Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Chinese punctuation

Chinese punctuation encompasses the standardized system of symbols employed in modern to denote pauses, intonation, sentence boundaries, and textual structure, facilitating clarity in a that historically lacked such conventions. These marks, primarily full-width characters adapted from , include the (。), (,), enumeration comma (、), colon (:), (;), (?), (!), parentheses (()), and (「」 or “”). Introduced during the late and systematically adopted in the early 20th century amid the , Chinese punctuation transformed classical writing practices by resolving ambiguities in unpunctuated texts. Prior to modernization, ancient and medieval manuscripts rarely featured consistent ; rudimentary notations like dots or circles occasionally marked pauses or emphasis, as seen in pre-Qin or "judu" lines, but readers relied on and context for interpretation. The influx of Western ideas during the (1840 onward) and subsequent cultural exchanges prompted initial adoption, with diplomat Zhang Deyi introducing European marks in his 1869 travelogue Diary of a Journey to Europe and America, though he deemed them overly intricate for . Full standardization occurred in 1919, when scholar Hu Shi published Outline of the History of as the first book to incorporate modern systematically, promoting it as essential for vernacular baihua literature during the . In contemporary usage, Chinese punctuation aligns closely with English equivalents but accommodates the language's logographic nature and bidirectional writing (horizontal left-to-right or vertical top-to-bottom). For instance, the enumeration comma (、) uniquely separates items in lists without implying a pause as strong as the regular (,), while vary by region—using corner brackets 「 」 in traditional (Taiwan, ) or double quotes “ ” in simplified ()—and orient differently in vertical text (e.g., opening marks at the bottom right). Official guidelines, such as those from the of China's State Language Commission, emphasize full-width forms to match character proportions, ensuring aesthetic harmony in . This system not only enhances but also supports digital processing and translation, though variations persist between , , and .

History

Origins in classical Chinese

In classical Chinese texts such as the and Shijing, there was no fixed system of punctuation, with readers inferring pauses and sentence boundaries primarily from prosody, structural parallelism, and the physical divisions of writing materials like bamboo slips. This absence created dense "walls of characters" that demanded extensive training to interpret correctly, as early texts from the pre-Qin period onward relied on contextual cues rather than visual markers. Rudimentary punctuation, known as judou (sentence and pause markers), emerged during the (206 BCE–220 CE) to aid comprehension, with pre-Qin texts occasionally using circular marks for emphasis or pauses; more systematic dots and circles for pauses developed later in the . Lexicographical works like Xu Shen's (c. 100 CE) introduced early symbols such as “、” for pauses within sentences and a “v”-shaped mark for paragraph divisions, though these were not widely adopted. These inventions were inconsistent and added by copyists or readers rather than standardized, reflecting an approach to clarifying the rhythmic flow of . For instance, vertical or dashed lines sometimes separated clauses in heavy prose, as noted in historical accounts of Han textual practices. Punctuation practices varied significantly across eras and media, with oracle bone inscriptions from the Shang dynasty (c. 1600–1046 BCE) and early bronze vessel engravings showing no marks whatsoever, treating text as continuous script. In the Tang dynasty (618–907 CE), punctuation remained sparse and inconsistent, with annotations relying on contextual cues rather than standardized marks. Song dynasty (960–1279 CE) woodblock prints introduced underdots or small circles for pauses, as recommended in printing guides like the Zengxiu Huzhu Libu Yunlue. These variations stemmed from the medium—bamboo, silk, or print—and the scribe's discretion, lacking any uniform convention until much later. The informal nature of these methods profoundly influenced reading practices, fostering heavy reliance on oral recitation traditions where tutors elucidated pauses through intonation, and on commentator notes to resolve textual ambiguities. Without reliable visual aids, interpretations could diverge widely, as seen in debates over classical phrasing. During the Southern Song (1127–1279 ), texts like the began emphasizing the teaching of sentence breaks and pauses to children, aiding scholarly interpretation. This legacy of inferred structure continues to shape the vertical flow of modern Chinese typography.

