Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Cursing of the fig tree

The Cursing of the Fig Tree is a recounted in the Gospels of and , in which , upon finding no fruit on a leafy , although it was not the season for figs, pronounces a upon it, declaring, "May no fruit ever come from you again," resulting in the tree withering from the roots. This event occurs during ' final week in , shortly after his triumphal entry and amid rising tensions with religious authorities, positioning it between accounts of the cleansing and confrontations over ' authority. Scholars interpret the act as richly symbolic, with the barren fig tree representing Israel's spiritual fruitlessness, particularly the of its religious leaders who maintained an outward show of without genuine or . The fig tree motif draws from prophetic imagery, where figs symbolize and its covenant faithfulness—or lack thereof—as seen in passages like 8:13 and 9:10. In the narrative structure of , the cursing frames the temple incident, equating the fruitless tree with the corrupted system, which condemns as a "den of robbers" rather than a house of , foreshadowing the temple's destruction in 70 . Following the , uses the withered to teach his disciples about the power of , stating that with unwavering , they could command mountains to be thrown into the , emphasizing prayer without doubt as key to effective discipleship. This didactic element underscores the event's role not merely as a display of divine but as a parable-like on and judgment, contrasting fruitless with the faithful life modeled. While some interpretations view the curse more literally as an expression of ' human frustration amid hunger during season, the predominant scholarly consensus aligns it with prophetic symbolism critiquing institutional .

Background and Symbolism

The Fig Tree in Hebrew Scripture

In ancient , the fig tree (Ficus carica) held significant agricultural importance as one of the seven symbolizing the land's fertility and abundance, providing nutritious fruit in both fresh and dried forms, shade, and economic value through trade and sustenance for the population. Its cultivation dated back millennia, with biblical references highlighting its role in daily life, such as the spies carrying fig clusters from as evidence of the land's productivity (Numbers 13:23). The tree's prosperity often represented divine blessing and national well-being, as seen in expressions of where "everyone shall sit under his vine and under his fig tree" (1 Kings 4:25; Micah 4:4). Throughout the Hebrew Scriptures, the fig tree recurs as a for Israel's spiritual health and relationship with , embodying themes of fruitfulness under obedience and desolation under disobedience. In 9:10, the prophet likens 's discovery of in the to finding "the first fruit on the fig tree in its first season," portraying the nation's initial and delight as a precious, early symbolizing divine favor and potential for spiritual vitality. This positive imagery contrasts with later prophetic warnings, where the tree's barrenness illustrates unfruitful fidelity and impending judgment. Jeremiah employs the fig tree motif extensively to depict Israel's spiritual barrenness amid and . In Jeremiah 8:13, the prophet declares, "There will be no figs on the tree... though the tree looks full of fruit," signifying a deceptive outward appearance masking inner emptiness and for breach. Similarly, Jeremiah 24:1-10 contrasts baskets of good figs—representing the faithful exiles in who will be restored—with bad, inedible figs symbolizing the unrepentant leaders left in destined for destruction, underscoring the tree as an emblem of moral discernment and eschatological sorting. Micah 7:1 extends the imagery to a personal and national , where the speaker mourns, "There is no cluster to eat... the first-ripe that my desires is not there," transforming individual over into a broader of societal and spiritual unproductivity under God's . Joel 1:7 and 1:12 further portray the fig tree's devastation by locusts as a direct sign of divine wrath, with the prophet describing how "it has laid waste my ... the tree splinters" and "the of our hearts has withered away," linking agricultural ruin to the withdrawal of God's due to the people's sins. The motif of the fig tree's barrenness or withering consistently signifies a divine in response to , disobedience, and failure to bear righteous "fruit," establishing a prophetic of that echoes Israel's collective accountability before . This scriptural provides foundational continuity for later depictions of divine assessment in the .

