Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Brother Jonathan

Brother Jonathan is a of the and its citizens, especially , portrayed in political cartoons and literature from the late 18th to mid-19th centuries as a brash, cunning, and resilient embodying ingenuity and . Originating as a derogatory term for unsophisticated colonial , possibly dating to the , the figure evolved post-Revolutionary War into a patriotic symbol of the young nation's rebellious spirit. The name is often linked to an apocryphal anecdote involving Connecticut Governor Jonathan Trumbull, whom George Washington reportedly consulted for supplies during the Revolution, leading to the phrase "We must consult Brother Jonathan." In cartoons, such as those by Amos Doolittle during the War of 1812, Brother Jonathan appears as a rustic Yankee in colonial attire—top hat, tight vest, and striped pants—outwitting figures like John Bull to represent American triumphs. Unlike the later Uncle Sam, who symbolized the federal government with poise and authority, Brother Jonathan stood for the common citizen and soldier, reflecting anti-establishment sentiments in the early republic. By the Civil War era, as national unity and governmental power grew, Brother Jonathan faded, with Uncle Sam adopting similar visual traits like striped trousers while evolving into a more sober emblem of the state. His legacy persists in cultural references to Yankee cleverness, though he occasionally appeared with xenophobic or regionalist undertones in 19th-century depictions.

Origins and Etymology

Derivation from Historical Figures

The most widely cited etymological theory attributes "Brother Jonathan" to Sr. (1710–1785), who served as governor of from 1769 to 1784 and was the only colonial governor to remain in office throughout the while actively supporting the patriot cause. Trumbull provided critical supplies, troops, and strategic advice to Army, including nine additional regiments in 1776 amid supply shortages. According to traditional accounts, , facing logistical or tactical dilemmas, would defer to Trumbull by exclaiming phrases such as "We must consult Brother Jonathan" or "Let us hear what Brother Jonathan says," reflecting Washington's reliance on Trumbull's judgment and 's resources. This derivation portrays "Brother Jonathan" as evolving from a specific for Trumbull into a broader for resourceful or the nascent collective, particularly during wartime provisioning requests from or forces. However, the lacks contemporary documentation and surfaced in 19th-century recollections, well after both men's deaths, suggesting it may represent rather than verified history. Less substantiated alternatives link the term to Puritan communal practices, where "Jonathan" denoted a common or in meetings, symbolizing pragmatic , though no primary records confirm this as the origin. Another theory draws from the biblical , , whose and cunning in aiding (2 Samuel 1:26) mirrored perceived resilience, but this remains speculative without direct textual linkage in colonial sources. By the early , "Brother Jonathan" appeared in post-Revolutionary literature, such as John Neal's 1825 Brother Jonathan, as a for the archetypal citizen, detached from specific figures yet echoing these foundational anecdotes.

Usage During the American Revolution

The term "Brother Jonathan" emerged in British military circles during the early stages of the as a derogatory reference to colonists, particularly those perceived as unsophisticated Yankees resisting authority in the 1770s. soldiers stationed in prior to the outbreak of hostilities in April 1775 applied it mockingly to local patriots, evoking images of rustic, stubborn provincials who challenged imperial order through boycotts and musters. By March 1776, as forces evacuated following the Continental Army's fortification of , the phrase had gained currency among officers to denote the collective American foe, often laced with contempt for their irregular tactics and provincial demeanor. The phrase's association with Governor of , a pivotal patriot leader serving from 1769 to 1784, provided a specific catalyst for its wartime usage. In mid-1776, as urgently sought provisions to sustain his army near amid supply shortages, he reportedly turned to Trumbull for cattle and materiel, uttering the line "We must consult Brother Jonathan" in council—a remark overheard by aides and echoed in military correspondence to signify reliance on resourcefulness. Trumbull's administration facilitated rapid deliveries, including oxen and flour, bolstering Continental forces during the subsequent ; this anecdote, preserved in officer accounts, underscored British perceptions of "Brother Jonathan" as a shrewd, opportunistic figure exploiting logistical vulnerabilities. Post-Declaration of Independence in July 1776, Americans repurposed the term as an emblem of defiant ingenuity, transforming the slur into a badge of colonial resilience against superior British forces. In letters from the Siege of Boston and later campaigns, such as the 1777 defense of Philadelphia's supply lines, Continental soldiers invoked "Brother Jonathan" to celebrate Yankee tactics like guerrilla foraging and militia ambushes that disrupted redcoat advances—exemplified by Connecticut troops under Trumbull's coordination securing grain convoys despite naval blockades. This evolution highlighted causal American adaptations, such as improvised wagon trains evading Hessian foragers, positioning the persona as a symbol of pragmatic defiance rather than mere rusticity.

