Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Flag signals

Flag signals are methods that employ flags to transmit messages over distances, primarily in and contexts, through either hoisted combinations on ships or hand-held positions by individuals. These systems enable the conveyance of letters, numbers, pre-arranged codes, or urgent signals without reliance on electronic means, facilitating coordination during , emergencies, and operations where or line-of-sight visibility is required. The most prominent maritime application is the International Code of Signals (ICS), a standardized system developed to overcome language barriers and ensure safety at sea. First drafted in 1855 by a British Board of Trade committee and published in 1857 with 70,000 signals using 18 flags, it was revised in 1887 and internationally adopted in 1901 following conferences in Washington, D.C., and later updated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in 1969 (effective 1 April 1969) and subsequent editions. The ICS comprises 26 alphabetic flags, 10 numeral pennants, 3 substitute flags (to repeat signals without lowering), and 1 answering pennant, allowing ships to form messages by hoisting flags in sequence from halyards; single flags often denote urgent or common signals, such as "C" for "Yes" or "N" for "No." This code remains in global use today for distress, medical, navigational, and procedural communications between vessels, shore stations, and aircraft. In parallel, provides a tactical, person-to-person method, particularly valued in naval and military environments for its speed and discretion. Originating from Claude Chappe's in during the late , which used mechanical arms on towers, the hand-held flag variant was adapted for and land use in the , with widespread adoption by navies including the U.S. . Signalmen hold two flags (typically red and yellow) and extend their arms to eight positions per hand—mimicking clock faces from 1 to 8 and 12—to represent the 26-letter , numbers, or procedural indicators; messages are spelled out letter by letter or via code groups, readable at distances up to several miles in clear conditions. Historically employed during battles, underway replenishments, and , semaphore persists for daylight signaling when other methods fail, though it has largely been supplanted by radio and systems.

History

Ancient and early modern origins

The earliest forms of visual signaling using flags and related methods trace back to prehistoric and ancient practices, where smoke signals and beacon fires served as rudimentary means of military communication over distances. In ancient , guards along the Great employed from to warn of enemy invasions, with the number and color of smoke columns indicating the scale and nature of the threat. Similarly, in the Kingdom of during biblical times, fire and smoke signals were used to coordinate responses to threats, as attested in texts like Judges 20:38-40, where agreed-upon signals relayed tactical information between forces. These methods relied on natural elements for visibility but were limited to basic alerts due to their dependence on clear weather and line-of-sight. By the classical period, more structured flag-based systems emerged in military contexts. The Roman legions employed vexilla—square banners attached to poles—as command signals for troop movements and formations, a practice documented from the late onward, including around 100 BCE during campaigns like those of . These flags, often emblazoned with unit symbols, helped maintain cohesion in large formations by visually directing maneuvers, such as advances or retreats, from a commander's position. The vexillum's role extended to signaling in units, where it facilitated coordination amid the chaos of battle, marking a shift from purely signals to semi-standardized visual cues. In medieval naval and military applications, colored flags and pennants evolved for fleet coordination and identification. The in the 9th century utilized flags on the admiral's ship to direct maneuvers, representing an early organized use of visual signals at sea to maintain formation during engagements against Arab fleets. Viking longships similarly flew distinctive striped or patterned banners, such as raven standards, to identify leaders and signal intent during raids, aiding in the of dispersed vessels across open waters. These applications extended to land battles, where banners served dual purposes of rallying troops and conveying orders through pre-arranged displays, though reliance on heraldic colors often prioritized identification over complex messaging. Early modern advancements in the 16th and 17th centuries introduced more systematic approaches, including basic numbered flag hoists for merchant and naval coordination. European powers, such as the British East India Company, employed striped ensigns and simple hoist flags to signal ship positions and instructions among trading fleets, enhancing efficiency in vast oceanic operations. Fighting instructions from the mid-16th century onward incorporated limited numbered flags—initially as few as five—to denote specific commands like line formations, marking the transition toward codified systems in navies like the and English. Despite these innovations, key limitations persisted: signals were constrained to short ranges, vulnerable to weather obscuring visibility, and hampered by inconsistent standardization across forces, often resulting in miscommunications during critical engagements.

