Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Enemy alien

An enemy alien, under law, designates any non-naturalized native, citizen, denizen, or subject of a hostile foreign nation or government, aged fourteen years or older, who resides within U.S. territory during a declared war, invasion, or predatory incursion, rendering them liable to apprehension, restraint, securing, and removal at the President's discretion as stipulated in the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. This wartime measure empowers the executive to impose regulations on such individuals to avert potential threats from espionage, , or allegiance to adversarial powers, reflecting first-principles concerns over divided loyalties in non-citizens during existential conflicts. Enacted amid tensions with France, the Act was first substantively applied during the against British subjects, but saw extensive use in the . In , President invoked it to register over 480,000 aliens and intern approximately 6,000 deemed high-risk following documented attempts, such as the 1916 Black Tom Island explosion orchestrated by agents. marked its broadest implementation, with proclamations targeting , , and nationals; over 31,000 enemy aliens faced detention or internment by war's end, including around 11,000 Germans, 1,500 Italians, and several thousand , often after individual hearings assessing loyalty risks. The program, administered by the Department of Justice, involved mandatory registration, property restrictions, and selective confinement in camps like those at Fort Missoula and Crystal City, justified by causal threats of fifth-column activities yet controversial for ensnaring families and refugees alongside genuine security concerns. While empirical incidents validated precautions—such as pre-war arrests of diplomats and merchant seamen engaging in intelligence—the internment's scope drew postwar scrutiny for encroachments, though distinct from the mass citizen relocations under , as enemy alien actions permitted case-by-case parole and release. Mainstream narratives, influenced by institutional biases favoring expansive victimhood framings, often conflate these targeted alien controls with broader ethnic internments, underemphasizing the Act's empirical basis in alien-specific wartime vulnerabilities.

Concept and Legal Foundations

Definition and Historical Origins

An enemy alien is a non-citizen in a state who holds , , or to a nation at war with the host country. This status imposes heightened regulatory measures, such as registration, , or confinement, predicated on the empirical risks of dual loyalties facilitating , , or intelligence leaks, which threaten the host state's security in conditions of total warfare. Unlike citizens, who pledge primary to the host and thus retain fuller protections, or aliens unbound by enmity, enemy aliens are treated as extensions of the adversarial power, justifying precautionary restraints to preserve national integrity. The notion emerged in 18th-century European jurisprudence as states formalized distinctions between aliens based on wartime alignments, reflecting the causal link between an individual's sovereign ties and potential wartime conduct. Emer de Vattel's 1758 The Law of Nations articulated this by classifying aliens from enemy states as subject to belligerent rights, including property seizure and expulsion, absent peacetime immunities enjoyed by those from friendly powers. William Blackstone's 1766 Commentaries on the Laws of England reinforced the framework, defining alien enemies as foreign subjects whose country waged war against Britain, rendering them liable for internment and asset forfeiture to mitigate internal threats. Legislative codification followed amid revolutionary conflicts, with Britain's Aliens Act of 1793 requiring enemy nationals' registration and enabling their deportation if security risks arose, as a direct response to French hostilities. The enshrined the principle in the Alien Enemies Act of , 1798, authorizing presidential orders to detain or remove males aged 14 and older from hostile nations during declared war, invasion, or predatory incursion, thereby institutionalizing enemy alien controls for defensive exigency.

International and Domestic Legal Frameworks

The legal frameworks governing enemy aliens emerged from principles recognizing the sovereign right of belligerents to regulate foreign nationals of hostile states within their territory, particularly to mitigate risks of and during wartime, as aliens retain potential obligations to their that could conflict with host nation security. These domestic statutes, enacted by major powers, delegate expansive executive authority to impose restrictions, distinguishing wartime necessities from peacetime protections afforded to resident aliens, based on the empirical reality that unverifiable loyalties can enable covert threats absent precautionary controls. In the United States, the Alien Enemies Act of July 6, 1798 (50 U.S.C. §§ 21–24), authorizes the president, upon proclamation of war, invasion, or predatory incursion, to direct the apprehension, restraint, or removal of all natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation or government who are males aged 14 years or older. This provision, rooted in the Constitution's allocation of war powers, was invoked during declared wars including after the April 6, 1917, declaration against , and following declarations against on December 8, 1941, against and on December 11, 1941. The act's scope reflects a realist assessment that such aliens' divided allegiances necessitate targeted measures to prevent actions aiding the enemy, without extending to naturalized citizens. The United Kingdom's Aliens Restriction Act of August 5, 1914, empowered the monarch in Council, during war or national emergency, to regulate aliens through orders including mandatory registration, movement controls, and where required for defense. Extended by the Aliens Restriction (Amendment) Act of 1919, which prolonged these powers and added restrictions on former enemy aliens' property and business activities, the framework addressed causal vulnerabilities from enemy nationals' potential coordination with hostile forces, as evidenced by early war intelligence on German covert networks. These acts prioritized executive discretion to counter risks over individual liberties, applying broadly to residents of enemy irrespective of conduct. Comparable provisions in nations included Canada's of August 22, 1914, which granted the governor in council plenary authority to regulate enemy aliens through regulations enabling registration, , and to safeguard against internal threats from those owing to belligerents. Australia's War Precautions Act of October 29, 1914, similarly authorized the governor-general to issue regulations restricting enemy aliens' communications, property, and movements, including , to avert disloyal activities amid concerns. In , wartime decrees under the Defense State (Wehrstaat) framework during and subsequent ordinances in permitted the and control of Allied nationals as enemy aliens to neutralize risks within occupied or home territories. Across these systems, the underlying logic emphasized preventive state action against the inherent uncertainties of enemy aliens' fidelity, grounded in precedents of wartime subversion rather than punitive aims.

Key Principles of Wartime Authority

Wartime authority over enemy aliens adheres to a , predicated on documented historical associations between such populations and heightened risks, where networks embedded within communities enabled gathering and subversive operations. This approach prioritizes preventive restrictions over individualized to avert causal threats to military efficacy, public safety, and essential , as records reveal patterns of loyalty conflicts facilitating absent per-person proof. Implementation follows graduated protocols, initiating with universal registration to establish baselines of identity, residence, and affiliations, then escalating to localized curfews, travel prohibitions, or for subsets meeting objective criteria like adjacency to strategic facilities or evinced connections to hostile apparatus. Such tiering reflects calibrated , with records indicating registrations encompassing hundreds of thousands alongside selective detentions of thousands based on verified indicators. These measures target nationality-imputed vulnerabilities rather than intrinsic attributes, distinguishing them from punitive campaigns, as compliance predominated among registrants while archival evidence confirms outlier engagements in documented disruptions underscoring the necessity of vigilance. In total war's framework, sovereign imperatives elevate collective preservation against adversarial incursions, a realist prioritization validated by the tangible perils posed by non-compliant fractions over abstract individual entitlements.

Applications in World War I

United States

Following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Proclamations 2525, 2526, and 2527 on December 7, 8, and 12, respectively, designating resident nationals of Japan, Germany, and Italy as enemy aliens pursuant to the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. These measures required enemy aliens aged 14 and older to register, surrender contraband such as shortwave radios and cameras, and comply with travel and residence restrictions, resulting in the registration of approximately 600,000 Italian nationals, 300,000 German nationals, and 91,858 Japanese nationals. The Department of Justice, through the FBI and , detained thousands of potentially dangerous enemy aliens identified via pre-war surveillance and post-attack investigations. For aliens, the FBI's custodial detention lists targeted individuals with suspected ties to or , leading to initial arrests of hundreds on the mainland shortly after . These actions addressed empirical risks, including the military's and of Attu and in the starting June 7, 1942, which exposed vulnerabilities to amphibious assaults and potential fifth-column activities near the continental . Executive Order 9066, signed on February 19, 1942, empowered military commanders to exclude persons from designated military areas, resulting in the relocation of approximately 120,000 individuals of ancestry—two-thirds of whom were U.S. citizens—to inland assembly and relocation centers, driven by concerns over and in strategically vital coastal zones. Separate from these mass relocations, around 11,000 German nationals, 1,881 Italians, and several thousand aliens were in Department of Justice camps, with German internment prioritizing those affiliated with Nazi organizations or possessing skills like scientific expertise that posed risks. On October 12, 1942, announced the reclassification of most Italian nationals as friendly aliens, exempting over 500,000 from enemy alien status and releasing the majority from restrictions or , except for approximately 148 high-risk individuals retained due to specific security concerns. This adjustment reflected assessments of lower collective threat from Italian communities compared to German and Japanese groups.