Cultural and Historical Context

Fig trees (Ficus carica) were among the most prevalent and economically vital crops in first-century Judean , cultivated extensively across the region's fertile valleys and hillsides for their reliable yields of nutritious fruit. As one of the seven species emblematic of the land's bounty, figs served as a source, providing fresh early summer delicacies and dried preserves for year-round consumption, while their broad, heart-shaped leaves offered essential shade in the hot for travelers, laborers, and communal gatherings. The historian highlighted the fig's prominence in his description of the Gennesaret plain, noting that it, alongside grapes, supplied fruit continuously for ten months of the year, underscoring its role in sustaining local populations and trade. In daily life, fig trees dotted rural landscapes and urban outskirts, contributing to diets rich in carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals, and even featuring in seasonal practices such as the offering of early-ripening figs as firstfruits during agricultural festivals. The fig's budding and fruiting patterns were well-documented in ancient Jewish sources, with varieties known to produce early growth even outside the typical to , a trait that reflected the adaptability of Judean . The , compiling oral traditions from the period, references early-ripening figs as exemplars for designating firstfruits, indicating their swift maturation once leaves emerged, often as early as late winter or early spring in milder microclimates. similarly attests to the extended fruiting cycle, attributing it to the soil's fertility, which allowed figs to bud and yield prematurely compared to other regions. This variability informed expectations of fruit presence on leafy trees year-round, including during transitional seasons. In , such as the , fig trees featured prominently in parables emphasizing fruitfulness as a for diligent observance and ethical living; for instance, the sustained productivity of the fig—bearing fruit over extended periods when tended—symbolized the enduring rewards of righteous study and practice. One Talmudic tale recounts an elder planting a fig tree despite his advanced age, illustrating faith in future generations' benefit from present labors, akin to investing in spiritual legacy. In the broader , figs carried symbolic weight as emblems of fertility and abundance, often linked to Dionysian cults where the tree's milky sap evoked and its fruit represented revelry and procreation, as seen in myths attributing fig discovery to himself. Jewish traditions, rooted in , diverged sharply from these pagan associations, instead integrating the into narratives of covenantal and moral instruction without erotic or idolatrous connotations, as evidenced in post-Temple rabbinic texts that prioritized its role in sustenance and symbolism of divine blessing. In first-century , fig cultivation was integral to the urban periphery, with archaeological evidence from Hellenistic and strata revealing fig tree imprints on sherds, confirming local and growth in the city's environs. Terraced hillsides surrounding the city, including areas near temple access roads like those from , supported dense fig orchards irrigated by seasonal rains, facilitating their proximity to pilgrimage routes. During , the festival's influx of visitors heightened the fig's practical and potential symbolic role, as early buds or stored dried fruits provided sustenance amid ritual observances, though such acts remained grounded in everyday agricultural rhythms rather than formalized rites. This setting contextualizes the "out of season" observation in Mark's account, as Judean figs were prone to unexpected early budding due to climatic variations.

Canonical Gospel Accounts

Gospel of Mark

In the , the cursing of the fig tree is recounted in :12–14 and 11:20–25, forming a narrative that spans two days and integrates a with subsequent teaching. On the first day, as and his disciples travel from to , , being hungry, approaches a fig tree in but finds no fruit on it, since it was not the season for figs. He then curses the tree, declaring, "May no one ever eat from you again," and the disciples hear him. The next morning, as they pass by the same location, the disciples notice that the fig tree has withered from the roots, prompting Peter's exclamation of amazement, to which responds by emphasizing in . This episode is strategically placed within Mark's Gospel, bookending the account of Jesus cleansing the (:15–19), creating an that frames the action with the fig tree . The leafy yet barren fig tree, observed out of season, symbolically parallels the as an institution that appears vital but fails to bear spiritual fruit, underscoring themes of on unproductiveness. In text, the term sykea denotes the fig tree, and the parachrema (immediately) highlights the rapid withering in the narrative's second stage, distinguishing Mark's portrayal as a two-part —curse on day one, visible effect on day two—unlike more instantaneous depictions elsewhere. Following the disciples' wonder, Jesus delivers a teaching on , , and in :22–25, instructing them to "have in " and assuring that unwavering in can accomplish the impossible, such as moving a mountain into the sea. He further links this to the necessity of forgiving others to receive from , tying personal to communal ethics. This passage forward-references the in :28–29, where uses the fig tree's budding leaves as a sign that summer—and by extension, the end times—is near, reinforcing the tree's role as a prophetic emblem.