Development of modern punctuation

The transition to modern Chinese punctuation occurred during the late and Republican era, as part of broader modernization efforts to adapt to vernacular (baihua) expression and facilitate literacy amid influences. Early adoption began in the 1870s–1890s, with diplomat Zhang Deyi introducing European marks in his 1869 travelogue Diary of a to and , though he deemed them overly intricate for . Chinese intellectuals also encountered ideas via translations that incorporated marks, influencing emerging print . Early missionary periodicals like Wan Guo Gong Bao (1868), launched by American Young J. Allen, began incorporating Western-style elements in translations to enhance readability, marking an initial shift from classical informal methods like judou. Western missionaries further accelerated this change by adding punctuation to Chinese Bibles and educational materials, enhancing clarity for new readers during the Self-Strengthening Movement. Punctuation guidelines for vernacular literature were promoted in the late 1910s, with scholar Hu Shi further advancing the cause in 1919 by publishing Outline of the History of Chinese Philosophy, the first book to incorporate modern punctuation systematically, to support the New Culture Movement's push for accessible writing. Lu Xun's early works in 1918, such as "A Madman's Diary," used vernacular style, contributing to broader literacy reforms. The 1920s saw the Republican government promote these practices through literacy campaigns, with the Beiyang administration approving a set of Western-derived marks (e.g., period, semicolon, question mark) via the Ministry of Education in 1920 to unify printing and education. Standardization intensified after the founding of the in 1949. In September 1951, the government published the first "General Rules for Marks," formalizing rules for simplified texts as part of reform initiatives. Post-WWII political divisions led to divergences: emphasized full-width marks aligned with simplified characters, while retained traditional forms and slight positional variations (e.g., comma alignment) influenced by earlier standards. By the 1980s, the GB 2312-1980 encoding standard incorporated full-width punctuation symbols, enabling digital representation and ensuring compatibility in computing for text processing.

Typographic features

Shapes and forms of marks

Chinese punctuation marks are designed to integrate seamlessly with the square em-box structure of , featuring full-width proportions that maintain typographic harmony in both and vertical layouts. These glyphs often employ rounded or forms suited to the monospaced nature of Hanzi typesetting, with variations in regional standards like GB/T 15834-2011 influencing their precise rendering. The ideographic full stop (。), or , consists of a small circular dot centered within its full-width square, typically occupying about half the of a standard to avoid visual dominance while ensuring alignment. Unlike the Latin , its compact circular shape—often rendered in styles in early 20th-century fonts—provides a subtle closure that fits the fluid rhythm of text without protruding from the character grid. The comma (、), known as the dùnhào, appears as a raised, oblique stroke resembling a tilted or short slash, positioned higher in the em square to distinguish it from the baseline (,) and facilitate clear separation in lists. This elevated design, with its diagonal line from upper left to lower right, enhances readability in dense CJK compositions by occupying minimal vertical space yet providing precise visual pause. The full-width question mark (?) mirrors the Latin form but adopts proportional adjustments for CJK typography, featuring a curved hook and centered dot within a square em frame that matches character width, often with slightly thicker strokes for balance against Hanzi radicals. Its design ensures it integrates without disrupting the monospaced flow, differing from half-width variants by filling the full character cell. Bracketing marks emphasize enclosure with distinctive curves and angles: corner brackets (《 》) use double-angle forms with thicker, bolder lines than European guillemets (« »), creating a robust frame for titles that aligns crisply at em edges. Parentheses (( )), rendered in full-width variants, feature pronounced rounded arcs that sweep outward, providing a softer, enclosing contour adapted to the circular elements common in Chinese glyphs, while maintaining square bounding boxes. Linear marks prioritize extension and spacing for separation: the two-em dash (——) is a solid horizontal bar spanning two em units without internal gaps or kerning, formed by consecutive em dashes (—) for unbreakable continuity in CJK lines. The ellipsis (……) employs six dots, arranged horizontally in a line in horizontal writing or as two columns of three dots each in vertical writing, occupying a two-em width to evoke omission while preserving grid alignment, distinct from the three-dot Latin ellipsis by its structure of six dots. The interpunct (·), or middle dot, is a centered circular point at mid-height within its em square, used for subtle division like in foreign names, with full-width rendering in traditional contexts to match character density. Typographic evolution of these marks traces to the Republican era (1912–1949), when Western printing presses influenced sans-serif adaptations, such as the simplified circular period in early metal-type fonts to improve castability and legibility. Modern digital fonts, standardized post-1980s via and national specs like GB/T 15834-2011, vary stroke thickness—thinner for screens to reduce —while retaining core shapes for cross-platform consistency. This progression filled gaps in pre-modern hand-set typography, enabling scalable designs that preserve CJK optical balance.

