First Solar, Inc. is an American photovoltaic solar technology and manufacturing company founded in 1999 and headquartered in Tempe, Arizona.[1][2] The company specializes in producing thin-film solar modules based on cadmium telluride (CdTe) semiconductor technology, which enables efficient energy conversion with lower material usage compared to crystalline silicon panels.[3][4]As the only U.S.-headquartered firm among the world's largest solarmodule manufacturers, First Solar has established itself as a leader in domestic production, avoiding reliance on foreign supply chains vulnerable to geopolitical disruptions.[5] Its Series 6 modules demonstrate industry-leading performance retention, retaining 92% efficiency after 30 years under warranty conditions, supported by empirical field data from long-term deployments.[6] The company's vertical integration—from module production to utility-scale project development—has driven consistent profitability, with second-quarter 2025 net sales reaching $1.1 billion and a gross margin exceeding 45%.[7][8]First Solar's defining characteristics include its commitment to responsible manufacturing practices, emphasizing recyclability and minimal environmental footprint in CdTe production, despite ongoing debates over cadmium's toxicity requiring stringent handling protocols.[1] Notable achievements encompass pioneering eco-efficient solar solutions deployed globally, powering large-scale projects in the U.S., India, and Chile, while recent intellectual property assertions against competitors underscore its innovations in advanced cell architectures like tunnel oxide passivated contacts.[9][10] These efforts position First Solar as a key player in advancing scalable, grid-reliable solar energy amid rising demand for secure domestic supply.[11]
Corporate Profile
Founding and Evolution
First Solar originated from efforts in thin-film photovoltaic technology dating back to 1990, when inventor and physicist Harold McMaster established the predecessor entity, initially named Glasstech Solar, Inc., in Perrysburg, Ohio, with the aim of developing cost-effective alternatives to silicon-based solar cells using cadmium telluride (CdTe).[12] The company was renamed Solar Cells, Inc. shortly thereafter, focusing on research and pilot-scale production of CdTe modules, which leveraged McMaster's expertise in glass processing from his prior work at Glasstech.[13] This early phase emphasized innovation in vapor transport deposition processes to achieve lower manufacturing costs compared to crystalline silicon competitors.[14]In 1999, private equity firm True North Partners, LLC—backed by investors including heirs to the Walmart fortune—acquired Solar Cells, Inc. and rebranded it as First Solar, LLC, shifting the focus toward commercial scalability and global market entry.[15] This transition marked the company's formal founding as recognized in its investor materials, with initial operations centered on a manufacturing facility in Perrysburg producing its Series 1 modules at a capacity of about 25 megawatts annually by 2004.[1] Commercial production ramped up in 2002, enabling First Solar to secure early contracts, such as supplying modules for Germany's solar incentive programs under the Renewable Energy Sources Act.[12]The company's evolution accelerated with its initial public offering on the NASDAQ in November 2006, raising approximately $151 million and valuing the firm at over $1.5 billion, which funded expansions including factories in Malaysia and Vietnam to capitalize on lower labor costs while maintaining U.S.-based R&D.[16] By the late 2000s, First Solar had differentiated itself through vertical integration, controlling the full module lifecycle from semiconductor deposition to lamination, achieving economies of scale that reduced costs to under $1 per watt by 2012—a milestone unattainable by many silicon rivals amid polysilicon price volatility.[13] This trajectory positioned it as a leader in utility-scale projects, though it navigated challenges like market gluts and policy shifts, evolving into a vertically integrated manufacturer with a emphasis on domestic production under subsequent U.S. incentives.[1]
Leadership and Organizational Structure
Mark Widmar has served as chief executive officer and director of First Solar since July 1, 2016.[17][18] Prior to this role, Widmar held the position of chief financial officer from 2011 to 2016 and contributed to the company's financial restructuring during the 2011-2012 industry downturn.[19]The executive leadership team reports to the CEO and oversees core functions, including finance, manufacturing, technology, and commercial operations. Key members include Alexander R. Bradley as chief financial officer since 2021, responsible for financial planning and investor relations;[18] Kuntal Kumar Verma as chief manufacturing officer, managing global production facilities;[18] Raffi Garabedian as chief technology officer, leading innovation in thin-film solar modules;[20] Georges Antoun as chief commercial officer, handling sales and project development;[21] and Caroline Stockdale as chief people and communications officer, directing human resources and corporate communications.[21] Jason Dymbort serves as executive vice president, general counsel, and secretary, managing legal and compliance matters.[22]The board of directors, which provides strategic oversight, is chaired by non-executive director Michael J. Ahearn since July 2012; Ahearn previously led the company as CEO from 2000 to 2006.[17][23] Independent directors include Michael T. P. Sweeney, William J. Post, and Paul H. Stebbins, with expertise in finance, energy, and governance.[23][24] Widmar also serves on the board.[24]First Solar maintains a traditional hierarchical organizational structure, with the CEO at the apex and executive vice presidents directing functional divisions such as manufacturing, research and development, supply chain, sales, and administrative support.[25] This setup supports the company's operations across approximately 6,200 employees globally, emphasizing vertical integration in module production while outsourcing certain non-core components.[22] The structure facilitates coordination between U.S.-based headquarters in Tempe, Arizona, and international manufacturing sites.[26]
Global Operations and Facilities
First Solar operates manufacturing facilities primarily in the United States and Southeast Asia, with additional production in India, enabling a global annual capacity targeting 20 gigawatts (GW) by the end of 2025.[27] The company's operations emphasize vertically integrated production of cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin-film modules, supported by research and development (R&D) centers in the United States.[5]In the United States, First Solar's largest manufacturing footprint is in Ohio, encompassing multiple facilities at its Northwest Ohio campus, including sites in Perrysburg and Walbridge, which form the Western Hemisphere's biggest solar production hub.[1][28] In September 2024, the company inaugurated a $1.1 billion, 3.5 GW facility in Lawrence County, Alabama—its fourth U.S. plant—expected to create over 800 jobs and enhance domestic supply chain resilience.[29][30]Construction advanced in 2024 on a second 3.5 GW factory in Iberia Parish, Louisiana, further expanding U.S. capacity amid policy incentives for onshore production.[31] R&D efforts are concentrated at labs in California and Ohio, focusing on module efficiency and scalability.[5]Outside the U.S., First Solar maintains facilities in Vietnam and Malaysia for module assembly and production, with a 2023 third-party audit confirming compliance standards at the Malaysian site.[32] In India, the company opened its first fully vertically integrated plant in Tamil Nadu in January 2024, adding approximately 3.3 GW of capacity and positioning First Solar as a key foreign manufacturer in the region's solar market.[33][34] These international sites support exports to utility-scale projects worldwide, though U.S. expansions reflect a strategic shift toward North American self-sufficiency in response to trade dynamics.[35]