Gospel of Matthew

In the , the cursing of the fig tree is recounted in chapter 21, verses 18–22, as a pivotal event during ' final week in . Early in the morning, while returning to the city, experiences hunger and approaches a fig tree by the road, finding only leaves but no fruit. He declares to it, “May you never bear fruit again!” and the tree withers immediately. The disciples, witnessing this, express amazement at the rapid withering, prompting to teach them about the power of . This episode unfolds as a single-day , condensed from a similar in , and is strategically placed immediately after ' (Matthew 21:12–17), highlighting themes of against religious and fruitlessness. The cleansing, where overturns tables and drives out merchants, critiques the corruption of sacred space, and the fig tree's barrenness serves as a symbolic extension of this condemnation, portraying unproductivity in spiritual leadership. The account connects eschatologically to the Olivet Discourse later in Matthew (24:32–35), where Jesus instructs the disciples to learn from the fig tree: as its twigs tender and leaves appear, signaling summer's nearness, so the signs of the end times indicate the Son of Man's approach is imminent. He emphasizes, “Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened,” linking the tree's imagery to urgent apocalyptic timing and the reliability of his words amid cosmic change. Matthew's version uniquely emphasizes the Aramaic-derived “amen” (translated as “Truly I tell you”) in ' response to the disciples, underscoring the solemnity of his teaching on without : believers can not only replicate the tree's withering but command a mountain to throw itself into the sea, and through prayerful belief, receive whatever they ask. This motif parallels other Matthean miracles, such as ( 8:23–27), where he rebukes the disciples' amid nature's chaos, reinforcing as the key to overcoming impossibility. The symbolism of the barren fig tree as a sign of judgment is shared with account, though integrates it more tightly with critique and .

Gospel of Luke

In the , the account of the fig tree appears as a within ' Galilean ministry, specifically in Luke 13:6–9, following a discussion of recent tragedies reported to Jesus, including Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with their sacrifices and eighteen people killed by the fall of the tower in Siloam (Luke 13:1–5). uses these events to challenge assumptions that suffering indicates greater sinfulness, instead urging his audience twice: "unless you , you will all perish just as they did" (Luke 13:3, 5). This context frames the as an illustration of the urgency of amid divine forbearance. The describes a man who owns a fig tree planted in his and comes seeking for three years but finds none. Frustrated, he instructs the vinedresser to cut it down, questioning why it should continue to exhaust the soil. The vinedresser intercedes, pleading: "Sir, let it alone for one more year, until I dig around it and put on it. If it bears , well and good; but if not, you can cut it down" (Luke 13:8–9). This narrative emphasizes the owner's expectation of productivity and the caretaker's appeal for additional cultivation, highlighting a moment of potential reprieve. Central to Luke's presentation are themes of God's and in delaying , allowing time for and fruit-bearing worthy of a renewed life (cf. :8). The barren tree symbolizes unfruitful existence under divine care, while the reflects God's , offering one final opportunity for before consequences ensue. The mention of "three years" underscores prolonged barrenness despite ample opportunity, possibly evoking the duration of ' as a period of expectant . The owner's frustration mirrors divine anticipation for faithfulness, yet the parable concludes openly, without resolving the tree's fate, to stress communal responsibility for . Unlike the miracle accounts in :12–14, 20–21 and 21:18–22, where enacts immediate on a barren fig tree, Luke's version presents a metaphorical on as a redactional emphasis on delayed and for .

