Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Conserved current

In theoretical physics, particularly in classical and quantum field theory, a conserved current is a four-vector field J^\mu(x) whose four-divergence vanishes, \partial_\mu J^\mu = 0, on solutions to the equations of motion, thereby expressing the local conservation of an associated charge Q = \int d^3x \, J^0. This conservation law holds provided the spatial components of the current vanish sufficiently rapidly at spatial infinity, ensuring the total charge remains constant over time.^[1]^[2] Noether's theorem establishes the fundamental connection between conserved currents and symmetries: every continuous symmetry of the action functional in a field theory gives rise to a corresponding conserved current. For a symmetry transformation \delta \phi^a = X^a(\phi) that leaves the Lagrangian density \mathcal{L} unchanged up to a total divergence \delta \mathcal{L} = \partial_\mu F^\mu, the conserved current takes the form j^\mu = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi^a)} X^a - F^\mu. This framework applies to both spacetime symmetries, such as translations yielding the energy-momentum tensor T^{\mu\nu} with \partial_\mu T^{\mu\nu} = 0, and internal symmetries, like global phase rotations. The theorem, originally proved by Emmy Noether in 1918, underpins much of modern particle physics by linking observable conservation laws to the underlying invariances of physical laws.^[3]^[1]^[2] Prominent examples of conserved currents include the electromagnetic current in quantum electrodynamics, arising from the U(1) gauge symmetry of the Dirac Lagrangian for fermions: j^\mu = \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \psi, which couples to the photon field and conserves electric charge. Similarly, for a complex scalar field under global U(1) transformations \phi \to e^{i\alpha} \phi, the Noether current is j^\mu = i (\phi^* \partial^\mu \phi - \phi \partial^\mu \phi^*), conserving particle number. These currents not only enforce conservation principles but also facilitate the quantization of fields and the construction of scattering amplitudes in perturbative quantum field theory. In broader contexts, such as general relativity or condensed matter physics, analogous conserved currents appear in discussions of energy flux or topological invariants.^[3]^[2]

Basic Concepts

Definition

In relativistic field theory, a conserved current is a four-vector field J^\mu(x) defined over spacetime, which describes the local flow and density of a conserved quantity, such as electric charge or particle number probability.^[2] The index \mu runs over spacetime coordinates, making J^\mu transform covariantly under Lorentz transformations, ensuring its physical interpretation remains consistent across reference frames.^[4] The general structure of this current decomposes into a time-like component and spatial components: J^\mu = (\rho, \vec{J}), where \rho represents the density of the conserved quantity at position x, and \vec{J} denotes the flux or current density vector indicating the direction and rate of flow.^[5] Conservation is enforced by the continuity equation \partial_\mu J^\mu = 0, which holds on solutions to the equations of motion, implying that the total quantity integrated over a spacelike hypersurface remains constant.^[2] The concept of conserved currents originated in Emmy Noether's seminal 1918 paper "Invariante Variationsprobleme," where she established the foundational link between variational principles and conservation laws in physical systems.^[6] This framework, later known as Noether's theorem, provides the theoretical basis for such currents without delving into explicit derivations here. In contrast to non-conserved currents, which appear in dissipative systems where \partial_\mu J^\mu \neq 0 due to mechanisms like friction or absorption that alter the total quantity, conserved currents preserve the integrity of the associated quantity across spacetime.^[5]

Relation to Symmetries

In physics, conserved currents arise fundamentally from continuous symmetries of the action or Lagrangian describing a system, as established by Noether's theorem. This theorem posits that for every continuous symmetry transformation that leaves the action invariant, there exists a corresponding conserved current whose divergence vanishes, leading to a conserved charge upon spatial integration.^[7] Such symmetries can be spacetime-related or internal, and the associated conserved quantities provide deep insights into the underlying laws of nature. Continuous symmetries are categorized into global and local types. Global symmetries involve transformations with parameters that are constant across spacetime, resulting in conserved currents whose divergence vanishes on solutions to the equations of motion.^[8] In contrast, local symmetries, also known as gauge symmetries, feature spacetime-dependent parameters and generally lead to identities among the field equations rather than directly conserved currents, though on-shell conservation can still hold.^[8] Infinitesimal forms of these transformations are expressed as \delta \phi = \epsilon [K](/page/K)[\phi], where \epsilon is an infinitesimal parameter and [K](/page/K)[\phi] represents the generator of the symmetry acting on the fields \phi.^[7] Specific types of symmetries yield distinct conserved quantities. Translational invariance in spacetime corresponds to conservation of energy-momentum via the stress-energy tensor current, while rotational invariance leads to conservation of angular momentum.^[7] Internal symmetries, such as phase rotations under a U(1) group, give rise to conserved charges like electric charge.^[7] Symmetries can be exact or approximate, affecting the strictness of current conservation. Exact symmetries produce precisely conserved currents, but approximate ones, perturbed by small terms in the Lagrangian, result in partially conserved currents. A prominent example is chiral symmetry in quantum chromodynamics (QCD), which is approximate due to small but nonzero quark masses; its spontaneous and explicit breaking leads to partially conserved axial currents, manifesting in phenomena like pion decay.^[9]

