Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Diskless node

A diskless node, also known as a diskless , is a computer system—typically a or —that lacks local disk drives for persistent , instead and operating entirely over a network by loading its operating system, applications, and data from a remote using protocols such as (NFS), (TFTP), or (PXE). This architecture relies on mechanisms, where the node fetches a minimal bootstrap loader via its network interface card () upon power-on, followed by the full from a central . Diskless nodes process computations locally using their own CPU and but defer all operations to the , making them dependent on a reliable, high-bandwidth (LAN). The concept of diskless nodes emerged in the early 1980s as part of research, with early implementations in systems like the Distributed V Kernel developed at , which enabled diskless workstations to connect to file servers over Ethernet for efficient remote file access. By the mid-1980s, commercial adoption grew through Unix-based workstations from , which were designed without local disks to leverage network-shared resources, predating widespread high-speed networking by over a decade. In the and 2000s, diskless nodes gained prominence in (HPC) environments, particularly Beowulf clusters running , where they served as slave nodes in setups, booting from a master server to execute distributed tasks like scientific simulations. Diskless nodes offer several key advantages, including reduced costs by eliminating per-node (saving approximately $100 per unit in early builds), simplified centralized for software updates and backups, and enhanced in environments where a single server image can support dozens of nodes simultaneously. They also promote resource efficiency, such as lower through shared servers and minimized overhead, while enabling user by allowing from any . However, challenges include dependency on for times and (potentially introducing compared to local disks), the need for substantial RAM (often over 128 MB without swap space), and complex initial setup requiring support for . Today, they remain relevant in educational labs, thin-client deployments, and HPC s for cost-effective, managed .

Fundamentals

Definition and Characteristics

A diskless node, also known as a , is a computer system lacking local persistent storage devices such as hard disk drives (HDDs) or solid-state drives (SSDs), which instead relies on to load its operating system from a remote and accesses files over the network using protocols such as the Network File System (NFS). This design eliminates the need for onboard secondary storage, allowing the node to function entirely through networked resources provided by a central . Key characteristics of a diskless node include its possession of a local central processing unit (CPU) and sufficient random-access memory (RAM) to handle computations and temporary data storage, often via a RAM disk for volatile needs, while depending on the network for all persistent data and software. It features a network interface card (NIC) capable of supporting boot protocols such as Preboot Execution Environment (PXE), enabling initial bootstrapping without local media. Unlike diskful nodes, diskless nodes avoid risks associated with local data storage, such as hardware failures or security vulnerabilities from unencrypted drives, but require a reliable network connection to operate effectively. In client-server architectures, diskless nodes serve as lightweight clients that offload storage and management to a central , which supplies operating system images, applications, and , thereby enabling centralized administration and reduced hardware costs per node. This setup assumes a robust infrastructure, including services like (DHCP) for IP assignment and Trivial File Transfer Protocol (TFTP) for boot file delivery, though these are foundational prerequisites rather than node-specific traits. Basic components of a diskless node encompass hardware elements like a PXE-enabled and ample (typically exceeding minimal OS requirements to support local processing), alongside software such as a bootloader (e.g., pxelinux for environments) to initiate the remote OS load.

Historical Development

The concept of diskless nodes emerged in the early 1980s as part of ' vision for networked computing, with the original product plan for its workstations emphasizing a fully diskless design due to the high cost and limited availability of local storage at the time. Sun introduced the Network File System (NFS) in 1984, enabling these workstations to and access files over Ethernet networks in university and research settings, where shared resources reduced hardware expenses. This approach relied on / protocols for efficient, low-overhead communication, marking an early shift toward distributed systems. Adoption accelerated in the late 1980s within UNIX environments, particularly , which integrated NFS for seamless diskless booting and among workstations. The (BOOTP), standardized in RFC 951 in 1985, provided a foundational mechanism for diskless clients to obtain IP addresses and boot server details over , evolving from earlier proprietary methods to support broader interoperability. By the 1990s, the technology expanded beyond UNIX; introduced Remoteboot in (released in 1996), allowing diskless x86 clients to boot over the network in enterprise settings, while precursors to the (LTSP), initiated in the late 1990s, facilitated similar setups for low-cost Linux-based nodes. Diskless nodes peaked during this client-server era, enabling scalable deployments in education and business. The 2000s saw standardization with Intel's (PXE), specified in 1998 as part of the Wired for Management initiative, which extended BOOTP's capabilities into DHCP (RFC 2131, 1997) for dynamic addressing and simplified across diverse hardware. However, the proliferation of affordable local storage in the late 1990s and early led to a decline, as organizations favored self-contained systems over networked dependencies. Post-2010, diskless nodes resurged in (HPC) clusters for enhanced and reliability, with technologies enabling stateless configurations that minimized failure points and supported massive . As of 2025, they continue to be deployed in HPC environments using frameworks like OpenHPC for provisioning diskless clusters.

