Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Drive testing

Drive testing is a fundamental method in mobile telecommunications for measuring and assessing the coverage, capacity, and (QoS) of radio access networks, involving the collection of using vehicles equipped with specialized scanners and test devices while traversing predefined routes. This technique provides snapshots of under actual environmental and usage conditions, capturing metrics such as signal strength, levels, handover success rates, throughput, , and call drop rates across technologies like , , , and . Primarily conducted outdoors, drive testing simulates user experiences in macro cellular deployments and is essential for verifying network deployment after site activations or infrastructure changes. The primary purposes of drive testing include network optimization, , and performance verification, enabling operators to identify coverage holes, interference sources, and mobility issues that affect . It supports key use cases such as coverage and , parameter tuning for common channels, QoS benchmarking against competitors, and compliance with regulatory requirements, including broadband availability validation in regions like the . For instance, in deployments, drive tests measure download/upload speeds, latency, and signal quality during peak hours to ensure reliable service delivery. Periodic drive testing is also performed in response to customer complaints, key performance indicator () alarms, or market-level comparisons to maintain competitive edge. In methodology, drive testing typically employs measurement vehicles fitted with rooftop antennas, radio frequency (RF) scanners for passive signal detection, and active test mobile devices to emulate user traffic, generating data logs that are post-processed using specialized software for and . Routes are selected to cover , suburban, and rural areas, with tests often repeated under varying conditions like traffic density or time of day to reflect diverse scenarios. Despite its effectiveness, traditional drive testing incurs high operational costs due to the need for skilled personnel, advanced equipment, and fuel, prompting the development of complementary technologies. Advancements such as the 3GPP-defined Minimization of Drive Tests (MDT) functionality aim to reduce reliance on physical drive tests by leveraging measurements from () in idle, connected, or inactive states, either logging for later or providing immediate to . Introduced in 3GPP Release 10 and enhanced through subsequent releases up to Release 17 (as of 2023), with further enhancements in Release 18, MDT collects similar coverage, quality, and performance at lower cost, covering UTRAN, E-UTRAN, and NG-RAN deployments while preserving through location obfuscation. This evolution complements drive testing by enabling scalable, crowdsourced insights, particularly for indoor and dense urban environments where vehicle-based methods are limited.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

Drive testing is a technique employed in to evaluate by conducting measurements from vehicles traversing designated areas. It involves equipping vehicles with (RF) receivers, such as scanners and test mobile devices, (GPS) units, and data logging software to capture on network signals and . This method provides empirical insights into how networks operate under actual field conditions, encompassing urban, suburban, and rural environments. The primary purposes of drive testing include validating network coverage to ensure consistent signal reach, identifying sources of that degrade performance, measuring signal quality to assess reliability, and verifying compliance with agreements (SLAs) that define expected network standards. These objectives support network deployment, optimization, and by highlighting discrepancies between planned and actual performance. Effective implementation requires a foundational understanding of RF propagation principles, which govern signal behavior, and familiarity with mobile network architectures such as for , for , and 5G New Radio (NR). In adapting to modern networks, drive testing has evolved to incorporate specialized assessments for millimeter-wave (mmWave) frequencies and technologies, which enable high-speed data transmission but demand precise alignment and coverage validation; these enhancements emerged prominently between 2018 and 2020 as deployments accelerated. Unlike simulation-based models that rely on theoretical predictions, drive testing delivers ground-truth data reflecting real-world variables like and user mobility, thereby facilitating proactive improvements to network efficiency and .

Historical Development

Drive testing originated in the early days of mobile networks during the , coinciding with the commercial deployment of analog cellular systems like the (AMPS) in the United States. Engineers performed manual assessments by driving vehicles equipped with basic radio frequency (RF) receivers to measure signal strength and identify coverage gaps, often logging data on paper to support initial network planning and optimization. These rudimentary efforts addressed the challenges of expanding analog voice services, where limited data volume and lack of made comprehensive testing labor-intensive. The technique was formalized in the 1990s with the transition to digital networks, particularly the (GSM), as European operators sought standardized methods for verifying coverage and performance. Field tests for GSM were conducted as early as 1986. The (ETSI), established in 1988, played a pivotal role by developing initial GSM specifications in 1990, which facilitated structured procedures for network verification to ensure and quality. By the late 1990s, drive testing became a core practice for GSM rollout, evolving from ad-hoc manual checks to more structured procedures using early digital logging tools. In the 2000s, drive testing advanced significantly with the advent of technologies like and , shifting toward automated software solutions that enabled real-time data collection for voice and emerging data services. Tools such as Anritsu's Master, introduced around 2005, facilitated automated measurements of parameters like throughput and latency, reducing reliance on manual processes and handling larger data volumes. The formation of the in 1998 further standardized these practices, with guidelines emphasizing drive tests in UMTS/CDMA optimization. The 2010s marked integration with 4G Long-Term Evolution (LTE) networks, where drive testing focused on high-speed data throughput and mobility scenarios, incorporating (GPS) integration by the early 2000s for precise geolocation of measurements following the end of GPS selective availability in 2000. To address ongoing challenges like high costs and limited coverage from manual drives, introduced Minimization of Drive Tests (MDT) in Release 10 (2011), enabling crowdsourced data from user devices to supplement traditional testing. Post-2020, enhancements for 5G New Radio (NR) included vehicle-mounted systems for massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) testing, supporting and millimeter-wave assessments. By the , cloud-based analysis platforms emerged, allowing remote processing of drive test data for faster optimization and scalability.

