Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sintering

Sintering is a thermal process in materials science that consolidates powdered or granular materials into a solid body by heating them to temperatures below their melting points, promoting interparticle bonding primarily through atomic or ionic diffusion without full liquefaction.^[1] This results in increased density, reduced porosity, and enhanced mechanical properties, transforming loose or compacted particulates into dense or porous structures suitable for engineering applications.^[2] The process is versatile, applicable to metals, ceramics, polymers, and composites, and serves as a cornerstone of powder metallurgy and ceramic fabrication.^[3] The origins of sintering trace back more than 25,000 years, with the earliest known uses involving the firing of clay in open pits to produce durable ceramics like bricks and pottery, leveraging heat to densify and strengthen the material.^[4] Metallic sintering developed later, gaining prominence in the late 19th and early 20th centuries as industrial needs for complex shapes and cost-effective production grew, particularly through powder metallurgy techniques patented around 1913 for tungsten filaments and other alloys.^[5] Over time, advancements have introduced variants such as liquid-phase sintering, where a minor liquid component aids densification,^[6] and modern field-assisted methods like spark plasma sintering to accelerate the process and refine microstructures.^[7] At its core, sintering proceeds in stages: initial neck formation between particles via surface or grain-boundary diffusion, intermediate pore elimination through lattice diffusion, and final densification where residual porosity is minimized.^[8] Key mechanisms include volume diffusion, which transports atoms through particle interiors, and grain-boundary diffusion, often dominant at lower temperatures due to lower activation energy, both driven by curvature gradients to reduce surface energy.^[9] Factors like particle size, temperature, atmosphere, and additives significantly influence kinetics, with finer powders accelerating diffusion but risking agglomeration.^[8] Sintering finds broad applications in producing high-performance components, including automotive parts like gears and bushings from iron-based powders, cutting tools and wear-resistant alloys in metallurgy, electronic ceramics for capacitors and insulators, and biomedical implants with controlled porosity.^[10] Emerging techniques, such as ultrafast high-temperature sintering and selective laser sintering, enable rapid prototyping and customization in additive manufacturing, while cold sintering allows densification at low temperatures below 300 °C for energy-efficient processing of ceramics and composites, expanding its role in aerospace, energy storage, and nanotechnology as of 2025.^[4]^[11] Despite its efficiency and ability to recycle materials, challenges like distortion from non-uniform heating and environmental concerns from high-energy furnaces continue to drive research toward sustainable, low-temperature alternatives.^[12]

Introduction

Definition and Principles

Sintering is a materials processing technique that involves compacting and forming a solid mass from particulate materials, such as powders, through the application of heat and/or pressure without causing complete melting or liquefaction of the material. This process transforms loose or pre-compacted powders into a coherent body with enhanced mechanical properties, often achieving densities approaching that of the fully dense material. Unlike melting or casting methods, which rely on full liquefaction and subsequent solidification, sintering maintains the solid-state integrity of the particles while promoting bonding through atomic diffusion at interfaces.^[1] The fundamental principle driving sintering is the reduction of surface free energy inherent in finely divided powders, which possess a high surface-to-volume ratio. This excess energy motivates the system to minimize total interfacial area by forming interparticle contacts, thereby lowering the overall Gibbs free energy. Key parameters influencing the sintering outcome include temperature, typically maintained at 70-80% of the material's absolute melting point to facilitate diffusion without melting; holding time, which allows sufficient atomic mobility; processing atmosphere, such as inert gases or vacuum to inhibit oxidation or unwanted reactions; and initial particle size, where smaller particles accelerate sintering due to shorter diffusion paths and greater curvature-driven forces.^[13]^[14]^[15] At a high level, sintering progresses through three distinct stages. In the initial stage, necks begin to form at points of contact between adjacent particles via surface and volume diffusion, with minimal overall densification occurring. The intermediate stage features continued neck growth, pore channel narrowing, and significant shrinkage as interconnected porosity reduces. Finally, the densification stage eliminates remaining isolated pores, leading to near-full density, though grain growth may also contribute to microstructural evolution. These stages collectively enable the consolidation of powders into robust components.^[16]^[9] Sintering finds common application in powder metallurgy for producing metal parts, ceramics manufacturing for structural and functional components, and additive manufacturing as a critical densification step following layer-by-layer powder deposition. In each context, it ensures the transformation of as-formed green bodies into high-performance materials with tailored microstructures.^[17]^[18]

Historical Overview

Sintering traces its origins to ancient civilizations, where it was employed in the production of ceramics and early metallic artifacts. One of the earliest known applications dates back to around 5000 BCE in ancient Egypt, where faience—a sintered composite of quartz powder, lime, and alkali glaze—was crafted into beads, amulets, and decorative items, demonstrating controlled heating to fuse materials without full melting.^[19] In prehistoric times, the firing of clay pottery in open pits represented an empirical form of sintering, enhancing strength and durability through thermal bonding of particles, a practice that spread globally and formed the basis for ceramic technologies.^[20] By the medieval period, rudimentary powder compaction techniques emerged in metallurgy, such as the use of iron sponge (a porous, partially sintered iron product from bloomeries) compacted and forged into tools, marking early steps toward structured powder processing in Europe and Asia.^[21] The 19th and early 20th centuries saw sintering evolve from artisanal methods to industrial processes, particularly in powder metallurgy. A pivotal milestone occurred in 1908 when William D. Coolidge at General Electric developed a method to produce ductile tungsten filaments by compacting and sintering tungsten powder, enabling reliable incandescent light bulbs and revolutionizing electrical engineering.^[22] By the 1920s, powder metallurgy formalized as a discipline, with manufacturers adopting sintering for producing cutting tools, self-lubricating bearings, and tungsten carbide components, driven by advancements in powder production and controlled atmospheres.^[23] Key theoretical contributions included Anders H.M. Andreasen's work in the late 1920s on continuous particle size distributions, which optimized packing density and sintering efficiency for better material uniformity.^[24] Post-World War II advancements accelerated sintering's role in high-performance applications, particularly in nuclear and aerospace sectors. In the 1950s, sintering became essential for fabricating uranium dioxide fuel pellets, where powder compaction followed by high-temperature sintering produced dense ceramic rods for nuclear reactors, supporting the global expansion of atomic energy programs. Aerospace industries leveraged sintering for superalloys and refractory metals, enabling components like turbine blades that withstood extreme conditions in jet engines and spacecraft.^[25] In the modern era, sintering integrated with additive manufacturing since the 1980s, exemplified by the invention of selective laser sintering (SLS) in 1986 by Carl Deckard, which used lasers to selectively fuse powder layers for rapid prototyping and complex geometries.^[26] Advancements in the 2010s built on earlier field-assisted sintering techniques, such as spark plasma sintering (SPS) developed in the 1960s, include patents like US20110236713A1 (2011) enabling ultra-rapid densification of nanomaterials under electric fields, reducing processing times from hours to minutes while preserving microstructures for advanced ceramics and metals.^[27]

Fundamentals

Driving Forces and Thermodynamics

The primary driving force for sintering is the reduction in the total surface free energy of the powder compact, as the high surface-to-volume ratio of fine particles creates an excess energy that the system seeks to minimize through bonding and densification.^[28] This process is inherently curvature-driven, with material transport occurring via diffusion from regions of high positive curvature (convex particle surfaces, higher energy) to regions of negative curvature (concave necks between particles, lower energy), thereby smoothing interfaces and reducing overall surface area.^[14] The curvature difference establishes a gradient that propels atomic or ionic species toward lower-energy configurations, initiating neck formation in the early stages of sintering.^[29] Thermodynamically, sintering proceeds to minimize the Gibbs free energy of the system, where the change is given by \Delta G = \Delta H - T \Delta S; here, the enthalpic contribution \Delta H is negative due to the release of surface energy as interfaces form, while the entropic term T \Delta S is generally smaller and often negative owing to reduced configurational freedom, ensuring \Delta G < 0 for spontaneous progression.^[30] The surface free energy \gamma directly contributes to this by increasing the chemical potential at curved interfaces, creating gradients that drive mass transport.^[31] At the particle necks, these chemical potential gradients arise from Laplace pressure differences, with the potential \mu at a curved surface expressed as \mu = \mu_0 + \gamma \Omega \kappa, where \mu_0 is the chemical potential of a flat surface, \Omega is the atomic volume, and \kappa is the mean curvature (positive for convex, negative for concave); this formulation shows how sharper curvatures at particle contacts generate higher potentials, promoting influx to the neck.^[29] For a spherical particle of radius r, the gradient simplifies to \mu - \mu_0 = +\gamma \Omega / r over convex regions, underscoring the inverse size dependence. A key relation governing the size dependence of sintering is Herring's scaling law, which predicts how processing time scales with particle size under self-similar geometries.^[14] The law states that the time t required to achieve equivalent microstructural evolution scales as t \propto L^n / D, where L is the characteristic length (e.g., particle radius), D is the relevant diffusion coefficient, and n is the scaling exponent dependent on the transport mechanism: n = 3 for volume (lattice) diffusion, n = 2 for grain-boundary or surface diffusion.^[32] To derive this for volume diffusion (n=3), consider a self-similar system where scaling the linear dimensions by a factor \alpha > 1 enlarges all features proportionally. The driving force, manifested as chemical potential difference \Delta \mu \propto \gamma \Omega / L \propto 1/\alpha, scales inversely with size. The concentration gradient driving diffusion then scales as \Delta c / L \propto (\Delta \mu / kT) / L \propto 1/(\alpha L), but since the diffusion path length also scales with \alpha L, the atomic flux J \propto D (\Delta \mu / \Omega kT L) \propto D / (\alpha^2 L^2). The linear shrinkage rate or neck growth velocity v = dL/dt \propto J \Omega / L \propto D / (\alpha^2 L^2). Thus, the relative rate (1/L) dL/dt \propto D / L^3, implying that time for a fixed relative change integrates to t \propto L^3 / D; for the scaled system, t_2 / t_1 = \alpha^3 (D_1 / D_2), confirming n=3.^[14] This derivation highlights why finer powders sinter faster, as smaller L reduces required time cubically for volume-diffusion-limited processes. Influencing factors include temperature, which exponentially activates diffusion via the Arrhenius relation D = D_0 \exp(-Q / RT), where D_0 is the pre-exponential factor, Q is the activation energy, R is the gas constant, and T is absolute temperature; thus, sintering rates increase dramatically above ~0.5-0.7 of the melting point, as higher T lowers the energy barrier for atomic jumps.^[33] The sintering atmosphere also plays a role by modulating surface chemistry, particularly through oxidation or reduction; oxidizing environments can form stable oxide layers that inhibit diffusion and raise effective surface energy, while reducing atmospheres (e.g., hydrogen) remove these oxides, lowering barriers and enhancing densification, as seen in iron powders where oxide reduction activation energies exceed 400 kJ/mol without proper control.^[34]

