Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

C. V. Raman

Sir Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman (7 November 1888 – 21 November 1970) was an physicist renowned for his discovery of the Raman effect, a form of of that reveals information about molecular structures. Born in , southern , to a father who lectured in mathematics and physics, Raman conducted groundbreaking experiments on scattering during a sea voyage in , leading to the observation of the effect on 28 February 1928 using sunlight and simple apparatus. For this work, he received the , becoming the first person of Asian descent to win in a scientific field and highlighting independent Indian contributions to fundamental physics amid colonial constraints. Raman's career also encompassed research in acoustics, , and vibration theory; he served as director of the in and founded the , fostering indigenous scientific inquiry. His empirical approach emphasized direct observation over theoretical speculation, influencing techniques still vital for chemical analysis today.

Early Years

Birth and Family Background

Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman was born on November 7, 1888, in (then spelled Trichinopoly), a city in the of British India. His parents belonged to the Tamil Iyer community, with his father, Chandrasekhara Iyer, employed as a teacher of mathematics and physics at a local institution. His mother, Sitalakshmi, managed the household amid a scholarly atmosphere shaped by his father's profession. The family's circumstances reflected modest academic roots typical of educated Brahmin households in colonial southern India, where Raman's father initially taught at a high school before securing a lectureship. When Raman was four years old, the family relocated approximately 800 kilometers northeast to Waltair (present-day Visakhapatnam), following his father's promotion to a college lecturer position at Mrs. A.V.N. College, which provided greater stability and exposure to scientific discourse. This move immersed the young Raman in an environment rich with discussions on physics and mathematics from an early age.

Formal Education and Early Influences

Raman received his early formal education in , where his family had relocated shortly after his birth. He attended , completing his at the age of 11 and ranking first overall. Following this, he spent two years studying intermediate sciences at A. V. N. College in the same city before transferring to Presidency College in Madras in 1902, at the age of 13. At Presidency College, part of the , Raman pursued a degree, graduating in 1904 at age 16 with first-class honors in physics, alongside distinctions in English; he received gold medals in both subjects for topping his class. He continued with postgraduate studies, earning a in physics in 1907 while conducting independent experimental work in , which formed the basis of his first research publication during his student years. These academic achievements reflected his exceptional aptitude, as he often completed coursework ahead of schedule and engaged in self-directed inquiries beyond the standard curriculum. Raman's early scientific inclinations were shaped by his father, Chandrasekhara Iyer, a in physics and who introduced him to experimental demonstrations and fostered a home environment conducive to intellectual pursuits. From childhood, Raman displayed a keen interest in physical phenomena, performing rudimentary experiments with available materials and developing an intuitive grasp of and . During his college years, he immersed himself in advanced texts, including Lord Rayleigh's Theory of Sound and works on acoustics and , which ignited his focus on wave propagation and ; his fascination with musical instruments further reinforced these interests through practical explorations of and harmonics. This blend of familial guidance and autonomous reading propelled his transition from prodigious student to nascent researcher, emphasizing empirical verification over rote learning.

Professional Trajectory

Entry into Civil Service and Initial Research

Following his degree in physics from Presidency College, Madras, in January 1907, where he achieved the highest honors, Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman opted for the due to limited research opportunities in and personal health constraints that precluded postgraduate studies abroad. He secured the top rank in the Financial Examination that year and was appointed Assistant Accountant General in the Indian Finance Department, posted to Calcutta (now ) at age 19. This role, which he retained until 1917 amid promotions to senior auditing positions, provided financial stability but demanded full-time administrative duties, including oversight of government accounts. Raman's commitment to physics persisted, as he utilized evenings and weekends for independent experimentation, initially leveraging rudimentary setups before accessing the underutilized laboratory of the Association for the Cultivation of Science (IACS) in Calcutta shortly after his arrival. His pre-civil service research had culminated in a 1906 publication on asymmetrical bands produced by a rectangular under inclined sources, submitted while he was still an undergraduate. During his service years, focus shifted to acoustics, yielding studies on the maintenance and decay of vibrations in elastic bodies (Bulletin No. 6, IACS, 1909) and the propagation of whispers in architectural spaces, inspired by observations in cathedrals but tested locally with Indian analogs. Further acoustics work examined the tonal qualities of Indian stringed instruments like the , correlating vibration modes with audible harmonics through precise frequency measurements, published in outlets such as the . Transitioning toward , Raman explored light propagation in media, laying groundwork for phenomena via early and analyses. By 1917, he had authored approximately 30 papers, establishing his reputation through empirical rigor despite institutional constraints, which underscored the viability of part-time, self-directed inquiry in resource-scarce environments.

Academic Positions and Institutional Roles

In 1917, at the age of 29, Raman resigned from his position in the Indian Finance Department to accept the newly endowed Palit Professorship of Physics at the , a role he held until 1933. This appointment, facilitated by Vice-Chancellor , marked his full transition to academic research despite the financial sacrifice, as the professorship offered lower remuneration than his civil service post. During his tenure at Calcutta, Raman also served as Honorary Secretary of the Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science (IACS) starting in 1919, where he conducted much of his experimental work and founded the Indian Journal of Physics in 1926 to promote indigenous scientific publishing. In 1933, Raman relocated to Bangalore to assume the professorship of physics at the (IISc), concurrently serving as its director from 1933 to 1937. He resigned the directorship amid administrative tensions but remained as professor until his retirement in 1948, during which period he mentored students including and expanded the physics department's focus on and spectroscopy. Post-retirement, Raman established the (RRI) in in 1948, personally funding its initial setup and directing it until his death in 1970; the institute emphasized independent, non-bureaucratic inquiry into and related fields. Concurrently, he founded the in 1934 and served as its president from inception, fostering a network for Indian scientists through its Proceedings, which he initiated to disseminate original research without reliance on foreign journals. These roles underscored Raman's commitment to institutional autonomy, often clashing with government oversight in scientific administration.

