Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Bundle branch block

Bundle branch block () is a condition in which there is a delay or blockage in the pathway that electrical impulses travel to reach the heart's lower chambers (ventricles), causing the ventricles to contract out of sync and potentially affecting the heart's pumping efficiency. This conduction disorder occurs in the , which splits into the left and right bundle branches responsible for coordinating ventricular depolarization. is typically diagnosed via electrocardiogram (ECG) showing a prolonged (≥120 ms), and it can be or associated with underlying heart conditions. There are two main types: left bundle branch block (LBBB) and right bundle branch block (RBBB). LBBB involves delayed activation of the left ventricle, often associated with structural heart diseases such as , , or ; conversely, prolonged LBBB can induce cardiomyopathy via electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony. It has a prevalence of 1%-5% in individuals over 70 years old. It can lead to electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony, impairing cardiac output and increasing risks in heart failure patients. In contrast, RBBB affects the right ventricle's and is frequently benign, especially in younger people, but its incidence rises with age to about 11.3% by age 80; it may signal issues like or right ventricular strain when symptomatic. Both types can arise from degenerative (e.g., Lenègre's or Lev's disease), ischemia, infections, or iatrogenic causes like cardiac procedures. Most individuals with BBB experience no symptoms and require no specific unless accompanied by , fainting, or reduced . Diagnosis often involves ECG for pattern recognition, to assess structural issues, and further tests like stress imaging if needed. Treatment focuses on managing underlying conditions with medications for blood pressure or , while options like pacemakers or () are used for symptomatic cases, particularly in LBBB with low left ventricular (≤35%) and wide QRS (≥150 ms). Emerging options include conduction system pacing, such as left bundle branch area pacing, for improved resynchronization (as of 2025). Complications may include arrhythmias or worsened heart function, emphasizing the need for monitoring in at-risk patients.

Cardiac Conduction System

Anatomy of the Conduction System

The cardiac conduction system's anatomy begins with the sinoatrial (SA) node, a small cluster of specialized pacemaker cells located at the junction of the superior vena cava and the right atrium, near the sulcus terminalis. This node, measuring approximately 10-20 mm in length and embedded subepicardially, initiates the heart's electrical impulses through spontaneous depolarization. The impulses then propagate through the atrial myocardium to the atrioventricular (AV) node, situated in the inferior-posterior right atrium within the triangle of Koch—bounded by the tendon of Todaro, the septal leaflet of the tricuspid valve, and the coronary sinus ostium. The AV node, a compact structure about 1-5 mm in size, consists of transitional cells that provide a brief delay in conduction to coordinate atrial and ventricular systole. Emerging from the AV node, the penetrating portion of the atrioventricular bundle, known as the , traverses the central fibrous body of the heart and extends along the superior for about 10-20 mm. This insulated tract of specialized conduction fibers, composed of spindle-shaped cells, at the crest of the muscular into the left and right bundle branches, marking the transition to ventricular activation pathways. The occurs near the membranous septum, with the branches running subendocardially beneath an insulating layer of . The left bundle branch originates as a broad, fan-like sheet of fibers on the left , extending inferiorly and posteriorly for a short main stem of 10-20 mm before dividing into its two primary fascicles. The anterior (superior) fascicle, narrower and longer (approximately 5-10 cm), courses superiorly and leftward along the endocardial surface to supply the anterolateral left ventricular wall and anterosuperior . The posterior (inferior) fascicle, broader and shorter, travels inferiorly and posteriorly to innervate the posterobasal left ventricle and posteromedial , providing a more extensive distribution. In contrast, the right bundle branch forms a single, discrete fascicle that descends longitudinally along the right side of the , embedded in the subendocardium from the bifurcation to the ventricular apex. This slender cord, measuring 8-12 cm in length and 1-2 mm in diameter, remains unbranched until near the apex, where it penetrates the moderator band to reach the right ventricular free wall and trabeculae. Distally, both bundle branches ramify into an extensive network of , which are modified cells forming the terminal conduction system. These pale-staining fibers, larger in diameter (up to 80 μm) than typical myocytes with abundant and fewer contractile elements, spread subendocardially through the ventricular trabeculae and papillary muscles, ascending slightly to distribute impulses across the endocardial surface of the myocardium. This network ensures rapid, near-synchronous of the ventricular walls, with denser arborization in the left ventricle due to its greater mass. Anatomical variations in the conduction system include accessory pathways, which are aberrant strands of conducting tissue connecting atrial and ventricular myocardium, often at the atrioventricular annuli, such as atriofascicular or nodofascicular tracts. These congenital anomalies bypass portions of the normal pathway but do not alter the core structural organization.