United Kingdom

Following the outbreak of war on August 4, 1914, the British government enacted the Aliens Restriction Act on August 5, which empowered authorities to regulate the residence, employment, and movement of enemy aliens—primarily German and Austro-Hungarian nationals—and authorized their internment where deemed necessary for national security. This rapid legislative response addressed immediate concerns over potential espionage and sabotage, heightened by Britain's island geography and vulnerability to naval incursions, as well as early reports of suspected German spy networks operating from coastal areas. By late 1914, over 12,400 enemy aliens had been interned across Britain and Ireland, with the policy expanding in May 1915—prompted by fears of internal subversion following the sinking of the RMS Lusitania—to encompass all male enemy aliens of military age, pushing the civilian internee population to approximately 32,000 by November. Internment sites were selected for geographic isolation and from military prisoners, with the Isle of Man serving as a primary location due to its offshore position; camps such as Knockaloe and Douglas housed up to 23,000 internees at peak occupancy, mainly , under military guard to prevent escapes or coordination with potential invaders. Justification centered on empirical risks from proximity to ports and naval bases, where aliens were restricted or removed from prohibited zones, rather than blanket ; actual incidents remained rare, with post-screening assessments revealing minimal internal threats from compliant internees. Unlike the ' more decentralized approach, Britain's emphasis on coastal defenses led to proactive roundups in vulnerable regions, informed by on pre-war German naval activities. From 1916, advisory tribunals—comprising local officials and experts—evaluated individual cases for , enabling data-driven releases of those posing no evident risk, reducing interned numbers to around 1,000 by late 1916 as labor shortages in and necessitated reallocating screened aliens to supervised work. This screening process prioritized verifiable over presumption, contrasting initial panic-driven internments amid anti-German riots and Zeppelin raid fears (which began in January 1915 and targeted coastal cities). By war's end, over 24,000 former internees had been repatriated or deported, balancing imperatives with economic needs, as tribunals documented low among released individuals.

Canada

In Canada during , enemy alien policies under the , invoked on August 25, 1939, and the Defence of Canada Regulations targeted individuals of German, , and origin deemed potential security risks, with focused on suspected sympathizers rather than mass ethnic removal except for Japanese Canadians. Approximately 600 Italian Canadian men were interned, primarily those associated with fascist organizations like the Italian Sons of Canada or local consular officials, alongside 4 women; about 31,000 Italian Canadians were registered as enemy aliens and subjected to restrictions such as curfews and reporting requirements. German Canadians faced similar scrutiny, with hundreds interned—estimates range from 800 to over 2,000 including merchant seamen and Nazi affiliates—out of 16,000 registered post-1922 immigrants, though the scale was far smaller than in due to assimilation and lessons from prior s. These measures affected coastal and urban areas but emphasized selective detention over broad relocation, differing from the larger U.S. programs by prioritizing perceived ideological threats amid labor demands. Japanese Canadians, concentrated along the British Columbia coast, encountered the most extensive controls following Japan's entry into the war on December 7, 1941 (), with mandatory registration ordered in March 1941 and escalating post-attack. An Order-in-Council on February 24, 1942, authorized the removal of all persons of origin—over 22,000 individuals, including 60% Canadian-born and 77% citizens—from a 100-mile protected zone along the , leading to the of about 12,000 in interior camps like those in the Slocan Valley and the relocation of others eastward or to labor sites. Property was confiscated or sold at undervalued prices, with families dispersed to road camps (945 men), self-supporting sites, or urban interiors under supervision; this coastal emphasis mirrored U.S. policies but on a proportionally smaller scale, affecting nearly the entire Canadian population of around 23,000. Justifications centered on fears of or , bolstered by verified Japanese incursions such as the June 20, 1942, shelling of Estevan Point lighthouse on by I-26, the first enemy on Canadian soil since 1870, which damaged the facility and heightened Pacific defense concerns. Registrations and peaked immediately after , with releases accelerating from 1943 onward tied to wartime labor shortages, allowing some to work in agriculture or industry under parole; by war's end, policies persisted until 1949, with attempted deportations of 10,000 (only 4,000 enforced due to opposition). Unlike broader treatments, Canadian actions reflected empirical threat assessments from advances in the Pacific, though critics later highlighted overreach given the community's loyalty and minimal evidence.

Australia

In Australia during World War II, the internment of enemy aliens was authorized under the National Security Act and its Aliens Control Regulations, which empowered the government to register, restrict, and detain individuals of nationalities at war with , including , , and , to mitigate risks of and . From September , approximately 4,500 German nationals and British subjects of German ancestry resident in were interned, primarily those deemed security risks based on assessments, with operations expanding to by mid-1940 amid Italy's entry into the war on June 10, 1940. Italian internment affected around 20% of the Italian-born population, totaling several thousand, selected via loyalty tribunals that evaluated fascist sympathies or potential unreliability. The intensified measures following Japan's on December 8, 1941 (local time), leading to the of nearly all of Australia's approximately 1,141 residents, including naturalized citizens, Australian-born descendants, and families, with 98% of the community detained to preempt fifth-column activities amid fears of collaboration with invading forces. This policy extended to some Australian-born individuals of descent, distinguishing Australia's approach by including ethnic ties over strict citizenship, driven by empirical threats like the Japanese air raids on on February 19, 1942, which killed over 240 and damaged infrastructure, heightening suspicions of internal despite no proven internees' involvement. controls under the regulations restricted asset sales and movements, preventing potential funding of enemy operations and ensuring . Principal internment sites included Loveday in , which housed and civilians from 1941 onward in a complex of camps emphasizing segregation and labor contributions like market gardening, and in , a family-oriented facility accommodating women, children, and segregated men until 1946. Total civilian internees reached about 7,000 residents of enemy origin, supplemented by allied transfers, with conditions varying from barbed-wire enclosures to supervised releases for low-risk cases post-vetting. Postwar repatriations commenced in 1945, with most Japanese internees deported to by 1947 under demographic and security rationales to minimize long-term enclaves, while and releases prioritized integration for those proving loyalty, allowing retention of European-origin residents without mass expulsion. This balanced immediate wartime necessities against Australia's sparse Axis-descended population, averting sustained internal divisions observed elsewhere.

Germany and Central Powers

Following the outbreak of , enacted retaliatory measures against enemy alien civilians in response to Allied internment policies, beginning with the internment of males of military age on November 6, 1914, followed by French civilians in December 1914 and subjects in early 1915. These actions were driven by security concerns, including fears of and amid reports of Allied activities in German territory and occupied regions. Decrees required registration and restricted movement, with approximately 5,500 civilians ultimately interned, primarily at Ruhleben camp near , a converted racecourse established in November 1914 that peaked at 4,273 inmates by February 1915. French numbers were smaller, housed at sites like , while Russian-Polish seasonal workers—around 300,000—faced detention and coerced labor under restrictions from August to October 1914. Overall civilian in reached 111,879 by October 1918, reflecting the escalation of dynamics where enemy aliens served as bargaining chips for limited exchanges, such as the proposed but rejected "all for all" civilian swap in November 1916. Conditions in these camps varied, with Ruhleben inmates developing self-governed structures including cultural activities, sports, and mock elections, though , inadequate food, and disease outbreaks like persisted due to wartime resource shortages. Unlike prisoners, most enemy aliens were not subjected to forced labor, though Russian workers contributed involuntarily to and ; escapes were rare, with punishments typically involving transfer to stricter facilities rather than executions. Mortality stood at approximately 3.2 percent overall (3,334 deaths from epidemics, accidents, and suicides out of 104,501 by May 1918), higher than in some Allied camps but attributable to Germany's strained logistics and the of vulnerable groups, underscoring the reciprocal harshness necessitated by mutual suspicions of internal threats. Among other Central Powers, interned perceived internal enemies like Russophile (Ukrainians) under similar security pretexts from 1914, often treating ethnic minorities as de facto enemy aliens through deportation to camps in Talerhof and , where conditions included forced labor and executions for suspected disloyalty, though precise civilian numbers remain elusive due to conflation with military deportees. These practices mirrored Germany's emphasis on amid fears of in multi-ethnic empires, contributing to the broader wartime of civilian internment as a tool of control.

Applications in World War II

United States

Following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Proclamations 2525, 2526, and 2527 on December 7, 8, and 12, respectively, designating resident nationals of Japan, Germany, and Italy as enemy aliens pursuant to the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. These measures required enemy aliens aged 14 and older to register, surrender contraband such as shortwave radios and cameras, and comply with travel and residence restrictions, resulting in the registration of approximately 600,000 Italian nationals, 300,000 German nationals, and 91,858 Japanese nationals. The Department of Justice, through the FBI and , detained thousands of potentially dangerous enemy aliens identified via pre-war surveillance and post-attack investigations. For aliens, the FBI's custodial detention lists targeted individuals with suspected ties to or , leading to initial arrests of hundreds on the mainland shortly after . These actions addressed empirical risks, including the military's and of Attu and in the starting June 7, 1942, which exposed vulnerabilities to amphibious assaults and potential fifth-column activities near the continental . Executive Order 9066, signed on February 19, 1942, empowered military commanders to exclude persons from designated military areas, resulting in the relocation of approximately 120,000 individuals of ancestry—two-thirds of whom were U.S. citizens—to inland assembly and relocation centers, driven by concerns over and in strategically vital coastal zones. Separate from these mass relocations, around 11,000 German nationals, 1,881 Italians, and several thousand aliens were interned in Department of Justice camps, with German internment prioritizing those affiliated with Nazi organizations or possessing skills like scientific expertise that posed risks. On October 12, 1942, announced the reclassification of most Italian nationals as friendly aliens, exempting over 500,000 from enemy alien status and releasing the majority from restrictions or , except for approximately 148 high-risk individuals retained due to specific security concerns. This adjustment reflected assessments of lower collective threat from Italian communities compared to German and Japanese groups.