Core Scientific Contributions

Pioneering Work in Acoustics and Optics

Raman initiated his acoustical researches during his student years at Presidency College in Madras, publishing his first paper in 1907 on the maintenance of vibrations. Between 1908 and 1918, he conducted extensive investigations into the vibrations of stretched strings, developing a mechanical theory that explained their behavior under various conditions, including experimental verifications. These studies, detailed in bulletins of the Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, laid foundational principles for understanding wave propagation in elastic media. Raman extended his acoustical work to musical instruments, particularly focusing on the physics underlying their sound production. In 1918, he published a comprehensive theory of musical instruments in the , addressing the mechanics of bowed strings and the role of the instrument's body in , with empirical validations. He also analyzed Indian percussion instruments, such as the mridanga—a double-sided shaped like truncated cones—demonstrating how their vibrational modes superimpose to produce complex harmonics analogous to those in stretched strings. His examinations of instruments like the , tambura, and highlighted nuanced acoustic properties unique to Indian designs, contributing pioneering insights into cultural acoustics without reliance on Western models. In optics, Raman's early contributions bridged his acoustical expertise with phenomena, including studies on the of by at ultrasonic frequencies, where sound-induced density variations act as a for . He explored the of colloids, investigating and in suspended particles, which informed later molecular interpretations. A pivotal publication, "Molecular of ," advanced theoretical frameworks for light-molecule interactions, setting the stage for quantum optical insights while emphasizing empirical observations over speculative models. These works demonstrated Raman's commitment to experimental rigor, often conducted with improvised apparatus during his tenure.

The Raman Scattering Phenomenon

The phenomenon, commonly referred to as the , constitutes the of by atoms or molecules in a material, wherein the scattered light experiences a change in compared to the incident . This shift arises from the exchange of between the photon and the material's vibrational or rotational modes, producing Stokes lines (longer , loss from molecule) and anti-Stokes lines (shorter , gain). Unlike elastic , which preserves , reveals molecular , enabling spectroscopic analysis of without . The effect's intensity is typically weak, comprising about 1 in 10^7 scattered , necessitating sensitive detection. C. V. Raman first experimentally observed this phenomenon on February 7, 1928, in , using a setup involving monochromatic light passed through transparent liquids such as and , viewed via a spectroscope. Initial light sources included filtered through a blue glass or a mercury , with scattering examined in vessels to minimize interference. Raman and his collaborator noted discrete frequency shifts in the scattered spectra, polarized in manner distinct from , confirming inelastic molecular interactions rather than thermal re-emission. These observations extended prior theoretical predictions, such as Adolf Smekal's 1923 quantum mechanical forecast of , by providing empirical verification through visible light rather than X-rays. The Raman effect's discovery stemmed from Raman's investigations into light scattering's polarization and color changes in media, motivated by discrepancies in sea and sky coloration theories. Key spectra, like that of benzene revealing lines at specific shifts (e.g., 992 cm⁻¹ corresponding to C-H vibrations), demonstrated the phenomenon's specificity to molecular structure. This non-resonant process, independent of electronic transitions, offered a complementary tool to infrared absorption for probing symmetric modes otherwise inactive. Verification followed rapidly in Europe using similar optical methods, affirming its universality across liquids, gases, and solids.

Conceptual Foundations and Motivations

Raman's investigations into light originated from empirical observations of optical phenomena in natural media, particularly the coloration of . During his voyage to in the summer of 1921 aboard the SS Narkunda, he noted the "wonderful blue opalescence" of the , rejecting Lord Rayleigh's prevailing explanation that the color stemmed chiefly from reflection of the . Instead, Raman attributed the effect to selective molecular of by molecules, analogous to atmospheric scattering but intensified in denser liquids due to molecular density and . This observation spurred immediate experimentation upon his return to Calcutta, where he used simple tools like a and pocket spectroscope to analyze scattered light from liquids, confirming as the dominant mechanism over surface reflection. Conceptually, these efforts extended classical wave theories of , such as Rayleigh's model, which adequately described dilute gases but failed to fully account for frequency-independent in liquids, colloids, and solids exhibiting vivid colors like those in gems or stratified media. Raman hypothesized that molecular irregularities and thermal agitation induce diffraction-like perturbations, potentially introducing inelastic components that reveal vibrational or levels without invoking , which he excluded by purifying samples and using non-absorbing wavelengths. His pre-1928 work, documented in publications like "Molecular of " (1922), emphasized propagation in non-vacuous media as a probe for atomic structure, drawing parallels to analogies from his earlier research. This framework motivated systematic to detect any "quantum jumps" in scattered , prioritizing experimental verification over theoretical preconceptions. The 1923 discovery of the Compton effect provided additional impetus, demonstrating inelastic scattering by free electrons with measurable wavelength shifts due to momentum transfer. Raman envisioned an optical counterpart involving bound electrons or molecular oscillators, where visible light might exchange energy with vibrational modes, yielding shifted frequencies proportional to molecular frequencies—potentially observable in the visible or near-infrared using feasible instrumentation like mercury arc lamps and spectrographs. This causal reasoning, rooted in conserving energy and momentum during light-matter collisions, aimed to bridge classical with emerging quantum insights, though Raman initially resisted full quantum adoption, favoring wave-based interpretations until empirical compelled alignment with phonon-like exchanges. By focusing on pure liquids under monochromatic illumination, he sought to isolate these modifications from elastic Rayleigh lines, addressing fundamental questions about inaccessible via traditional emission spectroscopy.

Experimental Methodology and Key Observations

Raman and his collaborator employed a custom-designed spectrograph coupled with a filtered mercury emitting monochromatic at 435.6 nm to investigate scattering in transparent media. The setup involved directing the incident beam through liquid samples held in glass cells, collecting the perpendicularly scattered radiation, and recording spectra on photographic plates with exposure times ranging from hours to up to 200 hours to capture the feeble signal intensity of approximately 1 in 10^6 to 10^8 incident photons. Initial experiments focused on organic liquids such as , with subsequent tests extending to over 60 liquids and gases. On February 28, 1928, they recorded the first clear spectra demonstrating , observing discrete spectral lines shifted from the incident wavelength. These shifts manifested as Stokes lines (to longer wavelengths) and weaker anti-Stokes lines (to shorter wavelengths), with shift values corresponding to molecular vibrational frequencies and independent of the excitation wavelength. The observed frequency shifts provided direct empirical evidence of quantized vibrational energy levels in molecules, distinguishing the phenomenon from fluorescence by the polarization and spectral characteristics of the scattered light. Raman noted the effect's occurrence across diverse media, including diamonds and gases, underscoring its universality for probing molecular structure.

