Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Flash smelting

Flash smelting is a used to produce nonferrous metals, primarily and , from ores by injecting fine, dried concentrate particles (typically 50-100 μm) and silica with oxygen-enriched air into a hot reaction shaft of a , where rapid exothermic oxidation reactions ignite the particles in a turbulent gas jet, generating sufficient heat for autogenous smelting without external fuel. The key reactions involve the oxidation of iron and sulfur in the concentrate, such as chalcopyrite (CuFeS₂), producing copper-rich matte (45-65% Cu), iron-bearing slag, and sulfur dioxide gas in a single continuous stream. This method enables efficient convective heat and mass transfer, with the reacted particles settling into a bath at the furnace bottom for separation. Invented by Finnish company in response to post-World War II energy shortages, flash smelting addressed the high electricity demands of traditional electric smelting by leveraging the internal energy of the feed. The first pilot experiments occurred in February 1947 at a plant in Harjavalta, , with industrial-scale operation commencing on April 20, 1949, at the same site. By the , it achieved significant energy savings, reducing consumption to about 1,000 kWh per ton of anode compared to 3,000 kWh for electric methods. The process offers several advantages over conventional smelting techniques like reverberatory furnaces, including higher metal rates, lower investment and operating costs, compact , and improved environmental through reduced emissions and enhanced in-plant . It minimizes the need for ladle transportation and supports long campaign lives, while enabling high sulfur (up to 99.9% in some installations) for production from the SO₂ off-gas. Since its adoption for in 1959 and lead in 1966, flash smelting has evolved with innovations like continuous converting in the , becoming a dominant technology for processing worldwide due to its and adaptability to goals.

History

Invention

Flash smelting was developed by Oy, a mining company, in the late 1940s as a direct response to severe postwar fuel shortages and high energy costs that plagued traditional smelting methods. Following , faced an , exacerbated by the loss of hydroelectric capacity at key sites like , forcing to seek more efficient, autogenous processes that minimized external fuel use. The go-ahead for construction of a at Harjavalta was given in 1946, with the first experiments undertaken in February 1947. Eero Mäkinen, Outokumpu's managing director at the time, played a pivotal role in driving the innovation, fostering a culture of ingenuity among the company's metallurgists to address these constraints. Under his leadership, the team conceptualized a process involving the rapid oxidation of concentrates using oxygen-enriched air, allowing the exothermic reactions to generate sufficient heat for without additional fuel. Outokumpu filed initial patents in 1948, describing a for injecting fine, dried particles into a reaction shaft to enable autogenous through controlled oxidation. The technology achieved its first successful industrial-scale operation on April 20, 1949, at the Harjavalta copper smelter in , marking a breakthrough in efficient metal extraction.

Commercial adoption

The commercial adoption of flash smelting marked a significant expansion from its origins, beginning with the licensing of 's technology to partners in the mid-1950s. The first licensed smelter outside operated in 1956 at a plant in , where provided the process for production, initiating global amid post-World War II demands for efficient methods. This licensing model allowed to disseminate the process while retaining control over its intellectual property, fostering adoption in resource-rich regions seeking to modernize operations. The technology was further expanded to production in 1959 at 's Harjavalta works and to in 1966. In parallel, the International Nickel Company (INCO) developed its own variant of flash smelting in the , incorporating higher oxygen enrichment to enhance efficiency for concentrates. The first commercial implementation of this INCO process occurred in 1972 at the smelter in , , where it processed -copper ores to produce , representing a key adaptation for non-copper applications. This variant complemented the original design and contributed to the technology's versatility across base metals. Corporate changes in 2006 further propelled the technology's dissemination: Outokumpu's engineering division was demerged to form (later integrated into ), which acquired the patents and expanded licensing worldwide, while Brazilian firm Vale purchased INCO, integrating its flash smelting expertise into a larger global portfolio. These acquisitions streamlined technology access for new projects, particularly in emerging markets. By the 2010s, over 30 flash smelters were operational globally, with the majority dedicated to copper production in high-output areas like and . Notable examples include the smelter in , which employs flash smelting to process large volumes of sulfide concentrates, and the Nchanga smelter in , utilizing similar technology for blister copper output. This growth underscored flash smelting's role in scaling sustainable metal production, driven by its energy savings during industrial recovery periods.

