Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

A20 line

The A20 line, also referred to as the A20 address line or A20 gate, is a hardware signal in the x86 processor architecture that controls the 21st bit (A20) of the physical memory address bus, enabling access to memory locations beyond the 1 MB limit imposed by the original and 8088 processors. Introduced with the (PC AT) in 1984, which utilized the microprocessor featuring a 24-bit address bus capable of addressing up to 16 MB of physical memory, the A20 line was implemented to support while ensuring with earlier PC systems. By default, the A20 line is disabled at system boot, masking the A20 bit to replicate the 20-bit addressing behavior of the 8086 (limiting access to 1 MB and causing addresses above 1 MB to wrap around to the first MB), a design choice rooted in maintaining software compatibility for the burgeoning PC ecosystem. This mechanism, physically represented on the PC AT system board and I/O channel connectors, is toggled through the 8042 keyboard controller or routines, such as those using interrupt 15h for operations. Enabling the A20 gate—via commands like writing to the controller's output port (bit 1) or manufacturing test port 0x80—allows the 80286 to utilize its full protected-mode addressing capabilities, including up to 1 of per task, which became essential for memory-intensive applications and operating systems in the and early . The A20 line's management persisted as a legacy requirement in subsequent x86 systems, influencing bootloaders, real-mode operating systems like , and even modern emulators, until hardware designs in the late and beyond rendered it obsolete by permanently enabling extended addressing without compatibility constraints.

Background

Early PC Memory Limitations

The and 8088 microprocessors, which powered the original PC and its compatible systems, featured a 20-bit address bus consisting of lines A0 through A19, enabling direct access to a maximum of of physical memory, equivalent to $2^{20} bytes or addresses from 00000h to FFFFFh. This hardware constraint arose from the design of the Bus Interface Unit (BIU), which generated 20-bit physical addresses to interface with memory and I/O devices. In , the addressing scheme employed 16-bit registers (CS for code, DS for data, for , and for extra) combined with 16-bit offsets to form physical addresses, calculated as ( value × 16) + offset, theoretically spanning the full 1 MB space. However, this mechanism introduced wraparound behavior at the 1 MB boundary, where addresses exceeding FFFFFh would cycle back to 00000h, potentially causing unintended overlaps or errors in memory access without explicit software management. Each was limited to 64 (65,536 bytes, addressed by offsets from 0000h to FFFFh), with segments aligned on 16-byte boundaries to facilitate overlapping and contiguous addressing. The PC, introduced in 1981, and its XT successor typically shipped with base read/write configurations ranging from 16 to 64 on the system board, expandable in 16 increments up to a maximum of 640 for general-purpose use by applications and the operating system. The remaining upper memory regions were reserved: approximately 128 from A0000h to BFFFFh for video (e.g., 32 for monochrome display at B0000h–B7FFFh or 32 for color/graphics at B8000h–BFFFFh), and 64 from F0000h to FFFFFh for containing firmware, I/O drivers, and the Cassette . This allocation left 384 (from 640 to 1 MB) unavailable for base memory expansion due to these hardware reservations, enforcing a practical limit on usable . Real-mode addressing quirks, such as the 64 KB size, required programmers to manage transitions across boundaries by adjusting the segment register when offsets approached FFFFh, as exceeding this would wrap the offset back to 0000h and potentially access unintended locations in the next . These characteristics, including the overlapping nature of segments by 16 bytes, influenced compatibility decisions in early PC software and hardware design to ensure reliable operation within the constrained 1 MB space.

Introduction of Extended Addressing

The original Intel 8086 and 8088 processors employed 20-bit addressing, constraining them to a 1 MB memory space with inherent wraparound at the upper limit. In February 1982, Intel introduced the 80286 microprocessor, which expanded physical addressing to 24 bits (A0–A23), enabling access to up to 16 MB of memory and marking a significant advancement beyond the 8086's capabilities. The 80286 incorporated two primary operating modes to balance innovation with legacy support: protected mode, which fully leveraged the 24-bit address bus for the complete 16 MB address space, and real mode, which preserved the 20-bit addressing and segmented memory model of the 8086 to ensure object-code compatibility with existing software. The IBM PC/AT, released in 1984, integrated the 80286 processor and introduced extended memory above the traditional 1 MB boundary, allowing for greater RAM capacity through onboard and expansion options while maintaining real-mode operation as the default for booting and running 8086-compatible applications. However, this transition created compatibility challenges, as the 80286's real mode did not automatically replicate the 8086's exact addressing behavior without additional hardware intervention. To achieve seamless 8086 emulation and prevent unintended access to the 1–2 MB address range—which would disrupt wraparound expectations—early motherboard designs like the IBM AT's included built-in logic to disable the A20 address line by default.