Dissemination, Verification, and Theoretical Implications

Raman disseminated his findings through a series of rapid publications starting with a preliminary report in the Indian Journal of Physics on March 31, 1928, detailing the observation of modified scattered radiation in liquids and solids. This was followed by submissions to international journals, including a note to Nature that appeared on April 21, 1928, announcing the phenomenon's universal character across various media. By July 1928, Raman and his collaborators had produced multiple papers, contributing to over 16 publications on the effect worldwide within months of the initial observation on February 28, 1928. News of the discovery reached global audiences via newspaper reports as early as February 29, 1928, amplifying its reach beyond academic circles. Verification came swiftly through independent replication. Soviet physicists Grigory Landsberg and Leonid Mandelstam reported an identical effect in crystals on February 21, 1928, publishing their findings in April 1928, confirming the phenomenon's occurrence without prior knowledge of Raman's work. In the United States, promptly reproduced the results across multiple substances and cabled confirmation to , validating the effect's and material independence. These corroborations, alongside Raman's own extensions to gases and vapors, established the effect's empirical robustness, leading to its recognition by the international community and Raman's in 1930. Theoretically, the Raman effect provided direct experimental evidence for the quantum mechanical description of light-matter interactions, demonstrating where photons exchange energy with molecular vibrations, producing frequency shifts characteristic of the scattering medium rather than the incident light. This shift, independent of the excitation wavelength, confirmed the existence of quantized vibrational and levels in molecules, aligning with predictions from and complementing by probing changes in . It bolstered causal understanding of scattering as arising from anharmonic oscillators in matter, influencing subsequent developments in , such as lattice dynamics, and enabling non-destructive molecular identification without constraints. The discovery thus bridged classical wave with , revealing light's particle-like behavior in energy transfer processes.

Extensions in Molecular Spectroscopy and Crystal Physics

Raman's 1922 monograph Molecular Diffraction of Light established foundational principles for understanding light scattering by molecules, emphasizing diffraction patterns and optical anisotropy in fluids as precursors to spectroscopic applications. This work anticipated the quantum mechanical interpretation of by detailing molecular refractive indices and depolarization factors. Following the 1928 discovery of the Raman effect, these concepts extended to molecular , where frequency shifts in scattered light directly revealed vibrational and levels, enabling analysis of molecular structures with simpler spectra than traditional or methods. Collaborators like advanced applications by examining liquids, correlating optical —measured via ratios—with chemical constitution and molecular shape. Studies from 1927 onward, intensified post-1928, demonstrated how Raman spectra complemented by accessing different selection rules and permitting observations in non-transparent media. For example, the 1928 benzene spectrum displayed characteristic Stokes and anti-Stokes lines corresponding to C-H and C-C , providing empirical data on strengths and symmetries. In crystal physics, Raman extended scattering studies from 1921 thermal diffusion observations in and to post-1928 Raman spectra, attributing discrete frequency shifts to quantized lattice vibrations. Crystals like yielded sharp lines, such as the 1332 cm⁻¹ fundamental mode, interpreted as optical phonons influenced by atomic ordering. By 1929, Raman posited that spectral monochromatism arose from regular lattices, rejecting models. Further developments included a 1941 theory of crystal specific heat and 1943 lattice dynamics model predicting (24p - 3) normal vibration modes—(3p - 3) acoustic and (21p) optical—for p atoms per primitive cell, diverging from and frameworks by emphasizing discrete oscillations. In rock salt, spectra revealed 9 discrete lines as overtones of fundamental modes, verified experimentally in 1931 and 1943. These extensions linked to crystal optics, , and thermal properties, advancing solid-state interpretations through empirical spectra and causal models of interactions.

Institutional and Administrative Endeavors

Establishment of Independent Indian Research Institutions

In 1934, C. V. Raman founded the as a society registered under the Societies Registration Act of 1860 on 27 April, with the primary objective of promoting the advancement of science in through original research and dissemination of knowledge. Raman served as its president from inception and initiated the publication of its Proceedings, which he edited continuously to foster rigorous scientific discourse independent of governmental or institutional bureaucracies. The academy emphasized autonomy, electing fellows based on merit and supporting interdisciplinary work in physical and biological sciences without reliance on state funding at its outset. Following his resignation from the directorship of the in 1948 amid administrative frustrations, Raman established the in as a private entity dedicated to fundamental research in physics, particularly and . Funded initially through his personal resources and endowments, the institute enabled Raman to pursue unencumbered investigations, serving as its director until his death in 1970 and mentoring a cadre of researchers focused on experimental verification over theoretical abstraction. This model of self-financed, merit-driven inquiry contrasted with emerging state-sponsored laboratories, prioritizing individual scientific initiative. These institutions exemplified Raman's commitment to insulating Indian science from political interference, with the academy expanding to over 100 fellows by the 1940s and the developing facilities for advanced instrumentation despite limited resources. By 1970, the had transitioned to partial public funding while retaining operational independence, influencing subsequent autonomous bodies in .

Clashes with Bureaucratic and Peer Authorities

Raman's tenure as Director of the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) in Bangalore, beginning in 1933, was marked by escalating tensions with the institution's governing council and faculty over administrative decisions and resource allocation. He prioritized the physics department, reallocating budgets that strained other disciplines, and appointed German physicist Max Born as a reader in theoretical physics in September 1935, intending to establish a permanent position, which drew criticism for favoritism toward physics and foreign hires. Faculty resignations, such as that of H.E. Watson, and senate attacks by figures like Kenneth Aston highlighted opposition to Raman's autocratic style and alleged embezzlement in fund use. Anonymous letters accused him of regional bias, favoring South Indian students and staff over Bengalis, fueling a no-confidence motion. The 1936 Irvine Committee, appointed by the , investigated these complaints and recommended against Born's professorship while criticizing Raman's , leading the IISc council to isolate him and accept the report's findings. On July 19, 1937, Raman was forced to resign as amid these pressures but retained his position as of Physics and Head of the until 1948. This episode, known as the Bangalore Affair (1935–1938), intertwined bureaucratic oversight with peer rivalries, as northern Indian scientists like and opposed Raman's influence, leveraging regional and disciplinary divides to undermine his authority. Similar frictions arose at the Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science in Calcutta, where Raman's 1933 bid to centralize membership control clashed with Bengali nationalist sentiments, resulting in his ouster as honorary secretary by Syama Prasad Mookerjee at the annual meeting. Post-independence, Raman rejected government funding for his newly founded in 1948, fearing bureaucratic interference and control akin to that stifling creativity in state institutions. He publicly critiqued Jawaharlal Nehru's scientific policies, including resource concentration in Council of Scientific and Industrial Research labs—a phenomenon he termed the "Nehru-Bhatnagar effect"—and in 1948 mocked Nehru's confusion of copper with during a speech, underscoring his disdain for centralized planning over independent research. These stances isolated him from peers aligned with government patronage, such as Bhatnagar, while affirming his commitment to autonomy despite ongoing institutional hostilities.

