Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Blast radius

The blast radius is the radial distance from the epicenter of an explosion within which the primary effects of the detonation—such as overpressure waves, fragmentation, and thermal radiation—can cause significant structural damage, injury, or lethality to personnel and property.^[1] This concept originates from explosives engineering and is fundamental to assessing the hazardous area surrounding a blast, where the sudden release of chemical energy rapidly compresses the surrounding medium (typically air), generating a supersonic shock wave that propagates outward.^[2] The extent of the blast radius is primarily determined by the yield of the explosive (measured in equivalent mass of TNT), the type of explosive material, and environmental factors such as confinement or openness of the space.^[3] For instance, in open air, blast effects scale according to the cube root of the explosive yield divided by the distance from the detonation point, following empirical models like the Kingery-Bulmash parameters, which predict peak overpressure and impulse at various ranges.^[4] Confinement, such as in urban environments or enclosed structures, can amplify the radius by 2 to 9 times through wave reflections off surfaces, increasing the risk of injury from enhanced pressures.^[2] In practical applications, blast radius estimation guides safety protocols in military operations, mining, and demolition, where thresholds are defined for effects like eardrum rupture (around 5 psi overpressure), lung damage (15-50 psi), or structural collapse (above 5-10 psi for typical buildings).^[5]^[6] For example, a 1 kg TNT equivalent explosion might have a lethal radius of approximately 2-3 meters for personnel based on empirical models, while larger yields, such as those in vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices, can extend this to tens or hundreds of meters depending on the scenario.^[4] These calculations rely on standardized tools and correlations to mitigate risks, emphasizing the nonlinear decay of blast energy with distance.^[4] The term "blast radius" is also used metaphorically in fields such as cybersecurity and cloud computing to describe the potential scope of impact from a failure, breach, or error.

Physical context

Definition and principles

The blast radius refers to the radial distance from the epicenter of an explosion within which destructive effects, including overpressure, fragmentation, and thermal radiation, can cause injury or damage.^[1] This concept originates in military and explosives engineering, where it delineates the zone affected by a detonation to inform safety measures for personnel and infrastructure. At its core, the blast radius is governed by the principles of blast waves, which are supersonic shock fronts generated by the rapid release of energy in an explosion, propagating outward and creating regions of elevated pressure known as overpressure, typically measured in pounds per square inch (psi) or kilopascals (kPa).^[2] Primary effects stem from this overpressure wave, which can shatter windows at thresholds as low as 1 psi and rupture eardrums in approximately 99% of exposed individuals at 5 psi.^[7]^[8] The concept was first formalized through the development of the Hopkinson-Cranz scaling law in the early 20th century.^[9] A key distinction exists between the lethal radius, the distance at which overpressure causes fatal injuries such as lung hemorrhage or organ rupture in humans, and the damage radius, the broader area where structural destruction occurs without guaranteed lethality.^[10] For example, a 500 kg TNT-equivalent bomb has a radius of approximately 11 meters for 15 psi (103 kPa) overpressure, the threshold for lung damage with increasing lethality at higher pressures closer to the epicenter.^[11] In technology and security domains, the term is metaphorically extended to quantify the potential spread of consequences from system failures or incidents.

Calculation and measurement

The blast radius is quantitatively determined using the scaled distance formula, defined as Z = \frac{R}{W^{1/3}}, where R is the distance from the explosion center in meters, W is the explosive yield in kilograms of TNT equivalent, and Z is a dimensionless scaling factor that allows prediction of blast effects across different charge sizes under the Hopkinson-Cranz scaling law.^[9] This cube-root scaling arises from dimensional analysis assuming energy release scales with W, and linear dimensions with W^{1/3}, enabling empirical data from tests with one charge size to predict effects for others at equivalent Z.^[12]^[13] Overpressure models rely on the Hopkinson-Cranz law for air bursts, where peak side-on overpressure P_s decreases with distance according to empirical fits derived from large-scale tests. In the far field (typically Z > 3 m/kg^{1/3}), P_s(r) \approx \frac{k}{r^3}, with k a constant depending on yield, but more accurate predictions use polynomial approximations or tabulated data from the Kingery-Bulmash parameters, which cover incident and reflected pressures for hemispherical surface bursts.^[9] For instance, severe structural damage occurs at approximately 20 psi (138 kPa) incident overpressure, corresponding to Z \approx 1.2 m/kg^{1/3} from these empirical curves.^[11]^[14] Blast parameters are measured using pressure transducers (gauges) positioned at various standoff distances to capture peak overpressure and impulse waveforms during controlled detonations. High-speed photography, often with schlieren or shadowgraph techniques, visualizes shock wave propagation to validate timing and velocity. In modern applications, computational simulations employ finite element analysis (FEA) or empirical models like the CONWEP software, developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which computes air blast loads, fragment trajectories, and structural responses based on Kingery-Bulmash data for military protective design.^[15]^[16]^[12] As an example, consider calculating the blast radius for 5 psi (34.5 kPa) incident overpressure from a 1 kg TNT charge, assuming a hemispherical surface burst. First, identify the scaled distance Z for 5 psi from Kingery-Bulmash empirical curves, which yield Z \approx 2.4 m/kg^{1/3} (interpolated from tabulated data where P_s drops from ~10 psi at Z = 2 to ~1 psi at Z = 10). Since W = 1 kg, W^{1/3} = 1, so R = Z \times W^{1/3} \approx 2.4 meters. This step-by-step derivation uses the scaling law to apply test-derived overpressure vs. Z relations directly to the specific yield.^[4]^[11]

