Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Additive white Gaussian noise

Additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) is a for in communication systems, representing random disturbances added to a transmitted signal, where the exhibits a Gaussian (normal) with zero and a flat power spectral density across all frequencies, making it uncorrelated in time and independent of the signal. This model approximates real-world phenomena such as thermal generated by the random motion of electrons in conductors or resistors at . The "additive" aspect signifies that the noise is linearly superimposed onto the clean signal, resulting in a received signal y(t) = x(t) + n(t), where x(t) is the transmitted signal and n(t) is the noise process. "White" describes the noise's power , which is constant (equal power per unit ) over the entire , implying infinite and delta-function in the . "Gaussian" refers to the of the noise samples, which follows a \mathcal{N}(0, \sigma^2), with variance \sigma^2 determining the . These properties ensure that AWGN samples are statistically independent, simplifying mathematical analysis in both continuous-time and discrete-time settings. AWGN serves as the foundational model in for evaluating the performance limits of communication systems, particularly in deriving fundamental bounds like the . For a bandlimited AWGN with W Hz and \text{SNR} = P / (N_0 W) (where P is the average signal power and N_0 is the ), the is C = W \log_2 (1 + \text{SNR}) bits per second, representing the maximum reliable data rate. This theorem, established by in 1948, underscores AWGN's role in quantifying the effects of noise on reliable transmission and guiding the design of , , and error-correcting schemes in communications. Beyond communications, AWGN models are applied in , systems, and to simulate environmental perturbations and assess system robustness.

Fundamentals

Definition and Characteristics

Additive white Gaussian (AWGN) is a canonical noise model employed in and to represent the random disturbances that degrade in communication systems. It combines three essential properties: additivity, whiteness, and Gaussian distribution, making it a versatile approximation for various physical noise sources. This model assumes the noise is superimposed on the signal without altering its form, possesses uniform power across frequencies, and exhibits a bell-shaped typical of many natural random processes. The additive nature of AWGN signifies that the noise is linearly added to the transmitted signal, resulting in a received signal that is the of the original signal and the noise component, with the noise being statistically of the signal itself. This ensures that the noise does not depend on the signal's content or , allowing for simplified in system design. In practical terms, this models scenarios where external or internal disturbances overlay the desired information without multiplicative effects. Whiteness describes the noise's power spectral density as constant over all frequencies of interest, implying equal energy contribution from each frequency band and uncorrelated samples in discrete-time representations. The Gaussian aspect means the noise values follow a normal probability distribution with zero , reflecting the cumulative effect of numerous independent microscopic fluctuations as per the . Additionally, AWGN is a , where its , variance, and correlation structure remain invariant over time, facilitating consistent statistical treatment. AWGN originates as an idealized representation of thermal in electronic circuits, particularly the Johnson-Nyquist arising from the random thermal agitation of charge carriers in conductors at equilibrium temperature. First observed experimentally and theoretically derived in the late , this provides a foundational physical basis for the AWGN model, enabling its widespread use to approximate real-world impairments like those in amplifiers and transmission lines.

Historical Development

The foundations of additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) were laid in the late through experimental and theoretical work on in electrical conductors. In 1928, John B. Johnson published experimental findings demonstrating that arises from the random agitation of electrons in resistors, with a power proportional to and . That same year, provided a rigorous theoretical derivation, confirming the noise's white spectrum and Gaussian distribution—stemming from the statistical superposition of numerous independent motions via the . This Johnson-Nyquist theorem established as inherently additive, Gaussian, and spectrally flat, providing the physical basis for AWGN models in subsequent . The integration of AWGN into information theory occurred in 1948 with Claude Shannon's foundational paper, "A Mathematical Theory of Communication," which formalized noisy channels using AWGN to quantify reliable data transmission limits. Shannon's noisy channel coding theorem specifically targeted the AWGN channel, proving that arbitrarily low error rates are achievable at rates below the channel capacity, fundamentally shaping modern communications. Post-World War II, the AWGN model saw rapid adoption in the 1950s for and systems, where it served as a standard benchmark for noise impairment analysis and system design amid growing and long-distance voice transmission needs. By the 1960s, advanced under this framework, with Peter Elias and Amiel Feinstein extending Shannon's ideas to practical error-correcting codes; their 1955 and 1954 works, respectively, derived bounds on error probabilities for discrete noisy channels, enabling codes that approach theoretical limits. As of November 2025, AWGN remains central to digital communications standards like 5G New Radio (NR) and (IEEE 802.11), where it underpins link-level simulations and performance evaluations in specifications. However, emerging technologies such as quantum communications are driving extensions to non-Gaussian noise models to account for photon loss, decoherence, and non-classical effects beyond traditional thermal assumptions.

