Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

American Red Cross

The American Red Cross is a nonprofit humanitarian organization founded on May 21, 1881, by in , as the affiliate of the International Committee of the Red Cross, with a mission to prevent and alleviate human suffering through disaster relief, blood services, health and safety training, and support for military members and their families. Initially established to aid victims of disasters and wars, it expanded during the Spanish-American War to provide medical supplies and nursing care to soldiers, marking its early commitment to wartime humanitarian efforts. The organization's core operations encompass responding to over 60,000 disasters each year by offering , food, and emotional support to affected individuals; collecting, processing, and distributing blood products that supply approximately 40 percent of the nation's blood needs; delivering training programs in CPR, , aquatics, and lifeguarding that reach millions annually; and facilitating communications, , and counseling for active-duty , veterans, and their families. These services are supported by a network of volunteers and chapters across the country, funded primarily through donations and fees for training and blood products. Historically, the American Red Cross has achieved significant milestones, including leading relief efforts for the 1889 —its first major domestic disaster response—coordinating aid during for both European civilians and U.S. troops, and establishing a nationwide civilian blood program after that revolutionized medical transfusions. In recent decades, it has installed over 1.6 million free smoke alarms and responded to events like the 9/11 attacks and , underscoring its role in national resilience, though operational challenges in fund distribution and response efficiency have periodically drawn scrutiny from oversight bodies.

Founding and Historical Development

Establishment and Clara Barton's Role (1881–1904)

The American Red Cross was founded on May 21, 1881, in Washington, D.C., by Clara Barton and a circle of associates, drawing inspiration from the International Committee of the Red Cross that Barton had encountered during her post-Civil War travels in Europe. Barton, a former teacher and federal clerk who had organized nursing and supply efforts for Union soldiers during the American Civil War, envisioned an organization to assist victims of both warfare and peacetime calamities, extending beyond the strict wartime focus of the original Red Cross treaty. The initial entity, named the American Association of the Red Cross, saw Barton elected as its first president the following month. Incorporation followed in 1882, coinciding with the ' ratification of the Geneva Convention and adherence to the International Red Cross, enabling Barton to affiliate the new group internationally. The first local chapter formed on August 22, 1881, in Dansville, , where Barton had recuperated earlier. Early operations emphasized rapid ; in 1881, Barton coordinated aid for victims of the Thumb Fire in , soliciting funds and supplies for the displaced. Subsequent efforts included relief for the 1884 Ohio and floods, where Barton personally oversaw distribution from chartered ships. Under her leadership, the organization conducted 18 peacetime relief missions by 1904, establishing its model of volunteer mobilization, supply logistics, and on-site nursing independent of government bureaucracy. Barton served as president for 23 years, personally directing field operations and advocating for expanded mandates, such as including forest fires and famines not covered by international protocols. Her hands-on approach, informed by Civil War logistics, prioritized direct aid over institutional overhead, though it later drew scrutiny for lacking formalized accounting. By the late 1890s, internal factionalism emerged, with critics questioning her age, autocratic style, and financial transparency amid growing organizational scale. In 1904, at age 82, Barton resigned following pressure from board members and associates who favored professionalization, marking the end of her direct involvement. Her tenure laid the foundational emphasis on humanitarian neutrality and disaster preparedness that defined the American Red Cross's early identity.

Early Expansion and World War I Involvement (1905–1918)

Following Clara Barton's resignation on May 14, 1904, amid a congressional investigation into administrative practices, an interim committee assumed control of the American Red Cross, leading to a reorganized structure under a new congressional charter enacted on January 5, 1905. This charter emphasized centralized governance and professional management, addressing prior criticisms of inefficiency and personal control. Mabel Boardman, a key advocate for reform, served as executive secretary of the Central Committee and influenced the shift toward a more bureaucratic model, sidelining Barton's decentralized approach in favor of elite oversight and expanded domestic programs. Under this framework, the organization grew its chapter network and initiated public education initiatives, including a first aid instruction program launched in 1910 and a lifesaving and water-safety service established in 1914, enhancing preparedness for disasters and emergencies. The outbreak of in prompted early international engagement, with the Red Cross dispatching nurses aboard a "mercy ship" to on , , and sending 11 commissions to assess and deliver to U.S. and Allied forces as well as civilian . Upon U.S. entry into the war in April 1917, President appointed a War Council on May 10, 1917, under chairman Henry P. Davison, which oversaw rapid mobilization. efforts proved exceptionally successful; the initial June 1917 War Fund drive targeted $100 million but exceeded it with over $115 million raised within days, contributing to total war-related funds approaching $250 million. By war's end, the organization's volunteer base had swelled to eight million members, including Junior Red Cross participants, who produced over 372 million relief items valued at nearly $94 million, encompassing surgical dressings, garments, and medical supplies. The Red Cross registered 22,800 personnel for service, deploying approximately 18,000 nurses and 4,800 drivers to support hospitals, field units, and efforts in and at home. numbers surged from 107 in 1914 to over 3,700 by 1918, reflecting grassroots expansion driven by patriotic appeals and systematic recruitment. These efforts focused on logistical support rather than combat, adhering to the neutrality principles of the while prioritizing empirical needs like , evacuation, and supply distribution.

Interwar Period and World War II Contributions (1919–1945)


Following the armistice of World War I, the American Red Cross shifted emphasis from wartime operations to domestic disaster relief and public health programs, including nursing education and Junior Red Cross initiatives for youth. In April 1927, the Great Mississippi Flood displaced nearly 640,000 people across multiple states; the Red Cross established 138 camps, fed over 600,000 individuals, and managed a relief fund exceeding $17.5 million to support recovery efforts.
The onset of the and droughts in the 1930s strained resources further, prompting expanded relief across 38 states by mid-1931, with expenditures including over $316,000 for seed distribution in 1930 and a dedicated $5 million allocation for drought aid. In alone, the organization operated 75 camps serving more than 17,000 families at a cost surpassing $1 million, while Junior Red Cross activities focused on supporting affected children amid widespread economic hardship. These efforts underscored the Red Cross's role in bridging gaps left by limited federal intervention prior to expansions. U.S. entry into in December 1941 triggered massive mobilization, with the Red Cross enrolling 7.5 million volunteers, raising $784 million in public funds, and supporting 16 million military personnel through supply chains and morale services. The National Blood Donor Service, launched in 1941 under medical leadership including Dr. , collected 13.3 million pints from 6.6 million donors to supply plasma and whole blood for battlefield transfusions. Overseas, the organization shipped 300,000 tons of supplies, assembled 27 million parcels for prisoners of war, and enrolled over 104,000 nurses for military hospitals; domestically, clubmobiles staffed by female volunteers—known as "Donut Dollies"—delivered refreshments and entertainment to troops, while programs like transcription aided blinded servicemen. These contributions, coordinated under its , extended to Allied civilians and war victims, amassing 36.7 million adult members and 19.9 million juniors by 1945.

Postwar Evolution and Modernization (1946–Present)

Following , the American Red Cross shifted focus to domestic services, establishing the first nationwide civilian blood collection program in 1946, which expanded to supply over 40 percent of the nation's blood products by the late . The organization aided veterans through rehabilitation and community support via its 3,000 chapters, while enhancing safety training and disaster preparedness programs. In 1950, it responded to the Great Appalachian Flood, providing relief to thousands, exemplifying its evolving role in peacetime emergencies. Military involvement resumed with the , where on July 22, 1950, the Red Cross became the primary blood collection agency for U.S. forces, supporting an average of 1.1 million servicemen annually through camps, hospitals, and POW exchanges under on August 5, 1953. During the from 1962 to 1973, 627 women served as Supplemental Recreational Activities Overseas (SRAO) staff, known as "Donut Dollies," offering morale-boosting recreation and emotional support to troops, alongside Service to Armed Forces personnel handling emergency communications. Blood services grew, collecting over 6 million pints annually by the , though the saw controversies over delayed screening, contributing to infections via contaminated transfusions despite joint industry statements in 1983 urging donor deferrals. Disaster response modernized with increased scale, aiding over 60,000 families after in 1989 and millions following 9/11 in 2001 and in 2012, incorporating technology for faster deployment and coordination. However, investigations revealed operational challenges, including inefficient fund allocation after 9/11—where much of the $500 million did not reach direct victims—and in 2005, marked by internal thefts exceeding hundreds of thousands of dollars and delayed aid distribution. A 2016 Senate report criticized high administrative costs, such as 25 percent of Haiti earthquake donations in 2010 spent on internal expenses rather than rebuilding. Organizational reforms addressed these issues; in 2007, following scrutiny, the board reduced its size by over half, delegated operations to management, and strengthened whistleblower protections via amendments. The brought blood services upgrades for pathogen reduction, responding to safety lapses like unreported infectious donors. Today, the Red Cross collects about 5 million pints of yearly, responds to over 60,000 disasters annually aiding 2 million people, and supports military families with 1 million contacts per year, adapting to pandemics and climate events through enhanced training and logistics.