Factors influencing the radius

The blast radius of an explosion is significantly influenced by the characteristics of the explosive material itself. High explosives, which detonate at velocities exceeding 5,000 feet per second (fps), generate stronger shock waves and better fragmentation compared to low explosives that deflagrate at 2,000–3,000 fps and primarily produce heaving effects.^[17] For instance, trinitrotoluene (TNT) has a detonation velocity of approximately 25,000 fps in compositions like Composition B, while plastic explosives like C4, akin to RDX, reach 27,000 fps, leading to more efficient energy release and extended fragmentation zones.^[17] The yield, often expressed in TNT equivalents, scales the radius cubically; higher-yield charges, such as RDX at 1.60 times TNT energy density, expand overpressure zones proportionally, with effects like crater radii increasing as the cube root of the charge weight.^[18] Environmental conditions further modify blast propagation and effective radius. In air bursts, where the charge is elevated above the ground, blast waves couple less efficiently into the soil, maximizing overpressure over wider areas compared to ground bursts that enhance low-level reflections and local ground shock by up to several times due to surface interaction.^[18]^[19] Terrain plays a critical role: urban settings amplify overpressures by 1.5–2 times through building reflections and channeling along streets, extending damage along linear paths while creating shadowed zones with reduced effects, whereas open terrain allows more uniform but less intensified propagation.^[20] Atmospheric factors, including temperature inversions and low relative humidity at ground level combined with light winds under 8 mph, can focus blast waves destructively, increasing propagation distances, while higher humidity or winds above 15 mph dissipate energy more rapidly.^[21] Containment and shielding alter the radial distribution of blast effects. Buried explosions confine the initial energy release, reducing the surface overpressure radius but intensifying seismic and ground shock transmission, with tightly coupled charges producing pressures that dissipate over shorter surface distances—e.g., near-zero at 20 meters for 45 kg TNT equivalents.^[18] Physical barriers, such as concrete slabs or walls, can mitigate effects in shadowed areas by halving the effective radius through absorption and diffraction, though they may reflect waves elsewhere to amplify local peaks.^[18] A notable example occurs in underwater blasts, where the absence of air allows for a gas bubble pulse that accounts for about 70% of the total energy release, compared to air blasts dominated by a 30% shock wave contribution; this pulsation expands the effective damage radius to 2–3 times that of an equivalent air burst by sustaining pressure oscillations and structural loading over longer durations.^[22]