Apocryphal and Early Christian Texts

Infancy Gospel of Thomas

The , a second-century apocryphal text, presents a series of childhood attributed to , emphasizing his divine authority from an early age while often depicting him as impulsive and quick to wield power punitively. Composed as falsely attributed to the apostle , the narrative fills gaps in the canonical accounts by focusing on ' life between ages five and twelve, portraying him as a wonder-working who both heals and harms in response to perceived slights. A key episode in chapter 3 (in the standard Greek A ) involves the cursing the son of the , who had disrupted the pools of water had miraculously formed while playing by a stream. Angered by the interference, Jesus declares, "You godless, brainless moron, what did the ponds and waters do to you? Watch this now: you are going to dry up like a and you will never produce leaves or roots or fruit," causing the boy to wither up completely and die. This serves as an early demonstration of Jesus' power, but it highlights a volatile , as the curse stems from childish annoyance rather than moral instruction, leading the villagers to complain to about the dangers of his son. Scholars date the composition of the Infancy Gospel of Thomas to the mid-second century CE, likely originating in a Greek-speaking Christian community outside the orthodox mainstream, as evidenced by its exclusion from the New Testament canon due to its unorthodox portrayal of Jesus. The text survives in multiple manuscript traditions, including Greek (the earliest fragments from the fifth-sixth centuries), Syriac (with variants from the sixth century onward), Latin, Slavonic, Georgian, and Ethiopic versions, reflecting its widespread circulation in early Christian folklore. These variants sometimes alter details of the miracles, but the core narrative of youthful prodigies persisted, influencing later apocryphal works like the Arabic Infancy Gospel and medieval legends of child saints. Unlike the Gospel accounts, which depict the cursing of a fig tree during ' adult ministry as a symbolic act tied to themes of judgment and faith, the Infancy Gospel episode centers on a punitive against a playmate, transforming the withering into a literal, immediate within a childhood context. This loose thematic similarity—both involving a that causes rapid withering—highlights early Christian fascination with ' miraculous potency, though the apocryphal version lacks the symbolic depth of the biblical narratives.

Patristic Interpretations

Early from the 2nd to 5th centuries interpreted the cursing of the fig tree in the canonical Gospels allegorically, often viewing it as a prophetic act of judgment on Israel's spiritual unfruitfulness, influenced by the destruction of the in 70 . This bridged the Gospel narratives with emerging , emphasizing the transition from the old covenant to the new, symbolized by the Church's fruitfulness. Common motifs included the fig tree representing the or Judaism's failure to produce the "fruit" of in Christ, leading to its withering as a sign of divine rejection and supersession. Origen of Alexandria (c. 185–254 CE), in his Commentary on Matthew (Book 16), allegorically linked the withered fig tree to the and Israel as a whole, portraying it as eternally barren due to its , with the temple's desolation fulfilling the curse as a prophecy of the old order's end. (c. 347–420 CE), in his Commentary on Matthew, similarly identified the fig tree as the , positioned "nigh to the way" through possession of the yet failing to recognize its Author; Jesus' curse thus condemns its unbelief, resulting in immediate withering and the transfer of God's to the faithful. (c. 339–397 CE), commenting on the related parable of the barren fig tree in Luke 13:6–9 in his Exposition on Luke, saw the tree as emblematic of the under God's care, urged toward by Christ's as the vinedresser, who delays to allow for fruitfulness amid the people's hardness of heart. Augustine of Hippo (354–430 ), in his Harmony of the Gospels (, Chapter 68), focused less on anti-Judaic symbolism and more on the miracle's demonstration of faith's transformative power, noting the disciples' astonishment at the tree's withering and ' subsequent teaching that unwavering could "move mountains," underscoring the event as an exemplar of and trust in God over natural impossibilities. These interpretations integrated the episode with broader patristic anti-Judaic theology, rejecting non- parallels in favor of canonical texts to affirm the Church's role as the fruitful successor, while homilies like Ambrose's highlighted as the path to averting similar judgment.

