Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

DCMU

DCMU, chemically known as 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea with the molecular C₉H₁₀Cl₂N₂O, is a synthetic phenylurea employed primarily as a and algicide. It functions by competitively binding to the Q_B site on the protein of in chloroplasts, thereby inhibiting the transfer of electrons from Q_A to the pool, which disrupts the of and leads to the cessation of ATP and NADPH production required for plant growth. This selective toxicity targets weeds and algae while sparing most crops when applied pre-emergently to soil. Commercialized by in 1954 under the trade name Diuron, DCMU rapidly gained adoption for controlling annual and perennial broadleaf and grassy weeds in crops including , , cereals, and vineyards, as well as for non-selective vegetation management on non-crop lands and as a sterilant under brands like Karmex. Its persistence in —lasting several months depending on conditions—provides extended residual control but contributes to runoff into waterways, where low concentrations can impair in aquatic plants and algae, posing risks to ecosystems. Empirical studies have documented DCMU's moderate to mammals but highlight concerns, including classification by the U.S. EPA as a "likely" based on increased tumor incidence in bioassays, alongside immunotoxic effects such as reduced T-cell function observed . Environmentally, its potential and disruption of non-target have prompted regulatory restrictions in various jurisdictions, including bans on certain uses in the due to contamination exceeding thresholds, underscoring trade-offs between agricultural efficacy and ecological safety.

History

Discovery and Early Development

DuPont researchers initiated systematic screening of substituted phenylurea derivatives in the early as potential herbicides, following the successful identification of monuron (N,N-dimethyl-N'-p-chlorophenylurea) in 1952, which exhibited pre-emergence through disruption of plant metabolic processes. Diuron, chemically 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea and commonly abbreviated DCMU, emerged from this program through synthesis of structural analogs aimed at enhancing efficacy and selectivity against broadleaf weeds and grasses. Initial synthesis and preliminary bioassays occurred circa 1953, with empirical tests revealing dose-dependent inhibition of emergence and growth in target species while sparing certain crops due to differential uptake and persistence in soil. Key experiments in the mid-1950s employed isolated preparations to quantify photosynthetic inhibition, adapting the Hill reaction—a photoreduction measuring coupled to acceptors—to evaluate compound effects on activity. These biochemical assays demonstrated DCMU's potent blockade of non-cyclic at sub-micromolar concentrations, correlating with observed herbicidal symptoms such as and in treated plants, thereby establishing a causal link between photosynthetic disruption and weed mortality independent of other toxicity modes. Field trials conducted by in 1954 further validated selectivity, showing effective control of annual weeds in and at application rates of 1-4 pounds per acre without significant crop under optimal and moisture conditions. Initial patent filings by , culminating in U.S. registration as a in 1954 under the trade name Karmex, reflected these findings and shifted focus from exploratory algicidal properties—observed in aqueous suspensions against aquatic weeds—to terrestrial pre- and post-emergence applications based on replicated trial data demonstrating superior residual activity over predecessors like monuron. This empirical progression underscored DCMU's viability as a non-selective soil-applied , with early limitations in and addressed through refinements prior to broader adoption.

Commercialization and Widespread Adoption

Diuron, commercially introduced under trade names such as by , received initial U.S. EPA registration on March 8, 1954, marking its entry as a selective for non-crop and agricultural . Early applications focused on pre-emergent suppression of broadleaf and grassy weeds, with rapid adoption in major crops including , , and by the early 1960s, driven by its efficacy in soil residual control lasting several months. This timeline aligned with post-World War II advancements in synthetic herbicides, enabling farmers to reduce mechanical cultivation and tillage, thereby minimizing and labor costs. Global usage expanded significantly through the and , coinciding with peak application rates in U.S. , where diuron accounted for substantial portions of in row like —comprising about 65% of its agricultural pounds applied. In regions such as the U.S. Southwest and , , diuron's integration into pre-plant and layby treatments supported consistent weed suppression, contributing to stabilized or enhanced yields by preventing from like morningglories in . Empirical data from agricultural surveys link such programs, including diuron, to overall gains in herbicide-reliant systems, though specific causal attribution to diuron alone varies by and rotation practices. By the 1990s, diuron evolved within (IPM) frameworks, often tank-mixed with contact herbicides for broader spectrum control and to delay resistance development in target weeds. While resistance to PSII-inhibiting ureas like diuron has emerged sporadically since the in weeds such as Lolium rigidum, its lower incidence compared to triazines prompted continued reliance in rotation strategies, sustaining adoption in non-crop areas and specialty crops into the . Recent regulatory reviews, including EPA reregistrations, affirm its role in modern weed management, with usage persisting in high-value systems despite shifts toward lower-residue alternatives.

Chemical Properties and Synthesis

Molecular Structure and Physical Characteristics

DCMU, or 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethyl, features a ring with substituents at the meta and positions relative to the linkage, connected to a 1,1-dimethylurea moiety via an amide bond. This structure, with the formula C₉H₁₀Cl₂N₂O, yields a molecular weight of 233.09 g/mol. As a white crystalline solid, DCMU has a density of 1.48 g/cm³ and melts at 158 °C. Its low , approximately 6.9 × 10⁻⁸ mm Hg at 25 °C, indicates minimal under ambient conditions. The (log Kₒw) of 2.68 reflects moderate , influencing its partitioning between aqueous and organic phases.
PropertyValueConditions
Water solubility37.5 mg/L25 °C
1.1 × 10⁻³ mPa25 °C
log Kₒw2.68-
DCMU demonstrates across a range of values and temperatures typical of environmental and storage conditions, with no significant observed under neutral to mildly acidic or basic aqueous environments. Spectroscopic , including UV absorption with maxima around 250-260 nm attributable to the aromatic and functionalities, facilitates its detection in analytical methods.

