Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Cold filter plugging point

The cold filter plugging point (CFPP) is a standardized measure of the low-temperature operability of and domestic heating s, defined as the lowest at which the provides trouble-free flow in certain fuel systems by avoiding blockage from formation. This property is particularly relevant for fuels containing paraffin waxes that crystallize in cold conditions, potentially causing engine or heating system failures if not managed. The CFPP is determined using ASTM D6371, a that involves cooling a 45 mL sample of fuel in a at a controlled rate of 30°C per hour from an initial of 9°C above the expected CFPP. At 1°C intervals, an attempt is made to draw 20 mL of the sample through a 45 μm wire mesh filter under vacuum within 60 seconds; the CFPP is recorded as the highest (in multiples of 1°C) at which this flow fails, indicating the onset of plugging. The method supports both manual and automated apparatus and is technically equivalent to EN 116 and IP 309, allowing for assessment of fuels with or without flow-improving additives. CFPP testing is essential for fuel , especially in climates, as it predicts the temperature below which crystals may accumulate and block fuel filters in vehicles and heating installations. In fuel specifications like for automotive in , CFPP limits are set by climate class—for instance, Class F requires a maximum of -20°C for winter-grade fuel in temperate regions—to ensure reliable cold-weather performance. Unlike (which detects initial appearance) or (which measures complete flow cessation), CFPP provides a practical of filter-related issues, making it a key parameter for blends and ultra-low sulfur formulations.

Fundamentals

Definition

The cold filter plugging point (CFPP) is defined as the lowest temperature, expressed in degrees (°C), at which a specified volume of or distillate —typically 20 —can still be drawn through a standardized 45 μm wire within 60 seconds under a of approximately 2 kPa without excessive due to the formation of crystals. This measurement serves as an indicator of the fuel's low-temperature filterability, marking the threshold beyond which crystallized components begin to restrict flow through fuel system filters. In paraffinic fuels, such as conventional , the CFPP reflects the onset of , where long-chain n-paraffins precipitate as temperature decreases, forming needle-like crystals that agglomerate and accumulate on filter surfaces, leading to plugging. This process is exacerbated in colder conditions, as the crystals grow and trap additional particles, potentially halting delivery to engines. The CFPP test is applicable to middle distillate fuels, including automotive and heating , biodiesel blends (such as B7 or higher), and similar light fuels, but it is not suitable for crude oils or heavy residual fuels due to their differing rheological behaviors. Originating as a European-developed method under the IP 309 standard in the , it was designed to predict cold-weather performance in fuel systems prevalent in temperate climates.

Importance in Fuel Performance

The cold filter plugging point (CFPP) is a critical parameter in assessing performance, particularly in preventing stalls caused by blockage during cold weather operation. In low temperatures, crystals forming in the can accumulate and clog the small-orifice s common in engines, leading to restricted flow and potential breakdowns. This risk is especially pronounced in regions with harsh winters, where temperatures can drop below -10°C, making CFPP testing essential for ensuring reliable starting and operation in reliant on precise systems. Fuel composition significantly influences CFPP, with higher paraffin (n-alkane) content promoting earlier wax and thus lowering the CFPP value, necessitating strategies like seasonal blending of or the addition of depressants and flow improvers to enhance low-temperature filterability. For instance, blends can degrade CFPP due to their higher saturated content, requiring careful formulation to maintain performance. These compositional adjustments are vital for mitigating cold flow issues, as untreated with poor CFPP may fail to meet operational demands in cold climates, potentially causing operational disruptions in transportation and heating systems. Economically, CFPP drives adaptations, such as producing winter-grade fuels with CFPP values of -20°C or lower in northern regions like and , which involves refining processes, additive treatments, and regional distribution logistics to avoid widespread fuel-related failures. These measures prevent costly in fleets and , but they also increase expenses, highlighting CFPP's role in balancing quality with market demands. However, CFPP provides only a laboratory-based estimate of fuel through a standardized and may not fully capture field performance variations across diverse designs, waxes, or real-world conditions like or prolonged storage.