Applications in technology and security

In cloud computing

In cloud computing, blast radius refers to the extent of potential disruption caused by the failure or misconfiguration of a single resource or component, such as how a faulty configuration in one service might cascade to affect dependent systems across an infrastructure.^[23] For instance, a misconfigured Amazon S3 bucket with overly permissive access policies can expose sensitive data not just within a single region but potentially across an entire organization's multi-region deployment, amplifying the scope of unintended data access.^[24] This concept, borrowed from physical explosion dynamics, underscores the importance of designing distributed systems to contain failures and prevent widespread outages.^[25] To minimize blast radius, cloud architects employ strategies like multi-region deployments, which distribute workloads across geographically isolated areas to ensure that a regional failure does not compromise global availability; microservices architecture, which breaks monolithic applications into loosely coupled, independently scalable components; and auto-scaling mechanisms that dynamically adjust resources while isolating faults through techniques such as circuit breakers.^[25] The AWS Well-Architected Framework specifically recommends segmentation via bulkhead or cell-based architectures to limit the impact of failures to a subset of components, thereby reducing the overall scope of disruption.^[26] These approaches promote fault isolation, allowing unaffected parts of the system to continue operating seamlessly. A notable example of a large blast radius occurred during the 2017 AWS S3 outage in the US-EAST-1 region, triggered by a human error in a configuration command that inadvertently removed servers from critical subsystems, leading to cascading failures.^[27] This incident disrupted not only S3 operations like GET and PUT requests but also dependent services including EC2 instance launches, Elastic Block Store volumes, and AWS Lambda functions, affecting numerous customer applications for several hours due to centralized dependencies.^[27] In response, AWS refactored S3 into smaller, independent cells to shrink future blast radii and accelerate recovery times.^[27] More recently, the October 20, 2025, AWS outage in the US-EAST-1 region highlighted ongoing challenges with blast radius. Caused by a DNS resolution failure in DynamoDB endpoints, the issue cascaded to impact services like EC2, RDS, and Lambda, leading to widespread disruptions for customers worldwide dependent on this region. The outage lasted several hours and affected millions of applications, underscoring the need for enhanced multi-region strategies and dependency mapping to contain such failures.^[28]^[29] Cloud teams measure and constrain blast radius using fault injection tools like Netflix's Chaos Monkey, which randomly terminates virtual machine instances in production environments to simulate failures and test system resilience.^[30] By targeting specific subsets of infrastructure, such as individual instances or pods, Chaos Monkey helps quantify impact through metrics like the percentage of affected instances relative to the total fleet—aiming to keep this below thresholds like 1-5% during experiments to validate isolation effectiveness.^[31] This practice enables engineers to iteratively refine architectures, ensuring that injected faults do not propagate beyond intended boundaries.

In cybersecurity

In cybersecurity, the blast radius refers to the potential scope of damage or compromise resulting from a single security vulnerability or breach, encompassing how far an attacker can propagate their access within a network or system. This concept is particularly critical in environments where a single point of failure, such as stolen credentials, enables lateral movement—where adversaries exploit trusted relationships to access additional resources, escalate privileges, or exfiltrate data across interconnected systems. For instance, if an attacker compromises a low-privilege account with overly broad permissions, they may pivot to high-value assets like databases or control systems, amplifying the overall impact of the initial intrusion.^[32]^[33]^[34] To mitigate blast radius, organizations employ strategies rooted in the principle of least privilege, which grants users and systems only the minimum access necessary for their functions, thereby limiting unauthorized propagation. Zero-trust architecture further enforces continuous verification of identities and devices, assuming no inherent trust within the network and requiring explicit authorization for every access request. Network segmentation, including micro-segmentation, isolates workloads and applications to prevent lateral spread; for example, tools like Illumio implement zero-trust segmentation to dynamically enforce granular policies that isolate compromised segments, reducing the potential impact of breaches to specific workloads rather than the entire infrastructure. These techniques collectively shrink the attack surface by containing threats at their point of entry.^[35]^[36]^[37] A prominent example of expansive blast radius occurred in the 2020 SolarWinds supply chain attack, where Russian state-sponsored actors (APT29) inserted malware into the Orion software updates distributed to up to 18,000 organizations, resulting in deeper compromises in approximately 50 high-value targets, including multiple U.S. government agencies such as the Departments of Treasury, Commerce, and Energy.^[38]^[39]^[40] The breach's wide reach stemmed from the trusted nature of the software, allowing undetected persistence and lateral movement for months, leading to espionage and data exfiltration across federal networks. This incident underscored the risks of unsegmented supply chains and prompted enhanced federal directives for vulnerability mitigation. Measuring blast radius often involves identity assessments that quantify the accessible resources tied to individual users or accounts, helping identify over-privileged identities that could enable widespread compromise. Tools like BloodHound, developed by SpecterOps, map Active Directory environments by visualizing attack paths, privilege escalations, and lateral movement opportunities, enabling security teams to calculate the "blast radius" of a compromised credential—such as the number of systems or data repositories reachable from a single account. These assessments prioritize high-impact paths, guiding remediation to enforce stricter access controls and reduce potential exposure.^[41]^[42]

