Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Elicitor

An elicitor is a compound that activates chemical defense responses in plants, particularly against pathogen infections.^[1] Originally defined as molecules inducing the production of phytoalexins—antimicrobial compounds synthesized by plants in response to stress—the term now broadly encompasses any substance capable of stimulating various plant defense mechanisms, including the accumulation of pathogenesis-related proteins and reactive oxygen species.^[1] These responses mimic natural signals triggered by biotic (e.g., microbial) or abiotic (e.g., environmental) stresses, enabling plants to mount rapid and effective resistance.^[1] Elicitors are categorized into several types based on their origin and nature.^[1] Physical elicitors, such as mechanical injury or UV radiation, directly damage plant tissues to provoke defensive signaling.^[1] Chemical elicitors include abiotic agents like metal ions (e.g., silver or vanadium salts) and biotic agents derived from pathogens, such as polysaccharides (e.g., chitosan from fungal cell walls), glycoproteins, lipids (e.g., lipopolysaccharides), and plant-derived hormones like salicylic acid or methyl jasmonate.^[1]^[2] Biotic elicitors can be complex, like yeast extracts or fungal mycelia, or defined, such as specific oligosaccharides, and they often act as general triggers in both host and nonhost plants or in race-specific interactions tied to particular pathogen strains.^[1] The mechanism of elicitor action begins with recognition by specific receptors on plant cell surfaces or within the cytoplasm, initiating intricate signal transduction pathways.^[1] This recognition leads to crosstalk among hormonal signaling routes, including salicylic acid for local hypersensitive responses (localized cell death to contain pathogens), jasmonic acid and ethylene for broader defenses against herbivores or necrotrophs, and the production of secondary metabolites that inhibit microbial growth.^[1] In systemic acquired resistance, elicitor-induced changes propagate through the vascular system, priming distant tissues for enhanced protection against future attacks.^[1] Beyond natural defense, elicitors play a crucial role in biotechnology for sustainable production of high-value compounds. Recent advances as of 2025 include the integration of elicitors with nanotechnology, omics technologies, and CRISPR-based bioprocessing to optimize yields and plant immunity.^[3] In plant cell suspension cultures and hairy root systems grown in bioreactors, elicitors like methyl jasmonate, cyclodextrins, and coronatine dramatically boost yields of pharmaceuticals such as taxanes (from Taxus species, up to 55-fold increases) and ginsenosides (up to 28-fold in Panax ginseng).^[2] These applications reduce reliance on wild harvesting of endangered plants, minimize pesticide use in agriculture, and support eco-friendly crop protection strategies, as seen with commercial products like benzothiadiazole (Bion) for inducing resistance in crops such as wheat and tomato.^[1]^[2]

Overview

Definition

In plant biology, elicitors are defined as molecules or compounds that trigger or activate plant defense mechanisms by stimulating biosynthetic pathways for the production of chemical defenses, such as phytoalexins and pathogenesis-related proteins.^[1] These substances function as signaling agents that mimic the presence of pathogens or environmental threats, thereby inducing systemic acquired resistance or hypersensitive responses in plants.^[1] Originally identified for their role in phytoalexin induction, the concept has broadened to include any compound that elicits a broad spectrum of defensive responses, including the accumulation of antimicrobial metabolites and reinforcement of cell walls.^[4] Elicitors exhibit general characteristics as low-molecular-weight compounds or factors that operate at minimal concentrations to provoke defense activation across various plant species.^[1] They are categorized into biotic elicitors, which are derived from pathogens (such as fungal or bacterial components) or the plants themselves (endogenous elicitors like cell-wall fragments), and abiotic elicitors, which encompass non-biological environmental factors including chemical agents or physical stressors.^[1] Biotic examples include polysaccharides like chitin and glycoproteins, while abiotic examples involve peptides, heavy metal ions, or mechanical wounding.^[1] This dual classification underscores their versatility in simulating attack signals to enhance plant resilience without direct pathogen involvement.^[1] The scope of elicitors is primarily within plant pathology and immunology, where they play a key role in studying and enhancing innate immune responses against biotic and abiotic stresses.^[1] Unlike biostimulants, which broadly promote growth, nutrient uptake, and overall physiological resilience, elicitors specifically target defense-related pathways to induce resistance mechanisms, distinguishing them as tools for targeted immunogenic activation rather than general agronomic enhancement.^[5] In this context, elicitors briefly activate downstream signaling pathways, such as those involving reactive oxygen species, leading to coordinated defense gene expression.^[1]

Historical Background

The concept of elicitors emerged from early observations in the 1960s and 1970s, when researchers noted that plants like soybeans produced antimicrobial phytoalexins, such as glyceollin, in response to fungal infections by pathogens including Phytophthora megasperma f. sp. glycinea. These findings highlighted the induced nature of plant defenses against microbial invasion, with pioneering studies by J. Kuć demonstrating that prior pathogen exposure could trigger systemic resistance through phytoalexin accumulation, as shown in tobacco and cucumber systems.^[6]^[7] A key milestone came in 1972, when Noel T. Keen and colleagues coined the term "elicitor" to describe specific compounds derived from Phytophthora megasperma var. sojae cell walls that induced phytoalexin production in soybeans without live pathogen involvement, distinguishing race-specific elicitors that correlated with gene-for-gene resistance. This work built on empirical assays of pathogen-induced responses and shifted focus toward isolating active molecules from fungal sources. In the 1980s, advances revealed oligoglucans from fungal cell walls as critical active elicitors; Peter Albersheim's group identified branched β-1,3/1,6-linked oligoglucosides, with Sharp et al. (1984) elucidating the structure of a potent hepta-β-glucoside from Phytophthora megasperma that strongly triggered phytoalexin synthesis in soybeans at nanomolar concentrations. These discoveries emphasized the role of carbohydrate fragments in defense signaling and expanded elicitor research beyond crude extracts. The 1990s marked a transition to molecular genetics, with the cloning of the first plant resistance (R) genes, such as RPS2 in Arabidopsis (1994), enabling studies on elicitor perception and laying groundwork for identifying pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that detect microbial patterns. By the 2000s, research evolved from pathogen-focused empirical studies to targeted elicitor applications for crop protection, while 2010s genomics efforts, including Phytophthora genome sequencing, unveiled diverse elicitor families and their evolutionary origins.^[8] In the 2020s, advances have integrated elicitors with omics technologies, nanotechnology, and CRISPR-based approaches to enhance secondary metabolite production and sustainable plant immunity, as seen in studies on nanomaterial elicitors and oligosaccharide mechanisms (as of 2025).^[3]^[9]