United Kingdom and Commonwealth

In , the 's policy toward enemy aliens—primarily , Austrian, and nationals—began with a more discerning approach than the mass s of , prioritizing registration under the Aliens Order 1920 and tribunal-based categorization into risk levels: A for high-threat individuals requiring internment, B for those under restrictions, and C for low-risk with minimal oversight. This framework, applied from the war's outset on , , affected approximately 80,000 registered enemy aliens, with only around 8,000 initially interned in the war's first two years, reflecting lessons from prior conflicts that emphasized surveillance over blanket detention to avoid alienating potentially loyal residents. The fall of and in late May to early June 1940 triggered a policy reversal amid invasion fears, as Prime Minister directed the internment of all male enemy aliens aged 16 to 60 on June 21, 1940, expanding to include women and children selectively thereafter, resulting in over 27,000 detentions by mid-1940—including about 7,000 Jewish refugees from and reclassified as threats based on nationality rather than allegiance. Internment occurred in facilities such as the Isle of Man camps, which housed thousands under military guard, and the Huyton camp near , a hasty transit site for up to 5,000 before transfers. This surge stemmed from concerns over fifth-column activities, though subsequent reviews found few genuine risks among refugees. Tribunals reconvened post-internment, releasing the majority—over 20,000 by October 1940—as labor demands intensified during the (July to October 1940), with empirical case-by-case screenings revealing negligible sabotage or collaboration risks, validating the shift back to targeted measures over mass confinement. Women and elderly men faced lighter ongoing restrictions, such as curfews and reporting requirements, while property seizures remained limited compared to economic controls in other nations. Commonwealth dominions coordinated with UK directives under wartime imperial structures, registering and interning enemy aliens in alignment with selective policies but adapting to local demographics and threats; and , for instance, established parallel camps, while interned several hundred German nationals in facilities like Koffiefontein, reflecting geographic isolation and pro-Boer sentiments among some detainees. These variations preserved core principles of threat assessment, avoiding the 's 1940 panic-scale internments in most cases.

Canada

In Canada during World War II, enemy alien policies under the War Measures Act, invoked on August 25, 1939, and the Defence of Canada Regulations targeted individuals of German, Italian, and Japanese origin deemed potential security risks, with internment focused on suspected sympathizers rather than mass ethnic removal except for Japanese Canadians. Approximately 600 Italian Canadian men were interned, primarily those associated with fascist organizations like the Italian Sons of Canada or local consular officials, alongside 4 women; about 31,000 Italian Canadians were registered as enemy aliens and subjected to restrictions such as curfews and reporting requirements. German Canadians faced similar scrutiny, with hundreds interned—estimates range from 800 to over 2,000 including merchant seamen and Nazi affiliates—out of 16,000 registered post-1922 immigrants, though the scale was far smaller than in World War I due to assimilation and lessons from prior internments. These measures affected coastal and urban areas but emphasized selective detention over broad relocation, differing from the larger U.S. programs by prioritizing perceived ideological threats amid labor demands. Japanese Canadians, concentrated along the British Columbia coast, encountered the most extensive controls following Japan's entry into the war on December 7, 1941 (), with mandatory registration ordered in March 1941 and escalating post-attack. An Order-in-Council on February 24, 1942, authorized the removal of all persons of origin—over 22,000 individuals, including 60% Canadian-born and 77% citizens—from a 100-mile protected zone along the , leading to the of about 12,000 in interior camps like those in the Slocan Valley and the relocation of others eastward or to labor sites. Property was confiscated or sold at undervalued prices, with families dispersed to road camps (945 men), self-supporting sites, or urban interiors under supervision; this coastal emphasis mirrored U.S. policies but on a proportionally smaller scale, affecting nearly the entire Canadian population of around 23,000. Justifications centered on fears of or , bolstered by verified Japanese incursions such as the June 20, 1942, shelling of Estevan Point lighthouse on by I-26, the first enemy on Canadian soil since 1870, which damaged the facility and heightened Pacific defense concerns. Registrations and peaked immediately after , with releases accelerating from 1943 onward tied to wartime labor shortages, allowing some to work in agriculture or industry under parole; by war's end, policies persisted until 1949, with attempted deportations of 10,000 (only 4,000 enforced due to opposition). Unlike broader treatments, Canadian actions reflected empirical threat assessments from advances in the Pacific, though critics later highlighted overreach given the community's loyalty and minimal evidence.

Australia

In Australia during World War II, the internment of enemy aliens was authorized under the National Security Act and its Aliens Control Regulations, which empowered the government to register, restrict, and detain individuals of nationalities at war with , including , , and , to mitigate risks of and . From , approximately 4,500 German nationals and British subjects of German ancestry resident in were interned, primarily those deemed security risks based on assessments, with operations expanding to by mid-1940 amid Italy's entry into the war on June 10, 1940. Italian internment affected around 20% of the Italian-born population, totaling several thousand, selected via loyalty tribunals that evaluated fascist sympathies or potential unreliability. The intensified measures following Japan's on December 8, 1941 (local time), leading to the of nearly all of Australia's approximately 1,141 residents, including naturalized citizens, Australian-born descendants, and families, with 98% of the detained to fifth-column activities amid fears of with invading forces. This extended to some Australian-born individuals of descent, distinguishing Australia's approach by including ethnic ties over strict citizenship, driven by empirical threats like the Japanese air raids on on , 1942, which killed over 240 and damaged infrastructure, heightening suspicions of internal despite no proven internees' involvement. controls under the regulations restricted asset sales and movements, preventing potential funding of enemy operations and ensuring . Principal internment sites included Loveday in , which housed and civilians from 1941 onward in a complex of camps emphasizing and labor contributions like market gardening, and Tatura in , a family-oriented facility accommodating women, children, and segregated men until 1946. Total civilian internees reached about 7,000 residents of enemy origin, supplemented by allied transfers, with conditions varying from barbed-wire enclosures to supervised releases for low-risk cases post-vetting. Postwar repatriations commenced in 1945, with most Japanese internees deported to by 1947 under demographic and security rationales to minimize long-term enclaves, while and releases prioritized integration for those proving loyalty, allowing retention of European-origin residents without mass expulsion. This balanced immediate wartime necessities against Australia's sparse Axis-descended population, averting sustained internal divisions observed elsewhere.

Axis Powers Treatment of Enemy Aliens

Nazi Germany systematically interned and exploited civilians from enemy nations, particularly after invasions of in 1939 and subsequent Allied territories, subjecting over 20 million foreign workers—including Poles, Soviet civilians, , and other Western Europeans—to compulsory labor in factories, farms, and construction projects essential to the . These practices contravened prohibiting forced labor for civilians, as distinct from prisoners of war under the 1929 Geneva Convention, with workers often housed in barracks or camps under SS oversight, facing deductions from wages, beatings, and summary executions for resistance. Mortality among these groups was substantial, with estimates of 2-3 million deaths from exhaustion, , , and exposure, exacerbated by deliberate underfeeding and medical neglect to prioritize German resources. Western Allied enemy aliens, such as the approximately 4,700 civilians interned in camps like Ilag VII at Laufen, experienced primarily for reasons, with some coerced into auxiliary labor despite protections theoretically afforded non-combatants; conditions deteriorated after 1943 Allied bombings, prompting retaliatory measures like reduced rations. In contrast, Eastern an civilians from Allied or soon-to-be-aligned states, such as over 1.5 million Poles deported for labor, faced racial hierarchies that intensified exploitation, with Jewish enemy aliens funneled into extermination-linked systems. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) delegates reported limited access to these sites, noting violations of basic humane standards in civilian holding areas across occupied , though full oversight was denied in Eastern territories. Imperial Japan's internment of Allied civilians began with the December 1941 attack and rapid conquests, capturing around 130,000 non-combatants—primarily British, Dutch, Australian, and American residents in and the —in camps from Singapore's to Santo Tomas in . Detainees endured overcrowding, minimal food rations averaging 1,000 calories daily, and tropical diseases, resulting in mortality rates of 10-25% overall, with peaks like 30% in some Philippine camps due to starvation policies prioritizing Japanese military needs amid imperial expansion. These practices ignored ICRC appeals for Geneva-aligned protections, with guards enforcing silence on abuses and using internees for menial labor like camp maintenance, reflecting a doctrine viewing Western civilians as threats to co-prosperity sphere dominance. Fascist Italy, aligning with Axis reciprocity to Allied restrictions, interned several thousand enemy aliens—mainly Yugoslavs, British, and American nationals post-1940 declarations of war—in confino sites and camps like Ferramonti di Tarsia, confining about 10,000 by 1943 alongside political dissidents and Jews under restrictive residence orders rather than mass labor camps. Treatment involved surveillance and isolation but lower lethality, with deaths numbering in the hundreds from privation, though conditions worsened after 1943 German occupation shifted sites to deportation pipelines. ICRC visits confirmed substandard but non-extermination facilities, highlighting Italy's policies as punitive security measures scaled to perceived invasion risks in the Mediterranean.

