Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Baton round

A baton round, also known as a , is a rigid cylindrical kinetic impact typically constructed from high-density or rubber, designed to deliver non-penetrating blunt force trauma at velocities exceeding 200 feet per second when fired from dedicated 37mm or 40mm grenade launchers for the purpose of incapacitating individuals or dispersing crowds in or military operations. Originating from British Ministry of Defence research in response to escalating civil disturbances, the baton round was developed in the late as a purportedly safer alternative to live or earlier rubber projectiles, with initial deployment occurring in in August 1970 during efforts. Although engineered to minimize lethality through reduced penetration compared to standard bullets, baton rounds have demonstrated substantial capacity for causing penetrating injuries, permanent disabilities, and death, particularly to the head, , or eyes; peer-reviewed analyses of global usage document at least 53 fatalities—including 26 children—and over 1,400 injuries from kinetic impact projectiles of this class, with head and neck trauma accounting for nearly 18% of cases and leading to outcomes such as blindness in dozens of instances.

Definition and Types

Overview and Purpose

A is a , typically a rigid cylindrical munition made from , , or composite materials, fired from , , or dedicated less-lethal weapons to deliver non-penetrating blunt force . Unlike traditional bullets, it relies on transfer upon to incapacitate targets rather than tissue penetration or fragmentation, with common calibers including 37mm, 40mm, or 1.5-inch variants. The aims to replicate the effects of a handheld baton strike from standoff distances, typically 5 to 50 meters depending on the specific round and launcher. The primary purpose of baton rounds is to enable , corrections personnel, or units to achieve temporary incapacitation or behavioral influence in crowd control, suppression, or against non-compliant subjects, serving as an intermediate force option between verbal and lethal firearms. By causing intense localized pain, muscle disruption, or disorientation without intending lethality, these rounds seek to enforce compliance while reducing the immediate risk of fatality compared to live ; official protocols emphasize (skip-firing off surfaces) or targeting large muscle groups to minimize injury severity. Empirical assessments confirm their role in lowering overall mortality rates in high-threat scenarios, though protocols stress training to avoid head, , or thoracic shots due to elevated risks. Despite the "less-lethal" classification, baton rounds have documented capabilities for severe trauma, including fractures, organ damage, and rare fatalities, particularly at close range (<5 meters) or with direct body hits, as evidenced by injury pattern analyses from deployments. This underscores their positioning not as risk-free tools but as calibrated alternatives where lethal force would otherwise be warranted, with effectiveness hinging on operator judgment and environmental factors.

Variations and Materials

Baton rounds encompass several variations designed to deliver kinetic impact while minimizing , with material choices influencing , deformation upon impact, and injury profiles. Rubber baton rounds, often propelled from 40mm launchers, feature projectiles composed of , sometimes incorporating multiple rubber elements within a single for dispersed patterns and reduced accuracy to discourage aimed shots at individuals. Plastic baton rounds, introduced to supersede early rubber variants, utilize (PVC) as the primary material, forming a cylindrical or baton-shaped that enhances flight over softer rubber due to its rigidity. Foam and sponge baton rounds employ compressible cellular materials, such as high-density sponge or , to absorb energy on contact and limit , with examples including 40mm cartridges housing three foam projectiles launched via for consistent velocity. Wooden baton rounds, less common in modern inventories, consist of projectiles encased in multi-projectile casings, providing a harder surface akin to early non-lethal designs but with higher to targets. Advanced formulations, as detailed in for less-lethal projectiles, incorporate polyurethane-based thermoplastics with International Rubber Hardness Degrees (IRHD) of 85 to 95 and masses around 90 to 100 grams, optimizing for controlled deformation without fragmentation. Bean bag rounds represent a pouch-style variation, comprising a fabric filled with rubber pellets, lead shot, or composite granules, which flattens on to distribute over a broader area compared to rigid types. These materials—ranging from elastomers and polymers to natural composites—are selected for their ability to transfer without consistent , though empirical data from field use indicates variability in outcomes based on range and target .

Historical Development

Origins in the 1970s

The baton round, initially developed as the "Round, Anti-Riot, 1.5-inch Baton," emerged in 1970 from the British Ministry of Defence as a kinetic impact for riot suppression during the escalating violence of in . This rubber-sheathed cylindrical munition, approximately 40 mm in diameter and weighing around 32 grams, was engineered to replicate the blunt-force effect of a handheld at extended ranges of up to 50 meters, fired from modified 37mm gas gun launchers or shotguns to minimize penetration while dispersing crowds without resorting to lethal firearms. The design prioritized transfer over fragmentation, with velocities typically between 70-100 m/s, aiming to cause temporary incapacitation through and bruising rather than permanent harm. First operational deployment occurred on August 2, , by units in , targeting rioters in urban disturbances where stone-throwing and petrol bombs posed risks to . By the end of , over 1,000 such rounds had been fired, establishing baton rounds as a of counter-insurgency tactics amid widespread civil unrest that claimed hundreds of lives annually. Initial protocols mandated ground-level aiming to projectiles toward legs, theoretically reducing upper-body impacts, though real-world application often deviated due to chaotic conditions. Early performance data highlighted limitations, including inconsistent against determined aggressors and unintended from direct hits, with at least one documented case of a fatality in 1972 prompting scrutiny. In response, by 1973, rubber variants were phased toward plastic-cased successors like the L1A1 PVC baton round, which featured a rigid core for improved and reduced tumbling in flight, though retaining similar and via black charges. This reflected iterative to balance efficacy against injury risks, informed by field reports from over 100,000 rounds expended by 1975.