Technological Foundations
Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) Thin-Film Technology
First Solar's cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin-film photovoltaic technology employs a polycrystalline semiconductor layer of CdTe, paired with a cadmium sulfide (CdS) window layer, deposited via vapor transport deposition onto a glass superstrate to form the active junction.[36] This structure enables efficient photon absorption due to CdTe's direct bandgap of approximately 1.45 eV, which aligns well with the solar spectrum, allowing over 90% absorption in layers as thin as 1-2 micrometers.[37] The manufacturing process, optimized by First Solar, completes module assembly in under 4.5 hours under a single roof, involving sequential deposition of transparent conductive oxide (TCO), CdTe absorber, CdS buffer, and back contact layers, followed by laser scribing for monolithic interconnection.[38] This continuous, high-throughput approach contrasts with siliconwafer processing by minimizing material waste and energy input during production.[39]Key performance attributes include commercial module efficiencies averaging around 18-19%, with First Solar achieving a verified aperture-area record of 18.6% for production-scale modules in 2015.[40] Laboratory-scale CdTe cells from First Solar have reached 22.1% efficiency, certified by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), though commercial modules lag behind crystalline silicon's 22-25% due to inherent material limitations and scaling challenges.[41] Advantages over silicon include lower levelized cost of energy (LCOE) from reduced material use (CdTe modules require ~1% of the semiconductor mass), superior temperature coefficients (-0.32%/°C vs. silicon's -0.4%/°C), and enhanced low-light performance, making them suitable for utility-scale deployments in hot climates.[42][43] First Solar's proprietary Copper Recovery (CuRe) process further mitigates degradation, warranting first-year loss at ≤2% and annual degradation at 0.2% thereafter, among the lowest in the industry.[44]Environmental and safety considerations arise from cadmium's toxicity, though CdTe's insolubility in water (unlike elemental cadmium) limits leaching risks; life-cycle analyses indicate CdTe systems emit the lowest heavy metals among PV technologies, including cadmium.[45] First Solar addresses end-of-life via proprietary recycling, recovering 95% of semiconductor materials for reuse, exceeding regulatory requirements and reducing virgin material demand.[46] Drawbacks include scalability constraints from tellurium scarcity (a byproduct of copper refining) and historical efficiency ceilings below silicon, though ongoing R&D focuses on tandem architectures with perovskites to surpass 25% without increasing cadmium usage.[47][48] Despite these, CdTe's manufacturability has enabled First Solar's vertical integration, insulating it from silicon supply chain disruptions.[49]
Performance Characteristics and Innovations
First Solar's cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin-film modules exhibit module efficiencies of approximately 18.8% in commercial Series 7 products, with power outputs ranging from 525 to 550 watts per module.[50][51] Laboratory achievements have reached cell efficiencies of 23.1%, certified by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), surpassing crystalline silicon benchmarks in certain metrics while maintaining lower manufacturing energy requirements.[52] These modules demonstrate annual degradation rates as low as 0.2% in Series 6 CuRe variants, with warranties guaranteeing 0.3% per year, validated through 25-year field testing showing 0.5% average degradation.[6][53][54]Key performance advantages include a temperature coefficient of -0.28% to -0.32% per degree Celsius, enabling superior output in high-temperature environments compared to crystalline silicon modules, which typically exceed -0.35%/°C.[54][55] This, combined with enhanced spectral response and shading tolerance, yields up to 8% more lifetime energy per nameplate watt in utility-scale deployments.[56] CdTe modules also feature rapid energy payback times, often under one year, due to low material intensity and streamlined vapor deposition processes.[57]Innovations center on material and process optimizations, such as the CuRe (copper replacement) technology introduced in Series 6, which minimizes copper diffusion to achieve the 0.2% degradation rate while reducing material costs.[14][54] The Series 7 platform builds on this with refined absorber layers and structural designs for higher bifaciality and durability, including integrations like quantum dot enhancements for improved rear-side performance.[58] Ongoing R&D at facilities like the CaliforniaTechnology Center has driven record cell efficiencies through advanced doping and contact innovations, such as ZnTe interlayers.[52][59] First Solar's closed-loop recycling processes recover over 90% of materials, including CdTe, supporting scalability without compromising environmental metrics.[60]
Research and Development Efforts
First Solar maintains dedicated research and development (R&D) facilities in California and Ohio, with the latter featuring the Jim Nolan Center for Solar Innovation, a 1.3 million square-foot complex in Lake Township commissioned on July 18, 2024, recognized as the largest solar R&D center in the Western Hemisphere.[61][62] These investments, including over $270 million allocated in 2022 for the Ohio site, are projected to generate approximately 300 jobs by 2025, primarily in engineering and scientific roles.[63][52] The company's cumulative R&D expenditure exceeds $2 billion, focused on advancing cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin-film photovoltaic technology through iterative improvements in module efficiency, manufacturing scalability, and material durability.[62][64]Central to these efforts is the enhancement of CdTe cell performance, exemplified by a 23.1% efficiency milestone achieved at the California Technology Center in Santa Clara in 2024, establishing a world record for the technology.[65] This builds on proprietary innovations such as advanced back contacts and stress-compensating glass designs, which have enabled First Solar modules to achieve industry-leading energy yield in real-world conditions, including low-light and high-temperature environments.[5] R&D also addresses lifecycle sustainability, with demonstrated cadmium recycling processes recovering over 90% of materials from end-of-life modules at scale.[47]Long-term collaborations underpin these advancements, notably a nearly 30-year partnership with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) initiated in the mid-1990s, which has validated CdTe's scalability and contributed to foundational breakthroughs in absorber layer deposition and defect mitigation.[14] Emerging initiatives explore tandem architectures, including perovskite-CdTe hybrids and next-generation substrates, to push beyond current efficiency limits while maintaining cost advantages over silicon-based alternatives.[66] These efforts prioritize empirical validation through accelerated stress testing and field data, ensuring innovations translate to reliable, bankable module warranties exceeding 30 years.[67]
Historical Timeline
Inception and Early Commercialization (1999–2008)
