Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Anglo-Mysore wars

The Anglo-Mysore Wars consisted of four conflicts between the British East India Company and the Kingdom of Mysore, fought in southern India from 1767 to 1799. Under Hyder Ali, who seized de facto control of Mysore in 1761, and his son Tipu Sultan, who succeeded him in 1782, the kingdom resisted British territorial ambitions through aggressive expansion and military innovation.^[1] These wars highlighted Mysore's adoption of European-style drill, artillery, and notably iron-cased rockets capable of reaching targets over a mile away, which inflicted significant casualties on British forces during battles like Pollilur in 1780.^[2] The First Anglo-Mysore War (1767–1769) arose from British alliances with Mysore's regional rivals, prompting Hyder Ali to besiege Madras and extract concessions via the Treaty of Madras.^[3] The Second (1780–1784), coinciding with the American Revolutionary War, saw Hyder Ali and Tipu coordinate with French allies, nearly expelling the British from the Carnatic before ending inconclusively with the Treaty of Mangalore. In the Third (1790–1792), Tipu faced a coalition of British, Maratha, and Nizam forces, resulting in territorial losses under the Treaty of Seringapatam.^[4] The Fourth (1799) ended with the siege of Seringapatam, Tipu's death in combat, and the partition of Mysore, restoring the Wodeyar dynasty as British puppets and securing British hegemony in the Deccan.^[1] These wars demonstrated the causal dynamics of European military professionalism clashing with indigenous adaptation, where Mysore's initial successes stemmed from numerical superiority and tactical surprise, but British logistical resilience and divide-and-rule diplomacy ultimately prevailed despite high costs in lives and resources.^[3] Scholarly analyses, drawing from period military records, underscore that while Hyder and Tipu modernized their army—integrating European deserters and emphasizing mobility—their overextension and failure to secure lasting alliances eroded Mysore's position against the Company's growing imperial apparatus.^[4] The conflicts' legacy includes the technological diffusion of Congreve rockets inspired by Mysore designs and debates over Tipu's governance, marked by economic reforms alongside religiously motivated campaigns that alienated potential Hindu allies.^[5]

Historical Context

Kingdom of Mysore and Hyder Ali's Rise

The Kingdom of Mysore originated as a feudatory principality under the Vijayanagara Empire, with the Wodeyar dynasty establishing control in 1399 when Yaduraya Wodeyar founded the state centered at Mysore city.^[6] The dynasty expanded its territory steadily during the 17th century, incorporating regions through military campaigns and alliances, but by the early 18th century, the kingdom faced severe internal divisions and external pressures from Maratha incursions and the Nizam of Hyderabad, leading to weakened central authority and reliance on mercenary commanders.^[7] Hyder Ali, born circa 1722 in Budikote to Fath Muhammad, a low-ranking officer of possible Afghan or Persian descent in the Mysore army, began his military career as a private soldier after his father's death around 1734.^[8] He rapidly advanced through merit, commanding a force of 100 cavalrymen and 2,000 infantry by the 1740s under various Mysore commanders, and gained prominence by capturing the fortress of Devanahalli in 1749 through tactical deception.^[9] Appointed commandant of Dindigul in 1756, Hyder Ali quelled local rebellions and expanded Mysore's artillery capabilities by acquiring European expertise, amassing 1,200–1,500 cannons by the 1760s.^[10] In 1760, Hyder Ali suppressed a rebellion by Nanjappa, the previous Dalvoy (commander-in-chief), and assumed that role himself in 1761, consolidating control over the army and treasury while ostensibly serving under Maharaja Krishnaraja Wodeyar II.^[8] Following Krishnaraja's death in 1766, which left the throne to an infant successor, Hyder Ali maneuvered to become de facto ruler, installing puppet Wodeyar kings and eliminating rivals such as the minister Khande Rao in a 1767 conspiracy, thereby centralizing power through military dominance and administrative reforms that prioritized cavalry, infantry discipline, and revenue collection.^[11] His rise transformed Mysore from a fragmented state into a militarized power capable of challenging regional adversaries, setting the stage for conflicts with the British East India Company.^[12]

British East India Company's Expansion in Southern India

The British East India Company (EIC) initiated its commercial activities in southern India by acquiring land at Madraspatnam (modern Chennai) on August 22, 1639, through a grant from Damarla Venkatadri Nayak, a local representative of the Vijayanagara Empire's remnants.^[13] This settlement served as a fortified trading outpost for cotton textiles, indigo, and other commodities, with Fort St. George constructed between 1639 and 1644 to protect against regional threats and European competitors.^[14] By 1653, the EIC had expanded the enclave to include surrounding villages, establishing the Madras Agency under the presidency system, which centralized administration and trade operations across coastal factories.^[15] Initially confined to coastal commerce, the EIC's role evolved amid Anglo-French rivalries during the mid-18th century, culminating in the Carnatic Wars (1746–1763), a series of proxy conflicts intertwined with European wars of succession. The First Carnatic War (1746–1748), sparked by the War of the Austrian Succession, saw French forces under Joseph François Dupleix capture Madras in September 1746, only for it to be restored to the British via the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle in 1748.^[16] The Second Carnatic War (1749–1754) arose from succession disputes in the Carnatic Nawabate and Deccan, where the EIC allied with Muhammad Ali against French-backed Chanda Sahib; Robert Clive's defense of Arcot in 1751 and subsequent victories, including the Battle of Plassey in Bengal's parallel context, bolstered British influence, ending with Muhammad Ali's installation as Nawab in 1752 under EIC protection.^[16] The Third Carnatic War (1756–1763), aligned with the Seven Years' War, featured decisive British successes, notably Eyre Coote's victory over the French at the Battle of Wandiwash on January 22, 1760, which dismantled French military power in the region.^[16] The 1763 Treaty of Paris confined the French to minor trading posts like Pondicherry, stripping them of territorial ambitions. Through these conflicts, the EIC transitioned from merchant to territorial actor, securing cirari (revenue collection) rights from the Carnatic Nawab, establishing subsidiary forces for local rulers, and extending de facto control over the Northern and Southern Circars—coastal districts yielding annual revenues exceeding 1 million rupees by the 1760s.^[17] This consolidation positioned the EIC as the dominant European power in the Carnatic, a fertile corridor between the Eastern Ghats and Bay of Bengal spanning approximately 50,000 square miles, though direct territorial holdings remained limited to fortified presidencies like Madras and subsidiary outposts such as Fort St. David (acquired 1690 near Cuddalore).^[17] Political leverage over indebted Nawabs enabled military garrisons and influence over inland trade routes, setting the stage for confrontations with autonomous Hindu states like Mysore, whose expansions under Hyder Ali from the 1760s threatened British-aligned principalities.^[14] By 1765, EIC armies in southern India numbered around 10,000 sepoys and Europeans, funded partly by Carnatic tribute, reflecting a shift from trade monopolies to politico-military dominance.^[17]