Historical Usage and Evolution

War of 1812 Period

During the War of 1812, Brother Jonathan emerged prominently in American political cartoons and broadsides as a satirical emblem of national defiance against British incursions, often depicted as a resourceful Yankee outmaneuvering the pompous John Bull. This portrayal emphasized American ingenuity and resilience amid invasions along the Canadian frontier and Chesapeake Bay, with Jonathan embodying the citizenry's scrappy resistance rather than military formality. Key examples include Amos Doolittle's circa 1813 Brother Jonathan Administering a Salutary Cordial to John Bull, where Jonathan force-feeds John Bull a draught of —a on Commodore Hazard Perry's September 10, 1813, victory at the —symbolizing U.S. naval triumphs humiliating pretensions. Another depiction, the undated cartoon A Match, or Another Bloody Nose for John Bull, shows Jonathan delivering a pugilistic blow to his adversary, referencing ongoing Anglo-American clashes and portraying the U.S. as victoriously bloodied but unbowed. These prints, circulated via inexpensive techniques, mocked overreach in events like the April 27, 1813, capture and burning of (now ) by American forces under Brigadier General William Winder, framing Jonathan as a cunning defender turning invasion into opportunity. Amid Federalist opposition in New England—culminating in the Hartford Convention of December 15, 1814, to January 5, 1815, where delegates debated secession over war grievances—Brother Jonathan's usage extended beyond regional confines, fostering a nascent unified national identity. Initially tied to Yankee thrift, the figure increasingly represented the broader republic's wartime vigor, bridging sectional divides by contrasting loyal patriotism with British aggression and domestic dissent. This shift marked Jonathan's transition toward a pan-American symbol, though it began yielding to Uncle Sam by war's end in 1815, reflecting evolving self-perceptions of sovereignty.

Antebellum and Expansion Era

During the era, Brother Jonathan frequently appeared in American and British political cartoons as a shrewd, opportunistic of interests, satirizing U.S. policies on westward expansion and territorial acquisition. In depictions from the 1840s, he embodied the assertive pragmatism of , often portrayed haggling or seizing land with a calculating demeanor reflective of economic . For example, cartoons addressing the around 1845-1846 showed Brother Jonathan confronting , symbolizing American demands for the territory up to the 54°40' parallel, amid threats of war over unresolved claims dating back to the 1818 Anglo-American convention. The Mexican-American War (1846-1848) further highlighted Brother Jonathan's role in expansionist satire, with illustrations depicting him as a land-hungry figure carving up Mexican territory like a pie, critiquing the U.S. annexation of over 500,000 square miles including California and the Southwest. One such 1846 cartoon portrayed him methodically dividing spoils from the conflict, which resulted in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo on February 2, 1848, and underscored perceptions of American opportunism in leveraging military victories for territorial gain. These representations emphasized his frugal, inventive traits—often clad in simple homespun attire—as allegories for the rising industrial capitalism that fueled migration and infrastructure projects like the Erie Canal's completion in 1825 and subsequent rail expansions. In broader media of the and , Brother Jonathan satirized internal economic debates, including tariffs that protected nascent industries, portraying him as a cunning trader outmaneuvering rivals in global commerce. This opportunistic character reflected the era's population boom, with U.S. territory expanding via the remnants and in 1845, while surged from 599,125 arrivals in the to over 1.7 million in the , bolstering labor for expansion. Such depictions avoided idealistic portrayals, instead highlighting pragmatic self-advancement amid debates over slavery's extension into new lands, though Brother Jonathan remained a northern, distinct from southern interests.

