Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Energy performance certificate

An (EPC) is a standardized document that assesses and rates the of a building, assigning a from A (most efficient) to G (least efficient) based on factors such as , heating systems, and glazing. Issued by accredited assessors following a physical survey or data-based evaluation, an EPC estimates current and potential energy performance, projected fuel costs, and carbon emissions over a . In the , EPCs became mandatory in 2007 under the European Union's Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, requiring them for domestic and non-domestic properties when constructed, sold, or let to inform buyers, tenants, and landlords about efficiency and improvement opportunities. The certificate includes recommendations for enhancements like loft insulation or efficient boilers to achieve higher ratings, aiming to reduce and environmental impact while lowering bills. Valid for ten years, EPCs must be provided free to prospective buyers or tenants before contracts, with non-compliance risking fines up to £5,000 for dwellings or £500 per m² for commercial spaces. Despite their intent to drive energy upgrades, EPCs have faced criticism for methodological flaws, including over-reliance on assumptions rather than on-site measurements, leading to inaccuracies in up to 20-30% of cases as reported by consumer groups, and challenges in applying standardized metrics to or unique buildings where retrofits may compromise structural integrity. Recent analyses highlight issues and the need for reforms to incorporate usage and lifecycle changes for more reliable assessments.

Definition and Purpose

Core Components and Scope

An Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) consists primarily of an asset rating that calculates a building's theoretical energy efficiency under standardized assumptions of occupancy, climate, and usage patterns, expressed on a scale from A (highest efficiency) to G (lowest). This rating incorporates metrics such as primary energy consumption in kWh/m²/year and associated CO₂ emissions in kg/m²/year, derived from factors including the building envelope, heating/cooling systems, lighting, and on-site renewable energy generation. EPCs also include a section detailing current and potential ratings post-improvement, alongside a prioritized list of recommended retrofit measures—such as upgrades or efficient replacements—with estimated implementation costs, payback periods, and anticipated savings. The document must be issued by a qualified, accredited assessor using nationally approved methodologies and software, and remains valid for 10 years from the date of issue. In terms of scope, the EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) mandates EPCs for residential dwellings and non-residential buildings (e.g., offices, commercial spaces) exceeding 50 m² floor area when constructed, sold, or let, as well as for public buildings over 250 m² where the certificate must be publicly displayed. National variations exist, but the 2024 EPBD revisions introduce EU-wide harmonization via common templates, performance classes, and inclusion of life-cycle indicators to enhance comparability and drive renovations toward zero-emission standards. In the UK, this extends to both domestic and non-domestic properties marketed for sale or rental, covering approximately 85% of the pre-2000 building stock targeted for efficiency upgrades.

Stated Policy Objectives

The Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD), which underpins EPC requirements across the , states its core objective as promoting energy savings in the building sector by accounting for local climatic variations and establishing minimum performance standards for new and existing structures. This aims to address the fact that buildings consume approximately 40% of EU energy and contribute significantly to , with the directive requiring member states to ensure EPCs provide standardized information on calculated energy performance to facilitate informed decisions by owners, buyers, and tenants. A key quantitative target articulated in the EPBD is to support the EU's ambitions, including a reduction in final by 11.7% by 2030 compared to projections, through mechanisms like mandatory s that highlight potential improvements and recommended measures for enhancing efficiency. The directive also seeks to drive market transformation by integrating EPC data into building sales, rentals, and public procurement, thereby incentivizing renovations and the uptake of low-carbon technologies to align with broader decarbonization goals, such as requiring new buildings to achieve zero-emission standards by 2030. In the , where EPCs implement EPBD provisions via domestic regulations, the stated objectives emphasize transparency in building to empower consumers and stimulate upgrades, with the underlying principle of using certificates to reveal performance ratings and cost implications for heating, hot water, and lighting. UK policy further aims to enforce minimum standards—such as elevating rental properties to EPC band C by 2030—to curb energy waste, alleviate affecting low-income households, and bolster amid reliance on imports. Overall, these objectives position EPCs as tools for behavioral nudges and to reduce aggregate energy demand, lower operational costs for occupants, and contribute to national climate targets, though implementation varies by jurisdiction to reflect local building stocks and economic contexts.

Historical Development

Origins in European Legislation

The Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD), initially enacted as Directive 2002/91/EC, marked the formal introduction of energy performance certificates (EPCs) within the framework. Adopted by the and Council on 16 December 2002 and entering into force on 4 January 2003, the directive established a for assessing and certifying the energy performance of buildings, requiring member states to implement certification schemes for new constructions, large existing buildings, and buildings undergoing significant renovations. This legislation responded to the sector's substantial energy consumption, with buildings accounting for approximately 40% of EU final energy use at the time, primarily driven by heating, cooling, and lighting demands. Under Article 7 of Directive 2002/91/EC, EPCs were mandated to provide standardized information on a building's rating, calculated via national methodologies that incorporated factors such as , heating systems, and overall fabric performance, with certificates valid for a period not exceeding 10 years. Member states were obligated to transpose the directive into national law by 4 January 2006, leading to the development of EPC systems tailored to local building stocks while adhering to common EU principles for comparability and transparency. The policy's rationale emphasized cost-effective reductions in energy demand and , aligning with broader EU commitments under the , though implementation varied due to differences in national building regulations and enforcement capacities. Subsequent evaluations highlighted uneven adoption, with some member states delaying full rollout of certification requirements, prompting the directive's recast in to strengthen enforcement and expand scope. Despite these origins in harmonized law, EPCs' effectiveness in driving verifiable energy savings has been subject to scrutiny, as national variations in assessment rigor and introduced inconsistencies across borders.

Expansion and International Variations

The Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) of 2002 (Directive 2002/91/EC) initially required EU member states to implement energy performance certificates (EPCs) for residential buildings subject to sales, rentals, or new by July 2009, marking the scheme's core expansion across . This was followed by a 2010 recast (Directive 2010/31/), which extended EPC obligations to non-residential buildings over 250 square meters and introduced cost-optimal calculations for renovations, alongside mandates for nearly zero-energy buildings in new constructions from 2020. The latest 2024 recast (Directive 2024/1275), entering into force on May 28, 2024, further broadens coverage to all building transactions and emphasizes zero-emission standards by 2050, with national transposition required by May 2026. National variations within the persist in assessment methodologies, rating scales, and data requirements; for instance, while many countries use an A-to-G categorical scale, others employ numerical indicators, and differences arise in handling on-site renewables or occupant behavior assumptions. These divergences stem from member states' adaptations to local building stocks and climates, though EU-level efforts seek greater in indicators like use and . Outside the EU, EPC-like systems have emerged independently, often as voluntary tools rather than mandatory certificates, reflecting policy priorities focused on disclosure or code compliance rather than transaction-based labeling. , the Home Energy Rating System (HERS), developed in the 1980s by state programs and standardized by the Residential Energy Services Network (RESNET) in the 1990s, assigns an index score (with 0 representing net-zero energy and 100 a code-compliant reference home), primarily for residential verification in voluntary programs like , launched in 1995. HERS ratings emphasize modeled energy use relative to a baseline, integrated into some state building codes but lacking federal mandation for all transactions. Australia's Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS), initiated in the early and coordinated nationally since 1998, provides star ratings from 0 to 10 for residential thermal performance, based on simulated heating and cooling loads; originally for new homes to meet minimum standards (e.g., 6-7 stars in state codes), it expanded to existing buildings via trials starting in 2023. In , Natural Resources Canada's EnerGuide system, operational since the for appliances and extended to homes, delivers a numerical rating of annual in gigajoules (lower values indicating better performance), used in evaluations for incentives but without national mandatory certification, deferring to provincial codes. Globally, over 70 countries enforce building energy codes with performance elements, but certificate schemes vary widely: asset-based predictions dominate in , while operational influences U.S. and Australian approaches, complicating cross-border comparisons and highlighting enforcement gaps in developing regions. These adaptations prioritize empirical and realities over uniform metrics, with studies noting that non-EU systems often achieve higher verification rates through third-party audits.

