciferase driven by promoters with upstream activator binding sites (e.g., GAL4-responsive UAS elements), provide sensitive, real-time measurement of transcriptional output through bioluminescence assays, often normalized against Renilla luciferase for transfection efficiency. Similarly, GFP reporters fused to minimal promoters enable visualization and flow cytometric quantification of transactivation in live cells, with induction levels detectable via fluorescence intensity changes exceeding 50-fold in optimized setups. Controlled expression of transactivators is achieved using tetracycline-inducible systems, which allow temporal regulation to mimic dynamic cellular responses. The Tet-Off system employs a tetracycline transactivator (tTA), a fusion of the Tet repressor and VP16 activation domain, that binds Tet-responsive promoters (TRE) to drive reporter expression in the absence of doxycycline, achieving near-complete repression (over 1,000-fold) upon addition. Conversely, the Tet-On system uses a reverse Tet transactivator (rtTA) that activates TRE only in the presence of doxycycline, facilitating inducible transactivation with activation kinetics within hours and sustained expression levels up to 1,000-fold over basal.^[56] High-throughput screening for transactivation domains (TADs) often utilizes variants of the yeast two-hybrid system adapted for activation potential. In these assays, randomized peptide libraries are fused to a heterologous DNA-binding domain like GAL4, and screened against reporter strains for growth or color selection on selective media, identifying functional TADs with activation strengths varying from weak (2-5 fold) to strong (over 50-fold). Such approaches have mapped thousands of human TADs, revealing motifs enriched in acidic residues and their context-dependent potencies in large-scale genomic libraries.

Applications in Research and Therapy

Artificial transactivation has emerged as a powerful tool in research, enabling precise manipulation of gene expression for studying cellular dynamics. Optogenetic transactivators, which fuse light-sensitive domains to transcription factors, allow for spatiotemporal control of gene activation, surpassing the limitations of chemical inducers by providing millisecond temporal resolution and subcellular precision.^[57] For instance, light-inducible systems based on LOV or CRY2 domains have been used to dissect signaling pathways in real-time, revealing mechanisms of gene regulation in living cells.^[58] In synthetic biology, transactivation modules form the basis of genetic circuits that integrate multiple inputs for complex behaviors, such as oscillatory networks or logic gates, facilitating the engineering of cellular responses to environmental cues.^[59] Therapeutically, artificial transactivators enhance gene delivery vectors for controlled expression in disease contexts. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors incorporating inducible transactivators, like the Tet-Off system, have been engineered to drive insulin production in hepatocytes, offering a regulatable approach to treat type 1 diabetes by preventing hypoglycemia through doxycycline-mediated shutdown.^[60] In cancer immunotherapy, synthetic circuits targeting NF-κB transactivation pathways amplify immune responses; for example, engineered T cells with NF-κB-responsive promoters selectively activate cytokine release in tumor microenvironments, boosting antitumor immunity while minimizing systemic toxicity.^[61] These applications leverage transactivation to achieve tunable, patient-specific therapies. Despite these advances, challenges such as off-target effects persist, where unintended activation of non-target genes can lead to cytotoxicity or immune responses, particularly in CRISPR-based activation (CRISPRa) systems.^[62] Post-2020 developments in CRISPRa have addressed this through epigenetic editing tools, such as dCas9 fused to activators like VP64 and p300, enabling locus-specific chromatin remodeling for sustained, heritable gene upregulation without DNA cleavage.^[63] These systems have shown promise in reactivating tumor suppressors, with up to 100-fold expression increases in preclinical models, paving the way for safer therapeutic interventions.^[64]

References

[1]
Commonly asked questions about transcriptional activation domains
Dec 5, 2023 · Transcriptional activation domains are the regions of transcription factors (TFs) that bind to coactivator complexes to activate transcription.
[2]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080468846002050
[3]
Sequential Steps in Tat Trans-Activation of HIV-1 Mediated Through ...
Trans-activation by the virally encoded Tat protein is one of the main mechanisms of LTR activation. Tat binds to its target, TAR RNA, and cellular proteins ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[4]
Transactivation - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Transactivation is the term used to describe activation of the EGFR directly or indirectly by heterologous ligands. Transactivation has been reported ...
[5]
Regulation of Transcription by Transcription Factors - NCBI - NIH
Transcription factors are categorized as trans-acting factors because they are regulatory agents which are not part of the regulated gene(s).Missing: transactivation definition
[6]
Viral Transactivation | Nature Biotechnology
Dec 1, 1986 · Transactivation is a term that was coined to describe the induction of lambda phage late gene expression by lambda gene Q, which blocks ...
