Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

General Concept

Definition

Turnaround time (TAT), also known as turnaround, is the total elapsed time from the of a request, task, or to its completion and the delivery of the resulting output or service. This metric captures the full duration of the cycle, including all phases such as submission, queuing, execution, and finalization, providing a holistic measure of . It overlaps with but is distinct from related metrics: unlike cycle time, which focuses on active processing duration, or , which encompasses the entire order-to-delivery period, TAT emphasizes the end-to-end fulfillment from to availability. The term originated in the mid-20th century, with its earliest recorded use in in and operational contexts, particularly in and where it described the time needed to complete a operational cycle, such as a ship's handling. Over time, it evolved from these specialized applications to a broader metric applied in diverse fields like , healthcare, and , emphasizing the minimization of delays to enhance productivity. In general terms, TAT can be calculated using the formula TAT = Completion Time - Submission Time, where submission time marks the point of initiation (e.g., when a request is received) and completion time indicates when the output is ready for delivery. This straightforward difference accounts for every intermediate stage without isolating individual components, making it a versatile baseline for assessing overall performance across processes.

Importance Across Disciplines

Turnaround time (TAT) plays a pivotal role in enhancing across diverse sectors by minimizing delays in process execution, thereby optimizing and fostering predictable workflows. By reducing bottlenecks, organizations can achieve smoother operations, lower costs, and higher throughput, which directly contributes to improved through timely service delivery. Furthermore, shorter TAT enhances competitiveness by enabling faster response to market demands and superior performance compared to rivals with longer processing cycles. These benefits extend to general process management, where TAT reduction promotes waste elimination and scalable productivity without compromising quality. The cross-disciplinary impact of TAT is evident in its influence on overall system performance, tracing back to its historical evolution in . Post-World War efficiency studies emphasized optimizing production cycles to rebuild economies, contributing to the development of key metrics in and management sciences. This foundation evolved into the digital era, where principles of measurement adapted to and service-oriented processes, underscoring versatility in assessing end-to-end performance amid technological advancements. As a (KPI) in methodologies, TAT integrates seamlessly into frameworks aimed at continuous improvement, providing a quantifiable measure of agility and effectiveness. approaches leverage TAT to identify non-value-adding activities, ensuring alignment with goals like just-in-time production and overall waste reduction. For example, in healthcare, reduced TAT for lab results correlates with shorter lengths of stay.

Computing

Meaning in Batch Systems

In batch processing systems, which emerged in the late and became prominent during the with mainframe computers, turnaround time served as a key metric for evaluating the efficiency of non-interactive job queues. These early systems, such as IBM's IBSYS and the Monitor System, automated the sequential execution of multiple jobs submitted via punched cards or tape, addressing the limitations of manual program loading on previous generations of computers. This historical context arose in environments like the series introduced in 1964, where minimized operator intervention and processor idle time during I/O operations. In operating systems supporting , turnaround time specifically measures the end-to-end duration of job processing in environments, including multiprogramming setups where multiple programs reside in to overlap and I/O. It quantifies the from job submission to the availability of output, capturing delays inherent to queued execution on centralized mainframes. This metric was essential for assessing system performance in non-interactive scenarios, where users submitted jobs remotely and awaited results without feedback. For example, in a typical batch queue on a 1960s mainframe, a program's turnaround time encompasses the wait in the job queue, followed by its execution on a shared CPU, and finally the generation and delivery of output, often spanning minutes to hours depending on queue length and system load.

