Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Contango

Contango is a market condition observed in futures trading where the price of a for a or exceeds the current price of the underlying asset, with futures prices typically increasing for contracts with longer maturities. This structure arises primarily from the cost-of-carry model, incorporating factors such as rates, costs, and , which elevate distant futures prices relative to the spot market absent sufficient from holding the physical asset. Empirically, futures markets have historically exhibited contango on average, reflecting these carrying charges rather than consistent expectations of price appreciation. In contango, opportunities are limited as the futures-spot differential aligns with verifiable carrying costs, preventing risk-free profits from storage and forward sales. For investors in futures-based instruments, such as commodity exchange-traded funds (ETFs), persistent contango imposes a "roll " penalty when contracts are rolled from near-term to longer-dated positions, as the sale of expiring contracts occurs below the purchase price of replacements, eroding returns independent of price movements. This dynamic has been particularly evident in oil markets, where high inventories and ample supply contribute to contango, contrasting with backwardation during periods of scarcity or high demand. While contango facilitates hedging for producers by allowing forward sales at premiums to , it underscores the divergence between futures pricing and pure expectations, driven by real economic costs rather than speculative biases.

Definition and Characteristics

Core Definition and Market Conditions

Contango describes a condition in futures markets where the price of a exceeds the prevailing spot price of the underlying asset, with futures prices typically ascending as the contract maturity date extends further into the future. This upward-sloping futures curve reflects the market's incorporation of carrying costs into forward pricing. Such market conditions prevail when the net —comprising interest rates, storage expenses, and insurance—surpasses the derived from holding the physical . Contango is characteristic of environments with ample supply relative to immediate demand, low , and expectations of or gradual appreciation, enabling arbitrageurs to profit from storing and selling forward without significant risk of shortages. In these scenarios, the absence of urgent physical delivery needs diminishes the premium for near-term contracts, fostering the contango structure. Contango contrasts with backwardation, where futures prices fall below spot levels due to supply constraints or heightened convenience yields, but it dominates in non-perishable commodities like crude oil during periods of oversupply, as observed in storage-saturated markets. This configuration incentivizes inventory accumulation, aligning spot and futures prices over time through convergence at expiration.

Comparison to Backwardation

Contango occurs when the futures price of a exceeds its current spot price, resulting in an upward-sloping futures curve where longer-dated contracts trade at progressively higher prices. In contrast, backwardation arises when the spot price surpasses the futures price, producing a downward-sloping curve with nearer-term futures commanding premiums over distant ones. This fundamental price relationship distinguishes the two states, with contango reflecting expectations that future delivery will cost more due to carrying expenses, while backwardation signals immediate or high demand for prompt access to the asset. The primary causes of contango stem from positive cost-of-carry elements, such as interest rates, storage fees, and insurance, which exceed any from holding the physical . Backwardation, conversely, emerges when — the benefit of having immediate inventory during shortages—outweighs these costs, often amid supply disruptions or seasonal demand spikes. Markets typically default to contango in stable conditions without acute supply constraints, whereas backwardation indicates underlying tightness, as seen in commodities like oil during geopolitical events. For investors in futures contracts, contango generates negative roll yield upon rolling expiring contracts to higher-priced longer-dated ones, eroding returns for long positions over time. Backwardation yields positive roll yield, as contracts are rolled into cheaper futures, potentially boosting performance for commodity index funds or hedgers. Shifts between these states, such as from contango to backwardation, often follow sudden spot price surges from unforeseen events like supply shocks, altering hedging strategies and opportunities.
AspectContangoBackwardation
Futures vs. SpotFutures > SpotSpot > Futures
Term StructureUpward-sloping curveDownward-sloping curve
Typical CausesHigh carry costs (storage, interest)High (shortages)
Roll Yield for LongsNegativePositive
Market SignalAmple supply, normal conditionsTight supply, urgency for immediate delivery