Governance and Organizational Framework

Congressional Charter and Quasi-Governmental Status

The Congressional Charter of the National Red Cross, enacted in 1900 and revised in 1905, establishes the organization as a federally chartered instrumentality under Title 36 of the (36 U.S.C. §§ 300101 et seq.), granting it status as a body corporate and politic with headquartered in the District of Columbia. This charter authorizes the Red Cross to provide volunteer aid to the sick and wounded in armed conflicts in accordance with the , to serve as a medium of communication and between the people and the U.S. Armed Forces, and to conduct domestic and international disaster , blood services, and related humanitarian programs during peacetime calamities. It also confers exclusive rights within the to use the Red Cross name and emblem for these purposes, prohibiting unauthorized commercial or competitive use by others. The charter's provisions impart a quasi-governmental character to the Red Cross, distinguishing it from purely nonprofits through mandatory obligations and oversight mechanisms, while maintaining its in and operations. Key governmental ties include the President's authority to appoint the chairman of the Board of Governors, the requirement to furnish assistance to the Armed Forces upon presidential request (as codified in 10 U.S.C. § 2602), and the obligation to maintain federally provided headquarters at no cost to the government. The organization must submit audited annual reports detailing finances and activities to the Secretary of Defense for transmission to , with the Comptroller General empowered to audit its accounts, ensuring accountability for its congressionally mandated roles in national emergencies and military support. Despite these elements, the Red Cross operates without direct for core activities, deriving revenue primarily from donations, fees (such as processing), and volunteer contributions, which underscores its hybrid status as a privately sustained entity with public duties. Amendments to the have periodically addressed and operational needs; a 1947 revision updated wartime and relief responsibilities post-World War II, while the most significant modern overhaul occurred in 2007 via the American National Red Cross Governance Modernization Act (Pub. L. No. 110-26), which expanded the Board of Governors to 12–25 members (subsequently adjusted to 12–20), imposed term limits, mandated independent audits, and required enhanced financial disclosures to mitigate prior criticisms of mismanagement and lack of transparency. These changes aimed to professionalize leadership and align the organization more closely with contemporary nonprofit standards, without altering its fundamental quasi-governmental framework or core statutory obligations.

Leadership Structure and Key Executives

The American Red Cross is governed by its Board of Governors, the primary body responsible for strategic oversight, policy direction, and supervision of organizational management as stipulated in its Congressional Charter. This structure, reformed through 2007 amendments to enhance accountability and efficiency, vests the Board with comprehensive authority to appoint the President and CEO, approve major initiatives, and ensure fiduciary responsibility. The Board comprises up to 23 members, including elected governors, appointees, and ex-officio roles, serving staggered terms to maintain continuity. The Chairman of the Board, , leads governance efforts and chairs the Executive Committee, having transitioned to this position on July 1, 2024, after 16 years as President and CEO during which she oversaw financial stabilization and operational expansions. Vice Chairman Herman Bulls supports these functions, drawing from expertise in global markets at JLL, Inc. Specialized committees, such as Audit and Risk Management (chaired by Aradhana Sarin) and Compensation (chaired by Mary Berner), address targeted oversight areas including financial controls and executive pay. Cliff Holtz serves as President and , effective July 1, 2024, managing biomedical services, , and armed forces support while implementing Board-approved strategies. Prior to this, Holtz held the role, contributing to and service delivery optimizations. Regional Chief Executive Officers, such as those leading chapters in or , report into the national structure to align local operations with federal mandates.
Key National Leadership (as of 2025)RoleNotable Background
Gail J. McGovernChairman of the BoardFormer CEO; academic and corporate turnaround specialist
Cliff HoltzPresident & CEOEx-COO; operational leadership in humanitarian logistics
Herman BullsVice ChairmanGlobal markets executive at JLL, Inc.
Aradhana SarinAudit & Risk ChairHealthcare and finance expert

Funding Mechanisms and Financial Transparency

The American Red Cross generates the bulk of its operating revenue from biomedical services, which encompass the collection, processing, and distribution of products sold to hospitals and healthcare providers. In 2023 (ending June 30, 2023), these services produced $2.01 billion, comprising 61.7% of the organization's total revenue of $3.26 billion. Contributions from individuals, corporations, foundations, and bequests added $811.8 million (24.9%), while net investment returns contributed $76.8 million (2.4%). Government contracts, including federal agreements with entities such as the Department of for blood supply and the for disaster coordination, accounted for $64.3 million (2.0%), reflecting a minor but steady revenue stream tied to its obligations. Additional funding arises from sales of program materials and services ($213.2 million, 6.5%) and other sources ($59.4 million, 1.8%). The organization maintains that approximately 90 cents of every dollar spent supports mission-related activities, with FY2023 expenses totaling $3.01 billion, of which 90.7% ($2.73 billion) funded program services such as and operations, and 9.3% covered and administrative costs. Financial statements undergo annual independent audits by KPMG LLP, which issued an unmodified opinion for FY2023, affirming compliance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Red Cross publicly discloses audited consolidated financials and IRS Form 990 filings on its website, enabling scrutiny by donors and regulators. Independent evaluators, including CharityWatch, assign it an A- rating, citing 91% program spending efficiency and a cost of $25 to raise $100 in contributions, while noting adherence to governance benchmarks like conflict-of-interest policies. Government oversight includes IRS reviews of Form 990 data and Department of Defense audits of financial statements, though federal funding constitutes 0-24% of revenue, limiting direct fiscal control. Notwithstanding these measures, the Red Cross has faced criticism over operational transparency, particularly in allocating disaster relief funds, where internal after-action reviews exist but lack regular external validation. A 2015 U.S. report found insufficient independent evaluations of disaster service effectiveness, recommending congressional establishment of federal mechanisms—such as through the Department of Homeland Security—for periodic, public external assessments to enhance . In 2017, Senators and introduced the American Red Cross Transparency Act to authorize GAO access to records for oversight, amid concerns over post-disaster fund deployment. Its federal instrumentality status exempts it from state charity registration in some jurisdictions, potentially complicating local monitoring.

Biomedical Services

Blood Collection, Processing, and Distribution

The American Red Cross Biomedical Services division manages the collection of approximately 4.5 million blood donations annually from volunteer donors across the , accounting for about 40 percent of the nation's total blood supply. These donations occur through fixed-site centers and mobile blood drives hosted at community locations such as schools, workplaces, and houses of worship, with donors eligible to give every 56 days or platelets via more frequently under FDA guidelines. Eligibility screening includes a health questionnaire, vital signs check (, , and levels), and temporary deferrals for factors like recent travel, medications, or illnesses to mitigate transfusion risks. Upon collection, donated blood undergoes immediate processing at regional facilities where it is separated into components—red blood cells, platelets, plasma, and cryoprecipitate—via centrifugation and filtration to maximize utility, as one whole blood donation can yield multiple therapeutic products. All units are tested for blood type (ABO and Rh), antibodies, and infectious diseases including HIV, hepatitis B and C, syphilis, HTLV, West Nile virus, and Trypanosoma cruzi using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and nucleic acid testing (NAT) protocols approved by the FDA. Reactive units are discarded, and donors are notified confidentially for follow-up, with ongoing surveillance tracking positivity rates by zip code to inform public health responses; for instance, in recent years, the Red Cross has implemented temporary COVID-19 antibody screening to assess community prevalence without affecting supply allocation. Processed blood products are inventoried in climate-controlled storage and distributed to over 2,500 hospitals nationwide based on real-time demand forecasts, with type O negative (universal donor) prioritized for emergencies due to its compatibility. The Red Cross supplies approximately 6.5 million blood products yearly, delivering them via dedicated logistics networks that ensure shelf-life compliance—red cells for 42 days, platelets for 5 days—while hospitals purchase units on a cost-recovery basis to cover collection, testing, processing, and transportation expenses, generating about $1.8 billion in revenue in 2022 without profit margins. Supply chain vulnerabilities persist, as evidenced by a 25 percent national inventory drop in July 2024 amid summer donation lulls and hurricanes, prompting emergency appeals to avert shortages that could delay surgeries or trauma care.