Operational Mechanisms

Booting and Initialization

The booting process of a diskless node begins with the power-on self-test (POST), where the , typically or , initializes the hardware components, including the (NIC). During this phase, the firmware executes the (PXE) option ROM embedded in the NIC to prepare for . The node then broadcasts a DHCP discover packet to obtain network configuration, as PXE relies on DHCP for initial discovery and address assignment. Upon receiving the DHCP offer from the , which includes the client's , subnet mask, gateway, and the IP address of the boot along with the path to the bootstrap file, the node configures its network stack accordingly. The client then enters the PXE selection phase, where it requests the network bootstrap program (NBP), such as pxelinux.0, via the (TFTP) from the specified boot . This lightweight is downloaded and executed, prompting the node to fetch the image (e.g., vmlinuz) and initial disk (initrd) over TFTP or, for larger files, (NFS). The protocols central to this process include PXE for overall network boot orchestration, DHCP for dynamic host configuration and boot file discovery, TFTP for efficient transfer of small boot files like the NBP and kernel, and NFS for mounting the root filesystem post-kernel load. In addition, modern UEFI systems support HTTP Boot as an alternative to TFTP, enabling direct HTTP downloads of boot files for enhanced performance on high-speed networks. PXE operates in phases: discovery (DHCP request/response), selection (further DHCP for boot server details), and loading (TFTP download of NBP). These protocols enable the node to operate without local storage by relying entirely on the network infrastructure. After the kernel loads into memory from the initrd, initialization proceeds with the kernel mounting the root filesystem over NFS, specified via command-line parameters like root=/dev/nfs nfsroot=<server-ip>:<root-dir>. The initrd provides a temporary root environment to load necessary drivers and modules, after which the system pivots to the NFS-mounted root, establishes connectivity if not already done, and initializes user-space services to establish a . Failure handling includes retries for DHCP timeouts (defaulting to multiple protocols like BOOTP or RARP if enabled) and kernel-level debugging options like nfsrootdebug for mount issues or errors. Hardware prerequisites for successful booting encompass a compatible with PXE firmware support (version 2.1 or later) to handle the initial network requests, and sufficient RAM to accommodate the , , and runtime needs (typically at least 2 for modern distributions, as the boot environment and caching rely heavily on ). or legacy must also support network boot prioritization in the firmware settings.

Storage and Resource Access

In diskless nodes, the storage model relies on a centralized exporting shared filesystems, typically via NFS in environments, allowing nodes to perform read and write operations remotely. Nodes access this storage primarily through the Network File System version 4 (NFSv4), which enables transparent as if the data were local. For Windows environments, the Common Internet File System (CIFS) or (SMB) protocols facilitate similar remote access to centralized file shares. Resource access in diskless nodes occurs entirely over the network, with mechanisms designed to support operational needs post-booting. Swap space is provisioned via NFS-mounted files or partitions on the server, providing virtual memory extension without local disks. Applications execute directly from remote filesystems, loading binaries and data from the server on demand. To mitigate network latency, nodes employ RAM-based caching, where the NFS client stores frequently accessed file attributes and data blocks in memory, reducing repeated server queries. Concurrent access to shared resources is managed through locking protocols; NFSv4 integrates byte-range locking natively to prevent conflicts, while earlier versions use the Network Lock Manager (NLM) for advisory locks. File system integration ensures seamless operation by mounting the server's exported directories over the network. The root filesystem (rootfs) is typically mounted via NFS, configurable as read-only for stability or read-write for modifications, containing the full operating system and binaries. User home directories reside on the centralized server, accessed through dedicated NFS exports, while all data changes persist server-side since nodes lack local storage for long-term retention. These mechanisms depend on robust network infrastructure to maintain performance, with or higher bandwidth recommended to handle file I/O demands effectively. Server-side load balancing, often via clustered NFS implementations, prevents bottlenecks from multiple nodes accessing shared storage simultaneously.