Assessment Methodology

Rating Scales and Criteria

Energy performance certificates (EPCs) utilize rating scales that categorize from A (highest ) to G (lowest), prioritizing intuitive letter grades over granular metrics to inform users on relative . This A-to-G framework predominates in , stemming from the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD), though national implementations vary in thresholds and underlying calculations until full harmonization. Under the recast EPBD (EU/2024/1275), a standardized EU-wide A-to-G scale takes effect for new EPCs from May 29, 2026, with A reserved for near-zero-energy buildings exhibiting use at or below 0 kWh/m²/year and substantial on-site renewable contributions. Criteria emphasize calculated demand, total , and non-renewable , incorporating building fabric integrity, system efficiencies, and renewables penetration; poor performers (F/G) typically exceed 300-500 kWh/m²/year in depending on climate zone. Member states must rescale existing certificates to align, ensuring comparability while accommodating local methodologies. In the United Kingdom, EPC ratings derive from the Standard Assessment Procedure (SAP) or Reduced Data SAP (RdSAP), yielding a score from 1-100+ translated to bands: A (92+), B (81-91), C (69-80), D (55-68), E (39-54), F (21-38), G (1-20). Assignment criteria evaluate fabric performance (e.g., U-values ≤0.18 W/m²K for walls/roofs in A/B bands), heating/hot water efficiency (e.g., >90% for gas boilers, seasonal performance factor >3.0 for heat pumps), ventilation (mechanical with heat recovery for higher ratings), lighting (>75% low-energy), and renewables (solar PV/thermal offsetting 10-20%+ demand). Scores assume standard occupancy, 230 m² floor area normalization, and fixed climate data, focusing on cost-based efficiency rather than absolute emissions.
Rating BandScore RangeKey Criteria Exemplars
A92+Zero-carbon ready: heat pumps, triple glazing (U≤0.8 W/m²K), full , integration yielding >20% renewables.
B/C69-91High efficiency: condensing boilers (>88%), double glazing (U≤1.4), loft/ insulation, low-air-permeability (<5 m³/h/m²).
D/E39-68Average: basic double glazing, partial insulation, standard boilers (70-80% efficient), minimal renewables.
F/G1-38Poor: single glazing, uninsulated walls/roofs (U>2.0), inefficient heating (e.g., non-condensing), high bridging.

Data Inputs and Calculation Processes

In the , energy performance certificate calculations adhere to the framework outlined in Annex I of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (recast as Directive (EU) 2024/1275), which mandates assessment of energy needs for heating, cooling, , domestic hot water, and under standardized conditions of typical occupancy, climate, and indoor temperatures. Key data inputs include building geometry (e.g., conditioned floor area, volume), envelope values (U-values for opaque elements and windows), system characteristics (e.g., heating/cooling equipment efficiency, controls, distribution losses), contributions, and local climate data such as external temperatures and . User behavior is standardized using national averages or metered data corrected for weather and occupancy variations, with calculated via national conversion factors distinguishing renewable and non-renewable sources. The process simulates energy balances on monthly, hourly, or sub-hourly bases, computing delivered energy from needs (fabric losses, , gains from /internal sources) adjusted for system efficiencies (e.g., seasonal efficiency, storage losses), then converting to total per square meter annually and CO2-equivalent emissions using fuel-specific factors. Member states adapt this via national methodologies compliant with EN ISO 52000-1 standards, incorporating cost-optimal levels and forward-looking energy mixes from Energy and Climate Plans. In the , the Standard Assessment Procedure ( 10.2, published 2022) applies to new dwellings and requires comprehensive measured inputs such as exact U-values, infiltration rates from tests, efficiencies from product databases, and detailed for and gains. For existing dwellings, Reduced data SAP (RdSAP 10, effective June 2025) streamlines inputs via on-site surveys yielding floor areas (to 0.01 m²), wall/roof/floor types with observed insulation thicknesses, window glazing types and orientations, heating fuel types and controls (e.g., responsiveness), and details (e.g., mechanical extract rates). Defaults substitute for unmeasurable data, such as U-values by age band (e.g., 2.1 W/m²K for uninsulated cavity walls pre-1976) or efficiencies (e.g., 88.9% for modern gas combi boilers). RdSAP calculations expand reduced inputs into a full SAP-equivalent using the BRE Domestic Energy Model, simulating monthly losses via design heat loss coefficients (incorporating U-values, thermal bridging at y=0.15 W/m²K default), / internal gains, and infiltration adjusted for features like chimneys or draught-proofing. Total energy costs derive from fuel uses multiplied by average tariffs (e.g., mains gas at specified pence/kWh), yielding a rating (0-100+) via logarithmic formula based on energy cost factor per m², alongside environmental ratings from CO2 emissions factored by grid carbon intensity.
CategoryExample Inputs (RdSAP/SAP)Role in Calculation
GeometryFloor area, room heights, exposed perimeterBasis for heat loss volume and areas
EnvelopeU-values (e.g., walls 0.7-2.3 W/m²K), glazing g-valuesFabric transmission losses and gains
SystemsBoiler efficiency, controls (e.g., TRVs), renewables (e.g., PV kWp)Delivered energy adjustments for efficiency and generation offsets
Ventilation/InternalInfiltration rate, parameterAir change losses and internal heat contributions

Inherent Methodological Limitations

Energy performance certificates (EPCs) employ standardized calculation methodologies that assume uniform occupant behaviors, such as fixed heating patterns and internal temperatures, which diverge from real-world variations driven by individual habits, socioeconomic factors, and choices. This inherently introduces a performance gap, as evidenced by empirical studies in showing EPCs systematically overpredict use intensity, with the discrepancy increasing for lower-rated properties (e.g., bands F and G, where actual metered consumption is substantially below predictions). For instance, analysis of metered data against EPC models reveals no significant difference for high-rated bands A-B but progressive overestimation downward, undermining the certificates' reliability as predictors of operational . Methodological reliance on simplified steady-state models, such as the UK's Reduced Data Standard Assessment Procedure (RdSAP), further limits accuracy by approximating building fabric properties (e.g., U-values) through default assumptions rather than detailed measurements, neglecting dynamic factors like airtightness, infiltration rates, and transient effects. These approximations propagate errors, particularly in older or retrofitted structures where actual deviates from modeled estimates due to unaccounted variables such as , , or influences. Peer-reviewed evaluations confirm that such gaps persist even after controlling for behavioral confounders, attributing them to the models' causal oversimplification of physics-based energy transfers. Input data collection exacerbates these issues through assessor-dependent judgments and measurement imprecisions; for example, inaccuracies, affecting up to 15% of EPCs, can shift ratings by one band or more, as a 1% area variance alters calculated intensities. EPCs provide static snapshots valid for 10 years, failing to capture temporal changes like fabric , upgrades, or usage shifts, rendering them outdated amid evolving building conditions and markets. Cross-national comparisons highlight methodological heterogeneity—e.g., differing definitions for use—but underscore a common inherent flaw: overemphasis on theoretical fabric at the expense of holistic, evidence-based validation against metered outcomes.