Sintering Mechanisms

Sintering involves several atomic and molecular transport mechanisms that drive particle bonding and densification by reducing surface energy through curvature gradients. The primary mechanisms include surface diffusion, lattice diffusion, grain boundary diffusion, and vapor transport. Surface diffusion entails the movement of atoms along the free surfaces of particles, which is typically dominant at lower temperatures due to its relatively low activation energy, facilitating initial neck formation without contributing to bulk densification. Lattice diffusion occurs through the crystal volume, requiring higher temperatures and activation energies, and plays a key role in transporting material from high-curvature regions like necks to pores. Grain boundary diffusion involves atom transport along interfaces between grains, offering a faster pathway than lattice diffusion at intermediate temperatures, especially in fine-grained materials. Vapor transport, involving evaporation from convex surfaces and condensation on concave ones, is less prevalent but significant in systems with high vapor pressure or under vacuum conditions, such as certain oxides.^[35]^[36] Neck growth models describe the initial bonding between particles. The Frenkel model applies to viscous flow in the early stage, treating the material as a viscous fluid where surface tension drives neck radius x growth proportional to t^{1/2}, with (x/r)^2 = (3 \gamma r / 2 \eta) t / r^2, where r is particle radius, \gamma is surface tension, \eta is viscosity, and t is time; this is particularly relevant for amorphous or polymer systems but also approximates crystalline behavior at high temperatures. For crystalline materials, diffusion-based models, such as those for evaporation-condensation, predict similar parabolic growth kinetics but via mass transport paths like vapor phase migration from the neck to particle surfaces.^[37]^[35] In the intermediate stage, densification proceeds via pore shrinkage, often modeled using Coble's creep relation adapted for sintering, where grain boundary diffusion controls the rate:

\frac{\dot{h}}{h} = \frac{42 \gamma \Omega D_{\mathrm{gb}} \delta}{k T d^3}

Here, \dot{h}/h represents the relative densification rate (linear shrinkage rate), \gamma is the surface energy driving curvature-induced stress, \Omega is the atomic volume, D_{\mathrm{gb}} is the grain boundary diffusivity, \delta is the effective grain boundary thickness (typically 0.5–1 nm), k is Boltzmann's constant, T is absolute temperature, and d is the average grain diameter. This relation underscores the inverse cubic dependence on grain size, emphasizing the benefit of fine microstructures for enhanced densification, and assumes pores are located at grain boundaries acting as vacancy sinks. In this stage, lattice diffusion from grain boundaries to pores also contributes to channel shrinkage, transitioning open porosity to isolated pores.^[38]^[36] The initial stage focuses on neck development between adjacent particles, primarily through surface diffusion, which rounds particle contacts and increases contact area while maintaining constant volume. As sintering progresses to the intermediate stage, interconnected pores shrink via lattice diffusion, with material flux from grain edges to pore interiors reducing porosity from about 40% to 10%, marking the onset of significant densification. In the final stage, closed pores, now spherical and grain-boundary attached, continue to diminish through grain boundary diffusion, though at a slower rate due to reduced driving force, ultimately yielding high-density microstructures.^[39]

Kinetics and Stages

Sintering progresses through three distinct stages characterized by evolving microstructure and densification levels. The initial stage involves the formation and growth of necks at particle contacts, driven by surface diffusion and curvature gradients, resulting in minimal densification of less than 5% as the relative density rises from the green body packing fraction to approximately 60-70%.^[40] In this phase, the process is dominated by rapid local mass transport without significant overall shrinkage.^[41] The intermediate stage follows, marked by the coalescence of necks into continuous channels of interconnected pores along particle boundaries, enabling substantial densification up to 90-95% relative density through channel shrinkage and pore narrowing.^[40] Pore interconnectivity persists, but the geometry shifts toward cylindrical pores, with mass transport increasingly limited by longer diffusion paths. The final stage occurs at high densities above 90%, where pores become isolated and spherical, often trapped within grains, leading to slower densification rates as transport distances lengthen and pore stability increases due to reduced connectivity.^[40] Kinetic models describe the temporal evolution of these stages using rate equations that incorporate activation energies specific to the dominant mass transport mechanisms, such as lattice diffusion (typically 300-600 kJ/mol for ceramics like alumina) or grain boundary diffusion (200-400 kJ/mol).^[43] These energies reflect the temperature sensitivity of atomic mobility, with higher values indicating volume-controlled processes over surface or boundary paths; the kinetics are briefly tied to diffusion mechanisms like those outlined in sintering theory.^[44] Isothermal sintering curves exhibit exponential densification with time at constant temperature, following Arrhenius behavior, whereas non-isothermal curves under varying heating rates show shifted trajectories due to transient thermal gradients affecting activation.^[14] A key advancement in modeling is the master sintering curve (MSC) approach, introduced by Su and Johnson, which unifies densification predictions across thermal histories by normalizing microstructural and thermal effects. The method assumes the densification rate follows \frac{d\rho}{dt} = f(\rho) \cdot K_0 \exp\left(-\frac{Q}{RT}\right), where f(\rho) captures density-dependent microstructure, Q is the activation energy, and the exponential term governs thermal activation. Integrating this under non-isothermal conditions yields the normalized parameter

\beta = \int \frac{(d\rho / dt)}{f(\rho)} \frac{dT}{T^2},

derived by substituting dt = dT / \beta for heating rate \beta = dT/dt and approximating the Arrhenius integral for high temperatures, where the T^2 term normalizes the temperature scaling. This \beta represents a dimensionless thermal work equivalent, plotted against \rho to form the invariant MSC once Q (determined iteratively from dilatometry data) and f(\rho) are fitted. Applications include forecasting final density for optimized cycles, such as in alumina where MSC accurately extrapolates from ramped heating to complex profiles, reducing trial experiments.^[45] Sintering rates are influenced by initial conditions, notably particle size distribution (PSD), where broader PSDs slow overall kinetics as fine particles densify rapidly but are hindered by coarser ones, particularly in the intermediate stage, reducing densification by up to 10-20% compared to monodisperse powders.^[46] Green body uniformity also plays a critical role; heterogeneous packing leads to variable local densities and pore distributions, accelerating abnormal pore growth and distorting kinetics, whereas uniform compacts ensure consistent rates and minimize warping during progression through stages.^[47]

Types of Sintering Processes

Solid-State Sintering

Solid-state sintering is a process in which compacted powders are heated to temperatures below the melting point of the material, typically 0.5 to 0.8 times the absolute melting temperature (Tm), to achieve bonding and densification through atomic diffusion mechanisms without the formation of any liquid phase. This diffusion-driven process begins with the formation of necks between adjacent particles due to surface and volume diffusion, followed by neck growth and particle coalescence, ultimately leading to pore elimination and increased density. The process is divided into initial, intermediate, and final stages, where the initial stage focuses on neck formation, the intermediate on pore channel closure, and the final on isolated pore shrinkage.^[48]^[49] A primary advantage of solid-state sintering is the retention of high material purity, as it avoids compositional changes associated with melting or liquid phases, making it particularly suitable for refractory materials with high melting points that cannot tolerate liquid formation. This method enables the production of dense components with excellent mechanical properties, such as enhanced strength and thermal conductivity, while preserving the original powder chemistry. It is widely used for materials where contamination must be minimized, allowing for the fabrication of high-performance ceramics and metals.^[50]^[48] Key parameters influencing solid-state sintering include temperature, typically ranging from 1000°C to 2000°C depending on the material, and holding times of 1 to 10 hours to allow sufficient diffusion. Atmosphere control is essential, with vacuum or inert gases employed for metals to prevent oxidation, while ceramics may use air or controlled oxygen partial pressures. Particle size, initial green density, and heating rate also play critical roles, as finer powders accelerate diffusion but may increase agglomeration risks.^[51]^[48] For example, in the sintering of alumina (Al₂O₃) powders, solid-state diffusion predominates typically at 1500-1700°C, enabling the achievement of 95-99% theoretical density through controlled heating in air, resulting in translucent or transparent ceramics for optical applications. Similarly, tungsten powders undergo solid-state sintering at 1500-2000°C in hydrogen or vacuum atmospheres for 1-5 hours, yielding dense heavy alloys with 95-98% density suitable for radiation shielding and high-temperature components. These examples illustrate how optimized parameters can drive near-full densification via solid diffusion alone.^[51]^[52]^[53]

Liquid-Phase Sintering

Liquid-phase sintering is a densification process in which a transient liquid phase forms during heating, facilitating rapid particle bonding and microstructure evolution without full melting of the compact. This technique is particularly effective for materials systems where a low-melting additive or eutectic composition generates the liquid, promoting enhanced mass transport compared to solid-state methods. The liquid typically arises from localized melting at particle contacts due to eutectic formation, enabling capillary forces to drive rearrangement and densification. The mechanism involves three primary stages: initial particle rearrangement facilitated by capillary action of the liquid, solution-reprecipitation where soluble species dissolve in the liquid and reprecipitate at high-curvature sites to smooth particle interfaces, and final densification of the solid skeleton through solid-state diffusion and Ostwald ripening. Eutectic liquids form preferentially at interparticle necks, wetting the solids and penetrating pores to redistribute material efficiently. These concurrent processes reduce porosity by promoting flow and diffusion, leading to a more uniform microstructure upon solidification. A key aspect of liquid penetration in Kingery's model is governed by capillary flow, where the depth of liquid infiltration into pores, L, scales as L \propto \sqrt{\frac{\gamma_{lv} t}{\eta}}, with \gamma_{lv} representing the liquid-vapor surface tension, t the time, and \eta the liquid viscosity. This relationship, derived from Poiseuille flow in capillaries, highlights how higher surface tension and lower viscosity accelerate liquid spreading, enabling rapid wetting and rearrangement. The full expression incorporates pore radius and contact angle, but the proportionality underscores the dominance of interfacial energy and fluidity in early-stage dynamics. Process parameters critically influence outcomes, including a liquid volume fraction of 5-20% to balance densification and structural integrity, temperatures slightly above the eutectic point (e.g., 1310°C for WC-Co systems) to form the liquid transiently, and additives such as cobalt or glass formers to induce melting without excessive flow. Optimal control of these ensures the liquid wets the solid phase effectively while minimizing grain growth.^[54] This method yields faster densification rates, often achieving over 98% theoretical density in minutes, as seen in WC-Co cemented carbides used for tool steels, where the cobalt liquid enables near-full consolidation at moderate temperatures. Such outcomes enhance mechanical properties like hardness and toughness, making liquid-phase sintering ideal for complex shapes in powder metallurgy.

