Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Character theory

Character theory is a central component of in , focusing on the study of finite groups through their characters—complex-valued functions defined on the group elements as the traces of the matrices representing those elements in a given linear representation over the complex numbers. These characters are class functions, constant on conjugacy classes, and they encode essential structural information about the group, allowing representations to be classified up to and facilitating the decomposition of representations into irreducible components. Developed primarily by Georg Frobenius in 1896 as an extension of earlier work on abelian groups by and , character theory originated from efforts to factor the group determinant, a constructed from the group's . Frobenius's groundbreaking contributions established that irreducible characters form an for the space of class functions under a specific inner product, with the relations providing a linear algebraic framework to compute character tables and determine the number of irreducible representations, which equals the number of conjugacy classes in the group. A key theorem, due to Frobenius, states that the sum of the squares of the dimensions of the irreducible representations equals the order of the group, underscoring the completeness of this decomposition. Beyond its foundational role in , character theory simplifies the analysis of group actions by reducing problems to computations involving traces and inner products, making it indispensable for applications in , , and . For finite groups over fields of characteristic zero, such as the complex numbers, characters are particularly well-behaved due to the , enabling the full machinery of and the Artin-Wedderburn theorem to classify semisimple algebras associated with the . Modern extensions, including modular character theory in positive , build on these classical results to handle broader contexts like p-groups and symmetric groups.

Foundations

Definitions

In the context of for s, a of a G is defined as a \rho: G \to \mathrm{[GL](/page/GL)}(V), where V is a finite-dimensional over the complex numbers \mathbb{C} and \mathrm{[GL](/page/GL)}(V) denotes the general linear group of invertible linear transformations on V. This setup encodes the action of G on V via linear transformations, preserving the group structure. The of V, denoted \dim V, is called the of the representation. The character \chi associated to a representation \rho is the function \chi: G \to \mathbb{C} given by \chi(g) = \operatorname{Tr}(\rho(g)) for each g \in G, where \operatorname{Tr} is the trace of the matrix representing \rho(g) with respect to any basis of V. Characters are class functions, meaning \chi(g) = \chi(hgh^{-1}) for all g, h \in G, as the trace is invariant under simultaneous conjugation of the matrix. The space of all class functions on G, denoted \mathrm{CF}(G), consists of complex-valued functions constant on the conjugacy classes \mathrm{Cl}(G) of G. An irreducible representation of G is one that admits no proper nontrivial invariant subspace under the action of \rho. The characters of the irreducible representations form an orthonormal basis for the vector space \mathrm{CF}(G) with respect to the inner product \langle \chi, \psi \rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g \in G} \overline{\chi(g)} \psi(g), though the orthogonality details are explored elsewhere. The set of irreducible characters is denoted \mathrm{Irr}(G), and its cardinality equals the number of conjugacy classes |\mathrm{Cl}(G)|. A fundamental example is the trivial representation, where \rho(g) is the identity transformation on V for all g \in G, yielding the trivial character \chi_{\mathrm{triv}}(g) = 1 for every g \in G. This one-dimensional representation is always irreducible.

Representations and linear characters

Linear characters are the characters of one-dimensional representations of a finite group G, which are group homomorphisms \chi: G \to \mathbb{C}^\times satisfying \chi(gh) = \chi(g)\chi(h) for all g, h \in G. These representations map elements of G to the multiplicative group of nonzero complex numbers, preserving the group operation multiplicatively. For a finite G, every is one-dimensional, meaning all irreducible characters are linear. The set of all linear characters of G forms a group under multiplication, known as the group \hat{G}, which is to G itself. The trivial , which sends every element to 1, serves as the in this dual group. The kernel of a linear \chi, defined as \ker(\chi) = \{g \in G \mid \chi(g) = 1\}, is a of G. By the first for groups, the G / \ker(\chi) is to the image \operatorname{im}(\chi) \subseteq \mathbb{C}^\times, which is a finite cyclic subgroup of the unit circle. A concrete example arises with the \mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}, generated by 1 modulo n. Its linear characters are given by \chi_k(m) = e^{2\pi i k m / n} for k = 0, 1, \dots, n-1 and m \in \mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}, corresponding to the nth roots of unity. In general, the number of linear characters of a finite G equals |G|, matching the order of the group since the group is isomorphic to G.

Properties

Arithmetic properties

In the theory of representations of finite groups over the numbers, the \chi associated to a representation \rho: G \to \mathrm{GL}(V) is defined by \chi(g) = \mathrm{tr}(\rho(g)) for g \in G. These are constant on conjugacy classes of G, meaning \chi(hgh^{-1}) = \chi(g) for all h, g \in G, and thus belong to the space of class functions on G. The degree of a character \chi, denoted \chi(1), is the value at the and equals the dimension of the representation space V. This degree is a positive . For an irreducible character, the degree \chi(1) divides the order of the group |G|. A fundamental states that for any character \chi and element g \in G, |\chi(g)| \leq \chi(1), with equality holding if and only if \rho(g) is a scalar multiple of the on V. This bound reflects the unitary nature of representations of finite groups up to . The arithmetic structure of characters is further illuminated by the inner product on the space of class functions, defined as \langle \chi, \psi \rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g \in G} \chi(g) \psi(g^{-1}). For irreducible characters \chi, \psi, this inner product takes integer values: it equals 1 if \chi = \psi and 0 otherwise. In particular, the norm \langle \chi, \chi \rangle = 1 if and only if \chi is the character of an irreducible representation. By , which asserts that the endomorphism algebra of an over \mathbb{C} is isomorphic to \mathbb{C}, distinct cannot have the same , ensuring that irreducible characters are pairwise distinct.

