Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

2000s commodities boom

The 2000s commodities boom, often termed a supercycle, encompassed a sharp and prolonged escalation in prices for energy, metals, and agricultural products from roughly 2000 to mid-2008, with nominal indices for non-energy commodities rising over 200% and energy prices surging even more dramatically amid robust global demand outpacing supply.^[1]^[2] This era marked the fourth notable commodity supercycle since the 1900s, following those during the inflationary periods of the 1910s, 1940s, and 1970s,^[3] driven fundamentally by surging consumption in emerging markets, particularly China's industrialization and infrastructure buildout, which absorbed vast quantities of raw materials like iron ore, copper, and oil.^[1]^[2] Key triggers included China's accession to the World Trade Organization in 2001, which accelerated its export-led growth and urbanization, propelling demand for industrial metals and energy to levels that strained existing production capacities and delayed new investments due to prior low-price environments.^[2] Supply-side rigidities, such as geological depletion in mature fields and regulatory hurdles in mining, compounded these pressures, while loose monetary policies in developed economies facilitated financial inflows into commodity markets via index funds, amplifying price volatility without fundamentally altering the demand-supply imbalance.^[1]^[4] Agricultural commodities followed suit, with food price indices climbing amid biofuel mandates, weather disruptions, and export restrictions, though energy-linked inputs like fertilizers played a secondary role.^[1] The boom peaked in July 2008, with crude oil exceeding $140 per barrel and metals like copper reaching record highs, before collapsing amid the global financial crisis—though the supercycle extended until around 2014—which curbed demand and exposed overleveraged positions.^[1]^[2] It profoundly benefited resource-exporting nations, boosting GDP in countries like Australia, Brazil, and Russia through terms-of-trade gains, yet fueled inflationary pressures worldwide and highlighted vulnerabilities in import-dependent economies.^[4] Debates persist on the relative weights of structural demand versus speculative elements, but empirical analyses affirm that real economic expansion in Asia underpinned the cycle's duration and scale, distinguishing it from shorter-lived bubbles.^[2]^[4]

Historical Context

Late 20th-Century Commodity Depression

The late 20th-century commodity depression refers to the extended period of declining real prices for primary commodities from the early 1980s to around 2000, contrasting sharply with the inflationary spikes of the 1970s oil crises. Real non-oil commodity prices, as tracked by the World Bank's commodity price index (deflated by manufacturing unit values), fell by approximately 47% between 1980 and 1999.^[5] This downturn affected energy, metals, and agricultural goods broadly, with energy prices collapsing after 1981 from over $35 per barrel (in 1980 dollars) to under $15 by the mid-1980s, remaining subdued thereafter.^[1] The initial phase of the depression in the early 1980s stemmed from a combination of demand suppression and supply overhang. High U.S. interest rates under Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, aimed at curbing inflation, triggered a global recession that reduced industrial demand, while a strengthening U.S. dollar made commodities costlier for non-dollar economies.^[6] Concurrently, producers had ramped up output in response to 1970s highs, leading to excess capacity; for instance, non-OPEC oil production rose significantly, eroding cartel discipline.^[7] These factors caused a rapid price correction, with agricultural and metal prices also declining due to expanded acreage and mining output.^[6] Sustained low prices through the 1990s were driven by structural shifts favoring supply over demand. Technological advancements, such as improved extraction methods and crop yields from the Green Revolution's legacy, boosted productivity and lowered production costs, exerting downward pressure on prices.^[8] Advanced economies experienced "dematerialization," with GDP growth increasingly decoupled from commodity inputs through efficiency gains and a shift toward services, reducing energy intensity by about 1-2% annually.^[1] Demand from emerging markets remained modest until the late 1990s, while ample inventories and low investment in new capacity—discouraged by unprofitable margins—reinforced the glut.^[9] This era imposed severe economic strains on commodity-exporting developing nations, exacerbating the 1980s debt crisis in Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa, where terms of trade deteriorated and fiscal revenues plummeted.^[10] The prolonged underinvestment in supply infrastructure, however, sowed seeds for the subsequent 2000s boom by creating inelasticity when global demand accelerated.^[11] Empirical analyses confirm that supply-side productivity trends dominated, with real prices exhibiting a secular downward bias absent major shocks.^[12]

Primary Drivers

Demand Surge from Industrialization in Emerging Economies

The industrialization of emerging economies, led by China, generated a substantial portion of the global commodity demand growth observed from 2000 to 2008. China's entry into the World Trade Organization in 2001 accelerated its manufacturing and export-oriented growth, with annual GDP expansion averaging over 10 percent during this period, driven by heavy investment in infrastructure such as highways, railways, and urban housing.^[13]^[14] This structural shift from agriculture to industry and services amplified requirements for raw materials, as fixed capital formation—encompassing construction and machinery—rose to represent nearly half of GDP by the mid-2000s.^[1] China's steel sector exemplified this demand surge, with apparent consumption climbing from approximately 127 million metric tons in 2000 to 542 million metric tons in 2008, achieving a compound annual growth rate exceeding 17 percent and capturing over 50 percent of worldwide totals by the decade's end.^[15]^[16] Such expansion stemmed causally from urbanization, which saw the urban population double to around 600 million, necessitating vast quantities of iron ore, coke, and alloys for steel production in construction and vehicle manufacturing. Similarly, refined copper consumption in China expanded at an average annual rate of about 16 percent through the 2000s, supporting electrical infrastructure and electronics assembly, while aluminum demand followed a comparable trajectory for similar applications.^[17] Energy commodities experienced parallel pressures, as China's oil consumption quadrupled from 1978 levels to 396 million tons by 2008, with imports surging from 1.4 million barrels per day in 2000 to support industrial processes, power generation, and burgeoning transportation needs amid vehicle ownership growth.^[18]^[19] This import dependency, reaching 7.8 percent of global supply by 2004, underscored the inelastic link between rapid per capita income gains and fossil fuel requirements in a coal-dominant but diversifying energy mix.^[20] While China dominated—accounting for roughly two-thirds of incremental global commodity demand in key categories—other emerging markets amplified the trend. India's GDP growth, averaging 7-9 percent annually in the 2000s, boosted demand for oil and agricultural products through population increases and industrial diversification, though its commodity intensity remained lower than China's due to a services-led economy.^[1]^[21] Brazil and other BRIC nations contributed via agro-industrial expansion, but their roles were secondary to Asia's structural transformations, which collectively shifted global demand curves outward and strained supply responses.^[22]

Supply Inelasticity and Underinvestment

The supply of commodities exhibits significant inelasticity, particularly in the short to medium term, as production capacities are fixed and expansions require substantial time and capital for exploration, permitting, construction, and infrastructure development—often spanning 5–10 years for oil fields and 10–15 years for new mines.^[23] This structural rigidity meant that the rapid demand growth from emerging economies in the early 2000s outpaced supply responses, exacerbating price volatility. The preceding decades of low prices during the late 20th-century commodity depression had discouraged investment, resulting in depleted inventories and limited spare capacity entering the boom period; for instance, global mining exploration expenditures remained subdued through the 1990s, constraining the pipeline of viable projects when prices began rising around 2003.^[24] In the oil market, underinvestment in upstream activities after the 1986 price crash left non-OPEC producers unable to materially expand output despite surging demand; production outside OPEC increased from 46 million barrels per day in 2000 to about 49 million by 2004 but then plateaued, contributing to tightening global balances.^[25] Although nominal upstream investment rose 70% between 2004 and 2006, real terms growth was negligible due to escalating input costs, smaller average field sizes, and technical hurdles in accessing resources like deepwater reserves and oil sands, leading to disappointing capacity additions and a sharp drawdown in commercial inventories by 2007.^[23] OPEC's production quotas further limited responsive supply increases, amplifying the inelasticity as spare capacity dwindled to historically low levels. Similar dynamics afflicted industrial metals and mining, where chronic underinvestment in the 1990s bear market—characterized by low capital expenditures and deferred greenfield projects—left the sector with aging assets and insufficient new supply to match the industrialization-driven demand spike from China and other emerging markets starting in 2002.^[24] Inventories of key base metals such as copper and aluminum reached critically low levels by 2006–2007, with supply growth lagging until around 2010 due to the lengthy timelines for permitting and development amid rising environmental and regulatory hurdles.^[23]^[26] In agriculture, supply inelasticity stemmed from fixed arable land and slow adaptation of planting cycles, compounded by underinvestment in irrigation and yield-enhancing technologies during prior low-price eras, pushing stocks of major grains like wheat and corn to two-decade lows by 2007.^[23] These supply constraints, rooted in lagged investment cycles and inherent production rigidities, transformed moderate demand pressures into sustained price surges across commodities, with real prices for energy and metals rising over 200% from 2000 to 2008 before the financial crisis intervened. The failure to build adequate buffers during the boom's early phases underscored the procyclical nature of commodity markets, where low prior prices beget underinvestment, which in turn fuels subsequent booms when exogenous demand shocks materialize.^[23]