Specific Implementations

In Unix-like Systems

In Unix-like systems, diskless nodes are commonly implemented using network booting protocols such as PXE (), which relies on a combination of DHCP for IP assignment, TFTP for transferring boot files, and NFS for mounting the root filesystem. The server-side setup involves configuring these services on a central host; for instance, in , the DHCP server is set up to provide boot parameters pointing to the TFTP server's IP and the NFS export path, while the TFTP server hosts the kernel and initramfs images generated using tools like dracut with the --add "dracut-network" option to include network modules in the initial RAM disk. On the client side, netboot tools such as FAI (Fully Automatic Installation) automate the provisioning of diskless environments by generating customized boot configurations and NFS exports during installation, allowing for scalable deployment across multiple nodes without local storage. Key tools and distributions provide tailored support for diskless operations. In , the mkinitcpio tool with the netboot hook enables the creation of an initramfs that mounts the NFS , as detailed in official configuration guides where the HOOKS array in /etc/mkinitcpio.conf includes 'net' and 'netconf' for early initialization. offers comprehensive diskless guides that emphasize compiling a custom with NFS and driver support, followed by exporting the filesystem via NFSv4 for enhanced security and performance. The Linux Terminal Server Project (LTSP) is particularly suited for educational clusters, where it automates the netbooting of thin clients by integrating DHCP, TFTP, and NFS into a single framework, allowing up to hundreds of diskless nodes to share a centralized with minimal per-client customization. boot parameters are crucial for NFS mounting, typically specified as root=/dev/nfs nfsroot=server_ip:/exported_path ip=dhcp in the PXE (e.g., pxelinux.cfg), ensuring the client locates and mounts the remote filesystem immediately after loading. Common use cases in Unix-like systems include high-performance computing (HPC) clusters and embedded systems. In HPC environments, diskless compute nodes are provisioned using frameworks like OpenHPC with Warewulf, which builds stateless images for bare-metal over NFS, enabling efficient resource sharing in clusters running resource managers such as Slurm or Professional; for example, Warewulf's vnfs tool creates a virtual NFS image that supports rapid scaling to thousands of nodes without local disks. Embedded systems leverage diskless nodes for resource-constrained devices, such as industrial controllers or IoT gateways, where Linux distributions like generate minimal initramfs images for PXE over NFS, reducing hardware costs and power consumption while maintaining remote manageability. Security benefits arise from stateless operation, as all file changes are discarded on reboot, preventing persistent or unauthorized modifications and simplifying compliance in multi-user environments like educational labs. Challenges in implementing diskless nodes include the need for custom builds to incorporate specific network drivers, as the initramfs must load hardware support before the NFS root is accessible; for instance, if a client's driver is not modular or included early, boot failures occur, requiring recompilation with CONFIG_NFS_FS=y and relevant drivers like e1000 or virtio enabled as built-in. Recent distributions, such as Server 24.04, address these through integrated PXE support in netboot images, where the subiquity installer can be configured for diskless booting via DHCP options and NFS exports, though users must verify compatibility and rules for TFTP (/69) and NFS (/2049).