Technical Mechanism

Role of the A20 Address Line

The A20 address line, also known as bit 20 (zero-indexed) on the address bus, serves as the 21st bit in x86 processor addressing, enabling the distinction between the lower 1 MB of (addresses 00000h to FFFFFh) and the immediately beyond it (1 MB to 2 MB). This line was introduced with the processor, which featured a 24-bit address bus capable of accessing up to 16 MB in , but required specific handling in to maintain compatibility with earlier systems. When the A20 line is held low (0) by the external gate, bit 20 is masked on the address bus, causing addresses that exceed 1 MB to wrap around to the base of memory, thereby emulating the 20-bit addressing behavior of the original Intel 8086 processor and limiting the effective addressable space to 1 MB (00000h to FFFFFh). For example, a linear address of 100000h would map to 00000h under this condition, preventing unintended access to higher memory regions and ensuring software compatibility with legacy 8086/8088 applications that assume a 1 MB wraparound. In real mode on the 80286, the physical address is 24 bits with A21–A23 always low, but A20 may be high for addresses >=1MB; the external A20 gate forces A20 low to enforce the 1MB boundary and emulate 8086 wraparound. When the A20 line is asserted high (1), bit 20 is unmasked, allowing full 21-bit addressing in and extending access to the High Memory Area (HMA), which spans 100000h to 10FFEFh (1 MB to approximately 1 MB + 64 KB, or 65,520 bytes). This capability provides a modest expansion beyond the traditional 1 MB limit without switching to , though the HMA's usability is constrained by the 64 KB segment size in . Subsequent processors, such as the 80386, integrated the A20 mechanism into the CPU pinout (via the A20M# pin) while preserving it for real-mode compatibility, ensuring with 80286 software and hardware designs.

A20 Gating for Compatibility

The A20 gate, also referred to as the Gate-A20, is a hardware circuit integrated into the design of the PC/AT, introduced in 1984, which forces the A20 address line to a low state upon system reset or power-up. This mechanism emulates the 20-bit addressing behavior of the original /8088 processors used in the PC, limiting effective addressable memory to 1 MB in . By default disabling the A20 line, the gate ensures that the 21st bit of the address bus (A20) remains inactive, causing memory addresses exceeding 1 MB to wrap around to the base of the address space rather than accessing higher memory regions. The primary purpose of this gating logic was to maintain with software developed for the 8086-based PC, much of which relied on the wraparound behavior at the 1 boundary for proper operation. Without this intervention, programs running in on the 80286 —capable of 24-bit addressing up to 16 —could inadvertently access undefined areas above 1 , leading to unpredictable behavior or crashes in ported applications such as early versions of QDOS or development tools. This design choice allowed to transition to more advanced processors while preserving the vast existing software ecosystem without requiring widespread recompilation or modifications. In early implementations on the PC/AT, the A20 gate employed straightforward hardware elements, such as AND gates or latches, directly tied to the CPU's reset signals to enforce the low state of A20. These simple circuits sufficed in the absence of advanced features like on-chip caches, as the PC/AT's focused on reliable of prior systems. As processor advanced into the 80386 era around 1985, the A20 gating mechanism grew more intricate to accommodate new complexities such as and the potential for external caching, which could otherwise introduce inconsistencies in address handling during real-mode operations. Despite these enhancements, the core principle of forcing A20 low on initialization endured to support real-mode , ensuring continued compatibility with legacy software environments.