Evolution and Key Milestones

Following the initial deployment of rubber projectiles in 1970, baton round technology evolved toward designs that prioritized controlled delivery to reduce risks of penetration and injuries. In 1973, British security forces introduced the L5 plastic baton round, a 37mm or 40mm cylindrical projectile composed of sintered (PVC) weighing approximately 40 grams, specifically engineered as a replacement for after reports of severe head from unpredictable bounces. This milestone marked a shift to baton-shaped munitions intended for aimed discharges at lower body extremities from distances of 10 to 50 meters, with the elongated designed to tumble on impact and disperse force laterally rather than concentrate it. Refinements continued through the and , culminating in variants like the L5A7, which incorporated minor adjustments to projectile density and launcher compatibility for improved stability in flight. These iterations were extensively fielded by the Royal Ulster Constabulary in , where approximately 125,000 baton rounds—predominantly plastic—were expended between 1970 and 2005, prompting ongoing evaluations of ballistic performance amid documented cases of unintended lethality. By the late , design emphases included velocity attenuation to limit , addressing empirical observations that higher-speed impacts exceeded non-penetrative thresholds. A pivotal advancement arrived in 2001 with the L21A1 short-range baton round, which superseded the L5A7 series across forces through integration of smokeless, flashless charges that minimized operational signatures while enabling precise low-velocity delivery (around 70-80 m/s). This update, authorized for mainland British police use beyond contexts, represented a technological leap in reducing visual cues for rioters and enhancing tactical discretion, though subsequent analyses questioned its risk profile relative to predecessors due to retained mass and characteristics. Further global adaptations in the incorporated materials, such as foam-tipped or air-cushioned variants, to modulate , reflecting iterative responses to forensic data on from prior generations.

Deployment in Specific Conflicts

Baton rounds, initially developed as rubber projectiles, were first deployed by British security forces during the on August 2, 1970, in response to rioting in , marking their inaugural use against civilians in a conflict setting. Over the period from 1970 to 1989, more than 125,000 such rounds were fired, predominantly in and , with security forces citing their necessity for crowd dispersal amid . These deployments resulted in at least 17 fatalities, including children, often from head or chest impacts at close range, prompting criticism for their lethality despite intended non-lethal design. Rubber baton rounds were phased out in Northern Ireland by late 1975 due to safety concerns, replaced by plastic variants intended to reduce penetration risks, though plastic rounds continued to cause deaths, with 16 confirmed killings by such munitions during the Troubles. British policy authorized their use only beyond 20 meters against identified threats, but investigations revealed frequent violations leading to unintended casualties, including a 10-year-old boy killed in 1982. By the 1980s, amid ongoing unrest, deployments persisted intermittently, contributing to over 3,500 total deaths in the conflict but highlighting baton rounds' role in escalating tensions due to their injury patterns. In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, baton rounds—often rubber-coated metal projectiles—have been employed by since the 1980s during intifadas and border protests, particularly along the Gaza Strip perimeter. A 2017 analysis of data from 2000 to 2014 documented 1,984 injuries from rubber bullets in the and , with a 3% fatality rate among the wounded, underscoring their capacity for severe harm including eye trauma and organ damage. During the 2018-2019 Great March of Return protests in , thousands of baton rounds were fired to suppress demonstrators approaching the border fence, resulting in documented cases of permanent disabilities and at least five deaths attributed to these munitions. Hong Kong police revived baton round usage in decades during the 2019 anti-extradition protests, firing them alongside on June 12, 2019, to disperse crowds near legislative buildings, the first such application since the riots. Over the ensuing months, were deployed in multiple clashes, including sieges at universities, injuring hundreds and drawing scrutiny for excessive force, with protesters reporting pellet scatter exacerbating wound risks. Official reports indicated over 10,000 rounds expended by late 2019, correlating with a spike in eye injuries and contributing to eroded public trust in policing amid the unrest.

Technical Specifications

Projectile Design and Propulsion

The baton round projectile is engineered as a kinetic impact munition, typically featuring a cylindrical or baton-shaped body designed to deliver blunt force trauma without penetration, with diameters standardized at 40 mm to fit common grenade launchers. Materials commonly include solid rubber for single or multiple projectiles, achieving weights around 1.10 (30.8 ) per rubber baton with dimensions of 1.00 in height and 1.40 in . Wooden variants consist of multiple (e.g., three) batons encased in a sabot system, promoting dispersion for area denial, while foam or sponge designs incorporate compressible materials like foam rubber ogives with plastic rotating bands for , yielding weights of approximately 60 and overall round weights of 100 . These constructions prioritize deformation on to reduce , though rigidity in wood or rubber can vary outcomes based on and . Propulsion relies on a charge, often nitrocellulose-based, contained within a 4.8-inch casing compatible with 40 mm launchers such as the M203 or dedicated less-lethal systems. This generates muzzle velocities around 260 (79 m/s) for wooden rounds, ensuring while minimizing over-penetration risks at distances beyond 5 meters. Single-impact rounds employ similar smokeless loads for point-of-aim accuracy, enhanced by from rifled or finned sabots that impart rotation during launch. Multiple-baton configurations use the same powder to achieve tighter patterns and consistent velocities compared to smaller-caliber analogs, with designs incorporating or for reliability in adverse conditions. Launch systems emphasize shoulder-fired delivery to maintain operator control, with quantities calibrated to limit maximum ranges to 50-100 meters for safety.

Ballistics and Range Considerations

Baton rounds, propelled by low-energy or black powder charges, exhibit muzzle velocities typically ranging from 70 to 100 meters per second (230 to 330 feet per second), depending on the variant and launcher caliber. For instance, 40 mm rubber rounds achieve approximately 79 m/s, while variants reach up to 99 m/s. These velocities result in kinetic energies on that scale with —often 20 to 40 grams for cylindrical or -shaped munitions—but diminish rapidly over distance due to air resistance and . The ballistic trajectory of baton rounds follows a pronounced parabolic , influenced by their relatively low initial velocity and the absence of high-stabilizing in most launchers (e.g., 37 mm or 40 mm launchers). , achieved through rifled barrels or finned designs in some models, mitigates tumbling and improves accuracy, but drop remains significant beyond 20 meters, often exceeding 1 meter at 50 meters under (9.8 m/s²). Environmental factors such as wind and temperature further degrade predictability, with crosswinds deflecting lighter foam or sponge projectiles more than denser rubber variants. Effective range for direct fire is generally limited to 5 to 40 meters to balance incapacitation with reduced risk, as impact energy peaks at closer distances and accuracy falls off sharply thereafter. Manufacturer guidelines specify minimum safe distances of 10 to 20 meters for skip-fire techniques, where the bounces off the ground to diffuse energy, versus direct fire at 30 to 60 feet for in crowd control. Maximum theoretical range can exceed 100 meters, but practical deployment avoids this due to uncontrolled bounce and minimal .
TypeMuzzle Velocity (m/s)Effective Range (m)Notes
40 mm Rubber Baton799–18 (direct fire optimal)Suitable for medium-range crowd dispersal; higher risk below 9 m.
40 mm Foam Baton991.5–37Spin-stabilized; used for targeted impact with velocity decay.
37 mm Multiple Foam~91Skip fire preferred; up to 20Lower velocity for reduced penetration; ground bounce mandatory in some protocols.