Width and orientation adaptations

Chinese punctuation marks are available in full-width and half-width variants to align with the typographic requirements of CJK text, which traditionally uses monospaced square characters. Full-width forms, such as the exclamation mark ! (U+FF01) and comma , (U+FF0C), occupy the same width as ideographs, ensuring seamless integration in printed literature and vertical compositions where uniformity is essential. Half-width forms, like ! (U+0021) and , (U+002C), mimic ASCII equivalents and are preferred in computing environments, mathematical notation, or mixed-language texts to save space and match proportional Latin typography. The Halfwidth and Fullwidth Forms Unicode block (U+FF00–U+FFEF) standardizes these variants, with half-width CJK punctuation (U+FF61–U+FF65) providing compact options like the ideographic full stop 。 (U+FF61). In vertical writing, which flows top-to-bottom with columns right-to-left, undergoes orientation adjustments to preserve and aesthetic balance. The ideographic (U+3001 、) and (U+3002 。) remain upright (with 'Tu' Vertical_Orientation ), but are repositioned— the to the left of the preceding character and the to the bottom-left—rather than rotated. Circular marks like 。 align sideways without alteration due to their symmetric design, while linear ones like the enumeration adapt by staying upright. Paired delimiters, such as double angle brackets 《 (U+300A) and 》 (U+300B) or corner brackets 「 (U+300C) and 」 (U+300D), rotate 90 degrees (with 'Tr' ), swapping positions so the opening mark appears on the right to match the reading direction. These adaptations, defined in the CJK Symbols and block (U+3000–U+303F), ensure marks follow the vertical flow without disrupting the grid-like character alignment. Digital standards and font technologies have evolved to support these adaptations, particularly in mixed horizontal-vertical environments. The Unicode Vertical Text Layout guideline (UAX #50, updated 2025) specifies orientation properties to guide rendering engines in applying rotations and transformations consistently across platforms. In the 2020s, enhancements in mobile operating systems and applications, including better glyph substitution in fonts like Noto Sans CJK and system defaults in and , have improved vertical rendering of rotated punctuation, facilitating its use in apps supporting traditional layouts such as e-books and messaging interfaces. Half-width forms find primary application in technical documentation, such as URLs and code snippets where ASCII compatibility is required, whereas full-width variants dominate literary and formal texts to maintain visual harmony with ideographs.