Pressure-Assisted Sintering

Pressure-assisted sintering involves the application of external mechanical pressure during the heating process to enhance densification of powder compacts, distinguishing it from pressureless methods by accelerating particle rearrangement and pore closure.^[55] The primary techniques include hot pressing, which applies uniaxial pressure through a die and punches, and hot isostatic pressing (HIP), which employs isotropic pressure via a high-pressure gas environment, typically argon.^[56] Uniaxial hot pressing is suitable for simpler geometries and allows direct control over deformation direction, while isotropic HIP provides uniform pressure distribution, minimizing shape distortions and enabling complex part consolidation without dies.^[57] These methods yield significant benefits in achieving high densities and refined microstructures. Densification routinely reaches near-theoretical levels exceeding 99% of the material's theoretical density, effectively eliminating residual porosity that persists in pressureless sintering.^[58] Additionally, the applied pressure lowers the required sintering temperature by 100-200°C compared to conventional processes, reducing energy consumption and limiting grain growth to preserve mechanical properties.^[59] A key theoretical framework for understanding densification under pressure is the Ashby-House model, which describes the process through viscous flow mechanisms in porous bodies. The model posits that the densification rate \dot{D}, where D is the relative density, is driven by the applied stress \sigma opposing the material's viscous resistance \eta. The governing equation is \dot{D} = \frac{3}{2} \frac{\sigma}{\eta} for viscous flow dominance. To derive this, consider the porous compact as a continuum with effective viscosity \eta, where external pressure induces volumetric strain. The uniaxial strain rate under stress is \dot{\epsilon} = \frac{\sigma}{3\eta} from linear viscous rheology, but accounting for the three-dimensional pore collapse and relative density evolution yields the factor \frac{3}{2} when integrating the bulk modulus relation \dot{V}/V = -\dot{D}/(1-D) \approx -\dot{D} for near-full density, leading to the simplified form for pressure-assisted regimes.^[60] Applications of pressure-assisted sintering are prominent in processing refractory metals and advanced ceramics, where high densities are critical for thermal and structural performance. For refractory metals like tungsten and molybdenum alloys, hot pressing at 100-500 MPa enables consolidation at 1300-1600°C with cycle times of 30-60 minutes, achieving full densification while controlling grain size.^[61] In ceramics such as zirconia and silicon carbide, HIP at similar pressures and temperatures produces pore-free components for aerospace and nuclear uses, with holding times typically 30-60 minutes to balance densification and creep.^[62] These processes are particularly valued in industries requiring materials with superior creep resistance and fracture toughness.

Sintering by Material

Ceramic Sintering

Ceramic sintering primarily addresses the processing of brittle, ionic-bonded materials such as oxide ceramics including alumina (Al₂O₃) and zirconia (ZrO₂), and non-oxide ceramics like silicon carbide (SiC) and silicon nitride (Si₃N₄).^[63] Oxide ceramics typically require sintering temperatures between 1200°C and 1800°C to achieve densification without melting, while non-oxide ceramics often demand higher temperatures exceeding 2000°C due to their covalent bonding and thermal stability.^[64]^[65] These elevated temperatures drive atomic diffusion and particle rearrangement, essential for overcoming the low self-diffusivity inherent in ceramics.^[66] Common processes for ceramic sintering involve two-step approaches to control microstructure and minimize defects, starting with presintering at intermediate temperatures to form a porous green body, followed by hot isostatic pressing (HIP) at higher pressures and temperatures to close residual pores and attain near-full density.^[67] Sintering aids are frequently incorporated to lower activation energies for diffusion; for instance, small additions of MgO (0.1-0.5 wt%) in alumina form spinel phases at grain boundaries, promoting densification while inhibiting excessive grain growth and abnormal coarsening.^[68]^[69] In zirconia, yttria or calcia stabilizers are used alongside to maintain the tetragonal phase during sintering, enhancing toughness.^[70] Key challenges in ceramic sintering arise from the materials' brittleness and tendency toward anisotropic shrinkage, where differential contraction in various directions can induce internal stresses, warping, or cracking during cooling.^[71] To prevent such defects, controlled heating rates of 1-5°C/min are employed, particularly in the 800-1400°C range, allowing gradual binder burnout and stress relaxation without thermal shock.^[72]^[73] Optimized ceramic sintering yields high-density (>99% theoretical) or translucent microstructures, enabling applications in electrical insulators where alumina provides high dielectric strength and thermal stability, and in biomaterials such as zirconia-based hip implants that offer biocompatibility and wear resistance.^[74]^[75] These outcomes rely on precise control of densification to eliminate porosity, as referenced in broader microstructural evolution discussions.^[76]

Metallic Powder Sintering

Metallic powder sintering is a thermal process in powder metallurgy where compacted metal powders are heated to 70-90% of the material's absolute melting point, enabling solid-state diffusion and bonding between particles without liquefaction. This temperature range facilitates neck formation and densification while preserving the powder's shape integrity. For instance, iron powders, with a melting point of 1538°C, are typically sintered at around 1100°C to achieve adequate metallurgical bonding. The ductility of metals allows for enhanced deformation and particle rearrangement during this stage, distinguishing it from more brittle ceramic systems. A critical aspect of metallic sintering is the use of protective atmospheres, such as the reducing hydrogen (H2) or inert nitrogen (N2), to mitigate oxidation of reactive metal surfaces, which could otherwise form insulating oxide layers that impede diffusion and reduce ductility. These atmospheres ensure clean particle interfaces and optimal mechanical properties in the final compact, with hydrogen actively removing surface oxides through chemical reduction while nitrogen prevents further oxidation. This sintering approach excels in producing cost-effective, complex-shaped parts via near-net forming, minimizing waste and secondary machining in powder metallurgy applications like automotive gears and tools. However, the resulting materials often display lower strength than wrought equivalents, with residual porosity (typically 5-15%) creating stress concentrations that accelerate fatigue failure under cyclic loading. For specialized alloys, sintering parameters are tailored to address compositional challenges; stainless steels require temperatures exceeding 1150°C to reduce persistent chromium oxides and attain corrosion resistance. Superalloys, such as nickel-based variants, benefit from powder metallurgy sintering to yield fine-grained microstructures for high-temperature aerospace parts, enhancing creep and oxidation resistance. Post-sintering infiltration with low-melting metals like copper fills interconnecting pores, boosting density to over 98% and improving overall ductility and load-bearing capacity. During this process, grain growth is moderated to maintain the enhanced ductility inherent to metallic structures.

Polymer Sintering

Polymer sintering refers to the process of consolidating polymer powders or particles into a dense solid through controlled heating, typically occurring via viscous flow mechanisms rather than atomic diffusion seen in inorganic materials. This process leverages the polymer's ability to soften and flow at relatively low temperatures, enabling the fusion of particles driven primarily by surface tension forces that promote neck formation and coalescence between adjacent particles.^[77] Unlike solid-state sintering in metals or ceramics, polymer sintering does not rely on long-range diffusion but instead on the viscoelastic deformation and merging of molten or semi-molten particles, resulting in pore elimination and densification over short durations.^[78] The unique aspects of polymer sintering include processing temperatures generally ranging from 100°C to 300°C, which align with the glass transition or melting points of common thermoplastics like polyamides or polystyrenes, allowing operation below degradation thresholds for many materials. Due to the inherently low viscosity of polymer melts (often 10^2 to 10^4 Pa·s at processing temperatures), sintering times are brief, typically spanning seconds to minutes, which facilitates rapid production cycles compared to high-temperature inorganic sintering. For instance, in amorphous polymers such as polystyrene, sintering proceeds through Newtonian viscous flow, where surface tension (around 20-40 mN/m) drives the coalescence, achieving significant densification in under 10 minutes at 230-260°C.^[78] This low-viscosity regime minimizes energy input while enabling precise control over microstructure, though viscoelastic effects can influence the rate of pore collapse during coalescence.^[79] Applications of polymer sintering are prominent in producing self-lubricating components, such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) bearings, where sintering at approximately 360-380°C fuses fine powders into porous structures that retain lubricants and exhibit low friction coefficients (around 0.05-0.1). In additive manufacturing, particularly selective laser sintering (SLS), polymer powders like polyamide-12 (PA12) are sintered layer-by-layer to create complex prototypes and functional parts, enabling customized geometries with densities up to 95% without support structures.^[80] These techniques are widely adopted in aerospace and automotive sectors for lightweight, durable components. Key challenges in polymer sintering include thermal degradation, which can occur above 250-300°C for many thermoplastics, leading to chain scission, reduced molecular weight, and diminished mechanical properties like tensile strength dropping by 20-30% after multiple cycles. Achieving uniform density without residual voids is difficult due to uneven heating or particle packing, potentially resulting in porosity levels of 5-10% that compromise part integrity; strategies like controlled cooling rates (1-5°C/min) help mitigate void formation during coalescence.^[81] Additionally, in 3D printing contexts, recycled powders exacerbate degradation, causing surface defects and inconsistent sintering.^[82]

Advanced Sintering Techniques

Electric Current Assisted Sintering

Electric current assisted sintering (ECAS) employs the passage of electrical currents through powder compacts to accelerate densification via localized heating and enhanced diffusion mechanisms. The process typically utilizes direct current (DC) or pulsed currents, generating heat primarily through Joule heating, where electrical resistance in the powder particles and interparticle contacts dissipates energy as thermal energy directly within the material. Additionally, electromigration—the directed movement of atoms under the influence of the electric field—can promote mass transport at particle interfaces, facilitating neck formation and growth at lower temperatures than traditional thermal sintering.^[83]^[84] Current densities in ECAS range from 100 to 1000 A/cm², enabling ultrafast heating rates that achieve sintering temperatures in seconds to minutes, often reducing the required peak temperature by 200–500°C compared to conventional furnace methods. This rapid timeframe minimizes exposure to high temperatures, preserving nanoscale features in powders. The temperature rise from Joule heating is governed by the relation