Operational Use

Protocols in Law Enforcement

agencies deploy baton rounds as part of a graduated use-of-force , positioning them between verbal commands and lethal firearms for scenarios involving active or imminent threats to officers or bystanders. Protocols their use only when lesser measures prove ineffective, targeting individuals who pose a specific danger rather than crowds indiscriminately. Verbal warnings must precede deployment unless circumstances render them impractical, such as in rapidly escalating situations. Officers are required to justify each use through incident reporting, with immediate medical assessment for impacted individuals. Aiming directives prioritize safety by restricting shots to peripheral body areas, such as the lower , thighs, or large muscle groups, while prohibiting impacts to the head, face, , , chest, or to avert risks of fractures, organ damage, or fatality. For single-target variants like 40 mm foam baton rounds, minimum engagement distances typically range from 5 to to ensure projectile stability and reduce penetration risks, with preferred over skip-firing except in designated crowd dispersal modes. Multiple or rapid-succession shots are forbidden, as are automatic firing mechanisms, to limit cumulative . Training protocols emphasize certification in weapon handling, ballistic trajectories, physiological effects, and de-escalation integration, often requiring annual recertification and scenario-based simulations. The guidelines stress equipping officers with knowledge of vulnerabilities in protected groups, such as the elderly or pregnant individuals, and prohibiting use against non-violent protesters or in modes that could cause disproportionate harm. In practice, agencies like the limit deployment to certified personnel and specify skip-firing techniques for non-lethal foam rounds in group settings, fired 5-10 feet ahead of advancing crowds at 10-50 feet range. Post-incident reviews assess compliance to refine tactics and mitigate liability.

Deployment Scenarios

Baton rounds are deployed in operations primarily for during riots, protests, or unlawful assemblies where participants exhibit violent behavior or fail to disperse after warnings, aiming to create temporary incapacitation without lethal intent. For instance, 37mm launchers dispersing multiple baton rounds toward the ground in front of advancing crowds are used to enforce dispersal orders in such scenarios. In individual targeting situations, baton rounds address uncooperative or actively resistant subjects at ranges of 10 to 50 feet, such as barricaded individuals or those posing an immediate threat but not warranting , allowing officers to maintain distance while delivering blunt impact to compel compliance. These deployments occur when verbal commands, physical presence, or other less-lethal options like tasers have failed, prioritizing officer safety in dynamic confrontations. Correctional settings represent another key scenario, where baton rounds manage inmate disturbances, riots, or extractions from cells involving multiple aggressors, providing a standoff capability to subdue threats in confined spaces without escalating to firearms. Deployment protocols emphasize targeting large muscle groups from safe distances to minimize penetration risks, though operational guidelines stress use only after assessing environmental factors like proximity and cover. In or contexts, such as public order maintenance during violent disorder endangering life or property, baton rounds serve as an intermediate force option between batons and live , often in urban environments with dense crowds.

Effectiveness

Empirical Studies on Incapacitation

A analysis of 373 field deployments of impact munitions, including and rubber rounds totaling 969 projectiles fired, reported that 93% of incidents resolved without to lethal force, implying successful behavioral interruption or incapacitation in the majority of cases. However, 7% of deployments failed to halt resistance, necessitating , with eight deaths attributed to the munitions among cases involving hits. Bruises accounted for 50.9% of documented impact outcomes (398 of 782 hits), while 6.5% produced no visible , highlighting variable physiological effects on target . In a of 4,303 police use-of-force reports from the Sheriff's Office and spanning 2000-2005, impact weapons such as and batons achieved a 54.9% success rate in terminating confrontations on the first application (32 of 71 cases). rounds specifically succeeded in 71.4% of limited deployments (n=7), though another assessment within the dataset pegged 12-gauge at 29% first-iteration effectiveness (2 of 7 cases). These rates lagged behind TASERs (69%) and units (69.8%) but exceeded holds (41.4%), with success rising in subsequent applications up to 81.5% for iterative use. Human effects testing on 40mm nonlethal impact munitions, including baton rounds, confirmed incapacitative potential through inducing and temporary motor impairment at ranges of 5-40 meters, though effectiveness depended on impact velocity (optimal 60-90 m/s) and site ( or limbs preferred over head/neck). Field data underscored reliability issues, with over 80% of nearly 1,000 round deployments causing injuries but not always immediate stoppage, particularly against determined or drug-influenced subjects requiring multiple projectiles (up to four in 90.4% of multi-hit cases). Manufacturers' claims of high incapacitation lack independent validation beyond these operational audits, which prioritize over guaranteed single-shot neutralization.