Statistical and Spectral Properties

Gaussian Distribution Aspects

The Gaussian component of additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) is characterized by its (PDF), which for a single noise sample n follows a n \sim \mathcal{N}(0, \sigma^2). The PDF is given by f(n) = \frac{1}{\sigma \sqrt{2\pi}} \exp\left( -\frac{n^2}{2\sigma^2} \right), where the mean is zero, reflecting the absence of any directional bias in the noise, and the variance \sigma^2 quantifies the noise's spread or intensity. This zero-mean property ensures that the noise does not systematically alter the signal's average value when added. For a sequence of multiple independent noise samples, such as \mathbf{n} = [n_1, n_2, \dots, n_k]^T, the joint distribution is a multivariate Gaussian with a diagonal covariance matrix \Sigma = \sigma^2 I_k, where I_k is the k \times k identity matrix. This structure arises because the samples are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.), implying zero covariance between distinct samples and identical marginal distributions for each. The zero off-diagonal elements in the covariance matrix highlight the lack of correlation, simplifying statistical modeling in systems with discrete-time noise processes. The Gaussian nature of real-world noise, such as or Johnson noise in electronic systems, is justified by the (CLT), which states that the sum of many independent random variables, each with finite variance, converges to a Gaussian distribution regardless of their individual distributions. In physical systems, noise often results from the superposition of numerous microscopic fluctuations, like movements, leading to this approximation even when individual components are non-Gaussian. The Gaussian distribution facilitates key implications for signal processing and analysis. The zero-mean property of the noise ensures that it does not introduce a in the mean of the received signal; that is, the of y equals the of x, assuming independence. Linear operations on Gaussian noise remain Gaussian, enabling tractable analysis; for instance, the achieves optimal detection performance in the presence of Gaussian noise by maximizing the at the filter output. The is defined as the \mathbb{E}[n^2] = \sigma^2, which directly relates to the (SNR) as \text{SNR} = \frac{P_s}{\sigma^2}, where P_s is the signal power, providing a fundamental metric for system performance evaluation.

Whiteness and Power Spectral Density

The "whiteness" in additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) refers to the property that the noise exhibits equal across all frequencies, resulting in a flat (PSD) that is idealized as extending over infinite ; in practical systems, this approximation holds only within the bandwidth of interest, as true infinite bandwidth would imply infinite total . The PSD of AWGN is constant for all frequencies f, denoted as the two-sided PSD S_n(f) = \frac{N_0}{2} or the one-sided PSD S_n(f) = N_0, where N_0/2 represents the noise power per unit bandwidth in hertz. This flat spectrum distinguishes white noise from colored noise, which has frequency-dependent power distribution. The autocorrelation function of AWGN, obtained as the inverse Fourier transform of its PSD, is R_n(\tau) = \frac{N_0}{2} \delta(\tau), where \delta(\tau) is the ; this indicates that the noise samples are uncorrelated (delta-correlated) for any non-zero time lag \tau \neq 0. In real communication systems, the approximation is valid over the signal's B, where the total within that is N_0 B for the one-sided PSD (or equivalently, integrating the two-sided PSD over [-B, B]). For thermal noise, which models AWGN in many physical channels, the one-sided noise PSD is given by N_0 = [kT](/page/KT), where k = 1.380649 \times 10^{-23} J/K is Boltzmann's constant and T is the absolute temperature in .