19th-century developments and standardization

The marked a pivotal era in the evolution of flag signaling, transitioning from ad-hoc methods to structured, code-based systems that enhanced naval and communication. Building on earlier practices, innovations focused on numerical and vocabulary codes to convey complex messages efficiently across distances. These developments were driven by the needs of expanding navies and merchant fleets during conflicts and global trade. In , Sir Home Popham introduced a telegraphic code in 1803, utilizing numbered flags to represent words and phrases from a marine vocabulary, which was officially adopted by for rapid naval messaging. This system employed ten numeral flags, allowing combinations to spell out entries or specific commands, significantly improving upon prior numerical signaling by incorporating a preparatory flag to denote telegraphic use. Complementing this, Captain developed a simplified code in 1817 tailored for , featuring a set of flags that enabled vessel identification by number and basic distress or navigational signals, promoting safer commerce by reducing reliance on complex naval protocols. Across the Atlantic, American advancements emphasized land-based applications adaptable to warfare. Albert J. Myer developed and patented a wig-wag system in 1861, involving a single flag waved in patterned motions to transmit messages via a numerical code, initially for Army use and later proven effective during the . The U.S. Navy adopted this system shortly after 1861, integrating it into operations for inter-ship and shore coordination, which underscored its versatility beyond static hoists. Efforts toward international culminated in the first , drafted in 1855 by a committee of the and revised for publication in , establishing a unified framework with 70,000 signals using 18 flags to facilitate global maritime communication. Subsequent updates in the early 1900s incorporated complementary methods like and lights, but the 1857 code laid the foundation by prioritizing unambiguous flag combinations for emergencies and routine exchanges. These codes saw practical application in major conflicts, demonstrating their tactical value. During the (1853–1856), British naval forces employed flag signaling derived from Popham's system for coordinating fleet movements and shore bombardments, enabling real-time commands amid the operations. Similarly, in the , Myer's wig-wag facilitated rapid orders at battles like in 1863, where Union signalers on relayed enemy positions and troop dispositions to commanders, contributing to defensive strategies. A key challenge in multi-flag hoists was ambiguity from repeated symbols, addressed through the introduction of substitute (or ) flags as early as the late , with early in British naval codes around 1790, but refined in 19th-century codes like Marryat's and the International Code. These special pennants indicated repetitions of prior flags in a hoist without requiring duplicates, streamlining and minimizing errors in high-stakes environments.

Principles of Flag Signaling

Equipment and visual elements

Flag signals rely on specialized equipment designed for durability, visibility, and ease of use in and terrestrial environments. The primary tools are the flags themselves, constructed from robust materials to withstand harsh conditions such as saltwater exposure, high winds, and . Modern nautical signal flags are typically made from 200-denier fabric, which provides resistance to fading and tearing while maintaining flexibility for hoisting. These flags are often square-shaped, with sizes ranging from 12 by 15 inches for smaller vessels to 24 by 24 inches or larger for enhanced visibility on bigger ships, allowing signals to be discerned from distances of up to several nautical miles under optimal conditions. For land-based or close-range systems like , flags measure approximately 18 inches square and are mounted on 24- to 30-inch wooden poles for handheld operation. Color schemes in flag signals prioritize to ensure clear differentiation against , , or backgrounds, using a limited palette of , , , black, and . This selection avoids similar hues that could lead to misinterpretation, as the colors are chosen for their distinct visibility even in varying light. Examples include bicolor designs like and or and , which create sharp visual boundaries essential for rapid recognition. In wig-wag signaling, a single —often with a central or black with a white square—is used, with the color chosen based on the background to maximize contrast, such as white-on-red for daytime against water. Supporting gear includes halyards—ropes or wires run through mast pulleys—for raising and lowering flags in hoist systems, ensuring stable positioning at height. Secure attachment is achieved via Inglefield clips, quick-release metal fasteners that interlock flags in sequence without tangling, commonly used in applications for their corrosion resistance. Semaphore operators handle two flags directly on poles, while wig-wag requires a pole-mounted flag, sometimes up to 6 feet square for extended-range signaling. Visibility is influenced by environmental factors, including weather and distance. Wind can cause flags to flutter, reducing readability if excessive, while fog or glare limits effective range to under 1 nautical mile; in clear conditions, signals remain legible from 2 to 5 nautical miles. Compared to lights, which extend to 10 nautical miles or more, flags are optimized for daylight use but perform best in moderate winds that keep them extended without distortion. Standardization of maritime flag equipment stems from (IMO) regulations, with the adopted in 1965 to ensure uniformity. This includes 26 square alphabetical flags, 10 triangular numeral for numbers, three triangular substitute to repeat flags without lowering, and a triangular answering , all designed for consistent shapes and attachments across vessels. These specifications promote in global shipping, with post-1965 updates focusing on material durability and clip compatibility for safe, efficient signaling.

Encoding methods and transmission protocols

Flag signaling employs various encoding methods to represent messages efficiently over visual distances, primarily using a set of standardized flags and pennants. Single flags are utilized for urgent or simple signals, such as the "C" flag indicating affirmative or "yes," or the "N" flag for negative responses, allowing rapid communication without complex hoists. Multi-flag hoists encode words, phrases, or numbers by combining alphabetical flags for letters and numeral pennants for digits, with the answering pennant serving as a decimal point; for instance, coordinates might be transmitted using numeral pennants to specify positions precisely. These hoists are broken into groups separated by tacklines to manage length, enabling the transmission of pre-arranged phrases from codebooks like the International Code of Signals. To handle repetition and substitution, three substitute pennants are employed: the first repeats the uppermost flag in a hoist, the second the second flag, and the third the third flag, preventing the need for duplicate flags and maintaining clarity in multi-hoist displays. The triangular "code" flag, often used as a , amplifies distant or critical signals by being hoisted alongside to draw attention or repeat key elements, particularly in fleet formations where relays extend range. Transmission follows structured protocols to ensure reliability. Preparation begins with an attention signal, such as hoisting the answering pennant at the dip to indicate readiness, followed by raising the message hoist closed up (fully extended) where most visible to the recipient. The sender maintains the hoist until acknowledgment, typically at speeds of 10-20 words per minute depending on conditions and system, with flaghoist allowing simultaneous group transmission for efficiency. Acknowledgment occurs when the receiver mirrors the key flags or hoists their answering pennant at the dip upon sighting and close-up upon understanding, confirming receipt before the sender lowers the hoist. Error prevention integrates pre-arranged codebooks for standardized meanings, visual acknowledgments to verify comprehension, and protocols for interruptions, such as the (N) to deny or correct, or signals like to request rechecking an unclear hoist. If a signal is garbled, the receiver keeps the answering pennant at the dip until clarification, minimizing misinterpretation in noisy or distant scenarios. Adaptations address environmental constraints: daytime operations rely on colored flags for , while nighttime shifts to lights or signals using equivalent protocols; in extended fleet maneuvers, relay stations repeat hoists to bridge ranges beyond direct line-of-sight. Halyards facilitate these protocols by allowing precise raising, dipping, and substitution during transmission.