Categories of punctuation marks

Sentence and clause terminators

In writing, the (。), known as the jùhào (句号), marks the end of a declarative or a complete thought, functioning as the primary sentence terminator. It is a small, full-width positioned at the of the preceding characters, with no space following it, to maintain the seamless flow characteristic of CJK . According to the national standard /T 15834-2011, in text as used in , the is aligned to the lower left corner relative to the text box; in vertical text, it shifts to the upper right. This ideographic (U+3002) occupies one full width, though it may be reduced to half an em at the end of a line for justified layout without altering its semantic role. The comma (,), or dòuhào (逗号), serves as a separator within , indicating minor pauses such as between subordinate , , or items in a list, without concluding the overall . Like the , it is full-width (U+FF0C) and placed without trailing , aligning to the lower left in horizontal text per /T 15834-2011, or centered in regions like and . It typically occupies one , but can be compressed to half an em at line boundaries or in tight to prevent awkward breaks, ensuring in dense Hanzi arrangements. For example, in a listing actions, it might appear as: 他跑步,跳绳,游泳 (He runs, jumps , swims). For stronger divisions, the semicolon (;), termed fēnhào (分号), delimits independent clauses that are closely related but could stand alone, akin to a major clause terminator within a compound sentence. This full-width mark (U+FF1B) follows the same unspaced placement and positional rules as the comma, with lower left alignment in horizontal mainland text under GB/T 15834-2011. It occupies a full em, non-adjustable in vertical writing, and is preferred over multiple commas to clarify structure in complex prose; for instance: 我喜欢读书;她喜欢画画 (I like reading; she likes drawing). Interrogative sentences conclude with the question mark (?), or wènhào (问号), a full-width form (U+FF1F) that mirrors its counterpart in but integrates into CJK spacing norms, placed immediately after the final without . In , it aligns to the lower left in horizontal text per /T 15834-2011, while centered in other regions; it spans one , though up to three may chain for emphasis (e.g., ???), repeated adjacently with no between them, though spacing may be adjusted in if needed. Exclamatory sentences similarly end with the (!), jīngtànhào (惊叹号, U+FF01), denoting strong or emphasis, following identical positioning and spacing rules, with potential for repetition up to three instances. Both marks are prohibited from starting a line to avoid visual disruption. The colon (:), called màohào (冒号), introduces , explanations, quotations, or elaborations, acting as a clause-level pause that anticipates further content rather than fully terminating it. As a full-width (U+FF1A), it is unspaced after and aligns to the lower left in horizontal mainland text according to GB/T 15834-2011, occupying one fixed in vertical modes. Unlike English usage, it does not typically prompt indentation; an example is: 水果有:苹果,香蕉 (Fruits include: apples, bananas). A distinctive feature of Chinese punctuation is the absence of a dedicated point mark among standard terminators; instead, decimal separators in numerical contexts employ the half-width (.), avoiding overlap with the circular sentence (。), in line with standard conventions for in Chinese. This separation ensures clarity between syntactic endings and , as outlined in Chinese typographic guidelines.

Quotation and bracketing marks

In Chinese typography, and bracketing marks serve to enclose direct speech, citations, titles, explanatory asides, or inserted material, adapting to both and vertical writing directions. The double angle brackets 《 》 (U+300A, U+300B), known as shūmínghào or title marks, are primarily used to denote titles of , articles, films, or other works, with the opening bracket on the left in text and positioned accordingly in vertical text. For nested titles, single angle brackets 〈 〉 (U+3008, U+3009) are employed inside the double ones. In , this convention is standardized, while may alternatively use a wavy low line (U+FE4F) for titles in some contexts. For direct speech or in modern prose, curly quotation marks “ ” (U+201C, U+201D) are preferred in for horizontal text, often paired with single curly marks ‘ ’ (U+2018, U+2019) for nested quotations; in vertical text or traditional contexts, corner brackets 「 」 (U+300C, U+300D) serve as the outer pair, with white corner brackets 『 』 (U+300E, U+300F) for inner ones. typically reverses this, using single corner brackets 「 」 for outer dialogue and double white ones 『 』 for inner. These marks enclose the quoted content without leading spaces inside, and if the continues after the closing mark, a follows immediately. An …… (typically six dots, formed by repeating U+2026 or using ······) may appear within quotes to indicate trailing off or omission. Parentheses ( ) (U+FF08, U+FF09), full-width round brackets, are used for parenthetical explanations, asides, or supplementary information, centered within the character frame in both horizontal and vertical orientations. Square brackets 【 】 (U+3010, U+3011), or black lenticular brackets, commonly enclose citations, directions, or insertions, while half-width square brackets [ ] (U+005B, U+005D) are reserved for mathematical expressions, foreign terms, or technical notations. Nesting of bracketing marks follows a of types for clarity, such as parentheses within square brackets, with no spaces adjacent to the enclosed text; in vertical writing, these marks rotate 90 degrees clockwise.