In 1999, True North Partners, LLC—a venture capital firm co-founded by Michael J. Ahearn and John Walton—acquired a controlling interest in Solar Cells, Inc., renaming it First Solar, LLC and pivoting toward large-scale commercialization of cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin-film photovoltaic modules.[15][68] This transition marked the company's departure from earlier research-oriented phases under founder Harold McMaster, emphasizing proprietary vapor transport deposition processes to produce lower-cost alternatives to crystalline silicon panels.[12] The acquisition leveraged CdTe's potential for higher manufacturing throughput and material efficiency, though initial challenges included scaling production while maintaining module efficiency around 7-8%.[68]Commercial production commenced in 2002 at First Solar's facility in Perrysburg, Ohio, with initial output focused on small-scale module assembly capable of generating approximately 100 megawatts annually once fully ramped.[69] Early market entry targeted niche applications, but sales accelerated in Germany following the 2000 enactment of the Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG), which provided feed-in tariffs incentivizing solar deployments.[70] By 2004, the company had secured contracts for multi-megawatt installations, demonstrating CdTe's viability in utility-scale and rooftop systems despite lower efficiencies than silicon competitors; modules achieved conversion rates of about 8% initially, offset by production costs below $2 per watt.[12]Expansion efforts from 2003 to 2005 included capacity doublings at Perrysburg and preparations for international facilities, funded by private investments amid rising global solar demand.[71] On November 17, 2006, First Solar incorporated as a Delaware corporation and completed its initial public offering (IPO) on NASDAQ under ticker FSLR, issuing shares at $20 each and raising $450 million to finance further manufacturing scale-up.[13] The IPO valued the company at over $2 billion, reflecting investor optimism about CdTe's cost trajectory amid silicon supply shortages that drove rival panel prices higher.[16]Post-IPO, First Solar prioritized cost reductions through process optimizations, achieving a manufacturing milestone in the fourth quarter of 2008 by lowering module costs below $1 per watt—undercutting silicon alternatives trading at $3-4 per watt.[71] This breakthrough, enabled by high-volume vapor deposition and minimal material waste in CdTe production, positioned the company for broader commercialization, with annual shipments reaching 100 megawatts by year-end and backlog exceeding 1 gigawatt for future deliveries.[12] Early operations highlighted CdTe's advantages in low-light performance and temperature tolerance, though cadmium's toxicity prompted rigorous recycling protocols from inception to mitigate environmental concerns.[68]
Growth, Crisis, and Recovery (2009–2015)
In the late 2000s and early 2010s, First Solar pursued aggressive expansion amid rising global demand for solar photovoltaic modules. Revenues reached $2.1 billion in 2009, a 66% increase from the prior year, driven by scaled production of cadmium telluride thin-film modules and new manufacturing facilities in Malaysia and Vietnam.[72][73] The company forecasted 46% sales growth for 2011, projecting $3.7 billion to $3.9 billion, supported by growing utility-scale projects, which rose from 5% to 25% of total sales between 2009 and 2011.[74][68]This period of expansion ended abruptly as the solar industry grappled with severe oversupply, primarily from low-cost crystalline silicon modules produced in China, alongside subsidy reductions in key European markets. First Solar recorded its first net operating loss in seven years in fiscal 2011, at $68 million, amid collapsing module prices and delayed projects.[73] In early 2012, the company announced a major restructuring, including the closure of two manufacturing plants in Frankfurt (Oder, Germany, idling four production lines in Kulim, Malaysia, and eliminating approximately 2,000 jobs—about 10% to 18% of its global workforce—incurring charges of $245 million to $370 million.[75][76][77] Quarterly results reflected the turmoil, with Q1 2012 revenue dropping to $497 million and a net loss of $449 million, largely from restructuring and impairment costs.[78] Full-year trailing twelve-month net losses reached $605 million by mid-2012, exacerbated by a $393 million goodwill writedown and elevated warranty provisions.[79][80] Declines persisted into 2013, with Q2 revenue falling 45.7% year-over-year due to ongoing market pressures.[81]Recovery began in 2013 and accelerated through 2014–2015 as First Solar refocused on cost-efficient utility-scale deployments in the United States, where stable policy support and higher module values provided a buffer against global price erosion.[82] Operating expenses were reduced from $587 million in 2011 to $421 million in 2012 (excluding restructuring), aiding margin preservation.[83] By late 2014, the company announced plans to reopen four idled plants in 2015 to meet anticipated demandgrowth, while achieving average moduleefficiency of 14.8% in Q4 2014—a significant improvement.[84][85] This strategic pivot, combined with technological refinements, positioned First Solar for renewed financial stability by emphasizing markets less vulnerable to subsidy fluctuations and commoditized competition.[86]
Modern Expansion and Policy Influences (2016–Present)
Following financial stabilization in the mid-2010s, First Solar accelerated its manufacturing expansion, with nameplate capacity increasing from 9.8 gigawatts (GW) in 2022 to 16.6 GW in 2023, driven by investments in U.S. facilities and policy incentives favoring domestic production.[87] The company announced up to $1.2 billion in U.S. investments in 2022 to add 4.4 GW of capacity across expansions in Ohio and a new site in the Southeast, reflecting a strategic shift toward vertically integrated thin-film production amid rising global solar demand.[88] By 2024, First Solar inaugurated a $1.1 billion, 3.5 GW facility in Lawrence County, Alabama, creating over 800 jobs and enhancing cadmium telluride (CdTe) module output.[29] A similar 3.5 GW plant in Louisiana followed, slated for commissioning in late 2025, pushing projected U.S. capacity to over 14 GW by 2026.[89]U.S. trade policies, including tariffs imposed under Section 201 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 in 2018—at 30% initially, declining annually to 15%—shielded domestic manufacturers like First Solar from low-cost imports predominantly sourced from China and Southeast Asia, where state subsidies distorted global pricing.[90] These measures, extended and expanded in 2022 to cover bifacial modules and Southeast Asian circumvention, elevated import costs and bolstered First Solar's competitive edge in utility-scale projects, contributing to higher module prices and sustained profitability.[91] Proposed 2025 tariffs under the Trump administration, targeting additional Southeast Asian imports, prompted First Solar to raise its net sales outlook, anticipating further price uplift for U.S.-made modules.[92]The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of August 2022 amplified this trajectory by introducing transferable manufacturing production tax credits (Section 45X), which First Solar leveraged to sell $857 million in credits generated from its U.S. operations in 2024 alone, funding further domestic scaling over export-focused production.[93] This policy causal link is evident in the company's 2023 Ohio expansion of $1.3 billion, which extended product sell-through to 2026 and aligned with IRA incentives for avoiding foreign supply chain risks, such as those under the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act.[94] In tandem, First Solar curtailed Southeast Asian output by 1 GW across Malaysia and Vietnam facilities in 2025, redirecting resources to U.S. growth amid tariff pressures and IRA-driven economics.[95]
Year
Global Nameplate Capacity (GW)
2020
6.3
2021
7.9
2022
9.8
2023
16.6
2024 (proj.)
