Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Certified reference materials

Certified reference materials (CRMs) are reference materials, sufficiently homogeneous and stable with respect to one or more specified properties, that are accompanied by a certificate providing the certified value of the property, its associated measurement uncertainty, and a statement of metrological traceability, typically to the International System of Units (SI). These materials are produced by accredited reference material producers following rigorous international standards, such as ISO 17034, to ensure competence in their creation and certification. CRMs play a critical role in and by supporting of instruments, validation of measurement methods, assessment of , in laboratories, and verification of result . They are essential across diverse fields, including , pharmaceuticals, , , and clinical diagnostics, where precise and comparable measurements are required to ensure reliability and compliance with regulatory standards. The certification process involves metrologically valid procedures for value assignment, often using multiple independent methods, statistical evaluation of homogeneity and , and documentation of uncertainties that account for , between-unit homogeneity, and long-term . The development of CRMs traces back to early 20th-century efforts in standardization, with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issuing its first Standard Reference Materials (SRMs)—a type of CRM—in 1906 as uniform iron chip samples to address inconsistencies in industrial testing that contributed to safety issues like train derailments. Key milestones include NIST's issuance of a SRM in 1967, which significantly improved accuracy in clinical measurements, and the establishment of international guidelines through ISO standards like Guide 30 (1992) for terminology and ISO 33405 (2024, superseding Guide 35 from 2006 and 2017) for characterization and production of reference materials. Today, over 1,300 NIST SRMs are available, alongside CRMs from global producers accredited under ISO 17034, facilitating international comparability in measurements.

Introduction

Definition and Purpose

Certified reference materials (CRMs) are reference materials characterized by a metrologically valid procedure for one or more specified properties, accompanied by a that provides the of the specified property, its associated , and a statement of metrological . These materials are sufficiently homogeneous and stable with respect to their specified properties and are produced by institutes or bodies accredited according to ISO 17034 to ensure competence in production and certification. The certified values are established through rigorous processes that often involve multiple independent measurement methods to achieve high reliability and minimize bias. The primary purpose of CRMs is to ensure the accuracy, , and comparability of across laboratories, industries, and countries by linking results to the (SI) or other recognized standards. They serve key roles in calibrating instruments, validating analytical methods, assigning values to other materials, and supporting in processes. By providing a with documented , CRMs enable the of procedures and facilitate and through standardized results. Key characteristics of CRMs include their intended use, which is explicitly stated—such as for or method validation—and the inclusion of comprehensive documentation on , typically expressed with a stated level. These materials must demonstrate long-term and homogeneity suitable for their application, ensuring reliable over time. For instance, in , CRMs like those containing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in are used to calibrate instruments for detection, while in , CRMs certified for total milk content in food matrices help validate testing methods to protect consumer .

Historical Development

The development of certified reference materials (CRMs) traces its origins to the early , when the need for standardized samples in chemical analysis prompted the creation of reliable measurement aids. In 1906, the U.S. National Bureau of Standards (NBS, now the National Institute of Standards and Technology or NIST) issued its first standard materials, consisting of iron chips with varying chemical compositions to assist foundries in and . These early materials, initially called standard samples, addressed inconsistencies in testing and marked the beginning of formalized standards in the United States. Following , the expansion of and the demand for consistent in manufacturing and scientific measurements accelerated the growth of reference materials programs globally. This period saw increased collaboration among national institutes to harmonize standards, driven by and regulatory needs in sectors like chemicals and metals. In 1975, these efforts culminated in the establishment of the (ISO) Committee on Reference Materials (), which aimed to promote the development and use of reference materials on an international scale. Key milestones in the standardization of CRMs followed, including the publication of ISO Guide 35 in 1989, which outlined general and statistical principles for their certification and production to ensure reliability and . The International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM), in its third edition published in 2007 (ISO/IEC Guide 99), formalized core concepts related to CRMs, such as metrological and , providing a unified terminological framework for global . Additionally, the first edition of ISO 17034 published in 2016 established comprehensive requirements for the competence of reference material producers, replacing earlier guides like ISO Guide 34 and emphasizing in CRM development. In December 2020, the ISO Technical Management Board decided to transform ISO/REMCO into a full technical committee, ISO/TC 334 Reference materials, which held its first meeting in 2021 to continue advancing international standards for reference materials. Recent publications as of 2024 include ISO 33405 (formerly ISO Guide 35:2017) for guidance on characterization, homogeneity, and stability assessment, and ISO 33401 for reference material certificates, reflecting ongoing refinements in CRM production and use. Over time, CRMs evolved from ad-hoc national standards to a globally harmonized system, propelled by regulatory demands in , , and to ensure comparable and accurate measurements worldwide. This progression reflected broader advancements in , shifting focus from basic chemical analysis to multifaceted applications requiring certified values with demonstrated uncertainty.

Terminology and Standards

ISO REMCO Definitions

The ISO Committee on Reference Materials (ISO/REMCO) was established in September 1975 by the (ISO) to promote the harmonization of reference materials, their production, and use, while providing guidance to other ISO committees and addressing inconsistencies in international practices. ISO/REMCO operated until 2021, when it was transformed into ISO Technical Committee 334 (ISO/TC 334) on Reference Materials, which continues this work and is developing the ISO 33400 series of standards to replace earlier ISO Guides, including Guide 30. This formation aimed to standardize terminology and practices globally, reducing confusion arising from varying definitions in fields like chemistry, physics, and . According to ISO Guide 30:2015, a reference material () is defined as a material, sufficiently homogeneous and stable with respect to one or more specified properties, which has been established to be fit for its intended use in or in examination of nominal properties. This definition emphasizes the material's homogeneity and stability with respect to specified properties, ensuring it is fit for its intended use in processes. A (CRM) is a specific type of characterized by a metrologically valid for one or more specified properties, accompanied by a that provides the value of the specified property, its associated , and a statement of metrological . CRMs are produced in accordance with ISO 17034:2016, which sets general requirements for the competence of reference material producers to ensure reliability and quality. Metrological validity here refers to the procedure's ability to realize the property's definition accurately, providing confidence in the result and its uncertainty through traceable measurements. Key terms in these definitions include "property value," which denotes the value of a specified (quantitative, ordinal, or nominal, such as or sequence) and may include an expressed as a probability or other means for non-quantitative attributes. The "certified value" is the value assigned to a , explicitly stated with its and in the accompanying to support high-confidence applications. "Intended use" specifies the purpose for which the or is designed, such as or , and is declared by the producer to confirm its fitness and metrological suitability. These terms collectively ensure metrological validity, enabling CRMs to serve as benchmarks in precise measurements across scientific and contexts.