Major Disputes and Critiques

Credit for the Raman Effect and Collaborative Roles

The discovery of the Raman effect resulted from collaborative experiments conducted by C. V. Raman and his associate Kariamanikam Srinivasa at the Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science in Calcutta. Krishnan, who had joined Raman's laboratory in 1925, performed critical demonstrations of light scattering and conducted experiments between February 19 and 26, 1928, that confirmed the of light in liquids like . Their joint paper, "A New Type of Secondary Radiation," was communicated to on February 16, 1928, and published on March 31, establishing the phenomenon through observations of frequency shifts in scattered light spectra. Raman received sole credit for the discovery, culminating in the 1930 Nobel Prize in Physics awarded "for his work on the scattering of light and for the discovery of the effect named after him." Krishnan's contributions, including experimental execution and data analysis, were acknowledged by Raman in personal records but not reflected in the Nobel citation or initial awards, leading later historians like S. Chandrasekhar to emphasize the duo's shared role in the breakthrough. Despite this, Krishnan's independent polarization studies on scattered light supported the effect's validation, though he remained uncredited in major honors until receiving a knighthood in 1948. Priority over contemporaneous work by Grigory Landsberg and Leonid Mandelstam, who observed similar in quartz crystals on February 21, , was secured by Raman and Krishnan's earlier communication date, though the Russians published their findings in May . Independent verification by both groups underscored the effect's robustness, but Raman's prior publication and experimental focus on molecular media affirmed his primary attribution, without evidence of or undue exclusion of collaborators beyond Krishnan's overlooked experimental input.

Confrontation with Max Born on Lattice Dynamics

In 1935, C. V. Raman invited to serve as a reader in at the (IISc) in for six months, during which Born delivered over 30 lectures, including on lattice dynamics, often sparking heated discussions with Raman. These interactions exposed Raman to Born's established model of crystal vibrations, developed with Theodor von Kármán, which employed cyclic boundary conditions to simulate an infinite lattice and predict dispersion relations based on short-range forces augmented by long-range . Raman, however, grew dissatisfied with this framework, viewing it as overly reliant on mathematical abstractions that neglected empirical realities of finite crystals. By the early 1940s, Raman formulated an alternative theory of dynamics, emphasizing the crystal as an aggregate of vibrating molecules whose spectra should align with observed patterns and thermal properties, adhering strictly to the principle of equipartition of energy. In key publications, such as those in 1941 with collaborators and subsequent works in the Proceedings of the , Raman argued that Born's model erroneously applied , ignoring non-periodic electronic polarization and surface effects, which he claimed led to unphysical predictions like incorrect limiting frequencies in optical branches. He contended that true manifest as discrete molecular modes rather than the implied by Born's infinite-lattice approximation, drawing from his extensions of the to crystal physics. Born responded defensively in and publications, reaffirming the model's consistency with experimental data, including absorption and specific heat measurements, and dismissing Raman's critiques as misapplications of conditions to real . He highlighted validations from works like Helen L. Smith's 1947 experiments on alkali halides, which supported the Born-von Kármán dispersion curves. The exchanges, spanning the and into the 1950s, extended through journals and personal letters, revealing deeper tensions: Raman's intuitive, experimentally driven approach—rooted in aesthetic preferences for and observability—clashed with Born's rigorous, formalism-heavy methodology, compounded by cultural divergences between and scientific traditions amid postcolonial . The international physics community largely endorsed Born's framework by the mid-1950s, as advanced computations and neutron scattering experiments confirmed the validity of cyclic boundaries for bulk properties, rendering Raman's model untenable for predicting spectra. Nonetheless, subsequent research in the 1950s and 1960s partially vindicated Raman's emphasis on and finite-size effects, influencing refinements in surface theories, though his core alternative did not supplant the standard lattice dynamics . The dispute irreparably strained their relationship, evident in awkward encounters like the 1954 Raman Effect anniversary in , and persisted in journals even after global .

Engagements with International Bodies

Raman first engaged prominently with international scientific bodies during his 1921 visit to , where he presented research on and acoustics to gatherings including the , establishing his reputation abroad prior to the Raman effect discovery. This trip, his initial overseas journey, involved interactions with British scientific societies and laid groundwork for subsequent recognition, though Raman increasingly prioritized indigenous research amid rising . Following the 1928 announcement of the Raman effect, the Faraday Society in convened a 1929 specifically on the phenomenon, underscoring its rapid global validation through empirical verification by European spectroscopists. In 1948, Raman attended the congress of the International Union of Crystallography in the United States, coinciding with his service on the Advisory Council of the for Reconstruction and Development in , reflecting broader advisory roles in postwar international forums. Later, in the mid-1950s, he traveled to the to receive an award and deliver addresses at scientific conferences, preparing by learning basic Russian through intensive lessons, which highlighted his selective willingness to engage amid Cold War-era scientific exchanges. These interactions, often tied to honors or validations of his work, contrasted with Raman's advocacy for self-reliant institutions, as he critiqued over-dependence on foreign methodologies in physics.

Personal Beliefs and Life

Family Dynamics and Personal Relationships

Raman married Lokasundari Ammal on May 6, 1907, in an arranged union when he was 18 and she was approximately 14 years old. Lokasundari, born in 1892 and later known as Lady Raman after her husband's knighthood, came from a family with administrative ties; her father, S. Krishnaswami , served as of Sea Customs in Madras. The couple relocated frequently due to Raman's postings, initially to , where he worked as an assistant accountant general while pursuing physics research. Lokasundari supported his scientific pursuits amid these transitions, managing household affairs as Raman immersed himself in experimental work. The marriage produced two sons: the elder, Chandrasekhar Raman (born circa 1921), and the younger, Venkatraman Radhakrishnan (born July 18, 1929). Venkatraman pursued a career in astrophysics, becoming a noted radio astronomer who contributed to solar radio emissions research at institutions like the Raman Research Institute, founded by his father. Limited public records detail the elder son's professional path, suggesting he did not enter scientific fields prominently associated with the family legacy. Raman's family life remained private, with Lokasundari outliving her husband by a decade, passing away in 1980. No extensive accounts of interpersonal conflicts or close collaborations within the household have been documented in primary sources, though Raman's intense focus on research likely shaped domestic priorities.