Classification

Biotic Elicitors

Biotic elicitors are molecules derived from living organisms that trigger defense responses in plants, primarily through the activation of innate immunity pathways. These elicitors originate from pathogens, damaged plant tissues, or herbivorous insects, serving as signals of potential infection or injury. Unlike abiotic elicitors, biotic ones are biologically produced and often conserved across species, enabling broad-spectrum recognition by plant receptors. Sources of biotic elicitors include microbial pathogens such as fungi, bacteria, and oomycetes, which release pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs); endogenous plant components released during damage, known as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs); and insect-derived molecules. Fungal pathogens contribute elicitors from their cell walls, bacterial ones from surface structures like flagella, and plant-derived DAMPs from degraded cell walls during wounding or infection. Insect elicitors, sometimes termed herbivore-associated molecular patterns (HAMPs), arise from oral secretions or regurgitants during feeding.^[10]^[11] The chemical nature of biotic elicitors encompasses polysaccharides, peptides, glycoproteins, and lipids, each with structures that facilitate recognition by plant pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). Polysaccharides, such as chitin and β-glucans from fungal cell walls, are linear or branched polymers that elicit responses at specific chain lengths; for instance, chitin oligomers of seven to eight units exhibit optimal activity in rice. Peptides include bacterial harpins, which are heat-stable proteins secreted via type III secretion systems, and flagellin, a 22-amino-acid epitope from bacterial flagella recognized in Arabidopsis. Glycoproteins like elicitins from oomycetes (e.g., INF1 from Phytophthora infestans) and lipids such as volicitin from insect saliva (a fatty acid conjugate in maize) also serve as elicitors. Chitosan, a deacetylated form of chitin, acts as a broad-spectrum elicitor derived from fungal sources.^[10]^[11] PAMPs and DAMPs represent key categories within biotic elicitors, distinguished by their origins and roles in immunity. PAMPs, such as flagellin and chitin, are exogenous microbe-derived patterns that initiate pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) against a wide range of pathogens. In contrast, DAMPs like oligogalacturonides—short chains of galacturonic acid from pectin degradation in plant cell walls—signal host damage and amplify defenses, often requiring a minimum degree of polymerization (e.g., 9-12 units) for activity. This diversity allows plants to detect both invading microbes and self-damage, with elicitor efficacy influenced by factors like molecular size and concentration thresholds. For example, β-glucans from fungal walls require chains longer than five glucose units to trigger responses in tobacco.^[10]

Abiotic Elicitors

Abiotic elicitors encompass non-biological factors derived from environmental stresses or synthetic compounds that trigger plant defense responses, distinct from biotic origins by their inanimate nature. These elicitors activate signaling pathways leading to the production of secondary metabolites, such as phytoalexins and phenolics, enhancing plant resilience against various stresses. Unlike biotic elicitors, abiotic ones often operate through broad, non-specific mechanisms involving reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and ion flux alterations.^[12]^[3] Environmental stresses serve as primary sources of abiotic elicitors, including ultraviolet (UV) radiation, temperature extremes, and mechanical wounding. UV radiation, particularly UV-B (280-315 nm), induces phenolic compound accumulation by upregulating phenylpropanoid pathway genes, with low doses (e.g., 0.738 kJ/m²) boosting phenolics by up to 22.8% in mung bean sprouts without causing cellular damage. Temperature extremes, such as hyperthermia at 42°C or chilling, activate defense enzymes and phytoalexin synthesis through oxidative bursts, while wounding mimics herbivore damage to stimulate jasmonic acid-independent pathways and localized resistance. These physical factors are dosage-dependent, where optimal exposure elicits potent defenses but excessive levels lead to toxicity.^[12]^[3]^[13] Synthetic chemicals further exemplify abiotic elicitors, categorized by their chemical or physical properties, such as heavy metals, osmotic agents, and hormone analogs. Heavy metals like copper (Cu²⁺) and silver (Ag⁺) ions act as potent inducers of phenolic and flavonoid production at low concentrations, for instance, CuO nanoparticles enhancing purpurin levels in Rubia cordifolia,^[14] though higher doses induce toxicity. Osmotic agents, including sodium chloride (NaCl) at 50-250 mM, simulate drought stress to elevate glucosinolates and alkaloids, as seen in Catharanthus roseus where NaCl treatment increases vinblastine yield. Hormone analogs, such as methyl jasmonate (MeJA) at 200 µM, mimic endogenous signals to amplify secondary metabolites like glucosinolates by 154% when combined with UV-B, while abscisic acid (ABA) analogs promote trehalose accumulation for osmotic tolerance. Silica nanoparticles represent emerging physical elicitors, with related metal oxide nanoparticles increasing phenolics up to 200-fold in barley under stress. Overall, these elicitors exhibit non-specific yet effective activity, often integrating with biotic signals to fine-tune comprehensive defense responses.^[3]^[15]^[12]