Normal Physiology of Impulse Conduction

The cardiac impulse conduction begins at the sinoatrial (SA) node, located in the right atrium, which generates electrical impulses at a rate of 60-100 beats per minute under normal conditions, serving as the heart's primary pacemaker. These impulses propagate rapidly through the atrial myocardium, causing atrial depolarization and contraction, before reaching the atrioventricular (AV) node at the base of the interatrial septum. The AV node introduces a physiological delay of approximately 120 milliseconds to allow complete atrial emptying into the ventricles prior to ventricular contraction. From the AV node, the impulse travels to the bundle of His, a specialized tract of conduction fibers that penetrates the fibrous cardiac skeleton to connect the atria and ventricles. The then divides into the left and right bundle branches, which course along the to distribute the impulse to the respective ventricles. The right bundle branch, being shorter and thinner, conducts the signal to the right ventricle, while the left bundle branch, longer and divided into anterior and posterior fascicles, handles the larger left ventricle. These branches terminate in the Purkinje fiber network, a subendocardial system of large, fast-conducting fibers that rapidly spread the impulse across the ventricular myocardium from to . This sequence ensures coordinated ventricular activation, with the thinner-walled right ventricle depolarizing slightly ahead of the left, typically within 40-50 milliseconds of transseptal conduction time. The entire ventricular activation process results in a QRS of 80-120 milliseconds, reflecting efficient synchronous for optimal ejection. The bundle branches play a critical role in maintaining synchronous ventricular by enabling near-simultaneous of both ventricles, which optimizes and prevents dyscoordinated pumping. This apex-to-base pattern allows the ventricles to contract as a unified pump, directing blood upward toward the outflow tracts. At the cellular level, impulse conduction relies on voltage-gated ion channels: rapid occurs via influx of sodium ions through fast sodium channels, creating the upstroke of the action potential, while follows through efflux of ions via delayed rectifier channels, restoring the resting . With advancing age, conduction velocity in the bundle branches and Purkinje system experiences slight slowing due to progressive , fatty infiltration, and increased deposition, particularly after age 40, which can subtly prolong overall impulse transmission without necessarily causing overt in healthy individuals.

and Risk Factors

Bundle branch block (BBB) commonly arises from underlying structural heart diseases, including ischemic heart disease such as , which can directly impair the conduction system through ischemia or of the bundle branches. is another frequent , contributing to and fibrosis that affects the conduction pathways, particularly in (LBBB). Cardiomyopathies, including dilated, hypertrophic, and infiltrative types, are also major causes, with often leading to stretching or fibrosis of the bundles and hypertrophic forms causing compression or ischemia. Congenital and degenerative conditions play a significant role, especially in older individuals. Lenègre's disease involves progressive idiopathic fibrosis and degeneration of the conduction fibers, predominantly affecting the left bundle and leading to LBBB. Lev's disease, characterized by senile calcification and fibrosis of the cardiac skeleton, is another degenerative cause that can result in both right and left BBB. Congenital heart defects, such as atrial septal defects, may predispose to right bundle branch block (RBBB) due to associated right ventricular volume overload. Iatrogenic factors are increasingly recognized, particularly following cardiac interventions. Post-cardiac surgery or (TAVR) can cause BBB in 30-50% of cases, with higher risks of progression to complete . procedures, especially for , may inadvertently damage the right bundle during ethanol septal ablation. Key risk factors include advanced , with rising from approximately 1% in the general to 17% by 80 years. RBBB shows a male sex predominance and is associated with and , while LBBB correlates more strongly with and . In heart failure patients, LBBB reaches up to 33%, underscoring its link to advanced cardiac pathology. Rare etiologies encompass infections like , which can induce inflammatory damage to the conduction system, and infiltrative diseases such as or that deposit abnormal proteins in the myocardium.

Pathophysiological Mechanisms

Bundle branch block arises from disruptions in the specialized conduction fibers of the His-Purkinje system, leading to delayed or absent impulse transmission to the ventricles. At the tissue level, fibrosis and scarring represent primary mechanisms, where progressive degeneration of conduction fibers—often due to age-related changes like Lenègre's or Lev's disease—interrupts the normal pathway, causing incomplete or complete block. Ischemia, particularly from or , induces reversible or permanent damage by reducing oxygen supply to the bundle branches, resulting in cellular injury and slowed conduction. Inflammation and edema, as seen in or post-infectious states, further contribute by causing transient swelling that impairs impulse transmission across affected fibers. On a cellular basis, these blocks involve alterations in propagation, primarily through disruption of gap junctions and dysfunction. Gap junctions, formed by connexins such as Cx43, facilitate intercellular electrical coupling; and reduce their expression and function, leading to heterogeneous conduction velocities and increased arrhythmogenic risk. dysfunction, particularly involving the Nav1.5 channel encoded by , impairs the rapid phase (phase 0) of the , slowing or blocking impulse spread—often exacerbated by or genetic variants. These changes collectively prolong the QRS duration by forcing ventricular activation through slower myocardial cell-to-cell conduction rather than the efficient Purkinje network. Vulnerability differs between the left and right bundle branches due to their anatomical and vascular distinctions. The right bundle branch relies on a single blood supply from septal perforator branches of the , rendering it more susceptible to ischemic damage during anterior . In contrast, the left bundle branch benefits from dual perfusion via the (anterior fascicle) and the posterior descending artery (posterior fascicle, typically from the in right-dominant systems), providing greater resilience to isolated ischemic events. However, left bundle involvement often signals more extensive underlying . Blocks can progress from incomplete (partial delay) to complete (total interruption) as cumulative damage exceeds the for conduction , influenced by ongoing or ischemia. Reversible blocks, such as those rate-dependent (e.g., tachycardia-induced) or due to transient factors like , may resolve with correction of the underlying trigger, restoring normal propagation. Irreversible blocks, typically post-infarction or from advanced degenerative , persist due to permanent structural loss, often necessitating interventions like pacing.

Classification and Types

Right Bundle Branch Block

Right bundle branch block (RBBB) is a cardiac conduction abnormality characterized by a disruption in the right bundle branch of the His-Purkinje system, resulting in delayed activation of the right ventricle and altered ventricular depolarization sequence. This leads to asynchronous contraction between the left and right ventricles, though the left ventricle typically depolarizes normally via the left bundle branch. The prevalence of RBBB increases with age, occurring in approximately 0.2% to 1.3% of the general adult population, with rates rising to 1.4% in men and 0.5% in women in large cohort studies; including incomplete forms, it can affect up to 5% of adults. Isolated RBBB is often benign and incidental, particularly in younger individuals or athletes, and is not strongly linked to traditional cardiac risk factors. On (ECG), complete RBBB is diagnosed by a QRS duration of 120 milliseconds or greater, an rSR' pattern (with the second R' wave taller than the initial r wave) in leads and , and a wide, slurred in leads I and V6 that is broader than the R wave or lasts more than 40 milliseconds. These findings reflect the delayed right ventricular activation, with the terminal QRS vector directed rightward and anteriorly. Clinically, isolated RBBB is usually and requires no in otherwise healthy individuals, though it may be associated with conditions such as , , or congenital heart diseases like . In contrast to , which often signals more advanced left-sided pathology and poorer , RBBB in isolation carries a relatively low risk of progression to higher-degree . However, when combined with left fascicular blocks, the risk of developing complete increases significantly, warranting closer monitoring.