Empirical Evidence on Effectiveness

Studies on Predicted vs. Actual Energy Use

Numerous empirical studies have documented a significant discrepancy, known as the energy performance gap, between the predicted by Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) and actual metered usage in residential and commercial . This gap arises from factors such as simplified modeling assumptions, unaccounted behaviors, and variations in quality, leading to predictions that often overestimate or underestimate real-world . For instance, a review of building simulation literature indicates that actual use can exceed predicted values by up to 2.5 times in commercial contexts, with average gaps around 30% in some residential samples. In the , analysis of metered data from over 1,000 homes revealed that EPC predictions systematically overstate energy use, particularly for lower-rated properties. EPC ratings for bands A and B showed no statistically significant with measured , while higher predicted usage in bands E-G was not matched by proportionally higher actual bills, suggesting EPCs inflate estimates by accounting for conservative assumptions like full and standard heating patterns. A separate of EPCs' for loss in English homes found weak associations, with certificates explaining only a modest portion of variance in performance after retrofits. Irish research on Building Ratings (BERs), equivalent to EPCs, using household billing from 2010-2019, concluded that ratings poorly forecast actual heating demand. Upgrading from band D to B implied 183% energy savings per EPC models, but observed differences across ratings were modest, with fabric-related factors explaining less than 10% of variation in consumption; the study attributes this to behavioral overrides and inaccuracies in assessments. Similarly, a analysis of the Cantonal Energy Certificate database for retrofitted quantified gaps where predicted savings post-upgrade were not realized in metered , highlighting methodological flaws in standardized inputs. European-wide reviews and case studies, including Swedish apartment buildings, report discrepancies of 20-50% between EPC forecasts and monitored use, often due to unmodeled variables like ventilation inefficiencies and user habits. These findings challenge the reliability of EPCs for policy-driven targets, as consistently shows predictions diverging from causal realities of operational energy dynamics, though gaps narrow in tightly controlled simulations versus field data. Peer-reviewed syntheses emphasize that while EPCs provide ordinal rankings, their cardinal predictions lack precision for individual buildings, underscoring needs for post-occupancy validation.

Behavioral and Market Impacts

Energy performance certificates (EPCs) have been introduced to inform building occupants and owners about potential energy costs, with the expectation that this disclosure would prompt behavioral adjustments such as reduced or increased . However, empirical analyses indicate limited causal influence on household energy-saving actions. A study examining households found that while EPCs raise awareness of , they do not significantly alter daily behaviors like settings or appliance use, attributing this to effects where efficiency gains lead to higher rather than net savings. Similarly, on resident participation in EPC programs links intentions to retrofit or conserve energy more strongly to pre-existing attitudes than to the certificate itself, suggesting EPCs serve primarily as informational tools without robustly shifting entrenched habits. This aligns with broader evidence of an "energy performance gap," where actual energy use deviates from EPC predictions due to occupant behaviors overriding rated . In contrast, EPCs exert clearer effects on markets by incorporating into property valuation. Multiple hedonic pricing studies across demonstrate that higher EPC ratings correlate with elevated sale prices, with premiums ranging from 1-3% per rating band improvement after controlling for structural attributes. For instance, in the UK, properties with A or B ratings command a 5-10% price uplift compared to D or lower, reflecting buyer for signaled lower running costs and future . Rental markets show analogous dynamics, with landlords of higher-rated units able to charge 0.2% more per efficiency point, though this effect diminishes for low-rated properties facing indexation bans. EPCs also reduce time on market, with rated homes selling 7-12% faster, as buyers prioritize disclosed efficiency amid rising energy prices. Regarding renovations, EPCs provide recommendations that theoretically incentivize upgrades, yet uptake remains modest. Evidence from Switzerland and the Netherlands suggests certificates increase retrofit inquiries but translate to actual investments in only 10-20% of cases, often contingent on subsidies rather than the EPC alone. A cross-European assessment found no significant aggregate rise in energy efficiency investments post-EPC mandates, questioning their role in driving market-wide behavioral shifts toward retrofitting. These findings underscore that while EPCs integrate energy performance into market signals, their behavioral impacts are constrained by factors like high upfront costs and occupant inertia, with market pricing effects outpacing direct action on consumption or improvements.

Quantitative Cost-Benefit Evaluations

In the , the cost of obtaining a domestic typically ranges from £60 to £120, influenced by property size, location, and assessor fees. Across the , equivalent costs vary nationally, with averages such as €119–€278 in Czechia for standard assessments. These represent direct private costs borne by property owners during or , alongside public administrative expenses for scheme oversight, assessor , and , though comprehensive program-wide cost estimates remain sparse. Empirical studies quantify benefits primarily through EPC-induced effects on property markets, where higher ratings signal lower expected energy costs and correlate with price premiums. A review of 68 studies across finds that each one-letter EPC grade improvement (e.g., from D to C) associates with a 1–3% increase in residential sale prices, reflecting capitalized future savings. In specific analyses, A-rated apartments command 6.5% premiums over lower bands, with B and C ratings at 5.5% and 3%, respectively, after controlling for non-energy attributes. The aggregate A-to-G rating gap can yield up to 30.5% price differentials in hedonic models accounting for location and building features. These effects suggest informational benefits by reducing , though premiums diminish at higher price quantiles and vary by maturity. Broader social benefits, such as induced investments or aggregate savings, lack robust quantification in mandatory EPC contexts. Partial evaluations of voluntary enhanced schemes project 30–50% energy reductions per certified building, with market premiums of 5–20% on rents, but standard EPCs show weaker retrofit incentives due to discrepancies between rated and actual performance. No large-scale empirical confirm net positive returns after netting assessment burdens against realized savings, with causal links to behavioral changes or CO2 abatement remaining inconclusive amid errors exceeding 50% in many cases.

Criticisms and Debunking Claims

Accuracy and Error Rates in Certifications

Empirical analyses of Energy Performance Certificate () databases reveal substantial error rates in the certification process. In the , an examination of the open EPC register identified flags for potential inaccuracies in 27% of records, with the estimated true error rate exceeding this figure due to undetected issues in data entry, assumptions about building features, and calculation discrepancies. These errors frequently arise from incomplete or erroneous inputs, such as mismeasured floor areas or overlooked details, which propagate through standardized software like the Reduced Data Standard Assessment Procedure (RdSAP). Inter-assessor variability further undermines certification reliability, as multiple evaluations of identical or similar properties yield divergent ratings despite adherence to uniform methodologies. A study of domestic EPCs demonstrated significant inconsistencies across assessors, attributed to subjective judgments on parameters like rates and bridging, even within small samples using the same models and procedures. Such variability can shift ratings by several bands, complicating comparisons and policy applications. Peer-reviewed quantification of measurement errors in EPCs estimates a one-standard-deviation of approximately ±8 points on the EPC scale for buildings rated around 35 (G-band equivalent), diminishing slightly for higher-rated structures but persisting as a systemic limitation. Inaccurate area measurements exemplify a common causal factor in errors, with research indicating that 1% deviations in can alter EPC scores, and up to one in four certificates involving at least 10% variation in reported areas—often understating size, which inflates efficiency ratings. Accreditation schemes attempt mitigation through audits and training, yet persistent discrepancies highlight inherent challenges in non-invasive assessments, where assumptions substitute for verified data. These issues, documented across EU implementations, question the certificates' precision for high-stakes decisions like lending or incentives.

Economic and Practical Burdens

The acquisition of an (EPC) imposes direct financial costs on owners, typically ranging from £60 to £120 in the , depending on size, location, and assessor fees. These expenses are mandatory for transactions involving sales or rentals in jurisdictions like the UK and much of the , where EPCs must be produced within specified timelines, such as 7-28 days post-assessment in . Non-compliance can result in fines up to £5,000 for domestic properties or higher for ones, adding risks to the baseline outlay. Beyond initial certification, escalating minimum EPC rating requirements amplify economic burdens, particularly for landlords facing deadlines like the UK's proposed 2030 mandate for rental properties to achieve at least an EPC C rating. Upgrading a typical EPC D-rated home to C can cost approximately £6,000, while smaller properties like one-bedroom flats may require £3,653 and terrace houses up to £6,400 in retrofitting measures such as insulation or boiler replacements. These upgrades often necessitate professional surveys and installations, with hidden compliance costs including disrupted tenancies, temporary relocations, or lost rental income during works, disproportionately affecting owners of older or low-value stock. Practical burdens manifest in administrative and logistical demands, as EPC processes require property access for accredited assessors, data collection on building features, and submission to national registries, often perceived across the EU as an undue administrative load rather than a driver of substantive gains. In practice, this can delay transactions by weeks, especially in high-volume markets, while owners navigate assessor availability shortages or disputes over rating methodologies that may undervalue certain improvements. EU-wide studies highlight inconsistencies in , exacerbating burdens through variable requirements and the need for periodic recertification every 10 years, without evidence that these efforts yield proportional market or behavioral shifts in energy use. For smaller owners or investors, these recurring obligations compound opportunity costs, diverting resources from maintenance or market responsiveness.