Spiritual Convictions and Philosophical Stance on Science

Raman identified as an agnostic, rejecting the atheist label despite influences from agnostic thinkers such as , , and . He explicitly stated in 1945, "If there is a we must look for him in the . If he is not there, he is not worth looking for," emphasizing empirical investigation over faith-based assumptions. This stance aligned with his dismissal of traditional religious doctrines, as articulated in 1934: "There is no , no Swarga, no , no rebirth, no and no immortality. The only thing that is true is that a man is born, he lives and he dies. Therefore, he should live his life properly." Despite his toward supernatural claims, Raman maintained Hindu cultural practices, including wearing a traditional (pagri) and the sacred thread (), which he viewed as symbols of personal discipline rather than devotion. He described the as a practical measure to "contain my ego" amid accolades, reflecting a pragmatic adherence to —ethical duty and order—without endorsing metaphysical interpretations. This duality underscored his commitment to as a framework for moral living, separate from scientific inquiry. Philosophically, Raman saw no inherent conflict between and but prioritized the former as the path to universal truth and unity. In a conversation with , he argued, "Religions cannot unite. offers the best opportunity for a complete fellowship. All men of are brothers," positioning scientific endeavor as a rational alternative to divisive faiths. He further suggested that astronomical and physical discoveries progressively revealed a cosmic order potentially indicative of , stating, "The growing discoveries in the of astronomy and physics seem to be further and further revelations of ." For Raman, 's method—, experimentation, and —provided the sole reliable means to probe existence, rendering untestable religious assertions secondary or irrelevant. This view framed as an aesthetic appreciation of nature's laws, akin to his own reverence for light's phenomena, rather than dogmatic belief.

Recognition and Enduring Influence

Major Awards and Official Honors

Raman was elected a in 1924, recognizing his early contributions to physics. In 1929, he received a knighthood from the British government, thereafter styled as Sir Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman. The following year, 1930, marked the pinnacle of his international recognition with the , awarded for his discovery of the Raman effect in the scattering of light. That same year, the Royal Society bestowed upon him the for his original discoveries in . In 1954, the honored Raman with the , the nation's highest civilian award, acknowledging his foundational role in Indian science. Four years later, in 1958, he received the from the for his contributions to science and peace. Throughout his career, Raman accumulated numerous honorary doctorates from universities across and , as well as memberships in prestigious scientific academies worldwide.

Long-Term Scientific and Cultural Impact

The Raman effect, discovered by C. V. Raman on February 28, 1928, provided empirical evidence for quantum vibrational and rotational energy levels in molecules through inelastic , fundamentally advancing the understanding of light-matter interactions and complementing complementary techniques like . This breakthrough enabled non-destructive molecular identification without sample preparation, spawning as a cornerstone analytical method in modern laboratories. Raman spectroscopy has permeated diverse fields, including for characterizing semiconductors, polymers, and ; pharmaceuticals for polymorph detection and ; biomedicine for tissue analysis, cancer diagnostics, and drug-cell interactions; and forensics for identification. By 2023, advancements like surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) had amplified signal detection to single-molecule sensitivity, facilitating applications in , for crop stress detection, and for battery material evaluation. These developments trace causal lineage to Raman's original observations of frequency shifts in scattered light from liquids like , which resolved debates on light's quantum nature post-Compton effect. In , Raman's work catalyzed institutional growth in physics research; as the first Indian director of the from 1933 to 1948, he mentored over 50 researchers, fostering experimental optics and acoustics programs that influenced post-independence scientific infrastructure. He established the Indian Journal of Physics in 1926 and later the in 1948, prioritizing indigenous instrumentation over imported reliance, which built self-sustaining research ecosystems amid colonial constraints. His studies on Indian musical instruments, such as the and , applied theory to acoustics, bridging physics with and inspiring applied research in wave propagation. Culturally, Raman's 1930 as the first Asian in physics symbolized indigenous intellectual sovereignty, galvanizing public interest in during British rule and post-1947 nation-building. The government designated February 28 as in 1986 to commemorate the discovery, promoting education and innovation through annual events reaching millions of students. As a communicator, Raman advocated 's role in upliftment via lectures and writings, countering colonial narratives of scientific inferiority and embedding empirical inquiry in national ethos, though his emphasis on foundational research over immediate utility drew critiques for limited industrial translation.

Final Years

Health Challenges and Resignation

In the later stages of his career, C. V. Raman encountered periodic setbacks that impacted his and required medical intervention. In 1951, he sustained a injury that rendered him unable to wear shoes for nearly a month. Around 1952, he underwent surgery at the American Mission Hospital, where his recovery demanded strict bed rest despite his resistance as a difficult . By 1964, contemporaries observed him appearing weaker, though he maintained overall functionality in his research activities. Raman's awareness of aging's toll surfaced publicly in his July 30, 1966, convocation address at the Indian Institute of Technology Madras, where he alluded to physical frailties such as "creaky bones" and falling teeth, alongside the peril of from excessive exertion. These reflections underscored his recognition of health vulnerabilities amid sustained scientific demands. In response to his advancing age and diminishing vigor, particularly during 1968–1970, Raman resigned from his fellowship in the Royal Society and several committee roles, redirecting his efforts exclusively to research at the . This strategic withdrawal allowed him to prioritize core scientific pursuits without the burdens of administrative obligations. His health decline accelerated in 1970, culminating in a heart attack that necessitated hospitalization, though he persisted in laboratory work until the episode. Despite these challenges, Raman prepared contingency plans for his institute and the , anticipating further deterioration.

Death and Immediate Aftermath

Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman suffered a heart attack in late October 1970 while working in his laboratory at the in . He was briefly hospitalized but, against medical advice, returned to the institute to continue his research. Raman died there on November 21, 1970, at the age of 82, from . News of his death spread rapidly across , with immediate coverage in national newspapers such as The Sunday Statesman reporting the event the following day. Prime Minister publicly expressed condolences, acknowledging Raman's foundational contributions to physics and Indian scientific independence. President also issued a statement mourning the loss of a national icon whose work had elevated 's global scientific stature. Raman's funeral adhered to traditional Hindu rites, with followed by the scattering of his on the grounds of the , reflecting his lifelong dedication to the institution he founded. No elaborate public ceremonies or photographs of the were publicized, consistent with Raman's for and focus on scientific pursuits over personal adulation. His death marked the end of an era for in , prompting reflections on his unyielding commitment to empirical inquiry amid institutional challenges.