Process description

Operational principles

Flash smelting operates on the principle of rapidly oxidizing fine concentrates in a high-temperature to produce molten metal (matte) and , leveraging the exothermic nature of the reactions for an energy-efficient, continuous . The begins with the preparation of the feedstock, where concentrates are dried and ground to a fine , typically less than 100 μm, to ensure rapid ignition and complete upon exposure to oxygen. This fine is then intimately mixed with fluxes, such as silica (SiO₂) or (CaCO₃), to control the of the and promote the separation of impurities. The prepared mixture is injected into the furnace through a specialized reaction shaft or burner, utilizing a high-velocity stream of oxygen-enriched air, with oxygen levels reaching up to 75% and injection velocities of 10-50 m/s. This creates a turbulent reaction zone where the particles are suspended and immediately exposed to the oxidizing gas, initiating instantaneous combustion. The process is fully autogenous, meaning the heat required for smelting is generated entirely by the exothermic oxidation of iron and sulfur in the concentrate, eliminating the need for external fuel and achieving furnace temperatures of 1200-1300°C within seconds. Following the rapid reaction in the shaft, the molten products—dense containing the valuable metal sulfides and lighter —flow into the settling of the , where gravitational separation occurs due to their differing densities. Simultaneously, the off-gas stream, rich in SO₂ (typically 30-75% for ), exits the at low volume and high concentration, facilitating efficient capture and conversion to in downstream processes. This integrated approach ensures high metal recovery while minimizing emissions.

Furnace components

The flash smelting furnace is composed of specialized structural elements engineered to withstand extreme temperatures and facilitate the rapid oxidation and separation processes. The reaction shaft serves as the primary zone for the initial flash reactions, consisting of a vertical, refractory-lined or water-cooled structure typically 4-6 meters in height and around 4.5 meters in diameter, where finely dispersed particles react exothermically with oxygen-enriched air to form molten and droplets. This component is often water-cooled to manage heat loads, with cooling elements monitoring losses to detect operational upsets, ensuring the of particles remains optimal for and . In the design, the reaction shaft is integrated with top-mounted burners for downward injection, while the INCO variant employs end-wall burners for horizontal feed into a hearth-type setup. The settling hearth, a horizontal refractory-lined chamber typically 7-20 meters in width and length, follows the reaction shaft and allows the molten droplets to separate by density into distinct layers of matte (containing valuable metals) and slag (primarily silicates), enabling periodic tapping for further processing. Lined with high-grade direct-bonded magnesite-chrome bricks to resist slag attack, matte penetration, and gas erosion, this area operates at approximately 1200°C and promotes coalescence of droplets to minimize metal losses in the slag. Burners, positioned at the furnace's top or end walls, are critical for precise injection of the dry , , and process gas (often oxygen-enriched air at 65-74% O₂), creating a high-velocity that disperses particles for efficient initiation and avoids uneven heating. These lances, sometimes equipped with flow-equalizing baffles, ensure uniform distribution in the reaction shaft, with designs varying between Outokumpu's vertical orientation and INCO's horizontal end-wall configuration. Downstream, the waste heat boiler and gas cleaning system are integrated to capture energy from the hot off-gases (typically 30,000-38,000 scfm containing 22-70% SO₂) exiting via an uptake shaft, generating for power while cooling the gases for production. The gas cleaning employs electrostatic precipitators to remove dust and particulates, mitigating emissions and recovering valuables before gas treatment.