Test Procedure

Equipment and Setup

The equipment required for the Cold Filter Plugging Point (CFPP) test includes a cooled sample jacket, a 45 μm wire mesh , a source, a or , and a 20 mL sample or pipet. The , with an exposed filtering area of approximately 12 mm , is housed in a holder sealed by an to prevent leakage during aspiration. The source must deliver a constant pressure of 2 kPa (20 mbar) below atmospheric, typically via a with an rate of 15 L/h to simulate draw in a system. The or , such as a resistance type, requires accuracy to within 0.5°C for precise monitoring. Setup begins with assembling the holder into the pipet unit and inserting it into the test jar, a clear marked at 45 mL capacity with an internal diameter of 31.5 mm. This assembly is then placed inside the air jacket—a with a 45 mm internal diameter—suspended within a cold bath or integrated cooling system. The cold bath must achieve from 45°C down to -35°C (or lower for grades), with programmable controlled cooling to achieve decrements of 1°C for testing and mechanical stirring to maintain uniform across the sample. Insulating spacers and rings of oil-resistant plastic are added around the jacket to minimize variations and ensure reproducible conditions. Manual setups rely on basic components like stopcocks for control and manual timers, operated by laboratory personnel to adjust temperatures stepwise or linearly as needed. Automated variants incorporate programmable controllers, electronic sensors for and monitoring, and integrated software for temperature ramping, allowing unattended operation while adhering to standard protocols. These systems often feature built-in cooling compressors, eliminating external baths for compact use. Prior to testing, verifies the filter's pore size through inspection against certified meshes or microscopic analysis to confirm the 45 μm nominal , and the system is checked with a manometer to ensure exactly 2 kPa differential . probes are calibrated against standards traceable to national metrology institutes, with checks recommended before each series or if results exceed limits.

Step-by-Step

The step-by-step method for determining the cold filter plugging point (CFPP) begins with pre-test . The sample is first filtered at a of 15°C or higher through a suitable to remove and any entrained , ensuring the specimen is free of contaminants that could interfere with the test. The filtered sample is then transferred to the test jar and allowed to cool to an initial test set at a suitable value, preferably +5°C or more above the expected CFPP based on preliminary estimates or type. In the cooling phase, the sample jar is immersed in a controlled , where the is decreased in 1°C decrements to simulate gradual environmental cooling. Starting at the initial test , and at every subsequent 1°C decrement, a is applied to draw 20 mL of the sample through the standardized filter assembly. The time required to collect this volume is measured, and after each attempt, the is released to allow the sample to drain back into the jar. This filtration check is performed at each 1°C interval while monitoring the sample continuously. The CFPP endpoint is recorded as the highest temperature (to the nearest 1°C) at which the filtration attempt fails, defined as exceeding 60 seconds to draw 20 mL or the sample not fully returning to the test upon release, indicating accumulation sufficient to plug the . Testing continues until this is met, ensuring the result reflects the onset of flow restriction. Post-test, the procedure is repeated on a duplicate sample for , with guidelines specifying a maximum deviation of 3°C between results; larger differences necessitate retesting or investigation of procedural errors. Safety considerations during the test include conducting operations in a well-ventilated to mitigate risks from volatile vapors, which can be flammable and harmful if inhaled. Additionally, cryogenic cooling baths pose hazards such as or to equipment, requiring the use of insulated gloves, , and stable cooling media to prevent spills or over-pressurization.

Standards and Specifications

Key International Standards

The cold filter plugging point (CFPP) test standards emerged in the 1980s primarily to address the need for reliable low-temperature flow specifications in winter fuels, driven by increasing reports of blockages in cold climates during that decade. These early developments focused on simulating real-world filterability under controlled cooling conditions to ensure automotive performance, with initial protocols established through collaborative efforts in to standardize testing for middle distillate fuels. Subsequent revisions in the adapted the standards to accommodate the transition to ultra-low fuels mandated by environmental regulations, such as the European Union's limits reduced to 10 by 2009, which required refinements in test procedures to maintain accuracy with altered fuel compositions. These updates enhanced the methods' applicability to modern refined products while preserving core principles of vacuum-driven filtration through a 45 μm . Standards are periodically revised; as of , the latest ASTM version is D6371-24 and is from , with no changes to core CFPP procedures. In the United States, ASTM D6371 provides the primary standard for CFPP determination, covering both manual and automated apparatus for evaluating and domestic heating fuels. First issued in 1999 and latest revised in 2024 as D6371-24, it explicitly includes applicability to blends up to B20 (20% methyl esters by volume), reflecting the growing integration of renewable components in fuel formulations. The method's precision is characterized by a repeatability of approximately 2°C, based on interlaboratory studies, ensuring consistent results across testing environments. Europe's equivalent standard, EN 116 (latest edition 2015), specifies the CFPP for and domestic heating fuels, with a strong emphasis on filterability relevant to automotive applications in cold conditions. It aligns closely with the UK's IP 309 method, which uses identical procedural elements for manual or automated testing of distillate fuels.

