Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Cornering force

Cornering force is the lateral force generated by a pneumatic tire when subjected to a slip angle during vehicle cornering, acting perpendicular to the tire's heading direction to provide the centripetal acceleration necessary for turning. This force arises from the deformation of the tire's contact patch with the road surface, where the rubber's elasticity resists lateral shear, converting steering input into sideways traction.^[1] In vehicle dynamics, cornering force is fundamental to handling characteristics, determining the maximum lateral acceleration a vehicle can achieve before losing grip, typically peaking at slip angles around 6 degrees for passenger car tires. The relationship between cornering force and slip angle is nonlinear, initially linear where the slope defines the tire's cornering stiffness (measured in Newtons per degree), which quantifies the tire's responsiveness to steering. Factors influencing cornering force include vertical load on the tire, inflation pressure, rubber compound, temperature, and road surface conditions; for instance, higher loads generally increase available force but reduce the coefficient of friction, while optimal temperature (around 80–100°C for racing tires) maximizes grip.^[1]^[2]^[3] The magnitude of cornering force is limited by the friction circle concept, where it combines with longitudinal forces (from acceleration or braking) within the tire's total friction capacity, often modeled using empirical equations like the Pacejka Magic Formula for precise simulations in engineering applications. In steady-state cornering, the balance of front and rear cornering forces dictates understeer or oversteer behavior: greater front force promotes understeer for stability, while rear bias can induce oversteer for agility. Aerodynamic downforce significantly enhances cornering force by increasing normal load, allowing high-performance vehicles to achieve lateral accelerations exceeding 2g on dry surfaces.^[3]

Fundamentals

Definition

Cornering force is the lateral (sideways) force generated by a pneumatic tire at the tire-road contact patch, acting perpendicular to the tire's heading direction during vehicle turning maneuvers. This force enables the vehicle to negotiate curves without skidding by providing the necessary lateral acceleration to counter centrifugal effects.^[1] Unlike longitudinal force, which acts parallel to the tire's rolling direction to facilitate acceleration or braking, or vertical force, which supports the vehicle's weight and maintains ground contact, cornering force specifically contributes to directional control in turns.^[4] In the standard SAE J670 tire axis system, cornering force is represented as the vector component F_y, directed along the tire's lateral y-axis in the local coordinate frame fixed at the wheel center.^[5] The concept of cornering force originated in mid-20th-century automotive engineering research on tire behavior, with seminal contributions from Hans B. Pacejka, whose semi-empirical Magic Formula tire models from the 1980s onward have become a cornerstone for predicting cornering forces based on slip angle and other parameters.^[6]^[7] This force arises from a small slip angle, the angular difference between the tire's orientation and its velocity vector.^[1]

Physical Principles

Cornering force, also known as lateral force, arises fundamentally from the dry friction between the tire's rubber and the road surface. In this interaction, static friction predominates at low slip angles, allowing the tire to generate a lateral force perpendicular to its rolling direction without significant sliding, while kinetic friction takes over as slip increases and limits the force once sliding begins.^[8] The magnitude of this force is constrained by the road's friction properties, with the maximum achievable cornering force given by F_y \leq \mu F_z, where F_y is the lateral force, \mu is the coefficient of friction (typically 0.7–1.2 for dry asphalt with passenger car tires), and F_z is the vertical normal load on the tire; this limit reflects the balance between adhesion and shear resistance at the interface.^[8] The tire functions as a flexible, viscoelastic structure, with its sidewall, carcass, and tread deforming under load to form an elliptical contact patch against the road. Within this patch, lateral deflection of the rubber elements induces shear stresses that accumulate across the patch's length, producing a net lateral force directed toward the inside of the turn; this shear buildup occurs as forward-rolling tread elements are laterally displaced relative to the wheel's plane, converting longitudinal compliance into transverse resistance.^[8] Such deformation is initiated by a small slip angle between the wheel's heading and its actual velocity vector. A key geometric consequence of this deformation is the pneumatic trail, defined as the longitudinal offset between the wheel's center of contact and the point where the resultant lateral force acts, typically 20–50 mm behind the center for passenger tires at moderate loads. This offset generates a self-aligning torque around the wheel's kingpin axis, which tends to reduce the slip angle and stabilize steering by countering external disturbances.^[8] Underlying these mechanics is the viscoelastic behavior of the rubber compound, where hysteresis—the lag between applied stress and strain recovery—leads to energy dissipation as heat during cyclic deformation in the contact patch. This dissipation, quantified by the loss tangent \tan \delta (often 0.1–0.3 for tire rubbers), imposes practical limits on cornering force by reducing effective stiffness and increasing wear at high loads or speeds, while also contributing to the tire's overall grip through enhanced shear compliance.^[8]

