Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Air Force Global Strike Command

The Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) is a major command of the responsible for developing and providing combat-ready forces to execute nuclear deterrence and global strike operations. Headquartered at , , AFGSC maintains continuous alert postures for its strategic assets, ensuring rapid response capabilities to national leadership directives. Activated on August 7, 2009, following provisional establishment on January 12, 2009, AFGSC unified the Air Force's (ICBM) and bomber missions, which had been fragmented after the 1992 disestablishment of , to strengthen oversight of the nuclear enterprise amid prior handling deficiencies. It traces its lineage to , inheriting responsibilities for long-range strike and deterrence that originated in the post-World War II era. AFGSC commands three ICBM wings operating the LGM-30G Minuteman III missile, the entire active bomber fleet comprising B-52H Stratofortress, B-2A Spirit, and B-1B Lancer aircraft, and subordinate numbered air forces including the Eighth and Twentieth. These forces, numbering around 33,000 personnel, support U.S. Strategic Command by delivering precise, long-range strike options while upholding the highest standards of safety and security for nuclear weapons.

History

Predecessor Organizations and Lineage

The Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) traces its primary lineage to the (SAC), a major command of the responsible for strategic nuclear deterrence from October 21, 1946, until its inactivation on June 1, 1992. SAC, formed from the Continental Air Forces, oversaw the Air Force's bomber fleet—including B-29, B-36, B-47, B-52, and later B-1 and B-2 aircraft—and intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) such as the Atlas, , Minuteman, and systems, maintaining continuous airborne alert postures and silo-based missile operations during the . Upon SAC's disestablishment amid post-Cold War force reductions, its bomber assets transferred to (ACC), while ICBM forces realigned under Air Force Space Command (AFSPC), fragmenting the unified strategic mission. AFGSC's activation on August 7, 2009, at , —following a provisional establishment on January 12, 2009, at , District of Columbia—effectively reactivated and redesignated the core functions of to reinvigorate the nuclear enterprise after incidents like the 2007 Minot AFB munitions mishandling and missile misloading errors exposed oversight lapses. The command consolidated 's strategic bomber wings ( and under on February 1, 2010) and AFSPC's ICBM forces (Minuteman III under on December 1, 2009), with full B-1B Lancer integration from completed on October 1, 2015. This structure mirrors 's organization, with and as subordinate numbered air forces providing operational control over approximately 33,000 personnel, 76 , and 450 ICBMs. Deeper historical roots extend to World War II-era organizations: descends from VIII Bomber Command, established January 28, 1942, and activated February 1, 1942, which conducted daylight campaigns over with B-17 and B-24 heavy bombers. , initially formed December 4, 1944, for B-29 Superfortress operations against —including the atomic bombings of and —later reactivated in 1991 for ICBM command. AFGSC inherits SAC's honors, battle streamers, and emblematic traditions, emphasizing a legacy of deterrence readiness unbroken from these forebears.

Establishment and Initial Reinvigoration

In response to a series of high-profile nuclear mishaps in 2007, including the unauthorized transport of nuclear warheads on a B-52 Stratofortress from Minot Air Force Base to Barksdale Air Force Base on August 30 and the erroneous shipment of Minuteman III missile nose cones containing nuclear warheads from Minot to Taiwan on March 25 via F.E. Warren Air Force Base, the United States Air Force initiated a comprehensive review of its nuclear enterprise. These incidents, which exposed systemic lapses in oversight, handling, and accountability, prompted Secretary of Defense Robert Gates to relieve senior leaders and direct reforms to restore deterrence credibility. The Air Force leadership, under Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz, prioritized reinvigoration of nuclear capabilities as its top mission, leading to the development of a Nuclear Roadmap that recommended consolidating strategic nuclear forces under a single major command. The creation of Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) was announced in November 2008 as a key element of this roadmap, aimed at unifying the 's (ICBM) and missions previously divided between Air Force Space Command and . A provisional headquarters was established on January 12, 2009, at , District of Columbia, to begin planning and resource allocation. Full activation occurred on August 7, 2009, at , , with Lt. Gen. Frank G. Klotz appointed as the inaugural commander, emphasizing a renewed focus on strategic deterrence, global strike, and assured nuclear readiness. This consolidation transferred approximately 33,700 personnel, 450 ICBMs, and the entire bomber fleet, including B-2, B-52, and B-1 aircraft, to AFGSC, enabling dedicated leadership and streamlined command structures. Initial reinvigoration efforts under AFGSC involved cultural and operational overhauls to address complacency identified in post-incident audits, including enhanced training protocols, stricter measures, and investments in modernization programs for aging nuclear assets. By centralizing responsibility, the command facilitated rapid implementation of reforms, such as improved missile alert procedures and bomber nuclear certification, which restored mission effectiveness and public confidence in the nuclear triad's land-based components. These steps marked a departure from the diffused oversight of the post-Cold War era, prioritizing empirical over bureaucratic to ensure causal reliability in deterrence signaling.

Key Milestones and Recent Developments

Air Force Global Strike Command was provisionally established on January 12, 2009, at , , to address systemic issues in the U.S. Air Force's nuclear deterrence mission, including procedural lapses and equipment failures identified in prior audits. The command consolidated oversight of strategic bombers from and intercontinental ballistic missiles from Air Force Space Command under a unified structure dedicated to reinvigorating nuclear stewardship. Full activation occurred on August 7, 2009, at , , marking the Air Force's first new major command in over a decade and positioning AFGSC as the custodian of the nation's long-range strike and deterrence capabilities. Early efforts focused on restoring confidence through rigorous , infrastructure upgrades, and personnel realignments, achieving initial operational capability within months. A pivotal acquisition milestone came on August 23, 2016, when the approved the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent program's transition to engineering and manufacturing development, initiating replacement of the aging Minuteman III ICBM fleet under AFGSC's purview. In November 2023, AFGSC executed its inaugural Combat Ammunition Production Exercise on November 7, demonstrating the command's capacity to surge munitions output in contested environments and bolstering conventional strike readiness. The command marked its 15th anniversary on August 7, 2024, reaffirming its role in providing safe, secure, and effective nuclear deterrence amid evolving global threats. Recent initiatives include a November 7, 2024, award of a $100 million, five-year to foster commercial partnerships for and acquisition, aiming to integrate private-sector innovations into strategic platforms. In February 2025, AFGSC advanced warfighter readiness through targeted innovation programs, including agile acquisition pathways. By August 2025, reactivated the ICBM , completing its first instructor qualification course to standardize missile operations training.

Mission and Strategic Role

Nuclear Deterrence Responsibilities

Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) executes nuclear deterrence by providing combat-ready strategic forces for the land-based leg of the U.S. through intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and the air leg via -capable bombers, operating under U.S. Strategic Command to deter adversaries, assure allies, and underpin objectives. AFGSC organizes, trains, equips, and sustains these forces to maintain continuous alert postures, ensuring rapid response to presidential directives for employment while upholding strict , , and reliability standards. The command oversees 400 LGM-30G Minuteman III ICBMs deployed in hardened silos across three bases: F.E. Warren Air Force Base, (90th Missile Wing); Malmstrom Air Force Base, (); and Minot Air Force Base, (). These missiles, operational since the 1970s, deliver warheads over intercontinental ranges in approximately 30 minutes, with AFGSC responsibilities encompassing launch crew operations, missile field security via patrols (transitioning from UH-1N to MH-139A), of convoys, and periodic unarmed launches to validate readiness and reliability. For instance, Minuteman III tests conducted in 2025 from demonstrated the force's safe and effective deterrent posture amid strategic competition. AFGSC's bomber force contributes flexible, recallable nuclear strike options through the B-52H Stratofortress and B-2 Spirit, with 46 B-52Hs certified for nuclear missions using air-launched cruise missiles (ALCMs) armed with W80-1 warheads and the approximately 20 B-2s capable of delivering nuclear gravity bombs or cruise missiles via stealth penetration. Responsibilities include sustaining aircraft for global reach—B-52s with over 8,800-mile range without refueling—and conducting Bomber Task Force deployments to forward locations, signaling operational credibility and adaptability in contested environments. These operations, such as B-52 deployments to in early 2025, reinforce deterrence by demonstrating and integration with allied forces. To ensure deterrence efficacy, AFGSC integrates command, control, and communications (NC3) systems across its forces, supporting USSTRATCOM's global situational awareness and execution chains while prioritizing resilience against threats. The command conducts rigorous training, evaluations, and exercises like Global Thunder to validate end-to-end operations, maintaining the ICBM force on alert since 1959 and bomber alert capabilities as needed. Modernization initiatives, including the LGM-35A Sentinel ICBM to replace Minuteman III starting in the late 2020s and B-21 Raider integration, address aging systems to preserve long-term credibility without compromising current readiness.