Challenges to Environmental Efficacy Narratives

Critics argue that the narrative portraying energy performance certificates (EPCs) as potent drivers of environmental benefits, such as substantial reductions in , overlooks empirical discrepancies between modeled predictions and real-world outcomes. While EPCs are intended to incentivize upgrades and inform market decisions, studies reveal an "energy performance gap" where actual often exceeds certified estimates by 20-50%, undermining claims of reliable environmental impact. This gap arises from unmodeled variables like occupant behavior and building-specific factors, leading to overstated potential for emissions savings in justifications. The rebound effect further erodes the net environmental efficacy of EPC-driven improvements. Efficiency gains lower effective energy costs, prompting increased consumption—such as higher indoor temperatures or expanded heated spaces—which can offset 10-30% of anticipated savings, with higher rebounds in lower-performing buildings. Empirical analyses in European contexts, including the and , confirm this phenomenon, where post-certification retrofits yield diminished marginal reductions in use due to behavioral responses. Consequently, the causal chain from EPC disclosure to verifiable CO2 abatement remains weak, as certificates prioritize static supply-side metrics over dynamic demand-side realities. Quantitative evaluations highlight minimal aggregate environmental returns relative to implementation scales. In the EU, despite millions of EPCs issued since 2002 under the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, sector-wide emissions reductions attributable to certification alone are elusive, with meta-analyses attributing less than 5% variance in actual consumption to rating influences amid confounding factors like prices and regulations. Reports from bodies like the note that without addressing data inaccuracies—such as inconsistent methodologies across member states—EPCs fail to deliver promised decarbonization, often serving more as administrative checkboxes than transformative tools. This disconnect is compounded by rebound and effects, suggesting that narratives of EPCs as "key to greener buildings" inflate efficacy while points to marginal, non-causal contributions to broader climate goals.

Regional Implementations

European Union Framework

The Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) establishes the 's primary legal framework for assessing and improving the of buildings, mandating the issuance of Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) as a core mechanism. Adopted initially as Directive 2002/91/EC, the EPBD requires member states to introduce methodologies for calculating building energy performance, including primary energy use and CO2 emissions, and to implement certification schemes applicable to new constructions, sales, and rentals of buildings. EPCs under this framework provide a standardized of a building's , typically on a scale from A (highest ) to G (lowest), accompanied by reference benchmark values for comparable buildings and recommended improvements to enhance performance. The 2010 recast (Directive 2010/31/EU) expanded these requirements by emphasizing nearly zero-energy buildings (NZEBs) for new constructions from 2021 onward, while reinforcing EPC obligations to include more detailed indicators such as shares and ventilation system efficiency. Member states retain flexibility in transposition, leading to national variations in assessment tools, rating scales, and certification validity periods—often 10 years—but must ensure EPCs are displayed in advertisements for sale or rent and accessible via public databases. An amendment in 2018 (Directive 2018/844) integrated and building renovation strategies, requiring EPCs to incorporate data on overheating risks and system controls. The latest recast, Directive (EU) /1275 adopted on May 24, 2024, introduces a harmonized EU-wide performance scale and template for EPCs to improve cross-border comparability, alongside extended triggers for including major renovations and lease renewals. It mandates zero-emission buildings for all new constructions by 2030 (with public buildings over 1,000 m² by 2028) and requires EPCs to evolve into digital formats with verifiable data from smart metering where available, aiming to support the EU's 55% reduction target by 2030. Member states must transpose this directive by May 2026, with provisions for simplified procedures for smaller buildings and exemptions for historical monuments to balance efficacy with practical constraints. Despite these advancements, the framework's reliance on national implementation has resulted in inconsistent EPC quality and enforcement across the EU, as evidenced by varying database coverage rates from under 10% in some states to over 90% in others.

United Kingdom Specifics

In the , Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) were introduced to comply with the Union's Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD), with phased implementation beginning in 2007 and full coverage for domestic properties achieved by autumn 2008. EPCs are mandatory for dwellings when marketed for sale or rental, as well as upon , and remain valid for 10 years. The certificates provide an rating from A (most efficient) to G (least efficient), calculated using methodologies such as the Reduced Data Standard Assessment Procedure (RdSAP) for domestic buildings, alongside recommendations for cost-effective improvements. Non-domestic buildings require EPCs under similar triggers—construction, sale, or letting—assessed via tools like the Simplified Building Energy Model (SBEM), with ratings also on an A-G scale reflecting current and potential performance. Accredited assessors, registered with approved schemes, conduct assessments, and EPCs must be lodged on national registers for verification. Public buildings over 250 m² additionally require Display Energy Certificates (DECs), which report actual energy use rather than modeled predictions. The UK's Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) tie EPC ratings to rental compliance: since April 2018, domestic private rented properties must achieve at least EPC band E, with non-compliance risking fines up to £5,000 per dwelling; non-domestic rentals followed suit from April 2018. Exemptions apply to certain listed buildings or where improvements are uneconomical, but landlords bear responsibility for validity. Implementation varies across devolved administrations: England and Wales align closely under shared regulations, while Scotland and Northern Ireland maintain parallel systems with their own registers and slight procedural differences, such as Scotland's emphasis on stock modeling for policy. Ongoing reforms, consulted upon in late 2024, propose metric updates for better alignment with real-world performance and potential validity reductions, with changes anticipated from mid-2026, amid debates over raising minimum standards to band C for new rentals by late 2025 or fully by 2030. These adjustments aim to address discrepancies between predicted and actual energy use but face scrutiny over assessment accuracy and compliance costs.

United States Approaches

In the , unlike the European Union's mandatory framework, no national energy performance certificate is required for buildings. Energy efficiency assessments occur through voluntary federal programs and decentralized state building codes, often incorporating standardized rating systems for compliance, incentives, or disclosure. These approaches emphasize performance paths in model codes like the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC), but implementation remains optional at the federal level and varies by jurisdiction. The Department of Energy's Home Energy Score program provides a voluntary, assessor-conducted evaluation of residential , yielding a score from 1 (least efficient) to 10 (most efficient) based on projected annual use under standardized conditions. Launched by the DOE and national laboratories, it generates comparable metrics for homeowners, buyers, and renters, accompanied by prioritized improvement recommendations to reduce consumption and costs. As of , the program operates nationwide via partner organizations and certified assessors, with annual funding of $1.2 million supporting thousands of assessments, though participation is not compelled by federal law. The Home Energy Rating System (HERS), developed and overseen by the Residential Energy Services Network (RESNET), functions as the predominant standard for residential buildings. It calculates an HERS Index score by modeling a home's relative to a reference specification home of identical size and shape built to baseline standards, where 100 represents average performance, scores below 100 indicate superior efficiency (e.g., 70 is 30% better), and scores above 100 denote poorer efficiency. Certified HERS Raters conduct plan reviews, onsite inspections, and simulations using approved software; ratings support verification, tax credits, mortgage qualifications, and code compliance via performance paths. Over one million U.S. homes have received HERS scores, with public data accessible through RESNET's registry. Commercial buildings primarily utilize the EPA's tool for , which generates a 1-100 score comparing a property's use to similar buildings nationwide, adjusted for factors like weather and operations. Eligibility for requires a score of 75 or higher, verified annually through third-party review, and applies to over 20 building types including offices and schools. This voluntary program has certified thousands of properties, focusing on rather than prescriptive upgrades. State-level variations integrate these tools into mandatory codes; , for example, requires HERS field verification and diagnostic testing for energy code compliance in new construction, additions, and alterations such as HVAC installations or duct systems, enforced through approved providers and data registries to ensure measurable efficiency gains. Other states adopting IECC performance compliance paths similarly leverage HERS, while localities like mandate benchmarking disclosures for large buildings without full certification. Federal incentives under acts like the further encourage adoption, but absent uniform mandates, coverage remains uneven.