Enabling Methods

Keyboard Controller Approach

The 8042 keyboard controller, introduced as the standard interface in the IBM PC/AT in 1984, provided the primary mechanism for enabling the A20 address line through dedicated output port commands. This microcontroller managed keyboard and auxiliary device inputs while also controlling system signals, including the A20 gate via bit 1 of its output port. The controller's ubiquity in the PC/AT design and subsequent compatible systems, including machines, established it as the for A20 management across x86 platforms. To enable the A20 line, software writes the command byte 0xD1 to the controller's command port at I/O address 0x64, instructing it to prepare for an output port update; it then waits for the input buffer to empty (indicated by bit 1 of the at 0x64 being clear) before writing the data byte 0xDF to the data port at 0x60, which sets output port bit 1 high and activates the gate. Disabling A20 follows a similar sequence: write 0xD1 to 0x64, wait for buffer readiness, then write 0xDD to 0x60 to clear bit 1. This procedure, which typically requires polling the in a loop with timeouts up to 20 ms for command acknowledgment, is routinely implemented in initialization routines and operating system bootloaders to ensure reliable memory addressing transitions. The A20 signal propagates within 20 μs of the controller accepting the port data. Early implementations of the 8042 exhibited inherent processing delays, with response times for commands ranging from 15 to start transmission to 2 for completion, compounded by the need for buffer synchronization. These latencies, including signal switching times on the order of 20 μs, posed reliability challenges in faster systems where rapid A20 toggling was required, often necessitating extended wait loops or retries to avoid incomplete gate operations during mode switches.

FAST and Alternative Gates

The FAST A20 gate provides a direct hardware method to enable the A20 address line by manipulating the system control port at I/O address 0x92, bypassing the slower keyboard controller sequence. This approach sets bit 1 (value 0x02) of the port, which controls the A20 gate on compatible chipsets, allowing activation in a single I/O operation without the delays associated with command queuing in the 8042 controller. It became common in later systems and many 386-era motherboards starting in the late 1980s, offering significantly faster enabling for access in performance-critical bootloaders and early operating systems. To implement the FAST gate, software reads the current byte from 0x92, performs a bitwise OR with 0x02 to set the A20 bit while preserving other bits (such as bit 0 for CPU reset), and writes the result back; a direct write of 0x02 was occasionally used but could interfere with functionality on some . This method became common in systems like those using AMI BIOS variants. Chipset-specific implementations, such as those in VIA's VT82C496G from the 1990s, supported fast A20 via 0x92 writes or other methods for enabling A20 on / platforms. Despite its speed advantages, the FAST A20 gate was not universally supported across all motherboards, leading to risks like system lockups or hardware damage if written to on incompatible systems. Reliable enabling required prior detection routines, such as probing the port's response or checking extension functions (e.g., INT 15h, AH=0x24), to confirm compatibility before attempting the write. This method saw adoption in operating systems like and early Windows versions, where it supplemented the keyboard controller approach on detected hardware for quicker initialization.

Software Implications

A20 Handlers and Memory Managers

A20 handlers are software routines implemented in or operating system code to detect the status of the A20 line and toggle it as needed for accessing beyond the 1 MB boundary. These handlers ensure compatibility with real-mode addressing while enabling access, particularly for operations involving the high memory area (HMA), which spans the 64 KB region immediately above 1 MB. In implementations, handlers often leverage interrupt 15h with =87h to perform block moves of , a that requires the A20 line to be enabled to avoid wrapping and ensure correct up to 16 MB. A prominent example of an A20 handler is provided by HIMEM.SYS, a device driver introduced with MS-DOS 5.0 in 1991, which implements the eXtended Memory Specification (XMS) for managing memory above 1 MB. HIMEM.SYS installs a dedicated A20 handler to control access to the HMA, supporting multiple machine-specific methods to toggle the line and allocating the HMA as a single 64 KB block for exclusive use by one program at a time. This driver detects the host system's configuration and selects an appropriate handler, such as those for IBM PC/AT compatibles, ensuring reliable enabling of extended memory without hardware conflicts. Detection of the A20 line's status in these handlers typically involves a probing sequence that writes a known value to a high , such as 0x500000 (5 ), and then reads from the corresponding low , 0x100000 (1 ), to check for due to wrapping. If the read value matches the written one at the low address, the A20 line is disabled; otherwise, it is enabled. Handlers retry alternative enabling methods—such as controller commands or chipset-specific ports—if the initial probe indicates failure, prioritizing non-disruptive approaches to maintain system stability. Beyond , other DOS memory managers incorporate A20 handling for advanced features like multitasking and expanded memory emulation. , Microsoft's expanded memory manager for , builds on XMS by emulating LIM 4.0 expanded memory using pages and relies on an underlying A20 handler (often from ) to switch between real and s for upper memory block (UMB) allocation. Similarly, Quarterdeck's QEMM provides an integrated A20 handler alongside its optimized , enabling efficient UMB usage and multitasking by dynamically controlling the line for tasks. In systems, such as early implementations, bootloaders include A20 enabling routines in code (e.g., setup.S) to prepare for loading, using probes and controller commands to ensure full 32-bit addressing before entry.