Tire Dynamics

Slip Angle Mechanics

The slip angle, denoted as \alpha, is defined as the angle between the tire's heading direction—perpendicular to the wheel's plane—and the actual path of travel of the tire's contact patch, arising from the lateral deflection of the tire carcass under load.^[9] This deflection occurs because the tire's rubber and structure deform elastically when subjected to lateral forces during cornering, causing the contact patch to shift sideways relative to the wheel's orientation.^[10] In vehicle dynamics, the slip angle develops primarily from the interaction between the vehicle's yaw motion and lateral acceleration during turns. When a vehicle corners, steering inputs and inertial effects produce a lateral velocity component at each tire, which differs from the wheel's pointed direction, resulting in the slip angle. For small angles, this is approximated as \alpha \approx \frac{V_y}{V_x} (in radians), where V_y is the lateral velocity and V_x the forward velocity of the tire contact point; more precisely, the relationship is given by

\tan(\alpha) = \frac{V_y}{V_x},

reflecting the geometric difference between the velocity vector and the wheel heading.^[11] This formulation assumes steady-state conditions and neglects transient effects like tire relaxation length, focusing on the quasi-static mechanics.^[10] The mechanics of slip angle exhibit distinct linear and nonlinear regimes depending on the magnitude of \alpha. At small slip angles (typically below 3–5 degrees for passenger car tires), the lateral force response is linear, with the cornering stiffness C_\alpha providing a proportional relationship between slip angle and generated force, enabling predictable handling.^[10] As the slip angle increases beyond this range, the response transitions to nonlinear behavior, where the force builds more gradually due to progressive deformation of the contact patch and alignment torque effects, eventually saturating near the friction limit and leading to gross sliding at large angles (around 10–15 degrees or more).^[10] This saturation arises from the finite shear capacity of the tire-road interface, limiting the maximum lateral force regardless of further increases in slip angle. The slip angle thus serves as the primary input parameter for generating cornering force in tire dynamics.^[4]

Lateral Force Generation

Lateral force in tires arises primarily from the elastic deformation of the rubber tread and carcass within the contact patch when a slip angle is applied, creating a shear stress distribution that opposes the vehicle's tendency to slide sideways. This deformation begins at the leading edge of the contact patch, where the tire first meets the road surface, and progresses rearward toward the trailing edge, with shear stress increasing gradually due to the cumulative elastic response of the tire structure under lateral loading. The resulting lateral force acts perpendicular to the tire's rolling direction, enabling cornering by providing the necessary centripetal acceleration.^[12] The magnitude of this lateral force, often denoted as F_y, varies nonlinearly with the slip angle \alpha, producing a characteristic S-shaped curve that describes the tire's cornering response. For small slip angles (typically below 3°), the relationship is approximately linear, where the force is proportional to the angle with a slope known as the cornering stiffness C_\alpha, which quantifies the tire's initial resistance to lateral deflection. As the slip angle increases to an optimal range of 5-10° for passenger car tires, the force reaches its peak due to maximum effective shear deformation across the contact patch before significant sliding occurs. Beyond this peak, the force diminishes as more of the contact patch transitions to gross sliding, reducing the elastic contribution and potentially dropping by up to 30% from the maximum.^[13]^[14] Factors such as camber angle influence this force-slip angle curve by adding a camber thrust component, which supplements the slip angle-generated force, particularly at higher angles; for bias tires, a camber of 4-6° can produce lateral force equivalent to about 1° of slip angle, while for radial passenger tires, 10-15° is required for the same equivalence. The curve's shape and peak can also shift with vertical load and inflation pressure, though the overall S-form remains a hallmark of pneumatic tire behavior as modeled in empirical approaches like the Pacejka Magic Formula.^[13]^[7] In real-world cornering, lateral force rarely acts in isolation, interacting with longitudinal forces (e.g., from acceleration or braking) within the limits of available tire friction, conceptualized by the friction ellipse. This ellipse represents the locus of possible combined force vectors (F_x, F_y), where the maximum resultant is constrained by the tire's friction coefficient, ensuring that increasing one force reduces the capacity for the other.^[15]