Financialization and Monetary Policy Influences

The financialization of commodity markets during the early 2000s involved a surge in participation by financial investors, such as hedge funds, pension funds, and index trackers, who treated commodities as an asset class for diversification and inflation hedging rather than traditional hedging against physical price risks.^[27] This shift was marked by rapid growth in commodity futures trading volume and the proliferation of financial instruments like exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and commodity index swaps, with total investments rising from approximately $15 billion in the early 2000s to over $200 billion by 2008.^[28] These inflows exerted upward pressure on prices by increasing demand for near-term futures contracts, elevating roll yields for long-only investors, and amplifying price momentum through positive feedback loops in speculative positioning.^[29] Monetary policy, particularly the U.S. Federal Reserve's accommodative stance following the 2001 recession and September 11 attacks, played a complementary role by lowering real interest rates to near-zero levels between 2002 and 2004, which reduced the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding commodities and encouraged capital flows into futures markets.^[30] Empirical analyses indicate that expansionary U.S. monetary policy shocks positively impacted broad commodity price indices, with low real rates fostering speculative demand as investors sought higher returns amid subdued yields on traditional fixed-income assets. For instance, a decline in real interest rates correlated with sustained commodity price appreciation through 2007, as liquidity from easy money policies in the dollar bloc countries fueled global asset searches that extended to commodities.^[31] While fundamental demand from emerging economies provided the primary impetus for the boom, financialization and loose monetary conditions amplified price dynamics by enhancing market liquidity yet also contributing to volatility spikes, as evidenced by heightened correlations between commodity returns and equity markets post-2004.^[32] Studies attribute part of the 2006–2008 price surge to these factors, noting that index fund inflows peaked alongside low-rate environments, though subsequent rate hikes and the 2008 credit contraction reversed much of the speculative premium.^[33] This interplay underscores how policy-induced liquidity interacted with financial innovation to distort traditional supply-demand signals in commodity pricing.^[34]

Price Dynamics During the Boom

Energy Commodities

Crude oil prices experienced dramatic increases during the 2000s, with West Texas Intermediate (WTI) averaging $30.38 per barrel in 2000 and reaching a nominal peak of $145.29 per barrel on July 14, 2008.^[35] Brent crude followed a similar trajectory, rising from around $28 per barrel in early 2000 to over $140 by mid-2008.^[36] This surge was primarily propelled by accelerating global demand, especially from China's industrialization, which boosted oil consumption by over 50% between 2000 and 2008, outpacing supply growth.^[1] Supply-side constraints, including underinvestment in exploration and production due to low prices in the 1990s, limited new capacity, while geopolitical disruptions like the 2003 Iraq War and 2005 Gulf hurricanes reduced output by up to 5% of global supply at peaks.^[36] ^[37] Natural gas prices also escalated sharply, with Henry Hub spot prices averaging $2.42 per million British thermal units (MMBtu) in 2000 and spiking to a monthly peak of $13.31 in July 2008.^[38] Demand growth in power generation and industry, coupled with supply inelasticity from regulatory hurdles and infrastructure bottlenecks in North America, drove the increase, though regional factors like U.S. LNG import reliance amplified volatility.^[39] Coal prices for thermal grades rose from approximately $25 per short ton in 2000 to over $140 per short ton by 2008, fueled by surging consumption in Asia for electricity production, where China alone added over 500 gigawatts of coal-fired capacity in the decade.^[40] Limited mining expansions and transportation constraints in exporting nations like Australia and Indonesia exacerbated shortages.^[41] Uranium prices underwent a pronounced boom, climbing from $10 per pound in 2003 to a spot market peak of $136 per pound in June 2007.^[42] This was triggered by renewed interest in nuclear power amid rising fossil fuel costs and concerns over energy security, leading to reactor orders doubling globally from 2000 to 2008, while secondary supply from dismantled warheads diminished.^[43] Mine production lagged due to prior low prices discouraging investment, creating a market deficit estimated at 20,000 tons annually by mid-decade.^[1] Across energy commodities, financialization played a role, with index fund investments surging from $13 billion in 2003 to $200 billion by 2008, contributing to price momentum beyond fundamentals in some analyses.^[44] However, empirical assessments attribute the core drivers to physical demand-supply imbalances rather than speculation alone.^[36]

Industrial and Precious Metals

Industrial metals prices experienced substantial increases during the 2000s commodities boom, primarily propelled by surging demand from rapid industrialization and urbanization in emerging economies, especially China, which accounted for a growing share of global consumption. Copper, a key indicator of economic activity due to its extensive use in construction, electronics, and infrastructure, rose from 1,844 USD per metric ton in January 2000 to a record high exceeding 8,600 USD per metric ton in early July 2008.^[45]^[46] This more than fourfold increase reflected supply constraints, including long lead times for new mine development and intermittent disruptions from labor strikes and regulatory hurdles in major producing regions like Chile and Peru.^[47] Iron ore prices followed a similar trajectory, climbing from approximately 32 USD per dry metric ton in late 2003 to over 140 USD per dry metric ton by mid-2008, driven by expanded steel production in Asia that outpaced mine output expansions from Australia and Brazil.^[48] Aluminum prices advanced from around 1,500 USD per metric ton in 2000 to peaks near 3,000 USD per metric ton in 2006-2007, amid heightened demand for packaging, transportation, and power transmission, compounded by energy-intensive smelting bottlenecks.^[49]^[50] Nickel, critical for stainless steel and batteries, saw prices multiply over five times from early 2000s lows to 2007 highs above 50,000 USD per metric ton, exacerbated by Indonesian export bans and later supply shortages.^[51] Precious metals also participated in the rally, though influenced more by investment flows and monetary factors than pure industrial demand. Gold advanced from an annual average of 279 USD per troy ounce in 2000 to a nominal peak surpassing 1,000 USD per ounce on March 13, 2008, as investors sought hedges against currency debasement, equity market volatility, and emerging inflation risks from expansive central bank policies.^[52]^[53] Silver prices roughly tripled over the decade, reaching about 20 USD per ounce by mid-2008, benefiting from both jewelry fabrication and speculative positioning.^[54] Platinum and palladium, with significant automotive catalytic converter applications, hit records with platinum exceeding 2,200 USD per ounce in 2008, reflecting South African supply vulnerabilities and substitution challenges from palladium.^[55] Overall, the metals price index for industrial varieties rose approximately 275% from 2000 to 2010, underscoring inelastic supply responses to demand shocks and contributing to elevated production costs in downstream manufacturing sectors.^[56] These dynamics highlighted the boom's roots in real economic expansion rather than mere speculation, as evidenced by sustained consumption growth outstripping inventory drawdowns.^[57]

Agricultural Products

Agricultural commodity prices experienced a sharp rise during the 2000s boom, with the FAO Food Price Index increasing from an average of about 90 in 2000 to a peak of 216.5 in June 2008, reflecting a more than doubling over the period.^[58] This surge was particularly pronounced in cereals, where the FAO Cereal Price Index reached 278 points in June 2008, up from around 100 in the early 2000s.^[59] Corn prices climbed from approximately $2 per bushel in 2002 to over $7 per bushel by mid-2008, while wheat and soybean prices similarly tripled, driven by a combination of heightened global demand and constrained supplies.^[60]^[61] Key drivers included surging demand from rapid urbanization and dietary shifts in emerging economies like China and India, which boosted consumption of grains and oilseeds for food and feed.^[23] The expansion of biofuel production significantly amplified pressures, as U.S. ethanol mandates diverted substantial corn acreage—reaching about 15% of total U.S. corn production by 2007—directly competing with food uses and elevating prices.^[62] European biodiesel policies similarly increased demand for soybeans and rapeseed, contributing to global price hikes estimated at 10-20% attributable to biofuels by some analyses.^[63] Supply-side factors exacerbated the imbalance, including adverse weather events such as droughts in Australia and Ukraine that reduced wheat exports, alongside chronic underinvestment in agricultural infrastructure following decades of low prices.^[7] Rising input costs, particularly for fertilizers and energy, further intensified price dynamics, as fertilizer prices correlated closely with natural gas and oil amid the broader commodities upswing.^[64] Speculative activity in futures markets was cited by some observers as amplifying volatility, though empirical studies attribute the primary impulse to fundamental supply-demand imbalances rather than pure speculation.^[65] By 2008, these pressures culminated in widespread food price inflation, prompting export restrictions in several producing countries and heightening concerns over global food security.^[66]