Data Collection

Key Parameters Measured

Drive testing captures a range of (RF) signal metrics essential for evaluating signal strength and quality in mobile networks. These include (RSSI), which measures the total power received from the transmitter including noise and interference; Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP), defined in and as the linear average of the power contributions (in watts) of the resource elements carrying cell-specific reference signals within the considered measurement frequency bandwidth; Bit Error Rate (BER), indicating the rate of erroneous bits in the received data; and Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise Ratio (SINR), calculated as \text{SINR} = \frac{S}{I + N} where S is the desired signal power, I is the interference power, and N is the noise power. Network performance parameters logged during drive tests focus on service reliability and efficiency. These encompass downlink and uplink throughput, representing the data transfer rates in bits per second; latency, the round-trip time for data packets in milliseconds; handover success rates, the percentage of seamless cell transitions without service interruption; and call drop rates, the frequency of involuntary connection terminations. Coverage indicators provide insights into and signal distribution. For CDMA systems, Ec/No measures the per chip normalized to ; serving cell ID identifies the currently connected ; and neighbor cell lists track adjacent cells for potential handovers. In networks, beam management metrics such as Synchronization Signal Block () RSRP are measured, representing the average RSRP over the SSB resource elements and introduced in 3GPP Release 15 (2018) to support directional . All parameters are logged as timestamped samples, at regular intervals often 1 second or less, to enable precise post-processing and with network events.

Location and Environmental Data

In drive testing for mobile networks, GPS integration via Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) receivers is essential for capturing precise positioning data that maps test routes and correlates measurements with geographic . Key parameters recorded include , , altitude, speed, and heading, enabling accurate route visualization and analysis of signal performance across traversed areas. These data points are typically logged at intervals determined by distance or time, with GNSS requiring a lock on at least three satellites for reliable operation during vehicle movement. Environmental factors play a critical role in contextualizing drive test results, as they influence signal and network behavior in diverse settings. Terrain types such as urban (dense buildings causing multipath fading), rural (open areas with line-of-sight dominance), and indoor (high penetration loss) are documented to assess how physical clutter affects coverage. conditions, particularly rain, induce attenuation known as , which is pronounced in millimeter-wave (mmWave) bands above 10 GHz, with increasing based on rainfall rate, frequency, and link distance—e.g., up to several / in scenarios. Time-of-day variations, including diurnal refractivity changes and traffic-induced mobility patterns, further modulate signal strength, with measurements showing greater fluctuations in afternoons compared to mornings due to atmospheric and usage dynamics. Route planning in drive testing involves designing pre-defined paths to systematically cover cellular cells, high-traffic hotspots, and coverage fringes where signal quality may degrade. These routes are optimized using algorithms that maps into sub-areas, select critical points based on density and poor signal zones (e.g., RSRP below -100 dBm), and employ traversal patterns like spirals or rows to minimize time and cost while ensuring comprehensive . (GIS) software facilitates visualization by overlaying planned routes on digital maps, incorporating factors like and speed limits to align with test objectives such as in specific clutter environments. Synchronization of location and environmental data with RF measurements relies on precise timestamps to align disparate logs from GNSS, sensors, and scanners, enabling post-processing into geospatial representations. Timestamps in Coordinated (UTC) format correlate position data (e.g., interpolated every 3-4 meters) with other metrics, facilitating the generation of coverage heatmaps that visualize signal distribution across tested areas. This process involves automated software correlation, often integrating data into GIS layers for heatmaps showing variations by band or . Advanced integrations since 2022 have enhanced drive testing accuracy in challenging environments, particularly for deployments. Accelerometers capture , such as vibrations and acceleration, to refine speed estimates and compensate for GNSS inaccuracies in urban canyons, supporting more robust tagging during high-mobility tests. sensors, increasingly adopted for urban clutter modeling, provide high-resolution 3D mapping of obstacles like buildings and foliage, aiding predictions and site-specific optimizations in mmWave scenarios where traditional GNSS alone falls short.

Methodologies

Types Based on Use Cases

Drive testing in is classified by its primary objectives, drawing from frameworks like those in specifications for radio measurement collection, which distinguish between pre-launch validation—such as verifying new site deployments and initial coverage—and post-deployment maintenance, including ongoing issue resolution and performance tuning. These use cases emphasize targeted data gathering to support network lifecycle stages, from rollout acceptance to sustained operations. Network benchmarking represents a comparative approach to drive testing, where measurements are conducted across multiple operators or technologies to assess relative market performance, including metrics like coverage extent and throughput consistency. This type often relies on neutral third-party tools and services to maintain impartiality, enabling regulators or operators to evaluate competitive landscapes without bias. For instance, benchmarking campaigns may involve synchronized multi-device setups driving predefined urban and rural routes to generate standardized reports on operator rankings. Optimization and troubleshooting drive tests focus on diagnosing and resolving specific network impairments, such as coverage holes, handover failures, or from external sources like buildings or spectrum neighbors. These tests employ scripted routes designed to replicate reported user complaints or hotspots, allowing engineers to correlate real-time measurements with site configurations for precise parameter adjustments. Unlike broader surveys, this prioritizes high-resolution during repeated traversals of problematic areas to isolate root causes efficiently. Service quality monitoring through drive testing involves periodic or continuous evaluations to track key performance indicators (KPIs), ensuring sustained metrics like voice quality via Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) and average data speeds under varying loads. This ongoing application supports and reporting, with tests often integrated into routine patrols to detect degradations early. Since 2020, drive testing has expanded in environments to verify ultra-reliable low-latency communication (URLLC) requirements, testing end-to-end latency below 1 ms and reliability exceeding 99.999% for mission-critical applications like industrial automation. These extensions incorporate specialized scenarios, such as vehicular or factory-floor simulations, to validate 3GPP-defined URLLC enhancements in real-world propagation conditions.