Multiplicativity and orthogonality

One key property of characters in is their multiplicativity under direct products of groups. For finite groups G and H, if \chi \in \operatorname{Irr}(G) and \psi \in \operatorname{Irr}(H), then the irreducible characters of the G \times H are precisely the products \chi \times \psi, defined by (\chi \times \psi)(g, h) = \chi(g) \psi(h) for g \in G and h \in H. This reflects how representations of G \times H arise as external tensor products of representations of G and H. A related multiplicativity holds for tensor products of representations of the same group. If \rho: G \to \operatorname{GL}(V) and \sigma: G \to \operatorname{GL}(W) are representations with characters \chi_\rho and \chi_\sigma, the tensor product representation \rho \otimes \sigma on V \otimes W has character \chi_{\rho \otimes \sigma}(g) = \chi_\rho(g) \chi_\sigma(g) for all g \in G. This product structure facilitates the analysis of how representations combine under tensoring, preserving the trace via the multiplicativity of traces on tensor products of matrices. In contrast, characters exhibit additivity under direct sums of representations. For representations \rho on V and \sigma on W, the direct sum \rho \oplus \sigma on V \oplus W has character \chi_{\rho \oplus \sigma}(g) = \chi_\rho(g) + \chi_\sigma(g) for all g \in G. This linearity allows any representation to be expressed as a direct sum of irreducible ones, with the character serving as an additive invariant. Irreducible characters also display orthogonality properties when viewed as functions constant on conjugacy classes. Specifically, the set of irreducible characters \operatorname{Irr}(G) forms an for the space of class functions on G with respect to the inner product \langle \chi, \psi \rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g \in G} \chi(g) \overline{\psi(g)}, where the sum can be grouped over conjugacy classes due to class constancy. This column orthogonality underpins the uniqueness of character tables and decomposition into irreducibles. To illustrate these properties, consider the S_3, which has three conjugacy classes: the \{e\}, transpositions (order 2), and 3-cycles (order 3). Its irreducible are the trivial \chi_1 \equiv 1, the sign \chi_{\operatorname{sgn}} with values $1, -1, 1, and the 2-dimensional \chi_2 with values $2, 0, -1. The additivity is evident in the permutation representation, whose $3, 1, 0 decomposes as \chi_1 + \chi_2. For multiplicativity, the of \chi_2 with itself yields the $4, 0, 1, which further decomposes but demonstrates the pointwise product rule. Restricting to the A_3 \cong C_3, the of S_3 multiply consistently with those of the subgroup's irreducibles (the trivial and two complex 1-dimensional ), aligning with the direct product structure for abelian factors.

Character Tables

Construction and examples

The character table of a G is constructed by indexing the columns with the conjugacy classes of G and the rows with its irreducible characters. The number of irreducible characters equals the number of conjugacy classes. To determine the table, first compute the conjugacy classes explicitly for small groups. The degrees (values at the identity) of the irreducible characters \chi(1) must satisfy \sum \chi(1)^2 = |G|, and each degree divides |G|. One standard approach uses the decomposition of known representations, such as the or representations on cosets. The regular representation of G acts on the vector space of functions on G by left translation, with character \chi_{\mathrm{reg}}(g) = |G| if g = e (the identity) and $0 otherwise. This character decomposes as \chi_{\mathrm{reg}} = \sum_{\chi} \chi(1) \cdot \chi, where the sum is over all irreducible characters \chi, so the multiplicity of each irreducible is its degree \chi(1). For small groups, the remaining character values can be found by decomposing the permutation representation (e.g., the action on cosets of subgroups) into irreducibles or by solving systems based on known values and verification via orthogonality relations.

Example: Symmetric Group S_3

The S_3 has order 6 and three conjugacy classes: the \{e\} (size 1), the 3-cycles \{(123), (132)\} (size 2), and the transpositions \{(12), (13), (23)\} (size 3). There are thus three irreducible characters, with degrees satisfying d_1^2 + d_2^2 + d_3^2 = 6; the possible degrees are 1, 1, and 2 (as S_3 has two 1-dimensional representations from its abelianization S_3 / A_3 \cong C_2). The trivial representation gives the first row: \chi_1 = (1, 1, 1). The sign representation (det of the permutation representation) gives \chi_2 = (1, 1, -1). The remaining 2-dimensional irreducible is the standard representation on \mathbb{C}^3 modulo the trivial subspace, with character \chi_3 = (2, -1, 0), obtained by subtracting the trivial and sign characters from the permutation character (3, 0, 1). The full table is:
Character / Classe (size 1)3-cycles (size 2)Transpositions (size 3)
Trivial (\chi_1)111
(\chi_2)11-1
(\chi_3)2-10
This table can be verified using orthogonality relations over the classes (weighted by class sizes).

