Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Email attachment

An email attachment is a computer file appended to an electronic mail message, enabling the transmission of non-textual content such as documents, images, audio, video, or executable programs alongside the email's primary body text. This feature relies on the Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) standard, which extends the original RFC 822 email format to support multipart messages, diverse character sets beyond ASCII, and binary data encoding for compatibility with text-based transport protocols. Introduced to address the limitations of plain-text email, attachments allow users to share files without requiring separate uploads or transfers, fundamentally enhancing email's utility for personal, professional, and collaborative purposes. The development of email attachments traces back to the early 1990s, when the limitations of ASCII-only email became evident as the internet expanded beyond academic and technical users. In June 1992, Nathaniel Borenstein of Bellcore and Ned Freed of Innosoft published RFC 1341, proposing MIME as a mechanism to specify and describe the format of internet message bodies, including support for multimedia attachments. This initial specification evolved through community feedback and was formalized in a series of RFCs, with RFC 2045 (November 1996) defining the core format for MIME-conformant message bodies. In practice, an email with attachments uses a "multipart/mixed" content type to delineate the message body from one or more attachment parts, each identified by a type (e.g., application/msword for .doc files) and optionally a filename parameter. This structure maintains with non-MIME systems while allowing rich media exchange, though transmission limits—often 25 MB per message for major providers like and —constrain large files. Despite their convenience, attachments introduce security vulnerabilities, serving as a primary vector for distribution through infected executables or macros in office documents, prompting recommendations to scan and verify files before opening. Over time, enhancements like for and digital signatures have bolstered secure attachment handling, reflecting ongoing efforts to balance functionality with risk mitigation.

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

An attachment is a separate sent alongside an message, distinct from the inline text or images within the message body itself. This allows users to include diverse content types, such as documents, photographs, spreadsheets, or executable programs, by embedding or linking the file to the for transmission to the recipient. Unlike the original limitations of early protocols, attachments enable the sharing of binary and non-textual data directly within a single message. The primary purpose of attachments arose from the need to extend 's utility beyond ASCII text, facilitating the exchange of files, application , and other resources that could not otherwise be conveyed in standard messages. By incorporating these files, attachments provide a self-contained method for communication, eliminating the dependence on external links or file-sharing services and allowing recipients to access the content offline once downloaded. This enhances 's role as a versatile tool for personal and professional interactions, where brevity in text can be supplemented with detailed supplementary materials. Common everyday applications include sharing job resumes in PDF format during applications, distributing family photos in files among contacts, or sending financial reports as Excel spreadsheets in . For example, a might attach a Word outlining a proposal, enabling the recipient to review and edit the full details without navigating to a separate . Such uses underscore how attachments augment 's core functionality, promoting efficient and comprehensive information exchange. Email attachments are differentiated from embedded content, like inline images that display directly in the message body for seamless viewing, as attachments appear as distinct, downloadable entities that require user action to open. This separation preserves the email's readability while accommodating larger or interactive files that might otherwise disrupt the flow. The capability is enabled by technologies such as the standard, which structures multipart messages to handle these additions.