Types Based on Scope

Drive tests in telecommunications are categorized by their geographical or network scale, ranging from focused evaluations of individual base stations to comprehensive surveys across broad regions. This classification emphasizes the extent of coverage and interaction tested, enabling operators to verify functionality at different deployment stages without overlapping with purpose-driven methodologies. Single Site Verification (SSV), also known as Single Cell Function Test (SCFT), involves drive or walk tests around a single base station, typically post-installation, to assess basic functionality such as coverage radius, call access, handover within the cell, and parameter settings. This scope targets one cell to validate voice services like CSFB or VoLTE calls, data throughput via ping and FTP tests, and signal quality metrics including RSRP and SINR, ensuring no active alarms or provisioning issues before integration into the live network. SSV is essential for isolating site-specific problems like antenna configuration or workmanship defects. Multiple Site Verification (MSV), or Cluster Drive Test, expands the scope to evaluate interactions among 5-20 adjacent sites in an operational network, focusing on inter-cell handovers, load balancing, and . Tests collect on radio parameters such as RSRQ and SINR across voice and data services, verifying seamless and (QoE) in clustered environments. This approach simulates real-world user movement between cells, optimizing network performance during active service. Operator Benchmarking, or Market-Level Drive Test, encompasses broad surveys across cities, regions, or entire markets to compare key performance indicators (KPIs) like call drop rates and data throughputs among multiple operators. This wide-scale testing provides insights into competitive coverage and , often conducted by regulators or independent entities to identify high- and under-performing networks over large geographical areas. Scope selection aligns with network lifecycle phases: SSV is primarily used for commissioning new sites to confirm isolated functionality, MSV supports rollout and optimization in clustered deployments, and market-level tests facilitate annual audits or competitive assessments. These distinctions ensure targeted , with SSV requiring minimal routes around one site, MSV covering predefined cluster paths for validation, and benchmarking involving extensive, standardized routes for equitable comparisons. In networks, these scopes have adapted to address densification challenges, with cluster tests (MSV) now incorporating integrations to handle up to 20 times more base stations than , emphasizing intra- and inter-site mobility for beam-specific KPIs and massive performance. Additionally, scopes are expanding to include non-terrestrial networks (NTN), such as integration for hybrid terrestrial- coverage, as standardized in Release 17 and demonstrated in trials by 2024, enabling verification of seamless handovers in global connectivity scenarios.

Applications

Network Benchmarking

Network benchmarking through drive testing involves conducting simultaneous or sequential measurements across multiple mobile operators using identical routes and controlled conditions to enable fair comparisons of . This process typically employs multi-device setups in vehicles, where a single tester manages from numerous cards or devices representing different operators, ensuring synchronized testing to minimize temporal variations in network load or traffic. For instance, campaigns often cover , suburban, and rural areas with predefined routes repeated across operators to capture real-world end-user experiences. Key performance indicators (KPIs) in network benchmarking focus on comparative metrics such as average throughput, coverage percentage, and accessibility rates, which quantify differences in speeds, signal availability, and connection success rates among operators. Throughput measures and upload speeds under varying loads, while coverage percentage assesses the proportion of the route with acceptable signal strength (e.g., above -100 dBm for ). Accessibility rates evaluate the success of call setups or data sessions, often expressed as percentages, to highlight reliability gaps. These metrics are aggregated to produce overall scores, prioritizing user-centric outcomes like video streaming quality over raw radio parameters. Tools like TEMS Paragon (scalable multi-device) and Nemo Network Benchmarking Solution (up to 48 devices per vehicle) facilitate neutral, multi-operator assessments by supporting automated testing of voice, data, and OTT services, integrated with cloud-based analytics for real-time monitoring. These platforms adhere to standards such as TR 103 559, which outlines methodologies for large-scale benchmarking, including device selection, route planning, and statistical confidence levels (e.g., 95% for key KPIs) to ensure and fairness in comparisons. Compliance with this standard helps mitigate biases from device variations or testing times. Outcomes of drive testing benchmarking include detailed reports used by regulators for spectrum allocation decisions or by operators for marketing claims, such as identifying the leader in 5G speeds—for example, RootMetrics' 1H 2025 U.S. report showed Verizon achieving the fastest 5G download speeds at a median of 192.1 Mbps, outperforming AT&T's 168.7 Mbps, across drive-tested routes. These reports often feature ranked operator scores and heat maps, influencing consumer choices and investment strategies. Challenges in network benchmarking via drive testing include maintaining route consistency across multiple runs to avoid discrepancies from traffic patterns or seasonal changes, which can require GPS-logged replays and multi-vehicle coordination. Accounting for dynamic network loads is also critical, as varying user traffic during tests can skew KPIs like throughput; solutions involve off-peak scheduling and load simulation, though spectrum allocation differences (e.g., mid-band vs. mmWave in ) introduce inherent variability that standards like TR 103 559 address through normalized scoring.