Mathematical Formulation

Time-Domain Representation

In the time domain, additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) is modeled as the direct superposition of a deterministic signal onto a noise process. For continuous-time systems, the received signal is expressed as r(t) = s(t) + n(t), where s(t) is the transmitted signal and n(t) is the noise component. The noise n(t) is characterized as a wide-sense stationary (WSS) Gaussian random process with zero mean, \mathbb{E}[n(t)] = 0, and an autocorrelation function R_n(\tau) = \frac{N_0}{2} \delta(\tau), where \delta(\tau) is the and N_0/2 represents the two-sided power spectral density of the noise. This delta-correlated property implies that noise samples at distinct times are uncorrelated, modeling the "whiteness" in the . In discrete-time representations, which arise in sampled or digital systems, the model simplifies to r = s + n, where k denotes the sample . Here, the noise samples n are and identically distributed (i.i.d.) as Gaussian random variables, n \sim \mathcal{N}(0, \sigma^2), with zero mean and variance \sigma^2. This i.i.d. assumption stems from the sampling of the continuous-time process under the , ensuring that the discrete noise maintains the uncorrelated nature of the original AWGN. From a perspective, pure is idealized and not a proper ; it can be formally viewed as the derivative of a () process, n(t) = \frac{dW(t)}{dt}, where W(t) is a standard with \mathbb{E}[W(t)] = 0 and variance t. In practice, however, the AWGN model simplifies to direct addition without solving such equations, as the idealized delta suffices for most communication analyses. Approximations like the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, driven by via dn(t) = -\frac{1}{\tau} n(t) dt + \sqrt{\frac{2}{\tau}} dW(t) and taking the limit \tau \to 0, yield the white noise behavior but are typically not required in standard formulations. The variance \sigma^2 in the discrete model is often normalized to \sigma^2 = N_0 / 2 to ensure equivalence with the continuous-time case, particularly for bandlimited channels where the within the W matches N_0 W. This normalization facilitates consistent (SNR) definitions across domains, with SNR given by P / (N_0 W), where P is the signal power. For simulation purposes, discrete-time AWGN is generated by drawing i.i.d. samples from a Gaussian distribution using pseudo-random number generators, such as the Box-Muller transform or built-in functions like MATLAB's randn, scaled to the desired variance \sigma^2. This approach allows efficient numerical evaluation of communication systems under AWGN conditions.

Frequency-Domain Representation

The frequency-domain representation of additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) is obtained by applying the to the time-domain noise process n(t), yielding the noise N(f) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} n(t) e^{-j 2\pi f t} \, dt. For white Gaussian , the of the squared magnitude of this transform, E[|N(f)|^2], is proportional to N_0 / 2, where N_0 is the one-sided (PSD), reflecting the flat characteristic of whiteness across all . This property holds in the idealized continuous-time model, where the is and Gaussian, ensuring that the components are uncorrelated and exhibit power density. In practical communication channels, the is typically bandlimited to a finite W due to filtering, resulting in a total of N_0 W. The of the bandlimited retains the Gaussian distribution in each bin within [-W, W], with the PSD remaining flat at N_0 / 2 (double-sided) over this interval. This bandlimitation simplifies analysis in systems like bandpass channels, where the effective is confined to the signal's support. Parseval's theorem provides a key link between time- and frequency-domain representations, stating that the energy of the noise process equals the of its PSD over frequency: \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |n(t)|^2 \, dt = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} |N(f)|^2 \, df. For AWGN, this implies that the total noise in the time domain matches the area under the constant PSD curve, confirming and enabling equivalent analyses in either domain for power calculations. In linear systems, the additive nature of AWGN in the time domain translates to addition in the frequency domain, where the received spectrum is Y(f) = H(f) X(f) + N(f), with H(f) as the channel transfer function; for unfiltered cases (H(f) = 1), this approximates multiplication by $1 + N(f)/X(f) in regions of high signal-to-noise ratio, highlighting the perturbative effect of noise on the signal spectrum. The Wiener-Khinchin theorem formalizes the whiteness of AWGN by relating its PSD to the time-domain autocorrelation function R_n(\tau) = E[n(t) n(t + \tau)], given by S_n(f) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} R_n(\tau) e^{-j 2\pi f \tau} \, d\tau. For white noise, R_n(\tau) = (N_0 / 2) \delta(\tau), yielding a constant PSD S_n(f) = N_0 / 2, which underscores the delta-correlated property essential to the model's idealization.

