Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Vermont General Assembly

The Vermont General Assembly is the bicameral state legislature of Vermont, consisting of the 150-member House of Representatives, elected from 100 single- and multi-member districts, and the 30-member Senate, with one senator per district. It convenes annually at the Vermont State House in Montpelier to exercise legislative powers, including enacting statutes, appropriating funds, impeaching officials, and confirming gubernatorial appointments as outlined in the state constitution. Both chambers' members serve two-year terms, with the Assembly originally unicameral until adopting its current structure in 1836 following disputes over gubernatorial elections. The legislature operates under a separation of powers framework, with sessions typically commencing in January and varying in length, as evidenced by the 2025 session running from January to June and the 2026 session scheduled to begin in January. Notable for its size—the House is the largest lower chamber in the U.S. by raw membership—and for sustaining minor-party representation, such as Progressives, the General Assembly reflects Vermont's tradition of independent political dynamics amid Democratic majorities in recent decades.

Legislative Structure

Vermont House of Representatives

The constitutes the lower chamber of the Vermont General Assembly, comprising 150 members who represent the state's through multi-member districts. These districts, numbering 108 in total, allocate one or two representatives each based on , a system established following the reapportionment that shifted from prior town-based representation—where even the smallest towns held equal seats regardless of size—to a one-person, one-vote principle aligned with federal equal protection requirements. This structure enables broader local representation, with districts redrawn decennially after U.S. Census data to maintain approximate , typically averaging around 3,400 residents per seat. Members must meet minimal qualifications outlined in the Vermont Constitution: residency in the state for two years, with the final year in the legislative district, and eligibility as a qualified voter, implying a minimum age of 18. Elected to two-year terms, representatives serve as part-time citizen-legislators, reflecting Vermont's tradition of accessible governance without stringent professional barriers. Compensation underscores this part-time status, with members receiving $843.32 per week during sessions—equating to roughly $10,000–$15,000 annually for typical attendance—plus $175 daily per diem for meals and incidental expenses when not in , far below full-time salaries in professional legislatures like California's $119,702 base pay. Sessions convene annually from early to late May, spanning about 100–125 legislative days, with additional work limited to preserve members' primary occupations. The of the , elected by majority vote at the session's outset, serves as presiding officer, enforcing rules, recognizing speakers, and maintaining decorum. The Speaker appoints members to standing committees—such as Ways and Means for fiscal matters or for legal bills—which scrutinize introduced , conduct hearings, amend drafts, and recommend passage or defeat to the full chamber. Bills originate in committees after first reading, fostering detailed debate enabled by the 's larger size relative to the 30-member , though all measures require majority approval for advancement. This committee-driven process handles the bulk of legislative workload, with the full House voting on reported bills in a structured sequence of readings and amendments.

Vermont Senate

The Vermont Senate consists of 30 members, each elected from single-member senatorial districts apportioned according to population as determined by the decennial federal . These districts ensure aligned with demographic shifts, with boundaries redrawn by the Vermont General Assembly following each to maintain equal population sizes across districts, subject to for compliance with one-person, one-vote principles. All senators serve two-year terms, with elections held concurrently for all seats in even-numbered years, synchronizing the chamber's composition with the broader electoral cycle. The Lieutenant Governor serves as the presiding officer of the , referred to as the , and casts the deciding vote in cases of ties, a mechanism that can introduce branch influence into legislative deliberations, particularly in scenarios of where the Lieutenant Governor's party affiliation differs from the Senate majority. In the Lieutenant Governor's absence, the —elected by the Senate from its members—assumes presiding duties, underscoring the chamber's internal hierarchy often shaped by seniority and experience. This presiding structure positions the Senate as a deliberative , where the tie-breaking authority amplifies the role of cross-branch dynamics in resolving deadlocks on key votes. Qualifications for Senate membership parallel those of the but include a higher age threshold: candidates must be at least 25 years old, U.S. citizens, residents for four years preceding election, and inhabitants of their district for one year prior. Seniority plays a pronounced role in leadership selection, with longer-serving senators typically ascending to positions like chairs or the , fostering institutional continuity and expertise in a body designed for measured review. With only 30 members compared to the House's 150, the 's compact size causally enables more extended debate, detailed scrutiny of amendments, and incorporation of specialized input, refining legislation passed by the larger, more representative lower chamber rather than initiating broad populist measures. This structural disparity promotes checks and balances by filtering House-originated bills through a venue conducive to policy maturation, reducing the risk of hasty enactments while ensuring upper-chamber input on fiscal and confirmatory matters, such as gubernatorial appointments requiring approval.

Leadership and Sessions

The leadership of the is headed by the , elected by a majority vote of house members at the start of each annual session, with the position typically held by a member of the majority party who organizes the chamber's agenda, appoints committee chairs, and manages floor proceedings. In the , Governor serves as formal but is frequently absent due to duties, leading senators to elect a from their ranks to preside over daily operations, enforce rules, and represent the chamber. These roles are filled through internal elections reflecting the balance of power, fostering accountability to the elected membership rather than external appointment. The General Assembly convenes in annual regular sessions commencing on the first Wednesday in , as established by longstanding practice and legislative custom, with the 2025 session beginning on January 8. Sessions generally conclude by early summer after addressing the legislative agenda, exemplified by the 2025 adjournment on June 16 following passage of key measures including adjustments. maintains a biennial framework, with comprehensive appropriations enacted in odd-numbered years for the ensuing two fiscal years, supplemented by targeted adjustments in even years to align with revenue changes and priorities. Special sessions can be convened by the Governor on specific topics or by a two-thirds vote in concurrent resolution from each chamber, but such calls remain rare, occurring sporadically for emergencies like budget shortfalls or unforeseen crises rather than routine business. This infrequency underscores the part-time structure of Vermont's citizen legislature, where members—often holding other professions—convene briefly to deliberate essentials, inherently curbing expansive lawmaking and incentivizing fiscal prudence over perpetual expansion of government scope. The constrained timeline compels prioritization of verifiable needs backed by data, minimizing opportunities for ideologically driven overreach that longer sessions in other states have enabled.