Affected Programs and Workarounds

Early DOS programs, particularly those developed for the 8086 processor, often relied on the 1 MB address wraparound behavior, where memory accesses beyond 1 MB folded back to the beginning of the address space. This assumption caused compatibility issues on 80286 and later processors, where the A20 gate was disabled by default to emulate the wraparound but could be enabled for extended memory access, breaking programs that depended on it. For example, Microsoft Pascal 1.0 (1981) used negative segment register values for copying static data, which wrapped around correctly on the 8086 but failed on the 80286 without wraparound emulation. Compilers like the compiler for exploited the CALL 5 interface in the program's segment prefix (), a holdover from compatibility that invoked functions via a far call wrapping from high addresses (e.g., FFFF:0005) to low (0000:0005). This mechanism, present since 1.0 (1981), failed if the A20 line was enabled, as the wraparound no longer occurred, leading to incorrect execution of handlers. Similarly, executables compressed with 's EXEPACK utility (introduced in 1985 with Microsoft C 3.0) unintentionally depended on wraparound during in-memory unpacking; when loaded below 64 KB with A20 enabled, the unpacking algorithm produced corrupt code due to misaligned relocations. To address these issues, early workarounds involved loading affected programs at higher memory addresses (above 64 KB) to shift the load location and restore effective wraparound, as outlined in a 1985 patent for compatibility enhancements. In 3.3 (1987) and subsequent versions, the operating system began incorporating basic support, but specific A20-related fixes were limited; programs often required manual intervention, such as avoiding high memory loading. By 5.0 (1991), built-in exepatching mechanisms detected and modified common affected executables on-the-fly, particularly EXEPACKed files like EDIT.COM and FDISK.EXE, ensuring they functioned even when core DOS was relocated to the high memory area (HMA) with A20 enabled. The LOADFIX command, available in 5.0 and later, provided a user-friendly by preloading a 64 dummy block into upper , forcing subsequent programs to load higher and bypassing EXEPACK unpacking flaws or CALL 5 wraparound dependencies. For systems using extended managers, (included starting with 5.0) allowed configuration of A20 handling via options in , such as /A20CONTROL:OFF to prevent HIMEM from overriding existing A20 control by hardware or other drivers, thus maintaining wraparound for legacy software. Games and terminate-and-stay-resident (TSR) utilities from the mid-1980s, such as early On-Line adventure titles, frequently crashed if A20 was enabled mid-execution, as they assumed uniform low-memory access patterns without wraparound disruptions; users mitigated this by disabling memory managers like during gameplay or using LOADFIX to enforce compatible loading.