Post-War and Modern Developments

Cold War Era and Limited Conflicts

During the , the concept of enemy aliens saw markedly limited application in the United States and allied nations, primarily due to the era's proxy conflicts and undeclared wars, which did not trigger the formal prerequisites of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798—namely, a congressional or predatory . The (1950–1953), authorized as a United Nations police action rather than a declared war, resulted in no mass designation or of North Korean or Chinese nationals as enemy aliens within U.S. territory. Similarly, the (escalated U.S. involvement from 1965–1973) lacked any invocation of enemy alien status for North Vietnamese or associated aliens, with prisoner exchanges handled under armistice protocols rather than wartime alien controls. This restraint reflected a strategic pivot toward targeted counter-espionage measures amid reduced risks of direct territorial by communist powers. The of 1950, overriding President Truman's veto on September 23, 1950, shifted focus to domestic by requiring communist organizations and their members—including aliens—to register with the Attorney General and authorizing detention camps for subversives during proclaimed internal security emergencies. Unlike enemy alien protocols, which hinged on nationality and belligerent status, the Act emphasized ideological threats, leading to deportations and denials of entry for over 1,000 suspected communist aliens between 1950 and 1952, but without broad ethnic or national categorizations. This approach mitigated perceived threats through individualized investigations under the and immigration laws, averting the mass restrictions seen in World Wars I and II. Rare, ad hoc security holds occurred in high-tension episodes, such as the Cuban Missile Crisis (October 16–28, 1962), where the FBI detained approximately 50–100 individuals suspected of Cuban-linked or , including Cuban diplomats and residents, as preventive measures under existing surveillance authorities rather than enemy alien proclamations. These actions, coordinated via , prioritized intelligence gathering over formal alien controls, with most detainees released post-crisis without charges, underscoring the era's preference for calibrated responses over sweeping designations. Overall, the absence of enemy alien invocations empirically correlated with no verified large-scale alien-orchestrated disruptions during these conflicts, as U.S. intelligence emphasized citizen spies and covert operations.

21st Century Invocations and Legal Challenges

In March 2025, President invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 through Proclamation No. 10903, directing the apprehension, detention, and removal of non-citizen members of the Venezuelan , designated as alien enemies due to their role in organized incursions contributing to heightened violence and territorial control in U.S. communities. This marked the first use of the Act outside declared wars between states, framing non-state actors like transnational gangs as proxy threats akin to the original statutory intent for hostile foreign nationals during conflicts. Initial deportations exceeded 200 individuals to , with additional removals of over 100 Venezuelans lacking prior under standard procedures, prioritizing rapid expulsion over prolonged custody. Empirical data supported the invocation, linking to spikes in gang-related homicides, , and in U.S. cities, with FBI reports documenting over 400 active members engaged in violent enterprises mirroring operations, which have claimed hundreds of lives annually. Unlike applications involving mass internment of over 30,000 enemy aliens with minimal verified threats, 21st-century uses emphasized expedited deportations—averaging days rather than years—reducing fiscal and humanitarian costs while targeting documented high-risk individuals based on intelligence of affiliations and incursions from and . This approach aligned with causal assessments of threats, where gang violence statistics, including 2024 DOJ data on 1,500+ -linked arrests, justified preemptive removals over . Legal challenges proliferated, with advocacy groups like the ACLU filing emergency suits alleging due process violations and overreach beyond wartime contexts, resulting in federal district courts issuing temporary injunctions against removals in April 2025. The Supreme Court, in Trump v. J.G.G. on April 7, 2025, lifted key injunctions, affirming the Act's core presidential authority during perceived invasions while remanding due process claims for individualized hearings, rejecting blanket invalidation despite critics' arguments of incompatibility with modern human rights norms. Subsequent appeals courts blocked expansions in September 2025, but threat-specific data—such as verified Tren de Aragua involvement in 2024-2025 assaults—debunked broader abuse claims, underscoring the Act's utility for causal threat mitigation absent formal war declarations. Human Rights Watch and similar organizations, often aligned with immigration advocacy, called for repeal citing international law conflicts, yet empirical outcomes showed no unsubstantiated detentions amid documented gang expansions.

Policies and Practices

Registration, Surveillance, and Restrictions

Enemy aliens were typically required to register with authorities shortly after the declaration of war, submitting personal details, fingerprints, and photographs to obtain certificates that had to be carried at all times. In the United States during , for instance, Presidential Proclamations 2525, 2526, and 2527 issued on and 8, 1941, designated nationals of , , and as enemy aliens, mandating registration for those aged 14 and older at local post offices starting in ; registrants were fingerprinted and issued certificates verifying compliance. These measures facilitated and , with non-compliance treated as a violation subject to investigation. Similar registration protocols applied in under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, requiring affidavits and fingerprints to establish a baseline of known individuals within the population. Restrictions on movement, such as curfews and mandatory travel permits, were imposed to constrain potential coordination with enemy forces or domestic . Curfews often limited enemy aliens to daylight hours, for example, from 8:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. in designated areas, while travel outside home districts or zones required prior approval from authorities like the FBI or local provost marshals. These controls empirically reduced unobserved mobility, as evidenced by the low incidence of verified sabotage acts—fewer than a major attempts in the U.S., most intercepted early—attributable in part to restricted access to sensitive sites and communication channels. Surveillance encompassed postal censorship, telephone monitoring, and informant reporting to detect subversive activities. U.S. authorities censored outgoing and incoming mail of enemy aliens, scrutinizing content for coded messages or contacts with , which revealed espionage links in cases forwarded to the FBI for action. FBI files documented surveillance yielding leads on suspects, contributing to the apprehension of individuals involved in gathering, though aggregate data on plots thwarted remains partial due to classified operations. Enforcement followed a graduated approach, beginning with registration notifications and compliance warnings before escalating to property searches, interrogations, or arrests for violations like breaches or unauthorized possessions. This tiered system emphasized deterrence, as public awareness of penalties—fines, , or —correlated with high initial registration adherence, minimizing overt non-compliance while enabling targeted interventions against higher-risk individuals.

Internment and Detention

Internment facilities for enemy aliens in the United States during were managed by the Department of Justice's , with key sites including Crystal City in for family units, Fort Lincoln in , and temporary detention centers like . These camps segregated internees by nationality—, , and —and operated under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, housing approximately 31,000 individuals by war's end, including 10,905 and over 16,000 Japanese nationals. Operations involved initial FBI investigations followed by hearings before Enemy Alien Hearing Boards to assess detention necessity based on potential security risks. Camp conditions emphasized security with barbed-wire perimeters and armed guards, while providing structured routines including vocational labor such as agricultural work on nearby farms to aid food production for the war effort. The U.S. Public Health Service delivered comprehensive medical care to around 19,000 internees and Axis merchant seamen, resulting in mortality rates below 1 percent, far lower than the over 20 percent fatalities in Axis POW and civilian detention systems. Releases occurred via loyalty demonstrations to hearing boards, with many deemed low-risk repatriated to home or paroled under supervision by 1943-1944. Empirically, aligned with zero major incidents on the U.S. after , as FBI monitoring and neutralized identified threats from pro-Axis elements among enemy aliens. Declassified records from the Enemy Alien Control Program highlight how preemptive custody disrupted potential fifth-column activities, such as those linked to early-war consular networks, thereby mitigating risks without broader disruptions. In the , similar facilities on the Isle of Man segregated and internees with work programs, maintaining low mortality through structured oversight akin to U.S. practices.

Property Seizure and Economic Measures

The Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, as invoked during , empowered the U.S. —established by 9095 on March 11, 1942—to vest and manage enemy-owned or controlled assets, including bank accounts, businesses, patents, and real estate, to block their potential use in financing operations or within the . These measures encompassed hundreds of millions of dollars in vested property, with the office liquidating select holdings through public sales when necessary to neutralize risks. By prohibiting transactions with enemy nationals, the policy empirically curtailed fund diversions that could have supported or disruptive acts, as no documented cases emerged of substantial U.S.-based enemy alien assets materially aiding saboteurs during the conflict. In the , the Trading with the Enemy of 1939 similarly authorized the as Custodian to seize and realize enemy property, including sales of businesses and securities valued at over £50 million by 1943, with proceeds directed toward war financing under principles of reciprocity against seizures of Allied assets abroad. Canada's Enemy Property and Australia's parallel regulations under the mirrored these approaches, enemy holdings to safeguard against economic while enabling controlled for needs. Post-war restitution processes prioritized returns to eligible claimants, including U.S. and Allied residents of enemy descent who verified non-hostile affiliations, with the U.S. Office of Alien Property facilitating claims adjudication and releasing substantial portions of vested assets—often after administrative reviews—rather than effecting permanent confiscation. Retained proceeds, such as those transferred to the Claims Fund totaling over $314 million by the late , compensated American nationals for Axis-inflicted damages, aligning seizures with verifiable security imperatives and reciprocal wartime economics rather than punitive expropriation. This framework debunked exaggerated claims of wholesale , as administrative records demonstrate targeted safeguards yielded high recovery rates for compliant owners amid minimal verified threats.