Derivation and Formulation

Noether's Theorem

Noether's first theorem establishes a profound connection between continuous symmetries of a physical system's action and the existence of conserved quantities. Specifically, it states that for every continuous symmetry of the action under infinitesimal transformations, there corresponds a conserved current in the theory. This theorem provides the foundational mathematical framework for understanding conserved currents as direct consequences of symmetries in Lagrangian field theories. The result was first articulated by Emmy Noether in her seminal 1918 paper, where she addressed concerns raised by Albert Einstein and David Hilbert regarding the validity of conservation laws, such as energy-momentum conservation, in the context of general relativity.^[6] The theorem presupposes the Lagrangian formalism, in which the dynamics of a field theory are derived from an action functional defined as S = \int L(\phi, \partial_\mu \phi) \, d^4x, where L is the Lagrangian density depending on the fields \phi and their first derivatives, integrated over spacetime. The action is assumed to be invariant under infinitesimal transformations of the fields, \delta \phi = \epsilon \Delta \phi, with \epsilon a small constant parameter for global symmetries. This invariance implies that the variation of the action vanishes, \delta S = 0, up to boundary terms, when evaluated on solutions to the equations of motion (on-shell). For a symmetry, the variation of the Lagrangian satisfies \delta L = \partial_\mu F^\mu, where F^\mu is some four-vector.^[6] To outline the proof, consider the total variation of the action under such a symmetry transformation: \delta S = \int \left[ \frac{\partial L}{\partial \phi} \delta \phi + \frac{\partial L}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \delta (\partial_\mu \phi) \right] d^4x. For field variations without coordinate changes, \delta (\partial_\mu \phi) = \partial_\mu (\delta \phi). Integrating the second term by parts yields \delta S = \int \left[ \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial \phi} - \partial_\mu \frac{\partial L}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \right) \delta \phi + \partial_\mu \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \delta \phi \right) \right] d^4x. Using the symmetry condition \delta L = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \phi} \delta \phi + \frac{\partial L}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \partial_\mu (\delta \phi) = \partial_\mu F^\mu and the Euler-Lagrange equations \frac{\partial L}{\partial \phi} - \partial_\mu \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \right) = 0 on-shell, this simplifies on-shell to \delta S = \int \partial_\mu \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \delta \phi - F^\mu \right) d^4x = 0. By the divergence theorem, this implies the existence of a four-vector current j^\mu = \frac{\partial L}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \Delta \phi - \frac{F^\mu}{\epsilon} (normalized by the infinitesimal parameter) whose divergence vanishes on-shell, \partial_\mu j^\mu = 0. For global symmetries, where the transformation parameter \epsilon is spacetime-independent, this directly produces Noether currents that are conserved in the sense \partial_\mu j^\mu = 0.^[6] However, the theorem's application has key assumptions: it applies straightforwardly to global symmetries, producing conserved currents without additional structure. In contrast, local symmetries—where \epsilon varies with spacetime coordinates—do not yield conserved currents in the same way unless gauge fields are introduced to maintain invariance, as in gauge theories. Noether's original work emphasized these distinctions, particularly in curved spacetime, resolving apparent paradoxes in conservation laws for general relativity.^[6]^[10]

Mathematical Expression of the Current

In field theory, the Noether conserved current arises from an infinitesimal symmetry transformation of the fields \phi and coordinates x^\mu, leading to the general expression