Other Commodities

Fertilizer prices for nitrogen, phosphate, and potash began increasing steadily from 2002 onward, driven by surging global agricultural demand linked to population growth, dietary shifts in emerging economies, and expanded biofuel production. This upward trend accelerated sharply in 2007-2008, with potash prices doubling, phosphate prices nearly doubling, and nitrogen prices rising by about one-third between spring 2007 and spring 2008.^[67]^[68] For instance, diammonium phosphate (DAP) prices escalated from $252 per metric ton in January 2007 to $752 per metric ton by January 2008, reflecting supply constraints and heightened input costs such as sulfur for phosphoric acid production.^[69] Uranium, essential for nuclear energy, underwent one of the most dramatic price surges among non-fossil energy commodities, rising from approximately $7 per pound in December 2000 to a peak of around $135 per pound in June 2007.^[70] This over 19-fold increase stemmed from anticipated nuclear power expansion amid concerns over fossil fuel dependence, coupled with production shortfalls from legacy mine closures and delays in new developments.^[43] Prices began declining in late 2007 as market imbalances emerged, but the boom highlighted uranium's sensitivity to long lead times in supply expansion.^[70]

Peak and Immediate Decline

Reaching the 2007-2008 Apex

Commodity prices across major categories intensified their upward trajectory in 2007 and the first half of 2008, culminating in an apex driven by persistent demand pressures and constrained supply responses. The IMF's Primary Commodity Price index, encompassing energy, non-fuel, and metals, exhibited steady escalation through this period, with broad gains reflecting synchronized global economic expansion before the onset of the financial crisis.^[71] This phase marked the convergence of structural factors from earlier in the decade, including rapid industrialization in Asia, with short-term catalysts such as low inventories and speculative positioning amplifying price volatility.^[72] Energy commodities epitomized the peak, as crude oil prices surged to a nominal record of $145 per barrel on July 3, 2008, following a steep acceleration from mid-2007 levels around $70.^[36] This apex resulted from robust demand outpacing production capacity, exacerbated by geopolitical tensions in oil-producing regions like the Middle East and Nigeria, alongside investor inflows into commodity futures amid equity market uncertainties.^[73] Natural gas and coal prices followed suit, with coal reaching highs tied to electricity demand in emerging markets.^[71] Industrial metals experienced parallel records, exemplified by copper prices climbing to approximately $4 per pound in April 2008, fueled by infrastructure booms in China and India where consumption accounted for over half of global demand.^[74] Precious metals like gold advanced from $700 per ounce in late 2007 to over $900 by summer 2008, as central bank easing and inflation fears drew safe-haven buying.^[75] ^[76] Aluminum and nickel similarly peaked, underscoring supply inelasticity from underinvestment in mining capacity during prior low-price years. Agricultural prices also crested, with wheat futures doubling from February 2007 to February 2008, exceeding $10 per bushel amid weather-related shortfalls in key exporters and biofuel mandates diverting supply.^[71] Corn and soybeans hit multi-year highs by mid-2008, pressured by ethanol production growth in the U.S. and export bans in response to domestic shortages. These synchronized peaks across asset classes highlighted the boom's maturity, where marginal supply additions failed to offset demand inelasticity, setting the stage for vulnerability to demand shocks.^[72]

The 2008 Financial Crisis Trigger

The intensification of the 2008 financial crisis, particularly following the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy on September 15, 2008, served as the proximate catalyst for the commodities boom's termination, transforming a maturing upcycle into a severe bust through a cascade of demand destruction and financial deleveraging. Prior to this, commodity prices had already crested in mid-2008—exemplified by crude oil reaching $147 per barrel on July 11—but the crisis's escalation triggered an unprecedented synchronization of global economic contraction, with industrial production in major economies contracting by 10-20% from peak to trough in late 2008 and early 2009.^[36]^[77] This was amplified by a sharp credit freeze, which curtailed lending for commodity inventories and trade finance, exacerbating the downturn beyond typical recessionary cycles.^[78] Commodity prices across categories experienced precipitous declines, with energy and metals suffering the most acute drops due to their sensitivity to industrial activity. The Thomson Reuters/Jefferies CRB Index, encompassing 19 raw materials, fell 36% in 2008 alone, from a July peak of approximately 470 to a December trough near 230, outpacing declines in prior downturns in both speed and magnitude.^[79] Crude oil prices, for example, plummeted over 75% from $147 per barrel in July to below $33 by December, reflecting a collapse in global consumption amid factory shutdowns and shipping halts.^[80] Metals like copper saw similar trajectories, with prices halving by early 2009 as Chinese import demand—previously a boom driver—evaporated amid export slumps.^[81] Agricultural commodities, though somewhat buffered by food security stockpiling, still declined 20-30% on average, underscoring the crisis's broad reach.^[82] Fundamentally, the trigger stemmed from real economic forces rather than isolated speculation: global trade volumes contracted by over 20% in late 2008, inventory cycles reversed into aggressive drawdowns, and emerging market growth—accounting for much of the prior demand surge—stalled as capital inflows reversed.^[83] While financialization had inflated prices via index funds and derivatives, the bust's severity aligned more closely with demand shocks, as evidenced by the disproportionate impact on physically traded volumes over paper positions.^[7] Central banks' initial rate cuts provided scant offset, as risk aversion dominated, forcing producers to curtail output amid fixed-cost structures, thus entrenching the supply-demand imbalance.^[84] This episode highlighted commodities' vulnerability to synchronized global recessions, distinct from supply-driven corrections.^[85]

Economic and Geopolitical Impacts

Growth Acceleration and Poverty Reduction

The commodities boom of the early 2000s accelerated economic growth in exporting nations by elevating export revenues, which funded infrastructure, mining expansions, and fiscal expansions, thereby amplifying GDP trajectories beyond historical norms. Low-income commodity-dependent countries, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, experienced average annual growth rates that roughly doubled compared to the prior three decades, reaching around 5-7% in many cases during 2003-2008, driven by sustained high prices for oil, metals, and agricultural goods.^[86] This acceleration stemmed from supply-side responses to price signals—increased production and investment in extractive sectors—coupled with demand from industrializing economies like China, which indirectly boosted global trade linkages for exporters.^[1] Poverty reduction followed as elevated commodity revenues translated into higher wages in resource sectors, expanded social transfers, and pro-poor public spending, lifting millions from extreme poverty. In Latin America, regional poverty incidence dropped from approximately 27% in 2000 to 12% by 2014, with the steepest declines during the boom concentrated in South American commodity exporters like Brazil and Peru, where real labor incomes rose due to commodity-linked job creation and conditional cash transfers funded by windfall taxes.^[87] Inequality metrics, such as the Gini coefficient, fell by about 11% across the region over the same period, reflecting broader income distribution effects from these revenues rather than solely growth alone.^[88] Similarly, in Chile, a major copper exporter, municipal-level poverty rates declined by over 2 percentage points between 2003 and 2009 directly attributable to mineral price surges, through mechanisms like increased employment and remittances in mining areas.^[89] These outcomes were not uniform, as effective institutions in countries like Australia and parts of Latin America maximized benefits via countercyclical policies, whereas weaker governance elsewhere risked volatility; nonetheless, the boom's net effect halved global extreme poverty rates from 2000 to 2010, with commodity channels contributing via faster per capita income gains in resource-rich low-income states.^[90] The deceleration of poverty reduction post-2014, to 1-2% annually from prior 8% rates, underscores the boom's causal role in sustaining elevated progress during its duration.^[91]