Other Jurisdictions

In , the Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS) provides a star from 0 to 10 for the thermal performance of residential buildings, simulating heating and cooling energy needs based on design elements like , , and zone. This system is integral to compliance with the National Construction Code, which mandates a minimum 7-star NatHERS for new homes from , 2024, onward, with approximately 80% of new dwellings assessed via accredited NatHERS software. For existing homes, NatHERS offers voluntary assessments incorporating appliances and solar systems to estimate overall energy use. Commercial buildings may use NABERS, a separate focusing on operational energy performance. Canada lacks a nationwide mandatory energy performance certification for buildings, relying instead on provincial building codes and voluntary programs. The EnerGuide rating system, administered by , evaluates homes on an absolute scale of annual energy consumption in gigajoules (GJ), where lower values indicate better efficiency; it compares a home's to a reference new house and supports incentives like retrofits. Commercial and institutional buildings can pursue certification, which verifies top-tier energy through benchmarking against similar properties, with certified structures demonstrating at least 75% better efficiency than averages. In , Singapore's Green Mark scheme, introduced in 2005 by the Building and Construction Authority, certifies buildings voluntarily on environmental performance, including criteria like system efficiency and renewable integration, with ratings from Bronze to Platinum. By December 2023, over 4,600 projects achieved certification, encompassing more than 60% of the nation's gross as of 2025. Japan's CASBEE assesses built environments across energy, resource, and indoor quality metrics, assigning ranks from C (lowest) to S (highest) based on life-cycle performance; it influences over 90% of domestic green certifications through the Japan Sustainable Building Consortium. Complementing CASBEE, the Building Energy-efficiency Labelling System (BELS) mandates disclosure of energy-saving labels for certain non-residential buildings since 2015.

Recent Reforms and Outlook

Developments from 2023 Onward

In the , the revised Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) was formally adopted by the Council on April 12, 2024, and published in the Official Journal on May 8, 2024, introducing stricter requirements for performance certificates to align with the '' climate goals. The updates mandate zero-emission standards for new buildings by 2030 and public buildings by 2028, alongside obligations for member states to achieve a 16% reduction in residential by 2030 through enhanced methodologies that incorporate whole-life carbon assessments and simplified renovation passports. Guidance documents on implementation were issued by the in 2024 and 2025, replacing prior 2019 recommendations and emphasizing statistical quality controls for certificates to address inconsistencies in assessor data. In the , the launched a consultation on December 4, 2024, proposing comprehensive reforms to the Energy Performance of Buildings () framework, including updates to metrics to better reflect real-world use and fabric performance rather than relying solely on modeled data. These reforms aim to improve quality through enhanced assessor , mandatory site visits for higher-risk assessments, and integration of factors aligned with evolving grid decarbonization. The minimum rating requirement for rental properties remains at Band E following the scrapping of the proposed Band C deadline in September 2023, though consultations indicate potential escalation to Band C for new tenancies by 2028 and all tenancies by 2030, contingent on feasibility studies. In , new Energy Performance of Buildings (Scotland) Regulations were laid in 2025, building on a 2023 consultation response to refine validity periods, disclosure requirements, and data privacy in assessments. France implemented updates to its Diagnostic de Performance Énergétique (DPE), effective October 1, 2025, introducing statistical for assessors—such as flagging over 1,000 certificates issued by one professional in 12 months—to curb inflation in favorable ratings and enhance certificate reliability. These changes reflect broader efforts across jurisdictions to calibrate systems against empirical performance data, amid ongoing debates over the certificates' predictive accuracy for actual .

Potential Future Adjustments

Proposed reforms to the Energy Performance of Buildings (EPB) framework in , outlined in a 2024 consultation, include shifting residential EPCs from a single A-G rating to multiple metrics such as fabric performance, , projected energy costs, and carbon emissions to better reflect real-world and support retrofit decisions. These changes aim to address longstanding criticisms of EPC unreliability, where assessments have deviated significantly from actual energy use, as evidenced by investigations showing inconsistent assessor methodologies and overstated savings recommendations. Implementation of revised metrics is targeted for the second half of 2026, with a transitional period to allow assessor training and data system updates. Validity periods for EPCs may shorten from the current 10 years to 2-7 years, enabling more frequent reassessments to capture building improvements or , though this could increase costs for property owners without guaranteed accuracy gains unless assessor is rigorously enforced. Digital enhancements, including online lodgement standardization and potential integration of data, are under consideration to reduce administrative burdens and improve , building on critiques that the existing scheme's paper-based elements hinder for net-zero transitions. At the EU level, the revised Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD), effective from May 2024, mandates member states to incorporate whole-life carbon assessments into EPCs by 2028 for buildings over 1,000 square meters, extending to all new constructions by 2030, to account for embodied emissions alongside operational energy. National implementations by 2026 will likely emphasize zero-emission standards for new builds from 2030, with trajectory plans for renovating existing stock to meet 2050 decarbonization goals, though empirical data on retrofit efficacy remains limited, prompting calls for pilot validations before widespread mandates. In parallel, minimum efficiency thresholds for rentals—such as EPC C in the UK by 2025 for new tenancies and 2030 for all—may tighten to EPC B for non-domestic properties by 2030-2035, reflecting policy shifts toward stricter enforcement amid energy security concerns post-2022 crises. Future adjustments could incorporate like AI-driven modeling for predictive assessments, as suggested in analyses, to mitigate assessor subjectivity, but causal from current trials indicates risks of over-optimism in projected savings without ground-truthed validation against metered consumption data. Reforms in jurisdictions like , via 2025 regulations, emphasize assessor market oversight and children's wellbeing impacts, potentially influencing broader harmonization efforts. Overall, while these evolutions prioritize empirical alignment with actual performance, their success hinges on independent audits to counter institutional tendencies toward unsubstantiated efficiency claims in policy-driven sources.