References

  1. [1]
    Sir Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman – Biographical - NobelPrize.org
    Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman was born at Tiruchirappalli in Southern India on November 7th, 1888. His father was a lecturer in mathematics and physics so that ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] CV Raman — A Memoir - Indian Academy of Sciences
    Some important dates in the life of C.V. Raman . . . . . . 238. Index. 243–247 ... Raman was born on November 7, 1888, in South India and died on ...Missing: reliable | Show results with:reliable
  3. [3]
    This Month in Physics History | American Physical Society
    He died in 1970. In honor of C.V. Raman and his discovery, India observes a national science day on February 28 each year. Physics History. This Month in ...Missing: reliable | Show results with:reliable
  4. [4]
    The Nobel Prize in Physics 1930 - NobelPrize.org
    The Nobel Prize in Physics 1930 was awarded to Sir Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman for his work on the scattering of light and for the discovery of the effect ...
  5. [5]
    C.V. Raman and the Raman Effect - Optics & Photonics News
    C.V. Raman and the Raman Effect ... Barry Masters describes the life and legacy of one of the most important optical scientists of the 20th century.Missing: reliable | Show results with:reliable
  6. [6]
    Raman effect: History of the discovery - Analytical Science Journals
    The Raman effect was discovered on February 28, 1928, when modified lines in benzene were observed using 435.8 nm mercury radiation.
  7. [7]
    C.V. Raman The Raman Effect - Landmark
    Sir CV Raman discovered in 1928 that when a beam of coloured light entered a liquid, a fraction of the light scattered by that liquid was of a different color.
  8. [8]
    Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman, 1888-1970 - Journals
    Nov 1, 1971 · Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman was born at Trichinopoly in South India on the 7 November 1888. Raman's parents, Chandrasekhara Iyer and ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  9. [9]
    C. V. Raman - Biography, Facts and Pictures - Famous Scientists
    Jun 30, 2016 · When Raman was four years old his father got a better job, becoming a college lecturer, and the family moved to Waltair (now Visakhapatnam).Missing: education early
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Sir CV Raman - Principal Accountants General
    Education. Raman had his early education in a high school at Visakhapatnam. At an early age of eleven, he stood first in the matriculation examination. He ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] RAMAN THE MAN, HIS CONTRIBUTION AND HIS MESSAGE
    Brilliant as he was, Raman raced through school to join. Presidency College in Madras—now Chennai—in the BA class. The year was 1903. In college, Raman's ...
  12. [12]
    The Life of C.V. Raman - Edinburgh Instruments
    Nov 1, 2021 · C.V. Raman was born on the 7th of November 1888, in Trichinopoly (now Tiruchirappalli), India. His father, a mathematics and physics teacher, ...Missing: siblings education
  13. [13]
    Remembering C V Raman - Swarajya
    Mar 23, 2019 · In 1907, Raman joined Financial Civil Service with First Rank in the exam. He was first posted in Calcutta as Assistant Accountant General.
  14. [14]
    C.V. Raman - Optica
    Instead, he took a civil service post in the finance department in Calcutta in 1907, and continued his scientific work in his spare time.
  15. [15]
    A New Radiation: C.V. Raman and the Dawn of Quantum ...
    Mar 3, 2025 · In Part I of this series, we profile C.V. Raman's discovery of the Raman Effect in 1928, which transformed physics and played a pivotal role ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  16. [16]
    Prof. C. V. Raman | History | About IASc - Indian Academy of Sciences
    Career: Indian Finance Dept., Calcutta and Rangoon: Gazetted Offr. 07-17; Univ. of Calcutta: Palit Professor-ship 17-33; IACS, Calcutta: Research 07-33 and Hon.
  17. [17]
    Raman, C. V., 1888-1970
    1918Palit Chair of Physics, University of Calcutta, Kolkata (India). 1919Honorary Secretary, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Kolkata (India).
  18. [18]
    [PDF] CV RAMAN AND PHYSICS AT IISc
    Raman stepped down as Director on 19 July 1937, but continued as. Professor of Physics until his retirement in 1948. His students at IISc included GN.<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman | The Franklin Institute
    While working another job, Raman was able to engage in experimental research on his own in the laboratory of the Indian Association for the Cultivation of ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] CV Raman commenced his acoustical researches at the age of 16 ...
    During the decade 1908-1918 Raman investigated several aspects of the vibrations of stretched strings culminating in his Mechanical Theory of Vibrations of ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] THE INDIAN MUSICAL DRUMS. - BY SIR CV RAMAN, KT., FRS, NL ...
    The classical form of the instrument known as the. Mridanga is a two-sided drum which is played with both hands. Its shape resembles that of two truncated cones ...
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    Raman Scattering - HyperPhysics
    Raman scattering produces scattered photons which differ in frequency from the radiation source which causes it, and the difference is related to vibrational ...
  24. [24]
    What is Raman Scattering? - Mettler Toledo
    Raman scattering occurs when photons from a monochromatic light source, such as a laser, interact with a molecule, resulting in the emission of inelastic ...
  25. [25]
    Raman scattering - DoITPoMS
    Raman scattering is different in that it is inelastic. The light photons lose or gain energy during the scattering process, and therefore increase or decrease ...
  26. [26]
    Raman effect: History of the discovery - Analytical Science Journals
    The paper gives a historical account of the discovery of the Raman Effect, starting from Raman's voyage to Europe through the Mediterranean Sea in the summer ...
  27. [27]
    Raman Effect - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The Raman effect was first predicted by Smekal in 1923 (82) and then measured with benzene in 1928 by the Indian physicist C.V. Raman (83). The intensity of ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] AN INTERNATIONAL HISTORIC CHEMICAL LANDMARK
    Dec 15, 1998 · Educated entirely in India,. Raman made his first trip to London in 1921, where his reputation in the study of optics and especially acoustics ...Missing: period | Show results with:period<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Raman: Theory - Chemistry LibreTexts