Inflationary Pressures and Resource Curse Risks

The rapid escalation of commodity prices in the 2000s, particularly in energy and metals, transmitted upward pressures to global inflation through higher input costs for production and transportation. Oil prices, which rose from around $20 per barrel in 2000 to a peak of $147 in July 2008, directly elevated energy components in consumer price indices and contributed to core inflation via pass-through effects in advanced economies.^[1] In the United States, for instance, the Federal Reserve reported that inflation rates in the first half of 2000 were notably higher due to surges in imported crude oil prices, which triggered sharp increases in retail gasoline and heating oil costs.^[92] Globally, commodity demand shocks from emerging market growth amplified these effects, with forecasts indicating persistent headline inflation impacts into 2008 even absent further price hikes, as central banks grappled with balancing growth against imported inflation.^[93]^[72] While monetary policies in many developed nations mitigated second-round effects through anchoring inflation expectations, the boom strained fiscal and monetary frameworks in import-dependent economies, exacerbating food and fuel-driven inflation that hit low-income households hardest. In developing Asia and Africa, where food commodities doubled or tripled in price by 2008, these pressures fueled social unrest and prompted subsidies that widened budget deficits.^[1] The commodity boom also amplified resource curse risks in exporting countries, where windfall revenues often fostered economic distortions rather than broad-based development. The Dutch disease phenomenon—characterized by real exchange rate appreciation from resource inflows—eroded competitiveness in non-resource tradable sectors like manufacturing and agriculture, as evidenced in panel analyses of 46 countries from 2000 to 2018 showing sector-specific contractions during the 2003-2013 price surge.^[94] In low-income commodity exporters, such as those in sub-Saharan Africa, the boom's volatility intensified dependency, with rapid revenue spikes leading to overinvestment in extractive industries while neglecting diversification, thereby heightening vulnerability to subsequent busts.^[95] Empirical studies from the period confirm that while short-term growth accelerated, institutional weaknesses frequently translated booms into corruption, inequality, and slowed long-term per capita income gains, as seen in oil-rich nations where governance failures prevented effective sovereign wealth fund utilization.^[96]^[97] Despite counterexamples of prudent management in countries with strong institutions, the prevailing pattern underscored causal links between unsterilized inflows and reduced productivity in non-boom sectors, perpetuating cycles of boom-bust dependency.^[98]^[99]

Controversies and Analytical Debates

Supercycle Thesis Versus Speculative Bubble Claims

The supercycle thesis posits that the 2000s commodities boom represented a multi-decade structural upswing in prices, driven by persistent demand imbalances from rapid industrialization and urbanization in emerging markets, particularly China. Proponents, drawing on historical analyses, identify four commodity supercycles since 1865, each lasting 30-40 years with price amplitudes 20-40% above or below long-term trends, attributing the latest phase to supply constraints meeting surging physical demand rather than transient financial factors.^[100] China's economic expansion, with average annual GDP growth exceeding 10% from 2000 to 2010, fueled this dynamic, as evidenced by steel consumption rising nearly sixfold over the decade to support infrastructure and manufacturing.^[101]^[102] Empirical decompositions confirm demand shocks, including from emerging economies, as the primary drivers of price booms, outpacing supply disruptions in explanatory power.^[7] Supporting data underscore the real-economy foundations: global commodity price indices, such as the GSCI, escalated from levels around 400 in early 2000 to a peak near 1,700 by mid-2008, reflecting broad-based gains across energy, metals, and agriculture aligned with consumption surges.^[103] This pattern mirrored physical indicators, including elevated production and trade volumes, rather than isolated financial signals. Econometric studies, including those from central banks, find that above-trend growth in commodity-intensive sectors like China's construction boom created sustained supply-demand gaps, with productivity-driven supply shocks playing a secondary role post-2000.^[104]^[2] In contrast, speculative bubble claims argue that financialization amplified prices beyond fundamentals, with inflows into commodity index funds and futures markets creating self-reinforcing momentum detached from physical supply-demand. Assets under commodity index management ballooned from $13 billion in 2004 to $260 billion by March 2008, coinciding with accelerated price rises and prompting assertions from some policymakers and analysts that non-commercial speculators distorted markets, akin to asset bubbles in equities or housing.^[105] Critics, including figures testifying before U.S. congressional committees, highlighted correlations between hedge fund positions and price volatility, suggesting low interest rates and portfolio diversification trends fueled excess demand in derivatives without corresponding inventory depletion.^[106] However, rigorous reviews challenge the bubble narrative's causality, finding limited evidence that speculation systematically elevated spot prices during the boom. IMF analyses of multiple studies conclude that while financial activity increased market liquidity, it did not drive the underlying trend, as prices remained anchored to real demand metrics like global growth and inventories, which did not exhibit the drawdowns typical of pure speculative frenzies.^[1] Similarly, examinations of 2004-2008 dynamics reveal no causal link from speculative positions to price increases, with fundamentals—such as China's import volumes—explaining the bulk of variance; post-crisis price recoveries in select commodities further indicate resilience beyond financial unwind.^[107] Meta-analyses of Granger causality tests across commodities yield mixed but predominantly non-supportive results for speculation as a primary vector, emphasizing instead that demand dominance aligns with supercycle patterns observed historically.^[108] This empirical tilt favors structural explanations, though amplified volatility from financial inflows remains acknowledged in hybrid models.^[109]

Environmental and Sustainability Critiques

The 2000s commodities boom, characterized by surging demand for metals, oil, and agricultural products, intensified extractive activities across resource-rich regions, drawing environmental critiques for accelerating habitat destruction and pollution without commensurate sustainability measures. In Latin America, particularly the Amazon basin, high prices for soybeans and beef prompted widespread land clearing, with commodity-driven deforestation contributing to an estimated 29% of Brazil's Amazon emissions from soy expansion and 71% from cattle ranching during the period. Mining operations for copper, iron ore, and gold expanded rapidly to meet global demand, resulting in over 70% of mining-related global forest loss from 2001 to 2019 attributed to gold and coal extraction alone, often in biodiverse rainforests where inadequate regulation led to soil erosion, water contamination from tailings, and mercury pollution. Oil exploration in sensitive ecosystems, such as Ecuador's Amazon blocks, saw production ramp up amid the boom, exacerbating risks of spills and seismic activity that degraded local water sources and displaced indigenous communities.^[110]^[111]^[112] Critics argued that the boom's emphasis on short-term output gains overlooked long-term ecological limits, as intensified extraction depleted non-renewable reserves and heightened vulnerability to climate variability. For instance, agricultural responses to elevated food commodity prices increased fertilizer and pesticide runoff, contributing to eutrophication in waterways, while the biofuel surge—spurred by high oil prices—diverted cropland from food production, indirectly pressuring forests through yield expansions in soy and palm oil. In export-dependent economies like Brazil and Peru, the influx of commodity revenues often funded lax enforcement rather than reforestation or renewable transitions, perpetuating a "resource curse" dynamic where environmental degradation outpaced benefits. Although Brazil implemented policies from 2004 onward that halved Amazon deforestation rates by 2008 despite rising exports, skeptics from environmental NGOs contended these were reactive and insufficient against boom-induced pressures, with cumulative land-use emissions rising as production scaled.^[113]^[114]^[115] Sustainability analyses highlighted the boom's role in amplifying greenhouse gas emissions through land-use change and fossil fuel dependency, with deforestation alone accounting for significant portions of national totals in boom beneficiaries like Indonesia and Brazil. Peer-reviewed assessments noted that while supply responses eventually moderated prices, the era underscored systemic failures in pricing externalities like biodiversity loss and carbon sequestration forgone, with mining waste and oil infrastructure leaving persistent legacies of contamination. Proponents of stricter regulations, including reports from international bodies, emphasized that without internalized environmental costs, such demand-driven cycles risked irreversible thresholds in ecosystem services, though empirical data showed varied outcomes—e.g., some regions decoupled production growth from deforestation via technological shifts. These critiques, often voiced by organizations like the World Wildlife Fund, urged decoupling economic gains from resource intensity, cautioning that the boom exemplified causal pathways from unchecked demand to ecological overshoot.^[116]^[117]^[118]

