Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Text messaging

Text messaging is the exchange of short electronic messages, typically limited to 160 alphanumeric characters, between mobile devices using cellular networks or internet protocols, originating with the Short Message Service (SMS) standardized for GSM networks.^[1]^[2] The first SMS message, "Merry Christmas," was sent on December 3, 1992, by engineer Neil Papworth from a computer to a Vodafone executive's phone, marking the practical debut of the technology after its conceptualization in the early 1980s.^[3]^[2] By enabling asynchronous, low-cost communication without voice calls, text messaging rapidly proliferated, with global daily volumes reaching approximately 23 billion SMS messages by the early 2020s, though supplemented by over-the-top applications like WhatsApp that handle trillions of messages annually across nearly 4 billion users.^[4]^[5] Its defining characteristics include brevity fostering concise language, such as abbreviations and emojis, and store-and-forward delivery ensuring reliability even when recipients are offline.^[6] Text messaging revolutionized personal and business interactions by displacing some face-to-face and voice communications, enhancing coordination in daily life and enabling rapid information dissemination during emergencies, yet it has drawn scrutiny for contributing to social isolation, reduced interpersonal skills, and hazards like distracted driving.^[7]^[8] Empirical studies indicate texters often exhibit higher social anxiety and prefer digital disclosure over direct interaction, underscoring causal shifts in relational dynamics.^[9] Notable achievements encompass its role in public health campaigns, such as smoking cessation reminders, and political mobilization, while controversies involve spam proliferation, privacy breaches via unencrypted transmission, and facilitation of harassment.^[10]^[11]

Definition and Fundamentals

Terminology and Core Concepts

Text messaging, commonly referred to as texting, encompasses the exchange of short electronic messages between mobile devices, primarily via cellular networks. The foundational protocol is the Short Message Service (SMS), which enables the transmission of text messages up to 160 characters in length when encoded using the GSM-7 character set, a 7-bit encoding standard developed for Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) networks.^[12]^[13] For messages incorporating non-Latin characters requiring UCS-2 encoding, the limit reduces to 70 characters per segment due to the 16-bit structure.^[13] SMS operates on a store-and-forward basis, where messages are routed through a Short Message Service Center (SMSC) that holds them until delivery is confirmed, ensuring reliability even if the recipient's device is temporarily unavailable. Longer messages exceeding the single-segment limit are automatically concatenated into multiple SMS parts, reassembled by the receiving device, though this can increase costs and transmission time as each segment is billed separately.^[14] Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) extends SMS capabilities to support richer content, including images, audio, video, and longer text up to approximately 1,600 characters, transmitted over data connections rather than pure signaling channels. Unlike SMS, which is limited to plain text, MMS requires multimedia support on both sending and receiving devices and often incurs higher fees due to data usage.^[15]^[16] Rich Communication Services (RCS) represents an advanced evolution, integrating SMS/MMS fallback with IP-based features such as high-resolution media sharing, read receipts, typing indicators, and group chats, primarily over internet connections when available. Developed by the GSM Association, RCS aims to bridge legacy carrier messaging with over-the-top (OTT) applications like WhatsApp, though adoption varies by carrier and device compatibility.^[17] Key distinctions include RCS's reliance on data networks for enhanced functionality versus SMS/MMS's circuit-switched origins, with fallback to SMS ensuring universal delivery.^[18]

Technical Mechanisms

The Short Message Service (SMS), the foundational mechanism for cellular text messaging, functions as a store-and-forward system independent of voice or data channels, utilizing signaling pathways to transmit alphanumeric messages up to 160 characters in length. Messages originate from a mobile station (MS), which submits them to the serving Mobile Switching Center (MSC) or Visitor Location Register (VLR) via the air interface, encapsulated in protocol data units (PDUs) such as SMS-SUBMIT. The MSC then routes the message to the Short Message Service Center (SMSC) using the Mobile Application Part (MAP) protocol over the SS7 (Signaling System No. 7) network stack, specifically via operations like MAP_MO-FORWARD-SM, which handles mobile-originated forwarding without requiring a circuit-switched connection.^[19]^[20] Upon receipt at the SMSC, the message is stored in a queue for delivery, with the SMSC querying the recipient's Home Location Register (HLR) via MAP_SEND_ROUTING_INFO_FOR_SM to obtain routing details, including the serving MSC address. Delivery proceeds through MAP_MT-FORWARD-SM to the recipient's serving MSC, which forwards an SMS-DELIVER PDU to the destination MS; undelivered messages trigger retries or expiry based on configurable timers, typically up to 72 hours. This architecture ensures reliability in intermittent coverage by decoupling sender and receiver availability, though it introduces latency from SMSC buffering—often seconds but extendable under congestion. For inter-network roaming, messages traverse interconnect gateways using similar MAP exchanges, with SS7's global addressing enabling cross-operator delivery.^[19]^[21] SMS PDUs consist of fixed and variable-length fields, including the service center address, protocol identifier, data coding scheme, user data header (UDH) for features like concatenation, and the user data payload. The payload employs GSM-7 encoding by default, a 7-bit alphabet mapping 128 characters (plus extensions) into septets, yielding 140 bytes for 160 characters via bit-packing across octets. Non-GSM-7 characters trigger UCS-2 (16-bit Unicode) encoding, limiting payloads to 70 characters (140 bytes), or 8-bit binary for data like ringtones. User data is preceded by a TP-User-Data-Length field specifying octets, ensuring interoperability per 3GPP TS 23.038 specifications. External applications interface with SMSCs via protocols like SMPP (Short Message Peer-to-Peer), an open TCP/IP-based standard for bulk submission and delivery receipts, abstracting the SS7 layer.^[22]^[23]^[24] In CDMA networks, analogous mechanisms use IS-41 protocols over SS7, while modern evolutions like SMS over IP (e.g., in IMS or VoLTE) encapsulate payloads in SIP/IMS stacks, retaining SMSC-like functions but shifting to packet-switched delivery for reduced latency. Legacy SS7 vulnerabilities, such as unencrypted MAP signaling, have prompted transitions to SIGTRAN (SS7 over IP) for transport efficiency without altering core application logic.^[19]

Historical Development

Invention and Initial Rollout

The concept of SMS emerged in 1984 during the Franco-German cooperation to develop the GSM standard, with Friedhelm Hillebrand and Bernard Ghillebaert proposing a service for short alphanumeric messages transmitted via cellular networks.^[25] The GSM specifications formalized SMS in 1985, defining it as a store-and-forward mechanism using the SS7 signaling protocol, initially limited to 160 characters to align with telex constraints and efficient paging.^[25] This design prioritized low-bandwidth delivery over voice channels, enabling non-real-time text exchange without interrupting calls.^[26] The first SMS message was transmitted on December 3, 1992, by engineer Neil Papworth at Sema Group (working with Vodafone), who typed "Merry Christmas" on a personal computer and sent it via the Vodafone network to Richard Jarvis's Orbitel 901 handset.^[27] ^[28] This test occurred on a developmental GSM infrastructure in the United Kingdom, marking the practical realization of the SMS protocol but not yet a consumer service, as recipient devices lacked reply capabilities.^[29] Commercial rollout began in 1993 with the deployment of GSM Phase 2 networks in Europe, where operators like Vodafone and Deutsche Telekom enabled SMS for subscribers using early compatible handsets such as the Nokia 2010.^[26] Initial adoption was confined to Europe due to GSM's regional focus, with services primarily for notifications rather than two-way communication, as sending required multi-tap keypads on basic phones introduced around that time.^[30] By 1994, Finland's Radiolinja launched the first person-to-person SMS offering, accelerating limited uptake among GSM users despite high per-message costs and rudimentary interfaces.^[26] Early volumes remained low, with global SMS traffic under 10 million messages annually until infrastructure expanded.^[10]

Expansion and Standardization

The Short Message Service (SMS) was standardized as an integral component of the Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), with core specifications outlined in documents such as GSM 03.40, which defines the protocol for short message transfer between mobile stations and service centers. These standards emerged from the GSM Phase 1 specifications finalized in 1990, enabling interoperability across networks through defined transfer protocol data units (TPDUs) limited to 140 octets (160 seven-bit characters).^[31] ETSI's work, conducted via its Technical Committee SMG (Special Mobile Group), ensured SMS compatibility with circuit-switched GSM networks, facilitating point-to-point and cell broadcast messaging without requiring modifications to existing voice infrastructure.^[32] Expansion began modestly following the first commercial SMS transmission on December 3, 1992, via the Vodafone network in the United Kingdom, but gained momentum in Europe as GSM networks proliferated in the mid-1990s.^[26] By 1995, countries like Finland and the United Kingdom saw annual SMS volumes exceeding 10 million messages, driven by falling per-message costs (often under $0.10) and the appeal of silent, asynchronous communication among youth.^[33] Adoption surged with the introduction of predictive text input systems like T9 in 1997, which reduced typing effort on numeric keypads, and inter-carrier interoperability agreements in 1999 that enabled cross-network messaging.^[34] Global growth accelerated in the early 2000s as GSM standards spread beyond Europe to Asia, Africa, and Latin America, with worldwide SMS traffic reaching approximately 15 billion messages per month by 2000.^[25] In the United States, where GSM competed with TDMA and CDMA networks, uptake lagged until carrier unification efforts and device affordability boosted volumes from 35 messages per person per month in 2000 to billions annually by 2005.^[33] Standardization extensions, including ETSI's GSM 03.38 for character encoding (supporting GSM 7-bit default alphabet and UCS-2 for Unicode), further enabled multilingual expansion, particularly in non-Latin script regions.^[35] By 2007, annual global SMS volumes surpassed 1 trillion, reflecting network effects from prepaid plans and feature phone saturation in emerging markets.^[26]

Advancements in Multimedia and Protocols

The Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) represented a significant protocol advancement over SMS by enabling the transmission of multimedia content such as images, audio clips, and short videos, standardized initially under 3GPP Release 4 with TS 22.140 specifying stage-one requirements for non-real-time messaging in December 2002.^[36] MMS protocols, including MM1 for user-to-relay interfaces and MM4 for relay-to-relay, relied on WAP and later HTTP/SMTP adaptations, allowing messages up to several hundred kilobytes, though early implementations were constrained by carrier gateways and device compatibility.^[37] Commercial rollout began in 2002 with devices like Sony Ericsson handsets supporting MMS features, expanding SMS's text-only limitation to richer content while maintaining circuit-switched network compatibility.^[38] Despite MMS's enhancements, its store-and-forward model inherited SMS inefficiencies, such as variable delivery times and limited interoperability across networks, prompting the development of IP-based protocols. The GSMA initiated Rich Communication Services (RCS) in 2007 as an evolution, formalizing it in 2008 to integrate messaging over IMS (IP Multimedia Subsystem) using SIP for session initiation and HTTP for media transfer, enabling features like high-resolution images, video sharing, and real-time indicators without fallback to circuit-switched paths.^[39] RCS standards, governed by GSMA's Universal Profile released in 2016, built on 3GPP IMS specifications for authentication and routing, supporting group chats for up to hundreds of participants and file sizes exceeding MMS limits, with initial interoperable services launching in mid-2009.^[40] ^[41] Further protocol refinements included RCS's Advanced Messaging extensions in subsequent GSMA releases (e.g., RCS 5.x from 2012 onward), incorporating end-to-end encryption options via OMEMO or similar, though adoption varied due to carrier dependencies and device support until broader implementations in the 2020s.^[42] These advancements shifted text messaging from legacy SS7 signaling to IP Multimedia Subsystem cores, reducing latency for multimedia delivery and enabling seamless fallback to SMS/MMS, as defined in 3GPP specifications for hybrid environments. By 2024, RCS deployments exceeded 1 billion users globally, driven by Android's native integration and iOS support, marking a protocol transition toward universal IP messaging.^[43]