Optimization and Troubleshooting

Drive testing plays a crucial role in optimization by enabling operators to identify impairments through systematic of collected . One key involves replaying logged drive test to pinpoint specific events such as call drops or throughput degradations, allowing engineers to reconstruct scenarios and isolate failure points with high precision. This replay process correlates signal measurements with timestamps, revealing patterns like sudden SINR () drops that indicate issues such as adjacent carrier interference, where emissions from neighboring frequency bands degrade the primary signal. By overlaying interference profiles on coverage maps, operators can adjust parameters to mitigate these effects, improving overall signal quality. The optimization process typically follows structured steps to ensure thorough . It begins with a baseline test to establish current metrics, followed by targeted s to replicate reported issues under similar conditions, such as high or load. then integrates the data, often using SINR maps to visualize weak spots and guide interventions like antenna tilt adjustments, which optimize beam direction to balance coverage and reduce in affected sectors. For instance, antenna tilt adjustments, such as increasing downward tilt, can improve SINR in overshoot-prone areas, directly addressing coverage holes identified from drive logs. In practical examples, drive testing has proven effective for resolving handover failures in dense urban environments, where frequent cell transitions lead to connection interruptions due to overlapping signals. Analysis of drive test logs in such scenarios reveals ping-pong s, enabling parameter tuning like hysteresis thresholds to stabilize connections and reduce failure rates. For 5G networks, troubleshooting extends to beam failure recovery, as defined in 3GPP Release 16, where drive tests validate the procedure's timers and beam selection to ensure rapid recovery from beam blockage, minimizing latency in mmWave deployments. These tests confirm compliance with recovery latency targets below 100 ms, critical for maintaining service continuity. Tools integrated into drive testing workflows enhance troubleshooting efficiency through real-time alerts and post-test capabilities. During drives, software platforms monitor key indicators like handover rates and trigger immediate notifications for anomalies, allowing on-the-spot adjustments to test routes or parameters. Post-test, simulations replay scenarios to evaluate "what-if" outcomes, such as the impact of proposed tilt changes on SINR distribution, supporting predictive optimization without additional field efforts. Emerging AI-driven approaches, particularly since 2023, automate in drive test data for faster optimization. models analyze logs to identify subtle patterns, such as interference correlations, outperforming manual methods in networks. These systems enable proactive tilt or power adjustments based on predictive insights, enhancing (SON) functions.

Service Quality Monitoring

Service quality monitoring in drive testing involves periodic assessments to ensure consistent end-user experience in mobile networks, typically conducted on a scheduled basis such as quarterly routes to benchmark key performance indicators (KPIs) against agreements (s). These drives focus on validating service reliability over time, including metrics like intelligibility measured via () and video streaming quality assessed through playback interruption rates and buffering durations. By tracking these against predefined thresholds, operators can maintain compliance and proactively address potential degradations before they impact customers. Central to this monitoring are customer-perceived metrics that reflect real-world usage, such as (TTFB) for web and application loading times, which indicates initial data transfer latency, and overall (QoE) scores derived from combined factors like throughput, latency, and error rates. For instance, TTFB targets below 200 ms are often set in SLAs to ensure responsive services, while QoE is quantified using standardized models like those from recommendations to correlate network conditions with user satisfaction. These metrics are collected during drives using automated tools that simulate end-user scenarios, providing longitudinal data for performance trends. Integration with Operations Support Systems () enables the aggregation of drive test data for advanced , allowing operators to visualize KPI variations over multiple test cycles and generate automated alerts for SLA breaches, such as sudden drops in voice below 3.5. This setup facilitates by correlating drive insights with network-wide , reducing manual intervention. In networks, monitoring extends to network slicing performance, a core capability introduced in Release 15 (2018), where drives verify slice-specific KPIs like , guarantees (e.g., under 5 ms for URLLC slices), and resource allocation to ensure for applications like autonomous vehicles. Recent advancements post-2022 have incorporated crowdsourced data from platforms like to supplement physical drive tests, enabling hybrid monitoring that covers broader geographic areas with user contributions while reducing the frequency of resource-intensive drives. This integration enhances accuracy by combining controlled drive measurements with anonymized crowdsourced signals, speeds, and coverage data, particularly for dynamic environments.

Tools and Equipment

Typical Features

Drive test tools typically consist of specialized hardware components designed for field deployment in mobile networks. Core hardware includes multi-band scanners, which are digital RF receivers capable of measuring signals across multiple frequency bands and technologies from 2G (GSM/GPRS/EDGE) to 5G NR, including both sub-6 GHz and mmWave ranges for comprehensive coverage assessment. User equipment (UE) simulators, such as engineering handsets or test mobiles with data cards, emulate end-user devices to perform active testing while supporting standards from 3GPP Release 99 to Release 18, with preliminary support for Release 19 features, enabling voice, data, and signaling interactions. GPS or GNSS antennas provide precise location tracking with sensitivities down to -165 dBm and 1 PPS timing output for georeferencing measurements, often connected via USB or Bluetooth. These components interface with rugged laptops or tablets meeting minimum specifications like Intel Core i5 processors, 8 GB RAM, and 512 GB SSD storage, ensuring durability in vehicular or outdoor environments. Software in drive test tools emphasizes real-time data processing and analysis, with features for such as dynamic signal plots, coverage maps, and beam representations to indicators (KPIs) like RSRP and SINR during tests. Automated scripting allows predefined test sequences, including scheduled executions and for repeatable scenarios across multiple devices, supporting up to 50 simultaneous connections for . Report generation capabilities produce customizable KPI summaries for voice and data services, with post-processing tools enabling offline replay and statistical analysis. Key functionalities focus on operational efficiency and network diagnostics. Call automation handles voice and data sessions, including dialing, handover testing, and quality-of-experience metrics for services like VoNR. Interference hunting identifies sources through pilot or reference signal analysis, while geo-fencing-like route adherence uses map-based planning to ensure tests follow predefined paths and trigger alerts for deviations. These tools support both indoor and outdoor scenarios, with Layer 2/3 message decoding for detailed troubleshooting. Connectivity options enable seamless data flow and integration. Tools integrate with external probes via RS232, USB 3.0, or RJ-45 interfaces to capture core network data, including Layer 2/3 messages for feature visibility like network slicing in . Cloud upload for remote analysis, introduced with TEMS Cloud in 2023, allows synchronization and collaborative processing over secure connections. Recent advancements incorporate for low-latency processing, enabling on-device root-cause analysis during high-speed tests without full cloud dependency. User interfaces prioritize usability in dynamic field conditions, featuring intuitive dashboards for live KPI monitoring, customizable graphical views, and real-time statistics overlays on maps. Export formats support GIS integration, such as KML for visualization in tools like , alongside CSV and MapInfo for further analysis in external software.