Enumeration and emphasis marks

The enumeration comma, known as 顿号 (dùn hào) and represented by the ideographic comma (、, U+3001), is specifically used to separate parallel items in lists within a sentence, including when there are only two elements, unlike the regular comma which handles pauses in clauses. For example, in horizontal writing, it appears between items such as 北京、哈尔滨、上海 (Beijing, Harbin, Shanghai), implying a connection akin to "and" for the final pair without needing an explicit conjunction. This mark, slanted from top-left to bottom-right, occupies full-width space and is placed directly after each item except the last, facilitating clear enumeration in both simplified and traditional Chinese texts. The em dash, termed 破折号 (pòzhé hào) and rendered as —— (two consecutive em dashes, U+2014 U+2014), spans two character widths and serves to indicate abrupt interruptions, explanatory insertions, or speaker attributions in . For instance, it can break a for emphasis or addition, as in 他突然停下——原来是看到了朋友 (He suddenly stopped—turns out he saw a friend), or denote like 小明——你好吗? (Xiaoming—how are you?). It also functions as a horizontal rule to separate sections, maintaining line integrity without hyphenation at breaks. In vertical text, it orients accordingly to fit the flow. The full-width hyphen (-, U+FF0D) connects components in compound terms, particularly in transliterations or technical phrases, such as 超-音速 (supersonic), though native compounds like 中美关系 (Sino-US relations) typically juxtapose characters without it. For precise ranges, an (——) links endpoints, as in 2025—2030, while the (〜, U+301C) denotes approximations, like 约5〜10人 (about 5 to 10 people). These distinctions ensure clarity in numerical or sequential contexts without overlapping clause functions. Emphasis in Chinese writing traditionally employs the emphasis mark (着重号, zhuó zhòng hào), consisting of dots or a line under characters (...), to highlight key terms, though boldface or italics are increasingly common in digital formats for formal stress. Informally, especially in online text, the tilde () adds casual emphasis, as in 真的很棒 (really~great). Underlines remain rare outside print, prioritizing readability over Western-style capitalization. The middle dot (·, U+00B7, 间隔号 jiàn gé hào) separates elements in translated foreign names or titles, such as 马克思·恩格斯 (Marx·Engels) for surname-given name division, or in works like 莎士比亚·哈姆雷特 (Shakespeare·). It also divides dates, like 9·11 (), occupying full-width space in both and vertical layouts. This mark avoids in non-native nomenclature without altering native Chinese structures. The apostrophe (’, U+2019) appears sparingly in Chinese text, primarily within romanized foreign words or to denote syllable breaks, such as Xī’ān to distinguish from xiān, but it does not form native contractions or possessives. Its use is confined to transliterations, ensuring phonetic accuracy without integration into hanzi sequences.