Applications in Communication Systems

AWGN Channel Model

The additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel serves as a cornerstone model in , simplifying the analysis of by assuming the received signal is the transmitted signal corrupted solely by random . The model is mathematically formulated as Y = X + Z, where X represents the input signal, Y the output signal, and Z the AWGN process with zero mean and variance N_0/2 per real dimension, assuming a W. This representation captures the essential noise degradation in band-limited systems without additional distortions. Key assumptions underpin the AWGN model: the is linear and time-invariant, the is statistically of the input signal, and it exhibits a flat power across the bandwidth. Unlike Rayleigh or models, which incorporate and amplitude variations due to scattering, the AWGN model presumes no such effects, idealizing scenarios like line-of-sight links or wired communications. Additionally, the channel's memoryless ensures that affecting each transmitted is , facilitating straightforward error-correcting codes and designs without interdependencies. The (SNR) quantifies the model's performance trade-off, defined as \mathrm{SNR} = P / (N_0 W), with P denoting the average input signal power and N_0 W the total noise power within W. This metric directly influences achievable data rates and error probabilities in practical systems. Despite its utility, the AWGN model is highly idealized and overlooks real-channel complexities such as (ISI) from dispersive media or Doppler effects from relative motion. In advanced contexts like multiple-input multiple-output () systems, AWGN provides a baseline for assessing gains from spatial diversity, though actual deployments require extensions to include and correlation.

Channel Capacity Derivation

The channel capacity of the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel represents the maximum rate at which can be reliably transmitted over the under a given power constraint. For a bandlimited AWGN with W Hz and average transmit power P, the C in bits per second is given by C = W \log_2 \left(1 + \frac{P}{N_0 W}\right), where N_0/2 is the two-sided power of the noise. This formula is equivalent to C = W \log_2 (1 + \mathrm{SNR}), with the defined as \mathrm{SNR} = P / (N_0 W). The derivation relies on information-theoretic limits, establishing both an upper bound () and achievability for rates up to C. The converse to the capacity theorem states that no coding scheme can achieve a reliable communication rate exceeding C. Specifically, the capacity is the maximum mutual information rate \max I(X; Y) over all input distributions satisfying the power constraint, where X is the input process and Y is the output process corrupted by AWGN. For the AWGN channel, the mutual information per channel use in the discrete-time approximation (with $2W samples per second) is maximized when X is Gaussian with variance P/(2W), yielding I(X; Y) = \frac{1}{2} \log_2 (1 + P / (N_0 W)) per sample, or C bits per second overall. This maximum is derived from the differential entropy properties: h(Y) = h(Z) + \frac{1}{2} \log_2 (1 + \mathrm{SNR}), where Z is the Gaussian noise, and h(X) = h(Y|X). Achievability is demonstrated through random coding arguments, showing the existence of codes that operate at rates up to C with vanishing probability as block length increases. Codewords are generated randomly from a Gaussian distribution under the power constraint, and decoding is used at the : the output sequences that fall into high-probability "typical sets" around codewords are decoded correctly with probability approaching 1 for rates below C. This relies on the asymptotic equipartition property, ensuring that the number of typical sequences is approximately $2^{nC} for n uses. An upper bound on is provided by the sphere-packing theorem, which interprets the AWGN channel in signal : transmitted signals are points in a $2nW-dimensional (for n seconds), with forming spheres of radius proportional to \sqrt{n N_0 W \log(1/[\epsilon](/page/Epsilon))} around each codeword to ensure low probability [\epsilon](/page/Epsilon). The maximum number of such non-overlapping spheres that can be packed under the power is $2^{nC}, so the achievable rate is at most C/n bits per on average, confirming the bound's tightness. For the flat AWGN spectrum, power allocation is uniform across the , as the is constant. In more general Gaussian channels with varying levels, the water-filling algorithm optimally allocates power by "pouring" it into frequency subchannels up to a determined by the total power P, maximizing the sum of \log_2 (1 + \mathrm{SNR}_k) over subchannels; however, for uniform N_0, this reduces to equal allocation yielding the standard formula. In the limit of infinite bandwidth (W \to \infty), the capacity approaches C \approx \frac{P}{N_0} \log_2 e bits per second, reflecting the wideband regime where additional bandwidth provides diminishing returns beyond a linear increase in low-SNR efficiency.