Causes and Mechanisms

Cost-of-Carry Components

The cost-of-carry model posits that the futures of a equals the spot plus the net costs of holding the physical asset until , expressed approximately as F = S + (r + u - y)T, where F is the futures , S is the spot , r is the risk-free , u represents and related costs as a proportion of the spot , y is the , and T is the time to maturity. In contango, where F > S, these components drive the upward slope of the futures curve when net carrying costs exceed benefits, reflecting opportunities that prevent indefinite without compensation. Financing costs, primarily the of capital or interest on borrowed funds to purchase and hold the , form a core component, as holders forgo returns from alternative investments like risk-free bonds. For instance, in liquid markets, this is often proxied by short-term interest rates such as or , compounded over the contract period to account for the . Storage costs encompass warehousing fees, handling, and preservation expenses specific to the , which vary by type—e.g., for perishables or for metals—and scale with levels and location. These proportional costs, often 1-5% annually for non-perishables like oil or grains, incentivize futures prices to embed compensation for physical holding, particularly when inventories are ample and supply exceeds immediate demand. Insurance premiums and minor outlays like transportation or spoilage risks add to the carry, protecting against loss or damage during , though they are typically smaller than financing or elements. The , an implicit non-monetary benefit from holding inventory (e.g., avoiding production disruptions), offsets these costs; low yields—prevalent in abundant supply scenarios—amplify contango by reducing the downward pressure on futures prices. Empirical deviations from pure cost-of-carry arise from frictions, such as imperfect storability or , but the model holds as a no-arbitrage bound in efficient s.

Influence of Supply-Demand Dynamics and Expectations

Contango emerges in futures markets when current supply exceeds , resulting in depressed prices, while futures contracts priced further into the future incorporate expectations of tighter supply- balances. This dynamic is evident in periods of oversupply, where immediate availability floods the market, but participants anticipate normalization through reduced production or increased consumption, bidding up longer-dated contracts. For instance, in commodity markets like , contango structures reflect projections that future will outpace supply, as observed in analyses of forward curves. Market expectations amplify contango when traders forecast events such as seasonal surges, geopolitical supply constraints, or economic expansions that elevate future prices. In agricultural futures like live , an upward-sloping curve signals anticipated higher or constrained supply ahead, diverging from current conditions influenced by abundant . Supply- imbalances interact with these expectations via management; excess today allow deferral of sales to capture higher future prices, but limitations and costs sustain the price gradient rather than eroding it through . from energy markets shows that balanced conditions with ample capacity typically yield contango, as futures embed premiums for holding assets amid stable or growing outlooks. Conversely, shifts in expectations toward persistent oversupply can flatten or reverse contango toward backwardation, underscoring the sensitivity of term structures to revised supply-demand forecasts. Studies of price responses to shocks highlight how adjustments mediate these effects, with high buffering prices downward while futures prices hinge on projected drawdowns. This interplay ensures contango serves as a of , where optimistic future outlooks relative to present gluts drive the characteristic upward curve, independent of pure cost-of-carry mechanics.

Economic and Investment Implications

Effects on Hedging and Production Decisions

In contango markets, commodity producers, who typically employ short hedging strategies by selling futures contracts to lock in prices for future output, benefit from the upward-sloping futures curve. This allows them to secure sales at premiums over prevailing spot prices, mitigating downside risk from potential near-term price weakness while capturing expected future value. For instance, oil and natural gas producers can hedge anticipated production at elevated forward prices, effectively stabilizing revenue streams against volatile spot conditions. This hedging advantage in contango often influences production decisions by discouraging immediate output curtailments, even amid current oversupply or low prices. Producers may opt to maintain or if marginal costs remain below hedged futures levels, prioritizing long-term profitability over short-term signals of weakness. In the U.S. as of March 2024, contango—with Henry Hub prices at $1.535 per million units (MMBtu) versus $1.842/MMBtu for May futures—prompted hedging into winter contracts near $4/MMBtu, enabling firms to sustain despite surpluses exceeding 629 billion cubic feet above five-year averages and delaying broader supply reductions anticipated from operators like and EQT. Such dynamics reflect how contango embeds cost-of-carry expectations, incentivizing production continuity when hedging offsets discounts, though persistent deep contango can still pressure unhedged marginal operators if constraints or negative extremes emerge, as seen in oil markets during 2020. Conversely, for consumers or long hedgers like refiners, contango elevates hedging costs, as purchasing futures incurs a reflective of carrying charges, potentially straining input and prompting deferred purchases or sourcing. This underscores contango's in reallocating , favoring sellers' incentives over buyers' immediacy, though empirical outcomes hinge on the curve's steepness relative to operational costs and fundamentals.