Alternative Terminology

In various contexts, certified reference materials (CRMs) are referred to by alternative terms that reflect institutional or regional preferences. In the United States, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) employs the term "Standard Reference Materials" (SRMs) for their CRMs, which are highly characterized materials issued under a registered to support measurement traceability. Additionally, in the pharmaceutical sector, "Reference Standards" is a common designation, as seen in the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) standards, which serve as authentic specimens for verifying drug identity, strength, purity, and quality. Field-specific terminology often emphasizes the material's composition, such as "pure substance CRMs" for essentially pure chemicals characterized for purity and trace impurities, versus "matrix CRMs" for complex, naturally occurring materials mimicking real samples. Terms like "calibrators" are generally avoided outside medical or assay contexts, as they imply a narrower role in instrument calibration rather than broader metrological validation. In quality control practices, "control materials" may appear as sector jargon for in-house or supplementary references, distinct from certified versions. These variations stem from historical national programs, such as the Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) in , which produced CRMs from the 1970s until the early 2000s before transitioning to the Joint Research Centre's framework. Sector-specific jargon further contributes, arising from practical needs in industries like pharmaceuticals or environmental testing. Such terminological diversity can lead to confusion in and collaboration, where mismatched terms might hinder recognition of material equivalence; this has been mitigated through harmonization efforts by ISO/ and now ISO/TC 334, which provides unifying definitions in standards like ISO Guide 30.

Classification

Types of Reference Materials

Reference materials (RMs) are broadly classified into types based on their , , and metrological characteristics, serving as foundational tools for , method validation, and in measurements. These classifications emphasize properties such as homogeneity, stability, and , which ensure the material's suitability for specific analytical purposes without necessarily involving formal . One primary distinction is between pure substance RMs and RMs. Pure substance RMs consist of highly homogeneous materials, typically elemental standards or solutions with certified purity levels and minimal impurities, used for direct calibration in techniques like . For instance, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) SRM 3128 provides a lead (Pb) standard solution at 10 mg/g concentration in dilute , enabling for lead measurements in various matrices. In contrast, RMs mimic the complex composition of real-world samples, incorporating target analytes within a representative to account for interferences during analysis; examples include or blood simulants for environmental or clinical testing, where the matrix closely resembles the material under investigation. Classification criteria for RMs focus on homogeneity (uniform distribution of properties across the material), (resistance to degradation under storage and use conditions), and (linkage to established measurement standards), all assessed without the rigorous protocols required for CRMs. These attributes determine an RM's fitness for purpose, with pure substances typically excelling in homogeneity and , while RMs demand thorough testing to ensure matrix-matched performance. Non-certified examples, such as in-house working standards for , illustrate lower-tier RMs suitable for routine tasks, highlighting how levels vary from basic internal references to those approaching CRM standards.

Certified Reference Materials

Certified reference materials (CRMs) represent a specialized subset of reference materials characterized by their rigorous certification process, which ensures metrological , reliability, and enhanced quality for analytical measurements. Unlike general reference materials, CRMs must be produced in accordance with ISO 17034, the international standard for the competence of reference material producers, and their property values are certified using multiple independent methods to validate accuracy and minimize bias. This certification includes comprehensive uncertainty budgeting, typically following the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in (GUM) framework, to quantify and express the associated measurement uncertainties at a specified level, often 95% with a coverage factor of k=2. CRMs are categorized into primary and secondary subtypes based on their metrological hierarchy and traceability chain. Primary CRMs, also known as primary certified reference materials (PCRMs), achieve the highest level of metrological quality through direct to the () via primary reference measurement procedures, such as , without intermediate references, resulting in minimal uncertainty propagation. Examples include Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and materials from the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM), which serve as benchmarks for calibrating other standards. Secondary CRMs, in contrast, are derived by comparison to primary CRMs or SRMs, offering high but slightly lower traceability with an additional link in the metrological chain; these are commonly produced commercially for practical applications in laboratories. A defining feature of CRMs is the accompanying certificate, which details the certified values for specified properties, their associated uncertainties calculated per the GUM framework, metrological traceability statements, and instructions for proper storage, handling, and use to maintain stability and validity. These certificates ensure users can reliably apply CRMs for calibration, quality control, and method validation across diverse matrices. The Codex of Online Available Reference Materials (COMAR) database serves as an international registry, listing over 2,000 CRMs from accredited producers worldwide as of 2025. Key providers include NIST with more than 1,200 SRMs, the Joint Research Centre (JRC, formerly IRMM) with about 700 materials, and the Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM) offering specialized CRMs for industrial and regulatory needs.