Types of Attachments

Email attachments encompass a variety of file formats, broadly classified into categories such as documents, images, archives, executables, and , each offering unique properties that influence their suitability for transmission via . These formats are defined by their types, which ensure proper handling by email clients, and their inherent characteristics like compression efficiency, cross-platform compatibility, and typical file sizes help determine their practicality for sharing. Documents
Document formats like PDF and DOCX are staples for sharing text-based content. The Portable Document Format (PDF) excels in portability, enabling consistent viewing and printing across devices and operating systems without requiring the original authoring software, making it ideal for professional and legal communications. PDFs incorporate built-in to maintain quality while reducing file sizes, often resulting in attachments ranging from 100 KB for simple text to several MB for complex layouts with images. Additionally, PDFs support security features such as password protection and , enhancing their suitability for sensitive information. In contrast, DOCX (Microsoft Word Open XML) provides excellent compatibility within the ecosystem and supports editing, but it may exhibit formatting inconsistencies on non-Windows platforms or without compatible software, with file sizes typically smaller than legacy DOC files due to XML-based . DOCX files are generally under 1 MB for standard reports but can grow with embedded media.
Images
Image attachments commonly use and formats, valued for visual communication in emails. employs , significantly reducing file sizes—often to under for high-resolution photos—while maintaining acceptable quality for photographs, though it may introduce artifacts in repeated saves. This makes highly suitable for email due to faster transmission and broad compatibility across all major platforms and devices. , on the other hand, uses , preserving exact image quality and supporting , which is advantageous for or logos, but results in larger files, typically 2-5 times the size of equivalent , potentially impacting load times on slower connections. Both formats enjoy universal support in email clients and browsers.
Archives
Archive formats such as ZIP and RAR enable bundling multiple files into a single attachment, streamlining sharing of collections. ZIP offers moderate compression levels, reducing overall size by 20-70% depending on content (e.g., text files compress better than already-compressed media), and provides strong cross-platform compatibility since it's natively supported on Windows, macOS, and Linux without proprietary software. Pros of ZIP include efficient emailing of multiple files, password protection for security, and ease of creation, though cons involve limited compression for certain file types like videos and potential total loss if the archive corrupts. RAR achieves higher compression ratios than ZIP—up to 10-30% better for mixed content—making it preferable for larger bundles, but it requires licensed software like WinRAR for full functionality, limiting compatibility on unlicensed systems. RAR files suit email for space savings but may face extraction issues on diverse recipients' devices.
Executables
files, such as for Windows applications, allow sharing of software but pose significant security risks, including potential delivery upon execution, leading many email providers to block or scan them rigorously. files lack inherent and vary widely in size from a few KB for simple scripts to hundreds of for full programs, with restricted primarily to Windows environments. Their use in attachments is generally discouraged outside trusted contexts due to these vulnerabilities.
Multimedia
Multimedia attachments include MP4 for videos and for audio, facilitating rich content sharing. MP4 uses efficient compression codecs like H.264, balancing quality and size to keep files manageable (e.g., 5-50 MB for short clips), and offers excellent across devices via HTML5 support, though longer videos can exceed email size limits. applies perceptual coding for , drastically reducing sizes—often to 1-10 MB per track—while retaining near-CD quality, making it ideal for music or voice notes with universal playback . Both formats prioritize efficiency for but may require preview capabilities in clients to avoid full downloads.
As an emerging alternative to traditional file uploads, cloud-linked attachments—such as shares from —allow users to embed access links in emails instead of attaching files directly, bypassing size constraints and enabling real-time collaboration without downloading large payloads. This method, supported in services like , maintains file integrity and while reducing storage demands on email servers.

Technical Implementation

MIME Standard

The Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions () standard extends the (SMTP) and other protocols by defining mechanisms to include non-ASCII text and binary data in messages, addressing limitations in the original RFC 822 format that restricted content to 7-bit US-ASCII. Introduced in RFC 1341 in June 1992, MIME enables the specification and description of diverse message body formats, such as text in multiple character sets, images, audio, and other media types, thereby supporting attachments as integral parts of . Key components of include specialized headers that describe the content of parts, such as Content-Type, which identifies the and subtype (e.g., text/plain or image/jpeg), and Content-Disposition, which specifies whether the content is intended for inline display or as a downloadable attachment. also supports multipart , where the Content-Type header is set to a multipart subtype like multipart/mixed to indicate multiple body parts within a single , allowing attachments to be bundled with the body. These parts are delimited by markers—unique strings defined in the Content-Type header (e.g., boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0010_01DABCDE")—which separate the into distinct sections without during . In a MIME-structured with attachments, the message begins with a MIME-Version header (typically "1.0") to declare compliance, followed by a top-level Content-Type of multipart/mixed and a declaration; each subsequent part includes its own headers, such as Content-Type for the attachment's and Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="example.pdf" to prompt the recipient's client to treat it as a rather than inline content. For inline attachments, like images, the Content-Disposition can be set to inline, enabling rendering within the body while still using MIME's multipart framework. The standard evolved from its initial proposal in RFC 1341 to MIME version 1.0, formalized in a series of RFCs (2045–2049) published in November 1996, which obsoleted earlier versions and refined the protocol for robust handling of international character sets through parameters like charset in Content-Type (e.g., charset="") and via extensible media types. This version 1.0 established as the foundation for modern attachments, ensuring across diverse email systems and clients.