J^\mu = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \delta \phi - \Lambda^\mu,

where \mathcal{L} is the Lagrangian density, \delta \phi is the variation of the field, and \Lambda^\mu accounts for the explicit dependence on spacetime transformations, typically forming an antisymmetric tensor for symmetries like translations or Lorentz boosts. The current is normalized such that it is independent of the infinitesimal parameter \epsilon, with \delta \phi = \epsilon \Delta \phi.^[6]^[11] This form encapsulates both the contribution from the field's intrinsic change and any adjustment due to the coordinate shift under the symmetry. For internal symmetries, which do not alter the spacetime coordinates (\delta x^\mu = 0), the term \Lambda^\mu vanishes, simplifying the current to

J^\mu = \sum_i \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi_i)} \frac{\delta \phi_i}{\epsilon},

where the sum runs over field components, \delta \phi_i = \epsilon K_i(\phi) is the infinitesimal variation parameterized by the constant \epsilon, and K_i is the generator of the transformation.^[2] This expression ensures the current is independent of the arbitrary scale of \epsilon. In the case of complex fields under a U(1) phase symmetry, where \delta \phi = i \epsilon \phi and \delta \phi^* = -i \epsilon \phi^*, the normalization introduces an explicit factor of i, yielding J^\mu = i \left( \phi^* \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi^*)} - \phi \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \right).^[2] The conserved current J^\mu is defined off-shell, meaning it exists for arbitrary field configurations without requiring satisfaction of the equations of motion. However, its conservation, expressed as

\partial_\mu J^\mu = 0,

holds only on-shell, i.e., when the fields obey the Euler-Lagrange equations derived from \mathcal{L}.^[11] Off-shell, the divergence \partial_\mu J^\mu equals a linear combination of the equations of motion, vanishing precisely when they are satisfied. In theories with additional structure, such as conformal invariance, the current—often the energy-momentum tensor for spacetime symmetries—admits improvement terms. These are total divergences added to the canonical form, like \partial_\nu K^{\mu\nu} where K^{\mu\nu} is antisymmetric in \mu\nu, to enhance properties such as tracelessness while preserving conservation on-shell.^[12]

Properties

Conservation Law

In field theory, the conservation law for a conserved current J^\mu is encapsulated in the continuity equation \partial_\mu J^\mu = 0, which enforces local conservation of the associated quantity at every spacetime point.^[1] This divergence-free condition arises from the invariance of the action under continuous symmetries, ensuring that the flow of the conserved quantity balances exactly without sources or sinks.^[1] Integrating the continuity equation over a spatial volume yields the global form of conservation. The total charge Q = \int d^3x \, J^0 then satisfies \frac{dQ}{dt} = -\int d^2\mathbf{S} \cdot \mathbf{J} = 0, where the surface term vanishes for fields that decay sufficiently fast at spatial infinity.^[13] For localized field configurations, this implies that Q remains time-independent, representing a constant total charge within the system.^[13] Although classical theories exhibit strict conservation via the continuity equation, quantum field theory introduces potential violations through anomalies. For instance, the axial anomaly causes the classically conserved axial current to acquire a nonzero divergence proportional to the field strength tensor in the presence of gauge fields.^[14] The discussion here emphasizes the classical framework, where such quantum effects are absent. In quantum theory, the classical conservation law manifests as Ward identities, which relate the divergence of the current to constraints on correlation functions, preserving the symmetry structure perturbatively.^[15]