In software reliability

In software reliability, blast radius refers metaphorically to the scope of impact from a failure, such as a bug or deployment error, measuring how widely it can propagate through interconnected components and affect system availability or functionality.^[43] This concept highlights the risks in tightly coupled architectures, where a single fault can cascade uncontrollably; for instance, in a monolithic application, a defective code update might disrupt the entire service, halting operations for all users due to shared dependencies.^[44] To mitigate such propagation, reliability practices emphasize fault isolation techniques like circuit breakers, which detect failures and prevent requests from reaching overwhelmed services, thereby containing the impact to affected modules.^[45] Canary releases further limit exposure by rolling out changes to a small subset of users or traffic, allowing early detection and rollback without widespread disruption.^[46] Feature flags enable dynamic toggling of functionality, isolating experimental code paths and reducing the blast radius of bugs by confining them to specific cohorts.^[47] A prominent example is Netflix's Chaos Engineering initiatives, where controlled experiments simulate failures on as little as 0.5% of production traffic to test resilience while minimizing user impact.^[31] The term blast radius gained prominence in DevOps practices after 2010, coinciding with the rise of continuous delivery and microservices, as teams sought to quantify and constrain failure effects in complex, distributed systems.^[48] This evolution was driven by high-profile incidents, such as the 2021 Fastly outage, where a software bug triggered by a customer configuration change acted as a single point of failure, amplifying the blast radius to affect 85% of the network and causing global disruptions for over an hour.^[49] A more recent illustration is the July 19, 2024, CrowdStrike outage, caused by a defective content update to the Falcon sensor software that triggered system crashes on approximately 8.5 million Windows devices worldwide. The failure propagated rapidly due to the software's kernel-level integration, disrupting airlines, hospitals, banks, and other critical services for hours to days, with recovery challenges amplifying the impact. This event emphasized the risks of untested updates in widely deployed security tools and the value of staged rollouts and testing to limit blast radius.^[50]^[51] Assessing blast radius involves modeling system dependencies to predict failure chains, often using graph-based approaches that map interactions between components without requiring full-scale simulations.^[52] Dependency graphs, for example, enable network analysis to forecast defect propagation, identifying high-risk paths where a local error could escalate into broader outages.^[53] Such techniques, rooted in program dependence graphs, support proactive design decisions to enhance overall reliability by prioritizing isolation in vulnerable areas.^[54]