\frac{dT}{dt} = \frac{I^2 \rho}{C_p V},

where I is the applied current, \rho is the electrical resistivity of the powder, C_p is the heat capacity, and V is the sample volume; this differential equation captures the rate at which electrical power input converts to thermal energy, driving the process efficiently without external furnaces.^[85]^[86] Key benefits of ECAS include significant energy efficiency, with power consumption roughly one-fifth that of hot pressing, due to direct heating and short cycles that avoid heat losses to surrounding environments. The fast processing also limits grain growth, yielding finer microstructures and higher densities without sintering aids. However, drawbacks encompass the high cost of equipment capable of delivering and controlling high currents, as well as restriction to electrically conductive materials like metals or doped ceramics, limiting applicability to insulators. ECAS can be briefly combined with uniaxial pressure to augment densification, though the electrical effects remain central.^[83]^[87]^[88]

Microwave Sintering

Microwave sintering utilizes electromagnetic radiation, typically at a frequency of 2.45 GHz, to achieve volumetric heating within materials, enabling selective and rapid densification of powders.^[89] This frequency allows microwaves to penetrate depths of 1-10 cm into many ceramic and composite materials, depending on their dielectric properties, which facilitates uniform energy absorption throughout the sample volume rather than surface-only heating.^[89] For materials with low microwave absorption, such as certain insulators, hybrid heating is employed by incorporating susceptors—highly absorptive materials like silicon carbide—that couple efficiently with microwaves to indirectly heat the workpiece.^[90] The primary advantages of microwave sintering include more uniform temperature distribution due to internal heat generation, which minimizes thermal gradients and reduces defects like cracking.^[91] Processing times are often reduced by 50-70% compared to conventional methods, attributed to faster heating rates of up to 100°C/min and enhanced reaction kinetics from accelerated atomic diffusion.^[92] This volumetric heating also promotes finer microstructures with less grain growth, improving mechanical properties while lowering overall energy consumption.^[93] Key parameters in microwave sintering include applied power levels ranging from 1-10 kW, which control heating rates and are scalable for industrial applications, and achievable temperatures up to 1600°C for high-melting-point ceramics.^[94] The efficiency of heating is governed by the material's dielectric loss factor (tan δ), which quantifies energy dissipation; materials with higher tan δ (>0.1) absorb microwaves readily, while those with low values require susceptor assistance.^[95] A notable example is the sintering of hydroxyapatite (HA) powders for biomedical implants, where microwave processing at 2.45 GHz achieves dense structures with enhanced bioactivity and mechanical strength suitable for orthopedic applications.^[96] In such cases, microwave sintering has demonstrated up to 80% reduction in energy use compared to conventional furnaces, primarily due to shorter dwell times and lower peak temperatures.^[97]

Field-Assisted Sintering Variants

Field-assisted sintering variants represent specialized techniques that enhance traditional electric current-assisted sintering by incorporating pulsed electric fields and mechanical pressure to accelerate densification and improve material properties. These methods leverage transient electrical phenomena, such as localized plasma generation and rapid Joule heating, to achieve near-full density in powders while minimizing grain growth. Spark plasma sintering (SPS), also known as field-assisted sintering technology (FAST) or pulsed electric current sintering (PECS), employs a pulsed direct current (DC) with on/off cycles typically lasting 3.3 ms, which generates intense localized Joule heating at particle contacts. This heating, combined with applied uniaxial pressures of 50-100 MPa, facilitates surface cleaning, oxide breakdown, and atomic diffusion activation, enabling rapid neck formation between powder particles. The process occurs in a vacuum or inert atmosphere, with heating rates up to 1000°C/min, allowing densification at lower temperatures than conventional methods. For instance, SPS can achieve over 99% relative density in ceramics and metals within less than 10 minutes at temperatures 200-300°C below traditional sintering thresholds.^[98]^[99]^[100] The electric field in SPS contributes to a reduction in the effective activation energy for sintering mechanisms, such as diffusion, by biasing atomic migration and lowering energy barriers. This can be modeled approximately as Q_{\text{eff}} = Q - \frac{\Delta V E}{k}, where Q is the intrinsic activation energy, \Delta V is the activation volume, E is the electric field strength, and k is Boltzmann's constant; the term \frac{\Delta V E}{k} represents the field-induced energy shift per atom, derived from electromigration principles adapted to powder interfaces. This reduction, often by 20-50% compared to field-free sintering, enhances mass transport and enables sub-micron grain retention in the final microstructure.^[101]^[102] Electro sinter forging (ESF), a variant suited for larger-scale production, utilizes low-voltage (typically 1-60 V), high-current pulses to deliver instantaneous heating through high-amplitude current discharges, often lasting 20-100 milliseconds, under simultaneous mechanical forging pressure. Unlike SPS, ESF operates in non-vacuum environments, making it more accessible for rapid prototyping and industrial applications, such as automotive components like gears or structural parts from metal powders. The process induces electroplastic effects and localized melting at particle boundaries, achieving high densities (>95%) in cycles under 1 second, which supports cost-effective manufacturing of complex shapes without extensive tooling. ESF extends field-assisted principles to bulkier samples, where the pulsed energy input minimizes thermal gradients and enables forging-like deformation for enhanced mechanical integrity.^[103]^[104]^[105] In comparison, SPS excels in precision control for nanoscale materials due to its vacuum compatibility and fine pulse tuning, routinely attaining 99% density in under 10 minutes for lab-scale samples, while ESF prioritizes speed and scalability for non-vacuum, prototype-to-production workflows in sectors like automotive, where cycle times below 1 second reduce energy use by orders of magnitude relative to conventional forging. Both techniques build on electric current assistance but introduce variant-specific pulse regimes to optimize field-particle interactions for diverse material systems.^[103]^[100]

Microstructural Evolution

Densification and Vitrification

Densification during sintering is the process by which the relative density of a powder compact increases significantly, driven by the elimination of interparticle pores through atomic diffusion and other mass transport mechanisms. In typical powder compacts, the green density starts at 50-60% of the theoretical value after compaction, but sintering elevates this to 95-100% relative density, resulting in a dense, solid body with minimal porosity.^[106]^[107] This transformation is essential for achieving mechanical strength and functional properties, as lower densities lead to coarsening of pores rather than their reduction.^[106] The densification process is commonly quantified using the Archimedes' principle for bulk measurements of apparent and true densities or through image analysis of polished cross-sections to assess microstructural porosity.^[108]^[109] Pore evolution plays a central role, with initial open porosity allowing gas escape and surface diffusion, but as densification progresses, pores shrink and become isolated. A key transition occurs around 90% relative density, where open porosity closes off, shifting to closed pores that require alternative mechanisms for elimination to prevent trapping of gases or impurities.^[110]^[111] In ceramic sintering, vitrification contributes to final densification by forming amorphous glass phases from fluxing agents or partial melting, which flow into and seal remaining pores, promoting a glassy matrix that enhances impermeability and uniformity.^[112] This phase formation is particularly effective in systems with silica-based compositions, where the liquid-like glass bridges particles and reduces void spaces without full melting of the body.^[113] To address residual closed pores after conventional sintering, post-sinter hot isostatic pressing (HIP) applies uniform high pressure (typically 100-200 MPa) at elevated temperatures under inert gas, collapsing isolated voids and achieving densities closer to 100% theoretical.^[57]^[114] Additionally, controlling shrinkage anisotropy—arising from non-uniform particle packing or directional stresses—ensures isotropic densification and predictable dimensions, often through optimized powder processing or sintering supports.^[115]^[116]

Grain Growth and Control

Grain growth during sintering occurs primarily through the migration of grain boundaries driven by their curvature, which minimizes the total interfacial energy of the microstructure. Smaller grains with higher curvature boundaries migrate faster toward centers of curvature, leading to the disappearance of small grains and enlargement of larger ones. This process follows the classical Burke-Turnbull model, where the boundary velocity v is given by v = M \gamma \kappa, with M as the boundary mobility, \gamma as the boundary energy, and \kappa as the curvature.^[117] The average grain size G evolves according to the normal grain growth law:

G^n - G_0^n = K t

where G_0 is the initial grain size, t is time, K is a rate constant dependent on temperature and material, and n is the growth exponent typically ranging from 2 to 3 for ceramics (often n = 3 due to boundary diffusion control). This equation describes power-law kinetics, resulting in parabolic growth for n = 2 (common in metals) or cubic growth for n = 3, where grain size increases gradually after an initial incubation period before reaching a steady-state distribution. The grain size versus time plot exhibits a sigmoidal shape, with slow initial growth accelerating as curvature differences diminish, approaching a self-similar log-normal distribution.^[118] To control excessive grain growth and maintain fine microstructures for desired properties, solute drag is employed by adding low concentrations of dopants that segregate to grain boundaries, thereby reducing boundary mobility. For instance, 1-2 mol% Y₂O₃ doping in zirconia creates a drag force that inhibits boundary migration, stabilizing submicron grain sizes during sintering. Another key method is Zener pinning by dispersed second-phase particles, which exert a drag pressure on moving boundaries proportional to particle-matrix interfacial energy. The limiting grain size \lambda is approximated by the Zener relation:

\lambda = \frac{4r}{3f}

where r is the particle radius and f is the volume fraction of the pinning phase; higher f or smaller r enhances pinning efficacy, preventing growth beyond the critical size.^[119]^[120]^[121] Excessive grain growth, such as achieving sizes greater than 10 μm in ceramics intended for high-strength applications, reduces fracture strength and toughness via the inverse Hall-Petch effect, as fewer grain boundaries limit crack deflection and propagation. Conversely, controlled grain enlargement to an optimal size enhances creep resistance by reducing the density of grain boundaries, which are primary sites for diffusion-mediated deformation at high temperatures. Grain growth is ultimately driven by the reduction in total grain boundary energy per unit volume.^[122]^[123] Grain size and its distribution in sintered materials are measured using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for imaging polished and etched surfaces, often combined with electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) to map orientations and precisely delineate boundaries for automated analysis of average size, aspect ratio, and log-normal distribution.^[124]