Components and Calculation

In batch processing systems within computing, turnaround time (TAT) consists primarily of two components: waiting time and execution time. Waiting time represents the delay a job experiences in the ready queue before it receives CPU allocation, often due to other jobs occupying the processor. Execution time, also termed burst time or service time, denotes the actual duration needed to complete the job's CPU and I/O processing requirements. While response time in interactive contexts may partially overlap with these elements by focusing on initial feedback, in batch environments, TAT fully captures the end-to-end duration from job submission to completion. The calculation of TAT follows the TAT = Waiting Time + Execution Time, where waiting time is derived as TAT minus execution time, or equivalently, completion time minus arrival time minus execution time. This approach stems from basic principles applied to operating system scheduling, where jobs form a and are serviced sequentially. For instance, under First-Come, First-Served (FCFS) scheduling—a common non-preemptive in batch systems—jobs are executed in arrival order, leading to straightforward TAT computations via a timeline. Consider a simple FCFS example with three jobs (P1, P2, P3) all arriving at time 0 milliseconds and having execution times of 24 ms, 3 ms, and 3 ms, respectively. The schedule proceeds as: P1 from 0 to 24 ms, P2 from 24 to 27 ms, and P3 from 27 to 30 ms. Completion times are thus 24 ms for P1, 27 ms for P2, and 30 ms for P3. TAT values are 24 ms (24 - 0), 27 ms (27 - 0), and 30 ms (30 - 0), yielding an average TAT of 27 ms. Waiting times are 0 ms for P1, 24 ms for P2 (27 - 3), and 27 ms for P3 (30 - 3), confirming the additive relationship with execution times. Several factors unique to computing environments influence these components, particularly waiting time. System load, defined by the arrival rate of jobs relative to processing capacity, increases queue lengths and thus elevates waiting times under high utilization, as per models like M/M/1 queues. Priority levels in scheduling algorithms can defer lower-priority jobs, extending their waiting periods regardless of arrival order. , such as competition for I/O devices or memory, further prolongs execution time by introducing additional delays beyond pure CPU bursts.

Comparisons with Other Metrics

Turnaround time (TAT) in computing systems provides a comprehensive measure of job completion duration, distinguishing it from response time, which focuses solely on the interval from request submission to the initial output or acknowledgment. While response time is critical in interactive environments to ensure user-perceived , TAT includes all waiting periods in queues, execution time, and I/O delays, making it more suitable for evaluating overall system efficiency in . In contrast to throughput, which assesses productivity by counting the number of completed jobs per unit time, TAT emphasizes individual job and is less concerned with output rates. High throughput might coexist with elevated TAT if long-running jobs dominate the , whereas optimizing TAT, as in non-preemptive scheduling, can sometimes reduce overall productivity. CPU utilization, measuring the fraction of time the is actively executing instructions, complements TAT but overlooks -induced ; a with 100% utilization could still exhibit poor TAT due to unbalanced . These metrics guide scheduler design, with TAT often prioritized in algorithms like Shortest Job First (SJF), which minimizes average TAT by executing the shortest jobs first when burst times are known, achieving provable optimality for non-preemptive cases. However, SJF's favoritism toward short jobs can starve longer ones, inflating their TAT and worsening response times compared to fairer policies like , which balance TAT against equitable access. In batch-oriented use cases, such as scientific computing, TAT's holistic inclusion of waits makes it preferable over throughput for user satisfaction, though it requires accurate job length predictions to avoid drawbacks like convoy effects in FCFS scheduling. Early operating system studies in the employed TAT for evaluating scheduler performance in multi-user environments, revealing trade-offs where minimizing TAT improved but demanded careful priority adjustments to prevent excessive waits.

Business and Manufacturing

Applications in Production Processes

In business contexts, turnaround time (TAT) for measures the elapsed period from receiving a customer request to shipping the product, encompassing , picking, , and dispatch activities. This application is vital in sectors like and , where shorter TAT directly influences customer loyalty and repeat business by meeting expectations for prompt delivery. For instance, , average TAT typically spans 1 to 2 days before shipping for domestic orders, allowing businesses to balance speed with cost in competitive markets. In , TAT specifically denotes the total duration required to convert raw materials into , incorporating all stages such as , , , quality checks, and any associated setup or unplanned . This metric highlights bottlenecks in operational workflows, enabling manufacturers to assess overall from input to output. Setup times, which involve preparing machinery for new runs, and from or failures, can significantly extend TAT. A seminal example of TAT application in manufacturing is the automotive industry's adoption of assembly line techniques pioneered by Henry Ford in the early 20th century. Before the moving assembly line introduced at Ford's Highland Park plant in 1913, assembling a single Model T automobile required more than 12 hours of labor per vehicle, limited by stationary workflows and sequential manual tasks. The innovation reduced this TAT to about 90 minutes per vehicle by 1914, through continuous flow production that synchronized worker movements and minimized idle periods, revolutionizing mass manufacturing scalability.