Encoding and Transmission

Email attachments, being binary data in many cases, require encoding into a text-safe format for reliable transmission over protocols like SMTP that traditionally handle only 7-bit ASCII text. The most common encoding scheme is , defined in the MIME standard, which converts every three bytes of binary data into four ASCII characters using a 64-character (A-Z, a-z, 0-9, +, /) with padding via "=" if necessary. This process increases the attachment size by approximately 33%, as the 24 bits from three bytes become 32 bits represented by four 8-bit characters, though line lengths are limited to 76 characters for readability. is preferred for non-text attachments like images or executables because it preserves the exact binary content without alteration. For attachments that are mostly text but contain occasional binary elements, such as emails with embedded non-ASCII characters, encoding is used. This scheme represents printable ASCII characters unchanged while encoding non-printable octets or high-bit characters as "=XX" where XX is the value, allowing the majority of the data to remain human-readable. It adds minimal overhead for text-heavy files but can expand binary-dense content significantly, and it enforces line breaks with soft line breaks via "=" to avoid hard wraps. A legacy alternative, UUEncode, originated in Unix systems for sending binary files via text-only mail and encodes data into 60-character lines using printable ASCII, but it is rarely used today due to inefficiencies and lack of standardization in . Once encoded, attachments are packaged into the email message body using multipart structures, where boundaries—unique strings specified in the Content-Type header—delimit the message parts to prevent overlap and enable error-free parsing. The entire -formatted message, including the encoded attachment, is then transmitted over SMTP via the command, which sends the as a stream terminated by a single period on a line by itself; the SMTP (defined by FROM and RCPT TO commands) handles separately from the message . For large attachments, the encoding itself involves chunking the into manageable groups (e.g., 3-byte blocks for ), and supports splitting oversized messages into multiple parts if needed, though standard SMTP does not stream attachments in real-time chunks without extensions like BDAT. Error-checking relies on the boundaries and SMTP response codes (e.g., 250 for successful delivery), ensuring the receiver can identify and extract parts correctly. In retrieval protocols, POP3 uses the RETR command to download the full -encoded message, including attachments, as a single octet stream that the client must decode locally. IMAP, in contrast, allows more granular access via the FETCH command with [section] specifiers to retrieve specific encoded parts without downloading the entire message, supporting partial fetches for large attachments. services like adhere to the same encoding standards during transmission but handle decoding server-side or via in the , differing from desktop clients (e.g., or ) that often perform decoding natively upon retrieval, potentially leading to variations in how non-standard encodings are processed. Encoding mismatches commonly cause attachment corruption, such as when a binary file is sent without Base64 (e.g., using 8-bit encoding over a 7-bit SMTP relay), resulting in altered bytes or garbled content upon decoding. For instance, a PDF encoded in Quoted-Printable instead of Base64 may appear truncated or unopenable in some clients due to improper handling of escape sequences. Recovery typically involves re-sending with correct encoding, using tools like base64 decoders on the raw message source, or extracting via email client utilities that ignore mismatched headers.

Historical Development

Early Email Attachments

In the pre-MIME era of the 1970s and 1980s, email attachments were rudimentary, relying on ad-hoc methods to transmit files over text-only networks like and . Early systems treated files as encoded text blocks to bypass the limitations of ASCII-based protocols, which could not natively handle . For instance, the Unix-to-Unix Copy Protocol () used uuencode, developed in 1980 by Mary Ann Horton at UC Berkeley, to convert binary files into printable ASCII characters for inclusion in email messages as inline text. As early as , Doug Engelbart's at SRI allowed users to send files or parts of files across the , laying groundwork for later attachment features. Initial implementations emerged from ARPANET experiments in the 1970s, where users manually appended files as plain text to messages. In 1971, developed an early on ARPANET using tools like SNDMSG and CPYnet, which appended text messages to remote files, limited to ASCII due to the absence of encoding mechanisms. Building on earlier precursors like the 1970 NLS , by formal mechanisms for enclosures were added to ARPANET via systems like COMSYS/MSGDMS, enabling basic , though still primarily constrained to text formats. For non-Unix platforms, BinHex was introduced in 1981 by Tim Mann as a hexadecimal encoding tool for the computer, later ported to Macintosh in by William Davis to facilitate via on Apple networks. These early approaches faced significant challenges due to the lack of , resulting in widespread incompatibility across systems. Binary files often corrupted during over 7-bit ASCII channels, and manual encoding processes were error-prone, limiting adoption to technical users familiar with command-line tools. A key milestone came in with the release of BinHex 4.0 by Yves Lempereur, which introduced a more robust 6-bit encoding format (.hqx) specifically for Macintosh files, bridging the gap between text-only and practical by simplifying . Similarly, uuencode became a in Unix environments by the mid-1980s, influencing commercial systems like cc:Mail. These innovations highlighted the need for a universal solution, leading to the development of the standard in the early .