Final Microstructure Characterization

The final microstructure of sintered materials is evaluated using a suite of characterization techniques to assess densification, phase purity, and homogeneity, which directly influence mechanical and functional properties. These methods ensure that the sintered product meets quality control standards by quantifying residual porosity, grain size distribution, and phase composition. For instance, achieving full density typically requires porosity levels below 1%, as higher porosity can compromise structural integrity and performance in applications like aerospace components. Optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) are fundamental techniques for visualizing porosity and grain size at the microstructural level. Optical microscopy provides a cost-effective overview of surface features and grain boundaries, while SEM offers higher resolution to measure pore sizes and distributions, often revealing interconnected pores that affect permeability. In sintered ceramics, uniform grain sizes under 5 μm are targeted to enhance strength and toughness, as coarser grains can lead to brittle failure. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) may supplement these for nanoscale defect analysis, though it is less routine due to sample preparation demands. X-ray diffraction (XRD) is employed for phase identification, confirming the absence of unwanted secondary phases that could arise from incomplete reactions during sintering. By analyzing diffraction patterns, researchers can quantify crystallinity and detect amorphous content, which is critical for materials like zirconia where phase stability dictates thermal shock resistance. Mechanical testing complements these imaging methods; Vickers or Rockwell hardness tests measure resistance to indentation, while fracture toughness evaluations via single-edge notched beam methods assess crack propagation resistance, correlating directly to microstructural uniformity. Advanced non-destructive tools like computed tomography (CT) scanning enable three-dimensional mapping of pore networks within bulk samples, revealing hidden defects that planar microscopy might miss. This is particularly useful in metallic sintered parts, where internal voids can lead to fatigue failure under cyclic loading. Additionally, thermal conductivity measurements serve as an indirect proxy for density, with correlations showing that near-theoretical density (porosity <1%) yields conductivity values approaching those of fully dense counterparts, aiding rapid quality screening in production. Standardized protocols, such as ASTM B925, guide the preparation and examination of powder metallurgy microstructures, specifying metallographic techniques for consistent reporting of porosity, inclusions, and grain features across industries. These standards ensure reproducibility, with guidelines for etching and imaging that align evaluations with performance requirements in automotive and biomedical sintering applications. Outcomes from grain growth control during processing are thus verified here, confirming that targeted microstructures enhance overall material reliability.

Applications and Considerations

Sintering in Catalyst Production

In catalyst production, sintering plays a crucial role in stabilizing supported metal nanoparticles, such as platinum (Pt) on alumina (Al₂O₃), by promoting controlled particle growth that enhances thermal and mechanical durability while preserving catalytic activity. This process typically involves heating the impregnated support at temperatures between 400°C and 800°C under controlled atmospheres, such as oxygen or inert gases, to induce partial agglomeration without excessive loss of dispersion. For instance, Pt/Al₂O₃ catalysts are often sintered by ramping from 300°C to 525°C in a 2% O₂/N₂ mixture, followed by isothermal holding, which anchors the metal particles to the support surface and prevents migration during operation.^[125]^[126]^[127] A primary challenge in this sintering process is Ostwald ripening, where smaller metal particles dissolve and redeposit onto larger ones, leading to particle coalescence and reduced active surface area. This mechanism is particularly pronounced for nanoparticles below 5 nm, causing growth beyond the optimal 5-20 nm range that balances high activity (from small sizes) with long-term stability (avoiding excessive sintering). In Pt-based catalysts, such ripening can diminish performance in high-temperature environments, necessitating precise control to maintain particle sizes in this window and mitigate deactivation.^[128]^[129]^[130] To address these issues, techniques like calcination-sintering cycles are employed, involving sequential heating steps in air or oxygen to decompose precursors and stabilize the structure, often followed by reduction. The incorporation of stabilizers such as cerium oxide (CeO₂) further enhances resistance to agglomeration by forming strong metal-support interactions that pin Pt particles and inhibit ripening, as seen in Pt/CeO₂-Al₂O₃ systems where CeO₂ reduces sintering of both the metal and support during aging up to 800°C. These methods ensure the catalyst retains a porous architecture with high surface area, typically 100-300 m²/g for γ-Al₂O₃ supports, essential for exposing active sites.^[131]^[132]^[133] Such sintered catalysts find critical applications in automotive exhaust treatment, where Pt/Al₂O₃ formulations in three-way converters oxidize CO and hydrocarbons while reducing NOx under fluctuating conditions, relying on the maintained porosity for efficient gas diffusion. In petroleum reforming, similar Pt/Al₂O₃ systems facilitate naphtha conversion to high-octane gasoline, with sintering during regeneration cycles managed to preserve 100-300 m²/g surface areas and prevent activity loss from particle growth. These applications highlight sintering's role in achieving durable, high-surface-area materials that optimize reaction kinetics and longevity.^[134]^[135]^[136]

Industrial Advantages and Limitations

Sintering enables near-net shape production, which minimizes the need for extensive post-processing machining and enhances manufacturing efficiency.^[137] This process achieves high material utilization rates, often exceeding 95%, by compacting powders directly into final forms with minimal waste. Additionally, sintering supports scalability for mass production of components like gears and filters, allowing consistent replication of complex geometries across large volumes.^[139] Despite these benefits, sintering has notable limitations in industrial applications. Dimensional tolerances typically range from ±0.5% to ±1% of nominal dimensions, which may require secondary sizing operations for precision demands.^[140] The process can introduce potential impurities, such as oxide phases, arising from interactions with the sintering atmosphere, affecting material purity.^[141] For large parts, sintering is energy-intensive due to prolonged high-temperature exposure, increasing operational costs compared to smaller components.^[142] Economically, sintering offers cost savings of 20-50% over casting for complex geometries, primarily through reduced material waste and fewer finishing steps.^[139] It also provides environmental advantages by facilitating the recycling of metal powders, which lowers resource consumption and waste generation in production cycles.^[143] In the automotive sector, sintering is widely applied in powder metallurgy parts, with over 70% of iron powder used for internal combustion engine components such as bushings and valves as of 2025.^[144] This case exemplifies how sintering contributes to efficient, high-volume manufacturing while balancing performance and cost in demanding applications.

Emerging Trends and Challenges

Recent advancements in sintering are increasingly incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) to optimize process parameters, predict microstructural evolution, and enhance energy efficiency. Machine learning algorithms have been applied to model sintering behaviors under variable conditions, enabling real-time adjustments that reduce defects and improve material properties in ceramics and metals.^[145] For instance, AI-driven simulations in additive manufacturing contexts have facilitated topology optimization accounting for sintering shrinkage, leading to more accurate metal parts.^[146] Nano-powder sintering is gaining prominence in fabricating 3D electronics, where sub-micron particles enable high-resolution structures with enhanced conductivity and thermal management. Developments in 3D printing of nano-materials, such as diamond particulates, have demonstrated viability for sensors and flexible electronics, achieving features down to nanoscale without compromising integrity.^[147]^[148] Sustainable sintering methods, exemplified by solar-driven processes, are emerging to minimize energy use and carbon footprints in materials production. Solar sintering systems using concentrated sunlight have successfully processed copper foams and other metals, offering a renewable alternative to conventional heating.^[149]^[150] Key challenges persist in scaling rapid sintering techniques, such as microwave and spark plasma sintering, from lab to industrial levels due to uneven heating and equipment limitations.^[151] The environmental impact of powder production remains significant, with high energy demands in atomization and milling contributing to substantial greenhouse gas emissions across the powder metallurgy chain.^[152] Achieving sub-micron features without defects is complicated by agglomeration and incomplete densification, though strategies like submicron coatings in liquid-phase sintering have improved outcomes in bimetallic systems.^[153] Notable recent developments include 2023 studies on laser-assisted sintering of metals, which have advanced inverted sintering processes to produce dense parts with minimal distortion.^[154] Hybrid microwave-spark plasma sintering (SPS) for ceramics has shown promise, achieving up to 30% faster processing times compared to standalone methods while enhancing hardness in alumina as of 2024.^[155] Looking ahead, sintering plays a pivotal role in advancing battery materials, particularly solid electrolytes, where low-temperature techniques like cold sintering enable dense, stable interfaces for all-solid-state batteries. As of 2025, cold sintering has been applied to fabricate robust composite electrolytes, such as Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 and LLTO-based systems, improving ionic conductivity and recyclability for next-generation energy storage.^[156]^[157]^[158] Additionally, field-assisted sintering variants are revolutionizing energy applications, and Ag/Cu sintering is rising for electric vehicle components to reduce costs and emissions.^[159]^[160] Standardization efforts for hybrid additive-sintering processes are underway through bodies like ASTM, focusing on sinter-based technologies to ensure reproducibility and scalability in multi-material manufacturing post-2020.^[161]