Synthetic Production Methods

DCMU, or 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, is primarily synthesized on an industrial scale through the of to 3,4-dichlorophenyl , forming the urea linkage. This exothermic reaction is typically conducted in an inert organic solvent such as or at temperatures between 0–20°C to control side reactions and ensure selectivity, followed by or to isolate the product with purity exceeding 98%. The process achieves overall yields of approximately 90–95% from the intermediate, depending on reaction scale and purification efficiency. The 3,4-dichlorophenyl isocyanate precursor is generated from 3,4-dichloroaniline via carbonylation, traditionally using phosgene gas in the presence of a base like triethylamine, though safer alternatives such as triphosgene (bis(trichloromethyl) carbonate) with catalysts like pyridine are increasingly employed to reduce handling risks associated with phosgene's high toxicity. This step requires anhydrous conditions and inert atmospheres to prevent hydrolysis, with the isocyanate isolated by distillation under reduced pressure. Commercial adaptations optimize precursor purity to minimize impurities like unreacted aniline, which could affect herbicide efficacy. An alternative route for cost-sensitive production involves direct condensation of 3,4-dichloroaniline with dimethylcarbamoyl chloride in the presence of a base such as , bypassing isolation and potentially lowering capital costs for facilities avoiding infrastructure. This method, while yielding comparable product quality after solvent extraction and recrystallization from or , may introduce chlorinated byproducts requiring additional . Yields in this pathway range from 85–92%, with scalability enhanced by continuous-flow reactors to manage the chloride's reactivity. Scale-up to multi-tonne emphasizes enclosed systems with automated and controls to handle the reaction's exothermicity, alongside and scrubbing units for volatile amines and . Safety protocols include rated for respiratory and dermal hazards, as well as emergency neutralization procedures using aqueous for spills, ensuring compliance with occupational exposure limits below 0.02 mg/m³ for phosgene derivatives. These measures address the intermediates' irritant and sensitizing properties while maintaining process efficiency for global demand.

Applications and Efficacy

Primary Agricultural Uses

DCMU, commercially known as diuron, serves as a selective primarily for pre-emergent and early post-emergent control of annual broadleaf weeds and certain annual grasses, such as , lambsquarters, and foxtail species, in agricultural settings. It is applied to crops including , , , , and , where it targets weeds that compete with seedlings during establishment. In non-crop areas like orchards and vineyards, it provides residual weed suppression around tree bases to reduce competition and facilitate mechanical operations. Application rates vary by crop and weed pressure but typically range from 0.9 to 1.9 kg active ingredient per hectare, ensuring soil incorporation or surface retention for uptake by weed roots and shoots. For cotton in Queensland and New South Wales, pre-emergence applications of 1-1.9 kg/ha are directed at planting or within seven days thereafter to suppress emergence of susceptible weeds without significant crop injury under labeled conditions. In sugarcane, rates up to 1.8 kg/ha are used within specified seasonal windows for directed spraying to minimize drift. Wheat applications often employ lower rates around 0.9 kg/ha post-emergence for selective grass and broadleaf control, integrated with cultivation practices. Common formulations include wettable powders (e.g., 80% or 900 g/kg diuron), dry flowable granules, and suspension concentrates, which facilitate uniform coverage when mixed with volumes of 300-450 /. These are deployed via ground sprayers or aircraft in some scenarios, with emphasis on complete coverage to maximize efficacy against germinating weeds. To broaden the spectrum against resistant or mixed weed populations, diuron is frequently tank-mixed with complementary herbicides, such as those targeting grasses or perennials, provided is verified to prevent or . Manufacturer guidelines recommend testing small areas first to assess , as mixtures can heighten risks while enhancing overall management without excessive standalone rates. Efficacy in field trials supports this approach, showing improved control when combined judiciously with products like bromacil in non-crop uses.

Performance in Weed Control and Crop Yield Benefits

Field trials have demonstrated diuron's efficacy in suppressing annual broadleaf weeds and grasses, with control rates ranging from 75% to over 90% depending on application rate, timing, and target species. For instance, pre-emergence applications at 0.36 kg per achieved 75% early-season control of broadleaf weeds in field crops, while higher rates of 650 g/ha yielded 92.2% suppression of dominant weeds like Commelina foecunda in fields. In perennial crops such as and strawberries, diuron provided over 90% weed reduction in initial years of application, maintaining low weed abundance through residual activity. This weed suppression translates to crop yield benefits by minimizing competition for resources like water, nutrients, and light. In sesame, diuron treatments with high efficacy resulted in statistically significant grain yield improvements compared to weedy controls, where unchecked weeds can reduce yields by up to 70% in similar systems. Broader agricultural data indicate that effective pre-emergence herbicides like diuron contribute to yield gains of 20-50% in weed-prone crops by sustaining plant vigor, particularly in labor-limited regions where manual weeding is impractical. Relative to manual weeding, diuron offers substantial labor and cost reductions, enabling timely control over larger areas without the intensive human input required for hand removal, which can consume 8-10 hours per versus mechanized application. This efficiency is pronounced in developing , where herbicide adoption has lowered overall expenses while boosting net returns through higher yields and reduced post-emergence interventions. Weed resistance to diuron has emerged since the 1980s, particularly in grasses like Italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne spp. multiflorum), with documented cases showing 2.4-fold resistance and shifts in weed communities after prolonged use. strategies include rotating with herbicides of different modes of action to delay resistance onset and preserve , as continuous reliance leads to weed resurgence and diminished control over time.