Plasma, Tissue, and Cellular Therapies

The American Red Cross collects human primarily through donations via programs like AB Elite, enabling eligible donors to contribute up to 13 times per year at intervals of 28 days, with each session averaging one hour and 15 minutes. These products, including , are processed and distributed to hospitals for treating conditions such as burns, , , and clotting disorders in cancer patients. In fiscal year 2022, formed part of the organization's $1.8 billion in revenues, which cover collection, testing, and costs before supply to medical facilities. During the , the Red Cross prioritized convalescent collection from recovered donors, facing an emergency national shortage by July 2020 due to surging demand for this antibody-rich product in treating severe cases, though clinical remained under evaluation by health authorities. Plasma processing includes freezing within 24 hours to preserve factors for therapeutic use, with rigorous testing for pathogens mandated by FDA regulations. The organization's involvement in tissue services historically encompassed recovery and distribution, processing tissues from over 2,000 donors annually to yield about 100,000 allografts for orthopedic, cardiovascular, and other reconstructive applications as of 2005; however, that year, assets of the Tissue Services Division were acquired by the , shifting ARC away from direct tissue banking operations. Current biomedical activities do not include tissue procurement or processing, focusing instead on fluid blood components. In cellular therapies, the Red Cross supports hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and emerging gene therapies through specialized apheresis collections of leukocytes, buffy coats, and leukopaks—starting at $200 compensation per session lasting 1-2 hours—for use in autologous and allogeneic treatments, clinical trials, and commercial manufacturing by biotech firms. Histocompatibility laboratories provide HLA typing and crossmatching essential for matching donors to patients with leukemias and other blood cancers, facilitating thousands of transplants annually. These services, operational for over a decade, emphasize FDA-compliant source material provision without direct therapy administration.

Safety Innovations and Ongoing Challenges

The American Red Cross implemented nucleic acid testing (NAT) for blood donations in 1999, becoming the first blood collector to adopt this method, which detects viral genetic material earlier than traditional antibody tests and has since become the industry standard for screening HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and other pathogens. In June 2009, the organization introduced automated triplex NAT for HIV, HCV, and hepatitis B virus (HBV), further enhancing detection sensitivity and reducing transfusion-transmitted infection risks. These advancements built on earlier efforts, including the opening of the first National Testing Laboratory in Dedham, Massachusetts, on August 3, 1992, which standardized testing protocols across operations. Leukoreduction, the filtration process to remove from units, was universally adopted by the Red Cross by the end of 2000 to minimize risks of febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reactions, HLA alloimmunization, and transmission. All Red Cross products are now leukoreduced prior to storage, aligning with FDA guidance on pre-storage reduction to improve component quality. Ongoing research and implementation of pathogen reduction technologies, such as those targeting residual contaminants in leukoreduced components, continue to address emerging threats like bacterial contamination. Despite these measures, the Red Cross has faced persistent challenges in maintaining blood safety, including repeated FDA citations for lapses in testing, processing, and distribution. In , federal regulators identified over 200 violations, including the release of blood products that failed quality checks. By 2003, a federal court, citing chronic non-compliance, authorized the FDA to impose fines on the for blood safety failures. In 2008, the FDA documented 113 events leading to the recall of 4,094 flawed blood components across 15 Red Cross regions, highlighting systemic issues in error tracking and corrective actions. These incidents contributed to a nearly $9.6 million fine in 2012 for unsafe practices, such as inadequate donor screening and component labeling errors. Regulatory scrutiny persists under FDA oversight, which mandates biennial inspections and enforces standards for donor eligibility, infectious disease testing, and error reporting to prevent transfusion-transmitted infections. vulnerabilities, including national blood shortages—such as a 25% inventory drop in July 2024—exacerbate challenges in balancing volume demands with rigorous safety protocols, though these do not directly compromise testing integrity. The organization's quasi-governmental status under its amplifies accountability, yet historical patterns of operational errors underscore the need for continuous process improvements to uphold in blood products.

Disaster Cycle Services

Preparedness Training and Education Programs

The American Red Cross offers a range of preparedness training and education programs designed to enhance individual, family, and community resilience against disasters through skills in risk assessment, emergency planning, and initial response. These initiatives include curricula on creating emergency kits, developing family communication plans, and recognizing hazards such as floods, wildfires, and earthquakes, delivered via in-person workshops, virtual sessions, and school-based presentations. Programs emphasize practical actions like evacuation procedures and sheltering in place, targeting diverse audiences from children to professionals. Youth-focused efforts include the Pillowcase Project, a school-based program launched in 2013 in partnership with , which equips children ages 8-11 with personalized disaster kits and interactive lessons on hazard awareness and personal preparedness. By June 2018, the initiative had trained 1 million children across the , fostering behaviors such as packing go-bags and alerting adults during crises. Complementing this, Prepare with targets grades K-3 with 30- to 45-minute sessions teaching basic actions like "drop, cover, and hold on" for earthquakes or evacuating during fires, using age-appropriate and activities. For adults, Be Red Cross Ready provides a free, modular in 20-minute segments covering disaster recognition, home , and , delivered by certified trainers to promote household-level readiness. Organizational programs like Ready Rating offer self-guided assessments and training for businesses, schools, and nonprofits to evaluate and strengthen their emergency protocols, including supply inventories and staff drills. These efforts integrate with broader health and safety certifications, such as , CPR, and courses, which underscore immediate life-saving responses as foundational to mitigation. Volunteer-specific disaster training, available at no cost online or in-person, prepares participants for roles in shelter management, damage assessment, and client assistance, ensuring scalable community support during events. In 2023, Red Cross training services certified over 2.7 million individuals in skills including those tied to , though comprehensive impact metrics on reduced vulnerability remain limited to program-specific evaluations like those for the Pillowcase , which report increased student confidence in emergency actions.

Immediate Response Operations

The American Red Cross immediate response operations focus on delivering urgent aid to disaster victims, including shelter, food, water, and essential health services, typically within hours of event notification or declaration. These efforts activate through a network of over 1,000 chapters and trained volunteers, coordinating with federal agencies like FEMA to assess needs and deploy resources rapidly. For single-family emergencies such as home fires, which constitute the majority of responses, Disaster Action Teams arrive on-site to provide direct assistance, including emergency financial aid averaging $500 per family and referrals for temporary housing. In major disasters like hurricanes, floods, or wildfires, the organization escalates to opening mass care shelters and deploying Emergency Response Vehicles (ERVs) to distribute meals, snacks, kits, and comfort items across affected areas. ERVs, equipped for mobility in disrupted environments, enable outreach to remote or inaccessible locations, serving thousands daily; for instance, during large-scale events, they can deliver over 100,000 meals in the initial response phase. Health and professionals also deploy to injuries, provide emotional support, and connect individuals to medical care, with protocols emphasizing rapid within the first 72-120 hours post-impact. The scale of these operations is substantial, with the Red Cross responding to approximately 60,000 disasters annually, primarily home fires but including escalating climate-driven events. In fiscal year 2023, over 8,500 disaster workers deployed more than 19,000 times nationwide, aiding tens of thousands with immediate necessities. For fiscal year 2024, responses covered major disasters in 18 states, involving nonstop volunteer mobilization to shelter and feed victims amid record-breaking hurricane activity. These operations prioritize self-sufficiency restoration, transitioning from acute aid to recovery planning while maintaining logistical chains for sustained delivery.

Recovery and Resilience Building

The American Red Cross transitions from immediate to long-term efforts, which include financial , housing repairs, and rebuilding to restore stability for affected individuals and families. These address unmet needs persisting months or years after events, such as structural damage and economic hardship, often in coordination with local nonprofits and government agencies. For instance, following Hurricanes Helene and Milton in 2024, the organization launched a Long-Term Grant in early 2025 to fund activities, including home repairs and resiliency measures, with ongoing support reported as of 2025. In specific cases, recovery initiatives have delivered quantifiable outcomes; after in 2017, the Red Cross awarded 48 Housing Repair grants across 39 counties in , facilitating 2,918 home repairs and rebuilds by enabling partnerships with organizations like . Similarly, for the 2025 wildfires, grants targeted long-term recovery and resiliency, prioritizing vulnerable populations through request-for-proposal processes to ensure efficient allocation. These efforts emphasize case management to connect survivors with resources, though effectiveness depends on donor funding and inter-agency collaboration, with the Red Cross reporting sustained assistance into 2025 for prior events like Helene. Resilience building extends recovery by enhancing community capacity to withstand future disasters through targeted programs like the Community Adaptation Program (), launched nationally in 2024 to establish permanent resources in high-risk areas. CAP fosters local partnerships for initiatives such as equipping food distribution centers, deploying mobile medical units, and improving access to health and mental health services, as seen in collaborations in , where partners addressed extreme heat vulnerabilities with cooling resources. Additional components include emotional recovery support via the Disaster Distress Helpline and child resilience training to develop coping skills for events like wildfires or floods, aiming to reduce long-term psychological impacts.