~25 (with 14 GW U.S.)
These expansions positioned First Solar to capture a larger share of U.S. utility-scale deployments, where policy protections mitigated the cost disadvantages of thin-film technology relative to crystalline silicon imports, though sustained growth remains contingent on ongoing subsidy renewals and trade enforcement.[98]
Manufacturing and Supply Chain
Production Capacity and Expansion
First Solar's global nameplate manufacturing capacity expanded to 21.2 GW by the end of 2023, reflecting additions of 6.8 GW during that year across its facilities.[87] In September 2024, the company inaugurated a $1.1 billion vertically integrated thin-film solar manufacturing facility in Lawrence County, Alabama, which adds 3.5 GW of annual capacity once fully ramped, increasing U.S. nameplate capacity to nearly 11 GW and global capacity to over 21 GW.[99][100]These expansions build on earlier investments, including a 2022 commitment of up to $1.2 billion to scale U.S. production by 4.4 GW, primarily through new factories in Ohio and Alabama.[88] The Alabama plant, spanning over 1 million square feet, supports domestic supply chain localization amid rising U.S. solar demand, with full ramp-up expected to contribute to module shipments in 2025.[29]Looking ahead, First Solar broke ground in September 2023 on another $1.1 billion, 3.5 GW facility in Iberia Parish, Louisiana, covering more than 2 million square feet, with commercial shipments projected to begin in the first half of 2026 following inauguration in November 2025.[101][102] This project, supported by local supply chain developments such as Noble Plastics' $8.5 million expansion to provide components, aims to bolster U.S. manufacturing resilience.[103]By the end of 2026, First Solar targets 14 GW of annual U.S. nameplate capacity and over 25 GW globally, aligning with forecasted module sales of 16.7–19.3 GW in 2025 and a backlog extending through 2030.[104][105] These capacity increases are positioned to meet surging domestic demand, with 2024 production reaching 15.5 GW of modules.[106]
Material Sourcing and Supply Chain Vulnerabilities
First Solar's cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin-film modules rely on tellurium and cadmium as primary semiconductor materials, both derived predominantly as byproducts from copper and zinc mining and refining processes.[57]Tellurium, in particular, constitutes a critical input, with global annual production limited to approximately 500-600 metric tons, of which over 70% originates from China.[107]Cadmium telluride materials account for about 53% of the production cost structure for First Solar's modules, exposing the company to fluctuations in raw material availability and pricing tied to volatile base metal markets.[107]Supply chain vulnerabilities stem from tellurium's scarcity and concentrated production, which constrain scaling CdTe photovoltaic deployment amid rising solardemand.[108] China's dominance in tellurium refining—controlling roughly 75% of global supply—amplifies risks from export restrictions and geopolitical tensions, as tellurium demand from photovoltaics has driven market prices upward, with projections indicating potential shortages if CdTe market share expands significantly by 2030.[109] Historical assessments highlight mid- to long-term supply risks for tellurium relative to other thin-film elements like indium or gallium, due to its byproduct dependency and limited primary mining feasibility.[110]In February 2025, China imposed export controls on cadmium telluride polycrystals and tellurium metal, directly impacting U.S.-based First Solar by restricting access to key inputs and elevating procurement costs.[111] These measures, part of broader strategic resource policies, exacerbate vulnerabilities for CdTe manufacturers, as alternative sourcing remains limited and recycling from end-of-life panels is not yet scaled to offset primary supply gaps.[107]System dynamics modeling forecasts tellurium availability challenges through 2050 under high CdTe demand scenarios, underscoring the need for diversified refining capacity to mitigate disruptions.[112]Cadmium sourcing presents secondary risks, though less acute than tellurium, given its wider availability from zinc processing; however, environmental regulations and toxicity concerns in handling add logistical complexities to the supply chain.[47] Overall, these dependencies heighten First Solar's exposure to cost volatility and production delays, particularly as global thin-film solar expansion competes with electronics and other sectors for finite tellurium reserves.[67]
Financial Performance
Revenue, Profitability, and Key Metrics
First Solar's revenue has demonstrated robust growth in recent years, driven by expanded manufacturing capacity, module sales to utility-scale projects, and favorable U.S. policy environments. For fiscal year 2024, the company reported net sales of $4.2 billion, a 27% increase from $3.3 billion in 2023, primarily attributable to higher shipment volumes of approximately 15.2 gigawatts (GW) and improved average selling prices.[7][113] Net income for 2024 reached $1.29 billion, up 55% year-over-year, reflecting operational efficiencies in its cadmium telluride thin-film technology and cost controls amid rising demand.[113]Profitability metrics highlight sustained margins, with a trailing twelve-month (TTM) gross profit of $1.86 billion and an EBITDA of $1.85 billion as of mid-2025, yielding a net profit margin of 28.95%.[114] In the second quarter of 2025, net sales totaled $1.1 billion, a 37% increase from the year-ago quarter, supported by 1.3 GW in module shipments and a gross margin of approximately 45.5%.[7] Net income for that period was $342 million, with diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $3.18, underscoring resilience despite supply chain pressures and global competition.[7][115]Key operational metrics include a contracted sales backlog of 64 GW as of June 2025, providing multi-year revenue visibility and equating to over $20 billion in potential future sales at prevailing prices.[7] The company's net cash position stood at $0.6 billion at quarter-end, bolstered by strong free cash flow generation from domestic manufacturing expansions.[7]Return on assets (TTM) was 7.13%, and return on equity reached 15.92%, reflecting efficient capital deployment in a capital-intensive industry.[114]Historical trends show revenue volatility earlier in the company's lifecycle, with annual figures declining to $2.6 billion in 2022 amid market oversupply, but rebounding sharply thereafter due to U.S. Inflation Reduction Act incentives and technological upgrades.[116]
First Solar, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLR) completed its initial public offering on November 17, 2006, listing on the NASDAQ exchange and raising capital to expand thin-film photovoltaic manufacturing.[117] The stock experienced rapid appreciation during the mid-2000s solar boom, reaching an all-time closing high of $311.14 on May 16, 2008, driven by global demand growth and favorable policy incentives.[118] However, the 2008 financial crisis and subsequent oversupply in the solar sector led to sharp declines, with shares falling below $10 by 2012 amid industry-wide pricing pressures and operational losses.[118]Post-2012 recovery aligned with cost reductions in cadmium telluride technology and U.S. trade protections against subsidized imports, enabling profitability resumption by 2013.[119] The stock demonstrated cyclical volatility tied to solar market dynamics, including raw material costs, installation demand, and policy shifts; for instance, the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act's production tax credits boosted shares, contributing to a year-to-date gain of approximately 29.5% as of October 2025.[120] Over the prior three months to October 2025, FSLR returned 31.5%, reflecting secured tax credit deals and backlog expansion, though 52-week lows reached $116.56 amid broader clean energy sector fluctuations.[120][121] As of October 24, 2025, shares closed at $241.41, with a 52-week high of $248.04.[121]