Optimization Techniques

In and , optimization techniques for reducing turnaround time (TAT) build on by targeting elimination, variation, and to enhance efficiency and responsiveness. focuses on eliminating non-value-adding activities, such as excess and waiting times, to streamline flows and shorten TAT. By identifying and removing muda (), principles enable manufacturers to achieve smoother operations and reduced cycle times. For instance, a study in machine building applied tools to minimize non-value-adding time, resulting in a 37.74% reduction in such activities and an overall improvement of 23.66%. Six Sigma employs the DMAIC framework—Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control—to systematically address TAT reduction through data-driven analysis of process defects and variations. In manufacturing settings, DMAIC helps pinpoint bottlenecks in production lines, leading to targeted improvements that lower TAT while improving quality. A case in railcar bogie assembly used Lean Six Sigma DMAIC to optimize assembly processes, reducing defects and enhancing flow efficiency. Just-in-time (JIT) inventory management synchronizes material deliveries with production needs, minimizing stock holding and associated delays to cut TAT. JIT reduces the time materials spend in storage, allowing for faster throughput and lower lead times by aligning supply with demand. Research shows JIT can shorten lead times by enabling pull-based production, with implementations demonstrating improved TAT through reduced inventory levels. Key tools for these techniques include events, which involve short, focused workshops to implement rapid improvements in specific production areas, and (VSM), which visualizes the entire production flow to identify TAT variances caused by uneven processes or delays. events foster continuous improvement by engaging teams in on-the-spot changes, while VSM quantifies TAT variance by mapping value-added versus non-value-added time, enabling targeted reductions in process fluctuations. For example, VSM has been used to reduce cycle times in by highlighting and eliminating variability in steps. Post-2000 case studies illustrate these techniques' impact in . In a global coatings manufacturer's implementation of and VSM, was reduced by 60% through process optimization and inventory cuts, demonstrating scalable TAT improvements without heavy reliance. In electronics , post-2000 adoptions of and , such as streamlined assembly lines, have achieved TAT reductions of up to 50% by integrating and to handle high-volume production variability. As of 2025, advancements in Industry 4.0, including AI-driven and for real-time monitoring, further optimize TAT by reducing unplanned by up to 50% in smart factories.

Logistics and Supply Chain

Vehicle and Shipment Handling

In logistics and , turnaround time (TAT) for vehicle and shipment handling specifically denotes the period from a vehicle's arrival at a —such as a , , or —to its departure after completing necessary operations. This includes unloading , inspecting goods, reloading for the next leg, and any associated or checks. The focus is on minimizing idle time to enhance throughput and reduce operational costs, distinguishing it from broader transit durations. In trucking operations, TAT measures the efficiency of dock and yard activities, where delays can cascade into supply chain bottlenecks. For instance, optimal benchmarks target under 30 minutes for trucks at distribution centers, reflecting high-efficiency standards that balance speed with safety and accuracy in handling. In shipping, particularly at ports, container vessel TAT involves coordinated crane operations and customs clearance; globally, the median TAT for container ships averaged about 17 hours in 2018, though it can extend to 24-48 hours at congested facilities due to berthing queues and volume surges. More recent data from the 2024 Container Port Performance Index indicate that average time in port for container ships has risen, exceeding 12 hours in developing countries and 8 hours in developed ones, amid ongoing global disruptions. Standard industry metrics emphasize TAT as a key , with frameworks promoting reductions through compensation rules for excessive waiting during loading or unloading. Updated regulations from 2022 entitle carriers to reimbursement after —typically 1-2 hours—incurring penalties like €100 per additional hour in some member states; in 2025, Italy's Law 105 further reinforced these measures with a 90-minute before €100 per hour compensation applies, aiming to keep truck TAT below 2 hours for seamless cross-border flows. These benchmarks, drawn from sources like the International Road Transport Union, underscore TAT's role in fostering resilient networks.