Core Technologies

SMS Infrastructure

The infrastructure supporting Short Message Service (SMS) primarily relies on the Signaling System No. 7 (SS7) protocol suite, a set of telecommunications standards developed in the 1970s and 1980s for out-of-band signaling in public switched telephone networks, enabling the exchange of control messages for services including SMS routing and delivery.^[44] SS7 facilitates SMS through its Mobile Application Part (MAP), which handles mobile-specific functions such as location updates and message transfer between network elements.^[45] Within GSM and subsequent 2G/3G networks, SMS messages are transported as signaling data rather than voice or circuit-switched content, using dedicated channels separate from user traffic to ensure reliability.^[46] At the core of SMS infrastructure is the Short Message Service Center (SMSC), a server-based system that receives messages from originating mobile stations, stores them temporarily if the recipient is unavailable, and forwards them to the destination via store-and-forward queuing.^[47] The SMSC interfaces with the mobile switching center (MSC) to accept incoming SMS submissions from base transceiver stations and employs MAP operations—such as MAP-MO-FORWARD-SM for mobile-originated messages and MAP-MT-FORWARD-SM for mobile-terminated ones—to query the home location register (HLR) for subscriber location and route messages through visitor location registers (VLR) to the recipient's MSC.^[48] This architecture supports both point-to-point (P2P) delivery within a single network and application-to-person (A2P) traffic, with SMSCs often scaled for high throughput via clustered, redundant nodes to handle billions of messages daily in large deployments.^[49] SMS gateways extend infrastructure connectivity for inter-operator and cross-network messaging, converting protocols like SS7 to IP-based alternatives such as SMPP (Short Message Peer-to-Peer) for efficient bulk routing and integrating with external systems for value-added services.^[50] In modern implementations, signaling gateways bridge legacy SS7 with SIGTRAN (Signaling Transport) over IP to reduce costs and improve scalability, while firewalls mitigate vulnerabilities like spoofing inherent in SS7's trust-based design.^[51] The overall topology divides into logical layers—application (SM-AL for encoding), transfer (SM-TL for peer routing), relay (SM-RL for SMSC handling), and physical (SM-PL for SS7 links)—ensuring end-to-end delivery with error recovery and validity period timers typically set to 24-72 hours.^[52] Despite evolutions toward IP multimedia subsystems in 4G/5G, SS7-based SMSCs remain dominant for global SMS volumes exceeding 5 trillion messages annually as of recent estimates.^[53]

MMS Capabilities

MMS enables the delivery of multimedia content, including images, short video clips, audio files, and extended text exceeding SMS's 160-character limit, via a store-and-forward architecture over cellular networks.^[54]^[55] Messages are composed using Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL) to integrate and sequence elements like slideshows or synchronized audio with visuals, supporting non-real-time transmission.^[37] Core functions include creation, storage, retrieval, and management of multimedia messages, with interoperability ensured through standardized formats defined in 3GPP TS 23.140.^[56] Supported media types encompass static and animated images in JPEG, PNG, and GIF formats; audio in MP3, WAV, M4A, and AMR; and video in MP4, 3GP, and M4V, with file sizes typically capped at 600 KB for audio/video and 2 MB for images to maintain compatibility.^[57]^[58] Overall message payloads are operator-dependent but reliably limited to 300 KB for broad delivery, though some networks accommodate up to 5 MB with up to five attachments.^[58]^[59] Additional features include delivery notifications, read replies, and retrieval from MMS centers (MMSCs), which handle routing, content adaptation for device capabilities, and integration with email or other messaging systems for cross-platform exchange.^[60]^[37] Security elements such as content filtering and virus scanning are implemented in MMSCs to mitigate risks from embedded media.^[61] Group messaging and subject lines further enhance utility for shared content distribution.^[62]

RCS Evolution and Integration

Rich Communication Services (RCS) emerged as a protocol to enhance SMS and MMS by enabling IP-based messaging with capabilities such as high-resolution media sharing, read receipts, typing indicators, and group chats, initially proposed by GSMA members in 2007 and formally launched by the GSMA in February 2008.^[41]^[40] The standard aimed to consolidate voice, messaging, and data services over IMS (IP Multimedia Subsystem) networks, evolving from earlier operator-led efforts to replace fragmented proprietary systems with a unified global framework.^[42] Early RCS iterations, such as RCS-e (enhanced) in 2008, focused on basic 1:1 messaging but faced delays due to inconsistent carrier implementations and device support, leading to minimal adoption by 2012.^[63] Subsequent releases under RCS 5.x (from 2011 onward, up to RCS 5.4 by 2014) expanded to IP-centric features like file transfer and group messaging, integrating with LTE networks for richer experiences while maintaining SMS compatibility.^[42] The GSMA's RCS Universal Profile, introduced in 2016, standardized core functionalities across operators and devices, facilitating broader deployment by decoupling from full IMS reliance and enabling app-based implementations.^[64] Adoption accelerated in the late 2010s through Google’s leadership, which embedded RCS in Android's default Messages app starting in 2019, bypassing some carrier dependencies via Jibe cloud infrastructure and achieving over 1 billion monthly active users by 2023.^[40] Carriers in regions like Europe and Asia, including Vodafone and Orange, rolled out support earlier, but fragmentation persisted until the Universal Profile's refinements, with RCS Business Messaging (RBM) seeing 40% year-over-year growth by mid-2023 for enterprise use cases.^[40] Integration with legacy SMS/MMS ensures seamless fallback: RCS messages transmit over data connections (Wi-Fi or mobile), reverting to SMS for unsupported recipients without user intervention, preserving universal reach while upgrading cross-platform interactions.^[65] Apple's inclusion of RCS in iOS 18 (September 2024) marked a pivotal shift, enabling rich features between iPhones and Android devices by default, though initially without end-to-end encryption—planned for interoperability via updated specifications in 2025—thus reducing the "green bubble" disparities in multimedia and reactions.^[43]^[66] As of 2025, RCS Universal Profile 3.1 further enhances integration with advanced media handling and business APIs, positioning it as the de facto evolution of carrier messaging amid rising OTT alternatives.^[64]

Primary Uses

Text messaging serves as a primary medium for personal communication, enabling individuals to maintain connections with family and friends through brief, asynchronous exchanges that accommodate busy schedules. Unlike voice calls, which demand immediate attention, texts allow recipients to respond at their convenience, fostering ongoing dialogues without interrupting daily activities. Globally, approximately 23 billion text messages are exchanged daily, with the majority dedicated to interpersonal interactions rather than commercial purposes.^[4] In the United States, consumers send and receive around 6 billion texts per day, reflecting widespread reliance on this channel for routine check-ins and updates.^[67] In social contexts, text messaging facilitates coordination of gatherings, sharing of humorous content, and real-time commentary on shared experiences, often extending interactions beyond physical presence. Among younger demographics, such as those aged 18-29, 95% prefer texting over other modes for everyday communication, citing its brevity and multimedia capabilities for conveying emotions via emojis or images.^[68] Group messaging features, prevalent in protocols like RCS and applications built on SMS infrastructure, enable multi-party discussions that strengthen community ties and collective decision-making. However, empirical studies indicate mixed relational outcomes; while frequent texting correlates with perceived partner accessibility in long-distance relationships, excessive reliance can amplify misunderstandings due to absent nonverbal cues, potentially eroding satisfaction.^[69] ^[70] Research further reveals that texting's immediacy supports emotional support networks, as individuals report using it to provide encouragement during personal challenges, though attachment styles moderate its impact on relational quality. For instance, secure attachments may enhance bonding through shared texting, whereas anxious styles can lead to dissatisfaction from over-analysis of response times.^[71] Daily patterns show users averaging dozens of personal exchanges, underscoring its role in sustaining social capital amid evolving digital habits.^[72] Overall, text messaging's accessibility has democratized personal outreach, particularly in regions with high mobile penetration, though its limitations in depth highlight the need for complementary face-to-face or voice interactions.

Group and Community Interactions

Broadcast SMS enables the simultaneous delivery of a single message to multiple recipients, facilitating one-to-many communication for community announcements, emergency alerts, and event coordination without requiring individual replies.^[73] Unlike interactive group chats, broadcasts treat recipients as a list rather than a conversational thread, minimizing carrier spam filters when properly opted-in and personalized.^[74] This feature, supported by SMS infrastructure since the early 2000s, has been widely adopted by organizations for rapid information dissemination, such as government-issued weather warnings or school closures affecting thousands.^[75] Advancements in protocols like RCS have expanded group interactions to include multi-party chats with features such as typing indicators, read receipts, high-resolution media sharing, and interactive elements like buttons or carousels.^[76] RCS group chats, which fallback to SMS for non-compatible devices, support up to hundreds of participants depending on carrier implementation, enabling real-time collaboration.^[77] As of 2025, daily person-to-person RCS messages in the U.S. exceed one billion, with group functionalities driving adoption following Apple's integration in iOS 18 on September 16, 2024.^[78]^[66] Nonprofits and advocacy groups harness text messaging for volunteer mobilization, event planning, and supporter engagement, often achieving higher response rates than email due to SMS's 98% open rate and near-instant delivery.^[79] For example, organizations use peer-to-peer texting campaigns to issue calls to action, such as petition signatures or rally attendance, with messages including links to digital resources.^[80] Political campaigns similarly deploy SMS for voter outreach, building permission-based lists to coordinate turnout efforts, as evidenced by its role in high-volume, relational messaging during elections.^[81] In grassroots movements, SMS has proven effective for coordinating protests and disseminating updates in areas with limited internet access, leveraging its ubiquity—81% of Americans send or receive texts daily.^[82] Historical applications include flash mobs in the early 2000s and broader organizing in regions like the Philippines' 2001 EDSA II revolution, where texts rallied millions against corruption.^[83] Modern examples persist in activism, where texts organize events and amplify causes by prompting immediate shares or attendance, though efficacy depends on list quality and regulatory compliance like TCPA opt-in rules in the U.S.^[84]^[85]

Intimate and Relational Exchanges

Text messaging facilitates intimate exchanges by enabling rapid, low-effort expressions of affection, such as sending "I love you" messages or sharing personal updates, which sustain emotional proximity between partners. This asynchronous format allows individuals to respond at convenient times, reducing pressure compared to synchronous calls while fostering a sense of ongoing connection. In romantic contexts, texting often serves as a primary channel for flirting, with users employing abbreviations, emojis, and multimedia to convey nuance absent in plain text. A 2018 study of 205 adults found that partners who perceived similarity in texting frequency and style reported higher relationship satisfaction and fulfillment, attributing this to aligned expectations in digital intimacy.^[86]^[87] In established relationships, texting supports relational maintenance through daily check-ins and conflict de-escalation attempts, though its efficacy varies. Research from 2015 demonstrated that sending positive, appreciative text messages between partners increased relationship satisfaction by promoting perceived responsiveness and warmth. Similarly, a 2021 analysis of long-distance couples showed that more frequent and prompt texting predicted significantly higher satisfaction compared to geographically close pairs, where over-reliance on text could dilute face-to-face depth. Emojis and expressive elements in messages further enhance bonding by signaling emotional intent; for instance, a 2024 study linked emoji use in texts to improved perceptions of partner attentiveness and relational closeness.^[88]^[69]^[89] However, texting's limitations in conveying tone contribute to relational strains, including misinterpretations that escalate minor disputes. Individuals with anxious attachment styles tend to engage in more frequent texting, which correlates negatively with satisfaction due to heightened monitoring and unmet response expectations. Excessive messaging can also foster dependency, displacing in-person interactions essential for nonverbal cues and physical intimacy, as evidenced by surveys linking constant availability via text to increased isolation or boredom-driven habits. Despite these risks, targeted use—such as intimate disclosures—can build social bonds comparably to face-to-face small talk, per a 2020 experiment comparing communication modes.^[71]^[86]^[90]

Commercial and Institutional Applications

Business Marketing Strategies

Businesses employ text messaging for marketing primarily through short message service (SMS) campaigns, leveraging its near-instantaneous delivery and high engagement to drive customer actions such as purchases or visits. Strategies typically involve obtaining explicit opt-in consent from consumers, segmenting lists based on demographics or behavior, and sending targeted promotions like discounts or limited-time offers. For instance, SMS open rates average 98%, far exceeding email's 20-30%, enabling rapid dissemination of time-sensitive content such as flash sales.^[82] ^[91] Key tactics include personalization, where messages incorporate recipient names or past purchase data to boost response rates, which reach 45% on average compared to 6% for email. Businesses often integrate SMS with e-commerce platforms for automated triggers, such as abandoned cart reminders that achieve conversion rates of 24.6%. Return on investment (ROI) for SMS marketing has been reported as high as $71 per dollar spent, attributed to its direct reach and low cost per message, around $0.01-$0.03.^[92] ^[93] ^[94] Compliance with regulations is foundational to these strategies, as violations can incur severe penalties. In the United States, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) mandates prior express written consent for marketing texts, including clear opt-out mechanisms like "STOP" keywords, with fines up to $1,500 per non-compliant message. European operations must adhere to GDPR, requiring affirmative consent and data minimization to process personal numbers for marketing. Non-compliance risks not only fines—such as the FTC's $5.9 million settlement with a telemarketer in 2023—but also reputational damage from consumer distrust.^[95] ^[96] ^[97] Successful implementations demonstrate strategic layering: retailers like Nordstrom use SMS for personalized loyalty alerts, yielding 29% higher conversion rates than email alone, while fitness chains like Orangetheory send class reminders that reduce no-shows by 20-30%. In e-commerce, brands deploy MMS for rich media like product images in promotions, enhancing click-through rates by 15-20% over plain SMS. Overall, 66% of businesses using SMS report increased budgets for 2025, citing its role in omnichannel funnels where texts prompt immediate app or web actions.^[98] ^[91] ^[99]