Influencing Factors

Tire Characteristics

Tire tread patterns significantly influence cornering force by affecting grip in both dry and wet conditions. Directional treads, characterized by V-shaped grooves, excel in channeling water away from the contact patch, thereby enhancing hydroplaning resistance and maintaining lateral force during high-speed cornering on wet surfaces.^[16] In contrast, symmetric treads provide uniform rubber distribution across the contact area, offering superior dry grip and consistent cornering force through even traction and reduced rolling resistance.^[17] The rubber compound of a tire plays a critical role in determining the friction coefficient (μ), which directly impacts the maximum cornering force. Soft compounds, often used in racing slicks, achieve higher μ values—typically exceeding 1.5 on dry pavement—due to increased viscoelastic adhesion and hysteresis, enabling greater lateral force generation at the limit of grip.^[18] However, these compounds sacrifice durability, wearing rapidly under prolonged stress, whereas harder compounds prioritize longevity for street applications at the expense of peak μ, often around 0.8-1.0.^[19] Tire construction, particularly the distinction between bias-ply and radial designs, affects cornering stiffness, defined as the lateral force per unit slip angle at low angles. Bias-ply tires feature plies layered at angles to the centerline, providing flexibility but lower stiffness, resulting in reduced cornering force response. Radial tires, with plies oriented perpendicular to the tread and reinforced by steel belts, exhibit higher cornering stiffness—often 20-30% greater than bias-ply equivalents—due to improved sidewall rigidity and load distribution, enhancing precise force buildup during turns.^[20] Tire size and aspect ratio further modulate cornering force potential through variations in contact patch geometry. Wider tires expand the contact patch area, increasing the maximum lateral force (Fy max) by distributing shear stress more effectively, with studies showing proportional gains in peak Fy for every 10-20 mm increase in width under constant load. Low-profile tires, with aspect ratios below 50% (sidewall height less than half the section width), reduce sidewall flex, improving steering responsiveness and maintaining consistent cornering force by minimizing deflection during lateral loads.^[21]

Load and Inflation Effects

The cornering stiffness, defined as the initial slope of the lateral force versus slip angle curve (dF_y/dα), varies nonlinearly with vertical load F_z. While absolute cornering stiffness generally increases with F_z, it does so sublinearly, meaning the normalized stiffness (dF_y/dα per unit F_z) decreases as load rises, leading to reduced efficiency in lateral force generation at higher loads. For instance, in aircraft tire tests, the cornering-force coefficient dropped from 0.041 per degree at 20% rated load (480 lb) to 0.022 per degree at 75% rated load (1760 lb). This load sensitivity implies that excessive vertical loading diminishes the tire's ability to produce proportional cornering force increments.^[22] During vehicle cornering, lateral load transfer shifts weight from the inner to the outer wheels due to centrifugal acceleration, reducing F_z on the inner wheel and thereby lowering its cornering stiffness and maximum lateral force output. This redistribution can cause the inner wheel to saturate its friction capacity earlier than the outer wheel, limiting overall vehicle grip and inducing understeer. The effect is particularly pronounced in vehicles with high centers of gravity or soft suspensions, where load transfer amplifies the disparity in wheel forces.^[23] Tire inflation pressure affects both structural stiffness and contact patch geometry, influencing cornering force generation. Higher pressures stiffen the sidewall and carcass, potentially increasing cornering stiffness at elevated loads (e.g., up to 20% higher lateral force at 16 psi versus 8 psi under 350 lb load in radial racing tires), but they also shrink the contact patch area, which can cap peak lateral forces. Lower pressures expand the patch for better force distribution at low loads but risk sidewall flex and reduced stiffness. For passenger car tires, pressures around 30-35 psi often optimize the balance between stiffness and patch size for effective cornering performance under typical operating loads.^[24]^[25] Camber thrust provides an additional mechanism for lateral force under load, where negative camber—common in cornering due to suspension geometry—tilts the contact patch, creating uneven normal pressure distribution that generates side force even at zero slip angle. This thrust augments total cornering force, with magnitude rising alongside camber angle and vertical load, as higher F_z amplifies the pressure differential across the patch. In car tires, camber thrust varies significantly with these factors, contributing to improved handling when optimized.^[26] A simplified model for lateral force incorporating camber effects is