Flaghoist Signalling

System mechanics

Flaghoist signaling operates by raising combinations of flags on s attached to yardarms or other elevated points on a ship's , allowing for visual transmission of messages to other vessels within . The process begins with signalmen bending flags onto short s, which are then hoisted rapidly and smoothly to either the "closed up" position—fully raised to the top of the —or "at the dip," positioned about three-fourths of the way up to indicate preparation for execution. Multiple flags, typically up to three or four per hoist, are arranged in groups to represent predefined signals, with the hoist executed upon hauling down unless specified otherwise. This method enables efficient ship-to-ship communication, particularly during daylight operations when is required. The system utilizes a standardized set of flags, including 26 alphabetic flags corresponding to letters A through Z, 10 numeric pennants for digits 0 through 9, and three substitute flags that allow repetition of previous groups without lowering the hoist. These elements are combined into two- or three-flag groups, where each combination stands for a word, phrase, or code from an authorized signal book, facilitating concise without spelling out full sentences. Tacklines—short six-foot halyards—or breaker flags separate distinct groups within a to prevent misinterpretation, ensuring clarity across varying distances. In multi-mast configurations, hoists are positioned on the , triatic stay, starboard yardarm, and yardarm, with up to three halyards in use simultaneously for complex signals. Reading conventions prioritize a systematic order to decode messages accurately: hoists are interpreted from top to bottom within each set and left to right across the , starting with the superior position (e.g., before yardarms). The number of hoists deployed depends on communication distance and visibility; for short-range engagements, a single with one hoist suffices, while longer ranges or fleet formations may require multiple hoists broken into segments separated by breakers. In maneuvers, the hoists the signal, with other vessels acknowledging by mirroring the flags before collective execution upon the lead's haul-down, enabling synchronized broadcasts to entire formations. This approach supports rapid tactical adjustments, such as speed changes or course alterations, across multiple ships. The system's efficiency stems from its ability to convey at a typical rate of 8 to 12 hoists per minute, depending on operator skill and conditions, allowing for quick transmission of administrative or tactical directives to all ships in company without individual addressing. This simultaneity is particularly advantageous in multi-ship fleets, where visual signals can be relayed or acknowledged en masse, reducing coordination time during operations like or amphibious assaults. However, limitations include susceptibility to wind interference, which can cause flags to foul or tangle, necessitating steady hands and precise handling by signalmen. Visibility is further constrained in or poor , often requiring supplementary methods like signal lamps for low-light or obscured conditions, and effective range is generally limited to several miles under optimal daylight.

International Code of Signals

The (ICS) serves as a universal maritime communication system designed to convey essential safety-related messages between vessels, aircraft, and shore authorities, particularly in cases of language barriers or distress. Originally developed by a committee of the British Board of Trade and published in 1857 with approximately 70,000 signals using 18 flags, the code has evolved through international revisions to address advancing navigational needs. The code was revised at the 1889 International Marine Conference in , and published in 1901 for broader global use and compatibility with emerging signaling methods like . The modern version, adopted by the (IMO) in 1969 and effective from April 1, 1969, with subsequent amendments through 2020 and errata as of 2022, consolidates all signals into a single volume for visual, sound, radio, and light transmission, emphasizing safety of navigation and persons. The structure of the ICS comprises 26 distinct flags for letters A through Z, 10 numeral pennants for digits 0 through 9, three substitute (repeater) flags to duplicate signals within a hoist for clarity in long messages, and one answering pennant to acknowledge receipt. In flaghoist application, these elements are raised in groups from a ship's yardarm, with repeaters ensuring accurate transmission of complex messages. Single-flag signals provide rapid communication for emergencies, such as the flag "N" indicating "No" or "Negative," and "O" signaling "Man overboard." Messages in the ICS are categorized into several types to facilitate efficient exchange. The enables spelling of proper names or terms, using pronounceable words like "Alfa" for A and "" for B, while figure codes spell numbers (e.g., "Nadazero" for 0). Multi-flag combinations represent predefined phrases, with two-flag signals for general and (e.g., "CS 1" meaning " (affirmative)" or "NC" for "I am in distress and require immediate assistance"), three-flag signals for medical queries (prefixed with "M" for urgency), and supplementary codes for specialized topics like . Numeric messages convey precise data, such as geographic positions using latitude and longitude (e.g., "L 4018 N 03045 W" for 40°18' N, 30°45' W) or course and speed. Overall, the encompasses more than 100 standard phrases across categories including distress, , pilotage, and reporting, prioritizing brevity and universality. Adopted worldwide by seafaring nations, the is mandatory under the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Chapter V, Regulation 21, which requires certain ships to carry the code. The publishes the code in multiple languages, including English, , , , and , ensuring accessibility for international crews and compliance with global maritime safety standards (as of November 2025).