Left Bundle Branch Block

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a cardiac conduction abnormality characterized by a delay or interruption in the electrical impulses traveling through the left of the His-Purkinje system, resulting in asynchronous of the left ventricle. This leads to initial of the right ventricle followed by delayed and abnormal of the left ventricle, causing electrical and dyssynchrony. The left divides into anterior and posterior fascicles; a complete LBBB typically involves blockade of both fascicles or the main trunk. The prevalence of LBBB in the general population is approximately 0.06% to 0.1%, with incidence rates of 1 to 4 cases per 1,000 person-years, increasing with age to 1%–5% in individuals over 70 years and 6%–7% over 80 years. It is more common in men and White individuals and is frequently associated with underlying structural heart disease, such as , , , or disorders, rather than occurring in isolation. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of LBBB relies on specific criteria established by the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and Heart Rhythm Society (AHA/ACCF/HRS). These include a QRS duration of 120 ms or greater, a broad, notched, or slurred R wave in leads I, aVL, V5, and V6, absence of Q waves in leads I, V5, and V6, a peak R-wave time greater than 60 ms in leads V5 and V6, and ST-segment and T-wave displacement opposite to the major deflection of the QRS complex. Additionally, there is often ST depression and T-wave inversion in the left-sided leads. For stricter diagnosis, particularly to identify patients likely to respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy, the Strauss criteria (proposed in 2011 and widely adopted) require a QRS duration of at least 140 ms in men or 130 ms in women, mid-QRS notching or slurring in at least two of the leads I, aVL, V1, V2, V5, or V6, and QS or rS complexes in leads V1 and V2. These criteria emphasize notching in the mid-QRS interval to distinguish true LBBB from nonspecific intraventricular conduction delays. A 2024 study proposed a revision to the LBBB criteria, incorporating measurement of the time to nadir of the R wave in lead V1 to better distinguish true LBBB, though this has not been adopted in major guidelines as of 2025. Clinically, LBBB is a marker of significant cardiac and portends a higher of adverse outcomes compared to , which is often incidental and benign. It is strongly associated with increased of (hazard ratio approximately 3.08), , sudden cardiac death (up to 10-fold higher incidence), and overall cardiovascular mortality (around 50% within 10 years in longitudinal studies). The dyssynchronous activation can induce or exacerbate left ventricular dysfunction, contributing to . Furthermore, LBBB complicates the detection of myocardial ischemia on ECG, as the altered pattern masks ischemic changes, such as ST-segment shifts, leading to challenges in interpreting tests and potentially false-positive or false-negative results on nuclear perfusion imaging.

Bifascicular and Trifascicular Blocks

Bifascicular block is defined as conduction delay or block involving two of the three main fascicles of the His-Purkinje system, most commonly (RBBB) combined with either (LAFB) or (LPFB). LBBB is sometimes considered a form of because it affects both left fascicles, though the term more typically refers to RBBB plus a left fascicular block. Trifascicular block extends this to involvement of all three fascicles while maintaining atrioventricular (AV) conduction, often manifesting as plus first-degree AV block (prolonged greater than 200 ms) or, less commonly, alternating bundle branch block or Mobitz type II second-degree AV block. These patterns indicate widespread disease in the distal conduction system, distinguishing them from isolated single-branch blocks. The prevalence of bifascicular block in the general adult population is approximately 1% to 1.5%, increasing with age and reaching up to 17% in patients over 80 years, particularly those with degenerative conduction disease like Lenègre's disease. Trifascicular block is even less common, often identified incidentally in elderly patients with underlying structural heart disease. On (ECG), appears as combined patterns, such as RBBB (QRS duration >120 ms with rSR' in V1 and wide S in I and V6) plus (<-30°) for RBBB + LAFB, or RBBB plus right axis deviation (>90° to +180°) for RBBB + LPFB. Trifascicular involvement adds a prolonged to these features, signaling potential instability in the remaining conduction pathway. Clinically, bifascicular and trifascicular blocks serve as precursors to complete AV block, with a cumulative incidence of high-degree AV block reaching 11% at 5 years in patients with , driven by progressive or ischemia in the conduction system. Symptoms, when present, arise from hemodynamic compromise due to intermittent or pauses, including syncope, , or , and are more frequent in trifascicular cases or with associated syncope of unknown origin. According to the 2018 /AHA/HRS guidelines (with no major updates through 2025), ambulatory such as 24- to 48-hour Holter or longer-term external loop recording is recommended (Class IIa) for patients with and unexplained syncope to assess progression risk and guide implantation decisions. In asymptomatic cases without structural heart , routine monitoring is not mandated but may be considered in high-risk elderly patients.