F_y \approx C_\alpha \alpha + C_\gamma \gamma

where C_\alpha is the cornering stiffness, C_\gamma is the camber stiffness, \alpha is the slip angle, and \gamma is the camber angle (in radians); this approximation captures the additive influence on force output for small angles.^[27]

Modeling and Analysis

Mathematical Models

Mathematical models for cornering force, typically expressed as the lateral force F_y generated by a tire in response to a slip angle \alpha, range from simple linear approximations to more complex semi-empirical and physical formulations. These models are essential for simulating vehicle handling and stability, with slip angle serving as the primary input representing the angular difference between the tire's heading and travel direction. The linear model provides a straightforward approximation for small slip angles, where the cornering force is proportional to the slip angle:

F_y = C_\alpha \alpha

Here, C_\alpha denotes the cornering stiffness, measured in newtons per degree (N/deg), which quantifies the tire's resistance to lateral deflection and is derived from the initial slope of the F_y-\alpha curve at \alpha = 0. This model assumes linearity and is widely used in preliminary vehicle dynamics analyses due to its simplicity and computational efficiency, though it loses accuracy beyond small angles (typically under 5 degrees). For broader operating ranges, the Pacejka Magic Formula offers a semi-empirical approach that captures the nonlinear behavior of cornering force through curve-fitting to experimental data. The basic form for pure cornering is:

F_y = D \sin \left( C \arctan \left( B \alpha - E (B \alpha - \arctan(B \alpha)) \right) \right)

The coefficients B, C, D, and E are empirically determined parameters: D represents the peak force factor, C shapes the initial stiffness, B controls the friction-like slope, and E adjusts the curvature near the peak. Developed to fit measured tire data across various conditions, this model excels in vehicle simulations by replicating S-shaped force-slip curves without physical assumptions, and it has been refined in subsequent versions for combined slip scenarios.^[28] The brush model, a physically based representation, conceptualizes the tire tread as an array of flexible bristles in contact with the road, allowing derivation of cornering force from mechanical principles. As the tire slips laterally, bristles at the leading edge of the contact patch deflect elastically until reaching a sliding threshold, after which they contribute frictional force; the total F_y integrates these contributions across the patch length. This approach, originating from early theoretical work, provides insight into force buildup and stiffness mechanisms, with cornering stiffness emerging from the integrated elastic deflections across the contact patch, typically expressed in terms of bristle stiffness, contact geometry, and vertical load. It serves as a foundational tool for understanding tire physics and validating more complex models. These models generally assume steady-state conditions, focusing on quasi-static force generation and neglecting dynamic effects such as transient load shifts or relaxation lengths that influence real-world responses during rapid maneuvers.