Service to the Armed Forces and Veterans

Historical Military Support Roles

The American Red Cross provided its first organized war-related assistance to U.S. troops during the Spanish-American War, when founder Clara Barton sailed to Havana, Cuba, on June 20, 1898, with supplies for victims and military personnel. Barton recruited nurses nationwide to staff Army medical camps, delivering nursing care, medical supplies, and other aid to soldiers amid disease outbreaks and combat casualties. This marked the organization's initial military engagement, focusing on direct field support rather than peacetime disaster relief alone. During World War I, the Red Cross expanded military support to include medical care, recreational services, and logistics for U.S. forces at home and abroad, establishing field hospitals, units, and supply chains for the . Over 28,000 Red Cross workers served overseas, aiding not only U.S. troops but also Allied forces and prisoners of war through limited and relief efforts. The organization suffered significant losses, with 296 nurses and 127 drivers dying in service between 1914 and 1921 due to combat, disease, and accidents. Domestic efforts included training civilians in and operating canteens for training camps. In , the Red Cross recruited more than 104,000 nurses for military hospitals worldwide and initiated a national Blood Donor Service in January 1941 at the request of U.S. military authorities to supply and for battlefield transfusions. Overseas, field directors accompanied troops, operating over 7,000 clubs and clubmobiles that served 163 million cups of coffee and 254 million doughnuts to boost morale amid grueling campaigns. By war's end in 1945, public donations exceeded $784 million, funding these operations alongside domestic blood collection and training programs. Post-World War II conflicts saw continued adaptation of services. In the , the Red Cross mobilized under its Service to the Armed Forces division, expanding military blood programs and deploying emergency mobile recreation units to front-line areas, while facilitating tens of thousands of prisoner exchanges between U.N. and North Korean/Chinese forces. During the , peak involvement in 1968 included 480 field directors supporting troops via the Supplemental Recreational Activities Overseas program, Rest and Recreation Centers, and direct welfare assistance in and Far East bases. These efforts emphasized psychological support, emergency communications, and recreational outlets to mitigate combat stress for deployed personnel.

Current Emergency Communication and Welfare Services

The American Red Cross's Service to the Armed Forces (SAF) division operates the Hero Care Network to facilitate emergency communications for active-duty , veterans, and their families, verifying and delivering notifications of critical family events such as the death or serious illness of an immediate relative, birth of a child, or other significant emergencies. Families initiate requests through a 24/7 toll-free hotline (1-877-272-7337), the Hero Care App, or online self-service , after which Red Cross staff confirm details with the family and coordinate with the service member's unit command worldwide, often within hours. This service, authorized by the U.S. Department of Defense, ensures secure, confidential transmission to maintain operational security and chain-of-command protocols. Welfare services under SAF extend beyond messaging to include emergency financial assistance, such as for , lodging, or food during crises like deployment-related hardships or hospitalization, disbursed directly or via partnerships with military relief societies. provides on-site briefings and counseling referrals for service members and families affected by emergencies, while information and referral services connect users to resources like , childcare, or benefits, all delivered confidentially 24/7 without cost. For hospitalized veterans and service members, volunteers offer bedside visits, comfort items, and linkage to family support, operating in over 1,000 and facilities annually. These services emphasize rapid response and verification to minimize disruptions to military duties, with the Red Cross maintaining a network of over 1,000 SAF staff and volunteers trained in DoD protocols as of 2024. Deployment support integrates these elements, allowing families to request aid during separations, with digital tools enabling real-time updates and multilingual assistance for global operations.

International Operations

Alignment with International Red Cross Movement

The American Red Cross (ARC) operates as the national society for the within the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, a global humanitarian network comprising the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), the International Federation of and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), and 191 national societies as of 2023. Founded on May 21, 1881, by —inspired by the ICRC's work during the —the ARC received formal international recognition at the Ninth International Conference of the Red Cross in 1882, establishing it as the official U.S. affiliate adhering to the Movement's statutes. The ARC aligns with the Movement through commitment to its seven Fundamental Principles—humanity, impartiality, neutrality, independence, voluntary service, unity, and universality—proclaimed in 1965 and reaffirmed at the 20th International Conference in . These principles guide ARC operations, mandating assistance without discrimination, avoidance of political or ideological positions, and maintenance of autonomy while fulfilling an auxiliary role to public authorities, such as supporting U.S. armed forces in humanitarian capacities without endorsing hostilities. ARC's explicitly prohibits taking sides in conflicts or engaging in partisan controversies to preserve trust across parties. Cooperation occurs primarily through the IFRC, which coordinates disaster response and development among national societies; the ARC contributes funding and expertise, such as $10 million allocated to IFRC-led efforts in the Ukraine crisis as of 2022 and over $99 million in total support to Movement partners by February 2024. This includes deploying personnel for joint operations and sharing best practices in areas like emergency response training, ensuring unified action under shared emblems protected by the . Operational differences exist despite principled alignment: the ARC emphasizes domestic priorities, collecting approximately 40% of U.S. blood donations and focusing on national disasters, whereas the ICRC specializes in impartial aid during armed conflicts without favoring any state, and the IFRC prioritizes global federation-wide coordination. The ARC's since reinforces its auxiliary status to U.S. authorities, potentially straining independence in domestic contexts compared to more detached international bodies, though this aligns with allowances for national societies to support their governments humanely. No verified systemic deviations from neutrality have been documented in ARC's international engagements, which remain subordinate to IFRC protocols to uphold -wide impartiality.

Global Disaster Relief and Health Initiatives

The American Red Cross contributes to global disaster relief primarily through partnerships with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) and local Red Cross/Red Crescent societies, offering financial contributions from U.S. donors, technical assistance in logistics and information management, and prepositioned relief supplies such as food, water, and shelter items. These efforts focus on enabling rapid local responses to events like earthquakes, typhoons, droughts, and conflicts, with American Red Cross specialists aiding in beneficiary registration, needs assessments, and distribution of aid using tools for mapping and data tracking. For instance, following the 2015 Nepal earthquake, the organization supplied shelter toolkits and approximately $150 in cash assistance per affected family to support immediate recovery. In more recent crises, such as typhoons in the Philippines and wildfires in Chile, it has provided operational support to enhance local response capacities. Health initiatives abroad emphasize disease prevention and response within the broader humanitarian network, including support for mobile units, campaigns, and safe water installations to mitigate outbreaks in disaster-affected areas. The American Red Cross channels resources to partners addressing , such as those stemming from conflicts or , by funding efforts like improvements and community education on . These programs align with the global Red Cross Movement's mandate to deliver assistance to war-wounded, displaced populations, and vulnerable groups, often integrating with long-term building through training local volunteers in protocols. In regions like and , this has involved technical aid for combating deadly diseases alongside , prioritizing scalable interventions over direct fieldwork by U.S. staff. Beyond immediate aid, the organization fosters global preparedness by partnering with sister societies to develop disaster-ready communities, including early warning systems and community-based risk reduction programs that address recurrent threats like and crises. This supportive role reflects the American Red Cross's charter limitations on foreign operations, emphasizing efficient allocation of resources to amplify local expertise rather than duplicating efforts. Quantifiable impacts include enabling IFRC appeals that have mobilized billions in global funding, though specific American Red Cross attributions vary by event and are tracked through annual services updates.

Impact, Achievements, and Criticisms

Quantifiable Contributions and Efficiency Metrics

The American Red Cross collects approximately 4.5 million donations annually, including over 1 million platelet donations, enabling the distribution of products to about 2,500 hospitals and transfusion centers nationwide, accounting for roughly 40% of the U.S. supply. In 2024 (ending June 30, 2024), the organization responded to over 56,000 disasters, providing aid to more than 30,700 households through financial assistance, recovery support, and of over 307,400 items, while also delivering millions of meals and snacks in partnership with local entities. These efforts included deploying resources for major events such as wildfires, hurricanes, and floods, with domestic disaster services comprising 26.6% of total operating expenses at $949.5 million. Training programs reach over 5 million individuals yearly in skills including CPR, , use, , and lifeguarding, with fiscal year 2023 enrollments exceeding 5.85 million participants and certifications for about 343,000 lifeguards alongside 2.1 million swim lessons. In the same period, the organization installed over 2.6 million free smoke alarms cumulatively since 2014 as part of its Home Fire Campaign to enhance preparedness. Service to armed forces and veterans handled over 620,000 emergency communication cases via the Hero Care Network in fiscal year 2024, supporting service members, families, and caregivers through inquiries, programs, and resiliency workshops. Efficiency metrics indicate that approximately 90.8% of expenses are allocated to program activities, as calculated by dividing program expenses by total expenses, earning a 4/4 star rating from . Independent evaluator reports a 91% program percentage for cash budgets, with a cost to raise $100 of $25, reflecting overhead including and management. In 2024, total operating revenues reached $3.845 billion against $3.572 billion in expenses, with biomedical services dominating at 56% ($1.999 billion), underscoring the scale of blood-related operations that involve substantial collection, testing, and distribution costs classified as programmatic. These ratios align with benchmarks set by nonprofit watchdogs, where programs should exceed 65-75% of spending, though critics note that ARC's biomedical focus inflates program figures relative to direct disaster aid.