Example: Q_8

The quaternion group Q_8 = \{\pm 1, \pm i, \pm j, \pm k\} has order 8 and five conjugacy classes: \{1\} (size 1), \{-1\} (size 1), \{i, -i\} (size 2), \{j, -j\} (size 2), and \{k, -k\} (size 2). Thus, there are five irreducible characters, with degrees 1, 1, 1, 1, and 2 (as \sum d_i^2 = 8). The four 1-dimensional characters arise from the quotient Q_8 / \langle -1 \rangle \cong C_2 \times C_2, which is abelian. The trivial character is \chi_1 = (1, 1, 1, 1, 1). The other three 1-dimensional characters are the sign-like representations with kernels \langle i \rangle, \langle j \rangle, and \langle k \rangle: \chi_2 = (1, 1, 1, -1, -1), \chi_3 = (1, 1, -1, 1, -1), and \chi_4 = (1, 1, -1, -1, 1). The 2-dimensional irreducible is faithful, realized over \mathbb{C} using quaternionic units (e.g., via matrices with i and j satisfying i^2 = j^2 = -1, ij = -ji = k), with character \chi_5 = (2, -2, 0, 0, 0). This representation is not realizable over \mathbb{R} without extension, highlighting the need for complex coefficients despite real-valued characters. The full table is:
Character / Class\{1\} (size 1)\{-1\} (size 1)\{i, -i\} (size 2)\{j, -j\} (size 2)\{k, -k\} (size 2)
Trivial (\chi_1)
i-kernel (\chi_2)-1-1
j-kernel (\chi_3)-1-1
k-kernel (\chi_4)-1-1
Faithful 2D (\chi_5)000

Orthogonality relations

The orthogonality relations for characters of a finite group G form a cornerstone of character theory, establishing that the irreducible characters form an orthonormal basis for the space of class functions on G. The row orthogonality relation asserts that for distinct irreducible characters \chi, \psi \in \operatorname{Irr}(G), \sum_{g \in G} \chi(g) \overline{\psi(g)} = 0, while if \chi = \psi, \sum_{g \in G} \chi(g) \overline{\chi(g)} = |G|. This relation follows from the fact that the inner product \langle \chi, \psi \rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g \in G} \chi(g) \overline{\psi(g)} equals the Kronecker delta \delta_{\chi, \psi}, which counts the multiplicity of the trivial representation in the tensor product of representations affording \chi and the dual of \psi. The column orthogonality relation, in turn, concerns sums over irreducible characters for fixed conjugacy classes. Let K and L be distinct conjugacy classes of G, and let \chi(K) denote the common value of \chi(g) for g \in K. Then \sum_{\chi \in \operatorname{Irr}(G)} \chi(K) \overline{\chi(L)} = 0, while if K = L, \sum_{\chi \in \operatorname{Irr}(G)} \chi(K) \overline{\chi(K)} = \frac{|G|}{|K|}. Here, |K| is the size of the class K, and the relation reflects the orthogonality of the columns of the character table when appropriately normalized by class sizes. A sketch of the proofs relies on the unitarity of irreducible representations and properties of matrix coefficients. For row orthogonality, consider unitary representations \rho and \sigma affording \chi and \psi, respectively. The characters are traces of these representations, and the sum \sum_{g \in G} \chi(g) \overline{\psi(g)} equals |G| times the dimension of the space of G-invariant bilinear forms intertwining \rho and \sigma^*, which is |G| if \rho \cong \sigma and zero otherwise by Schur's lemma. Column orthogonality follows by applying row orthogonality to induced characters or by considering the regular representation decomposed into irreducibles, where the coefficient of the class function supported on K is analyzed via conjugation action. These relations imply the uniqueness of the character table of G up to of rows (corresponding to irreducibles) and columns (corresponding to classes), as the irreducible characters form a basis for the s, with the ensuring and completeness. Moreover, they provide an explicit formula for decomposing any \phi on G as \phi = \sum_{\chi \in \operatorname{Irr}(G)} \langle \phi, \chi \rangle \chi, where the coefficients \langle \phi, \chi \rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g \in G} \phi(g) \overline{\chi(g)} are computed using the inner product; this "inverse" formula allows determination of multiplicities in direct sums of representations from their characters.