Friction Limits

The friction circle, also known as the friction ellipse in cases where longitudinal and lateral friction coefficients differ, geometrically represents the ultimate constraints on the combined tire forces during cornering. It defines the boundary within which the magnitude of the resultant friction force must lie, given by the equation

|F_y|^2 + |F_x|^2 \leq (\mu F_z)^2,

where F_y is the lateral (cornering) force, F_x the longitudinal force, \mu the tire-road friction coefficient, and F_z the vertical load on the tire.^[29] This formulation illustrates that any increase in longitudinal force demand, such as from acceleration or braking, reduces the available capacity for lateral force, thereby limiting the maximum cornering capability.^[29] The circle (or ellipse) concept is fundamental to understanding how tires operate near their friction envelope without exceeding it, preventing loss of traction.^[30] The peak value of \mu varies significantly with road conditions and environmental factors, imposing direct limits on cornering force. On dry asphalt, \mu typically ranges from 0.8 to 1.0, allowing substantial lateral forces before sliding occurs.^[31] In wet conditions, \mu drops to 0.5–0.7 due to reduced contact patch adhesion and potential hydroplaning, sharply constraining cornering performance.^[32] Additionally, tire temperature plays a critical role, with friction peaking at an optimal range of 70–90°C for high-performance rubber compounds, where viscoelastic properties maximize hysteresis and grip; below this, the tire is too stiff, and above, it softens excessively, reducing \mu.^[33] Exceeding these friction limits results in tire sliding thresholds that affect vehicle stability. When the demanded F_y surpasses the available friction, the tire cannot generate sufficient lateral force, leading to sliding; this manifests as understeer if the front tires reach the limit first (causing the vehicle to widen its turn radius) or oversteer if the rear tires do (causing the rear to swing out).^[29] These behaviors highlight the tire-road interface as the primary bottleneck in cornering. The linkage to vehicle dynamics is captured by the maximum lateral acceleration a_y = F_y / m \leq \mu g, where m is the vehicle mass and g is gravitational acceleration, quantifying how friction directly caps achievable cornering speeds and radii.^[29]

Applications and Measurement

Vehicle Handling Implications

Cornering force plays a critical role in determining vehicle handling characteristics, particularly through the understeer and oversteer gradients, which describe how differences in lateral forces (Fy) between the front and rear axles influence yaw response during turns. The understeer gradient, denoted as Kus, quantifies the change in steering angle required to maintain a constant turn radius as lateral acceleration increases, arising from the front axle generating less Fy relative to the rear at higher slip angles.^[34] When the front axle Fy saturates first due to higher load sensitivity or lower cornering stiffness, the vehicle exhibits understeer, requiring increased steering input to sustain the turn and promoting stability for road vehicles. Conversely, oversteer occurs if the rear axle Fy limits are reached sooner, causing excessive yaw rotation and potential loss of control, though this can enhance agility in performance applications. Suspension geometry, particularly the roll center height, optimizes load distribution to achieve balanced cornering by minimizing uneven Fy across axles during lateral acceleration. The roll center acts as the instantaneous pivot point for the chassis under cornering loads, where lateral forces are transmitted without inducing body roll; a higher roll center reduces the moment arm between the center of gravity and this point, diverting more load transfer geometrically through suspension links rather than elastically via springs and dampers.^[35] This configuration equalizes vertical load shifts on inner and outer tires, preserving Fy capacity and preventing premature slip on one axle, thus promoting neutral handling.^[35] Proper front-rear roll center alignment further tunes the understeer gradient by controlling differential axle loading, enhancing overall stability without excessive roll.^[35] Active systems like electronic stability control (ESC) intervene to manage Fy limits by selectively modulating brake forces on individual wheels, correcting yaw deviations beyond passive handling capabilities. ESC detects discrepancies between intended and actual vehicle paths using sensors for yaw rate and steering angle, then applies differential braking to the oversteering or understeering axle—such as braking the outer front wheel in oversteer to reduce rear Fy and restore balance.^[36] This targeted intervention effectively simulates additional Fy on the deficient axle, preventing skids near friction limits and improving safety in dynamic maneuvers.^[36] In Formula 1 racing, aerodynamic downforce exemplifies how increasing effective normal force (Fz) elevates Fy without exceeding tire slip thresholds, enabling higher cornering speeds. Downforce, generated by inverted wings and underbody diffusers, can produce up to three times the car's weight in vertical load at high speeds, proportionally boosting tire grip and Fy capacity per the friction coefficient.^[37] This allows sustained lateral accelerations exceeding 5g in turns, where mechanical grip alone would limit performance, though it trades off with increased drag on straights.^[37]