Clinical Presentation

Symptoms and Signs

Bundle branch block (BBB) is frequently asymptomatic, particularly in cases of isolated (RBBB), where it is often detected incidentally during routine or evaluation for unrelated conditions. In contrast, (LBBB) may also present without symptoms in its early stages, especially among older adults, with prevalence increasing to 1-5% in those over 70 years. When symptoms occur, they are typically nonspecific and arise from associated cardiac dysfunction rather than the conduction delay itself, including , , and presyncope due to transient or diminished . Syncope represents a more concerning manifestation, potentially signaling intermittent high-degree or reduced ventricular synchrony leading to hemodynamic instability. may accompany these episodes, often indicating underlying arrhythmias that warrant urgent evaluation. On physical examination, patients with LBBB may exhibit reversed (paradoxical) splitting of the second heart sound (S2), resulting from delayed left ventricular activation that postpones aortic valve closure relative to pulmonic valve closure. Isolated RBBB, however, is more commonly associated with wide physiological splitting of S2 due to prolonged right ventricular ejection time. Bifascicular blocks can contribute to exercise intolerance, manifesting as exertional fatigue or dyspnea from impaired chronotropic response and ventricular dyssynchrony. LBBB tends to be more symptomatic than RBBB, particularly when linked to structural heart disease, whereas bifascicular or trifascicular involvement heightens the risk of progressive conduction abnormalities.

Associated Conditions

Bundle branch block (BBB) frequently coexists with various cardiovascular conditions, reflecting underlying structural or ischemic heart disease. (LBBB) is particularly common in , occurring in 20-30% of patients with reduced , where it correlates with more advanced disease and dyssynchrony. (AF) also shows a higher among individuals with BBB compared to those without, with studies indicating that BBB patients have an elevated risk of AF development, especially in the context of cardiovascular hospitalizations. , such as , is associated with BBB, notably following where new-onset LBBB arises in up to 50-70% of cases depending on the valve system used. Non-cardiac conditions can similarly accompany BBB, often through secondary effects on cardiac conduction. (RBBB) is linked to , where increased right ventricular pressure contributes to conduction delays, with RBBB appearing more frequently in patients with advanced . imbalances, particularly , can induce transient BBB, including LBBB, by altering membrane potentials and slowing intraventricular conduction; this reversible association underscores the need for prompt correction in acute settings. Certain syndromic conditions exhibit notable overlaps with BBB patterns. often presents with an RBBB-like morphology on , characterized by right precordial ST-segment elevation, which can mimic or coexist with true conduction blocks in genetically predisposed individuals. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular (ARVC) is associated with RBBB and fascicular blocks due to fibrofatty replacement in the right ventricle, leading to progressive conduction abnormalities in affected patients. Epidemiologically, BBB shows heightened incidence in endemic regions for , where RBBB and bifascicular blocks are hallmark findings in up to 30-50% of chronic cases, serving as early indicators of chagasic . In such areas, serological testing is warranted upon detection of these conduction patterns to identify underlying infection. The presence of BBB, especially LBBB, complicates the management of coexisting acute conditions like ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) by obscuring ST-segment changes on , potentially delaying ; modified criteria such as Sgarbossa's rules are employed to improve diagnostic accuracy in these scenarios.

Diagnosis

Electrocardiographic Criteria

Bundle branch block (BBB) is characterized on the electrocardiogram (ECG) by a prolonged QRS duration exceeding 120 milliseconds, reflecting delayed ventricular activation due to conduction delay in the His-Purkinje system. This prolongation is accompanied by secondary ST-segment and T-wave changes opposite in direction to the main QRS deflection, which are considered abnormalities rather than ischemic signs. Right Bundle Branch Block (RBBB) is diagnosed by specific QRS morphology in precordial leads. In lead V1 or V2, a characteristic rsR' or rSR' pattern is observed, with the R' wave representing delayed right ventricular activation, alongside a wide S wave in leads I, aVL, and V5-V6. Complete RBBB requires a QRS duration of at least 120 ms, while incomplete RBBB features a QRS between 110 and 120 ms in adults, with similar but less pronounced morphological changes. Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB) shows broad, monophasic R waves in the lateral leads (I, aVL, V5, and V6), with absence of Q waves in these leads and a QS or rS complex in V1-V2. Traditional criteria include a QRS duration ≥120 ms, but stricter definitions proposed by Strauss et al. emphasize QRS >140 ms in men and >130 ms in women, plus notching or slurring on the upstroke of the R wave in at least two contiguous lateral leads, with the time from QRS onset to the nadir of the S wave in V1-V2 exceeding 60 ms.02421-5/fulltext) Recent refinements, such as a time to notch in lead I >75 ms, enhance specificity for true LBBB by distinguishing it from mimics like left ventricular hypertrophy. Bifascicular block is identified by RBBB combined with (left axis deviation ≤ -45°) or (right axis deviation ≥ +120°), resulting in a prolonged QRS with axis shift. Rate-dependent BBB occurs when conduction delay appears or worsens at higher heart rates. Aberrancy, a functional rate-related often due to partial refractoriness in the bundle branches, produces transient BBB patterns that resolve with rate slowing and must be differentiated from true organic block by its reproducibility with pacing or exercise and absence of persistent structural changes.
BBB TypeKey ECG FeaturesQRS Duration
Complete RBBBrsR' in V1-V2; wide S in I, V5-V6≥120 ms
Incomplete RBBBrsR' in V1-V2 (milder); wide S in lateral leads110-120 ms
LBBB (Strauss criteria)Monophasic R in I, aVL, V5-V6; notching/slurring; QS/rS in V1-V2>140 ms (men), >130 ms (women)
Bifascicular (RBBB + LAFB)RBBB pattern + (≤ -45°)≥120 ms