Effects and Analysis

Impact in Time Domain

In the , additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) superimposes uncorrelated random variations onto the transmitted signal , primarily degrading performance by increasing the probability of detection errors at the . This degradation is particularly evident in digital modulation schemes, where noise corrupts symbol decisions. For binary phase-shift keying (BPSK), the (BER) under AWGN is expressed as P_b = Q\left( \sqrt{\frac{2E_b}{N_0}} \right), with Q(\cdot) denoting the Gaussian , E_b the received bit energy, and N_0/2 the two-sided noise power . This formula highlights how higher (SNR), defined as E_b / N_0, exponentially reduces error probability, establishing a fundamental limit on reliable communication. To mitigate these effects, the optimal receiver structure in AWGN employs a or correlator, which concentrates signal energy while suppressing noise, thereby maximizing the instantaneous SNR at the sampling instant. For a known signal pulse with energy E_b, the matched filter output SNR achieves $2E_b / N_0, independent of the specific pulse shape, provided the filter is the time-reversed conjugate of the signal. This design principle ensures that the receiver extracts the maximum possible information from the noisy waveform, forming the basis for coherent detection in many systems. AWGN also visibly impacts eye diagrams, which overlay multiple symbol periods to assess ; noise-induced fluctuations cause the eye opening to narrow vertically, compressing the decision threshold margin and increasing sensitivity to timing errors. As noise variance rises (lower SNR), this closure limits the maximum data rate by heightening susceptibility and error floors, often visualized in simulations where eye height drops proportionally with \sqrt{N_0}. Empirical validation of these time-domain effects frequently relies on Monte Carlo simulations, which generate thousands of AWGN-corrupted signal instances to estimate BER by counting decision mismatches against theoretical predictions. Such methods confirm the Q-function accuracy for BPSK, with simulation runs scaling inversely with desired confidence intervals for low error rates like $10^{-5}. In contrast to colored noise, where correlated components necessitate a pre-whitening filter to diagonalize the noise covariance for optimal detection, AWGN's uncorrelated nature simplifies processing, avoiding the computational overhead of filter design and enabling direct matched filtering.