Customer Engagement and Service

Businesses employ text messaging for customer engagement and service to deliver timely notifications, facilitate two-way interactions, and enhance responsiveness, leveraging the medium's high penetration and immediacy. In 2024, 75% of businesses reported using SMS for customer service purposes, including alerts and support queries.^[100] This approach supports functions such as order confirmations, shipping updates, appointment reminders, and account balance inquiries, which reduce operational costs compared to voice calls.^[100] SMS achieves superior effectiveness in customer communication due to its delivery and engagement metrics. Messages have an average open rate of 98%, with 95% read within three minutes, far exceeding email's 20% open rate.^[101] ^[102] Response rates average 45%, enabling rapid resolution of service issues via two-way texting, which can improve business efficiency by up to 80%.^[103] ^[104] These rates stem from SMS's direct delivery to devices without reliance on inboxes, though they assume opt-in compliance to avoid user opt-outs from perceived intrusion. Regulatory frameworks mandate explicit consent to mitigate spam risks and protect consumers. Under the U.S. Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) of 1991, businesses must obtain prior express written consent before sending promotional or non-emergency SMS, with violations incurring fines from $500 to $1,500 per message.^[105] ^[106] The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 applies to commercial texts, requiring accurate sender identification, opt-out mechanisms, and no deceptive subject lines, though TCPA governs automated dialing more stringently for wireless devices.^[107] ^[108] Non-compliance has led to multimillion-dollar settlements, underscoring the need for verified opt-ins to sustain engagement without legal repercussions. Practical implementations demonstrate SMS's utility across sectors. Retailers like Domino's Pizza use SMS for order tracking and promotions, achieving higher redemption rates than email campaigns.^[109] Service-oriented firms, such as those in healthcare or finance, send appointment confirmations and fraud alerts, with 68% of businesses citing scheduling as a key use.^[100] Two-way platforms enable customers to reply for support, as seen in banking apps querying transaction details, fostering loyalty through convenience while adhering to consent protocols.^[110] Despite benefits, over-reliance without personalization can erode trust, as unsubscribes rise with irrelevant messaging.^[111]

Professional and Organizational Tools

Enterprise text messaging platforms facilitate secure, scalable short message service (SMS) and multimedia messaging service (MMS) for organizational communication, including internal employee coordination, customer notifications, and compliance-managed outreach. These tools integrate with customer relationship management (CRM) systems, support two-way interactions, and provide features like automation, analytics, and role-based access controls to handle high-volume messaging while adhering to regulations such as the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) in the United States.^[112]^[113] Key functionalities include bulk messaging for announcements, scheduled reminders for workflows, and audit logs for accountability, enabling organizations to replace or supplement email and voice calls in scenarios like field service updates or shift scheduling. For instance, platforms offer single sign-on (SSO), encryption, and segmentation to ensure data security and targeted delivery, which are essential for sectors such as logistics, healthcare, and sales where real-time responsiveness drives efficiency.^[112]^[114] Adoption has grown due to SMS's 98% open rate and rapid read times, with 82% of messages viewed within five minutes, outperforming email in urgency-driven professional contexts.^[82] In organizational settings, these tools support internal tools like team inboxes for shared responses and API integrations for custom applications, reducing communication silos. A 2024 survey indicated that 75% of businesses using text messaging apply it for customer service, 68% for scheduling, and 21% for review requests, reflecting its role in operational streamlining.^[100] Enterprise solutions from providers like Textmagic and Zendesk emphasize scalability, with features such as workflow automation and detailed reporting to measure engagement metrics like response rates, which can reach 45% for business SMS.^[115]^[82] However, implementation requires attention to opt-in compliance and data privacy, as non-adherence risks fines exceeding $1,500 per violation under TCPA guidelines.^[116] Two-way messaging capabilities enhance professional interactions by enabling conversational flows, such as automated confirmations followed by human escalation, which studies attribute to up to 80% efficiency gains in business processes.^[104] Globally, 66% of consumers engage companies via text messaging, underscoring its institutional utility, though enterprise adoption varies by region due to infrastructure and regulatory differences.^[117] These platforms prioritize verifiable delivery and analytics over consumer apps, mitigating risks like spoofing through dedicated short codes and carrier partnerships.^[118]

Global Adoption and Variations

Regional Usage Patterns

In North America, text messaging via SMS and carrier messaging services like iMessage sees high daily engagement, with 81% of Americans frequently using texting and the region collectively sending approximately 6 billion texts per day as of 2025. Preference for SMS remains stronger here than globally, with 30% of consumers favoring it for communications compared to a 24% worldwide average. However, adoption of over-the-top (OTT) apps such as WhatsApp and Signal is growing among younger demographics, though SMS retains dominance for alerts and marketing due to its universality across feature and smartphones.^[82]^[119] Europe exhibits fragmented patterns influenced by regulatory environments and app ecosystems, where WhatsApp holds over 80% market share in many countries, leading to lower reliance on traditional SMS for personal use. Europeans show high repeat purchase rates via SMS marketing at 46% subscribing to four or more services, reflecting its role in commerce despite privacy laws like GDPR curbing unsolicited messages. In Eastern Europe and rural areas, SMS persists for cost-sensitive users, while urban Western Europe favors data-based apps, with texting frequency aligning closely to North American levels but skewed toward multimedia-rich platforms.^[120]^[121] In Asia-Pacific, OTT messaging apps dominate due to rapid smartphone penetration exceeding 70% in countries like China and India, with platforms such as WeChat and LINE handling billions of daily interactions and supplanting SMS for social and commercial purposes. SMS usage lingers in rural and low-data zones for essential services like mobile money transfers, but overall opt-in rates for SMS marketing are elevated at around 40%, driven by dense populations and affordable plans. Regional variations include high app adoption in urban Southeast Asia versus sustained SMS volumes in South Asia's feature-phone markets.^[120]^[122] Sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Latin America feature persistent SMS dominance, with over 80% of mobile users relying on it for communication amid smartphone ownership below 50% in many nations, as per 2023 GSMA data. Texting rates exceed 75% among cell owners for coordination and information-sharing, often bypassing apps due to data costs and infrastructure gaps. In these regions, SMS facilitates financial inclusions like remittances, with daily volumes supporting billions of transactions annually, though emerging 4G expansions are gradually introducing hybrid app usage.^[123]^[124]

Penetration in Developing Economies

In developing economies, text messaging achieved rapid penetration through the leapfrogging of traditional fixed-line telephony, enabling populations to adopt mobile-based SMS directly on affordable feature phones without prior landline infrastructure.^[125] ^[126] This phenomenon, observed since the early 2000s, allowed countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Latin America to bypass costly wired networks, with mobile subscriptions surpassing population levels in many areas by 2023.^[127] By 2024, mobile penetration rates reached approximately 86% in Latin America and 89% in Asia Pacific, correlating closely with SMS adoption as the predominant messaging form due to its minimal data requirements and low per-message costs, often under $0.01.^[128]^[129] SMS usage remains dominant in regions with limited broadband access, such as Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, where it accounts for the majority of person-to-person and application-to-person (A2P) communications as of 2024.^[129] In Sub-Saharan Africa, surveys indicate that over 50% of mobile phone owners sent text messages in the preceding year, even amid modest smartphone penetration around 30-40% in 2018, a trend persisting into the 2020s due to feature phone prevalence.^[130] A2P SMS volumes, including alerts for banking, health, and agriculture, generated market revenues of $3.12 billion in the Middle East and Africa and $4.37 billion in Latin America in 2024, reflecting entrenched infrastructure use despite global shifts to over-the-top apps.^[131] Forecasts from Omdia project sustained telco SMS traffic in these regions through 2029, driven by rural coverage gaps where data plans remain unaffordable for 39% of covered populations.^[132] ^[133] This high penetration has facilitated practical applications, such as mobile money transfers initiated via SMS in Kenya since 2007, which by 2023 supported over 330 million accounts across developing markets, enhancing financial inclusion without internet dependency.^[134] ^[135] Similarly, SMS-based disease prevention campaigns in low-income countries demonstrated efficacy in reaching remote users, with systematic reviews confirming its role in behavior change where literacy and signal coverage align.^[136] However, adoption varies by literacy rates and network reliability; in South Asia, bottom-of-the-pyramid users cite affordability as a key enabler, though network externalities amplify usage only after critical mass thresholds.^[137] Overall, SMS penetration mirrors mobile connectivity, exceeding 80% in active usage among subscribers in these economies, underscoring its resilience amid transitioning digital landscapes.^[138]

Cultural Adaptations

Text messaging practices exhibit significant variations across cultures, shaped by local norms of politeness, privacy, and social interaction. In the United States, users often engage in texting during public settings or in the presence of others, reflecting a cultural tolerance for multitasking and individualistic communication styles.^[139] By contrast, in India, texting is predominantly confined to private or semi-private contexts, with users like Indian men (41%) preferring to read messages away from public view to align with collectivist values emphasizing discretion and group harmony.^[139] These differences highlight how text messaging adapts to underlying cultural dimensions, such as individualism versus collectivism, influencing when and where devices are used. Politeness norms in text messaging also diverge culturally. American texters frequently employ direct language and abbreviations, mirroring low-context communication preferences where explicitness reduces ambiguity.^[140] In high-context cultures like Japan, adaptations include elaborate keitai shousetsu (mobile novels) and decoku (decorative text art using characters), which integrate aesthetic and indirect expressions to maintain relational harmony and avoid confrontation.^[141] Similarly, Indian users incorporate more deferential phrasing and contextual cues in texts, adapting SMS to hierarchical social structures where overt directness could offend.^[139] The use of non-verbal elements like emojis further illustrates cultural adaptation. Research indicates that emoji selection and frequency vary by cultural background; for instance, users from East Asian cultures tend to favor positive, relational emojis more than Western counterparts, reflecting collectivistic emphases on harmony over individual assertion.^[142] ^[143] In advertising, cultural factors such as uncertainty avoidance influence SMS adoption rates, with high-uncertainty-avoidance societies like those in Latin America showing greater receptivity to personalized, low-risk promotional texts compared to individualistic cultures skeptical of unsolicited messages.^[144] Regional linguistic adaptations demonstrate text messaging's flexibility with non-Latin scripts and hybrid languages. In Arabic-speaking regions, Arabizi (Latin-script transliterations of Arabic) emerged as a workaround for early SMS limitations on Unicode support, enabling efficient communication until full script compatibility improved around 2010. In Iran, Pinglish (Persian in Latin script) proliferated for similar technical reasons, fostering creative abbreviations tied to Farsi phonetics. These evolutions underscore how technological constraints prompt culturally grounded innovations in expression, prioritizing accessibility over standardization.