Advanced Diagnostic Modalities

plays a crucial role in evaluating bundle branch block by assessing left ventricular function and identifying wall motion abnormalities. In patients with , echocardiographic studies often reveal increased end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, along with reduced , indicating dyssynchronous contraction and potential . This modality helps differentiate conduction delays from underlying structural heart disease, such as ischemic or non-ischemic , by quantifying septal and lateral wall motion discrepancies. For , may show right ventricular dilation or dysfunction, particularly in cases associated with . Electrophysiology studies, including His bundle recordings, provide precise localization of the conduction block level, distinguishing intra-Hisian from infra-Hisian sites. These invasive procedures involve catheter-based mapping of the to measure intervals like the time, which is prolonged in infranodal blocks. In patients with bundle branch block, such recordings confirm abnormal intraventricular conduction and guide decisions on pacing therapy. This approach is particularly valuable for bifascicular or trifascicular blocks, where it identifies risks of progression to complete . Cardiac (MRI) and computed (CT) are advanced tools for detecting or ischemia in the conduction tissue underlying bundle branch block. Late enhancement on MRI highlights myocardial in the or bundle branches, correlating with conduction system degeneration in . can identify ischemic causes, such as affecting the conduction pathways, especially in acute presentations. These imaging techniques offer superior tissue characterization compared to , aiding in etiological diagnosis. Holter monitoring is essential for capturing intermittent bundle branch blocks and tracking disease progression over time. Continuous 24-hour recordings detect rate-dependent or transient blocks that may not appear on standard electrocardiograms, such as alternating narrow and wide QRS complexes. This tool quantifies the frequency and duration of episodes, providing insights into arrhythmogenic risks and guiding monitoring in patients. As of 2025, -assisted ECG analysis has emerged as a promising advancement for identifying subtle bundle branch blocks. algorithms enhance detection of incomplete or atypical conduction delays by analyzing vast datasets for patterns invisible to the human eye, improving sensitivity in early-stage disease. These tools integrate with wearable devices for real-time screening, potentially reducing diagnostic delays in high-risk populations.

Management and Prognosis

Therapeutic Interventions

The management of bundle branch block () primarily focuses on addressing symptoms, preventing progression to higher-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, and treating underlying etiologies, with interventions tailored to the type of BBB and clinical context. For asymptomatic patients with isolated (), conservative observation is recommended, as permanent pacing is not indicated in the absence of symptoms or advanced conduction disease. Similarly, isolated () without symptoms or structural heart disease warrants monitoring rather than intervention, emphasizing the benign nature of BBB in otherwise healthy individuals. Treatment of underlying causes is foundational, particularly for BBB associated with ischemia, hypertension, or cardiomyopathy. In ischemic BBB, such as new BBB following acute , revascularization through or coronary artery bypass grafting is prioritized to restore and potentially reverse conduction abnormalities, though permanent pacing is not recommended for BBB alone without second- or third-degree AV block. For BBB linked to or , guideline-directed medical therapy—including beta-blockers, inhibitors, or antagonists—is employed to control , reduce ventricular remodeling, and alleviate symptoms, thereby mitigating progression of conduction delays. Reversible causes, such as medication-induced BBB (e.g., from beta-blockers or antiarrhythmics), require discontinuation of the offending agent, with class I antiarrhythmics specifically avoided due to their potential to exacerbate conduction slowing. Device therapy plays a central role in symptomatic or high-risk cases. Permanent pacemaker implantation is indicated (Class I recommendation) for patients with bifascicular or trifascicular experiencing syncope attributable to transient high-degree , particularly with a His-ventricular ≥70 on electrophysiologic study or of infranodal . It is also recommended for alternating BBB or symptomatic in these settings. For LBBB with concomitant and reduced (≤35%), () is strongly recommended (Class I, Level of Evidence A) in patients with QRS duration ≥150 , New York Heart Association class II-IV symptoms, and despite guideline-directed medical therapy, as it improves ventricular synchrony, reduces hospitalizations, and enhances survival. Emerging techniques such as conduction system pacing, including left bundle branch area pacing, are under investigation as alternatives to traditional biventricular , with studies as of 2025 showing promising improvements in ventricular synchrony and clinical outcomes in select patients with LBBB and . In post-transcatheter persistent LBBB, or consideration (Class IIb) is advised if high-degree develops, with close surveillance for . Pharmacologic options are generally supportive rather than directly targeting BBB, focusing on rate control in associated tachyarrhythmias or symptom relief from comorbidities. Beta-blockers or may be used for or rate control in complicating BBB, but with caution to avoid further conduction prolongation; antiarrhythmic drugs like can be considered for ventricular arrhythmias but require monitoring for worsening block. Surgical interventions are uncommon and reserved for reversible etiologies, such as for accessory pathways contributing to conduction disturbances or surgical correction in congenital heart disease, though these are not standard for acquired BBB.

Prognostic Implications

The prognosis of bundle branch block (BBB) varies significantly by type and underlying cardiac status. Isolated (RBBB) in asymptomatic individuals without structural heart disease is generally benign and does not confer additional cardiovascular or impact . In contrast, (LBBB) is associated with a substantially elevated of incident , with a of approximately 5 (95% CI, 2.18-11.39) in older adults with structurally normal hearts at baseline. carries a of progression to advanced atrioventricular (AV) block, occurring at an annual rate of 1-4% overall and up to 17% in symptomatic patients with syncope. Mortality outcomes are more adverse with LBBB than isolated RBBB. A meta-analysis of patients developing new-onset persistent LBBB after transcatheter implantation found a 41% increased risk of all-cause mortality at 1 year (risk ratio 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12-1.78) and a similar elevation in cardiovascular mortality. In broader cohorts with , LBBB predicts higher 1-year mortality rates, with hazard ratios ranging from 1.7 to 3.18 for all-cause death compared to those without LBBB. Key complications stem from ventricular dyssynchrony induced by , particularly LBBB, which leads to inefficient left ventricular contractions, septal thinning, lateral wall , and progressive remodeling that exacerbates and systolic dysfunction. In patients with structural heart disease, this dyssynchrony heightens the risk of sudden cardiac death, with LBBB serving as an independent predictor (up to 10-fold increased incidence in some populations). can be modified by factors such as age and comorbidities; BBB is often benign in young adults without evident heart disease, with favorable long-term outcomes and low rates of ventricular dysfunction. Early interventions, such as in eligible cases, have been shown to reverse remodeling and improve survival. Post-2020 studies highlight BBB's role in cardiac sequelae, where new-onset blocks during infection are associated with increased odds of major cardiovascular complications such as (adjusted OR 2.11) and . These findings underscore persistent myocardial injury and arrhythmogenic risks in , particularly among those with conduction abnormalities.