Evolution and Standardization

The adoption of the standard marked a pivotal advancement in attachments, formalized in RFC 1341 published in June 1992. This specification extended the (SMTP) to support non-textual content, including files, images, and audio, by allowing multiple parts within a single message body. Prior to MIME, attachments were limited to text-based encodings that often corrupted ; MIME's structured format ensured reliable transmission of diverse file types. clients such as Eudora and rapidly implemented MIME in the early to mid-1990s, with widespread use enabling true binary attachments and transforming from a text-only medium to a versatile communication tool. By 1996, MIME had become a , as revised in RFC 2045-2049, facilitating across diverse systems. In the 2000s, email attachment capabilities evolved further with enhancements in security, formatting, and accessibility. (Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions), initially specified in RFC 1847 (1995) and refined in RFC 2311 (1998) and subsequent versions, gained traction for encrypting and digitally signing attachments, addressing rising concerns over data privacy in business communications. Its adoption accelerated in enterprise environments during the decade, integrating with clients like to protect sensitive files from interception. Concurrently, integration via subtypes (e.g., text/html defined in RFC 2854, 2000) allowed attachments to complement rich message bodies, such as embedding images or linking documents, while mobile email support emerged with devices like BlackBerry Enterprise Server (2002), which enabled attachment viewing and management on handheld devices, broadening access beyond desktops. From the 2010s onward, email attachments adapted to and bandwidth constraints, shifting toward link-based sharing to circumvent traditional size limitations. Webmail providers played a key role in standardization; for instance, Gmail's launch on April 1, 2004, introduced 1 GB of storage—vastly exceeding competitors—and supported attachments up to 10 MB initially, popularizing generous quotas and influencing industry norms. Protocol updates, including IMAP extensions like the PARTIAL command in RFC 3501 (2003), allowed clients to fetch only portions of messages or attachments, optimizing for mobile and low-bandwidth scenarios. This era saw widespread use of cloud integrations, such as Outlook's linkage with (introduced around 2011) and Gmail's with (2012), where users share secure links to large files stored remotely rather than embedding them directly, reducing transmission overhead and enhancing collaboration.

Constraints and Limitations

Size and Storage Limits

Email attachment size limits vary across providers, protocols, and configurations, primarily to manage server resources and ensure reliable delivery. Major consumer email services like enforce a 25 MB limit per message (as of 2025), including all attachments, body text, and encoding overhead. Similarly, and personal accounts cap attachments at 25 MB total per email (as of 2025). On-premises enterprise servers default to 10 MB, while Online in environments defaults to 35 MB; both can be configured up to 150 MB. These provider-specific thresholds reflect a balance between user convenience and demands, with enterprise setups often imposing stricter limits to control costs in corporate networks. Protocols underlying email transmission and storage also contribute to effective size constraints. SMTP, the standard for sending messages, lacks a universal size cap in its specification but is practically limited by relay servers, which commonly reject messages exceeding 10 MB to 25 MB to prevent overload. IMAP, used for retrieving and storing emails, imposes per-message limits tied to server policies rather than the protocol itself, often aligning with SMTP bounds but allowing mailbox-wide storage up to 50 GB primary (100 GB with archive) or more depending on the provider and licensing (as of 2025). Transmission encoding, such as used in , can inflate file sizes by about 33%, further reducing the practical attachment capacity within these limits. Several factors influence these size and storage limits, including available server storage capacity, network bandwidth constraints, and anti-spam mechanisms that flag oversized messages as potential threats. Exceeding limits typically results in delivery failures, such as bounced emails or automatic stripping of attachments by intermediate servers. Most attachments in practice remain small, with typical sizes ranging from 2-5 , allowing the majority of exchanges to proceed without issues. To circumvent size restrictions, users often compress files using tools like to reduce payload before attachment, potentially shrinking sizes by 50% or more for compressible formats. Alternatively, uploading files to external hosting services such as or and sharing access links via email bypasses attachment limits entirely, enabling transmission of files up to gigabytes in size while maintaining compatibility across providers.