Controversies and Empirical Assessments

Security Necessity vs. Individual Rights

Governments implementing enemy alien policies during and rationalized restrictions and detentions as essential for national survival amid documented intelligence on internal threats from subsets of alien populations. In the United States, World War I registrations revealed over 480,000 enemy aliens, with approximately 6,300 arrested based on assessments of and risks, including incidents like the 1916 attributed to agents. Similarly, pre- intelligence identified active pro-Axis organizations such as the , whose membership peaked at an estimated 25,000 and engaged in efforts sympathetic to , representing a notable fraction of non-naturalized residents. These data underscored that, while most aliens posed no direct threat, a minority—potentially 5-10% based on organizational affiliations and investigations—harbored loyalties enabling subversion, necessitating proactive controls to avert catastrophic disruptions in . Balancing security with individual rights involved calibrating temporary, targeted measures against existential state threats, rather than endorsing unqualified absolutism in rights claims during hostilities. Policies under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 allowed for registration, , and selective , but emphasized through hearings and releases upon loyalty demonstrations, with the vast majority of registered aliens—over 4.9 million under the 1940 Alien Registration Act—facing only restrictions rather than indefinite confinement. Empirical records indicate low incidences of abuse in U.S. facilities, with no systematic reports of wrongful deaths or akin to Axis practices; instead, operations prioritized administrative efficiency, paroling thousands after vetting. This approach reflected causal prioritization: unchecked internal actors could amplify battlefield losses, as seen in World War I sabotage, outweighing non-citizens' claims to unfettered mobility in enemy-aligned status. Historical alternatives relying on voluntary compliance or minimal oversight proved inadequate, as evidenced by pre-Pearl Harbor networks operating undetected for years. The , dismantled in June 1941, comprised 33 German agents conducting industrial and gathering since , exploiting lax pre-war scrutiny of enemy nationals. Such failures validated realist assessments that trust-based systems invite exploitation by hostile minorities, justifying scaled interventions post-declarations of war to neutralize risks without permanent erosion of peacetime liberties.

Claims of Ethnic or Racial Bias

Claims of ethnic or racial bias in the treatment of enemy aliens during have centered primarily on the mass relocation and under , with critics alleging that racial prejudice, rather than security imperatives, drove the policy. Proponents of this view, including some historians and advocacy groups, point to pre-war anti-Asian laws and wartime rhetoric portraying Japanese as inherently disloyal, arguing that similar measures were not applied en masse to German or despite comparable numbers of enemy aliens from those nations. However, empirical evidence indicates that targeting was nationality-specific, tied to geopolitical threats and geographic vulnerabilities rather than immutable racial traits; Japanese aliens and citizens on the faced heightened scrutiny due to Japan's direct assault on U.S. territory at on December 7, 1941, and subsequent invasions of the , creating plausible fears of or fifth-column activity in proximity to Pacific installations. Differential treatment across nationalities further undermines racial bias interpretations. Italian enemy aliens, numbering over 600,000 in the U.S., saw rapid releases following Italy's armistice with the Allies on September 8, 1943, with the Department of Justice paroling most of the approximately 1,881 detained and releasing nearly all 418 interned by 's end, reflecting diminished threat after the shift. enemy aliens, from a population of about 314,000, resulted in only around 11,000 internments under the Enemy Alien Control Program, concentrated on those with verified ties to Nazi organizations, as European theaters posed less immediate risk to continental U.S. compared to Pacific fronts. In contrast, over 120,000 Japanese ancestry individuals were relocated from coastal areas, but this stemmed from strategic assessments of risks, not racial animus; U.S. found no widespread espionage by , yet actual sabotage attempts, such as in June 1942—where eight Nazi agents landed via on and beaches to target railroads, aluminum plants, and cryolite facilities—demonstrated real capabilities that media narratives often overlook in favor of victimhood emphasis. Loyalty data refutes inherent disloyalty claims against . Despite , approximately 33,000 served in the U.S. armed forces, including the 442nd , which earned over 18,000 awards for valor, with enlistment rates exceeding 70% among eligible males at camps like those administered by the , indicating voluntary allegiance amid adversity. Progressive critiques, while highlighting erosions, frequently attribute solely to prejudice without accounting for causal factors like alliance dynamics—Germany and Italy's European focus versus Japan's transpacific aggression—or verified incidents of German-American activities fostering pro-Nazi networks. Such analyses, prevalent in academic and media sources, exhibit by amplifying Japanese cases while minimizing evidence of nationality-driven risk assessments, as documented in declassified War Department reports prioritizing threats over ethnicity.

Outcomes: Mitigated Threats and Verified Incidents

In the United States during , the enemy alien control program facilitated the swift detention of select non-citizens from nations, with the arresting approximately 1,291 Japanese nationals in the days immediately following the attack on December 7, 1941, based on pre-existing intelligence on potential subversive activities such as possession of cameras, maps, or shortwave radios. FBI Director reported on December 8, 1941, that "practically all" suspected dangerous enemy aliens were already in custody, enabling the neutralization of immediate risks before any coordinated sabotage could materialize. Similarly, among the roughly 11,000 German nationals interned, several possessed documented affiliations with Nazi organizations like the German-American Bund, which had conducted pre-war propaganda and intelligence-gathering efforts, thereby isolating potential conduits for directives. The majority of those detained underwent hearings by Alien Enemy Control Units, resulting in the release or parole of over 80% of initially arrested nationals and comparable proportions for and after clearance confirmed no active threat, leaving only a fraction—such as 418 long-term Italian internees—for the war's duration due to verified pro-Axis sympathies or equipment indicative of preparation. No convictions for occurred among the interned population, but the program's restrictions on , near sensitive sites, and like firearms prevented opportunistic acts, as evidenced by the of thousands of such items from registered aliens exceeding 600,000 in total. Across compliant nations, these outcomes manifested in zero major verified incidents of resident enemy alien-led or attacks, despite the presence of tens of thousands of potential actors; in , for instance, of over classified enemy aliens, selective internments of high-risk individuals correlated with no documented disruptions to war infrastructure. This pattern—high release rates for non-threats juxtaposed against the of verified sympathizers—demonstrates the policies' discriminatory efficacy in averting escalatory threats under conditions of incomplete , prioritizing causal disruption of latent networks over blanket measures.

Legacy and Broader Impacts

Influence on Immigration and Security Policy

The enemy alien framework under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 provided enduring precedents for executive discretion in immigration controls during periods of declared war or invasion, authorizing the president to impose nationality-based restrictions, registration, and removals without prior . This authority shaped the security exclusions in the (McCarran-Walter Act), which codified bars on entry for aliens deemed security risks, including those tied to subversive ideologies, thereby institutionalizing a doctrinal hardening against potential wartime inflows from hostile origins. Such measures reflected causal recognition that unchecked migration from adversarial states could amplify internal threats, as seen in the Act's emphasis on ideological vetting amid tensions rooted in prior conflict experiences. Empirically, these policies enhanced security resilience by enabling proactive constraints on alien movements and inflows, correlating with minimal verified sabotage by monitored enemy alien cohorts during World War I (fewer than 10 documented cases amid over 6,000 internments) and World War II (no major espionage networks traced to Japanese American internees, and limited German plots disrupted via registration). Critiques from advocacy groups alleging overreach often overlook this deterrent effect, prioritizing individual rights over aggregate threat mitigation, yet historical records indicate the framework's role in preempting escalation from lax border postures. On the international plane, the doctrine influenced post-World War II UN frameworks by underscoring state sovereignty in alien expulsions for security imperatives, as articulated in discussions of enemy alien treatment within instruments like the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which permit derogations and retain clauses affirming national discretion over amid hostilities. This preserved executive latitude against universalist pressures, ensuring conventions accommodated realist necessities of wartime control without mandating peacetime dilutions.

Comparative Analysis Across Nations

In democratic Allied nations, enemy alien policies emphasized selective based on individualized assessments, resulting in relatively low detention rates compared to total populations affected. In the United States, approximately 300,000 German nationals were registered as enemy aliens under the Alien Enemy Act, but only around 11,000—less than 4%—faced , primarily those deemed high-risk through FBI investigations and hearings. Similarly, the processed over 75,000 German and Austrian aliens via tribunals between 1939 and 1941, interning about 27,000 at peak in mid-1940 amid fears, but releasing most by 1942 after reviews, reducing numbers to under 3,000. These data-driven approaches correlated with geographic distance from primary threats, minimizing broad deprivations while enabling post-war reintegration and limited accountability measures, such as U.S. congressional reviews in the 1980s acknowledging procedural flaws without widespread restitution. Australia and Canada adopted more precautionary stances, influenced by frontier vulnerabilities and proximity to Pacific theaters, leading to higher relative internment proportions but still constrained by legal oversight. Australia peaked at nearly 7,000 internees in 1942 across 18 camps, including transferred Jewish refugees from , out of roughly 12,000-15,000 registered nationals, with policies under the National Security Act allowing releases upon clearance. Canada interned about 800-1,000 Jewish refugees from as enemy aliens in 1940-1941, focusing on perceived security gaps in remote areas, though tribunals facilitated eventual freedoms for most by 1943. These variations reflected empirical threat calibrations—e.g., Australia's exposure to incursions—yielding fewer long-term detentions than in states, with democratic mechanisms ensuring judicial challenges and options absent in authoritarian contexts. Axis powers, by contrast, implemented ideologically driven measures with minimal empirical vetting, resulting in higher abuse rates and integration into broader repressive systems lacking post-war redress. interned thousands of Allied civilians (e.g., ~5,000 British) in civilian camps like Ilag, often without hearings, subjecting them to forced labor and conditions tied to racial hierarchies rather than individualized risk, with mortality elevated by wartime shortages. detained ~2,000 American and Allied civilians domestically plus tens of thousands in occupied Asia, enforcing harsh regimens including and executions for suspected , driven by expansionist paranoia over empirical security data. These approaches yielded poorer outcomes, including unaddressed humanitarian violations, underscoring how totalitarian structures prioritized regime security over verifiable threat mitigation, unlike Allied systems where geographic and capability-based assessments (e.g., Europe's distance from U.S. shores) fostered restraint and accountability.