Theological and Scholarly Interpretations

Core Themes of Judgment and Faith

The cursing of the fig tree in the serves as a powerful emblem of against spiritual unfruitfulness, particularly portraying as a nation that displays outward vitality—symbolized by leaves—yet fails to produce the expected fruit of righteousness and obedience. This motif draws from Hebrew Scripture, where the fig tree frequently represents 's covenant relationship with God, as seen in prophetic warnings of barrenness leading to desolation (e.g., 8:13). In the accounts, the tree's curse prefigures the impending destruction of the in 70 and broader eschatological reckoning, critiquing the religious establishment's akin to a "den of robbers" that prioritizes externals over genuine devotion. Central to the event's theological significance is the theme of faith as the conduit for divine power, illustrated through Jesus' post-miracle teachings on the efficacy of prayer. Believers are exhorted to exercise unwavering faith, capable of "moving mountains" as a metaphor for overcoming formidable obstacles through trust in God, with the withered tree demonstrating the immediacy of such authority when aligned with divine will. Fruitfulness emerges as tangible evidence of authentic belief, contrasting the tree's barrenness with the expectation that true faith yields spiritual productivity, while forgiveness toward others is presented as an essential prerequisite for receiving answered prayer. These themes interconnect to underscore a of religious superficiality, where the fig tree's leaves without fruit expose the peril of performative piety devoid of internal transformation and . The narrative calls for heartfelt , warning against that invites while urging a shift toward genuine fidelity. In Luke's presentation, this balance is accentuated through a merciful delay in , as the of the barren fig tree allows additional time for cultivation and before any final reckoning, tempering the severity found in and . The episode resonates with broader motifs of accountability, paralleling the of the wicked tenants in which unfaithful stewards face expulsion from the , symbolizing Israel's leadership and the consequences of rejecting God's messengers. It also echoes warnings to disciples about bearing in keeping with , reinforcing the dual emphasis on for unproductivity and the transformative power of across the Gospels.

Modern Perspectives

In the wake of the Holocaust, scholars have critiqued traditional supersessionist readings of the cursing of the fig tree that portray it as divine rejection of Judaism, reframing it instead as an intra-Jewish prophetic critique of corrupt Temple leadership. Post-Holocaust theological reflections emphasize avoiding anti-Semitic interpretations, such as viewing the withered tree as a symbol of God's curse on Israel or the Temple, which historically fueled anti-Judaic sentiment. For instance, a 2023 analysis argues that the event functions as an imprecatory prayer against exploitative practices within Judaism, signaling judgment for repentance and restoration rather than replacement theology, thereby affirming God's ongoing covenant with Israel. Recent scholarly works from the onward extend these interpretations into symbolic prophecy and contemporary applications. Theologian Greg Boyd interprets the curse as a messianic act "cursing the curse" of demonic corruption on creation, symbolizing ' victory over Satan's dominion and promising restoration of abundant nature free from famine. A 2023 eco-theological reading highlights the fig tree's cultural and economic role in first-century , using the narrative to caution against premature judgment on unfruitful systems and advocating patience for repentance, with implications for modern and ethical . Diverse modern perspectives draw on the episode for ethical and social insights. views the curse as a rebuke to creation's unfruitfulness, empowering marginalized voices—particularly Black women—to confront systemic starvation and reclaim authority against deceptive religious structures. perspectives see it as Jesus' solidarity with the oppressed, critiquing institutional and corruption that exclude Gentiles and the poor, calling for inclusive over oppressive . Some analyses frame the act psychologically as a non-violent symbolic against , modeling bold confrontation of fruitless faith without physical harm, akin to the cleansing. Ongoing scholarly debates center on the pericope's , redactional shaping, and cultural relevance. While some posit an early historical kernel from a Jerusalemite source around 40 , possibly an aetiological legend tied to a real withered , others view it primarily as Markan for amid judgment, questioning a literal event due to its unique destructive nature in the Gospels. notes Luke's omission of the curse, replacing it with a merciful (Luke 13:6–9) to emphasize delayed judgment and over immediate withering, reflecting a theological softening for a post-Temple audience. A 2017 analysis applies the narrative to as an unfruitful modern institution, urging self-examination of in religious and social systems to foster genuine and .