Elections and Representation

Election Procedures

The Vermont General Assembly conducts elections for all 180 House seats and 30 seats every two years during even-numbered years, aligning with midterm and presidential cycles. Primary elections for party nominees occur on the first in , while the general takes place on the first following the first Monday in , as stipulated in state election law. Voter closes seven days before the primary and general elections, with same-day registration available at polling places under Vermont's universal primary system, which allows unaffiliated voters to participate in any party's primary. Eligibility to vote in legislative elections requires U.S. , attainment of age 18 by the general date, and residency in for at least one year prior, with no durational residency requirement for the specific town or district beyond general state residency rules. Candidates for the must be at least 21 years old, U.S. citizens, and residents for one year preceding the ; Senate candidates face the same requirements except a minimum age of 25. imposes no term limits on legislators, permitting indefinite reelection subject to voter approval. Absentee by mail or in-person is available without excuse, with ballots accepted up to the close of polls on day, facilitating broader participation. In the , multi-member districts elect one to six representatives via , where the candidates receiving the highest number of votes equal to the seats available win, without ranked-choice or runoff mechanisms. The employs single-member districts with simple wins, the candidate with the most votes prevailing regardless of threshold. This system, unchanged since the 1965 reapportionment reforms, lacks instant-runoff or , potentially amplifying outcomes in low-turnout or uncompetitive races. for legislative elections, often concurrent with higher-profile federal contests, averaged approximately 65% of registered voters in the 2022 general election, though off-year local races see lower participation around 40-50%. Empirical data indicate limited in many , with 7 of 114 races in 2024 featuring only first-time candidates running unopposed, reflecting the persistence of safe seats driven by geographic and demographic clustering rather than deliberate . Multi-member can mitigate some intra-party but often result in bloc patterns that favor incumbents or aligned slates. Vermont's part-time , convening annually from early January to late May with compensation of about $10,000-15,000 per two-year term plus , structurally incentivizes citizen-legislators over full-time professionals, lowering barriers to entry for non-career candidates while correlating with higher uncontested races due to reliance on personal networks over campaign infrastructure. This model prioritizes direct , as legislators maintain primary occupations outside the State , though it has drawn critique for potentially excluding lower-income aspirants unable to forgo full-time work.

Apportionment and Districting

Prior to 1965, the apportioned seats according to a "one town, one vote" principle, granting each a single representative regardless of population size, which resulted in severe malapportionment favoring rural areas. This system violated the of the , as rural towns with minimal populations wielded disproportionate influence compared to urban centers like , where one representative might serve thousands while another served dozens. The U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in (1962), which established justiciability of apportionment claims in federal courts, and (1964), which mandated "one person, one vote" for state legislatures, directly invalidated such schemes by requiring districts to reflect substantial population equality. In response, a federal district court in Buckley v. Hoff declared Vermont's apportionment unconstitutional and ordered reapportionment for the elections, with the U.S. affirming this in Parsons v. Buckley (), directing the court to devise a compliant plan if the legislature failed. The court-imposed plan shifted to population-based districts, fundamentally altering by curtailing rural overrepresentation and enabling legislative majorities to reflect statewide demographics more accurately, which diluted the power of sparsely populated towns that had previously blocked reforms on issues like education funding and taxation. This causal shift empowered urban and suburban voices, as equal-weight districts prevented minority rural blocs from sustaining policy stasis against majority preferences. Vermont's Constitution (Chapter II, Sections 13, 18, and 73) requires decennial reapportionment of both chambers following the federal to maintain equality, with the legislature enacting districts via statute subject to gubernatorial veto. The comprises 150 representatives elected from approximately 114 districts (some multi-member), with each ideally representing about 4,287 residents based on the 2020 of 643,077. The has 30 members from 14 districts (with 1–3 senators each), where each senator ideally represents roughly 21,436 residents, ensuring deviations remain minimal to comply with federal standards. The Legislative Apportionment Board, comprising former legislators and officials, provides advisory recommendations to guide , promoting though final maps require legislative approval. Districts must prioritize compact, contiguous boundaries and respect town lines where feasible, but population equality overrides traditional geographic units, a upheld in subsequent court challenges to prevent or reversion to pre-1965 imbalances. This framework has sustained , though it has faced criticism for occasionally splitting communities to achieve numerical parity. The Vermont General Assembly exhibited dominance from 1854 to 1958, during which the party secured unbroken victories in statewide elections and maintained legislative majorities, reflecting the state's conservative rural ethos and alignment with national GOP trends. This era correlated with and intervention, as Republicans controlled both chambers and the governorship without interruption. Democratic gains began in the and accelerated in the , driven by demographic shifts toward urban areas like and an influx of younger, liberal-leaning migrants; by the , Democrats achieved consistent majorities, often in coalition with Progressives and caucusing Independents. Post-2000, Democrats solidified supermajorities exceeding two-thirds in both chambers, enabling veto overrides against (elected 2016 and reelected through 2024). In the 2024 elections, capitalized on voter dissatisfaction with property taxes and progressive policies, netting 17 seats and six seats—their largest gains in over a —ending the veto-proof majorities. The resulting 2025-2026 session features : retain slim majorities but lack the thresholds for unilateral overrides, with the poised to break ties.
ChamberDemocratsRepublicansProgressives/IndependentsTotal Seats
(2025)87567 (4 Prog., 3 Ind.)150
(2025)17 (incl. some Prog.)13030
Empirical trends show Independents and Progressives frequently caucusing with Democrats, augmenting effective control despite nominal multipartisanship; however, the 2024 shift introduces checks, as Republicans now hold enough seats to sustain gubernatorial vetoes on party-line votes. Prolonged Democratic since the has enabled expansive policy initiatives, often diverging from fiscal restraint characteristic of prior , though recent gains signal potential moderation amid economic pressures.

Powers and Operations

Legislative Authority

The Vermont General Assembly possesses the supreme legislative power as delineated in Chapter II of the state constitution, enabling it to prepare and enact bills into laws, redress grievances, grant charters of incorporation (subject to constitutional limits), and establish towns and counties. Bills may originate in either chamber, except for revenue measures, which must begin in the , though the Senate retains the ability to propose or concur in amendments. This bicameral structure ensures that no becomes law without the approval of both houses, promoting deliberation and compromise in the lawmaking process. Upon passage, bills are subject to gubernatorial , which the General Assembly may override by a two-thirds vote of members present in each chamber. Beyond primary lawmaking, the legislature exercises authority over executive and judicial appointments, with the providing for gubernatorial nominees to key positions such as agency secretaries and judges. The House holds the sole power to impeach civil officers by a two-thirds vote of its members for offenses constituting "state crimes," while the conducts trials and may upon a two-thirds vote, resulting in removal from office and potential disqualification from future roles. The General Assembly also initiates constitutional amendments, which originate in the and require approval by two-thirds of the full membership of each chamber in one biennium, followed by identical approval in the subsequent biennium before submission to voters for . In practice, the legislature's part-time structure—featuring biennial sessions commencing in odd-numbered years and typically adjourning by early summer—limits its capacity for expansive output, with approximately 679 bills introduced in the 2025 session and fewer than 15 percent advancing to enactment. This framework, characteristic of citizen legislatures, contrasts with full-time bodies by prioritizing targeted interventions over continuous policymaking.