References

[1]
Sintering Process - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Sintering is one of the processes used to increase the density of the material by heating it at high temperatures below its melting point. The sample powders ...
[2]
Full article: Interstitial chemistry in sintering of metallic materials
Sintering is a process by which particulate materials – loose or compacted – are transformed into a body that may be fully dense or may still contain pores, but ...
[3]
Sintering (Chapter 14) - Materials Science
Sintering is a process of bonding small particles without melting them. It is a simple and cheap way of fabricating parts of metals, ceramics, ...
[4]
A Perspective on Emerging and Future Sintering Technologies of ...
Mar 17, 2023 · Sintering is an extremely old process—the oldest artifacts made out of clay and fired in a kiln are more than 25 000 years old—but has ...
[5]
History of sintering: Empirical phase - R M German, 2013
Sintering is well established as a component fabrication approach. It has been applied to ceramics for 26 000 years. Metallic sintering is more recent, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[6]
Review of flash sintering: materials, mechanisms and modelling
During sintering, six material transport mechanisms have been identified: lattice diffusion (from grain boundary to neck), grain-boundary diffusion (from ...
[7]
[PDF] Sintering of Ceramics - HAL-UPHF
Aug 13, 2022 · This type of diffusion is initiated at lower temperatures due to its lower activation energy and is usually the dominant mass transport.
[8]
Diffusion Mechanism for Tungsten Sintering Kinetics - AIP Publishing
Diffusion coefficients calculated from the sintering kinetics are considerably larger than the diffusion coefficients determined for volume self‐diffusion in ...
[9]
[PDF] SINTERING APPLICATIONS
Sintering applications include ceramics, metals, and basic sintering. Sintering increases strength in ceramics and changes microstructure, such as grain size ...
[10]
Shape distortion in sintering results from nonhomogeneous ... - NIH
May 9, 2023 · In this paper, we demonstrate that distortion during sintering results from mass-transport driven by nonhomogeneous temperature distribution.
[11]
Sintering of nanocrystalline materials: Sintering parameters - PMC
This review aims to understand the sintering of nanomaterials, with a clear focus on the spark plasma sintering technique and its associated sintering ...
[12]
[PDF] Sintering theory - EPFL
'A "stage" of sintering may be described as an interval of geometric change in which the pore shape change is totally defined (such as rounding of necks ...
[13]
Influence of sintering temperature and atmosphere on densification ...
Oct 17, 2025 · Temperature is one of the most important parameters in the sintering process. ... The powder morphology and particle size distribution are ...
[14]
Necking mechanism under various sintering process parameters
Necking is the fusion of particles during sintering, driven by diffusion to minimize energy. It occurs in the initial stage of sintering, forming grain ...
[15]
What is Sintering in Manufacturing? - Xometry
May 16, 2023 · Sintering is a broad family of methods that forms integral and potentially highly complex parts from a wide range of materials.
[16]
Sintering metal powders | Thermal Processing Magazine
Jun 14, 2025 · The initial stage of sintering involves the growth of a sinter bond by diffusion from the single point contact (necking). The first stage ends ...
[17]
Egyptian Faience: Technology and Production
Dec 1, 2017 · In ancient Egypt, objects created with faience were considered magical, filled with the undying shimmer of the sun, and imbued with the powers of rebirth.Missing: sintering 5000
[18]
History of Sintering - CISP - Penn State
Humans have used the process of sintering for thousands of years. Some of the first sintered products were bricks heated in open-pit fires to add strength.
[19]
Aspects of Powder Technology in Ancient and Medieval India
Jul 19, 2013 · Abstract. The production, characterisation, and application of metal powder in ancient and medieval India have been investigated on the ...
[20]
Tungsten's Brilliant, Hidden History | American Scientist
One hundred years ago, William D. Coolidge coaxed tungsten into filaments, illuminating incandescent light bulbs—and the world.
[21]
History of Powder Metallurgy & Metal Powder Products - & Their Future
Mar 29, 2019 · Ancient people used metal powders, modern sintering emerged in the late 19th century, and the industry has grown significantly in the last 100 ...
[22]
[PDF] PARTICLES SIZE DISTRIBUTION EFFECT ON 3D PACKING OF ...
In the late 1920s Andreasen and Andersen developed a continuous particle size distribution for the particles packing [27]. Although Andreasen's work had not ...
[23]
Review Silicon carbide and its composites for nuclear applications
Dec 1, 2019 · Sintered ceramics are basically superior to RB-SiC in some characteristics, for example, in mechanical properties, radiation stability and ...Missing: post- WWII
[24]
3D Printing History: A Complete Timeline of Additive Manufacturing ...
Jun 25, 2024 · The 1980s were a dynamic period in the history of 3D printing, in ... Selective Laser Sintering (SLS). Another significant advancement ...
[25]
fundamentals of the sintering of ceramics
There is probably universal agreement that the driving force for sintering is the excess surface free energy present in a powder compact, but numerous ...
[26]
[PDF] 1.5.6 Sintering Models Matter transport during sintering is driven by ...
This gradient in the chemical potential produces a driving force for matter transport from the (convex) particle surfaces and from the grain boundaries between ...
[27]
[PDF] Master Sintering Curve and Its Application in Sintering of Electronic ...
Specifically, polycrystalline ceramics sinter as a result of the thermodynamic driving force to minimize the Gibbs' free energy, G, of a system9-13, including ...
[28]
Sintering Time - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Sintering is often conducted at a temperature of 700–1200 °C (He and Wang, 2019; Nie et al., 2021) for 10–30 min (Wang et al., 2021b), although such a process ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
[29]
[PDF] Sintering of Ceramics - AGH
4.1 Sintering of Ceramics. 4.1.2.6.2 Herring's Scaling Law. 197. Herrings scaling law [22] does not assume a specific geometrical model. Instead, it assumes ...
[30]
[PDF] Diffusion in Oxides - Case Western Reserve University
The lower temperature results have an Arrhenius slope similar to those found in many other experimental studies of oxygen diffusion, but with lower diffusivity ...
[31]
Oxide reduction and oxygen removal in water-atomized iron powder
May 9, 2020 · Reduction of oxides during sintering is a prerequisite for the manufacturing of powder metallurgy steels. Inadequate control of the ...
[32]
Effect of Change of Scale on Sintering Phenomena - AIP Publishing
It is shown that when certain plausible assumptions are fulfilled simple scaling laws govern the times required to produce, by sintering at a given temperature ...
[33]
Sintering Crystalline Solids. I. Intermediate and Final State Diffusion ...
Photomicrographs of pore and grain boundary structures in sintered powder compacts are presented to provide the basis for qualitative description of the ...
[34]
Viscous Flow of Crystalline Bodies under the Action of Surface ...
Viscous Flow of Crystalline Bodies under the Action of Surface Tension · J. Frenkel · Published 1945 · Physics, Materials Science.
[35]
A Model for Boundary Diffusion Controlled Creep in Polycrystalline ...
The creep rate (ė) predicted by the boundary diffusion (Db) model is ė≃150σDbWΩ/(GS)3kT, where σ is the stress, W is the boundary width, (GS) is the average ...
[36]
Sintering Crystalline Solids. II. Experimental Test of Diffusion Models ...
During sintering in alumina powder compacts, the density has been found to increase linearly with the logarithm of time, and the grain size increases with ...
[37]
Current understanding and future research directions at the onset of ...
Apr 9, 2017 · Sintering and accompanying microstructural evolution is inarguably the most important step in the processing of ceramics and hard metals.
[38]
Interface topology for distinguishing stages of sintering - Nature
Sep 11, 2017 · The final stage begins when the pinch-off of interconnected pore channel forms closed pores at the relative density of 0.9. The final stage of ...
[39]
Intermediate and Final Stage Sintering - ResearchGate
... Conventional solid-state sintering is characterized by three distinct stages: initial neck formation, intermediate densification with pore isolation ...
[40]
Initial Sintering of Alumina and Hematite - COBLE - 1958
Tbe temperature dependence of the rate of shrinkage and neck growth in Al2O3 is characterized by an activation energy of 165 kcal. per mole.
[41]
On the evaluation of the activation energy of sintering - ScienceDirect
One of the main purposes of these studies is to evaluate the activation energy of sintering for distinguishing the controlling mechanisms and determining the ...
[42]
(PDF) Master Sintering Curve Constructing Techniques: A Review
Aug 10, 2025 · The master sintering curve (MSC) is a useful technique for calculating the final density of a part, in dependence on the process parameters.
[43]
Particle size distribution effects on sintering rates - AIP Publishing
Jul 1, 1986 · The sintering ability of a compact decreases with a broader particle size distribution and this effect becomes dramatic in the intermediate ...
[44]
Effect of Green States on Sintering Behavior and Microstructural ...
It was found that the more nonuniform the powder compact, the higher the degree of pore growth in the initial and at the beginning of intermediate stages of ...
[45]
Solid-State Sintering | Request PDF - ResearchGate
Solid-state sintering is the bonding and densification of particles by the application of heat below the melting point of a material.Missing: advantages scholarly
[46]
Models for Kinetics of Solid State Sintering
### Summary of "Models for Kinetics of Solid State Sintering"
[47]
Solid Phase Sintering - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The solid-phase sintering process is a method in which the as-pressed mixed powder is sintered below the melting point of the low-melting-point component.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
[48]
Sintered Alumina - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
However, both ions diffuse at higher temperatures (>1300 °C), allowing the solid-state sintering of alumina materials, which is the most used process to ...
[49]
Processing, Microstructure, and Mechanical Behavior of Tungsten ...
2.1.1. Solid-State Sintering of WHA. SSS of WHAs involves heating compacted powders below the melting point of both components (matrix and W).
[50]
Solid-State Sintering of Tungsten Heavy Alloys
This work addresses practical variables affecting the sinterability: powder particle size, powder mixing, and sintering temperature and time.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[51]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemical-engineering/sintered-alumina
[52]
Pressure-Assisted Sintering - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
There are two principle ways to apply external pressure to the ceramic sample: isostatic (hot isostatic pressing) and uniaxial (hot pressing, sinter forging). ...
[53]
Hot Isostatic Press (HIP) Equipment | KOBE STEEL, LTD.
Difference between HIP and Hot Pressing. HIP applies isostatic pressure to materials using gas pressure, while hot pressing applies only uniaxial pressure.
[54]
Hot Isostatic Pressing - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
