Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Demon core

![Partially-reflected-plutonium-sphere.jpeg][float-right] The demon core was a 6.2-kilogram subcritical sphere of plutonium-gallium alloy, measuring 8.9 centimeters in diameter, manufactured at Los Alamos Laboratory as the fissile component for a planned third plutonium implosion-type atomic bomb during World War II but repurposed for criticality experiments after Japan's surrender.^[1] It became infamous following two supercriticality accidents during manual "tickling the dragon's tail" tests to determine its critical mass: on August 21, 1945, physicist Harry K. Daghlian Jr. accidentally dropped a 4.4-kilogram tungsten carbide brick reflector onto the core while working alone at night, prompting a brief chain reaction that exposed him to a fatal radiation dose, leading to his death from acute radiation syndrome 25 days later.^[2]^[1] Less than a year later, on May 21, 1946, physicist Louis Slotin demonstrated a similar experiment to colleagues by precariously separating beryllium hemisphere reflectors with a screwdriver, which slipped and allowed the assembly to go supercritical for nearly a minute; Slotin displaced the upper hemisphere with his body to shield others but absorbed a lethal dose himself, succumbing to radiation poisoning nine days afterward.^[2]^[1] These incidents, the first documented criticality accidents resulting in fatalities, underscored the perils of hands-on nuclear experimentation without remote handling, prompting Los Alamos to ban such manual procedures and eventually leading to the core's meltdown for reuse in other fissile material.^[2]^[1] The core's nickname, "demon core," emerged posthumously, reflecting its deadly reputation among laboratory personnel.^[3]

Production and Initial Purpose

Manufacturing and Composition

The demon core was composed of a plutonium-gallium alloy, primarily plutonium-239 with approximately 1% gallium added to stabilize the delta phase of plutonium, which facilitated casting and machining while preventing phase transitions that could alter its density and criticality properties.^[4]^[5] The finished core formed a subcritical spherical mass weighing 6.2 kilograms and measuring 8.9 centimeters in diameter.^[6]^[7] Plutonium production for the core occurred at the Hanford Site, where uranium-238 was irradiated in graphite-moderated reactors to produce plutonium-239 via neutron capture and subsequent beta decay. Chemical separation processes extracted the plutonium from the spent fuel, requiring roughly 4,000 pounds of uranium to yield 1 pound of plutonium.^[8]^[9] The purified plutonium was then transported to Los Alamos Laboratory for alloying and fabrication. At Los Alamos, the plutonium-gallium alloy underwent casting followed by hot-pressing into the spherical form, after which a thin nickel coating was applied to inhibit oxidation and contain emitted alpha particles.^[5]^[10] This manufacturing yielded a core intended as the fissile component for a third atomic bomb but repurposed for postwar criticality experiments.^[5]

Role in Manhattan Project and WWII

The demon core, a 6.2-kilogram sphere of plutonium-gallium alloy, was produced at Los Alamos Laboratory as the fissile material for the third atomic bomb in the U.S. arsenal during World War II.^[11] This plutonium implosion-type device, akin to the Fat Man bomb detonated over Nagasaki on August 9, 1945, was prepared amid plans for additional strikes on Japan to hasten its surrender.^[12] By mid-August 1945, the core had been machined to specifications optimizing neutron multiplication for supercriticality when compressed by conventional explosives in a bomb assembly.^[13] Initially slated for shipment to Tinian Island for integration into a weapon potentially targeting Japanese cities such as Kokura or Niigata, the core's deployment was halted by Japan's unconditional surrender on August 15, 1945, following the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings.^[7] The Manhattan Project's plutonium production at Hanford Site supplied the fissile cores for both Fat Man and this reserve unit, underscoring the program's rapid scaling to support multiple operations under Operation Downfall, the planned invasion of Japan.^[14] With the war's end, the core was retained at Los Alamos rather than disassembled or repurposed for immediate postwar use, allowing its subsequent role in criticality research to extend the project's legacy in nuclear physics.^[15]