Committee and Procedural Framework

The Vermont General Assembly relies on standing committees for the initial review and refinement of . The maintains 14 standing committees, each focused on specific policy areas such as , Bill Backlog, Commerce and , Corrections and Institutions, , Environment and Energy, General and , Government Operations, , , , Natural Resources, Fish, and , and Ways and Means. The operates with 11 standing committees, including , , and General Affairs; ; Finance; Government Operations; Health and Welfare; Independent Articles; Institutions; ; Natural Resources and Energy; and Transportation. These committees hold public hearings to gather testimony from stakeholders, experts, and the public, facilitating deliberation on referred bills. Bills introduced in either chamber are referred by chamber leadership to the appropriate standing committee based on subject matter, where they undergo analysis, potential amendments, and voting on advancement. If approved, the bill proceeds to the chamber floor; otherwise, it may be recommitted, tabled, or committee. This referral process ensures specialized scrutiny but can create bottlenecks, as committees often handle dozens of bills per session, prioritizing through hearings and work sessions to prevent floor consideration of underdeveloped measures. Each chamber adopts rules of procedure at the session's outset, governing , , and order. A requires a of members—76 in the and 16 in the —to conduct business. Votes are typically taken by voice or division, with roll calls ordered upon request by a certain number of members or for final passage on certain bills; systems aid efficiency in the . Unlike some s, Vermont lacks a mechanism, with controlled by the presiding officer, time limits on speeches, and rules against dilatory tactics to maintain progress. These procedures promote orderly deliberation but can enable delays in divided sessions, where minority members leverage referrals, amendments, or procedural motions to extend review, as seen in bienniums with slim majorities requiring cross-party for advancement. The framework thus balances thoroughness against expedition, with rules emphasizing majority rule tempered by minority participation rights.

Budget and Oversight Functions

The Vermont General Assembly holds primary authority over state appropriations, reviewing the governor's proposed , conducting hearings through the and Appropriations Committees, and enacting funding bills that allocate resources across general, transportation, and funds. The process typically involves annual adjustment acts for operational spending and biennial bills, with the fiscal year 2026 totaling approximately $9 billion, including significant allocations for , services, and . In the 2025 session, legislators emphasized municipal through targeted and adjustments in the proposed , alongside reforms under Act 73 (H.454), which introduced inflation-adjusted small school of $1,954 per in sparse and mechanisms to cap excessive per-pupil spending growth. Oversight functions include scrutiny of executive agencies via the bipartisan Government Accountability and Oversight Committee, which reviews audits and program performance, and the Senate's role in hearings for gubernatorial appointees to key positions such as agency heads. The , an elected official, conducts post-audits of agency finances and compliance, reporting findings directly to legislative leadership for potential corrective , as mandated under 32 V.S.A. § 163. These mechanisms aim to enforce fiscal accountability, though empirical data indicate state general fund spending has grown steadily—reaching $2.2 billion in FY2025—often outpacing revenue without corresponding tax hikes, contributing to Vermont's high overall tax burden, including a top individual rate of 8.75% and among the nation's highest effective rates. Causal factors in Vermont's fiscal strains trace to policies like Act 60 (1997), which centralized education funding through a statewide to equalize disparities but inadvertently fueled per-pupil spending increases—rising 10.7% statewide for FY2025—disproportionately burdening rural areas with lower property values and higher reliance on non-income-sensitive components, exacerbating hikes averaging 13.8%. Partisan dynamics influence restraint: Republican Governor has vetoed expansive spending bills, such as a 2025 midyear adjustment extending motel stays for the homeless, citing unchecked growth, while Democratic majorities have pursued expansions in social programs amid revenue shortfalls requiring adjustments like short-term rental taxes. Republicans have withdrawn support from budgets perceived as fiscally loose, highlighting tensions over revenue-dependent expansions versus structural reforms.

Historical Evolution

Origins in the Vermont Republic (1777–1791)

The emerged from the disputed region, where settlers resisted colonial authority and British oversight during the . On January 15, 1777, delegates from multiple towns convened at to declare independence from both and the British Crown, establishing a framework for autonomous governance that prioritized local over external claims. This declaration reflected empirical necessities of frontier defense and resource control, as settlers under leaders like Ethan Allen's had already engaged in armed resistance, such as skirmishes against sheriffs in the early . The foundational legislative structure was codified in the adopted on , 1777, at a in , which vested supreme legislative authority in a unicameral , termed the General Assembly. Representatives were elected annually by freemen—defined as free adult males aged 21 or older with one year of residency and —without property qualifications, marking one of the broadest extensions in the and enabling near-universal male participation among non-enslaved residents. Representation adhered to a town-based system, with each qualifying town (those with at least 80 taxable inhabitants) initially electing two members for a seven-year period before standardizing to one per town, ensuring proportional rural influence and rejecting population-weighted models that favored urban centers. The further prohibited perpetual by mandating for males at age 21 and females at 18, and imposed no religious test for officeholders beyond a basic Protestant affirmation, innovations that underscored a commitment to individual liberty amid existential threats from British forces and neighboring colonies. The first General Assembly assembled on March 12, 1778, in , electing as governor and promptly addressing wartime exigencies, including militia organization against raids—such as the 1780 Royalton incursion—and the issuance of continental currency to sustain economic independence. Auxiliary bodies, including a 12-member Governor's Council for advisory functions and a 13-member Council of Censors elected every seven years to review laws without amending the , provided checks on legislative overreach while preserving the assembly's primacy. This structure facilitated pragmatic governance, such as policies and negotiations with and , enabling the republic to endure isolation and invasions until its in 1791.