Mechanism of Action

Inhibition of Photosynthesis

DCMU, or 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, inhibits by binding to the QB plastoquinone-binding site on the protein of (PSII), thereby preventing the transfer of electrons from the primary acceptor to the secondary acceptor QB. This binding competes directly with , blocking its reduction and halting the reoxidation of , which disrupts the linear from PSII to plastoquinone. As a result, the photochemical of excited molecules ceases, leading to an accumulation of reduced and excitation energy that cannot be dissipated through productive electron . The interruption of electron transport at this site prevents the reduction of the pool, which is essential for downstream proton gradient formation and cyclic electron flow around PSII. Consequently, ATP and NADPH production in the of is severely impaired, depriving the Calvin-Benson cycle of reducing power and energy for carbon fixation. In susceptible , this biochemical blockade triggers photooxidative stress, as excess light energy generates (ROS) that damage PSII reaction centers and membranes, culminating in rapid (bleaching of ) and within 2-5 days of exposure, depending on and concentration. Selectivity arises from differences in foliar uptake, translocation, and metabolic between tolerant crops (e.g., , which conjugates DCMU to glucose for ) and susceptible weeds, allowing crops to avoid equivalent intracellular concentrations at the QB site. Empirical validation of this mechanism comes from assays, such as the Hill reaction, where DCMU inhibits electron transport from water to artificial acceptors like (DCPIP) with values typically ranging from 0.1 to 1 μM. spectroscopy further confirms the effect, showing a characteristic increase in minimal fluorescence () due to blocked reoxidation, as measured in isolated thylakoids exposed to DCMU concentrations as low as 1 μM. These assays, rooted in spectroscopic and measurements, demonstrate the causal link from QB site occupancy to photosynthetic shutdown without reliance on whole-plant phenotypes.

Molecular Interactions and Selectivity

DCMU exerts its inhibitory effect by binding competitively to the QB site within the protein (PsbA) of (PSII), blocking from QA to the plastoquinone pool. The binding niche, a hydrophobic cavity approximately 10-15 Å deep, accommodates the phenylurea moiety through van der Waals contacts with nonpolar residues like D1-Phe255, D1-Leu218, and D1-Phe265, while the urea forms a critical with the side chain of D1-His215, stabilizing the complex and mimicking plastoquinone orientation. These interactions, predominantly hydrophobic (contributing ~70-80% of binding affinity) with supplementary hydrogen bonding, have been elucidated through molecular modeling aligned with crystallographic structures of PSII at resolutions of 2.9-3.5 Å, which reveal the QB pocket's architecture despite challenges in co-crystallizing DCMU directly due to its displacement of endogenous quinones. Structure-activity studies confirm that increased hydrophobicity of the phenyl ring substituents enhances binding potency, correlating with values and inhibitory reductions in assays. Selectivity of DCMU toward weeds over tolerant crops stems primarily from physiological and metabolic differences rather than target-site variations, as the PSII QB site is highly conserved across species. Tolerant crops such as and exhibit enhanced via P450-mediated of the phenyl ring, followed by conjugation with by glutathione S-transferases (s), rendering the molecule inactive; for instance, GST activity in tolerant varieties can conjugate up to 50% of absorbed diuron within 24-48 hours post-application. Physical barriers, including thicker cuticles and reduced root uptake in mature crops, further limit accumulation at photosynthetic sites compared to susceptible annual weeds with higher rates (e.g., 2-5 times greater in sensitive spp.). The spectrum of DCMU is biased toward germinating annual broadleaves and grasses, with efficacy rates exceeding 90% at 1-2 kg/ha doses, due to its reliance on persistence and contact with emerging radicles or shoots. It shows limited effectiveness against established weeds, achieving <50% control, as these species possess extensive rhizomatous or taproot systems beyond the herbicide's shallow mobility zone (typically <10 cm depth) and lack sufficient translocation to underground meristems, necessitating integrated management with systemic or post-emergent alternatives. This limitation underscores application specificity to pre-emergence scenarios, avoiding reliance on DCMU for perennials where root reserves enable regrowth despite foliar contact.

Environmental Fate and Impacts

Persistence, Degradation, and Mobility

Diuron (DCMU) demonstrates moderate persistence in soil, with laboratory aerobic DT50 values typically ranging from 30 to 120 days, though field dissipation half-lives can extend to 300 days or more depending on microbial activity, temperature, and moisture. Primary degradation occurs via microbial hydrolysis, cleaving the urea linkage to form 3,4-dichloroaniline (3,4-DCA) as a key intermediate, followed by further mineralization to CO2 (up to 40% after 100 days in some soils); photodegradation contributes on exposed surfaces but is limited in depth. Its strong adsorption to soil organic carbon, characterized by Koc values of 300–800 L/kg across diverse soil types, restricts vertical mobility and leaching, classifying it as having low groundwater contamination potential under typical application rates. In aquatic systems, diuron exhibits greater persistence, with half-lives in water columns of 20–180 days under natural conditions, influenced by limited hydrolysis and photolysis rates in the presence of dissolved organics and particulates. Sediments act as sinks due to partitioning (Koc similar to soils), extending half-lives to months or longer, though anaerobic degradation can accelerate breakdown to and simpler compounds. Runoff monitoring in agricultural watersheds shows concentrations diluting rapidly through dispersion and sedimentation, with detected levels rarely exceeding 1–10 μg/L beyond application sites. Bioaccumulation potential remains low, evidenced by fish BCF values below 100 (often <20), attributable to poor uptake efficiency and rapid excretion; transformation products like 3,4-DCA exhibit even lower bioaccumulation (BCF ~2–10) and shorter environmental half-lives due to enhanced reactivity and microbial transformation. Overall mobility is constrained by sorption dominance over solubility (36 mg/L), minimizing long-range transport except in high-runoff events on low-organic soils.