Criticality Experiments and Accidents

Methods of Criticality Testing

Criticality experiments with the demon core, a 6.2-kilogram sphere of plutonium-gallium alloy approximately 89 millimeters in diameter, aimed to measure neutron multiplication factors and approach supercriticality without initiating a sustained chain reaction.^[1] These tests involved surrounding the subcritical core with neutron-reflecting materials to enhance fission efficiency, using a polonium-beryllium neutron source to initiate chains, and monitoring neutron flux via detectors connected to oscilloscopes.^[16] Researchers manually adjusted reflector positions to incrementally increase reactivity, observing exponential rises in neutron counts to determine the effective multiplication constant k and critical mass parameters for plutonium assemblies.^[2] The phrase "tickling the dragon's tail," attributed to physicist Richard Feynman, described this precarious balancing act near the prompt-critical threshold, where delays in neutron emission could still allow brief supercritical excursions.^[17] One primary technique employed tungsten carbide bricks as reflectors, stacked around the core's sides and top on a platform to simulate tamper effects in bomb designs.^[7] On August 21, 1945, physicist Harry Daghlian added bricks layer by layer, withdrawing one when detectors indicated excessive reactivity, but accidentally dropped a 4.4-kilogram brick onto the assembly, reducing separation and prompting a 0.9-second supercritical burst yielding about 10^{15} fissions.^[1] This method tested geometric configurations' impact on criticality, with bricks chosen for their high density and neutron moderation properties akin to uranium tampers.^[16] Another approach utilized beryllium hemispheres, valued for their low neutron absorption and high scattering cross-section, to enclose the core hemispherically.^[18] On May 21, 1946, physicist Louis Slotin demonstrated this to observers by lowering the upper hemisphere over the core, maintaining a gap with a flathead screwdriver while a neutron source operated nearby; slippage caused the halves to close fully, inducing a 700-millisecond pulse of 3 × 10^{16} fissions.^[2] Beryllium's reflective qualities allowed precise control of k-effective, enabling measurements of assembly behavior under varying separations, though manual handling introduced human-error risks absent in later remote manipulators.^[17] These experiments, conducted at Los Alamos Laboratory's Omega Site, prioritized rapid data collection post-World War II over formalized safety protocols, reflecting the era's emphasis on empirical validation of theoretical criticality models.^[1]

Harry Daghlian Incident (August 1945)

On August 21, 1945, at the Omega Site laboratory in Los Alamos, New Mexico, physicist Harry Daghlian conducted a manual criticality experiment using the 6.2-kilogram plutonium-gallium core.^[11]^[19] He worked alone late in the evening, stacking tungsten carbide bricks—each weighing approximately 4.4 kilograms—as neutron reflectors around the core to determine the precise configuration needed for criticality.^[11]^[19]^[20] This hands-on approach violated standard safety protocols, which discouraged solitary operations and favored remote handling to minimize exposure risks.^[11] As Daghlian positioned the final brick atop the assembly, which was already near the critical point, he misjudged its stability and accidentally dropped it directly onto the core.^[19]^[20] The impact initiated a supercritical chain reaction, producing an intense burst of neutron and gamma radiation, accompanied by a blue glow from ionized air and a wave of heat.^[11]^[20] Recognizing the danger, Daghlian immediately used his hands to remove the offending brick and then manually disassembled the surrounding stack, halting the reaction after about 20 seconds but prolonging his exposure to the decaying radiation field.^[11]^[19] Daghlian received an estimated whole-body dose of around 404 rem (approximately 4 Gy), with his hands and arms absorbing far higher localized doses due to their proximity—up to 200 Gy on the right hand.^[21] Initial symptoms included a tingling sensation and subsequent painful blisters and burns on his hands.^[20] Within days, he developed acute radiation syndrome, manifesting as nausea, high fever, significant weight loss, severe gastrointestinal distress, and eventual coma despite intensive medical intervention at the U.S. Engineers Hospital in Los Alamos.^[21]^[19] Daghlian died on September 15, 1945, 25 days after the accident, marking the first documented laboratory fatality from radiation exposure.^[11]^[19]^[20] The cause was acute radiation syndrome, resulting from the destruction of bone marrow and gastrointestinal tissues by the ionizing radiation, which overwhelmed the body's regenerative capacity.^[21] This incident underscored the hazards of manual criticality testing and contributed to subsequent reforms, including stricter rules against solo experiments and the development of remote-handling equipment.^[19]

Louis Slotin Incident (May 1946)