In Windows Environments

In Windows environments, technologies for and deployment have been used to support setups resembling diskless nodes, though full persistent operation without local storage is less common than in systems and often involves thin clients or virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) rather than direct network-hosted root filesystems. Remote Installation Services (RIS), introduced with Windows 2000 Server, provided a PXE-based mechanism for unattended installations of Windows operating systems over the network, allowing client machines to boot remotely and receive OS images from a without . RIS integrated with for user authentication during the setup process, streamlining deployment in domain-joined scenarios. This approach evolved with (WDS), the successor to RIS released in , which expanded support for deploying and later versions using (PXE) booting combined with (WinPE) images in .WIM format. WDS facilitates imaging of multiple clients via network multicast, reducing usage for large-scale rollouts, though it requires compatible network infrastructure to avoid transmission failures. These tools are primarily for initial OS deployment, often to local storage, but can enable network access to shares post-boot using the (SMB) protocol for applications and data in scenarios approximating diskless operation. Contemporary configurations leverage the Microsoft Deployment Toolkit (MDT) alongside WDS for automated network booting, where clients initiate PXE requests to load WinPE boot images and access deployment shares over the network. MDT configurations often integrate with Active Directory for centralized authentication, ensuring secure domain logons and policy application during and after the boot sequence. As of Windows Server 2025, WDS continues to support UEFI-based PXE booting with Secure Boot integration for enhanced security in network deployments. However, Windows setups exhibit limitations for true diskless nodes compared to Unix-like systems, such as reduced flexibility for kernel modifications due to the proprietary nature of the Windows kernel, and a dependence on multicast protocols in WDS for efficient multi-client imaging, which can be constrained by network variability and the slowest participating device.

Comparative Analysis

Versus Fat Clients

Diskless nodes differ fundamentally from fat clients, which are traditional workstations equipped with local storage, full operating systems, and substantial processing capabilities. In terms of software management, diskless nodes enable centralized updates and configurations on the , allowing a single patch or modification to propagate instantly to all connected nodes without the need for individual device interventions required in fat client environments. This reduces administrative overhead significantly, as administrators maintain uniformity across the fleet from one location, contrasting with the decentralized patching and challenges in fat clients where each machine must be updated separately. Storage in diskless nodes relies on network-shared resources from a central , eliminating local disks and thereby preventing silos that can occur in clients with independent hard drives. This centralization facilitates consistent access and avoids duplication across devices but introduces a potential if the server experiences , unlike the distributed of local in clients where individual failures do not impact the entire system. Maintenance benefits further highlight the advantages, as backups and scanning can be performed centrally on the , protecting all nodes simultaneously without per-device operations; for instance, antivirus measures need only target the single , minimizing propagation risks that plague client networks. Additionally, the absence of local disks promotes hardware uniformity, simplifying repairs and upgrades across diskless setups compared to the varied disk configurations in clients. Cost implications favor diskless nodes through lower per-node expenses, as no local is required, though this shifts reliance to robust network infrastructure. deployments often achieve cost savings by consolidating resources on , reducing the need for redundant drives and associated power consumption in each fat client.

Versus Thin Clients

Diskless nodes and thin clients both represent approaches to minimizing local in networked computing environments, but they differ fundamentally in their processing models. A diskless node boots its full operating system into local from a remote and executes applications locally on the client , relying on for files and data. In contrast, thin clients employ a server-centric model where the client device runs a minimal operating system and uses remote protocols such as RDP or VNC to offload nearly all , rendering, and application execution to the , with the client primarily handling and . This local execution in diskless nodes allows for greater autonomy in running complex software stacks once booted, whereas thin clients function more as terminals dependent on server resources for core operations. Resource requirements also highlight key trade-offs between the two. Diskless nodes typically demand more substantial local hardware, including higher CPU capabilities and (often 8-32 as of 2025) to accommodate the full OS and local application processing in memory, enabling support for resource-intensive tasks even with intermittent access to . Thin clients, by comparison, operate with minimal resources, such as 2-8 of and low-power processors, as they defer most workload to the and require only enough local capability for handling and basic rendering. This disparity means diskless nodes can handle offline-capable complex applications without server intervention, while thin clients prioritize low cost and simplicity at the expense of local versatility. Both architectures exhibit high network dependency, yet the nature of failure modes varies. Diskless nodes require a stable connection for initial , OS updates, and access via protocols like NFS, and loss of can severely impair functionality by denying file access, potentially halting operations mid-task. Thin clients are similarly reliant on the for all processing, but they can often degrade gracefully to a basic or locked state if falters, without the same level of local state disruption since applications run remotely. Consequently, diskless nodes face harder failures in -dependent scenarios, while thin clients maintain some usability as long as the remains reachable. Deployment scenarios further underscore these differences, with diskless nodes suiting environments needing local compute power for tasks like CAD or scientific simulations, where low-latency processing benefits from running on client . Thin clients, however, excel in office productivity settings such as , web browsing, or document editing, where centralized server resources can efficiently support multiple users with standardized applications.