Semaphore Signalling

Arm and flag positions

In semaphore signaling, the basic setup involves a signaler holding a flag in each hand with arms fully extended horizontally from the shoulders, creating a framework for precise positional communication. The flags are square and divided diagonally, typically red in the upper hoist with yellow in the lower fly for naval use, chosen for high visibility against sea and sky backgrounds. This system derives from the 1792 invented by in , with the hand-held flag version formalized for British naval service in 1866. Positions are defined using a clock-face , with each arm capable of eight orientations at 45-degree increments: vertically upward (12 o'clock), 45 degrees upward to the side (1:30 or 10:30), horizontally outward (3 or 9 o'clock), 45 degrees downward to the side (4:30 or 7:30), and vertically downward (6 o'clock). These combine to form 30 distinct configurations for the 26 letters of the and 10 numerals, read from the receiver's perspective facing the signaler. For instance, "A" is conveyed with the right arm low (4:30 o'clock) and left arm down (6 o'clock), "B" with the right arm horizontal (3 o'clock) and left arm down (6 o'clock); "C" with the right arm high (1:30 o'clock) and left arm down (6 o'clock). Between letters, the signaler returns to the rest position with both arms lowered vertically alongside the body. Numeric mode is engaged by first signaling the numeral indicator (left arm high at 10:30 o'clock, right arm upward at 12 o'clock), after which numbers 1 through 9 and 0 correspond to the positions of letters A through I and J, respectively—for example, the position for A (right arm low at 4:30 o'clock, left arm down at 6 o'clock) for "1". The error signal, used to correct mistakes, involves crossing the flags by placing both arms at 45 degrees toward each other across the chest. To aid visibility over distances of 1 to 2 kilometers in daylight, the bright contrasting colors ensure clear , even in moderate weather. Adaptations for one-armed signaling incorporate verbal announcements or pre-arranged cues to specify the intended position.

Operational procedures and training

In semaphore signaling, the sending procedure begins with the sender obtaining the receiver's attention by waving both flags overhead in a scissor-like motion. Once acknowledged by the receiver with the "K" signal, the sender transmits the message letter by letter, forming each character in the shoulder plane with a distinct pause of approximately 3-5 seconds per character to ensure clarity. Words are separated by a front signal, where flags are crossed in front of the body, and the message concludes with the "AR" prosign, prompting the receiver to acknowledge with "R". Proficient operators achieve a transmission rate of 10-15 , with 3 level at 10 and 2 at 15 , prioritizing accuracy over speed by adjusting to the receiver's capability. This method suits short messages of 20-50 characters in clear weather and daylight conditions, where line-of-sight visibility is optimal up to several miles. Training for semaphore in the U.S. Navy has involved structured drills since the early 20th century, including the when signalmen underwent extended instruction under chief petty officers to master the system. Modern regimens, as outlined in Signalman training courses like NAVEDTRA 14244, emphasize memorization of arm positions via charts in Appendix II, followed by practical exercises in "A" School at , , lasting 33 days with lectures and hands-on drills. Certification for advancement requires demonstrating transmission and reception at required speeds, often with evaluations achieving at least 90% accuracy over distances up to 1 kilometer during exercises like CCC-17-SF. Operational adaptations account for platform stability, with stationary senders using full speed while those on moving ships or small boats reduce rates to compensate for roll and , ensuring legible signals. Hybrid integrations combine with voice radio for confirmation in tactical scenarios, enhancing reliability during emissions control (EMCON). Semaphore offers high precision for spelling out messages letter by letter, providing a secure, short-range alternative to radio during radio silence, though it is limited to line-of-sight and has been largely superseded by electronic methods. It remains retained as a backup for underway replenishment and emergency communications in naval operations.

Wig-wag Signalling

Waving technique and code

Wig-wag signaling utilizes a single featuring a center square, held on a by the signaler, who faces the intended to maintain line-of-sight for effective . The core waving technique distinguishes between s and es through distinct motions from a starting vertical position: from a neutral position with the flag held vertically overhead, a is signaled by a wave to the right and back to vertical, while a is a wave to the left and back to vertical. The return to vertical indicates a pause between elements within a or word, and a wave forward (to the front) signals the end of a word, , or message. This method enables rapid, directional communication over distances of up to 3-5 km in clear daylight, often aided by telescopes for observation. The code system is a modified form of , adapted for visual transmission, where letters are encoded as sequences of dots and dashes—for instance, the letter "A" is conveyed as dot-dash. Numerals are signaled using specific code sequences, often preceded by the "NUMERALS" indicator (a dedicated sequence) or an attention signal such as two circles to the right to alert the receiver that numerical digits follow, after which the code elements for the number are sent. Developed by U.S. Army surgeon Albert J. Myer in 1858, this code was designed for simplicity and speed in the field, emphasizing binary-like elements to minimize motion complexity. A night variant replaces the with a or focused light beam, replicating the same waving motions to ensure continuity in low-visibility conditions; this adaptation was incorporated into U.S. military practice during the . Precision in execution is critical, with signalers maintaining a steady of 1-2 seconds per or to facilitate accurate decoding, while intervals between letters or words are lengthened for clarity. Error correction relies on a dedicated repeat request wave—a distinct sweep or series of vertical holds—prompting the sender to retransmit unclear portions.