Expansion and Institutionalization (1791–1965)

Upon on March 4, 1791, Vermont's operated as a unicameral body comprising only the , with each of the state's approximately 200 towns electing one representative regardless of population size, a system inherited from the . This structure emphasized town-level representation over proportional population, ensuring small rural communities held equal legislative weight to emerging urban centers. Legislative sessions during the early years were itinerant, convening in rotating locations across the state such as Bennington, , and , which imposed logistical burdens and reflected the decentralized nature of the young state's governance. In 1805, the General Assembly designated as the permanent state capital, stabilizing operations and reducing travel costs associated with peripatetic meetings; this decision centralized administrative functions amid Vermont's integration into the federal system. The assembly's unicameral format persisted until a in 1835, when a multi-candidate gubernatorial produced no winner, prompting 65 failed ballots in the House between October 9 and November 2; Lieutenant Governor Silas H. Jennison served as acting governor for the ensuing year. Public discontent with this deadlock spurred a ratified in 1836, establishing a 30-member elected from districts comprising multiple towns, thereby creating a bicameral legislature to balance representation and mitigate future impasses. The mid-19th century saw further institutional solidification, including the completion of the current in in 1859, designed by Thomas Silloway and featuring a distinctive gilded dome, which provided a dedicated venue for sessions and symbolized the assembly's maturation as a state institution. Sessions, initially annual and held in autumn to align with harvest cycles, gradually formalized into biennial winter meetings by the late 19th century, accommodating lawmakers' agrarian schedules while enabling year-round governance needs. The , formed in Vermont in 1854 from anti-slavery Whigs and Free Soilers, swiftly dominated the General Assembly; from 1854 to 1958, Republicans won every statewide election, often securing near-unanimous control, such as 100% of seats in many sessions and House majorities exceeding 70% (e.g., 172 Republicans to 62 Democrats in 1890). This partisan hegemony facilitated consistent policy continuity but coincided with representational stasis under the enduring one-town-one-representative , which resisted proposals in 1785, 1793, and 1849 despite and industrialization; by 1962, towns with as few as 24 residents wielded the same influence as Burlington's 35,000, entrenching rural priorities and diluting urban voices even as and population centers grew. The system's persistence stemmed from a deliberate valuation of local over demographic equity, yielding legislative outputs focused on rural like railroads and education but critiqued for underrepresenting industrial-era shifts, as small-town veto power preserved agrarian interests against proportional reforms.

Reapportionment Reforms and Modernization (1965–Present)

In 1964, the U.S. District Court for , in Buckley v. Hoff, ruled the state's legislative apportionment unconstitutional due to extreme population disparities, where rural towns with populations under 100 received the same representation as urban centers like with over 35,000 residents. This malapportionment, rooted in town-based allocation since statehood, violated the by denying equal voting weight, as affirmed by precedents like Reynolds v. Sims (1964). The court ordered population-based redistricting, prompting the 1965 General Assembly to enact Act No. 68, which reduced seats from 246 to 150, consolidated into multi-member configurations averaging one representative per 3,400 residents, and reapportioned the similarly. These changes, implemented for 1966 elections, marked a causal shift from geographic to demographic equity, enhancing representational accuracy but immediately transferring influence from rural conservatives to urban progressives. The reforms' empirical effects included a structural of densely populated counties like Chittenden, where population growth outpaced rural areas, correlating with policy tilts toward urban priorities such as expansive environmental mandates and social welfare expansions that rural districts had previously restrained. Decennial reapportionments, mandated by the and , continued under legislative authority as statutory enactments, subject to gubernatorial and court scrutiny for deviations exceeding 10-15% population variance. Absent an independent commission, the process retained partisan elements, though judicial interventions—such as in Mikell v. Rousseau ( challenges)—enforced compactness and contiguity standards. Post-1990s modernization integrated computational tools, with GIS software enabling precise census block-level mapping from the 2000 cycle onward, improving district equity and public transparency via online data portals. The Legislative Apportionment Board, formalized in statute for advisory roles after 2002, analyzed census data to propose maps minimizing splits and maximizing equal weight, as in the 2022 cycle under H.722, which adjusted for 2020 shifts giving northwestern Vermont added seats. These adaptations raised efficacy by reducing litigation—Vermont avoided major federal overhauls post-1965—but sustained urban-rural tensions, as population-based mechanics amplified progressive strongholds' leverage. The 2025 session illustrated reform-enabled responsiveness: Republican House gains of 18 seats and Senate pickups of six in 2024 ended Democrats' veto-proof majority (House: 76D-58P-16R to 64D-67P-19R; Senate: 16D-7P-7R to 12D-5P-13R), forcing cross-aisle negotiations on budgets and overrides, thereby checking prior unchecked left-leaning agendas and fostering compromise on fiscal restraint.

Policy Impact and Controversies

Key Achievements in Governance

The Vermont General Assembly's long periods of dominance following the contributed to governance stability, with uninterrupted control from 1854 to 1958 enabling consistent policy continuity amid national challenges and economic shifts, as the party secured every statewide election during this span, supporting institutional resilience without partisan upheavals. A landmark achievement in rural preservation came with the 1970 passage of Act 250, which established district environmental commissions to review subdivisions and developments affecting ten or more acres or five or more units, enforcing criteria on , , , and regional ; this framework has causally constrained , maintaining Vermont's forest cover at approximately 80% of land area and agricultural viability through regulated growth, as evidenced by sustained low-density development patterns over five decades. In infrastructure, the Assembly's 2025 enactment of the Community Housing & Infrastructure Program (CHIP) authorizes tax increment financing for up to $2 billion in local projects, targeting water, sewer, and roadway upgrades tied to housing development, thereby enabling municipal investments without broad tax hikes and addressing chronic underfunding in rural areas through project-specific bonds. The 2025 education reforms via H.454 (Act 73), passed in June and signed July 1, represent a structural overhaul, introducing a statewide foundation formula with per-pupil grants starting fiscal year 2029 alongside mandatory district redistricting by 2028 to consolidate the existing 119 districts, aiming to curb escalating costs—Vermont's per-pupil spending reached $23,000 in 2024, 50% above the national average—while standardizing quality and equity through coordinated governance that preserves select local decision-making on curricula and operations.