References

  1. [1]
    Selling a home: Energy Performance Certificates - GOV.UK
    An EPC gives a property an energy efficiency rating from A (best) to G (worst) and is valid for 10 years. Check if a property has a valid EPC. It's free to ...
  2. [2]
    What is an EPC? - Elmhurst Energy
    An Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) is a legally valid document which provides an energy efficiency rating (displayed on an A-G scale) in relation to a ...
  3. [3]
    Energy performance certificates (EPCs) explained
    Energy performance certificates (EPCs) tell you how energy efficient a building is. They are different from energy ratings, which are the multi-coloured labels ...
  4. [4]
    Energy Performance Certificates - Business Companion
    Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) give information on the energy performance of a building in a sliding scale from A (very efficient) to G (least efficient) ...
  5. [5]
    The History Of The EPC - EPCHome
    Jan 15, 2023 · The concept of the energy performance certificate (EPC) was first introduced in the UK by the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) in 2003.
  6. [6]
    Energy performance certificates are unreliable and need reform ...
    Jun 17, 2024 · EPCs were introduced in 2007 as a way of assessing a home's energy performance, with properties banded from A, the most energy efficient ...
  7. [7]
    The EPC system is no longer fit for heritage buildings
    Jun 9, 2023 · Without reform of the Energy Performance Certificate system, historic buildings could be left to rot because they can't obtain permission for secondary glazing.
  8. [8]
    The challenges for a holistic, flexible and through-life updated ...
    The data in the certificates provide limited energy-related information and lack accuracy. Moreover, they cannot account for the continuous changes that occur ...
  9. [9]
    Energy Performance of Buildings Directive
    Strengthened energy performance certificates (EPCs), based on a common template and common criteria for energy performance classes, will ensure citizens ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Energy Performance Certificates: enabling the home energy transition
    The core purposes of EPCs are well established. UK government aims for EPCs to provide a trusted, accurate and reliable measure of a building's energy ...
  11. [11]
    Energy performance of buildings | EUR-Lex - European Union
    Directive (EU) 2024/1275 aims to improve the energy performance of buildings within the European Union (EU), with the objective of achieving a zero-emission ...
  12. [12]
    Energy Performance of Buildings Directive 2024/1275 - Spacewell
    May 17, 2024 · A key goal of these standards is to ensure that all new buildings are net-zero carbon emitters by 2030, which marks a significant step towards ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] A guide to energy performance certificates for the marketing, sale ...
    The principle underlying the Directive and the regulations is to make energy efficiency of buildings transparent by using an energy performance certificate (EPC) ...Missing: goals | Show results with:goals
  14. [14]
    Improving the energy performance of privately rented homes: 2025 ...
    Feb 7, 2025 · We are seeking views on the government's proposals to raise minimum energy efficiency standards for privately rented homes in England and Wales by 2030.Missing: goals | Show results with:goals
  15. [15]
    [PDF] The EPBD and renovation Minimum Energy Performance Standards ...
    As defined in the EPBD, MEPS are: “Rules that require existing buildings to meet an energy performance requirement as part of a wide renovation plan for a ...
  16. [16]
    The European Union's Energy Performance of Buildings Directive
    The objective of the Directive is to promote energy savings in buildings by taking into account local climatic conditions in different parts of the EU as well ...
  17. [17]
    Energy Performance of Buildings Directive implementation in ...
    Feb 15, 2023 · The first version of the EPBD, Directive 2002/91/EC, was approved on 16 December 2002 and entered into force on 4 January 2003 [4]. The EU ...
  18. [18]
    EPBD – Energy Performance Of Buildings Directive | Anthesis Global
    The EPBD was introduced in 2002 as part of the EU's commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving energy efficiency. Over the years, cutting CO2 ...
  19. [19]
    Energy Performance Certificates: boosting the market ... - BUILD UP
    Nov 5, 2024 · The Energy Performance Certificate (EPC), a policy instrument that not only certifies a building's energy efficiency but also seeks to incentivise investment ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EU) 2024/1275 Link
    The revised EPBD entered into force on 28th May 2024. • Ireland must transpose the Directive into Irish law by 29th May 2026. • There are three implementation ...
  21. [21]
    Energy performance certificate calculation methodologies across ...
    Sep 9, 2024 · This paper explores the variations in different aspects of EPC assessment methodologies across 10 European countries and how these differences impact the EPC ...Missing: outside | Show results with:outside
  22. [22]
    Towards harmonising energy performance certificate indicators in ...
    The research aims to evaluate the implementation of EPC indicators, focusing on data quality, calculation methods, and costs.
  23. [23]
    Home Energy Rating System (HERS) - EMPRESS - NASEO
    HERS Background. The Home Energy Rating System (HERS) has been around since the 1980s when a group of states offered energy ratings and, along with the ...Missing: history | Show results with:history<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    HERS® Index and Energy Codes - RESNET
    The HERS® Index is a trusted measurement of the energy performance of a home. Over one million homes have been issued a HERS® Index Score in the US.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  25. [25]
    Welcome to NatHERS | Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme ...
    A NatHERS certificate shows an additional energy performance score out of 100. ... Explore ways to improve energy efficiency at your home dot gov dot au ...Certificates · NatHERS Assessor Handbook · NatHERS Assessor Toolkit · About
  26. [26]
    EnerGuide Rating System for builders - Natural Resources Canada
    Jan 16, 2025 · Natural Resources Canada's (NRCan) EnerGuide Rating System helps homebuilders evaluate their house plans for energy performance and provide customers with ...
  27. [27]
    EnerGuide in Canada
    Jun 25, 2025 · EnerGuide rating for products. Find the most efficient product in their class. It provides verified data about a product's energy performance.EnerGuide Rating System... · The EnerGuide label · EnerGuide for products
  28. [28]
    Unlocking efficiency: The global landscape of building energy ...
    Key findings on building energy regulations · 71 countries have adopted mandatory building energy codes (BECs), yet only 52 demonstrate consistent enforcement.Missing: certificates | Show results with:certificates
  29. [29]
    A Comparative Study of Energy Performance Certificates across ...
    Sep 14, 2024 · It is worth noting that many other countries outside of Europe adopt similar schemes for assessing energy performance of buildings and there is ...
  30. [30]
    Energy performance certificates in the USA and in France—a case ...
    May 3, 2022 · The European Union established the first version of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive in 2002, and revised it in 2010 and 2018 ( ...Missing: history controversies
  31. [31]
    Energy Performance Certificates: guide - gov.scot
    Nov 29, 2023 · An EPC provides information about how energy efficient a building is, and how the efficiency could be improved. Buildings are rated on a scale from A to G.<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) - GOV.UK
    The graph shows the current energy efficiency of your home. The higher the rating the lower your fuel bills are likely to be. The potential rating shows the ...
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Standard Assessment Procedure - GOV.UK
    Overview of how a home's energy performance is calculated using the Standard Assessment Procedure (SAP).Missing: inputs | Show results with:inputs
  35. [35]
    [PDF] RdSAP10 Specification - BRE Group
    Feb 12, 2024 · Reduced data SAP (RdSAP) is the UK approved1 methodology for assessing energy performance and generating EPCs for the existing dwellings.
  36. [36]
    Energy Performance Certificate Reform: Mighty Metrics!
    Feb 13, 2025 · EPCs use standard occupancy and heating assumptions to estimate energy demand which may be quite different to actual building usage. A lot of ...
  37. [37]
    The over-prediction of energy use by EPCs in Great Britain
    Jun 1, 2023 · We show that EPCs predict significantly more energy use than metered in homes in Great Britain. EPC bands A and B show no statistically significant difference.
  38. [38]
    Energy Performance Certificates in Great Britain overpredict energy ...
    Apr 24, 2023 · The study found that as the EPC rating band of a property worsens, the EPC is increasingly likely to overpredict the energy use. For band C ...
  39. [39]
    SERL paper examines EPC ratings gap - Smart Energy Research Lab
    Apr 3, 2023 · The gap between the EPC prediction and the actual energy used widens towards the F and G rated homes which used much less energy than EPC ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  40. [40]
    EPC methodology changing from 15 June – good news or bad?
    Jun 16, 2025 · It seeks to address some of the long-standing limitations of the outgoing system, which relies on default assumptions about materials and ...
  41. [41]
    Are energy performance certificates a strong predictor of actual ...
    Apr 20, 2023 · This paper evaluates the extent with which Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) reflect observed energy used for heating.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  42. [42]
    How well do building energy performance certificates predict heat ...
    Sep 4, 2023 · This paper evaluates the effects of mandatory building energy performance certificates (EPCs) on home heat loss in existing residential buildings.
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Impacts of inaccurate area measurement on EPC rating - Webflow
