Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Tritonal

Tritonal is a high explosive composition primarily used in military applications, consisting of 80% trinitrotoluene (TNT) and 20% powdered aluminum by weight, which enhances its blast and fragmentation effects compared to TNT alone. Developed during World War II as a castable and relatively insensitive filler for ordnance, it offers improved performance in air, underwater, and underground environments, with a typical density of 1.72 g/cm³, detonation velocity of approximately 6,250 m/s, and relative explosive power of 127% that of TNT in ballistic mortar tests. The addition of aluminum increases the total heat of explosion and sustains combustion, making Tritonal particularly effective for aerial bombs, artillery shells, torpedoes, depth charges, and shaped charges. It continues to be used in some modern aerial bombs and warheads. It is prepared by melting TNT at around 80–90°C, incorporating dry aluminum powder, and casting into munitions, resulting in a low-sensitivity material that withstands rifle bullet impacts without detonation in testing. Environmentally, Tritonal's TNT component has low water solubility (130 mg/L at 20 °C) and degrades via photolysis, hydrolysis, and biodegradation, producing potentially persistent byproducts like amino-dinitrotoluenes, while aluminum may oxidize and alter soil pH at contaminated sites.

Composition and Properties

Chemical Composition

Tritonal is a castable explosive mixture consisting primarily of 80% trinitrotoluene (TNT) by weight and 20% powdered aluminum. The aluminum powder typically features a particle size of 10-20 microns to optimize reactivity and dispersion within the matrix. TNT serves as the base explosive, offering chemical stability and reliable detonation initiation due to its relatively low sensitivity and consistent performance in high-explosive applications. The aluminum component functions as a fuel additive, enhancing overall blast energy by undergoing an exothermic oxidation reaction with available oxygen in the detonation products, thereby increasing the total heat release beyond that of pure TNT. The manufacturing process begins with melting at 80-90°C to form a liquid phase, followed by the addition of aluminum powder under continuous agitation to create a homogeneous and prevent . The mixture is then cooled and cast into munitions casings or desired shapes, with measures ensuring uniform aluminum dispersion to maintain consistent performance. While the 80:20 -to-aluminum ratio represents the standard formulation, minor variants incorporate small amounts of additives such as waxes to improve pourability during casting, though these do not significantly alter the dominant composition.

Physical and Explosive Properties

Tritonal exhibits a loaded of approximately 1.72 g/cm³, which is higher than that of pure (1.65 g/cm³) owing to the incorporation of aluminum that enhances packing efficiency. The of Tritonal typically ranges from 6,000 to 6,500 m/s, depending on charge diameter and loading conditions; for instance, measurements in 25.4 mm diameter charges yield around 6,050 m/s, increasing to 6,520 m/s in 50.8 mm diameter charges at 1.77 g/cm³ . In terms of energy release, Tritonal has a relative effectiveness (RE) factor of 1.10 compared to (set at 1.0) for air blast effects, reflecting the additional energy from aluminum combustion post-detonation. This contributes to a increase of about 10% over due to the rapid oxidation of aluminum, enhancing shattering power despite similar initial detonation pressures. Tritonal demonstrates moderate sensitivity, being more shock-sensitive than pure but less so than . The critical diameter for reliable detonation is approximately 25 mm, allowing propagation in moderately confined geometries. Regarding thermal stability, Tritonal begins to decompose exothermically around 185–300°C, influenced by the TNT component, with autoignition occurring at 270–450°C under adiabatic conditions. The approximate heat of explosion is 7.4 MJ/kg, derived from TNT's baseline of 4.2 MJ/kg augmented by the oxidation contribution of aluminum (yielding up to 31 MJ/kg for Al alone, though partial reaction limits the net gain).