Relation to Effectors and Hormones

Effectors

Effectors are proteins secreted by microbial pathogens, particularly bacteria and fungi, that are translocated into host plant cells to manipulate cellular physiology and promote infection.^[16] These molecules typically function as virulence factors by interfering with host processes, such as suppressing basal immune responses.^[17] In bacterial pathogens like Pseudomonas syringae, effectors are injected directly into plant cells via the type III secretion system, a needle-like apparatus that delivers up to dozens of such proteins during pathogenesis.^[17] Fungal pathogens, including biotrophs like Cladosporium fulvum and powdery mildews (Blumeria graminis), secrete effectors into the extracellular space or translocate them into host cells, often through haustoria, to similarly subvert host defenses.^[18] Certain effectors serve dual roles as avirulence (Avr) factors, acting as elicitors when recognized by plant resistance (R) proteins, thereby triggering robust defense responses.^[16] For instance, the Avr2 effector from the fungal pathogen Cladosporium fulvum inhibits the tomato cysteine protease Rcr3 to suppress defenses but is perceived by the Cf-2 R-protein, eliciting a hypersensitive response (HR) characterized by localized cell death and restriction of pathogen spread.^[19] Similarly, the bacterial effector AvrPto from Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato binds to the Pto kinase, which associates with the Prf R-protein in tomato, activating effector-triggered immunity (ETI) and HR upon recognition.^[16] In powdery mildews, effectors such as those encoded by AVR genes (e.g., recognized by allelic MLA immune receptors in barley) are detected intracellularly, provoking ETI and halting fungal penetration.^[20] According to the zig-zag model of plant-microbe coevolution, effectors primarily suppress PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI)—the basal defense against microbial patterns—to facilitate effector-triggered susceptibility (ETS), but mismatched recognition by R-proteins shifts the outcome to ETI, amplifying defenses like HR.^[16] This distinction underscores effectors' role as both suppressors of innate immunity in compatible interactions and potent elicitors in incompatible ones, driving the evolutionary arms race between plants and pathogens.^[16]

Plant Hormones

Plant hormones play crucial roles in modulating elicitor responses during defense signaling, acting as endogenous signals that coordinate systemic immunity. Salicylic acid (SA) is a key hormone associated with systemic acquired resistance (SAR), which provides long-lasting protection against biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens following an initial infection.^[21] In contrast, jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene primarily mediate responses to wounding, necrotrophic pathogens, and herbivory, activating defenses such as the production of protease inhibitors that impair herbivore digestion.^[22]^[23] These hormones function as elicitors when applied exogenously, mimicking biotic stresses to prime plant defenses. For instance, exogenous methyl-SA application induces SAR-like resistance by elevating endogenous SA levels and activating defense gene expression, while methyl jasmonate (MeJA), a JA derivative, triggers JA-dependent pathways to enhance resistance against herbivores and necrotrophs.^[24]^[25] Elicitors such as pathogen-associated molecular patterns further upregulate the biosynthesis of these hormones, amplifying signaling cascades. Typical elicitation concentrations range from 50–150 μM for SA and JA in foliar applications, though higher doses like 0.1–1 mM JA can intensify responses in certain species.^[26]^[27] Interactions between these pathways often exhibit antagonism, allowing plants to fine-tune defenses based on the threat type. The SA pathway typically suppresses JA signaling, and vice versa, as seen in Arabidopsis where elevated SA levels inhibit JA-induced protease inhibitor accumulation, prioritizing biotrophic over necrotrophic defense.^[28] Biosynthetically, SA is primarily derived via the phenylpropanoid pathway from phenylalanine through phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) or the isochorismate synthase (ICS) route, while JA arises from α-linolenic acid via the octadecanoid pathway in chloroplasts and peroxisomes.^[29]^[30] Ethylene biosynthesis from methionine complements JA in wound responses, though its elicitor role is less direct. Downstream, these hormones briefly converge to activate defense genes like PR1 for SA or PDF1.2 for JA.^[31]