    15% of EPCs are incorrectly rated, and 1% area change can alter scores. 1 in 4 properties have at least 10% area variation, with 56% understating and 44% ...
  44. [44]
    Are Energy Performance Certificates accurate? - Designing Buildings
    Jun 15, 2025 · In 2019 a study of the 'Impacts of inaccurate area measurement on EPC rating" suggested up to 2.5 million EPCs were inaccurate because of floor ...
  45. [45]
    Mind the Energy Performance Gap: testing the accuracy of building ...
    Limitations of Energy Performance Certificates. The mixed evidence on the value of EPCs is unsurprising. Evidence for the Irish EPC suggests that trust in ...
  46. [46]
    A Review of the Energy Performance Gap between Predicted and ...
    Studies have indicated that there is a substantial gap between the computer-predicted performance at the design stage and the actual performance of buildings ...
  47. [47]
    Are energy performance certificates a strong predictor of actual ...
    Apr 30, 2024 · Our results indicate that improving a building's energy performance, as measured by EPCs, reduces energy use, but the difference in energy use ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Are energy performance certificates a strong predictor of actual ...
    The findings underscore that BERs are poor predictors of actual energy use and consequently cast doubt on the efficacy of public energy efficiency retrofit ...
  49. [49]
    Do energy performance certificates allow reliable predictions of ...
    Oct 1, 2020 · This study examines the performance gap in retrofitted buildings using the Swiss Cantonal Energy Certificate for Buildings (CECB) database.
  50. [50]
    Full article: The energy performance gap – a Swedish perspective
    Oct 13, 2025 · Studies conducted in various regions have reported significant discrepancies between predicted and actual energy use. Research on residential ...
  51. [51]
    A review of causes and solutions to the Energy Performance Gap in ...
    Oct 15, 2021 · This work performs a systematic review of EPG causes and reduction strategies in the context of heating of residential buildings.
  52. [52]
    The gap between predicted and measured energy performance of ...
    The Energy Performance Gap (EPG) describes the difference between theoretical energy use predicted by Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) and actual observed ...<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    Residents' participation in energy performance certification for ...
    Jul 11, 2023 · This study contextualizes residents' intentions to participate in EPC programs in terms of their attributions to and attitudes toward climate change.
  54. [54]
    The impact of occupants' behaviours on building energy analysis
    This paper presents a review of the literature published in leading journals through Science Direct and Scopus databases within this research domain.
  55. [55]
  56. [56]
    Uncovering the price effect of energy performance certificate ratings ...
    This paper explores whether insufficient control of non-energy-related architectural attributes in hedonic specifications is responsible for such a divergence.
  57. [57]
    The growing importance of energy efficiency in home buying decisions
    Oct 4, 2024 · Our analysis of house prices by EPC rating shows that willingness to pay increases with a higher EPC rating of a home. We find that consumers ...
  58. [58]
    Do private rental tenants pay for energy efficiency?: The dynamics of ...
    The findings provide evidence of a rental premium of 0.2% for a one-point improvement in energy efficiency. In terms of EPC ratings, we find premiums for B- and ...
  59. [59]
    Rental prices of properties with a low EPC can no longer be indexed
    Effects on the Real Estate Market. The renovation obligation and the ban on indexation are already impacting property prices: Well-insulated homes are ...<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    Energy performance certification and time on the market
    The information conveyed by these certificates reduces the information asymmetry between buyers and sellers, which helps to reduce the uncertainty of quality.
  61. [61]
    Energy Performance Certificates and investments in building energy ...
    Energy Performance Certificates signal energy performance on housing markets. · They are expected to reduce energy use by increasing retrofitting incentives.Missing: behavior | Show results with:behavior
  62. [62]
    [PDF] The Effectiveness of Energy Performance Certificates - Evidence ...
    This study evaluates how effective EPCs have been in helping purchasers of dwellings in Germany to incorporate energy efficiency into their home purchasing ...
  63. [63]
    EPC Certificate Costs 2025 - HomeOwners Alliance
    An Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) typically costs between £60 and £120. EPC certificate costs vary depending on the size of the property, the location, ...
  64. [64]
    How Much Does an EPC Cost in 2025? - Checkatrade
    EPC prices typically range from £65 - 120, with the higher price being more likely if your house is large or situated in an expensive city.
  65. [65]
    Operational delivery of Energy Performance Certificates in Europe
    Feb 12, 2025 · For example, in Czechia the average cost of a standard EPC is thought to be between 3000 – 7000 CZK (€119 – €278). This is because many ...<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    The Impact of Energy Efficiency on London Housing Prices over Time
    A recent review of 68 studies concludes that each one-letter improvement in a home's EPC band is associated with roughly a 1–3% increase in its sale price. This ...
  67. [67]
    The effect of energy performance ratings over residential prices or ...
    The results suggested that EPC ratings have impacts on housing price significantly with a premium of 6.5%, 5.5% and 3% for apartments with rating A, B, C after ...
  68. [68]
    (PDF) Energy performance certificates and house prices: a quantile ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · This paper aims to quantify and measure the dynamic effects of EPCs on house prices across the price spectrum and account for standardised cost-effective ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Cost-benefit analysis of the Voluntary Common European Union ...
    This report assesses the potential benefits of the implementation of a European-wide voluntary certification scheme for non-residential buildings. Arising from ...<|separator|>
  70. [70]
    An analysis of errors in the Energy Performance certificate database
    Aug 5, 2025 · We find that 27% of EPCs in the open EPC record display at least one flag to suggests it is incorrect and estimate the true error rate of the ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Investigating the consistency and quality of EPC ratings and ...
    Significant variation was observed across this small sample, even though assessors would be tasked with using the same methods, models and procedures. It can be ...
  72. [72]
    Quantifying the Measurement Error on England and Wales EPC ...
    Sep 13, 2019 · The results predict that the one standard deviation measurement error decreases with EPC rating, from around ± 8.0 EPC points on a rating of 35 ...
  73. [73]
    Energy Performance of Buildings Certificates Statistical Release
    Jul 31, 2025 · Analysis of EPC data can provide estimates of new dwellings built with solar photovoltaic (PV) panels. Specifically looking at new dwellings ...
  74. [74]
    The Real Estate Beginners Guide to Energy Performance Certificate ...
    Compliance Penalties: Non-compliance with EPC regulations can result in fines. Investment Decisions: Investors consider EPC ratings to assess long-term ...
  75. [75]
    Energy Performance Certificate: The key to a greener home, but at ...
    Mar 14, 2025 · The English Housing Survey reports that the cost of upgrading an EPC D rated home to an EPC C is approximately £6,000.
  76. [76]
    The true cost of Energy Performance Certificate upgrades | PropCert
    According to the findings, it will cost roughly £3,653 for a one-bedroom flat to achieve this rating. A small terrace house is likely to cost up to £6,400 to go ...
  77. [77]
    Landlords Face Soaring Costs and EPC Upgrades Under New Rules
    Jun 23, 2025 · This article explores the implications of the EPC reforms for landlords, the reasons behind the downgrades, the hidden costs of compliance, and ...<|separator|>
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Energy Performance Certificates
    The aim overarching aim was to ensure the design, implementation and evaluation of key provisions to ensure EU buildings align with climate goals. Starting with ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] ENERGY PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATES ACROSS THE EU
    EPCs not only serve as valuable sources of information regarding cost-effective measures, but can also be an important tool to evaluate and monitor renovation ...
  80. [80]
    and Rebound Effects for Building Stock Energy Upgrade
    Feb 28, 2023 · Moreover, the empirical model emphasises that rebound effects increase as the energy performance of the pre-renovated building decreases.
  81. [81]
    Introducing the prebound effect: the gap between performance and ...
    Jun 1, 2012 · The opposite phenomenon, the rebound effect, tends to occur for low-energy dwellings, where occupants consume more than the rating. A similar ...
  82. [82]
    Accelerating the energy efficiency renovation of residential buildings
    Jun 29, 2023 · Even if the renovation rate does increase, a rebound effect may jeopardise the resulting increases in energy efficiency. Addressing behavioural ...
  83. [83]
    Advancing energy efficiency at the urban scale - BUILD UP
    Dec 19, 2024 · The Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) database represents a core resource. It can be exploited to develop energy models of building stocks.
  84. [84]
    Unlocking the potential of Energy Performance Certificates: a key to ...
    Mar 6, 2025 · Energy Performance Certificates are key to improving building efficiency, but their reliability and harmonization remain challenges.Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
  85. [85]
    Nearly-zero energy and zero-emission buildings