Major Criticisms and Failures

The Vermont General Assembly's pursuit of through Act 48, enacted in 2011 under Democratic leadership, ultimately failed due to insurmountable financial hurdles. Initial projections underestimated costs, which ballooned to an estimated $2.5 billion to $4.3 billion annually by 2014—equivalent to 25-40% of the state's budget—without viable funding sources like new taxes exceeding 10% of wages, leading Governor to abandon the plan in December 2014. This collapse exposed flaws in legislative overambition, as actuarial analyses revealed premiums would need to rise dramatically while providers faced reimbursement shortfalls, deterring implementation despite years of planning. High taxes imposed by the Assembly, including rates ranking among the nation's highest at over 1.8% effective rate in recent years, have drawn criticism for accelerating out-migration and contributing to long-term population stagnation. From 1990 to 2020, Vermont experienced net domestic out-migration of over 50,000 residents, with young adults citing costs as a primary factor, resulting in the state's averaging just 0.3% annually—far below the U.S. average of 1%. Critics, including fiscal watchdogs, argue these policies, such as progressive income and fund taxes, create a causal barrier to retention, even as temporary COVID-era influxes of remote workers masked underlying trends of net losses in working-age demographics. Post-1965 reapportionment reforms, compelled by federal courts enforcing one-person-one-vote principles, shifted power from rural towns—previously granted equal representation regardless of size—to urban and suburban districts, effectively diluting rural voices in the 150-member . Prior to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision influencing state action, Vermont's system allocated one representative per town, empowering small rural communities; the 1965 overhaul reduced this to population-based districts, leading to persistent complaints of urban-centric policymaking that neglects agricultural and remote interests, such as in debates over and funding. Democratic supermajorities, controlling over 80% of seats in both chambers through , have been faulted for curtailing debate and enabling veto overrides that bypass executive checks, fostering one-party dominance. described this as an "arrogant" dynamic in June , after legislators overrode his vetoes on spending and regulatory bills without , a pattern enabled by 105-38 and 23-7 margins that marginalized input on issues like taxes and . gains of 18 and 6 seats in ended the veto-proof edge for 2025, but prior sessions exemplified how such imbalances stifled bipartisan scrutiny. Gun control expansions, including a 2018 ban on magazines over 10-15 rounds and a 2023-mandated 72-hour purchase waiting period, have faced legal challenges for overregulating law-abiding owners and infringing Second Amendment protections under recent precedents like Bruen. Gun rights organizations sued in 2023, arguing these measures lack historical analogues and burden rights, with federal courts preliminarily questioning their amid Vermont's traditionally permissive culture shifting post-2016. Environmental overregulation via Act 250, Vermont's landmark 1970 land-use law administered through Assembly oversight, has been criticized for imposing excessive permitting delays and costs that deter and commercial development, exacerbating affordability crises. Reforms in 2025 attempted streamlining, but stakeholders contend the framework's broad veto power over projects—requiring reviews for impacts on aesthetics, traffic, and resources—has stifled growth, with approval times averaging 1-2 years and rejection rates contributing to Vermont's lowest-in-New-England housing starts . Budget processes in the 2025 session drew rebukes for perpetuating bloat, with spending rising 15% since 2019 to over $8 billion despite stagnant revenues and federal uncertainties, prompting calls to eliminate redundancies in agencies and contracts estimated at $2 billion savable through audits. Fiscal conservatives highlighted unchecked growth in and entitlements as causal drivers of , with the Assembly's reluctance to prioritize cuts amid hikes underscoring inefficiencies.