[7]
Differential contribution of cis and trans gene transcription regulatory ...
Apr 20, 2018 · Both cis-acting and trans-acting factors have the potential to regulate gene expression patterns in the brain and to mediate the interaction ...
[8]
The Role of cis- and trans-Acting RNA Regulatory Elements in ... - NIH
Dec 20, 2020 · Similar to DNA sequences, the cis-acting elements of RNA influence transcripts' fate internally, while trans-acting RNA regulatory factors ...
[9]
Dissociation of transactivation from transrepression by a ... - PubMed
The antiinflammatory effects are mediated to a major extent via transrepression, while many side effects are due to transactivation.
[10]
Dissociation of transactivation from transrepression by a selective ...
The antiinflammatory effects are mediated to a major extent via transrepression, while many side effects are due to transactivation. Our aim has been to ...
[11]
Selective transrepression versus transactivation mechanisms by ...
Apr 7, 2008 · Glucocorticoid receptor polymorphisms exist that can distinguish between transactivation and transrepression mechanisms. In this respect the ...
[12]
Regulatory mechanisms of hypoxia‐inducible factor 1 activity - NIH
... autotransactivation of HIF‐1α expression (Table 1). However, negative regulators of the transcription initiation of the HIF‐1α gene have been reported. An ...
[13]
Activation of JAK3, but not JAK1, is critical for IL-2-induced ...
Recent evidence for a preferential coupling of JAK3 to interleukin-2 receptor- γ (IL-2R γ) and JAK1 to IL-2R β supports the concept of heterotransactivation ...
[14]
Epstein-Barr Virus Protein Kinase BGLF4 Interacts With Viral ...
... downregulation of BZLF1 autotransactivation activity mediated by BGLF4. These results indicate that formation of a stable complex of BGLF4-BZLF1 enables ...
[15]
A high‐throughput method to identify trans‐activation domains ...
TFs are typically modular with two distinct functionalities—they bind to specific DNA sequences via their DNA‐binding domains (DBDs, blue), and trans‐activate ...Results · Gfp‐facs Can Enrich... · Tad‐seq Recovers The Known...
[16]
Review Compendium of human transcription factor effector domains
Feb 3, 2022 · Transcription factors (TFs) regulate gene expression by binding to DNA sequences and modulating transcriptional activity through their ...
[17]
Transcription Factor Effector Domains - PMC - PubMed Central
NR transactivation domains (also referred to as Activating Function, or AF ... gene transcription [97]. For example, liganded nuclear receptors recruit ...
[18]
Transactivation Domain 2 (TA2) of p65 NF-κB - ScienceDirect.com
TADs have been classified according to their predominant amino acid composition as proline-rich, glutamine-rich, or acidic (reviewed by Mitchell and Tjian ...Materials And Methods · Results · Discussion
[19]
Dissecting the transactivation domain (tAD) of the transcription factor ...
Sep 25, 2020 · Genes are activated by transcription factors through their transactivation domains (tADs); disordered regions that have been poorly understood ...
[20]
Structure and functions of powerful transactivators: VP16, MyoD and ...
The VP16 TAD does not usually take a specific three dimensional structure on its own; however, it will adopt an α-helical conformation upon binding to ...
[21]
Yeast Gal4: a transcriptional paradigm revisited | EMBO reports
During the past two decades, the yeast Gal4 protein has been used as a model for studying transcriptional activation in eukaryotes.The Gal4--Gal80 Regulatory... · Transcriptional Activation... · Gal4 Regulation By...<|separator|>
[22]
The Mediator complex subunit MED25 is targeted by the N-terminal ...
Interactions usually occur between TADs and one or more Mediator subunits. For example, the N-terminal TAD of p53 binds directly to MED17 ( 41 , 42 ), while ...
[23]
Unexpected specificity within dynamic transcriptional protein ... - PNAS
Nonspecific models propose that the TADs of unique activators bind the ABDs of coactivators via nonspecific intermolecular interactions, forming complexes ...
[24]
Activation of gene expression by detergent-like protein domains - PMC
Sep 24, 2021 · ... tADs lack specificity in sequence, structure, and interactions with targets ... Mediator specificity is mediated by a large and dynamic ...
[25]
The metazoan Mediator co-activator complex as an integrative hub ...