Civil War and Postwar Applications

During the (1861–1865), Brother Jonathan served as a prominent symbol in Northern political cartoons, representing the Union's determination to preserve national integrity against Southern . In publications like , he was depicted as a resolute figure embodying American sovereignty, often in contexts highlighting military and naval advancements under President Abraham Lincoln's administration. For instance, a January 11, 1862, cartoon portrayed him in a , long-tailed coat, and striped pants, evoking steadfast resolve amid the early war efforts. Similarly, on May 10, 1862, illustrations showed Brother Jonathan asserting U.S. naval superiority with the ironclad to , underscoring defiance against potential European intervention and alignment with Lincoln's strategy to maintain and territorial control. These depictions positioned him as a defender of federal authority, contrasting with decentralized state-focused symbolism predating the conflict, though Confederate sources rarely engaged him directly, viewing him implicitly as a of Northern aggression rather than adopting him for Southern propaganda. Brother Jonathan's role extended to broader advocacy, including implicit support for policies aimed at abolition and national cohesion, as cartoonists linked his image to the North's moral and martial stance against the . By mid-war, however, his prominence began yielding to , who more explicitly embodied centralized federal power and Lincoln's visage in enlistment and policy illustrations. This shift reflected evolving needs, with Brother Jonathan fading as a unifying emblem by war's end in , supplanted by figures better suited to postwar narratives. In the postwar era, Brother Jonathan's usage declined sharply during the , as dominated representations of the federal government amid and industrialization. Sporadic appearances persisted into the , occasionally critiquing political excesses, such as in an 1888 HarpWeek cartoon referencing electoral dynamics and lingering partisan divides. Yet, by the late 1870s, his obsolescence was evident, with cartoonists favoring more modern icons for commentary on corruption and economic disparity, marking the transition from Revolutionary-era to symbols aligned with an expanding .

Depictions and Characteristics

Visual Representations in Art and Media

Brother Jonathan appeared in early 19th-century political cartoons as a lanky, elongated figure clad in outdated colonial attire, featuring a tall top hat, tight vest and jacket, and striped pants often rendered as ill-fitting or too short to evoke thriftiness. These stylistic elements distinguished surviving woodcuts and etchings from the 1810s, such as Amos Doolittle's circa 1813 colored etching depicting the figure in a colonial hat while engaged in an animated pose. Illustrations evolved from rudimentary sketches in post-Revolutionary prints to more detailed lithographs by the , incorporating finer lines and shading in pictorial newspapers like the 1840 Pictorial Double Brother Jonathan, a mammoth double-sheet publication with elaborate engraved imagery. covers from the 1790s through 1860s similarly showcased the character in patriotic motifs, as in the 1861 lithographed cover for "Yankee Volunteers Marching into Dixie," where Brother Jonathan is portrayed in period garb amid marching figures. Theatrical representations in Yankee plays drew on these visual conventions, with actors donning rustic New Englander costumes including top hats and striped , as promoted in 19th-century playbills and stage illustrations emphasizing a gaunt, wiry . Posters for such performances, circulating from the early 1800s, replicated the gaunt and colonial styling to advertise Brother Jonathan as a sly trader or peddler archetype.

Symbolic Personality Traits

Brother Jonathan embodied a constellation of traits rooted in Yankee stereotypes, portraying the archetypal New Englander as a cunning who relied on shrewdness and resourcefulness to navigate adversities, often outwitting more formally powerful European adversaries like through clever stratagems rather than direct confrontation. This depiction highlighted individual agency and practical ingenuity, as seen in political cartoons where he employed humorous ruses, such as offering pear cordial to disarm British symbolism, reflecting a causal preference for adaptive over rigid collectivist hierarchies. Central to his persona were boorish yet ingenious qualities, including ill-mannered brusqueness, rustic simplicity, and a brash irreverence toward established , which lampooned the unsophisticated "" while underscoring self-reliant . These attributes drew from empirical observations of behaviors, such as widespread to evade British blockades during the and inventive circumventions of trade embargoes in the early 19th century, fostering a cultural self-perception of pragmatic survivors who prioritized personal initiative amid scarcity. In narratives, Brother Jonathan's irreverent role reinforced by contrasting wit—manifest in depictions as a crafty or trader—with pomp, attributing national successes to decentralized problem-solving over centralized might. This symbolism causally linked to historical traits like acquisitiveness and hick-like , evident in post-Revolutionary cartoons that celebrated victories born of local ingenuity, such as Connecticut's resourceful governance under figures like .