Empirical Critiques of Operational Effectiveness

Investigative reporting by and has highlighted empirical shortcomings in the American Red Cross's (ARC) operations, particularly during Superstorm Sandy in 2012, where prepositioned emergency response vehicles often drove empty or in circles due to poor logistics planning, and stored meals spoiled without distribution, resulting in unmet sheltering and feeding needs despite raised funds exceeding $1 billion across disasters that year. These inefficiencies stemmed from a centralized national headquarters model that overrode local chapters' on-the-ground knowledge, leading to duplicated efforts and resource wastage, as corroborated by internal ARC documents and whistleblower accounts reviewed in the investigation. A 2015 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report examined ARC's domestic disaster assistance and found that the organization's services vary significantly across events due to factors like disaster scale and local capacity, with no consistent external benchmarks for performance evaluation, hampering accountability. For instance, during Sandy, ARC shelters operated below capacity while coordination with state and local partners faltered, and the report noted ARC's internal metrics often lacked transparency or comparability, recommending establish regular federal oversight to assess effectiveness against federal expectations. The GAO's analysis, based on ARC data and interviews, underscored systemic issues in measuring outcomes, such as the of beneficiaries served to funds expended, which revealed gaps in longer-term support. Financial efficiency critiques further question ARC's operational model, as its disaster division consistently operates at a loss, subsidized by profitable blood services revenue, with disaster-related expenses outpacing dedicated donations by margins exceeding 50% in some audited years. ARC public claims of allocating approximately 90 cents per donated dollar to programs have been contested as misleading, since aggregated figures blend high-margin biomedical operations with low-efficiency disaster responses; disaggregated data from IRS filings show administrative and fundraising costs for disaster-specific activities approaching 25% or more when excluding cross-subsidies. This structure, per analyses of ARC's audited financials, incentivizes over-reliance on national-scale deployments that inflate overhead without proportional impact, as evidenced by post-Haiti earthquake (2010) spending where only about 6% of $488 million raised was directed to immediate in the first two years, with much allocated to administrative partnerships yielding minimal on-site outcomes. Subsequent GAO reviews, such as on the 2017 hurricanes, identified persistent coordination deficiencies with FEMA, including mismatched shelter staffing and supply distribution, where ARC's mass care efforts reached fewer than expected evacuees despite federal funding infusions. These findings, drawn from federal records and response data, indicate that ARC's effectiveness is undermined by inadequate pre-disaster planning metrics and post-event impact assessments, contributing to public distrust evidenced by donor retention drops following high-profile failures. While ARC maintains internal improvements, the absence of independent, longitudinal studies quantifying beneficiary outcomes per dollar—such as reduced mortality or faster recovery rates—leaves empirical validation of operational reforms unverified.

Major Controversies and Reforms

Financial Mismanagement and Donation Allocation Disputes

![Letter illustrating American Red Cross donation allocation][float-right] The American Red Cross has faced repeated controversies over the allocation of disaster-specific donations, with critics alleging that funds raised for particular events were diverted to general operations, administrative costs, or unrelated programs rather than direct victim aid. In the case of the September 11, 2001, attacks, the organization established the , raising approximately $547 million by late October 2001. Initially, Red Cross leadership, including then-president , planned to use surplus funds for long-term preparedness and other disasters, prompting public outrage and congressional scrutiny from Senator , who questioned the ethics of reallocating donor-intended contributions. Under pressure, the Red Cross pledged in November 2001 to dedicate the entire exclusively to 9/11 victims and families, contributing to Healy's later that month. Following in August 2005, the Red Cross raised over $2 billion for efforts but encountered internal accusations of financial mismanagement, including the improper diversion of supplies, failure to track distributions per procedures, and unauthorized use of Katrina-designated resources for other purposes. An internal review uncovered these issues across multiple chapters, leading to investigations and the resignation of CEO Marsha Evans in December 2005 amid broader criticism of the organization's response efficiency. Fraud cases also emerged, with at least 50 indictments in one instance for siphoning funds. The donations exemplified ongoing disputes, as the Red Cross raised nearly $488 million but constructed only six permanent homes, with a 2015 and investigation revealing that about 25 percent of funds supported administrative functions like internal flights and management rather than direct housing. A 2016 Senate report by the and Governmental Affairs Committee accused the organization of misleading and donors by claiming efficient use of 91 percent of funds for programs, while stonewalling inquiries into specific expenditures. These issues persist, as evidenced by a November 2024 lawsuit filed by alleging mismanagement of over $500 million in earthquake aid, claiming funds were not delivered as promised for rebuilding efforts. Critics, including investigative outlets, have highlighted patterns where disaster-specific pledges are pooled into general funds, reducing transparency on exact allocations and fueling perceptions of inefficiency despite favorable overall ratings from watchdogs like , which reported 90.6 percent program expenses in 2022. Executive compensation has also drawn scrutiny, with CEO Gail McGovern's pay exceeding $700,000 annually in recent years, though the organization defends it as necessary for a large-scale operation managing blood services and global aid. Such disputes have prompted internal reforms, including enhanced auditing post-2005, but donor trust remains challenged by instances where empirical outcomes, like limited tangible aid in , diverged from fundraising promises.

Disaster Response Shortcomings and Accountability Issues

The American Red Cross has encountered substantial criticism for operational failures in disaster response, including delays in aid delivery, inadequate , and prioritization of over victim needs. Investigations have highlighted systemic issues such as bureaucratic inefficiencies, inexperienced leadership deployment, and a lack of transparency in fund usage, which have undermined trust in its capacity to fulfill core mandates during crises. These shortcomings persisted despite the organization's receipt of billions in donations, prompting calls for greater from federal oversight bodies. During in 2005, the Red Cross response was faulted for poor planning and overreliance on untrained personnel, resulting in long queues at distribution sites, unresponsive emergency hotlines, and delayed assistance to evacuees. A congressional review identified structural flaws akin to those in government agencies, including cumbersome decision-making that hindered rapid deployment of supplies. Internal probes also uncovered allegations of volunteer misconduct, such as of relief goods, exacerbating perceptions of disarray amid the storm's $1 billion in donations. Superstorm Sandy in 2012 exposed further deficiencies, with the Red Cross raising $312 million but diverting resources to media events while basic needs like meals and went unmet in affected areas. An investigative report detailed how emergency response vehicles were reassigned for promotional photo opportunities, and internal emails revealed senior officials acknowledging chaos in supply chains and shelter management. The organization's refusal to disclose detailed spending breakdowns—citing them as proprietary "trade secrets"—intensified scrutiny over accountability. The response drew particularly acute rebukes, as the Red Cross collected nearly $500 million yet constructed only six permanent homes, with much of the funding supporting administrative overhead and partner projects marred by poor execution. Confidential documents showed top executives warning of "failures on the ground," including stalled housing initiatives and inflated success claims, while a 2016 inquiry found 25% of donations allocated to internal costs. A 2024 lawsuit by Haitian-American advocates alleged persistent mismanagement, asserting that promised aid for over 1.5 million homeless individuals largely failed to materialize. Accountability gaps compound these operational lapses, as the Red Cross operates with minimal federal supervision despite its quasi-governmental role in mass care coordination with FEMA. A 2015 (GAO) assessment concluded that the absence of routine evaluations allows inconsistencies in service delivery to persist, recommending periodic audits to verify effectiveness across response phases. Subsequent GAO reviews of 2017 hurricanes reiterated coordination shortfalls with federal partners, including underutilization of voluntary agency capacity and inadequate tracking of aid outcomes. Critics, including congressional Democrats, have advocated for like the American Red Cross Sunshine Act to mandate detailed reporting, yet implementation remains limited.

Biomedical Policy and Ethical Concerns

The American Red Cross implemented a policy of in blood collection and processing starting in , requiring separate labeling and storage of donations from Black donors as "Negro" despite no medical or supporting racial differences in . This approach, adopted to align with U.S. military demands during , prioritized institutional accommodation of prevailing segregationist norms over empirical equity in transfusion practices, effectively limiting Black donors' contributions to white recipients and perpetuating notions of biological hierarchy. The policy faced opposition from figures like Dr. , who resigned in protest, and was phased out nationally in 1948 following sustained advocacy, though some regional programs persisted into the 1950s. In response to the emerging HIV/AIDS crisis, the organization drew ethical scrutiny for delaying donor deferral and surrogate testing protocols despite CDC epidemiological data by January 1983 indicating blood as a transmission vector. Internal records reveal ARC leadership privately accepted the transfusion risk by mid-1983 but resisted broader implementation of available tests, citing logistical and cost burdens, which prolonged exposure until routine HIV antibody screening began in March 1985. This hesitation contributed to documented cases of transfusion-acquired infections, violating principles of nonmaleficence by subordinating donor and recipient safety to operational continuity. Persistent biomedical safety lapses have prompted multiple regulatory interventions, including a $9.6 million FDA fine in January 2012 for 298 violations across 13 regional blood centers, such as distributing untested or inadequately labeled components and failing to report donors positive for or to health authorities. Earlier, in , federal inspectors identified ongoing deficiencies despite prior $21 million in penalties, including inadequate contamination controls and record-keeping errors that risked supply integrity. These incidents underscore ethical tensions between the ARC's dual nonprofit mandate and its market-like distribution of blood products—generating $1.8 billion in 2022 revenue from hospital sales—to sustain testing and logistics, potentially eroding donor trust through recurrent accountability failures. The ARC's tissue services division, active for over 50 years in procuring and distributing allografts for transplants, encountered procurement-related ethical questions, as evidenced by arrangements where a received personal payments from the for hospital-harvested s, raising concerns over incentives that could undermine voluntary standards. Amid industry-wide scrutiny of consent documentation and sterilization efficacy in the early , the ARC ceased tissue operations in 2005, transferring assets to the Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation to refocus on blood services. This withdrawal followed broader regulatory pressures on tissue banking, including FDA oversight gaps that permitted non-registration by some entities, though the ARC maintained compliance through its adhering to principles of respect, beneficence, and justice.