Societal and Cultural Effects

Impacts on Language and Cognition

Text messaging has introduced linguistic innovations such as abbreviations (e.g., "u" for "you"), acronyms (e.g., "LOL" for "laughing out loud"), and non-standard grammar, collectively termed "textese" or "textisms," which prioritize brevity over formal conventions.^[145] These features emerged prominently with the rise of SMS in the late 1990s and early 2000s, driven by character limits in early mobile networks, and have persisted in modern messaging apps despite expanded capabilities.^[145] Emojis, standardized by the Unicode Consortium since 2010, further supplement or replace words, conveying tone or emotion in ways that parallel pictographic elements in historical writing systems. Empirical studies indicate that text messaging does not impair formal language skills, including grammar and spelling, in children or adults. A 2014 longitudinal analysis of over 200 children aged 10-12 found no correlation between the frequency of grammatical violations in texting and declines in spelling, grammar, or orthographic processing over time; instead, textism use predicted stronger reading ability.^[146] Similarly, research on adolescents and young adults has shown that heavy texters perform comparably or better on standardized literacy tests, suggesting that the metalinguistic awareness required to code-switch between informal texting and formal writing may enhance overall proficiency.^[147]^[148] Public perceptions often link texting to literacy deficits, but these views lack support from controlled experiments, which reveal that texting increases writing volume and exposes users to diverse registers without eroding standard usage.^[145] On cognition, text messaging's demand for rapid, fragmented responses can fragment attention, particularly when combined with notifications or multitasking. Experimental data from driving simulations demonstrate that texting reduces sustained attention and increases response latency to stimuli by up to 30%, attributable to divided cognitive resources rather than inherent linguistic demands.^[149] However, isolated texting sessions show minimal direct effects on working memory or executive function; any observed impairments, such as in recall tasks, stem more from habitual interruption patterns than the medium itself.^[150] Peer-reviewed reviews conclude that while excessive messaging correlates with shorter attention spans in observational studies, causal links remain weak, with benefits like improved phonological awareness from phonetic spellings (e.g., "gr8" for "great") potentially offsetting minor costs.^[149]^[148]

Psychological and Interpersonal Dynamics

Text messaging facilitates rapid interpersonal exchanges but often lacks nonverbal cues such as tone, facial expressions, and body language, which can lead to misinterpretations and escalated conflicts in communication.^[71] Research indicates that frequent texting correlates with higher relational conflict, particularly when attachment insecurities amplify perceived slights from delayed responses or ambiguous phrasing.^[151] Individuals with anxious attachment styles, who crave reassurance, report heightened distress from unread messages or "left on read" scenarios, interpreting delays as rejection, whereas avoidant styles may use texting to maintain emotional distance.^[152]^[153] In romantic relationships, empirical studies show mixed outcomes: positive text exchanges, such as affirmations, modestly boost satisfaction and perceived partner responsiveness, especially in long-distance contexts where texting sustains accessibility.^[69]^[154] However, excessive reliance on texting for substantive discussions inversely predicts satisfaction, as it fosters attachment-related anxieties and reduces intimacy compared to voice or in-person interactions.^[155] Couples exhibiting similar texting styles—such as matching frequency and responsiveness—report higher relational happiness, underscoring compatibility in mediated communication habits.^[86] Phubbing, the act of snubbing others via phone engagement during face-to-face interactions often tied to texting, undermines interpersonal bonds by evoking ostracism, negative mood, and threats to fundamental needs like belonging and self-esteem.^[156] Surveys and experiments link phubbing to dehumanization of the ignored party through induced uncertainty about their subjective experience, further eroding trust and empathy in relationships.^[157] Among adolescents and young adults, phubbing behaviors serially mediate links to depression via diminished social support and heightened rumination, with correlational evidence showing associations with anxiety, stress, and insomnia, particularly in females.^[158]^[159] Psychologically, heavy texters exhibit elevated social anxiety and loneliness relative to voice communicators, preferring asynchronous messaging to disclose authentic selves while avoiding real-time vulnerability.^[9] This dynamic may exacerbate isolation for those with preexisting traits, as texting reinforces avoidance patterns without the relational depth of direct interaction.^[160] Despite these risks, texting enhances connectedness in close dyads by enabling frequent, low-effort check-ins that signal availability, though overdependence can dilute deeper emotional processing.^[161] Overall, these dynamics highlight texting's dual role: augmenting accessibility while challenging authentic interpersonal rapport, with outcomes contingent on user traits and usage patterns.

Positive Contributions to Connectivity and Efficiency

Text messaging fosters social connectivity by enabling asynchronous, low-cost communication that sustains personal relationships over long distances, particularly when in-person or voice interactions are impractical. A 2013 experimental study found that frequent SMS use in student teams improved social connectedness and positive group attitudes, with participants reporting stronger interpersonal bonds compared to non-texting groups.^[162] This mode reduces barriers like time zone differences or scheduling conflicts, allowing brief exchanges that reinforce ties without demanding immediate responses, as evidenced by user reports of maintained long-distance friendships through regular texting.^[163] In daily life, text messaging enhances efficiency through rapid, high-reliability delivery, achieving open rates of up to 98% and response rates around 45%, outperforming email and voice calls in speed and accessibility.^[164] Its brevity supports quick coordination for tasks like meeting arrangements or sharing updates, minimizing disruptions while conveying essential information, which studies attribute to improved workflow in educational and professional contexts.^[165] For instance, SMS reminders in health interventions have demonstrated consistent behavior change across demographics, streamlining adherence to medical regimens without requiring extended interactions.^[166] During emergencies, SMS excels in mass alerting due to its independence from internet access and ability to penetrate congested networks, delivering real-time instructions that reduce response times and panic.^[167] Public health applications, such as workforce notifications during crises, have improved situational awareness and coordination, with delivery confirmations enabling two-way verification of receipt.^[168] Systems like AMBER Alerts, operational since 1996 and expanded via SMS in the U.S. by 2013, have facilitated over 1,000 child recoveries by rapidly broadcasting descriptions to millions of devices. In disaster scenarios, such as earthquakes or hurricanes, SMS broadcasting provides actionable safety guidance, minimizing casualties through timely, widespread dissemination.^[169]

Risks, Challenges, and Criticisms

Operational Hazards and Personal Responsibility

Text messaging during vehicle operation substantially impairs driver attention, contributing to a notable portion of road fatalities. In 2023, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported 3,275 deaths in U.S. motor vehicle crashes involving distracted drivers, with cell phone use, including texting, as a primary factor in many cases.^[170] Texting specifically diverts visual, manual, and cognitive resources, increasing crash risk by up to 23 times compared to undistracted driving, according to studies on reaction times and lane control.^[171] Personal responsibility remains central, as while 48 states and the District of Columbia prohibit texting while driving, enforcement relies on individual compliance rather than technological mandates.^[172] Beyond vehicular use, text messaging while operating heavy machinery or in industrial settings heightens accident risks through similar attentional lapses. Research on farm equipment operation indicates that texting correlates with delayed responses and control errors, potentially leading to rollovers or collisions, prompting safety guidelines to ban such distractions outright. In construction environments, mobile device use during machinery handling exposes workers to hazards like impaired spatial awareness and fire risks from sparks near phones, underscoring the need for site-specific policies enforcing undivided attention.^[173] Users bear primary responsibility here, as occupational safety standards from bodies like OSHA emphasize personal vigilance over external monitoring, with violations often resulting from self-imposed distractions rather than equipment failure.^[174] Distracted pedestrian activity from texting also constitutes an operational hazard, particularly in transit-heavy areas. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons notes that texting accounted for 9% of pedestrian injuries treated in emergency departments, often due to failure to detect obstacles or vehicles.^[175] A 2024 University of British Columbia study found that texting pedestrians on busy streets exhibit reduced detection of oncoming traffic, elevating collision probabilities.^[176] Personal accountability is emphasized in public safety campaigns, which promote habits like stopping to text rather than regulatory bans, given the impracticality of policing ambulatory behavior.^[177] Overall, these hazards stem from the cognitive demands of composing and reading messages, which fragment attention in dynamic environments. Mitigation hinges on user-initiated practices, such as designated no-device zones or hands-free alternatives, as empirical data shows self-regulation outperforms passive interventions in reducing incidents.^[178] Legal frameworks reinforce this by imposing penalties for negligence, holding individuals liable for foreseeable risks rather than absolving them through technological ubiquity.^[179]

Privacy, Security, and Data Vulnerabilities

Traditional Short Message Service (SMS) transmits messages without end-to-end encryption, exposing content to interception during transit through cellular networks.^[180] This vulnerability stems from the protocol's design, which relies on the Signaling System No. 7 (SS7) for routing, lacking robust authentication or encryption mechanisms.^[181] Attackers with access to SS7, often through compromised telecom operators or black-market tools, can exploit these gaps to eavesdrop on SMS, track locations, or redirect messages, as demonstrated in controlled tests by security researchers since at least 2014.^[182]^[183] SIM swapping attacks further compound these risks, where fraudsters impersonate victims to convince carriers to transfer phone numbers to attacker-controlled SIM cards, thereby intercepting SMS-based two-factor authentication codes.^[184] Such incidents have targeted high-profile individuals, enabling unauthorized access to financial accounts and personal data, with carriers like T-Mobile reporting thousands of attempted swaps annually.^[185] The Federal Bureau of Investigation and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency have issued alerts emphasizing SMS's inadequacy for sensitive communications due to these exploits.^[186] Phishing attacks via SMS, known as smishing, exploit user trust in text messages, which boast click-through rates of 8.9% to 14.5%, far exceeding email phishing.^[187] In February 2025 alone, Americans received 19.2 billion spam texts, many containing malicious links leading to malware or credential theft.^[188] Carriers retain SMS metadata—such as sender/recipient numbers and timestamps—for periods ranging from 90 days to seven years, facilitating law enforcement access but also raising privacy concerns over prolonged surveillance capabilities.^[189] Content is typically not stored long-term by providers, though interception prior to delivery circumvents this.^[190] In contrast, internet-based messaging applications like Signal or WhatsApp employ end-to-end encryption, rendering intercepted traffic unreadable without recipient keys, a feature absent in standard SMS and even Rich Communication Services (RCS) for cross-platform exchanges.^[191]^[192] Google has advocated shifting away from SMS for security-critical uses, citing persistent carrier network flaws.^[191] Despite mitigations like firewalls in some networks, SS7's legacy architecture persists globally, underscoring SMS's fundamental limitations for privacy-sensitive applications.^[193]

Spam, Exploitation, and Regulatory Responses

Text messaging has been plagued by spam, consisting of unsolicited commercial advertisements and fraudulent messages, with Americans receiving approximately 19.2 billion spam texts in February 2025 alone.^[188] Smishing, or SMS phishing, attacks surged by 328% in 2020 and continued to affect 76% of businesses by 2023, often impersonating banks, delivery services, or government entities to extract personal data or funds.^[194] In 2024, the Federal Trade Commission identified top text scams including fake package delivery alerts, banking fraud warnings, and job offers, leading to $470 million in reported consumer losses in the United States—over five times the amount lost in 2020.^[195] These exploits exploit the immediacy and perceived trustworthiness of SMS, with global SMS scams contributing to tens of millions in fraud annually through tactics like artificially inflated traffic and malware distribution.^[196] Exploitation extends beyond financial theft to include romance scams and investment fraud initiated via SMS, where perpetrators build rapport before demanding money, resulting in average victim losses of around $452 per incident in related phone-based scams.^[197] Cybersecurity analyses of over 7,700 user reports classified 40.27% of suspicious texts as scams, highlighting patterns like urgent demands for action or links to malicious sites.^[198] Economic repercussions for businesses include operational costs from increased customer service inquiries—such as a 40% surge in contact center calls following one smishing campaign—and broader fraud losses exceeding $13 million in single incidents.^[199] While legitimate SMS marketing thrives with 84% consumer opt-in rates in 2025, blurred lines with spam erode trust, prompting 52% of recipients to delete unread messages and 38% to report them.^[91] Regulatory responses prioritize consent and penalties to mitigate abuse. In the United States, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) of 1991 prohibits unsolicited promotional texts without prior express written consent, enforceable by the Federal Communications Commission with fines up to $1,500 per violation.^[106] The CAN-SPAM Act supplements this by mandating clear identification of commercial messages and opt-out mechanisms, though it primarily targets email; TCPA-specific rules address SMS gaps.^[107] In the European Union, the ePrivacy Directive requires opt-in consent for direct marketing via electronic communications, integrated with GDPR for data protection, while countries like Canada enforce similar anti-spam laws under CASL.^[200] Globally, frameworks vary, with bodies like the CTIA in the US issuing guidelines for carrier-level filtering, but enforcement challenges persist due to cross-border operations of spammers, often from regions with lax oversight.^[201] Despite these measures, SMS fraud volumes indicate incomplete deterrence, as international perpetrators exploit jurisdictional limits, underscoring the need for enhanced carrier cooperation and AI-driven detection.^[202]

Health, Addiction, and Behavioral Concerns

Excessive engagement with text messaging contributes to addictive patterns, often manifesting as nomophobia, a portmanteau of "no mobile phone phobia," defined as distress arising from inability to access one's device for communication.^[203] Research indicates that nomophobia correlates with heightened levels of depression, social appearance anxiety, and attachment anxiety among young adults and students, with smartphone-dependent individuals reporting elevated emotional reactivity when separated from their phones.^[204] ^[205] These patterns stem from habitual checking driven by intermittent reinforcement akin to gambling, though longitudinal studies emphasize correlation over direct causation, noting confounding factors like pre-existing impulsivity.^[206] On health fronts, frequent texting, particularly before bedtime, disrupts sleep architecture by exposing users to blue light that suppresses melatonin production, leading to delayed sleep onset and reduced sleep efficiency.^[207] A 2022 study found that nighttime cell phone use for texting or calls after lights out predicted longer sleep latency and greater disturbances, with odds ratios indicating 1.5-2 times higher risk for poor sleep quality among young adults.^[208] Physically, divided attention during texting while ambulatory elevates injury risk; U.S. emergency departments treated approximately 13,264 lower extremity injuries linked to cell phone use while walking from 2000 to 2023, representing 35.5% of such cases, with texting implicated in gait instability and veering off course.^[209] ^[210] Behaviorally, compulsive texting impairs sustained attention and executive function, with adolescents sending high volumes of messages showing diminished study skills and academic performance; one analysis of middle and high school students revealed that those texting over 6 minutes per class interval experienced measurable declines in task persistence.^[211] This extends to social domains, where "phubbing"—snubbing others via phone preoccupation—erodes interpersonal trust and relationship quality, as evidenced by experimental data linking device diversion to reduced empathy perception during face-to-face interactions.^[212] Additionally, preference for texting over verbal communication among socially anxious individuals reinforces avoidance of nuanced cues like tone and body language, potentially stunting relational depth, though self-reported data in these studies warrants caution due to response biases.^[213]