Historical military applications

Wig-wag signaling made its military debut in the U.S. Army during the in 1861, when Major Albert J. Myer established the to implement the system for visual using a single flag waved in numerical code patterns. The first combat application occurred in June 1861 at Fort Calhoun (now Fort Wool), , where operators directed naval fire against Confederate batteries at , effectively coordinating bombardment to protect positions and demonstrating the system's value in preserving assets under threat. Myer's innovations expanded the Corps to nearly 2,900 personnel by 1863, when formalized it as a permanent branch, promoting Myer to colonel as its first chief. The Confederates quickly adapted a similar wig-wag system under Captain , Myer's prewar assistant, who introduced it in combat at the in July 1861 to direct artillery and coordinate infantry movements from Signal Hill, marking the first battlefield use of the method. Alexander's Signal Corps played a pivotal role in subsequent engagements, including the in May 1863, where it supported Stonewall Jackson's audacious 12-mile flank march around the Union right by relaying orders and observations, contributing to one of the war's most decisive Confederate maneuvers despite the system's vulnerability to interception. Following the , wig-wag spread to other militaries. During (1914–1918), it saw restricted short-range use in trenches as a backup when radio and wire communications failed, particularly for immediate coordination over distances of about one mile. The system's key tactical advantages included high portability for mobile units and transmission speeds of several words per minute by trained operators, enabling rapid orders in line-of-sight scenarios without reliance on infrastructure. However, its effectiveness waned after 1900 with the advent of and radio, which offered greater range and security. Wig-wag's final major military application came in the Spanish-American War of 1898, exemplified by U.S. Marine Sergeant John Quick's signaling at the , where he used the flag under intense fire to call for , aiding the defense of Marine positions and earning him the .

Specialized and Modern Applications

Non-naval uses

Flag signaling has been adapted for various land-based military applications, particularly in the U.S. , where and wigwag systems facilitated battlefield coordination when radio communications were unavailable or impractical. During , U.S. Airborne paratroopers, including pathfinders, employed signal panels—often orange or colored fabric markers—to designate drop zones and guide aircraft landings, ensuring precise deployment in operations like the D-Day invasion. The maintained training in visual flag signaling, including with two flags held in specific positions to represent letters, at facilities like and Camp Gordon until the 1940s, though its prominence declined with the advent of wireless technologies. In scouting and youth programs, flag signaling promotes teamwork and basic communication skills, with the Boy Scouts of America incorporating semaphore as part of its Signaling Merit Badge since 1911, requiring participants to transmit messages at speeds of at least 30 letters per minute using paired flags. This training, drawn from military traditions, has been featured in jamboree events and drills, such as those emphasizing long-range visual signaling up to 1 kilometer for inter-patrol coordination. Aviation and rescue operations utilize ground-to-air flag panels to convey critical messages to overhead , following international standards outlined in ICAO Annex 12 for visual signals. For instance, panels arranged in an "X" shape signal "require medical assistance," a practice standardized by the FAA since the 1950s for emergency airstrips and distress scenarios. kits often include compact signal flags or reversible panels, such as the VS-17 orange-pink markers, to form symbols like an "X" for medical aid or arrows for directional guidance during or crash rescues. Railway and industrial settings have historically relied on hand-held flags for safe operations, especially in shunting yards where verbal commands were insufficient. In 19th-century railways, shunters used red flags to indicate stop or danger, white for all-clear, and green or for proceed with caution, enabling precise control of train movements in sidings and junctions. Similar practices extended to safety signaling, where workers deployed colored flags—red for halt machinery, yellow for caution—to prevent accidents during material handling and assembly line coordination, as recommended in historical safety practices. Cultural persistence of flag signaling is evident in historical reenactments and festivals, where enthusiasts demonstrate techniques like Civil War-era wig-wag using a single flag swung in patterns to replicate battlefield messages. Events such as days at sites showcase these methods to educate on 19th-century communication, preserving the tactile and visual aspects of the practice.