Applications and Considerations

Modern Uses and Case Studies

In (HPC), diskless nodes continue to enable scalable clusters by centralizing storage and reducing hardware complexity, allowing systems to support thousands of compute nodes efficiently. For instance, the supercomputer in , operational since 2022 and ranked among the world's top systems, employs diskless compute nodes that load operating system images into via , facilitating rapid provisioning across its 2,048 CPU nodes and 2,978 GPU nodes. This architecture minimizes local storage dependencies, enhancing reliability in large-scale simulations for scientific research. In and , diskless designs optimize efficiency by decoupling compute from , leading to faster I/O performance and lower maintenance costs. Huawei's OceanDisk, introduced in 2023, represents a professional solution tailored for diskless architectures in multi-cloud environments, where operate without local disks and rely on remote enclosures for data access, reducing space and energy consumption by 40%. Similarly, in (IoT) deployments, devices leverage netbooting to run diskless, centralizing image management on a for edge clusters; this approach supports scalable networks by enabling quick updates without per-device . Educational and enterprise environments benefit from diskless nodes through simplified lab management and enhanced security. The Linux Terminal Server Project (LTSP) powers diskless labs in schools, supporting over 100 nodes from a single server to provide centralized access to , reducing costs for under-resourced institutions. For cluster security, the oneSIS framework integrated with enables immutable diskless images, allowing version-controlled updates and verification to prevent tampering; originally detailed in 2012. Case studies illustrate practical implementations in diverse settings. supports diskless home servers via netboot configurations, where nodes boot from a central NFS root filesystem, ideal for lightweight multi-device environments as outlined in recent documentation. In research grids, and RHEL-based diskless nodes, such as those provisioned in the Grid'5000 platform, reduce failure points by eliminating local disks, improving uptime in distributed scientific computing workflows.

Advantages and Challenges

Diskless nodes offer enhanced primarily because they lack local , eliminating the risk of data theft from physical devices and preventing persistent infections since systems revert to a clean state upon . This stateless further reduces malware persistence by ensuring no residual changes survive restarts, while centralized auditing on the simplifies and efforts. Cost savings are a key benefit, as diskless nodes require cheaper without disk drives, and unified on a central server streamlines updates, backups, and maintenance across all nodes, lowering total ownership costs. Scalability is facilitated by protocols like DHCP, allowing easy addition of new nodes without individual , with systems supporting up to thousands of nodes in production environments. However, network latency poses a significant challenge, as remote file access via protocols like NFS results in slower read speeds than local SSDs due to protocol overhead and transmission delays. A single failure can halt operations for all dependent nodes, creating a critical that affects availability. High initial setup complexity, involving network configuration, image distribution, and protocol tuning, also demands specialized expertise and time. Performance impacts from can be mitigated through caching to store frequently accessed data locally and by deploying high-speed 10GbE networks to reduce transmission times. While security benefits like stateless booting inherently counter , scalability limits generally confine diskless setups to 10-1000 nodes effectively; larger deployments may require distributed storage solutions such as GlusterFS to distribute load and avoid bottlenecks.