Testing Methods

Flat-track testing is a primary method for isolating and measuring cornering force in tires under controlled conditions. In this approach, a tire is mounted on a drum or continuous belt simulating a flat road surface, with the tire spun at various speeds while the slip angle is incrementally varied. Load cells integrated into the test rig directly measure the lateral force (Fy) generated by the tire, along with other parameters like aligning torque and vertical load.^[38]^[39] Systems such as the MTS Flat-Trac apply precise vertical, camber, steer, and drive/braking inputs to the spinning tire, enabling accurate quantification of cornering force up to high speeds and loads.^[40] Vehicle-based testing evaluates cornering force in the context of whole-vehicle dynamics, typically through steady-state cornering maneuvers on a skidpad. The vehicle is driven in a constant-radius circle at progressively higher speeds, with accelerometers mounted near the center of gravity recording lateral acceleration (ay). Cornering force is then inferred from the relationship Fy = m × ay, where m is the vehicle mass, providing insights into overall tire-road interaction under loaded conditions.^[41]^[42] These methods differ in environment: flat-track testing is predominantly indoor, offering precise control over variables like temperature and surface texture in a lab setting, whereas vehicle-based skidpad tests are often outdoor, exposing the system to real-world variables such as wind and surface irregularities. Both adhere to standardized protocols, such as ISO 4138, which defines open-loop procedures for steady-state circular driving behavior in passenger cars and light trucks, specifying test track radii (typically 30–100 m), speed increments, and data logging requirements to ensure reproducibility.^[43]^[44] Modern advancements incorporate optical sensors to analyze the tire contact patch during cornering, capturing real-time deformations and pressure distributions that influence force generation. These non-contact systems, often using high-speed cameras or laser scanning, provide detailed visualizations of patch shape and stress under slip angles, enhancing understanding beyond traditional force measurements.^[45]^[46] Physical test data from these methods also validates tire simulation models, ensuring predictive accuracy for cornering force characteristics.^[47]^[48]