Comparison to Lethal Alternatives

Baton rounds, as kinetic impact projectiles, primarily incapacitate targets through blunt trauma, inducing , temporary disorientation, and muscle rather than of vital organs, in contrast to lethal which disrupts physiological function via hydrostatic , blood loss, and structural damage to tissues. This mechanistic difference results in lower immediate for baton rounds, often necessitating precise targeting of large muscle groups and potentially multiple s to achieve compliance, whereas center-mass shots with standard firearms reliably neutralize threats by compromising cardiovascular or respiratory systems. Empirical assessments indicate that baton rounds resolve approximately 93% of encounters without to , demonstrating utility in scenarios involving non-compliant but unarmed subjects. Fatality rates underscore the reduced lethality of baton rounds compared to firearms: analyses of over 700 documented impacts from less-lethal munitions report a of about 2.2%, including cases of chest or trauma, versus roughly 46% for conventional in analogous law enforcement applications. A systematic review of global crowd-control incidents from 1985 to 2017 identified 53 deaths (3% of 1,984 affected individuals) attributable to kinetic impact projectiles like baton rounds, predominantly from head, , or thoracic strikes, with muzzle velocities comparable to those of lethal rounds exacerbating risks or with improper angling. These figures reflect baton rounds' design intent to minimize penetration while transferring , though severe injuries occurred in 71% of cases, often requiring medical intervention. In terms of operational effectiveness, baton rounds exhibit variable incapacitation success, with studies noting over 80% of deployments causing some injury but inconsistent deterrence against highly motivated or intoxicated individuals due to reliance on psychological rather than physiological shutdown. Lethal alternatives, by contrast, offer near-certain incapacitation in defensive scenarios but at the cost of irreversible harm, prompting their reservation for imminent threats where less-lethal options fail. Deployment data from U.S. agencies (1995–2000) show baton rounds averted lethal outcomes in suicidal or barricaded subject incidents, yet 7% of cases escalated, highlighting limitations in high-stakes confrontations compared to firearms' decisive .

Injuries and Risks

Types of Documented Injuries

Baton rounds, as kinetic impact projectiles, primarily inflict blunt force trauma but can produce penetrating injuries depending on velocity, range, and impact site, leading to outcomes ranging from superficial wounds to permanent or . A of incidents from 1990 to identified over 1,900 injuries and 53 associated with such projectiles in crowd-control settings, with penetrative wounds accounting for much of the severe morbidity, particularly to the , , and . Empirical data from medical case series emphasize that while designed for reduced , these munitions frequently exceed intended tissue disruption, causing and secondary fractures via energy transfer. Ocular and periocular injuries represent a prominent category, often resulting in irreversible vision loss; documented cases include ruptured globes (38% of eye trauma incidents), hyphaema (40%), or damage (26%), and orbital fractures (38%), with orbital tissues prone to due to their thin bony . Facial impacts from plastic baton rounds have caused severe lacerations, depressed skull fractures, and , as seen in reports of beanbag variants leading to ocular . Thoracic and abdominal strikes document penetrating chest wounds, rib fractures, and internal organ lacerations, including rare but verified cases of cardiac or pulmonary damage from attenuated energy projectiles fired at close range. Extremity injuries, particularly to lower limbs, involve soft-tissue penetration, compound fractures, and requiring , with deeper embedding noted in higher-velocity baton designs. Head and neck traumas, though reduced in some baton iterations compared to earlier , still yield concussions, cervical fractures, and basilar skull disruptions, underscoring the munitions' capacity for lethal kinetic effects despite protocols limiting head targeting.

Factors Influencing Severity

The severity of injuries inflicted by baton rounds, also known as kinetic impact projectiles, depends primarily on the anatomical site of impact, with strikes to the head and neck causing 49.1% of documented deaths and 82.6% of permanent disabilities across reviewed cases involving individuals. Chest and abdominal impacts contribute to 27% of fatalities, often through internal rupture or hemorrhage, while extremity strikes typically result in fractures or damage but rarely prove lethal. Ocular impacts lead to permanent blindness in 84.2% of instances, underscoring the vulnerability of unprotected sensory organs. Historical data from indicate that all 14 recorded deaths from plastic baton rounds stemmed from head or chest , highlighting the causal link between vital area targeting and mortality risk. Firing distance modulates kinetic energy transfer, with closer ranges—below manufacturer-recommended minimums, often under 40 meters—increasing injury severity due to higher retained and reduced deformation upon . At extended distances, inaccuracy heightens the chance of unintended head or neck strikes, though may lessen overall force; studies confirm that deviations from optimal ranges correlate with worse outcomes in 8 analyzed datasets. design further influences severity: rubber-coated metal or composite variants, comprising the majority of severe cases (1219 injuries, 237 disabilities), promote penetration over , exacerbating tissue damage compared to softer attenuated- types that prioritize force dispersion to minimize and depth. Muzzle velocities akin to those of lethal firearms amplify peak force magnitude and rate of onset, directly scaling injury potential via exponential (½mv²). Individual and situational variables compound these effects; suspect intoxication from drugs or elevates required levels due to heightened thresholds, thereby raising likelihood during deployment. Delayed medical , observed in 7 studies, worsens by allowing unchecked hemorrhage or swelling, particularly for thoracic or cranial wounds. Across empirical reviews, 71% of 2135 documented injuries qualified as severe, yielding a 3% and 15% permanent disability rate, emphasizing that while rounds aim for incapacitation without , these factors routinely override intent in real-world applications.

Controversies and Debates

Criticisms from Human Rights Perspectives

organizations contend that baton rounds, categorized as kinetic impact projectiles, pose an unacceptably high risk of severe injury and death, often violating principles of proportionality and necessity in the under . A systematic review of global incidents documented 53 deaths and 300 permanent disabilities among 1,984 individuals struck by such projectiles, with 71% of survivor injuries classified as severe and head or neck impacts responsible for 49% of fatalities and 83% of lasting impairments. These outcomes stem from the rounds' ballistic properties, including potential for penetration and , which exacerbate harm in dynamic crowd environments where precise targeting is infeasible. Amnesty International has highlighted routine misuse against peaceful protesters, reporting dozens of deaths and thousands maimed across more than 30 countries since 1990, with specific patterns of eye trauma—such as over 440 injuries and 30 enucleations in Chile's 2019 protests—indicating deliberate or reckless aiming at vulnerable areas. The organization argues this contravenes the right to life and freedom from cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment, as enshrined in instruments like the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and urges binding global controls on production and deployment to prevent escalation of protest policing into de facto lethal force. In during , plastic baton rounds drew particular scrutiny from and the UK Joint Committee on Human Rights, which noted 17 deaths—including eight children—attributable to their use by security forces from 1971 onward, alongside undetermined thousands of injuries. Critics emphasized the weapons' inaccuracy at range, leading to indiscriminate strikes on bystanders, and the absence of prosecutions for lethal applications, framing them as tools enabling impunity in crowd control. Physicians for Human Rights, in a 2023 analysis, reported 12 deaths, 945 permanent disabilities, and 1,575 ocular from kinetic impact projectiles between 2016 and 2021, attributing disproportionate harm to factors like close-range firing and multi-projectile designs, which undermine claims of reduced and facilitate rights violations during assemblies. The group advocates prohibiting variants with metal components or scatter patterns, aligning with UN guidance that deems such weapons unsuitable for crowds due to inherent risks of unnecessary suffering. Overall, these perspectives prioritize empirical data over manufacturer assurances, arguing for phased restrictions or outright bans to safeguard protesters without compromising public order alternatives.