The Mediator is an evolutionarily conserved, multiprotein complex that is a key regulator of protein-coding genes. In metazoan cells, multiple pathways that are ...Targeting Of Med1 By... · Med15 As A Regulatory Node... · Effector Functions Of...
[26]
https://genesdev.cshlp.org/content/13/18/2369.short
[27]
Recruitment of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex by ...
SWI/SNF is a chromatin remodeling complex that facilitates expression of a number of yeast genes. Here we demonstrate that SWI/SNF can be recruited from yeast ...
[28]
The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex: a critical regulator of ...
Apr 26, 2024 · The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex functions by displacing nucleosomes near important regulatory sites which can facilitate transcription ...Introduction · History of SWI/SNF discovery... · Glucose metabolism · Perspectives
[29]
Roles of H3K4 methylation in biology and disease - ScienceDirect.com
Trimethylated H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me3) is one of the most studied histone modifications owing to its enrichment at the start sites of transcription and its ...H3k4 Methylation · Role Of H3k4me3 In Promoting... · H3k4 Methyltransferase...Missing: transactivation | Show results with:transactivation
[30]
Mechanisms of enhancer action: the known and the unknown
Apr 15, 2021 · The GRBs have been identified as TADs in as diverse organisms as Drosophila and human [231], indicating deep evolutionary roots of TADs. An ...
[31]
NF-κB in inflammation and cancer | Cellular & Molecular Immunology
Jun 25, 2025 · Activated NF-κB directly engages in the transactivation of genes encoding proinflammatory cytokines, and it also promotes the generation of ...
[32]
The JAK/STAT signaling pathway: from bench to clinic - Nature
Nov 26, 2021 · The JAK/STAT signaling pathway was first discovered when studying how IFNs lead to the activation of a transcription factor. In 1990, the ...
[33]
Gene Transactivation and Transrepression in MYC-Driven Cancers
Mar 27, 2021 · MYC overexpression is a hallmark of malignant growth, inducing self-renewal of stem cells and blocking senescence and cell differentiation.<|separator|>
[34]
Wnt/β-catenin signaling in cancers and targeted therapies - Nature
Aug 30, 2021 · In this study, we systematically reviewed the most updated knowledge of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in cancers and relatively targeted therapies.
[35]
Mechanism of action of regulatory proteins encoded by complex ...
In general, these data demonstrate that retrovirally encoded transcriptional trans-activators can exert a similar effect by several very different mechanisms.
[36]
HTLV Tax: A Fascinating Multifunctional Co-Regulator of ... - Frontiers
The HTLV-1 transactivator protein, Tax, has been identified as a protein of significant interest in HTLV-1 pathogenesis as it is a potent activator of a variety ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[37]
The HIV-1 Tat protein activates transcription from an u .stream DNA ...
The Tat protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) activates transcription following binding to nascent trans-activation response (TAR) RNA ...
[38]
mechanism of action and target for HIV-1 cure strategies - PMC - NIH
Jan 1, 2018 · This mechanism involves Tat binding to the TAR RNA element that forms at the 5′ end of viral transcripts and recruiting a general RNAP II elongation factor ...Missing: seminal papers
[39]
Activation of HIV transcription by Tat - ScienceDirect.com
This paper describes experiments demonstrating that the specific binding of Tat peptides to TAR relies largely on the structure of the RNA, rather than on a ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[40]
Mechanisms of Oncogenesis by HTLV-1 Tax - PMC - PubMed Central
HTLV-1 is the causative agent of a neoplasm of CD4+CD25+ T cells known as adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL), which consists of four clinical subtypes: ...
[41]
Human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 Tax transactivates the ... - NIH
Abstract. The human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) transforming protein, Tax, is a potent transactivator of both viral and cellular gene expression.Missing: mechanism seminal papers
[42]
HTLV-1 Tax and adult T-cell leukemia - PubMed - NIH
Jan 1, 2007 · Human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-1) is the etiological agent of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) and HTLV-1 associated ...
[43]
ADAM17 Mediates Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ...
Jul 13, 2006 · Although there are multiple EGFR ligands, HB-EGF has been intensively reported to be the key EGFR ligand responsible for EGFR transactivation ...Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
[44]
Unravelling the molecular complexity of GPCR‐mediated EGFR ...
Sep 2, 2013 · In this review, we describe the current view of GPCR–EGFR transactivation, identifying the established models of receptor cross-talk.