Effects on Non-Target Ecosystems

DCMU exerts its primary non-target effects in aquatic ecosystems through inhibition of photosystem II in photosynthetic organisms, affecting algae and microalgae at concentrations as low as 0.02–2 μg/L. Laboratory studies demonstrate reduced photosynthetic efficiency (e.g., Fv/Fm and rETRmax) and potential shifts in phytoplankton community structure at these levels, with chronic exposure leading to sustained impairment in some cases. Field-relevant assessments, including detections of up to 19 μg/L in runoff-impacted waterways, suggest risks to benthic biofilms and microphytobenthos, though partial recovery of photosynthetic parameters occurs post-exposure to 20–30 μg/L within 2–16 hours. In intertidal and coastal sediments, DCMU disrupts microphytobenthos vertical migration minimally at ≤60 μg/L but inhibits biomass accumulation and primary production, potentially altering grazer communities indirectly; however, ecosystem-level recovery is observed following transient pulses typical of agricultural runoff. While laboratory models predict synergies with stressors like light reduction, amplifying inhibition, field monitoring indicates that exposure rarely exceeds no-effect thresholds (e.g., 10 μg/L for no photosynthetic impact) under approved practices with buffer zones, mitigating widespread community shifts. Terrestrial non-target ecosystems experience minimal direct impacts beyond intended weed control, with ecotoxicity data showing low to negligible effects on soil microorganisms, earthworms (NOEC 14.4 mg/kg dry weight), and arthropods at application rates up to 16 kg/ha. Herbicide field studies and assessments report transient changes in microbial composition and function but no evidence of persistent biodiversity loss when adhering to labeled rates, as dose-response relationships emphasize thresholds seldom breached in agronomic settings. Overall, exaggerated projections from isolated lab exposures overlook dilution, degradation, and recovery dynamics verified in environmental monitoring.

Toxicity and Health Effects

Mammalian and Human Toxicity Data

Diuron demonstrates low acute mammalian . The acute oral LD50 in rats ranges from approximately 3,400 mg/kg to greater than 5,000 mg/kg body weight, corresponding to EPA III. Acute dermal LD50 values exceed 2,000 mg/kg in both rats and rabbits, with no adverse effects observed up to these doses, also classifying as III or . similarly shows low , with LC50 values exceeding the limit dose in rats. Chronic oral exposure in rodents and dogs reveals effects primarily on the hematopoietic system, including hemolytic anemia, splenic congestion, and bone marrow hyperplasia at doses of 10 mg/kg/day or higher, establishing a NOAEL of 1 mg/kg/day in rats from combined chronic/carcinogenicity studies. Thyroid gland alterations, such as follicular cell hypertrophy and increased thyroid-stimulating hormone levels, occur in rats at doses above 25 mg/kg/day, linked to diuron-induced hepatic uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase activity accelerating thyroxine clearance—a mechanism deemed species-specific due to rodents' higher rates of thyroid hormone metabolism and limited relevance to humans. NOAELs for subchronic and chronic effects vary from 7.5 mg/kg/day in dogs (based on methemoglobinemia) to 8.7 mg/kg/day in 90-day rat studies. Diuron metabolites, such as 3,4-dichloroaniline, contribute to observed hematological effects via oxidative stress but do not alter the overall low systemic toxicity profile at relevant exposures. Human toxicity data are limited, with no dedicated epidemiological studies demonstrating elevated cancer incidence or other effects among occupationally exposed applicators; incident reports from 2015–2020 indicate low frequency of adverse events, consistent with effective mitigating dermal and risks. The reference dose (RfD) is 0.01 mg/kg/day based on the NOAEL of 1 mg/kg/day with uncertainty factors, while the WHO (ADI) is 0.002 mg/kg/day derived from a NOAEL of 2.5 mg/kg/day for hematological endpoints.

Exposure Risks and Mitigation

Human exposure to Diuron (DCMU) occurs mainly through dietary residues in treated crops and , as well as occupational routes for applicators involving dermal absorption and during mixing, loading, and application. Spray drift represents a potential incidental pathway for nearby residents or workers, though assessments indicate margins of exposure (MOEs) exceeding 350 for children aged 1 to less than 2 years at the field edge, suggesting negligible acute risks from this source. Dietary risk modeling shows acute exposures at 36% of the acute population-adjusted dose (aPAD) for infants under 1 year, with chronic exposures reaching 150% of the chronic PAD (cPAD) largely due to modeled contributions of up to 92%, though actual residue monitoring in food typically remains below established maximum residue limits (MRLs) like 0.1-1 mg/kg in various commodities. Occupational risks for applicators are addressed through mandatory (PPE), including long-sleeved shirts, pants, chemical-resistant gloves, and respirators for certain tasks, yielding MOEs from 1.7 to 44,000 for non-cancer effects and reducing cancer risks to below 10^{-4}. A 12-hour restricted entry interval () further limits post-application exposure. biomonitoring studies specific to Diuron are scarce, but modeled population exposures and the absence of widespread elevated burdens in agricultural cohorts align with low systemic rates observed in dermal and toxicity data (e.g., no systemic effects up to 1000 mg/kg/day in rats). Mitigation emphasizes label-mandated buffer zones (e.g., 10-50 feet downwind depending on application method) to curb drift, integration with (IPM) to minimize application frequency, and avoidance of use during windy conditions or near water bodies, which compliance data shows effectively reduces off-site deposition by up to 90% in field trials. Compared to manual weeding alternatives, Diuron application lowers physical occupational hazards like repetitive strain injuries and , which affect up to 20% of agricultural laborers annually, while enabling higher crop yields that enhance overall food production safety by reducing reliance on labor-intensive methods in large-scale farming.

Regulatory Status and Controversies

Approval Processes and Restrictions

Diuron, known chemically as DCMU, was first registered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1967 for use as a , , and mildewcide. The EPA completed its Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) in , determining diuron eligible for continued registration with risk mitigation measures, including buffer zones and application restrictions, after assessments showed risk quotients (RQs) below 1 for most terrestrial and aquatic uses, indicating acceptable margins of safety. In ongoing registration reviews, including a 2022 Proposed Interim Decision and 2023-2024 cancer assessment reevaluation incorporating new data on bladder and kidney effects in rodents, the EPA has upheld tolerances for food residues where dietary RQs remain below 1, while proposing enhanced labels for high-risk scenarios without proposing outright cancellation. In the , diuron faced stricter scrutiny due to its persistence and potential for , leading to non-inclusion on I of Directive 91/414/EEC in 2007 for non-agricultural uses and subsequent phase-out for most plant protection applications by 2019. directives impose limits of 0.1 μg/L for individual pesticides, with diuron frequently exceeding thresholds in monitoring, prompting precautionary restrictions despite lower profiles. Maximum residue levels (MRLs) were reduced to limits of detection for many commodities by 2023, reflecting a hazard-focused approach prioritizing environmental detection over exposure-based risk quotients. Australia's Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA) registered diuron for various uses but imposed seasonal suspensions, such as wet-season bans on tropical crops like since 2011 to mitigate runoff to aquatic systems, including the , where modeled risks exceeded protective thresholds. Internationally, the classifies diuron as Class U (unlikely to present acute hazard in normal use), supporting approvals in countries like and parts of where periodic reviews through 2023 have confirmed low human health risks at labeled rates, contrasting EU-style bans with data-driven tolerances elsewhere.