References

  1. [1]
    Bundle branch block - Symptoms & causes - Mayo Clinic
    Bundle branch block is a condition in which there's a delay or blockage along the pathway that electrical impulses travel to make the heart beat.
  2. [2]
    Left Bundle Branch Block - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Oct 5, 2024 · Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a cardiac conduction disorder that affects the left bundle branch of the heart's conduction system.Introduction · Evaluation · Treatment / Management · Differential Diagnosis
  3. [3]
    Right Bundle Branch Block - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Right bundle branch block (RBB) is an electrocardiogram finding resulting in a widened QRS and electrocardiographic vector changes.
  4. [4]
    Bundle branch block - Diagnosis & treatment - Mayo Clinic
    A delay or blockage in the heart's signaling pathways can interrupt the heartbeat and make it harder for the heart to pump blood.
  5. [5]
    Overview of Cardiac Conduction - Conduction System Tutorial
    The atrial depolarization spreads to the atrioventricular (AV) node, and passes through the bundle of His to the bundle branches/Purkinje fibers. Right: The ...
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
    Conduction System of the Heart: Overview, Gross Anatomy, Natural ...
    Feb 3, 2025 · The conducting system of the heart consists of cardiac muscle cells and conducting fibers (not nervous tissue) that are specialized for initiating impulses.
  8. [8]
    Anatomical Considerations for His Bundle Pacing | Circulation
    Jul 12, 2019 · Fascicles finally lose their fibrous sheaths as they extensively ramify into peripheral conduction network referred to as the Purkinje fibers.Conduction System Of The... · How To Find The Hb? · Factors Impacting Hb Capture
  9. [9]
    Left Bundle Branch - AnatomyZone
    The left bundle branch is comprised of an anterior fascicle and posterior fascicle. The bundle branches terminate by dividing into Purkinje fibres.
  10. [10]
    Bundle Branch and Fascicular Blocks | Concise Medical Knowledge
    May 16, 2024 · The bundle splits in 2 → right and left bundles branches; Left bundle branch splits → left anterior fascicle and left posterior fascicle ...
  11. [11]
    Heart Conduction System (Cardiac Conduction) - Cleveland Clinic
    Bundle of His (atrioventricular bundle)​​ The bundle of His (sounds like “hiss”) is a branch of fibers (nerve cells) that extends from your AV node. This fiber ...
  12. [12]
    Purkinje Fibers | Cardiovascular System - Histology Guide
    Distribution: Form extensive networks throughout the ventricular walls. Cellular Morphology: Cell Size : Significantly larger than normal cardiac myocytes (2-3 ...
  13. [13]
    Variants of accessory pathways - PubMed
    Jan 9, 2020 · Variant accessory pathways include atriofascicular, nodofascicular, nodoventricular, atrio-Hisian, and fasciculoventricular pathways.
  14. [14]
    Accessory Pathway - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    An accessory pathway is usually a strand of atrial myocardium joining the atrium to the ventricle at the level of the tricuspid or mitral valve annulus.
  15. [15]
    Physiology, Bundle of His - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    May 1, 2023 · The bundle of His is an elongated segment connecting the AV Node and the left and right bundle branches of the septal crest.
  16. [16]
    Normal and Abnormal Electrical Conduction - CV Physiology
    The impulses then enter the base of the ventricle at the Bundle of His and then follow the left and right bundle branches along the interventricular septum.
  17. [17]
    ECG Patterns In Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - PMC - NIH
    QRS Pattern Of Underlying Ventricular Activation​​ The LV endocardium is reached through the septum, which takes 40 to 50 ms. This transseptal conduction time ...
  18. [18]
    Normal Electrocardiography (ECG) Intervals - Medscape Reference
    Feb 16, 2024 · QRS complex: 80-100 milliseconds. ST segment: 80-120 milliseconds. T wave: 160 milliseconds. QT interval: 420 milliseconds or less if heart ...
  19. [19]
    Bundle Branches - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The right bundle branch travels along the right side of the septum and supplies excitation to the right ventricle. The left bundle branch is really two sets of ...
  20. [20]
    Physiology, Action Potential - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    The subsequent return to resting potential, repolarization, is mediated by the opening of potassium ion channels. To reestablish the appropriate balance of ions ...
  21. [21]
    Age-related variation in the interstitial tissues of the cardiac ...
    In the His bundle (HB), fatty infiltration and fibrosis appear after 40 years. The left bundle branch (LBB) showed similar changes. The appearance of ...Missing: velocity | Show results with:velocity
  22. [22]
    Epidemiology of Arrhythmias and Conduction Disorders in Older ...
    These changes include sinus node dysfunction, slowing of AV nodal conduction, left axis deviation, bundle branch blocks, and an increased prevalence of both ...
  23. [23]
    Bundle-Branch Block in a General Male Population | Circulation
    The prevalence of bundle-branch block increases from 1% at age 50 years to 17% at age 80 years, resulting in a cumulative incidence of 18%.
  24. [24]
    Lyme carditis with isolated left bundle branch block and myocarditis ...
    Dec 16, 2017 · We present an interesting case of a young male whose main manifestation of Lyme carditis was isolated LBBB. He also had mild Lyme myocarditis.
  25. [25]
    Right Bundle Branch Block: Current Considerations - PMC - NIH
    RBBB is a block at the right bundle branch leading to delayed right ventricle depolarization. It can develop due to various reasons such as function and ...7. Ecg Findings And... · 7.1. Complete Rbbb · 7.1. 1. Qrs Complex<|control11|><|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Cardiac arrhythmogenesis: roles of ion channels and their functional ...