Gauge Invariance Aspects

In quantum field theories, conserved currents arise from symmetries via Noether's theorem, but the nature of the symmetry—global or local—fundamentally alters their role and implementation. A global symmetry involves a transformation parameter \epsilon that is constant across spacetime, such as a phase rotation \delta \phi = i \epsilon \phi for a complex scalar field \phi, yielding a conserved Noether current without necessitating additional fields. In contrast, promoting this to a local (gauge) symmetry requires \epsilon \to \epsilon(x), where the parameter varies with position x; to preserve invariance under such spacetime-dependent transformations, auxiliary gauge fields A_\mu must be introduced to compensate for the variation in the field derivatives. The covariant derivative provides the mechanism to achieve this local invariance. Defined as D_\mu = \partial_\mu - i g A_\mu for an Abelian gauge theory (with coupling constant g), it transforms homogeneously under the local phase shift: if \phi \to e^{i \epsilon(x)} \phi, then D_\mu \phi \to e^{i \epsilon(x)} D_\mu \phi, ensuring that kinetic terms like (D_\mu \phi)^\dagger (D^\mu \phi) remain gauge invariant. Substituting into the Lagrangian replaces ordinary derivatives with covariant ones, generating an interaction term g J^\mu A_\mu, where J^\mu is the Noether current associated with the global symmetry, such as J^\mu = i (\phi^\dagger \overleftrightarrow{\partial}^\mu \phi) for the scalar case. This coupling enforces the interaction between matter fields and gauge fields, distinguishing local symmetries from their global counterparts, which yield conservation laws without mandating dynamical interactions. Gauge-invariant currents retain their conservation properties under local transformations. In quantum electrodynamics (QED), the U(1) electromagnetic current J^\mu = \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \psi for Dirac fermion fields \psi is invariant under local phase rotations \psi \to e^{i \epsilon(x)} \psi and \bar{\psi} \to e^{-i \epsilon(x)} \bar{\psi}, with the photon field A_\mu transforming as \delta A_\mu = \frac{1}{g} \partial_\mu \epsilon to maintain the covariant derivative D_\mu = \partial_\mu - i g A_\mu. The continuity equation \partial_\mu J^\mu = 0 holds on-shell, linking charge conservation to the gauge symmetry. For non-Abelian gauge theories, such as those in Yang-Mills models, the structure generalizes using Lie algebra structure constants f^{abc}. The gauge fields A_\mu^a (with a labeling the group generators) transform non-trivially, \delta A_\mu^a = \frac{1}{g} \partial_\mu \epsilon^a + f^{abc} \epsilon^b A_\mu^c, and the covariant derivative becomes D_\mu = \partial_\mu - i g A_\mu^a T^a, where T^a are the generators. The associated currents J^{\mu a} = \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu T^a \psi couple via g J^{\mu a} A_\mu^a, previewing the self-interactions of gauge bosons essential to strong and electroweak forces, while preserving local invariance and on-shell conservation.

Examples in Field Theories

Electromagnetic Current

In quantum electrodynamics (QED), the electromagnetic current arises from the U(1) gauge symmetry associated with charged fermionic fields, such as the Dirac field describing electrons. For a Dirac field \psi, the current is defined as J^\mu = \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \psi, where \bar{\psi} = \psi^\dagger \gamma^0 and \gamma^\mu are the Dirac matrices.^[16] This bilinear form captures the flow of electric charge carried by the fermions. Similarly, in scalar QED, which couples a complex scalar field \phi to the electromagnetic field, the current is J^\mu = i (\phi^* \partial^\mu \phi - \phi \partial^\mu \phi^*), reflecting the phase rotation symmetry of the scalar.^[16] The interaction between this current and the electromagnetic field is incorporated into the Lagrangian density via the term -e J^\mu A_\mu, where e > 0 is the elementary charge magnitude and A_\mu is the photon four-potential.^[16] This minimal coupling generates the source terms in Maxwell's equations, with the time component J^0 acting as the charge density \rho and the spatial components as the current density \mathbf{J}. Consequently, Gauss's law becomes \nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = \rho = J^0, and Ampère's law with Maxwell's correction is \nabla \times \mathbf{B} - \frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t} = \mu_0 \mathbf{J}, linking the currents directly to observable electromagnetic fields. The conservation of the electromagnetic current, expressed as \partial_\mu J^\mu = 0, follows from the antisymmetry of the field strength tensor and the equations of motion, ensuring local charge conservation.^[16] Integrating over a spatial volume, this implies \frac{dQ}{dt} = 0 for the total charge Q = \int \rho \, dV in an isolated system, as any change in charge must balance the net flux through the boundary via \mathbf{J}. Historically, the conservation law implicit in the electromagnetic current predates its quantum formulation, appearing in James Clerk Maxwell's 1873 treatise, where the continuity equation \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot \mathbf{J} = 0 ensures consistency among the equations without explicit reference to a separate symmetry principle.^[17] In the quantum theory, the electromagnetic current plays a central role in perturbative calculations, appearing as the vertex factor -i e \gamma^\mu in Feynman diagrams for processes like electron-photon scattering (Compton scattering) or electron-electron scattering (Møller scattering), mediating interactions via virtual photon exchange.^[16]

Global Symmetry Currents in Scalar Fields

In the theory of a complex scalar field \phi, the Lagrangian density is given by

\mathcal{L} = \partial_\mu \phi^* \partial^\mu \phi - V(|\phi|^2),

where V is a scalar potential that depends only on the magnitude squared of the field to preserve rotational invariance in the complex plane. This form ensures the Lagrangian is invariant under global U(1) phase transformations \phi \to e^{i\alpha} \phi and \phi^* \to e^{-i\alpha} \phi^*, with \alpha a spacetime-independent constant parameter.^[2] The Noether current associated with this global U(1) symmetry is