Investor relations activities emphasize transparency through quarterly earnings releases, SEC filings, and webcasts, with the company maintaining a dedicated portal at investor.firstsolar.com for financial reports, presentations, and governance details.[5] First Solar does not pay regular dividends, prioritizing reinvestment in manufacturing capacity and R&D over distributions; its last nominal dividend occurred nearly 16 years prior, yielding negligible shareholder returns via payouts.[122][123] Share repurchases have been limited, with total returns primarily derived from capital appreciation amid episodic policy-driven rallies, such as those from domestic content incentives and tariffs mitigating foreign competition.[124] Annual shareholder meetings, like the 2025 event scheduled for May 14, facilitate direct engagement on strategy and performance.[125] Stock volatility remains elevated compared to broader markets, with weekly fluctuations around 7% in recent periods, underscoring sensitivity to legislative changes and supply chain risks.[126]
Dependence on Government Incentives and Subsidies
First Solar's operations and profitability are substantially supported by U.S. federal tax incentives, including the Investment Tax Credit (ITC), Production Tax Credit (PTC), and manufacturing credits under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022.[127][128] The IRA's Section 45X provides advance manufacturing production credits for solar components, which First Solar has leveraged to generate billions in value, with projections estimating up to $10 billion over a decade through expanded domestic production capacity.[129][130]The company has actively monetized these incentives by selling transferable tax credits to third parties, a mechanism enabled by the IRA. In January 2024, First Solar completed its first major deal, selling credits worth up to $700 million.[131] By mid-2025, it had sold an additional $311.8 million in June and $391 million in July, with total 2025 credit sales exceeding $1.5 billion at ratios near $0.95 per $1 of credit value.[132][133] These transactions have directly contributed to revenue recognition, with Q2 2025 financials reflecting adjustments tied to credit valuations.[134]This reliance underscores vulnerabilities, as policy shifts could materially impair performance; for instance, proposed reductions in ITC and PTC eligibility for new solar projects post-August 2025 have prompted stock declines and revised guidance.[135][136] Analysts highlight that U.S. subsidies are primary drivers of First Solar's profit margins and expansion, enabling competitiveness against lower-cost imports despite thin-film technology's inherent efficiencies.[136][129] Without sustained incentives, the company's net income—such as the $341.9 million reported in Q2 2025—could face significant downward pressure, as evidenced by historical threats from subsidy phase-outs.[7][25]
Market Position and Competitive Landscape
Global Market Share and Segmentation
First Solar maintained a modest position in the overall global solar photovoltaic (PV) module market, shipping 14.1 gigawatts (GW) of modules in 2024, which represented approximately 2% of total global shipments estimated at 703 GW.[31][137] The company's thin-film cadmium telluride (CdTe) technology accounted for the vast majority of its output, contrasting with the crystalline silicon (c-Si) modules that dominated over 98% of global shipments in recent years.[138] Within the thin-film segment, First Solar commanded over 90% of CdTe production worldwide, establishing it as the leading producer in this niche, though thin-film technologies collectively held less than 5% of the broader PV market due to cost and efficiency advantages of c-Si alternatives.[60]The company's market segmentation emphasized utility-scale deployments over distributed generation, with nearly all revenue derived from module sales to systems developers, independent power producers, utilities, and commercial entities focused on large projects.[31] Geographically, net sales in 2024 totaled $4.2 billion, with 93% ($3.9 billion) from the United States, reflecting a strategic pivot toward domestic expansion amid policy incentives like the Inflation Reduction Act; international sales included $202 million from India and $34 million from France, while exposure to other regions like Chile declined to negligible levels.[31] This U.S.-centric focus differentiated First Solar from competitors reliant on Asian manufacturing and exports, insulating it from some supply chain disruptions but limiting diversification.[31]
Key Competitors and Differentiation
First Solar's primary competitors in the photovoltaic (PV) module market are manufacturers of crystalline silicon (c-Si) panels, which accounted for over 98% of global PV module production in 2024.[139] Leading c-Si producers include JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. with $12.8 billion in revenue, Trina Solar Co., Ltd. at $11.2 billion, and Canadian Solar Inc. at $6.0 billion, all leveraging high-volume manufacturing primarily in China to dominate utility-scale and distributed solar deployments.[140] These firms benefit from economies of scale in polysilicon processing and wafer production, enabling lower module prices amid oversupply, though they face vulnerabilities from concentrated supply chains reliant on Asian raw materials and geopolitical tensions.[139]In contrast, First Solar maintains a niche leadership in thin-film cadmium telluride (CdTe) technology, which constitutes a small but distinct segment outside the c-Si hegemony. CdTe modules differentiate through lower manufacturing energy intensity and shorter energy payback times compared to c-Si, requiring less material input and enabling production with reduced carbon emissions during fabrication.[25] They also exhibit superior efficiency in high-temperature environments and diffuse light conditions, yielding 5-10% higher energy output in hot climates like the U.S. Southwest or Middle East relative to equivalent c-Si systems under real-world testing.[141]First Solar's vertical integration—from semiconductor deposition to module assembly in U.S. facilities—provides supply chain resilience against disruptions affecting c-Si competitors, such as polysilicon shortages or tariffs on Chinese imports. This model supports faster scaling and customization for utility-scale projects, where First Solar's modules often achieve competitive levelized cost of energy (LCOE) despite higher upfront costs, bolstered by performance warranties exceeding 30 years. However, advancing c-Si innovations, including n-type TOPCon and HJT cells, have eroded some thin-film cost advantages, pressuring First Solar to innovate in efficiency (reaching 22.5% module conversion rates by 2024) and recycling to sustain market viability.[142][143]
Trade Policies, Tariffs, and International Disputes