Modern Legacy

Phasing Out in CPUs

The A20M# pin, an active-low signal that masks address line A20 to emulate the 1 MB memory wraparound of the original 8086 processor, was introduced by in the 80486 in 1989 to provide explicit hardware control over A20 gating integrated directly into the CPU. This pin allowed system designers to assert it low during real-address mode operations for with 8086 software, while enabling full 32-bit addressing when deasserted. The feature was retained in subsequent architectures, including the series launched in 1993, where the pin similarly forced bit 20 to zero for on-chip cache accesses and external bus cycles when asserted. Support for the A20M# pin persisted through the Core 2 family in 2006, ensuring compatibility with legacy real-mode environments. However, starting with the Nehalem microarchitecture in 2008, the physical pin was removed from the CPU, with the A20M# signal instead generated by the chipset and forwarded to the processor via the QPI interface. In Intel's 64-bit mode (IA-32e), introduced with earlier architectures and extended in Nehalem, the CPU continued to emulate the real-mode A20 behavior internally, applying the mask to effective addresses in compatibility sub-mode to maintain 8086-like wrapping unless explicitly managed by software or hardware signals. This emulation preserved the functionality for older operating systems that relied on A20 gating during boot or legacy execution. The full deprecation of A20M# hardware support was noted starting with the Haswell microarchitecture in 2013, where Intel's System Programming Manual (Volume 3A) explicitly stated that the functionality—primarily used by legacy systems—was no longer supported in hardware on newer Intel 64 processors, and the signal may be ignored in long mode. In subsequent generations like Skylake and beyond (starting 2015), the CPU ignores the A20M# signal in long mode, as 64-bit addressing inherently exceeds the 1 MB boundary without needing emulation, rendering the pin vestigial or absent on the package. AMD processors followed a parallel path, incorporating A20M# support in their AMD64 architecture for 8086 compatibility via address bit masking, but this became vestigial in later designs from the late 2010s onward, where real-mode emulation persists only for minimal legacy needs without dedicated pin control.

Relevance in Contemporary Systems

In x86 systems utilizing legacy rather than , the A20 line must still be enabled during the boot process to support real-mode code execution, particularly for accessing beyond the first in components like option ROMs on cards. This requirement persists to maintain with the original 8086 addressing model, where the A20 is initially disabled upon power-on to emulate wraparound, necessitating explicit enabling by the or for full 1MB+ utilization in . firmware, by contrast, automatically enables the A20 line early in the boot sequence, eliminating the need for manual intervention in modern firmwares. Operating system loaders such as continue to incorporate A20 handlers to ensure compatibility with partitions, including those formatted for or , allowing seamless ing of older real-mode environments on contemporary hardware. For instance, automatically enables the A20 gate during its initialization to access regions required by these systems. Similarly, in scenarios involving modes, components like the rely on underlying or compatibility layers to manage A20 state transitions when supporting older installation media or partitions. This handling prevents addressing conflicts and ensures that real-mode code from vintage OSes can execute without modification. Emulation environments replicate A20 gating to achieve faithful of 1980s-era , preserving the exact addressing behaviors for software testing and retro . Virtual machines like and emulate the A20 line's toggle via I/O ports (e.g., 0x92 or keyboard controller), allowing users to disable it for authentic real-mode wraparound or enable it for protected-mode transitions, which is essential for running unmodified applications or legacy . Retro hardware platforms, such as FPGA with its ao486 or PCXT cores, implement A20 logic in to mirror the original PC/AT chipset, enabling cycle-accurate execution of 8088/286/386 software including games and utilities that depend on gated addressing. As of 2025, A20 concepts see niche applications in x86 systems for precise mapping in control applications and in hardware modifications like the original A20 hack, which grounds the line to bypass secure boot and map directly, facilitating installation on 2001-era consoles. These uses highlight lingering compatibility needs in specialized domains, though the A20 gate has had no on PC hardware or software since Intel phased out support around 2013 with the Haswell .