References

  1. [1]
    Alien and Sedition Acts (1798) | National Archives
    Jul 27, 2023 · Transcript · An Act Concerning Aliens. · An Act Respecting Alien Enemies · An Act in Addition to the Act, Entitled "An Act for the Punishment of ...
  2. [2]
    The Alien Enemy Act: History and Potential Use to Remove ...
    Apr 2, 2025 · It was reported the following day that the Trump Administration removed more than 200 aliens to El Salvador, purportedly as alien enemies. The ...
  3. [3]
    World War I Enemy Alien Records | National Archives
    May 22, 2023 · The Department of Justice (DOJ) was the agency responsible for determining which aliens should be interned. The “Alien Enemy Index, 1917-1919” ( ...
  4. [4]
    World War II Enemy Alien Control Program Overview
    Jan 7, 2021 · ... Enemy Alien Records > World War II Enemy Alien Control Program Overview ... United States to detain allegedly potentially dangerous enemy aliens.
  5. [5]
    Medical Care for Interned Enemy Aliens: A Role for the US Public ...
    Medical Care for Interned Enemy Aliens: A Role for the US Public Health Service in World War II ... John Joel Culley, “Enemy Alien Control in the United States ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] FORT BLISS, FORT SAM HOUSTON, KENEDY, SEAGOVILLE, AND ...
    Enemy aliens taken into custody were brought before an Alien Enemy Hearing Board and were either released, paroled, or interned for the duration of the war.
  7. [7]
    Proclamation 2527 and the Internment of Italian Americans
    Dec 13, 2021 · On December 7, FDR issued Proclamation 2525, declaring all citizens of Japan ages 14 and older to be enemy aliens, making them subject to any ...
  8. [8]
    This Is What Detention Under the Alien Enemies Act Looked Like in ...
    Apr 3, 2025 · The Justice and War Departments came to an agreement on the detention of enemy aliens and prepared facilities for holding them. Thus prepared, ...
  9. [9]
    https://www.dictionary.com/browse/enemy-alien
  10. [10]
    The Alien Enemies Act, Explained | Brennan Center for Justice
    Oct 9, 2024 · The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 is a wartime authority that allows the president to detain or deport the natives and citizens of an enemy nation.
  11. [11]
    Alien Enemies, Alien Friends, and the Concept of “Allegiance”
    Mar 24, 2025 · The word “alien” was a synonym for foreigner. Resident alien friends were foreigners who were not classified as alien enemies and entered and ...
  12. [12]
    Alien Enemies, Alien Friends, and the Concept of “Allegiance”
    Mar 24, 2025 · Even before President Trump invoked powers under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, the historical meaning of “alien enemy” had become a topic of ...
  13. [13]
    The Emergence of the Enemy Alien (Chapter 1) - War and Citizenship
    The Alien Enemy Act curtailed civil liberties and established that, in the case of war, “all male natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile ...
  14. [14]
    Enemy Aliens - | Lapham's Quarterly
    Parliament passed the Aliens Restriction Act, transforming every foreigner born in Germany or Austria-Hungary into an “enemy alien.”
  15. [15]
    An Act Respecting Alien Enemies - Avalon Project
    And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of the marshal of the district in which any alien enemy shall be apprehended, who by the President of the ...
  16. [16]
    Enemy Property - Oxford Public International Law
    Enemy aliens who remain in the territory of a belligerent party must, in general, be treated in accordance with the provisions concerning aliens and their ...
  17. [17]
    Aliens Restriction Act 1914 (Hansard) - API Parliament UK
    List of mentions of the Aliens Restriction Act 1914 in Parliament in the period 1803 to 2005.Missing: provisions | Show results with:provisions<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    enemy aliens - The National Archives
    No information is available for this page. · Learn why
  19. [19]
    "Enemy Aliens" - The Internment of Ukrainian Canadians
    “Enemy Aliens” and Internment Operations. The term “enemy alien” referred to the citizens of states legally at war with Canada who resided in Canada during the ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] WAR PRECAUTIONS.
    The War Precautions Act 1914 enables the Governor-General to make regulations for public safety and defense during war, including preventing communication with ...
  21. [21]
    Enemy Aliens and Internment - 1914-1918 Online
    Oct 8, 2014 · As of 1 August 1914, when Germany declared war on Russia, they were also technically enemy aliens. ... In effect they were now forced labourers, ...Missing: WWII | Show results with:WWII
  22. [22]
    The Status and Treatment of Foreign Civilians in Modern War: IGdJ
    During the Second World War, tens of thousands of Jewish refugees who had fled Nazi persecution were categorised as »enemy aliens«. This research project ...
  23. [23]
    Police and German Enemy Aliens in Britain during the First World War
    Sep 1, 2021 · ... aliens, but enemy aliens suffered much greater restriction. The ... F Branch Report, part 1, 26–27; “Alien Spies on the East Coast ...Missing: correlation | Show results with:correlation
  24. [24]
    [PDF] The Illusory Threat Enemy Aliens in Britain during the Great War
    36 T Crowdy, The Enemy Within; A History of Espionage (Oxford, 2006), p. ... May 1915, the focus for enemy spies moved from the enemy aliens at large around the.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Internal Affairs: Untold Case Studies of World War I German Internment
    Apr 4, 2016 · ' Henri Interned as an. Alien Enemy: Wrote Medford Woman He Had Been a Spy; Providence 'Patients' Plead for Chance to Kiss Him,”. Boston Daily ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] the history of British civilian internment, 1899-1945
    enemy aliens in wartime Britain must be understood. The study of internment ... While potential enemy espionage was a major theme of the press during August and.<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    WWI Enemy Alien Registrations, Permits, and Enforcement
    Jul 1, 2022 · More than 480,000 German enemy aliens were registered, 200,000 permits were issued, and 6,300 enemy aliens were arrested under Presidential ...
  28. [28]
    Proclamation 2525—Alien Enemies, Japanese
    All alien enemies are enjoined to preserve the peace towards the United States and to refrain from crime against the public safety, and from violating the laws ...
  29. [29]
    Proclamation 2527—Alien Enemies, Italian
    All alien enemies are enjoined to preserve the peace towards the United States and to refrain from crime against the public safety.
  30. [30]
    [PDF] R E P O R T - Congress.gov
    (1) During World War II, the United States Government deemed as ''enemy aliens'' more than 600,000 Italian-born and 300,000 German-born United States resident ...
  31. [31]
    Timeline: Japanese Americans during World War II
    Mar 20, 2023 · 91,858 Japanese aliens registered. ... January 5, 1942: All Japanese American selective service registrants are reclassified as IV-C, “enemy ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Custodial detention / A-B-C list - Densho Encyclopedia
    Dec 18, 2023 · The FBI, by the end of the day, arrested 736 mainland Issei and some German and Italian aliens. There is some question concerning the extent to ...
  33. [33]
    Stories - Aleutian Islands World War II National Historic Area (U.S. ...
    Oct 4, 2024 · On June 7, 1942, the Japanese invaded the Aleutian island of Kiska. At its height of occupation 6,800 Japanese personnel were on the island.
  34. [34]
    Executive Order 9066: Resulting in Japanese-American ...
    Jan 24, 2022 · This order authorized the forced removal of all persons deemed a threat to national security from the West Coast to relocation centers further inland.
  35. [35]
    Japanese American Incarceration | New Orleans
    ... alien and citizen alike. Virtually all Japanese Americans were forced to leave their homes and property and live in camps for most of the war. The ...
  36. [36]
    Civil Liberties Violations - German American Internee Coalition
    In cooperation with the War Department, pursuant to the Alien Enemies Act, DOJ created a network of prohibited zones and restricted areas. Enemy aliens were ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] American Italian Historical Assocation
    ❑ On October 12, 1942, Attorney General Francis Biddle announces at Carnegie Hall that Italian Americans are removed from “enemy alien” status. Except for ...
  38. [38]
    ALIENS RESTRICTION BILL (Hansard, 15 April 1919)
    The next Sub-clause provides that if an enemy alien in any industry in which he is not bonâ fide engaged seeks to stir up unrest he is guilty of a crime. The ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] German enemy aliens and the decine of British liberalism in World ...
    enemy, spies. In the preface, Le Queux explains his ... wrote against outbursts hostile to supposed spies, aliens or anyone who befriended an alien, or.Missing: correlation | Show results with:correlation
  40. [40]
    https://brill.com/display/book/9789004310018/B9789004310018_006.pdf
  41. [41]
    The start of WW1 internment | Knockaloe | Isle of Man
    ... Britain declared war on Germany, the British Government passed the Aliens Restrictions Act, whereby the British Government could control the movement of “enemy ...
  42. [42]
    Uninterned Enemy Aliens - UK Parliament - Hansard
    Herbert Samuel on 21st February, that on that date there were 22,946 uninterned enemy aliens in Great Britain, and to a further statement made a few days later ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Internment in Canada
    ### Summary of Internment of Enemy Aliens in Canada During WWII
  44. [44]
    Ordinary Lives, Extraordinary Times: Italian Canadian Experiences ...
    Those considered most dangerous, around 600, were sent to three internment camps in Alberta, Ontario, and New Brunswick for a period of up to five years. Though ...
  45. [45]
    Shining light on a dark secret: The internment of Italian-Canadians