Roll Yield and Performance of Commodity Investments

Roll yield represents the component of total return from futures contracts arising from the convergence of futures prices to price as contracts approach expiration, particularly when positions are rolled over to maintain . In contango markets, where distant futures prices exceed near-term prices, rolling long positions incurs losses as expiring contracts are sold at lower prices relative to the higher-priced replacement contracts, resulting in negative roll yield. This effect systematically erodes the performance of futures-based investments, such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and indices that do not hold physical commodities. Empirical decompositions of futures returns confirm that negative roll yield in contango dominates spot price changes in explaining underperformance for long-only strategies. For instance, analysis of major indices like the shows that roll yield accounted for a substantial portion of negative returns during periods of persistent contango, with total returns lagging spot returns by the magnitude of the roll drag. In the market from 2014 to 2016, characterized by deep contango due to oversupply, futures-based ETFs such as the Oil Fund (USO) experienced annualized returns of approximately -40%, far below spot price changes, primarily attributable to negative roll yield averaging -10% to -15% annually. The of markets, marked by increased in futures via ETFs and indices, has amplified contango and thus negative by boosting for longer-dated contracts without corresponding physical hedging needs. Studies indicate that higher in these vehicles correlate with wider contango spreads, creating a self-reinforcing drag on investor returns independent of underlying supply- fundamentals. While from treasuries held against futures margins provide some offset, they typically fail to compensate for severe roll losses in prolonged contango, leading to net underperformance relative to physical or spot-linked holdings. This dynamic underscores the importance of futures curve shape in assessing viability, with contango environments favoring short strategies or physical over standard long futures rolls.

Historical and Empirical Examples

Origins in Early Commodity Markets

The term contango emerged in the mid-19th century on the , initially denoting the premium or fee paid by a buyer to a seller for deferring settlement and delivery of from one account day to the next, typically fortnightly. This fee compensated the seller for the interest foregone on the purchase price and other carrying costs during the postponement, reflecting basic economic principles of time value and storage in trading practices. Etymologically, it may derive from "continue" or "contingent," capturing the conditional extension of the trade. In early commodity markets, the concept manifested similarly, as traders in perishable or storable goods like grains, metals, and routinely incorporated deferral premiums to cover financing, , and warehousing expenses, leading to futures or forward prices exceeding levels. By the 1850s, the term extended explicitly to on exchanges, where abundant supply and low immediate demand often resulted in such premiums for delayed , distinguishing contango from backwardation (the inverse condition). This usage aligned with the growing formalization of futures trading in 19th-century , predating modern exchanges but rooted in at venues like the , where forward contracts for had been negotiated since the . These origins underscore contango's role in efficient , as the premium incentivized holding rather than forced immediate , stabilizing markets amid seasonal supply variations—evident in historical records of colonial in staples like and , where delivery terms embedded verifiable carrying costs averaging 1-2% per month in the 1850s-1870s.

2007–2008 Global Commodity Surge

The 2007–2008 global commodity surge marked a period of rapid price increases across energy, metals, and agricultural sectors, driven primarily by robust demand growth from emerging economies, particularly , alongside supply-side constraints, a weakening U.S. dollar, and low interest rates that encouraged speculative . Crude prices, for instance, rose from approximately $52 per barrel in mid-January 2007 to a peak of $147 per barrel on July 11, 2008, while metals like saw gains exceeding 300% from early 2007 levels, and agricultural commodities such as and corn experienced doublings in price amid weather-related supply disruptions and demand. In the of futures market structures, the surge often disrupted typical contango patterns, with many shifting toward backwardation due to perceived near-term supply tightness relative to longer-term expectations. For oil, the futures curve steepened into backwardation by mid-2008, as evidenced by near-month contracts trading at premiums to deferred months, reflecting immediate drawdowns and lags despite ample longer-dated supply prospects. This backwardation indicated that convenience yields exceeded storage and financing costs, countering the cost-of-carry basis for contango and contributing to price as physical shortages pressured immediate . However, contango persisted or emerged in segments less affected by acute supply disruptions, particularly in certain agricultural and metals futures where was feasible and was anticipated to outpace near-term resolution of constraints. Increased , including inflows from commodity index traders who systematically purchased and rolled longer-dated contracts, exerted upward pressure on distant futures prices, sometimes steepening contango in these markets by amplifying expectations of sustained global . For storable commodities included in major indices, this dynamic reinforced contango during phases of when inventories began rebuilding, as arbitrageurs stored goods to capture the futures-spot , though low initial stocks limited the scale. The interplay between contango and underscored the influence of investor flows on term structures; while fundamental drove gains, futures positioning by non-commercial traders—reaching record levels by mid-—helped propagate price signals across maturities, with contango in select markets enabling positive roll yields for long investors despite overall upward price momentum. This period's mixed structures highlighted causal tensions between empirical supply- imbalances and theoretical cost-of-carry models, as backwardation dominated tight sectors like while contango facilitated hedging and in others. Post-peak in late , widespread contango reemerged amid collapse and builds, amplifying the boom-bust cycle.