References

[1]
Blast Radius | Alford Technologies
Jul 26, 2024 · The blast radius is the area around an explosive device within which the effects of the detonation, can cause damage or injury.
[2]
The Science of Blast - Blast Injury Research Coordinating Office
Sep 12, 2024 · Explosive blasts or explosions are physical phenomena that result in a sudden release of energy. This process causes a near instantaneous compression of the ...Missing: radius | Show results with:radius<|control11|><|separator|>
[3]
Blast Damage Estimation | International Ammunition Technical Guidelines
### Summary of Blast Damage Estimation
[4]
Kingery-Bulmash Blast Parameter Calculator
The Kingery-Bulmash Blast Parameter Calculator calculates the blast-wave parameters of a hemispherical free field air-blast, based on the empirical relations ...
[5]
[PDF] Explosive blast 4 | FEMA
Vehicle bombs have the added advantage of being able to bring a large quantity of explosives to the door- step of the target undetected. Finally, terrorists ...
[6]
What is Blast Radius - entitle[.]io
In cybersecurity, the blast radius concept originated from the field of explosives and bomb detonation where it represented the physical area damaged by an ...
[7]
[PDF] 1) Effects of blast pressure on the human body - CDC
... psi overpressure will cause eardrum rupture in about 99% of all subjects. The threshold for lung damage occurs at about 15 psi blast overpressure. A 35-45 psi.
[8]
Overpressure Levels of Concern | response.restoration.noaa.gov
ALOHA's Default Overpressure Levels of Concern · 8.0 psi (destruction of buildings) · 3.5 psi (serious injury likely) · 1.0 psi (shatters glass).
[9]
Primary blast wave protection in combat helmet design: A historical ...
Feb 13, 2020 · This study compares the blast protective effect of historical (World War I) and current combat helmets, against each other and 'no helmet' or bare head.
[10]
Blast Overpressure - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Peak overpressures can be 20–100 times the initial pressure, with typical values of 20 bar. Detonation can be initiated either by use of a high explosive charge ...
[11]
[PDF] Blast Overpressure and Survivability Calculations for Various Sizes ...
Blast overpressures and durations were calculated for several different explosive charge sizes. The charge sizes range froin 1 ounce of TNT to 32 ounces of TNT.Missing: lethal bomb<|control11|><|separator|>
[12]
Scaled Distance - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
where S is the stand off from the explosion in m and W is the TNT equivalent of the explosive charge weight in kg. The time of arrival of the shock wave ta ...
[13]
[PDF] A new blast wave scaling - New Mexico Tech
Apr 7, 2021 · A new scaling is developed for both air and underwater blast waves based on dimensional analysis. The new length, time, velocity, and pressure ...
[14]
[PDF] Study For Development Of A Blast Layer For The Virtual Range Project
This is the well known Hopkinson-Cranz law of blast scaling, “or cube root scaling”. (Hopkinson, 1915; Cranz, 1926). It states that self-similar blast waves are ...
[15]
[PDF] PEAK OVERPRESSURE VS SCALED DISTANCE FOR TNT ... - DTIC
Sep 7, 1977 · 01 psi. Curves presenting overpressure versus radial distance (measured and theoretical) have been available for many years for spherical ...
[16]
Peak Overpressure Vs Scaled Distance for TNT Surface Bursts ...
The measurements were made on 5 20- and 100-ton TNT surface bursts. The charges were hemispherical in shape and the instrumentation included overpressure ...
[17]
PDC Software - USACE Omaha District
ConWep performs a variety of conventional weapons effects calculations including an assortment of airblast routines, fragment and projectile penetrations ...
[18]
[PDF] Airblast Loading Model for DYNA2D and DYNA3D. - DTIC
The CONWEP algorithms do account for angle of incidence by combining the reflected pressure (normal-incidence) value and the incident pressure (side-on ...
[19]
[PDF] Chapter 2 EXPLOSIVES
A lower heat of explosion means a lower energy output and thereby less efficient blasting. Antacids. Antacids are added to an explosive compound to increase its ...
[20]
[PDF] NUREG/CR-7201, "Characterizing Explosive Effects on ...
The blast-induced dynamic loads explosions generate above ground and in contact with the ground surface can damage underground structures. Underground ...Missing: lethal | Show results with:lethal
[21]
[PDF] Planning Guidance for Response to a Nuclear Detonation - FEMA
Low-altitude14 air burst detonations generate larger thermal and blast damage areas than near- surface bursts, but local fallout will be minimal or negligible.
[22]
[PDF] DISPATCH - Defense Threat Reduction Agency
In conclusion, the blast overpressure in an urban environment is generally higher than for the free field. This is caused by reflections from buildings and ...Missing: humidity | Show results with:humidity
[23]
[PDF] Investigation of the Propagation of Blast Waves over ... - DTIC
Light surface winds and low relative humidity at the ground Plus the presence of stratified cloud deck below 10,000 feet indicate dangerous firing conditions.Missing: environmental urban terrain
[24]
Dynamic Behavior of Submerged Cylindrical Shells Under ... - NIH
Feb 13, 2025 · The simulated value of the maximum radius of the bubble is 0.750 m, the theoretical value is 0.745 m, and the deviation is 0.67%. It can be ...
[25]
Design principles - AWS Well-Architected Framework
Automated deployment techniques together with smaller, incremental changes reduces the blast radius and allows for faster reversal when failures occur. This ...
[26]
Sealing Off Your Cloud's Blast Radius | CSA