    Disruption of myocardial bundle continuity and gap junction formation due to increased extracellular matrix associated with fibrotic and/or hypertrophic ...
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    What Should Be Done With the Asymptomatic Patient With Right ...
    Sep 14, 2020 · Right bundle branch block (RBBB) is frequently found in the general healthy population. RBBB is caused by diseases that affect the right bundle ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  29. [29]
    Incidence, Clinical Characteristics, and Prognostic Significance of ...
    RBBB is usually the manifestation of large infarctions that are often accompanied by heart failure, complete AV block, arrhythmias, and a high mortality rate.
  30. [30]
    Left Bundle Branch Block: Current and Future Perspectives
    Mar 18, 2020 · Left bundle branch block may be due to conduction system degeneration or a reflection of myocardial pathology.
  31. [31]
    Left bundle branch block: prevalence, incidence, follow-up and ...
    27 men and 17 women were found to have left bundle branch bock (LBBB). The prevalence of LBBB at that time was 0.43% for men and 0.28% for women.
  32. [32]
    Prevention of Syncope Through Permanent Cardiac Pacing in ...
    Bifascicular block is a rhythm disturbance linked with increased mortality, with an uneven occurrence of syncopal episodes, often associated with severe patient ...
  33. [33]
    Arrhythmia - Cardiology Explained - NCBI Bookshelf
    Bifascicular block. The term "bifascicular block" refers to a block of any two of the three fascicles. Clearly, this should include LBBB (left anterior + ...
  34. [34]
    Incidence of and Risk Factors for Bundle Branch Block in Adults ...
    The Incidences of complete right bundle branch block (CRBBB) were 1.5 and 2.9% in people older than 40 and 65 years, respectively. Approximately 38.0% of ...
  35. [35]
    Chronic bifascicular block in a geriatric patient presenting for ... - NIH
    Jun 1, 2020 · [1] The incidence of bifascicular block is almost 17% in patients of age more than 80 years and is diagnosed by the presence of complete right ...Missing: prevalence | Show results with:prevalence
  36. [36]
    Relationship of Right Bundle-Branch Block and Marked Left Axis ...
    The pattern of complete right bundle-branch block (RBBB) combined with abnormal left axis deviation is shown to be the predominant conduction abnormality.
  37. [37]
    Fascicular Blocks: Update 2019 - PMC - NIH
    This review intends to redefine reliable criteria for the electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic diagnosis of left fascicular blocks [hemiblocks].
  38. [38]
    Bifascicular block in unexplained syncope is underrecognized ... - NIH
    Feb 28, 2022 · The presence of bifascicular block on electrocardiography suggests that otherwise-unexplained syncope may be due to complete heart block.
  39. [39]
    2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management ...
    Nov 6, 2018 · A study of 518 consecutive 24-hour Holter monitors performed for a broad range of cardiac symptoms revealed significant bradyarrhythmia in only ...
  40. [40]
    Mortality in Patients With Right Bundle‐Branch Block in the Absence ...
    Sep 14, 2020 · Right bundle‐branch block (RBBB) occurs in 0.2% to 1.3% of people and is considered a benign finding. However, some studies have suggested ...
  41. [41]
    The Second Heart Sound - Clinical Methods - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    ... S2 is produced in part by hemodynamic events immediately following closure ... Right bundle branch block (RBBB) is the most common cause of the ...
  42. [42]
    Long‐term prognosis in patients with bifascicular block – the ...
    Apr 21, 2006 · Impaired exercise tolerance and blunted BP/HR reactions during the exercise test were associated with a significantly higher incidence of all- ...
  43. [43]
    Mechanism of harm from left bundle branch block - ScienceDirect
    LBBB is found in 20–30% of all patients with congestive heart failure and is associated with increased mortality [5]. A number of studies have discussed the ...
  44. [44]
    Association between atrial fibrillation and bundle branch block - PMC
    This study demonstrates that prevalence of Afib is higher in patients with BBB than without BBB. Cost are higher for Afib patients with BBB, compared to those ...
  45. [45]
    Bundle branch blocks and cardiovascular mortality in chronic ...
    Whereas new-onset LBBB might be indicative of acute coronary syndrome, RBBB may be associated with lung diseases, pulmonary embolism, and pulmonary hypertension ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Transient Left Bundle Branch Block due to Severe Hyperkalemia - NIH
    May 3, 2017 · Hyperkalemia is a potentially life-threatening electrolyte imbalance that can lead to sudden death from cardiac arrhythmias and asystole.
  47. [47]
    The Brugada ECG Pattern | Circulation: Arrhythmia and ...
    Jun 1, 2010 · The typical ECG anomaly is currently known as the Brugada ECG pattern and the conglomerate of features as the Brugada syndrome.
  48. [48]
    Diagnostic Dilemmas: Overlapping Features of Brugada Syndrome ...
    Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and Brugada syndrome are distinct clinical entities which diagnostic criteria exclude their coexistence ...
  49. [49]
    Chagas Cardiomyopathy: An Update of Current Clinical Knowledge ...
    Aug 20, 2018 · The combination of RBBB and left anterior fascicular block is strongly suggestive of Chagas disease and should prompt a search for risk factors ...
  50. [50]
    Electrocardiographic abnormalities in Chagas disease in the ...
    Among specific ECG abnormalities, prevalence of complete right bundle branch block (RBBB) (OR=4.60; 95%CIs=2.97-7.11), left anterior fascicular block (LAFB) ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Evolving Acute Myocardial ...
    Feb 22, 1996 · The presence of left bundle-branch block on the electrocardiogram may conceal the changes of acute myocardial infarction, which can delay both its recognition ...
  52. [52]
    AHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the Standardization and ...
    Feb 19, 2009 · Incomplete RBBB is defined by QRS duration between 110 and 120 ms in adults, between 90 and 100 ms in children between 4 and 16 years of age, ...
  53. [53]
    A Revised Definition of Left Bundle Branch Block Using Time to ...
    Mar 27, 2024 · A time to notch in lead I longer than 75 milliseconds was proposed as a new ECG criterion for LBBB, and this criterion demonstrated improved specificity.
  54. [54]
    2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management ...
    The presence of left bundle branch block on electrocardiogram markedly increases the likelihood of underlying structural heart disease and of diagnosing left ...
  55. [55]
    Influence of left bundle branch block on left ventricular volumes ...
    Patients with complete left bundle branch block showed higher EDV (p=0.025) and ESV (p<0.01) and a lower EF (p<0.01) than patients with normal conduction.
  56. [56]
    Effect of isolated left bundle-branch block on biventricular volumes ...
    Sep 20, 2018 · Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is associated with abnormal left ventricular (LV) contraction, and is frequently associated with co-morbid ...
  57. [57]
    Predicting the Development of Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection ...
    Left bundle branch block (LBBB) increases the likelihood of developing reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) but predicting which patients with ...
  58. [58]
    Electrophysiological and Clinical Observations in Patients ... - PubMed
    Electrophysiological studies (His bundle recordings and atrial stimulation) were performed in nine patients who manifested periods of both right and left ...
  59. [59]
    Significance of his Bundle Recording in Bundle Branch Block
    His bundle studies in patients with bundle branch block (BBB) have revealed abnormal intraventricular conduction in many patients especially with left ...
  60. [60]
    The use of His bundle recordings in the analysis of unilateral and ...
    His bundle electrograms were recorded in 26 patients with bundle branch block. The interval from the His bundle electrogram to the onset of ventricular ...
  61. [61]
    Relationship between myocardial fibrosis and left bundle branch ...
    It can affect LV working myocardium [8,9] and involve conduction system including left bundle branch. Myocardial fibrosis is a common pathological ...
  62. [62]
    Insights From Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    May 13, 2025 · Our results confirm this mechanism, showing that IVCD is linked to greater tissue damage and more LGE in the LV free wall compared with LBBB.
  63. [63]
    A Case of Intermittent Left Bundle Branch Block - PMC - NIH
    Jun 23, 2021 · Holter monitor (24 hours) showed sinus rhythm with narrow QRS complexes alternating with intermittent LBBB at faster heart rates. Patient ...
  64. [64]
    Repetitive intermittent left bundle branch block - PubMed
    Continuous 24-hour Holter monitoring revealed a broad range of repetitive intermittent LBBB grades with a rate-dependent pattern that was also associated with ...
  65. [65]
    Decoding the heart: how artificial intelligence is transforming ...
    Sep 19, 2024 · ECG and wearables. AI algorithms can analyze vast amounts of ECG data, identifying subtle patterns indicative of arrhythmias. This allows for ...
  66. [66]
    Artificial intelligence-enhanced six-lead portable electrocardiogram ...
    Mar 25, 2025 · In this prospective, single-centre study, we assessed the diagnostic performance of AI-ECG for detecting LVSD using a six-lead hand-held portable device.<|control11|><|separator|>
  67. [67]
    2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure
    Apr 1, 2022 · Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and right bundle branch block: a systematic review.
  68. [68]
    Left Bundle Branch Block as a Risk Factor for Heart Failure
    Aug 7, 2025 · This cohort study analyzes associations of left bundle branch block with heart failure among adults aged 65 years or older from the ...
  69. [69]
    Bifascicular Block - ECG Library - LITFL
    Oct 8, 2024 · Overall rate of progression to complete heart block is 1-4% per year. In symptom free patients, these figures are ~1% per year. Patients ...Missing: 5-10% | Show results with:5-10%
  70. [70]
    The Prognostic Relevance of a New Bundle Branch Block After ...
    Dec 26, 2024 · Bundle branch block results in ventricular dyssynchrony and reduced cardiac output and may be associated with a poorer prognosis. This ...Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
  71. [71]
    Left bundle-branch block is associated with increased 1-year ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · LBBB was present in 1391 patients (25.2%) and was associated with an increased 1-year mortality rate from any cause (hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% ...
  72. [72]
    New-onset left bundle branch block independently predicts long ...
    New-onset LBBB was a strong and independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR 3.18, 95% CI: 1.90–5.31, P < 0.001) at multivariate analysis.<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    Clinical and Prognostic Significance of Idiopathic Left Bundle ...
    Mar 9, 2021 · In young adults without apparent heart disease, LBBB is a heterogeneous condition. In the vast majority of cases, the prognosis is good and no ventricular ...Missing: comorbidities | Show results with:comorbidities
  74. [74]
  75. [75]
    Outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and new onset heart blocks - NIH
    To analyze the impact that COVID-19 has on the odds of major cardiovascular complications in patients with new onset heart blocks or bundle branch blocks (BBB).Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
  76. [76]
    Left vs. Right Bundle Branch Block in COVID-19 Patients - MDPI
    Clinical evidence indicates that LBBB poses greater health risks, resulting in higher mortalities and more advanced cardiac dysfunction [3]. RBBB is more ...