Debates on Benefits Versus Risks

Diuron's agricultural benefits center on its efficacy as a pre- and post-emergence for controlling broadleaf and grassy weeds in crops such as , , and , where it provides residual activity for extended weed suppression at lower costs compared to some alternatives. In regions like , its flexibility supports sustainable intensification by enabling higher yields through reduced weed competition, with studies indicating herbicide applications, including diuron, can boost grain yields by 19–96% via 52–96% efficiency across agro-ecologies. Proponents argue that restricting such compounds overlooks broader imperatives, as is critical to averting yield losses that could exacerbate global shortages, particularly given scrutiny on alternatives like for their own environmental profiles. Opponents, including environmental groups and regulators, advocate phase-outs due to diuron's persistence in and potential to induce algal inhibition or endocrine effects in non-target at environmentally relevant concentrations, as evidenced by histopathological changes in gonads and altered neurobehavior in model organisms. The U.S. EPA has proposed banning diuron on food crops to mitigate human health and ecological risks, citing detections in watersheds and toxicity to aquatic life, while the EU restricted it over contamination concerns exceeding thresholds. However, some assessments rebut overstated hazard claims by noting low acute mammalian toxicity (EPA Category III/IV) and emphasizing that risks at realistic field exposures often fall below effect thresholds when proper application mitigates runoff, though data on low-dose endocrine disruption remain inconclusive without robust meta-analyses confirming . Recent 2020s research highlights differential impacts from acute versus chronic exposures, urging refined risk models that account for degradation metabolites and realistic dosing rather than laboratory maxima. Advocates on both sides converge on precision technologies, such as spot-spraying with GPS-guided applicators, which can reduce diuron usage by up to 70–87% while maintaining and minimizing runoff concentrations, potentially reconciling productivity gains with reduced ecological footprints. This approach underscores ongoing debates favoring integrated management over outright bans, prioritizing empirical field data over precautionary narratives that may undervalue diuron's role in intensification amid rising global demand.