Chemical reactions

Primary oxidation reactions

In flash smelting, the primary oxidation reactions occur rapidly in the gas phase within the reaction shaft, where finely dispersed concentrate particles, primarily (CuFeS₂), react with oxygen-enriched air at high temperatures around 1300°C. These reactions are highly exothermic, providing the autogenous necessary to sustain the process without external , while selectively oxidizing iron and sulfur to form , gas, and a copper-rich phase. The core oxidation of can be represented by the simplified equation: $2\mathrm{CuFeS_2} + (4 - x)\mathrm{O_2(g)} \rightarrow [\mathrm{Cu},\mathrm{Fe_x}]_2\mathrm{S} + (2 - 2x)\mathrm{FeO} + 3\mathrm{SO_2(g)} where x denotes the iron content retained in the phase, allowing partial sulfur retention to prevent complete oxidation of copper sulfides. For typical conditions producing low-iron , x approaches 0, yielding approximately $2\mathrm{CuFeS_2} + 4\mathrm{O_2} \rightarrow \mathrm{Cu_2S} + 2\mathrm{FeO} + 3\mathrm{SO_2}, with the exothermic nature of this transformation generating significant thermal energy to melt the charge and drive subsequent reactions. Iron sulfide (FeS), present in the or formed as an , undergoes further : \mathrm{FeS} + \mathrm{O_2(g)} \rightarrow \mathrm{FeO} + \mathrm{SO_2(g)} This contributes additional exothermic heat, enhancing the overall , though excess oxygen can lead to further oxidation of FeO to (Fe₃O₄). The process is controlled to retain some in the as a Cu₂S-FeS , typically achieving 50-70% content, which avoids excessive oxidation and preserves valuable metals in the separable phase. Oxygen enrichment in the reactant gas (often 20-40% O₂) plays a critical role in optimizing these reactions, enabling over 90% conversion of to SO₂ in the off-gas stream, which facilitates downstream production while minimizing unreacted losses. Fluxes like silica are added briefly to bind iron oxides into , but the primary focus remains on gas-phase oxidation.

Slag and matte formation

In flash smelting, the primary byproduct forms through the reaction of iron oxides, generated from the oxidation of concentrates, with added to produce (2FeO·SiO₂) as the dominant . This typically exhibits a composition rich in iron and oxides, such as approximately 53% FeO and 32% SiO₂, with minor contributions from other elements like and , depending on the and ratios. The resulting has a around 3.7 g/cm³, which facilitates its separation from the denser due to gravitational in the . Matte, the valuable intermediate product, consists of a - or -rich melt with 40-70% metal content, capturing most of the target metal from the while excluding oxidized impurities. For production, grades commonly range from 50-70% Cu, while may reach up to 45% under similar conditions; this is tapped from the and transferred to converters for further oxidation and into metal. The 's higher density (typically 10-20% greater than ) and lower promote efficient droplet settling through the layer via channeled paths, minimizing metal losses. Impurity management in flash smelting relies on the high temperatures and oxidative environment, which promote volatilization of elements like and into the off-gas stream as volatile oxides (e.g., As₂O₃ and Sb₂O₃). Minor elements such as exhibit partitioning behavior, though overall recoveries remain high for primary metals. procedures ensure continuous operation by skimming from the top, often continuously or periodically via launders at the end, to maintain optimal bath levels and prevent overflow. is drained intermittently from bottom tapholes using cooled ladles or iron bars, allowing accumulation and settling before extraction, which typically occurs every few hours depending on production rates. These practices, supported by the primary oxidation reactions providing necessary oxides, enable effective while minimizing entrainment losses below 1% for in .

Applications

Copper production

Flash smelting is primarily employed for processing concentrates, particularly those derived from ore, which constitutes the dominant mineral in . This method enables the efficient treatment of fine, dried particles mixed with fluxes and oxygen-enriched air, facilitating rapid oxidation and separation into and phases. Typical furnaces handle 1-2 million tons of annually, allowing for high-throughput operations that align with large-scale outputs. In production, flash smelting generates a high-grade that is subsequently refined in Peirce-Smith converters to produce blister , which is then electrorefined into anode . This integrated achieves overall recovery rates exceeding 98%, minimizing losses and maximizing metal yield from the initial . The converters perform the final oxidation and sulfur removal, converting the to 98-99% pure while capturing valuable byproducts like from off-gases. Key flash smelting facilities include the smelter in , which adopted the technology in 1986 and has a capacity of around 450,000 tons of per year, the Olympic Dam operation in utilizing flash smelting for direct blister production, and numerous expansions in after 2000, such as the Guixi and Jinchuan smelters with capacities of 600,000 and 450,000 tons respectively. These developments have propelled flash and continuous smelting technologies to account for approximately 67% of global smelting capacity by 2019, significantly contributing to primary output in the 2020s. Similar principles are applied in production, adapting the process for different feeds.