Influencing Factors

Several factors influence turnaround time (TAT) in and , including limitations, regulatory hurdles, environmental conditions, and technological integrations. These variables can extend or shorten the duration required for vehicles and shipments to complete loading, unloading, and processing at key nodes like ports, warehouses, and distribution centers. Infrastructure constraints, such as limited availability and port congestion, directly prolong TAT by creating bottlenecks in vessel or berthing and cargo handling. For instance, high demand for berths during peak seasons can delay ship turnaround by hours or days, exacerbating overall slowdowns. Similarly, insufficient docking facilities hinder efficient vehicle processing, leading to queuing and idle time. Regulatory processes, particularly customs clearance, introduce variability in TAT through requirements for documentation, inspections, and compliance checks at international borders. Delays often arise from incomplete paperwork or heightened scrutiny on high-risk shipments, which can add several days to transit times and disrupt downstream flows. In cross-border operations, these factors compound with varying national policies, further extending TAT for global shipments. Weather disruptions pose unpredictable challenges to TAT, as storms, fog, or extreme conditions can halt maritime, road, or air transport operations. Heavy rains or hurricanes, for example, force port closures or rerouting, significantly prolonging vessel TAT, sometimes by days or more, in affected regions. Such events also amplify risks in vehicle handling by slowing loading processes and raising safety concerns. Technological advancements, such as RFID tracking, mitigate TAT by enabling visibility and in operations. RFID systems reduce manual scanning errors and speed up verification at docks and warehouses, potentially cutting processing times by 15-25% through faster and shipment . This technology supports quicker during disruptions, enhancing overall efficiency from supplier handover to final . In extended supply chains, TAT for inventory replenishment from supplier to warehouse is particularly sensitive to variability and transportation reliability. Delays in supplier delivery or internal logistics can extend replenishment cycles, leading to stockouts or excess holding costs if not anticipated through robust forecasting. Factors like inconsistent carrier performance and route inefficiencies further inflate this TAT, emphasizing the need for synchronized planning across the chain. Global disruptions in the , such as the 2021 Suez Canal blockage caused by the grounding of the container ship, dramatically illustrated these influences by halting traffic for nearly a week and forcing reroutes that added weeks to overall shipping transit times worldwide. This event disrupted over 400 vessels and increased transit times by up to 10-14 days for Asia-Europe routes, highlighting the cascading effects of chokepoint vulnerabilities on supply chains, including potential downstream delays in port handling.

Healthcare

Laboratory Testing

In clinical laboratory testing, turnaround time (TAT) refers to the duration from specimen accessioning—when the sample is received and logged in the —to the and of results to the . This metric is crucial for timely diagnostics, enabling prompt treatment decisions in healthcare settings. TAT is typically categorized into (urgent) tests, which require results within minutes to hours for critical conditions like emergencies, and routine tests, which allow longer intervals for non-urgent cases such as outpatient screenings. Variations in definition exist, but most measure TAT from sample receipt to result dispatch to ensure consistency in performance evaluation. The TAT process in laboratories is divided into three primary phases: pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical. The pre-analytical phase encompasses specimen collection, labeling, transportation to the lab, , and accessioning, which can account for up to 60-70% of total TAT delays due to errors like mislabeling or transport issues. The analytical phase involves the actual performance of the test on automated analyzers or methods, representing the core execution time, often the shortest segment in labs with high-throughput equipment. Finally, the post-analytical phase includes result validation by technologists, checks, reporting, and delivery to electronic health records, where bottlenecks such as verification can extend timelines. These phases highlight opportunities for to streamline workflows and reduce overall TAT. Laboratory standards emphasize efficient TAT to support clinical care, with recent benchmarks targeting 90% of routine tests completed within from receipt to reporting for common assays like complete blood counts and biochemical profiles in high-throughput settings, though longer goals like 24 hours persist for some outpatient routine tests. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) provides guidelines for total testing process management, including TAT monitoring through documents like GP26-A, which stress minimizing pre- and post-analytical errors to achieve reliable timelines, though specific numerical targets vary by test complexity. During the , TAT for viral testing faced significant surges, with initial median times exceeding 20 hours due to high volumes, but optimizations like point-of-care platforms reduced this to under 6 hours in some high-capacity labs, underscoring the impact of scalable infrastructure on diagnostic responsiveness.

Patient Care Processes

In patient care processes, turnaround time (TAT) refers to the duration from initial admission or presentation to the initiation of , , or , encompassing multiple stages of healthcare beyond isolated diagnostics. This is crucial for evaluating in clinical workflows, ensuring timely interventions that can improve outcomes and . For instance, in departments, TAT often measures the interval from arrival (door time) to first provider contact or departure, integrating elements like , , and . Similarly, in surgical settings, it tracks the time from completion to readiness for the next case, influencing overall throughput. A key application of TAT in emergency rooms is the door-to-doctor time, which represents the period from patient arrival to initial evaluation by a or advanced practitioner, with targets often aiming for under 30 minutes to minimize delays in critical care. The U.S. (CMS) monitors TAT through metrics like median time from arrival to departure for admitted or discharged patients, where targets for discharged patients often aim for under 4 hours to align with guidelines and reduce overcrowding risks. In surgical contexts, turnaround time is defined as the interval between the previous patient's exit from the operating room (wheels out) to the next patient's entry (wheels in), typically targeted at 30-45 minutes to optimize room utilization and scheduling; studies show that streamlining cleaning, equipment setup, and staff handoffs can reduce this by up to 20 minutes per case. Patient care TAT may incorporate turnaround as a subprocess, such as awaiting test results during assessment, but focuses holistically on the end-to-end journey. The advent of telemedicine in the has significantly reduced TAT in outpatient care by eliminating travel and wait times, with implementations showing decreases in overall visit durations from 4 hours to 2.5 hours in multidisciplinary settings and up to 37.5% reductions in referral wait times. This shift, accelerated by the , allows for virtual consultations that expedite follow-ups and routine monitoring, though challenges include ensuring equitable access and integrating virtual TAT into broader hospital metrics without compromising care quality.