J^\mu = i \left( \phi^* \partial^\mu \phi - \phi \partial^\mu \phi^* \right),

which satisfies the local conservation law \partial_\mu J^\mu = 0 when the field equations of motion are imposed. This current arises directly from the invariance of the action under infinitesimal transformations and encodes the flow of the conserved U(1) charge in the theory. The corresponding conserved charge,

Q = \int d^3 x \, J^0,

represents the total particle number and remains constant in time for solutions of the equations of motion, reflecting the global conservation law.^[18] When the potential V(|\phi|^2) admits spontaneous symmetry breaking—such as for V = -\mu^2 |\phi|^2 + \lambda (|\phi|^2)^2 with \mu^2 > 0 and \lambda > 0, where the minimum occurs at a nonzero vacuum expectation value \langle |\phi| \rangle = \sqrt{\mu^2 / (2\lambda)}—the ground state does not share the U(1) invariance of the Lagrangian. This breaking introduces a massless Goldstone mode associated with fluctuations in the phase of \phi, while the radial mode acquires a mass. Despite the broken symmetry in the vacuum, the Noether current J^\mu remains conserved at the classical level, as the underlying symmetry of the action persists.^[19]

Gauge Currents in Non-Abelian Theories

In non-Abelian gauge theories, the underlying symmetry group is a compact Lie group such as SU(N), where N ≥ 2, with the gauge fields transforming in the adjoint representation and matter fields, like quarks, in the fundamental representation.^[20] The conserved currents associated with these local symmetries are matrix-valued, indexed by the group's generators T_a (a = 1 to N^2 - 1), and for Dirac fermions \psi, take the form J^\mu_a = \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu T_a \psi. These currents couple to the gauge fields A^\mu_a in the Lagrangian, which for pure Yang-Mills theory is \mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4} F^{\mu\nu}_a F_{\mu\nu}^a, extended to include matter as \mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4} F^{\mu\nu}_a F_{\mu\nu}^a + \bar{\psi} (i \gamma^\mu D_\mu - m) \psi, where the interaction term effectively involves J^\mu_a A_{\mu a}.^[20] The field strength tensor incorporates non-Abelian self-interactions: F_{\mu\nu}^a = \partial_\mu A_\nu^a - \partial_\nu A_\mu^a + g f^{abc} A_\mu^b A_\nu^c, with g the coupling constant and f^{abc} the structure constants of SU(N).^[20] The conservation of these currents follows from the gauge invariance of the theory, but in the non-Abelian case, it manifests as covariant conservation under the full dynamics. Specifically, the equation of motion yields D_\mu J^{\mu a} = 0, where the covariant derivative acts as D_\mu J^{\mu a} = \partial_\mu J^{\mu a} + g f^{abc} A_\mu^b J^{\mu c}, ensuring the current transforms homogeneously under infinitesimal gauge transformations.^[21] This differs from Abelian theories, where conservation is simply \partial_\mu J^\mu = 0, due to the non-commuting nature of the group generators leading to gluon self-couplings that entangle the current with the gauge fields.^[21] A prominent example is the color current in quantum chromodynamics (QCD), based on SU(3)_c, where quarks carry color charges and the currents J^\mu_a mediate strong interactions via gluons. However, due to confinement, these color currents are not directly observable; quarks and gluons form color-neutral hadrons, preventing free color flow over long distances.^[22] In the electroweak theory, SU(2)_L × U(1)_Y, the non-Abelian weak currents J^\mu_a = \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \frac{\tau_a}{2} P_L \psi (with \tau_a the Pauli matrices) couple to W bosons and underlie processes like beta decay, with the SU(2)_L structure enabling parity violation. Asymptotic freedom in these theories, where the effective coupling g decreases at high energies (short distances), allows perturbative calculations of current interactions at large momentum transfers, while confinement at low energies implies non-perturbative binding that screens color charges. This duality profoundly affects the observability and computation of non-Abelian currents, enabling precise predictions for deep inelastic scattering in QCD despite the underlying strong dynamics.^[22]