Global Strike and Conventional Operations

The Global Strike Command (AFGSC) executes conventional global strike operations primarily through its strategic bomber fleet, comprising the B-52 Stratofortress, B-1B Lancer, and B-2 Spirit, which deliver precision-guided and unguided munitions over intercontinental ranges to support combatant commanders. These platforms enable rapid, flexible responses to conventional threats, with the B-1B serving as the backbone of long-range conventional strike due to its capacity for the largest conventional payload in the inventory, including both guided and unguided weapons. Unlike intercontinental ballistic missiles, which are reserved for deterrence, bombers provide versatile options for non-nuclear strikes, allowing for mission adaptability such as standoff or penetrating attacks. Bomber Task Force (BTF) deployments form the core of AFGSC's conventional operations, involving routine worldwide positioning of bombers to maintain persistent presence, assure allies, and deter adversaries in alignment with the National Defense Strategy. For instance, in September 2024, three B-2 Spirits deployed to , , logging 295 flight hours and 34 sorties to enhance and readiness in the . Similarly, B-1B Lancers participated in BTF 24-2 at , , marking the first such deployment there and demonstrating global reach for conventional missions. These operations build proficiency, familiarize forces with regional bases and , and integrate with and allied partners, as seen in a December 2024 B-52 exercise involving with , , and other allies, including the first simulated weapons drop in . AFGSC maintains conventional readiness through exercises like the Global Strike Challenge, which evaluates teams on conventional weapons loading and aircraft generation to ensure rapid deployment capabilities. The B-1B's operational history underscores its conventional role, with its combat debut on December 18, 1998, during , and subsequent missions supporting airstrikes in various theaters, often via long-duration continental U.S.-to-U.S. sorties under BTF frameworks. This dual-capable bomber force—nuclear for the B-52 and B-2, exclusively conventional for the B-1B—ensures AFGSC can pivot between deterrence and kinetic effects as required by strategic needs.

Integration with Joint Commands

Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) primarily integrates with the (USSTRATCOM) as its designated air component, providing combat-ready forces, intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), and associated elements to execute nuclear deterrence and global strike missions. Established upon AFGSC's activation on February 24, 2009, this integration ensures USSTRATCOM maintains operational authority over AFGSC's nuclear-capable assets, including all Minuteman III ICBMs and B-52H, B-2A, and B-1B bomber wings, enabling synchronized planning and execution across phases of conflict. The Eighth Air Force, headquartered at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, functions as the Joint-Global Strike Operations Center (J-GSOC), serving as USSTRATCOM's dedicated warfighting air component for bomber operations and nuclear command, control, and communications (NC3). Complementing this, the 608th Air Operations Center (AOC), also under AFGSC, manages USSTRATCOM's air tasking cycle, integrating kinetic and non-kinetic effects from global strike assets to support deterrence objectives and rapid response scenarios. This structure facilitates seamless force presentation, with AFGSC units participating in annual exercises such as Global Thunder, which tests nuclear command and control procedures involving bomber alert postures and ICBM readiness evaluations as of October 18, 2024. Beyond USSTRATCOM, AFGSC supports geographic combatant commands by allocating conventional bomber capabilities for theater-specific operations, such as Bomber Task Force deployments to U.S. Command or U.S. Command, where B-52s and B-1Bs conduct precision strikes and deterrence signaling in contested environments. In October 2024, AFGSC activated the Provisional 95th Wing at , , to consolidate non-doctrinal units under a unified chain, enhancing integration with USSTRATCOM's broader operational framework. These efforts underscore AFGSC's role in joint force employment, prioritizing verifiable nuclear readiness while adapting bomber assets for flexible conventional contributions across commands.

Operational Components

Bomber Force Operations

The Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) oversees the U.S. Air Force's strategic bomber fleet, comprising B-52 Stratofortress, B-1B Lancer, and B-2 Spirit aircraft, which enable both nuclear deterrence and conventional global strike capabilities. These bombers are organized under active-duty bomb wings at bases including Barksdale Air Force Base (B-52, 2nd Bomb Wing), Minot Air Force Base (B-52, 5th Bomb Wing), Dyess Air Force Base (B-1B, 7th Bomb Wing), Ellsworth Air Force Base (B-1B, 28th Bomb Wing), and Whiteman Air Force Base (B-2, 509th Bomb Wing), with reserve support from units like the 307th Bomb Wing at Barksdale. The 8th Air Force, as the operational numbered air force under AFGSC, directs these assets for strategic deterrence and global strike missions in support of U.S. Strategic Command. Bomber operations emphasize Bomber Task Force (BTF) deployments, which involve routine worldwide positioning of bombers to enhance deterrence, theater familiarization, and integration with allies and joint forces. Since 2018, BTF missions have included B-2 Spirits in the and , B-52s in exercises like Cobra Warrior 2025 in the UK, and combined operations across multiple combatant commands. In 2024 and 2025, these missions featured first-time accomplishments such as extended B-52 patrols off Venezuela's coast and B-1B combat strikes alongside B-2 and B-52 platforms. BTF activities support rapid global response, with bombers capable of delivering precision conventional munitions or nuclear gravity bombs, maintaining readiness through long-duration flights exceeding 30 hours with . AFGSC bomber forces participate in the annual Global Strike Challenge, a competition evaluating operations, maintenance, and security across bomb wings to ensure combat readiness. Recent operations have integrated bombers with five combatant commands, demonstrating flexibility in scenarios from European deployments to Middle East responses, where all three bomber types conducted strikes as of June 2025. These activities underscore the bombers' role in credible deterrence, with B-52 and B-2 platforms retaining nuclear certification while B-1Bs focus on conventional high-volume strikes.

ICBM Force Operations

The ICBM force operations under Air Force Global Strike Command are conducted by Twentieth Air Force, headquartered at F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyoming, which directs the three active missile wings maintaining the U.S. land-based nuclear deterrent. These wings—90th at F.E. Warren AFB, 91st at Minot AFB, North Dakota, and 341st at Malmstrom AFB, Montana—operate approximately 400 LGM-30G Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles deployed in hardened silos across missile fields spanning five states. Each wing manages 150 missiles, supported by launch control centers (LCCs) and missile alert facilities (MAFs) where crews maintain 24-hour alert status to ensure rapid response capability. Minuteman III operations emphasize reliability, security, and readiness, with missiles capable of delivering multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs) over intercontinental ranges. Crews, consisting of two officers per , monitor systems continuously and execute launch procedures if directed by national command authorities, while ground teams perform periodic maintenance and propellant surveillance to sustain operational integrity. Security forces from each wing patrol vast missile complexes, secure nuclear convoys, and counter threats in remote areas, integrating with broader AFGSC nuclear surety protocols. Operational testing validates the force's effectiveness through unarmed launches from , , such as the May 2025 test demonstrating safe and reliable deterrence against modern threats. These evaluations, conducted annually, involve teams from all three wings and confirm system performance without live warheads. The 625th Strategic Operations Squadron at Offutt AFB, Nebraska, provides centralized support, ensuring synchronized ICBM execution within joint operations. Competitions like the Global Strike Challenge assess crew proficiency in launch procedures, security tactics, and logistics, fostering adaptability in ICBM operations amid evolving challenges. Recent adaptations include enhanced training for cyber threats and remote , maintaining the force's survivability and deterrence posture.

Command, Control, and Support Elements

The command, control, and support elements of Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) center on providing assured nuclear command, control, and communications (NC3) as well as operational oversight for strategic deterrence and global strike missions in support of U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM). These elements enable the integration of bomber and (ICBM) forces through resilient architectures, including ground-based operations centers and airborne platforms, ensuring continuity across all phases of conflict. The 95th Wing, activated on March 28, 2025, at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, under Eighth Air Force, serves as the primary C2 entity, consolidating active-duty, Air Force Reserve, and Air National Guard units for survivable, enduring command and control to the National Command Authority and combatant commanders. This activation inactivated the prior 595th Command and Control Group (established October 6, 2016) and integrated its components, such as squadrons handling airborne command control, strategic communications, and aircraft maintenance for NC3 assets including the E-4B National Airborne Operations Center. The wing's Joint-Global Strike Operations Center (J-GSOC) acts as the core node for orchestrating AFGSC operations, facilitating real-time monitoring, execution, and execution of nuclear and conventional strike tasks. Support functions within these elements include 24/7 operations at the AFGSC , which coordinates fielded forces and demonstrates capabilities to allies and adversaries, alongside sustainment of legacy NC3 systems and development of replacements. Additional support encompasses UH-1N Iroquois helicopters—operated in largest numbers by AFGSC—for missions such as ICBM field security, convoy surveillance, and base operations sustainment across and wings. These capabilities prioritize resilience against contested environments, aligning with AFGSC's role as the Air Force's NC3 lead.

Organizational Structure

Numbered Air Forces

The Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) operates through two subordinate Numbered Air Forces (), which serve as operational-level commands responsible for organizing, training, and equipping forces for strategic deterrence and global strike missions. These NAFs align with AFGSC's core components: conventional and nuclear-capable bombers under one, and intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) under the other. Approximately 33,700 personnel are assigned across these NAFs, supporting 12 wings including active-duty, , and Air Force Reserve units. Eighth Air Force (8 AF), headquartered at , , functions as the bomber NAF within AFGSC and is designated as U.S. Strategic Command's Task Force 204 for operations. It trains, exercises, and equips Airmen to execute global strike missions, including long-range conventional and nuclear-capable bomber operations with the B-52H Stratofortress, B-1B Lancer, and B-2A Spirit fleets. The command emphasizes readiness for indefinite strategic deterrence, force generation, mission validation, and integration with joint-global strike operations centers to enable rapid response capabilities. Twentieth Air Force (20 AF), headquartered at F.E. Warren Air Force Base, , serves as the missile NAF and oversees all U.S. Air Force ICBM operations, including maintenance, security, and sustainment of the Minuteman III arsenal. It commands three active-duty missile wings: the at F.E. Warren AFB, the at Minot AFB, , and the at Malmstrom AFB, , which collectively operate approximately 400 ICBM launch facilities and ensure continuous alert status for national deterrence. Additionally, 20 AF manages nuclear operations support functions, including UH-1N Huey helicopter operations for ICBM field activities, and reports directly to AFGSC for force presentation to U.S. Strategic Command.