References

  1. [1]
    TURNAROUND TIME definition | Cambridge English Dictionary
    Oct 29, 2025 · the amount of time taken for something to happen after a vehicle, an instruction, or an order for goods arrives at a place: Turnaround time ...
  2. [2]
    Understanding Turnaround Time: A Comprehensive Guide - Six Sigma
    May 22, 2024 · Turnaround time, or TAT for short, measures the duration between a process starting and finishing. It encompasses a task's full lifespan.
  3. [3]
    Operating Systems: CPU Scheduling
    Turnaround time - Time required for a particular process to complete, from submission time to completion. ( Wall clock time. ) Waiting time - How much time ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Scheduling: Introduction - cs.wisc.edu
    Thus, if we knew job lengths, and that jobs only used the CPU, and our only metric was turnaround time, STCF would be a great policy. In fact, for a number of ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Scheduling Processes
    Turnaround time: The length of time it takes to run a process from initialization to termination, including all the waiting time. • Waiting time: The total ...
  6. [6]
    Turnaround Time (TAT): Difference in Concept for Laboratory ... - NIH
    Defining Turnaround Time​​ TAT can be defined as “Period for completing a processcycle, commonly expressed as an average of previous such periods” [4]. The term ...
  7. [7]
    Turnaround Time in Logistics: Definition, Importance, and How to ...
    Feb 27, 2025 · Turnaround Time (TAT) measures how long it takes to complete a process from start to finish. Logistics includes the time from arrival to departure and crucial ...
  8. [8]
    Turnaround Time: A Comprehensive Guide - Energy Robotics
    Aug 20, 2024 · Turnaround Time in Manufacturing: This refers to the duration required to transform raw materials into finished products, encompassing the ...
  9. [9]
    What is Turnaround Time (TAT) in Aviation? TAT Meaning - Isarsoft
    Jun 1, 2024 · The Turnaround Time (TAT) in Aviation is the time of the turn-round process from reaching parking position (AIBT, Actual In Block Time) to leaving parking ...
  10. [10]
    What is Turn Around Time - ProHance
    Turnaround time (TAT) refers to the period between the initiation and completion of a process or task. It is a critical metric used across various industries.
  11. [11]
    Turnaround Time (TAT) - Meaning, Formula, Vs Waiting Time
    Dec 30, 2022 · Turnaround time (TAT) is the time taken to complete a process. It is measured as the duration between an order request and the task completion (execution).
  12. [12]
    turnaround time, n. meanings, etymology and more
    The earliest known use of the noun turnaround time is in the 1940s. OED's earliest evidence for turnaround time is from 1946, in the Sun (Baltimore). Nearby ...
  13. [13]
    How To Compute the Turnaround Time? - Baeldung
    Jul 6, 2024 · Turnaround time is simply the total time a process spends in the system, whereas completion time is the point in time when the process ...4. Calculating Turnaround... · 4.1. Illustrative Example · 5. Factors Affecting...
  14. [14]
    Turnaround Time: An Efficacy Measure for Medical Laboratories - PMC
    Sep 6, 2022 · With a reduced delivery period, monthly throughput can be doubled. · Physicians can respond to reports more quickly, thanks to shortened ...
  15. [15]
    Reduce Lead Time: Strategies and Benefits Explained - Intuendi
    Dec 23, 2024 · Reducing lead time is vital in competitive markets, as it leads to faster response times, improved customer satisfaction, and a stronger competitive edge.
  16. [16]
    How Cycle Time Reduction Improves Operational Efficiency
    Jul 10, 2024 · Systematically reducing cycle times, enables you to significantly boost productivity, lower costs, improve quality, and enhance customer satisfaction.
  17. [17]
    Historical Development of Industrial Engineering
    After World War II, Industrial Engineering saw rapid advancements with the development of new methodologies and tools. The introduction of Operations Research, ...
  18. [18]
    The Evolution of Industrial Engineering: Past, Present, and Future
    Additionally, the advent of assembly line techniques marked a turning point in industrial engineering. Introduced by Henry Ford in the early 1900s, the assembly ...
  19. [19]
    Lean and Process Improvement | NIST
    Jun 4, 2020 · Benefits of this lean manufacturing principle include increased productivity, reduced lead time, reduced inventory and faster resolution to ...
  20. [20]