2.1. Hot isostatic pressing (HIP) differs most significantly from hot pressing by replacing a uniaxial application of pressure via a linearly translating ram ...
[55]
[PDF] Sintering of ZrC by Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) and Spark ... - OSTI
Either HIP or SPS sintering process enables to reach. 99% of ZrC theoretical density. By HIP, the sintering optimisation consisted, in a fist time, in ...
[56]
Pressureless versus pressure-assisted spark plasma sintering
The complete densification (>98 % TD) was attained at approximately 100 °C lower temperatures as in conventional sintering. Rapid pls-SPS sintering (∼300 °C ...
[57]
[PDF] Modeling and Experimental Studies of Densification Rates in ...
right on the cusp of the power law creep-Coble creep transition. At 71 MPa ... by equating the rate equations for each sintering mechanism. Regions ...
[58]
[PDF] The Densification of Molybdenum and Molybdenum Alloy Powders ...
Sep 24, 2022 · Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) densification occurred at 15-30 Kai, 1300-16006C, for 1.5 to 3.0 hours. The TZM REP/PREP powders (220/74 us) ...
[59]
Developments in hot pressing (HP) and hot isostatic pressing (HIP ...
In HIP, the main advantage is the great ﬂ exibility in sample shapes. The sintering process simultaneously densiﬁ es and bonds the powders or porous. bodies.
[60]
978-94-009-3423-8.pdf
Non-oxide technical and engineering ceramics. 1. Ceramic ... silicon carbide and silicon nitride, each with high strength and good oxidation resistance.
[61]
Study of the alumina sintering process with a low zirconia content
Jan 15, 2022 · At the sintering temperature of 1600 °C, significant grain growth was observed for both pure and doped alumina ceramics. However, the careful ...Study Of The Alumina... · Introduction · References (35)<|separator|>
[62]
Common Sintering Processes for Silicon Carbide Ceramics
Nov 16, 2023 · Suitable sintering aids are added, and dense sintering is achieved between 2000°C and 2150°C. The process can be categorized into solid-phase ...
[63]
Optimum sintering temperature of high quality silicon nitride ...
Apr 15, 2018 · The optimum sintering temperature for silicon nitride ceramics under oscillatory pressure is considered to be 1770 °C.
[64]
Preparation of Alumina Ceramics via a Two-Step Sintering Process
Apr 14, 2025 · Conventionally, high-temperature and high-pressure sintering techniques such as hot pressing (HP) or hot isostatic pressing (HIP) are needed to ...
[65]
Influence of MgO–SiO 2 –CeO 2 sintering additives on the sintering ...
Sep 12, 2025 · As a high-quality sintering aid for Al2O3 ceramics, MgO directly influences the growth of Al2O3 grains via its doping concentration.
[66]
Impact of sintering thermal history on MgO‐doped alumina ...
Sep 10, 2023 · This work examines the impact of sintering thermal history on kinetics of grain growth for 1264 ppm (0.1 wt%) MgO-doped alumina.
[67]
Two-Step Sintering of Partially Stabilized Zirconia for Applications in ...
The aim of the present work was to study the effect of two-step sintering of a commercial powder (Zpex Smile, Tosoh Corp., Tokyo, Japan) on the grain size and ...
[68]
Anisotropy in Shrinkage During Sintering - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · However, challenges arise during the sintering process, including intrinsic anisotropy leading to part deformation and the risk of cracks with ...
[69]
Effects of heating rate on the microstructure and mechanical ...
The sintering conditions were: heating/cooling rates 5 °C/min and 1.7 °C/min until the maximum temperature of 1400 °C and a dwell time of 2 h. The ...
[70]
Evaluating the sintering behaviors of ceramic oxide powders ...
Aug 26, 2024 · We also used two different heating rates or firing techniques: 5°C/min (conventional firing) and ∼500°C/min (fast firing). For conventional ...
[71]
A review on optical properties and application of transparent ceramics
In this review, an effort was made to summarize the advancement of transparent YSZ ceramics, focusing on applications and various consolidation technologies.
[72]
Ceramic Materials for Biomedical Applications: An Overview ... - NIH
The main characteristics of ceramic materials are high stiffness and strength, great hardness, insulating behavior, and resistance to high temperatures, wear, ...
[73]
Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) in Advanced Ceramics Production
Mar 5, 2025 · Hot isostatic pressing (HIP) is a manufacturing process designed to decrease the porosity and increase the density of various ceramic materials.<|control11|><|separator|>
[74]
Process Phenomena and Material Properties in Selective Laser ...
[97] used HSM to study the coalescence behavior of PA12, TPE, and TPU powders, in order to identify differences in polymer sintering ... Polymer Viscous Flow and ...
[75]
(PDF) Sintering Rheology of Amorphous Polymers - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · The author reported that a variation in temperature reduced the melt viscosity up to 50% (4600 Pa-s (230 • C) and 2500 Pa-s (260 • C)), where ...
[76]
Modelling of Pore Collapse during Polymer Sintering: Viscoelastic ...
Polymer sintering can be described as a process where polymer particles are fused together by heat or pressure. It plays an important role for several polymer- ...
[77]
Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing
Jul 30, 2017 · This Review focuses on polymer processing and the development of polymers and advanced polymer systems specifically for AM.
[78]
Degradation effects of reused PA12 powder in selective laser ...
Sep 30, 2025 · According to literature, the powder degradation leads to various quality problems, such as surface finish issues (orange peel, etc.) and lower ...
[79]
The impact of thermal reprocessing of 3D printable polymers on their ...
Oct 26, 2021 · Thermal degradation results in reductions in the mass and the density of the polymer. These factors are major determinants of the tensile ...
[80]
Electric current activated/assisted sintering (ECAS) - PubMed Central
Joule heating is rapidly generated across the powder. Ultrafast ECAS (see section 2.3.2) is also known as electric discharge compaction (EDC) [17–19], high ...
[81]
[PDF] Sintering mechanisms of metals under electric currents - HAL
Dec 2, 2019 · But the most popular effect of an electric current on materials is indisputably the failure of electronic interconnects by electromigration. Due ...
[82]
Heating mechanism of spark plasma sintering - ScienceDirect.com
It is proposed that the sintering temperature of conductive materials rises faster mainly due to the contribution of the direct current (DC) component in pulse ...
[83]
Electric Current Activated/Assisted Sintering (ECAS) - ResearchGate
ECAS mainly applies to electrically conductive powders. Joule heating is rapidly generated across the powder.
[84]
Magnetic Field Generated during Electric Current-Assisted Sintering
Dec 8, 2020 · Compared with conventional sintering techniques, ECAS has the following advantages: low furnace temperature, short processing duration, direct ...
[85]
Application of Electric Current‐Assisted Sintering Techniques for the ...
Mar 6, 2020 · ECAS techniques offer several advantages, which are difficult to achieve with established sintering techniques. In the case of materials, where ...
[86]
Microwave Synthesis: a Physical Concept - IntechOpen
Jul 27, 2011 · For microwave prone materials the absorption coefficient at 2.45 GHz is moderate and depth of penetration is of the order of 10 cm to 1m ...
[87]
A study on microwave susceptor material for hybrid heating
These susceptor materials are tested experimentally with 900W and 2.45GHz electromagnetic frequency to highlight the key role of a hybrid mode during microwave ...
[88]
Microwave Processing of Materials - The National Academies Press
The perceived advantages of microwave sintering over conventional sintering include expectations for more-uniform heating, better properties of the product ...
[89]
Microwave Enhanced Reaction Kinetics in Ceramics - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · Numerous observations have been reported in the literature of enhanced mass transport and solid-state reaction rates during microwave ...
[90]
Characteristics of Conventional and Microwave Sintered Iron Ore ...
Apr 4, 2022 · When compared to CS, microwave sintering offers the following advantages: (i) volumetric and uniform heating, (ii) faster sintering resulting in ...
[91]
Ultra-rapid microwave sintering employing thermal instability and ...
Jul 29, 2019 · ... dT/dt is the heating rate, and p ... , and Wilshaw, P.R.: Electrical characteristics of flash sintering: Thermal runaway of Joule heating.
[92]
(PDF) Microwave sintering of ceramic materials - ResearchGate
Dielectric ceramics with low dielectric losses [tan(δ) < 10 −4 ] behave ... microwave heating conditions within the temperature range of 700-1600°C.
[93]
Synthesized Nanorods Hydroxyapatite by Microwave-Assisted ... - NIH
This research presents an optimal and inexpensive, without any additives, method for the synthesis and sintering of hydroxyapatite (HA) by microwave-assisted ...
[94]
Effect of microwave and conventional processing techniques on ...
... hydroxyapatite thin films for biomedical implants. Article ... Microwave sintering allowed a significant reduction of 80% in both processing time and energy ...
[95]
Spark Plasma Sintering - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) is an advanced sintering technique that employs pulsed direct electric current via the electrodes at the top and bottom punches of ...Missing: sparks | Show results with:sparks
[96]
Progress of Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS) Method, Systems ... - MDPI
After 2010, the progress of SPS technology is now getting into the 5th generation, advanced SPS, with customized SPS apparatus and more practical manufacturing ...3. Spark Plasma Sintering... · 3.4. Neck Formation And... · 3.7. Sps Sintering...<|control11|><|separator|>
[97]
Spark plasma sintering and mechanical properties of compounds in ...
Dec 15, 2018 · ... density. Hayun et al. found that the dwell time had a strong effect, with a relative density of 89% for 1 min to 99% for 10 min [29]. In ...
[98]
A review of multi-physical fields induced phenomena and effects in ...
In SPS, regardless of the current types, a widely recognized heat generation mechanism is Joule heating due to the resistances to electric current [103].
[99]
[PDF] The effects of an electric field on the sintering of ceramics
Joule heating is the increase in temperature from the dissipation of electrical energy. The presence of Joule heating can be seen when the current-voltage (I-V) ...Missing: equation | Show results with:equation
[100]
Advancements and Prospects in Electro-Sinter-Forging - MDPI
Apr 27, 2022 · A summary of the recent advancements, future prospects and open issues in the materials, methods and machines for the technology known as electro-sinter- ...
[101]
A faster FAST: Electro-Sinter-Forging - ScienceDirect.com
A novel sintering technology based on high density electric currents and sintering cycles shorter than a second is presented.Missing: voltage | Show results with:voltage
[102]
Electro Sinter Forging, a breakthrough in field-assisted sintering | Epos
By combining a rapid high-current discharge with a mechanical pulse, eForging represents the latest evolution in industrial field-assisted sintering technology.
[103]
Sinterability - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Typically, this requires green density greater than 50%. At lower densities, the pores tend to coarsen with minimal densification. Sintering densification is ...
[104]
Sintering Ceramics Guide: Process, Temperature & Best Practices