    The recast Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) (EU/2024/1275), adopted in May 2024, enhances the energy performance requirements for new buildings.
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Implementing-the-EPBD_BPIE_2019.pdf
    This document is a guide to implement the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (2018/844), providing guidance to support EU Member States in meeting the ...
  87. [87]
    EU law on the energy performance of buildings - Pinsent Masons
    Jul 9, 2024 · The EPBD also requires, for the first time, “the life-cycle global warming potential” (life cycle GWP) to be calculated and included in the EPC ...
  88. [88]
    Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) 2024 Revisions
    The EPC system is being standardised across the EU on an A (or A0) to G scale so future EPCs will not be comparable to existing EPCs.
  89. [89]
  90. [90]
    Energy Performance of Buildings Certificates in England and Wales
    Jul 31, 2025 · Included: Insights into the energy efficiency, carbon dioxide emissions and central heating main fuel type for new and existing homes by ...
  91. [91]
    Energy Performance of Buildings Certificates: notes and definitions
    May 25, 2021 · This guidance is to be read in conjunction with the experimental official statistics series on Energy Performance of Buildings Certificates.
  92. [92]
    Non-domestic private rented property: minimum energy efficiency ...
    Guidance to landlords of privately rented non-domestic property on complying with the 2018 'Minimum Level of Energy Efficiency' standard (EPC band E).
  93. [93]
    Energy Performance Certificates Frequently Asked Questions
    An EPC is required for buildings marketed for sale or rent. Owners/landlords must provide it, and builders for new builds. It's valid for 10 years.
  94. [94]
    Energy Performance of Buildings (Scotland) Regulations 2025
    Oct 10, 2025 · Our updated response to the 2023 Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) reform consultation and 2025 technical consultation.Missing: United | Show results with:United
  95. [95]
    Reforms to the Energy Performance of Buildings regime - GOV.UK
    Dec 4, 2024 · It is anticipated that any changes to the EPC metrics will be introduced in the second half of 2026. Further details concerning these proposed ...
  96. [96]
    Energy Performance Certificates and Minimum Energy Standards
    "identify and promote energy-efficient products and buildings in order to reduce energy consumption, improve energy security, and reduce pollution through ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  97. [97]
    Home Energy Score
    Developed by DOE and its national laboratories, the Home Energy Score provides home owners, buyers, and renters directly comparable and credible information ...
  98. [98]
    What Is the HERS® Index - HERS Index | Home Energy Rating System
    The HERS Index is the industry standard by which a home's energy efficiency is measured. It's also the nationally recognized system for inspecting and ...
  99. [99]
    ENERGY STAR Certification for Buildings
    To be eligible for ENERGY STAR certification, a building must earn an ENERGY STAR score of 75 or higher on EPA's 1 – 100 scale.
  100. [100]
    Home Energy Rating System Program - HERS
    The Home Energy Rating System (HERS) Program is designed to help identify and fix issues, recognize areas for improvement, and compare the energy efficiency of ...
  101. [101]
    NatHERS for new homes | Nationwide House Energy Rating ...
    NatHERS is an energy assessment for new homes, using star and whole of home ratings to help make design choices for energy efficiency.
  102. [102]
    Energy Rating - Australian Housing Data
    Energy efficiency star ratings are core to NatHERS, required for new dwellings to meet NCC. 80% of new buildings use NatHERS software to demonstrate compliance.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  103. [103]
    NatHERS for Existing homes | Nationwide House Energy Rating ...
    The Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS) is being expanded. Previously, NatHERS has only been available for rating new homes and major renovations.Scale-Up · Nsw Home Energy Rating Trial · Residential Efficiency...
  104. [104]
    Energy Performance Certificates and Minimum Energy Standards
    This is one of the ways of meeting the energy efficiency requirements established under the National Construction Code.
  105. [105]
    Energy Performance Certificates and Minimum Energy Standards
    There is no mandatory form of energy performance certification in Canada. However, certain provinces and territories have adopted codes and/or regulations.
  106. [106]
    ENERGY STAR certification for buildings in Canada
    Mar 19, 2025 · ENERGY STAR certification for commercial and institutional buildings is available in Canada. A building with this recognized symbol means it's certified as ...
  107. [107]
    Green Mark Certification Scheme
    Dec 4, 2024 · The Green Mark certification scheme was launched in January 2005. It is a green building rating system designed to evaluate a building's environmental impact ...Green Mark 2021 · Green Mark Assessment... · Green Credential for Green...
  108. [108]
    The Green Mark Certification Scheme explained - CIM
    Jan 29, 2025 · As of December 2023, more than 4,600 buildings in Singapore have been certified under the Green Mark Certification Scheme, covering a total ...What Is The Singapore Green... · Who Can Apply For Green Mark... · How Can Building Analytics...
  109. [109]
    Welcome to CASBEE website!!
    CASBEE is a method for evaluating and rating the environmental performance of buildings and the built environment.Certification system · Graphic indication system · CASBEE Accredited... · Download
  110. [110]
    Environmental Activities (E) - Green Building Certifications
    BELS is a third-party certification in Japan which represents energy-saving performance of buildings. Real estate companies are required to display energy- ...
  111. [111]
    Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) - REHVA
    12 April 2024: Council formally adopts the revised EPBD. 8 May 2024: Final EPBD text published in the Official Journal.
  112. [112]
    Revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive
    The revised directive requires all new buildings to be zero-emission by 2030, public buildings by 2028. Member states must reduce residential energy use by 16% ...
  113. [113]
    EU approves revised EPBD for 'Fit for 55' climate initiative
    Mar 12, 2024 · The revised EPBD includes carbon footprint calculations, zero-emission standards for new buildings, energy efficiency improvements, and ...
  114. [114]
    Proposed Reforms to the Energy Performance of Buildings Regime
    Feb 20, 2025 · These reforms aim to enhance the applicability and quality of energy certificates, update metrics for Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) and Display Energy ...
  115. [115]
    EPC Requirements for Landlords: What You Need to Know in 2025
    Rating 4.8 (757) Stay compliant with EPC requirements in 2025. Learn current rules, penalties, and upgrades UK landlords can make to future-proof rentals.Missing: United specifics
  116. [116]
    Energy Performance of Buildings (Scotland) Regulations 2025
    Oct 10, 2025 · The Scottish Government set out its final decisions on EPC reform in its response to the 2023 consultation, which committed to laying new EPC ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  117. [117]
    Energy Performance Certificate (EPC): What's new in 2025
    Sep 12, 2025 · Defines anomalies detected via statistical analysis, e.g. over 1,000 EPCs issued in 12 months by one assessor. Effective from 1 October 2025.
  118. [118]
    Energy Performance Certificates Consultation: what it means, and ...
    Dec 5, 2024 · The changes to EPC metrics are expected to be introduced in the second half of 2026, with a transition period to follow. The Government is also ...Missing: adjustments | Show results with:adjustments<|separator|>
  119. [119]
    Proposed overhaul of Energy Performance Certificates will impact ...
    Dec 10, 2024 · The reforms propose reducing the validity period of EPCs, currently 10 years, to somewhere between two and seven years. While existing ...
  120. [120]
    EPC Reforms 2025 - Northants EPC
    Jul 28, 2025 · The Upcoming Changes: EPC Reform Consultation 2025 · 1. New Performance Metrics · 2. Increased Assessment Frequency · 3. Digital Overhaul and ...<|separator|>
  121. [121]
    Revised Energy Performance of Buildings Directive
    Nov 12, 2024 · On 28 May 2024, the revised Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (Revised EPBD) entered into force in all EU Countries.
  122. [122]
    The Energy Performance of Buildings Directive
    From 2028, the GWP for all new buildings with a useful floor area over 1000 sqm must be disclosed in the energy performance certificate (EPC). From 2030, the ...
  123. [123]
    Towards zero-emission buildings by 2050: Council adopts rules to ...
    Apr 12, 2024 · Under the new rules, by 2030 all new buildings should be zero-emission buildings, and by 2050 the EU's building stock should be transformed into zero-emission ...
  124. [124]
    What can we expect from the upcoming changes to Minimum Energy ...
    Jun 24, 2025 · Upcoming changes to Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards are set to require an EPC B rating for commercial properties between 2030 and 2035 ...
  125. [125]
    EPC Regulations – where are we in 2025?
    Apr 23, 2025 · From December 2025, all newly rented properties must meet a minimum EPC rating of C, with this requirement extending to all existing rental properties by 2030.
  126. [126]
    The future of EPCs: Data, policy, and public perception in the race ...
    This article presents insights from a qualitative study of various stakeholders, including public agencies, technical experts and real estate professionals.
  127. [127]
    Energy Performance of Buildings (Scotland) Regulations 2025
    Oct 10, 2025 · The overall aim of these regulations is to provide the legislative basis for the operation of the EPC system and assessor market within Scotland ...
  128. [128]
    EPC Reform - National Retrofit Hub
    However, the current EPC system has faced widespread critique, with calls for reform to make it a more effective tool for large-scale, high-quality retrofit ...