Alliances, Rivalries, and Immediate Causes

The Kingdom of Mysore under Hyder Ali developed intense rivalries with neighboring powers, including the Marathas and the Nizam of Hyderabad, due to territorial encroachments and mutual expansionist ambitions. Hyder Ali, who assumed de facto control of Mysore in 1761, repelled a Maratha siege of Bangalore in 1758 and later capitalized on the Marathas' defeat at the Battle of Panipat in 1761 to annex territories such as Bednore.^[18]^[19] These actions heightened tensions, as the Marathas and Nizam viewed Mysore's growing military strength—bolstered by reforms and cavalry—as a direct threat to their influence in southern India.^[20] The British East India Company, expanding southward after securing the Northern Circars via a 1766 treaty with the Nizam, perceived Hyder Ali's consolidation as an obstacle to dominance over trade routes and the Carnatic region, where they supported the Nawab of Arcot.^[18]^[19] Hyder Ali's overtures to the French, including the establishment of a modern arsenal at Dindigul in 1755 with French technical aid, exacerbated British concerns amid ongoing Anglo-French rivalry in India.^[18] In 1766, the British forged a triple alliance with the Nizam and Marathas explicitly to contain Mysore, offering subsidies and promises of territorial shares to align these regional powers against Hyder Ali.^[18]^[19] Immediate causes of the First Anglo-Mysore War centered on border disputes, as Mysore's expansion encroached on areas under British protection, coupled with the alliance's activation following Maratha incursions into Mysore territory in 1767.^[21]^[19] Hyder Ali's refusal to submit to British influence, demonstrated by his independent military campaigns, prompted the Company to declare war, framing it as defense of allies while pursuing strategic control.^[20] Subsequent wars followed similar patterns, with Mysore repeatedly seeking French military support—such as arms shipments and advisors—while the British reinforced coalitions with the Nizam and Marathas through subsidiary treaties and shared spoils, isolating Mysore diplomatically.^[18]^[20]

The Conflicts

First Anglo-Mysore War (1767–1769)

The First Anglo-Mysore War arose from tensions between Hyder Ali, who had consolidated control over Mysore through military reforms and territorial expansion since 1761, and the British East India Company, which viewed his growing power as a threat to its influence in southern India.^[22] The Company, emboldened by victories in Bengal, allied with the Nizam of Hyderabad and Maratha forces to invade Mysore in early 1767, aiming to partition its territories and install a puppet ruler.^[21] Hyder Ali, commanding a disciplined army incorporating European-style infantry and cavalry, initially faced defeats against the allied coalition but leveraged superior mobility to counterattack effectively.^[23] Key engagements included British Colonel Joseph Smith's victories over Hyder's forces at Changama on September 3, 1767, and subsequent advances capturing towns like Kaveripattinam, demonstrating British discipline in set-piece battles.^[23] However, Hyder employed guerrilla tactics, avoiding decisive confrontations while harassing supply lines and employing scorched-earth policies to deny resources to the invaders.^[19] By late 1768, British forces under Smith had penetrated deep into Mysore territory, reaching within 20 miles of Srirangapatna, Hyder's capital, but overextension and logistical strains weakened their position.^[21] In December 1768, Hyder Ali launched a bold counteroffensive, marching rapidly on Madras with an estimated 80,000 troops, exploiting the Company's divided forces and the vulnerability of its coastal presidencies.^[22] This maneuver induced panic in Madras, where the British garrison numbered only about 3,000-4,000 men, far outnumbered and unable to mount effective resistance without reinforcements.^[19] Facing the prospect of the Company's southern headquarters falling, British Governor Verelst negotiated the Treaty of Madras on April 4, 1769, restoring mutual territories to pre-war status and pledging defensive alliances against common enemies.^[21]^[22] The war highlighted Hyder Ali's strategic acumen in asymmetric warfare, preventing British dominance in the Carnatic despite initial setbacks, though specific casualty figures remain sparse in records, with British losses estimated in the low thousands from battles and disease.^[23] The treaty's mutual defense clause later strained relations when the British failed to aid Hyder against Maratha incursions in 1771, sowing seeds for the Second Anglo-Mysore War.^[22] Overall, the conflict underscored the limits of British expeditionary forces against a unified indigenous power employing rapid maneuvers and local knowledge.^[19]

Second Anglo-Mysore War (1780–1784)

The Second Anglo-Mysore War erupted in July 1780 when Hyder Ali, de facto ruler of the Kingdom of Mysore, launched a surprise invasion of the Carnatic region held by the British East India Company, seeking to exploit British distractions during the American War of Independence and their failure to honor defensive obligations under the 1769 Treaty of Madras amid Maratha attacks on Mysore in 1779–1780.^[24] Hyder's army, bolstered by French-supplied arms and numbering around 80,000 infantry and cavalry with rocket artillery, rapidly overran British positions, capturing Arcot on August 3, 1780, after the devastating Battle of Pollilur on August 10, where Mysorean rockets and cavalry charges annihilated a British force of about 3,000 under Colonel William Baillie, inflicting over 2,000 casualties including most European troops.^[25] This victory, one of the worst British defeats in India up to that point, allowed Hyder to seize further strongholds like Wandiwash and threaten Madras itself, while allying loosely with the Marathas and Nizam of Hyderabad against the British.^[26] British reinforcements under General Sir Eyre Coote arrived in 1781, leading to a series of engagements that halted Mysorean advances; on July 1, 1781, at the Battle of Porto Novo, Coote's 8,000 troops repelled Hyder's 60,000-strong army in fierce hand-to-hand fighting, preserving British supply lines despite heavy losses on both sides.^[26] Subsequent British successes included recapturing Arcot and Vellore, though Hyder maintained pressure through guerrilla tactics and rocket barrages, which inflicted significant disruption on formed infantry units. Hyder Ali died of illness on December 7, 1782, near Chittoor, succeeded by his son Tipu Sultan, who continued the war with renewed vigor, besieging British-allied forts and coordinating with French naval forces under Admiral Suffren, who challenged British sea power in the Indian Ocean but failed to decisively alter land outcomes.^[25] The conflict concluded inconclusively on March 11, 1784, with the Treaty of Mangalore, negotiated after British victories at Arnee and the relief of Cuddalore but strained by mutual exhaustion and the global peace ending the American Revolution, which freed British resources.^[25] The treaty restored pre-war territorial boundaries, mandated the exchange of prisoners and captured territories without indemnity, and required both parties to cease hostilities, effectively a status quo ante bellum agreement that preserved Mysore's independence temporarily while exposing British vulnerabilities in southern India.^[27] Despite the stalemate, the war highlighted Mysore's innovative use of iron-cased rockets—capable of ranges up to 2 kilometers and fired in salvos from mobile launchers—which influenced later European rocketry, though British naval superiority and disciplined infantry ultimately prevented a decisive Mysorean triumph.

Third Anglo-Mysore War (1790–1792)

The Third Anglo-Mysore War erupted following Tipu Sultan's invasion of the British-allied Kingdom of Travancore on 29 December 1789, aimed at seizing the Nedumkotta fort line after Travancore acquired the Dutch-held Cranganore fort, violating perceived regional boundaries.^[28] This aggression prompted British Governor-General Lord Charles Cornwallis to declare hostilities on 27 January 1790, leveraging prior diplomatic efforts to forge a Triple Alliance with the Maratha Confederacy under Nana Fadnavis and the Nizam of Hyderabad in 1790, isolating Mysore militarily and economically.^[29] Tipu's overtures to France for support, including requests for troops and munitions, heightened British resolve to curb Mysorean expansionism, as Mysore's modernized army posed a threat to East India Company holdings in southern India.^[30] Initial British operations faltered under General William Medows, who advanced from Madras in May 1790 with 10,000 troops but faced Tipu's guerrilla tactics, supply shortages, and monsoon disruptions, capturing only minor forts like Dindigul by September before retreating.^[31] Cornwallis assumed personal command in February 1791, marching with 20,000 men to seize Bangalore on 21 February after the Battle of Arikera on 15 May, where British forces repelled a Mysorean ambush.^[23] Advancing toward Seringapatam, Cornwallis reached the city on 13 May 1791 but, hampered by depleted supplies and the need to protect his baggage train, withdrew on 26 May amid Tipu's harassing counterattacks, though British discipline prevented major losses during the retreat.^[32] Tipu capitalized on the British withdrawal by pursuing Cornwallis but shifted focus northward as Maratha forces under Hurry Punt Phadke invaded Mysore's territories in June 1791, capturing key forts like Savanur and Dharwad, while the Nizam's army seized Gooty.^[19] Cornwallis, reinforced, rejoined the campaign in January 1792, defeating Tipu's main army at Arakere on 16 February and besieging Seringapatam from 5 February, where Mysorean rocket barrages and fortifications inflicted casualties but could not halt the allied convergence.^[33] Facing encirclement and ammunition shortages, Tipu sued for peace, culminating in the Treaty of Seringapatam signed on 18 March 1792.^[34] Under the treaty's terms, Mysore ceded one-half of its territories— one-quarter directly to the British East India Company (including Malabar and Coorg regions) and the remaining quarter partitioned between the Marathas and Nizam—reducing Tipu's domain significantly while providing Britain strategic coastal enclaves.^[19] Tipu agreed to pay an indemnity of 33 million rupees (approximately 3.3 crore) in three installments to cover war costs, release all prisoners of war, and surrender his two youngest sons, aged seven and eleven, as hostages in British custody until the final payment, ensuring compliance without immediate deposition.^[35] The agreement prohibited Mysore from employing French nationals or forming anti-British alliances, though Tipu retained core territories around Seringapatam, allowing temporary recovery but foreshadowing further conflict due to unresolved ambitions and British consolidation.^[36]