On May 21, 1946, physicist Louis Slotin conducted an informal demonstration of criticality using the plutonium core at Los Alamos Laboratory's technical area, with several observers present including Alvin C. Graves.^[17]^[22] The setup involved two beryllium hemispheres positioned around the 6.2-kilogram spherical plutonium-gallium core, with neutron-reflecting beryllium tamper pieces, to approach supercriticality in a procedure colloquially known as "tickling the dragon's tail."^[23]^[2] Slotin manually held the upper hemisphere in place using a flathead screwdriver inserted between the halves to prevent full closure, monitoring neutron output with detectors while gradually lowering the reflector to edge closer to the critical point.^[17]^[22] At approximately 3:20 p.m., the screwdriver slipped from Slotin's hand, allowing the upper beryllium hemisphere to drop fully onto the core assembly, initiating a supercritical chain reaction.^[2]^[23] Observers reported a brilliant blue flash of Cherenkov radiation illuminating the room, accompanied by a wave of heat, as the excursion released a burst of neutrons and gamma rays lasting less than one second.^[17]^[22] Reacting instinctively, Slotin flipped the hemisphere away with his screwdriver and body, halting the reaction after an estimated 1000-2000 fissions had occurred, though his positioning between the core and others resulted in him receiving the majority of the radiation exposure.^[11]^[24] Slotin absorbed a lethal dose of approximately 1000 rad (10 Gy) of mixed neutron and gamma radiation, far exceeding the acute fatal threshold, while nearby individuals like Graves received doses around 200-400 rad but survived with varying symptoms.^[11]^[24] Immediately following the incident, Slotin remarked, "I'm okay," and assisted in dismantling the assembly, but within 30 minutes he vomited, signaling the onset of acute radiation syndrome.^[17]^[22] He was transported to Los Alamos Hospital, where over the next nine days his condition deteriorated rapidly: initial remission gave way to severe gastrointestinal damage, internal hemorrhaging, and third-degree burns resembling a "three-dimensional sunburn," culminating in a coma and death on May 30, 1946, at age 35 from radiation-induced poisoning.^[2]^[17] The accident highlighted procedural risks in manual criticality experiments, as Slotin's demonstration bypassed safer mechanical methods advocated by some colleagues, relying instead on his expertise for precise control.^[23] Post-incident dosimetry and modeling confirmed the excursion's intensity, with neutron flux peaks estimated at levels sufficient for prompt criticality, though insufficient for a runaway explosion due to the core's subcritical mass in air.^[22] This event, the second fatal mishap involving the core, prompted immediate restrictions on such "tickling" techniques at Los Alamos.^[2]

Health Consequences and Medical Insights

Acute Radiation Effects on Victims

Harry Daghlian Jr. received a lethal radiation dose during the August 21, 1945, criticality accident, estimated at 5.1 Sv to the whole body, with extreme localized exposure to his right hand (approximately 200 Gy) and left hand (30 Gy) from direct contact with the tungsten carbide brick.^[13]^[25] Initial symptoms included severe burns and blistering on his hands, followed by the prodromal phase of acute radiation syndrome (ARS) manifesting as nausea, vomiting, and fatigue within hours.^[2] By the end of the first week, symptoms intensified into high fever, persistent vomiting, diarrhea, and delirium, reflecting gastrointestinal and early hematopoietic damage from the neutron-heavy exposure.^[21] Daghlian endured agonizing physical deterioration, including widespread tissue breakdown, before succumbing on September 15, 1945, 25 days post-accident.^[2] Louis Slotin absorbed an estimated 10–20 Gy total-body equivalent dose in the May 21, 1946, incident, primarily neutrons and gamma rays, with his right hand closest to the core receiving the highest localized flux.^[25] Acute effects began shortly after the excursion ended, with Slotin reporting nausea and abdominal pain that evening, escalating to vomiting and weakness the following day.^[17] His right hand blistered rapidly, fingernails turned blue, and skin reddened and swelled across hands and abdomen, indicative of cutaneous radiation injury superimposed on systemic ARS.^[2] Within days, redness spread, skin sloughed in sheets, fever rose, and he experienced severe weight loss and organ swelling, culminating in multi-system failure; Slotin died on May 30, 1946, nine days later.^[2]^[26] Both cases demonstrated the rapid progression of ARS from high-dose neutron irradiation, where neutron capture caused widespread cellular ionization beyond gamma effects alone, leading to refractory nausea, epithelial sloughing, and immune suppression without immediate criticality burns from heat.^[21] Observers like Alvin Graves received sublethal doses (e.g., 182 rem for Graves in Slotin's accident) and exhibited milder transient symptoms such as nausea but recovered, underscoring dose-dependency in ARS onset and severity.^[27] These incidents provided early empirical data on human neutron tolerance, revealing thresholds around 2–6 Gy for survivable ARS versus fatal outcomes above 10 Gy.^[21]