Economic Dimensions

Cost Structures and Market Dynamics

The cost structure of traditional short message service (SMS) for mobile network operators (MNOs) has historically featured low marginal costs per message, primarily involving signaling overhead on the SS7 network rather than significant data transmission expenses, with estimates placing the incremental cost at approximately $0.0001 to $0.001 per message in efficient networks. Wholesale termination fees between operators, often regulated, added to these costs, typically ranging from $0.001 to $0.01 per message depending on the interconnect agreement and geography, enabling high profit margins during peak adoption in the 2000s when per-message retail pricing reached $0.10 to $0.20 in many markets.^[214] Consumer pricing evolved from pay-per-message models, common in the 1990s and early 2000s, to bundled or unlimited plans by the mid-2010s amid intensifying carrier competition and the rise of all-you-can-eat data packages that subsumed texting. In the United States, for instance, the proportion of subscribers on unlimited voice and text plans exceeded 70% by 2015, driven by price wars among operators like Verizon and AT&T, which eroded per-message revenues but stabilized subscriber retention through flat-rate predictability.^[215] This shift reflected causal pressures from elastic demand—consumers favored volume-insensitive pricing—and competitive dynamics where differentiation via speed or coverage overshadowed messaging fees.^[216] Market dynamics have been profoundly disrupted by over-the-top (OTT) applications such as WhatsApp and iMessage, which leverage IP data networks to offer free or low-cost alternatives, precipitating a decline in peer-to-peer (P2P) SMS revenues for MNOs; global SMS traffic share is projected to fall to 32% of mobile messaging by 2029 from 45% in 2024, amid a forecasted $23 billion revenue drop for carriers over five years attributable to OTT substitution.^[217] ^[218] Conversely, application-to-person (A2P) SMS, used for alerts, marketing, and two-factor authentication, has sustained growth, with the global A2P market valued at $71.50 billion in 2024 and expected to reach $74.27 billion in 2025, buoyed by regulatory mandates for transactional messaging and lower fraud risks compared to P2P.^[219] A2P costs for businesses typically range from $0.01 to $0.05 per message, inclusive of carrier surcharges of $0.002 to $0.005, underscoring persistent viability in enterprise segments despite OTT encroachment.^[220] Regional variations persist: in developed markets like the EU and North America, unlimited inclusions dominate, commoditizing SMS and pressuring MNOs to pivot toward data monetization, while in emerging economies such as India and parts of Africa, per-message billing endures due to prepaid dominance and uneven broadband access, sustaining localized revenues.^[221] Carriers have responded by promoting rich communication services (RCS) as a premium, carrier-controlled alternative to OTT, though adoption lags due to interoperability challenges and iOS resistance, highlighting ongoing tensions between legacy infrastructure economics and IP-native competitors.^[222]

Revenue Models and Business Impacts

Telecommunications carriers have historically derived revenue from text messaging primarily through short message service (SMS) billing models, including per-message fees for person-to-person (P2P) exchanges and application-to-person (A2P) transactions, often bundled within prepaid or postpaid plans.^[223] A2P messaging, used for enterprise notifications, marketing, and two-factor authentication, generates income via volume-based pricing or revenue-sharing agreements with content providers and gateways, enabling operators to monetize high-throughput business communications without proportional infrastructure costs.^[224] In 2024, the global premium messaging market, encompassing A2P SMS, was valued at USD 75.44 billion, with projections for a 9.1% compound annual growth rate through 2030 driven by demand for reliable transactional alerts.^[225] Over-the-top (OTT) messaging platforms, such as WhatsApp and iMessage, operate on freemium or data-inclusive models that bypass carrier billing for P2P traffic, relying instead on advertising, in-app purchases, or business application programming interfaces (APIs) for revenue. WhatsApp, for instance, monetizes through its Business API, which charges enterprises for scaled customer interactions, contributing to Meta's broader ecosystem earnings without direct user fees for core messaging.^[226] These platforms leverage internet protocol (IP) networks, shifting costs to data usage covered by flat-rate plans rather than metered SMS, which has eroded traditional carrier margins on voice and P2P texting.^[227] The proliferation of OTT services has significantly impacted carrier business models, with P2P SMS revenues declining sharply since the early 2010s as OTT traffic surpassed SMS volumes by 2013, leading to an estimated global loss of over $3 billion in SMS business messaging revenue for operators in subsequent years.^[228] ^[227] This cannibalization prompted carriers to pivot toward data-centric strategies, bundling unlimited messaging with high-speed internet access to retain subscribers, while A2P segments sustained growth amid pricing pressures from regulatory caps and OTT alternatives like rich communication services (RCS).^[229] The global business SMS market, focused on A2P, expanded from USD 5.3 billion in 2024 toward USD 5.981 billion, reflecting resilience in utility-driven use cases despite forecasts of potential A2P revenue collapse without adaptation to fraud prevention and monetization tools.^[230] ^[231] Overall, text messaging's evolution has compelled telecom firms to diversify into value-added services and IP-based upgrades, mitigating revenue shortfalls through ancillary data consumption while highlighting vulnerabilities in legacy billing infrastructures.^[223]

Regulatory and Legal Frameworks

Government Interventions and Policies

In the United States, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) of 1991, enforced by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), prohibits the use of autodialed or prerecorded text messages to wireless numbers without prior express consent from the recipient, with violations subject to fines of up to $500 per message, or $1,500 if willful.^[232] The TCPA treats text messages as equivalent to calls, extending National Do Not Call Registry protections to SMS and requiring clear opt-out mechanisms, such as replying "STOP" to unsubscribe.^[233] In December 2023, the FCC adopted rules mandating one-to-one consent for marketing texts—meaning consent from a lead generator does not transfer to unrelated marketers—and prohibiting texts after opt-out requests except for a single acknowledgment, effective January 27, 2025.^[234] State-level interventions supplement federal rules, with variations in registration and penalties; for instance, Texas amended its Telephone Solicitation Act effective September 1, 2025, requiring SMS marketers to register annually and adhere to enhanced disclosure rules, with fines up to $20,000 per violation.^[235] Regarding public safety, while no federal ban exists on texting while driving, 48 states, the District of Columbia, and territories like Puerto Rico prohibit text messaging for all drivers as of 2023, with primary enforcement allowing stops solely for texting in most jurisdictions.^[236] States like Colorado implemented hands-free laws effective January 1, 2025, banning handheld device use including texting, with fines starting at $100 for first offenses.^[237] Governments also leverage SMS for emergency communications, with the U.S. Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) system, authorized under the WARN Act of 2006 and managed by FEMA and the FCC, enabling geo-targeted, non-opt-out alerts for imminent threats like AMBER Alerts or severe weather since 2012.^[238] WEA messages, limited to 360 characters, reach compatible devices without user registration or fees, covering over 95% of the population by 2023.^[239] Internationally, the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) since 2018 requires explicit opt-in consent for SMS marketing involving personal data, with fines up to 4% of global annual turnover for non-compliance, treating unsolicited commercial texts as privacy infringements.^[240] EU member states enforce additional ePrivacy Directive rules prohibiting spam SMS without consent, though enforcement varies; for example, the UK's Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations mirror GDPR requirements for prior opt-in.^[241] These policies prioritize consumer protection against unsolicited messaging while facilitating state uses like alerts, reflecting a balance between utility and intrusion risks.

Legal Liabilities and Enforcement

Senders of text messages face liability under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) for unsolicited commercial messages, with statutory damages of $500 per violation, trebled to $1,500 for willful or knowing violations.^[242]^[243] Enforcement occurs through private lawsuits by recipients and actions by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which has imposed fines exceeding $300 million in major robocall and text campaigns as of 2023.^[244] Businesses must obtain prior express written consent for marketing texts, and failure to provide opt-out mechanisms like replying "STOP" exacerbates penalties.^[106] Harassing or threatening texts can trigger civil liability for defamation or intentional infliction of emotional distress if they contain false statements published to third parties or cause severe harm.^[245] Criminal enforcement applies under federal statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 2261A for cyberstalking, involving repeated communications causing substantial emotional distress, with penalties including imprisonment up to five years.^[246] State laws vary; for instance, repeated unwanted texts may constitute misdemeanor harassment, prosecutable by local authorities with fines and potential jail time.^[247] Courts admit text records as evidence, often preserved via carrier logs or device screenshots. In vehicular accidents, drivers texting at the time bear primary negligence liability, as texting violates duty of care and contributes to crashes; juries have awarded verdicts like $43.5 million in a 2023 Texas case for injuries from a distracted driver.^[248] Senders generally escape liability unless they knowingly encourage texting by the driver, per precedents emphasizing driver responsibility.^[249] Enforcement relies on civil suits using phone records to prove distraction, with states imposing fines up to $1,000 for violations.^[250] Healthcare providers risk HIPAA violations for unencrypted texts containing protected health information, facing civil monetary penalties up to $50,000 per violation and criminal charges for willful neglect.^[251] Mobile carriers enforce content rules indirectly by filtering prohibited messages (e.g., illegal or spam), imposing sender penalties like $1,000 for illegal content, but disclaim liability for user-generated SMS.^[252] Text-based contracts bind parties if elements of offer, acceptance, and consideration are met, enforceable in disputes via digital records.^[253]

Representations in Culture and Innovation

Depictions in Media and Entertainment

Text messaging has emerged as a staple in modern films and television, serving as a narrative device for interpersonal drama, secrecy, and rapid information exchange, often reflecting the medium's brevity and potential for misinterpretation. In many productions, it replaces verbal phone conversations to heighten tension or reveal subtext, as seen in teen-oriented series where anonymous messages propel plots forward.^[254] Visual representation poses technical challenges due to the small scale of phone screens and the static nature of reading text, leading filmmakers to employ stylized overlays or pop-up bubbles rather than literal screen captures. The BBC series Sherlock, debuting July 25, 2010, pioneered a technique overlaying message content directly onto the actor's visual field, simulating how texts "appear" in the character's mind.^[255] This approach, later adopted in House of Cards under David Fincher's direction starting February 1, 2013, prioritizes readability over realism, avoiding prolonged close-ups that disrupt pacing.^[256] Such depictions frequently diverge from actual usage; television characters' message histories are often absent or reset per scene, ignoring accumulated threads that characterize real texting.^[257] In comedies and dramas alike, texts are rendered in oversized, fleeting fonts—tiny or flashing too quickly for full legibility—forcing viewers to infer content, as critiqued in shows like The Bear and Starstruck.^[258] This stylization underscores texting's dramatic utility but highlights cinema's struggle to capture its mundane, asynchronous essence without inducing viewer boredom.^[259]

Notable Records and Technological Feats

The first short message service (SMS) text was transmitted on December 3, 1992, over the Vodafone GSM network in the United Kingdom, when software engineer Neil Papworth sent "Merry Christmas" from a personal computer to the Orbitel mobile phone of his colleague Richard Jarvis.^[27]^[29] This inaugural transmission demonstrated the feasibility of alphanumeric paging via cellular networks, paving the way for widespread adoption despite initial limitations in character length and device compatibility.^[3] In terms of speed, the Guinness World Record for the fastest time to type a text message on a touch-screen mobile phone stands at 17.00 seconds, achieved by Marcel Fernandes Filho of Brazil in 2014 using the Fleksy keyboard to compose a predefined 160-character paragraph.^[260] Earlier iterations of the record, such as 18.19 seconds also by Filho, highlighted advancements in predictive text input and gesture-based typing algorithms that reduced error rates and input latency on capacitive screens.^[261] Volume-based records underscore SMS's scalability. The highest number of text messages received in one hour is 19,649, set by the Aleradah Organization for Talented People with Disability in Saudi Arabia on an unspecified date, reflecting coordinated bulk reception capabilities.^[262] Globally, SMS traffic peaked in the United States at approximately 2.3 trillion messages in 2011, equating to about 6.3 billion per day, driven by unlimited plans and feature phone ubiquity before app-based alternatives proliferated.^[4] An individual record for sustained volume includes 566,607 texts sent in one month by a single user in 2012, averaging 18,887 daily, achieved through automated or high-frequency manual input on a standard handset.^[263] Technological feats of SMS include its robust handling of global scale via the GSM protocol, which enabled interoperability across disparate networks without central coordination, supporting peak daily volumes exceeding 20 billion messages worldwide by the mid-2010s through simple store-and-forward mechanisms resilient to intermittent connectivity. Another milestone is the simultaneous transmission record of 2,193 people sending identical texts on June 24, 2017, organized by the National Speech & Debate Association in the United States, testing network capacity under synchronized load without widespread failure.^[264] These achievements stem from SMS's lightweight 140-byte (160-character) format, which prioritized efficiency over multimedia, allowing deployment in resource-constrained environments like early 2G infrastructure.