Fourth Anglo-Mysore War (1799)

The Fourth Anglo-Mysore War pitted the Kingdom of Mysore under Tipu Sultan against a coalition led by the British East India Company, including forces from the Nizam of Hyderabad and the Maratha Confederacy. Prompted by Tipu Sultan's diplomatic overtures to France amid the French Revolutionary Wars, British Governor-General Richard Wellesley authorized a preemptive invasion to eliminate the perceived threat of French influence in southern India.^[37] The campaign commenced in February 1799 with two British columns advancing on Mysore: General George Harris commanding the main army from Madras, comprising approximately 4,381 European and 10,695 native troops, and a smaller force from Bombay under Colonel Arthur Wellesley with 1,617 Europeans and 4,803 natives, supported by the Nizam's contingent of 16,157 troops.^[38] Mysore's army, depleted from prior conflicts, fielded around 33,000 infantry, 15,000 cavalry, and rocket troops under Tipu Sultan. Early engagements favored the British; at the Battle of Seedaseer on 6–8 March 1799, Harris's forces used artillery to repel a Mysorean counterattack, inflicting heavy losses and securing the route to Seringapatam.^[39] Further advances culminated in the siege of Seringapatam beginning 5 April 1799, where coalition engineers breached the fortress walls after a month-long bombardment and trench warfare.^[40] On 4 May 1799, British assault columns stormed the breaches in the northwest wall, overwhelming defenders despite fierce resistance. Tipu Sultan, leading a countercharge near a gateway, was shot and killed by a British grenadier, effectively ending organized Mysorean resistance.^[38] British casualties totaled 69 Europeans and 12 sepoys killed, with 248 Europeans and 32 sepoys wounded; Mysorean losses were significantly higher but unquantified in detail.^[38] The fall of Seringapatam led to the partition of Mysore: the British East India Company annexed key territories including Malabar and Coimbatore, the Nizam received eastern districts, and the Marathas gained western lands, while the reduced princely state was restored to the Wodeyar dynasty under British protection and subsidy. Tipu's army was disbanded, marking the conclusive British dominance in southern India and the end of Mysorean independence.^[38]^[40]

Military Innovations and Strategies

Mysorean Rockets and Artillery

Hyder Ali initiated the development of military rocket technology in Mysore during the 1750s as part of broader army reforms, transitioning from earlier bamboo or paper casings to iron tubes filled with black powder propellant and fitted with sword-blade fins for stabilization. These innovations allowed for greater explosive force and portability, with rockets weighing 2–5 kilograms and achieving ranges of up to 1.5–2 kilometers, though accuracy remained limited to area saturation rather than precision targeting.^[41]^[42] Rockets proved tactically valuable in open battles during the Anglo-Mysore Wars, particularly in disrupting British line formations and cavalry charges through incendiary effects and psychological terror. In the Battle of Guntur on July 26, 1780, during the Second Anglo-Mysore War, Hyder Ali's forces deployed approximately 1,200 rockets from a dedicated corps, inflicting heavy casualties on a British cavalry regiment and contributing to the rout of their position. Tipu Sultan scaled production in dedicated factories at Srirangapatna, reportedly manufacturing over 1,200 rockets monthly by the 1790s, and fielded specialized units such as 120- and 131-man brigades in the Third Anglo-Mysore War (1790–1792), where they supported infantry assaults by creating chaos in enemy ranks.^[41] Complementing rockets, Mysore's conventional artillery emphasized mobility and volume of fire, drawing on French artillery expertise acquired through alliances. Hyder Ali and Tipu equipped their armies with lightweight field guns cast locally in expanded forges—up to 20 iron-smelting furnaces by the 1780s—and organized into horse-drawn batteries for rapid deployment, enabling effective counter-battery fire and siege operations that initially outmatched British pieces in maneuverability during the early wars. This integrated rocket-artillery system inflicted significant losses, such as at the Battle of Pollilur on September 10, 1780, where combined barrages shattered a British square formation, killing over 2,000 troops including eight officers.^[42]^[20] British capture of Mysorean rocket stockpiles and production techniques following Tipu Sultan's defeat at Srirangapatna on May 4, 1799, directly informed the development of Congreve rockets, which incorporated iron casings and were deployed in the Napoleonic Wars by 1805. Despite their eventual obsolescence against improved British drill and firepower in the Fourth War, Mysore's rockets demonstrated the viability of self-propelled munitions in pre-industrial warfare, prioritizing volume and morale disruption over pinpoint accuracy.^[41]^[42]

Mysore's Army Reforms and Tactics

Hyder Ali initiated comprehensive military reforms in Mysore during the 1760s, transitioning from a feudal levy system dependent on local chieftains to a centralized standing army composed of salaried professional soldiers. This shift emphasized discipline, regular pay, and merit-based recruitment, enabling greater loyalty and efficiency compared to traditional Indian armies reliant on temporary mobilizations. By incorporating European training methods, particularly through the employment of French officers and deserters from the British and French East India Companies, Hyder Ali equipped his infantry with standardized musket drill, bayonet tactics, and improved artillery handling.^[43]^[20] The army's size expanded significantly, growing from approximately 23,000 troops in the 1760s to 58,000 by the 1780s, supported by state revenues from agricultural taxes and conquests.^[44] Mysore's tactics under Hyder Ali prioritized mobility and surprise over prolonged sieges or pitched battles, leveraging a balanced force of swift cavalry, rocket-equipped light infantry, and field artillery for rapid maneuvers. Cavalry units, often numbering in the thousands, excelled in hit-and-run raids, harassing supply lines and outflanking slower European columns, as demonstrated during the First Anglo-Mysore War (1767–1769) where Mysorean forces repeatedly evaded and ambushed British detachments. Guerrilla-style operations, including scorched-earth policies to deny resources to invaders, allowed Mysore to compensate for occasional numerical disadvantages against British regulars. French advisors facilitated the adoption of linear infantry formations for defensive stands, blending these with indigenous elephant charges and archers for versatility in varied terrain.^[44]^[45] Tipu Sultan, succeeding his father in 1782, systematized these reforms by further professionalizing the army through rigorous training regimens and administrative innovations, such as the introduction of a rocket corps integrated into infantry tactics for psychological and suppressive fire support. He maintained the standing army's structure, emphasizing iron discipline enforced via corporal punishments and rewards, while expanding cavalry risalas—regiment-sized units—for sustained operational tempo. Tipu's strategies evolved to include fortified defensive positions with water defenses and tunnel networks around Seringapatam, combined with offensive feints to draw enemies into unfavorable engagements, as employed in the Second and Third Anglo-Mysore Wars. Despite these advancements, tactical rigidity in later campaigns, such as over-reliance on static defenses during the Fourth War (1799), highlighted limitations against British adaptations in siege warfare and alliances.^[40]^[46]^[44]