Treatment Efforts and Autopsies

Following Harry Daghlian's criticality accident on August 21, 1945, he received an estimated whole-body dose of 5.1 Sv from neutrons and gamma rays, with his hands absorbing significantly higher localized doses up to 200 Gy on the right hand.^[25] Medical response was limited to supportive care, including antibiotics, fluids, and a platelet transfusion that briefly stabilized his blood counts before they plummeted.^[25] His sister and mother were flown to Los Alamos to provide bedside care amid his deteriorating condition.^[19] Symptoms unfolded over days: nausea and vomiting within hours, erythema by day 3, fever and cramps by day 5, mucositis by day 12, and epilation by day 17, progressing to near-zero white blood cell counts and severe gastrointestinal failure by day 24.^[25] Daghlian died on September 15, 1945, from hematopoietic syndrome, the bone marrow suppression phase of acute radiation syndrome (ARS).^[19]^[25] Autopsy details remain sparse in declassified records, but tissue analysis confirmed profound radiation-induced cellular destruction without complicating infection, attributing death solely to ARS-mediated organ failure.^[28] Louis Slotin's accident on May 21, 1946, delivered a lethal dose of 11-20 Gy, predominantly to his body shielding the assembly, equivalent to about 800-1000 rem biologically weighted.^[25]^[29] Treatment efforts mirrored Daghlian's, focusing on palliation: penicillin and strict asepsis to avert secondary infection, a nasal gastric tube to drain accumulating fluids and ease paralytic ileus, and an oxygen tent for respiratory distress in his final hours.^[29] Initial symptoms included hand burns and nausea, escalating by day 4 to abdominal distension, gas pains, and fever over 103°F (39.4°C); by day 7, delirium, bloody diarrhea, and hypotension ensued, culminating in circulatory collapse on day 9.^[29]^[25] Slotin died on May 30, 1946, at age 35, his case exemplifying combined gastrointestinal and hematopoietic ARS phases.^[26] Autopsy by Chicago pathologist Louis Hempelmann revealed aspiration of gastric contents into the lungs as the proximate cause, triggered by reflex paralysis and debility.^[29] Radiation effects dominated: abdominal viscera showed massive edema, atrophy, and sloughing of the jejunum and ileum mucosa with villous denudation; widespread congestion and hemorrhage reflected platelet counts below 10,000 per microliter; and a bronze skin erythema overlaid nascent petechiae from vascular fragility.^[29]^[25] No infection marred the findings, leading physicist Philip Morrison to conclude: "It was a pure and simple case of death from radiation."^[29] These autopsies underscored ARS's mechanistic progression—initial cellular ionization yielding unchecked inflammation, mitosis arrest, and systemic lysis—informing early understandings of neutron-heavy exposures absent targeted therapies like bone marrow transplant, unavailable until decades later.^[29]^[25]

Long-Term Follow-Up Studies

A retrospective health physics study, conducted approximately 30 years after the 1945 Daghlian and 1946 Slotin accidents and documented in Los Alamos National Laboratory report LA-UR-79-2802 (October 1979), reconstructed radiation doses and examined long-term outcomes for survivors present during the incidents who lived beyond one year post-exposure.^[21] Eight such individuals were identified across both events, with estimated whole-body doses ranging from 11 rem to 136 rem, derived from contemporaneous measurements including blood serum sodium-24 activity (1.1 to 13.3 Bq per mg) and later neutron activation analysis of personal effects.^[21] Among these survivors, four deaths occurred from conditions potentially linked to radiation exposure: two cases of cancer, one instance of chronic bone marrow suppression resulting in fatal infection, and one heart attack.^[21] The remaining four individuals were alive at the time of the study or succumbed to unrelated causes, such as combat-related injuries.^[21] Dose reconstructions relied on empirical data from film badges, ionization chambers, and biological indicators, but the small cohort size precluded statistical confirmation of causality, with confounding factors like age, lifestyle, and baseline health unaccounted for in the limited follow-up.^[21] No systematic long-term monitoring programs were established immediately after the accidents, reflecting the era's nascent understanding of stochastic radiation effects; the 1979 analysis served primarily as a dosimetry validation exercise rather than a prospective epidemiological survey.^[21] Subsequent reviews of criticality incidents, such as those compiled by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, have referenced the acute exposures but noted the absence of comprehensive longitudinal data on sublethal doses in these cases, underscoring gaps in early health physics protocols.^[1]