References

  1. [1]
    Why Did Jesus Curse a Fig Tree? (Matthew 21)
    ### Summary of Jesus Cursing the Fig Tree (Matthew 21)
  2. [2]
    Making Sense of Jesus Cursing the Fig Tree - Gutenberg College
    The literal action of the passage is this: Jesus is hungry, and when he does not find figs on the tree, he curses it. Apparently, he curses the tree out of ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] chapter seventeen - a new interpretation of jesus' cursing the fig tree
    It was in this area where Jesus cursed a barren fig tree. The unripe figs were not considered proper as food to be served in a Sabbath meal (Babylonian. Talmud ...
  4. [4]
    Fig Trees (BiblePlaces.com)
    ### Summary of Fig Trees in Ancient Israel (BiblePlaces.com)
  5. [5]
    (PDF) The Eschatological Significance of the Fig Tree - Academia.edu
    Additionally, it serves as a metaphor for Israel's spiritual state, reflecting both fruitfulness and impending judgment.
  6. [6]
    https://www.jerusalemperspective.com/579/
  7. [7]
    Fig - Keren Kayemeth LeIsrael - KKL-JNF
    Of all the fruit trees found in Israel, none has the central status and importance attached to the fig, which is scattered widely among the country's mountains.<|control11|><|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Jerusalem Talmud Bikkurim 3:1 - Sefaria
    MISHNAH: How does one designate First Fruits? A person comes into his field and there sees an early ripening fig, an early ripening bunch of grapes, an early ...
  9. [9]
    Chapter V - Chabad.org
    A fig tree produces fruit throughout the entire time that a person pays attention to it (i.e., it does not produce its fruit only at one time; instead, today, ...
  10. [10]
    The Old Man and the Fig Tree - Chabad.org
    There is a story in the Talmud of an old guy who was seen planting a fig tree. The people who observed him asked, "Do you really expect to live long enough ...
  11. [11]
    Associations and Symbols of Dionysos - The Thyrsus
    Jun 26, 2025 · Walter Otto notes that the latex sap of the fig tree resembles semen, which may explain why the fig tree is sacred to Dionysos and linked to the ...
  12. [12]
    The History of the Fig in the Holy Land from Ancient Times to ... - jstor
    The fig is the first fruit tree mentioned in the Bible, in the story of Adam and Eve: "And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked ...Missing: analysis | Show results with:analysis
  13. [13]
    Plant Imprints on Pottery Reveal Fig Tree in Hellenistic Jerusalem
    cultural relationships with plants. We examined 15 sherds with plant imprints retrieved from Hellenistic strata from the Givcati Parking Lot, Jerusalem.
  14. [14]
    Terraces in Ancient Jerusalem
    Farmers harvested grapes, olives, pomegranates and figs that had been watered solely by rainfall. Archaeological Evidence. We know about these terraces from ...
  15. [15]
    Bible Gateway passage: Matthew 21:18-22 - New International Version
    ### Extracted Text: Matthew 21:18-22 (NIV)
  16. [16]
    Jesus Curses the Fig Tree - Fuller Theological Seminary
    Thus the fig tree's cursing seems to make most sense as a symbolic action, to be interpreted in the light of Jesus' attitude towards the temple, and perhaps ...Missing: analysis | Show results with:analysis
  17. [17]
    Bible Gateway passage: Matthew 24:32-35 - New International Version
    ### Extracted Text
  18. [18]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2013%3A1-9&version=NRSVUE
  19. [19]
    Commentary on Luke 13:1-9 - Working Preacher from Luther Seminary
    The implication to be drawn from the parable is that God is patient, which gives Jesus' hearers time for repentance, but there is a limit.
  20. [20]
    Commentary on Luke 13:1-9 - Working Preacher from Luther Seminary
    The parable of Luke 13:6-9 presses upon the listeners the importance of repenting soon. An owner planted a fig tree and, after three years, came looking for the ...
  21. [21]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+13%3A6-9&version=NRSVUE
  22. [22]
    Two ancient theologians' interpretations of the withered fig tree (Mt ...
    Jul 6, 2021 · -Chrysostom then concludes his sermon with a doxology: 'To whom (be) the glory and the power, now and always, and into the ages of ages. Amen'.