References

  1. [1]
    Our History
    - **Founding**: American Red Cross founded by Clara Barton on May 21, 1881.
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    Significant Dates in History
    ### Significant Dates and Events (1946–Present) – American Red Cross
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    About Us
    **Summary of American Red Cross Key Services and Mission:**
  6. [6]
    None
    ### Summary of American Red Cross Activities (1919–1945)
  7. [7]
    American Red Cross Founded - History.com
    In Washington, DC, humanitarians Clara Barton and Adolphus Solomons found the American National Red Cross, an organization established to provide humanitarian ...
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    Clara Barton Biography - National Women's History Museum
    Hayes. On May 21, 1881, the American Association of the Red Cross was formed; Barton was elected president in June. In 1882, the US joined the International ...
  10. [10]
    Clara Barton and The American Red Cross
    Clara Barton spent a decade organizing the American National Red Cross, which was officially incorporated in 1882. Under her leadership the Red Cross assisted ...
  11. [11]
    Red Cross Founded by Clara Barton - Philanthropy Roundtable
    After volunteering with that organization in overseas war zones she returned to the U.S. and eventually founded an American branch of the Red Cross in 1881.
  12. [12]
    American Red Cross - Clara Barton National Historic Site
    Clara Barton founded the American Red Cross in 1881 and remained at its helm until 1904. During this time, the organization was responsible for 18 peacetime ...
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    Clara Barton - National Museum of the United States Army
    Barton served as the president of the American Red Cross for 23 years until she was asked to resign in 1904 among criticism of her managerial style, age, and ...
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    The American Red Cross “Mercy Ship” in the First World War
    Jan 1, 2023 · On September 12, 1914, a group of American Red Cross (ARC) nurses stood in their red-lined navy-blue capes along the rails of an Atlantic ...<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Honoring the Red Cross
    Mar 7, 2014 · The Red Cross held its first national War Fund drive in June 1917 and set a goal of $100 million. Within days, over $115 million was raised. It ...
  19. [19]
    Rallying a Nation: Red Cross During WW I
    In total, the War Funds brought in about $250M, significantly surpassing the organization's expectations.
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    American Red Cross & World War I History in Numbers
    May 12, 2014 · 22,800 nurses & ambulance drivers registered for WWI- The Red Cross was able to bring in 18,000 nurses and 4,800 ambulance drivers to help serve ...
  22. [22]
    The Great Mississippi River Flood of 1927
    Sep 7, 2016 · The flood inundated 16 million acres of land, displacing nearly 640,000 people in states from Illinois to Louisiana. In Vicksburg, Mississippi, ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Old Black Water - PMC
    Nov 5, 2005 · The American Red Cross established 138 camps and fed more than 600,000 people during the relief and recovery effort (3). But the response was ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Mississippi Valley Flood Official Report Chapter 2
    When at last the contributions had ceased , the Mississippi. Valley Relief Fund had reached the total of $ 17,498,902.16 . This figure included generous ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  25. [25]
    Great Depression: Good Impact of the Red Cross
    By June 30, 1931, the Red Cross had given disaster relief to 38 of the drought stricken states which spread over the northwestern states. At the peak of the ...Missing: American involvement
  26. [26]
    RED CROSS WINDS UP DROUGHT SEED AID - The New York Times
    -The American Red Cross expended more than $316,350 for drought relief from midsummer up to Nov. 1 in the distribution of free seed to residents of 245 ...
  27. [27]
    The 20th Century's Imprint on the American Red Cross
    Sep 1, 2006 · Like all organizations during the Great Depression, the Red Cross's resources were strained, but it agreed to set aside $5 million to aid ...Missing: involvement | Show results with:involvement
  28. [28]
    American Red Cross - Encyclopedia of Arkansas
    Mar 19, 2024 · The American Red Cross provided seventy-five camps in Arkansas, which served more than 17,000 families. The Red Cross spent more than a million ...
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    World War II: "Donut Dollies" & the American Red Cross
    By the time of the end of the war, the American public had contributed over $784 million in support of Red Cross activities. Red Cross World War II Statistics
  31. [31]
    History of Blood Transfusions - Red Cross Blood Donation
    The Red Cross begins National Blood Donor Service to collect blood for the U.S. military with Dr. Charles R. Drew, formerly of the Plasma for Britain program, ...
  32. [32]
    The American Red Cross and the Military: A century-old partnership
    Apr 3, 2018 · The organization collected about 13.4 million pints of blood from 6.6 million donors over the course of the war. The military took over its own ...Missing: involvement facts
  33. [33]
    Home Front Organizations and Services | Encyclopedia.com
    By 1945, the last year of the war, the Red Cross had 36.7 million adult members, 19.9 million Junior Red Cross members, 7.5 million volunteers, and 24,378 paid ...
  34. [34]
    THE AMERICAN RED CROSS IN KOREA, 1950 – 1953
    Each year of the Korean War, an average of 1,100,000 servicemen received Red Cross assistance at camps and hospitals, at home and abroad.
  35. [35]
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Service Organizations in the - Vietnam War Commemoration
    Jul 19, 2023 · The American Red Cross sponsored three programs in Vietnam during the war in support of the U.S. Armed Forces: Service to Military ...
  37. [37]
    History of the Controversy - HIV And The Blood Supply - NCBI - NIH
    On June 22, 1983, the American Association of Blood Banks, the Council of Community Blood Centers, and the American Red Cross issued a second joint statement, ...
  38. [38]
  39. [39]
    Commentary: More Red Cross Criticism - ABC News
    Jan 24, 2002 · You've heard about the Red Cross scandal after Sept.11. Most of the hundreds of millions of dollars raised for terrorism victims was not getting to the victims.
  40. [40]
    Red Cross scandals tarnish relief efforts - NBC News
    Dec 29, 2005 · 49 people in California busted for stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars from a Red Cross fund designated for Hurricane Katrina victims.
  41. [41]
    Report: Red Cross Spent 25 Percent Of Haiti Donations On ... - NPR
    Jun 16, 2016 · A congressional inquiry finds that the American Red Cross stonewalled lawmakers as they sought to understand the charity's finances, ...
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
    H. Rept. 110-87 - THE AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS ...
    The bill explicitly delegates to Red Cross management the responsibilities for day-to-day operations; reduces the Board of Governors' size by more than half; ...Missing: post | Show results with:post
  44. [44]
    American Red Cross | Encyclopedia.com
    During the 1990s, it undertook a massive modernization of its blood services operations to increase the safety of its blood products. It continued to provide ...
  45. [45]
    None
    ### Summary of Key Sections of the Congressional Charter of The American National Red Cross
  46. [46]
    Our Federal Charter
    **Summary of Congressional Charter (American Red Cross):**
  47. [47]
  48. [48]
  49. [49]
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
    Cliff Holtz New CEO At American Red Cross - The NonProfit Times
    Jul 2, 2024 · Cliff Holtz is the new president and chief executive officer of the American Red Cross in Washington, DC.
  52. [52]
  53. [53]
  54. [54]
    None
    ### Key Financial Data for FY2023 (American National Red Cross)
  55. [55]
    The American National Red Cross - GovTribe
    Major contract awards include multi-million dollar agreements with the VA to supply blood, blood components, and laboratory testing to Veterans Integrated ...
  56. [56]
    How the Red Cross Spends Your Donations
    ### Summary of Donation Spending Breakdown
  57. [57]
  58. [58]
    American Red Cross | Charity Ratings | Donating Tips
    Jul 8, 2025 · The Organization recorded contributed services revenue and related expense of approximately $36 million and $39 million in 2024 and 2023, ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] GAO-15-565, American Red Cross: Disaster Assistance Would ...
    Sep 9, 2015 · American Red Cross, Annual Report 2014 (Washington, D.C.: 2014). ... federal charter, the Federal Supply Schedules Usage Act of 201020 gave.
  60. [60]
    Grassley, Thompson Introduce American Red Cross Transparency ...
    Feb 3, 2017 · The American Red Cross Transparency Act gives the GAO complete access to the Red Cross' records when needed to conduct oversight.Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  61. [61]