British Adaptations and Superiority Factors

The British East India Company demonstrated adaptability in response to early setbacks, particularly after the devastating defeat at the Battle of Pollilur on September 10, 1780, during the Second Anglo-Mysore War, where Hyder Ali's forces employing rockets and cavalry annihilated a British detachment of around 4,000 men under Colonel William Baillie.^[47] This prompted shifts toward more compact infantry formations protected by artillery screens and greater emphasis on combined arms tactics, integrating sepoy battalions trained in volley fire and bayonet charges with allied cavalry to mitigate Mysorean guerrilla raids and rapid strikes. In the Third Anglo-Mysore War (1790–1792), Governor-General Lord Cornwallis further refined these approaches by concentrating forces for decisive maneuvers, capturing Bangalore on March 21, 1791, as a forward base to shorten supply lines and reduce vulnerability to attrition warfare.^[48] Logistical innovations underpinned British resilience, including the establishment of forward magazines stocked via coastal shipping routes, which alleviated dependence on unreliable local foraging that had plagued earlier campaigns.^[49] The Company's superior financial resources, derived from control over Bengal's revenues exceeding £6 million sterling across the Mysore conflicts, enabled sustained recruitment of up to 60,000 troops by the Fourth War (1799), including reliable sepoys paid more consistently than Mysorean irregulars.^[50] This fiscal edge contrasted with Mysore's strained economy, hampered by Tipu Sultan's heavy taxation and disrupted commerce. Naval dominance provided a decisive superiority factor, as Royal Navy squadrons blockaded Mysorean ports like Mangalore, severing French alliances and Middle Eastern trade that supplied gunpowder and iron for rockets and artillery.^[20] ^[51] By the Third and Fourth Wars, strategic alliances with the Marathas and Nizam of Hyderabad amplified numerical advantages—pitting combined forces of over 100,000 against Tipu's 50,000 at Seringapatam in 1799—while British intelligence networks, leveraging local informants and deserters, exposed Mysorean positions.^[47] These elements, coupled with disciplined European-style drill that emphasized rapid reloading and square formations resilient to cavalry, shifted the balance from defensive attrition to offensive sieges, culminating in the storming of Seringapatam on May 4, 1799.^[49]

Principal Figures

Hyder Ali: Military Reformer and Strategist

Hyder Ali, who assumed de facto control of Mysore in 1761, implemented sweeping military reforms that transformed its forces into a disciplined, technologically advanced army capable of challenging British expansion. He reorganized the army by abolishing corporal punishment except for treason, which was adjudicated by court-martial and punishable by death, fostering greater discipline among troops.^[46] Hyder employed French officers and workmen to train infantry and enhance artillery production, adapting European drill and tactics to local conditions while integrating indigenous elements like cavalry.^[12] This modernization included the establishment of state-run laboratories and factories for munitions, which by the time of his death in 1782 surpassed contemporary European industrial standards in output.^[46] A hallmark of Hyder's innovations was the development and deployment of iron-cased rockets, introduced as early as 1767 with practical use against British forces commencing in 1780 during the Second Anglo-Mysore War. These rockets, launched from ground troops or mounted on camels, achieved a range of approximately 1.4 kilometers and were employed by contingents of up to 5,000 rocket men to disrupt enemy cavalry formations and supply lines.^[46] Complementing this, Hyder's arsenal featured superior-quality pistols and expanded artillery units, enabling effective combined arms operations that emphasized mobility and firepower. His forces, blending well-trained infantry with irregular cavalry numbering around 11,000 in 1767, demonstrated tactical flexibility through rapid raids and encirclements.^[52] As a strategist, Hyder excelled in exploiting geopolitical opportunities and terrain advantages during the Anglo-Mysore conflicts. In the First Anglo-Mysore War (1767–1769), he conducted swift cavalry incursions into British-held territories, nearly capturing Madras and compelling the Treaty of Madras in 1769, which restored the pre-war status quo.^[20] Hyder's diplomacy played a crucial role, as he allied with the French to secure technical aid and neutralized potential rivals like the Marathas through subsidies, while maneuvering against the Nizam of Hyderabad. In the Second Anglo-Mysore War (1780–1784), he capitalized on British commitments in the American Revolutionary War, launching invasions into the Carnatic with up to 90,000 troops, employing guerrilla tactics, fortified defenses, and rocket barrages to inflict defeats such as at Pollilur in 1780, though the conflict concluded with the Treaty of Mangalore in 1784 after his death.^[20] ^[12] These approaches underscored Hyder's emphasis on mobility, alliances, and technological asymmetry to counter British naval and logistical superiority.^[44]

Tipu Sultan: Innovations, Policies, and Debates

Tipu Sultan, who ruled Mysore from 1782 to 1799, advanced military technology through the development of iron-cased rockets, which featured gunpowder-filled metal tubes with stabilizing fins for improved accuracy and range of up to 2 kilometers.^[53]^[54] These were deployed in brigades, with 200 rocket artillerymen assigned per unit across 16 to 24 formations, enabling effective psychological and material impact against British forces during the later Anglo-Mysore Wars.^[55] He also reorganized the infantry along European lines, amassed a large arsenal including 300,000 firelocks and 22,000 cannons by 1786, and established a modern navy to support coastal defenses.^[56]^[57] In administration, Tipu implemented a centralized system that supplanted feudal structures, introduced a new coinage with Arabic inscriptions, a lunar calendar (Mauludi), and a land revenue assessment based on direct collection to eliminate intermediaries, aiming for efficiency amid wartime pressures.^[58]^[59] Economically, he promoted sericulture by importing silkworm eggs and expertise from China and France, establishing factories in regions like Srirangapatna, which laid foundations for Karnataka's silk industry and reduced dependence on imports.^[60]^[61] These measures reflected pragmatic efforts to bolster state revenue and self-sufficiency, though constrained by ongoing conflicts. Tipu's religious policies diverged from his father Hyder Ali's relative inclusivity, as he curtailed Hindu appointments in military and administrative roles and pursued aggressive Islamization in conquered territories.^[62] In Malabar and Coorg, campaigns from 1788–1790 involved documented forced conversions, temple destructions (including edicts targeting Kerala temples), and massacres, such as the circumcision or execution of thousands of Nairs and Kodavas, with local records estimating 70,000–80,000 conversions or deaths in Malabar alone.^[62]^[63] While he granted lands to some Hindu temples per inam registers, these appear exceptional against broader patterns of coercion, including the reported suicide of 3,000 Brahmins to evade conversion.^[59]^[64] Historiographical debates portray Tipu as either an anti-colonial innovator or a religious fanatic, with early British accounts emphasizing tyranny to justify conquests, yet corroborated by indigenous sources like Coorg and Kerala gazetteers detailing atrocities.^[65]^[66] Nationalist narratives since independence have elevated him as a secular freedom fighter, often downplaying persecutions as wartime necessities or British fabrications, while regional perspectives in Karnataka's Kodagu and Kerala view him as a despoiler responsible for demographic shifts through conversions.^[67]^[68] Recent scholarship, such as Vikram Sampath's analysis, credits administrative foresight but substantiates intolerance via primary edicts and survivor testimonies, rejecting revisionist sanitization amid politicized commemorations.^[69]^[5] Causal factors include jihad rhetoric in his correspondence and strategic alliances with France, underscoring policies driven by Islamic revivalism rather than mere realpolitik.