Usage guidelines

Spacing and positioning rules

In typography, spaces are not used between hanzi characters, even at word boundaries, as the script relies on character density and contextual cues for . Punctuation marks are full-width and placed directly adjacent to the surrounding characters without intervening spaces, ensuring seamless integration into the text flow. For instance, the phrase 你好,朋友 (nǐ hǎo, péngyǒu; "Hello, friend") features the immediately following 你好, occupying its own em-width space equivalent to a single hanzi. This no-spacing convention applies universally to native text, promoting compactness and visual uniformity. The national standard GB/T 15834-2011 explicitly prohibits spaces around most punctuation marks to maintain this tight composition, with narrow exceptions for integrating English loanwords or foreign terms, where half-width spaces or punctuation may be inserted to avoid awkward juxtapositions, such as in mixed-script sentences like " 人工智能". Full-width spaces are reserved for separating paragraphs at their conclusion or delineating columns in vertical layouts, where text flows top-to-bottom across right-to-left columns, enhancing structural clarity in traditional formats like newspapers or scrolls. In digital contexts of the , these rules extend to automated line-breaking algorithms, which avoid hyphenation in pure text but apply it judiciously to loanwords per updated guidelines. Positioning of punctuation adheres to precise alignments relative to the baseline of adjacent hanzi. In horizontal writing, sentence terminators like the full stop (。) and commas (,) or semicolons (;) sit at the lower-left corner of their em-space, flush with the , while midline marks such as the enumeration comma (、) or (·) are centered vertically for balance. No indentation follows periods or other terminators within a ; new continue on the same line, with only new paragraphs indented by two em-spaces (equivalent to two hanzi). This contrasts with conventions, prioritizing fluid continuity over hierarchical breaks. For bracketing and quotation structures, punctuation placement follows logical enclosure. punctuation is placed outside book title marks (《》), as in 《书》。 (ending a with a title reference). However, when titles function as nominal objects in a , external punctuation remains outside the marks, such as 《书》有趣 ("The book is interesting."). These rules ensure serves the quoted unit without disrupting outer syntax. For nested quotes or content with internal , marks belonging to the inner content are placed inside. In vertical writing, positioning adapts to the columnar flow, with marks rotated 90 degrees counterclockwise and repositioned relative to the preceding . The horizontal comma (,) transforms into a vertical equivalent akin to the enumeration mark (、), placed in the upper-right corner, while full stops (。), question marks (?), and exclamation marks (!) shift to the lower-right corner under the text. Semicolons, colons, and similar terminators follow suit at the lower right. Brackets and rotate accordingly—horizontal forms like 《 》 become vertical variants (e.g., 〖 〗 or rotated ︸ ︹), with opening and closing symbols swapping sides to align with the right-to-left progression of columns, preventing visual inversion. Dashes and ellipses center horizontally under characters, maintaining readability across the rotated axis. These adaptations, rooted in GB/T 15834-2011, ensure punctuation remains intuitive in traditional vertical compositions like classical or .