Oct 28, 2025 · Benefits: Achieve full density at 100-200°C lower temperature; Lower temperature = less grain growth; Outcome: Full density with finer grain ...
[105]
Effect of sintering temperature on the crystal growth, microstructure ...
The lowest density measurement using the Archimedes principle was achieved by 0.421 g/cm3 with the highest volumetric expansion at 92% after the sample ...
[106]
[PDF] 3D analysis of ceramic powder sintering by synchrotron X-ray ... - HAL
Nov 24, 2023 · Correlation between the density of the sintered compact measured by the. Archimedes approach and the grain volume fraction obtained by image ...
[107]
Investigation of YAP/YAG powder sintering behavior using ...
Aug 5, 2019 · HIP process is effective only if the processed body reaches a density of min. 90%, then it is guaranteed that the residual porosity is an open ...
[108]
Experimental investigation and modeling of densification during ...
Aug 1, 2024 · In this study, the densification of binder-jetted Ti–6Al–4V samples is investigated experimentally through experiments with interrupted sintering cycles and ...
[109]
Influence of postsintered wastes incorporation on physico ...
Apr 8, 2019 · ... vitrification at elevated temperature. 1 INTRODUCTION. Globally ... sealing pores during sintering as reported by Cavalcante.13 It is ...
[110]
Vitrification - Digitalfire
Vitrification is the solidification of a melt into a glass rather than a crystalline structure (crystallization). By this definition, ceramic glazes vitrify.Missing: sealing pores
[111]
Hot Isostatic Pressing - HIP in MIM - ZCMIM
It becomes an important finishing process for Metal Injection Molding. The HIP process can eliminate the remaining residual porosity in sintered MIM components.
[112]
Anisotropic sintering shrinkage behavior of stainless steel fabricated ...
Sep 8, 2023 · In this work, the underlying behaviors of anisotropic shrinkage during the entire sintering of extrusion-printed stainless steel 316L parts will be understood ...
[113]
Sintering anisotropy of binder jetted 316L stainless steel: part I
Dec 25, 2021 · To achieve full densification during conventional sintering, BJ samples experience anisotropic shrinkages of up to 20%, which depends on the ...
[114]
Coarsening and grain growth in sintering of two particles of different ...
According to Burke and Turnbull's assumption [32], the grain boundary motion by curvature in grain growth is expressed by v = M gb γ gb κ , where v is the ...
[115]
[PDF] SINTERING THEORY
May 24, 2021 · – Initial, intermediate, final. • Liquid phase sintering. – Wetting ... • The process has three stages: – Rearrangement. – Solution ...
[116]
Role of Solute Segregation at Grain Boundaries During Final–Stage ...
The inhibition of grain growth is accomplished by the segregation of solute at the grain boundaries, causing a decrease in the grain–boundary mobility.
[117]
Segregation‐controlled densification and grain growth in rare earth ...
May 6, 2021 · Cation doping of Y2O3 is an established approach for tailoring densification and grain growth during sintering. However, the segregation of ...
[118]
Examination of the Zener Relationship between Grain Size ... - j-stage
Zener-Smith proposed the original relation R=4r/3f, in 1948, where R and rare the mean radii of the matrix grains and dispersed particles, and ƒ, ...
[119]
Revealing process and material parameter effects on densification ...
Mar 4, 2024 · It could be shown that pressure-assisted sintering and Coble creep can be effectively modelled by the presented phase-field model of sintering.
[120]
Effect of Grain Size on Mechanical and Creep Rupture Properties of ...
The initial grain size of 40.35 µm was the optimum grain size for a high value of creep rupture time due to the low hardness and elongation values at room ...
[121]
Grain size quantification by optical microscopy, electron backscatter ...
The primary benefit of grain size measurement using EBSD over imaging of etched surfaces is that grain boundaries can be precisely identified owing to contrast ...
[122]
[PDF] 5 Sintering of Supported Metal Catalysts - IntechOpen
Mar 23, 2012 · The effect of different atmospheres, such as N2, O2, and H2 on the sintering of diluted samples of Pt/Al2O3 reforming catalyst was studied in ...
[123]
Development of Pt–Co/Al2O3 bimetallic catalyst and its evaluation in ...
Jan 2, 2024 · The Pt/CZY catalyst did not sinter when calcined at 800 °C, whereas Pt/Al2O3 catalyst showed significant sintering (under similar conditions).
[124]
Influence of Oxidation Temperature on the Regeneration of a ... - MDPI
It was found that mild sintering of Pt occurred during oxidation in the temperature range of 550–650 °C, and the catalyst could be fully restored in the ...
[125]
Sintering of Catalytic Nanoparticles: Particle Migration or Ostwald ...
Scientists have proposed two mechanisms for sintering of nanoparticles: particle migration and coalescence (PMC) and Ostwald ripening (OR). PMC involves the ...
[126]
Insights into the reaction mechanism and particle size effects of CO ...
... Ostwald ripening (see Fig. 1) [37]. The size regime below 5 nm is specifically prone to particle size effects, since. Conclusions. “Surfactant-free” Pt NPs in a ...
[127]
Quantification of critical particle distance for mitigating catalyst ...
Aug 11, 2021 · We quantify a critical particle distance of platinum nanoparticles on carbon supports, over which the sintering can be mitigated greatly up to 900 °C.
[128]
High-temperature calcination improves the catalytic properties of ...
Calcination to higher temperatures improves the performance of the core–shell catalysts, possibly by tailoring the reduction properties of the ceria shell so ...
[129]
Tuning Pt-CeO2 Interactions for Improved Lattice Oxygen Reducibility
Mar 25, 2019 · The strong interaction between Pt and CeO2 required to stabilize Pt as single atoms also reduces the sintering of CeO2. This is observed by ...
[130]
g-Al2O3 catalysts: enhanced thermal stabilization in - RSC Publishing
Mar 20, 2023 · The g-Al2O3 supported catalysts are widely used in the industrial catalyst eld due to their essential properties of high surface area, good ...
[131]
[PDF] Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx over Alumina-Supported Silver ...
The alumina phase most widely used for this purpose is the porous and amorphous γ-Al2O3, which provides a high surface area (100-300 m2/g).Missing: automotive | Show results with:automotive
[132]
Sintering and redispersion of Pt/γ-Al2O3 catalysts: a kinetic model
Sintering is one of the main causes of deactivation of bifunctional Pt/Al2O3-Cl naphtha reforming catalysts [1]. It mainly occurs during catalyst regeneration ...Missing: petroleum | Show results with:petroleum
[133]
[PDF] Sintering and Particle Dynamics in Supported Metal Catalysts
Sintering also represents a significant deactivation mechanism in catalytic reforming of petroleum-based hydrocarbons [38,39]. In steam re- forming of ...
[134]
Advantages of Powder Metallurgy - Miba
A major advantage of powder metallurgy is low energy consumption, better material utilization and the small number of process steps. This results in higher cost ...
[135]
State of the PM Industry in North America—2024
Jun 17, 2024 · An advanced manufacturing process that can produce robust net-shape components, PM's high material utilization promotes efficient use of raw ...<|separator|>
[136]
Advantages of Powder Metallurgy Vs. Die Casting
Apr 27, 2020 · However, there are differences between die casting and powder metallurgy that have significant cost implications. Material use/yield. Scrap ...
[137]
DIMENSIONAL TOLERANCES
Sintered powder metallurgy technologies generally have a tolerance range from ±0.5% of the nominal dimension down to ±0.038mm or ±0.0015" on features of 7.5mm ...
[138]
The effects of sintering atmosphere on impurity phase formation and ...
The activation energy for the grain boundary resistivity is independent of the sintering temperature and atmosphere and is similar to that for the lattice ...
[139]
A techno-economic analysis of energy efficient sintering ...
This paper presents a critical review and analysis of a number of sintering techniques and compares them with the recently developed cold sintering process (CSP) ...
[140]
Evaluation of Recycled and Reused Metal Powders for DMLS 3D ...
Dec 18, 2024 · The reuse and recycling of powder is introduced as a means of reducing environmental impact. One of the most significant benefits is the ...
[141]
State of the PM Industry in North America—2022
Jun 13, 2022 · We estimate over seventy percent of the iron powder shipped is used for parts in internal combustion engine (ICE) passenger vehicles.
[142]
Review of Intelligent Modeling for Sintering Process Under Variable ...
This paper seeks to offer a comprehensive review of the advancements in research within the field of sintering modeling, with a focus on analyzing the current ...4.1. Mechanism Modeling · 4.2. Data-Driven Modeling · 4.2. 3. Carbon Efficiency...
[143]
New Sintering-Aware Topology Optimization Method Enhances ...
Jul 30, 2025 · Researchers at Aalborg University have developed a computational topology optimization framework that accounts for sintering-induced ...
[144]
3D printing of micro-nano devices and their applications - Nature
Feb 27, 2025 · This paper offers a comprehensive overview of the current advancements in 3D printing technology and its diverse applications in micro and nanodevice ...
[145]
Diamond 2D/3D Printing Technology: Bringing Scintillating ...
Aug 12, 2025 · This review highlights advances in printing with nano- and microparticulate diamond for applications such as sensors, thermal management, ...
[146]
Solar powder metallurgy: An efficient processing of copper foams
May 8, 2025 · Powder metallurgy methodology and a novel solar sintering process are combined to successfully produce porous copper foams with varying ...
[147]
Solar-Driven additive Manufacturing: Design and development of a ...
May 1, 2025 · This manuscript presents a novel approach to solar sintering, emphasizing the development of a system designed to achieve a smaller focal spot ...
[148]
Making the Case for Scaling Up Microwave Sintering of Ceramics
Mar 2, 2024 · Microwave sintering achieves ceramic sample densification at a significantly faster rate compared to conventional sintering. The faster heating ...Missing: advantages seminal
[149]
[PDF] Environmental analysis of the powder metallurgy value chain
Nov 19, 2024 · With our methodology, we are aiming at identifying environmental challenges and opportunities for PM, from mining operation and powder.
[150]
Increasing strength properties in sinter-based additive ...
Jun 5, 2024 · In this study, we leveraged novel “drop-on-demand” Metal Material Jetting (MMJ) of sub-micron powders to fabricate SS316L samples.
[151]
Inverted laser sintering of metal powders | Scientific Reports - Nature
Nov 16, 2023 · We demonstrate the ability of the inverted laser sintering process to manufacture parts composed of metal powder.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[152]
Spark plasma and microwave hybrid sintering - ScienceDirect.com
Apr 1, 2024 · Spark plasma sintering (SPS) and microwave hybrid sintering (MHS) were examined for improving the hardness of alumina and results are compared with ...
[153]
Review of recent progress in sintering of solid-state batteries
Nov 10, 2024 · This comprehensive review article embarks on an exploration of the latest advances in solid-state batteries, offering a panoramic view of their evolution.
[154]
Sinter-based AM technologies in focus at ASTM's ICAM 2024 ...
Feb 25, 2025 · Since 2020, most sinter-based Additive Manufacturing technologies have been moving to higher Technology Readiness Levels (TRL), with Binder ...