Production Process

Principal Steps

The production of certified reference materials (CRMs) involves a systematic designed to ensure metrological , homogeneity, and while meeting user requirements. The process begins with a to evaluate the technical and economic viability of developing the material, followed by to identify suitable candidates that align with intended applications. Production planning then outlines the detailed procedures, resources, and quality controls needed, incorporating to determine material properties, to assign certified values with associated uncertainties, and to end users with accompanying . Compliance with ISO 17034 is a foundational principle, specifying requirements for the competence of reference material producers to maintain , , and consistent quality throughout the process. Multidisciplinary teams, including chemists for , statisticians for , and metrologists for , collaborate to address complex challenges and ensure robust outcomes. Risk is conducted at key stages to identify and mitigate potential issues, such as or variability in material properties. Decision points emphasize assessing user needs, often through market surveys or consultations to confirm demand for specific measurands, matrices, and concentration levels, ensuring the addresses real-world analytical gaps. The overall development timeline typically spans several years from initial conception to release, reflecting the extensive validation required. Costs vary widely based on complexity, ranging from hundreds of thousands to over one million euros per material, covering , testing, and efforts. Homogeneity testing and stability assessment represent critical phases embedded in the production workflow to verify material uniformity and long-term reliability.

Sample Preparation and Homogenization

The production of certified reference materials (CRMs) begins with the careful selection of source materials to ensure they meet stringent criteria for purity, representativeness, and . Source materials are chosen based on their ability to mimic real-world samples, such as natural matrices like sediments, soils, or biological tissues, to provide relevant for analytical methods. Purity is assessed to minimize impurities that could affect property values, while representativeness ensures the material reflects the composition and variability of the intended application, such as environmental or samples. is critical, aiming for production batches of 100 to 1000 units to meet global demand without compromising quality. Preparation techniques transform raw source materials into a form suitable for production, emphasizing contamination avoidance through protocols like environments or dedicated equipment. Common methods include grinding to reduce , mixing to distribute components evenly, and sieving to achieve uniform sizes, particularly for matrices like biological tissues or geological samples. For synthetic CRMs, techniques such as doping pure substances with s allow precise control over composition. In biological samples, freeze-drying followed by grinding and sieving through meshes as fine as 200 μm is standard to preserve integrity while breaking down heterogeneous structures. These steps are designed to prevent cross-contamination, often by processing in isolated batches or using inert atmospheres. Homogenization methods ensure uniformity at the micro-scale, essential for reliable sub-sampling in end-use applications. Mechanical approaches, such as milling, tumbling in large drums for extended periods (e.g., 16 hours across multiple axes), or , are widely used for complex matrices to achieve even without altering chemical properties. Thermal methods like and recasting apply to simpler inorganic materials, while chemical techniques involving and reprecipitation are employed for solutions or to incorporate spikes in biological matrices. For instance, in preparing tissue-based CRMs, extensive mechanical mixing post-grinding ensures comparable to natural variability. These methods target homogeneity sufficient for subsequent verification, though full assessment follows in dedicated testing. Challenges in and homogenization arise particularly from matrix effects in complex samples, such as biological tissues, where natural inhomogeneities at microscopic levels can persist despite . Achieving particle sizes below 200 μm is often difficult due to toughness, requiring specialized equipment like ball mills or for sterilization without introducing . Scale-up from trials to production batches introduces risks of inconsistent mixing or , necessitating iterative optimization to maintain purity and representativeness across hundreds of units. In environmental matrices like sediments, adsorption or during preparation can exacerbate these issues, demanding tailored protocols to ensure micro-scale uniformity.

Homogeneity Testing

Homogeneity testing is a critical step in the of certified reference (CRMs) to verify that the is sufficiently uniform across and within units, ensuring that the certified values are valid for any portion used in measurements. The primary purpose is to confirm that between-unit and within-unit variances are negligible relative to the overall , thereby supporting the reliability and metrological of the CRM. According to ISO Guide 35:2017, this assessment must demonstrate that inhomogeneities do not significantly affect the intended use of the in or . Techniques for homogeneity testing typically involve robust analytical methods capable of high precision, such as (ICP-MS) for elemental analysis or (GC) for organic compounds, applied to multiple units and subsamples from a batch. Sampling plans follow statistically valid designs, often testing 10 to 20 units randomly selected from batches exceeding 100 units, with subsampling to evaluate within-unit uniformity; ISO Guide 35:2017 recommends a minimum of 10 units and the use of to optimize the design for detecting inhomogeneities. For instance, in the development of a mercury-in-fish CRM, homogeneity was assessed by analyzing 15 units via ICP-MS after microwave-assisted digestion, confirming uniformity across the batch. If inhomogeneity is detected, re-testing or process adjustments, such as improved homogenization during preparation, may be required. Statistical approaches primarily rely on analysis of variance (ANOVA) to partition variance components, including between-unit standard deviation (s_bb) and within-unit contributions, using nested or randomized block designs to account for analytical variability. Outliers are identified via tests like Grubbs' or t-Student at 5% significance, and trends are checked to ensure no systematic biases. Acceptance criteria require that the between-unit inhomogeneity uncertainty (u_bbw) is insignificant compared to the certified value's uncertainty, often with s_bb < 1% of the certified value as a practical threshold in cases like gas mixture CRMs where ANOVA F-statistics must not exceed critical values. These results contribute to the CRM's uncertainty budget without dominating it, as outlined in foundational guidance.

Stability Assessment

Stability assessment in the production of certified reference materials (CRMs) involves monitoring potential changes in property values over time due to environmental factors such as temperature, light, and humidity, ensuring that the material remains suitable for its intended use throughout its validity period. This process is essential to confirm that users can rely on the certified values without significant degradation, as instability could compromise calibration, quality control, or method validation applications. General strategies for stability begin with pre-production predictions based on the material's chemistry to identify potential degradation risks, followed by experimental during and ongoing after . These approaches integrate into the overall production process to manage instability risks proactively, allowing producers to design appropriate storage and handling conditions. Monitoring typically includes initial short-term tests conducted during production to establish baseline , with subsequent periodic re-evaluations to verify long-term performance, often scheduled every 1 to 5 years depending on the material's risk profile and intended . Key factors influencing stability encompass the material's inherent chemical reactivity, which may lead to decomposition or interactions, as well as packaging choices like inert vials that minimize exposure to contaminants and environmental stressors. Effective and controlled storage conditions enable shelf-life assignments ranging from 2 to 10 years, during which the certified properties are expected to remain valid under specified conditions.