Fuel Quality Requirements

The Cold Filter Plugging Point (CFPP) plays a central role in European specifications under , which mandates maximum CFPP limits based on seasonal and climatic classifications to ensure reliable cold-weather performance. For temperate climates, the standard defines six grades (A through F), with winter-grade fuels in colder zones requiring a CFPP of ≤ -20°C (Grade F) during periods typically from to , as determined by national meteorological data. In or severe winter conditions, five stricter classes (0 through 4) apply, such as Class 3 at ≤ -38°C, allowing for regional adjustments to match extreme low temperatures. These limits accommodate up to 7% (V/V) (FAME) content, provided cold flow improvers are compatible with both the base and components. In the United States, ASTM D975 governs specifications but does not directly impose CFPP limits, instead relying on related low-temperature flow tests like the Low-Temperature Flow Test (LTFT) under ASTM D4539 to assess filterability and prevent wax buildup in systems. CFPP measurements, however, are commonly referenced for and compliance, particularly when aligning with international standards such as for global trade. Appendices in ASTM D975 and D7467 provide regional temperature maps (e.g., 10th minima) to guide selection, ensuring operability without explicit CFPP thresholds. Biodiesel blends, such as B5 to B20, exhibit elevated CFPP values compared to conventional diesel due to the saturation levels in fatty acid feedstocks, often necessitating pour point depressants or flow improvers to meet specifications. Under EN 14214 for pure fatty acid methyl esters (FAME), CFPP limits are not fixed but vary by national implementation and season; for instance, in the United Kingdom, winter biodiesel must achieve ≤ -15°C from November to March, while summer grades allow up to -5°C. Feedstock choice significantly influences these properties—palm oil-derived biodiesel typically has a higher CFPP (around 12–15°C) than rapeseed-based (around -7°C), requiring tailored blending or additives for compliance in colder applications. Globally, CFPP requirements intensify in extreme environments, with regions and applications demanding limits as low as -38°C to -44°C under 's arctic classes to support operations in sub-zero conditions. For fuels like F-76, arctic variants adhere to Class 3 (≤ -38°C CFPP) during winter, ensuring filter passage in harsh climates without gelling. In contrast, temperate zones maintain milder thresholds, such as ≤ 0°C for standard winter , reflecting localized climate needs while prioritizing engine reliability.

Differences from Cloud Point and Pour Point

The represents the temperature at which the first wax crystals begin to form in , detected optically as a hazy appearance in the sample, and it typically occurs at a higher than the cold filter plugging point (CFPP), often 5–10°C above it. This measurement, governed by standards such as ASTM D2500 and EN 23015, serves as an early indicator of potential low-temperature issues but does not account for the mechanical constraints of fuel delivery systems. In contrast, the is the lowest temperature at which the still flows under the influence of when tilted, marking the point where wax networks cause complete solidification and loss of fluidity; it is generally the lowest of the three metrics, frequently 10–20°C below the CFPP. Standardized under ASTM D97, this test evaluates bulk flow behavior without simulating filtration or pumping pressures, making it less representative of real-world operability in cold conditions compared to CFPP. The CFPP uniquely assesses the temperature at which wax crystals accumulate sufficiently to restrict flow through a standardized mesh under controlled , mimicking the dynamic conditions in pumped systems like those in vehicles and heating equipment. This makes CFPP more predictive of field performance in cold weather than the static, visual or gravity-dependent , as it directly evaluates filterability under simulated operational stress. While CFPP values typically fall between the and for a given , reflecting progressive stages, there is no universal conversion formula between these metrics due to variations in , additive effects, and test conditions. Correlations exist in specific contexts, such as blends, but they require empirical adjustment for accuracy, underscoring the need for direct CFPP testing in specifications.