Protocol-Specific Restrictions

Email attachments are subject to various restrictions imposed by underlying protocols and client implementations, which can affect how attachments are handled, transmitted, and retrieved. The (SMTP), defined in 5321, does not specify limits on the number of attachments or MIME parts in a multipart , allowing theoretically unlimited attachments as long as the overall size complies with policies. However, practical implementations in email servers and relays often enforce caps to prevent abuse and manage resources; for example, Exchange defaults to a maximum of 250 MIME parts per (as of 2025), which includes attachments in multipart/mixed structures, though this can be configured lower, such as to 100 in some environments. Retrieval protocols like version 3 (POP3) and (IMAP) differ significantly in attachment handling, impacting user experience and storage. Under POP3 (RFC 1939), the entire email message, including all attachments, is downloaded to the client upon retrieval, potentially leading to immediate storage overflow on devices with limited space if attachments are numerous or large. In contrast, IMAP (RFC 3501) synchronizes only message headers and bodies initially, enabling selective downloading of attachments on demand, which mitigates storage risks and supports better multi-device access. Client-side software introduces additional constraints, often tailored to platform limitations. Web-based email interfaces, such as , support up to 250 attachments per message in environments, with file sizes limited by the total message size (default 35 MB). Mobile applications enforce stricter rules to optimize battery life and data usage; for instance, the default email client historically limited attachments indirectly through size thresholds around 5 MB, while apps like for restrict effective attachment handling to smaller sets to avoid performance degradation. Compatibility challenges arise with legacy protocols and clients that predate or incompletely support the standard (RFC 2045), potentially blocking certain attachment types or necessitating manual intervention. Older systems relying on uuencode for encoding, common before 's widespread adoption in the , may display modern MIME-encoded attachments as raw, garbled text, requiring users to manually decode them using tools like uudecode if the client lacks MIME parsing. Inconsistent support across some legacy clients can also result in attachments being stripped or misinterpreted, such as inline images failing to render properly.

Security Considerations

Malware Risks

Email attachments serve as a primary for distribution, often exploiting user trust and software vulnerabilities to initiate infections. Attackers embed malicious code in files such as macro-enabled documents, which, when opened, can automatically execute scripts to download and install viruses, , or without further user interaction. Social engineering tactics, like disguising attachments as legitimate invoices or urgent updates, trick recipients into enabling or running executables, thereby delivering payloads that compromise systems. For instance, the , one of the most prolific families, spread widely through emails containing infected Word or Excel files that exploited macro vulnerabilities to propagate further infections. According to the 2024 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report, phishing (often delivered via ) was involved in 36% of breaches, underscoring attachments' role in major campaigns. The 2025 Verizon DBIR further notes linked to 75% of system-intrusion breaches, with remaining a key . Kaspersky detected over 125 million attempts to access malicious attachments in 2024 alone, highlighting the scale of this threat. These statistics reflect 's dominance in propagation, with variants like those in attacks seeing a 22.6% increase in delivery via attachments from late 2024 onward. Malware in attachments often bypasses initial security scans through techniques, such as packing code to evade signature-based detection or using polymorphic variants that alter their structure with each infection. Zero-day exploits targeting unpatched software further enable infections by leveraging undisclosed vulnerabilities before patches are available. These processes allow to establish persistence, exfiltrate data, or encrypt files for . The broader impacts of attachment-delivered malware include widespread data breaches and substantial financial losses, with the average cost of a breach reaching $4.88 million in 2024 according to IBM's Cost of a Data Breach Report. Ransomware attacks originating from such vectors contributed to reported losses of approximately $12.5 million via the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center in 2024, though experts note significant underreporting. Over time, threats have evolved with phishing kits that automate the creation and distribution of emails embedding malicious attachments, amplifying the reach and sophistication of attacks.

Dangerous File Types

Certain file types attached to emails pose significant risks due to their inherent capabilities to execute or harbor malicious payloads, making them prime vectors for distribution. High-risk categories include executable files such as .exe and .bat, which contain that runs directly on the operating system when opened, potentially installing viruses or trojans without user intervention. Script files like .js () and .vbs () are similarly dangerous, as they can automate harmful actions, such as downloading additional or modifying system settings, upon execution in environments like Windows. Microsoft Office files with embedded macros, including .docm and .xlsm formats, enable VBA scripts that can auto-run to deliver or , exploiting the trust users place in familiar document types. Medium-risk file types encompass archives like ., which can conceal high-risk executables or scripts within nested structures, evading initial scans and deploying payloads only after extraction. PDFs also fall into this category when they include embedded , allowing attackers to trigger exploits or redirect to malicious sites upon viewing, as the format's interactivity can basic security checks. The primary dangers stem from these files' ability to execute arbitrary immediately upon opening, often without prompting, combined with the frequent lack of sandboxing in default clients and viewers, which permits direct access to the host system. Historical exploits illustrate this vulnerability; for instance, CVE-2017-0199 targeted HTA (.hta) files in email attachments, enabling remote execution through Microsoft parsers to deliver like FormBook. To mitigate delivery, major providers automatically filter high-risk types: blocks .exe attachments to prevent spread, while services like similarly restrict executables and scripts.