Oil Market Instances (2014–2016 and 2020 Super Contango)

During the 2014–2016 period, the oil market entered a pronounced contango driven by a global supply glut, primarily from surging U.S. production and OPEC's decision on November 27, 2014, to maintain output levels rather than cut production to support prices. prices plummeted from approximately $115 per barrel in June 2014 to below $30 per barrel by January 2016, while U.S. crude inventories reached record highs, exceeding 500 million barrels by early 2016. This oversupply encouraged arbitrage, with traders exploiting contango spreads by holding physical oil in onshore tanks and floating via very large crude carriers (VLCCs), as the futures reflected expectations of eventual rebalancing through drawdowns. The WTI front-month to six-month spread widened to levels supporting such trades, though less extreme than prior crises, with contango persisting into 2016 amid abundant inventories that suppressed spot prices. The contango structure incentivized producers to maintain output despite low prices, as hedging via futures locked in higher future deliveries, but high storage costs and limited capacity began constraining opportunities by mid-2016. Empirical data from the showed , inventories—key for WTI pricing—peaking at over 64 million barrels in May 2016, amplifying the backward pressure on prompt prices relative to deferred contracts. In , the oil market experienced an unprecedented "super contango" triggered by the pandemic's demand collapse, with global oil consumption dropping by over 30 million barrels per day in due to lockdowns and travel restrictions. Compounded by initial + production disputes in March that flooded markets before subsequent cuts, storage facilities worldwide filled rapidly, pushing WTI front-month futures to negative prices of -$37.63 per barrel on , , for May delivery, while six-month spreads reached extremes exceeding $10 per barrel in contango. This hyper-steep curve, dubbed super contango, reflected acute storage scarcity at hubs like Cushing, where inventories approached 70 million barrels, forcing traders to pay to offload physical barrels amid vanishing on-land capacity. The magnitude of the 2020 contango dwarfed prior episodes, with WTI spreads hitting negative differentials of up to -$58 in some metrics between near-term and longer-dated contracts, incentivizing massive floating deployments—over 100 VLCCs by May—and highlighting the limits of carry trades when physical constraints override financial incentives. Brent exhibited similar dynamics, though less severely due to diversified options, with the persisting into mid-2020 until recovery and cuts narrowed the . These instances underscore how extreme contango emerges from mismatched supply- imbalances amplified by bottlenecks, influencing hedging strategies and flows toward storage-linked plays.