Mechanisms of Action

Perception and Recognition

Plants perceive biotic elicitors primarily through two classes of immune receptors: pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) located at the plasma membrane, which detect pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), and intracellular nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) proteins, which recognize pathogen effectors.^[32] PRRs, such as leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases (LRR-RLKs), bind to conserved microbial features to initiate pattern-triggered immunity (PTI), while NLRs mediate effector-triggered immunity (ETI) upon detection of virulence factors delivered inside host cells. A key example of PRR-mediated perception is the Arabidopsis FLAGELLIN-SENSING 2 (FLS2) receptor, an LRR-RLK that specifically binds the bacterial flagellin-derived epitope flg22, triggering immune responses. Upon ligand binding, FLS2 undergoes dimerization with the co-receptor BRI1-ASSOCIATED KINASE 1 (BAK1), leading to autophosphorylation and activation of the receptor kinase complex. Similarly, in rice, the chitin elicitor receptor kinase 1 (OsCERK1), a LysM-RLK, perceives fungal chitin oligosaccharides through its extracellular LysM domains, initiating kinase activity essential for defense signaling. The recognition process typically involves direct or indirect binding of the elicitor to the receptor's extracellular domain, resulting in conformational changes that activate intracellular kinase domains and propagate signals. For instance, in the case of chitin perception by OsCERK1, binding induces receptor oligomerization, enhancing autophosphorylation and downstream immune activation.^[33] In NLR-mediated recognition, effectors are often detected indirectly through the "guard" model, where NLRs monitor host proteins modified by effectors, or directly via physical interactions, though direct binding is less common.^[34] Initial cellular responses to elicitor perception include rapid ion fluxes across the plasma membrane, such as calcium influx and potassium efflux, followed by depolarization of the membrane potential.^[35] These events, occurring within seconds to minutes of recognition, generate an electrochemical gradient that amplifies signaling and contributes to defense activation, as observed in tobacco cells treated with fungal elicitors.^[36] Recognition specificity is exemplified by race-specific interactions between avirulence (Avr) proteins from pathogens and corresponding resistance (R) proteins in hosts, such as the tomato Cf-9 NLR recognizing Cladosporium fulvum Avr9, leading to targeted hypersensitive cell death. The perception systems reflect an evolutionary arms race, where pathogens evolve to evade or suppress receptors, driving selection for new recognition specificities in plants through co-evolution of elicitors and immune receptors.^[37] This dynamic has resulted in diverse receptor architectures, with NLR genes showing signatures of positive selection in response to pathogen effector variation across plant lineages.^[38] Abiotic elicitors are perceived through mechanisms distinct from those of biotic elicitors. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation, particularly UV-B, is detected by the photoreceptor UV RESISTANCE LOCUS 8 (UVR8), which exists as a homodimer in the absence of UV-B. Upon UV-B absorption, UVR8 monomerizes and translocates to the nucleus, where it interacts with CONSTITUTIVELY PHOTOMORPHOGENIC 1 (COP1) to regulate gene expression for defense and acclimation.^[39] Physical elicitors such as mechanical injury are sensed via mechanosensitive channels and receptors. For example, stretch-activated ion channels like MID1-COMPLEMENTING ACTIVITY (MCA1) in Arabidopsis mediate calcium influx in response to mechanical stimulation, initiating wound signaling.^[40] Chemical abiotic elicitors, including heavy metal ions (e.g., cadmium or silver), are often perceived indirectly through transporters or by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) that activate downstream stress pathways, though specific sensors like metal-binding proteins may contribute to recognition.^[41]

Signal Transduction

Upon perception of elicitors, plants initiate intracellular signal transduction cascades that amplify and relay the signal to coordinate defense responses. These pathways involve rapid activation of second messengers and kinases, leading to transcriptional reprogramming. Key components include reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades, and calcium ion (Ca²⁺) fluxes, which integrate with phytohormone signaling for specificity and amplification.^[42] A primary early event in elicitor signaling is the oxidative burst, where ROS such as superoxide and hydrogen peroxide are generated primarily through the activity of plasma membrane-bound NADPH oxidases, known as respiratory burst oxidase homologs (RBOHs). In Arabidopsis, the elicitor flg22 triggers rapid phosphorylation of RBOHD by the receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase BIK1, initiating ROS production within minutes to reinforce cell walls and act as a signaling molecule.^[43] Similarly, chitin oligosaccharides in rice activate OsRbohB via OsRLCK176 phosphorylation, sustaining the ROS burst to propagate defense signals.^[42] This ROS accumulation not only has antimicrobial effects but also serves as a hub for crosstalk with other pathways. Parallel to the ROS burst, MAPK cascades transduce elicitor signals through sequential phosphorylation events. The conserved module involves MAPKKK-MAPKK-MAPK kinases, with MPK3 and MPK6 being central in Arabidopsis defense. Elicitors like flg22 activate the MAPKKK3/5-MKK4/5-MPK3/6 cascade downstream of pattern recognition receptors, leading to phosphorylation of downstream targets within 5-15 minutes.^[44] In rice, chitin induces OsMPK3/6 via OsMKK4 and upstream MAPKKKs, amplifying signals for immune activation.^[42] These MAPKs integrate with ROS by promoting further RBOHD activity and feedback loops, ensuring signal robustness.^[43] Calcium influx serves as a versatile second messenger in these cascades, decoding elicitor signals through oscillatory patterns. Elicitors such as oligogalacturonides trigger rapid cytosolic Ca²⁺ elevation via channels like cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (CNGCs) and glutamate receptor-like channels (GLRs), peaking within seconds to minutes.^[45] In rice, chitin oligosaccharides activate OsCERK1-mediated Ca²⁺ influx through OsCNGC9, which in turn activates calmodulin-dependent kinases to phosphorylate RBOHs and MAPKs.^[42] This Ca²⁺ signaling reinforces the ROS burst by directly binding and activating RBOHD, creating a feed-forward loop that sustains oxidative signaling.^[43] Hormone signaling hubs exhibit extensive crosstalk with these core pathways, modulating response specificity. Salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) pathways often antagonize each other in elicitor responses, with SA suppressing JA via NPR1-mediated degradation of JAZ repressors and redox changes that inhibit JA biosynthesis enzymes like ACX2/3.^[46] Abscisic acid (ABA) synergizes with JA by activating MYC2 transcription factors, which integrate with MAPK outputs to fine-tune defenses; for instance, pectin oligosaccharides enhance SA accumulation while JA/ABA pathways promote ROS-dependent responses.^[42]^[46] Calcium further links these by phosphorylating WRKY51 in JA-ABA modules, illustrating multilayered integration.^[46] Signal amplification occurs through phosphorylation cascades and transcriptional regulators like WRKY factors. MPK3/6 directly phosphorylate WRKY33, releasing it from inhibitory complexes to bind W-box elements in defense gene promoters, thereby reprogramming transcription.^[44] In elicitor-treated parsley cells, WRKY1 binds rapidly to W-boxes, amplifying MAPK signals for sustained defense activation.^[47] This phosphorylation-dependent mechanism ensures signal fidelity, with WRKYs also mediating hormone crosstalk, such as AtWRKY40 repressing ABA-responsive genes while enhancing SA pathways.^[47] Signaling specificity distinguishes pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) from effector-triggered immunity (ETI), with elicitors primarily driving PTI but overlapping in ETI amplification. PTI features transient ROS bursts, short-lived MAPK activation (e.g., 15-30 minutes for MPK3/6), and moderate Ca²⁺ spikes via PRRs, whereas ETI sustains these—prolonged ROS via NLR-RBOHD feedback, extended MAPK activity, and robust Ca²⁺ waves—often leading to stronger hormone shifts like elevated SA.^[48] For example, oligogalacturonides elicit PTI with rapid but limited ROS, while Avr effectors in ETI potentiate this through shared cascades, enhancing overall immunity without independent pathways.^[42]^[48]