Certification Methods

Value Assignment Techniques

Value assignment in certified reference materials (CRMs) involves the characterization of property values using rigorous analytical and statistical approaches to ensure metrological reliability and minimize bias. The primary goal is to establish certified values that are traceable to the (SI) through validated methods, typically employing multiple independent techniques or interlaboratory comparisons. One key approach is the use of multiple independent (orthogonal) techniques by expert laboratories to determine values for non-operationally defined measurands, such as elemental concentrations. These techniques rely on different physical or chemical principles to cross-validate results and reduce systematic errors; common examples include isotope dilution (ID-MS) for precise quantification, (NMR) for organic purity assessment, and for compositional mixtures. For instance, ID-MS combined with liquid chromatography tandem (LC-MS/MS) has been applied to certify veterinary drug residues in bovine muscle CRMs, achieving high accuracy through isotope-labeled standards. Similarly, quantitative NMR (qNMR) enables direct value assignment for pharmaceuticals and carbohydrates by integrating signal intensities without external calibration, as demonstrated in the certification of ginkgolide standards. , often paired with these, provides primary traceability for mass-based properties in solution CRMs. This multi-method strategy, recommended in ISO Guide 35, ensures consensus values from at least two to four orthogonal approaches, enhancing confidence in the assigned property. For operationally defined measurands or complex matrices, interlaboratory comparisons—such as pilot studies or proficiency testing schemes—involving 5 to 20 competent laboratories are employed to derive consensus values through data . Participants apply their validated methods independently, submitting results for centralized evaluation to identify compatible datasets and reconcile discrepancies. Statistical treatment of these datasets includes calculating weighted means, where weights account for method uncertainties, and robust estimators to handle non-normal distributions. detection is critical, often using tests like the Grubbs test for individual results or Mandel's statistics to assess laboratory and method biases, ensuring only reliable data contribute to the final value. A representative case study is the certification of trace elements in open-ocean seawater CRMs NASS-7 and nearshore CASS-6, where an interlaboratory study coordinated by the involved expert labs worldwide. Values for elements like (Cd), (Cu), (Fe), and (Zn) were assigned using 4 to 6 orthogonal methods, including high-resolution ICP-MS, double , standard , and co-precipitation preconcentration. Data from multiple labs were reconciled via robust means and outlier rejection, yielding certified concentrations (e.g., Cd at 0.182 ± 0.015 nmol/kg in CASS-6) with compatibility checks confirming agreement within 5-10% across methods. This approach minimizes bias and supports global for marine .

Uncertainty Evaluation

The evaluation of uncertainty in certified reference materials (CRMs) follows the framework established by the ISO/IEC Guide 98-3 (), which distinguishes between Type A uncertainties derived from statistical methods (e.g., repeated measurements) and Type B uncertainties based on other information such as instrument calibration or expert judgment. This approach ensures a comprehensive assessment of all potential error sources affecting the certified value, enabling users to propagate these uncertainties into their own measurements. Key sources of uncertainty in CRMs include contributions from sampling (if applicable), homogeneity testing, stability assessments, and analytical method biases during characterization. The combined standard uncertainty u_c is calculated by propagating these components using the law of propagation of uncertainty, given by: u_c = \sqrt{\sum u_i^2} where u_i represents the standard uncertainty from each source. For instance, between-unit heterogeneity u_{bb} and within-unit heterogeneity u_{wb} arise from homogeneity studies, while long-term stability u_{lts} and short-term (transport) stability u_{trn} are derived from stability monitoring; characterization uncertainty u_{char} accounts for variability in value assignment techniques. To provide a , the expanded U is computed as U = [k](/page/K) \cdot u_c, where the coverage [k](/page/K) is typically 2 for approximately 95% assuming a . CRM certificates must report the certified value alongside this expanded and include a detailed outlining each component's contribution. For example, in the CRM ERM®-CZ130 for powder, the certified content is 4.1 mg/kg with an expanded of 0.4 mg/kg (relative 9.8%, [k](/page/K)=2), where the includes 2.12% from between-unit homogeneity, 1.66% from long-term , 0.21% from , and 2.92% from .

Metrological Traceability

Metrological is defined as the property of a result whereby the result can be related to a reference through a documented unbroken chain of calibrations, each contributing to the . This concept, as outlined in the International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM), ensures that measurements are comparable worldwide by linking them to the (SI) or to certified reference measurement procedures. In the context of certified reference materials (CRMs), traceability establishes the reliability of certified property values, enabling users to connect their analytical results to these international benchmarks. CRMs serve as key anchors in metrological traceability hierarchies, providing stable and verified property values that support the chain of calibrations. Primary CRMs are those whose certified values are determined directly by primary measurement methods, which realize SI units without reference to other standards, thus offering the highest level of direct traceability to the SI. Secondary CRMs, in contrast, are calibrated against primary CRMs or other traceable references, extending accessibility to a broader range of measurements while maintaining the unbroken chain. This hierarchical structure allows CRMs to disseminate traceability from national metrology institutes to routine laboratory practices, ensuring consistency across global analytical workflows. In practice, CRMs are implemented to establish through of analytical instruments and validation of methods. For , CRMs with known concentrations are incorporated into calibration graphs or curves, allowing the adjustment of instrument responses to align with traceable values and thereby linking subsequent to SI units. Similarly, in method validation, CRMs are analyzed alongside test samples to verify that the method produces results consistent with certified values, confirming the method's accuracy and . These applications ensure that end-user inherit the metrological validity of the CRM's . On an international scale, metrological traceability for CRMs is supported by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) through key comparisons and the Calibration and Measurement Capabilities (CMC) database. Key comparisons, conducted among national metrology institutes under the Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA), demonstrate equivalence in measurement capabilities, including those for CRM value assignment, thereby underpinning global confidence in traceability chains. The KCDB lists approved CMCs for CRM production and certification, providing a public registry that verifies the traceability of specific measurement services to SI units or reference procedures. This framework facilitates international comparability by allowing users to select CRMs from producers with demonstrated metrological competence.