[45]
EGFR transactivation: mechanisms, pathophysiology and potential ...
Jun 20, 2017 · Angiotensin II triggers EGFR tyrosine kinase-dependent Ca2+ influx in afferent arterioles. Hypertension. 2002;40:700–6. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp ...
[46]
Cell-Surface Receptors Transactivation Mediated by G Protein ...
The ligand-independent mechanism suggests that GPCR stimulation triggers the activation of several second messengers such as Ca2+ ions, protein kinase C (PKC), ...
[47]
Cardiac GPCR-Mediated EGFR Transactivation - PubMed - NIH
Here, we discuss the mechanisms and impact of GPCR-mediated EGFR transactivation in the heart, focusing on angiotensin II, urotensin II, and β-adrenergic ...
[48]
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Transactivation - PubMed - NIH
The capacity of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists, such as angiotensin II (AngII), to promote EGFR signaling is called transactivation and is well ...
[49]
Persistent transactivation of EGFR and ErbB2/HER2 by protease ...
Jul 24, 2008 · We also show that PAR1 signaling through Galpha(i/o) and metalloprotease activity is critical for ErbB transactivation and cellular invasion.
[50]
Tissue kallikrein promotes prostate cancer cell migration and ...
In this study, we investigated the potential role of PAR(1) in mediating the effect of TK on cancer cell migration, invasion and proliferation. Our results show ...<|separator|>
[51]
The epidermal growth factor receptor system in skin repair ... - PubMed
In addition, the EGFR can be activated by transactivation from a variety of G-protein-coupled receptors, integrins, and cytokine receptors, so that it acts as ...Missing: wound healing
[52]
Transactivation of EGFR by LPS induces COX-2 expression in ...
May 31, 2012 · LPS induction of COX-2 requires Src-family kinase signaling while LPS transactivation of EGFR requires matrix metalloprotease (MMP) activity.
[53]
Matrix Metalloproteinase-7-Catalyzed Release of HB-EGF Mediates ...
These control experiments indicate that MMP inhibitors block release of EGFR ligands but do not block EGFR activation per se (that is, EGF stimulates p44/42 ...
[54]
An Alternative Mode of GPCR Transactivation: Activation of GPCRs ...
Jan 10, 2025 · Biased agonism is defined as the selective ability of different ligands (agonists) acting at the same GPCR to stabilize unique active ...
[55]
Transcriptional Activation by Tetracyclines in Mammalian Cells
A transcriptional transactivator was developed that fuses the VP16 activation domain with a mutant Tet repressor from Escherichia coli.
[56]
Optogenetics for transcriptional programming and genetic engineering
Jan 13, 2022 · Optogenetics combines genetics and biophotonics to enable noninvasive control of biological processes with high spatiotemporal precision.
[57]
Light-switchable transcription factors obtained by direct screening in ...
Jun 2, 2023 · Optogenetic tools can provide fine spatial and temporal control over many biological processes. Yet the development of new light-switchable ...
[58]
Engineering a synthetic gene circuit for high-performance inducible ...
Apr 17, 2024 · Here, we focus on an alternative strategy using quantitative synthetic biology to mitigate leakiness while maintaining high expression, without ...
[59]
Development of a liver‐specific Tet‐off AAV8 vector for improved ...
We have developed a single AAV8 vector with a Tet‐Off regulatable system as a safety mechanism to turn off insulin secretion should hypoglycaemia develop in ...
[60]
Targeting the NF-κB pathway as a potential regulator of immune ...
Feb 29, 2024 · The current review discussed the role of the NF-κB pathway as a tumor promoter, and how it can govern inflammatory responses and affect various immune ...Nf-κb Under A Magnifying... · Lag3 And Nf-κb Pathway In... · Nf-κb And The T-Cell...
[61]
Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing - PMC - NIH
The off-target effects occur when Cas9 acts on untargeted genomic sites and creates cleavages that may lead to adverse outcomes.
[62]
Bidirectional epigenetic editing reveals hierarchies in gene regulation
May 17, 2024 · In this study, we developed a system for bidirectional epigenetic editing, called CRISPRai, in which we apply activating (CRISPRa) and repressive (CRISPRi) ...
[63]
Epigenetic reactivation of tumor suppressor genes with CRISPRa ...
Apr 29, 2023 · Unlike epigenetic modifying drugs lacking locus selectivity, CRISPRa systems enable potent and precise reactivation of at least 4 TSGs tailored ...