Long-Term Aftermath

Supply Response and Market Adjustments

High commodity prices during the early to mid-2000s incentivized substantial investments in production capacity across energy, metals, and agriculture, though supply responses were constrained by inherent lags in project development. In the oil sector, sustained prices above $50 per barrel from 2004 onward spurred exploration and development, particularly in non-OPEC regions; global crude oil production rose from approximately 73 million barrels per day in 2000 to 82 million barrels per day by 2008, driven by offshore projects in deepwater Brazil and the North Sea, as well as unconventional sources like Canadian oil sands.^[37] ^[119] However, these expansions occurred with a multi-year lag—typically 3 to 5 years for new fields—insufficient to fully offset demand surges from emerging economies, exacerbating price pressures until the 2008 peak.^[37] ^[71] In base metals, the boom prompted a capex surge, with mining companies committing over $100 billion annually by the late 2000s to new projects; copper mine production grew by about 40% from 12.3 million metric tons in 2000 to 17.2 million metric tons in 2008, fueled by greenfield developments in Chile, Peru, and Africa.^[120] Iron ore output similarly expanded, with Australia increasing exports from 140 million tons in 2000 to over 300 million tons by 2010 through mega-projects like Rio Tinto's Pilbara expansions, while Brazil's production rose from 212 million tons to around 350 million tons over the same period, supported by Vale's Carajás operations.^[121] ^[122] ^[123] These responses faced longer lead times of 5 to 10 years for full mine lifecycle development, limiting immediate supply elasticity. Agricultural supply adjustments were quicker but still lagged, with high prices from 2006-2008 prompting expanded acreage and yield investments; global harvested area for major grains increased by roughly 5% between 2000 and 2010, alongside fertilizer and irrigation boosts, though competition from biofuels diverted cropland and slowed net food supply growth.^[124] ^[125] Farmland values in key producers like the U.S. doubled nominally from 2000 to 2010, reflecting capital inflows to meet demand.^[124] Following the 2008 financial crisis, abrupt demand contraction triggered price collapses—oil fell from $147 per barrel in July 2008 to $32 by December—yet ongoing supply projects flooded markets, creating oversupply gluts into the early 2010s. Producers responded with cost-cutting, deferred capex, and mine rationalizations; for instance, iron ore spot prices dropped over 60% from 2008 peaks to 2010 troughs, forcing efficiency gains and output curbs in high-cost regions, while copper saw similar adjustments with production growth slowing post-2009.^[121] ^[126] These dynamics stabilized prices at lower levels, with inventories building and investment cycles resetting until renewed demand pressures emerged around 2010-2011.

Lessons for Subsequent Commodity Cycles

The 2000s commodities boom demonstrated that sustained demand surges from structural economic transformations, such as China's urbanization and industrialization, can generate multi-year price elevations across diverse commodities, but these dynamics are inherently finite due to maturing growth trajectories and eventual supply adaptations. Empirical analyses of the period, spanning roughly 2000 to 2011, reveal that commodity prices rose by averages of 150-300% in real terms for energy and metals, driven primarily by a tripling of China's commodity imports rather than isolated speculative activity.^[84] This underscores a core lesson: policymakers and investors must prioritize identifying genuine, long-term demand drivers—such as demographic shifts or technological adoptions—over transient financial flows, as misattributing booms to speculation alone, as some post-2008 analyses did, obscures the need for proactive supply-side responses.^[127] A second critical insight is the lagged nature of supply elasticity in capital-intensive sectors like mining and oil extraction, where development timelines often exceed five years from investment to production. During the 2000s, underinvestment prior to the boom exacerbated shortages, pushing prices to peaks like copper at $4.50 per pound in 2006 before supply expansions—such as new Australian iron ore mines and Brazilian soybean plantings—contributed to the 2008-2011 downturn.^[128] For subsequent cycles, including the 2020s uptick fueled by post-pandemic stimulus and geopolitical disruptions, this implies that high prices should trigger disciplined capital allocation toward capacity building, rather than complacency; failure to do so risks amplified volatility, as seen in the prolonged 2011-2020 bear market when excess supply from 2000s investments flooded markets amid China's slowing infrastructure demand.^[72] Commodity-dependent economies learned the perils of over-reliance on windfall revenues, with evidence from resource exporters like Australia and Brazil showing temporary GDP boosts—up to 5-7% annual growth in some cases—but accompanied by "resource curse" effects, including currency appreciations that eroded manufacturing competitiveness and fostered inefficient investments.^[129] Fiscal prudence, such as Norway's sovereign wealth fund model, mitigated these risks by saving boom-era surpluses, contrasting with Venezuela's mismanagement that led to hyperinflation post-bust; thus, diversification and countercyclical policies remain essential to buffer against inevitable reversals, as booms historically last 10-30 years before demand normalization.^[130] Finally, the interplay between monetary policy and commodity cycles highlights the amplification risks of accommodative central banking, as low interest rates in the early 2000s facilitated credit expansion that indirectly boosted demand but also sowed seeds for the 2008 financial crisis trigger.^[102] In later cycles, such as the 2021-2022 energy spike, similar loose policies contributed to inflationary pass-through, emphasizing the need for vigilance against conflating commodity-driven inflation with broader monetary excesses; real-time data on inventories and freight rates, rather than headline prices alone, better signal sustainable trends versus bubbles.^[131] These patterns affirm that while supercycles recur around transformative global shifts—like the 2020s energy transition demanding critical minerals—they demand rigorous causal analysis to distinguish enduring scarcities from cyclical noise.