References

  1. [1]
    Diuron | C9H10Cl2N2O | CID 3120 - PubChem - NIH
    N'-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)-N,N-dimethylurea, diuron is a broad-spectrum algicide, which acts by interrupting the photosynthetic electron transport in algae. The ...
  2. [2]
    DCMU - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    DCMU, or diuron, is defined as a chemical compound with the molecular formula C9H10Cl2N2O, commonly used as an herbicide. It is also known by various trade ...
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
    3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea - an - ScienceDirect.com
    3-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea is defined as a chemical compound that strongly suppresses the photoresponse in photosystem II membranes, ...
  5. [5]
    DIURON - EXTOXNET PIP
    Diuron is a substituted urea herbicide used to control a wide variety of annual and perennial broadleaf and grassy weeds, as well as mosses.<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    DCMU/Diuron | Biesterfeld SE
    In 1954 it was introduced by Bayer under the trading name Diuron. It is used for the protection of sugarcane, cereal, cotton cultivation, viticulture and ...Missing: discovery | Show results with:discovery
  7. [7]
    Toxicity Response and Swimming Speed Regularity in Daphnia ...
    May 15, 2025 · Research indicates that DCMU has significant toxic effects on aquatic organisms, posing serious ecological risks to non-target biological ...
  8. [8]
    Diuron (DCMU) – Pure Water Products, LLC
    Diuron is an herbicide used on a wide range of crops and non-agricultural areas. It is classified as a “known/likely” human carcinogen.
  9. [9]
    The DCMU Herbicide Shapes T-cell Functions By Modulating Micro ...
    Jul 28, 2022 · Our study suggests that DCMU reduces T-cell abilities, participating thus to the establishment of an environment conducive to cancer development.
  10. [10]
    Adverse effects of atrazine, DCMU and metolachlor on ...
    Apr 10, 2020 · Based on these findings, existing national environmental guidelines and standards are insufficient to adequately prevent adverse effects of ...
  11. [11]
    Adverse effects of atrazine, DCMU and metolachlor on ... - PubMed
    Apr 10, 2020 · The widespread and persistent contamination of freshwater environments by low concentrations of pesticides is a growing concern worldwide.Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  12. [12]
    Diuron - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Usage Diuron was introduced in 1954 by E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company under the trademark “Karmex” and is mainly used as a preemergence herbicide for ...
  13. [13]
    Tebuthiuron - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The first phenylurea herbicide, N,N-dimethyl-N′-(4-chlorophenyl)-urea, was introduced in 1952 by Du Pont under the common name of monuron. In subsequent years, ...
  14. [14]
    Effects of the herbicide diuron on the early life history stages of coral
    The effects of the herbicide diuron on the early life history stages of broadcast spawning and brooding corals were examined in laboratory experiments.Missing: DCMU discovery
  15. [15]
    DCMU - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    DCMU, or diuron, is defined as an herbicide belonging to the phenylamide family and the subclass of phenylurea, which inhibits photosynthesis by blocking ...
  16. [16]
    Pesticide Fact Sheet Diuron
    duPont de Nemours and Company, Vertac Chemical Corp., Bayer AG, Matchteshim-Agan, Pennvalt Holland B.V., Rhone- Poulenc, Staveley Chemicals Ltd., Universal Crop ...
  17. [17]
    Du Pont Karmex Diuron Herbicide pesticide information - Pomerix
    Its Federal EPA registration number is: 352-199. It was originally approved by EPA on 08 Mar 1954. Its registration got cancelled on 16 Dec 1991. It has a ' ...
  18. [18]
    Diuron (Ref: DPX 14740) - AERU - University of Hertfordshire
    Introduction & key dates. Circa 1951, introduced. Example manufacturers ... F4 F = U.S. EPA ECOTOX database / U.S. EPA pesticide fate database ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Assessment of Diuron (PC #035505) Usage and Benefits in ...
    Nov 17, 2021 · Diuron is registered for use on many crops, with cotton accounting for 65% of total diuron pounds applied in agriculture. Diuron is also ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Diuron environmental assessment report
    Jul 1, 2011 · It is used in many agricultural situations, general weed control in irrigation ditches and drains and in non-agricultural areas (rights-of-way, ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Pesticide Use in U.S. Agriculture: 21 Selected Crops, 1960-2008
    By 1980, herbicide use had reached 90-99 percent of U.S. corn, cotton, and soybean acres planted. Notably, the four most heavily used active ingredients in 2008 ...
  22. [22]
    Herbicide Treatment Table / Pear / Agriculture - UC IPM
    When choosing a pesticide, consider information relating to environmental impact, resistance management, the pesticide's properties, and application timing.
  23. [23]
    Herbicide Resistance Management Strategies - CropLife Australia
    Jun 26, 2025 · HERBICIDE RESISTANCE. Herbicides have proven to be the most efficient and cost-effective methods of weed control in farming systems.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] US EPA-Pesticides; Diuron
    Herbicide for weed control in. sugarcane. Proposed experimental program: Shipment of 6,000 lbs of formulated product containing 5,400 lbs of active ingre ...
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Diuron: Draft Human Health Risk Assessment for Registration Review
    Dec 17, 2020 · Diuron has a vapor pressure of 6.9 x 10-8 mm Hg. See Appendix B for a table of the physical and chemical properties of diuron. 3.3 Pesticide Use ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Sorption and Desorption Behaviors of Diuron in Soils Amended with ...
    Diuron is a nonionic urea herbicide with a very wide use globally. The herbicide is nonvolatile (vapor pressure is 1.1 × 10-3 mPa at 25 °C), has a water ...
  28. [28]
    Diuron | C9H10Cl2N2O - ChemSpider
    Molecular formula: C9H10Cl2N2O. Average mass: 233.092. Monoisotopic mass: 232.017018. ChemSpider ID: 3008. Wikipedia. Spectra. Download .molMissing: weight | Show results with:weight
  29. [29]
    CN104496855A - Method for preparing diuron - Google Patents
    The method comprises the following steps: dropwise adding liquid dimethylamine into an organic solvent of 3,4-dichlorophenyl isocyanate under a positive ...
  30. [30]
    CN105294504A - Method for synthesizing diuron - Google Patents
    A synthetic method for Diuron Tech, from raw material 3,4-DCA, preparation 3,4-dichlorophenyl isocyanate under the effect of triphosgene and catalyzer; 3,4- ...
  31. [31]
    Microsynthesis of [ring-14C]diuron (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)
    Microsynthesis of [ring-14C]diuron (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea) from 3,4-[14C]dichloroaniline and dimethylcarbamoyl chloride.Missing: synthesis | Show results with:synthesis
  32. [32]
    CN107129445A - A kind of synthetic method of diuron
    The present invention provides a kind of synthetic method of diuron, and it comprises the following steps:By 3, the 4- dichloro isocyanides of pretreatment Acid ...Missing: DCMU | Show results with:DCMU
  33. [33]
    How to Start a Diuron Manufacturing Business?
    Chemical Synthesis: Diuron is produced by reacting urea, chloroform and catalysts in certain conditions in a closed container. It is evident that this process ...