Contemporary roles and evolutions

In contemporary maritime operations, flag signaling persists as a vital backup communication method, mandated by the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) 1974, which requires ships to maintain visual signaling capabilities, including flags from the (ICS), in the event of radio or electronic communication failures. This ensures redundancy in distress and navigational exchanges, particularly on vessels subject to SOLAS regulations for international voyages. Modern navies, including the U.S. Navy, incorporate such traditional methods into broader cyber-resilient strategies to counter electronic disruptions, emphasizing non-digital alternatives in training programs amid rising cyber threats to communication systems. Flag signals also feature in emergency and remote scenarios as outlined in survival protocols, providing language-independent visual cues for safety and coordination in isolated environments. For instance, techniques are detailed in rescue manuals for distress signaling when other means fail. In search-and-rescue operations, evolutions like LED-based visual distress devices offer enhanced visibility at night through high-intensity lights that comply with requirements and replace pyrotechnic flares. Digital adaptations have extended flag signaling's utility beyond physical flags. Mobile applications, such as those simulating flag positions for , have been available on platforms since the early 2020s, enabling interactive practice of codes for educational and operational preparation. Regulatory frameworks continue to evolve; while the core remains stable. Routine use of flag signaling in communications has notably declined with the dominance of and radio systems, though it retains niche reliability in interference-prone settings. Looking ahead, integrations with promise to revitalize flag signaling by enabling automated interpretation. models, such as convolutional neural networks, have demonstrated real-time recognition of semaphore positions with high accuracy, potentially aiding remote decoding in naval or contexts. Additionally, pose-estimation tools like PoseNet facilitate systems for classifying flag signals from video feeds. In , semaphore and flag signals serve as practical tools in programs, teaching concepts in , visual communication, and historical through hands-on activities like building signaling systems. These developments underscore flag signaling's transition from standalone method to a hybrid element in resilient, tech-augmented frameworks.