Active-Duty Wings and Squadrons

The active-duty components of Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) comprise eight wings organized under two numbered air forces: the , which oversees bomber operations, and the , which manages (ICBM) operations. These wings execute nuclear deterrence and global strike missions, maintaining approximately 450 Minuteman III ICBMs across 450 operational launch facilities and the Air Force's fleet of B-52H, B-1B, and B-2A strategic bombers. The following table summarizes the active-duty wings, their bases, and primary assets:
WingBase LocationPrimary Asset
2d Bomb WingBarksdale AFB, LouisianaB-52H Stratofortress
Minot AFB, B-52H Stratofortress
Dyess AFB, TexasB-1B Lancer
Ellsworth AFB, South DakotaB-1B Lancer (phasing out for B-21 Raider transition)
Whiteman AFB, MissouriB-2A Spirit
F.E. Warren AFB, LGM-30G Minuteman III ICBMs
Minot AFB, LGM-30G Minuteman III ICBMs
Malmstrom AFB, LGM-30G Minuteman III ICBMs
Each includes an operations group with specialized squadrons for execution. Bomber wings typically feature two to three bomb squadrons () for crew training and operations, alongside and squadrons where applicable. For instance, the 2d Bomb 's 11th , 20th , and 23rd (expeditionary) conduct B-52H sorties, while the 509th Bomb Wing's 13th and 393rd operate B-2As for stealthy global strikes. The B-1B-equipped wings, 7th and 28th, maintain operational squadrons such as the 9th and 34th at Dyess and the 37th at Ellsworth, though B-1B accelerated in 2024 with planned retirements continuing into 2025 to prioritize B-21 . Missile wings operate five missile squadrons (MS) each, responsible for ICBM alert duties, launch facility maintenance, and security. The 90th Missile Wing's squadrons include the 319th MS, 320th MS, 321st MS, 322nd MS, and 400th MS, managing 150 missiles across dispersed silos. Similarly, the 91st Missile Wing fields the 74th MS, 85th MS (test), 86th MS, 87th MS, and 91st MS; the 341st Missile Wing operates the 10th MS, 12th MS, 341st MS, 490th MS, and 491st MS. These squadrons ensure continuous 24/7 postures, with each missile squadron overseeing 50 launch and associated crews. Support squadrons within each wing handle , , and , enabling self-sustained operations. AFGSC's active-duty structure emphasizes redundancy and dispersal to enhance survivability against threats.

Reserve and Guard Components

The contributes to Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) missions through the , stationed at , , which operates as a Total partner to the active-duty . This wing is the only bomb unit in the Reserve Command and maintains operational responsibility for 20 B-52H Stratofortress bombers, enabling extended deterrence and global strike surge capacity. Reserve personnel integrate with active forces for training, , and deployments, participating in exercises such as Bomber Task Force missions to demonstrate strategic readiness. The supports AFGSC via the 131st Bomb Wing, based at , , serving as an associate unit to the active-duty . This wing delivers expeditionary B-2 Spirit stealth bomber operations, including combat support, weapons loading, and mission planning, with Guard Airmen contributing to federal missions like precision strikes. As the sole ANG unit equipped with B-2s, it enhances and conventional strike capabilities through integrated Total Force operations, including evaluations and real-world deployments. No Reserve or Guard units are assigned to AFGSC's forces, which remain exclusively active-duty. These components participate in AFGSC-led events like the Global Strike Challenge, competing alongside active units to validate nuclear surety, bomber employment, and command-and-control proficiency across the Total Force. Such integration ensures scalable manpower and expertise for strategic deterrence without dedicated Guard or Reserve missile wings.

Capabilities and Assets

Strategic Bomber Inventory

Air Force Global Strike Command maintains the United States Air Force's strategic bomber fleet, comprising the , , and , which collectively enable global strike capabilities for nuclear deterrence and conventional operations. These platforms are distributed across active-duty bomb wings, with reserve augmentation, and support continuous alert postures and deployments. The B-52H Stratofortress forms the backbone of the conventional and nuclear-capable bomber force, with 76 aircraft in the inventory as of 2025. These are primarily operated by the at , , and the at , , supplemented by the Air Force Reserve's at Barksdale. Equipped for both nuclear and conventional payloads, including cruise missiles and gravity bombs, the B-52H fleet is undergoing engine and radar modernization to extend service life into the 2050s. The B-1B Lancer inventory stands at 45 aircraft, focused on high-speed, low-altitude conventional strikes with the largest payload capacity among current bombers. Assigned to the at , Texas, and the at , South Dakota, the fleet has been divested of nuclear roles since 2011 to prioritize conventional missions. Retirement of older airframes is accelerating, with plans to phase out the type in favor of emerging platforms by the . The B-2 Spirit provides stealthy, penetrating strike options, with 19 operational aircraft and one dedicated test airframe in service as of 2025, all under the at , . Capable of delivering precision nuclear or conventional munitions over intercontinental ranges, the fleet faces sustainment challenges due to low numbers and high maintenance demands, prompting a planned retirement of one additional aircraft in 2025. The B-21 Raider is slated to incrementally replace both B-1 and B-2 capabilities starting in 2028.
Aircraft ModelQuantityPrimary OperatorsKey Capabilities
B-52H Stratofortress762nd BW, 5th BW, 307th BW/conventional, long-range cruise missiles, gravity bombs; range ~8,800 miles unrefueled
B-1B Lancer457th BW, 28th BWConventional supersonic penetration, up to 75,000 lb payload
B-2 Spirit20 (19 operational)509th BW, /conventional strikes, ~6,000 range

Ballistic Missile Systems

The Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) maintains the land-based leg of the U.S. nuclear triad through its oversight of the LGM-30G Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs). These missiles form the primary ballistic missile system under AFGSC, providing a rapid-response strategic deterrent capability. Deployed since the 1970s with multiple service life extension programs, the Minuteman III remains operational as of 2025, ensuring continuous on-alert status for national defense. The current operational inventory consists of 400 Minuteman III missiles distributed across 450 hardened silos at three missile wings: the at F.E. Warren Air Force Base, ; the at , ; and the at , . Each missile is a three-stage, solid-propellant system capable of delivering multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs), though under agreements like , they are configured with a single warhead, typically the or W78. The system's design emphasizes survivability, with missiles dispersed to complicate enemy targeting, and rapid launch times of under 30 minutes from alert. Regular test launches, such as those conducted in 2024 and 2025 from , validate the missiles' reliability and the command's operational proficiency. AFGSC conducts ongoing maintenance and upgrades to sustain Minuteman III effectiveness amid aging infrastructure, including propulsion system enhancements and guidance set modernizations. However, the system faces obsolescence risks, prompting the transition to the LGM-35A ICBM program. , developed by , aims to replace all Minuteman III components with new missiles, silos, and command facilities, achieving initial operational capability around 2029 and full deployment by the mid-2030s. Construction has begun at F.E. Warren AFB, and the first Minuteman III silo was deactivated in September 2025 as a preparatory . This modernization addresses evolving threats while preserving deterrence through improved cybersecurity, accuracy, and lifecycle extendability to 2075.

Modernization and Technological Advancements

Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) oversees modernization programs to sustain and enhance the reliability, survivability, and effectiveness of its strategic nuclear forces amid evolving threats. These efforts encompass the replacement of legacy systems with advanced technologies, including the LGM-35A Sentinel (ICBM) to succeed the Minuteman III and upgrades to the bomber fleet, such as radar enhancements for the B-52 Stratofortress and integration of the B-21 Raider. The represents a comprehensive recapitalization of the land-based leg of the U.S. , designed to replace 400 aging Minuteman III ICBMs that have served over 50 years. AFGSC plans to procure 634 missiles, including spares, for deployment across missile fields at F.E. Warren Air Force Base, , and , modernizing 450 silos and over 600 facilities spanning nearly 40,000 square miles. A key milestone occurred on March 6, 2025, when the and completed a stage-one solid rocket motor test, advancing propulsion development. A supplemental for the program is scheduled for release in August 2025, supporting upgrades and site activation, such as the establishment of Site Activation Task Force Detachment 9 at on March 6, 2025. Bomber modernization focuses on extending the service life of existing platforms while introducing next-generation capabilities. The B-52H Stratofortress, operational for seven decades, undergoes upgrades including the AN/APQ-188 radar modernization program, which neared flight testing as of August 30, 2025, after addressing delays and cost overruns to enhance all-weather targeting and terrain-following capabilities. Additional improvements incorporate digital cockpit systems and advanced radar to ensure combat relevance through the 2050s. The B-21 Raider, a bomber under development by , features open systems architecture to facilitate rapid integration of future technologies and reduce sustainment costs; the second test aircraft arrived at on September 11, 2025, with initial operational capability expected to incrementally replace B-1 Lancer and B-2 Spirit fleets starting in the mid-2020s. AFGSC anticipates fleet growth, requiring expanded personnel to operate at least 100 B-21s alongside modernized legacy bombers. These advancements, including command-and-control enhancements and infrastructure recapitalization, aim to bolster deterrence by improving system resilience against emerging threats like hypersonic weapons and vulnerabilities, with AFGSC projecting increased end strength to manage the transition.