  34. [34]
    3-(3,4-DICHLORPHENYL)-1,1- DIMETHYLUREA (DIURON) - Ataman
    DESCRIPTION: DCMU (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea) is an algicide and herbicide of the arylurea class that inhibits photosynthesis.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Diuron 900 WG - Apparent Ag
    Cotton. Annual broadleaf weeds and some annual grasses. Qld & NSW only. 1 - 1.9 kg/ha. Pre-emergence: Apply at planting or within 7 days of planting and prior ...
  36. [36]
    Diuron chemical review | Australian Pesticides and Veterinary ...
    ... diuron was used to: control weeds in agriculture—sugarcane, cotton, broadacre crops (oats, wheat, and barley) and some horticultural crops, including apples ...
  37. [37]
  38. [38]
    [PDF] DIURON 4L - Greenbook.net
    This product may be applied to soil prior to emergence of weeds to control susceptible weed seedlings for an extended period of time. The degree of control and ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Diuron 4L - Agrian
    Moisture is required to activate the chemical; best results occur if rainfall (or sprinkler irrigation) occurs within 2 weeks of application. DIURON 4L applied ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Diuron 4L | Alligare
    Tank mixes with other herbicides can increase the risk of crop injury. When using a certain tank mix for the first time, limit use to a small area to ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] BROMACIL/DIURON 40/40 - LabelSDS
    Bromacil/Diuron 40/40 may be tank mixed with other suitable herbicides registered for non-agricultural use . Use only those herbicides approved for use in non- ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Efficacy of S-metolachlor, Diuron and their Tank Mixture for Weed ...
    Diuron at the rate of 0.36 kg a.i./ha gave good control (75%) of broadleaf weeds early in the season and moderate control (51%) late in the season.
  43. [43]
    (PDF) Efficacy of diuron on the management of broad-leaf weeds in ...
    Jan 8, 2024 · The highest efficacy (92.2%) against Commelina foecunda was obtained from diuron WP 650 g/ha. The ANOVA for sesame grain yield showed ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Selectivity and Efficacy of Diuron for Weed Control in Peppermint
    Diuron was usually more effective on winter annual weeds when applied in early fall compared to mid or late fall (Table 1).
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Weed Community Changes Following Diuron, Simazine, or Terbacil ...
    Weed control was over 90% in 1981 and 1982, but by 1984 weeds increased in plots treated with diuron and simazine. Weed abundance was relatively low from 1981 ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Efficacy and Selectivity of Pendimethalin, Diuron and their Mixtures ...
    Some studies reported yield reduction in the oil yield by 70% under weedy conditions as compared to grain yield under two hand weeding at 20 and 40 days.
  47. [47]
    Herbicides in modern sustainable agriculture: environmental fate ...
    Jun 19, 2024 · Weeds in farmland compete with the crops for nutrients, space, light, and moisture, leading to a reduction in production ranging from 20 to 50%, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Herbicides: The Key to Efficient Weed Control in Agriculture
    Feb 16, 2025 · Herbicides have revolutionized weed control in agriculture, reducing labor costs and improving crop yields.
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Diuron Use and Benefits in Arizona Agriculture
    Jun 7, 2021 · Diuron is useful because it provides a broad range of weed control with a long residual, reducing the need for additional herbicide applications ...
  50. [50]
    Characterization of Multiple Herbicide-Resistant Italian Ryegrass ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The CT population is resistant to at least six herbicides with four different mechanisms of action: atrazine (>16-fold), diuron (2.4-fold), ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Binding Properties of Photosynthetic Herbicides with the QB Site of ...
    Many herbicides used for weed control inhibit PSII by interfering with the photosynthetic electron transport at the level of the D1 protein, through competition ...
  52. [52]
    Structures and Binding Sites of Phenolic Herbicides in the Q B ...
    Herbicides targeting photosystem II (PSII) block the electron transfer beyond QA by binding to the QB site. Upon binding, the redox potential of QA shifts ...
  53. [53]
    Mode of action of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. Evidence ...
    The mode of action of DCMU is a competition with plastoquinone for the binding to the secondary acceptor site.Missing: synthesis | Show results with:synthesis
  54. [54]
    Mechanism of photosystem II photoinactivation and D1 protein ...
    It was reported previously that occupancy of the QB site by DCMU which in light-exposed thylakoids blocks the site in the reduced state and promotes charge ...Measurements Of Psii... · Results · Discussion<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    Energetics of the exchangeable quinone, QB, in Photosystem II | PNAS
    Sep 5, 2019 · In summary, the mechanism and energetics of the PSII acceptor side and especially QB are still relatively poorly understood. The redox ...
  56. [56]
    DCMU is an inhibitor of thea. PS-Ib. PS-IIc. Calvin Cycled. Krebs Cycle
    DCMU is a photosynthesis inhibitor that is very precise and sensitive. It blocks photosystem II's QB plastoquinone binding site, preventing electron flow.
  57. [57]
    Review Photoinhibition of photosystem II under environmental stress
    In the “classical” scheme for the mechanism of photoinhibition, strong light induces the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which directly inactivate ...
  58. [58]
    Monoclonal anti-diuron antibodies prevent inhibition of ...
    Effect of the addition of antibody B91-KF5 to the diuron-inhibited Hill reaction. The assay mixtures contained 1 μM diuron at the onset of the DCPIP reduction.
  59. [59]
    Quantifying the Inhibitor-Target Site Interactions of Photosystem II ...
    Jun 12, 2017 · Binding appeared to be predominantly hydrophobic with hydrogen bonding also having an important role. ... Hydrophilic Photosystem II ...
  60. [60]
    Structure/Function/Dynamics of Photosystem II Plastoquinone ... - NIH
    PSII integral lipids behave more as a dynamic multifunctional cofactor into overall functioning of the complex than as a simply hydrophobic surrounding matrix.
  61. [61]
    Modeling of the D1/D2 proteins and cofactors of the photosystem II ...
    Residues involved in interprotein interactions in the model were also identified. Herbicide 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) was also modeled in ...
  62. [62]
    Understanding Mechanisms of Herbicide Selectivity in Agro ...
    Feb 10, 2023 · Physiological selectivity occurs when the plant species affect herbicide retention, penetration, movement, and detoxification. Herbicide ...
  63. [63]
    Detoxification and activation of agrochemicals in plants - Cole - 1994
    In the main, however, mechanisms such as hydroxylation, dealkylation and glutathione conjugation bring about detoxification and form the basis of herbicide ...
  64. [64]
    Absorption and translocation of the herbicide diuron by susceptible ...
    It was concluded that differential absorption and/or translocation were not involved in the mechanism of tolerance to diuron present in Digitaria nuda crabgrass ...Missing: DCMU | Show results with:DCMU<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    [PDF] 8 Common Reasons Why Herbicides Fail - UT Institute of Agriculture