Induction and Decomposition

Induced characters

In representation theory of finite groups, given a H of a G and a \chi of a representation of H, the induced \operatorname{Ind}_H^G(\chi) is defined by \operatorname{Ind}_H^G(\chi)(g) = \frac{1}{|H|} \sum_{t \in T} \chi^t(g), where T is a set of left coset representatives for H in G, and \chi^t(h) = \chi(t^{-1} h t) is the conjugate (with \chi^t(g) = 0 if g \notin H). A key property of the induced character is its value at the : \operatorname{Ind}_H^G(\chi)(1) = [G : H] \chi(1), where [G : H] = |G|/|H| is the of H in G, reflecting the dimension of the underlying . Additionally, \operatorname{Ind}_H^G(\chi) is constant on the s of H in G, meaning its value at g \in G depends only on the double coset HgH. For example, if \chi is the trivial character of H, then \operatorname{Ind}_H^G(\chi) is the character of the permutation representation of G acting on the left cosets G/H by left multiplication. When H is the trivial \{[1](/page/1)\} and \chi is the trivial character of \{[1](/page/1)\}, the induced character \operatorname{Ind}_{\{1\}}^G(1) is the regular character \chi_{\mathrm{reg}} of G, which takes the value |G| at the identity and $0 elsewhere. The Frobenius reciprocity theorem relates to restriction of characters: for characters \chi of H and \psi of G, \langle \operatorname{Ind}_H^G(\chi), \psi \rangle_G = \langle \chi, \operatorname{Res}_G^H(\psi) \rangle_H, where \langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle_K denotes the inner product of functions on K.

Frobenius reciprocity

Frobenius reciprocity establishes an adjunction between the and restriction functors in the representation theory of finite groups, providing a fundamental link for computing characters of groups using information from their subgroups. Specifically, for a finite group G, a H \leq G, an irreducible character \chi of H, and an irreducible character \psi of G, the theorem states that \langle \operatorname{Ind}_H^G \chi, \psi \rangle_G = \langle \chi, \operatorname{Res}_H^G \psi \rangle_H, where \langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle_K denotes the inner product of functions on K. This equality implies that the multiplicity of \psi in the decomposition of the induced character \operatorname{Ind}_H^G \chi equals the multiplicity of \chi in the restriction of \psi to H. The proof proceeds by establishing a natural between Hom-spaces: \operatorname{Hom}_G(V, \operatorname{Ind}_H^G U) \cong \operatorname{Hom}_H(U, \operatorname{Res}_H^G V), where U is a of H and V of G. To show this, define an evaluation map \operatorname{ev}: \operatorname{Hom}_G(V, \operatorname{Ind}_H^G U) \to \operatorname{Hom}_H(U, \operatorname{Res}_H^G V) by restricting a G-homomorphism to the H-fixed part, and construct an inverse using the coinduction structure or direct summation over cosets. For the character version, the inner products are computed explicitly using the of and the for the induced character, which sums \chi over double cosets H g H weighted by their sizes: \chi_{\operatorname{Ind}_H^G U}(g) = \frac{1}{|H|} \sum_{x \in G} \chi_U(x^{-1} g x), leading to the equality after averaging over conjugacy classes. This reciprocity enables the decomposition of induced characters into irreducibles by examining restrictions of known irreducibles to the , avoiding direct computation of the full induced character table. For instance, if \operatorname{Res}_H^G \psi contains \chi with multiplicity m, then \operatorname{Ind}_H^G \chi contains \psi with the same multiplicity m, facilitating efficient character table construction for larger groups. A concrete application appears in the D_4 of order 8, generated by rotation r (order 4) and reflection s, with cyclic H = \langle r \rangle of order 4. The irreducible characters of H include the faithful character \chi with \chi(1) = 1, \chi(r) = i, \chi(r^2) = -1, \chi(r^3) = -i. Inducing \chi to D_4 yields a 2-dimensional irreducible representation, and Frobenius reciprocity confirms its irreducibility by showing that the restriction of each 2-dimensional irreducible of D_4 to H contains \chi exactly once, matching the inner product \langle \operatorname{Ind}_H^{D_4} \chi, \psi \rangle_{D_4} = 1 for the corresponding \psi. As a in the context of normal subgroups, Frobenius reciprocity underpins basic Clifford theory: if N \trianglelefteq G and \rho is an of N, then any \psi of G whose restriction to N contains \rho induces from the of \rho under the conjugation of G/N, with the restriction \operatorname{Res}_N^G \psi being a multiple of the G- of \rho. This transitive on homogeneous components ensures that \psi is induced from an extension or twist of \rho over its inertial .