Allegorical Interpretations

Brother Jonathan's depictions often embodied through modest, ill-fitting attire contrasting with the ornate garb of European figures like , symbolizing a pragmatic approach to resource use over ostentatious display. This visual restraint, paired with portrayals as a sly trader or , served as a for opportunistic navigation of market opportunities, reflecting the dynamism of early where individual cunning yielded economic advantages. Such representations in trade-related cartoons highlighted Brother Jonathan as an enterprising businessman, underscoring the virtues of self-reliant exchange in a burgeoning free-market environment. As a of national ethos, Brother Jonathan exemplified democratic , depicted as a clever prioritizing practical ingenuity and empirical outcomes over monarchical . His qualities—outwitting more powerful adversaries through wit rather than formal authority—allegorized a republican spirit valuing personal agency and tangible success against hereditary pomp, as seen in contrasts with crowned . Literary developments, such as in John Neal's 1825 novel Brother Jonathan, further entrenched this as a core trait of American character, emphasizing boisterous self-assertion and moral lecturing rooted in Yankee universality. Critiques in allegorical portrayals occasionally cast Brother Jonathan as parochial and bigoted, embodying unsophisticated regionalism through rustic, ill-mannered traits like boorishness and hick-like simplicity, often from perspectives viewing him as a ruffian braggart. These negative , however, were balanced by attributions of innovative prowess, with his sly adaptability in and underscoring achievements in practical and economic resilience, as evidenced in roles promoting and .

Comparisons with Other Personifications

Contrast with John Bull

In political cartoons depicting Anglo-American rivalries, was typically portrayed as a stout, pompous figure embodying aristocratic —often depicted with a bulging belly, , and an air of imperial entitlement—while Brother Jonathan appeared as his lean, shrewd counterpart, representing the resourceful, plebeian spirit of the young . This visual dyad underscored real geopolitical frictions, such as British trade restrictions and of American sailors, which fueled the and positioned Jonathan as an trickster outmaneuvering Bull's rigid establishment. During the , cartoons like "A Boxing Match, or Another Bloody Nose for " (1813) showed pummeling a battered Bull—complete with a black eye and bloodied nose—to symbolize American resilience against British aggression, with Jonathan's agility contrasting Bull's cumbersome form. Similarly, " Administering a Salutary to " (c. 1813) depicted Jonathan force-feeding a potion to a weakened Bull, illustrating U.S. naval victories like the USS Constitution's triumphs that humbled British naval supremacy and highlighted Jonathan's cunning exploitation of Britain's overextended empire. In later satires, such as those surrounding 1830s boundary disputes over and , Jonathan's portrayal as a wily negotiator tricking Bull into concessions mirrored U.S. diplomatic gains, like the Webster-Ashburton Treaty of 1842, which resolved northeastern borders without war, emphasizing America's opportunistic sovereignty assertions against Britain's colonial pretensions. These oppositions in caricature reflected causal drivers of tension—Britain's lingering post-Revolutionary dominance versus America's emergent commercial ingenuity—without romanticizing outcomes, as Jonathan's "victories" often stemmed from Britain's strategic distractions elsewhere, like the (1839–1842), where U.S. traders indirectly benefited from Bull's imperial missteps.

Distinctions from Uncle Sam

Brother Jonathan typically embodied the collective spirit of the American populace or the nation as a shrewd, resourceful rooted in folk traditions, often portrayed with rustic or cunning traits reflecting common citizens' ingenuity against external foes or internal elites. In contrast, emerged as a symbol of federal authority and , depicted with formal attire, a stern demeanor, and an air of official dignity that aligned more closely with governmental institutions rather than the populace. This divergence highlighted Jonathan's role in representing decentralized "," as seen in early 19th-century cartoons where he outwitted adversaries like , versus Sam's later association with centralized policy and recruitment drives. By the , explicit distinctions appeared in print, with referenced as the embodiment of the country and its inhabitants, while denoted the government apparatus, implying a separation between the sovereign people and state machinery. For instance, an publication articulated this by having voice separation from Sam's political domain, underscoring 's folkloric, non-official origins tied to Revolutionary-era figures like Governor , against Sam's more abstract, post-1812 evolution from wartime provisioning lore. Usage timelines reflect this: dominated representations through the antebellum period, with notable overlap in the 1850s–1870s amid Civil War-era illustrations, before Sam's ascendancy via federal posters solidified his governmental persona.