    Mar 5, 2012 · More than 600 Italian Canadians were interned across the country, at camps in Petawawa, Ont., and Minto, N.B., as well. The British Columbia men ...
  46. [46]
    https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/internment-of-japanese-canadians
  47. [47]
    Shelling of Estevan Point - British Columbia - An Untold History
    On June 20, 1942, a Japanese submarine that had been stationed off Seattle was on its way back to the Aleutian Islands of Kiska and Attu, which Japan had ...
  48. [48]
    Japanese Canadian Internment | VALOUR CANADA
    Once the war ended, 10,000 Japanese Canadians were ordered to be deported, but due to public pressure only 4,000 of them were destined for that fate. Almost two ...
  49. [49]
    Wartime internment camps in Australia | naa.gov.au
    They included around 4500 enemy aliens and British nationals of German ancestry living in Australia. Second World War (WWII). With the outbreak of WWII, there ...First World War · Second World War · Life in internment camps
  50. [50]
    Civilian internees in Australia | Australian War Memorial
    Dec 16, 2020 · About 4,500 were enemy aliens and British nationals of German ancestry already resident in Australia. During the Second World War, Japanese ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    [PDF] About 20 percent of the Italian-born population of
    Australia was interned during the Second World War. This was a significant proportion of the community, a higher proportion than one would expect in a ...
  52. [52]
    Repatriated from Home as Enemy Aliens: Forgotten Lived ...
    Jun 5, 2023 · When Japan entered World War II in December 1941, the Japanese people living in Australia were treated as enemy aliens, resulting in 1,141 ...
  53. [53]
    Discrimination, internment camps, then deportation - The Conversation
    Aug 14, 2023 · 98% of Australia's Japanese population were sent to internment camps during the second world war.
  54. [54]
    Wartime Internment of Japanese Australians | naa.gov.au
    During WWII, Japanese Australians were interned as 'enemy aliens' to calm public concerns, with over 12,000 people held at its peak.
  55. [55]
    Internment during World War II Australia
    Government regulations required 'enemy aliens' to register and limit their travel to between work and home and within a specified distance from the local post ...
  56. [56]
    History - Loveday Lives
    The Loveday camps were part of a much larger complex of civilian internment camps created across Australia after the outbreak of World War II. As in World War ...
  57. [57]
    Japanese survivors recall Australia's WWII civilian internment camps
    Apr 23, 2017 · The family was taken from Darwin to an internment camp in Tatura, Victoria. Other camps specifically for civilian internees were set up in ...
  58. [58]
    Internment in World War II | Stories | Anzac Square
    Jul 15, 2024 · Accounts of their experiences differ and a number of former 'enemy aliens' who were repatriated at the end of the war, later returned to live in ...
  59. [59]
    Full article: The 'Normality' of civilian internment in Germany during ...
    Oct 14, 2024 · Over the past two decades, scholars have explored the complex history of internment of so-called enemy aliens, resulting in a wide range of ...
  60. [60]
    Ruhleben Internment Camp - 1914-1918 Online
    Feb 18, 2016 · Enemy Aliens and Internment; The Everyday as Involved in War; Prisoners of War (Australia) and Prisoners of War (India). MapImages. External ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] internment practices in the Habsburg Empire, 1914-1918
    Nov 6, 2014 · In particular, most of those who were interned in Austria-Hungary during the war were not enemy aliens at all, but either deportees from ...
  62. [62]
    The Internment of Russophiles in Austria-Hungary
    Nov 17, 2020 · The proclamation of a local Ukrainian (Ruthenian) ethnic group as enemy aliens, their execution, internment, and subsequent resettlement in ...2The Beginning of WWI and... · 3Public Discourse and... · 4Conclusion · Notes
  63. [63]
    Internees - The National Archives
    For the first two years of the Second World War about 8,000 enemy aliens were temporarily interned in British camps prior to being deported to the colonies and ...
  64. [64]
    Fact File : Civilian Internment - BBC - WW2 People's War - Timeline
    Thousands of Germans, Austrians and Italians were sent to camps set up at racecourses and incomplete housing estates, such as Huyton outside Liverpool. The ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  65. [65]
    A Bitter Road: Britain and the Refugee Crisis of the 1930s and 1940s
    Following pressure from the right-wing press, around 27,000 Jewish refugees were now also interned as 'enemy aliens'. Most were released by autumn 1940. Some ...
  66. [66]
    'I remember the feeling of insult': when Britain imprisoned its wartime ...
    Feb 1, 2022 · Winston Churchill, during his first cabinet meeting as prime minister, agreed to the internment of all male “enemy aliens” between the ages of ...
  67. [67]
    Huyton Interment Camp - Discover Liverpool
    Here, up to 5,000 enemy alien detainees were held, awaiting transfer to Australia, New Zealand, or Canada, or to the more permanent internment camps that had ...
  68. [68]
    Jewish refugees in Britain: Internment of 'enemy aliens' during WWII
    Feb 21, 2019 · The British government instituted a series of tribunals to ascertain which enemy aliens were 'dangerous' and which were refugees. Many ...Missing: Battle | Show results with:Battle
  69. [69]
    Enemy Aliens: internment and deportation policy in Great Britain ...
    Oct 9, 2024 · During the Second World War, Germans, Austrians and Italians living in Great Britain were designated as 'enemy aliens' and consequently interned.
  70. [70]
    Forced Labor: An Overview - Holocaust Encyclopedia
    German military, SS, and civilian authorities brutally exploited Jews, Poles, Soviet civilians, and concentration camp prisoners for the war effort. Many forced ...
  71. [71]
    Nazi Forced Labor – Background Information - Zwangsarbeit Archiv
    Nazi Germany created one of the largest forced labor systems in history: Over twenty million foreign civilian workers, concentration camp prisoners and ...
  72. [72]
    US Prisoners of War and Civilian American Citizens Captured
    Of the approximately 130,000 American prisoners of war (POWs) in World War II (WWII), 27,000 or more were held by Japan. Of the approximately 19,000 American ...Missing: mortality | Show results with:mortality
  73. [73]
    The ICRC during World War II | ICRC Archives, audiovisual and library
    Nov 26, 2018 · This research guide aims to provide an overview as comprehensive as possible of the main documentary resources available on the activities of the ICRC during ...Missing: violation | Show results with:violation
  74. [74]
    Prisoners of the Japanese: Civilian internees, Pacific and South ...
    Oct 31, 2023 · In total, approximately 130,000 Allied civilians were interned by the Japanese during this period of occupation. The exact number of internees ...
  75. [75]
    The Japanese Occupation and Pacific War (in numbers) - NIOD
    Numbers quoted by L. de Jong for the Japanese occupation of the Dutch East Indies: Prisoners of war. Numbers: 42,233; Deaths: 8,200; % deaths: one in five.
  76. [76]
    Mussolini's Camps: Civilian Internment in Fascist Italy (1940-1943)
    Jan 5, 2020 · ... fascist ventennio and World War II. Even Italian Jews, who ... internment of enemy aliens and undesirables, and of 'dangerous' Italians.
  77. [77]
    Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its ...
    Mar 17, 2015 · The ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva military convention in order to gain access to civilian internees held in Central and Western ...
  78. [78]
    Detention of U.S. Persons as Enemy Belligerents | Congress.gov
    Jan 23, 2014 · The first presidential proclamation under the Enemy Alien Act did not occur until the War of 1812, when President Madison ordered that alien ...
  79. [79]
    Veto of the Internal Security Bill. | The American Presidency Project
    The bill would deprive our Government and our intelligence agencies of the valuable services of aliens in security operations. ... internal and external enemies.
  80. [80]
    [PDF] The Global Cuban Missile Crisis at 50 COLD WAR ...
    ... Cubans, including Fidel Castro..3 For the past two decades, even as more ... enemy. “This clash (and we were truly on the verge of war) demonstrated ...Missing: detentions | Show results with:detentions
  81. [81]
    Invocation of the Alien Enemies Act Regarding the Invasion of The ...
    Mar 15, 2025 · ... Alien Enemy described in section 1 of this proclamation. The ... The Attorney General is further granted authority, pursuant to the Alien Enemies ...Missing: principles | Show results with:principles
  82. [82]
    Alien Enemies Act: The 1798 law Trump used to deport migrants - BBC
    Sep 3, 2025 · ... enemy country. While the Alien Enemies Act was enacted to prevent foreign espionage, the Trump administration has invoked it as the legal ...
  83. [83]
    5 Things You Should Know About Trump's Alien Enemies Act ...
    Mar 17, 2025 · The Trump administration over the weekend unlawfully deported over 100 Venezuelans with zero due process under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 ( ...
  84. [84]
    Tapping Ancient Wartime and Security Laws, Trump Administration ...
    Mar 21, 2025 · The administration has invoked the 1798 Alien Enemies Act and 1940 Alien Registration Act. The Alien Enemies Act previously had been invoked only three times.
  85. [85]
    [PDF] 24A931 Trump v. J. G. G. (04/07/2025) - Supreme Court
    Apr 7, 2025 · The Gov- ernment expressly agrees that “TdA members subject to re- moval under the Alien Enemies Act get judicial review.” Reply in Support of ...
  86. [86]
    Groups Move to Block Removals Under Alien Enemies Act - ACLU
    Apr 8, 2025 · An emergency lawsuit this morning in federal court in New York to again halt removals under the Alien Enemies Act for people within that court's judicial ...
  87. [87]
    Supreme Court Lifts Injunction Barring Deportations Under Alien ...