    Jan 29, 2023 · Raman scattering is most easily seen as the change in frequency for a small percentage of the intensity in a monochromatic beam as the result of coupling.Introduction · Classical theory · Quantum mechanical treatment
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Sir Chandrasekhara V. Raman - Nobel Lecture
    It was experimentally discovered that associated with the Rayleigh-Einstein type of molecular scattering, was another and still. Page 4. 270. 1930 C.V.RAMAN.
  31. [31]
    The Birth of The Raman Effect - HORIBA
    Nov 21, 2022 · Raman microscopes followed in the 70s, and the first commercial Raman Laser microscope was developed in 1976 in France.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] 80TH Anniversary of the discovery of the Raman Effect: a celebration
    Eighty years ago on 31 March 1928, a letter dated 16 February was published in Nature by C. V. Raman (Fig. 1) and K. S.. Krishnan with the title 'A New Type of ...
  33. [33]
    C. V. Raman and the Discovery of the Raman Effect
    In 1928 the Indian physicist C. V. Raman (1888-1970) discovered the effect named after him virtually simultaneously with the Russian physicists G. S. Lands.
  34. [34]
    Sir Venkata Raman – Facts - NobelPrize.org
    Prize motivation: “for his work on the scattering of light and for the discovery of the effect named after him”. Prize share: 1/1. Work. When light meets ...
  35. [35]
    A New Radiation: C.V. Raman and the Dawn of Quantum ...
    Mar 10, 2025 · This modified scattering laid the foundation for the discovery of the Raman Effect, where the frequency shift in scattered light corresponds ...<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Molecular Diffraction of Light - Nature
    Molecular Diffraction of Light. By Prof. C. V. Raman. Pp. x + 103. (Calcutta: University of Calcutta, 1922.) You ...
  37. [37]
    C.v. Raman - Molecular Diffraction Of Light - Internet Archive
    Jan 21, 2017 · Molecular Diffraction Of Light. by: C.v. Raman. Publication date: 1922. Topics: Other. Collection: digitallibraryindia; JaiGyan. Language ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Sir C. V. Raman and crystal physics - Indian Academy of Sciences
    SIR C. Vo RAMAN AND CRYSTAL PHYSICS. OPTICAL theory and the physics of crystals are linked together almost inseparably in the history of their development.
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Raman spectra of crystals and their interpretation
    The researches on the Raman effect designed expressly to elucidate the fundamental aspects of crystal physics are not very numerous. As we shall see, however, ...
  40. [40]
    History | About IASc - Indian Academy of Sciences
    The Academy was founded in 1934 by Professor C. V. Raman (Nobel Laureate) and was registered as a Society under the Societies Registration Act of 1860, on 27 ...
  41. [41]
    How C V Raman established IASc in 1934 and Bangalore became ...
    Jul 29, 2024 · On April 24, 1934, he established the IASc and rolled out two dedicated streams catering to chemical and biological sciences.
  42. [42]
    Overview | Raman Research Institute - rri.res.in
    The Raman Research Institute was founded in 1948 by the Indian physicist and Nobel Laureate, Sir CV Raman, to continue his studies and basic research.
  43. [43]
    75 years of frontier physics - Nature
    The renowned physicist, Professor C V Raman, established RRI in Bengaluru in 1948. Raman is known for many noteworthy contributions to the areas of acoustics, ...
  44. [44]
    Indian Academy of Sciences: Home
    Founded in 1934 by Sir CV Raman the Indian Academy of Sciences, Bangalore was registered as a Society on 27 April 1934 with the main objective of promoting the ...e-Books · Journals · History · Role of the Academy
  45. [45]
    Raman Research Institute: Home
    The Raman Research Institute is an autonomous research institute engaged in research in basic sciences. The institute was founded in 1948 by the Indian ...PhD Programme · Raman Research Institute · Research highlights · Other OpeningsMissing: independent | Show results with:independent
  46. [46]
    When Raman Brought Born to Bangalore - Connect with IISc
    Dec 12, 2019 · Eventually on 19 July the following year, Raman was forced to resign as Director but continued as a professor and the Head of the Physics ...
  47. [47]
    Flashback: Nobel laureate CV Raman resented Nehru (and even ...
    Nov 7, 2017 · The physicist's life was marked by administrative battles, cutthroat rivalries and politics.
  48. [48]
  49. [49]
    Scientists, International Networks, and Power in India
    Aug 10, 2015 · Bangalore Affair: the C. V. Raman Conflict. [This chapter outlines a conflict involving] Saha, Bhatnagar and C. V. Raman in the period 1930-1938 ...
  50. [50]
    Why India failed to produce a Second CV Raman? - LinkedIn
    May 31, 2016 · Raman was against all type of Govt. control or interference: “Government control not only inhibits creativity, but more disastrously, it ...
  51. [51]
    Remembering the Raman-Krishnan collaboration on National ...
    Feb 28, 2017 · C. V. Raman, the Indian scientist who won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1930, collaborated with K. S. Krishnan to discover the Raman effect.
  52. [52]
    The Raman effect and Krishnan's diary - Journals
    Jan 22, 2000 · K.S. Krishnan, F.R.S. (1898–1961) is one of the most distinguished Indian scientists of this century. His collaboration with Sir C.V. Raman ...
  53. [53]
    The 1930 Nobel Prize for Physics: A close decision? - ResearchGate
    If C.V. Raman had not published first we might know Raman scattering as the Landsberg-Mandelstam Effect. Raman was awarded the 1930 Nobel Prize for the ...
  54. [54]
    38. K.S. Krishnan et al., – students related to the discovery of Raman ...
    Feb 28, 2021 · The article has some comments by S. Chandrasekhar on the credit of discovery behind Raman effect, in which he attributes Raman and Krishan's ...
  55. [55]
    The Discovery of the Raman Effect - jstor
    Raman's principal collaborator,. K. S. Krishnan, was totally ignored in the first round of awards, though, almost 20 years later, he too received a knighthood ( ...
  56. [56]
    C.V. Raman and the Colour of the Sea - The Wire Science
    Nov 9, 2020 · Light scattering in air was Rayleigh's explanation for why the sky was blue; and Raman found that this was true also for why the sea was blue.Missing: inspiration | Show results with:inspiration
  57. [57]
    Priority and the Raman effect - Nature
    Landsberg and Mandelstam discovered the Raman effect independently of Raman, but published later. Raman's first observation was on Feb 28, 1928, while  ...
  58. [58]
    Leonid Mandelstam - Wikipedia