References

[1]
Tyre dynamics - Racecar Engineering
Jan 29, 2020 · A tyre with a higher cornering stiffness will produce a greater lateral acceleration and this is a key performance measure of any tyre.
[2]
Physical forces when cornering: Cornering force while driving a car
As its name suggests, cornering force is the lateral force that's generated by your tyres every time they turn. This force is equivalent to the centrifugal ...Cornering Force While... · What Is Cornering Force? · What Affects Cornering Force...<|control11|><|separator|>
[3]
C.0415 Cornering basics - The Contact Patch
To travel round a curve of constant radius R, the car and its passengers must be propelled sideways by a force directed towards the centre of the curve.
[4]
[PDF] The tire model
The initial slope of the curve is known as the cornering stiffness, Cα, described in units of force per degree. There exist many tire models to describe tire ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[5]
Tire axis system and terminology defined by SAE standards
In order to be able to analyze the forces and moments which are acting on a vehicle tire, especially during cornering, we need to define an axis (coordinate) ...Missing: Fy | Show results with:Fy
[6]
Full article: Hans B. Pacejka (1934–2017): a life in tyre mechanics
Mar 24, 2020 · The scientific contributions of Pacejka can be divided into the subjects of vehicle handling, the shimmy phenomenon, tyre modelling, motorcycles ...
[7]
Magic Formula - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The Magic Formula is defined as a tire model used to describe the steady-state forces and moments occurring under various slip conditions, widely applied in ...
[8]
[PDF] The Pneumatic Tire - Safety Research & Strategies, Inc.
For many years, tire engineers relied on the monograph, “Mechanics of Pneumatic Tires”, edited by S. K. Clark, for detailed information about the principles ...
[9]
Slip Angle α - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The angle made between the direction of the wheel plane and that which it travels is known as the slip angle. Provided the slip angle is small, the compliance ...
[10]
Tyre and Vehicle Dynamics - ScienceDirect.com
Tyre and Vehicle Dynamics. Book • Second Edition • 2006. Author: Hans B ... The input steady-state side force is calculated, for example, with the Magic Formula, ...
[11]
[PDF] On-Track Tire Characterization - OptimumG
The following equation can be used to find the slip angle, . The term is the total steered angle and includes the toe angle. = ARCTAN ( Vy / Vx ) –.
[12]
[PDF] Tire Contact Patch Characterization through Finite Element ...
the shear stresses at the contact patch as it better describes the deformation modes of the material. Figure 3.19 shows the completed mesh. Care had to be ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[13]
[PDF] meca0525 : introduction to tire mechanics ii
«Motor vehicle dynamics: Modelling and Simulation ». Series on Advances in ... As the cornering force and the tractive/braking forces are coupled, it ...
[14]
Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics - Google Books
Apr 29, 2021 · A world-recognized expert in the science of vehicle dynamics, Dr. Thomas Gillespie has created an ideal reference book that has been used by engineers for 30 ...
[15]
[PDF] The Tire-Force Ellipse (Friction Ellipse) and Tire Characteristics
Apr 12, 2011 · Fy(a) and F.-.:(s) for a combined steering and traction force. Then the concept of the idealized tire-force circle is covered.
[16]
Tires and Hydroplaning 680140 - SAE International
30-day returnsThe paper discusses the phenomena which are primarily responsible for hydroplaning and includes results from studies of the effects due to individual tire ...
[17]
https://www.tires-easy.com/blog/different-tread-patterns-on-tires/
[18]
Rubber Friction and Tire Dynamics: A Comparison of Theory with ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Tire mechanical model for cornering simulation with friction coefficient calculated from viscoelasticity of rubber by multiscale friction theory.
[19]
Friction coefficient of different velocity depending on ... - ResearchGate
The investigation led to conclusive evidence that the tread rubber compound affects drawbar pull coefficient significantly (double for best than for the worst ...
[20]
Radial Ply Tires-How Different Are They in the Low Lateral ...
Feb 1, 1975 · The cornering and camber stiffnesses of about 160 passenger car tires were analyzed with the objective to assess the differences between ...
[21]
Tire Contact Patch - Goodyear Tires
The wider, low profile sizes result in a contact patch shape that is wide and relatively short, a good match to deliver highly responsive handling and cornering ...Missing: width aspect ratio Fy
[22]
[PDF] A Study of the Cornering Forces Generated by Aircraft Tires on a ...
A more detailed description of the vehicle can not affect the cornering ... Cornering force is defined as the component of the side force that is perpendicular to.
[23]
Lateral and Longitudinal Load Transfer - Suspension Secrets
Jun 7, 2018 · Lateral load transfer occurs during cornering and is the shift of mass across the wheels due to the centrifugal force and the lateral acceleration.
[24]
Inflation Pressure Effects in the Nondimensional Tire Model