Aftermath and Broader Impact

Fate of the Core in Postwar Tests

Following the Louis Slotin criticality accident on May 21, 1946, the demon core—already contaminated from the prior Harry Daghlian incident in August 1945—was slated for incorporation into a plutonium device for Operation Crossroads, the U.S. military's series of postwar nuclear tests at Bikini Atoll in the Marshall Islands. Specifically, it was considered for the planned third detonation, codenamed "Charlie," an underwater test intended to follow the Able and Baker shots conducted in July 1946. However, the core's elevated radioactivity, resulting from neutron activation during the two supercritical excursions, rendered it unsuitable for safe transport and assembly, as the added fission products and induced isotopes increased handling risks and potential predetonation hazards.^[30]^[27] The "Charlie" shot itself was ultimately canceled in late 1946 due to concerns over radioactive fallout and logistical challenges, further obviating the core's direct use. Instead, during the summer of 1946, the approximately 6.2 kilograms of plutonium-gallium alloy was melted down at Los Alamos National Laboratory and recast, with its material blended into the stockpile for fabricating pits in subsequent nuclear weapons. This recycling process removed short-lived contaminants while preserving the fissile Pu-239 content, allowing the plutonium to contribute to postwar test devices in the late 1940s and beyond, though no records specify exact detonations attributable to its atoms.^[17]^[26]^[12] The core's disassembly marked the end of its individual history as a distinct object, underscoring the pragmatic reuse of scarce plutonium resources in the early atomic era, where material conservation outweighed sentimental or symbolic retention. No further criticality experiments were conducted with it, reflecting heightened caution post-accidents, and its fate exemplified the transition from wartime improvisation to structured postwar weapons development under the Atomic Energy Commission.^[27]^[30]

Contributions to Nuclear Safety Protocols

The criticality accidents involving the demon core at Los Alamos National Laboratory catalyzed immediate and enduring changes to nuclear safety practices. Following Louis Slotin's fatal supercritical excursion on May 21, 1946, which exposed him to approximately 1,000 rads of neutron and gamma radiation, all hands-on critical assembly experiments were prohibited.^[2] This ban explicitly ended manual techniques, such as using screwdrivers to precariously position beryllium reflectors around plutonium cores to approach criticality, as these methods had repeatedly demonstrated vulnerability to human error and unintended prompt critical reactions.^[11]^[2] In place of direct manipulation, subsequent criticality testing shifted to remote-controlled mechanisms, positioning operators roughly 0.25 miles from the experimental apparatus to eliminate personal exposure to potential radiation bursts.^[11] These procedural reforms, implemented shortly after Slotin's death on May 30, 1946, addressed the causal chain of events in both the August 21, 1945, Harry Daghlian incident—where a dropped tungsten carbide brick triggered supercriticality—and Slotin's accident, where mechanical slippage amplified neutron multiplication exponentially.^[11]^[2] The demon core incidents highlighted the inherent instability of subcritical assemblies near the critical point, where small perturbations could yield lethal doses in seconds, prompting the institutionalization of remote handling as a core principle in fissile material experiments.^[1] This transition not only averted further manual mishaps but also laid foundational precedents for modern criticality safety standards, including geometric spacing requirements, mass limits, and engineered barriers to prevent accidental assembly of supercritical configurations.^[11]^[1] By privileging mechanical reliability over operator dexterity, these protocols reduced reliance on individual vigilance, recognizing that human factors alone could not mitigate the rapid kinetics of fission chain reactions.^[2]