Theoretical and Critical Perspectives

Foundations in Economic Theory

The cost-of-carry model forms the core theoretical foundation for contango, positing that in efficient markets free of arbitrage, the futures price equals the spot price adjusted for the net costs of holding the physical commodity until delivery. This relationship is expressed as F_t = S_0 e^{(r + u - y)T}, where F_t is the futures price, S_0 the current spot price, r the risk-free interest rate representing the opportunity cost of capital, u proportional storage and insurance costs, y the convenience yield from holding the asset, and T the time to maturity. Contango arises when the net carry cost (r + u - y) > 0, resulting in an upward-sloping futures curve where distant contracts trade at a premium to the spot price. This equilibrium prevents riskless profits, as discrepancies would incentivize cash-and-carry arbitrage (buying spot, storing, and selling futures) or reverse cash-and-carry. Complementing the cost-of-carry framework, the theory of elucidates the dynamics of and inventory levels in driving contango. Developed initially by Holbrook Working in empirical studies of grain markets during and formalized by Michael Brennan in 1958, the theory holds that inversely correlates with available stocks: abundant inventories diminish the non-monetary benefits of physical possession (such as avoiding shortages), lowering y and allowing futures prices to fully incorporate carry costs, thereby fostering contango. In contrast, tight supplies elevate y, compressing the basis toward backwardation. Empirical analyses confirm that high inventory-to-use ratios predict persistent contango, as costs become the binding constraint on . While ' 1930 theory of normal backwardation emphasized a downward in futures prices due to hedgers' net short positions requiring speculators to demand a , contango aligns with scenarios where carry costs or bullish expectations dominate, or where short hedgers (e.g., consumers) pay a premium to speculators for price certainty. Modern extensions integrate these views, recognizing that risk premia fluctuate with market fundamentals, but the no-arbitrage cost-of-carry remains the invariant anchor ensuring contango reflects genuine economic costs rather than inefficiency. Arbitrage-free bounds further constrain deviations, as unbounded contango would invite exploitable spreads beyond verifiable carry expenses.

Debates on Speculation, Financialization, and Market Efficiency

Critics of commodity futures markets have argued that excessive exacerbates contango by inflating distant futures prices detached from physical supply-demand fundamentals, potentially fostering bubbles as seen in during the 2007–2008 surge when net long speculative positions reached record levels per CFTC data. However, empirical studies using disaggregated trader positions and econometric tests, such as those on agricultural futures over four decades, find scant evidence of speculative bubbles driving persistent price deviations, attributing contango primarily to carrying costs like storage and interest rather than investor . These analyses emphasize that enhances and without systematically distorting the futures curve, countering regulatory narratives that often overlook hedging roles of producers. Financialization, involving massive inflows into commodity index funds starting around —reaching over $200 billion by 2008—has sparked debate over whether non-commercial investors sustain contango through mechanical rolling of long positions, leading to underperformance of futures-based investments relative to prices, as documented in from 2006 to 2017 where contango prevailed 80% of the time and eroded returns by up to 10% annually via roll yield. Evidence is mixed: some research links financialization to increased futures-spot comovements and spillovers from equities, suggesting crowding effects steepen the curve, while others, including assessments, detect no pervasive impact on price levels or persistence of contango beyond fundamental inventory signals. This divergence highlights how index demand may amplify short-term curve shapes but fails to override storage theory predictions, where high inventories rationally produce contango without implying . On market , contango is often portrayed as of inefficiency due to predictable negative roll yields—averaging -2% to -5% in commodities like crude oil over long horizons—yet rational models reconcile this with risk premia compensating for inventory risks and absent convenience yields, as per the theory of storage where futures prices embed expected marginal costs of holding physical stocks. Empirical tests, including predictability regressions on futures returns conditioned on curve slope, support semi-strong , showing that apparent anomalies like persistent contango reflect time-varying systematic risks rather than exploitable mispricings, challenging claims of by demonstrating to fundamentals over cycles. Critics alleging inefficiency, often from advocacy groups, undervalue how bolsters depth and information aggregation, with studies finding improved informational in indexed markets post-inflows.