Impact in Phasor Domain

In the phasor domain, modulated signals such as those in (PSK) or (QAM) are represented as , or rotating vectors in the , where the real part corresponds to the in-phase (I) component and the imaginary part to the quadrature (Q) component. Additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) perturbs this representation by adding independent, zero-mean Gaussian random variables to each component, with variance N_0/2 per dimension, where N_0 is the one-sided noise power spectral density. This model assumes the noise is circularly symmetric, ensuring equal power in I and Q and no correlation between them, which simplifies analysis in baseband equivalent channels. The impact of AWGN is vividly illustrated in constellation diagrams, where ideal symbol points form a discrete set in the I-Q plane, but received symbols appear as probabilistic "clouds" centered around these points due to the Gaussian perturbations. The extent of each cloud is determined by the noise variance, with larger spreads at lower signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), increasing the overlap between adjacent clouds and thus elevating error rates. Symbol detection errors arise when a noisy crosses decision boundaries, typically Voronoi regions around each constellation point, leading to misclassification in maximum-likelihood decoding. At high SNR regimes, AWGN primarily induces small phase perturbations on constant-envelope signals like PSK, where the phase jitter \phi can be approximated as \phi \approx n_Q / A, with n_Q the quadrature noise component and A the signal amplitude. This linear approximation holds because the phase deviation is small relative to the signal, yielding a phase variance of \sigma_\phi^2 = N_0 / (2 E_s), where E_s is the symbol energy; amplitude fluctuations are negligible for such modulations. This jitter degrades phase estimation and synchronization, particularly in higher-order PSK schemes sensitive to angular errors. For M-ary PSK (M-PSK) in AWGN, the symbol error rate (SER) under this phasor perturbation is approximated as P_e \approx 2 Q\left( \sqrt{2 \gamma_s} \sin\left(\frac{\pi}{M}\right) \right), where \gamma_s = E_s / N_0 is the symbol SNR and Q(\cdot) is the Gaussian Q-function; this tight bound derives from the geometry of decision regions and the dominance of nearest-neighbor errors at high SNR. The approximation improves for larger M and higher \gamma_s, capturing how noise clouds encroach on angular sectors. From a perspective, the transmitted symbols form a of basis vectors in a two-dimensional signal space for I-Q , and AWGN projects as isotropic orthogonal to these dimensions. Optimal detection minimizes the between the received vector and the constellation points, equivalent to maximum-likelihood decoding, which exploits the noise's statistical to achieve near-capacity performance in uncoded systems. This framework extends to higher-dimensional lattices for coded , where minimum distance determines error resilience.