Emerging Trends and Future Outlook

Shift Toward IP-Based Systems

The transition from traditional Short Message Service (SMS), which relies on circuit-switched cellular networks using the SS7 signaling protocol, to IP-based messaging systems began accelerating in the late 2000s, driven primarily by the widespread adoption of smartphones and affordable mobile data plans enabled by 3G and 4G networks.^[265]^[266] SMS, limited to 160 characters per message and often incurring per-message fees, proved inadequate for users seeking richer interactions, such as multimedia sharing and group communications, as data connectivity became ubiquitous.^[267] This shift favored over-the-top (OTT) applications like WhatsApp, launched in 2009, which operate entirely over IP networks, offering end-to-end encryption, high-quality media transmission, and zero marginal cost for users on Wi-Fi or data plans.^[268] OTT apps rapidly displaced personal SMS usage in developed markets due to these advantages, with U.S. SMS volume peaking at 2.4 trillion messages in 2011 before stabilizing or declining per capita as app-based alternatives proliferated.^[269] Globally, factors including reduced roaming charges via data and the limitations of SMS in supporting interactive elements—such as read receipts or location sharing—propelled adoption, particularly among younger demographics who prioritized seamless, feature-rich experiences over carrier-billed texts.^[270]^[268] By 2024, OTT platforms dominated consumer messaging, with billions of daily active users, while SMS persisted for business notifications and regions with limited data infrastructure.^[271] In response to OTT dominance, carriers developed Rich Communication Services (RCS), an IP-based protocol intended to enhance native messaging apps with features akin to those in WhatsApp, including high-resolution images, videos, and interactive buttons, while maintaining interoperability via phone numbers.^[272] RCS specification work began in 2007 under the GSMA, but commercial rollout lagged until around 2016, hampered by fragmented carrier support and competition from established apps; Google acquired Jibe in 2016 to accelerate Android integration.^[267] As of June 2024, RCS had approximately 1.4 billion users worldwide, growing 36% annually since 2022, bolstered by Apple's RCS support in iOS 18, yet it trails OTT apps in market penetration for non-business use due to the latter's cross-device ecosystem and first-mover advantages.^[272]^[78] This carrier-led IP evolution underscores a hybrid future, where RCS supplements SMS for reliability in low-data scenarios, but full IP reliance exposes vulnerabilities like dependency on internet coverage.^[221]

AI Enhancements and Competitive Pressures

Google Messages introduced Magic Compose in May 2023, a generative AI tool that analyzes conversation context to suggest replies in customizable styles such as formal, excited, or Shakespearean, powered by Google's Gemini model.^[273]^[274] Apple Intelligence, launched in October 2024 with iOS 18.1, integrates into iMessage features like thread summarization to highlight key points and writing tools for rephrasing or proofreading messages, enhancing efficiency for long exchanges.^[275]^[276] WhatsApp's Meta AI, rolled out progressively from mid-2024, enables users to query information, generate images, and obtain chat summaries directly within conversations, maintaining end-to-end encryption for private interactions.^[277]^[278] AI-driven security measures further refine text messaging by combating spam and scams. Google Messages employs real-time AI detection to flag conversational fraud in RCS and SMS, analyzing patterns beyond keywords for proactive warnings as of March 2025.^[279]^[280] Such capabilities address rising threats, where AI aids spammers in crafting convincing messages but also empowers filters through machine learning for superior accuracy over rule-based systems.^[281] In application-to-person (A2P) contexts, AI chatbots enable automated, personalized responses via SMS or OTT platforms, processing inquiries at scale with natural language understanding; adoption surged as businesses leverage them for customer service, with conversational AI handling sentiment analysis and multilingual support by 2025.^[282]^[283] These advancements intensify competitive pressures between traditional SMS carriers and over-the-top (OTT) apps like WhatsApp. OTT platforms, enriched by AI for interactive features, capture user preference due to zero marginal cost and seamless integration, projecting SMS to comprise just 32% of global mobile messaging revenue by 2028 amid declining A2P volumes.^[217] Mobile operators counter with RCS expansion for rich media and AI compatibility, yet grapple with pricing erosion from communications-platform-as-a-service (CPaaS) providers and OTT dominance, necessitating strategies to monetize enhanced services without alienating cost-sensitive enterprises.^[229]^[214] Approximately 58% of AI-adopting firms, including those in telecom, cite competitor emulation as the primary driver, underscoring the imperative for rapid innovation to avert market share loss.^[284]