Development and History

Invention and Early Development

Tritonal's conceptual origins trace back to the late , when the addition of aluminum to explosives like was first proposed by R. Escales in to boost power through enhanced combustion. This idea was formalized in a patent by Julius Roth in 1900 (German Patent 172,327), laying early groundwork for metallized s. Practical invention and development of Tritonal as a standardized military occurred during at , the U.S. Army's key facility for research in . Led by Army s seeking to enhance -based fills for munitions, the composition—80% and 20% flaked aluminum—was created to produce a castable high with superior effects, overcoming 's relatively low by leveraging aluminum's with atmospheric oxygen for afterburning. The initial purpose centered on aerial bombs and warheads, where greater fragmentation and cratering were needed without compromising melt-pourability. Predecessors included WWII-era experiments with TNT-aluminum mixtures, such as the British-developed (a 42% , 40% , 18% aluminum blend), which demonstrated aluminum's sensitization potential but was more complex; Tritonal simplified this for broader U.S. production. A 1953 study by researchers J. E. Abel and H. E. LaBeur at refined the formula for metallized explosives, confirming 18-20% aluminum as optimal and showing improved and blast performance over pure through cylinder expansion and power index evaluations. By the mid-1950s, Tritonal was fully documented in U.S. Army technical manuals.

Military Adoption and Evolution

Tritonal was developed during and adopted by the U.S. military for use in aerial bombs due to its enhanced blast effects from the aluminum content, which increases the overall energy release compared to pure . It saw widespread combat deployment during WWII and the (1950-1953), including in bombs such as the M117. By the early , it became the standard filling for general-purpose bombs in the Mark 80 series, including the 500-pound Mark 82, as part of efforts to improve explosive performance in unguided munitions. Continued widespread use occurred during the from 1965 onward, where it powered air-dropped ordnance in operations targeting North Vietnamese infrastructure and supply routes. Following its U.S. success, Tritonal saw adoption among allies in the 1970s as standardized Mark 80-series bombs were integrated into alliance inventories for interoperability in conventional air campaigns. In response, the developed comparable aluminized explosives, such as variants blending with aluminum powder in differing ratios, though these emphasized higher detonation velocities for artillery and rocket applications. A key demonstration of Tritonal's role came in 1972 during , where U.S. aircraft dropped thousands of tons of Mark 82 and larger bombs filled with the explosive to disrupt North Vietnamese logistics during their . In the , Tritonal underwent refinements to support the transition to precision-guided munitions, serving as the warhead fill in laser-guided variants like the series attached to Mark 80 bodies, enhancing accuracy while maintaining blast potency. By the 1991 , approximately 20% of U.S. ordnance consisted of Tritonal-loaded general-purpose bombs, contributing to coalition air strikes that neutralized Iraqi command centers and air defenses. Post-2000, partial replacements emerged with like PBXN-109 in new U.S. systems to reduce accidental detonation risks, though Tritonal persists in legacy stockpiles for its proven reliability in non-precision roles. U.S. production of new Tritonal ceased around 2010 amid environmental regulations targeting handling and waste, shifting focus to safer alternatives while existing inventories remain operational.

Uses and Applications

In Aerial Bombs and Warheads

Tritonal serves as the primary filler in a range of general-purpose aerial bombs weighing between 500 and 2,000 pounds, including the Mk 82 (500 lb class), Mk 84 (2,000 lb class), and BLU-109 hardened penetrator bomb. In the Mk 84, it provides up to 945 pounds of net weight, while the BLU-109 contains approximately 535 pounds of Tritonal, enabling effective and fragmentation effects against a variety of targets. It is also employed in certain shells and select warheads, contributing to their capacity in air-to-ground roles. The loading process for Tritonal in these munitions involves melt-pouring the directly into the casing after the has been installed, a that minimizes risk to sensitive components while ensuring a fill. This cast-loading method leverages Tritonal's melt temperature of around 80°C, allowing it to flow into complex casings without voids, followed by controlled cooling to achieve the desired density of about 1.72 g/cm³. Tritonal's higher density compared to pure permits the design of thinner bomb casings, thereby increasing the overall explosive payload within weight constraints and enhancing fragmentation efficiency. In contemporary applications as of 2025, Tritonal-filled legacy bombs like the Mk 84 are integrated with (JDAM) guidance kits to form precision-guided weapons such as the GBU-31, maintaining compatibility with modern aircraft while providing reliable explosive performance. These munitions have been exported to U.S. allies, including , for use in conflicts, notably during Yemen operations in the , where they were deployed in airstrikes against Houthi targets. Despite its versatility in blast-oriented warheads, Tritonal is not ideal for shaped charge applications due to its relatively lower velocity of —approximately 6,600 m/s—compared to HMX-based compositions exceeding 9,000 m/s, which limits jet formation and in anti-armor roles.