Historical Lessons on Risk in Scientific Advancement

The Demon core incidents revealed the acute dangers of manual criticality experiments in early nuclear research, where human precision was tasked with maintaining subcritical configurations amid pressures for rapid advancement. On August 21, 1945, physicist Harry Daghlian Jr. accidentally dropped a tungsten carbide brick onto the plutonium assembly, inducing supercriticality and exposing him to a lethal neutron burst estimated at 510 rem; similarly, on May 21, 1946, Louis Slotin’s screwdriver slipped while separating beryllium hemispheres, causing a prompt critical excursion that delivered approximately 1,000 rem to Slotin. These events, both at Los Alamos National Laboratory, demonstrated how minor mechanical failures could escalate into exponential fission chain reactions, with radiation outputs far exceeding safe thresholds due to delayed disassembly times of seconds to minutes.^[1]^[11] The accidents catalyzed a shift from ad hoc, hands-on "tickling the dragon's tail" procedures—informal demonstrations prioritizing data over safeguards—to formalized remote operations using mechanical manipulators and automated controls. Pre-incident practices reflected wartime exigencies, where scientists like Slotin conducted low-budget assemblies without redundant interlocks, relying on visual and auditory cues for criticality onset; post-incident reviews at Los Alamos banned such direct interventions, recognizing that human reflexes could not reliably counter the millisecond-scale dynamics of prompt criticality. This pivot emphasized engineered geometry controls, such as fixed mass limits and neutron poisons, to enforce subcriticality margins independently of operator skill.^[31]^[32] Broader implications extended to institutional protocols, influencing the development of criticality safety handbooks and international standards that prioritize double contingencies—multiple independent failures required for an accident—over single procedural barriers. The core's subsequent meltdown for postwar testing cores underscored the non-reusability of near-critical assemblies without redesign, while long-term dosimetry from bystander exposures informed dose reconstruction models, revealing underestimations in early neutron flux calculations. These lessons affirmed that scientific progress in hazardous domains demands causal prioritization of fail-safe designs over expediency, as empirical validation through risky trials yielded data at the cost of irreplaceable lives and eroded trust in unchecked ambition.^[13]^[11]^[1]