    The Supreme Court overturned a lower court's order blocking the Trump administration from deporting Venezuelan nationals under the Alien Enemies Act.
  88. [88]
    Appeals court rules against Trump's use of Alien Enemies Act - NPR
    Sep 3, 2025 · Since then, the use of this power has attracted a slew of legal challenges, including two prior Supreme Court decisions. ... Alien Enemies Act of ...
  89. [89]
    5 Big Questions in the Alien Enemies Act Litigation - Just Security
    Mar 16, 2025 · 5 Big Questions in the Alien Enemies Act Litigation · First, what exactly is the Alien Enemies Act, and what is the basis for invoking it here?
  90. [90]
    US: Repeal Alien Enemies Act | Human Rights Watch
    May 1, 2025 · In March 2025, US President Donald Trump became only the fourth president to invoke the Alien Enemies Act, and the only one to do so outside the ...
  91. [91]
    Alien Registration Forms on Microfilm, 1940 - 1944 - USCIS
    Jan 24, 2025 · (This ambitious project was separate from “enemy alien registration;” the Alien Registration Program sought to make a registry of all aliens ...
  92. [92]
    Alien Registration (AR-2) Forms - National Archives
    Sep 6, 2024 · Enemy Alien Records · Passport Records · Other Immigrant Topics. Search ... The registration process included a questionnaire form and a ...
  93. [93]
    [PDF] Report to the Congress of the United States
    These wartime restrictions were sanctioned by the Alien Enemy Act of 1798, ... Travel, contraband, and curfew violations: Alien enemies within the United ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
  94. [94]
    Prologue | Spring 2001 | National Archives
    Jul 15, 2024 · Mayer Return to Sender: U.S. Censorship of Enemy Alien Mail in World War II Louis Fiset "Fix Bayonets": The Attack on Hill 180 in the Korean ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] The World War II Alien Enemy Control Program
    Mar 19, 2009 · The Alien Enemy Act of 1918, which authorized internment of “enemy aliens” during WWII, remains intact. It permits arrests, evacuation ...
  96. [96]
    The American Home Front During World War II: Incarceration and ...
    Nov 16, 2023 · Enemy alien detention camps across the US include: Camp Angel Island, San Francisco, California. Also known as Fort McDowell. Enemy aliens and ...
  97. [97]
    [PDF] World War II Alien Enemy Control Program
    31,275 enemy aliens were imprisoned in Justice Department camps under the provisions of the Alien Enemies Act during World War II--10,905 Germans, 16,845.Missing: incidents post-
  98. [98]
    The Alien Enemy Hearing Board as a Judicial Device in the United ...
    United States utilised special judicial proceedings in dealing with enemy aliens during World War II. Alien enemy hearing boards were created and utilised ...
  99. [99]
    History of Crystal City — Crystal City Pilgrimage
    During World War II, the INS turned the migrant labor facility into an internment camp for "enemy aliens" in order, it claimed, to reunite "enemy aliens" with ...<|separator|>
  100. [100]
    Prisoners of war in World War II - Wikipedia
    Approximately 14% (~5 million, not counting Chinese POWs) died in captivity. Soviet POWs in Germany (approximately 3 million fatalities) and Axis and German ...Missing: alien | Show results with:alien
  101. [101]
    Records of the office of Alien Property - National Archives
    History: Office of Alien Property Custodian established in Office for Emergency Management (OEM) by EO 9095, March 11, 1942, under authority of the Trading with ...
  102. [102]
    50 U.S.C. App. 6 - Sec. 6 - Alien Property Custodian; general powers ...
    Harry S Truman. Ex. Ord. No. 9788. Termination of Office of World War II Alien Property Custodian and Transference of Its Functions to the Attorney General.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  103. [103]
    Asset Seizures of “Enemy Aliens” | States of Incarceration
    ... assets were seized from the German Americans.[2]. President Woodrow Wilson enabled “enemy alien” asset seizure via the Trading with the Enemy Act, which ...
  104. [104]
    Enemy Aliens in the World Wars | Encyclopedia.com
    Congress also claimed the right to deport troublesome aliens. In 1948, the Supreme Court upheld the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which authorized the president to ...
  105. [105]
    [PDF] Foreign Funds Control and the Alien Property Custodian
    This. Order established the Office of Alien Property Custodian within the Office for Emergency Management, the head of which was to be an Alien Property.
  106. [106]
    Enemy-Owned Property: Restitution or Confiscation? - Foreign Affairs
    ... enemies in occupied or conquered territory is protected against confiscation and only the public property of the enemy government may legitimately be seized.
  107. [107]
    Civilian Agency Records RG 131 | National Archives
    Aug 15, 2016 · (RG 131). The World War II Office of Alien Property Custodian, also know as APC, was established within the Office for Emergency Management by ...
  108. [108]
    Message to the Congress Transmitting Annual Report of the Office of ...
    In 1947, the Office of Alien Property Custodian was terminated and its functions transferred to the Office of Alien Property within the Department of justice.Missing: managed post-
  109. [109]
    Staff Report: Chapter III
    "Civil Rights of Enemy Aliens During World War II," 91 states that in this case "the alien enemy was considered an alien friend, rather than an enemy." ...Missing: compliance | Show results with:compliance
  110. [110]
    FBI Records: The Vault — German American Federation/Bund
    The German American Bund, or German American Foundation, was a pro-Nazi group formed in the U.S. in the mid ... Report Threats & Crime · More Contacts... About ...
  111. [111]
    More Americans Supported Hitler Than You May Think. Here's Why ...
    Oct 4, 2018 · The threat of Nazism in the United States before World War II was greater than we generally remember today, and that those forces offer valuable lessons ...
  112. [112]
    Prelude to War - Enemy Alien Files Online Exhibit
    War planners in Washington believed that the Germans in Latin America posed an even greater security threat than Germans in the United States. U.S. code- ...Missing: assessments | Show results with:assessments
  113. [113]
    The Japanese American Wartime Incarceration - NIH
    One Nisei interviewee recalled that “Being labeled as an enemy alien and incarcerated in a concentration camp was the most traumatic experience of my life.
  114. [114]
    Nazi Saboteurs and George Dasch - FBI
    On September 1, 1939, World War II opened in Europe with the invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany. ... Nazism among German Americans and German immigrants in ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  115. [115]
    The Inside Story of How a Nazi Plot to Sabotage the U.S. War Effort ...
    Jun 28, 2016 · Eight agents of Nazi Germany were in custody, caught on American soil with detailed plans to sabotage key infrastructure and spread panic. In ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  116. [116]
    The Question of Loyalty - Association for Asian Studies
    During World War II, the loyalty of all people of Japanese ancestry in the United States was questioned, in contrast to people of German and Italian ancestry.
  117. [117]
    German Sabotage and Espionage in the United States During WWII
    Dec 14, 2019 · The FBI used the lists of contacts secreted on Dasch's and Kerlings' handkerchiefs to infiltrate groups of Nazi sympathizers. One of the more ...
  118. [118]
    Internment | US House of Representatives - History, Art & Archives
    Edgar Hoover reported that he had “practically all” suspected enemy aliens in custody. ... threat of a Japanese military invasion had passed. In Korematsu ...
  119. [119]
    The use of emergency powers in Canada and the United States
    More than 80,000 Canadians were classified as “enemy aliens” because they had family ties to the countries with which Canada was at war. During the course ...
  120. [120]
    How U.S. immigration laws and rules have changed through history
    Sep 30, 2015 · The Alien Enemies Act authorized the imprisonment or deportation of ... Since enactment of the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, immigration ...
  121. [121]
    https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/policy-solutions/alien-enemies-act
  122. [122]
    The Alien Enemies Act | Brennan Center for Justice
    Oct 10, 2024 · ... enemy combatants for the duration of the war. But the Alien Enemies Act, an authority that permits summarily detaining and deporting ...
  123. [123]
    United States: Repeal the Alien Enemies Act - Human Rights Watch
    May 1, 2025 · It does not require any sort of individualized determination that the internment of a particular “enemy alien” is strictly necessary. It ...
  124. [124]
    [PDF] Expulsion of aliens - Memorandum by the Secretariat
    Aug 11, 2006 · The expulsion of enemy aliens who are nationals of an opposing State ... sovereignty; nationality; immigration; treatment of aliens ...
  125. [125]
    [PDF] The Alien Enemies Act - Brennan Center for Justice
    When Congress debated the Alien Enemies Act in 1798, ... 63 Gerald Neuman and Charles Hobson, “John Marshall and the. Enemy Alien,” Green Bag 9, no .
  126. [126]
    [PDF] US World War II Treatment of German Americans and Latin Americans
    ... United States (All numbers are estimates and are likely higher.) • Alien registration branded 300,000 Germans as “enemy aliens,” restricting travel and.
  127. [127]
    Mapping the German and Austrian population in Great Britain at the ...
    Nov 25, 2024 · This article maps where Germans and Austrians over the age of 16 were resident in the United Kingdom in September 1939.
  128. [128]
    Australia under attack: Enemy aliens and prisoners of war
    Dec 3, 2019 · From 1943, many of the camps intended for internees were used to house enemy prisoners of war. The prisoners spent their time in camps such as ...<|separator|>
  129. [129]
    [PDF] “ENEMY ALIENS” RESEARCH GUIDE
    Jul 28, 2016 · 'Enemy Aliens': The Internment of Jewish. Refugees in Canada, 1940-1943. Digital Museum of. Canada, 2012. http://www.enemyaliens.ca. Companion ...