Performance Advantages Over Alternatives

Tritonal exhibits notable advantages over , primarily due to the incorporation of aluminum powder, which undergoes an afterburn reaction in the post- , releasing additional and enhancing overall blast effects. This results in greater air-blast compared to pure , as the sustained energy release from aluminum oxidation improves both propagation and burrowing capability in earth targets. When compared to Composition B (a 60/40 RDX/TNT mixture), Tritonal demonstrates similar sensitivity to impact and initiation while offering advantages in blast effects. Relative to modern polymer-bonded explosives (PBX), such as PBX-9011 or PBXN-109, Tritonal is inferior in terms of insensitivity to shock and unintended initiation, as PBX formulations incorporate desensitizing binders like polyurethane or fluoroelastomers. However, Tritonal's superior castability—enabled by its melt-pourable nature at around 80–90°C—facilitates efficient filling of large warhead casings with minimal voids, unlike the more complex pressing or extrusion required for PBX. Application of the Gurney equations predicts higher fragment velocities for Tritonal compared to TNT due to its greater energy content. Despite these benefits, Tritonal incurs higher material costs than alone due to the added aluminum (typically 10–20% more expensive per unit mass) and carries a drawback of potential incomplete in low-oxygen environments, such as deeply buried or detonations, where the aluminum afterburn is oxygen-limited, reducing overall yield compared to air- scenarios.

Safety and Handling

Hazards and Risks

Tritonal presents several inherent hazards during handling, , and potential accidental initiation, primarily stemming from its nature and the presence of aluminum . The mixture is highly sensitive to and , capable of producing a powerful upon ignition, with fragments potentially projected up to 1 mile (1.6 ). Additionally, the aluminum component introduces a of dust explosions when fine particles become airborne during processing or loading operations, as aluminum clouds can ignite explosively in the presence of an ignition source such as sparks or open flames. The sensitivity profile of Tritonal is similar to that of pure , with comparable thresholds for initiation by impact or friction, though specific values vary by formulation and testing conditions. Moisture exposure can lead to or reduced over time in humid environments, as aluminum may oxidize. Toxicological risks arise from exposure to both components during manufacturing or maintenance activities. of aluminum dust can cause respiratory irritation, (characterized by flu-like symptoms including cough and chest tightness), and chronic effects such as . Exposure to vapors or may result in liver damage, , and sensitization leading to ; the (OSHA) permissible exposure limit (PEL) for is 1.5 mg/m³ as an 8-hour time-weighted average (), with a skin notation due to its absorption potential. For aluminum, the OSHA PEL is 15 mg/m³ for total dust and 5 mg/m³ for respirable fraction over an 8-hour . Notable accidental incidents underscore these dangers. In the , a ignited by hot shoes on a led to the of multiple rail cars loaded with 500-pound Tritonal-filled bombs, resulting in a massive blast equivalent to several tons of and highlighting the risk of ignition from frictional heat or sparks during transport. Such events demonstrate how static sparks or improper handling can propagate to catastrophic detonation in confined or stacked munitions. Basic mitigation strategies focus on preventing ignition sources and exposure. Equipment must be grounded to dissipate , and non-sparking tools should be used during handling to avoid friction-induced sparks. Controlling relative humidity below 50% helps minimize static buildup, while engineering controls like and (e.g., respirators) reduce dust and vapor risks.