Nickel and lead production

Flash smelting technology, initially pioneered for ores, has been adapted for production through the INCO oxygen flash smelting , which processes pentlandite-bearing concentrates containing -iron sulfides. In this adaptation, dried concentrates are injected into the along with high-purity oxygen (typically 95% ) to facilitate rapid oxidation and separation into and . The yields a high-grade with 50-70% content, though it results in higher losses to the , approximately 4-5% , compared to other smelting methods due to the more oxidizing conditions. To optimize the iron-to- ratio in the and minimize these losses, operators employ elevated oxygen levels, which enhance the selective oxidation of iron and while preserving in the phase. A prominent example is Vale's operations in , , where the Copper Cliff smelter utilizes INCO flash to process complex - ores from the , contributing significantly to global supply. For lead production, flash variants like the Kivcet address the challenges of (PbS) concentrates by integrating flash oxidation with subsequent slag fuming to achieve high metal recovery. In the Kivcet furnace, fine particles are suspended in an oxygen-enriched flame for rapid partial roasting and , producing lead bullion, , and sulfur dioxide gas suitable for acid production. This method combines flash with slag treatment techniques, enabling over 95% recovery of lead from the concentrate, along with efficient capture of associated metals like and silver. Key adjustments include the addition of fluxes such as (CaCO3) and silica to form a fusible PbO-rich that facilitates separation of impurities and reduces the of the charge. While larger-scale implementations are found in facilities like Teck's Trail operations, smaller lead flash plants in , such as those exploring Outokumpu-derived technologies, demonstrate the 's applicability to regional deposits with high impurity levels.

Advantages and limitations

Energy and efficiency benefits

Flash smelting leverages the exothermic oxidation of minerals in the to generate autogenous heat, substantially reducing the need for external inputs. This self-sustaining process minimizes usage, achieving reductions of approximately 80-90% compared to traditional reverberatory furnaces, which rely heavily on fossil fuels for heating. consumption in flash smelting is around 300-400 kWh per ton of , compared to about 1,000 kWh per ton of anode copper in electric smelting methods. The process supports high throughput rates of 100-200 tons of per hour, facilitating large-scale operations with continuous feed and product flow, which enhances overall plant productivity and . Additionally, the off-gas from flash smelting contains SO₂ concentrations exceeding 70%, enabling efficient downstream production of and generating economic value from what would otherwise be a waste stream. Compared to some bath smelting techniques, such as the Noranda process, flash smelting offers 10-20% lower overall use, further improved by heat recovery systems such as waste heat boilers that capture thermal energy from the high-temperature off-gas to produce and . This not only boosts but also supports brief mentions of environmental gains through effective SO₂ gas capture for acid production. Recent innovations, including advanced controls and higher oxygen use, have further reduced energy needs in modern installations as of 2025.

Operational challenges

One significant operational challenge in flash smelting arises from the highly oxidizing conditions within the , which result in elevated metal losses to compared to reducing processes like electric smelting. For instance, losses to can reach approximately 4%, necessitating downstream electric settling for , whereas electric typically exhibit lower losses due to their reducing environment. In operations, typically contains 0.5–1% , further emphasizing the need for slag cleaning to minimize these losses. Dust generation poses another key issue, stemming from the fine particle nature of the injected concentrate and fluxes, which can produce particulate loads of up to 20 kg per ton of produced before gas . This requires advanced electrostatic precipitators to capture the dust-laden off-gas, which contains 20–50 vol.% SO₂ and fine particulates, preventing equipment and ensuring stable operation. Furnace maintenance is complicated by refractory wear caused by high temperatures (around 1300°C) and aggressive slag-matte interactions, particularly at the line and lower shaft where and infiltration occur. campaigns typically last 5–10 years, depending on cooling systems and design, after which relining is required to restore integrity. Early flash smelting plants encountered scale-up instabilities, including problems in charge bins, uneven heating in the reaction shaft, and upset burner conditions leading to excessive heat loss. These were largely resolved through modern process controls, such as automated oxygen injection and enrichment (65–74% O₂) to stabilize gas flows and grades (62% ±2%), enabling reliable operation in larger-scale facilities. While these challenges increase maintenance costs, the benefits of flash smelting often offset them in high-throughput operations.