First Solar has actively supported U.S. trade measures aimed at countering subsidized imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic (c-Si PV) products from China and Southeast Asian countries, viewing them as essential to protecting domestic manufacturing. In January 2018, the U.S. imposed Section 201 safeguard tariffs on imported solar cells and modules, starting at 30% and declining over four years, following investigations into surging imports that threatened U.S. producers; First Solar, as a leading American thin-film manufacturer, benefited from reduced competition, enabling capacity expansions in Ohio and Alabama.In April 2024, First Solar joined other U.S. manufacturers in filing petitions with the U.S. Department of Commerce and International Trade Commission for antidumping (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD) on c-Si solar cells from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam, alleging these nations serve as conduits for Chinese overcapacity and evasion of earlier tariffs through transshipment and undervalued pricing. Preliminary affirmative determinations in late 2024 led to duties ranging from 50% to over 300% on certain imports, which First Solar's CEO Mark Widmar described as addressing "illegal trade practices" that undermine U.S. investments; these measures supported First Solar's market position by elevating import costs, contributing to a 2025 sales outlook revision upward amid higher domestic pricing.[144][145][146]International disputes have reinforced U.S. tariff efficacy. In WTO case DS562 (2018–2021), China challenged the Section 201 solar tariffs as inconsistent with GATT Article XIX, but a panel ruled in favor of the U.S. in September 2021, validating the safeguards against import surges; First Solar indirectly gained as the decision preserved protections without requiring tariff modifications. First Solar has criticized tariff exemptions and moratoriums, such as the 2022–2024 pause on SE Asian duties, for enabling Chinese firms to exploit U.S. incentives like the Inflation Reduction Act's production tax credits, potentially eroding domestic advantages.[147][148][149]While tariffs have bolstered First Solar's competitiveness—evidenced by its avoidance of direct import reliance and focus on utility-scale U.S. deployments—broader 2025 escalations under renewed Section 301 actions raised input costs for non-solar components, prompting a downward earnings revision in April 2025 to $4.5–5.5 billion in net sales. Critics, including import-dependent installers, argue such policies slow deployment, but empirical data shows U.S. solar manufacturing capacity tripling post-2018 tariffs, with First Solar capturing significant share.[150][151]
Deployments and Installations
Major Projects and Utility-Scale Focus
First Solar primarily targets utility-scale solar deployments, where its cadmium telluride thin-film modules offer advantages in energy yield under high-temperature conditions and diffuse light, making them suitable for large ground-mounted arrays rather than space-constrained rooftop applications. This strategic emphasis emerged prominently around 2012, as the company pivoted from broader market exposure to focus on turnkey engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) services for utility-scale projects in regions with strong solar irradiance and supportive policies. By concentrating on projects exceeding 100 MW, First Solar has supplied modules for installations representing gigawatts of capacity, often integrating with power purchase agreements (PPAs) from utilities seeking cost-effective, scalable renewable energy.[73]Key completed projects underscore this focus. The Desert Sunlight Solar Farm, a 550 MW facility in Riverside County, California, achieved full commercial operation in December 2014 after phased construction beginning in 2011; it deployed First Solar's Series 3 thin-film modules across 3,800 acres, generating approximately 1.7 million MWh annually to power over 160,000 homes under a 20-year PPA with Southern California Edison. Similarly, the Agua Caliente Solar Project in Yuma County, Arizona, a 290 MWac (397 MWdc) installation completed in phases from 2012 to 2014, incorporated more than 4.9 million First Solar cadmium-telluride panels—the first utility-scale PV plant to utilize centralized inverter technology—producing enough energy to serve about 200,000 homes via interconnections with the Western Area Power Administration. The Topaz Solar Farm, another 550 MW project in San Luis Obispo County, California, operational since 2014, relied on First Solar modules for its output, which supports PG&E customers and demonstrates the scalability of thin-film technology in desert environments.[152][153][154][155]Ongoing commitments reinforce First Solar's utility-scale orientation, with module supply agreements exceeding 6 GW announced since 2022 for developers like Silicon Ranch (4 GW for Southeast U.S. projects) and Swift Current Energy (2 GW of U.S.-made modules), enabling deployments in states such as Tennessee, Georgia, and Alabama. These partnerships prioritize single-axis trackers and bifacial enhancements in Series 6 and 7 modules to maximize levelized cost of energy (LCOE) in grid-scale applications, while the company's U.S. manufacturing expansion to 25 GW annual capacity by 2026 supports domestic content requirements under the Inflation Reduction Act. This approach positions First Solar to capture a significant share of projected U.S. utility-scale solar growth, forecasted at over 40 GW annually through 2030, amid rising demand for resilient, American-sourced supply chains.[156][157][158]
Geographic Distribution and Case Studies
First Solar's module deployments are predominantly in the United States, which accounted for approximately 93% of its 2024 net sales of $4.2 billion, reflecting sales to developers and operators for utility-scale installations there.[31] India represented about 5% of sales, with modules supplied for projects in states including Rajasthan, Gujarat, and Maharashtra, while other regions such as Chile, Australia, and Europe contributed minimally.[31][159] This distribution aligns with First Solar's focus on markets offering favorable incentives and grid integration for thin-film cadmium telluride technology, though international exposure has declined as the company prioritizes domestic manufacturing under U.S. policies like the Inflation Reduction Act.[31]In the United States, deployments emphasize large-scale desert and arid-region sites suitable for high-yield thin-film panels. The Topaz Solar Farm in San Luis Obispo County, California, exemplifies this, with its 550 MW capacity achieved through approximately 9 million First Solar CdTe modules installed across 9.5 square miles, reaching full operation in 2014.[160] The project, developed by First Solar in partnership with MidAmerican Renewables, generates enough power for over 160,000 homes annually and demonstrated the scalability of thin-film technology in dusty environments, where modules maintained efficiency above crystalline silicon counterparts due to lower soiling losses.[161][162]Internationally, First Solar's projects highlight adaptation to diverse climates and regulatory frameworks. The Luz del Norte solar plant in Copiapó, Atacama Region, Chile, a 141 MW facility commissioned in 2016, utilized First Solar modules to deliver over 1.9 TWh to the national grid by 2023, powering approximately 174,000 homes yearly.[163][164] First Solar developed and operated the site before selling it in 2023, pioneering ancillary grid services like frequency regulation from solar output, which enhanced system stability in Chile's high-irradiance northern grid.[164] In India, supplies to utility-scale developments, such as 50 MW projects in Rajasthan, underscore growing demand amid government auctions, with recent 1 GW orders targeting arid western states for optimal performance.[165][159] These cases illustrate First Solar's emphasis on sites with abundant sunlight and land availability, though challenges like supply chain localization in India have influenced deployment pacing.[31]
Environmental and Sustainability Assessment
Lifecycle Environmental Impacts