    Systemic herbicides translocate through the plant and do not just cause contact leaf burn. Therefore, you would not want to attempt to control a perennial weed.
  66. [66]
    Herbicides — A Double Edged Sword | IntechOpen
    This chapter will discuss different herbicide groups, classification, selectivity, interference with metabolic processes and hazardous action upon crop plants.
  67. [67]
    Environmental impact of diuron transformation: a review
    Diuron is also present in soil where it may be submitted to breakdown leading to 3,4-dichloroaniline (3,4-DCA). However, there is no evidence to state that 3,4- ...
  68. [68]
    Dispersal of the pesticide diuron in the Great Barrier Reef
    Jun 25, 2023 · ... half-life of diuron in GBR marine waters of 40 days. We followed diuron dispersal in the GBR (2016–2018) using the 1 km resolution eReefs ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Diuron - CIRCABC - European Union
    Jan 15, 2005 · Diuron is not liable to bioaccumulation (BCF 2, log Kow <3; see section 5 of this data sheet). Thus the trigger criterion to derive a ...
  70. [70]
    Microalgae-Based Fluorimetric Bioassays for Studying Interferences ...
    DCMU is extensively used as a selective pre-emergence herbicide against mono- and dicotyledonous weeds in agricultural crop areas of citrus, grapes, cotton, ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Diuron effects on photosynthesis and vertical migration of ... - HAL
    Jun 19, 2021 · Diuron inhibition on photosynthesis has been observed in all kinds of aquatic plants and algae,. 13 with differences in both toxicity degree ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Effects of herbicide on non-target microorganisms - Hal Inrae
    Oct 25, 2021 · on soil ecosystems showing inhibition of microbial functions, reduction of microbial group. 50 abundance, changes in the composition and ...<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    Diuron - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Biochemical effects Diuron, a dihalogenated substituted urea herbicide, has ... NOAEL of 100 ppm in diet equivalent to 8.3 mg/kg/day (U.S. EPA, 1995) ...<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Diuron human health assessment report
    Jul 1, 2011 · The LD50 values were 437 +139, 2390 + 1440 and. 1017 + 222 mg/kg bw respectively for the 3 groups, suggesting that protein-deficiency might ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Diuron 80DF CAUTION - Greenbook.net
    The applicator must follow the most restrictive precautions to avoid drift, including those found in this labeling as well as applicable state and local ...
  76. [76]
    Beyond the field: How pesticide drift endangers biodiversity
    Feb 1, 2025 · Pesticide drift has been linked to over 50% reductions in wild plant diversity within 500 m of fields, reducing floral resources for pollinators.
  77. [77]
    Development and Evaluation of a GPS-Based Weeding System for ...
    Weeds are currently controlled by chemical herbicides and manual weeding, which is a strenuous task that exposes agricultural workers to various ...Missing: comparison | Show results with:comparison
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Alternatives to Labor Intensive Tasks in Roadside Vegetation ...
    Jun 30, 2008 · This report describes an investigation into machine based technologies that are alternatives to the current methods of vegetation.
  79. [79]
    [PDF] ~h~ . V'~ - Regulations.gov
    Diuron was first registered in the United States in 1967 and it is used as a pre and post-emergent herbicide, algaecide, and mildewcide (USEPA, 2003).
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Diuron Proposed Interim Registration Review Decision Case ...
    Mar 30, 2022 · This mitigation measure was suggested by the diuron registrants. Proposed Label Update for both Antimicrobial and Conventional Uses. 13 ...Missing: zones | Show results with:zones
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Diuron: Report of the Cancer Assessment Review Committee FROM
    Jan 23, 2024 · The CPRC classified diuron as a "known/likely" human carcinogen based on urinary bladder carcinomas in both sexes of the Wistar rat, kidney ...
  82. [82]
    Diuron and Carbofuran to be banned - ENDS Report
    Feb 23, 2007 · Diuron, the herbicide widely used in amenity applications and noted for its potential to pollute water, is to be withdrawn across the EU.Missing: restrictions | Show results with:restrictions<|separator|>
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1783 - EUR-Lex - European Union
    Sep 15, 2023 · The MRLs for diuron on all products are currently set at the product specific LODs. It is therefore appropriate to delete the MRLs set out for ...
  84. [84]
    Diuron use suspended for tropical crops - ABC News
    Nov 28, 2011 · Use of the herbicide diuron on canefields has been banned for the duration of the wet season. (Daniel Hamilton: ABC Local). abc.net.au/news ...
  85. [85]
    Herbicides use in crop production: An analysis of cost-benefit, non ...
    Besides, it could increase grain yield of different arable crops by 19–372% with an additional economic benefit of US$ 305 - US$ 867 over unweeded control.
  86. [86]
    Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards
    Both diazinon and diuron were found at levels exceeding concentrations recommended by the National Academy of Sciences for the protection of aquatic life ( ...Direct Impact On Humans · Impact Through Food... · Non-Target Organisms
  87. [87]
    Herbicide Diuron as Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs ... - NIH
    Mar 20, 2020 · The results obtained in this study had proven our hypothesis that long-term exposure of herbicide Diuron can cause alterations in the gonadal ...
  88. [88]
    Diuron metabolites act as endocrine disruptors and alter aggressive ...
    These results indicate that biotransformation of diuron to active metabolites alter signaling pathways of the CNS which may impact androgen and the stress ...Missing: algal blooms rebuttals
  89. [89]
    US EPA proposes banning diuron herbicide on food - C&EN
    May 6, 2022 · The herbicide diuron would be banned on all US food crops under a proposed decision announced April 28 by the Environmental Protection Agency.
  90. [90]
    EPA Seeks Public Comment on Measures to Address Human Health ...
    Apr 28, 2022 · EPA is seeking public comment to address human health and ecological risks posed by Diuron.
  91. [91]
    Acute and chronic pesticide exposure trigger fundamentally different ...
    Mar 11, 2025 · To effectively assess the environmental risks of pesticides, it is critical to understand how different exposure schemes influence their effects ...
  92. [92]
    Spot spraying reduces herbicide concentrations in runoff
    Recommended rates of the herbicides glyphosate, 2,4-D, fluoroxypyr, atrazine, and diuron were sprayed onto 0, 20, 40, 50, 70, or 100% of the area of runoff ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  93. [93]
    Managing Weeds with Precision Tech - No-Till Farmer
    Jul 16, 2025 · University of Nebraska-Lincoln tests indicated an 87% reduction in post-emergence herbicide use with the same or similar levels of efficacy ...Micro-Sensors, Ai... · Takeaways · Ai Chemical Systems
  94. [94]
    Precision robotic spot-spraying: Reducing herbicide use and ...
    A custom-designed robotic spot spraying tool based on computer vision and deep learning can significantly reduce herbicide usage on sugarcane farms.Original Papers · 3. Methods · 3.2. Weed Image Acquisition...Missing: diuron | Show results with:diuron