Interactions in Political Cartoons

In political cartoons of the War of 1812 era, Brother Jonathan frequently appeared in competitive interactions with John Bull, personifying Anglo-American rivalries through physical confrontations or mockery. A 1813 etching titled Brother Jonathan Administering a Salutary Cordial to John Bull depicts Jonathan forcibly pouring fermented pear juice (perry) down the throat of a uniformed Bull, symbolizing American defiance against British impressment and blockades, with Jonathan exclaiming "Take it, you d--d infernal rascal" amid the conflict's naval engagements. Similarly, the cartoon A Boxing Match, or Another Bloody Nose for John Bull portrays Jonathan delivering a punch to Bull's face, with warships exchanging fire in the background, illustrating U.S. naval victories like those on Lake Erie and underscoring themes of Yankee resilience against British aggression. During the antebellum and expansion periods, Jonathan's cartoon interactions extended to triadic scenarios involving and emerging figures like , often mediating territorial disputes or trade rivalries. In depictions from the 1840s–1850s, Jonathan occasionally bridged or competed with Sam in representations of internal U.S. debates over , while clashing with Bull over Canadian boundaries and claims, as seen in satirical prints where Jonathan's brash negotiations highlighted tensions without resolving them. These visuals emphasized alliances when U.S. expansion aligned against European powers but rivalry when interests, embodied by Bull, encroached on American spheres. Civil War-era cartoons shifted Jonathan's interactions toward cooperative dynamics with , reflecting the latter's rising prominence as a unified . A Granger Collection image conflates the two as a defiant "Uncle Sam (Brother Jonathan)" rebuffing John Bull and after the Union defeat at Bull Run, assuring foreign observers of resolve with the declaration that persistence would prevail. In illustrations from January 11, 1862, Jonathan rallies support for efforts, appearing alongside or subsumed under Sam's banner to symbolize sectional reconciliation and national mobilization against , though cartoonists like those in portrayed Jonathan (as ) in squire-like garb to critique U.S. interventionism. Such portrayals balanced competitive foreign skepticism with domestic unity, without favoring pro- or anti-war narratives.

Decline and Legacy

Factors Leading to Obsolescence

The rise of as a symbol of the federal government during the contributed significantly to Brother Jonathan's decline, as recruitment posters and political cartoons increasingly standardized Sam to represent centralized authority rather than the more localized, citizen-focused persona of Jonathan. Unlike Jonathan, who embodied a mischievous, everyman tied to early republican virtues, Uncle Sam projected poise and institutional gravity, aligning with the postwar emphasis on national unity and expansion. Brother Jonathan's inherently regional character, rooted in stereotypes of frugality and shrewdness, became mismatched with the ' westward growth and demographic diversification after the , rendering it less adaptable as a pan-American icon. This flavor, while resonant in the Revolutionary and eras, clashed with the need for a figure encompassing southern and western identities amid and industrialization. Advances in printing technology, particularly from the 1830s onward, facilitated of political cartoons favoring Uncle Sam's streamlined, authoritative visage over Jonathan's folksier, less refined depictions, which were harder to generalize in national media. By the , Jonathan's appearances in major newspapers and periodicals had sharply diminished, supplanted by Sam's dominance in outlets like . Newspaper usage data from the mid-19th century confirms this trajectory: while "Brother Jonathan" peaked in frequency during the 1840s and 1850s, its mentions declined steadily post-Civil War, overtaken by "" which surged in the 1850s and solidified thereafter. This empirical shift reflects not just stylistic preferences but a cultural pivot toward symbols evoking federal permanence over provincial eccentricity.

Transition to Uncle Sam Dominance

During the latter half of the , Brother Jonathan and coexisted in American symbolism, with dual usage persisting from the 1860s into the early 1900s, though increasingly represented federal authority while Brother Jonathan embodied the everyday citizen. This overlap reflected a transitional phase, as evidenced by an 1893 article in The Lutheran Witness, which equated the figures but distinguished their contexts: "When we meet him in politics, we call him ; when we meet him in society, we call him Brother Jonathan." The (1861–1865) accelerated Uncle Sam's ascendancy, as the conflict's demands centralized federal power, including expanded military and infrastructure projects that projected governmental strength, favoring Sam's poised, authoritative image over Jonathan's folksy mischief. Postwar Reconstruction and industrialization further entrenched this, with Uncle Sam's symbolism aligning with the maturing nation's need for a dignified emblem of unified sovereignty rather than Jonathan's regional, irreverent caricature, often depicted as a boorish hick unsuited to projecting imperial gravitas. By , Uncle Sam's dominance eclipsed Brother Jonathan entirely in official propaganda, exemplified by James Montgomery Flagg's March 1917 recruitment poster I Want You for U.S. Army, which distributed over 4 million copies and crystallized Sam as the stern recruiter for federal mobilization, rendering Jonathan obsolete for wartime efficiency. This handover prioritized Sam's utility in conveying centralized command amid global conflict, though Jonathan's legacy subtly endured in as a reminder of populist wariness toward overreaching authority.