Other Low-Temperature Tests

The Low-Temperature Flow Test (LTFT), standardized as ASTM D4539, assesses the filterability of fuels at low s by determining the minimum pass —the lowest (expressed as a multiple of 1°C) at which a fresh 180 mL sample, cooled at a rate of 1°C per hour, can be drawn through a 17 μm screen under a of approximately 20 kPa in 60 seconds or less. This test uses a fresh sample for each , making it particularly suitable for evaluating fuels with flow improver additives in high-pressure injection systems. Compared to the CFPP, which is also filter-based, the LTFT is generally more severe, often yielding lower pass temperatures for additized fuels due to its emphasis on sustained flow under simulated vehicle conditions. The Scanning Brookfield Viscosity (SBV) test, per ASTM D5133, monitors the of or lubricants during controlled cooling from -5°C to -40°C at a rate of 1°C per hour, using a low-shear at approximately 0.2 s⁻¹ to detect increases that could impair pumpability. It calculates the gelation index as the maximum rate of viscosity rise, providing insight into the onset of gelation or excessive thickening in heavy or residual exposed to cold environments. This method is valuable for predicting real-world handling issues in fuel systems where high might lead to , especially in applications beyond light like or industrial heavy fuels. Research on waxy fuels often involves rheological measurements of yield stress—the minimum stress required to initiate flow in gelled structures—to evaluate how depressants reduce gel strength and associated pressure buildup across filters, offering insights for optimizing flow improvers in experimental formulations. Regionally, the LTFT predominates in as the key standard for on-road fuels, particularly those used in direct-injection engines requiring robust low-temperature performance, while the CFPP remains the primary filter-based metric in to align with specifications. These preferences reflect differences in vehicle designs and climate demands, with LTFT providing a more predictive assessment for additive-treated fuels in harsher n winters.