    Reduction in laboratory turnaround time decreases emergency room ...
    Apr 20, 2018 · Rapid turnaround of laboratory tests can optimize ED throughout by reducing the length of stay (LOS) and improving patient outcomes.
  21. [21]
    Big Ideas in the History of Operating Systems - Paul Krzyzanowski
    Aug 26, 2025 · The problem being addressed was processor idle time. Even with batch processing, CPUs were often waiting for I/O operations to complete.Missing: turnaround | Show results with:turnaround
  22. [22]
    Mainframe History: How Mainframe Computers Have Evolved
    Jul 26, 2024 · Learn about mainframe history in this quick synopsis of major developments for these computer powerhouses from their launch through today.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Chapter 6: CPU Scheduling - FSU Computer Science
    Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition. Turnaround Time Varies With The Time Quantum. 80% of CPU bursts should be shorter than q. Page 24. 6.24. Silberschatz ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Process Scheduling - Clemson University
    Feb 20, 2015 · Older batch processing systems had run-to-completion schedulers where a ... Turnaround time is the elapsed time between the time the job ...
  25. [25]
    Operating Systems: CPU Scheduling
    For example, the following Gantt chart is based upon these process burst times and priorities, and yields an average waiting time of 8.2 ms: Process, Burst Time ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] CPU Scheduling - Stanford Secure Computer Systems Group
    - Waiting time – time each proc waits in ready queue. 4/36. Example: FCFS Scheduling. • Run jobs in order that they arrive. - Called “First-come first-served” ( ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    [PDF] A Short Introduction to Queueing Theory
    Jul 21, 1999 · Queueing Theory tries to answer questions like e.g. the mean waiting time in the queue, the mean system response time (waiting time in the queue ...Missing: turnaround components
  28. [28]
    [PDF] CPU Scheduling - CS@Cornell
    Turnaround time: How long? • User-perceived time to complete some job. Response time: When does it start? • ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Chapter 5: CPU Scheduling - FSU Computer Science
    • Turnaround time: the time to execute a particular process. • from the ... time, waiting time, and response time. • Different systems optimize different ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Chapter 6: CPU Scheduling - GMU CS Department
    CPU utilization – keep the CPU as busy as possible. Throughput – # of processes that complete their execution per time unit. Turnaround time – amount of ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] CPU Scheduling - Stanford Secure Computer Systems Group
    Shortest-job first (SJF) attempts to minimize TT. • Two schemes: - nonpreemptive – once CPU given to the process it cannot be.Missing: operating | Show results with:operating
  32. [32]
    [PDF] CPU Scheduling - CS@Cornell
    Would another schedule improve avg turnaround time? Shortest Job First (SJF). Average Turnaround Time: (1+3+6+10+15)/5 ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] THE EVOLUTION OF OPERATING SYSTEMS - CiteSeerX
    Fortunately this does not happen often but when it does, it ruins the turnaround time. ... The Unix time-sharing system. Communi- cations of the ACM 17, 7 ...
  34. [34]
    Order Fulfillment Cycle Time: What It Is and How To Improve It (2024)
    Nov 26, 2024 · What is the average order fulfillment cycle time? For US-based stores shipping to US customers, typical fulfillment takes three to five days.Benefits of improving order... · Factors affecting order... · Ways to improve order...
  35. [35]
    Assembly Line Revolution | Articles - Ford Motor Company
    Sep 3, 2020 · The moving assembly line changed the way automobiles are made. The $5 day brought workers to this new method of building cars.Missing: turnaround | Show results with:turnaround
  36. [36]
    Essence of Lean – Eliminating Waste (Muda) | Lean Production
    Lean manufacturing's core idea is to relentlessly eliminate waste, anything that does not add value from the customer's perspective.Missing: turnaround | Show results with:turnaround
  37. [37]
    Production lead time improvement through lean manufacturing
    Feb 22, 2022 · The study aims to improve the production lead time by minimizing non-value adding activities associated with several resources in the process.Missing: turnaround | Show results with:turnaround
  38. [38]