Ongoing Debates on Partisanship and Efficiency

In the 2024 elections, Republicans achieved notable gains in the Vermont General Assembly, narrowing Democratic majorities and introducing elements of divided government that have heightened partisan tensions in the 2025 session. The Senate composition shifted to 17 Democrats and 13 Republicans, with Republican Lieutenant Governor John Rodgers serving as the tie-breaking vote in close decisions. The House saw Republicans flip several seats, reducing the Democratic edge to 88-59 with three Progressives and independents, complicating legislative progress on budget and reform measures amid Democratic resistance to GOP priorities like spending restraint. This dynamic has fueled debates over whether the influx of Republican voices fosters necessary checks on long-standing Democratic dominance or exacerbates gridlock, particularly as Democrats have historically controlled supermajorities enabling progressive fiscal policies without robust opposition. Efficiency critiques center on structural issues, including low legislative evidenced by high bill introduction volumes relative to enactments. Over the 2023-2024 biennium, lawmakers introduced 1,206 , yet passage rates remained low, with only a fraction advancing amid protracted debates and session overruns—such as the 2025 session extending weeks beyond its planned May adjournment into mid-June due to negotiations on education funding. Critics, including groups, argue this reflects entrenched from part-time roles and resistance to reforms like term limits, which have gained traction in discussions but lack formal proposals, potentially perpetuating incumbency advantages that stifle fresh perspectives on fiscal discipline. Controversial pay raise proposals have intensified efficiency debates, with lawmakers advancing plans to nearly double compensation—proposing a 93.79% increase from 2022 levels by 2025—despite public backlash over perceived self-interest amid stagnant productivity and rising state deficits. These hikes, justified by proponents as needed to attract talent, contrast with empirical fiscal strains, including Vermont's high taxes and spending shortfalls, where prior Democratic-led expansions normalized deficits exceeding $100 million annually without corresponding revenue realism. gains have amplified calls for rightward corrections, emphasizing causal links between unchecked left-leaning policies and unsustainable budgets, as seen in 2025 disputes over reforms that avoided deeper spending cuts despite projected shortfalls.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Page 1 of 5 Overview of Vermont State Governmental Structure I ...
    require a 150–member House and a 30–member Senate—together entitled “The General. Assembly of the State of Vermont”—and further require the two chambers to ...
  2. [2]
    Vermont State Legislature - Ballotpedia
    The legislature is a bicameral assembly, consisting of the 150-member Vermont House of Representatives and the 30-member Vermont State Senate.
  3. [3]
    Constitution of the State of Vermont | Vermont General Assembly
    The Senate shall have the like powers to decide on the election and qualifications of, and to expel any of, its members, make its own rules, and appoint its own ...
  4. [4]
    Vermont Legislature: Home | Vermont General Assembly
    History. History of the General Assembly · The State House. Visiting the State House. About the State House · Hours & Directions · State House Floor Maps ...Vermont Laws · The House of Representatives · History of the General Assembly
  5. [5]
    Historical and Present Day Vermont General Assembly
    Jul 30, 2024 · The Vermont senate was started in 1836 because the Vermont house could not decide on a governor in the year of 1835. There were three candidates ...
  6. [6]
    2025 Vermont legislative session - Ballotpedia
    2025 Vermont legislative session. Seal of Vermont.png. General information. Scheduled session start: January 8, 2025. Scheduled session end: June 17, 2025.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Vermont - Levin Center for Oversight and Democracy
    This means that Vermont currently has a divided government, with the. Democratic Party/liberal coalition controlling the general assembly and the Republican ...
  8. [8]
    50 years ago, reapportionment forever changed Vermont Legislature
    May 19, 2015 · [T]here is little to remind visitors today at the Statehouse of what the House Chamber looked like 50 years ago on May 14, 1965.Missing: districts | Show results with:districts<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Vermont's Legislative Process
    FREE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE---Same as conference committee, with additional power to insert new matter, to facilitate compromise. Rarely used in Vermont. GALLERY ...
  10. [10]
    Vermont - All About Redistricting
    Vermont has only one congressional district. Vermont's state legislative lines are drawn by the state legislature, as a regular statute, subject to ...Missing: structure size terms
  11. [11]
    Vermont House of Representatives - Ballotpedia
    The Republican Party controls the office of governor, while the Democratic Party controls both chambers of the state legislature. This page contains the ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  12. [12]
    2024 Legislator Compensation
    The session per diem rate for state legislators is $70 per day for lodging ... Per diem is taxable for all representatives. Members can receive per ...Missing: length part-
  13. [13]
    [PDF] State Legislative Session Length - University of Vermont
    This report examines the possible effects of a limiting the length of the legislative session. In order to put the issue in context, we first examine the ...Missing: annual | Show results with:annual
  14. [14]
    How Vermont Elects a Speaker: Laura Sibilia's Campaign and Our ...
    Oct 28, 2024 · Speaker's Formal Responsibilities: Defined by House Rules, including maintaining order, appointing committee members, and referring bills.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] House Rules - Vermont Legislature
    (a) The Clerk shall submit the original bill to the Speaker for examination, after which it shall be read the first time and by the Speaker. Page 15. VT LEG # ...
  16. [16]
    Vermont state legislative districts - Ballotpedia
    There are 180 seats in the Vermont State Legislature. All 30 seats in the Vermont State Senate and all 150 seats in the Vermont House of Representatives are up ...
  17. [17]
    Vermont State Senate - Ballotpedia
    The Republican Party controls the office of governor, while the Democratic Party controls both chambers of the state legislature. This page contains the ...
  18. [18]
    Who's in charge of the Vermont Legislature - VTDigger
    Jan 22, 2024 · The lieutenant governor also serves as president of the Senate. In that role, she presides when the Senate is in session, decides parliamentary ...
  19. [19]
    Vermont Legislature adjourns 2025 session after weeks of debate ...
    The Vermont Legislature adjourned its 2025 session Monday night after approving a bill that would make generational changes to the ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Appropriations & Budget | Vermont Legislative Joint Fiscal Office
    The Budget Bill Process “At A Glance”​​ Each year there are two budget bills that the General Assembly works on, passes, and sends to the Governor for signature. ...Missing: biennial | Show results with:biennial
  21. [21]
    Powers & Authority - National Governors Association
    As state managers, Governors are responsible for implementing state laws and overseeing the operation of the state executive branch.
  22. [22]
    Special Sessions - National Conference of State Legislatures
    There are no limits on the number of special session that may be called. Many factors can influence the number of special legislative sessions that occur in any ...
  23. [23]
    This election season, 7 first-time House candidates face no opposition
    Sep 5, 2024 · Seven state House races have just one candidate with no legislative experience running without opposition. That is, unless last-minute challengers stand up ...
  24. [24]
    Resource Full- and Part-Time Legislatures