Leadership and Command

List of Commanders

The commanders of Air Force Global Strike Command, responsible for the stewardship of the nation's strategic deterrence forces including intercontinental ballistic missiles and strategic bombers, are listed below in chronological order since the command's activation on , 2009.
No.Name and RankTerm
1Lt. Gen. Frank G. KlotzAugust 7, 2009 – January 6, 2011
2Lt. Gen. James M. KowalskiJanuary 6, 2011 – October 23, 2013
3Lt. Gen. Stephen W. WilsonOctober 23, 2013 – July 28, 2015
4Gen. Robin F. RandJuly 28, 2015 – August 21, 2018
5Gen. Timothy M. RayAugust 21, 2018 – August 30, 2021
6August 30, 2021 – December 7, 2022
7December 7, 2022 – present (as of October 2025)

Current Leadership and Decision-Making Processes

General Stephen L. Davis assumed command of Global Strike Command on October 17, 2025, succeeding General Thomas A. Bussiere, who retired after leading the command since December 2022. Davis, promoted to four-star general for the role, previously served as of the Department of the since March 2022, with prior assignments including Director of at . In this capacity, he directs approximately 33,700 active-duty, Guard, Reserve, and civilian personnel across three bases, ensuring combat-ready forces for nuclear deterrence and global via strategic bombers and intercontinental ballistic missiles. Supporting are key deputies, including the vice commander, who assists in operations oversight, and the command , responsible for enlisted matters and morale. The command's leadership structure aligns under two numbered air forces— for bombers and for missiles—each led by a , enabling decentralized execution while maintaining centralized control. Decisions on force readiness, training, and modernization flow from Davis through these components, with input from specialized directorates for strategy, logistics, and nuclear surety. Decision-making processes emphasize rigorous chain-of-command protocols, particularly for nuclear operations, where AFGSC serves as the Air Force component to U.S. Strategic Command, providing forces under the . The Joint Global Strike Operations Center, commanded by a major general, integrates planning for bomber and missile alerts, retargeting via the Strategic Automated Command and Control System, and rapid response to combatant commander requirements. Operational choices prioritize empirical readiness data from exercises and assessments, with higher-level approvals required for deployments or system upgrades, ensuring alignment with and Department of Defense priorities amid great-power competition. Recent initiatives incorporate human-machine teaming and for accelerated battle management, tested in experiments like to enhance course-of-action generation without compromising human oversight.

Challenges and Controversies

Nuclear Safety and Surety Incidents

In March 2023, the at , , under Air Force Global Strike Command, failed a , resulting in the relief of six officers from command positions due to deficiencies in safety protocols and readiness. The inspection assessed compliance with weapons handling, storage, and operational security standards, revealing systemic issues in unit leadership and execution that compromised requirements. Earlier, in May 2014, a Minuteman III at F.E. Warren Base, —home to the under AFGSC—sustained damage during routine maintenance troubleshooting inside its launch facility, when airmen improperly used tools that breached the missile's pressurized compartment, rendering it inoperable without nuclear detonation or release. The incident, classified as a mishap (minor nuclear-related event), prompted an investigation and highlighted procedural errors in access and equipment handling. In March 2014, the at , , also failed a , marking the second such failure for an AFGSC ICBM unit in quick succession and leading to leadership accountability measures. This followed broader scrutiny of nuclear enterprise discipline, including the November 2014 relief of two missile wing commanders at Malmstrom and Minot for failing to uphold standards amid inspection shortfalls and morale issues. These events, occurring against a backdrop of post-2007 reforms aimed at restoring rigor, underscore persistent challenges in training, oversight, and cultural adherence to and procedural integrity within AFGSC's bomber and missile components, though official assessments maintain no compromise to security occurred. AFGSC responded with intensified staff assistance visits and program reviews to mitigate recurrence, as detailed in updated directives like AFI 91-121.

Budgetary Constraints and Political Debates

The Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) has faced persistent budgetary pressures from defense spending caps and mechanisms, which threaten to curtail operational readiness and modernization efforts. In anticipation of potential cuts triggered by the Budget Control Act, AFGSC projected a 10% reduction in B-52 flying hours and a 20% decrease in bomber munitions stockpiles as of July 2025, prioritizing nuclear sustainment over conventional operations. These constraints stem from broader fiscal limitations, including the flattening of budgets under recent debt deals capping military spending at $886 billion for FY2024 onward, forcing trade-offs between immediate readiness and long-term investments in strategic assets. Modernization programs under AFGSC's purview, particularly the B-21 Raider bomber and Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), have sparked intense political debates over affordability amid escalating costs. The Sentinel program, intended to replace the aging Minuteman III ICBMs, experienced an 81% cost overrun by July 2024, inflating the total estimated price from $78 billion to $141 billion, prompting congressional critics to label it a "collective failure" of oversight by the , , and the Department of Defense. In response, the paused construction on certain launch facilities in 2025 to reassess overruns, while the highlighted critical risks in the transition timeline. The B-21 program, though reportedly under its initial budget targets during low-rate production as of 2022, faces scrutiny over potential fleet size limitations due to unit costs exceeding $700 million each, with debates centering on whether to procure 100 or more aircraft to maintain credibility against peer adversaries. Politically, these programs have divided , with supporters emphasizing the imperative of sustaining the for deterrence—projected to require $946 billion across U.S. nuclear forces from 2025 to 2034—against arguments from cost-focused critics advocating delays or reductions to redirect funds. Proponents, including analysts, contend that forgoing modernization risks eroding U.S. strategic superiority, as evidenced by the triad's historical role in preventing great-power conflict, while could exacerbate delays without alternatives to systems like . Despite advocates decrying the expenditures as unsustainable, congressional appropriations have largely sustained funding, as seen in FY2025 requests balancing nuclear priorities amid overall cuts to for readiness. This tension reflects causal trade-offs in , where underfunding AFGSC's assets could compromise empirical deterrence efficacy, given the Minuteman III's extensions approaching limits without .

Readiness and Operational Assessments

The readiness of Global Strike Command (AFGSC) assets, including strategic and intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), has been subject to periodic evaluations by the (GAO), Air Force Inspector General inspections, and internal command assessments, revealing persistent challenges from aging systems and maintenance demands. GAO reports have highlighted incomplete readiness reporting for nuclear forces, where the Air Force lacks comprehensive metrics for sustainment risks in legacy platforms like the Minuteman III ICBM, potentially undermining deterrent posture amid delays in replacements such as the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent. Bomber fleet mission-capable rates under AFGSC have declined, with overall U.S. bomber availability dropping to 54 percent in recent fiscal years from 59 percent in 2021, attributed to structural , parts shortages, and high operational tempos. Nuclear surety inspections, which evaluate handling, security, and reliability of nuclear weapons, have exposed vulnerabilities; for instance, the at , responsible for Minuteman III operations, failed a inspection, resulting in the relief of six squadron commanders due to deficiencies in procedures and oversight. These pass/fail assessments, classified in detail, underscore causal factors like gaps and maintenance lapses, echoing earlier critiques of systemic erosion in nuclear enterprise discipline. Despite a 2021 self-assessment claiming AFGSC's highest historical readiness levels amid pandemic constraints and aging fleets, subsequent data indicate stagnation or regression, with Minuteman III sustainment deemed feasible to 2050 only under elevated risks from obsolescent components and issues. Operational exercises, such as the 2020 demonstration of simultaneous bomber and ICBM alerts representing two-thirds of the U.S. , affirm execution capability but do not mitigate broader empirical shortfalls in daily readiness metrics. GAO has recommended enhanced for ICBM transitions and fuller readiness to address these gaps, yet lags persist as of 2025.

Strategic Impact and Effectiveness

Contributions to National Security

The Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) contributes to U.S. national security by organizing, training, equipping, and maintaining combat-ready forces for strategic nuclear deterrence and global strike operations, ensuring a credible threat of overwhelming retaliation against potential aggressors. This role underpins the land-based component of the nuclear triad, deterring nuclear-armed states through assured destruction capabilities rooted in survivable, responsive forces. AFGSC's deterrence posture has been integral to preventing great-power nuclear conflict since the command's establishment in 2009, aligning with broader U.S. strategy to maintain strategic stability amid rising threats from peer competitors. Central to these contributions are AFGSC's (ICBM) forces, consisting of 400 deployed LGM-30G Minuteman III missiles across three wings at Malmstrom AFB, ; Minot AFB, ; and F.E. Warren AFB, , with total launch facilities numbering 450. These silo-based systems, capable of delivering multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs) with or warheads, provide a prompt, hardened response option, enhancing second-strike reliability against preemptive strikes. Ongoing surveillance, security, and testing—such as the unarmed Minuteman III launch on November 13, 2024, from —validate system readiness and deter through demonstrated operational efficacy. AFGSC's strategic bomber fleet further bolsters national security with flexible, long-range strike options, including 76 B-52H Stratofortress and 20 B-2 Spirit aircraft certified for nuclear missions, supported by approximately 178 total aircraft under command. These platforms enable global reach without forward basing, delivering gravity bombs like the B61-12 or air-launched cruise missiles such as the AGM-86B ALCM, while also executing conventional precision strikes to support combatant commanders. Bomber task forces deployed to allied regions, as in exercises simulating rapid nuclear response, reassure partners under extended deterrence commitments, such as NATO's , countering coercion from adversaries. Through annual events like Global Thunder, involving thousands of personnel validating command-and-control procedures, AFGSC sustains high readiness rates—exceeding 95% for alert forces—ensuring executable options for national leadership in crises. These capabilities not only deter direct attacks but also shape adversary risk calculations in gray-zone competitions, preserving U.S. freedom of action without kinetic escalation. Modernization efforts, including the transition to the LGM-35A Sentinel ICBM by 2029, reinforce long-term deterrence credibility against evolving threats.