    Facts About Blood Supply In The U.S. - Red Cross Blood Donation
    Each year, an estimated 6.8 million people in the U.S. donate blood. 13.6 million units of whole blood and red blood cells are collected in the U.S. in a year.
  62. [62]
    [PDF] U.S. blood donation statistics and public messaging guide
    Jan 9, 2024 · Individuals can donate whole blood no more than once in eight weeks and may donate double red blood cells by apheresis collection procedures ...Missing: processing | Show results with:processing
  63. [63]
    Free Health Screening and Blood Tests - Red Cross Blood Donation
    All donors will receive a free health screening. At the time of your donation, your blood pressure, hemoglobin, and pulse will be checked.
  64. [64]
    Blood Products | American Red Cross
    The American Red Cross uses its national reach and decades of industry experience to supply hospitals with 6.5 million blood products each year for lifesaving ...
  65. [65]
    Infectious Disease Testing | Red Cross Blood Services
    The Red Cross blood donations are screened using the Ortho T. cruzi Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for the qualitative detection of antibodies to T.
  66. [66]
    Tracking of Donation Reactivity | Red Cross Blood Services
    The map provides a visual distribution of reactive donations by residential zip codes. The vertical bar chart illustrates the number of positive donations ...Missing: facts statistics
  67. [67]
  68. [68]
  69. [69]
    Why the American Red Cross makes money from donated blood
    Nov 26, 2023 · But the majority of its revenue, just over $1.8 billion, comes from what its financial statements refer to as "Biomedical services." "The ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  70. [70]
  71. [71]
    AB Elite Plasma Donation - Red Cross Blood
    Plasma products are used by burn, trauma and cancer patients. You can donate every 28 days, up to 13 times per year. The average donation takes one hour and 15 ...
  72. [72]
  73. [73]
    [PDF] American National Red Cross/Biomedical Services - FDA
    Jun 10, 2005 · Number of Recalled Products/Product. Type. Reason for Recall. Penalty ... 3 - Plasma Frozen Within 24 hours. Failure to control suspect ...<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    Nation's Largest Tissue Bank To Acquire Assets Of American Red ...
    Oct 19, 2005 · American Red Cross Tissue Services has recovered tissues from over 2,000 donors annually, distributing approximately 100,000 tissue allografts ...
  75. [75]
    Cell and Gene Therapy Solutions | Red Cross Blood Services
    The Red Cross provides cell and gene therapy source materials and collection services to support both clinical trials and commercial therapies.Missing: plasma | Show results with:plasma
  76. [76]
    Cell Therapy - Red Cross Blood Donation
    - A Cell Therapy Blood (Whole Blood) collection or Leukocytes (Buffy Coat) collection, which takes approximately 1-2 hours and is compensated starting at $200.Missing: plasma | Show results with:plasma
  77. [77]
    The Role of Histocompatibility Laboratory Services at the American ...
    Jul 5, 2023 · The services provided by the American Red Cross laboratories are significant in assisting with lifesaving transplantation for patients with these cancers.
  78. [78]
    2024 Biotherapies Pavilion Participant Spotlight - American Red ...
    Our Cell and Gene Therapy Solutions team has been supporting the collection and processing of autologous and allogeneic therapies for over a decade, offering ...Missing: plasma | Show results with:plasma<|separator|>
  79. [79]
  80. [80]
  81. [81]
    Nucleic acid testing-benefits and constraints - PMC - NIH
    [8] The American Red Cross implemented automated triplex NAT for HIV, HCV and HBV in June 2009. They analyzed their results of the initial year of testing and ...
  82. [82]
    Universal leukoreduction-fix or folly? - CAP TODAY
    Last spring, the American Red Cross announced that all of its service regions will be converted to ULR by the end of the year. Blood centers affiliated with ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Final Guidance for Industry: Pre-Storage Leukocyte Reduction of ...
    AABB,. America's Blood Centers, American Red Cross, Armed Services Blood Program, December. 2009. 35. Bodensteiner, D. White cell reduction in blood from ...
  84. [84]
    Product Safety and Blood Center Operations
    A new instrument to count residual levels of white blood cells in leukoreduced blood components recently implemented by ARCBS. A new pathogen reduction ...
  85. [85]
    Did Red Cross Release Bad Blood? - CBS News
    Dec 20, 2002 · The American Red Cross may have released tainted blood to hospitals, the government said Friday, reporting more than 200 violations of federal blood safety ...Missing: incidents challenges
  86. [86]
    $$10 Million Fine on Red Cross Highlights Its Troubled History of ...
    Feb 2, 2012 · For example, the agency failed to notify health departments when donors had infectious diseases such as HIV and syphilis, failed to add new ...Missing: 1980s | Show results with:1980s
  87. [87]
    Problems Persist With Red Cross Blood Services
    Jul 17, 2008 · In that letter, dated Feb. 8, the drug agency listed 113 “events” involving 4,094 flawed blood components that were recalled by 15 of the Red ...<|separator|>
  88. [88]
    FDA fines Red Cross nearly $9.6 million for blood safety lapses
    Jan 16, 2012 · Federal health officials have fined the American Red Cross nearly $9.6 million for sloppy and unsafe blood management practices.
  89. [89]
    Blood & Blood Products - FDA
    Sep 10, 2025 · FDA inspects all blood facilities at least every two years, and "problem" facilities are inspected more often. Blood establishments are now held ...Regulation of the Blood Supply · Approved Blood Products · Questions about Blood
  90. [90]
    Blood Guidances - FDA
    Aug 27, 2025 · FDA blood guidance includes recommendations for testing, collection, processing, storage, donor eligibility, and use of blood components.
  91. [91]
  92. [92]
  93. [93]
  94. [94]
  95. [95]
  96. [96]
  97. [97]
  98. [98]
  99. [99]
  100. [100]
    The American Red Cross' Disaster Protocol: The Delaware Chapter
    The American Red Cross (ARC) provides emergency assistance, disaster relief, and disaster preparedness education wherever it is needed.
  101. [101]
  102. [102]
  103. [103]
  104. [104]
  105. [105]
  106. [106]
  107. [107]
  108. [108]
  109. [109]
    New Community Adaptation Program Builds Resiliency in ...
    May 29, 2024 · The Red Cross has launched a national program to establish permanent resources to build community resiliency. Called Community Adaptation Program (CAP).
  110. [110]
    How the American Red Cross Helps Build Disaster Resilience ...
    Jul 14, 2025 · The Community Adaptation Program by the American Red Cross builds disaster resilience through local partnerships in high-risk and ...
  111. [111]
    How the Red Cross Community Adaptation Program is Building ...
    Jun 18, 2025 · One powerful example is the partnership with the Central Valley Empowerment Alliance (CVEA). During recent extreme heat, CVEA used industrial ...Missing: initiatives | Show results with:initiatives
  112. [112]
  113. [113]
    American Red Cross - AMEDD Center of History & Heritage
    FIRST-AID DIVISION. Long before the war the first-aid division of the American Red Cross engaged in the dissemination of instruction to the people of the ...
  114. [114]
  115. [115]
    An American Red Cross volunteer on the front during WWII: Dorothy ...
    Mar 23, 2022 · By the time World War II ended in September 1945, the American public had contributed over $784 million in support to the American Red Cross.
  116. [116]
    The American Red Cross and the Military: A century-old partnership
    Apr 3, 2018 · During the Korean War, the Red Cross was instrumental in facilitating tens of thousands of prisoner exchanges between United Nations and North ...
  117. [117]
  118. [118]
  119. [119]
  120. [120]
  121. [121]
  122. [122]
  123. [123]
  124. [124]
  125. [125]
    The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement - IFRC
    The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement is made up of three independent parts. It is guided by the Fundamental Principles and united by a central ...
  126. [126]
  127. [127]
    [PDF] THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES - ICRC
    The International Red Cross and Red Crescent. Movement is the largest humanitarian network in the world. Its mission is to alleviate human suffering, protect ...
  128. [128]
    Fundamental Principles - IFRC
    What are the seven Fundamental Principles? · Humanity · Impartiality · Neutrality · Independence · Voluntary service · Unity · Universality.
  129. [129]
  130. [130]
  131. [131]
  132. [132]
    About the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement
    The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement is the world's largest humanitarian network, dedicated to preventing and alleviating suffering.
  133. [133]
  134. [134]
    Our Fundamental Principles - ICRC
    The Fundamental Principles that guide and define the ICRC: Humanity, impartiality, neutrality, independence, voluntary service, unity and universality.
  135. [135]
    International Disasters and Crises