Commercially Available Tools

Several leading vendors dominate the market for drive test tools in mobile network optimization, including Technologies, Infovista (formerly associated with ), Rohde & Schwarz, and Viavi Solutions, with also providing specialized testing equipment. offers Nemo Outdoor, a laptop-based tool for vehicle-mounted drive testing supporting over 300 devices and scanners for 2G to networks, enabling data collection for optimization and troubleshooting. Infovista's Pocket provides portable, phone-based testing suitable for indoor venues, stadiums, and drone applications, with recent updates adding support for devices like the Apple 17 series. For post-processing, [Keysight](/page/ GPSight)'s Actix Analyzer delivers advanced analytics for drive test data, facilitating network optimization through visualization and reporting. Rohde & Schwarz contributes with the R&S®ROMES4 drive test software, which supports PCI and beam evaluation for , and the R&S®TSMx scanner for non-intrusive coverage measurements during drive and walk tests. Viavi's EVOIA Drive Test focuses on mission-critical communications and railway telecoms, integrating route mapping for performance validation. Key differentiators among these tools include advanced capabilities, such as Anritsu's mmWave testing solutions launched in 2019, which support millimeter-wave frequencies up to 40 GHz for over-the-air evaluations in FR2 bands using equipment like the MT8000A radio communication test station. Rohde & Schwarz's Benchmarker 3, introduced in 2023, enhances benchmarking with integrated signaling and scanner functions. Pricing varies by configuration, with basic portable kits starting around $10,000 and comprehensive vehicle-based suites exceeding $100,000, reflecting the inclusion of multi-technology support and software licenses. Market trends indicate a shift toward software-defined and virtualized drive test solutions by 2025, driven by deployments and open RAN architectures, allowing greater flexibility and reduced hardware dependency; for instance, Keysight's Virtual Drive Test Software simulates performance in non-standalone and standalone modes without physical drives. Subscription-based models are emerging for platforms, enabling scalable access to updates and processing, while open-source alternatives like srsRAN Project support research-oriented testing through its full-stack RAN implementation, including gNB emulation for load and NTN scenarios. The overall market for mobile network drive test equipment is valued at USD 6.17 billion in 2025, growing at a CAGR of 8.1% to USD 9.11 billion by 2030, fueled by penetration and network needs. When selecting commercially available tools, operators prioritize compatibility with diverse network types (e.g., to /NSA), user-friendly interfaces for field deployment, and integration with AI-driven analytics for automated insight generation, as seen in Infovista's Suite enhancements for faster validation. Emerging Chinese vendors like are gaining traction in through integrated testing platforms, though detailed market share data remains limited post-2020.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Minimization of Drive Tests (MDT) in Mobile Communication Networks
    ABSTRACT. Drive tests are used for collecting data of mobile networks. This data is needed for the configuration and the mainte- nance of mobile networks.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 137 320 V16.2.0 (2020-11)
    The present document provides an overview and overall description of the minimization of drive tests functionality. The document describes functions and ...
  3. [3]
    'Drive Tests' and Other 'Speed Tests' Conducted to Validate Mobile ...
    Feb 14, 2023 · Drive tests are a subset of speed tests, and involve testing speed while in a vehicle, either performed in motion or standing still.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Study And Implementation Of Drive Test For Development Of GSM ...
    Oct 10, 2013 · Drive Testing is a method of measuring and assessing the coverage, capacity and Quality of Service (QoS) of a mobile radio network [1]. It is ...
  5. [5]
    R&S®ROMES4 Drive test software - Rohde & Schwarz
    R&S®ROMES4 is the universal software platform for network engineering, network optimization and troubleshooting. When combined with test mobile phones and drive ...Mobile Coverage And Qos... · Network Engineering... · Features & Benefits
  6. [6]
    Making 5G NR mmWave a reality for 2019 smartphones - Qualcomm
    Oct 4, 2017 · The testing showcases how advanced 5G NR adaptive beamforming and beam tracking techniques can be utilized to deliver robust mobile broadband ...Missing: adaptation | Show results with:adaptation
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    Mobile Network Testing Evolution | Dingli
    Jan 11, 2025 · Early mobile network testing was a manual and time-consuming process. Engineers would drive around with testing equipment, measuring signal ...
  9. [9]
    Our history - ETSI
    History of ETSI. ETSI was set up in 1988 by the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT) in response to proposals from ...Missing: drive | Show results with:drive
  10. [10]
    GSM testing Wireless communications - Rohde & Schwarz
    GSM is the most dominant 2G technology deployed worldwide. In 1990, it was originally developed to transmit voice, but was later enhanced with packet data ...<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    [PDF] UMTS Master™
    Dec 14, 2005 · UMTS Master is a trademark of Anritsu Company. NOTICE. Anritsu Company has prepared this manual for use by Anritsu Company personnel and ...
  12. [12]
    GPS World: 20 Years Young, 1990-2010