References

  1. [1]
    Cheapest and Hardest: Diskless Nodes - Duke Physics
    Sun Microsystems, in particular, for years sold workstations designed to operate as diskless computers. They didn't have a disk. They didn't want a disk.Missing: definition science
  2. [2]
    [PDF] A Linux PC Cluster with Diskless Slave Nodes for Parallel Computing
    Diskless nodes lower the “Total Cost of Ownership” of the computer system. In this paper, a SMP-based PC cluster consists of one master node and eight diskless ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] The Distributed V Kernel and Its Performance for Diskless ...
    Jul 1, 1983 · Diskless workstations, however, have a number of advantages, including: 1. Lower hardware cost per workstation. 2.
  4. [4]
    What is Diskless Workstation? - Webopedia
    Sep 1, 1996 · A diskless workstation or PC on a local-area network (LAN) is a computer system that does not have its own disk. Instead, it stores files on a network file ...Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
  5. [5]
    Chapter 19. Setting up a remote diskless system | 8
    The following diagram describes the connection of a diskless client with the server through Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) and Trivial File Transfer ...Missing: features | Show results with:features
  6. [6]
    First-Hand:Sun Microsystems's Storage History – The Early Years
    The original product plan for the Sun workstation was to be diskless, meaning to have no disk storage at all, because at the time, in 1980, there was no ...
  7. [7]
    Network File System - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The systems covered are: NFS developed by Sun Microsystems in 1984, AFS developed at Carnegie Mellon University as part of the Andrew project, and SFS developed ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Sun's Network File System (NFS) - cs.wisc.edu
    One of the earliest and quite successful distributed systems was devel- oped by Sun Microsystems, and is known as the Sun Network File Sys- tem (or NFS) [S86].
  9. [9]
    NFS: the early years - LWN.net
    the next generation. These early versions of NFS were developed within Sun Microsystems. The code was made available for other Unix ...
  10. [10]
    RFC 951 - bootstrap protocol (bootp)
    This RFC describes an IP/UDP bootstrap protocol (BOOTP) which allows a diskless client machine to discover its own IP address, the address of a server host, ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  11. [11]
    Explanation of How Windows NT Server 4.0 Remoteboot Works ...
    This article discusses the benefits and inner workings of the Windows NT 4.0 Remoteboot utility.Missing: 1990s history
  12. [12]
    Open Source Linux For You - May 2013 | PDF | Sap Se - Scribd
    Rating 4.0 (1) May 1, 2013 · The Linux Terminal Server Project (LTSP). In the late 1990s, the LTSP was created to enable low-end PCs to function as thin clients, especially ...
  13. [13]
    D Understanding PXE Booting and Kickstart Technology
    PXE is part of the "Wired for Management" (WfM) specification, which is part of a bigger PC98 specification defined by Intel and Microsoft in 1998. A detailed ...
  14. [14]
    The Benefits of Delivering a Diskless HPC Cluster - PSSC Labs
    Jun 12, 2017 · The most obvious benefit is reduced support cost and down time in the event of Compute Node disk failure. Now no one needs to go into the data center to swap a ...Missing: resurgence 2010s
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Towards Green Computing using Diskless High Performance Clusters
    In this section, we present our configuration to setup and perform (HPL) benchmark for both diskless and diskfull nodes. To measure and compare performance, we ...Missing: resurgence 2010s
  16. [16]
    [PDF] UEFI PXE Boot Performance Analysis - Intel
    Preboot Execution Environment (PXE) defines a method for booting computers using a network interface, independent of local storage devices or installed ...
  17. [17]
    Mounting the root filesystem via NFS (nfsroot)
    3.5) Using a boot ROM This is probably the most elegant way of booting a diskless client. With a boot ROM the kernel is loaded using the TFTP protocol. The ...
  18. [18]
    Chapter 24. Setting up a Remote Diskless System
    Swap Space. Swap Space; 15.1. Adding Swap ... After configuring tftp for diskless clients, configure DHCP, NFS, and the exported file system accordingly.
  19. [19]
    RFC 7530 - Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Protocol
    Unlike earlier versions, the NFS version 4 protocol supports traditional file access while integrating support for file locking and the MOUNT protocol. In ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Microsoft SMB Protocol and CIFS Protocol Overview - Win32 apps
    Jul 9, 2025 · The Server Message Block (SMB) Protocol is a network file sharing protocol, and as implemented in Microsoft Windows is known as Microsoft SMB Protocol.Missing: diskless | Show results with:diskless
  21. [21]