References

[1]
[PDF] Lecture 4: Noether's Theorem Sept. 16, 2013 - Rutgers Physics
Sep 16, 2013 · Noether's theorem relates continuous symmetries of a theory to conserved currents and conserved charges for classical fields.
[2]
[PDF] Quantum Field Theory I, Chapter 4
Noether's Theorem. Every continuous global symmetry of the action leads to a conserved current and thus a conserved charge for solutions of the equations of.
[3]
[PDF] Quantum Field Theory
For a real scalar field, we have no suitable conserved current. This means that we can't couple a real scalar field to a gauge field. – 138 –. Page 145. Let's ...
[4]
conserved current in nLab
Jan 12, 2025 · Via the variational bicomplex. The following discusses the formulation of conserved currents in terms of variational calculus and the ...
[5]
[PDF] Classical Scalar Fields and Local Conservation Laws - Clear Physics
Feb 5, 2022 · A conserved current is a quantity with components Ja constructed from the fields that satisfies ∂aJa(x) = 0 whenever the fields satisfy ...
[6]
[physics/0503066] Invariant Variation Problems - arXiv
Mar 8, 2005 · Authors:Emmy Noether, M. A. Tavel. View a PDF of the paper titled Invariant Variation Problems, by Emmy Noether and M. A. Tavel. View PDF.
[7]
[PDF] 3 Classical Symmetries and Conservation Laws
One im- portant feature of these conservation laws is the existence of locally conserved currents. This is the content of the following theorem, due to Emmy ...
[8]
[PDF] Noether's Theorems and Gauge Symmetries - arXiv
'Noether's theorem' is used to connect symmetries with conserved currents (and thence conserved charges, subject to suitable boundary conditions).7 ...
[9]
[PDF] Introduction to chiral symmetry in QCD - EPJ Web of Conferences
Spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking is thus manifested by the existence of eight pseudoscalar massless particles (mesons), called Nambu-Goldstone bosons.
[10]
[2206.00283] Noether's 1st theorem with local symmetries - arXiv
Jun 1, 2022 · In this paper, we propose a general method to derive a matter conserved current associated with a special global symmetry in the presence of local symmetries.
[11]
[PDF] Field transformations and Symmetries Noether's Theorem ...
If the transformation is a symmetry then the current will be conserved. 2. Page 3. That's fine if you already know about gauge fields. Here we give an ...
[12]
Improved Noether's theorem for spacetime symmetries | Phys. Rev. D
Dec 13, 2022 · We exploit an ambiguity somewhat hidden in Noether's theorem to derive systematically, for relativistic field theories, the stress-energy tensor's improvement ...
[13]
[PDF] Lecture notes - Yay, physics!
Dec 6, 2022 · current jµ defined by the first equation in (1.37) is conserved. These words are an accurate description of the equation ∂µjµ = 0 (called ...
[14]
[PDF] Axial anomaly in quantum electro- and chromodynamics and ... - arXiv
Dec 22, 2008 · An anomaly is called a phenomenon in which the given symmetry and the conservation law are violated as we pass to quantum theory. The reason for ...
[15]
[PDF] Electric Current Conservation and Ward–Takahashi Identities
QED has a large family of Ward–Takahashi identities. Of particular importance are two series of WT identities for the off-shell amplitudes involving 0 or 2 ...
[16]
[PDF] 6. Quantum Electrodynamics
In this section we finally get to quantum electrodynamics (QED), the theory of light interacting with charged matter. Our path to quantization will be as ...
[17]
A treatise on electricity and magnetism : Maxwell, James Clerk, 1831 ...
Mar 16, 2006 · A treatise on electricity and magnetism. by: Maxwell, James Clerk, 1831-1879. Publication date: 1873. Topics: Electricity, Magnetism, ...Missing: equations | Show results with:equations
[18]
[PDF] Symmetries and Noether's theorem - Amazon AWS
Aug 22, 2016 · From this expression we can identify the conserved current corresponding to the global U(1) symmetry,. jµ = i Φ†∂µΦ − Φ∂µΦ† . One can easily ...
[19]
[PDF] Lecture 9 Spontaneous Breaking of Continuous Global Symmetries
Below, we approach this subject through a simple quantum mechanical derivation of the Gold- stone theorem. The simplest example, that of a complex scalar field ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[20]
Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance
Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance. C. N. Yang* and R. L. Mills. Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York. *On leave of absence ...
[21]
Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories. I | Phys. Rev. D
Asymptotically free gauge theories of the strong interactions are constructed and analyzed. The reasons for doing this are recounted.
[22]
The discovery of asymptotic freedom and the emergence of QCD
Sep 7, 2005 · In this Nobel lecture I shall describe the turn of events that led to the discovery of asymptotic freedom, which in turn led to the formulation of QCD.