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] 1502494_PC_AT_Technical_Ref...
    ... Hardware Reference. Lihrary. Technical. Reference. Page 4. First Edition (March 1984) ... A20. SA11. I/O. A 21. SA10. I/O. A22. SA9. I/O. A23. SA8. I/O. A 24. SA7.
  2. [2]
    The A20-Gate Fallout - The OS/2 Museum
    Apr 13, 2018 · The A20 gate was easy to implement in the PC/AT because there were no caches to contend with. Simply forcing the output of CPU's address pin A20 ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] intel-8086_datasheet.pdf
    The Intel 8086 is a 16-bit CPU with 1MB direct addressing, 5-10 MHz clock rates, 14-word register set, 24 operand addressing, and 8/16-bit arithmetic.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Users Manual - Bitsavers.org
    This publication describes the Intel® 8086 family of microcomputing components, concentrating on the 8086, 8088 and 8089 microprocessors. It is written for ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] IBM PC Technical Reference - Bitsavers.org
    The System Board is a large board which fits horizontally in the base of the System Unit and includes the microprocessor, 40KB ROM and. 16KB memory. The ...
  6. [6]
    Architecture of 8086 - GeeksforGeeks
    Jul 11, 2025 · The 8086 microprocessor has a 20-bit address bus, which can address up to 1 MB of memory, and a 16-bit data bus, which can transfer data ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Introduction to the iAPX 286 - Bitsavers.org
    The iAPX 286 has a management overview, addresses application requirements, and offers increased throughput, product flexibility, and a new architecture.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Intel 80286 Programmer's Reference Manual - Bitsavers.org
    This manual describes the 80286, the most powerful 16-bit microprocessor in ... For more information on the 80286 book's organization, see its first chapter, ...Missing: 1982 | Show results with:1982
  9. [9]
    [PDF] 80286 and 80287 Programmer's Reference Manual - Bitsavers.org
    COMPLETE SET OF 9 HANDBOOKS. Save $50.00 off the retail price of $175.00. MEMORY COMPONENTS HANDBOOK. MICROCOMMUNICATIONS HANDBOOK.
  10. [10]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the A20 Line and Address Bit 20 information from the Intel 80286 Hardware Reference Manual (1987), consolidating all details from the provided segments into a dense, comprehensive response. To maximize information density, I’ve organized key details into tables where appropriate, followed by a narrative summary for additional context. The response retains all information mentioned across the segments and includes the useful URLs provided.
  11. [11]
    the keyboard controller - Computers Are Bad
    Dec 17, 2022 · To make sure that existing IBM PC software would be usable on the PC/AT, IBM introduced a trick to the architecture: the A20 gate. An extra ...
  12. [12]
    A20 Line - OSDev Wiki
    The A20 Address Line is the physical representation of the 21st bit (number 20, counting from 0) of any memory access. When the IBM-AT (Intel 286) was ...
  13. [13]
    A20 - a pain from the past
    The A20 address line is disabled at boot time, so the operating system has to find out how to enable it, and that may be nontrivial since the details depend on ...
  14. [14]
    Linux 2.4.x Initialization for IA-32 HOWTO: Linux early setup
    Bit 0 or 1 (either one) of Feature byte 1 indicates that the system contains ... Set bit number 1 (value 0x02: FAST_A20) in the "port 0x92" system control ...
  15. [15]
    Operating System Development: Enabling the A20 Line
    Oct 23, 2013 · The Intel 80386 processor had 32 address lines, so it could address 2^32 = 4,294,967,296 = 4 GB of memory. Also, it was a 32-bit processor which ...The A20 Line · Putting It All Together · Legacy PainMissing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  16. [16]
    eXtended Memory Specification (XMS), ver 2.0 - Phat Code
    The purpose of this document is to define the Extended Memory Specifica- tion (XMS) version 2.00 for MS-DOS. ... - If HIMEM finds that the A20 line is ...Missing: handler | Show results with:handler
  17. [17]
    RBIL61 - INT 15 - SYSTEM - COPY EXTENDED MEMORY
    INT 15 - SYSTEM - COPY EXTENDED MEMORY AH = 87h CX = number of words to copy (max 8000h) ES:SI -> global descriptor table (see #00499) Return: CF set on ...
  18. [18]
    Q95555: Overview of Memory-Management Functionality in MS-DOS
    HIMEM.SYS includes a number of "A20 handlers" for different machines. The XMS allocates and deallocates the HMA as one block, that is, only one program can ...
  19. [19]
    Q96711: HIMEM.SYS Reports Error: Unable to Control A20 Line!
    If HIMEM.SYS is working properly, it should display a message similar to the following: Installed A20 handler number 1. 64K High Memory Area is available ...
  20. [20]
    QEMM386 from FOLDOC