    Estimated average annual compensation of legislators including salary, per diem, and any other unvouchered expense payments. Source: NCSL 2014. Average number ...
  25. [25]
    Sens. Hardy and White: Many people can't afford to be state legislators
    Apr 14, 2023 · Almost anyone would do better to get a full-time, full-year job than take time to be a legislator. And yet, Vermont benefits from a diverse, ...Missing: part- professionalization
  26. [26]
    [PDF] history - Vermont Historical Society
    Jul 9, 2020 · The apportionment process, however, brings about very significant political change in a state. Apportionment and reapportionment in a democratic ...Missing: reforms | Show results with:reforms
  27. [27]
    Parsons v. Buckley | 379 U.S. 359 (1965)
    That provision envisages a reapportionment of the Vermont Legislature by the District Court itself if an apportionment of that body, satisfying the requirements ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Parsons v. Buckley, 379 U.S. 359 (1965). - Loc
    District Court judgment holding Vermont constitutional provisions concerning legislative apportionment invalid under Fourteenth. Amendment approved by this ...
  29. [29]
    Redistricting in Vermont - Ballotpedia
    This section includes background information on federal requirements for congressional redistricting, state legislative redistricting, state-based requirements, ...Missing: reapportionment reforms
  30. [30]
    Freedom & Unity: Political Power Shifts - Vermont Historical Society
    Between 1854 and 1962 every Vermont governor had been a member of the Republican Party. For a generation, the party had been deeply divided.Missing: control 1850-2024
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Little Republics - Vermont Historical Society
    From 1854 until 1958 Vermont Republicans never lost a statewide elec- tion, and the state, the only one, never failed to deliver its electoral vote.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] 1965–Present: Vermont House Membership by Party1
    1965–Present: Vermont House Membership by Party1. Session. Democrats. Republicans ... that party. 2 On 1/22/2025, Rep. Troy Headrick changed party affiliation ...
  33. [33]
    State Partisan Composition
    Every election impacts the partisan composition of state legislatures. Current party control of state legislatures and government can be accessed below.Missing: Vermont | Show results with:Vermont
  34. [34]
    Republican victories crack Democrats' veto-proof majority in ...
    Nov 6, 2024 · Republicans Tuesday picked up more seats in the Vermont Legislature than they have in more than a decade and dislodged the Democratic/Progressive supermajority.
  35. [35]
    Partisan divide of the Vermont Senate to be tighter than in almost a ...
    Nov 12, 2024 · With a Republican lieutenant governor casting tie-breaking votes in the chamber, Democrats can lose just one vote on party-line issues. by Erin ...<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Vermont Republicans break up Democratic Supermajority in state ...
    Nov 6, 2024 · In 2024, Democrats outweighed Republicans 21-7 in the State Senate, with an additional Progressive seat. In 2025, there will be 13 Republicans, 16 Democrats ...Missing: partisan | Show results with:partisan
  37. [37]
    Those Republican gains in the Vermont House and Senate? Here's ...
    Nov 6, 2024 · ... Senate seat, at an election night party at the Associated General Contractors garage in Montpelier on Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2024. Congress has ...Missing: control 1850-2024<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Vermont Legislature overrides six vetoes in one day, setting new ...
    Jun 17, 2024 · To override a gubernatorial veto requires a two-thirds vote of members present. In theory, Democrats have veto-proof majorities in both the ...
  39. [39]
    The Vermont Statutes Online
    (b) When a vacancy occurs in an office requiring appointment with the advice and consent of the Senate, an appointment may be made to fill the vacancy.
  40. [40]
    Vermont Constitution Ch. II, § 58 - Codes - FindLaw
    The Senate shall have the sole power of trying and deciding upon all impeachments. When sitting for that purpose, they shall be on oath, or affirmation, and ...
  41. [41]
    2025 Legislative Wrap-Up | Vermont League of Cities and Towns
    Jun 30, 2025 · Vermont's 2025 legislative session officially ended just before 9 PM on June 16. For those who made over-under wagers, that means that the ...
  42. [42]
    Courier Q&A: Legislator Pay? - Randy Brock
    Oct 4, 2022 · QUESTION: Vermont is one of a handful of states that has a part time citizen legislature. As you are running for office, ...Missing: professionalization | Show results with:professionalization
  43. [43]
    About Legislative Committees | Vermont General Assembly
    There are 14 House standing committees and 11 Senate standing committees. The House standing committees meet all day, and each Representative serves on one ...
  44. [44]
    What passed in Vermont's 2025 legislative session
    Jul 3, 2025 · What passed in Vermont's 2025 legislative session · State budget · Landmark education reform · Property taxes · Medical debt relief · 'Safe leave'.
  45. [45]
    Act 73 of 2025 - Vermont Agency of Education
    The small schools support grant will be adjusted for inflation annually. Each student attending a “sparse school” will receive an additional $1,954 in funding.Missing: FY2025 | Show results with:FY2025
  46. [46]
    Previous Meetings - Full Report | Senate Committee on Transportation
    Meeting Record. 9:30 AM. Senate Floor. 10:00 AM. Confirmation Hearing ... Jonathon Kingston, Audit Manager, Office of the Vermont State Auditor; Rob ...Missing: oversight | Show results with:oversight
  47. [47]
    32 VSA § 163 - Vermont Laws
    (4)(A)(i) From time to time, as audits are completed, report his or her audit findings first to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President ...Missing: oversight confirmation hearings
  48. [48]
    Vermont | Urban Institute
    The legislature is not required to pass a balanced budget, the governor is not required to sign one, and deficits may be carried over into the following year.Missing: biennial process
  49. [49]
    Vermont Tax Rates & Rankings
    How does Vermont's tax code compare? Vermont has a graduated state individual income tax, with rates ranging from 3.35 percent to 8.75 percent.
  50. [50]
    There's more to school tax increases than spending
    Sep 6, 2024 · Vermonters have been understandably upset by the abrupt rise in their school taxes for fiscal 2025. Most of the complaints focus on the rise in spending.
  51. [51]
    BRSU Budgeting Process & Vermont Property Tax FAQs
    The final outcome was a statewide education spending increase of 10.7% and property taxes growing at an average rate of 13.8%. (The 10.7% increase in FY25 ...<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    Capitol Recap: In first veto of 2025, Phil Scott strikes down spending ...
    or forgo the midyear spending ...Missing: fiscal | Show results with:fiscal
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Economic Review and Revenue Forecast Update - Joint Fiscal Office
    Jul 31, 2025 · Aside from this, the new Short Term Rental tax boosted E-Fund M&R revenues by about $8M in FY25 and will continue to support revenue growth in.
  54. [54]
    House Republicans Pull Their Support for Budget Plan | Seven Days
    Four weeks after heaping uncharacteristic praise on the House budget, Republican lawmakers rescinded their support Friday. If Gov.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Making the Vermont Constitution: 1777-1824
    Specifically, this article will investigate three aspects of the Vermont constitution of 1777 -its historical context, its constitutional content, and its ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  56. [56]
    Constitution of Vermont - July 8, 1777 - The Avalon Project
    SECTION II. The supreme legislative power shall be vested in a House of Representatives of the Freemen or Commonwealth or State of Vermont. SECTION III. The ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] the Vermont State constitution and the American revolution