Lifecycle assessments of First Solar's cadmium telluride (CdTe) photovoltaic modules indicate relatively low greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to many other solar technologies, primarily due to the thin-film manufacturing process requiring less material and energy input than crystalline silicon production. A 2013 National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) harmonization study of published LCAs reported a median lifecycle GHG emission rate of 46 g CO₂-equivalent per kWh for CdTe modules under standardized conditions (10.9% efficiency, 30-year lifetime, 1,700–2,400 kWh/m²/year irradiation).[166] This value encompasses raw material extraction, manufacturing, transportation, installation, operation, and decommissioning, with harmonization reducing variability by adjusting for factors like performance ratio (0.75–0.80). More recent First Solar Series 6 modules achieve a carbon footprint 2.5 times smaller than typical crystalline silicon panels, reflecting manufacturing optimizations and higher efficiencies up to 19%+.[167]Energy payback time (EPBT), the period required for a module to generate energy equivalent to that used in its production, is approximately one year or less for CdTe modules under average U.S. solar irradiation (1,700 kWh/m²/year), outperforming multicrystalline silicon's 2–4 years. This short EPBT stems from lower embodied energy in thin-film deposition versus silicon purification and wafering, enabling net positive energy returns over 25–30-year operational lifespans. Water usage across the lifecycle is also minimal for CdTe, with First Solar's Series 7 modules exhibiting the lowest footprint among commercial PV technologies, primarily because manufacturing avoids water-intensive polysilicon processes.[168]Regarding toxicity and heavy metals, CdTe modules emit the lowest lifecycle levels of cadmium and other metals among analyzed PV types, as the semiconductor is stably encapsulated in glass with negligible solubility in water (nonflammable, melting point >1,000°C).[169][170] While cadmium poses risks if released, normal operations and disposal show no significant environmental leaching, and recycling—First Solar's preferred end-of-life method—recovers 95% of materials (glass, aluminum, EVA, CdTe) globally as of 2023, yielding lower impacts than virgin mining.[171][172] Lifecycle toxicity potentials may appear elevated in some models due to inherent cadmium content, but empirical data confirm minimal real-world dispersion under standard conditions or fires, with recycling offsetting 96–97% of potential impacts.[173][174]
Cadmium Management, Recycling, and Safety
First Solar's cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin-film photovoltaic modules incorporate a thin layer of CdTe semiconductor material, encapsulated between glass superstrates and ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) laminates, which prevents release of cadmium under normal operating conditions.[170] CdTe as a compound exhibits lower toxicity and greater stability than elemental cadmium, with low solubility in water and a melting point exceeding 1,000°C, rendering it nonflammable and resistant to environmental degradation.[170][57] Studies simulating landfill conditions demonstrate negligible cadmiumleaching from intact or broken CdTe panels, with concentrations below regulatory thresholds even after accelerated weathering.[175][176]The company maintains stringent safety protocols during manufacturing, including closed-loop systems for handling cadmium compounds and compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards, with no reported major cadmium-related incidents in its operations as of 2023. First Solar conducts environmental, health, and safety (EHS) assessments, emphasizing proactive riskmitigation such as worker training and monitoring for potential exposure pathways.[177] Lifecycle analyses indicate that CdTe modules pose lower overall environmental risks compared to crystalline silicon alternatives when accounting for manufacturing emissions and end-of-life management.[178]First Solar operates a high-value recycling program integrated into its business model since 2005, processing end-of-life and manufacturing scrap modules to recover materials including the CdTe semiconductor layer.[171] In 2023, the program achieved a global average material recovery rate of 95%, encompassing glass, aluminum, steel, laminates, and semiconductors, with cadmium and tellurium reclaimed for reuse in new modules.[179] By late 2023, annual recycling capacity reached 88,000 tonnes, supporting closed-loop supply chains and minimizing landfill disposal.[180] This third-generation recycling technology, refined since 2015, yields purified outputs suitable for remanufacturing, outperforming mechanical separation methods in efficiency and cadmium containment.[181] Recycling is prioritized over landfilling to address cadmium's toxicity, with independent validations confirming reduced potential impacts versus disposal scenarios.[178][57]
Comparative Analysis with Other PV Technologies
First Solar's cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin-film photovoltaic technology exhibits distinct performance characteristics compared to the dominant crystalline silicon (c-Si) modules, which hold over 95% of global market share, as well as other thin-film alternatives like copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS). CdTe modules typically achieve commercial efficiencies of 18-20%, with laboratory records at 22.1% for cells, while c-Si modules reach 20-25% in production and up to 25.4% in records.[47][182][47] This efficiency gap necessitates larger installation areas for equivalent power output in CdTe systems, though CdTe's superior spectral response in diffuse light and lower temperature coefficient—around -0.30%/°C versus -0.35 to -0.40%/°C for c-Si—enhance energy yield in hot, cloudy climates by 5-10%.[37][183]
Parameter
CdTe (Thin-Film)
Crystalline Silicon (c-Si)
Module Efficiency (Commercial)
18-20%
20-25%
Temperature Coefficient
-0.25 to -0.35%/°C
-0.35 to -0.40%/°C
Annual Degradation Rate
0.5-1.0% (climate-dependent; stabilized after early years)
Degradation rates for CdTe modules, informed by 25-year NREL outdoor testing of First Solar panels, show long-term stability comparable to c-Si, with annual losses averaging under 0.5% after initial stabilization, though thin-film variants can exhibit higher rates in harsh conditions.[182][184][185] Economically, CdTe benefits from simpler, faster vapor deposition manufacturing, yielding lower levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) in utility-scale deployments—often competitive with or below c-Si in regions with high irradiance variability—despite requiring policy support for scaling.[37][186] Environmentally, CdTe production emits approximately 67 kg CO2eq per MWh less than c-Si equivalents over lifecycle, due to reduced material inputs and shorter energy payback, though cadmium handling demands rigorous recycling protocols absent in silicon processes.[186]Versus CIGS, another thin-film contender, CdTe holds advantages in scalability and coststability, with First Solar dominating commercial thin-film production; CIGS labs exceed 23% efficiency but lag in manufacturing yield and uniformity.[187] Overall, CdTe's niche strengths in cost and thermalperformance position it for growth in large-scale, hot-climate projects, offsetting efficiency deficits through system-level optimizations, while c-Si's maturity sustains its volume leadership.[57][187]
Controversies and Criticisms
Subsidy Reliance and Market Distortions