Defenses from Law Enforcement Viewpoints

agencies maintain that baton rounds, as kinetic impact projectiles, serve as an essential intermediate tool on the use-of-force , bridging the gap between non-impact methods like verbal commands or tasers and lethal firearms. This positioning allows officers to incapacitate resistive or combative subjects at a safe distance, thereby averting scenarios where might otherwise be the only viable option to protect officers or bystanders. A analysis emphasizes that such munitions expand force options for managing resistive individuals, potentially decreasing overall reliance on higher levels of force. Similarly, impact munitions have been credited with resolving encounters involving armed but non-fatally threatening suspects, reducing the incidence of shootings while enabling quicker suspect compliance. Proponents within policing highlight their utility in high-risk environments, such as crowd disturbances or confrontations with emotionally disturbed persons wielding weapons, where close-quarters engagement could escalate dangers to all parties. For instance, bean bag variants of baton rounds are deployed to target large muscle groups, delivering blunt force sufficient to disrupt aggression without penetration, thus preserving officer standoff capability and minimizing exposure to edged or improvised weapons. Empirical evaluations indicate that when skip-fired or indirectly applied, these rounds enhance incapacitation rates—up to higher efficacy in certain engagement methods—while correlating with fewer officer injuries compared to unarmed interventions. Law enforcement training protocols, including those from federal guidelines, stress precise deployment to extremities or torso peripheries, arguing that adherence mitigates severe outcomes and upholds operational necessity in dynamic threats. Critics of restrictions on baton rounds from within policing circles contend that their absence would compel greater use of either physical subdual—heightening assault risks to officers—or immediate firearm deployment, potentially elevating total harm in volatile incidents. Historical deployments during civil unrest, such as 1960s riots, underscore their role in restoring order without widespread lethality, a rationale echoed in modern defenses of 12-gauge bean bag systems as proven deterrents against escalating violence. Overall, agencies assert that baton rounds, when integrated into layered response strategies, contribute to net reductions in fatalities and serious injuries across use-of-force encounters, supported by data on decreased deadly outcomes post-adoption. In response to documented fatalities and severe injuries associated with baton rounds, particularly during in where 17 deaths were recorded between 1970 and 2003, the UK Ministry of Defence implemented operational guidelines in the 1970s restricting their deployment to situations of imminent serious threat, with a minimum firing range of 20 meters and prohibitions on targeting the head or upper body. These rules were codified in military and police protocols, emphasizing last-resort use against specific individuals rather than crowds, though compliance issues persisted, leading to inquiries by the in 2003 that recommended alternatives due to inherent risks. Internationally, the issued guidance in 2020 advising that kinetic impact projectiles like baton rounds should only be used against individuals posing an imminent threat of serious injury, explicitly discouraging their application in crowd-control scenarios or against assemblies, including prohibitions on use near children or in confined spaces. , citing over 1,300 documented injuries and dozens of deaths globally from 2018 to 2022, proposed 25 operational rules in 2023, including mandatory warnings, ground-level aiming to induce , and post-incident investigations, while urging states to prioritize non-projectile alternatives amid evidence of misuse causing permanent disabilities. The government banned exports of baton rounds in 2001, a policy later adopted by the , reflecting recognition of their potential lethality despite less-lethal intent. In the United States, heightened scrutiny followed widespread deployment during 2020 protests, prompting Assembly Bill 48 in 2021, which limits kinetic impact projectiles to dispersal of assemblies only when lesser measures fail and imminent is present, mandating of uses and injuries. Similar restrictions emerged in localities, such as bans on direct firing by some agencies, driven by empirical data showing eye injuries in 15-20% of cases and skull fractures at close . Legal challenges have resulted in substantial settlements, including $27 million by , for protest-related less-lethal injuries by 2025, and $3.5 million awarded against Los Angeles County in 2025 for a deputy's causing brain trauma, underscoring judicial findings of excessive force in non-compliant uses. These outcomes have spurred departmental policy revisions, such as enhanced on and , though standards remain guidelines rather than mandates, with ongoing debates over balancing against risks.

Regulatory and Future Developments

International Standards and Bans

International human rights standards emphasize strict limitations on the deployment of baton rounds, classified as kinetic impact projectiles (KIPs), to ensure compliance with principles of necessity, proportionality, and minimization of harm under instruments such as the UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials (1990). The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) guidance specifies that KIPs should be used only in direct fire against the lower abdomen or legs of a violent individual posing an imminent threat to officers or the public, prohibiting targeting of the head, face, neck, or torso due to risks of fatal or debilitating injuries such as skull fractures or organ damage. Automatic firing modes and multiple simultaneous projectiles are generally banned owing to their inaccuracy and indiscriminate nature, while variants like metal pellets or rubber-coated metal bullets are prohibited for their elevated penetration and injury potential. The Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights guidelines reinforce these restrictions, mandating direct fire solely against the lower body of individuals presenting a substantial risk of escalation to lethal violence, with skip-firing explicitly forbidden to avoid unpredictable trajectories and heightened injury risks. Accuracy must be verified to within a 10 cm diameter at the intended operational range, and use is deemed unlawful against passive resisters, non-violent crowds, restrained persons, or from elevated positions where head strikes become probable. These standards derive from broader obligations under the International Covenant on , requiring states to conduct risk assessments, training, and post-use reviews to prevent arbitrary or excessive force. No binding international treaty imposes a outright ban on baton rounds in law enforcement contexts, distinguishing them from prohibitions on expanding bullets in armed conflicts under the 1899 Hague Declaration. However, advocacy groups such as have called for prohibiting KIPs inherently prone to excessive harm, including small-caliber single projectiles, multiple-pellet ammunition, and those fired from close range or at high velocities, citing documented fatalities and maimings from misuse in protests. These recommendations, while influential in policy debates, remain non-binding and have not resulted in global restrictions, though some states have adopted national moratoriums or phased out specific variants following empirical reviews of injury data. Compliance monitoring by bodies like the UN Human Rights Committee underscores that violations of these standards may constitute under Article 7 of the ICCPR.