Modern References and Cultural Persistence

In the 21st century, Brother Jonathan persists in niche historical reenactment communities as a symbol of early American personification, often portrayed to illustrate pre-Uncle Sam representations of Yankee ingenuity and regional identity during events focused on the Revolutionary War or War of 1812. Living history schedules, such as those compiled by dedicated reenactment organizations, describe him as the initial emblem of New England thrift and resourcefulness, used interchangeably with later figures in educational demonstrations of evolving national icons. Scholarly and educational materials occasionally reference Brother Jonathan in discussions of symbolic , positioning him as a precursor embodying and anti-authoritarian traits that contrasted with European caricatures, without revival for contemporary political purposes. For instance, analyses in studies highlight his depiction as a clever, self-reliant figure in 19th-century contexts, serving to educate on the organic development of U.S. emblems amid sanitized narratives that prioritize later symbols like . These echoes appear in academic works exploring and national character, underscoring his obsolescence post-Civil War due to associations with localized rather than unified federal identity. Literary allusions remain sparse, typically confined to or essays invoking him as an archetype of , as seen in modern reprints or commentaries on early novels that nod to his traits without broader cultural resurgence. This limited persistence reflects empirical patterns of symbolic evolution, where Brother Jonathan's utility waned as national imagery centralized, yet endures in targeted historical preservation efforts valuing causal continuity over revisionist omission.