    Aug 1, 2010 · Test signals were needed to exercise the receivers for the Galileo Ground Sensor Stations and the initial “Test User Segment” receivers.
  13. [13]
    Specification # 37.320 - 3GPP
    Reference: 37.320. Title: Radio measurement collection for Minimization of Drive Tests (MDT); Overall description; Stage 2. Status: Under change control.
  14. [14]
    Nemo Intelligent Device Interface 5G NR Drive Test Solution - Keysight
    Free deliveryThe reliable Nemo Intelligent Device Interface offers a wide range of flexible mounting options for drive testing, from a window-mountable lightweight rack to a ...
  15. [15]
    TEMS Cloud Analytics: A Smarter Way to Analyze Drive Testing Data
    Apr 10, 2025 · TEMS Cloud analytics is a game-changing tool if you are looking to optimize your drive testing processes. It transforms the way you conduct them.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    RF Drive Test in Telecom: Measurements and Tools
    RF drive testing is a critical process in the telecommunications industry, used to evaluate and optimize network performance.
  17. [17]
    5G NR SINR Measurement and Its Mapping - Techplayon
    It can be defined as the ratio of wanted signal strength and the unwanted interference plus noise. Signal to Interference and Noise Ratio (SINR) - Techplayon.
  18. [18]
    None
    ### Summary of RSRP Definition from 3GPP TS 36.214 V14.2.0
  19. [19]
    Measurement and Analysis of 4G/5G Mobile Signal Coverage in a ...
    Apr 15, 2024 · The dynamic parameters, known as KPIs, are crucial objective measures for evaluating signal quality in mobile networks [12].
  20. [20]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 138 133 V15.3.0 (2018-10)
    Editor's Note: FFS how to define the measurement period for SSB based L1-RSRP reporting. ... 3GPP TS 38.133 version 15.3.0 Release 15. Per-UE measurement gap. E- ...
  21. [21]
    Coverage Mapping with GPS | Anritsu America
    In this application note, you will learn how to fully operate the instrument with accordance to the coverage mapping with GPS process.
  22. [22]
    Prediction of RF-EMF Exposure by Outdoor Drive Test Measurements
    Jun 28, 2022 · In this paper, we exploit the artificial neural network (ANN) model for a spatial reconstruction of radio-frequency (RF) electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure ...Prediction Of Rf-Emf... · 2. Measurement Description · 2.2. Drive Test Protocol And...<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Top Eight Frequently Asked Questions about RF Drive Testing
    Oct 16, 2022 · Drive testing is the process of collecting samples of RF signals while driving in a certain geographical area.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Impact of Rainfall on 5G Millimeter Wave Channels - PIER Journals
    Jul 5, 2024 · The attenuation of propagating signals varies with factors such as rain rate, density, drop size, operating frequency, and path length [10, 11].Missing: day | Show results with:day
  25. [25]
    (PDF) Impacts of Weather and Environmental Conditions on Mobile ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · The impacts of weather and environmental conditions on mobile communication signals were determined in this study.
  26. [26]
    (PDF) Drive Test Route Optimization in Mobile Networks
    Sep 24, 2024 · This paper proposes a more cost-effective method for optimizing data collection during drive tests in mobile networks. The proposed method ...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    [PDF] t-mobile-drive-test-methodology-01082021.pdf
    Jan 8, 2021 · The drive testing software indicates the cell in which the speed measurement is being performed, which provides visibility to the drive test ...
  28. [28]
    Speed Estimation using Smartphone Accelerometer Data
    Mar 13, 2019 · This paper is focused on developing an algorithm to estimate vehicle speed from accelerometer data generated by an onboard smartphone.<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    [PDF] LiDAR Technology for Future Wireless Networks - Scholars' Mine
    Jan 1, 2024 · We explore two potential use cases of LiDAR integration in wireless networks, offering detailed insights into the underlying motivation ...
  30. [30]
    (PDF) Clutter height production technology with ArcGIS for the ...
    This technology, which is based on aerial images, may be adapted to use LiDAR data. The technology includes the data integration between the different software.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 137 320 V17.4.0 (2023-07)
    The document describes functions and procedures to support collection of UE-specific measurements for MDT using. Control Plane architecture, for UTRAN, E-UTRAN ...
  32. [32]
    Minimization of Drive Test Use Cases | 3GLTEInfo
    Feb 1, 2012 · Minimization of Drive Test (MDT) specifies different ways to improve network efficiency by using UE measurement logs.Missing: pre- launch validation maintenance
  33. [33]
    Measurement analysis and performance evaluation of mobile ...
    Mar 1, 2023 · Several performance metrics, such as signal quality, throughput (downlink and uplink), ping, and handover, were measured during the drive tests.
  34. [34]
    Nemo Network Benchmarking Solution - Keysight
    The new Nemo Network Benchmarking Solution (NBM) is a fully scalable drive test solution that enables mobile operators, regulators, and service contractors ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] 2024 umlaut Mobile Benchmarking Framework - Accenture
    Apr 30, 2024 · Today, more than 200 mobile networks in more than 120 countries are being evaluated by our unique scoring methodology.
  36. [36]
    Best Practices for Mobile Network Troubleshooting and Optimization