Environmental impact

Emissions management

Flash smelting operations generate significant (SO₂) emissions due to the oxidation of concentrates, but these are effectively managed through high-efficiency capture systems. The process produces off-gases with SO₂ concentrations typically ranging from 10% to 80% by volume, which facilitates efficient conversion in downstream acid plants. Double-contact plants are the standard technology employed, achieving greater than 99% conversion of SO₂ to by passing the gases through multiple beds and towers. This high SO₂ concentration in flash smelting off-gases aids capture compared to lower-strength sources from other methods. For every ton of concentrate processed, these plants produce approximately 1-2 tons of , turning a potential into a valuable . Particulate matter, including dust from unreacted and furnace carryover, is controlled using a combination of wet scrubbers and baghouses to prevent atmospheric release. Wet scrubbers, such as Venturi types, capture fine particles by impaction and in a liquid medium, while baghouses employ fabric filters to trap at efficiencies exceeding 99%. These technologies collectively reduce particulate emissions to below 50 mg/Nm³, often achieving levels under 20 mg/Nm³ in modern installations. Compliance is monitored through continuous emission systems, ensuring adherence to limits set by standards. Trace metals like and mercury, present as impurities in concentrates, require targeted management to minimize environmental release. Arsenic volatilizes during the high-temperature oxidation in the flash furnace, forming arsenious oxide that is carried in the off-gas and subsequently captured in the plant's dust collection systems, preventing its emission as fly ash. Mercury emissions are minimized upstream through pre-treatment of concentrates, such as blending low-mercury ores or to reduce volatile content before feeding into the smelter, achieving removal efficiencies of 70-99% in abatement systems. Flash smelting facilities comply with stringent regulatory frameworks, particularly the European Union's standards under Directive 2010/75/EU, which mandate emission limits for SO₂, particulates, and metals. emissions, arising primarily from in the reaction shaft, are monitored continuously using automated systems to ensure levels remain below 500 mg/Nm³, with low- burners and applied where necessary to meet BAT-associated emission levels. Overall, these measures ensure that flash smelting operations achieve high environmental performance while maintaining process viability.

Sustainability improvements

Flash smelting contributes to sustainability by achieving high recovery rates of valuable metals, typically 95-98% for from concentrates, which minimizes compared to traditional reverberatory furnaces. This efficiency stems from the direct oxidation of finely ground in a high-temperature reaction zone, allowing for better extraction without the need for extensive pre-processing steps like or that characterize older methods. Byproduct management further enhances in flash smelting operations. generated during the process, rich in silicates and oxides, is commonly reused as an in materials such as bases and , diverting significant volumes from landfill disposal and supporting principles. Additionally, the captured from off-gases is converted in integrated acid plants to , which serves as a key feedstock for fertilizers, thereby transforming a potential into a valuable agricultural input. The process also offers notable reductions in , with 20-40% lower than those from coke-dependent traditional due to reliance on the exothermic oxidation of ores rather than external inputs. This aligns with broader industry efforts toward by 2050, as flash smelting's lower facilitates integration into decarbonization strategies. Recent advancements include pilot projects post-2020 that integrate sources for oxygen production, such as powered by or , further lowering the environmental impact of the oxygen-enriched air used in the . These upgrades, demonstrated in experimental setups for sustainable metal production, enhance the process's viability in low-carbon scenarios without compromising output .