Variations by region and context

In , where simplified characters predominate, punctuation adheres strictly to full-width forms as mandated by the national standard GB/T 15834—2011, which emphasizes minimal spacing and consistent baseline alignment for horizontal text, such as placing periods and commas at the lower left corner of the character square. This standard, issued by the Standardization Administration of , governs official publications and education from the 1950s onward, requiring book titles to be enclosed in double angle brackets 《 》 and direct speech in double “ ”, with no spaces adjacent to marks except in specific enumerations. In , using traditional characters, guidelines from the Ministry of Education favor centered positioning within the character square, diverging from mainland practices, and incorporate influences from due to historical colonial rule (1895–1945), such as occasional use of square brackets 「 」 for in educational texts. Style guides recommend 《 》 exclusively for titles like books or articles, reserving “ ” or 「 」 for spoken quotes, while half-width (e.g., , .) appears in software interfaces and some school materials to align with digital keyboards, though full-width remains standard in formal writing. Hong Kong and Macau, employing traditional characters in a bilingual environment, blend Chinese full-width marks with English half-width commas and spaces, particularly in legal and commercial texts, to facilitate between and English. In media, such as newspapers and , the wavy dash ~ serves as an informal approximator or range indicator (e.g., 5~10人), reflecting colloquial speech patterns not emphasized in mainland standards. Across regions, punctuation varies by context: formal literature maintains full-width marks with precise spacing per GB/T 15834—2011, while informal social media often substitutes traditional marks with emojis for emphasis (e.g., 😂 replacing an exclamation), reducing reliance on dashes or ellipses in platforms like Weibo. Classical Chinese reprints, especially in vertical format, follow standard vertical punctuation positioning with 90-degree counterclockwise rotation for modern marks added to unpunctuated originals, aligning with traditional scroll layouts without unique conversions. In technical writing, half-width punctuation integrates seamlessly with Latin scripts and numbers (e.g., in equations or code), as permitted by layout standards to avoid visual disruption in mixed-language documents. Recent digital adaptations, including app interfaces from 2023–2025, promote flexible —such as context-aware half-width in AI-assisted —to enhance in multilingual outputs, though explicit guidelines remain tied to regional standards like those in WeChat's content policies.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] The Process of the Introduction of Western Punctuation System Into ...
    Due to the wars and the colonization of European countries in modern China, the Chinese punctuation system was influenced by the European punctuation system.
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    The Ancient History of Chinese Punctuation
    Sep 29, 2021 · Western-style punctuation marks first came to China via Zhang Deyi (张德彝), a scholar who was sent on a tour of Europe by the Qing court. In ...
  4. [4]
    The Process of the Introduction of Western Punctuation System Into ...
    1. INTRODUCTION. Punctuation is the use of spacing, conventional · 2. THE HISTORY OF PUNCTUATION. BEFORE MODERN HISTORY IN CHINA · 3. THE HISTORY OF PUNCTUATION ...
  5. [5]
    All About Common Chinese Punctuation Marks - ThoughtCo
    Mar 10, 2019 · The Chinese full stop is a small circle that takes the space of one Chinese character. The Mandarin name of the full stop is 句號/句号(jù hào).
  6. [6]
    General Rules for Punctuation | Academy of Chinese Studies
    Mar 12, 2020 · Punctuation marks denote pauses, intonation, and word function. They indicate the nature of phrases, and can emphasize or omit words. Misplaced ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] An Introductory Study on China's Cultural Transformation in Recent ...
    ... Wan Guo Gong Bao [A Review of The Times, or The Globe Maga- zine] in 1874 ... punctuation, from Chinese grammar to horizontally aligned Chinese writing ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] OXEN OF THE S - Electronic Theses for Schreyer Honors College
    Commercial Press was the first volume that formally uses the Vernacular language with the new set of punctuations. As mentioned before, Jin‟s translation is ...<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Lu Xun , An Outsider's Chats about Written Language - Pinyin.info
    Lu Xun1 (1881–1936) is generally regarded as the greatest Chinese writer of the twentieth century. He never produced a novel, but he wrote numerous ...
  10. [10]
    (PDF) The History of Modern Chinese Grammar Studies
    PDF | This book discusses the way Chinese scholars developed a national grammar. Chinese didn't develop grammar until China's contact with Western.
  11. [11]
    GB 2312 Encoding : JavaScript in Browser - MojoAuth
    GB 2312 is a character encoding standard used primarily for Simplified Chinese characters. Developed in China in 1980, it encompasses a vast range of Chinese ...