References

[1]
What is SMS? - Short Message Service Explained - AWS
SMS stands for Short Message Service. It is a text messaging service that allows the exchange of short text messages between mobile devices.
[2]
SMS Introduction - SmsSolutions.net
SMS was created as part of the GSM Phase 1 standard. The first short message is believed to have been sent in December 1992 from a PC to a mobile phone on the ...
[3]
Everything You Need to Know About the First SMS Message
Jan 20, 2022 · The first-ever text message was sent on 3 December 1992 by Neil Papworth, a young software programmer from the UK.
[4]
How Many Text Messages Are Sent a Day? (2024 Statistics) - SellCell
May 9, 2023 · Across the world, we send an enormous 23 billion text messages per day! Text messaging is less popular than WhatsApp messaging; we send 70 ...
[5]
Messaging App Revenue and Usage Statistics (2025)
Jun 6, 2025 · The number of people using messaging apps almost reached four billion in 2024. Messaging app users 2016 to 2024 (bn). Messaging Users by ...
[6]
What is SMS, and how does it work? | Sinch MessageMedia
Mar 27, 2024 · SMS, also commonly known as text messaging, stands for short messaging service. The SMS protocol allows sending text messages of up to 160 characters between ...
[7]
[PDF] Impact of Text Messaging on Communication - Cornerstone
The results of this study suggest text messages do have a displacing effect on face-to-face communication. But text messaging is not the only technology that ...
[8]
The History and Impact of SMS Technology - Ranplan Wireless
Dec 2, 2024 · In the 1980s, the emergence of SMS (Short Message Service) revolutionized communication by introducing text messaging capabilities to cellular ...
[9]
(PDF) Insights into the social and psychological effects of SMS text ...
Compared to Talkers, Texters were found to be more lonely and socially anxious, and more likely to disclose their 'real-self' through text than via face-toface ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[10]
The History of SMS Text Messaging | SMS Turns 30 - Bandwidth
Dec 2, 2022 · Texting has been through many iterations over the past three decades. See what's changed since the first ever SMS text message was sent.
[11]
How has Texting Changed the Way We Communicate? - Kaleyra
Oct 17, 2022 · In many ways, texting has made communication more accessible, allowing individuals to avoid lengthy and unpleasant phone conversations and opt ...
[12]
Definition of Short Message Service (SMS) - Gartner
Short message service (SMS) is a facility developed as part of the GSM standard that enables a mobile device to send, receive and display messages of up to 160 ...
[13]
Messaging Character Limits - Twilio
The 160-character limit is for messages encoded using the GSM-7 character set. Messages not encoded with GSM-7 are limited to 70 characters.
[14]
SMS (Short Message Service) Definition | PubNub
SMS (Short Message Service) is a way to send short, 160-character text messages from one mobile device to another over the cellular telephone network.
[15]
What's the Difference Between SMS vs MMS? - SlickText
Mar 3, 2025 · The simplest way to understand the difference is that SMS refers to text messages, while MMS refers to messages with a picture or video.
[16]
SMS vs MMS: Key differences and uses - SimpleTexting
Oct 8, 2025 · TL;DR: SMS comes with a 160-character limit, while MMS allows for 1,600 characters as well as media such as pictures, videos, or audio. The main ...
[17]
RCS vs. MMS: A texting technology comparison - Textline
Oct 24, 2024 · RCS, which stands for Rich Communication Service, is a modern messaging protocol built to replace SMS and MMS. Developed by the GSM Association, ...Missing: terminology | Show results with:terminology
[18]
What's the Difference Between SMS, MMS, and RCS? - Braze
Dec 16, 2021 · SMS is short text, MMS supports multimedia, and RCS is an enhanced SMS with rich media and interactive features.Missing: terminology | Show results with:terminology
[19]
[PDF] ETSI TS 123 040 V12.2.0 (2014-10)
Technical realization of the Short Message Service (SMS). (3GPP TS 23.040 ... SMS-DELIVER: short message transfer protocol data unit containing user ...
[20]
SS7 MAP: What it is and how it works - Mobius Software
How does SS7 MAP work? ... The SS7 MAP protocol works by sending and receiving messages between nodes in the SS7 network. These messages contain information about ...
[21]
SMSC is the mobile network element handles SMS operations
When an SMS is sent from any mobile phone, it must get to an SMSC first before it is forwarded to the end-point or destination. Learn more about SMSC now!
[22]
GSM 7-bit Default Alphabet Table (with Character Codes of ISO ...
The GSM 7-bit default alphabet consists of 128 characters totally and each character is represented by 7 bits. 10 extra characters are defined in the GSM 7-bit ...
[23]
How character encoding affects SMS message length
GSM-7 multi-part or concatenated messages: When the message text is longer than 160 GSM characters, the message is concatenated and sent. When a message is ...Message length · GSM-7 · UCS-2/UTF-16 · UTF-8
[24]
SMPP - Short Message Peer-to-Peer Protocol
The SMPP (Short Message Peer-to-Peer) protocol is an open, industry standard protocol designed to provide a flexible data communications interface.
[25]
When Did Texting Start? Text Message & Smartphone History
Oct 29, 2022 · The first text message was sent on December 3rd, 1992. Neil Papworth sent the first text message "Merry Christmas" to Richard Jarvis at Vodafone ...
[26]
The History of Texting: 30+ Years of SMS - Textmagic
Texting, also known as SMS (Short Message Service), refers to the exchange of short written messages between individuals using mobile devices or computers.
[27]
First SMS text message is sent | December 3, 1992 - History.com
Oct 4, 2022 · On December 3, 1992, the first SMS text message in history is sent: Neil Papworth, a 22-year-old engineer, uses a personal computer to send the text message.
[28]
The First Text Message Celebrates 25 Years - NPR
Dec 4, 2017 · The first text message was transmitted Dec. 3, 1992. Engineer Neil Papworth typed "merry Christmas" on a computer and sent the first SMS message to the ...
[29]
25 years since the world's first text message - Vodafone.com
In 1992, Neil Papworth, a 22-year-old software programmer from the UK, sent the first ever text message from a computer to his colleague Richard Jarvis.
[30]
Fast facts about the first SMS text ever sent | SimpleTexting
Sep 11, 2025 · This landmark holiday greeting was sent on December 3, 1992 by then-22-year-old engineer Neil Papworth at Vodafone on an Orbitel 901. He sent ...
[31]
[PDF] ETSI TS 123 040 V3.7.0 (2001-12)
The Short Message Service (SMS) provides a means of sending messages of limited size to and from GSM/UMTS mobiles. The provision of SMS makes use of a Service ...
[32]
Our committee Mobile Standards Group (MSG) - ETSI
We provide the regulatory standards needed to support the deployment of GSM, Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS™) and LTE™ networks in Europe.Missing: SMS | Show results with:SMS
[33]
A Brief History of Text Messaging - Mobivity
Sep 27, 2012 · The first text message was sent years later on December 3rd, 1992 from Neil Papworth, a former developer at Sema Group Telecoms.
[34]
When Was Texting Invented? A Text Messaging Timeline - Heymarket
Text messaging was invented in 1984. That much we know for a fact. From there, the exact details become quite a bit murkier.SMS research and discovery... · and Beyond: Business texting...<|separator|>
[35]
[PDF] GSM 03.38 - Version 5.0.0 - ETSI
These are specific codepoints required by the Short Message Service. (SMS) specifications which in turn are used not only for SMS (GSM 03.40, 03.41) but also ...
[36]
[PDF] ETSI TS 122 140 V4.3.0 (2002-12)
3GPP TS 22.140 version 4.3.0 Release 4 This Technical Specification defines the stage one description of the non real-time Multimedia Messaging Service, MMS.
[37]
[PDF] Multimedia Messaging Service Architecture Overview
Dec 17, 2003 · For sent MMs, the MMS Proxy-Relay will submit the message to the addressed host using the SMTP protocol. The MM will be converted to standard ...
[38]
MMS Messaging for Business: Benefits & Use Cases - Textmagic
Sony Ericsson released the first phones with MMS messaging features in 2002. This was almost a decade after Nokia sold the first text-capable handsets. Other ...Missing: introduction date
[39]
GSMA To Take Rich Communication Suite Forwards | Newsroom
Sep 15, 2008 · Over 30 companies are now supporting the initiative and the first interoperable RCS services are set to be launched in mid 2009. The integration ...
[40]
A brief history of RCS messaging - Sinch
Jan 8, 2025 · RCS was developed in 2007 to upgrade SMS, introduced in 2008, with a universal profile in 2016, and Apple support in 2024.Founding To Growth: 2008 To... · Quick Growth Years: 2023 To... · 2025 And Beyond: The Next...
[41]
RCS - Rich Communication Services - GSMA
RCS, or Rich Communication Services, modernises traditional SMS messaging by introducing features like group chats, file sharing, and read receipts.Universal Profile · RCS Market · The RCS Ecosystem · RCS Resources
[42]
Evolution of GSMA RCS standards - Netmanias
Jan 21, 2014 · As of now, RCS r5 has evolved up to RCS r5.4. The RCS r5.x intends to integrate all the communication features on the basis of IP network.
[43]
RCS Now in iOS: a New Chapter for Mobile Messaging - GSMA
Sep 17, 2024 · We are celebrating a significant milestone in the evolution of messaging with the launch of Rich Communication Services (RCS) support on iPhone with the ...
[44]
What is Signaling System 7 (SS7)? A Definitive Guide
Dec 24, 2024 · SS7 is one such framework consisting of a family of protocols, that has revolutionized how voice calls, SMS, and data services are delivered.
[45]
Mastering the Essentials of SMSC: The Backbone of Text Messaging
Jun 23, 2023 · In this blog post, we will delve into the essential components and functions of SMSCs, and explore routing mechanisms, protocols, message queue management, ...
[46]
(PDF) Successful Architecture for Short Message Service Center
This paper presents and analyzes the key architectural decisions in the design of a successful Short Message Service Center as part of a GSM network.
[47]
Short Message Service Center (SMSCs) - Meaning & Importance
Short Message Service Center is responsible for storing, routing, receiving and forwarding text messages sent from mobile phones.Missing: architecture | Show results with:architecture
[48]
SMS (Short Message Service) Architecture
Sep 3, 2010 · These mainstream protocols, which include SMPP, CIMD, UCP/EMI, and OIS, are proprietary binary access protocols associated with SMS that ...
[49]
Short Message Service Centre (SMSC) - Enghouse Networks
Modular, Flexible Architecture. Supports industry-leading performance, high-availability and cost-eﬀective scalability as well as the addition of bulk messaging ...
[50]
SS7 SMSC for A2P, P2A and P2P Messaging - ComCode Technology
ComCode's SS7 SMSC offers scalable, SIGTRAN & SMPP-based messaging for MVNOs and enterprises—ideal for A2P, P2A, and P2P SMS delivery.
[51]
[PDF] SMS Messaging in SS7 Networks: Optimizing Revenue with ...
These components include SS7 interface boards, protocol stacks, and signaling gateways that utilize the Internet Protocol (IP) to transport. SS7 messages. The ...
[52]
SMS Network architecture - Ozeki AI Server
In the SMS network operated by GSM service providers four layers of transport is used (Figure 1.): SM-AL (Application Layer), SM-TL (Transfer Layer), SM-RL ( ...
[53]
The Importance of SS7 Stack in Mobile Networks - Mobius Software
May 8, 2023 · The SS7 protocol stack is an essential component of mobile networks, providing critical functionalities like call routing, SMS messaging, network management, ...
[54]
https://flowroute.com/blog/understanding-sms-and-mms-messaging-a-complete-guide/
[55]
What is MMS Messaging? The 2025 Guide to Sending Multimedia ...
Jan 22, 2025 · MMS is a messaging protocol for sending multimedia like photos, videos, and audio over a mobile connection, an evolution of SMS.Missing: introduction date
[56]
[PDF] 3GPP TS 23.140 V4.10.0 (2003-06)
The present document contains the core functions for a non realtime Multimedia Messaging Service, MMS, which are sufficient to provide a basic service. MMS uses ...
[57]
MMS file types, size and character limits - AWS Documentation
A single MMS media file can be up to 2 MB for all image types (gif, jpeg, png) and 600 KB in size for all audio and video media file types.
[58]
Message types using MMS - Infobip
Maximum MMS sizes vary depending on the network operator, but all operators will reliably handle messages of up to 300 KB of data. Most of the US and Canadian ...
[59]
Understanding MMS Messaging - IntelePeer Docs
Understanding MMS Messaging · Maximum message size: 5 MiB. Maximum number of attachments: 5 · Maximum number of links: 5. Maximum text size: 5,000 characters.
[60]
[PDF] ETSI TS 122 140 V5.3.0 (2002-09)
The MMS shall be able to support the ability to create, update, store, transfer, interrogate, manage and retrieve a user's multimedia messaging profiles.
[61]
Multimedia Messaging Service Center (MMSC) - Bandwidth
Jun 25, 2025 · MMSC can include security features like virus scanning and content filtering to prevent the distribution of harmful or inappropriate content.Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
[62]
MMS Overview - SmsSolutions.net
MMS will enable messages to be sent and received using lots of different media including text, images, audio and video. As new more advanced media become ...<|separator|>
[63]
Explaining Rich Communication Services (RCS) - Converge Digest
Jan 15, 2024 · A Brief History of RCS · 2008: GSMA took ownership of the RCS project and began promoting it as a global standard. · 2008 (September 15): Original ...Rich Communications Service... · A Brief History Of Rcs · Key Capabilities Of Rcs
[64]
Elevating the Messaging Experience with RCS Universal Profile 3.1
Jul 25, 2025 · I am excited to tell you about the next milestone in the evolution of Rich Communication Services (RCS) with the release of RCS Universal ...
[65]
Enable RCS Chats on Android & iPhone: Get The Message
Enjoy clearer pictures, better group chats, and seamless communication between Android & iPhone with RCS. Learn to enable RCS messaging on your device.
[66]
Growing Adoption of RCS Messaging in the U.S. Following iPhone ...
May 19, 2025 · RCS now serves as the default protocol for text messages exchanged between iPhone and Android users.
[67]
Text Message Statistics & Trends for 2024 [And Beyond!] - Intradyn
Since then, SMS usage in the U.S. has skyrocketed, with Americans sending roughly 6 billion texts per day.
[68]
60+ SMS and email statistics: Why using both channels works better
SMS & email as communication channels · 95% of people aged 18-29 chose texting as their preferred mode of communication, while social media engagement stands at ...
[69]
Long-distance texting: Text messaging is linked with higher ...
Some studies have found that more frequent texting is linked to greater relationship satisfaction (Luo & Tuney, 2015), ratings of partner accessibility and ...
[70]
The impact of texting on committed romantic relationships
Results suggest that text messaging influences social behavior within romantic relationships; there are both positive and negative aspects of texting use within ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[71]
Effects of texting on satisfaction in romantic relationships: The role of ...
Aug 7, 2025 · The results suggested that texting share showed positive links with both attachment dimensions and a negative link with relationship satisfaction.
[72]
A daily-diary study on the effects of face-to-face communication ...
The goal of the current study is to investigate the impact that the use of texting has on relationship satisfaction and levels of understanding in romantic ...
[73]
SMS broadcast: Guide to sending bulk texts - SimpleTexting
Apr 2, 2025 · An SMS broadcast is a way of sending text messages to a group of recipients, rather than one contact.
[74]
What is SMS Broadcasting: 7 Tips for Effective Messaging - Messente
Jan 8, 2024 · SMS broadcasting means sending a single text message to a broad audience where all recipients receive it simultaneously. Unlike group texting, ...
[75]
Broadcast Text Messaging - Reach The Masses with SMS | SlickText
Send an SMS broadcast to all of your contacts at once, regardless of list size. Our platform supports both SMS and MMS messaging and you can easily scale up or ...
[76]
What is RCS messaging? All You Need to Know in 2025 - Sinch
RCS chat offers communication capabilities like read receipts, typing indicators, high-quality media sharing, and more. RCS chats can also include multimedia ...
[77]
RCS Messaging & Chats Explained for Conversational ... - Webex
Rich messaging capabilities: Within an RCS chat or group chat share high-resolution media, including gifs, image carousels, and dynamic media cards. Live ...
[78]
30+ RCS Statistics You Need to Know For 2025 - Sinch
Sep 24, 2025 · Massive user base: In 2025, Google reported that more than a billion person-to-person (P2P) RCS messages are sent every day in the U.S. alone.Key Rcs Market Insights · Rcs Facts And Features · Case Study: Picard's...<|separator|>
[79]
8 Ways Nonprofits Can Use Text Messaging - Donorbox
Rating 4.8 (234) · $0.00 to $475.008 Ways Nonprofits Can Use Text Messaging · 1. Fundraising · 2. Steward donors · 3. Rally supporters · 4. Plan strategies · 5. Manage events · 6. Organize volunteers.