British Leaders: From Defeats to Victory

In the Second Anglo-Mysore War, British forces under Colonel William Baillie's command suffered a catastrophic defeat at the Battle of Pollilur on 10 September 1780, where Tipu Sultan's cavalry and rocket artillery annihilated a detachment of approximately 3,800 troops, resulting in over 2,000 casualties and the capture of survivors, marking one of the East India Company's worst losses in India up to that point.^[23] Similarly, Major John Braithwaite's force was surrounded and compelled to surrender in March 1782 after a prolonged engagement, further highlighting vulnerabilities in British detached operations against Mysore's mobile warfare.^[24] These reverses stemmed from inadequate scouting, overextended supply lines, and underestimation of Mysorean iron-cased rockets and guerrilla tactics, which disrupted conventional European formations. The tide began to turn with the appointment of Lieutenant-General Sir Eyre Coote as commander-in-chief in Bengal, who assumed field command in Madras by June 1781. Coote decisively defeated Hyder Ali's army of around 40,000 at the Battle of Porto Novo on 1 July 1781, with his 8,000-strong force enduring intense heat and ammunition shortages to repel multiple assaults, inflicting heavy casualties while losing fewer than 500 men.^[70] He followed this with victories at the Battle of Arni on 3 August 1781 and the Battle of Sholinghur on 27 September 1781, where disciplined infantry squares and bayonet charges countered Mysorean cavalry charges, restoring British morale and forcing Hyder into defensive postures despite ongoing French naval support. Coote's emphasis on maintaining cohesive formations and foraging locally mitigated earlier logistical failures, though his death in 1783 and Hyder's in 1782 led to a stalemate concluded by the Treaty of Mangalore in 1784.^[71] During the Third Anglo-Mysore War, initial invasions under Lieutenant-General William Medows in 1790 stalled against Tipu Sultan's counteroffensives, prompting Governor-General Lord Cornwallis to take personal command of a 20,000-man army in 1791. Cornwallis captured Bangalore on 21 February 1791 after bypassing fortified positions and won key engagements like the Battle of Arikera on 26 May 1791, where British artillery and sepoys repelled Tipu's larger host, compelling the surrender of significant Mysorean artillery.^[31] Advancing to besiege Seringapatam in February 1792 with allied Nizam and Maratha contingents totaling over 50,000 troops, Cornwallis forced Tipu to cede half of Mysore's territory and pay 3.6 million rupees in indemnities under the Treaty of Seringapatam on 18 March 1792, though supply strains prevented a full assault. His strategy of coalition warfare and fortified camps addressed prior isolation of British forces.^[23] The Fourth Anglo-Mysore War culminated British ascendancy under Governor-General Richard Wellesley, who orchestrated a coalition with the Nizam of Hyderabad and Marathas against Tipu in 1799. Lieutenant-General George Harris commanded the primary Madras army of 22,000, advancing from Vellore to breach Mysore's defenses at Malavalli on 10 March 1799, where subordinate Arthur Wellesley (future Duke of Wellington) led a flanking maneuver to rout Tipu's forces.^[38] Harris's combined force, bolstered by superior siege artillery and intelligence from defectors, besieged Seringapatam starting 5 April 1799; a coordinated assault on 4 May overwhelmed the garrison, resulting in Tipu's death amid the breach and the collapse of Mysorean resistance, with British losses under 500 against thousands for the defenders.^[37] This victory reflected matured British adaptations, including integrated European and sepoy units, reliable logistics via Bombay and Madras ports, and preemptive alliances that isolated Tipu, securing permanent territorial gains and dismantling Mysore's military innovations.^[72]

Consequences and Legacy

Immediate Territorial and Political Outcomes

The Fourth Anglo-Mysore War concluded with the storming of Seringapatam on 4 May 1799, where Tipu Sultan was killed during the defense of the fortress, marking the effective end of Mysorean resistance. In the immediate aftermath, British forces under Arthur Wellesley secured the capital, leading to the occupation and subsequent partition of Mysore's territories among the victors.^[73] Governor-General Richard Wellesley orchestrated the settlement, directing that approximately half of Mysore's territory be ceded to the British East India Company, the Nizam of Hyderabad, and the Marathas, while the central tableland was designated for restoration to the pre-Hyder Ali Wodeyar dynasty.^[73] The British annexed key coastal and western districts, including Malabar, Kanara, Coimbatore, and Wayanad, enhancing their strategic control over southern India's trade routes and frontiers. The Nizam received eastern territories such as Gooty and Gurramkonda, while the Marathas acquired northern border regions, though they declined some offered lands.^[74] The remaining Mysorean core, centered around Mysore city and Seringapatam, was restored on 30 June 1799 to five-year-old Krishnaraja Wadiyar III of the Wodeyar dynasty, ending the brief Muslim rule established by Hyder Ali. Politically, this restoration was conditioned on a subsidiary alliance, requiring Mysore to fund a British subsidiary force for protection and accept a British Resident at the court to regulate diplomacy and military affairs, thereby subordinating the kingdom to British paramountcy.^[34] This arrangement dismantled Mysore's sovereignty, integrating it into the British sphere of influence and preventing French alliances, while Tipu's family was exiled to Calcutta to neutralize potential claimants.^[74]

Economic Disruptions and Administrative Shifts

The Anglo-Mysore Wars caused profound economic disruptions across southern India, marked by agricultural devastation, trade interruptions, and fiscal burdens from indemnities and territorial cessions. Military campaigns involved scorched-earth tactics and invasions that destroyed crops and infrastructure, contributing to food shortages; notably, the Third Anglo-Mysore War (1790–1792) coincided with a regional famine from 1790 to 1793, where ongoing hostilities exacerbated scarcity and mortality.^[75] The Treaty of Seringapatam (1792) imposed on Mysore a war indemnity of 3.3 crore rupees—equivalent to roughly one-third of its annual revenue—payable in installments, with half due immediately, compelling Tipu Sultan to divert resources from economic initiatives like sericulture and irrigation to debt servicing; failure to pay promptly required surrendering two sons as hostages to the British.^[76]^[34] These terms halved Mysore's territory, curtailing access to fertile lands and ports, which undermined its state-controlled economy reliant on agriculture, textiles, and export commodities.^[34] The Fourth Anglo-Mysore War (1798–1799) amplified these strains, ending with Tipu Sultan's death at Seringapatam and the kingdom's partition: the British annexed coastal districts like Kanara and Malabar, while allies (Nizam of Hyderabad and Marathas) received shares, reducing Mysore's core to about one-quarter of its pre-war extent.^[34] This fragmentation disrupted internal trade networks and revenue streams, as lost territories had supplied key commodities such as pepper, cardamom, and sandalwood; the immediate post-war period saw depopulation from conflict and migrations, further hampering recovery in agrarian sectors that formed over 80% of Mysore's economy under Hyder Ali and Tipu.^[77] Administrative shifts post-1799 transitioned Mysore from Tipu Sultan's centralized, autocratic model—featuring direct state oversight of revenue, new coinage, and a reformed land assessment system—to a princely state under British subsidiary alliance. The Wodeyar dynasty was restored under the five-year-old Krishnaraja Wodeyar III, with Purnaiah (Tipu's former finance minister) as dewan retaining some fiscal efficiencies like periodic surveys and cash-based collections, but sovereignty was curtailed by a British resident enforcing foreign policy and a mandatory subsidy for subsidiary troops—initially 4 lakh rupees annually, later adjusted upward—diverting up to 40% of revenues to military maintenance rather than infrastructure or innovation.^[78]^[57] This arrangement prioritized British strategic interests, standardizing tax payments in cash and integrating Mysore into Company trade orbits, while abandoning Tipu's experimental calendar and monopolies; by 1800, a British commission oversaw boundary settlements and debt liquidation from prior indemnities, embedding colonial administrative norms like district collectors and judicial oversight.^[78] These changes fostered short-term stability but imposed structural dependencies, with revenue extraction geared toward subsidizing expansion elsewhere in India.^[20]