References

[1]
[PDF] Commodities Boom: Riding a Wave
been booming. Prices of many commodities—especially those of oil, nickel, tin, corn, and wheat— have reached record highs in recent months.Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
[2]
[PDF] Commodity Price Cycles - World Bank Documents & Reports
In particular, a number of studies have associated the post-2000 commodities boom with increased demand for commodities due to the strong growth in emerging ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
[3]
[PDF] Macroeconomic Performance During Commodity Price Booms and ...
Then we provide empirical evidence (using commodity price boom and bust episodes) that commodity price shocks have a significant impact on output and investment.<|separator|>
[4]
[PDF] World Bank Commodity Price Data (The Pink Sheet)
1960. 1.63 .. 1.63 .. .. .. .. 0.14. 0.40 .. 3.62. 0.59. 0.92. 0.70. 1.03. 0.93. 1.12. 1.04. 312.33. 201.67 .. .. 327.00. 224.42 .. 91.83. 223.92. 81.01.
[5]
Causes of the 1984-86 Commodity Price Decline - IMF eLibrary
Jun 1, 1988 · The results of the analysis of commodity prices showed that rising supplies of food and larger production capacity of agricultural raw materials and metals ...
[6]
[PDF] What Drives Commodity Price Booms and Busts? - Dallas Fed
After World War II, positive commodity demand shocks led to increases in real prices in the wake of the immediate post-war efforts at re-industrialization and ...
[7]
[PDF] The Evolution of Commodity Markets Over the Past Century
May 11, 2022 · Dramatic increases in productivity have resulted in a declining trend in prices relative to manufactured goods and services. Technical ...
[8]
[PDF] Commodity Price Shocks: Order within Chaos - World Bank Document
Our analysis identifies three medium-term cycles: The first (from the early 1970s to mid-1980s) and third (from the early 2000s to 2020 onwards) exhibit similar ...
[9]
[PDF] Chapter 4: Commodity Price Swings and Commodity Exporters
11. 1970. There has been a broad-based rise in commodity prices during the past decade. Source: IMF staff calculations. Note: The real price index for a ...
[10]
[PDF] Commodity Price Supercycles: What Are They and What Lies Ahead?
In this article, we examine why commodity prices tend to go through multi-year periods of boom and bust, known as supercycles. We present evidence showing that ...
[11]
[PDF] A Typology of Real Commodity Prices in the Long Run
On the opposite end of the spectrum, soft commodities have been in collective and constant decline since 1900. Indeed, a broader interpretation of soft ...Missing: causes | Show results with:causes
[12]
China GDP Growth Rate | Historical Chart & Data - Macrotrends
China's GDP growth was 5.25% in 2023, 2.95% in 2022, 8.45% in 2021, and 2.24% in 2020.
[13]
Unpacking China's GDP - ChinaPower Project - CSIS
Since 1990, China has averaged breakneck GDP growth of almost 9 percent per year, at times peaking at over 14 percent. This is considerably faster than the ...
[14]
Must-know: Why China became the global steel giant - Yahoo Finance
Sep 16, 2014 · ... growth in China's steel consumption. The government has supported ... As we saw previously, between 2000–2008, steel consumption grew by 17% in ...
[15]
[PDF] China's Steel Industry - Reserve Bank of Australia
China's steel industry has grown rapidly in recent decades, with China now the world's largest producer and consumer of steel. this has resulted in a sharp ...
[16]
China's emergence in global commodity markets | Treasury.gov.au
Mar 29, 2012 · For example, China's consumption of copper and aluminium has increased by annual average rates of around 16 per cent over the past decade, in ...
[17]
China's oil use, 1990–2008 - ScienceDirect
By 2008, it had reached 396.0 million tons, roughly four times the 1978 level, making China the second largest oil user worldwide. The country became a net oil ...<|separator|>
[18]
China's Top Crude Oil Suppliers (2000–2024) | Econovis
China's crude oil imports have grown at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.0%, surging from 1.4 million barrels per day (bpd) in 2000 to a record- ...
[19]
[PDF] The Effects of Increasing Chinese Demand on Global Commodity ...
China's stunning economic growth in recent years has increased the country's demand for energy and other commodities used by a wide range of industries.
[20]
On booms and super-cycles: China and India's central role in global ...
Jul 31, 2015 · Some argue that rapid income growth in emerging economies, including China and India, was a key factor behind increases in food commodity prices ...
[21]
The Role of Major Emerging Markets in Global Commodity Demand
Rapid growth among the major emerging markets over the past 20 years has boosted global demand for commodities. The seven largest emerging markets accounted ...
[22]
Finance and Development
### Summary of Supply Factors Contributing to the 2000s Commodity Price Boom
[23]
Five reasons to believe in a new commodities super-cycle - Schroders
Mar 2, 2021 · For example, the early 2000s saw China's boom following a period of underinvestment due to the bear market in the 1990s. We believe these ...<|separator|>
[24]
Why Oil Booms And Busts Happen | OilPrice.com
Feb 25, 2016 · However, after rising from 46 million bpd to 49 million bpd (all liquids) from 2000 to 2004; non-OPEC supply stalled at around 49 million bpd ...
[25]
Will commodities roar like in the 2000s, or fall flat like in the 2010s?
Nov 28, 2023 · “The supply side was caught short and lagged this increased level of demand until around 2010. It's difficult to build out a mining facility and ...
[26]
[PDF] Financialization of Commodity Markets - Princeton University
Financialization thus affects risk sharing in commodity markets through the dual roles of financial investors: as providers of liquidity to hedgers when ...
[27]
Financialization in commodity markets: A passing trend or the new ...
In this paper, we show that large inflows into commodity investments, a recent phenomenon known as financialization, has changed the behavior and dependence ...
[28]
[PDF] Effects of Index-Fund Investing on Commodity Futures Prices
The last decade brought substantial increased participation in commodity markets by index funds that maintain long positions in the near futures contracts.Missing: inflows | Show results with:inflows
[29]
Did Easy Money in the Dollar Bloc Fuel the Global Commodity Boom?
Oct 14, 2009 · The IMF index of non-fuel commodity prices roughly doubled between end-2002 and its peak in mid 2008, driven by especially strong increases in ...
[30]
The Effects of Interest Rates on Commodity Prices | Jeffrey Frankel
High interest rates cause commodity prices to fall, while lower rates cause them to rise. Real interest rates are an important influence on commodity prices.
[31]
The evolution of commodity market financialization: Implications for ...
The financialization period is characterized by increased interdependence of non-oil and oil commodity markets with each other and with other asset markets, ...
[32]
[PDF] The Impact of Index and Swap Funds on Commodity Futures ...
Jun 1, 2010 · First, inflows into long-only commodity index funds did increase rather substantially throughout 2006-08 (see Figure 1). According to the most ...
[33]
[PDF] Interest Rate Dynamics and Commodity Prices - CEPII
Interest rates are a major factor in commodity price fluctuations, with real interest rates having a negative impact through the speculative channel. Rising ...
[34]
Crude Oil Prices (1946-2025) - Macrotrends
Interactive charts of West Texas Intermediate (WTI or NYMEX) crude oil prices per barrel back to 1946. The price of oil shown is adjusted for inflation.Missing: boom causes
[35]
[PDF] Causes and Consequences of the Oil Shock of 2007–08
a. Average monthly shortfall of global production of crude petroleum over the episode as a share of global production in the month before the episode. b ...
[36]
[PDF] Oil Market Dynamics through the Lens of the 2002-2009 Price Cycle
Jan 1, 2010 · First, changes in wholesale oil prices tend to have a small (and often insignificant) effect on demand for crude oil, particularly in the short ...
[37]
Henry Hub Natural Gas Spot Price (Dollars per Million Btu) - EIA
2000, 2.42, 2.66, 2.79, 3.04, 3.59, 4.29, 3.99, 4.43, 5.06, 5.02, 5.52, 8.90. 2001, 8.17 ... Natural Gas Futures Prices (NYMEX)Natural Gas Futures Prices · Daily · Annual · DataMissing: boom | Show results with:boom
[38]
Does the shale gas boom change the natural gas price-production ...
Thanks to the shale gas boom, the natural gas price collapsed from $7.97 per thousand cubic feet in 2010 to $2.66 in 2014. Given the widespread application of ...<|separator|>
[39]
The End of Cheap Coal - Post Carbon Institute
Jul 14, 2011 · Demand rose modestly in the 1990s (0.45% per year), but since 2000 it has been surging at 3.8% per year. China is both the world's biggest ...
[40]
[PDF] The U.S. Coal Industry: Challenging Transitions in the 21st Century
Sep 26, 2016 · Coal lost its comparative advantages after 2000. Prices of metallurgical coal (used in global industries) rose in the 2000-2010 period, leading ...
[41]
Uranium prices are soaring. Investors should be careful
Feb 29, 2024 · Prices jumped from $10 in 2003 to $136 in 2007 as investors forecast a nuclear renaissance thanks to “peak oil”, a supply crunch and dwindling ...<|separator|>
[42]
Uranium Markets - World Nuclear Association
Aug 23, 2024 · Spot and long-term uranium prices (2000-2023). uranium spot price and long term price between 2000 and 2021. Source: Cameco, UxC, TradeTech ...
[43]
The 2008 oil bubble: Causes and consequences - ScienceDirect.com
During the entire period from 2000 to 2008, the US dollar has been falling, while the price of crude oil has been rising, with the culmination in July 2008. If ...