Empirical Evidence of Deterrence Success

The absence of nuclear conflict between major powers since the establishment of credible U.S. strategic forces in the late 1940s constitutes primary empirical evidence supporting deterrence efficacy, with Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) maintaining key components of this posture since 2009 through oversight of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and nuclear-capable bombers. Historical analyses attribute this outcome to the survivable triad—ICBMs, submarine-launched ballistic missiles, and bombers—which complicates adversary calculations for a disarming first strike, as evidenced by the resolution of crises like the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, where U.S. strategic alerts (including B-52 bomber operations) influenced Soviet withdrawal without escalation to nuclear use. Similarly, during the Korean War (1950–1953), U.S. nuclear capabilities deterred broader Soviet or Chinese intervention despite limited arsenal size (fewer than 1,200 warheads), preventing direct great-power confrontation. Post-Cold War data reinforces this pattern: U.S. strategic deployments declined 85% from peak levels (approximately 31,000 total warheads) to 1,550 deployed under by 2018, yet no nuclear-armed adversary has initiated strategic on the U.S. or extended deterrence allies, even amid provocations such as Russia's 2014 annexation of or North Korea's 2017 intercontinental-range missile tests. AFGSC's role in this era includes annual ICBM test launches (e.g., Minuteman III flights from ) demonstrating system reliability and visibility to adversaries, which former AFGSC commander Lt. Gen. James cited in 2013 as essential to "deter and assure" without requiring arsenal expansion. Kowalski emphasized that diverse, flexible forces under AFGSC enable tailored responses, correlating with observed restraint in adversary behavior during regional crises. Recent assessments link AFGSC-maintained capabilities to ongoing stability, such as in the 2022 , where Moscow's threats did not materialize into use despite territorial setbacks, consistent with analyses attributing restraint to the credibility of U.S. strategic posture rather than conventional aid alone. Quantitative indicators include zero unauthorized incidents tied to size across decades of varying deployments (e.g., 32 U.S. accidents from despite growth to 23,000 warheads by 1982), underscoring operational surety that bolsters deterrence without unintended risks. These outcomes align with broader empirical patterns: no peer exchange in over 75 years, contrasting pre- eras of frequent great-power wars (e.g., World War II's 72 million fatalities over six years). While remains inferential—dependent on adversary perceptions—historical case studies and sustained non-aggression provide the strongest available proxy for AFGSC's contribution to deterrence success.

Criticisms and Alternative Perspectives

Critics of the U.S. , which forms the core of Air Force Global Strike Command's (AFGSC) strategic capabilities, argue that the land-based (ICBM) leg—comprising approximately 400 Minuteman III missiles as of 2023—poses inherent vulnerabilities due to its fixed , potentially incentivizing preemptive strikes in a crisis and eroding deterrence . This perspective, advanced by analysts at organizations like the , contends that ICBMs compel a launch-under-attack posture, heightening escalation risks without commensurate survivability benefits compared to mobile sea- or air-based alternatives. Strategic bombers under AFGSC, including the B-52H and B-2 fleets, face scrutiny for their aging infrastructure and high operational costs, with maintenance demands straining readiness amid modernization delays for successors like the B-21 Raider, whose program costs exceeded $203 billion by 2023 estimates. Detractors, including policy experts at the , question the 's overall necessity in an era of conventional precision strikes and hypersonic weapons, asserting that U.S. superiority in non-nuclear long-range systems diminishes the marginal deterrent value of maintaining all three legs, particularly given the absence of empirical evidence linking triad redundancy directly to prevented conflicts since 1945. Alternative perspectives propose a dyad emphasizing submarine-launched ballistic missiles and bombers, which offer greater recallability and flexibility for limited scenarios, potentially reducing fiscal burdens—projected at over $1 trillion for triad modernization through 2040—while preserving credible second-strike assurance against peer adversaries like and . Proponents of this shift, such as contributors to War on the Rocks, argue it aligns better with causal deterrence dynamics in multipolar environments, where fixed ICBMs may signal vulnerability rather than resolve, though defenders of the full counter that eliminating the ICBM component could undermine targeting options and allied perceptions of U.S. commitment. Budgetary critiques highlight AFGSC's ICBM replacement program, whose costs ballooned from $96 billion to $141 billion by 2024 due to engineering challenges and issues, prompting debates on costs versus conventional force enhancements for great-power competition. advocates, including those from the Arms Control Association, suggest scaling back deployed warheads to 1,000—below the treaty limit—without triad alterations, citing historical non-use of nuclear weapons in conventional wars as evidence that deterrence relies more on overall military posture than sheer numbers. These views, while influential in policy circles, are contested by strategic analysts who emphasize empirical correlations between triad maintenance and extended deterrence successes, such as NATO's amid .