Applications

Calibration and Quality Control

Certified reference materials (CRMs) play a crucial role in analytical instruments and ensuring the reliability of measurements in settings. In , CRMs serve as primary standards to establish metrological to the (SI), enabling accurate value assignment to instruments or methods. Direct involves using CRMs to directly calibrate equipment, such as in where CRM solutions are spiked into samples to generate curves for . Indirect calibration, on the other hand, uses CRM values to bracket unknown samples or correct for matrix effects, ensuring comparability without direct instrument adjustment. These practices are outlined in international guidelines for measurement processes. For , CRMs are routinely incorporated into workflows to monitor and detect drifts or biases. Daily or periodic checks involve analyzing aliquots of CRMs alongside test samples, with results compared against certified values to verify ongoing accuracy. Acceptance criteria typically require that the between the measured and certified value be less than twice the expanded (e.g., |measured - certified| < 2U, where U is the combined standard at a coverage k=2 for approximately 95% confidence). This approach helps maintain statistical , as deviations trigger investigations or recalibrations. In industrial chemical , such checks are essential for instruments like (XRF) spectrometers, where CRMs condition the equipment and confirm stability. Practical applications highlight the versatility of CRMs in specific sectors. In laboratories, CRMs certified for content in fuels or oils are used to calibrate methods compliant with ISO/IEC 17025, ensuring accurate low-level determinations critical for environmental regulations and product specifications. Similarly, in pharmaceutical analysis, CRMs for active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) purity support under FDA (GMP) guidelines, verifying assay results and impurity profiles to confirm drug safety and efficacy. These uses reduce systematic , enhance measurement precision, and facilitate interlaboratory comparability, ultimately supporting such as ISO/IEC 17025 for testing labs. The metrological traceability of CRMs underpins their effectiveness in these roles, linking routine operations to higher-order references. By integrating CRMs into and , laboratories minimize errors and uphold the integrity of analytical data across diverse applications.

Validation of Analytical Methods

Certified reference materials (CRMs) play a pivotal role in the validation of analytical methods by providing an independent, traceable benchmark to assess the performance of new or modified procedures, ensuring they meet required criteria for reliability and accuracy before routine application. This verification is essential in fields such as and , where method validation confirms that analytical results are fit for purpose, minimizing errors in decision-making processes. Key validation parameters evaluated using CRMs include accuracy, precision, linearity, and limits of detection. Accuracy, often assessed through or studies, involves comparing method results against CRM certified values to quantify systematic errors; for instance, recovery rates close to 100% indicate minimal . is determined by the repeatability of measurements on CRM samples under varying conditions, such as different analysts or instruments, typically expressed as relative standard deviation. is verified by analyzing CRM-spiked samples across a concentration range, confirming proportional responses without deviations. Limits of detection are established using low-level CRM materials or spiked blanks to ensure the method can reliably identify analytes at regulatory thresholds. Common procedures for CRM-based validation include spike-and-recovery tests and direct comparison to certified values. In spike-and-recovery experiments, a known amount of is added to a representative , and the measured is calculated to evaluate extraction efficiency and matrix effects; the relative recovery R is given by: R (\%) = \frac{\bar{x}_{\text{spiked}} - \bar{x}_{\text{unspiked}}}{x_{\text{spike}}} \times 100 where \bar{x}_{\text{spiked}} and \bar{x}_{\text{unspiked}} are the means of replicate measurements, and x_{\text{spike}} is the added amount. For comparison, multiple analyses (e.g., 10 replicates) of a are performed, and b is computed as: b = \bar{x} - x_{\text{ref}} or in relative terms, b (\%) = \frac{\bar{x} - x_{\text{ref}}}{x_{\text{ref}}} \times 100, where x_{\text{ref}} is the certified value; this provides an objective measure of trueness. These approaches ensure the method's results are comparable to international standards. In environmental analysis, CRMs for pesticides in plant matrices are used to validate high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods for pesticide residues, confirming accuracy and precision in complex samples. Similarly, in food safety, CRMs such as BCR-471 (ochratoxin A in wheat) support validation of methods for mycotoxins, enabling spike-recovery tests to assess detection limits and linearity for contaminants like aflatoxins. These practices align with established guidelines, such as ICH Q2(R1), which recommends using reference materials for accuracy verification in pharmaceutical analyses, and Eurachem's "The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods," emphasizing CRMs for independent trueness assessment in broader applications. using CRMs forms a foundational subset of this validation process.