    Nov 11, 2024 · In this article, we will explore the best practices for troubleshooting mobile networks and how to optimize them to ensure a reliable and high-quality user ...
  37. [37]
    Mobile Network Benchmarking - TEMS Paragon - Infovista
    TEMS™ Paragon is a multi-device benchmarking solution that enables you to compare the service quality of your network to the competition.
  38. [38]
    Ultra Reliable and Low Latency Communications - 3GPP
    Jan 2, 2023 · URLLC is a major axis of enhancement of the 5G System. In Rel-16, the main improvement for URLLC is the introduction of Redundant transmission ...
  39. [39]
    How to test the ultra-reliability and low latency of 5G networks ...
    Mar 31, 2022 · 5G mobile networks supporting URLLC must provide low latency, with minimum packet loss or packets arriving out of order.
  40. [40]
    RF Drive test in telecom | Drive test analysis | Rantcell
    Operators conduct drive testing on an area to analyse user experience with respect to other cellular service providers. Market level drive testing can identify ...
  41. [41]
    Network benchmarking - Rohde & Schwarz
    Drive testing and benchmarking provide you with all the end-user insight that is necessary for intelligent network investment decisions.Maximize Qoe And Get Ahead... · Our Solutions · Video: Use Quality Products...
  42. [42]
    5G site verification – what is it and why does it matter? - Infovista
    May 24, 2023 · Site verification involves validating that new 5G sites and clusters provide the intended coverage and that all voice and data services are working as expected.Missing: MSV | Show results with:MSV
  43. [43]
    Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTN) - 3GPP
    May 14, 2024 · The 5G system with satellite access shall support the use of satellite links between the radio access network and core network, by enhancing the ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] ETSI TR 103 559 V1.2.1 (2023-10)
    Mobile network benchmarking is performed mainly using drive testing. This relies heavily on the choice of test device(s). Care should be taken in the selection ...<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    A simple premise for a sophisticated methodology - RootMetrics
    What are the goals of RootMetrics testing? The goal of our testing is to provide an accurate characterization of the end-user's mobile network experience.
  46. [46]
    Drive Testing Challenges and How To Cope
    Sep 18, 2015 · Like all wireless field work, it presents specific challenges technicians must overcome. Lack of Test Signals. When performing drive tests to ...
  47. [47]
    Nemo Analyze Drive Test Post Processing Solution - Keysight
    Nemo Analyze is a highly efficient and fully scalable analysis tool for benchmarking, automated troubleshooting, and statistical reporting based on drive test ...Missing: replay | Show results with:replay
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Agilent Technologies E7475A GSM Drive-Test System - Amazon AWS
    Using these channels in close proximity can cause co-channel and adjacent channel interference, which reduces the quality of the signal received by a ...
  49. [49]
    Analysis of adjacent channel interference using distribution function ...
    Sep 4, 2019 · This paper presents an adjacent channel interference ratio and communication coverage to obtain a satisfactory performance.Missing: correlation carriers
  50. [50]
    [PDF] The Benefits of SON in LTE, 4G Americas, July 2011 - 3G4G
    The optimization of handover parameters by system operators typically involves either focused drive-testing, detailed system log collection and post-.
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Dynamic Self-Optimization of the Antenna Tilt for Best Trade-off ...
    Antenna tilt improves signal reception and reduces interference, leading to higher signal-to-interference ratio and increased data rate in mobile networks.Missing: root | Show results with:root
  52. [52]
    [PDF] The Effect of Overshoot on 4G LTE Network Performance in East ...
    May 21, 2024 · The steps to improve the tilt of the antenna are carried out based on the data from the analysis of the drive test. Table 4. Antenna data ...Missing: root | Show results with:root
  53. [53]
    Performance Improvement of Handover Scheme For An Established ...
    Aug 12, 2023 · In this study, we utilize a dense LTE drive test dataset to first estimate the device's distance to the base station and the geographical ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 138 133 V16.5.0 (2020-12)
    (3GPP TS 38.133 version 16.5.0 Release 16). TECHNICAL ... EN-DC Beam Failure Detection and Link Recovery Test for FR1 PSCell configured with SSB-.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] The 5G Evolution:3GPP Releases 16-17
    Jan 16, 2020 · o Reduced latency and overhead, by avoiding beam tracking via RRC o Beam failure recovery for Scell o Measurement and reporting of L1-SINR.
  56. [56]
    Case Study: América Móvil and Viavi - Networks - GSMA
    Dec 17, 2019 · Traditionally, drive test has been used for network rollout (site verification), network s optimisation, and VIP troubleshooting. However, this ...Missing: optimization techniques<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    How generative AI is transforming telecom - Ericsson
    Nov 7, 2023 · Network traffic analysis and anomaly detection: Together with unsupervised deep learning, generative AI can be used for anomaly detection ...
  58. [58]
    Artificial intelligence advances in anomaly detection for telecom ...
    Jan 25, 2025 · This review critically examines the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, in modern anomaly detection systems for telecom networks.