Ongoing Research and Innovations

Technological advancements in less-lethal kinetic impact munitions, including rounds, emphasize designs that attenuate upon impact to reduce and damage risks. Research has evaluated compliant nose configurations, such as or materials in 40mm rounds, which deform to distribute force over a larger area, potentially lowering severe probabilities compared to rigid projectiles when targeted at large muscle masses. These designs aim to mimic strikes at distance while minimizing lethality, with human effects assessments indicating reduced torso risks under controlled conditions. Attenuated energy projectiles (AEPs), evolved from earlier rubber and plastic rounds, incorporate deformable components to limit transfer, positioning them as a preferred option in scenarios involving violent individuals . Developments in the have refined AEPs for dissuasion without immediate lethal intent, though post-deployment analyses reveal ongoing challenges with unintended injuries, prompting iterative material testing. agencies, including U.S. departments, have transitioned to 40mm baton systems from legacy 12-gauge variants to enhance stand-off safety and compliance efficacy in confined environments. Broader industry trends project continued innovation through , integrating softer polymers and aerodynamic refinements to balance deterrence with injury mitigation, as evidenced by growth forecasts tied to precision enhancements and reduced collateral effects. These efforts, driven by empirical bioeffects studies and operational feedback, seek to address documented risks like fractures and organ trauma, though comprehensive field data remains limited to support unqualified efficacy claims.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] BATON ROUNDS - Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission
    Mar 6, 2003 · More specifically the baton round is a non-flexible impact projectile (also called a kinetic energy round), launched from a grenade launcher.
  2. [2]
    Death, injury and disability from kinetic impact projectiles in crowd ...
    Kinetic impact projectiles (KIPs), commonly called rubber or plastic bullets, are CCWs that are designed to incapacitate individuals by inflicting pain or ...
  3. [3]
    L2A2 rubber baton round | Imperial War Museums
    The L2A2 baton round was used in riot control situations. Such projectiles were first used in Belfast by the British Army in August 1970.
  4. [4]
    Northern Ireland and the Original Rubber Bullet
    After nine months of research, MoD weapons developers came up with something they believed was better: the rubber baton round.
  5. [5]
    Penetrating injury to the chest by an attenuated energy projectile
    Previous reports of serious injuries and even deaths, caused by hard rubber bullets, have prompted the development of safer, attenuated energy rounds [1-3].
  6. [6]
    Ocular foam round injury: A case report and literature review - PMC
    Jun 18, 2021 · Foam rounds can cause a pattern of vision-threatening ocular trauma similar to that of rubber bullets with the additional risk of chemical injury.
  7. [7]
    CDCR Military Equipment Use Policy (AB 481)
    The 40 mm Wood Baton Round is intended to be skip fired but may be direct fired at the discretion of the operator. It is ideal for correctional facilities where ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Police Equipment and Community Safety Ordinance Impact ...
    Mar 30, 2022 · 40mm sponge baton round. The CTS 4557 has a maximum effective range of 45 meters. The tip of the projectile is a pliable rubber material ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Los Angeles Police Department Less Lethal/Munitions 1850-30986
    Apr 11, 2022 · The term “less lethal” or “Baton rounds, fire!” in itself does not satisfy the pre-use of force warning requirement. d. When determining if it ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Columbus Police Division Directive I. Introduction II. Definitions
    Jun 30, 2023 · Kinetic impact. When the deployment of a projectile is intended to come into physical contact with the body of a specifically targeted subject,.
  11. [11]
    Plastic baton round injuries - PMC - NIH
    The use of plastic baton rounds has decreased and, while a reduction in head injuries is noted, potentially serious chest injuries are still occurring. It is ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Kinetic Impact Projectiles | Lethal in Disguise 2
    Kinetic impact projectiles (KIPs) are bullet- like missiles used in various law enforcement contexts as a deterrent through the pain of impact.
  13. [13]
    Multiple Rubber Baton Round 40mm - Defense Technology
    The round contains three rubber projectiles. It utilizes smokeless powder as the propellant and has more consistent velocities and tighter patterns compared to ...
  14. [14]
    How do rubber and plastic bullets work? - WIRED
    Aug 9, 2011 · In 1972, a shorter, lighter, more accurate version with a PVC outer layer, known as the plastic bullet, was developed, and it was first used in ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Impact Munitions Use: Types, Targets, Effects
    Oct 3, 2004 · Sponge rounds are, as their name implies, projectiles made of a spongy material that can be fired from long range with increased accuracy and.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] 40MM FOAM BATON SMOKELESS POWDER ROUND
    The 40mm Foam Baton incorporates a 4.8-inch casing that contains three (3) foam projectiles. The 40mm utilizes smokeless powder and therefore has more ...
  17. [17]
    [XLS] Specifications
    37/40 mm Wood Baton Round is most widely used as a crowd management tool. The Wood Baton Round contains three hardwood projectiles. It utilizes smokeless ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    US7614349B2 - Less-lethal ammunition projectile - Google Patents
    They are made of polyurethane-based thermoplastics and have oIRHD (ASTM D1415) hardness in the range of 85 to 95 and mass in the range of 90 to 100 g.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Impact Munitions Data Base of Use and Effects
    Photos of Injuries Attached Y/N. Admitted to Hospital for Psychiatric Y/N. Ammo used, Area hit, Distance fired, Injuries & Effectiveness Examples: #1 MK 12 ...