References

[1]
[PDF] A Review of Criticality Accidents - Nuclear Regulatory Commission
creating a metal critical assembly were being demon- strated to several people. The system consisted of the same plutonium sphere reflected, in this case, by.
[2]
May 21, 1946: Louis Slotin Becomes Second Victim Of “Demon Core”
... criticality experiments with the same plutonium core, dubbed the “demon core. ... A Review of Criticality Accidents, September 26, 1967, Los Alamos National ...<|separator|>
[3]
Calculating Criticality | Los Alamos National Laboratory
Nov 1, 2023 · The Los Alamos report A Review of Criticality Accidents (McLaughlin et al. ... demon core” criticality accidents at Los Alamos in the 1940s.
[4]
[PDF] THE DEMON CORE & FRIENDS - Hemker Lab
Oct 21, 2022 · Core was constructed of Plutonium-Gallium. Alloy, the same as the Demon Core. Plutonium was more fissile than U-235; more neutrons and less ...Missing: size composition
[5]
The Atomic-Bomb Core That Escaped World War II - The Atlantic
Apr 2, 2018 · The plutonium-gallium alloy of the demon core was hot-pressed into two hemispheres and then coated with a thin layer of nickel to protect the ...
[6]
Demon Core: The 3.5-Inch Nuclear Orb That Killed 2 Physicists
Apr 9, 2024 · Enter the "demon core". Sitting at a sizeable 6.2 kilograms (13.7 pounds) and 8.9 centimeters (3.5 inches) in diameter, this spherical mass of ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
[7]
The Chilling Tale of The 'Demon Core' And The Scientists Who ...
Dec 29, 2022 · The demon core wasn't actually demonic. If there's an evil presence here, it's not the core, but the fact that humans rushed to make these ...
[8]
plutonium - Manhattan Project - National Park Service
Approximately 4000 pounds (1814.36 kg) of uranium are needed to produce 1 pound (0.45 kg) of plutonium. Eventually, enough plutonium was ...
[9]
Plutonium Production - Manhattan Project - OSTI.gov
The production of plutonium bomb cores depended on the mining, milling, and refining of uranium ore as much as the uranium bomb designs did.
[10]
What Is 'The Demon Core' And Why Is It Called That? - ScienceABC
Dec 4, 2021 · Hence, the core has a nickel coating, which blocks the short-range alpha particles and also prevents the core from rusting. Furthermore, due ...Missing: plating | Show results with:plating
[11]
Atomic Accidents - Nuclear Museum
The same plutonium core – nicknamed “the demon core” – was being used by Daghlian and Slotin at the time of their accidents. The plutonium core was intended ...
[12]
The Story of the Demon Core, WWII's Leftover Atomic Bomb
Jul 28, 2023 · In August 1945, America was building a third atomic bomb to strike Japan, but that weapon's “demon core” begot a different tragedy.
[13]
The Demon Core: A Tale of Atomic Ambition and Tragic Fate
Apr 3, 2024 · The demon core was a plutonium core, originally intended to be the heart of the third atomic bomb developed by the United States during World War II.Missing: composition manufacturing
[14]
Demon Core: The Third Atomic Bomb Intended for Japan ... - SOFREP
May 14, 2022 · There was supposed to be a third bomb that earned the moniker “demon core” because it tended to kill anyone who did not handle it with the greatest care.
[15]
The 'Demon Core' That Killed 2 Manhattan Project Scientists
Jul 29, 2023 · WWII-era experiments on a hunk of plutonium known as the "demon core" left two Manhattan Project physicists dead.
[16]
Tickling A Dragon's Tail: The Physicist Who Tangled ... - The Debrief
Dec 1, 2020 · This time, Enrico Fermi also warned about tickling the dragon's tail, but Slotin was undaunted. ... The Demon Core was used in a test blast over ...
[17]
Demon Core: The Strange Death of Louis Slotin - The New Yorker
May 21, 2016 · Louis Slotin, a Canadian physicist, was showing his colleagues how to bring the exposed core of a nuclear weapon nearly to the point of criticality.
[18]
Slotin Building (U.S. National Park Service)
Mar 8, 2022 · He conducted criticality tests, helping determine the critical mass values of uranium and plutonium samples. ... demon core” of plutonium.
[19]
Manhattan Project Scientists: Harry Daghlian (U.S. National Park ...
Mar 4, 2025 · As Daghlian attempted to withdraw it, he accidentally dropped the brick into the center of the assembly, and it went critical. He tried ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[20]
The Demon Core - UEW Healthcare
He only lived for 9 days after this accident. These accidents led to the renaming of the plutonium core from “Rufus” to “The Demon Core.” While this story is ...
[21]
Medical Studies of the Demon Core Victims - Stanford University
Mar 18, 2024 · In a study commissioned over thirty years after the demon core incidents, the health of the those that were present in the rooms with Daghlian ...
[22]
How a careless slip led to a fatal accident in the Manhattan Project
Jul 19, 2023 · The lump of plutonium that killed Slotin was later nicknamed the "demon core". In March 1965, four months before his own death, Graves gave ...
[23]
The blue flash | Restricted Data - The Nuclear Secrecy Blog
May 23, 2016 · And even the anticlimax has a bit of a literary touch to it: the “demon core” wasn't expended in a flash, it was melted down and reintegrated ...
[24]
Dr. Louis Slotin and "The Invisible Killer" - Canada's History
Aug 28, 2016 · Louis Slotin had been exposed to almost 1,000 rads of radiation, far more than a lethal dose. Kline, who had been three or four feet away ...
[25]
None
### Summary of Acute Radiation Syndrome in Demon Core Accidents (Daghlian and Slotin)
[26]
The Death of Louis Slotin - Atomic Heritage Foundation
He was demonstrating to his colleagues how to bring a two hemispheres of a plutonium core nearly to criticality, a dangerous experiment called “tickling the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[27]
The Demon Core | Nevada Technical Associates, Inc.
Apr 2, 2021 · On May 21, 1946 physicist Louis Slotin was conducting a dangerous experiment with a plutonium sphere – designed and constructed to the exacting standards ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
[28]
Harry Daghlian - Nuclear Museum - Atomic Heritage Foundation
He died in 1945 from radiation poisoning after a criticality accident at Los Alamos. Daghlian initially studied at MIT, then transferred to Purdue University in ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[29]
The Slotin Accident: Inside the Archives – Los Alamos Historical ...
The Slotin accident was the second fatal criticality accident. Harry K. Daghlian Jr. died in 1945 after a criticality accident on August 21, 1945.
[30]
What Was The 'Demon Core', And Why Does It Matter? - Forbes
Jun 5, 2024 · The plutonium sphere was known as the “demon core.” It had originally been planned for use in a potential third atomic bomb to be dropped on Japan.
[31]
Screwdrivers And Nuclear Safety: The Demon Core | Hackaday
Aug 15, 2023 · The core had been known as Rufus but was now the “demon core.” One of the survivors of the accident would go on to design remote control ...<|separator|>
[32]
The Demon Core: Deadly Nuclear Sphere - Discovery UK
Nov 19, 2024 · The first victim of the Demon Core was 24-year-old physicist Harry Daghlian. On 21st August 1945, he was conducting an experiment that involved ...