Induced Responses

Defense Gene Expression

Elicitors trigger the activation of defense genes in plants, leading to the production of proteins that directly combat pathogens or reinforce cellular structures. This process primarily involves the transcriptional upregulation of pathogenesis-related (PR) protein genes, which are hallmark markers of induced defenses. For instance, PR-1 genes, associated with the salicylic acid (SA) signaling pathway, are rapidly expressed in response to biotic elicitors such as fungal cell wall fragments, encoding acidic proteins with antimicrobial properties.^[49] Similarly, PR-3 (chitinases) and PR-2 (β-1,3-glucanases) genes are induced to hydrolyze fungal chitin and glucans, respectively, thereby degrading pathogen cell walls and preventing invasion.^[50] The regulation of these defense genes is mediated by key transcription factors, with NPR1 serving as a central regulator in systemic acquired resistance (SAR). Upon elicitor perception, NPR1 monomers translocate to the nucleus, where they interact with TGA family transcription factors to bind promoters of PR genes like PR-1, promoting their expression within hours of stimulation—typically detectable within 3-6 hours and peaking at 12-24 hours.^[51] This rapid induction is crucial for mounting timely local defenses during the hypersensitive response (HR), where genes associated with reactive oxygen species production and cell death are activated at the infection site to contain biotrophic pathogens. In contrast, systemic defenses via SAR involve mobile signals, such as SA derivatives, that propagate PR gene expression to distant tissues, enhancing broad-spectrum resistance. In jasmonic acid (JA)-mediated pathways, elicitors from necrotrophic pathogens or wounding activate genes like PDF1.2, which encodes a defensin with antifungal activity against soil-borne fungi. PDF1.2 expression is synergistically regulated by JA and ethylene signaling through ERF transcription factors binding to GCC-box motifs in its promoter, providing targeted protection against necrotrophs without overlapping significantly with SA-dependent PR genes.^[52] These distinct yet interconnected regulatory networks ensure coordinated gene expression tailored to the invading pathogen type.

Secondary Metabolite Production

Elicitors trigger the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites in plants as a key component of induced defense responses, redirecting metabolic resources toward the production of antimicrobial compounds that inhibit pathogen growth.^[53] These metabolites, including phytoalexins, phenolics, alkaloids, and terpenoids, accumulate in response to biotic and abiotic stresses, providing localized protection against invaders.^[54] The induction process involves the activation of specific enzymatic pathways, leading to rapid shifts in carbon flux that favor secondary metabolism over primary growth processes.^[55] Phytoalexins represent a prominent class of antimicrobial secondary metabolites elicited in plants, such as camalexin in Arabidopsis thaliana, which is synthesized via the cytochrome P450 monooxygenase CYP71A13 that converts indole-3-acetaldoxime to indole-3-acetonitrile in the biosynthetic pathway.^[56] Phenolics, including flavonoids and stilbenes, are derived from the phenylpropanoid pathway, where elicitors like fungal cell wall extracts upregulate phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) to initiate the production of lignins and isoflavonoids that reinforce cell walls and deter herbivores.^[55] Alkaloids, such as those boosted by jasmonate elicitors, accumulate in response to wounding or herbivory; for instance, combined sodium fluoride and methyl jasmonate treatment in Cephalotaxus mannii cell cultures enhances harringtonine production up to 4.8-fold through jasmonate-responsive signaling.^[53] Terpenoids, synthesized via the mevalonate pathway in the cytosol, include triterpenoids like tanshinones in Salvia miltiorrhiza, where compound elicitors such as methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid increase yields by activating upstream isoprenoid precursors.^[57] These secondary metabolites exhibit distinct timing and localization patterns, with rapid accumulation often observed within hours at infection sites to contain pathogen spread; for example, resveratrol, a stilbene phytoalexin in grapevines (Vitis vinifera), is induced by elicitors from Trichoderma viride and accumulates in cell suspensions to confer resistance against fungi like Botrytis cinerea.^[58] In elicited plant cell cultures, quantitative enhancements are significant, with yields of metabolites like resveratrol in Arachis hypogaea reaching up to 99-fold higher following sodium acetate treatment, and phenolics such as verbascoside in Rehmannia glutinosa increasing 10-fold with methyl jasmonate.^[54] Such amplifications, ranging from 10- to 100-fold across various systems, underscore the efficiency of elicitation in scaling metabolite production for defense.^[53] This elicitor-driven biosynthesis is upregulated alongside defense gene expression but focuses on non-protein outputs that directly contribute to antimicrobial activity.^[53]