Mackey decomposition

The Mackey decomposition theorem provides a formula for expressing the of a from a H to the full group G in terms of inductions from an intermediate K, where H \leq K \leq G. Specifically, for a \chi of H, the induced \operatorname{Ind}_H^G \chi decomposes as \operatorname{Ind}_H^G \chi = \sum_t \operatorname{Ind}_K^G \left( \operatorname{Ind}_{H \cap t^{-1} K t}^K (\chi^t) \right), where the sum runs over a set of representatives t for the double cosets K \backslash G / H, and \chi^t denotes the conjugate defined by \chi^t(h) = \chi(t^{-1} h t) for h \in H \cap t^{-1} K t. This formula arises from applying the adjointness of and restriction (Frobenius reciprocity) to the standard Mackey restriction formula, allowing the decomposition of induced characters through intermediate steps. It is particularly useful for understanding the structure of representations when subgroups form a chain, as it facilitates iterative computations. When K is a of G, the Mackey decomposition simplifies significantly. In this case, the double cosets K \backslash G / H correspond to the cosets of N_G(H)/H acting by conjugation on the characters of H, and \operatorname{Ind}_H^G \chi decomposes into a of induced characters from the stabilizers under this action. More precisely, if \chi is H-irreducible, the constituents of \operatorname{Ind}_H^G \chi are determined by the orbits of \chi under conjugation by elements of N_G(H), with the decomposition involving inductions from the linear characters of the quotient N_G(H)/H. This special case connects directly to Clifford theory, where the irreducible constituents above \chi correspond bijectively to the irreducible characters of N_G(H)/H via the Clifford , ensuring that each such is irreducible if the stabilizer action is transitive. The Mackey decomposition is especially valuable for computing character tables of solvable groups, where one can exploit a or chief series $1 = H_0 \triangleleft H_1 \triangleleft \cdots \triangleleft H_n = [G](/page/G) with abelian factors. Starting from linear s of the minimal nontrivial subgroup, successive applications of the formula allow induction through each layer, decomposing the resulting s into manageable sums that can be further restricted or analyzed using . For instance, in p-groups, this approach reveals the structure of nonlinear irreducibles; consider an extraspecial p-group [G](/page/G) of p^{2m+1}, where Z(G) is of p. Inducing a nonprincipal linear \lambda of Z(G) to [G](/page/G) yields \operatorname{Ind}_{Z(G)}^G \lambda = p^m \psi_\lambda, where \psi_\lambda is the unique irreducible representation of degree p^m with central \lambda. Since the conjugation of G/Z(G) \cong (\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})^{2m} on the nonprincipal linear s of Z(G) is trivial, there are p-1 such distinct irreducibles, one for each nonprincipal \lambda, complemented by the p^{2m} linear s. This method efficiently constructs the full character table without enumerating all conjugacy classes.

Advanced Topics

Twisted dimensions

In , twisted characters arise from s, which are modifications of ordinary linear representations using 2-cocycles. A 2-cocycle \omega: [G](/page/G) \times [G](/page/G) \to \mathbb{C}^* for a [G](/page/G) satisfies the condition \omega(g, h) \omega(gh, k) = \omega(g, hk) \omega(h, k) for all g, h, k \in [G](/page/G). This defines a projective representation \rho: [G](/page/G) \to \mathrm{GL}(V) on a finite-dimensional complex vector space V, where \rho(g) \rho(h) = \omega(g, h) \rho(gh) for all g, h \in [G](/page/G). The associated twisted group algebra \mathbb{C}_\omega[[G](/page/G)] has basis \{g \mid g \in [G](/page/G)\} and multiplication g \cdot h = \omega(g, h) (gh), with irreducible modules corresponding to irreducible projective representations. The twisted \chi_\omega of such a representation is defined by \chi_\omega(g) = \mathrm{Tr}(\rho(g)) for g \in G. It is an \omega-, meaning \chi_\omega(h^{-1} g h) = \overline{\omega(h, h^{-1})} \chi_\omega(g). The twisted is \chi_\omega(1) = \dim V, the dimension of the representation space, which divides |G| for irreducible cases assuming a normalized cocycle where \omega(1, g) = \omega(g, 1) = 1. A key property is the inequality |\chi_\omega(g)| \leq \chi_\omega(1) for all g \in G, with equality holding if and only if \rho(g) is scalar multiplication by a complex number of modulus 1, analogous to the ordinary case but adjusted by the cocycle twist. Twisted characters relate to ordinary characters through the structure of the twisted group : the irreducible twisted characters form an orthonormal basis for the space of \omega-class functions with respect to a twisted inner product, mirroring the orthogonality relations in classical character theory. Specifically, for distinct irreducible projective characters \chi_\omega and \psi_\omega with the same cocycle, the inner product is zero, and it equals 1 for \chi_\omega with itself. Moreover, any projective character decomposes as a linear of irreducible characters lifted via central extensions associated to the cohomology class [\omega] \in H^2(G, \mathbb{C}^*), providing a bridge between projective and linear representation theories. An illustrative example occurs with extraspecial p-groups, such as the modulo p of order p^{2m+1}. Here, nontrivial 2-cocycles yield projective representations whose twisted characters reveal additional structure beyond the ordinary irreducible characters of dimensions 1 and p^m; for instance, faithful projective irreducibles have degree p^m and characters that detect via cocycle adjustments, aiding classification of representations over algebraically closed fields of characteristic zero. In over fields of positive characteristic, twisted characters via cocycles on Sylow subgroups help analyze decomposition of characters into modular components, particularly for groups with nontrivial Schur multipliers. This framework explains apparent "fractional" dimensions in contexts like reduction modulo primes, where effective representation degrees appear non-integer in terms but resolve to integers through projective lifts, ensuring consistency with group divisibility.