Storage and Disposal Procedures

Tritonal, classified as a UN 1.1D due to its potential for mass with and fragment hazards, must be stored in dedicated magazines with to prevent thermal instability, typically avoiding extremes that could cause exudation above 74°C or freezing. These facilities require separation from flammable materials and ignition sources to minimize fire risks during storage. For compatibility, Tritonal must be segregated from oxidizers, such as or , to avoid enhanced reactivity or spontaneous ignition, in accordance with Department of Defense explosives safety standards that prohibit co-storage of incompatible materials. Stacking heights must comply with standards to ensure and prevent pressure buildup, typically limited based on type and munition configuration. Disposal of surplus Tritonal follows open-pit protocols for bulk quantities, conducted under U.S. Environmental Protection Agency guidelines to ensure controlled destruction while minimizing air emissions and residue dispersal. For demilitarization, thermal treatment in specialized facilities at approximately 1,000°C neutralizes the component through oxidation while allowing recovery of aluminum particles from the residue for reuse. U.S. Department of Defense Directive 6055.9 requires annual visual inspections of Tritonal storage sites to verify compliance with safety criteria, including structural integrity and environmental controls. Internationally, the Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants imposes limits on unintentional environmental releases from such operations, mandating best available techniques to reduce byproducts like dioxins formed during thermal processes. In recent years, demilitarization practices have increasingly incorporated of metals, including aluminum, from residues where feasible, aligning with goals by processing recovered metal through and for industrial reuse.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Engineering Design Handbook: Explosives Series Properties of ...
    Apr 13, 2025 · Ammonium Nitrate. 21. Ammonium Perchlorate. 26. Ammonium Picrate—See. Explosive D. Baratol. 29. Baronal. 33. Black Powder.
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    TRITONAL - CAMEO Chemicals - NOAA
    A castable mixture of 20-40% aluminum and 80-60% TNT. Explosive, especially under exposure to heat or fire. Primary hazard is blast of an instantaneous ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  4. [4]
    Tritonal | C7H5AlN3O6+3 | CID 62079 - PubChem - NIH
    Tritonal appears as a castable mixture of 20-40% aluminum and 80-60% TNT. Explosive, especially under exposure to heat or fire.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  5. [5]
    [PDF] explosives and terminal ballistics - Government Attic
    Tritonal. The present composition is 80% TNT and 20% aluminum, but there is evi- dence that a 70/30 composition is more powerful. This explosive is somewhat ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Confined Combustion of TNT Explosion Products in Air
    In 1880, Nobel and Able [5] published their research on explosives. In 1881-2 Berthelot [6] with Vieille. [7] were the first to measure the detonation velocity ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Detonation Front Curvature Measurements and Aquarium Tests of ...
    Apr 1, 2003 · The samples shown are cylinders 1” (25.4mm) in diameter and 250mm long. Some. Tritonal charges were cast in two pieces and then glued together.
  8. [8]
    High Explosives Containing Ultrafine Aluminum ALEX - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · Aluminum fuel can react with free oxygen available in the explosive plasma formed upon detonation to produce aluminum oxide and significant ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] AD0692432.pdf - DTIC
    ABSTRACT: This report covers the evaluation of low cost aluminum alloy granules for use in aluminized explosives, i.e.. Tritonal, DESTEX and H-6.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  10. [10]
    Reduced sensitivity, melt-pourable tritonal replacements
    This melt-pourable explosive composition shares explosive properties comparable to those of Tritonal and is melt-pourable and castable under conditions ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  11. [11]
    [PDF] TNT Equivalence - OSTI.GOV
    The CJ pressure can be quite accurately estimatedwhen one knows the density and detonation velocity (Ref. 2), both obtained by rather simple straight ...Missing: stability | Show results with:stability
  12. [12]
    [PDF] unclassified ad number - DTIC
    Jan 17, 1984 · Tests were applied to TNT and TNT-based compositions including Composition B, Composition B-3, 75/25 Cyclotol, 70/30 Octol,. 75/25 Octol, 80/20 ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Hazardous Reactions of Aluminum Powder with Water in the ... - DTIC