References

  1. [1]
    About - Air Force Global Strike Command
    The official site of Air Force Global Strike Command.AFGSC History · Global Strike Strategic Plan · Strikewerx · Striker Leadership Library
  2. [2]
    Air Force Global Strike Command - Air Forces Strategic - AF.mil
    Air Force Global Strike Command is responsible for the nation's three intercontinental ballistic missile wings, the Air Force's entire bomber force.
  3. [3]
    General Thomas A. Bussiere - Air Force Global Strike Command
    Bussiere is Commander, Air Force Global Strike Command and Commander, Air Forces Strategic - Air, U.S. Strategic Command, Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana.
  4. [4]
    Contact Us - Air Force Global Strike Command
    318-456-5211. Air Force Global Strike Command Air Forces Strategic-Air Public Affairs 245 Davis Ave. E Suite 198. Barksdale AFB, La. 71110. Contact Form.
  5. [5]
    AFGSC History - Air Force Global Strike Command
    The AFGSC History page contains stories, photos and videos about Air Force Global Strike Command, as well our lineage to the Strategic Air Command.
  6. [6]
    AMC consolidates with MAC - Air Force Financial Management
    In 2009, the Air Force redesignated and reactivated the inactivated SAC as Air Force Global Strike Command. In an effort to eliminate the confusion and ...
  7. [7]
    Remember Our Legacy - Air Force Global Strike Command
    May 22, 2013 · The lineage of Air Force Global Strike Command is traced to fabled fighting units as VIII Bomber Command, 20th Air Force, and Strategic Air ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Assessment of Air Force Global Strike Command ... - DoD
    Jul 20, 2012 · AFGSC was activated on August 7, 2009, in conjunction with an overarching effort to reinvigorate the nuclear enterprise after the inadvertent ...<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Global Strike Evolution | Air & Space Forces Magazine
    Air Force Global Strike Command stood up five years ago, on Aug. 7, 2009, in the wake of Air Force nuclear-mission problems that garnered national headlines.Missing: establishment | Show results with:establishment
  10. [10]
    - [H.A.S.C. No. 111-118] STATUS OF THE AIR FORCE NUCLEAR ...
    Reinvigorating the Air Force nuclear enterprise has been the Air Force's top priority for the past 18 months. The foundation of our effort was a comprehensive ...
  11. [11]
    6 bases considered for Global Strike Command
    Jan 22, 2009 · Its creation was announced in November 2008 as part of the Air Force's Nuclear Roadmap designed to reinvigorate the service's nuclear enterprise ...
  12. [12]
    Air Force Global Strike Command - Minuteman Missile
    History of AFGSC. The Air Force officially established Air Force Global Strike Command on January 12, 2009 at Bolling Air Force Base, Washington D.C. This ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Air Force Global Strike Command's Reinvigoration of the ... - dtic.mil
    To gain knowledge of how to organize and execute change within an organization, this paper will first examine John Kotter's 8-step process for leading change, ...
  14. [14]
    Air Force Global Strike Command: Five Years in the Making
    Aug 7, 2014 · ... reinvigorate this community. The journey to reinvigorate the nuclear enterprise began Aug. 7, 2009. During Lt. Gen. Frank Klotz's activation ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  15. [15]
    Air Force stands up Global Strike Command
    Aug 7, 2009 · "This week we achieved a major milestone in the activation of Air Force Global Strike Command," said Air Force Secretary Michael Donley.<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    AF reaches first milestone in acquisition of new ICBM
    Sep 1, 2016 · The Air Force received approval on August 23 for the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent program to start the next phase of its acquisition effort.
  17. [17]
    Air Force Global Strike Command conducts first annual Combat ...
    Nov 21, 2023 · In a milestone event, AFGSC successfully executed its inaugural Combat Ammunition Production Exercise (CAPEX) on November 7, 2023, ...
  18. [18]
    AFGSC Celebrates 15th Anniversary
    Aug 7, 2024 · BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, La. - Today Air Force Global Strike Command celebrates 15 years of being the Cornerstone of America's Defense!
  19. [19]
    AFGSC Launches $100M Initiative to Accelerate Commercial ...
    Nov 7, 2024 · Air Force Global Strike Command has embarked on a significant initiative, awarding a $100 million, five-year contract to strengthen commercial engagement.
  20. [20]
    The Innovation Corner - Air Force Global Strike Command
    Feb. 19, 2025: Air Force Global Strike Command advances warfighter readiness with ongoing initiative; Aug. 28, 2024: Second annual ARROW held at Camp Guernsey ...
  21. [21]
    20 AF reactivates ICBM Center of Excellence, completes inaugural ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · 20th AF achieved a significant milestone in June with the successful execution of the 1st Instructor Qualification Course under the newly ...
  22. [22]
    Air > Air Force Global Strike Command AFSTRAT-AIR > Fact Sheets
    Our capabilities should deter our adversaries from competing with us in the military dimension because we are postured to execute our mission in any contested ...
  23. [23]
    Strengthening our nuclear deterrence: Part 1
    Mar 4, 2024 · The 377th Test and Evaluation Group plays an important role in nuclear deterrence by continually testing our ICBM capabilities for all the world to see.
  24. [24]
    LGM-30G Minuteman III > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display - AF.mil
    The current ICBM force consists of 400 Minuteman III missiles located at the 90th Missile Wing at F.E. Warren AFB, Wyo.; the 341st Missile Wing at Malmstrom AFB ...
  25. [25]
    Minuteman III test launch showcases readiness of U.S. nuclear ...
    May 21, 2025 · ICBM test launches demonstrate that the US ICBM fleet is ready, reliable and effective in leveraging dominance in an era of strategic competition.Missing: bomber | Show results with:bomber
  26. [26]
    Minuteman III test launch showcases readiness of US nuclear force's ...
    Feb 19, 2025 · Minuteman III test launch showcases readiness of US nuclear force's safe, effective deterrent · Published Feb. 19, 2025 · By Staff Sgt. Joshua ...
  27. [27]
    Report to Congress on U.S. Strategic Bombers - USNI News
    Jun 19, 2025 · According to DOD, 46 B-52 aircraft are capable of carrying nuclear weapons. These nuclear-capable B-52s are equipped to carry air-launched ...
  28. [28]
    Bomber Task Force - Air Force Global Strike Command - AF.mil
    The three types of bomber aircraft comprising AFGSC's fleet are the B-52 Stratofortress, the B-1 Lancer, and the B-2 Spirit; with plans for the B-21 Raider to ...
  29. [29]
    Bombers arrive in Europe for BTF 25-2
    Feb 13, 2025 · US Air Force B-52H Stratofortress strategic bombers have arrived in Europe as part of a routine Bomber Task Force-Europe deployment.Missing: numbers | Show results with:numbers
  30. [30]
    [PDF] AFDP 3-72, Nuclear Operations - Air Force Doctrine
    It serves as the backstop and foundation of US national defense, the defense of US allies and partners, and underwrites every US military operation. Nuclear ...
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    B-1B Lancer - Air Force Global Strike Command - AF.mil
    Carrying the largest conventional payload of both guided and unguided weapons in the Air Force inventory, the multi-mission B-1 is the backbone of America's ...
  33. [33]
    AFGSC names 2023 Global Strike Challenge winners
    AFGSC names 2023 Global Strike Challenge winners ; Best Conventional Weapons Load Team. 28th Bomb Wing, Ellsworth AFB, South Dakota ; Best Conventional Aircraft ...
  34. [34]
    Bones and Bombs, 25 years since the B-1's combat debut
    Dec 15, 2023 · The B-1B Lancer made its historic combat debut 25 years ago, on Dec. 18, 1998, in support of Operation Desert Fox on Sheikh Isa Air Base in Bahrain.
  35. [35]
    B-1s Part of Airstrikes - Air Force Global Strike Command
    Feb 3, 2024 · Ellsworth and Dyess B-1 crews routinely conduct long duration CONUS-to-CONUS missions as a part of strategic Bomber Task Force missions ...
  36. [36]
    Joint Forces Air Component Commander (JFACC)
    AFGSC provides strategic deterrence, global strike capability, and combat support to USSTRATCOM and other geographic combatant commands.
  37. [37]
    About - U.S. Strategic Command
    ... nuclear deterrence operations and national security objectives. JEC - Joint ... Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC). Air Force Global Strike Command ...
  38. [38]
    8th Air Force/J-GSOC - AF.mil
    The J-GSOC is the warfighting air component to USSTRATCOM, the operational arm of both the U.S. bomber forces and Nuclear Command, Control and Communications ( ...
  39. [39]
    608th Air Operations Center > 8th Air Force/J-GSOC > Display
    The 608th Air Operations Center (AOC) is responsible for executing USSTRATCOM's Air Tasking Cycle through all phases of conflict. It provides the Joint ...
  40. [40]
    U.S. Strategic Command to Commence Exercise Global Thunder 25
    Oct 18, 2024 · US Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) will commence its annual nuclear command and control exercise, Global Thunder, October 18, 2024.
  41. [41]
    Air Force Global Strike Command activates Provisional 95th Wing at ...
    Oct 4, 2024 · “The intent of the 95th Wing is to integrate three units that currently do not exist in a doctrinal chain of command and bring them together ...
  42. [42]
    Global Strike Challenge
    The following AFGSC units will participate in competitions run by AFGSC Headquarters: 2nd Bomb Wing, Barksdale AFB, Louisiana. 5th Bomb Wing, Minot AFB, North ...
  43. [43]
    7th Bomb Wing - Air Force Global Strike Command
    Honorary commanders from the 17th Training Wing at Goodfellow Air Force Base visited Dyess Air Force Base, August 6, 2025. The 7th Bomb Wing welcomed ...
  44. [44]
    28th Bomb Wing - Air Force Global Strike Command
    Sept. 11, 2025. US Air Force announces arrival of second B-21 test aircraft at Edwards AFB. The DAF announced the arrival of the second B-21 Raider flight ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  45. [45]
    2024 Bomber Task Force missions: A year of first-ever ...
    Jan 21, 2025 · Since 2018, U.S. strategic Bomber Task Force (BTF) missions have provided theater familiarization for aircrew and aircraft integration ...
  46. [46]
    307th Bomb Wing Arrives in UK for Cobra Warrior 2025 Exercise
    Sep 12, 2025 · U.S. Air Force B-52 Stratofortress aircraft assigned to the 307th Bomb Wing at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, arrived at Royal Air Force ...
  47. [47]
    US Bombers Step Up Combat Operations as Demand Grows
    Jun 9, 2025 · ... Air Force Global Strike Command said June 5. “We've seen . . . an ... All three types of bombers—B-1s, B-2s and B-52s—struck targets in ...
  48. [48]
    B-52 Bombers Just Flew For Hours Off Venezuela's Coast (Updated)