Characters of Lie groups and algebras

In the representation theory of compact groups, characters are defined as the traces of unitary representations on finite-dimensional complex vector spaces, yielding class functions that are continuous and integrable with respect to the normalized on the group. These characters determine the representation up to unitary equivalence and play a central role in decomposing general unitary representations into direct sums of irreducibles via integration against the , analogous to the relations for finite groups but in a continuous setting. The irreducible representations of a compact semisimple G are finite-dimensional and parameterized by dominant integral weights \lambda in the weight lattice relative to a . The character \chi_\lambda of the irreducible representation with highest weight \lambda is given by the : \chi_\lambda(t) = \frac{\sum_{w \in W} \epsilon(w) \, t^{w(\lambda + \rho)}}{\sum_{w \in W} \epsilon(w) \, t^{w \rho}}, where T is a , t \in T, W is the , \epsilon(w) is the sign of w, \rho is half the sum of the positive roots, and t^\mu = \prod_i t_i^{\mu_i} with t_i the eigenvalues of t. This formula, originally due to , expresses the character as a ratio of alternating sums over the and can be realized using Schur polynomials when restricted to the torus, providing an explicit combinatorial description for classical groups. A concrete example arises for the group \mathrm{SU}(2), whose irreducible representations have dimension n+1 for n = 0, 1, 2, \dots. For an element g \in \mathrm{SU}(2) conjugate to \operatorname{diag}(e^{i\theta}, e^{-i\theta}) in the , the of the n-th irreducible is \chi_n(g) = \frac{\sin((n+1)\theta)}{\sin(\theta)}. This formula illustrates the trigonometric form typical of in low-rank groups and follows from summing the weights in the . The Peter-Weyl theorem provides a foundational completeness result: the matrix coefficients of all finite-dimensional irreducible unitary representations are dense in the space of continuous functions on G (with ) and form an for L^2(G) under the inner product \langle f, h \rangle = \int_G f(g) \overline{h(g)} \, dg with respect to the , generalizing the basis for abelian compact groups. This orthogonality of matrix coefficients extends the discrete orthogonality of characters for finite groups to the continuous case, enabling on G. For semisimple Lie algebras over \mathbb{C}, characters of representations are formal power series in the group algebra of the weight lattice, tracking weight multiplicities as \mathrm{ch}(V) = \sum_{\mu} m_\mu e^\mu, where m_\mu = \dim V_\mu. Infinite-dimensional representations, such as those in category \mathcal{O}, have characters that are infinite sums; for a Verma module M_\lambda induced from a Borel subalgebra with highest weight \lambda, the character is \mathrm{ch}(M_\lambda) = \frac{e^\lambda}{\prod_{\alpha > 0} (1 - e^{-\alpha})}, reflecting the infinite multiplicity structure along negative root directions. Harish-Chandra modules, which are finitely generated (\mathfrak{g}, K)-modules for a real form with compact subgroup K, admit similar formal characters but are used to study unitary representations of the corresponding real , with central characters distinguishing blocks via the .

Applications

In finite group classification

Character theory plays a pivotal role in classifying finite groups by providing tools to analyze their structure, detect isomorphisms, and determine properties like solvability. A fundamental result is that the number of irreducible complex characters of a finite group G equals the number of conjugacy classes of G, arising from the orthogonality relations for characters established by Frobenius. This equality implies the important formula |G| = \sum_{\chi \in \mathrm{Irr}(G)} \chi(1)^2, where \chi(1) denotes the degree of the irreducible character \chi, offering a direct computational link between the group's order and its representation degrees. For solvability, character degrees serve as a diagnostic tool: a finite group is solvable if every irreducible character has degree 1 or 2. This criterion, while not encompassing all solvable groups (which may admit higher-degree characters), guarantees solvability when the condition holds, as such groups fall into a classified family including cyclic, dihedral, and certain semidirect products, all of which have solvable composition series. Attributed to work in the area by Gallian, this bound leverages Itô's theorem, which states that character degrees divide |G|/p for Sylow p-subgroups, restricting structural possibilities in low-degree cases. Rational character tables, consisting of rational-valued irreducible characters, further aid isomorphism detection by capturing the group's rational representations and determining it up to certain ambiguities, such as isoclinism classes where central extensions and derivations differ. While the full character table does not always distinguish non-isomorphic groups (e.g., the of order 8 and the share the same table), the rational version provides stronger constraints on the derived subgroup and abelianization, often resolving structure up to these equivalences. In classifying simple groups, character degrees impose strict bounds: for a non-abelian , the minimal non-trivial degree exceeds certain thresholds, and degrees must satisfy inequalities like \chi(1)^2 \geq |G|/k for some k related to the number of classes. These bounds, derived from and power map considerations, exclude many candidates and confirm known simples. A example is the A_5, whose irreducible character degrees are 1 (with multiplicity 1), 3 (multiplicity 2), 4 (multiplicity 1), and 5 (multiplicity 1). To prove A_5 simple using characters, suppose N \trianglelefteq A_5 is proper non-trivial; then |A_5 : N| must divide some degree greater than 1 by properties of induced characters and Frobenius reciprocity, yielding possible indices 3, 4, or 5. However, A_5 has no subgroups of index 4 or 5, and the unique Sylow 2-subgroup of index 15 precludes a normal subgroup of index 3, as its character restrictions would contradict the table's class fusion and values. Thus, no such N exists, confirming .