References

  1. [1]
    D6371 Standard Test Method for Cold Filter Plugging Point of Diesel ...
    Apr 10, 2024 · 5.1 The CFPP of a fuel is suitable for estimating the lowest temperature at which a fuel will give trouble-free flow in certain fuel systems.
  2. [2]
    ASTM D6371 | Standard Test Method for Cold Filter Plugging Point ...
    In general, CFPP is the temperature of the sample being analyzed when 20 mL of it first fails to pass through a standard wire mesh in less than 60 s. This ...
  3. [3]
    Fuel Property Testing: Low Temperature Operability - DieselNet
    As a result, two fuels which have the same cold filter plugging point will not necessarily show the same tendency for the wax crystals to settle and they ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    EU: Automotive Diesel Fuel - DieselNet
    The EN 590:1999 CFPP point specification (Temperate Climate Grades of diesel fuel) remained unchanged (see Table 11). Specifications for Arctic Classes of ...Background · Regulatory Requirements · EN 590 Specification
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Diesel Fuels Technical Review - Chevron
    cold filter plugging point [ASTM D 6371], and low-temperature flow ... a 45-micron wire mesh under 2 kPa vacuum in less than 60 seconds is the CFPP ...
  6. [6]
    (PDF) Fuzzy logic model for prediction of cold filter plugging point of ...
    ... cold filter plugging point (CFPP) of biodiesel fuel from its ... cold filter plugging point ... 20 ml of fuel can be drawn through a 45 micron screen in 60 seconds ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] a survey of european diesel fuel quality - Concawe
    Cloud Point (CP) and Cold Filter Plugging Point (CFPP) indicates the use of flow improvers to enhance the cold operability of the fuels. Page 19. report no. 3/ ...
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    [PDF] The Biodiesel Handbook
    Nov 4, 2004 · cosity and allow the material to pass safely through the 45-μm wire mesh screen ... Cold filter plugging point (CFPP) vs. cloud point (CP) for ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Cold Filter Plugging Point of Diesel and Heating Fuels1
    1.1 This test method covers the determination of the cold filter plugging point (CFPP) temperature of diesel and domes- tic heating fuels using either manual or ...
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    IP 309 - Normalab
    This method specifies the determination of the cold filter plugging point (CFPP) of diesel and domestic heating fuels using either manual or automated test ...
  13. [13]
    ISO 11658:2012 - Cardiovascular implants and extracorporeal ...
    2–5 day deliveryThis International Standard specifies requirements for the physical, biological and performance testing of. biocompatible modifications on extracorporeal ...Missing: cold filter plugging point
  14. [14]
    [PDF] EN 590:2004
    The options are for temperate climates six CFPP (cold filter plugging point) grades and for arctic or severe winter climates five different classes. Climate ...
  15. [15]
    Winter diesel fuel - Wikipedia
    The cold filter plugging point (CFPP) is based on a standardized test that indicates the rate at which diesel fuel will flow through a standardized filtration ...
  16. [16]
    California Diesel Fuel - DieselNet
    Regulatory requirements for California diesel fuel include a sulfur limit of 15 ppm, a limit on aromatics of 10% or equivalent and a lubricity requirement of a ...
  17. [17]
    Low-Temperature Properties - Mypdh.engineer
    Note that cold filter plugging point (CFPP) and low-temperature flow test (LTFT) are particularly useful for revealing the presence of additives. For blends, ...
  18. [18]
    Low Temperature Operability of Biodiesel - DieselNet
    Test limits in ASTM D6751 are 360 s maximum or 200 s maximum if the expected fuel temperature is -12°C or lower. [schematic] Figure 10. CSFT Apparatus to ...
  19. [19]
    Biodiesel standards / specification - Biofuel Systems
    Country Specific CFPP requirements according to various national versions of EN 14214, Standard, Season, Dates of season, Max CFPP (°C). United Kingdom, BS EN ...
  20. [20]
    Selected specifications from ASTM D6751 and EN 14214 biodiesel ...
    The European biodiesel standard, EN 14214 (Table 1), specifies limits for CFPP, which are variable according to location and time of year. ...
  21. [21]
    [DOC] Document for completion and publication by the Contracting Authority
    Oct 7, 2024 · The bidder must demonstrate his capacity for delivery of requested fuel items in relation to truck capacity needed to accomplish required task.
  22. [22]
    Prediction of the cold flow properties of biodiesel using the FAME ...
    Apr 15, 2024 · The cold flow properties of biodiesel, including pour point (PP), cold filter plugging point (CFPP), and cloud point (CP), are crucial.
  23. [23]
    D97 Standard Test Method for Pour Point of Petroleum Products
    Nov 29, 2022 · This test method covers and is intended for use on any petroleum product.2 A procedure suitable for black specimens, cylinder stock, and nondistillate fuel oil ...
  24. [24]
    Cold Flow Property - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    There are three related properties associated with cold flow properties, such as cloud point (CP), cool filter plunging point (CFPP), and pour point (PP) of the ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Biodiesel Cold Flow Characteristics
    The. CFPP is less conservative than cloud point and is most often considered to be a better, truer indicator of low temperature operability. The petroleum ...
  26. [26]
    Correlation between the cloud point (CP) and the cold filter plugging...
    Since the CP is associated with the start of agglomeration and the CFPP to further crystal growth, the CFPP is expected to be lower than the CP at all times.
  27. [27]
    D4539 Standard Test Method for Filterability of Diesel Fuels by Low ...
    Dec 13, 2022 · 5.1 The Low Temperature Flow Test results are indicative of the low temperature flow performance of the test fuel in some diesel vehicles ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Applying the Low-Temperature Scanning Brookfield Technique to ...
    Adequate flow response can be a problem with lu- bricants, transmission/differential fluids, and fuels at low temperatures. In developing lubricants or fuel for ...Missing: SBV | Show results with:SBV
  29. [29]
    [PDF] CRC Project No. AV-16-11 - Coordinating Research Council
    Scanning Brookfield Viscometry (SBV) (ASTM D5133) and Freezing Point measurements. (ASTM D5972) over a range of fuel samples and temperatures. These data ...
  30. [30]
    Effects of N-containing pour point depressants on the cold flow ...
    Results showed that all the three PPDs have obvious improvements on the low-temperature fluidity of diesel. Among that, C14MC-NMA presented a better impact in ...
  31. [31]
    Dependence of cold filter plugging point on saturated fatty acid ...
    May 1, 2017 · Among these parameters, the LTFT (applied in North America) and the CFPP (applied in countries outside North America) are direct and reliable ...