References

  1. [1]
    What is Contango and Backwardation - CME Group
    When a market is in contango, the forward price of a futures contract is higher than the spot price. Conversely, when a market is in backwardation, the forward ...
  2. [2]
    Futures Glossary | CFTC
    It is a carrying charge market when there are higher futures prices for each successive contract maturity. If the carrying charge is adequate to reimburse the ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Chapter 10 Forwards and Futures
    Contango means: (a) spot prices are lower than futures prices, and/or. (b) prices for near maturities are lower than for distant ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] The Fundamentals of Commodity Futures Returns
    Otherwise stated, on average, commodity futures markets have been in “contango.” At the same time, the average excess return on the equally-weighted index has ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Contango and Backwardation in Arbitrage-Free Futures-Markets
    In the above example, the futures price will fall and/or the spot price will rise until the difference exactly corresponds to the sum of the costs for storage ...
  6. [6]
    Commodity ETFs: Contango/Backwardation - Fidelity Investments
    If each subsequent month on the futures "curve" is priced higher than preceding months, a commodity is said to be in contango.
  7. [7]
    What is the natural gas futures market? - U.S. Energy ... - EIA
    Jul 29, 2024 · If futures prices increase over time compared with the current price, the market is referred to as being in a state of contango.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] The Dynamics of Commodity Spot and Futures Markets - mit ceepr
    (We say that the futures market is in contango when Pt < Ft,T. Thus contango includes weak backwardation and zero backwardation.) For an extractive resource ...
  9. [9]
    Contango Meaning, Why It Happens, and Backwardation
    Contango is when the futures price of an asset is higher than its current price. Contango is a market characterized by assets being cheaper today on the spot ...Market Insights from Contango · Real-World Examples · Market Significance of...
  10. [10]
    What is Contango, How it Works, Backwardation Differences | tastylive
    Contango describes the structure of prices in the market across the time horizon, and is most often associated with commodities and futures markets.
  11. [11]
    Understanding Backwardation: Key Concepts and Trading Insights
    Backwardation can result from supply shortages affecting spot prices in the commodities market. Unlike backwardation, contango is when futures prices are higher ...
  12. [12]
    Contango vs Backwardation - Differences in the Futures Market
    Contango and backwardation are terms used to describe the observed difference between the spot, or cash, price and futures prices for a commodity.Contango vs Backwardation · What is Contango? · What is Backwardation?
  13. [13]
    Contango vs. Normal Backwardation: What's the Difference?
    Contango is when the futures price is above the expected future spot price. Because the futures price must converge on the expected future spot price, contango ...Contango vs. Normal... · Special Considerations
  14. [14]
    [PDF] The Fundamentals of Commodity Futures Returns
    This link, also known as “cost of carry arbitrage,” predicts that in order to induce storage, futures prices and expected spot prices of commodities have to ...
  15. [15]
    Commodity Futures and Forwards - FRM Part 1 Study Notes
    Describe the cost of carry model and illustrate the impact of storage costs and convenience yields on commodity forward prices and no-arbitrage bounds.Missing: components | Show results with:components<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    How Carry Charge Works in the Futures Market (2025) ⚙️
    A carrying charge market refers to a futures market structure in which the price of a commodity contract increases for delivery in more distant months.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Backwardation, Contango and Returns to Investors in Commodity ...
    Jun 2, 2021 · contango market there is over supply and/or low demand, and in a backwardated market there is under supply and/or high demand. The CME also ...
  18. [18]
    A Tale of Two Markets: Why the Future Looks Different for Hogs and ...
    Aug 10, 2022 · Alternatively, the upward slope of the Live Cattle forward curve illustrates contango, which potentially indicates higher future demand and/or ...
  19. [19]
    Trading Energy Calendar Spread Options - CME Group
    Aug 12, 2025 · The term structure in crude oil is largely influenced by supply/demand, storage dynamics and geopolitical events. This results in the market's ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] How Commodity Price Curves and Inventories React to a Short-Run ...
    A greater understanding of futures price curves and inventory dynamics can help market participants plan their responses to supply and demand shocks. It may ...
  21. [21]
    Contango: Meaning, Criticisms & Real-World Uses
    Sep 23, 2025 · Contango is a market condition within derivatives where the futures price of a commodity or financial asset is higher than its current spot ...
  22. [22]
    Contango vs. Backwardation (2025): Key Differences Explained