References

  1. [1]
    Meet Brother Jonathan, the Predecessor to Uncle Sam
    Meet Brother Jonathan, the Predecessor to Uncle Sam. Older, but by no means wiser, the political cartoon character symbolized a mischievous young nation.Missing: personification | Show results with:personification
  2. [2]
    Before America Got Uncle Sam, It Had to Endure Brother Jonathan
    Jul 3, 2017 · But after the Revolutionary War, Brother Jonathan was the personification of the newly independent American people: clever, courageous, not ...
  3. [3]
    Brother Jonathan, American Icon - New England Historical Society
    Brother Jonathan. The expression dates back to at least the English Civil War. Then, supporters of the Crown used it as a derogatory nickname for the Puritans ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] The Governors of Connecticut
    The epithet " Brother Jonathan," applied to Governor Trumbull, originated with Washington, who according to a learned writer, when perplexed or in any ...
  5. [5]
    The Complete Patriot's Guide to Uncle Sam - Civic Nebraska
    Sep 6, 2023 · Modern-day Uncle Sam is most certainly an evolution of Brother Jonathan – an 18th-century character often associated with the region of New ...
  6. [6]
    John Neal's <i>Brother Jonathan</i> (1825) - Document - Gale
    Brother Jonathan was first published in London by the Scottish publisher William Blackwood. Neal had lived in England between 1824 and 1827 with the purpose of ...
  7. [7]
    Jonathan Trumbull Sends Good News to George Washington
    George Washington called Jonathan Trumbull “the first of the patriots.” He wrote frequently to Trumbull, asking for more men, food, cannon and the always-scarce ...Missing: symbol anecdotes
  8. [8]
    JANUARY MEETING, 1901 - Colonial Society of Massachusetts
    Origin of the Term as applied to the United States. “When General Washington, after being appointed commander of the Army of the ...
  9. [9]
    Brother Jonathan Administering a Salutary Cordial to John Bull
    Brother Jonathan Administering a Salutary Cordial to John Bull. Amos ... War of 1812 · Great Britain · Identity · Navy · Humor · Patriotism · Personification ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    A boxing match, or another bloody nose for John Bull
    Brother Jonathan (Nickname)--1810-1820. John Bull (Symbolic character)--1810-1820. United States--History--War of 1812. Format:.
  11. [11]
    Oregon - The Historical Marker Database
    Captions: (upper left) British cartoon of John Bull (England) versus Brother Jonathan (USA), ca. 1845.; (upper right) Allegorical painting of "Manifest Destiny ...
  12. [12]
    English View of Oregon Boundary Dispute Print, 1846
    1846 Argument Boundary Brother Jonathan Crown Entertainment Lion Manifest Destiny Northwest Oregon Political Action Tamer Territory Victorian Westward Expansion.
  13. [13]
    [Brother Jonathan carving up the pie of Mexico] | A Continent Divided
    U.S. Political Opposition to the War · U.S. Religious ... [Brother Jonathan carving up the pie of Mexico]. [Brother Jonathan carving up the pie of Mexico].Missing: American | Show results with:American
  14. [14]
    MEXICAN WAR CARTOON, 1846. /nAmerican cartoon ... - Alamy
    1846 american brother jonathan bull cartoon england john bull latin america latin american ... mexican war mexico middle namerican northwest oregon political ...
  15. [15]
    EXHIBITIONS - Macculloch Hall Historical Museum
    ... Brother Jonathan and Yankee Doodle. Brother Jonathan was depicted typically as portly and wearing a brown homespun suit, while Yankee Doodle wore stars and ...
  16. [16]
    A Brief History of U.S. Immigration Policy from the Colonial Period to ...
    Aug 3, 2021 · Overall, international and domestic conditions increased the number of immigrants from 599,125 during the 1830s to 1,713,251 during the 1840s.
  17. [17]
    Whig harmony - The Library of Congress
    At the same time, a Brother Jonathan or Uncle Sam figure steers in the opposite direction, toward the White House. Greeley whips his horse, a scrawny nag with ...
  18. [18]
    Brother Jonathan - The Civil War
    As we study the political cartoons and posters of the Civil War years (1861-1865), we see a transformation in which Brother Jonathan is replaced by Uncle Sam.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Harper's Weekly: Civil War Naval Cartoons
    Depicts Brother Jonathan (U.S.) telling John Bull (England) in 1862 that his version of a man-o-war (an ironclad Monitor) is “about right!,” in contrast to ...
  20. [20]
    The Real Life of Uncle Sam - Priceonomics
    Aug 14, 2014 · Following the Union's victory in the Civil War, Uncle Sam supplanted Brother Jonathan as the country's “mascot.” By the time of his death in ...
  21. [21]
    Elections | 1888 Medium Cartoons - HarpWeek
    The faded poster behind Brother Jonathan (right) celebrates Cleveland felling the Republican elephant in the election of 1884 (when he defeated Republican James ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Brother Jonathan administering a Salutary Cordial to John Bull
    Soon after, the figure of Brother Jonathan was created to represent Bull's colonial archrival. In this scathing caricature, Brother Jonathan forces the older, ...Missing: visual cartoons examples<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Mammoth Double Sheet Pictorial Brother Jonathan now online
    May 23, 2016 · “The Pictorial Double Brother Jonathan for Christmas and New Years was first issued in the year 1840-—just twenty years ago. It was at that time ...
  24. [24]
    Yankee volunteers marching into Dixie - The Library of Congress