First Solar has received substantial federal and state subsidies, including over $90 million in grants and allocated tax credits from federal sources and approximately $24 million from state and local governments as of recent tracking.[188] These include specific awards such as $5.2 million in federal funding in 2025 and $3.3 million in 2013.[188] The company has also monetized advanced manufacturing production tax credits under Section 45X of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), selling $645 million in fixed credits in 2024 plus additional variable amounts exceeding $200 million, with further sales of $391 million announced in July 2025.[189][133] Analysts estimate that IRA-related subsidies could deliver up to $10 billion to First Solar over a decade, correlating with a doubling of its stock price and surging profits since 2022.[129][190]The company's financial performance exhibits significant dependence on these incentives, as subsidies underwrite manufacturing expansions and offset costs for its cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin-film technology, which faces cost disadvantages relative to crystalline silicon panels in unsubsidized markets.[191] Without such support, First Solar reported scenarios of net losses, such as a projected $45 million deficit in a recent period absent U.S. manufacturing credits.[192] Investment analyses highlight this vulnerability, noting that policy-driven tax credits form the core of profitability, rendering the firm range-bound amid political shifts and exposing it to subsidy discontinuation risks.[193][194]These subsidies contribute to market distortions by artificially lowering U.S. production costs, enabling First Solar to capture domestic utility-scale contracts that might otherwise favor cheaper imports, while global photovoltaic pricing remains suppressed by unsubsidized Asian supply chains.[192] This dynamic incentivizes overcapacity in protected segments, elevates taxpayer burdens—estimated in billions annually across renewables—and skews resource allocation toward intermittent solar over dispatchable alternatives, per economic critiques of energy incentives.[195][196] First Solar's advocacy for tariffs on foreign-subsidized imports, such as those from China, occurs alongside its utilization of domestic credits, illustrating selective application of free-market principles in trade disputes.[197] Such policies, while bolstering U.S. manufacturing jobs, have been faulted for inflating panel prices and hindering efficiency gains through genuine competition.[198]
Environmental and Health Risk Perceptions
Public perceptions of environmental and health risks associated with First Solar's cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin-film photovoltaic modules primarily center on the inherent toxicity of cadmium, a heavy metal linked to carcinogenicity, kidney damage, and environmental bioaccumulation when released in soluble forms.[199] These concerns are amplified by comparisons to elemental cadmium emissions from fossil fuelcombustion or mining, leading some advocacy groups and media reports to portray CdTe panels as a potential source of widespread contamination if modules break or are improperly disposed.[200] However, empirical leaching studies indicate that intact CdTe layers remain stable and insoluble in neutral or rainwater conditions due to encapsulation in glass and polymers, with no verifiable evidence of toxic release under operational or typical weathering scenarios.[170][201]Laboratory simulations of landfill disposal reveal conditional leaching: in acidic environments mimicking early leachate phases, up to 73% of cadmium and 21% of tellurium may mobilize from crushed, non-encapsulated CdTe material, but release drops to negligible levels in subsequent methanogenic phases or under standard Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) tests for intact modules.[175][181]Health risk assessments, including oral, inhalation, and aquatic toxicity evaluations, confirm that CdTe's bioavailability is orders of magnitude lower than soluble cadmium compounds, with hypothetical exposures from broken panels falling below regulatory thresholds for chronic effects even in worst-case breakage scenarios (e.g., 1-10% module failure over 25 years).[176][200] First Solar's lifecycle analyses further quantify these risks as minimal during manufacturing and use, with end-of-life recycling recovering over 90% of cadmium to prevent landfill migration, contrasting perceptions that overlook such engineered mitigations.[202][203]Relative to crystalline silicon panels, which incorporate lead in solders and emit silicon tetrachloride byproducts during production, CdTe modules face heightened scrutiny despite comparable or lower overall toxicity profiles; peer-reviewed comparisons attribute this disparity to cadmium's stigma rather than elevated empirical hazards, as silicon variants pose risks from heavy metal fluxes in wafer processing exceeding CdTe's contained amounts.[204][205] No documented cases of population-level health impacts from deployed CdTe systems exist as of 2023, underscoring that perceived risks often stem from unverified extrapolations of laboratory extremes rather than field data.[170][178] Regulatory bodies like the U.S. EPA classify operational CdTe PV under low-hazard categories, prioritizing recycling mandates over disposal bans to address residual concerns.[181]
Legal Challenges and Business Practices
First Solar has faced significant securities litigation, primarily stemming from allegations of misleading investors about product defects and warranty reserves. In 2012, shareholders initiated a class actionlawsuit (Smilovits v. First Solar, Inc.) claiming the company concealed manufacturing and design flaws in its thin-film solar modules, which led to accelerated power degradation and unexpectedly high warranty claims exceeding $164 million in the fourth quarter of 2011.[206][207] The case, litigated in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, alleged violations of federal securities laws through false statements in financial disclosures.[208] First Solar settled the suit for $350 million in January 2020, just before trial, with the settlement approved by the court; the company had previously reserved funds and incurred costs for warranty repairs, including $125.8 million in Q4 2011 claims.[209][210]The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigated First Solar for potential disclosure violations tied to these issues. In 2013, the SEC charged a former vice president of investor relations, Lawrence D. Polizzotto, with breaching Regulation FD by selectively disclosing material nonpublic information about warranty exposure to analysts before public announcement.[211] Polizzotto settled without admitting or denying wrongdoing, paying $50,000 in disgorgement and penalties.[212] The SEC declined to pursue enforcement against First Solar itself, citing the company's "extraordinary cooperation" during the probe.[213] A subsequent securities class action alleging misrepresentations about Series 6 module performance was dismissed with prejudice in June 2023 by the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.[214]In intellectual property disputes, First Solar has pursued aggressive enforcement of its patents, reflecting a business strategy emphasizing proprietary technology protection. In February 2025, the company filed suit against JinkoSolar in U.S. federal court in Delaware, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,130,074 related to TOPCon solar cell technology acquired via its 2013 purchase of TetraSun.[215][216] Earlier, in October 2024, First Solar notified multiple large competitors of alleged patent infringements on advanced solar technologies.[217] In August 2025, it accused an Adani Green Energy subsidiary of infringing solar technology patents, escalating tensions amid U.S. trade tariffs on imports.[218]Regarding operational practices, an independent audit of First Solar's Malaysia manufacturing facility in 2023 uncovered unethical labor conditions among subcontracted migrant workers, including excessive recruitment fees, unlawful wage retention, and indicators of forced labor such as passportconfiscation and debt bondage.[219][220] Four onsite service providers were implicated, affecting workers from Bangladesh and Nepal.[221] First Solar responded by terminating non-compliant providers, implementing remediation including fee refunds totaling over $1 million, enhancing supplier audits, and committing to ethical recruitment policies aligned with international standards.[219] The company disclosed these findings in its sustainability report, emphasizing third-party verification for ongoing compliance.[220]