References

  1. [1]
    Flash Smelting Process - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The flash smelting process is defined as a method for producing nonferrous metals from sulfide minerals, where fine, dried mineral particles and fluxes are ...
  2. [2]
    the copper flash cc smelting process | Total Materia
    Copper flash smelting involves injecting fine, dried copper sulphide concentrate and silica flux with air, oxygen-enriched air, or oxygen blast into a hot ...
  3. [3]
    70 years of flash smelting - shaping the industry - Metso
    Jun 11, 2019 · Flash smelting technology was operated for the first time on an industrial scale on April 20th, 1949 at the Harjavalta copper smelter in ...
  4. [4]
    Flash Smelting Process - Metso
    Metso's Outotec process for Flash Smelting is one of the world's most commonly used processes for the production of primary copper and nickel.Missing: metallurgy | Show results with:metallurgy
  5. [5]
    (PDF) Constraints and Ingenuity: The Case of Outokumpu and the ...
    Dec 3, 2014 · In this chapter, we document the invention of novel copper smelting technology after a post-war energy crisis. The particular technology is ...
  6. [6]
    History of Outokumpu, from mining to stainless steel
    Aug 19, 2025 · Only a few years later, “flash smelting” technology as it became known, was in production. It was the start of the Outokumpu's technology ...1910s--1920s: From... · 1930s--1940s: Major Copper... · 1970s--1980s: Multi-Metal...
  7. [7]
    Former Outokumpu CEO Eero Makinen elected to the US National ...
    Nov 4, 2024 · Eero Mäkinen was the embodiment of the innovation spirit at Outokumpu and was instrumental in development of flash smelting technology for ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] vol2chap4.pdf - Minnesota Legislative Reference Library
    Merla, S., Young, C.E., Matousek, J.W. 1972. Recent developments in the. INCO oxygen flash smelting process. International Nickel Company of. Canada, Ltd ...
  9. [9]
    Outokumpu Technology is now Outotec - Metso
    Apr 24, 2007 · Outokumpu Technology Oyj has changed its name to Outotec Oyj as of today. New name Outotec unites all the company's businesses all over the world.Missing: patents INCO
  10. [10]
    Copper Flash Smelting Process Balance Modeling - MDPI
    Currently, more than 50% of the world's primary copper is produced by Flash Smelting technology. There are two types of flash smelting: the Outotec process (~30 ...
  11. [11]
    Chuquicamata Copper Mine, Chile - Mining Technology
    May 3, 2024 · An Outokumpu flash smelter is installed for smelting the concentrate. The concentrate is then passed through a converter with an electric ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] An overview of copper smelting in southern Africa - Pyro.co.za
    Jul 15, 2015 · • Konkola Copper Mines' (KCM) Nchanga smelter in Zambia uses Outotec. Flash Smelting technology and it is designed to produce blister copper in.
  13. [13]
    Flash Smelting - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Flash smelting entails continuously blowing oxygen, air, dried particulate sulfide concentrate and silica flux into a 1300 °C furnace. The principal objective ...
  14. [14]
    Flash Smelting of Copper by the Outokumpu Process - P2 InfoHouse
    The Outokumpu flash smelting process combines the conventional operations of roasting, smelting and partial converting into one process. Preheated oxygen- ...
  15. [15]
    Extraction of Copper 2 | PDF | Smelting - Scribd
    2 m high (all dimensions inside the refractories). It has a 4.5 m diameter, 6 m high reaction shaft and a 5 m diameter, 8 m high off gas uptake. It has one ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Development of a mathematical model of flash smelting and ...
    Dec 12, 2003 · The refractory-lined furnace vessel is composed of three sections: reaction shaft, settler and uptake shaft. In the flash smelting process, a ...Missing: settling hearth INCO
  17. [17]
    [PDF] THE DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF A CFD MODEL OF ...
    Heat Loss from Reaction Shaft​​ The reaction shaft of the furnace is constructed of water- cooled copper elements. The heat load from each element is measured ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] AP-42 12.3 Final Background Document for Primary Copper Smelting
    This process is similar to Outokumpu flash smelting with oxygen enriched air and dried, granulated matte as feed materials. Impurities in blister copper may ...Missing: principles | Show results with:principles
  19. [19]
    Flash Smelting Process - 911Metallurgist
    Aug 6, 2018 · The fire refining process includes a conventional oxidation stage for sulfur removal, followed by natural gas poling to remove oxygen.
  20. [20]
    Flash Smelting Furnace - Osymen Refractories