References

  1. [1]
    Additive White Gaussian Noise - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) is defined as a type of noise that has a normal distribution in the time domain with an average value of zero, ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] CHAPTER 9 - Noise - MIT OpenCourseWare
    Sep 30, 2012 · as additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN); this is the case we will consider. The origin of the term “white” will become clearer when we ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] LECTURE 4 - Noise - MIT
    Sep 26, 2010 · This model of noise is sometimes referred to as additive white Gaussian noise or AWGN. In this lecture we will be primarily concerned with ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Lecture 2: Binary Sources, Lossy Compression and Channel Capacity
    Jan 11, 2018 · For real world communication systems (e.g., wireless), the Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) Channel is a natural model due to the ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Discrete-time and continuous-time AWGN channels
    presence of additive white Gaussian noise. In this situation the following theorem is fundamental: Theorem 2.1 (Theorem of irrelevance) Let X(t) be a random ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] 5 Capacity of wireless channels - Stanford University
    Section 5.1 starts with the important exam- ple of the AWGN (additive white Gaussian noise) channel and introduces the notion of capacity through a ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Capacity of AWGN channels
    The capacity of an AWGN channel with bandwidth W and signal-to-noise ratio SNR is W log2(1+SNR) bits per second (b/s).
  8. [8]
    [PDF] thermal agitation of electricity in conductors | mit
    97. Page 2. 98. J. B. JOHNSON sistance was varied and the result of that test left little doubt that the thermal agitation of electricity in the resistance ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Thermal Agitation of Electric Charge in Conductors - Physics 123/253
    R. J. B.JOHNSON' has reported the discovery and measurement of an electromotive force in conductors which is related in a simple manner.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] A Mathematical Theory of Communication
    By C. E. SHANNON ... We may also refer here to Wiener's Cybernetics (Wiley, 1948), dealing with the general problems of communication and control.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Characterization of Noise Technology Radar (NTR) Signal ... - DTIC
    First, the noise was created using an Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) model ... The concept of noise radar was introduced circa 1950. However, its ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] TR 138 921 - V17.1.0 - 5G - ETSI
    - AWGN channel model. Page 19. ETSI. ETSI TR 138 921 V17.1.0 (2022-05). 18. 3GPP TR 38.921 version 17.1.0 Release 17. - Link Adaptation (see Table 4.2.7-1 for ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] 5 Noise in Physical Systems - MIT Fab Lab
    We now see why fluctuations such as Johnson noise so often have a Gaussian distribution (remember the Central Limit Theorem?). If the state of the system is ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Capacity of Gaussian Noise Channels with Side Information and
    Thermal noise usually re- sults from an aggregation of multiple noise sources and, by virtue of the central limit theorem, can very often be modeled as having a ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] arXiv:2110.01883v1 [gr-qc] 5 Oct 2021
    Oct 5, 2021 · Matched filtering is an optimal algorithm to search an unknown signal in the presence of Gaussian noise. Mathematically it can be expressed ...
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    [PDF] phaselocktechniques - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
    No physical process can be truly white since that would imply infinite power. A practical definition of whiteness is that the noise spectral density is ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Detection of Signals by the Digital Integrate-and-Dump Filter With ...
    (3) and noting that E [n(t)n(~)] = N0/2 6,(t - 7), where here &,(e) is the Dirac delta function, we have where R, is the autocorrelation of zi. 111 ...
  19. [19]
    10.2.4 White Noise - Probability Course
    White Gaussian noise can be described as the "derivative" of Brownian motion. Brownian motion is an important random process that will be discussed in the next ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Colored Noise in Dynamical Systems
    Gaussian white noise, whereas the derivative of the Poisson process yields white shot noise. These two elementary noise processes form the building blocks ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
    AWGN Channel - Add white Gaussian noise to input signal - Simulink
    The AWGN Channel block adds white Gaussian noise to the input signal. It inherits the sample time from the input signal.<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    White Noise : Simulation and Analysis using Matlab - GaussianWaves
    Nov 29, 2013 · White Gaussian Noise can be generated using randn function in Matlab which generates random numbers that follow a Gaussian distribution.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Wiener-Khintchine Theorem
    real, nonnegative function. Lecture 15. 2. White Noise. A white noise process is zero for all lags except m = 0. Thus, rww(m) = σ. 2 wδ(m). The PSD is therefore.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Wiener-Khinchin theorem Consider a random process x(t) ( a ...
    2Recall that h x2 i = 2D t in one dimension. 5. Page 6. The random noise is assumed to be zero-mean, Gaussian, white noise for simplicity. What does this mean ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Introduction to digital communication - MIT OpenCourseWare
    ... Digital Communications I, Fall 2006. MIT OpenCourseWare. (http://ocw.mit.edu ... Figure 1.5: Linear Gaussian channel model. The linear Gaussian channel ...
  26. [26]
    EE 643 Spring 2024 | AWGN vs fading channels
    Aug 13, 2025 · AWGN channel versus fading channel. The input/output model of a wired channel is usualy modeled as an additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) ...
  27. [27]
    Rateless Codes for MIMO Channels - IEEE Xplore
    The first construction based on simple layering induces an additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) scalar channel and with perfect base codes achieves a ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Capacity of AWGN channels
    In this chapter we prove that the capacity of an AWGN channel with bandwidth W and signal-to- noise ratio SNR is W log2(1+SNR) bits per second (b/s).
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Digital Communications - Spiros Daskalakis Homepage
    1727–1737. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. Proakis, John ... Chapter 4 is focused on optimum receivers for additive white Gaussian noise. ( ...
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    [PDF] ECE 361: Lecture 4: Matched Filters – Part II 4.1 Introduction
    A matched filter has impulse response λ[s0(T0 − t) − s1(T0 − t)] = λs(t), where λ > 0, and is matched to signals s0(t) and s1(t) at time T0.
  32. [32]
    Filtering in Communication Systems - MATLAB & Simulink
    ... eye diagram with large eye openings. If you decrease the SNR parameter in the AWGN Channel block, the eyes in the diagram will close more. In the eye ...
  33. [33]
    Constellation Diagram - Display and analyze input signals in IQ-plane
    Use the Constellation Diagram block to visualize the constellation of a modulated signal. A random signal is M-PSK modulated, filtered through an AWGN channel, ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Carrier Acquisition, Phase Noise, and Modulation Constellation - DTIC
    Therefore at high SNR, the AWGN contributes two independent components to the phase noise, with total variance. L(2EjNo) {2Es/No) \L ) {2Es/No). Phase shift ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Performance of small signal sets
    5.1.2 Minimum-distance decoding. Again, a decoding scheme is a method for mapping the received sequence into an estimate of the transmitted signal sequence ...