Historiographical Perspectives and Enduring Debates

Colonial-era British historiography framed the Anglo-Mysore Wars as defensive imperatives against the expansionist threats posed by Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan, whose military innovations and alliances with France were depicted as existential dangers to British commerce and allies in southern India. Mark Wilks, in his Historical Sketches of the South of India (1810), utilized captured Mysorean documents and interviews with local elites to narrate Hyder's usurpation of the Wodeyar throne in 1761 as a product of intrigue rather than merit, justifying British interventions as stabilizers of regional order disrupted by Mysore's conquests.^[79] Wilks attributed early British defeats, such as the 1780-1781 routs in the Second War, to tactical errors and divided commands, while crediting ultimate victories to disciplined infantry and naval supremacy that enabled reinforcements and supply lines unattainable by landlocked Mysore.^[79] Post-independence Indian scholarship shifted emphasis toward Hyder and Tipu as indigenous reformers resisting European hegemony, often portraying the wars as precursors to unified anti-colonial struggle. Mohibbul Hasan's History of Tipu Sultan (1951), relying on Persian chronicles and British records, lauds Tipu's administrative innovations—like state-controlled sericulture and a coinage system—as evidence of progressive governance, while interpreting his defeats as outcomes of betrayal by Indian princes allied with Britain rather than systemic military inferiority.^[80] This perspective critiques colonial narratives for bias, arguing they exaggerated Mysore's "fanaticism" to legitimize conquest, though Hasan's work has been faulted for selective emphasis on Tipu's anti-British diplomacy over internal coercive measures.^[5] Enduring debates hinge on Tipu Sultan's religious policies and their implications for assessing Mysore's internal stability amid external wars. Proponents of a tolerant image cite land grants to Hindu temples and retention of Brahmin officials, yet primary evidence—including Tipu's 1788-1792 campaigns in Coorg and Malabar—documents orders for mass conversions, temple demolitions (e.g., over 2,000 in Malabar per local records), and the enslavement or deportation of non-Muslims, affecting tens of thousands.^[5] The 1784 Mangalorean Christian captivity, involving 60,000-80,000 forcibly marched to Seringapatam for conversion or labor, exemplifies this pattern, corroborated by survivor testimonies and Mysorean state papers rather than solely British propaganda.^[81] Scholars like Narasingha Sil contend that minimizing these as wartime expedients ignores Tipu's ideological correspondence with Ottoman and Persian rulers, revealing a ruler prioritizing Islamic consolidation over pragmatic pluralism, which alienated potential Hindu allies and facilitated British divide-and-rule strategies.^[82] ^[5] Military historiography debates whether Mysore's rocket artillery and hybrid cavalry-infantry tactics represented a near-peer challenge thwarted only by British contingencies, or inherent limitations in scalable logistics and command unity. While Hyder's 1767-1769 victories demonstrated effective use of terrain and feints, post-1799 analyses highlight Mysore's fiscal overextension—annual war costs exceeding revenues by 1780s—and dependence on French aid disrupted by European conflicts, contrasting with Britain's global financing and alliance networks that isolated Mysore by 1799.^[79] Recent scholarship questions overstatements of Mysorean "modernity," attributing British ascendancy to causal factors like ironclad discipline forged in European wars and access to Bengal's revenues, rather than mere numerical edges.^[5] These interpretations reflect broader tensions between empirical reconstruction from multilingual archives and ideologically driven legacies, with Indian public discourse often amplifying heroic motifs amid regional political contests.^[82]