Applications

Crop Protection

Elicitors are applied in crop protection through various strategies to induce plant resistance against pathogens, primarily by activating defense mechanisms such as induced systemic resistance (ISR). Foliar sprays represent a common method, where elicitors like chitosan are directly applied to leaves to trigger rapid defense responses; for instance, chitosan foliar application has been shown to protect tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum) against early blight caused by Alternaria solani, reducing disease incidence by enhancing chitinase activity and phenolic compound production.^[59] Seed treatments involve coating seeds with elicitors prior to planting to provide early protection; treatments with jasmonic acid or methyl jasmonate on tomato seeds have induced resistance to insect pests like the Colorado potato beetle, correlating with increased polyphenol oxidase activity in leaves and reduced larval survival.^[60] These approaches are often integrated into pest management (IPM) programs, combining elicitors with biological controls or reduced chemical inputs to enhance overall efficacy while minimizing environmental impact.^[61] Specific examples illustrate the practical application of elicitors in field settings. Acibenzolar-S-methyl (BTH), a synthetic mimic of salicylic acid, is used to induce systemic acquired resistance (SAR) against fungal diseases; in tomato crops, BTH applications have reduced gray mold (Botrytis cinerea) severity by upregulating pathogenesis-related proteins, providing broad-spectrum protection without direct antimicrobial activity.^[62] Similarly, phosphites, such as potassium phosphite, are employed for controlling oomycete pathogens like Phytophthora infestans in potatoes; foliar or soil applications alleviate late blight symptoms by boosting antioxidant enzyme levels and restricting pathogen spread, achieving approximately 50% disease control in field trials.^[63] The benefits of elicitor use in crop protection include reduced reliance on conventional pesticides, promotion of sustainable agriculture, and durable resistance. ISR induced by elicitors can persist for several weeks. Efficacy studies report 50-80% reductions in disease incidence across various crops, such as Fusarium wilt in tomatoes treated with non-pathogenic Fusarium elicitors, allowing for fewer pesticide applications and lower residue levels.^[64] Despite these advantages, challenges persist in widespread adoption. Efficacy of elicitors varies significantly by crop genotype, environmental conditions, and pathogen type; for example, plant responsiveness to defense elicitors like jasmonic acid differs across Brassica species due to ontogenetic and genotypic factors, leading to inconsistent protection in diverse field scenarios.^[65] Regulatory hurdles also complicate use, as many elicitors are classified as biopesticides by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), requiring streamlined but still rigorous data on safety and efficacy for registration, which can delay commercialization.^[66]

Biotechnology and Commercialization

In plant biotechnology, elicitors are widely employed to enhance the production of secondary metabolites in controlled in vitro systems, such as cell suspension cultures and hairy root cultures, offering a sustainable alternative to field extraction for pharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals. Fungal elicitors, derived from pathogens like Aspergillus niger, have demonstrated significant efficacy in stimulating paclitaxel (taxol) biosynthesis in Taxus chinensis cell cultures, with reported increases of up to 8-fold through medium renewal and elicitor addition.^[67] Similarly, hairy root cultures, induced by Agrobacterium rhizogenes, provide a stable platform for alkaloid production; elicitation with biotic agents like methyl jasmonate in Papaver somniferum hairy roots has boosted morphinan alkaloid yields by activating biosynthetic pathways. These approaches leverage the genetic and biochemical stability of hairy roots, enabling scalable bioreactor cultivation without hormonal supplementation. Commercialization of elicitor-based products has advanced, particularly in biostimulants and plant activators that induce systemic resistance while promoting metabolite accumulation. Acibenzolar-S-methyl, marketed as Bion by Syngenta, functions as a synthetic elicitor that mimics salicylic acid signaling to enhance defense-related secondary metabolites in crops like cyclamen and grapes. Chitosan-based formulations, such as those developed for broad-spectrum resistance induction, further exemplify this trend by triggering chitinase activity and phenolic compound production in treated plants. The global plant health elicitors market, valued at approximately $1.1 billion in 2025, is projected to reach $2.0 billion by 2032.^[68] Recent advances include nano-elicitors, which facilitate targeted delivery of signaling molecules to plant cells, improving elicitation efficiency in tissue cultures; for instance, silver nanoparticles have enhanced bioactive compound yields in medicinal plant hairy roots by modulating reactive oxygen species.^[69] Genetic engineering of elicitor receptors, such as pattern recognition receptors like receptor-like proteins, has enabled engineered plants with amplified immune responses, as seen in broad-spectrum antifungal resistance in crops through receptor modification. A notable case study involves Catharanthus roseus cell cultures, where fungal elicitors like Fusarium oxysporum increased vinblastine and vincristine yields.^[70] However, commercialization faces challenges, including elicitor instability during storage and high production costs—such as around €130-200 per 100 mg for jasmonic acid derivatives—that limit scalability beyond niche applications.