    While the INCO flash furnace at Sudbury was the first commercial use of oxygen flash smelting, fewer smelters use the INCO flash furnace than the ...Missing: variant 1972<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Reaction Sequences in Flash Smelting and Converting Furnaces
    Aug 10, 2021 · This review gives a detailed outlook on the microscale phenomena in flash smelting and flash converting furnaces accumulated during the last decades.Missing: hearth | Show results with:hearth
  22. [22]
    An Innovated Application of Reutilize Copper Smelter Slag ... - Nature
    Nov 1, 2018 · Iron is mostly crystallized as fayalite (Fe2SiO4) and magnetite (Fe3O4) during the matte smelting process or water cooling. There are some ...<|separator|>
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    Holistic valorization of fayalitic slag to pig iron and glass fibers
    Sep 15, 2023 · The grain density is around 3.7 g cm−3 (fayalite crystal ∼4.4 g cm−3). The PCS is characterized via XRF using a Bruker S8 TIGER.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] AP-42, CH 12.3: Primary Copper Smelting - EPA
    Flash furnace smelting combines the operations of roasting and smelting to produce a high- grade copper matte from concentrates and flux. In flash smelting, ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Arsenic Condensation and Reaction Mechanisms in Flash Smelting ...
    Jul 27, 2023 · The high volatility of arsenic is due to the low boiling points of metallic arsenic, As2O3, and As2S3. Thus, the volatilization and perhaps ...
  27. [27]
    Strategies for arsenic pollution control from copper pyrometallurgy ...
    Arsenic in copper flash smelting (FS) systems not only affects the quality of products but also poses significant technological and environmental problems.
  28. [28]
    Feeder System Redesign for Flash Furnace at BHP Copper
    Nov 6, 2012 · BHP Copper operated a 3,400 tons per day dry concentrate, single burner, Outokumpu flash smelting furnace at its San Manuel copper smelter in ...
  29. [29]
    Gold Recovery from Smelting Copper Sulfide Concentrate - MDPI
    Among integrated smelting-converting routes, the flash smelting to Peirce–Smith converting route achieves the highest gold first-pass recovery (98.8–99.5%), ...
  30. [30]
    Ice-core evidence of earliest extensive copper metallurgy in ... - Nature
    Jan 31, 2017 · In 1986, the first flash furnace was installed at Chuquicamata allowing a reduction in pollution levels. Figure 6: Ice core records of Cu ...
  31. [31]
    Smelting Practice at Olympic Dam - AusIMM
    The Olympic Dam smelter utilises Outokumpu Oy, flash smelting technology to produce blister copper direct from high grade copper concentrate.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] THE WORLD COPPER FACTBOOK 2020
    The largest producer of mined copper was Chile (5.8 million tonnes). Smelter production in 2019 reached around 20.0 million tonnes. China was the largest ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Minerals Extraction and Processing: New Developments - CDC Stacks
    The International Nickel Co. (INCO), at Sudbury, Canada, injects dried copper concentrate entrained inoxygen (95 percent grade) ...
  34. [34]
    The Direct Leaching of Nickel Sulfide Flotation Concentrates – A ...
    May 16, 2022 · Starting from a nickel flotation concentrate of grade 5–20% Ni, smelting and converting produces a nickel matte containing 40–70% Ni, resulting ...
  35. [35]
    Ignition and combustion of synthetic nickel mattes in simulated flash ...
    By increasing the oxygen concentration in the reaction gas from 40 vol% to 85 vol%, the Ni/Fe ratio of the spheres increased from approximately 1.6 to 1.8.
  36. [36]
    NICKEL SMELTING: Vale shuts down No.2 furnace
    Vale, the Brazilian owner of what used to be Inco, announced the closing on its No.2 flash furnace at the Copper Cliff smelter near Sudbury for at least 16 ...
  37. [37]
    Kivcet Process - 911Metallurgist
    Nov 9, 2018 · The Kivcet process is a lead smelting process that can recover zinc, and it uses a closed reactor to eliminate emissions.Missing: flash galena
  38. [38]
    the kivcet smelting process - Total Materia
    The process efficiently recovers lead while simultaneously enabling zinc recovery, produces concentrated sulfur dioxide gas suitable for sulfuric acid ...Missing: galena | Show results with:galena
  39. [39]
    Lead Extraction - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The KIVCET process for smelting lead concentrates ... Direct production of 99% Pb as compared to 95% Pb produced in smelting processes prior to refining.
  40. [40]
    Lead Smelting - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Lead smelting extracts lead from lead sulfide via roasting and reduction, involving sintering, reduction, and refining, and can be done via conventional or ...
  41. [41]
    The Outokumpu Lead Flash Smelting Process - AusIMM
    All the know-how and development made in copper and nickel smelters was applied to the Lead Flash Smelting process and the tests were successful. Outokumpu has ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Copper Smelting