Quality Assurance

Accreditation of Producers

Accreditation of producers of certified reference materials (CRMs) is governed primarily by the international standard , which specifies general requirements for the competence and consistent operation of reference material producers (RMPs). This standard ensures that producers demonstrate technical competence, impartiality, and the use of validated processes for producing reliable reference materials, including CRMs used in , , and method validation. Accreditation is typically granted by national or international accreditation bodies that are signatories to the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA), which promotes global confidence in the competence of accredited RMPs through harmonized criteria. The accreditation process involves rigorous evaluations to verify compliance with ISO 17034, including document reviews, on-site audits to witness production activities such as material processing and homogeneity testing, and assessments of personnel competence. Proficiency demonstrations, often through participation in interlaboratory comparisons or proficiency testing schemes, are required to confirm the accuracy of value assignment and uncertainty evaluation. Peer reviews by technical experts, including those with expertise in statistics and (e.g., per ISO Guide 35), evaluate aspects like stability studies and . Examples include the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference Materials (SRM) program, which conforms to ISO 17034 for CRM production, and the European Commission's (JRC) Reference Materials Unit, accredited under ISO 17034 as part of the European Reference Materials (ERM) framework since completing the transition from ISO Guide 34 in 2017. Key producers of CRMs include national metrology institutes such as NIST in the and the Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM) in , both operating under ISO 17034 accreditation scopes for specific material types. Commercial entities like LGC Standards, accredited by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) to ISO 17034 for a wide range of chemical and microbiological CRMs, and (part of MilliporeSigma), which manufactures CRMs in compliance with ISO 17034 and ISO/IEC 17025, also play significant roles. International organizations, such as the (IAEA), hold ISO 17034 accreditation for CRMs like IAEA-478 (agricultural soil) and IAEA-479 (milk powder), ensuring in nuclear applications. The 2016 edition of ISO 17034, which replaced ISO Guide 34:2009, introduced structural alignment with ISO 9001:2015, incorporating risk-based thinking for process management and requirements for integrating user feedback to improve production and relevance. These updates emphasize proactive in areas like and stability monitoring, while mandating records of customer discussions and feedback to refine material specifications and certification.

Monitoring and Recalls

Producers of certified reference materials (CRMs) are required to implement ongoing programs to ensure the continued validity of certified values after and . These programs typically involve periodic re-testing of retained samples for , with intervals often ranging from 2 to 5 years depending on the material's expected and , as outlined in ISO 33405:2024. For instance, certain CRMs, such as those for genetically modified organisms, undergo additional every 3 years to confirm that values remain within specified uncertainty limits. User feedback mechanisms are integrated into these programs, where producers respond to inquiries from users regarding observed deviations, allowing for rapid assessment and potential adjustments to usage recommendations on certificates. Recall procedures for CRMs are activated when post-certification or user reports reveal evidence of , , or other compromises to the material's , such as beyond certified limits. These procedures follow established protocols from accrediting bodies and producers, including notification to users, from , and coordination for returns or disposal, as exemplified in the NIST Standard Reference Materials guidelines. Notifications are disseminated through producer certificates, dedicated websites, and international databases like COMAR, which facilitate user access to updated CRM status information. Global coordination of CRM monitoring and recalls is supported by organizations such as the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) and the (ISO), which provide frameworks for and through initiatives like the Consultative Committee for Metrology in Chemistry and Biology (CCQM). The BIPM oversees key comparisons and calibration capabilities that indirectly support CRM surveillance by ensuring metrological consistency across national metrology institutes, while ISO standards like 33405:2024 mandate stability monitoring strategies to prevent widespread issues. Successful interventions, such as timely stability updates shared via international networks, have helped maintain user trust in CRM reliability by averting broader impacts on analytical measurements. Emerging trends in quality assurance include the adoption of digital certificates, which enable real-time updates on stability and recall status without reprinting physical documents. Efforts by organizations like NIST are advancing machine-readable digital reference material certificates, potentially incorporating QR codes for instant verification and access to data, addressing gaps in traditional post-certification communication.