References

[1]
Role of Elicitors in Inducing Resistance in Plants against Pathogen ...
Elicitors are compounds, which activate chemical defense in plants. Various biosynthetic pathways are activated in treated plants depending on the compound ...
[2]
Elicitation, an Effective Strategy for the Biotechnological Production ...
In plant cell cultures, an elicitor can be defined as a compound introduced in small concentrations to a living system to promote the biosynthesis of the target ...
[3]
Elicitor - Oxford Reference
A substance that induces the production of phytoalexins in higher plants. Elicitors may be exogenous (e.g. produced by potentially pathogenic bacteria or ...
[4]
Biostimulation can prime elicitor induced resistance of grapevine ...
Nov 9, 2022 · Therefore, biostimulants are not plant elicitors or resistance-inducers against biotic stress or fertilizers. The worldwide biostimulant market ...
[5]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9682252/
[6]
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.py.10.090172.001231
[7]
[PDF] Elicitors, Effectors, and R Genes: The New Paradigm and a Lifetime ...
Subsequently, when scientists met 10–20 years ago to discuss pathogen virulence and plant disease resistance mech- anisms, key questions emerged. These included ...
[8]
https://plantpath.webhosting.cals.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/320/2021/07/BentMackey07-AnnRev.pdf
[9]
https://www.cell.com/plant-communications/fulltext/S2590-3462%2825%2900231-7
[10]
Elicitors enhance bioactive compound production in sprouts and ...
Sep 26, 2025 · Examples of biotic elicitors include substances produced by microorganisms, herbivores, fragments of plant cell walls, and chemicals released by ...
[11]
Elicitor-mediated enhancement of secondary metabolites in plant ...
Elicitors, both biotic and abiotic, have emerged as effective strategies to enhance metabolite biosynthesis by triggering plant defense signaling pathways.
[12]
[PDF] Role of elicitors in plant defense mechanism
Oct 28, 2018 · Elicitors are chemicals/bio-factors that trigger plant defense responses, including phytoalexin accumulation, by binding to receptors and ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[13]
Elicitation: A biotechnological tool for enhanced production of ...
Jul 16, 2019 · Biotic elicitors are either crude extracts or partially purified products derived from either pathogen (fungal, bacterial, yeast) or the plant ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[14]
The plant immune system - Nature
Nov 16, 2006 · Our current view of the plant immune system can be represented as a four phased 'zigzag' model (Fig. 1), in which we introduce several important ...
[15]
Type III Protein Secretion in Plant Pathogenic Bacteria - PMC
Many gram-negative plant and animal pathogenic bacteria employ a type III secretion system (T3SS) to subvert and colonize their respective host organisms.
[16]
The Powdery Mildew Effector CSEP0027 Interacts With Barley ...
Sep 8, 2021 · We propose that CSEP0027 interacts with barley HvCAT1 to regulate the host immunity and likely reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis to promote fungal ...
[17]
Multiple pairs of allelic MLA immune receptor-powdery mildew AVR ...
Feb 19, 2019 · Powdery mildews are fungal diseases that affect many plants, including important crops such as barley. The fungi behind these diseases deliver ...
[18]
Systemic Acquired Resistance and Salicylic Acid: Past, Present, and ...
Jul 10, 2018 · Here, we present a historical overview of the progress that has been made to date in elucidating the role of SA in signaling plant immune responses.IDENTIFICATION OF... · ROLE OF SA IN PLANT... · SA AND THE SAR SIGNALS
[19]
The Essential Role of Jasmonic Acid in Plant–Herbivore Interactions
The plant hormone jasmonic acid (JA) plays a central role in plant defense against herbivores. Herbivore damage elicits a rapid and transient JA burst in ...
[20]
Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under ...
Many inducible chemical responses, such as protease inhibitors (8), slow herbivore growth by reducing their digestive efficiency. Some of these function ...
[21]
Synthetic plant defense elicitors - Frontiers
While the discovery of some synthetic elicitors had already been reported in the 1970s, recent breakthroughs in combinatorial chemical synthesis now allow ...Missing: 1960s | Show results with:1960s
[22]
Effects of Exogenous Application of Methyl Jasmonate and Salicylic ...
Jun 24, 2024 · MeJA and SA can act as elicitors by triggering plant defense responses similar to those induced by pathogens and may even provide long-term ...
[23]
Modulation of plant defenses by Jasmonic acid and salicylic acid in ...
The already prepared concentrations of JA and SA elicitors (50, 100, and 150 μM)) were sprayed to 6 sets of plants on the leaf surface every 24 h for 2 ...
[24]
Methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid as powerful elicitors for ... - NIH
Mar 20, 2023 · This review mainly deals with the enhancement of biomass and biosynthesis of different bioactive compounds by methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and salicylic acid (SA) ...
[25]
Signaling Crosstalk between Salicylic Acid and Ethylene/Jasmonate ...
Increasing evidence indicates that the SA- and ET/JA-mediated defense response pathways are mutually antagonistic.
[26]
Salicylic Acid Biosynthesis in Plants - Frontiers
Apr 16, 2020 · In this review, we have taken a closer look at how SA is synthesized and the importance of both biosynthesis pathways in different plant species.
[27]
Jasmonates: biosynthesis, metabolism, and signaling by proteins ...
JA biosynthesis is initiated by release of α-LeA from galactolipids of chloroplast membranes by phospholipase A1 (PLA1) which hydrolyzes with sn-1 specificity.Abstract · Introduction · Occurrence and biosynthesis · Jasmonate signaling
[28]
Involvement of salicylic acid, ethylene and jasmonic acid signalling ...
Apr 8, 2017 · Phytohormones, such as salicylic acid (SA), ethylene (ET) and jasmonic acid (JA), play key roles in plant defence following pathogen attack.
[29]
Pathogen perception and signaling in plant immunity | The Plant Cell
Intracellular immunity receptors, predominantly nucleotide-binding leucine-rich-repeat (NLR) proteins, can recognize specific effectors and activate defense.