    The flash techniques reduce the energy demand to about 20 million Btu ... Energy efficiency measures (such as waste heat recovery from process gases) ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Energy Consumption in Copper Smelting - Pyro.co.za
    Mar 18, 2015 · Higher oxygen enrichment has the benefit of re- leasing more heat during the smelting process and of allowing more reverts or low-grade ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Phase chemical composition of slag from a direct nickel flash ...
    Nov 14, 2012 · A nickel flash smelting furnace is initially used to obtain the valuable metal but the loss of nickel in the slag amounts to about 4 % and thus ...Missing: higher | Show results with:higher
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Copper Smelting - MIGA
    The sulfur dioxide concentration in the exhaust gas from a reverbatory furnace is about 0.5-1.5% and from an electric furnace is about 2-4%. So called flash ...
  46. [46]
    Smelting Furnace - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The advantages of flash smelting over roasting/electric furnace melting are that flash smelting ... Nevertheless continuous campaigns of up to 7 years without ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the Non ...
    Jun 30, 2019 · This BREF for 'Non-Ferrous Metals Industries' concerns the activities specified in Sections 2 and 6.8 of Annex I to Directive 2010/75/EU, ...
  48. [48]
    FACTBOX-Sulphuric acid and base metals | Reuters
    Apr 30, 2009 · * Copper smelters produce around one tonne of sulphuric acid for each tonne of copper concentrate. * Copper miners using the solvent ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] ARSENIC MANAGEMENT IN THE METALLURGICAL INDUSTRY
    The objective of this thesis is carry out a review of the effects of arsenic on human health, the solution chemistry of arsenic, the world production and ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] guidance on best available techniques and best environmental ...
    This document sets out guidance on controlling emission of mercury and mercury compounds to air from point sources, as adopted by the Conference of the ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Guidance document on control techniques for emissions of sulphur ...
    May 7, 2006 · NOx emission levels associated with BAT for ferrous metals production. Emission Source. BAT associated emission levelsa mg/Nm3 or (kg/tonne).
  52. [52]
    Copper Smelting - 911Metallurgist
    Jan 13, 2021 · The feed is mixed with oxygen in the water-cooled section of the concentrate feeder and is blown into the furnace at position one (fig. 1) where ...
  53. [53]
    Slag: From By-product to Valuable Construction Material
    Jul 29, 2014 · Slag is a by-product of the metallurgical smelting process. Slag has a double role: it permits removal of impurities, known as gangue, from the melt by forming ...
  54. [54]
    The Utilization of the Copper Smelting Slag: A Critical Review - MDPI
    Due to its favorable chemical and physical properties, copper slag is widely regarded as a suitable material for resource recovery and reuse. In this case, it ...
  55. [55]
    Sulfuric acid, slag, gypsum, etc. | JX Advanced Metals Corporation
    Sulfuric acid is produced in the copper smelting process using as raw material the sulfur contained in copper concentrate. It is a colorless, odorless viscous ...
  56. [56]
    Sulfuric Acid - Atlantic Copper
    Gases with a sulfur dioxide content of 25-30% are produced in the smelting process in the flash furnace, while gases produced during the conversion process ...
  57. [57]
    Environmental Impacts of Energy‐Efficient Pyrometallurgical Copper ...
    Nov 23, 2015 · The Outokumpu flash furnace is currently one of the most energy-efficient and widely available technologies used in the world's Cu smelters, and ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] THE PATHWAY TO NET ZERO - International Copper Association
    Mar 20, 2023 · Flash smelting furnace. Converter ... output of refined copper takes place in Chinese smelting and refining plants (see detailed data.
  59. [59]
    Decarbonizing copper production by power-to-hydrogen: A techno ...
    Jul 15, 2021 · An analysis of the total GHG emissions shows that decarbonization through Power-to-Hydrogen reduces the global GHG emissions only if the ...<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    SwRI, 8 Rivers patent more cost-effective, efficient power generation ...
    Oct 15, 2025 · “Our idea is to generate oxygen during off-peak hours, when electricity is less expensive because demand is lower,” said SwRI Institute Engineer ...Missing: flash smelting 2020
  61. [61]
    [PDF] KS5 Pilot Plant Study Report
    Pilot flash reactor (PFR) (as shown in Figure 31) was built at the University of Utah with iron ore concentrate feeding rate of 1–7 kg/h and operating ...