Oct 7, 2025 · Under a 150 lb normal load, a decrease in in ation pressure increases the lateral force capability of the tire; while under a 350 lb load, the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[25]
Correct Tire Air Pressure | Recommended Tire PSI - Discount Tire
Most passenger cars' psi requirement will be between 30 to 35 psi, but several vehicles fall outside of that range and every vehicle will have specific ...
[26]
[PDF] C i P ti f Ti Cornering Properties of Tires
Behavior of a cambered tire. Page 13. Camber thrust with camber angle. Variation of camber thrust with camber angle and normal load for a car tire. Page 14 ...
[27]
THE MAGIC FORMULA TYRE MODEL: Vehicle System Dynamics
Aug 6, 2007 · The model provides a set of mathematical formulae from which the forces and moment acting from road to tyre can be calculated at longitudinal, lateral and ...
[28]
[PDF] Vehicle Dynamics
May 21, 2019 · Friction Circle. • As a rule, the friction properties for a tire will be roughly the same for the lateral direction and the longitudinal.
[29]
[PDF] Tire Modeling to Enable Model Predictive Control of Automated ...
maximum lateral tire force based on longitudinal forces at each tire. Using the friction circle as a constraint, the maximum lateral force can be calculated ...
[30]
[PDF] Wear, Friction, and Temperature Characteristics of an Aircraft Tire ...
Figure 20.- Effect of operating mode on tire friction coefficient on smooth asphalt runway surface. Page 39. Brakin. (from fig. 11). Cornering, unbraked. 0. 0.
[31]
Tire friction and rolling coefficients - HPWizard.com
Dry earth road, Gravel, Hard-packed snow. Wet asphalt, Wet earth road, Sand, Ice. Treadwear. *Friction coefficient for street tires on dry asphalt only (±10%)
[32]
What Should The Temperature Of Your Racing Car Tyres Be?
Temp ℃ (℉), Grip Level, Degradation ; < 60 (<140), Low, Low ; 65 – 75 (149-158), Medium, Low ; 85 – 90 (185-194), High, Medium ; 90 – 95 (194-203), Very High, High.Missing: friction 70-90° C
[33]
None
### Summary: Understeer Gradient Relation to Differential Lateral Forces and Yaw Response
[34]
Tech Explained: Roll Centre - Racecar Engineering
Jan 7, 2021 · In a cornering scenario, lateral load transfer is distributed proportionally between the suspension links and the spring/damper units by the ...
[35]
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Electronic Stability Control ...
Jun 23, 2015 · An ESC system enhances the RSC functions because it has the added information from the steering wheel angle and yaw rate sensors, as well as ...
[36]
[PDF] Ground Effect Aerodynamics of Race Cars - ePrints Soton
2 Overall Force Behavior. The downforce generated by a Formula 1 race car can be as much as three times the weight of the car. The major downforce generating ...
[37]
MTS Flat-Trac® Tire Force & Moment Measurement Systems
Flat-Trac systems measure force and moment properties of tires by applying inputs to a spinning tire on a flat surface, affecting vehicle performance and ...
[38]
Force and Moment Testing | Tire and Wheel - Smithers
Cornering force plots can be compared to indicate steering gain ... Our MTS Flat-Trac III and CT Plus can test tire loads up to 5500 lb (25 kN) ...
[39]
Tire F&M Testing - MTS Systems
Flat-Trac Tire Testing Systems apply precise vertical, camber, steer, and drive/braking inputs to spinning tires on a flat surface to accurately measure force ...
[40]
g Masters - Lateral Acceleration Testing - MotorTrend
Jun 15, 2007 · It's the measure of lateral acceleration, also known as cornering force ... skidpad is still a good measure of most street cars' amount of stick.
[41]
Skid Pad Circle Test - Design News
Employing an accelerometer close to the CG of the vehicle, Consumer Reports testers drive around the skid pad circle, measuring maximum lateral G forces.Missing: cornering | Show results with:cornering<|control11|><|separator|>
[42]
ISO 4138:2021 - Steady-state circular driving behaviour
In stockISO 4138:2021 specifies open-loop test methods for determining the steady-state circular driving behaviour of passenger cars and light trucks.
[43]
Steady state cornering characteristics cf. ISO 4138 of a BMW HAN ...
Jun 21, 2025 · This test was done on a real vehicle (BMW i320) in order to determine the characteristics of the vehicle under steady-state cornering conditions ...
[44]
Typical setup for optical tire sensor (left) - ResearchGate
This paper studies strain-based intelligent tire contact patch length and vertical force estimation; first, a 205/55R16 radial tire was established, and static ...
[45]
Case Study: Verifying Tire Contact Loss During Extreme Cornering
Calspan conducted a test using Tekscan's High Speed TireScan system on a tire subjected to 9 kN of lateral shear force during a high-speed cornering maneuver.<|control11|><|separator|>
[46]
Prediction of automobile tire cornering force characteristics by finite ...
Cornering tests on the modeled tire are performed using the tire testing setup developed during this research to validate the results obtained using the finite ...
[47]
Modeling and Validation of a Passenger Car Tire Using Finite ...
Feb 9, 2024 · The cornering simulation was also performed to extract the lateral force of the tire under the state stage. The results were validated using the ...