    Tuning to Improve NFS Performance - Oracle Help Center
    Disk bandwidth on an NFS server has the greatest effect on NFS client performance. Providing sufficient bandwidth and memory for file system caching is crucial ...
  22. [22]
    NFS File Locking - TechDocs - Broadcom Inc.
    File locking mechanisms are used to restrict access to data stored on a server to only one user or process at a time. The locking mechanisms of the two NFS ...
  23. [23]
    24.3. Configuring an Exported File System for Diskless Clients
    Configure the NFS service to export the root directory by adding it to /etc/exports . For instructions on how to do so, see the Section 8.6.1, “The /etc/exports ...Missing: workstation centralized
  24. [24]
    [PDF] NFS in NetApp ONTAP Best practice and implementation guide
    This guide provides basic concepts, support, configuration tips, and best practices for NFS in NetApp ONTAP, covering the latest ONTAP versions.<|control11|><|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Highly Available NFS Exports with DRBD & Pacemaker - LINBIT
    May 29, 2025 · This blog post explains how to configure an NFS server instance in a 3-node high availability (HA) active/passive Linux cluster using DRBD® and Pacemaker.
  26. [26]
    FAI Guide (Fully Automatic Installation)
    Apr 10, 2025 · FAI is a non-interactive system to install, customize and manage Linux systems and software configurations on computers as well as virtual machines and chroot ...
  27. [27]
    Diskless system - ArchWiki - Arch Linux
    Oct 14, 2025 · A diskless node (or diskless workstation) is a workstation or personal computer without disk drives, which employs network booting to load its ...
  28. [28]
    Diskless nodes - Gentoo Wiki
    Feb 23, 2025 · This article will help setting up diskless workstations based on the Gentoo Linux distribution. This guide is intended to make the process as user friendly as ...
  29. [29]
    Linux Terminal Server Project
    The Linux Terminal Server Project (LTSP) helps netboot LAN clients from a single template, making maintenance of many diskless clients easy. LTSP was ...Support · Ltsp.conf · Ltsp-dnsmasq · Ltsp-imageMissing: nodes | Show results with:nodes
  30. [30]
    Warewulf: Home
    Warewulf is an open-source, successful HPC cluster platform that provisions containers to bare metal hardware, is easy to use, and is scalable.Documentation · News · About · Getting HelpMissing: diskless | Show results with:diskless
  31. [31]
    Diskless (Stateless) Installation — xCAT 2.17.0 documentation
    If you want, your Service Nodes can be stateless (diskless). The Service Node must contain not only the OS, but also the xCAT software and its dependencies.
  32. [32]
    Ubuntu 22.04 PXE / UEFI netboot DESKTOP installation
    Apr 21, 2022 · Just finished unattended installation of Ubuntu Server 22.04.1 on diskless server without any issues. It boots using iSCSI. I'm using iPXE ...
  33. [33]
    Microsoft Security Bulletin MS06-077 - Important
    Dec 12, 2006 · What is RIS? Remote Installation Services (RIS) is a Pre-boot Execution Environment (PXE)-based deployment technology that allows Windows setup ...
  34. [34]
    Windows Deployment Services - Win32 apps | Microsoft Learn
    Aug 19, 2020 · Windows Deployment Services (WDS) is the revised version of Remote Installation Services (RIS). WDS enables the deployment of Windows ...
  35. [35]
    Multicast deployment fails from WDS - Windows Server
    Jan 15, 2025 · This article provides a solution to an issue where deploying an image from a Windows Deployment Services (WDS) server by using multicast fails.
  36. [36]
    Get started with the Microsoft Deployment Toolkit (MDT) (Windows 10)
    Nov 27, 2022 · MDT is a unified collection of tools, processes, and guidance for automating desktop and server deployment.
  37. [37]
    Overview of file sharing using the SMB 3 protocol in Windows Server
    Jan 15, 2025 · This article provides an overview of the Server Message Block (SMB) 3 protocol in Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2012 R2, and Windows ...Missing: diskless | Show results with:diskless
  38. [38]
    What's New in Windows Server 2022
    ### Summary: UEFI PXE, Diskless, or Network Boot in Windows Server 2022
  39. [39]
    WDS Multicast Configuration - Specops Software
    May 9, 2025 · Multicast in WDS sends one data stream to multiple clients, reducing network usage. WDS can use multiple streams, but speed is limited by the ...
  40. [40]
    AIX
    ### Summary of Advantages of Diskless and Dataless Clients
  41. [41]
    3. Advantages of Diskless Computer
    Diskless computers are absolutely maintainence free and troublefree. Long life of diskless clients - more than 300 years without any hardware or software ...Missing: storage maintenance
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Internet Cafe and Intel SSD Case Study
    We save on the average per-client cost of a diskless server by up to 40 percent.” Reduce management and maintenance cost of the server. In the Internet café ...Missing: fat comparison