In physics and chemistry

In , character theory provides a framework for classifying quantum states according to the irreducible s (irreps) of groups, particularly the group SO(3), where each irrep corresponds to an state labeled by the integer or half-integer l, with dimension $2l + 1. The characters of these SO(3) irreps, given by the of the matrix for a by \theta, enable the orthogonal of any onto the basis of irreps, facilitating the of composite systems like coupled angular momenta into definite types. This approach, foundational to understanding atomic and molecular spectra, was systematically developed by in his seminal 1931 monograph. Wigner's application of character theory extended to nuclear physics in the 1930s, where he employed it to explore symmetries of atomic nuclei, introducing supermultiplets under an SU(4) group that combines and degrees of freedom for protons and neutrons. This work, detailed in his 1937 analysis, used character decompositions to classify nuclear states and predict selection rules for β-decay and other processes, laying groundwork for shell models and symmetry-based structure theory. In chemistry, character theory of finite point groups classifies molecular vibrations by reducing the representation spanned by atomic displacements into irreps, revealing which modes couple to electric transitions for () activity or polarizability changes for Raman activity. -active modes must belong to irreps matching the symmetry of the dipole components (typically x, y, z), while Raman-active modes align with quadratic terms like x^2 - y^2 or xy, as specified in the group's character table; this analysis, a cornerstone of , was comprehensively outlined by . For (CH₂Cl₂) in the C_{2v} , the reducible representation for its nine (3N-6 = 9 for N=5 atoms) decomposes as $4A_1 \oplus 2B_1 \oplus 2B_2 \oplus A_2, where the A_1, B_1, and B_2 modes are both - and Raman-active, while the A_2 mode is solely Raman-active. Examples include the symmetric C-H stretch and Cl-C-Cl bend (A_1), asymmetric C-H stretch (B_1), asymmetric C-Cl stretch and H-C-H wag (B_2), and H-C-H twist (A_2); there are additional modes in the A_1 and B_1 irreps. In , character theory supports the SU(3) flavor symmetry, where up, down, and strange quarks transform under the 3-dimensional irrep, and their combinations form higher multiplets like the octet ( particles including proton and ) and decuplet (spin-3/2 resonances like Δ and Ω⁻). Characters of SU(3) irreps, labeled by Young tableaux or (p,q) dimensions, decompose products such as $3 \otimes 3 \otimes 3 = 10 \oplus 8 \oplus 8 \oplus 1 to predict content and symmetries, central to the eightfold way classification introduced by . This framework, validated by the discovery of the Ω⁻ in 1964, underpins the of strong interactions.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Group Representations and Character Theory - UChicago Math
    Aug 26, 2011 · In this paper, we provide an introduction to the representation theory of finite groups. We begin by defining representations, G-linear maps,.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] A brief introduction to group representations and character theory
    Sep 28, 2018 · Group representations are important partly because they simply come up throughout mathematics. Unless you're studying group theory for its own ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] The origin of representation theory - UConn Math Department
    Representation theory was created by Frobenius about 100 years ago. We describe the background that led to the problem which motivated Frobenius to define.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] CHARACTER THEORY OF FINITE GROUPS Chapter 1 - SLMath
    Note: The set of linear characters of G forms a group under pointwise multiplication. The identity is 1G and λ. −1. = λ, the complex conjugate of λ.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Character Theory - Alexander Rhys Duncan
    Feb 8, 2023 · Throughout this document, we make the standing assumptions that G is a finite group and k is a field of characteristic coprime.
  6. [6]
    [PDF] representation theory of finite groups - Yale Math
    A representation of a finite group G is a pair (V,ρ) where V is a C-vector space and ρ is a homomorphism from G to GL(V).
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Representation theory of finite groups - MIT Mathematics
    The character of a representation f for G is a function χ : G → C defined as χ(g) := Tr(f(g)). Here, we would say that χ is the character of G afforded by f.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] some elementary results in representation theory - UChicago Math
    Abstract. This paper will prove that given a finite group G, the associated irreducible characters form an orthonormal basis for the set of class functions.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Linear Representations of Finite Groups
    1 Generalities on linear representations. 3. 1.1 Definitions. 3. 1.2 Basic examples. 4. 1.3 Subrepresentations. 5. 1.4 Irreducible representations.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Groups and representations
    Jan 3, 2010 · (i) |χ(g)| ≤ χ(1) for all g ∈ G and equality holds if and only if ∆(g) = a · In with a ∈ K. (ii) χ(g) = χ(1) ⇔ ∆(g) = In ⇔ g ∈ ker(∆).<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Isaacs_Character_theory.pdf
    ' Preface. Character theory provides a powerful tool for proving theorems about finite groups ... characters to group theory. The ernphasis in all chapters ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Introduction to representation theory - MIT Mathematics
    Jan 10, 2011 · ... table of a finite group G and turn it into a matrix XG by replacing every entry g of this table by a variable xg. Then the determinant of XG.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Finite Groups and Character Theory - Columbia Math Department