References

[1]
The Military Structure during the Reigns of Haidar 'Ali and Tipu Sultan
... Anglo-Mysore wars; many of them were forced to ... 2011. Rukhsana, Parveen. “Military Administration under Tipu Sultan – A Study.” Quarterly Journal of.
[2]
[PDF] Life History Of Tipu Sultan
Oct 6, 2025 · Tipu Sultan successfully defended Mysore in multiple Anglo-Mysore Wars, notably using innovative rocket artillery and guerrilla tactics.
[3]
Mysore at War. The military structure during the reigns of Haidar Ali ...
... Anglo-Mysore Wars added to the sultanate's isolation. The EIC's greatest ... History of Mysore (1399–1799 A.D.), vol. 3, (1766–1799) (Bangalore: Su ...
[4]
[PDF] TYRANT! TIPU SULTAN AND THE RECONCEPTION OF BRITISH ...
This dissertation argues that the figure of Tipu Sultan and the spectacle of the Mysore Wars were a key contributor to shifting British attitudes about empire ...
[5]
Tipu Sultan in History: Revisionism Revised - Sage Journals
Tipu Sultan's Mysore: An economic study. Bombay, India: Popular Prakashan ... The history of Hyder Shah alias Hyder Ali Khan Bahadur and of his son. Tippoo Sultan ...
[6]
Empire of Mysore - Unacademy
From 1399 to 1947, the Wodeyar or Wadiyar dynasty ruled over the ancient Kingdom of Mysore. In 1399, the Wodeyar family established a feudatory principality ...
[7]
History of Wadiyars : Rajput Provinces of India
The Wadiyar dynasty is an Indian Hindu dynasty that ruled the Kingdom of Mysore from 1399 to 1947. The kingdom was incorporated into the Dominion of India ...
[8]
Hyder Ali Biography for UPSC - BYJU'S
In 1761, Hyder Ali assumed the power of Mysore by removing the Prime Minister and making Krishna Wodeyar II, a prisoner. He maintained cordial relations with ...
[9]
Haider Ali (1761-1782) - Modern India History Notes - Prepp
His birth dates range from 1717 to 1722, according to various historical sources. His early years are unknown; after their father was killed in action, he and ...Haider Ali - Early Life · Rise Of Haider Ali · First Anglo-Mysore War...<|control11|><|separator|>
[10]
[PDF] HYDER ALI: THE RISE TO POWER AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ...
Hyder Ali's rise to power and the establishment of the Mysore Sultanate mark a significant chapter in South Indian history. Born around 1720 into a family ...
[11]
https://www.historymarg.com/2023/12/hyder-ali-and-tipu-sultan-eighteenth.html
[12]
Hyder Ali | Research Starters - EBSCO
Hyder Ali was a prominent military leader and ruler of Mysore in southern India during the 18th century, known for his significant role in resisting British ...
[13]
Madras Day: How Madras was founded and why it became Chennai
Aug 22, 2023 · It was on this day in 1639 that the town of Madrasapatnam was purchased by the East India Company (EIC) from local kings.<|separator|>
[14]
Presidencies in British India | Setup, Major Locations, History, & Facts
Sep 22, 2025 · The Madras Presidency In 1640 the East India Company opened a trading post at the fishing village of Madraspatnam (later Madras, now Chennai) ...
[15]
Chennai (Madras) | Silk Roads Programme - UNESCO
The British East India Company first settled in southern India in 1611, but moved to the area of Madras in 1639 in order to be near the established textile ...
[16]
Carnatic Wars, 1st, 2nd & 3rd Carnatic War, Reasons, UPSC Notes
Oct 1, 2025 · The Carnatic Wars resulted in British supremacy in the region, territorial gains for the British East India Company, and increased dependence of ...Fall of Madras · Second Carnatic War 1749-54 · Robert Clive in the Second...
[17]
The British East India Company | American Battlefield Trust
Dec 5, 2023 · The history of the British East India Company encompasses nearly three centuries and reflects Britain's rise to a global power, the expansion of European ...
[18]
Anglo-Mysore Wars: British Conquest of Mysore - UPSC Notes
Nov 27, 2024 · The British contended that many Indian rulers of their time were oppressive leaders who had seized power from legitimate dynasties and rightful owners.
[19]
Anglo-Mysore War in India (1767-99) - NEXT IAS
Nov 12, 2024 · The British began occupying the Northern Circars, fuelling Nizam's ambition to take Mysore from Haider Ali. The Marathas also joined Nizam in ...
[20]
[PDF] THE ANGLO-MYSORE WARS: STRATEGY, DIPLOMACY, AND ...
The Marathas and the Nizam of Hyderabad, two significant regional powers, oscillated between alliance and conflict with Mysore and the British. Their shifting ...
[21]
First Anglo Mysore War (1766-69) - Modern India History Notes
Answer: Hyder Ali played a critical role in resisting British expansion during the First Anglo-Mysore War by employing innovative military strategies and swift ...
[22]
Anglo-Mysore War – Who was Hyder Ali? - BYJU'S
The British, along with the Marathas and the Nizam of Hyderabad declared war on Mysore; Hyder Ali was able to bring the Marathas and the Nizam to his side with ...<|separator|>
[23]
Mysore Wars - Heritage History
The Mysore Wars, fought between 1767 and 1799 were the first and gravest threats to British dominions, after they had established their supremacy in India ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
[24]
Second Anglo-Mysore War (1780-84) - Modern India History Notes
It was the second of four Anglo-Mysore Wars, with the British gaining control of most of southern India as a result. The British did not take part in the 1785 ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
[25]
Second Anglo-Mysore War - GKToday
Hyder Ali forged an alliance with the Nizam of Hyderabad and the Marathas, both of whom also had grievances against the British. In July 1780, Hyder ...
[26]
Second Anglo-Mysore War (1780-1784) - Easy Mind Maps
Feb 15, 2025 · Major Events of the Second Anglo-Mysore War · The British recovered and defeated Hyder Ali at Porto Novo (1781). · They recaptured Arcot and other ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
[27]
THE TREATY OF MANGALORE 1784 (G3b) END OF THE SECOND ...
In 1784 the status quo was restored by the Treaty of Mangalore, but, as we shall see, two more wars were yet to come. The end of the Anglo-Mysore Wars was not ...
[28]
3rd Mysore War - FIBIwiki - Families in British India Society
Nov 6, 2023 · Tipu invaded Travancore on 29 December 1789 and Lord Cornwallis declared the opening of hostilities on 27 January 1790. General William Medows ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
[29]
Anglo-Mysore Wars | Research Starters - EBSCO
Even though Hyderabad withdrew from their alliance with Mysore, Hyder Ali pushed the British back to the city of Madras and forced the British to sign an ...
[30]
[PDF] TIPU SULTAN: A REPRESENTATION OF COURAGEOUSNESS IN ...
Third Anglo-Mysore War (1790-1792). In1784, Treaty of Manglore was between the British and King of Mysore, but Tipu Sultan, the King of Kingdom Mysore showed ...Missing: outcome primary
[31]
Third Anglo-Mysore War (1790-92) - Modern Indian History Notes
Answer: The Third Anglo-Mysore War, fought between 1790 and 1792, was caused primarily by Tipu Sultan's aggression toward the Kingdom of Travancore, a British ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
[32]
Third Anglo-Mysore War - Phersu Atlas
May 1791: In 1791, during the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War, British General Cornwallis defeated Tipu Sultan at Seringapatam. The battle on 15 May forced Tipu to ...
[33]
Charles Cornwallis - World History Encyclopedia
Jul 15, 2024 · Cornwallis also oversaw the third of the Anglo-Mysore Wars (1790-1792), in which he led the East India Company to victory against Tipu Sultan.Fighting The Americans · Capture Of Philadelphia · Southern Campaign & Yorktown<|separator|>
[34]
Anglo-Mysore Wars - Drishti IAS
Jan 25, 2021 · The war was concluded with the Treaty of Seringapatam, 1792. Under this treaty, nearly half of the Mysorean territory was taken over by the ...
[35]
23rd February 1792 Treaty Of Seringapatnam - Shivaji Raje
Feb 23, 2015 · 23-February-1792, The Third Mysore War ended in Tipu Sultan's signing of Peace Treaty dictated by Lord Cornwallis & surrendering his two sons, ...
[36]
https://www.studyiq.com/articles/anglo-mysore-war/
[37]
The Fall of Seringapatam - Warfare History Network
The British resolved to reduce the power of French ally Tipu Sultan during India's Fourth Anglo-Mysore War.
[38]
Storming of Seringapatam - British Battles
The Storming on 4th May 1799 of Tipu Sultan's palace fortress, leading to the death of Tipu Sultan, ruler of Mysore: A key battle in the conquest of South ...Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome
[39]
What was the Fourth Anglo-Mysore War (1798-1799)?
May 4, 2021 · On 08 March, a forward force managed to hold off an advance by Tipu at the Battle of Seedaseer. On 04 May, in the Battle of Seringapatam, broke ...Missing: reliable sources<|separator|>
[40]
Tipu Sultan's war turban - National Army Museum
Tipu Sultan's war ... Tipu's capital, Seringapatam, after a month-long siege. Tipu was killed in the fighting, bringing an end to the Fourth Mysore War (1799).Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome
[41]
How the Mysorean rocket helped Tipu Sultan's military might gain ...
Aug 5, 2018 · “The Mysore rockets of this period were much more advanced than what the British had seen or known, chiefly because of the use of iron tubes for ...