  43. [43]
    Diskless Client - Super User
    Feb 23, 2018 · It seems you are confusing what a diskless client and a thin client do. A diskless client boots off of a network, but uses network storage ...Missing: node OS
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Thin Client-Server Computing
    This paper presents an overview of the current technology in regards to thin client hardware and software. The main concentration is on Windows Based Terminals,.<|control11|><|separator|>
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Virtual memory for Diskless Desktop Workstations - Purdue e-Pubs
    We have developed a virtual memory system that pages to a remote page server machine over a local area network. The client operating system is based on the.Missing: thin | Show results with:thin
  46. [46]
    How to fully set up a thin client environment - TechTarget
    Jul 31, 2025 · At the user front end, thin clients require low to moderate CPU power, 2-8 GB of RAM depending on user workload, small solid-state drive ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Comparison of Thin Client Solutions
    Apr 7, 1999 · This PC was called a diskless workstation. The main functions of the NetPC are to offer flexibility and scalability. You can use it on your.Missing: differences | Show results with:differences
  48. [48]
    DebianEdu/Documentation/Stretch/HowTo/NetworkClients
    Aug 17, 2025 · A diskless workstation runs all software locally. The client machines boot directly from the LTSP server without a local hard drive. Software is ...Missing: differences | Show results with:differences
  49. [49]
    Client Machine - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A thin client requires little or no software on the client machine, often using an Internet browser for the front end, while a thick-client design requires a ...
  50. [50]
    VDI hardware comparison: Thin vs. thick vs. zero clients | TechTarget
    Sep 11, 2020 · Thin clients aren't on a diet; they just do less processing than 'fat' clients. Devices such as the iPad are also VDI hardware options.Missing: diskless node dependency
  51. [51]
    HPE Cray PE - LUMI training materials
    Since LUMI compute nodes are diskless, the system image actually occupies RAM which is another reason to keep it small. Programming models¶. Slide Programming ...
  52. [52]
    CPU nodes - LUMI-C - Documentation
    The LUMI-C hardware partition consists of 2048 CPU-based compute nodes. Some of these nodes contain more memory than others as specified in the table below.Missing: diskless | Show results with:diskless
  53. [53]
    Huawei Releases New Storage Solution to Build Data Infrastructure ...
    Feb 28, 2023 · To resolve this issue, Huawei has launched OceanDisk, the industry's first professional storage for diskless architecture with decoupled storage ...
  54. [54]
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Diskless Cluster Computing: Security Benefit of oneSIS and Git
    Apr 12, 2012 · OneSIS is an open source project that was developed by Josh England while working for Sandia National Laboratories as a method for booting ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Efficient and Scalable Operating System Provisioning for HPC Clusters
    Jun 21, 2012 · We present Kadeploy3, a tool built to efficiently and reliably deploy a large number of cluster nodes. Since it is a keystone of the Grid'5000.
  57. [57]
    2. Advantages of Diskless Computer
    Virus cannot do any damage to diskless computers. Only one single server box need to be protected against virus attack. This saves millions of dollars for the ...Missing: scanning | Show results with:scanning
  58. [58]
    Implementing scalable disk-less clusters using the Network ... - OSTI
    Sep 1, 2003 · This paper describes a methodology for implementing disk-less cluster systems using the Network File System (NFS) that scales to thousands of nodes.
  59. [59]
    Why is the write speed on NFS share slower than the write speed on ...
    Aug 5, 2024 · Performing write operations on NFS shares is three times slower than the local file system. Why does write speed slow over NFS as compared to ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Evaluating the Shared Root File System Approach for Diskless High ...
    The shared root file system approach for large-scale diskless HPC systems, such as with 100,000 or more compute nodes, can only be achieved in a hierarchical.<|control11|><|separator|>
  61. [61]
    Implementing Caching Strategies To Accelerate Network Booting
    Oct 4, 2025 · Caching reduces boot time in network environments by storing frequently accessed data locally, which minimizes the need for repeated data ...
  62. [62]
    GlusterFS – Description of the distributed file system - Server - IONOS
    Jul 29, 2020 · GlusterFS is a distributed, arbitrarily scalable file system that aggregates storage components from several servers into one, uniform file system.Missing: diskless | Show results with:diskless