    A combined expanded memory manager and extended memory manager ... Quarterdeck Office Systems. QEMM386 can also act as an UMB provider and an A20 handler.
  21. [21]
    4. linux/arch/i386/boot/setup.S
    Note again, type_of_loader has been changed to 0x20 by bootsect_helper() when it loads bvmlinux. 4.8. Enable A20. For A20 problem and solution, refer to A20 - a ...
  22. [22]
    The A20-Gate: It Wasn't WordStar | OS/2 Museum
    Mar 16, 2018 · In the 1990s, the most common troublemaker related to the A20 gate was EXEPACK (another Microsoft tool), or rather DOS executables packed with ...
  23. [23]
    EXEPACK and the A20-Gate | OS/2 Museum
    ### Summary of EXEPACK and A20 Gate from https://www.os2museum.com/wp/exepack-and-the-a20-gate/
  24. [24]
    HIMEM.SYS
    HIMEM is an extended-memory manager--a program that coordinates the use of your computer's extended memory, including the high memory area (HMA).
  25. [25]
    [PDF] 80486DX2-66-Intel-datasheet-7086155.pdf - Octopart
    A20M# emulates the address wraparound at 1 Mbyte, which occurs on the 8086 processor. A20M# is active LOW and should be asserted only when the embedded IntelDX2 ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Pentium® Processor Family Developer's Manual
    ... Pin Reference. Symbol. Type*. Name and Function. A20M#. I. When the address bit 20 mask pin is asserted, the Pentium® processor emulates the address wraparound ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] 31407918.pdf - Intel
    An external A20M# pin if enabled forces address bit 20 to be masked ... AP1: The following specification change is incorporated in the Intel® Core™2 Duo.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual
    Intel® microarchitecture code name Westmere is a 32 nm version of Intel® microarchitecture code name Nehalem. ... pin (SMI#), which generates a system ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 2
    ... AMD64 Technology. 24593—Rev. 3.10—February 2005 address wrapping of the 8086 processor by using the A20M# input signal to mask the A20 address bit. Real ...
  30. [30]
    Who enables the A20 line when booting in pure UEFI?
    Sep 1, 2019 · UEFI firmware enables A20 if it isn't already enabled, sets up the GDT with flat descriptors, enters protected mode etc.x86 CPU Modes / Rings During Boot Process - Stack OverflowHow is BIOS ROM accessible at 0xFFFFFFF0 if A20 line is disabled ...More results from stackoverflow.comMissing: process | Show results with:process
  31. [31]
    The A20 Line - TheJat.in
    The A20 address line is the physical representation of the 21st bit (number 20, counting from 0) of any memory access. It was introduced with 80286 processor to ...
  32. [32]
    a20 and modern hardware - OSDev.org
    Jun 28, 2015 · And according to wiki: Intel no longer supports the A20 gate starting with Haswell. Page 271 of the Intel System Programmers Manual Vol. 3A from ...Missing: pin | Show results with:pin
  33. [33]
    x86 Assembly/Bootloaders - Wikibooks, open books for an open world
    The GRand Unified Bootloader (GRUB) is an example of such. Some boot loaders ... A20 call empty_8042 mov al,#0xD1 | command write out #0x64,al call ...<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Change status of A20 line when QEMU starts? : r/osdev - Reddit
    Dec 1, 2018 · Apparently QEMU supports disabling A20 by reading from IO location 0xEE, and I was able to test that way. Might try on real hardware soon.Has anyone here ever done 386+ emulation? I'm upgrading ...Start QEMU with the a20 line disabled? : r/qemu_kvmMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: emulation | Show results with:emulation
  35. [35]
    Bochs x86 PC emulator / Bugs / #1061 wrong behaviour a20 at boot
    Feb 14, 2007 · Some documentation about a20 in Bochs: Bochs can emulate the A20 line; however emulating A20 adds a little bit of overhead because Bochs ...
  36. [36]
    PCXT port for MiSTer by spark2k06. - GitHub
    The purpose of this core is to implement a PCXT as reliable as possible. For this purpose, the MCL86 core from @MicroCoreLabs and KFPC-XT from @kitune-san ...Missing: A20 | Show results with:A20
  37. [37]
    Understanding Controls Applications Embedded Systems
    Dec 20, 2018 · Controlling A20 line access. Controllers can easily be adapted to meet the needs of the host application and the operating conditions of the ...
  38. [38]
    Xbox Hacks: The A20 - Connor Tumbleson
    Jul 18, 2021 · This CPU had 20 physical address lines labeled A0 through A19 and each line represents a simple binary (0/1) so you can store 220 bytes or 1 ...
  39. [39]
    Grandpa, Tell Me The Story Again About The A20 Gate
    Nov 19, 2024 · The A20 gate logic defaulted to the original 8088 behavior—the A20 address line was turned off, and memory accesses beyond 1MB wrapped around ...Basic Concepts · 1. 8088/8086 Segmented... · A20 Gate To The Rescue!<|control11|><|separator|>