    Contango occurs when futures prices exceed expected spot prices due to storage costs, interest rates, and carrying costs.
  23. [23]
    Natural Gas Market Contango Incentivizing Hedging, Could Keep ...
    Mar 19, 2024 · Discover how the contango in the natural gas market could impact producers' decisions on supply tightening and hedging strategies.
  24. [24]
    The challenges of oil investing: Contango and the financialization of ...
    The increase in assets under management contributes to the contango, which is a drag on their performance when compared with spot oil. One concern of studies ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Understanding Contango and Backwardation: Key Concepts in ...
    Companies that rely on commodities might use futures contracts to manage risk. In contango, hedging can become more expensive due to carrying costs.What Is Contango? · Causes And Effects · What Causes Contango?<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Backwardation vs. Contango in the Crude Oil Market - SRB Capital
    Nov 6, 2024 · In contango, hedging becomes more costly since they must pay a premium for future contracts relative to spot prices. Conclusion. Backwardation ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Deconstructing Futures Returns: The Role of Roll Yield | CME Group
    Conceptually, the return due to the impact of backwardation/contango is represented by the sum of the basis and the roll adjustment.
  28. [28]
    Understanding the Components of Commodity Futures Returns
    In markets that are consistently in backwardation, the positive roll yield can enhance returns, while in markets in contango, the negative roll yield can erode ...
  29. [29]
    A Cautionary Tale of Contango: Why the Shape of the Futures Curve ...
    Nov 6, 2017 · Contango creates negative roll yield for an investor who purchases futures contracts (goes long) and then closes them out as the price converges ...
  30. [30]
    Increased roll yield seen through the third futures contracts | Insights
    May 15, 2024 · The difference in the negative roll yield for commodities in contango, like copper and corn, had the biggest effect on returns compared to the ...
  31. [31]
    Contango: Definition and Backwardation Differences - MasterClass
    Sep 14, 2022 · Contango is a theoretical term that describes the relationship between future prices and spot prices of underlying assets.
  32. [32]
    Contango: Explained | TIOmarkets
    Jul 2, 2024 · Contango is a term that originated in the mid-19th century and is derived from the London Stock Exchange. It is a situation that arises when ...
  33. [33]
    CONTANGO Definition & Meaning - Dictionary.com
    Contango definition: (on the London stock exchange) a fee paid by a buyer of ... Origin of contango. 1850–55; said to be alteration of continue or ...
  34. [34]
    What’s contango, etymology - ERIC KIM ₿
    Apr 6, 2025 · The evidence leans toward “contango†being a practical term that evolved from delaying delivery in markets. What is Contango? Contango is ...
  35. [35]
    How Oil Markets Came to Embrace Contango - Bloomberg.com
    Mar 31, 2015 · Both contango and its doppelganger, backwardation, originated in Britain in the 19th century to describe futures trading.
  36. [36]
    Contango - MarketsWiki, A Commonwealth of Market Knowledge
    Feb 22, 2017 · Originally, contango was defined as a fee paid by a stock buyer to the seller in order to postpone the delivery of the stock to a future date.
  37. [37]
    Investor Flows Were Behind the 2008 Oil Price Wild Ride
    Sep 15, 2011 · It was the wildest of wild rides. In mid-January of 2007, crude oil futures on the NYMEX Exchange closed at $52 a barrel.
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Causes and Consequences of the Oil Shock of 2007–08
    A typical strategy is to take a long position in a near-term futures contract, sell it a few weeks before expiry, and use the proceeds to take a long posi- tion ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Commodities Boom: Riding a Wave
    The commodity boom is driven by demand from emerging economies, driven by strong income growth, industrialization, and population growth, and supply forces.
  40. [40]
    [PDF] The 2008 Boom/Bust in Oil Prices
    May 17, 2010 · There is a clear tendency throughout the period of 2004 through 2009 for inventories to increase when the futures market is in contango.5. 3 ...Missing: surge | Show results with:surge
  41. [41]
    Is oil futures in contango or backwardation through most of its history ...
    Jan 21, 2015 · Oil futures are in contango through most of its history because of huge storage costs. higgest backwardation were when crude oil hit 147 in July ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Financialization of Commodity Markets - Princeton University
    First, when the futures curve is in contango, the standard no-arbitrage principle implies that the slope of the curve is equal to the cost of carrying the ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    The Growing Financialisation of Commodity Markets
    Jun 11, 2012 · During 2006–2009, index trader positions had a price impact for some agricultural commodities, as well as oil. During 2007–2008, money managers ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Investor Flows and the 2008 Boom/Bust in Oil Prices
    Mar 23, 2011 · This paper explores the impact of investor flows and financial market conditions on returns in crude-oil futures markets.