Prevention and Best Practices

Users should always verify the identity of the sender before interacting with any email attachment, especially if the message is unsolicited or unexpected, by contacting the purported sender through a trusted channel to confirm legitimacy. Avoiding the opening of unsolicited attachments is a fundamental practice, as these are common vectors for distribution. Enabling email client features that allow previewing attachments without full download, such as in , can help assess content safely. Additionally, scanning all attachments with reputable , like , prior to opening is essential to detect potential threats. Organizations can implement email security gateways, such as Proofpoint, which employ sandboxing to detonate and analyze attachments in isolated environments before delivery, thereby preventing malicious payloads from reaching users. Adopting zero-trust policies requires continuous verification of all attachments regardless of sender, assuming potential compromise at every step. Regular employee training on recognizing attempts, including simulated attacks, significantly reduces the risk of attachment-related incidents by fostering awareness of common tactics. Technological solutions include using digitally signed attachments via , which provides and authentication to ensure integrity and origin, as recommended by NIST for trustworthy email. Implementing file type whitelisting in email filters restricts processing to approved formats like PDFs and images, blocking executable files that pose higher risks. Modern alternatives to direct attachments, such as secure sharing links from services like , allow controlled access to files without embedding them in emails, reducing exposure to interception. In 2025, AI-based systems are increasingly integrated into platforms to identify unusual patterns in attachments, such as unexpected file behaviors or inconsistencies, enhancing proactive —as seen in a 17.3% rise in attacks incorporating AI-generated content. Regulatory compliance, particularly under GDPR, mandates secure sharing practices for attachments containing , requiring and access controls to prevent unauthorized processing.