  59. [59]
    TEMS Suite – Mobile Network Testing - Infovista
    The TEMS Suite provides phone-based solutions to drive test, walk test, benchmark and monitor your mobile network.
  60. [60]
    Service quality monitoring in the digital economy - Ericsson
    Jan 11, 2024 · The SLAs specify the expectations on service quality in terms of target values for key performance indicators (KPIs) and quality indicators ...
  61. [61]
    Drive testing data: 4 strategies to analyze faster and reduce costs
    Apr 16, 2025 · Say goodbye to inefficient drive testing. Discover 4 proven strategies to accelerate analysis and cut costs using automation and cloud-based ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Mobile Service Assurance | Juniper Networks
    Manual drive testing is needed for radio coverage measurements, but it is not suitable for dynamic, on-demand testing as part of slice activation and operations ...
  63. [63]
    Opensignal: Insights that connect you to success
    Opensignal is the leading global provider of independent insights into consumers' connectivity experiences and choice of carrier.Coverage Maps · Apps · Data Privacy Charter · Market InsightsMissing: integration crowdsourced 2022
  64. [64]
    Back to the future for network and service performance measurement
    Jul 25, 2024 · ... Root Metrics and Opensignal, and the ways in which they might disrupt more traditional methods such as drive testing and network data analytics.
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Revision of Standard for Generic Requirement (GR) of “Drive Tool ...
    May 21, 2025 · Types of Drive Test. 1.3.1. Single Site Verification (SSV)/Single Cell Functionality Test (SCFT). Drive Test: SSV drive test or SCFT drive ...
  66. [66]
    TEMS Investigation – Mobile Network Drive Testing - Infovista
    A powerful drive testing solution to verify, optimize and troubleshoot ... pre-launch performance. TEMS Investigation provides you with a complete set ...
  67. [67]
    Rethinking TEMS probes for 5G NR drive testing - Infovista
    Mar 2, 2021 · Continuing our exploration of subjects covered in our drive testing white paper, we now look at how Infovista is rethinking TEMS probes.Missing: massive | Show results with:massive
  68. [68]
    Tool for Drive Test and Benchmarking: KML Generator | PROMAX
    Sep 4, 2019 · KML Generator creates 3D maps, Excel files, and CSV exports from drive test data, displaying measurements and creating graphs for analysis.Missing: scripted | Show results with:scripted
  69. [69]
    Mobile Network Drive Test Equipment Market Size & Share Analysis
    May 5, 2025 · Drive testing is a process of measuring and assessing a mobile radio network's coverage, capacity, and Quality of Service (quality of service).Missing: GSM | Show results with:GSM
  70. [70]
    TEMS | Mobile Network Testing News | November 2025 - Infovista
    TEMS Investigation: our powerful drive testing solution. TEMS Investigation 27.2 adds support for new devices including the Apple iPhone 17 Series, Motorola ...
  71. [71]
    Nemo Wireless Network Solutions - Keysight
    Nemo Wireless Network Solutions provides drive testing and analytics solutions for all stages of the wireless network life cycle from rollout to optimization ...
  72. [72]
    Nemo Outdoor 5G NR Drive Test Solution - Keysight
    Nemo Outdoor is a laptop-based drive test tool for 2G, 3G, 4G, and 5G NR mobile network testing which supports over 300 devices and scanning receivers.Missing: telecom | Show results with:telecom
  73. [73]
    TEMS | Mobile Network Testing News | December 2024 - Infovista
    TEMS Pocket is a portable phone-based network testing solution for venues, stadiums, malls, offices, and drone testing.
  74. [74]
    Actix Analyzer Update 2025 - Telecom Tools
    Actix Analyzer is a network test data analysis software suite that provides advanced drive test survey analytics. It is used for network optimization, network ...
  75. [75]
    R&S®TSMx Drive and walk test scanner - Rohde & Schwarz
    The R&S®TSMx drive and walk test scanner features optimization, troubleshooting and mobile coverage measurements with non-intrusive scanner measurements.Optimization... · Features & Benefits · Available Models
  76. [76]
    EVOIA Drive Test | VIAVI Solutions Inc.
    Proven technology to validate, test and optimize mission critical communications (MCx) and railway telecom networks with confidence.Missing: Nemo | Show results with:Nemo
  77. [77]
    C8709000A Virtual Drive Test Software - Keysight
    The Virtual Drive Test Software enables you to efficiently analyze the performance of 5G new radio (NR) devices deployed in non-standalone (NSA) or standalone ...Missing: telecom | Show results with:telecom
  78. [78]
    srsran/srsRAN_Project: Open source O-RAN 5G CU/DU ... - GitHub
    The srsRAN Project is a complete 5G RAN solution, featuring an ORAN-native CU/DU developed by SRS. The solution includes a complete L1/2/3 implementation with ...
  79. [79]
    srsRAN gNB for 5G NTN
    May 15, 2024 · This tutorial demonstrates how to configure and run a 5G NR SA Non-Terrestrial Network (NTN) using srsRAN Project and Amarisoft UE with NTN extensions.
  80. [80]
    Infovista TEMS™ Suite Reviews & Ratings 2025 - TrustRadius
    Rating 9.1/10 (1) The solution helps to drive faster 5G time-to-market with lab testing, initial tuning, cluster acceptance and troubleshooting; network validation with drive ...
  81. [81]
    Functions and Applications of Automatic Integration Center - ZTE
    Mar 24, 2023 · Diverse tools are used to test the functions, performance, and security of the VNF networks to meet the hierarchical tests of the network ...