    Aug 22, 1996 · Although aluminum powder has been successfully used in propellant, explosive and pyrotechnic. (PEP) for generations, there are hazards ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Small-Scale Testing of High Bulk Cubical and Spherical ... - DTIC
    (tritonal/SNQ and tritonal/. HBCNQ) attained ideal ... were thermal stability, critical diameter, detonation velocity and pressure, shock sensitivity, and.Missing: physical | Show results with:physical
  15. [15]
    [PDF] METALLIZED EXPLOSIVES - DTIC
    Jun 6, 2019 · The addition of 20 percent cf selected metals, alloys or metallic compounds as a direct replacement for the aluminum in 8o/20 Tritonal, rather ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] MILITARY EXPLOSIVES - Bulletpicker
    Scope а. This manual contains information and data pertaining to the chemistry, physics, manufacture, properties, identification, handling,.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] 9546041.pdf - Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
    ... used in the selection of particular compounds among the many explosive compounds are covered. Chapter 6 contains a description of the tests used to evaluate ...<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    [PDF] An Aerodynamic Database for the Mk 82 General Purpose Low Drag ...
    The trajectory and subsequent impact point of the bomb released by the aircraft weapon system depend on many factors: free stream aerodynamic characteristics, ...Missing: military adoption<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Aircraft bombs | Rheinmetall
    Rheinmetall produces the full MK80 series bombs (MK82, MK83, MK84) and also offers an enhanced MK-EP bomb and the BLU-109 hardened penetration bomb.Missing: adoption 1960
  20. [20]
    [PDF] EXPLOSIVE WEAPON EFFECTS - GICHD
    Jul 20, 2006 · The five weapon systems reviewed are 122 mm multi barrel rocket launchers,. 81-120 mm mortars, 152-155 mm artillery guns, 115-125 mm tank guns ...
  21. [21]
    1972 - Operation Linebacker I - Air Force Historical Support Division
    Laser-guided bombs proved effective, especially against bridges, severing the bridge at Thanh Hoa, which had survived Rolling Thunder, and the highway and ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Precision Guided Munitions: Constructing a Bomb More Potent Than ...
    Sep 5, 2002 · This dissertation discusses precision guided munitions and constructing a bomb more potent than the A-bomb.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Gulf War Air Power Survey. Volume 4. Weapons, Tactics, and ... - DTIC
    The Gulf War Air Power Survey was commissioned on 22 August 1991 to review all aspects of air warfare In the Persian Gulf for use by the. United States Air ...
  24. [24]
    Progress continues on safer, 500-pound bomb | Article - Army.mil
    Oct 1, 2014 · PICATINNY ARSENAL, N.J. - The U.S. armed services, which aim to achieve widespread use of safer munitions less prone to accidental ...Missing: Tritonal | Show results with:Tritonal
  25. [25]
    [PDF] 693512 - US EPA
    A Superfund Site constitutes an area that is contaminated with hazardous substances at levels that may present a threat to human health or the environment.
  26. [26]
    MK84 - Dumb Bombs - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jul 7, 2011 · H-6 or Tritonal. Fuze, Variety of mechanical or electrical. Stabilizer, BSU-50 AIR MK-84 Conical Fin. Contractor/Manufacturer. Unit Cost, $3,100.
  27. [27]
    Explosives - Compounds - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jul 7, 2011 · Explosive (NEW) 535 lbs. Tritonal in the BLU-109 and 945 lbs. of Tritonal on the MK 84. The Munitions Directorate's successful completion of the ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] AMMUNITION LOADING TECHNIQUES - DTIC
    2. All standard present day melt-loaded explosives melt at a temperature of about 1760F {00oC). However, the optimum casting or loading ...Missing: manufacturing | Show results with:manufacturing
  29. [29]
    Guided Bomb Unit-10 (GBU-10) Paveway II - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jun 12, 2017 · The GBU-10 consists of an MK-84 2,000 pound bomb with an added laser guidance package. ... Tritonal [MK 84]. Fuze, FMU-81 N/T. Range, 8 nautical ...
  30. [30]
    Yemen: US-Made Bombs Used in Unlawful Airstrikes
    Dec 8, 2016 · Since March 2015, the UK has approved £3.3 billion in military sales to Saudi Arabia, according to the London-based Campaign Against Arms Trade.Missing: tritonal | Show results with:tritonal<|separator|>
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    Some Sensitivity and Performance Characteristics of the Explosives ...