    ... print : lithograph printed in colors on wove paper ; 25.9 x 31.5 cm. (image) | Music cover showing a patriotic but fanciful portrayal ... Brother Jonathan.
  25. [25]
    Before Uncle Sam, America Had 'Brother Jonathan' - InsideHook
    Jul 4, 2017 · Brother Jonathan represented ordinary Americans who were trying to make their way in the harsh new world. He was a trickster; many American ...
  26. [26]
    You Know Uncle Sam. But Who is Brother Jonathan? - BTW
    Oct 18, 2023 · The term Brother Jonathan was used by the British as an insult to make fun of the colonial New Englanders as unsophisticated country bumpkins.
  27. [27]
    “We must consult Brother Jonathan”*… | (Roughly) Daily
    Jul 27, 2019 · He was ill-mannered and ill-spoken—a boor, a braggart, a ruffian, a bigot, a hick, and a trickster. His name was Brother Jonathan.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Ideology, Allegory, and Identity:
    Jun 13, 2022 · In 1813, the fancy-dressed John Bull wears a crown, a remarkable contrast to the modest and gray dress Brother Jonathan wears, to symbolize ...
  29. [29]
    Uncle Sam and Brother Jonathan: Salesmen 1876 - 1900
    Brother Jonathan had originated as a regionalist Yankee and was the personification of New England. He became a symbolic figure of the United States in general, ...
  30. [30]
    John Bull and Uncle Sam: Four Centuries of British-American ...
    John Bull, a farmer figure, and Uncle Sam, a lean, whiskered man, are personifications of Britain and the US, often depicted as friends or antagonists.
  31. [31]
    Brother Jonathan Administering a Salutary Cordial to John Bull
    Brother Jonathan is a nickname for the United States that pre-dates Uncle Sam and John Bull is a nickname for England. In this political cartoon from 1813, ...Missing: origin symbol
  32. [32]
    The Bulls and the Jonathans; Comprising John Bull and Brother ...
    “JOHN BULL and Brother Jonathan” is an allegory, conveying in a strain of fatiguing drollery the history of the relations between Great Britain and the United ...Missing: cartoons examples
  33. [33]
    Uncle Sam: Birth of An Icon - Notes From the Frontier
    Oct 22, 2019 · Brother Jonathan was the personification of the common man, the hard-working, hard-drinking, hard-fighting American—a hayseed and proud of it.
  34. [34]
    Brother Jonathan Administering a Salutary Cordial to John Bull
    This early American political cartoon depicts "Brother Jonathan," a symbolic representation of the United States, forcing a mug of fermented pear juice, ...
  35. [35]
    A Boxing Match, or Another Bloody Nose for John Bull
    Brother Jonathan, a pre-cursor to Uncle Sam, has given John Bull a bloody ... Like many other cartoons during the War of 1812, this image is meant to ...
  36. [36]
    Image of CIVIL WAR CARTOON, 1861. - A Defiant Uncle Sam ...
    A defiant Uncle Sam (Brother Jonathan) assures England's John Bull and Emperor Napoleon III of France, that the Union defeat at the (First) Battle of Bull ...
  37. [37]
    Not "Love," But Justice | Cartoons | Political - Thomas Nast
    used by both English and American cartoonists — who generally interacted with ...
  38. [38]
    The Peculiar History of Uncle Sam Leaves Questions Unanswered
    Brother Jonathan was distinctly a New Englander and was often depicted as being of poor temper, wanting to close ranks around Catholics and immigrants, and even ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Nissan,“Exploring Two Histories of American Political Cartoons. With ...
    Jan 27, 2013 · Dewey also delves into a discussion of not as well known symbols, some of them long forgotten, such as Brother Jonathan, Uncle Sam's predecessor ...<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Counting Culture; or, How to Read Victorian Newspapers from a ...
    Jun 22, 2012 · While 'Brother Jonathan' began as the more popular choice, its usage gradually declined. 'Uncle Sam' increased significantly in the 1850s ...
  41. [41]
    Who Is Uncle Sam? - World Atlas
    May 20, 2018 · In fact, according to a certain article in The Lutheran Witness of 1893, Brother Jonathan and Uncle Sam were one and the same. The article ...
  42. [42]
    The History Behind America's Iconic WWI 'Uncle Sam, I Want You ...
    Mar 22, 2024 · This iconic image, featuring Uncle Sam pointing directly at the viewer, was first used during the First World War and has since been turned into a rallying cry ...
  43. [43]
    “Brother Jonathan” – Reenacting Schedule
    Sep 18, 2024 · The character was originally adopted by citizens of New England from 1783 to 1815, when Brother Jonathan became a nickname for any Yankee sailor ...<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Reenacting Schedule – A Listing of Living History Events
    Before Uncle Sam became a national symbol, we had Brother Jonathan. Brother Jonathan started out as a personification of New England. He was also used as an ...Missing: 2000s | Show results with:2000s
  45. [45]
    National Symbols, Stories & Icons - Star-Spangled Banner National ...
    Apr 7, 2020 · The figure “Brother Jonathan” personified the United States during the Revolutionary War, but during the War of 1812, his successor—“Uncle Sam”— ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Blood In My Eye by George L. Jackson - Libcom.org
    George Jackson's last book, Blood in My Eye, speaks with the voice of the dead, not only the dead George Jackson and his brother, Jonathan, but the living dead ...Missing: dynamism | Show results with:dynamism
  47. [47]
    Brother Jonathan V2: Or The New Englanders (1825) - Amazon.com
    Through the eyes of Brother Jonathan, readers are introduced to a wide range of characters, from wealthy merchants and politicians to farmers and laborers.