References

  1. [1]
    RFC 2045 - Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One
    This set of documents, collectively called the Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions, or MIME, redefines the format of messages.
  2. [2]
    RFC 1341 - MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions)
    This document redefines the format of message bodies to allow multi-part textual and non-textual message bodies to be represented and exchanged without loss of ...
  3. [3]
    The MIME guys: How two Internet gurus changed e-mail forever
    Feb 1, 2011 · Two decades ago, Nathaniel Borenstein and Ned Freed revolutionized multimedia e-mail by creating the MIME standard.
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    MIME Message Format - Microsoft Learn
    Oct 20, 2013 · The Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) specification enables the exchange of messages with more complex content than RFC 822.
  7. [7]
    Using Caution with Email Attachments - CISA
    Feb 1, 2021 · While email attachments are a popular and convenient way to send documents, they are also a common source of viruses.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  8. [8]
    Attachment Definition - TechTerms.com
    Apr 24, 2015 · An attachment, or email attachment, is a file sent with an email message. It may be an image, video, text document, or any other type of file.<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Definition: email attachment - ComputerLanguage.com
    A computer file that rides along with an email message. Attachments are widely used to transfer photos and documents to another party.
  10. [10]
    Common media types - HTTP - MDN Web Docs
    Jul 4, 2025 · This topic lists the most common MIME types with corresponding document types, ordered by their common extensions.
  11. [11]
    What is a PDF? Portable Document Format | Adobe Acrobat
    ### Summary of PDF Properties from Adobe Acrobat About Page
  12. [12]
    What a ZIP File Is and How They Work - Dropbox.com
    Rating 4.8 (424,618) · Free · Business/ProductivityOct 23, 2024 · The Advantages. First, zipped files save storage space and increase the efficiency of your computer. It's also an effective way to improve file ...
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    What is the Uuencode (Uuencode/Uudecode) command and how ...
    Jun 17, 2021 · Learn how the Uuencode command encodes a binary file or email attachment into ASCII format to prevent corruption.
  18. [18]
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    Content conversion in Exchange Server - Microsoft Learn
    Apr 30, 2025 · Any message attachments are encoded by using Quoted-printable or Base64 encoding. By default, when you compose and send a plain text message ...
  24. [24]
    java mail attachments getting corrupted - Stack Overflow
    Jun 13, 2014 · The problem here is that although the files get attached and I receive the E-mail fine, I am unable to open the attachments because the data is corrupt.How do I correct the character encoding of a file?Fix the names of file attachmentsMore results from stackoverflow.comMissing: mismatch recovery
  25. [25]
    Email Attachments - Mary Ann Horton
    Mary Ann Horton invented "uuencode" to create binary email attachments, which became the standard before MIME. Email attachments existed since 1980.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Email Innovation Timeline
    Aug 18, 2022 · 1963. First computer-based chat service created. 13. 1965, August 6. First computer-based email program created. 14. 1967, October.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] The Technical Development of Internet Email
    In November. 1971, a team including Watson proposed a way to enhance (the still nascent) FTP with an explicit MAIL command to support appending a file to a ...
  28. [28]
    Prehistory of BinHex
    ### Summary of BinHex History
  29. [29]
    Attachment size exceeds the allowable limit error - Outlook
    Jun 25, 2025 · The error occurs because Outlook has a default 20MB limit for internet accounts, and 10MB for Exchange accounts, which can be modified.
  30. [30]
    Reduce attachment size to send large files with Outlook
    For Exchange accounts (business email), the default email size limit is 10 MB. This limit includes both the size of the attachment and the size of the email.
  31. [31]
    Message size and recipient limits in Exchange Server | Microsoft Learn
    Apr 30, 2025 · Organizational limits ; Maximum size of a message sent, 10 MB, Mail flow > Receive connectors > More options More Options icon. > Organization ...Types of message size limits · Scope of limits
  32. [32]
    Exchange Online limits - Service Descriptions | Microsoft Learn
    Jul 11, 2025 · Without a license, shared mailboxes are limited to 50 GB. To increase the size limit to 100 GB, the shared mailbox must be assigned an Exchange ...
  33. [33]
    Guide to Email File Size and Load Times - Litmus
    Apr 24, 2024 · Average image weight: 2.24MB. Mobile optimized emails: Average HTML weight: 53KB; Average image weight: 2.7MB.
  34. [34]
    Outlook Attachment Size Limits Explained and Managed - Exclaimer
    Outlook attachment limits vary; for Office 365, it's 150MB for paid and 20MB for free users. Older versions may have lower limits.How do you check the email... · How to manage and work...
  35. [35]
    Maximum Email Size Limits You Should Follow - Mailtrap
    Aug 24, 2019 · Email body should be 15-100 KB, attachments under 10 MB. Most clients retrieve 20-25 MB. Gmail is 25 MB, Outlook 20 MB (10 MB for Exchange).
  36. [36]
    Gmail Attachment Size Limit: How to Send Large Files - Kinsta
    Oct 18, 2023 · The Gmail attachment size limit is 25 MB. You can have more than one attachment, but they can't add up to more than 25 MB.Why Emails Have File Size... · Size Limits for Top Email Clients · Use Cloud Storage
  37. [37]
    What are IMAP and POP? - Microsoft Support
    IMAP only downloads a message when you click on it, and attachments aren't automatically downloaded. This way you're able to check your messages a lot more ...
  38. [38]
    Microsoft 365 email account limitations - GoDaddy
    : 250 attachments per message, not exceeding the 35 MB message size limit. Note: Outlook on the web has a maximum individual file attachment size of 10 MB.
  39. [39]
    Help needed- limit of 5mb when sending attachments/files by email
    Feb 3, 2014 · The 5MB limit is likely due to a hard-coded limit in the default Android email app, not the mail server, and is hard to bypass.Missing: maximum per
  40. [40]
    Understanding the Difference Between SMTP and MIME - BigRock
    Dec 14, 2024 · Traditional email protocols only allow ASCII characters and have limits on message length. MIME overcomes these limitations, enabling emails to ...Missing: restrictions | Show results with:restrictions
  41. [41]
    Malicious Email Attachments - Definition & Protection | Proofpoint US