  20. [20]
    Peace Magazine v17n3p13: The Rise and Fall of the Plastic Bullet
    Jul 1, 2001 · Rubber bullet launchers were first used in Northern Ireland in 1970, under rules stipulating that they were to be fired at the ground in front ...
  21. [21]
    Plastic Bullets and the Law, 1990
    Mar 1, 1990 · Plastic bullets, officially called baton rounds, were first introduced as a riot control weapon by the British Army in Northern Ireland in 1973.
  22. [22]
    Safer baton gun aims below the belt - The Scotsman
    Nov 30, 2003 · The use of solid plastic baton rounds by police in Northern Ireland resulted in 17 deaths between 1970 and 1989. But scientific advances mean ...
  23. [23]
    guide to baton rounds — anticop
    May 3, 2025 · Baton rounds or kinetic impact projectiles are bullets that are designed to cause pain in victims. Despite their marketing as “less lethal” ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  24. [24]
    A 50-Year History of Less-Lethal Shootings
    Sep 2, 2022 · This timeline outlines events from before rubber bullets were invented through the 50 years that followed.
  25. [25]
    UK Baton Rnds - General Ammunition Discussion
    May 19, 2018 · Over the period 1970-2005 some 125,000 baton rounds were fired in Northern Ireland. These resulted in 17 deaths, the last being in 1989. This ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    New baton rounds are deadlier, study finds - The Irish Times
    Apr 8, 2003 · Baton rounds introduced in Northern Ireland two years ago are potentially more deadly than the weapons they replaced, a new report claims.
  27. [27]
    On August 2nd 1970, Rubber Bullets were used for the first time by ...
    Aug 2, 2025 · The British developed rubber rounds – the “Round, Anti- Riot, 1.5in Baton” – in 1970 for use against rioters and to disperse protests in the Six ...
  28. [28]
    These are rubber (left) and plastic (right) baton rounds—the so ...
    Jul 27, 2025 · Between 1970 and 1989, over 125,000 were fired, mostly in Belfast and Derry/Londonderry (yes, it's officially both now). At least 17 people were ...
  29. [29]
    'Lodged in skulls': The army's deadly plastic bullets scandal
    Mar 17, 2023 · Sixteen people were killed by rubber or plastic bullets during the Troubles (a seventeenth was killed by a fall after being hit by a bullet).<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    The Troubles | National Army Museum
    The British Government ordered the deployment of troops to Northern Ireland in August 1969. ... The introduction of rubber bullets and plastic baton rounds ...
  31. [31]
    Using Israeli data, study finds rubber bullets cause significant fatalities
    Dec 19, 2017 · About three in every 100 people injured by rubber bullets died as a result, according to a review of recorded casualties published Tuesday.
  32. [32]
    Palestinians face 'explosive' bullets, dangerous gas bombs
    May 3, 2018 · Demonstrators suffer wounds of 'unusual severity' as Israeli forces introduce deadlier weapons in Gaza protests.
  33. [33]
    Hong Kong protests: The flashpoints in a year of anger - BBC
    Aug 30, 2020 · Police fired volleys of tear gas and rubber bullets, used for the first time in decades, into the crowd. In chaotic scenes screaming protesters ...
  34. [34]
    Hong Kong police fire rubber bullets and tear gas at protesters - CNN
    Jun 12, 2019 · Police officers use a water canon on a lone protester near the government headquarters in Hong Kong on June 12, 2019. Anthony Wallace/AFP/Getty ...
  35. [35]
    'Blunt, unplanned': Police tactics under fire in HK protests - Al Jazeera
    Nov 1, 2019 · Amid increasingly violent unrest, experts say trust in force is being undermined and will be hard to rebuild.
  36. [36]
    [PDF] 40MM RUBBER BATON SMOKELESS POWDER ROUND
    PROJECTILE SPECIFICATIONS. Material. Rubber. Height. 1.00 in / 2.54 cm. Diameter. 1.40 in / 3.55 cm. Weight. 1.10 oz / 30.8 g. Part No. 6064. Warranty. 5 years ...Missing: design propulsion mechanism
  37. [37]
  38. [38]
  39. [39]
    [PDF] 37MM RUBBER BATON BLACK POWDER ROUND
    As a pain compliance round for crowd control, it is most suitable at medium to extended ranges of fire, approximately 40 to 75 feet. Inside of 40 feet, this ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Guidance on Less-Lethal Weapons in - ohchr
    Various names are used to describe kinetic impact projectiles, such as rubber bullets, plastic bullets, impact rounds, baton rounds or bean bags.
  41. [41]
    A visual guide to the 'less lethal' weapons used by law ... - Reuters
    Jun 11, 2025 · Police are forbidden from aiming sponge rounds at the head, neck, groin and spine. A member of the Los Angeles Metro Police fires a sponge ...
  42. [42]
    Specialty impact munitions: Design purpose and effect - Corrections1
    Jun 11, 2009 · A typical scenario that often calls for use of such munitions is an uncooperative subject standing at various ranges from 10 to 50 feet away in ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Less Lethal Tactical Decision-Making for the Team Leader
    Verify the facts known and the situation. • Evaluate the environment or terrain. • Use the appropriate police tool and/or tactic. • Use your officer instincts.
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Introduction The purpose of this Training Bulletin is to ... - PowerDMS
    The 40 mm Foam Baton Round is intended to be direct fired. The operator shall be adequately trained in the use of Less Lethal Impact Munitions and have a ...
  45. [45]
    Plastic Baton Rounds - Hansard - UK Parliament
    Jun 19, 1997 · Plastic baton rounds are used by the armed forces in situations of violent disorder where life or property is at risk and their use is judged ...Missing: scenarios | Show results with:scenarios
  46. [46]
    [PDF] penetrating projectiles for public order maintenance and riot cont
    Research by Orbons on the use of plastic baton rounds in Northern-Ireland shows that, quite apart from the characteristics of the weapons, the effects of ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Less Lethal Weapon Effectiveness, Use of Force, and Suspect ...