    Application of lean Six Sigma methodology using DMAIC approach ...
    This study employs the Lean Six Sigma (LSS) approach for process improvement of the railcar bogie assembly process.Research Article · 3. Methodology · 3.8. Improvement Phase...
  39. [39]
    https://www.gocubic.io/glossary/turnaround-time
  40. [40]
    Just-in-Time (JIT): Definition, Example, Pros, and Cons - Investopedia
    A just-in-time (JIT) inventory system is a management strategy that aligns raw-material orders from suppliers directly with production schedules.Missing: turnaround | Show results with:turnaround
  41. [41]
    Just-in-Time (JIT) in Lean Manufacturing? Toyota Production System
    Jun 28, 2024 · Just-in-time production system has reinvented making by minimizing wasted efforts, boosting efficiency, and strengthening quality control.Inventory Management In... · Quality Control And... · Setup Time Reduction With...<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    What is a Kaizen Value Stream Mapping (VSM) Event? - Six Sigma
    Nov 23, 2018 · Value Stream Mapping (VSM) event is an event focused on mapping the system from client orders to client delivery.
  43. [43]
    https://safety4sea.com/container-port-performance-index-crises-have-shaken-global-trade/
  44. [44]
    TXM Lean Case Study - Reducing Lead Time by 60%
    Through Lean principles, TXM Lean Solutionshelped a global coatings manufacturer boost profits and cut lead time.Missing: TAT post- 2000
  45. [45]
    Lean Manufacturing for Tsukiden Electronics Philippines, Inc.: a Six ...
    May 14, 2019 · In this case-experimental research for TEPI the paper proposes a process improvement technique for inventory management. Six Sigma methodology ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  46. [46]
    Turnaround Time - Supply Chain Glossary and Definitions - Cubic
    Turnaround Time:The time required to unload reload and dispatch a vessel aircraft or truck at a terminal or warehouse.
  47. [47]
    Truck Turnaround Time - KPI Depot
    What is Truck Turnaround Time? The total time from when a truck arrives at a facility until it departs. View Benchmarks. What is the standard formula?
  48. [48]
    Port Call Optimisation paves the way towards a higher port ... - Wärtsilä
    In 2018, a given ship spent a median of 23.5 hours during a port cal (UNCTAD). Dry bulk carriers spent typically 2 days and container ships–only 0.7 days.<|control11|><|separator|>
  49. [49]
    Container ports: the fastest, the busiest, and the best connected
    Aug 7, 2019 · The global average time ships spent in port in 2018 was 41 hours, vis-à-vis 23.5 hours median time. Sign up for our Insights newsletter ...
  50. [50]
    Can loading and unloading times be reduced? - Trans For Carriers
    Oct 14, 2024 · Under the 2009 regulation, updated in 2022, the carrier can claim compensation from the sender if the waiting time for the described activities ...Parking Costs · Loading And Unloading Times... · Fix And Ready Digital Tools<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Italy to fine €100/hour for HGV waiting delays - Trans.INFO
    May 16, 2025 · Italy is set to introduce a €100-per-hour compensation for truck waiting times exceeding 90 minutes during loading or unloading.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Q&A - loading, unloading, waiting times - IRU
    Is there a provision in this new law that states that all companies operating in Spain who require product to be loaded or unloaded are required by law to.
  53. [53]
    Shipping Delays: 10 Causes & How to Prevent - NetSuite
    May 29, 2025 · Supply chain disruptions, bad weather, and infrastructure problems are among the common causes of shipping delays. Learn how to mitigate ...
  54. [54]
    Port congestion and delays: causes and solutions - Alg Global
    Feb 18, 2025 · The demand growth has been linked to an imbalance between the availability of containers and cargo demand has contributed heavily to congestion.Root Causes Of Port... · Impact And Consequences Of... · Addressing The IssueMissing: turnaround RFID
  55. [55]
    10 Ways That Logistics Companies Deal with Shipping Delays
    Nov 20, 2023 · What Causes Shipping Delays? · 1. Weather Conditions · 2. Traffic Congestion · 3. Customs and Regulatory Issues · 4. Port Congestion · 5. Labor ...
  56. [56]
    Impact of Customs Clearance Delays on Global Shipping Time
    Feb 13, 2025 · Customs clearance delays, driven by incomplete documentation, regulatory issues, and inspections, further disrupt delivery schedules and create supply chain ...
  57. [57]