[44]
Copper, grade A cathode Monthly Price - US Dollars per Metric Ton
Copper, grade A cathode Monthly Price - US Dollars per Metric Ton ; May 2000, 1,785.62, 6.37% ; Jun 2000, 1,753.18, -1.82% ; Jul 2000, 1,799.36, 2.63% ; Aug 2000 ...Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
[45]
Copper prices have been in freefall since the highs over $8600 ...
Oct 22, 2008 · Copper prices have been in freefall since the highs over $8600/tonne reached in early July 2008. Last updated: 08:37 22 Oct 2008 EDT. First ...
[46]
[PDF] NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES FROM BOOM TO BUST
The findings of the paper can be summarized as follows: real commodity prices of both energy and non-energy commodities have been on the rise from 1950 across ...
[47]
Iron Ore Monthly Price - US Dollars per Dry Metric Ton - IndexMundi
Iron Ore Monthly Price - US Dollars per Dry Metric Ton ; Oct 2003, 31.95, 0.00% ; Nov 2003, 31.95, 0.00% ; Dec 2003, 31.95, 0.00% ; Jan 2004, 37.90, 18.62%.
[48]
Aluminum Monthly Price - US Dollars per Metric Ton - IndexMundi
Aluminum Monthly Price - US Dollars per Metric Ton ; Oct 2000, 1,500.24, -6.31% ; Nov 2000, 1,473.86, -1.76% ; Dec 2000, 1,565.41, 6.21% ; Jan 2001, 1,615.65, 3.21%.Missing: boom | Show results with:boom
[49]
Aluminum Prices: 15-Year Price Analysis And Production-Demand ...
Nov 5, 2019 · Aluminum Price Movement Over Last 15 Years During the commodity boom period, price continuously increased from $1,716 in 2004 to $2,638 in 2007 ...
[50]
Industrial Metal Prices: Is the End in Sight or Further to Go?
Nov 2, 2018 · Indexing the real price level in January 2000 as 100, inflation-adjusted lead, tin, copper and zinc prices rose to 325, 221, 231 and 172 in May ...
[51]
Daily Gold Price History - usagold
Explore the dynamic journey of gold prices through history, from the gold standard era to the present day, highlighting significant fluctuations.
[52]
Highest Ever Gold Price in US Dollars | Chards
On 13th March 2008, it broke through the $1,000 per ounce barrier for the first time ever. Although it retreated to about $995, we think it may fix at over ...
[53]
Historic Gold, Silver, Platinum, & Palladium Price Spikes - JM Bullion
Gold, silver, platinum, and palladium have each exhibited massive fluctuations in price over the past five decades.
[54]
Historic Precious Metals Price Spikes - APMEX
May 17, 2022 · Between 1978 and early 1980, the world witnessed a 4X increase in oil prices, a 5X increase in platinum prices, a 6X increase in palladium ...
[55]
Does the commodities boom support the export led growth ...
Oct 20, 2016 · This study examines whether the higher growth was explained by the commodity boom, and if so, which of the different export commodities accounted for this ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
[56]
Metals and Oil: A Tale of Two Commodities
Sep 14, 2015 · In the early 2000s, demand for metals shifted from advanced economies in the West to emerging markets in the East. China, by far the main ...
[57]
FAO Food Price Index
The FAO Food Price Index (FFPI) is a measure of the monthly change in international prices of a basket of food commodities.
[58]
The FAO Price Index
After reaching a high of 278 points in June 2008, the FAO Cereal Price Index fell to 228 points in September, down 5 percent from the previous month but still ...
[59]
Corn Prices (1959-2025) - Macrotrends
Interactive chart of historical daily corn prices back to 1959. The price shown is in U.S. Dollars per bushel.Soybean Prices (1968-2025) · Wheat · Coffee Prices (1969-2025)Missing: boom | Show results with:boom
[60]
Soybean Prices (1968-2025) - Macrotrends
Interactive chart of historical daily soybean prices back to 1971. The price shown is in U.S. Dollars per bushel.Missing: boom | Show results with:boom
[61]
IMF Survey: Biofuel Demand Pushes Up Food Prices
Oct 17, 2007 · Higher biofuel demand in the United States and the European Union (EU) has not only led to higher corn and soybean prices, it has also resulted in price ...
[62]
- BIOFUELS IMPACT ON FOOD PRICES - GovInfo
91 BIOFUELS IMPACT ON FOOD PRICES ... This approximates the contribution of biofuel demand to increases in grain prices from 2000 to 2007.
[63]
[PDF] Farm Foundation Issue Report: What's Driving Food Prices?
Jul 1, 2008 · Some studies conclude that oil prices and rising production and transportation costs have helped drive current commodity price increases. But ...<|separator|>
[64]
Drivers and triggers of international food price spikes and volatility
The recent literature identifies the determinants of food price hikes as biofuel demand, speculation in commodity futures markets, and macroeconomic shocks.
[65]
Publication: Long-Term Drivers of Food Prices
This paper examines the relative contribution of various sector and macroeconomic drivers to price changes of five food commodities.
[66]
Causes of Fertilizer Price Volatility | Oklahoma State University
Prices of nitrogen, phosphate, and potash fertilizers began increasing in 2002, then increased sharply and reached historic highs in mid-2008.
[67]
[PDF] Factors Contributing to the Recent Increase in U.S. Fertilizer Prices ...
From 2007 to 2008, spring nitrogen prices increased by a third, phosphate prices nearly doubled, and potash prices doubled. The price spike in 2008 reflects low ...
[68]
World fertilizer prices surge 200% in 2007, hurting the poor
Feb 20, 2008 · World fertilizer prices surged by more than 200 percent in 2007, as farmers sought to maximize corn production for ethanol.<|separator|>
[69]
Uranium Monthly Price - US Dollars per Pound - IndexMundi
Uranium Monthly Price - US Dollars per Pound ; Dec 2000, 7.14, 0.14% ; Jan 2001, 7.10, -0.56% ; Feb 2001, 7.39, 4.08% ; Mar 2001, 7.69, 4.06%.
[70]
[PDF] Commodities in Boom
The food price surge in the second half of 2010, for example, was triggered by weather-related supply disruptions—drought and wildfires in russia, Ukraine, and ...
[71]
[PDF] Commodity Price Synchronization: A New Era?
The data for the dynamic factor model are sourced from the World. Bank Commodities Price Data (the Pink Sheet), which includes more than 70 commodity prices.
[72]
FACTBOX: Why oil prices hit a record high near $146 | Reuters
Jul 4, 2008 · A combination of weaker performance in other asset classes and expectations of continued strength across the commodities complex has drawn in ...
[73]
Copper Prices (1959-2025) - Macrotrends
Interactive chart of historical daily COMEX copper prices back to 1971. The price shown is in U.S. Dollars per pound.
[74]
Why gold is a hedge for nearly all seasons - Reuters
Oct 14, 2024 · The price of gold rose from around $700 per ounce in late 2007 to over $1,000 per ounce by early 2009, and it continued to climb in the ...
[75]
Gold Prices - 100 Year Historical Chart - Macrotrends
Interactive chart of historical data for real (inflation-adjusted) gold prices per ounce back to 1915. The series is deflated using the headline Consumer ...Gold Price vs Stock Market · Gold Daily · Silver Prices
[76]
: Half a century of oil price volatility - Reuters
Nov 20, 2008 · Prices rise fairly steadily through the first half of the year and peak on July 11 at $147.50 for Brent and $147.27 for U.S. crude.
[77]
Finance & Development, June 2012 - Commodities in Boom
SOARING commodity prices were a hallmark of the global economic boom from 2003 to mid-2008 (see Chart 1). When the global financial crisis erupted and the Great ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
[78]
How commodity business, worldwide economy crumbled in 2008
In 2008, the Reuters/Jefferies CRB Index of 19 raw materials fell 36 percent, the most since the gauge debuted in 1956, to 229.54. It rose to a record ...
[79]
Why This Oil Crisis Is Different To 2008 | OilPrice.com
Jul 17, 2016 · Oil prices dropped from historic highs of $144.29 in July 2008, to $33.87 five months later.
[80]
https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Why-This-Oil-Crisis-Is-Different-To-2008.html
[81]
IMF Survey: Commodity Prices Buoyant in Year of Crisis, Recovery
Dec 30, 2009 · The effects of the crisis have been to reduce prices somewhat below their 2008 peaks, but demand is expected to continue rising at a solid pace ...
[82]
WTO sees 9% global trade decline in 2009 as recession strikes
Mar 23, 2009 · The collapse in global demand brought on by the biggest economic downturn in decades will drive exports down by roughly 9% in volume terms in 2009.
[83]
Commodities in Boom: The global economic crisis ... - IMF eLibrary
May 31, 2012 · This article considers commodity market developments since the global financial crisis in light of recent research on the origins of commodity price booms.
[84]
[PDF] Financial Crash, Commodity Prices, and Global Imbalances
Sep 15, 2008 · Essentially, in the first phase of the crisis the combination of tight commodities markets and the decline in equilibrium real interest rates.
[85]
[PDF] After the Commodities Boom—WhAt Next for LoW-iNCome CouNtries?
Growth in low-income countries doubled during the 2000s, compared with the average for the previous three decades. For many, particularly those in Sub-Saharan ...
[86]
How the Commodity Boom Helped Tackle Poverty and Inequality in ...
Jun 21, 2018 · We show that poverty has decreased from about 27 to 12 percent, and inequality has decreased almost 11 percent across Latin America from 2000 to 2014.
[87]
Commodity Cycles, Inequality, and Poverty in Latin America in
Apr 26, 2021 · Poverty and inequality reduction was strong across Latin America during the commodity boom period, especially in South America (Figures 3 and 4) ...
[88]
Commodity price shocks and poverty reduction in Chile
According to our estimations, the increase in mineral prices experienced between 2003 and 2009 reduced poverty by more than 2% points in municipalities ...