References

  1. [1]
    Flag Signals and Semaphore - Naval History and Heritage Command
    L09-01.01.01 Communication via flag semaphore. Aboard ... Gardner has learned the many intricate hand movements required to signal another ship with flags.
  2. [2]
    Signal Flags Activity (U.S. National Park Service)
    Jan 16, 2025 · Long before radio communication, mariners used signal flags to communicate between ships. An international code still exists at sea today.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] INTERNATIONAL CODE OF SIGNALS 1969 Edition (Revised 2020)
    The First International Code was drafted in 1855 by a Committee set up by the British Board of Trade. It contained 70,000 signals using eighteen flags and was ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Semaphore Flag Alphabet - National Museum of the Marine Corps
    Semaphore uses flags to convey letters by extending arms in positions resembling a clock face, using the standard 26 letter alphabet.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Semaphore!
    Semaphore flag communication was used in the maritime world in the 19th century. It uses red and yellow triangles on paper with rulers as handles.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Aerosol Science and Technology - RTI International
    One early application of obscurants used as smoke signals was to communicate enemy threats along the Great Wall of China. Obscurants were used, or at least ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] COMMUNICATION BY FIRE (AND SMOKE) SIGNALS IN ... - CORE
    Abstract: This paper examines the use of ancient fire and smoke signals for communication in the. Kingdom of Judah. Historical and biblical references are ...
  8. [8]
    Vexillum - Oxford Classical Dictionary
    In general, a vexillum was a commander's flag used for signalling. Miniature representations of vexilla were issued as military decorations. See signa ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] The Roman vexillum | FIAV.org
    It has been suggested, that the Celts had used cloth flags like the vex ilia and introduced them into the Roman army, when hired as auxiliary cavalry [30].
  10. [10]
    The Beacons are Lit! - Age of Invention
    Nov 10, 2022 · In the Byzantine navy of the ninth century, the admiral's ship used flags ... It thus took well over century for naval flag signalling ...
  11. [11]
    Medieval banners: their use on battlefields | Battle-Merchant
    Jul 4, 2024 · Banners were often wrapped around the flagpole for easier transport and unfurled on the battlefield to signal readiness for battle. Prominent ...
  12. [12]
    The STRIPED FLAG of the EAST INDIA COMPANY, and its ...
    May 31, 2020 · In the seventeenth century the flag had, as stated by Perrin (loc. cit. p. 130), generally from nine to thirteen alternate red and white ...
  13. [13]
    Signals at sea - Oxford Reference
    The first record of a system of communication between ships with flags was the fighting instructions of the 16th century. Only five flags were used at first and ...
  14. [14]
    Notes on the Early Development of the Designs in Marine Signal Flags
    Throughout the greater part of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, guns and sails were used in connection with many of the flag signals. In the gradual ...
  15. [15]
    https://www.lippert.com/blog/understanding-nautical-flags
  16. [16]
    https://www.gettysburgflag.com/code-signal-flag-sets
  17. [17]
    Code & Signal Flags - Prestige Flag
    Ready duty ship (Inport)." With one or more numerals, distance (range) in nautical miles. Size; 12" x 15"; 18" x 24"; 24" x 24".
  18. [18]
    https://www.flagcenter.com/semaphore-signal-flags/
  19. [19]
    Guide to Nautical Flags | NMMC - National Maritime Museum Cornwall
    Jun 17, 2024 · Colours. All of the flags used by the ICS are either black, white, red, dark blue or yellow – or a combination thereof. This is ...
  20. [20]
    https://bestflag.com/blogs/news/a-guide-to-nautical-flags-and-their-meaning
  21. [21]
    How To: Use International Maritime Signal Flags - Ingman Marine
    Nov 15, 2021 · There are 26 square flags (each representing a letter of the alphabet), ten numeral pennants, a code/answering pennant and three substitute/ ...
  22. [22]
    Wigwag flags - aerial telegraphy - CRW Flags
    Jul 19, 2025 · - black flag with white square, used against a background of snow. The standard flag sizes were: - 4 ft (120 cm), basic size (all three designs) ...Missing: wig- wag
  23. [23]
    https://www.gettysburgflag.com/inglefield-clips
  24. [24]
    https://jimmygreen.com/content/177-flags-bending-and-hoisting-methods-for-sailing-flags
  25. [25]
    The Signal Corps - Antietam National Battlefield (U.S. National Park ...
    Wig Wag: The Army's "talking flags". A signal system using flags and torches was invented by a U.S. Army surgeon, Major Albert Myer, in the 1850's and ...Missing: semaphore | Show results with:semaphore
  26. [26]
    https://www.showallegiance.com/blogs/american-flag/boat-flags-101-choosing-and-caring-for-your-nautical-flag
  27. [27]
    Color and Visibility Standards in Marine Navigation Lights - Yushuo
    Jul 30, 2025 · Visibility Range: Visible from a minimum of 3 nautical miles. 4. Yellow Light. Yellow lights are used in specific situations, usually for ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] International Code of Signals - beMPC
    It contained 70,000 signals, used eighteen flags and was published by the British Board of Trade in 1857 in two parts, the first containing universal and ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] INTERNATIONAL CODE OF SIGNALS 1969 Edition (Revised 2003)
    Flag signaling​​ 2. A set of signal flags consists of twenty-six alphabetical flags, ten numeral pennants, three substitutes, and the answering pen- nant. ...Missing: standardization | Show results with:standardization
  30. [30]
    [PDF] chapter 1 - signaling instructions - Maritime Safety Information
    The methods of signaling which may be used are: (a) Flag signaling, the flags used being those shown inside the front cover. (b) Flashing light signaling, using ...Missing: protocols | Show results with:protocols
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Signalman 1 & C
    Explain the use of flag signals, transfer station markers, distance ... ship or naval station displaying the flag of the official indicated and by a ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] ALLIED FLAGHOIST PROCEDURES - GlobalSecurity.org
    Flaghoist is rapid because, by hoisting one or more flags that have a predetermined meaning, you can communicate simultaneously with all ships in company.Missing: mechanics conventions
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Signalman 3 & 2 | Navy Tribe
    THE COURSE : This self-study course is organized into subject matter areas, each containing learning objectives to help you determine what you should learn ...
  34. [34]
    Visual Signalling
    Flag signals are executed when the Senior officer hauls down the hoist. This is the instant when all ships carry out the order conveyed by the flag hoist.Missing: mechanics process conventions<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    https://www.imo.org/en/publications/Pages/English.aspx
  36. [36]
    Listing of current IMO publications
    International Code of Signals, 2005 Edition (IB994E); International Conference on Salvage, 1989 Edition (K450E); International Convention on Load Lines 1966 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    A [Flag semaphore]: Wills's Cigarettes: No. 1 signalling series
    This type of signalling between ships was first used for naval service at sea by Britain's Royal Navy in 1866. IT is still in use today. Today's ...
  38. [38]
    Balls and Flags, Shutters and Moveable Arms