    Jan 1, 2018 · The Vermont state constitution was the most revolutionary and democratic plan of government established in America during the late eighteenth ...
  58. [58]
    Then Again: Until 1965, the smallest town had as much ... - VTDigger
    one for each of the state's ...Missing: reforms | Show results with:reforms
  59. [59]
    [PDF] The Vermont State House in Montpelier - HISTORIC ROOTS
    For the first 28 years of Vermont's history, from 1777 until 180 5, legislators met in different places around the state. But a government on the move cost too ...
  60. [60]
    Montpelier State House Dome - Vermont Historical Society
    The copper roofing was originally painted red and was first gilded in 1906. Only a few people, including the State House Pages, are allowed to visit the inside ...
  61. [61]
    How The Election Of 1835 Changed Vermont's Political System
    Jan 1, 2015 · In 1835, there was a stalemate so severe that lawmakers finally gave approval to a constitutional amendment that would create the Vermont Senate ...
  62. [62]
    Welcome to the Vermont State House! | Visit the State House
    The Vermont State House is one of the oldest and best preserved of our nation's state capitols. After nearly 160 years it remains an icon in Montpelier.
  63. [63]
    Buckley v. Hoff, 234 F. Supp. 191 (D. Vt. 1964) - Justia Law
    "[T]he Court enter an order causing the reapportionment of the Representatives and Senatorial Districts of the State of Vermont in accordance with the ...Missing: reforms | Show results with:reforms
  64. [64]
    The Vermont Statutes Online
    (a) The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires all state ...Missing: reforms | Show results with:reforms
  65. [65]
    2022 Reapportionment (Redistricting) - Vermont Legislature
    The Vermont House of Representatives and the Senate are periodically reapportioned to reflect Vermont's changing population patterns. The reapportionment ( ...
  66. [66]
    Redistricting in Vermont after the 2020 census - Ballotpedia
    Vermont Gov. Phil Scott (R) signed H722 on April 6, 2022, enacting new legislative districts for the state House and Senate.
  67. [67]
    Historic Gains by Republicans Shift Montpelier's Balance of Power
    Nov 13, 2024 · Democratic leadership and their priorities could be imperiled next year by the drastic changes in the state legislature.
  68. [68]
    Act 250, 1970 - Vermont Historical Society
    Act 250 was a historic piece of state environmental legislation passed in 1970 by the Vermont legislature to provide a mechanism to control the developers.
  69. [69]
    Strengthening Act 250 - Vermont Natural Resources Council
    Act 250 is Vermont's landmark land use law, regulating development by reviewing larger scale projects for their potential impacts on the surrounding area.
  70. [70]
    2025 Vermont Legislative Session Wrap-Up
    Jul 8, 2025 · The session's signature accomplishments include the launch of a first-in-the-nation project-based TIF program that municipalities and developers ...<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Bill Status H.454 (Act 73) - Vermont Legislature
    Regular Session 2025-2026 · An act relating to transforming Vermont's education governance, quality, and finance systems.Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  72. [72]
    Vermont Legislature passes landmark education reform, despite ...
    Jun 16, 2025 · The bill, which Gov. Phil Scott is expected to sign, would fundamentally change how the state pays for and governs its K-12 schools.<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    What the Bluest State is Teaching Us About the School Choice Wave
    Aug 12, 2025 · H. 454 made several sweeping reforms to Vermont's education finance system. Some are good, such as a transition to a foundation formula and ...
  74. [74]
    How Vermont's single-payer health care dream fell apart - Vox
    Dec 22, 2014 · I asked Shumlin's office for an interview Wednesday to discuss what the plan's failure meant. Through a spokesperson, that request was declined.
  75. [75]
    Six Reasons Why Vermont's Single-Payer Health Plan Was Doomed ...
    Dec 21, 2014 · Vermont single payer: An unmitigated failure. What's remarkable, then, about Shumlin's attempt at single-payer health care is not that it failed ...
  76. [76]
    Why Bernie Sanders' Single-Payer Health Care Plan Failed In ... - NPR
    Sep 13, 2017 · ... Vermont was unable to establish a single-payer health care system. Politics. Why Bernie Sanders' Single-Payer Health Care Plan Failed In Vermont.
  77. [77]
    Charts & Infographics - Public Assets Institute
    But these net changes are still a small share of the total population: Since 1993, Vermont has seen a total net gain of about 3,000 people through migration.
  78. [78]
    CFV Releases Wealth Migration Report - Campaign for Vermont
    Dec 12, 2024 · Today we released a report examining migration patterns into and out of the state using Census and Internal Revenue Service data.Missing: stagnation | Show results with:stagnation
  79. [79]
    Scott chides 'arrogant' Legislature after Democrats flex supermajority ...
    Jun 18, 2024 · Republican Gov. Phil Scott, seen here speaking to reporters Tuesday, said Democratic supermajorities in the House and Senate have rendered him powerless.
  80. [80]
    Democrats lose supermajority — and a pair of committee chairs
    and a pair of committee chairs — in the Vermont House ... Republicans wiped out a Democratic supermajority ...
  81. [81]
    Vermont faces lawsuit over gun control laws - The Center Square
    Dec 19, 2023 · Gun rights groups are challenging a pair of Vermont laws that ban "high-capacity" magazines and set a 72-hour waiting period to purchase firearms.Missing: overregulation criticisms
  82. [82]
    Gun rights groups sue Vermont over two firearms laws - VTDigger
    Dec 18, 2023 · The lawsuit challenges the state's newly passed 72-hour waiting period for firearms purchases and a ban on high-capacity magazines that became law in 2018.Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  83. [83]
    Soulia: Act 250: A barrier to Vermont's economic future
    Jan 23, 2025 · Over the decades, Act 250 has grown into a broad regulatory framework that has hindered development while providing questionable benefits.Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  84. [84]
    COMMENTARY: Vermont's fiscal mess: Let's slash bloat and restore ...
    Jun 11, 2025 · However, the fiscal bloat since 2019 shows little progress toward cost-effective governance. Vermont could cut an estimated $2 billion from ...
  85. [85]
    Analysts raise concerns about Vermont budget | News - Times Argus
    By Darren M. Allen VERMONT PRESS BUREAU MONTPELIER - Despite presenting legislators with a balanced budget that increases government spending by less than ...<|separator|>
  86. [86]
    Vermont election updates: Scott, Rodgers and legislative candidates ...
    Nov 5, 2024 · Republican John Rodgers is on his way to win the tight lieutenant governor race, beating incumbent David Zuckerman, a Democrat/Progressive.
  87. [87]
    2024 Election Results - Vermont Chamber of Commerce
    Nov 8, 2024 · On Tuesday, Vermonters cast ballots to elect 150 House members, 30 Senate members, and most statewide officials.
  88. [88]
    2024 State Legislative Session Takeaways: Vermont
    Jun 14, 2024 · The Vermont Legislature adjourned on May 10. Lawmakers introduced 1206 bills during the two-year biennium, including 522 in 2024.Missing: Assembly | Show results with:Assembly<|separator|>
  89. [89]
    Another BIGGER Legislative Pay Raise Introduced While Blocking ...
    Feb 15, 2025 · Rather than the originally reported 96% increase, the total proposed salary change from 2022 to 2025 now amounts to 93.79%—still a substantial ...
  90. [90]
    Vermont House approves bill to double legislative pay by 2027
    amounts that could still be adjusted for ...
  91. [91]
    Chamber Raises Alarm on House Education Tax Proposal
    Jun 6, 2025 · The Vermont Chamber urges lawmakers to reject a House education finance proposal that unfairly targets businesses through a new tax ...Missing: fiscal irresponsibility
  92. [92]
    Vermont House passes mid-year budget tune-up after debate over ...
    The Vermont House on Friday passed its version of an annual bill to true-up state spending midway through the fiscal year — and ...