[89]
Assessing a Decade of Progress in Reducing Poverty, 2000-2010
Poverty fell from 49 percent in 2000 to 40 percent in 2005, propelled by respectable economic growth and relatively stable inequality.
[90]
Reversing the setback to global poverty – will a commodity super ...
The pace of global poverty reduction decelerated abruptly with the commodity price crash of 2014–2015, which marked the end of a decade-long boom in commodity ...Missing: effects 2000s
[91]
[PDF] Monetary Policy Report to the Congress - Federal Reserve Board
Inflation rates over the first half of 2000 were elevated by an additional increase in the price of imported crude oil, which led to sharp hikes in retail.
[92]
Commodities Boom: Riding a Wave in: Finance & Development ...
Apr 7, 2008 · The lead article warns that the impact on headline inflation levels might persist throughout 2008, even without further commodity price hikes.
[93]
[PDF] Sector-specific Dutch Disease effects of the 2003 to 2013 commodity ...
Oct 20, 2022 · It is used to analyze panel data for 46 countries from 2000 to 2018. Following the theory of the Dutch Disease, the hypothe- sis is that all ...
[94]
The shadow over commodity exporting low-income countries (LICs)
Aug 21, 2015 · Finally, Dutch Disease associated with the commodity boom means that, for many commodity-exporting LICs, shifting growth away from a shrinking ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[95]
[PDF] Natural Resource Booms in the Modern Era: Is the curse still alive?
A boom means that the resource-intensive sector is growing; by defin- ition this rules out a slow-growth curse, at least in that part of the economy. In ...
[96]
[PDF] The Resource Curse
The term resource curse encompasses the significant social, economic and political challenges that are unique to countries rich in oil, gas and minerals. • Many ...
[97]
The dark side of the boom: Dutch disease, competition with China ...
The dark side of the boom: Dutch disease ... The natural resource boom of the 2000s brought important economic benefits to commodity-exporting nations.
[98]
A “dark side” to the commodity boom in Africa
Jun 28, 2017 · New evidence on the resource curse · double-edged sword for developing economies. Commodity prices are volatile, and focusing too much on one ...
[99]
Super Cycles of Commodity Prices Since the Mid-Nineteenth Century
Decomposition of real commodity prices suggests four super cycles during 1865–2010 ranging between 30 and 40 years with amplitudes 20–40% higher or lower ...
[100]
The China commodities supercycle is over. Will there be another?
Jan 14, 2025 · For the countries and companies that rode the wave of the Chinese supercycle for the past 20 years, it is a profound and at times painful shift.
[101]
Revisiting super-cycles in commodity prices - ScienceDirect.com
Results show that super-cycles in oil prices still exist and are not moderating. The last peak in long-term oil price was observed in 2012 and since then it has ...
[102]
GSCI Commodity Index - Price - Chart - Historical Data - News
Historically, GSCI Commodity Index reached an all time high of 1718.63 in July of 2008. GSCI Commodity Index - data, forecasts, historical chart - was last ...
[103]
[PDF] How Super is the Commodity Cycle? - GCARD
Therefore, it should be evident that a large demand shock such as above-trend economic growth in China could create a supply-demand imbalance that results in ...
[104]
When Oil Prices Jump, Is Speculation To Blame? | St. Louis Fed
Apr 1, 2012 · On balance, the evidence does not support the claim that a sudden explosion in commodity trading tectonically shifted historical precedent: ...
[105]
[PDF] A Speculative Bubble in Commodity Futures Prices? Cross ...
Recent accusations against speculators in general and long-only commodity index funds in particular, include: increasing market volatility, ...
[106]
[PDF] The Simple Economics of Commodity Price Speculation - MIT Sloan
1 In a more qualitative study, Smith (2009) does not find any evidence that speculation increased prices between 2004 and 2008, noting that inventories were ...<|separator|>
[107]
The impact of speculation on commodity prices: A Meta-Granger ...
This paper uses Meta-Granger analysis to explain and summarize the mixed results in the literature on the impact of financial speculation on commodity prices.
[108]
The impact of speculation on commodity futures markets – A review ...
Speculation with agricultural and food commodities has been criticized for being responsible for the commodity price boom in the 2000s. In the US, the ...
[109]
30% of Brazil's emissions from deforestation are export-driven
According to the paper, 29 percent of emissions from deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon were due to soybean production and 71 percent were due to cattle ...
[110]
Over 3 million acres of trees have been lost globally from 2001 to ...
Oct 23, 2024 · According to a World Wildlife Fund study, gold and coal extraction resulted in over 70% of all mining-related deforestation from 2001 to 2019.
[111]
Environmental impacts of oil extraction in blocks 16 and 67 of the ...
Nov 10, 2024 · During the period 1999-2022, the carbon emissions associated with the oil extraction in these blocks have increased by 139.01%. It has been ...
[112]
[PDF] COMMODITY BOOM AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
This paper investigates the apparent paradox of the mid 2000's sharp reduction in the deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon that happened alongside fast growing ...
[113]
Commodity boom extracting increasingly heavy toll on Amazon forests
Jan 6, 2015 · It has also unleashed a new scramble for oil, minerals and cropland that is accelerating deforestation and fuelling a new wave of land conflicts ...
[114]
The environmental impacts of export booms in Brazil
Aug 19, 2025 · Brazil's export boom since 2000 has driven job growth, especially in formal and greener employment, though environmentally risky jobs ...
[115]
Decoupling of deforestation and soy production in the southern ...
From 2006 to 2010, deforestation in the Amazon frontier state of Mato Grosso decreased to 30% of its historical average (1996–2005) whereas agricultural ...
[116]
Mining Is Increasingly Pushing into Critical Rainforests and ...
Oct 23, 2024 · According to a WWF study, gold and coal extraction resulted in over 71% of all mining-related deforestation from 2001 to 2019. The current gold ...
[117]
Environmental consequences of oil production from oil sands - Rosa
Dec 16, 2016 · Here we examine forest loss and water use for the world's major oil sands deposits. We calculate actual and potential rates of water use and forest loss.
[118]
The history of global oil production - Visualizing Energy
Jun 17, 2024 · Oil consumption increased steadily in the 2000s due to rising population, increased affluence, and especially the use of personal vehicles and ...
[119]
Copper-bottomed booms and busts - Winton
Jan 18, 2017 · During the 2000s, the price of copper quadrupled, reflecting the extraordinary swell in demand by China. Urbanisation, rural electrification and ...
[120]
The Australian Mining Industry during the 2000s | RDP 2011-08
Mining investment rose from 1½ per cent of GDP in 2000 to over 4 per cent recently, to be well above the levels during previous booms.Missing: damage | Show results with:damage
[121]
[PDF] Iron ore: the bigger picture - Minerals Council of Australia
Over the period of strong production growth from 2000, the diversity of iron ore supply broadened sharply. The number of countries producing more than 10 ...
[122]
Figure 2 Production and exports of iron ore in Brazil. 2000 -2017...
Over the period, the annual average growth in the production of iron ore was 4.57%, leading the production to rise from 212.5 million tons to 454 million tons, ...
[123]
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Production-and-exports-of-iron-ore-in-Brazil-2000-2017-millions-of-tons_fig2_351041385
[124]
[PDF] How Fast Do Commodity Markets Adjust to Shocks?
Supply and demand become more elastic at longer time horizons for mineral and energy commodities, but not for most agricultural commodities. RECOMMENDED ...
[125]
[PDF] Recent commodity market developments: trends and challenges
Dec 23, 2008 · However, since mid-2008, commodity prices have fallen sharply in a reversal of recent trends. This background note reviews recent developments ...
[126]
A Closer Look at Past Commodities Supercycles - OpenMarkets
May 5, 2021 · This was a broad-based commodities supercycle,” says Putnam. The 90s-2000s supercycle was due to China's enormous growth and modernization.
[127]
[PDF] Commodity price super-cycle: what lies ahead?
➢ Downswing of the current super-cycle likely to continue. ▫. Slower demand growth in China. Shift in its pattern of growth also suggest uneven impact on ...<|separator|>
[128]
Commodity price cycles: Causes and consequences
Jan 24, 2022 · In the past, global recessions have been associated with weak demand and disruptions in supply, which combined to depress commodity prices.
[129]
Commodity terms of trade: The history of booms and busts
This column presents comprehensive new data on country-specific commodity terms of trade. It finds that, on average, countries grow nearly 2 percentage points ...
[130]
[PDF] Commodities BOOM - IMF eLibrary
This article considers commodity market developments since the global financial crisis in light of recent research on the ori- gins of commodity price booms, ...
[131]
Super-cycles of commodity prices since the mid-nineteenth century
UN DESA working paper decomposing real commodity prices and identifying four super-cycles from 1865-2009, aligning with periods of industrialization and inflation.