  45. [45]
    WTI oil market spread hits backwardation for first time since 2014
    Nov 1, 2017 · The price of oil collapsed from near $120 a barrel in June 2014 due to weak demand, a strong dollar and booming U.S. shale production. OPEC's ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  46. [46]
    High inventories help push crude oil prices to lowest levels in 13 years
    Feb 4, 2016 · Several factors have played a part in pushing US crude oil prices below $30 per barrel (b), including high inventory levels of crude oil, uncertainty about ...
  47. [47]
    Crude oil contango arbitrage and the floating storage decision
    The recent Oil Glut (2014–2016) and the Financial Crisis (2008–2009) both caused severe drops in oil prices. The Financial Crisis led to an contraction the ...
  48. [48]
    Oil and Gas Investors Note Move Away From Contango
    Aug 14, 2017 · Contango is the result of an “oversupplied market with abundant inventories.” For example, if crude oil is trading at $45 per barrel right now, ...
  49. [49]
    Goodbye contango? Oil's long march towards backwardation: Kemp
    Aug 16, 2017 · Oil market crashes are normally accompanied by a shift from backwardation to contango, while recoveries and rebalancing are accompanied by ...
  50. [50]
    The historic oil price fluctuation during the Covid-19 pandemic
    The Covid-19 pandemic has restricted movement globally, resulting in a drop in demand of more than 30 million barrels of oil in early April 2020 (International ...
  51. [51]
    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/oil-market-in-super-contango-underlines-storage-fears-as-coronavirus-destroys-crude-demand-2020-04-17
  52. [52]
    [PDF] On the Negative Pricing of WTI Crude Oil Futures
    Eventually, the WTI futures market reached unprecedented levels of contango (“super contango”) with an all-time large and negative spread of -$58.06 on. April ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] “Contango With Me”: COVID-19 and the US Crude Oil Market
    This article looks at how the COVID-19 pandemic and other events created a price structure in futures and spot markets that incentivize market participants ...
  54. [54]
    Crude Oil Can Get Carried Away by Contango - S&P Global
    Jun 19, 2020 · Super contango usually occurs when storage space becomes scarce due to excess supply—meaning that the cost of carry (the cost of storing a ...
  55. [55]
    Understanding Cost of Carry: Key Definitions, Models, and Factors
    Futures pricing often incorporates factors like risk-free interest rates, storage costs, and convenience yield in the cost of carry model.
  56. [56]
    What is Cost of Carry? Definition, Models, and Formula - HDFC Sky
    Apr 30, 2025 · Cost of Carry explains the net expense of holding assets by combining interest, storage fees, & yield deductions.Open Free Demat Account · Cost Of Carry Formula · Futures Cost Of Carry Model
  57. [57]
    Inventories and the term structure of oil prices: A complex relationship
    The theory of storage suggests that the relationship between market structure – namely the degree of contango/backwardation – and inventories is well-defined ...
  58. [58]
    Theories of Commodity Future Returns - CFA, FRM, and Actuarial ...
    Nov 29, 2021 · Commodity futures markets result in a state of contango because of speculators insisting on a risk premium in exchange for accepting price risk.
  59. [59]
    Speculative bubbles in recent oil price dynamics - ScienceDirect.com
    We investigate whether the heavily financialized market for crude oil has been driven by speculative bubbles.Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Speculation in the Oil Futures Market - MIT
    This relationship changed beginning in 2003, which may have generated the type of dynamic in beliefs that is a key feature of speculative bubbles. More ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Bubbles in Food Commodity Markets: Four Decades of Evidence
    Mar 1, 2013 · By contrast, Gutierrez (2012) finds evidence of explosiveness in wheat, corn and rough rice prices in 2007–2008, but not in soybean prices.
  62. [62]
    [PDF] speculation and the commodity markets
    The current cycle has led to concerns about a commodity bubble, and ultimately a bust, like that experienced in 2007-2008. The 2010-2011 increase in crop prices ...<|separator|>
  63. [63]
    Commodity Market Financialisation: A Closer Look at the Evidence
    We conclude that there is no clear evidence that the financialisation of commodity markets has had a pervasive effect on commodity prices.Missing: persistent contango
  64. [64]
    Financialization in Commodity Markets
    The financialization view is that increased trading in commodity futures markets is associated with increases in the growth rate and volatility of commodity ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] What Went Wrong? The Puzzle of Disappointing Commodity ETF ...
    First, the carry structure of the futures market, whether contango or backwardation, has no direct impact on the long return to holding a commodity futures ...Missing: implications | Show results with:implications
  66. [66]
    The impact of financialization on the efficiency of commodity futures ...
    We find empirical evidence that the financialization positively affected the market efficiency of indexed commodity futures markets.