    Oct 15, 2025 · ... B-52s have returned to base or are still airborne. TWZ has reached out to Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) and Air Forces Southern ...
  49. [49]
    Air Force Global Strike Command advances warfighter readiness ...
    Feb 19, 2025 · Air Force Global Strike Command partnered with Louisiana State University Health Shreveport through a Cooperative Research and Development ...<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Global Strike Challenge
    The Global Strike Challenge is a competition for bomber, ICBM, helicopter, and security forces units, testing operations, maintenance, and security forces.
  51. [51]
    Global Strike bombers conclude European deployment
    Air Force Global Strike Command deployed bombers to the European area of operations for more than two weeks to work with the United States' allies and ...
  52. [52]
    B-52 Stratofortress - Air Force Global Strike Command
    The B-52 also played a role in Operation Iraqi Freedom. On March 21, 2003 ... Air Force Global Strike Command. The aircraft is also assigned to the Air ...
  53. [53]
    TWENTIETH AIR FORCE FACT SHEET > 20th Air Force > Display
    Twentieth Air Force oversees three ICBM wings and one nuclear operations support wing: - 90th Missile Wing at F.E. Warren AFB, Wyo. - 91st Missile Wing at Minot ...
  54. [54]
    341st Missile Wing > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display - AF.mil
    The 341st Missile Wing operates Minuteman III missiles which provide the critical component of America's on-alert strategic forces. The wing also hosts a ...Missing: 90th 91st
  55. [55]
    LGM-30G Minuteman III - 20th Air Force
    The LGM-30G Minuteman III is a silo-launched, surface attack, guided intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) part of the strategic deterrent forces.
  56. [56]
    625th Strategic Operations Squadron
    Mission: Execute and support global strike through continuous, rapid, accurate and survivable ICBM operations. Vision: A team of nuclear professionals ...
  57. [57]
    Minuteman III test launch showcases readiness of US nuclear force's ...
    May 27, 2025 · Airmen from all three missile wings were selected for the task force to support the test launch, while maintainers from the 90th Missile Wing at ...
  58. [58]
    ICBM Operations : Always Adapting > Air Force Global Strike ...
    Jan 10, 2022 · Lt. Col. Robert Mack, 319 MS commander, gives his impressions on the adaptive nature of ICBM Operations,
  59. [59]
    Eighth Air Force activates 95th Wing
    Mar 28, 2025 · The 95th Wing will focus on providing combatant commanders with assured command and control (C2) over assigned forces through global command, ...
  60. [60]
    95th Wing - Air Force Global Strike Command - AF.mil
    ... Global Strike Command. History of the "Square B". The 95th Wing traces ... The 253rd Command and Control Group (comprised of the 153rd Command and Control ...
  61. [61]
    Joint Nuclear Operations Center > 8th Air Force/J-GSOC > Display
    Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) Command Center (ACC): The AFGSC Command Center Division is a 24/7 Specialized Command and Control Element responsible ...
  62. [62]
    Air Force Global Strike Command - Air Forces Strategic - Air - AF.mil
    AFGSC, activated Aug. 7, 2009, is a major command with headquarters at Barksdale AFB, La., in the Shreveport-Bossier City community. AFGSC is comprised of ...Missing: VIII | Show results with:VIII
  63. [63]
    [PDF] USAF MAJOR COMMANDS - Air & Space Forces Magazine
    AFGSC AIR FORCE GLOBAL STRIKE COMMAND. Barksdale AFB, La. EST. Aug. 7, 2009 ... (Retirement planned for the summer of 2025.) Page 8. 75. ALMANAC 2025.
  64. [64]
    USAF Units of Action: Combat Wings, Air Base Wings, Institutional ...
    Sep 17, 2024 · Air Force combat wings will be structured as mission-ready Units of Action and will have all the necessary elements stationed together at ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] GAO-25-108466, ICBM Modernization: Air Force Actions Needed to ...
    Sep 10, 2025 · Air Force Global Strike Command, hereafter referred to as Global ... GAO-21-210. Missile Wing Organization and Personnel. Air Force Has.
  66. [66]
    Air Force Global Strike Command
    The primary missions include supporting ICBM operations in the missile fields, providing security and surveillance of off-base nuclear convoys and providing ...
  67. [67]
    307th Bomb Wing
    It is responsible for flying and maintaining 20 B-52 Stratofortress aircraft and is the only bomb wing in the Air Force Reserve Command. The 307th Operations ...
  68. [68]
    307th Bomb Wing - Air Force Global Strike Command
    AFGSC tests new B-52 Stratofortress towbar prototype.
  69. [69]
    Units - 131st Bomb Wing
    The 131st Bomb Wing's primary operational mission is to provide full spectrum, expeditionary, B-2 global strike and combat support capabilities.
  70. [70]
    131st Bomb Wing
    Official website for the 131st Bomb Wing, Missouri Air National Guard. Serving our nation providing full-spectrum, expeditionary B-2 global strike and ...Recruiting page · Units · Current Opportunities · About
  71. [71]
    131st Bomb Wing - Air Force Global Strike Command
    2024 Bomber Task Force missions: A year of first-ever accomplishments. Nov. 22, 2024 Stealth bombers land precision strike against Houthi militia.
  72. [72]
    Latest Videos from Air Force Global Strike Command
    Jul 14, 2023 · Air Force Global Strike Command unveiled its first demonstration tri-bomber/fighter formation at the Hyundai Air and Sea Show at Miami Beach, Florida.Missing: developments | Show results with:developments
  73. [73]
    US Air Force Aircraft Fleet in 2025 - Aviation A2Z
    May 31, 2025 · B-52H: 76, B-1B: 45, B-2A: 19. Close-Air Support, 295, 5.9%, A-10C: 261, AC-130J: 31, A-29C: 3. Helicopters, 218, 4.4%, HH-60G/U: 64, UH-1N: 63, ...
  74. [74]
    U.S. Strategic Bombers | Congress.gov
    Sep 12, 2025 · These nuclear-capable B-52s are equipped to carry air-launched cruise missiles (ALCMs) armed with the W80-1 warhead. The Air Force has stated ...
  75. [75]
    B-1B Lancer > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display - AF.mil
    Carrying the largest conventional payload of both guided and unguided weapons in the Air Force inventory, the multi-mission B-1 is the backbone of America's ...
  76. [76]
    B-2 Spirit - Air Force Global Strike Command - AF.mil
    The B-2 has a crew of two pilots, a pilot in the left seat and mission commander in the right, compared to the B-1B's crew of four and the B-52's crew of five.
  77. [77]
    LGM-30G Minuteman III - Air Force Global Strike Command - AF.mil
    The Minuteman is a strategic weapon system using a ballistic missile of intercontinental range. Missiles are dispersed in hardened silos to protect against ...
  78. [78]
    Minuteman III | Missile Threat - CSIS
    The LGM-30G Minuteman III is a three-stage, solid-fueled, intercontinental-range ballistic missile. The Minuteman III is the sole land-based component of the U ...
  79. [79]
    Minuteman III test provides vital data before termination
    Nov 1, 2023 · The LGM-35A Sentinel will replace the Minuteman III ICBM with an initial capability of 2029. Until full capability is achieved in the mid-2030s, ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  80. [80]
    Project Information - Air Force Global Strike Command
    F.E. Warren AFB is home to the 90th Missile Wing. On-base actions at F.E. Warren AFB and Camp Guernsey would include new construction and renovation to support ...
  81. [81]
    Air Force takes first Minuteman III silo offline, in milestone towards ...
    Sep 3, 2025 · The Air Force plans to replace its existing MMIII fleet with a new missile known as the LGM-35A Sentinel. ... The MMIII arsenal is maintained by ...
  82. [82]
    Sentinel - Air Force Global Strike Command
    The project includes replacing all land based MMIII ICBMs deployed in the continental United States with Sentinel ICBMs. All components of the MMIII missile ...
  83. [83]
    B-21 Raider - Air Force Global Strike Command - AF.mil
    The B-21 is being designed with open systems architecture to reduce integration risk and enable competition for future modernization efforts to allow for ...
  84. [84]
    Global Strike to Grow as B-21, Other New Systems Come Online
    Jul 28, 2025 · The growth in end strength is driven in part by shifting from a three-bomber force of B-1s, B-2s, and B-52s to a four-bomber force by adding B- ...
  85. [85]
    LGM-35A Sentinel - Air Force Global Strike Command - AF.mil
    Sentinel System is the next generation ICBM under development. A megaproject equivalent to 15 Defense Department programs in scope, design, development, ...
  86. [86]
    Another decade of the B-52's enduring legacy
    Jun 27, 2025 · The B-52's assignment to SAC laid the groundwork for the bomber force AFGSC continues to refine and lead. For seven decades, the B-52 has stood ...
  87. [87]
    B-52 Radar Modernization Nears Flight Testing - The Aviationist
    Aug 30, 2025 · The AN/APQ-188 radar upgrade for the B-52 is finally preparing to begin flight testing, following years of delays, cost overruns, and a program ...The AN/APQ-188 radar... · The Radar Modernization... · Delays And Cost Growth
  88. [88]
    US Air Force announces arrival of second B-21 test aircraft at ...
    Sep 11, 2025 · DAF provides B-21 Raider program updates. Sept. 18, 2024. The B-21 Raider will incrementally replace the B-1 Lancer and B-2 Spirit bombers to ...
  89. [89]
    Bussiere assumes command of Air Force Global Strike Command
    Dec 8, 2022 · Thomas Bussiere assumed command of Air Force Global Strike Command during a ceremony Dec. 7, becoming the newest leader of the organization ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline<|separator|>
  90. [90]
    Air Force Global Strike Command gets new top leader
    Jan 7, 2011 · Gen. James Kowalski assumed command of Air Force Global Strike Command here Jan. 6, becoming the second-ever commander of the organization ...
  91. [91]
    General Klotz reflects on command, career - Marines.mil
    Jan 5, 2011 · Gen. Frank Klotz says he never imagined where his Air Force career would take him. Now, after more than 37 years of commissioned service, he ...
  92. [92]
    Lt. Gen. Stephen Wilson Is New Boss at Air Force Global Strike ...
    Oct 29, 2013 · Lt. Gen. Stephen Wilson took charge of Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) and pinned on his third star Oct. 23, 2013.
  93. [93]
    AFGSC commander bids farewell - Air Force Global Strike Command
    Jul 23, 2015 · Lt. Gen. Stephen Wilson will transfer command of Air Force Global Strike Command to Gen. Robin Rand during a ceremony here, July 28.
  94. [94]
    Passing the guidon: Gen Ray takes command of AFGSC
    Aug 21, 2018 · Gen. Timothy Ray took command of Air Force Global Strike Command from Gen. Robin Rand, outgoing AFGSC commander, during a ceremony here, Aug. 21.
  95. [95]
    Air Force Global Strike Command welcomes new commander - AF.mil
    Aug 30, 2021 · Gen. Anthony Cotton took command of Air Force Global Strike Command from Gen. Tim Ray, outgoing AFGSC commander, during a ceremony at Barksdale Air Force Base.
  96. [96]
    Bussiere assumes command of Air Force Global Strike Command