  23. [23]
    What is the meaning of the Parable of the Fig Tree? | GotQuestions.org
    Jan 9, 2024 · The moral of that story is found in Luke 13:3: “Unless you repent, you will likewise perish.” To reiterate this moral, Jesus tells the story of ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  24. [24]
    Infancy Gospel of Thomas - Tony Burke
    The Infancy Gospel of Thomas (IGT) is a second-century collection of tales of the young Jesus from the ages of five to twelve.Missing: scholarly introduction
  25. [25]
    Infancy Gospel of Thomas - Early Christian Writings
    Infancy Gospel of Thomas. The following translation is based on the Greek text printed in Ronald F. Hock's The Infancy Gospels of James and Thomas.
  26. [26]
    The Infancy Gospel of Thomas from an Unpublished Syriac Manuscript
    Jul 3, 2018 · Tony Burke, "The Infancy Gospel of Thomas from an Unpublished Syriac Manuscript: Introduction, Text, Translation, and Notes." Hugoye: Journal of ...
  27. [27]
    St. Thomas Aquinas: Catena Aurea - Gospel of Matthew
    Jerome: The tree which He saw by the wayside we understand as the synagogue, which was nigh to the way inasmuch as it had the Law, but yet believed not on the ...
  28. [28]
    LUKE CHAP. 13 - Catena Aurea by St. Thomas Aquinas
    Mystically the unfruitful fig tree signifies the woman that was bowed down. For human nature of its own will rushes into sin, and as it would not bring forth ...
  29. [29]
    Harmony of the Gospels, Book II, Chapter 68 (Augustine) - New Advent
    ... fig-tree which You cursed is withered away. Then, too, he informs us that He gave the answer relating to the power of faith. On the other hand, Matthew ...
  30. [30]
    Why Did Jesus Curse the Fig Tree? - The Gospel Coalition
    Oct 2, 2018 · Several times the prophets describe God as inspecting Israel for “early figs,” as a sign of spiritual fruitfulness (Mic. 7:1; Jer. 8:13; Hos. 9: ...Missing: Judea | Show results with:Judea
  31. [31]
    Echoes of a New Ingathering and Renewed Exile (Mark 11.12–21)
    Dec 9, 2021 · This article considers Mark's account of the cursing of the fig tree, read in conjunction with Jesus' temple action.
  32. [32]
    (PDF) CURSING OF THE BARREN FIG TREE (MARK 11:12-14
    Sep 27, 2023 · The paper attempts to study exegetically the text and its context in Mark in an effort to bring out implications for Catholic Christians in Nigeria.
  33. [33]
    Luke Makes Jesus More Patient with the Fig Tree - Vridar
    Jan 17, 2018 · Luke removed Mark's episode of Jesus cursing the fig tree and replaced it with a far more merciful one.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Bearing Faithful Witness - Ecumenism in Canada
    The cursing and withering of the fig tree (a Jewish symbol) has been interpreted as symbolizing that the Temple and Israel are under God's curse (11:12–14 ...
  35. [35]
    A Post-Supersessionist Reading of the Temple and Torah in Mark's ...
    Apr 4, 2023 · ... curse, it could also be an imprecatory prayer (cf. Acts 8:20; Jude 9), which is a prayer that invokes judgment, calamity, or curses as in Ps ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  36. [36]
    Why Did Jesus Curse the Fig Tree? - Greg Boyd - ReKnew
    Sep 1, 2015 · Most commentators argue that the fig tree represented Israel and Jesus was symbolically warning that judgment was coming if it didn't start ...Missing: prophecy | Show results with:prophecy
  37. [37]
    Reading Matthew 21.18–22.14 with the Fig Tree - ResearchGate
    This article engages the cultural, economic, and ecological significance of fig trees in first-century Syrio-Palestine in conversation with the cursing of the ...
  38. [38]
    An Open Rebuke to Creation - WomanPreach! Inc.
    Apr 3, 2024 · The rebuke of the fig tree is a condemnation of religious practices that prohibit the life of creation. As a millennial womanist preacher, the ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    How the Fig Tree that Jesus Cursed Represents Nationalism - PCPJ
    Mar 8, 2017 · The cursing of the fig tree is a prophetic act that hints at what might happen in Jerusalem. When Jesus arrives in Jerusalem he makes his way to ...
  40. [40]
    None
    ### Summary of Scholarly Debate on Historicity and Redaction Criticism of the Fig Tree Pericope