    Malicious email attachments are files sent with emails designed to compromise or damage the recipient's computer system or exfiltrate sensitive information.
  42. [42]
    Why do adversaries use spearphishing attachments? - Red Canary
    Spearphishing attachments use malware in emails, often with malicious macros in Office documents, to exploit human trust and low cost of sending.Analysis · Detection Opportunities · Testing
  43. [43]
    The most common malicious email attachments infecting Windows
    Oct 11, 2020 · Emotet is the most widely distributed malware through spam emails containing malicious Word or Excel documents. Once infected, Emotet will steal ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] 2024 Data Breach Investigations Report | Verizon
    May 5, 2024 · This 180% increase in the exploitation of vulnerabilities as the critical path action to initiate a breach will be of no surprise to anyone who ...
  45. [45]
    Kaspersky spam and phishing report for 2024 | Securelist
    Feb 19, 2025 · In 2024, Kaspersky solutions detected 125,521,794 attempts to open malicious email attachments, ten million fewer than the previous year. ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Phishing Threat Trends Report - KnowBe4
    Mar 1, 2025 · From September 15, 2024, until February 15, 2025, we observed a 22.6% increase in ransomware payloads in phishing attacks versus the previous ...Missing: distribution | Show results with:distribution
  47. [47]
    How Hackers Use Malicious Attachments to Give You Malware
    Dec 15, 2021 · Hackers use fake emails to fool you into opening attachments containing malware. The malware often targets unpatched vulnerabilities or bugs in the operating ...
  48. [48]
    When are email attachments safe to open? - Cloudflare
    Email attachments from malicious parties may contain malware, which can lead to a hack or data breach. There is no foolproof way to know if an email attachment ...Why Are Email Attachments... · Which Email Attachments Are... · How Do Attackers Embed...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] 1 2024 IC3 ANNUAL REPORT
    Dec 3, 2024 · Fraud represented the bulk of reported losses in 2024, and ransomware was again the most pervasive threat to critical infrastructure, with ...
  50. [50]
    2024 State of the Phish Report - Proofpoint
    The report reveals over 70% of employees take risky behavior, a high number of users knowingly take security risks, and the rise of sophisticated phishing ...
  51. [51]
    An overview of unsafe file types in Microsoft products
    Unsafe file types in Microsoft products, like .exe, .cmd, .bat, .mdb, .doc, and .xls, can contain malicious code and cause damage.
  52. [52]
    What Are High-Risk File Types and How to Block Users ... - EzProtect
    Apr 10, 2024 · Malware Infection: Many high-risk files, such as executable files (.exe) or document files with malicious macros (.docm), may contain malware.
  53. [53]
    Protect yourself from macro viruses - Microsoft Support
    A macro virus is a type of computer virus that could be stored in macros within a Microsoft 365 file (such as a document, presentation, workbook, or template)
  54. [54]
    Email Protection: List Of Dangerous Attachments
    Oct 11, 2023 · Email Protection Lite spam filters block certain attachment types because those attachment types often contain viruses.
  55. [55]
    Top 4 dangerous attachments in spam e-mails | Kaspersky official blog
    small programs that run inside the file. Cybercriminals use macros as scripts for downloading malware.Missing: high- | Show results with:high-
  56. [56]
    The 8 Most Dangerous File Types for Malware Infections | Votiro
    Oct 14, 2025 · Archives can bundle multiple infected files and hide them behind passwords or encryption. Once extracted, the hidden malware deploys immediately ...<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Are PDFs with JavaScript Trustworthy? - Cloudmersive APIs
    Feb 29, 2024 · Threat actors can write malicious JavaScript in a specially crafted PDF file to exploit vulnerabilities in our web browsers. Moreover, they can ...<|separator|>
  58. [58]
  59. [59]
    How a Malicious Excel File (CVE-2017-0199) Delivers the ... - Fortinet
    Jun 5, 2025 · Read how a malicious Excel file exploits CVE-2017-0199 to deliver FormBook malware via phishing.CVE-2017-0199 · Malicious HTA file; “ · sihost.exe” · AutoIt Script
  60. [60]
    File types blocked in Gmail - Google Help
    Gmail blocks messages that may spread viruses, like messages that include executable files or certain links. Messages that have attachments. To protect your ...Missing: Yahoo | Show results with:Yahoo
  61. [61]
    Beware: Attachments May Ruin Your Email Delivery Expectations
    Jul 26, 2012 · Email attachments can be blocked by ISPs/webmail providers due to size limits (often 25MB) and certain file types like .exe, which can cause ...<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Email Protection | Best Practices | IT Security | SDSU
    Verify the contents of any email attachment before opening it and never click on attachments from unknown persons. Do not respond to any email requesting ...
  63. [63]
    Blocked attachments in Outlook - Microsoft Support
    Some attachment file types are automatically blocked because of their potential for introducing a virus into your computer.Save The File To The Cloud · Rename A File · Blocked File Types In...
  64. [64]
    What Is Email Security? Definition & Best Practices | Proofpoint US
    Learn what email security is, why it's essential, and discover best practices to protect your business from phishing, spam, and other email-based threats.
  65. [65]
    How to Protect Against Evolving Phishing Attacks
    Oct 18, 2023 · It lists more than a dozen best practices for IT professionals to follow to avoid their organization being compromised, including phishing ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Trustworthy Email - NIST Technical Series Publications
    Feb 1, 2019 · allow organizations to open email attachments, execute untrusted or suspicious applications, and execute Universal Resource Locator (URL) ...
  67. [67]
    How to Send Large Files via Email Securely - Dropbox.com
    Rating 4.8 (424,618) · Free · Business/ProductivityJun 15, 2025 · Dropbox offers a free plan for basic file-sharing, while Dropbox Transfer allows secure link-sharing for larger files.
  68. [68]
    How Does AI Email Security Work in 2025 — and Why Traditional ...
    Jul 25, 2025 · AI uses anomaly detection: it looks at the “why” behind emails. For instance, if a legitimate-looking attachment is sent from an external party ...
  69. [69]
    Encryption scenarios | ICO - Information Commissioner's Office
    Encrypted email can allow you to encrypt the body and attachments of emails. ... This can provide a secure and auditable means to share information. But ...