    Dec 8, 2022 · Gen. Thomas Bussiere assumed command of Air Force Global Strike Command during a ceremony at Barksdale Air Force Base Dec. 7, becoming the ...
  97. [97]
    Air Force Global Strike chief Bussiere to retire - Breaking Defense
    Oct 1, 2025 · Thomas Bussiere as the head of Air Force Global Strike Command in a ceremony scheduled for Oct. 17. By Michael Marrow on October 01, 2025 10:42 ...
  98. [98]
    Air Force IG Tapped to Lead Global Strike Command
    Jul 18, 2025 · Air Force Inspector General Lt. Gen. Stephen L. Davis has been nominated to lead Air Force Global Strike Command.
  99. [99]
    Lieutenant General STEPHEN L. DAVIS - AF.mil
    Lt. Gen. S.L. Davis is the Inspector General of the Department of the Air Force, Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, Arlington, Virginia.
  100. [100]
    595th Command and Control Group
    595th Command and Control Group ... It is located at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, and aligned under Eighth Air Force and Air Force Global Strike Command ( ...
  101. [101]
    Air Force experiments with AI, boosts battle management speed and ...
    Sep 19, 2025 · The DASH series is part of the Air Force's campaign to modernize command and control and gain decision advantage through human-machine teaming.
  102. [102]
    Minot firings due to failed nuclear safety inspection - Air Force Times
    Mar 1, 2023 · The six officers at Minot Air Force Base, ND, who were fired Monday were relieved of command after their units failed a nuclear surety inspection.
  103. [103]
    US Air Force fires leaders for failing nuclear safety inspection - CNN
    Mar 1, 2023 · The officials told CNN that the six service members were relieved of duty following the failed nuclear surety inspection at the base. The ...Missing: violations | Show results with:violations
  104. [104]
    Air Force ICBM Nuclear Missile Damaged in 2014 ... - ABC News
    Jan 22, 2016 · &#151; -- An Air Force Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile was damaged in May 2014 during maintenance work inside its launch ...<|separator|>
  105. [105]
    AIR FORCE MISSILE WING FAILS NUCLEAR SURETY INSPECTION
    Mar 17, 2014 · Another Air Force nuclear unit has stumbled on an inspection, this time with the 341st Missile Wing at Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana ...
  106. [106]
    Air Force fires 2 nuclear missile corps commanders | PBS News
    Nov 4, 2014 · It is unusual for disciplinary action to be taken against senior officers at two of the Air Force's three nuclear missile bases on the same day.
  107. [107]
    [PDF] afi91-121_afgscsup.pdf - Air Force - AF.mil
    Jan 6, 2023 · The Nuclear Surety Staff Assistance Visit team will review nuclear surety training programs and administration to ensure commanders and ...Missing: violations | Show results with:violations
  108. [108]
    Air Force Nuclear Force Anticipates Budget Constraints - DVIDS
    Jul 3, 2025 · The Air Force Global Strike Command predicts budget cuts triggered by sequestration will reduce B-52 flying hours by 10 percent and lead to a 20 percent ...
  109. [109]
    Avoid a Sequester and Fully Fund a Preeminent Military
    Sep 21, 2023 · The debt deal caps US military spending at $886 billion, which may initially appear to be a raise, but effectively flattens the Pentagon budget over the next ...
  110. [110]
    New Sentinel nuclear weapons program is 81% over budget. But ...
    Jul 8, 2024 · The new Sentinel nuclear weapons program is 81% over budget and is now estimated to cost nearly $141 billion.
  111. [111]
    ICBM cost overrun a 'collective failure' of USAF, Northrop, DOD
    Sep 5, 2024 · Some critics have argued that the Sentinel program's massive cost overruns—81 percent beyond initial estimates—flowed largely from the U.S. ...
  112. [112]
    AI Look at Sentinel Missile News as of 12 Feb 2025
    Feb 17, 2025 · The Air Force has paused work on launch facilities for the Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile program due to significant cost overruns ...
  113. [113]
    Air Force Actions Needed to Expeditiously Address Critical Risks to ...
    Sep 10, 2025 · ICBM MODERNIZATION. Air Force Actions Needed to Expeditiously Address Critical Risks to Sentinel Transition. Report to Congressional Committees.
  114. [114]
  115. [115]
    Projected Costs of U.S. Nuclear Forces, 2025 to 2034
    Apr 24, 2025 · Plans to operate, sustain, and modernize current nuclear forces and purchase new forces would cost a total of $946 billion over the 2025–2034 period.Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  116. [116]
    We Can't Afford To Cut America's Nuclear Modernization Program
    Some members of Congress are suggesting that the US reduce that very “necessary but insufficient” program.Missing: AFGSC debates
  117. [117]
    USAF Modernization at Risk If Sequester Hits, But Sentinel 'Will Be ...
    Jan 24, 2024 · A sequester would be catastrophic to Air Force modernization, but there's no alternative to the Sentinel ICBM, senior service leaders said.
  118. [118]
    Sentinel ICBM Costs "Unacceptable and Unsustainable," Say Critics
    Jul 9, 2024 · The Pentagon now believes the Sentinel program will cost taxpayers $141 billion to build, up from an original estimate of $78 billion in 2020.
  119. [119]
    Air Force Makes 'Difficult Decisions' in 2025 Budget
    Mar 11, 2024 · Air Force leaders had to cut back on procurement to support readiness and modernization when developing the 2025 budget request.
  120. [120]
    The Two-Hundred Billion Dollar Boondoggle
    Jun 24, 2025 · In January 2024, the Air Force notified Congress that the Sentinel program had incurred a critical breach of the Nunn-McCurdy Act, legislation ...<|separator|>
  121. [121]
    Air Force aircraft readiness plunges to new low, alarming chief
    Mar 6, 2025 · In 2021, the bomber had a 59% mission-capable rate, but that has now slid to 54%. The overall numbers show a swift decline in aircraft ...Missing: AFGSC | Show results with:AFGSC
  122. [122]
    Challenges inspire the highest readiness level in Air Force Global ...
    Feb 9, 2021 · Air Force Global Strike Command's readiness levels are currently the highest in the command's history despite the global pandemic and aging aircraft.
  123. [123]
    Air Force Says Minuteman III Is 'Feasible' Until 2050 but Faces Risks
    Sep 11, 2025 · The Air Force believe it could operate its Minuteman III missiles until 2050 if needed, yet there would be major sustainment risks.
  124. [124]
    Nuclear forces simultaneous operations demonstrate global strike ...
    Feb 11, 2020 · Airmen demonstrated that bomber and intercontinental ballistic missile capabilities are ready to respond by displaying two-thirds of the US nuclear triad.
  125. [125]
    Minuteman III Test Launch Showcases Readiness of US Nuclear ...
    Nov 13, 2024 · A joint team of Air Force Global Strike Command Airmen and U.S. Navy aircrew launched an unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic ...Missing: size | Show results with:size
  126. [126]
    Fact Sheets - Air Force Global Strike Command
    Jul 8, 2008 · B-2 Spirit. The B-2 Spirit is a multi-role bomber capable of delivering both conventional and nuclear munitions; bringing massive firepower to ...
  127. [127]
    [PDF] Senate Armed Services
    May 22, 2024 · Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC) provides strategic deterrence and long- range strike, anytime, anywhere, as mandated by the ...
  128. [128]
    Global Strike Challenge - U.S. Strategic Command
    Nov 7, 2012 · STRATCOM provides the deterrent foundation for every other military mission and if someone needs to reach out and touch someone at global ...
  129. [129]
    [PDF] Defending the Record on US Nuclear Deterrence - Northrop Grumman
    Feb 22, 2022 · The empirical evidence is sig- nificant. The United States deployed 13,000 strategic weapons at the height of the Cold War. Today we have ...
  130. [130]
    [PDF] Minimum Deterrence: Examining the Evidence
    deterrence success in nuclear crisis outcomes.88. The importance of U.S. ... Kowalski, “To Deter and Assure,” Air Force Global Strike Command, May 7 ...
  131. [131]
  132. [132]
    How effective is nuclear deterrence today? - Polytechnique Insights
    Mar 5, 2025 · Deterrence is there to prevent major wars between powers, not just nuclear wars. And in this sense, it works, including in the context of the war in Ukraine.Missing: AFGSC evidence
  133. [133]
  134. [134]
    Rethinking the US strategic triad: When it comes to nuclear platforms ...
    Dec 20, 2023 · Some critics have called in the past for elimination of the US land-based missile force on account of its first-strike vulnerability and ...
  135. [135]
    Setting a Course Away from the Intercontinental Ballistic Missile
    Feb 16, 2021 · ICBMs, with high-yield warheads, are especially unsuitable for deterring low-intensity aggression. What's more, ICBMs are still unsuitable to ...
  136. [136]
    [PDF] ALTERNATIVES TO THE GROUND-BASED STRATEGIC ...
    The deterrence mission of the ICBMs can be fulfilled by other nuclear systems. ICBMs are often characterized as the most “responsive” leg of the triad in the ...
  137. [137]
    Nuclear Triad: DOD and DOE Face Challenges Mitigating Risks to ...
    May 6, 2021 · DOD and DOE have limited ability to mitigate risks to the efficacy of the nuclear deterrent with their current strategy, and are beginning to ...
  138. [138]
    The Case against the Nuclear Triad - Cato Institute
    But, as the authors show, “U.S. power today makes the case for the triad more dubious.” No U.S. adversary has the capability to destroy all U.S. ballistic ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  139. [139]
    The Future of the U.S. Intercontinental Ballistic Missile Force - RAND
    Feb 4, 2014 · RAND was asked to examine and assess possible intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) alternatives against the current Minuteman III system.<|separator|>
  140. [140]
    Assessing U.S. Options for the Future of the ICBM Force
    Sep 7, 2022 · Our task was to consider the relative risks and benefits of options for the future US intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) force.
  141. [141]
    In defense of the US maintaining a balanced nuclear triad
    Sep 29, 2025 · However, there are growing stressors that might lead to decisions that could undermine the triad's continued effectiveness and credibility.
  142. [142]
    Time to DOGE the nuclear triad | Responsible Statecraft
    The new massively over-cost 'Sentinel' nuclear weapon program is inefficient and a security risk to the United States.
  143. [143]
    Responses to Common Criticisms of Adjusting U.S. Nuclear ...
    May 18, 2021 · Claim: Adjusting U.S. nuclear modernization plans would undermine the assurance of allies amid allied concern about the threats posed by Russia ...Nuclear weapons don't... · Adjusting U.S. nuclear force... · Adjusting U.S. nuclear...
  144. [144]
    [PDF] Rethinking the US Nuclear Triad - Air University
    One way in which the Air Force has attempted to address these criticisms is through the development of stealth technology. Unfortunately, experiences with the B ...