References

  1. [1]
    SRM Definitions | NIST
    Aug 11, 2010 · Certified Reference Material (CRM) - Reference material characterized by a metrologically valid procedure for one or more specified properties, ...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
  2. [2]
    What are Certified Reference Materials? - ASTM
    Jul 5, 2023 · Certified reference material (CRM) – Reference material characterized by a metrologically valid procedure for one or more specified properties, ...
  3. [3]
    Standard Reference Materials | NIST
    Apr 29, 2022 · History · NIST Digital ... Strontium standard solution is one of the many standard reference materials (SRMs) produced and certified by NIST.
  4. [4]
    History of NIST's contributions to development of standard reference ...
    The issuance of cholesterol as a Standard Reference Material (SRM) in 1967 started the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
  5. [5]
    ISO Guide 30:2015 - Reference materials — Selected terms and ...
    ISO Guide 30:2015 recommends terms and definitions that should be assigned to them when used in connection with reference materials.
  6. [6]
    232 - Standard Reference Material Program | NIST
    Oct 16, 2008 · SRMs are used for three main purposes: tohelp develop accurate methods of analysis (reference methods); to calibratemeasurement systems; and to ...
  7. [7]
    Reference materials for environmental analysis - EU Science Hub
    Examples of certified reference materials provided by the JRC in this field are: PAHs and selected heavy metals in a PM10-like dust, trace elements or dioxins ...
  8. [8]
    Reference Materials for Food Safety | NIST
    Jun 11, 2020 · Reference Materials for Allergens: SRM 1549a Whole Milk Powder, SRM 1567b Wheat Flour, SRM 1568b Rice Flour, SRM 1845a Whole Egg Powder, SRM 1947a Lake ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Standard Reference Materials - The First Century
    Standard Reference Materials have played a major role in the history of the National Institute of. Standards and Technology (NIST), as well as its ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] The international role of ISO-REMCO—guiding reference materials
    reports on the workings of REMCO. Peter Jenks. The ISO Committee on Reference. Materials (ISO-REMCO) was formally established in 1975, following a series of ...
  11. [11]
    Trends in selected fields of reference material production - PMC - NIH
    Mar 22, 2022 · The ISO Committee on Reference Materials (ISO REMCO) was established in 1975 to push for the harmonization and promotion of RMs, their ...Recent Rm Trends In Selected... · Food Reference Materials · Gaseous Crms
  12. [12]
    ISO Guide 35:1989 - Certification of reference materials
    General and statistical principles. Withdrawn (Edition 2, 1989). New version available: ISO Guide 35: ...Missing: 1990 | Show results with:1990
  13. [13]
    ISO 17034:2016 - General requirements for the competence of ...
    In stockISO 17034:2016 specifies general requirements for the competence and consistent operation of reference material producers.
  14. [14]
    Twenty-five years of international collaboration in reference ...
    ... In 1975, the Committee on Reference Materials (REMCO) was established [28] by the International Organization of Standardization (ISO). As part of its ...
  15. [15]
    USP Reference Standards
    USP standards for drug reference standards are used to demonstrate identity, strength, purity and quality for medicines, dietary supplements and food ...FAQs · Use and Storage of USP... · Person_outline · Here
  16. [16]
    Pitfalls in terminology and use of reference materials - ScienceDirect
    What are certified reference materials and reference materials? How are they produced? Why do we need them and how do we use them? These are questions that ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Development and use of reference materials and quality control ...
    The application of certified reference materials (CRMs) in analytical chemistry for quality control purposes is well recognized and recommended by a wide ...
  18. [18]
    Certified reference materials - The Joint Research Centre
    It currently provides over 760 reference materials under the BCR, IRMM, EURM and ERM brands, and distributes around 20,000 units per year to testing ...
  19. [19]
    Reference materials — Selected terms and definitions - ISO
    Reference materials (RMs) and certified reference materials (CRMs) (defined in 2.1 and 2.2) are widely used for the calibration of measuring apparatus, for ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Standard Reference Material® 3128 Lead (Pb) Standard Solution
    May 27, 2022 · This SRM can be used to establish traceability of the results of lead measurements to NIST measurement results and standards. One approach is to ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Elemental Analysis Manual - Section 3.5 Version 3.0 (December 2021)
    Matrix Reference Material-Reference material that has a composition similar to that of the material being investigated (food, leaves, water, soil, etc.).
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Catalog - National Institute of Standards and Technology
    NIST Standard Reference Materials® (SRMs) are used by industry, government ... (NIOSH) Analytical Method 7500 or equivalent methods. SRM. Description.<|separator|>
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    What is the difference between certified reference materials and ...
    Oct 10, 2024 · In analytical testing, certified reference materials are used for calibration, quantification and verification. Read on to find out more.Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
  25. [25]
    [PDF] JCGM 100:2008 (GUM 1995 with minor corrections - BIPM
    Although this Guide provides a framework for assessing uncertainty, it cannot substitute for critical thinking, intellectual honesty and professional skill ...Missing: CRM storage
  26. [26]
    Standard Reference Materials | NIST
    NIST supports accurate and compatible measurements by certifying and providing over 1200 Standard Reference Materials with well-characterized composition or ...SRM Definitions · Using the SRM Catalog · NIST Store · Ordering PoliciesMissing: purpose | Show results with:purpose
  27. [27]
    The Exceptional Quality of Primary Certified Reference Materials
    The first questions that you might ask are: “What are Primary Certified Reference Materials and how do they differ from the Certified Reference Materials (CRM) ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Primary Certified Reference Materials (PCRM™s) - Inorganic Ventures
    NIST SRMs are primary measurement standards5, meaning, they establish their certified values through primary reference measurement procedures6. A primary ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] how to use and how not to use certified reference materials in ...
    The primary need is to have a material in good supply and with a high level of homogeneity fit for the purpose, meaning the standard deviation from measurement ...
  30. [30]
    Matrix Certified Reference Materials - MDPI
    According to ISO 17034 [1], reference material producers must meet a range of requirements regarding quality management, documentation, traceability, and ...Missing: budgeting | Show results with:budgeting
  31. [31]
    [PDF] 7.1 General requirements 7.2 Production planning 7.3 Production ...
    The general and statistical principles for certification of a given reference material in ISO Guide 35, where appropriate, shall be followed. SS/ISO 17034/ ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Exposing Myths, Legends and Tales About Reference Materials
    ➢ in-house reference materials. ➢ quality control materials. ➢ check ... ➢ Producer and producer's code for the material. ➢ General description of ...
  33. [33]
    Are certified reference materials really expensive? - ScienceDirect
    CRMs are expensive products. Indeed, the production, certification and storage costs may exceed €1m per material.Missing: worldwide | Show results with:worldwide
  34. [34]
    ISO Guide 35:2017 - Reference materials — Guidance for ...
    ISO/Guide 35:2017 explains concepts and provides approaches to the following aspects of the production of reference materials: - the assessment of homogeneity.Missing: preparation | Show results with:preparation
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Development of Reference Material of Mercury in Fish - IMEKO
    Oct 22, 2020 · In the study of homogeneity of the material, ICP-MS in standard mode was used, like a measurement method with microwave-assisted acid digestion.
  36. [36]
    Evaluation of Homogeneity in Certified Reference Materials (CRM)