[30]
Chitin-induced activation of immune signaling by the rice receptor ...
We show the molecular basis of chitin recognition by the rice receptor, CEBiP (chitin-elicitor binding protein), and following receptor dimerization.Results · Std Nmr Epitope Mapping Of... · Cebip Binds Chitin...
[31]
Plant NLRs: Evolving with pathogen effectors and engineerable to ...
In this review, we summarize the studies on the mechanism of NLRs in the processes of effector recognition, resistosome formation, and defense activation.Missing: elicitors | Show results with:elicitors
[32]
Calcium in plant defence‐signalling pathways - Lecourieux - 2006
Jun 23, 2006 · Several studies reported a rapid elicitor-induced plasma membrane depolarization resulting, at least in part, in the activation of anion ...Ii. Increases In Free... · 1. Ca Signatures In... · Iv. Calcium Targets Involved...
[33]
Cation Fluxes Cause Plasma Membrane Depolarization Involved in ...
Inducible and specific ion fluxes on plasma membranes represent very early events during elicitation of plant cells. The hierarchy of such ion fluxes involved ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
[34]
Plants versus pathogens: an evolutionary arms race - PMC
The focus of this review is on the evolution of plant defence responses and the coevolution of their pathogens, primarily from a molecular-genetic perspective.
[35]
Origin and evolution of the plant immune system - Han - 2019
Dec 21, 2018 · The conflicts between plants and pathogens result in everchanging coevolutionary cycles known as 'Red Queen' dynamics. These ancient and ongoing ...
[36]
https://apsjournals.apsnet.org/doi/10.1094/MPMI-18-0983
[37]
Reactive Oxygen Species in Plant Signaling - Annual Reviews
Apr 29, 2018 · Respiratory burst oxidases: the engines of ROS signaling ... NADPH oxidase-mediated oxidative burst are two independent signaling events in plant ...
[38]
MAP kinase cascades in plant development and immune signaling
MAPK cascades are important signaling modules in plants, regulating diverse processes like plant development and innate immunity. They consist of MAPKKKs, ...
[39]
Ca2+ signals in plant immunity - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
This review summarizes how calcium ions, and the proteins which transport them, are integrated into plant immune responses.
[40]
Multiple levels of crosstalk in hormone networks regulating plant ...
The main hormones involved in the regulation of plant defense responses are salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET) and abscisic acid (ABA). Each ...Crosstalk At The Network... · Crosstalk At The Gene... · Crosstalk By Binding Of Tfs...
[41]
WRKY Transcription Factors: Molecular Regulation and Stress ...
WRKYs are of particular interest as they are involved in diverse biotic/abiotic stress responses as well as in developmental/physiological processes.Abstract · Introduction · WRKYs in Multiple Responses · Regulation of WRKYs at...
[42]
PTI‐ETI synergistic signal mechanisms in plant immunity - PMC
Mar 12, 2024 · This concept is illustrated by the 'Zigzag' model, which represents ... suppressing xanthomonas effector Tal2h. Mol. Plant‐Microbe ...
[43]
Characterization of an Arabidopsis Mutant That Is Nonresponsive to ...
This mutant, npr1 (nonexpresser of PR genes), carries a single recessive mutation that abolishes the SAR-responsive expression of other PR genes as well. While ...
[44]
Pathogenesis-Related Proteins (PRs) with Enzyme Activity ... - NIH
Jun 5, 2023 · The present review will discuss defense response proteins, which have been identified as PRs, with enzymatic action, including constitutive enzymes.
[45]
The Arabidopsis NPR1 Gene That Controls Systemic Acquired ...
The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene controls the onset of systemic acquired resistance (SAR), a plant immunity, to a broad spectrum of pathogens.Results · Mapping The Npr1 Gene · Discussion
[46]
A role for jasmonate in pathogen defense of Arabidopsis - PNAS
The defensin gene PDF1.2 of Arabidopsis, which encodes a protein with demonstrated antifungal activity, is induced strongly by either pathogen challenge or ...
[47]
(PDF) Chitosan-induced defence responses in tomato plants against ...
Nov 14, 2013 · 2010). The present results indicate that chitosan can be applied as foliar spray to protect. tomato plants from early blight disease pathogens ...
[48]
Benefits and costs of tomato seed treatment with plant defense ...
Results suggest that seed treatment with MeJA will induce defenses in plants, which is correlated with increased PPO activity in leaves and reduction in larval ...
[49]
(PDF) Exploiting Induced Plant Resistance for Sustainable Pest ...
Sep 7, 2024 · Applying induced response elicitors to crop plants can strengthen their natural defences against herbivore damage. Additionally, it is possible ...
[50]
Induction of disease resistance by acibenzolar-S-methyl and o ...
Aug 9, 2025 · Formulated with acibenzolar-Smethyl (ASM), it provides protection to plants against a variety of bacterial and fungal pathogens (Cole, 1999; ...
[51]
Phosphite Application Alleviates Pythophthora infestans by ... - NIH
KPhi treatment alleviated adverse effect of late blight in potato leaves. KPhi application also increased plant tolerance to the pathogen with improved ...
[52]
The Practical Role of Induced Resistance for Crop Protection
May 4, 2023 · The first report of chemical-IR was reported by Kuc et al. (1959) who showed that infiltration of apple leaves with D-phenylalanine, D-alanine, ...Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
[53]
Induced systemic resistance in tomato by non-pathogenic Fusarium ...
Aug 6, 2025 · ... disease control (50–80% reduction of disease incidence) in several. repeated tests (Larkin and Fravel 1998). Direct action on pathogenic ...
[54]
Variation in plant responsiveness to defense elicitors caused by ...
Plant defense elicitors could provide novel agrochemicals to protect crops from pests and diseases. ... seed treatment. J. Chem. Ecol. 39, 1297–1300 10.1007/ ...
[55]
Biopesticides | US EPA
Biopesticides include naturally occurring substances that control pests, microorganisms that control pests, and pesticidal substances produced by plants ...