  12. [12]
    Requirements for Chinese Text Layout - 中文排版需求 - W3C
    Punctuation marks used in Taiwan and Hong Kong are usually positioned in the vertical and horizontal center of the square space left for them; while in vertical ...
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    Requirements for Chinese Text Layout
    Jul 13, 2023 · Chinese layout requirements include two scripts, vertical/horizontal modes, square characters, and solid setting with no extra space between  ...
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    Evolution of Chinese Typeform in the 19th and 20th Centuries - ATypI
    Current research mainly explores the history of Chinese typeforms in the 19th and 20th centuries from the perspective of typeface designers. While studying the ...
  18. [18]
    Behind the painstaking process of creating Chinese computer fonts
    May 31, 2021 · More than 40 years ago, designers drew and edited thousands of characters by hand to make it possible to type and print in Chinese.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Halfwidth and Fullwidth Forms - The Unicode Standard, Version 17.0
    Halfwidth and Fullwidth Forms. FF00. FF0 FF1 FF2 FF3 FF4 FF5 ... Halfwidth CJK punctuation. See CJK punctuation 3000-303F. FF61 。 HALFWIDTH IDEOGRAPHIC FULL STOP.
  20. [20]
    UAX #50: Unicode Vertical Text Layout
    Aug 16, 2022 · This report describes a Unicode character property which can serve as a stable default orientation of characters for reliable document interchange.
  21. [21]
    VerticalOrientation.txt - Unicode
    ... Rotated # # - Certain ranges of unassigned code points default to U. These ranges # are mostly associated with CJK scripts and punctuation, or with # a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    CJK Symbols and Punctuation - Unicode
    FF64 、 halfwidth ideographic comma. 3002 。 Ideographic Full Stop. →, 002E . full stop. →, FF0E . fullwidth full stop. →, FF61 。 halfwidth ideographic full stop.
  23. [23]
    Is the halfwidth ideographic comma (、) (U+FF64) ever used in ...
    Mar 28, 2018 · According to the original definition, halfwidth punctuation marks are exactly half the width of a Chinese character, while fullwidth punctuation ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] CJK Symbols and Punctuation - The Unicode Standard, Version 17.0
    bracket. CJK corner brackets. The CJK corner brackets, which function as quotation marks, are not recommended for general-purpose corner brackets. See the ...
  25. [25]
    The Complete Guide To Chinese Punctuation - StoryLearning
    Chinese punctuation is broadly similar to English punctuation, but there are also some differences – as well as a couple of extra punctuation marks to learn.Missing: jue shu dian shuowen jiezi
  26. [26]
    Language Guidelines – Chinese (HK) - Unbabel Community Support
    Oct 23, 2024 · Unlike in English, we use a double em dash (——) in Chinese Traditional Hong Kong. So please do not use a single em dash or en dash or even ...
  27. [27]
    11.4 Use of the Hyphen; Abbreviations and Short Forms - Pinyin.info
    A most striking difference between the hyphen and all other punctuation marks is that the hyphen alone can be used inside a word.
  28. [28]
    Language Guidelines – Chinese (TW) - Unbabel Community Support
    May 29, 2024 · In Traditional Chinese, you should use full-width punctuation marks (,。?「」!), rather than half-width punctuation marks in Western languages ( ...
  29. [29]
    How To Use Chinese Punctuation And Keyboard Input
    May 24, 2017 · Learn about the different types of punctuation in written Chinese and which keyboard keys to use for their input.<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    emphasis - How to emphasize a word in writing?
    May 17, 2012 · Chinese emphasis can be done with underdots, squiggly underlines, or by using adverbs like '也' and '都' to imply emphasis. Bold/italics are ...
  31. [31]
    Apostrophes in Hanyu Pinyin: when and where to use them
    Put an apostrophe before any syllable that begins with a, e, or o, unless that syllable comes at the beginning of a word or immediately follows a hyphen or ...
  32. [32]
    GB/T 15834-2011 Part 5: Positioning of Punctuation Mark - W3C
    Dec 2, 2013 · When two question marks(or exclamation marks) are used together, they should only carry one em space; when three question marks(or exclamation ...
  33. [33]
    Detail of GB/T 15834-2011 - Code of China
    GB/T 15834-2011 General rules for punctuation (English Version). Standard No. GB/T 15834-2011. Status, valid. Language, English. File Format, PDF.
  34. [34]
    Beginner's Guide to Punctuation in Chinese - GoEast Mandarin
    This beginner's guide covers the major punctuation marks in Chinese, when to use them, and the basic rules for proper usage.
  35. [35]
    How To Use: Chinese Punctuation
    Dec 28, 2015 · As such, Chinese punctuation marks are called full-width, as opposed to English half-width punctuation, because of the space they take up.
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Traditional Chinese Style Guide - Index of /
    This part of the style guide contains information about standards specific to Traditional Chinese. Country/Region Standards. Characters. Country/region. Taiwan; ...
  38. [38]