    According to ISO 17034:2016, these mixtures have to be evaluated regarding the homogeneity, which is one of the fundamental requirements for the production of ...
  37. [37]
    (PDF) Homogeneity testing of reference materials - ResearchGate
    Aug 10, 2025 · Homogeneity testing is of the highest importance for the certification of reference materials, as it should demonstrate the validity of the certified values.
  38. [38]
    [PDF] GUIDE 35 - iTeh Standards
    ISO Guide 35:2017 https://standards.iteh.ai ... This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/REMCO, the Reference Materials. Committee of ISO.
  39. [39]
    Reference Standard Expiration and Extension - Novachem
    AccuStandard's analytical chemists assign an expiration period ranging from three months to ten years.<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    [PDF] CERTIFIED REFERENCE MATERIALS CATALOG D.I. Mendeleyev ...
    not less than 99%, packaged in (10 – 30) g in dark glass vials with screw caps, placed in cardboard packaging or in double-sealed plastic bag, labelled ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  41. [41]
    Production and certification of BOTS-1: bovine muscle–certified ...
    Jun 16, 2023 · Value assignment was carried out using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) methods in conjunction with isotope dilution ...
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
    Determining Gravimetric Sample Composition of Mixtures - AZoM
    Jan 15, 2025 · This article demonstrates achieving quantification by assessing the molecular weight with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) using the 1 H-detected diffusion- ...Missing: certified | Show results with:certified
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Reference Materials: A review - Semantic Scholar
    Oct 15, 2023 · TERMS AND DEFINITIONS. ISO Guide 30:2015 (5) defines a reference material. (RM) and a certified reference material (CRM) as follows ...
  45. [45]
    Inter-laboratory study for the certification of trace elements in ...
    May 2, 2018 · (PDF 345 kb) ... Inter-laboratory study for the certification of trace elements in seawater certified reference materials NASS-7 and CASS-6 ...Missing: PDF | Show results with:PDF
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Certification of the mass fraction of arsenic, cadmium, nickel, lead ...
    This publication is a Reference Materials report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European. Commission's science and knowledge service.<|control11|><|separator|>
  47. [47]
    [VIM3] 2.41 metrological traceability - BIPM
    Property of a measurement result whereby the result can be related to a reference through a documented unbroken chain of calibrations.
  48. [48]
    Metrological Traceability: Frequently Asked Questions and NIST Policy
    As a general principle, the definition of metrological traceability in the VIM suggests that it is necessary to establish the traceability of all input ...
  49. [49]
    to BIPM.org
    The BIPM key comparison database – supports the CIPM MRA. The KCDB contains information on the internationally recognized Calibration and Measurement ...Key comparisons · CMC Advanced search · Comparisons search · About the KCDBMissing: metrological traceability
  50. [50]
    ISO Guide 33:2015 - Reference materials — Good practice in using ...
    ISO Guide 33:2015 describes good practice in using reference materials (RMs), and certified reference materials (CRMs) in particular, in measurement processes.
  51. [51]
    How to Use and How Not to Use Certified Reference Materials in ...
    Mar 17, 2020 · The presentation provides a brief background on the above problems and a look at some support and reference information provided by NIST to metals and mining ...Missing: PDF | Show results with:PDF
  52. [52]
    Q7A Good Manufacturing Practice Guidance for Active ... - FDA
    This document is intended to provide guidance regarding good manufacturing practice (GMP) for the manufacturing of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs)Missing: CRMs | Show results with:CRMs
  53. [53]
    [PDF] The Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods - Eurachem
    This Eurachem guide is about the fitness for purpose of analytical methods, and is a laboratory guide to method validation.
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Correct choice and application of certified reference materials in ...
    May 24, 2023 · Correct choice and application of certified reference materials in method validation in food analysis. Gisela Umbricht. Page 2. Agenda. 1 ...
  55. [55]
    (PDF) Development of certified reference materials for mycotoxins
    Jun 27, 2016 · Overview on the currently available (C)RMs in the field of mycotoxin analysis. CRM Mycotoxin Matrix Certified value Uncertainty. BCR-385 1,2 ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Q 2 (R1) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology
    INTRODUCTION. This document presents a discussion of the characteristics for consideration during the validation of the analytical procedures included as ...
  57. [57]
    Accreditation of RMPs Using ISO 17034
    Nov 10, 2016 · These resolutions will allow the extension of the ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA) to incorporate the accreditation of Reference Material Producers ( ...
  58. [58]
    None
    ### Summary of Accreditation Process for ISO 17034 (DIN EN ISO 17034)
  59. [59]
    FAQs | NIST - National Institute of Standards and Technology
    The criteria for the contents of certified reference material (CRM) certificates are contained in ISO 17034 and ISO 33401.
  60. [60]
    Accreditation - Certified Reference Materials catalogue of the JRC
    Since 2004, the Reference Materials Unit is accredited according to ISO Guide 34 and ISO/IEC 17025. The switch from ISO Guide 34 to ISO 17034 was completed in ...Missing: ERM | Show results with:ERM
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Certified Reference Materials Catalogue - BAM
    The catalogue provides technical and general ordering information for the CRMs currently available from the. BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and ...
  62. [62]
    Our Quality - LGC Standards
    Many of our reference standard ranges are accredited to ISO 17034 and are analyzed under our ISO 17025 accreditation for testing and calibration laboratories, ...
  63. [63]
  64. [64]
    Reference Materials under ISO 17034 accreditation
    View all Reference Materials under ISO 17034 accreditation. Certified Reference Materials within the scope of ISO 17034 accreditation.Missing: EU | Show results with:EU
  65. [65]
    ISO 17034:2016(en), General requirements for the competence of ...
    This first edition of ISO 17034 cancels and replaces ISO Guide 34:2009, which has been technically revised. The following major changes have been made compared ...Missing: risk- | Show results with:risk-
  66. [66]
    The new International Standard ISO 17034: general requirements ...
    Sep 26, 2017 · The introduction clarifies that ISO 17034:2016 outlines the general requirements for producers of RMs and that it supersedes ISO Guide 34:2009.
  67. [67]
    Certified reference materials for GMO analysis—more than 25 years ...
    Jan 23, 2025 · (1) Certified reference material must be available to Member States and any third party. (2) Certified reference material shall be produced and ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] DISTRIBUTION OF NIST STANDARD REFERENCE MATERIALS ...
    Notify DISTRIBUTOR by SRM number and lot number if appropriate of any. SRM being recalled and to accept return or disposal; ... Certified Reference Materials.
  69. [69]
    [PDF] COMAR user guide - BAM - RRR
    Each material in the database has a CRM name or number assigned to it by the producer. This option enables a quick search for the desired material if the CRM ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Calibration and measurement capabilities in the context of the CIPM ...
    Jan 11, 2021 · BIPM ... - Value assignment and characterization should be carried out in compliance with relevant ISO guides, such as ISO 17034;.Missing: recalls | Show results with:recalls
  71. [71]
    [PDF] THE DIGITAL NIST - National Institute of Standards and Technology
    Human-Readable Certificates. The creation of digital reference material certificates to enable machine-to-machine communication is essential to the future of ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] CCQM Online Workshop on Digital and FAIR Chemical and Biological
    The focus of the day was on the digitalization of reference material certificates, exploring the challenges and opportunities associated with this process.