    Jun 26, 2018 · The French already had a type of semaphore system in use during the 18th century, invented by Claude Chappe. But the Royal Navy, who were the ...
  39. [39]
    Semaphore Flag Signalling System
    The Semaphore flag signaling system is an alphabet signalling system based on the waving of a pair of hand-held flags in a particular pattern.Missing: 1901 compatibility
  40. [40]
    RN Semaphore Procedure
    Dec 29, 2005 · The semaphore arms must be placed at the exact position indicating the letters or signs, the arms being moved from sign to sign by the shortest route.Missing: 1867 | Show results with:1867
  41. [41]
    Visual Signalling in the RCN - Semaphore - Jerry Proc
    Here is a procedure to send a semaphore message. First, get the receiver's attention with the Attention signal, made by waving both flags repeatedly overhead in ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] acp-130.pdf - Navy Tribe
    Jul 18, 2005 · Chapters 1 through 4 contain, for the most part, standard communication procedures peculiar to flashing light, semaphore and flaghoist. In ...
  43. [43]
    The Navy Signal System | Proceedings - 1913 Vol. 39/2/146
    There is no well established method of training for signalmen. At the Great Lakes Training Station, and at other stations where classes have been established, ...Missing: 1920s | Show results with:1920s<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Naval Signaling | Proceedings - 1892 Vol. 18/4/64
    When this is transmitted by a wig-wag flag or a torch, the dot is a motion to the right, the dash is a motion to the left, the space is a motion to the front, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  45. [45]
    Gilbert Signal 1 - Science Notebook
    The two flags are 3 feet 9 inches square with 12-inch centers; they are of alternating colors, red and white, as in the smaller outfit. The size of the wigwag ...
  46. [46]
    Albert Myer (U.S. National Park Service)
    Jun 17, 2015 · In the American Civil War, both sides adopted the wig-wag system. It was, in fact, the Confederate Captain Edward Porter Alexander who first ...Missing: 1859 | Show results with:1859
  47. [47]
    Keeping the Lines Open: The United States Army Signal Corps
    With flags for daytime signaling and torches at night, Myer first used his visual signaling system in New Mexico during the 1860-1861 Navajo expedition.
  48. [48]
    Flag moves to the right (↘️). Front (3 Position) – Flag ... - Facebook
    Feb 22, 2025 · Wigwag Flag Design: Daytime Flag: Red with a white center square or ⚪ White with a red center square Nighttime Use: A lantern or ...Missing: wig- wag
  49. [49]
    [PDF] A Concise History of the U.S. Army Signal Corps - DTIC
    1856. Assistant Surgeon Albert J. Myer patented a system of wigwag signalling. 21 June 1860. Congress authorized the appointment of a signal officer for the ...Missing: wig- wag
  50. [50]
    “Porter, how old are you?” E. P. Alexander, The Young Artilleryman
    Sep 9, 2022 · At Chancellorsville Alexander accompanied General Jackson on his famous flank march. In his extended memoir he pondered how long it took for ...
  51. [51]
    1860-1865 SIGNAL CORPS. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW ~ Part I
    In 1859 the Secretary of War commended Myer's system to Congress. As a result the following bill was passed: 'For the manufacture or purchase of apparatus ...<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    [PDF] War Communication during WWI
    " Military communication has evolved throughout the ages from flaming arrows, drum beats, smoke signals, messenger pigeons, to modern satellite enabled ...Missing: ancient | Show results with:ancient
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Sgt. John Quick – The Cuban “Wig-Wag”
    During the Spanish-American War, Quick received the Medal of Honor for his actions at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in 1898. During World War I, Quick received the.
  54. [54]
    US Airborne Paratrooper Pathfinder Signal Panel Case CS-150
    In stock Free delivery over $200US WW2 Paratrooper Pathfinder Marker Panel Case Very nice US Airborne marker panel pouch, marked "Case CS-150 Y" does not contain the marker panels.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Signaling
    Wigwag signaling was performed during daylight with a single flag tied to a hickory staff constructed in four-foot jointed sections. Flags were generally made ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Annex 2
    For details of the search and rescue visual signals, see Annex 12. ... 4.2 Visual ground signals. Note.— For details of visual ground aids ...
  57. [57]
    FAA VISUAL EMERGENCY SIGNALS - NPS History
    Probably Safe to Land He re ........ 6. Require Fuel and Oil ... USFS AIR TO GROUND SIGNALS. Received Meesage--Rock plane. Will Drop Meeeage ...<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    [PDF] AviAtion SurvivAl Kit
    As another signaling option, there's an orange plastic hunter's vest could be used as a signal flag or signal panel. Firestarting is covered via a variety ...
  59. [59]
    British Railway Signals - Mechanical and Fog signals - IGG.org
    On the railway a white flag or light meant all-clear, red meant danger or stop and green originally meant caution. With the increasing use of gas and electric ...
  60. [60]
    https://civilwarrailroadtunnel.com/event/living-history-day-battlefield-hospital-and-wigwag-demonstration/
  61. [61]
    Living History Day – Battlefield Hospital and Wigwag Demonstration
    Mar 22, 2025 · Explore the fascinating world of wartime communication with a hands-on Civil War telegraph and wigwag signal demonstration.Missing: flag | Show results with:flag
  62. [62]
    International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974
    The main objective of the SOLAS Convention is to specify minimum standards for the construction, equipment and operation of ships, compatible with their safety.
  63. [63]
    Cyber Ready and Zero Trust: Powering the Program's Modernization ...
    Jun 9, 2025 · This phase lays the groundwork for transforming the Navy's security posture, ensuring that mission outcomes are safeguarded even in hostile ...Missing: semaphore 2020s
  64. [64]
    International Code of Signals (Pub. 102) - Maritime Safety Information
    The Code is intended to cater primarily to situations related to safety of navigation and personnel, especially when language difficulties arise.
  65. [65]
    Visual Distress Signals - BoatUS Foundation
    For example, an aerial flare can be seen over a long distance on a clear night, but for closer work, a hand-held flare may be more useful. SOS Distress Light.Missing: factors weather
  66. [66]
    Semaphore Training - App Store - Apple
    Our app provides easy-to-follow, step-by-step tutorials that guide you through the Semaphore flag system, from the basics to advanced techniques.Missing: 2015 | Show results with:2015
  67. [67]
    Piracy and armed robbery against ships
    IMO issues incident reports on piracy and armed robbery against ships using data submitted by Member Governments and appropriate international organizations, ...Missing: Signals | Show results with:Signals
  68. [68]
    Semaphore Recognition Using Deep Learning - MDPI
    This study explored the application of deep learning models for signal flag recognition, comparing YOLO11 with basic CNN, ResNet18, and DenseNet121.
  69. [69]
    Signal flag semaphore interpretation using PoseNet() pose ... - GitHub
    Teaching flag-signaling with a pose-recognition game.​​ It was initially created using the ml5. js library and the poseNet() pose-recognition/pose-estimation ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Semaphore System - Digital Technologies Hub
    - The Semaphore flag system is a method of communication used to convey messages at a distance by making different visual signals with hand held flags. - The ...<|control11|><|separator|>