[42]
Tipu Sultan and His Mysorean Rockets, the World's First War Rockets
Oct 26, 2017 · During the Anglo-Mysore wars of the late 1700s, Mysorean rockets were used by Tipu to great effect. Especially during the Battle of Pollilur ( ...
[43]
Story of Hyder Ali of Mysore - From Soldier to Sultan
With superior French artillery and tactical support, Hyder Ali was able to enhance Mysore's military capabilities. Eventually, his increasing influences and ...
[44]
The Art of War of Hyder Ali & Tipu Sultan - Securityworldbd
Mar 20, 2022 · Hyder Ali, was able to use the cavalry to great effect, during the first two Anglo-Mysore wars, harrying and raiding up to the gates of Fort ...
[45]
Hyder Ali: The Thunder Before Tipu — The Warrior Who Shook the ...
He reorganized Mysore's army, hiring French experts, modernizing weaponry ... Hyder Ali was a master of guerrilla tactics and surprise attacks. He ...<|separator|>
[46]
[PDF] Military Modernization Efforts Under Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan - IJFMR
They also played a vital part in the Wareagainst the British colonialists, what with the Mysore army having a contingent of 5.000rocket men, contributing in a ...
[47]
What were the Anglo-Mysore Wars (1767-1799)?
May 4, 2021 · Tipu's army was outnumbered 4:1 in this war. Mysore had 35,000 soldiers, whereas the British commanded 60,000 troops. The Nizam of Hyderabad ...
[48]
Warfare in India, 1450–1850 (Chapter 16) - The Cambridge History ...
Jul 18, 2025 · 24 Kaushik Roy, 'Military Synthesis in South Asia: Armies, Warfare, and Indian Society, c. 1740–1849', Journal of Military History 69 (2005), ...
[49]
Myopia or strategic behavior? Indian regimes and the East India ...
The Company paid its soldiers and officers more regularly, thereby ensuring greater loyalty. It also developed superior systems of military intelligence.1. The ...
[50]
https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110644647-002/html
[51]
Maritime Trade, Seapower, and the Anglo‐Mysore Wars, 1767–1799
Aug 6, 2025 · ... superiority of the EIC (British East India Company) was an important factor in causing the British supremacy. 97 Inter-state rivalries and ...
[52]
Rethinking the Origins of British India: State Formation and Military ...
Aug 10, 2025 · Historical Journal, 19(2), 1976, pp. 375-404... 6. Indian spheres ... 1767, Haidar Ali's forces, include 11,000 irregular cavalry.
[53]
Unveiling the Story of Tipu Sultan: The Father of War Rockets
Oct 12, 2023 · Men in Tipu's army created rockets that were made of metal tubes filled with gunpowder and were equipped with stabilizing rods at the rear.
[54]
Tipu's Mysorean Rocket: The Remarkable Tale Of The World's First ...
Oct 14, 2023 · The Mysorean Rockets, built by Tipu Sultan in the 18th century were the world's first iron-cased rockets used in wars and they caused the British Empire, some ...
[55]
Mysorean rockets
Hyder Ali, the 18th century ruler of Mysore, and his son and successor, Tipu Sultan used them effectively against the British East India Company. Their ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[56]
Elephants, Rockets, and Tiger Statecraft: Tipu Sultan the Moderniser
Jun 22, 2025 · By 1786, Tipu's inventory contained 300,000 firelocks, 22,000 pieces of cannon, 11,000 horses, and some 700 elephants. Most extraordinarily, ...
[57]
[PDF] Tippu Sultan's Period was a Revolutionary Changes in the Mysore ...
He deployed the rockets against advances of. British forces and their allies during the Anglo-Mysore Wars, including the Battle of Pollilur and Siege of ...
[58]
The Administrative Innovations in Mysore Under Haidar Ali and Tipu ...
Nov 7, 2023 · The land revenue reforms implemented by Haidar Ali and Tipu Sultan represented some of the most progressive administrative innovations of their ...
[59]
Tipu Sultan | Life, Indian Resistance, Anglo-Mysore Wars, & Rule of ...
Oct 1, 2025 · In 1789, however, he provoked British invasion by attacking their ally, the raja of Travancore. Thus began the Third Anglo-Mysore War (1790–92).
[60]
Silken dreams of a Sultan - Deccan Herald
Sep 22, 2014 · Following is the verbatim instruction Tipu Sultan sent to officials about the development of sericulture, “Our economic and commercial policies ...
[61]
A sultan's silken dreams - Down To Earth
Nov 18, 2015 · The sultan laid the foundations of the silk industry in Karnataka, especially in the southern part of the state.
[62]
The Religious and Foreign Policies of Tipu Sultan - HISTORY MARG
Tippu Sultan discontinued the practice of appointing Hindus in different administrative and military jobs as practiced by his father, Hyder Ali Khan, in the ...
[63]
RELIGIOUS INTOLERANCE OF TIPU SULTAN - Voice of Dharma
Tipu Sultan entered the fort and offered to spare their lives, provided they accepted conversion to Islam. The unfortunate lot of 2000 Nairs were then forced to ...
[64]
[PDF] religious philosophy of tipu sultan - EA Journals
Tipu's attempt at forced conversion leading to the alleged suicide of 3,000 Brahmins to escape it, as noted by a Sanskrit scholar of Calcutta University ...
[65]
Was India's Tipu Sultan a hero or a despot? - BBC News
Jan 28, 2014 · He is famous for fighting the British - but was he a hero, or a villain? ... history Tipu Sultan: The Tyrant of Mysore. He, and others, argue ...
[66]
As Known In Kerala - Tipu Sultan Villain Or Hero? An Anthology
Tipu Sultan of Mysore was a fanatic Muslim tyrant who was responsible for the destruction of hundreds of Hindu temples, large-scale forcible conversion of the ...Tipu Sultan · Death of Tipu Sultan · Tipu's Fanaticism · Result of Tipu's Invasion...
[67]
Tipu Sultan: Hero or Villain? Resurgence of the Debate - NewsClick
Aug 6, 2019 · At the same time, as communalism strengthens its roots in Karnataka, he is being presented as an anti-Hindu tyrant. Recently, while Congress ...<|separator|>
[68]
TIPU'S MASSACRES AND FORCED ISLAMIC CONVERSIONS TO ...
Dec 24, 2021 · The massacre of Hindus, large scale conversion into Islam especially Hindus of Kerala and Kodavas from Coorg are well documented in various literature.
[69]
“Tipu Sultan: The Saga of Mysore's Interregnum” by Vikram Sampath
Oct 16, 2025 · Tipu's administrative reforms, his attempts at modernising the army, his curious experiments with the Mauludi calendar, all are given their due.<|separator|>
[70]
Battle of Porto Novo - FIBIwiki
Mar 12, 2021 · British victory. Combatants. East India Company · Kingdom of Mysore. Commanders. Lt Gen Sir Eyre Coote · Hyder Ali. Strength. 8,476, 40,000.
[71]
Last Battle Between Hyder Ali and Sir Eyre Coote
Oct 26, 2020 · During the second Anglo-Mysore war, Hyder Ali was defeated by the British General, Sir Eyre Coote, in three consecutive battles at Porto Novo, ...
[72]
An Account of His Majesty's De Meuron Regiment Chapter 6
At the commencement of the Anglo-Mysore War 1799, three companies of the De Meuron Regiment under Major HD de Meuron-Motier were stationed at Tripassore.Missing: reliable | Show results with:reliable
[73]
Wellesley's Settlement of Mysore, 1799 - jstor
Meanwhile at Seringapatam, the partition of the country was being arranged ... The treaty in its final form was signed in Seringapatam on the. 22nd June ...
[74]
Tipu Sultan and Anglo-Mysore Wars (1767-1799) - CivilsDaily
Jul 18, 2025 · Alliance Against Mysore: British, Marathas, and Nizam formed a coalition against Haidar Ali. Diplomatic Victory: Haidar neutralized the Marathas ...Missing: immediate Hyder<|separator|>
[75]
Mughal Decline to Early British Rule: c.1707 to c.1821
The famine of 1790–93 coincided with the third Anglo-Mysore war, and the food crisis of 1803–04 was aggravated by fighting between the Marathas and the British.
[76]
Tipu's treaty, as reported in 1792 - The Hindu
Mar 15, 2012 · Following the treaty, Tipu had to cede half of his dominion and pay 3.3 crore sicca rupees in pagodas, or gold mohurs, or its worth in gold or ...<|separator|>
[77]
British Conquest Of Mysore: The Rise And Fall Of Haidar Ali And ...
Jan 10, 2025 · British colonial expansion led to Haidar Ali and Tipu Sultan challenging their dominance, resulting in the intense Anglo-Mysore Wars.
[78]
Subsidiary Alliance System and Anglo Mysore Wars - GK Chronicle
Administrative Structure · Revenue Administration ... The second one to sign was Mysore state after completion of the fourth Anglo Mysore war in 1799.Missing: changes | Show results with:changes
[79]
Historical sketches of the South of India in an attempt to trace the ...
Jun 5, 2020 · Historical sketches of the South of India in an attempt to trace the history of Mysore ... Vol 1. by: Wilks, Mark. Publication date: 1989. Topics ...
[80]
History Of Tipu Sultan : B. A. Hasan Mohibbul - Internet Archive
Oct 23, 2020 · History Of Tipu Sultan Source: Digital Library of India Scanning Centre: Allama Iqbal Library, University of Kashmir Source Library: Sp College, Srinagar
[81]
the captivity of the cañara christians under tipu sultan - jstor
a hundred thousand people were carried as captives to Mysore and converted to Islam. The Chrisitans call this even the Great Captivity1.
[82]
Tipu Sultan in History - Narasingha Sil, 2013 - Sage Journals
Tipu Sultan emerges from his hallowed historiography as an ambitious, courageous, albeit headstrong, impetuous, and short-sighted autocrat.