Here are the differences between on-premises and cloud security, the main challenges in securing the cloud, and solutions for security teams to implement.
[27]
REL10-BP03 Use bulkhead architectures to limit scope of impact
Implement bulkhead architectures (also known as cell-based architectures) to restrict the effect of failure within a workload to a limited number of components.
[28]
Further reading - Reducing the Scope of Impact with Cell-Based ...
AWS Well-Architected Framework Reliability Pillar whitepaper, specifically REL10-BP04 Use bulkhead architectures to limit scope of impact.
[29]
Summary of the Amazon S3 Service Disruption in the Northern ...
Feb 28, 2017 · As S3 has scaled, the team has done considerable work to refactor parts of the service into smaller cells to reduce blast radius and improve ...
[30]
https://netflixtechblog.com/chaos-monkey-kill-one-instance-at-a-time-5db0b3c5a0f
[31]
ChAP: Chaos Automation Platform - Netflix TechBlog
Jul 26, 2017 · To limit this blast radius, in ChAP we take a small subset of traffic and distribute it evenly between a control and an experimental cluster.Experiment Size · Example · Learn More About Chaos
[32]
Understanding And Controlling The 'Blast Radius' - Forbes
Sep 18, 2024 · The "blast radius" is the full extent of damage that a single security breach could cause. In other words, what's the worst that could happen if ...
[33]
Understanding your Identity Blast Radius in Security | Proofpoint US
Feb 7, 2024 · An identity blast radius represents the potential impact of an attacker who is moving laterally using a compromised identity.
[34]
Lateral movement: How attackers silently spread in 48 minutes
Each minute of undetected lateral movement increases the potential blast radius of an attack. ... credential theft. Event ID 4769 (Kerberos Service Ticket Request) ...
[35]
What is the Principle of Least Privilege? - Illumio Cybersecurity Blog
Jul 28, 2022 · Least privilege enforces the principles of Zero Trust by allowing access to only trusted traffic, and blocking all other traffic. With the ...Missing: blast | Show results with:blast
[36]
Cybersecurity 101: What is Zero Trust Segmentation? - Illumio
Zero Trust Segmentation (ZTS), also called microsegmentation, is a security tool that helps stop threats from spreading inside a company's network. Unlike older ...
[37]
Zero Trust Solutions | Illumio
Illumio's Zero Trust Segmentation is an essential component of any Zero Trust solution and a fundamental building block of any security strategy.
[38]
Advanced Persistent Threat Compromise of Government Agencies ...
Apr 15, 2021 · (Updated January 6, 2021): On December 13, 2020, CISA released Emergency Directive 21-01: Mitigate SolarWinds Orion Code Compromise, ordering ...
[39]
FireEye: SolarWinds Hack 'Genuinely Impacted' 50 Victims
Dec 21, 2020 · "The reality is: The blast radius for this, I kind of explain it with a funnel. It's true that over 300,000 companies use SolarWinds, but ...
[40]
Enhancements for BloodHound v7.0 Provide Fresh User Experience ...
Improved risk scoring by utilizing Impact and Exposure measurements that analyzes the blast radius of an object. · ...
[41]
Reducing the blast radius of credential theft - Help Net Security
Jan 31, 2022 · Threat actors rely on automated tools like Bloodhound to sniff out targets such as AD for them, and they aren't used to the idea of these ...
[42]
Blast Radius: Definition, Examples, and Applications - Graph AI
In the context of DevOps, the Blast Radius refers to the scope of impact that a change or failure in a system or service can have. It is a measure of the ...
[43]
Limiting the Deployment Blast Radius - The New Stack
Nov 15, 2022 · Limit blast radius by planning, scheduling, thorough testing, automating, and using an internal developer portal.
[44]
Architecture strategies for designing a reliability testing strategy
Nov 15, 2023 · Minimize the blast radius. Implement fault isolation strategies to help ensure that, even if a failure occurs, its scope is limited. The system ...Test Reliability... · Unplanned Outage · Use Fault Injection And...<|control11|><|separator|>
[45]
Understanding canary releases and feature flags in software delivery
Feb 27, 2025 · Both aim to reduce the “blast radius” of unforeseen problems and build confidence in a new release. Both gradually expose new code to users on ...Missing: circuit breakers
[46]
Feature Flags 101: Use Cases, Benefits, and Best Practices
Nov 17, 2023 · Feature flags can manage and control the behavior of a system toggling a feature on/off to minimize the impact of incidents. Using operational ...
[47]
History of DevOps | Atlassian
The DevOps movement started to coalesce some time between 2007 and 2008, when IT operations and software development communities raised concerns.
[48]
Summary of June 8 outage | Fastly
Jun 8, 2021 · We experienced a global outage due to an undiscovered software bug that surfaced on June 8 when it was triggered by a valid customer configuration change.
[49]
Understanding Software Dependency Graphs | Blog - VulnCheck
May 21, 2025 · WIth an impact analysis, developers can determine the ripple effect or blast radius that refactoring or change management can have across the ...Cross-File Analysis · Visibility Into Potential... · Prioritizing Remediation...
[50]
Predicting defects using network analysis on dependency graphs
Aug 7, 2025 · These dependencies can be construed as a low level graph of the entire system. In this paper, we propose to use network analysis on these ...
[51]
Design-Time Reliability Prediction Model for Component-Based ...
Apr 6, 2022 · Reliability prediction models participate in the prevention of software failures ... dependency graphs (PDG) to model the interactions ...