    **Summary of American Red Cross Role in Global Disaster Relief:**
  136. [136]
  137. [137]
  138. [138]
    International Disaster Relief Efforts - American Red Cross
    Whether it's a typhoon in the Philippines, a migration crisis in the Mediterranean, wildfires in Chile, or extreme winter weather in Mongolia, our teams are ...<|separator|>
  139. [139]
    International Services
    - **International Health Initiatives**: The American Red Cross supports international services aimed at helping to save lives globally, though specific health programs are not detailed in the provided content.
  140. [140]
  141. [141]
  142. [142]
  143. [143]
  144. [144]
  145. [145]
    None
    ### Quantifiable Metrics from American Red Cross FY24 Annual Report
  146. [146]
    None
    ### Key Quantifiable Contributions for FY23 (July 1, 2022–June 30, 2023)
  147. [147]
  148. [148]
    Rating for American Red Cross - Charity Navigator
    Rating 4/4 · Review by Charity NavigatorAmerican Red Cross has earned a 4/4 Star rating on Charity Navigator. This Charitable Organization is headquartered in Washington, DC.
  149. [149]
    10 Disturbing Things ProPublica Learned Investigating the Red ...
    While the Red Cross called its response nearly “flawless,” a ProPublica investigation uncovered a much different version of events.
  150. [150]
    The Red Cross CEO Has Been Serially Misleading About Where ...
    Dec 4, 2014 · The 17 percent the Red Cross has spent on average for fundraising expenses is below the ceilings set by nonprofit watchdogs. The Better Business ...Missing: efficiency | Show results with:efficiency<|control11|><|separator|>
  151. [151]
    Special Report: The American Red Cross - NPR
    An investigation by NPR and ProPublica finds a string of poorly managed projects, questionable spending and dubious claims of success, according to a review of ...Missing: empirical critiques effectiveness<|separator|>
  152. [152]
    [PDF] GAO-19-526, DISASTER RESPONSE: FEMA and Red Cross Need ...
    Sep 19, 2019 · GAO reviewed relevant federal laws, federal frameworks, and written agreements between federal, state, or local governments and various ...
  153. [153]
    Red Cross Pledges Entire Terror Fund To Sept. 11 Victims
    Nov 15, 2001 · The American Red Cross, humbled by weeks of scathing criticism, announced today that it would use its $543 million Liberty Disaster Fund only to assist the ...Missing: controversy | Show results with:controversy
  154. [154]
    Red Cross Defends Sept. 11 Fund - ABC News
    Controversy over the fund led to the resignation of Red Cross president Bernadine Healy. So far the Liberty Fund has given out $121 million in direct cash ...
  155. [155]
    Grassley Seeks Answers on Red Cross' 9-11 Relief
    In the wake of 9-11, the Red Cross was criticized for not using all of the funds raisedin response to the attacks for that relief effort but for other, long- ...Missing: controversy | Show results with:controversy
  156. [156]
    Despite huge Katrina relief, Red Cross criticized - NBC News
    Sep 28, 2005 · The Red Cross estimates it will need $2 billion to finance Katrina-related emergency services. Even if the goal is reached, Goldburg said, any ...
  157. [157]
    Red Cross Sifting Internal Charges Over Katrina Aid
    Mar 24, 2006 · The accusations include improper diversion of relief supplies, failure to follow required Red Cross procedures in tracking and distributing ...Missing: allocation disputes
  158. [158]
    Red Cross Workers Accused of Katrina Fraud - NPR
    Dec 27, 2005 · In the past three months 50 people have been indicted in Bakersfield, California, for allegedly siphoning hundreds of thousands of dollars from ...Missing: allocation disputes
  159. [159]
    American Red Cross Troubles | PBS News
    Dec 14, 2005 · The chief executive of the American Red Cross resigned amid criticism of the charity's disaster relief efforts, including its response to Hurricane Katrina.Missing: allocation | Show results with:allocation
  160. [160]
    Senator: Red Cross Misled Congress, Refused To 'Level With the ...
    Jun 16, 2016 · Red Cross officials, including McGovern, have repeatedly told the public that the charity retains 9 percent of donations to cover management and ...
  161. [161]
    Haitian Americans Sue Red Cross Over Alleged Mismanagement of ...
    Nov 26, 2024 · Haitian Americans Sue Red Cross Over Alleged Mismanagement of Earthquake Aid ... The lawsuit claims over $500 million in donations raised for ...
  162. [162]
    Executive Compensation at the American Red Cross (2022)
    Mar 24, 2024 · Executive Compensation at the American Red Cross (2022) · $832,241: Gail McGovern, President and CEO · $732,793: Clifford Holtz, Chief Operating ...<|separator|>
  163. [163]
    [PDF] The American Red Cross Faces Organizational Integrity Challenges
    These examples of mismanagement of charitable funds and volunteers pose questions about the ARC's ability to prevent fraud and protect resources amid the chaos ...
  164. [164]
    The Red Cross' Secret Disaster - ProPublica
    Oct 29, 2014 · The Red Cross botched key elements of its mission after Sandy and Isaac, leaving behind a trail of unmet needs and acrimony, according to an investigation by ...
  165. [165]
    American Red Cross: Disaster Assistance Would Benefit from ...
    Sep 9, 2015 · The Red Cross is involved in three phases of emergency assistance: immediate response, longer-term recovery, and preparedness.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  166. [166]
    Report Finds Lack of Federal Oversight of Red Cross Disaster ...
    Sep 16, 2015 · GAO found that the Red Cross is subject to minimal federal oversight – it only submits mandated high-level financial reports to relevant federal ...
  167. [167]
    Red Cross Response to Katrina Criticized - NPR
    Oct 6, 2005 · They cite long lines at relief centers, unanswered emergency phone lines and little or late help for victims.
  168. [168]
    Reports Critique U.S. Red Cross's Katrina Response
    Apr 4, 2006 · The American Red Cross response to Hurricane Katrina was poorly planned, relied too heavily on inexperienced managers, and often failed to meet the needs of ...
  169. [169]
    [PDF] trouble exposed: - katrina, rita, and the red cross: a familiar history
    The charity has come under increased scrutiny in recent years for alleged delayed responses to disasters, race and economic-based discrepancies in aid ...
  170. [170]
    Red Cross: How We Spent Sandy Money Is a 'Trade Secret'
    Jun 26, 2014 · The charity is fighting our public records request for information on how it raised and spent money after the superstorm.
  171. [171]
    Red Cross 'Diverted Assets' During Storms' Aftermath To Focus On ...
    Oct 29, 2014 · An investigation by NPR and ProPublica reveals how the Red Cross increased its focus on public relations while it struggled to meet basic ...
  172. [172]
    How the Red Cross Raised Half a Billion Dollars for Haiti and Built ...
    Jun 3, 2015 · But in fact, the Red Cross has repeatedly failed on the ground in Haiti. Confidential memos, emails from worried top officers, and accounts of a ...
  173. [173]
    In Search Of The Red Cross' $500 Million In Haiti Relief - NPR
    Jun 3, 2015 · NPR and ProPublica went in search of the nearly $500 million and found a string of poorly managed projects, questionable spending and dubious claims of success.
  174. [174]
    FEMA and the American Red Cross Need to Ensure Key Mass Care ...
    Sep 19, 2019 · GAO was asked to review their efforts. This report examines (1) FEMA's and the Red Cross' coordination of mass care in response to the 2017 ...
  175. [175]
    Good Blood, Bad Policy: The Red Cross and Jim Crow
    Jan 18, 2023 · A 1940s Red Cross rule, which racially segregated blood, propped up notions of racial difference and Black inferiority.Missing: biomedical | Show results with:biomedical
  176. [176]
  177. [177]
    The Color of Blood | National Museum of African American History ...
    Although the policy was revised to allow African Americans to make blood donations, it still prohibited giving blood from non-white donors to white members of ...
  178. [178]
    Dr. Charles Drew: A Pioneer in Blood Transfusions - Pieces of History
    Feb 8, 2023 · Drew's stint with the Red Cross, however, was short-lived. At the time, the Red Cross segregated blood by race even though they acknowledged ...
  179. [179]
    Blood Banks' Test Rejection Criticized - Los Angeles Times
    May 29, 1994 · The American Red Cross and other blood-bank groups refused to adopt a screening test in January, 1983, publicly contending there was no hard evidence people ...Missing: scandal | Show results with:scandal
  180. [180]
    S.Hrg. 107-73 — TISSUE BANKS: IS THE FEDERAL ...
    In 1996, Hoffmann arranged to have the tissue harvested from hospital patients delivered to the American Red Cross. In return, the Red Cross paid him personally ...
  181. [181]
    [PDF] Regulating Human Tissue Banks - STU Scholarly Works
    In order to legally comply with the Federal Regulations, tissue banks must register with the FDA, however, many do not, and exist under the radar of the FDA.
  182. [182]
    American Red Cross Institutional Review Board
    The Red Cross follows the ethical principles of respect for persons, beneficence and justice as set forth in the Belmont Report any time it conducts human ...