    Tritonal explosives · Aluminized explosives · H-6 explosives · Performance · Sensitivity · Firing tests(Ordnance) · Cylindrical bodies · Impact tests ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] An Ingredient for Use in Low Sensitivity Melt Cast Formulations - DTIC
    2,4-Dinitroanisole (DNAN) is a promising alternative that prima facie appears to possess adequate properties and, by virtue of reduced sensitivity, may enable ...
  34. [34]
    None
    ### Summary of Tritonal and Related Explosives from Technical Paper No. 12
  35. [35]
    Initial Fragment Velocity for Cylindrical Charge - vCalc
    May 21, 2025 · Gurney Constant (√2E), m/s. Compostion B, 2,774. Composition C4, 2,530 ... 2,402. Tetryl, 2,499. TNT, 2,438. Tritonal, 2,316. Resource: "Formulae ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] ALUMINUM HAZARD SUMMARY IDENTIFICATION ... - NJ.gov
    OSHA: The legal airborne permissible exposure limit. (PEL) is 15 mg/m3 for total dust and 5 mg/m3 for respirable dust averaged over an 8-hour workshift. NIOSH: ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Lessons Learned from 5 Decades of Aluminium Dust Explosions
    Handling such a hazardous material presents challenges to manufacturers such as AMG to ensure the fire and explosion risks are suitably controlled. Owing to the ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Outdoor Weathering and Dissolution of TNT and Tritonal - DTIC
    Low-order detonations of military munitions scatter cm-sized chunks of high-explosives onto military range soils, where rainfall can dissolve and then ...
  39. [39]
    2,4,6-TRINITROTOLUENE | Occupational Safety and Health Administration
    ### Summary of OSHA PEL and Health Effects for TNT
  40. [40]
    2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene - IDLH | NIOSH - CDC
    Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health Concentrations (IDLH) · CAS number: 118–96–7 · NIOSH REL: 0.5 mg/m3 TWA [skin] · Current OSHA PEL: 1.5 mg/m3 TWA [skin].Missing: m3 | Show results with:m3
  41. [41]
    [PDF] southern pacific transportation company roseville, calif april 28 ...
    Apr 28, 2025 · (a) May 27, 1967, explosion of a 750-lb. tritonal bomb at Naval Weapons Station, Concord, California. (b) The "recent accidents" referred to in ...Missing: aerial | Show results with:aerial
  42. [42]
    [PDF] DOD Contractor's Safety Manual For Ammunition and Explosives
    Mar 13, 2008 · Closed systems should be used to control dust, humidity ... used in their production are highly susceptible to initiation by static electricity, ...
  43. [43]
    Humidifiers for Eliminating Static Electricity | Industrial Humidification
    By keeping the humidity at 55%RH the moisture content of the air is a natural conductor and earths any potential static charge.Missing: Tritonal | Show results with:Tritonal
  44. [44]
    [PDF] dod contractors' safety manual for ammunition and explosives
    Use closed systems as much as possible for dust, humidity, and tramp material control. ... Static electricity control measures shall be used to dissipate static ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods - UNECE
    ... classification and labelling of chemicals which are applicable under various regulatory regimes, e.g.: transport; workplace safety; consumer protection ...
  46. [46]
  47. [47]
    49 CFR 177.848 -- Segregation of hazardous materials. - eCFR
    Oxidizers ... (2) The letter “X” in the table indicates that explosives of different compatibility groups may not be carried on the same transport vehicle.
  48. [48]
    [PDF] DoD 6055.09-STD, February 29, 2008 - Training Command
    Feb 29, 2008 · It establishes uniform safety standards applicable to ammunition and explosives throughout their life-cycle, to protect associated personnel and ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] EPA REgion 3 Open Burning Open Detonation Permit Guidelines ...
    Open detonation to treat waste explosives and certain munition items typically has been conducted directly on the ground surface, in open pits or trenches, or ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Alternative Treatment Technologies to Open Burning and Open ...
    Dec 11, 2019 · This report identifies alternative treatment technologies to open burning and open detonation (OB/OD) of energetic hazardous wastes.
  51. [51]
    [PDF] DoD Ammunition and Explosives Safety Standards. - DTIC
    This Standard is issued under the authority of DoD Directive 6055.9, "DoD Explosives Safety. Board (DDESB) and DoD Component Explosives Safety Responsibilities, ...
  52. [52]
  53. [53]
    Demilitarization - Munirem Environmental
    The scrap metals are decontaminated to MDAS (5X) level of decontamination, allowing for the scrap metals to be recycled at metal recycling facilities or ...