    From a macro-view, substantially more suspects sustained injury than law enforcement officers. Twenty three percent (23%) of suspects were injured during force ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Human Effects Assessment of 40mm Nonlethal Impact Munitions
    An extensive human effects study was conducted on 40MM nonlethal impact munitions having two different projectile nose configurations: a compliant sponge ...
  49. [49]
    Death, injury and disability from kinetic impact projectiles in crowd ...
    We find that these projectiles have caused significant morbidity and mortality during the past 27 years, much of it from penetrative injuries and head, neck and ...
  50. [50]
    Orbital and ocular trauma caused by the Flash-Ball®: A case report
    The types of injuries were laceration of skin lids (54%), hyphaema (40%), ruptured globe (38%), orbital fracture (38%) and retinal damage (26%). Rubber bullets ...
  51. [51]
    The Flexible Baton TM-12: A case report involving a new police ...
    The purpose of this case report is to describe a new type of police weapon and the injuries sustained by an individual after being shot with it.
  52. [52]
    Penetrating injury to the chest by an attenuated energy projectile: a ...
    Jun 26, 2009 · We present the case of a patient who sustained a penetrating injury to the chest caused by an attenuated energy rubber bullet and review the literature on ...
  53. [53]
    Pattern of rubber bullet injuries in the lower limbs: A report ... - NIH
    Dec 23, 2015 · Rubber bullet injuries with deeper penetration and associated fractures require immediate and aggressive irrigation and debridement. The margins ...
  54. [54]
    Dozens killed and thousands maimed by misuse of rubber bullets
    Mar 14, 2023 · Police misuse of rubber bullets and other less lethal weapons against peaceful protesters is increasingly routine, leading to more injuries ...Missing: baton | Show results with:baton
  55. [55]
    Joint Committee On Human Rights - Nineteenth Report
    Since they were first used in Northern Ireland , rubber and plastic bullets have caused 17 deaths,[242] and a large, though undetermined, number of injuries.
  56. [56]
    Issues: Violence - List of People Killed by 'Rubber' and 'Plastic' Bullets
    Mar 9, 2025 · 17 people were killed in Northern Ireland by security forces using rubber or plastic bullets, including 8 children. Most victims were Catholic.Missing: human rights
  57. [57]
    Lethal in Disguise 2 - PHR - Physicians for Human Rights
    Mar 22, 2023 · KIPs–commonly referred to as “rubber bullets” or “baton rounds”–are bullet-like missiles used by law enforcement and security forces to deter ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  58. [58]
    Law Enforcement Use of Less-than-Lethal Weapons - Congress.gov
    Jan 23, 2025 · Batons are favored LLWs in correctional facilities and crowd control situations, where baton strikes to large muscle groups can effectively ...
  59. [59]
    In defense of the 12-gauge bean bag round - Police1
    Aug 25, 2005 · HISTORY OF BEAN BAG ROUNDS. During the turbulent 1960s, America battled internally over the civil rights movement and our involvement in the ...
  60. [60]
    Police Use of Force: The Impact of Less-Lethal Weapons and Tactics
    Mar 2, 2011 · Advances in less-lethal technology offer the promise of more effective control over resistive suspects with fewer serious injuries. Pepper spray ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] plastic bullets and - Committee on the Administration of Justice
    Plastic bullets or P.V.C. haton rounds as they are officially called were first used in Northern Ireland in February 1973. By the end of 1974 only 258 had been ...
  62. [62]
    25 rules to protect protesters from rubber bullets
    Mar 17, 2023 · Amnesty International has devised 25 rules to try and stop human rights abuses being perpetrated through the improper use of rubber bullets ...Missing: responses | Show results with:responses
  63. [63]
    U.S. Current Trend: Protest Rights Accountability and Reform - ICNL
    California enacted legislation in 2021 that allowed police to only use kinetic impact projectiles and chemical agents to disperse an assembly if a number of ...
  64. [64]
    Austin has paid $27M to settle lawsuits over injuries at protests
    May 30, 2025 · Austin has paid out nearly $30 million to settle lawsuits over police conduct during protests following George Floyd's murder five years ago.
  65. [65]
    A jury has awarded $3.5 million to a man who sued L.A. County ...
    Aug 21, 2025 · BreakingNews: A jury has awarded $3.5 million to a man who sued L.A. County alleging he was injured by a rubber bullet fired by a deputy ...
  66. [66]
    LA Could Face Losing Millions for Police Using Nonlethal Bullets
    Jun 9, 2025 · In March 2023, a federal jury awarded $375,000 to Deon Jones after he was shot in the face with a rubber bullet by an LAPD officer during a May ...Missing: settlements | Show results with:settlements
  67. [67]
    None
    ### Summary of Guidelines on Kinetic Impact Projectiles (Including Baton Rounds)
  68. [68]
    [PDF] KINETIC IMPACT PROJECTILES IN LAW ENFORCEMENT
    Mar 2, 2023 · This 'solid rubber baton' round cartridge was found in the ... claims made by manufacturers regarding its safety and effectiveness.<|control11|><|separator|>
  69. [69]
    Injuries caused by the attenuated energy projectile - NIH
    The attenuated energy projectile (AEP) is the most recent projectile to be developed as a less lethal system for use against violent individuals.
  70. [70]
    OXPD upgrades to 40mm foam baton rounds for less lethal options
    Jul 16, 2025 · OXPD has started replacing older less than lethal platforms such as 12 gauge beanbag rounds to new 40mm launchers with 40mm less than lethal ...
  71. [71]
    Less Lethal Ammunition Market | Global Market Analysis Report - 2035
    Aug 11, 2025 · Less Lethal Ammunition Market was worth USD 1.2 billion in 2025, and is predicted to grow to USD 1.6 billion by 2035, with a CAGR of 2.9%.Missing: ongoing | Show results with:ongoing
  72. [72]
    Rubber Bullet Market Research Report 2033
    The integration of softer polymers and aerodynamic enhancements aims to strike a balance between effectiveness and safety, catering to the evolving needs of end ...