    How Weather Disrupts Shipping Patterns Across the Supply Chain
    Nov 1, 2024 · Port congestion, caused by shipping delays due to weather, increases turnaround times. STG Logistics keeps safety concerns top of mind, as ...
  58. [58]
    Effectof RFID Technology on Lead-time Compression ... - 中国管理科学
    Abstract: RFID technology can reduce lead-time and increase the retailer's service level. However, it can also affect the income of the supply chain, which ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    RFID in the Supply Chain: Benefits, Uses, and Examples - Surgere
    May 19, 2025 · It helps improve real-time visibility at every stage, making your supply chain management smoother and more reliable.How Rfid Works In Supply... · Rfid Applications In Supply... · The Benefits Of Rfid...
  60. [60]
    How Delays In Supply Chain Can Affect Replenishment Decisions
    Nov 6, 2024 · Delays in receiving raw materials or components due to supply chain disruptions can lengthen lead times, making it harder to predict delivery dates.
  61. [61]
    5 Factors Affecting Lead Times for Manufacturers
    Jan 13, 2020 · The five factors affecting lead times are: stockouts, lead time variability, shipping delays, unnecessary processes, and inefficient inventory ...Missing: turnaround logistics
  62. [62]
    Analysis of the impact of Suez Canal blockage on the global ...
    Nov 1, 2023 · This study aims to quantitatively analyze the impact of the Suez Canal blockage on global maritime transportation networks.
  63. [63]
    Modeling the dynamic impacts of maritime network blockage on ...
    Jun 5, 2024 · Beginning on March 23, 2021, the Suez Canal faced a 175-h blockage (∼7.3 days) caused by the grounding of the container vessel Ever Given (see ...
  64. [64]
    Laboratory Turnaround Time - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    Turnaround time (TAT) is one of the most noticeable signs of laboratory service and is often used as a key performance indicator of laboratory performance.
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Turnaround Time: An Efficacy Measure for Medical Laboratories
    Sep 6, 2022 · The TAT procedure can be broadly divided into three stages pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical. There is variability in TAT according ...
  66. [66]
    Routine Outpatient Laboratory Test Turnaround Times and Practice ...
    Jan 1, 2002 · In all, 94% of participants set a TAT goal for the CBC and biochemical profile of within 24 hours, compared to 75% for thyrotropin. About 6% of ...
  67. [67]
    Laboratory Surge Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Incident ...
    May 11, 2022 · The turn-around times of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests were shortened from 21.2 hours to 5.8 hours in the second week of the COVID-19 wave.
  68. [68]
    Section 3. Measuring Emergency Department Performance - AHRQ
    Previous CMS ED measures related primarily to clinical processes (fibrinolytic therapy received within 30 minutes of ED arrival and median time to ECG). Pending ...
  69. [69]
    Standards for Measuring and Reporting Emergency Department ...
    ED patient "wait time" should be defined as "door to provider contact time." · Provider is defined as physician (MD, DO), advanced practice nurse, or physician ...Missing: doctor | Show results with:doctor
  70. [70]
    Hospitals - Timely & effective care | Provider Data Catalog
    This measure shows the average (median) time in minutes that patients spent in the emergency department – from the time they arrived, to the time they left.
  71. [71]
    The association between emergency department length of stay and ...
    We used four hours for discharged patients and eight hours for patients admitted to inpatient and observation services as LOS targets based on the Accreditation ...
  72. [72]
    Surgical pit crew: initiative to optimise measurement and ... - NIH
    Jul 14, 2023 · We defined 'turnover time' as the time between 'wheels out' of the previous case to 'wheels in' of the case to follow (figure 1)--case tracking ...
  73. [73]
    Multidisciplinary Telemedicine in Healthcare During and After the ...
    Telemedicine reduced hospital visit times from four hours to two and a half hours, and 84.8% of patients expressed satisfaction with the model. Quality of life ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  74. [74]
    Impact of Asynchronous Telemedicine Adoption on Patient Flow
    Oct 30, 2024 · AT implementation led to a 20% increase in recommended visit time and an 8.5% increase in required clinical resources for in-person ...