    A representation of a group is a homomorphism from the group to invertible linear transformations. Finite groups have complete reducibility, meaning any  ...
  14. [14]
    Determination of character table of symmetric group:S3 - Groupprops
    Jun 23, 2014 · This page describes various ways to determine the character table of symmetric group:S3. The idea is to determine as much as possible with ...
  15. [15]
    Linear representation theory of quaternion group - Groupprops
    Oct 1, 2016 · The character table of the quaternion group is the same as that of the dihedral group of order eight. Note, however, that the fields of ...1Summary · 3Character table · 6Orthogonality relations and...
  16. [16]
    Linear Representations of Finite Groups - SpringerLink
    In stockDownload chapter PDF. Representations and Characters. Front Matter. Pages 1-1. Download chapter PDF · Generalities on linear representations. Jean-Pierre Serre.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory
    A milestone in the subject was the definition of characters of finite groups by Frobenius in 1896. Prior to this there was some use of the ideas which we can ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] 1 Proof of Frobenius reciprocity - Yale Math
    argumentneeds a fewthings from category theory It's based on thefollowing natural isomorphisms. Hem IV Indy Nau. Frobenius reciprocity Home IV V04. tensorHom.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Lectures on Representation Theory Dragan Milicic
    2.8. Characters and Frobenius reciprocity. Now we are going to give a proof of 2.4.2 based on character formula for the induced representation and the.<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
    [PDF] MTH 410/514/620: Representation Theory
    Frobenius Reciprocity states that ri,j = sj,i for all i, j. Corollary 4.2.9 (Induction in stages). Suppose H<K<G and ρ : H → GL(W) is a representation ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Lecture 12. Induced Characters
    May 19, 2020 · Example: the dihedral group D8. Let us do an example. We consider the dihedral group. D8 = <t,s|t4 = s2 = 1,sts. −1. = t. −1>. The commutator ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] character theory for projective representations of finite groups
    Section 5 is the main part of this paper. We relate the projective representations of G to C[G]α-modules, where C[G]α is the twisted group algebra.
  23. [23]
    A character theory for projective representations of finite groups
    Mar 15, 2015 · In this paper, we construct a character theory for projective representations of finite groups. Consequently, we compute the number of distinct irreducible ...
  24. [24]
    Projective representations of extra-special p-groups
    In this note we shall describe its representations in the case R is an algebraically closed field C of characteristic zero and G is an extra-special p -group P.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Harmonic Analysis on Compact Lie Groups: the Peter-Weyl Theorem
    The characters of the irreducible representations are just χn(eiθ) = einθ. The space of characters is the space of all functions on the group, it is Abelian.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Compact Lie Groups - University of Oregon
    May 5, 2022 · These notes are about Lie groups which are compact, and about the irreducible represen- tations of these groups. In our sketch of the ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] The Weyl Integral and Character Formulas
    We have seen that irreducible representations of a compact Lie group G can be constructed starting from a highest weight space and applying negative roots.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] SU(2) Representations and Their Applications
    ... (n+2)θ + ··· + einθ. = ei(n+1)θ − e−i(n+1)θ eiθ − e−iθ. = sin((n + 1)θ) sin(θ). This character formula is the simplest example of a the more general Weyl.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Verma Modules and the category O.
    The Harish-Chandra homomorphism. Definition 5.1. The Harish-Chandra center of a Lie algebra g is the center Z(g) of the universal enveloping algebra U(g).
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Harish-Chandra's homomorphism, Verma modules
    These are also called creation and annihilation operators. A representation or g-module (π, V ) is a complex vectorspace V and π is a Lie algebra homomorphism π ...
  31. [31]
    Groups whose irreducible representations have degree at most 2
    We classify the finite groups G for which every irreducible F -representation of G is of degree 1 or 2 and the degree 2 representations are * -stable. We then ...Missing: Gallian | Show results with:Gallian
  32. [32]
    The character ring of a finite group - Project Euclid
    X is isomorphic to the smallest subring of the direct sum of n copies of the complex numberfield C which contains the rows of M. Consequently, the character ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Wigner and the groups in classifying elementary particles and ...
    Wigner did a pioneer work in the application of group theory in physics. An important milestone was the publication of his famous textbook [1]. As its title ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Chemical applications of group theory
    In this book, of course, we shall be concerned with the groups formed by the sets of symmetry operations that may be carried out on molecules or crystals, but ...
  35. [35]
    Vibrational Modes of Methylene Chloride
    5 models in this collection. Use getProperty "modelInfo" or getProperty "auxiliaryInfo" to inspect them. Default Van der Waals type for model set to Babel. 25 ...