    Thus, combinational scattering of light was observed by Mandelstam and Landsberg a week earlier than by Raman and Krishnan. ... "Priority and the Raman effect" ...<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    The 1930 Nobel Prize for Physics: A close decision? - Journals
    Raman scattering (in Russia called combination scattering) was discovered in 1928 by Indian and Russian scientists, at almost the same time.Missing: effect priority
  60. [60]
    The Raman-Born Controversy on Lattice Dynamics | Isis: Vol 90, No 1
    Through the 1940s and 1950s the foremost Indian physicist, C. V. Raman, was embroiled in a scientific controversy concerning crystal dynamics with Max Born, ...Missing: dispute | Show results with:dispute
  61. [61]
    The theory of the vibrations and the Raman spectrum of the diamond ...
    Raman and his collaborators have recently (1941) put forward a new theory of lattice dynamics according to which the vibrational spectrum of a crystal consists ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  62. [62]
    The Raman-Born Controversy on Lattice Dynamics
    Raman epitomized discipline and abhorred any disruption of his routines. The morning after he was asked to resign the directorship of the Indian Institute of ...
  63. [63]
    C. V Raman's scientific temper was laced with nationalism
    Feb 28, 2022 · In Raman's laboratory, science was mixed with nationalism. Raman never believed in borrowing scientific ideas, technologies, or research from foreign nations.
  64. [64]
    SCIENTIST OF INDIA VISITS SCHOOL HERE; Dr. C. V. Raman at ...
    C. V. Raman at Brooklyn Polytechnic Institute Talks With Indian Students ... He also took part in the congress of the International Union of Crystallography at ...
  65. [65]
    When a 27-year-old metallurgist taught Nobel laureate CV Raman ...
    Nov 7, 2015 · Towards the end of almost 100 morning lessons, Raman received an invitation to travel to the USSR to receive the Lenin award and address the ...
  66. [66]
    Lokasundari Ammal (1892–1980) • FamilySearch
    She married Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman FNA, FASc, FIAS, FASB, FRS on 6 May 1907, in Madras, India. They were the parents of at least 2 sons. She died in 1980, ...
  67. [67]
    CV Raman – the Man of Science who never gave up on Dharma
    Nov 7, 2021 · CV Raman was a hard-core agnostic. However, he believed that if there is a God exists, we must look for him in the Universe.
  68. [68]
    C. V. Raman - Geniuses.Club
    The Council offered Raman two choices, either to resign from the institute with effect from 1 April or resign as the Director and continue as Professor of ...
  69. [69]
    5 Quotes By CV Raman, India's Nobel Laureate | Wonders of Physics
    Oct 28, 2023 · ... Raman said "Mahatma ji, religions cannot unite. Science offers the best opportunity for a complete fellowship. All men of Science are brothers.
  70. [70]
    C.V. Raman Biography: Early Life,Family, Education, Career ...
    Feb 27, 2025 · C.V. Raman was born on 7th November 1888, in a Brahmin family from South India at Tiruchirappalli in Tamil Nadu. His father was Chandrasekhara ...Missing: siblings | Show results with:siblings
  71. [71]
    [Solved] Who among the following is one of the first Bharat Ratna Awa
    The first scientist to receive Bharat Ratna - C. V. Raman (1954). C. V. Raman was an Indian Physicist. He discovered a Scattering of Light. On 28th February ...
  72. [72]
    A Comprehensive Review on Raman Spectroscopy Applications
    Raman spectroscopy is a very powerful tool for material analysis, allowing for exploring the properties of a wide range of different materials.
  73. [73]
    Recent advancements and applications of Raman spectroscopy in ...
    Apr 15, 2023 · The present application of Raman spectroscopy has been found significantly useful in carrying out the pharmaceutical quality control processes ...Recent Advancements And... · 2. Raman Spectroscopy · 3.1. Pharmaceutical Analysis
  74. [74]
    Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: a half-century historical ...
    Dec 23, 2024 · TERS is promising for solving the issue of substrate and surface generalities as the Raman signals from any substrate regardless of material and surface ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  75. [75]
    C.V. Raman and the Impact of Raman Effect in Quantum Physics ...
    Sep 18, 2008 · After a brief account of Raman's extraordinary scientific career, I will recount the profound impact made by Raman effect, which launched a new ...Missing: term | Show results with:term
  76. [76]
    The Physics of C.V. Raman, S.N. Bose and M.N. Saha. Part 1 ... - arXiv
    Sep 13, 2024 · Three extraordinary physics discoveries were made from colonial India, which did not have any previous tradition of research in modern physics.
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Raman Effect: A Giant Leap for Science in India
    Feb 1, 2021 · Raman also made significant contributions towards understanding of the physics of Indian musical instru- ments and clearly established the rich.Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  78. [78]
    National Science Day 2025: Why do we celebrate C.V. Raman and ...
    Feb 28, 2025 · National Science Day celebrates C.V. Raman's discovery, promotes science, and empowers Indian youth for global leadership in science.Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  79. [79]
    C.V. Raman as a Science Communicator: A Historical Perspective
    Feb 28, 2024 · classes.” As you may observe, Raman saw the utility of teaching not only in educating students but also in positively affecting the teacher. ...
  80. [80]
    Sir Chandrasekhara V. Raman, Indian Nobel Scientist, 82, Dies
    Nov 22, 1970 · NEW DELHI, Nov. 21—Sir Chandrasekhara Venkata Ra man, a Nobel laureate in phys ics, died in Bangalore today of a heart attack.Missing: illness | Show results with:illness
  81. [81]
    Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman - NNDB
    Born: 7-Nov-1888 ; Birthplace: Trichinopoly, Tamil Nadu, India ; Died: 21-Nov-1970 ; Location of death: Bangalore, India ; Cause of death: Heart Failure
  82. [82]
    Dr. C. V. Raman dead - RRI Digital Repository
    Citation: The Sunday Statesman, 22nd Nov. 1970 ; Abstract: Dr. C.V.Raman, founder of Raman Research Institute passed away in Bangalore on Saturday. He was 82.
  83. [83]
    Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman (1888-1970) - Find a Grave
    May 7, 2007 · Cremated, Ashes scattered. Specifically: Ashes scattered on the grounds of the Raman Institute. Memorial ID: 19275762 19275762 · View Source.
  84. [84]
    C. V. Raman dead - RRI Digital Repository
    Title: C. V. Raman dead. Other Titles: No funeral pictures. Science was C.V.Raman's religion. Keywords: funeral dead. Issue Date: 22-Nov-1970.