[80]
SMS campaigns for activists - Activist Handbook
Nov 15, 2022 · Peer to peer texting is a method for contacting your base via text messages to deliver calls to action. Usually done at high volumes, ...
[81]
Why SMS Messaging, Done Right, is the Secret Weapon for Political ...
The most effective SMS campaigns build real, permission-based relationships with voters. These texts feel more like conversations than commands. Here's what ...
[82]
SMS Marketing Statistics 2025: Trends, Insights, and Data - Notifyre
Oct 17, 2025 · Global Business Texting Statistics This figure was expected to rise to $339 billion in 2023, and the market size is projected to double by 2024 ...
[83]
Text Messaging for Grassroots Community Organizing
Jan 30, 2014 · Text messaging is more accessible than ever and can be a powerful tool in direct community organizing. Text messaging can have a huge impact on movements.
[84]
The Role of SMS in Promoting Social Causes - LinkedIn
Sep 7, 2024 · Organizations can use SMS to: Organize Events and Protests: Text messaging can be used to coordinate grassroots movements, allowing supporters ...
[85]
https://clubtexting.com/blog/essential-guide-using-group-texting-to-organize-group-events
[86]
It's complicated: Our relationship with texting
Aug 9, 2018 · For instance, couples with similar texting habits tend to be happier and more fulfilled, according to one study. Researchers surveyed 205 adults ...
[87]
I just text to say I love you: Partner similarity in ... - ScienceDirect.com
This study examined the role of perceived texting similarity between romantic partners in predicting relationship satisfaction.
[88]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563214006372
[89]
The impact of emojis on perceived responsiveness and relationship ...
In digital communication, perceived responsiveness remains a crucial factor in relationship satisfaction. Positive text messaging between partners is associated ...
[90]
Intimate Conversation Leads to Greater Social Bonding in Both Face ...
Jun 8, 2020 · Intimate texting promotes social bonding more than small talk over text. Intimate texting leads to similar social bonding as small talk face-to ...Missing: peer- reviewed
[91]
SMS Marketing Statistics 2025: Key Insights - SimpleTexting
In 2025, 84% of consumers are opted in to receive texts from businesses, marking a 35% growth in SMS marketing opt-ins since 2021.
[92]
SMS marketing statistics: Key figures for 2025 - Infobip
Apr 14, 2025 · SMS has 98% open rate, 90% read rate within 3 minutes, 45% response rate, 7100% ROI, and 72% purchase rate from texts.
[93]
43 SMS Marketing Statistics for 2025: Open Rates, CTRs & ROI
Jun 13, 2025 · SMS response rates are 45%, compared to 10% for email. SMS campaign conversion rates range from 21% to 32%. Abandoned cart SMS conversion: 24.6% ...
[94]
https://www.text-em-all.com/blog/sms-marketing-roi-business-impact-success-stories
[95]
SMS Marketing Compliance: Understanding TCPA and GDPR
Feb 11, 2025 · The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) governs SMS marketing in the United States. Under TCPA, businesses must obtain express written consent from ...
[96]
TCPA and CTIA Compliance for SMS Marketing in the US
May 1, 2024 · Learn how to make your SMS marketing compliant with TCPA regulations and CTIA best practices to avoid fines and provide a better customer ...
[97]
Understanding how GDPR affects SMS in Europe
Sep 1, 2025 · To ensure compliance with SMS marketing regulations in Europe, you must adhere to the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and ...
[98]
15 real-life SMS marketing case studies and examples to inspire you
Sep 29, 2022 · 15 SMS marketing case studies and examples · 1. Pottery Barn · 2. Nordstrom · 3. Orangetheory Fitness · 4. Wayfair · 5. Wag! · 6. Fit Athletic · 7.
[99]
SMS Marketing Examples: 6 Use Cases & 11 Real-World Campaigns
Sep 18, 2025 · SMS marketing examples from real-life brands · 1. Promote product launches, sales, and discounts · 2. Coax abandoners back to their shopping ...
[100]
2024 State of Business Texting Report by Text Request
75% are texting for customer service · 68% are texting for appointment scheduling · 62% are texting for alerts and notifications · 39% are texting for employee ( ...
[101]
20+ SMS Marketing Statistics (With Sources) to Know in 2025
Jan 21, 2025 · Surveyed businesses reported 11-20% of their revenue coming from SMS marketing (Simple Texting). With its unmatched open rates and ability to ...
[102]
30 SMS Marketing Statistics You Need to Know For 2024 - Textellent
Sep 17, 2024 · 72% of retailers prioritize SMS and omnichannel for 2024 growth. Marketing text messages boast a 98% open rate. 95% of SMS messages are read ...
[103]
SMS Marketing in 2024: Key Stats and Insights for USA Businesses
On average, text messages have an open rate of 98% and a response rate of 45%. According to a survey, 91% of customers prefer text messages from businesses as a ...What Is Sms Marketing · Key Trends In Sms Marketing · Insights For Usa Businesses<|separator|>
[104]
SMS Marketing Statistics 2024: Key Trends and Insights for Effective ...
Sep 3, 2024 · Around 65% of the global population uses SMS. It ... Almost 80% to 85% of retailers use text messages to communicate with customers.
[105]
TCPA text messages: Rules and regulations guide for 2025
Jun 6, 2025 · Explore our comprehensive guide for compliance with TCPA text messages. Learn key rules, requirements, and how TrustedForm can help in 2025.
[106]
Understanding US SMS compliance laws | Klaviyo Help Center
Jul 7, 2025 · Under TCPA, sending spam text messages is illegal and can result in fines starting at $500 per infringement, and reaching as high as $1,500.
[107]
CAN-SPAM Act: A Compliance Guide for Business
The CAN-SPAM Act, a law that sets the rules for commercial email, establishes requirements for commercial messages, gives recipients the right to have you stop ...
[108]
Every Business Needs to Follow These Text Message Laws
Sep 10, 2025 · SMS compliance basics: federal regulations to know · Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) · Express written consent · CAN-SPAM Act.
[109]
15 real companies that use SMS marketing - SimpleTexting
Mar 5, 2020 · 15 Examples of Companies That Use SMS Marketing · 1. Michaels · 2. Applebee's · 3. Papa John's · 4. World Market · 5. Domino's · 6. PetSmart · 7.
[110]
6 industries using SMS messaging | Clickatell
Clickatell looks at the top industries using SMS messaging; travel & tourism, catering, shopping, real estate and financial.
[111]
2024 SMS Marketing Consumer Behavior Report - EZ Texting
Consumers continue to express their desire for faster and more efficient messaging. A full 84% of respondents say that it takes them just 15 minutes to read new ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[112]
Enterprise SMS Solutions that Scale with your Business - Textmagic
Enterprise SMS solutions are made to scale up with your business. Audit logs, role-based access, and SSO are just some of the features that help you grow.
[113]
Enterprise Messaging: Benefits, Challenges, Strategies & Tools
Unlike consumer-grade messaging apps, enterprise solutions prioritize features like encryption, role-based access, and integration with other workplace tools, ...Top 10 Benefits of Enterprise... · Steps to Building a Robust...
[114]
Enterprise Text Messaging Guide: Everything You Need To Know
Enterprise texting is a platform for businesses to send and receive text messages, delivering updates, promotions, and reminders directly to mobile devices.
[115]
Business text messaging services - Zendesk
Aug 13, 2025 · Below, we'll explore 10 business texting services to help you find the best solution for your text messaging needs.What is business text... · Business text services and... · The 10 best business text...
[116]
7 Best Text Messaging Services for Business - Nextiva
Aug 25, 2025 · Textedly is well-rated for features like bulk SMS and two-way messaging, while tools like reporting, team management, and text-to-landline see ...<|separator|>
[117]
5 charts showing the potential of text message (SMS) marketing
Jan 23, 2024 · Some 66% of people worldwide use text messaging to engage with companies, and 65% use messenger apps, according to July 2023 Salesforce data.
[118]
Understanding the Features of SMS Marketing Platforms - TrueDialog
A SMS marketing platform is a tool used for crafting and sending promotional and transactional text messages to specific phone numbers.
[119]
SMS Marketing Statistics 2025 - Fascinating Numbers - TxtCart
9. Regional Differences · North America – SMS is the preferred channel for 30% of consumers, compared to 24% globally. · Europe – 46% of Europeans subscribe to 4+ ...
[120]
100+ SMS & Text Marketing Statistics to Know in 2025 - Klaviyo
Jun 17, 2024 · Top SMS marketing stats in 2024: SMS speeds up time to purchase ; Text messages drive purchases. 1 ; People who buy from text messages are buying ...
[121]
https://txtcartapp.com/blog/text-marketing-statistics
[122]
Current State of Mobile Messaging Market Adoption - LinkedIn
Sep 4, 2024 · Adoption rates vary by region due to differences in technological infrastructure, consumer behavior, and platform preferences: Asia-Pacific: ...
[123]
Global Digital Communication: Texting, Social Networking Popular ...
Dec 20, 2011 · Text messaging is a global phenomenon – across the 21 countries surveyed, a median of 75% of cell phone owners say they text.Missing: penetration | Show results with:penetration
[124]
Smartphone owners are now the global majority, New GSMA report ...
Oct 11, 2023 · Over half (54%) of the global population – some 4.3 billion people – now owns a smartphone, according to the GSMA's annual State of Mobile Internet ...Missing: messaging | Show results with:messaging
[125]
Cell Phones Allow Countries to 'Leapfrog' Technology - VOA
Nov 1, 2009 · Cell phones are an example of what is sometimes now called leapfrog technology, a product that allows developing nations the benefits of a reliable and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[126]
Cell phones, text-messaging revolutionize conservation approaches
Apr 15, 2007 · Mobile phones, however, have been spreading rapidly and today are nearly ubiquitous in some countries, leapfrogging the number of land lines in ...
[127]
Every global region has seen a steep rise in mobile phone ...
May 5, 2025 · The visualization illustrates the increase in mobile cellular subscriptions per 100 people across various global regions from the year 2000 to 2023.Missing: SMS | Show results with:SMS
[128]
Mobile Usage Trends Across Different Countries: Global Patterns ...
Jul 3, 2025 · By 2024, we estimate global mobile penetration to reach: North America: 95%; Europe: 92%; Asia Pacific: 89%; Latin America: 86%; Middle East & ...
[129]
RCS: Global adoption trends and future growth - Plusmo
Feb 18, 2025 · Meanwhile, SMS still dominates in Africa and Latin America due to lower internet penetration, although RCS adoption continues to rise steadily.
[130]
1. Majorities in sub-Saharan Africa own mobile phones, but ...
Oct 9, 2018 · In every country surveyed, more than half of mobile phone owners report using their phone to send text messages during the past year. But ...
[131]
A2P Messaging Statistics By Usage, Market Size and Facts (2025)
Sep 23, 2025 · Meanwhile, Latin America is forecast to bring in USD 4.37 billion, and the Middle East and Africa (MEA) region is estimated at USD 3.12 billion.
[132]
Mobile Messaging Traffic and Revenue Forecast: 2024–29 - Omdia
Nov 11, 2024 · The Mobile Messaging Traffic and Revenue Forecast: 2024-29 forecasts telco messaging for 67 countries in eight regions.
[133]
New GSMA report shows mobile internet connectivity continues to ...
Oct 23, 2024 · 3.1 billion people (39% of the global population) live within mobile internet coverage but do not use it (the usage gap). The usage gap is nine ...
[134]
[PDF] Technology Adoption and Leapfrogging: Racing for Mobile Payments
Feb 21, 2025 · In 2007, Vodafone launched one of the largest mobile payment systems in the world. It was based on SMS/USSD text messaging technology and ...
[135]
There are now more than half a billion mobile money accounts in the ...
Jul 7, 2025 · In 2023, there were over 330 million active mobile money accounts in the region; more than one mobile money account for every four people.
[136]
(PDF) Short Message Service (SMS) Applications for Disease ...
Aug 10, 2025 · 17 A systematic review of short message services for disease prevention in the developing countries has also shown that text messages are ...
[137]
[PDF] Facilitators and Barriers to SMS Use among the Low-income Mobile ...
We assume that the effect of critical mass or network externalities of SMS is currently less salient in developing countries as the adoption rate is less.
[138]
The Mobile Economy 2025 | GSMA Intelligence
Mar 3, 2025 · Mobile technologies and services now generate around 5.8% of global GDP, a contribution that amounts to $6.5 trillion of economic value added.
[139]
[PDF] Emerging interpersonal norms of text messaging in India and the ...
American women. Indian men (41%) preferred reading texts in semi private settings as compared to 15% of U.S. American women. Indian women, who differ ...
[140]
https://www.marquettewire.org/3778166/republican-national-convention/textiquette-texting-differences-across-cultures-wpo1-az2-dac3/
[141]
The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS
This paper describes social, cultural, and historical contexts that structure current mobile text messaging practices of Japanese youth. First are ways in which ...
[142]
New research shows that where we come from can influence our ...
Nov 2, 2021 · A Miami University graduate student has found distinct cross-cultural differences in the use of the increasingly popular emoji images used in text messaging.
[143]
(PDF) Cross-Cultural Differences in Online Communication Patterns
Cultural variations also extend to the use of non-verbal cues and symbols in online communication. Emojis, GIFs, and memes are commonly used in digital ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[144]
Cultural influences on adoption of SMS advertising: A study of ...
Feb 18, 2008 · This study examines whether cultural differences between countries have a significant impact on consumers' adoption of SMS advertising.
[145]
The Influence of Texting Language on Grammar and Executive ... - NIH
Mar 31, 2016 · In public opinion, use of textese by children and young adults has been linked to poor reading and writing skills and even language ...
[146]
Exploring the longitudinal relationships between the use of grammar ...
Jun 13, 2014 · This study therefore examined the interrelationships between children's and young adults' tendency to make grammatical violations when texting and their ...
[147]
New study challenges myth that texting affects children's grammar ...
Jul 11, 2014 · Researchers have discovered that that the use of “textisms” does not appear to have a negative impact on the development of children's grammar and spelling.
[148]
The Effects of Text Messaging and Instant Messaging on Literacy
Aug 8, 2025 · This article reviews empirical studies published in the last decade on the effects of text messaging and instant messaging on literacy
[149]
Smartphones and Cognition: A Review of Research Exploring ... - NIH
Apr 3, 2017 · They reported that texting consistently led to decreased attention to the road, slower response time to hazards, greater lateral variance ...
[150]
[PDF] Texting and its Effect on Memory Retention
Apr 27, 2017 · There is good reason to suspect that waiting to respond to a call or text message may itself disrupt attention performance. First, work in ...
[151]
Why Attachment Styles and Texting Don't Always Mix
Aug 6, 2018 · A recent study by Halpern and Katz, 2017, revealed that more texting is related to more conflict erupting and less intimacy in romantic relationships.
[152]
What Your Texting Habits Say About Your Attachment Style
Jan 29, 2025 · An anxious attachment style desires intimacy and closeness but struggles to feel worthy of love, leading to clingy and needy behavior. · On the ...
[153]
[PDF] The Relationship among Gender, Attachment Style and the ...
The study examines how gender and attachment styles relate to the perception of text message valence. Women tend to see texts as more affectionate, and anxious ...
[154]
Can texting be used to improve romantic relationships?—The effects ...
Aug 7, 2025 · In digital communication, perceived responsiveness remains a crucial factor in relationship satisfaction. Positive text messaging between ...
[155]
Effects of texting on satisfaction in romantic relationships: The role of ...
The results suggested that texting share showed positive links with both attachment dimensions and a negative link with relationship satisfaction.
[156]
The Effect of Phubbing on Fundamental Needs, Mood, and Trust - NIH
Results from both studies suggest that phubbing triggers negative mood and feelings of ostracism, and threatens fundamental needs.
[157]
Phubbing breeds dehumanization via subjectivity uncertainty
Phubbing increased dehumanization. Subjectivity uncertainty mediated the effect of phubbing on dehumanization. Dehumanization induced by phubbing further ...
[158]
Linking adolescents' phubbing to depression: the serial mediating ...
The present study aimed to explore the link between adolescents' phubbing behavior and depression, focusing on the underlying psychological mechanisms.Introduction · Method · Results · Discussion
[159]
Phubbing Behavior and its Association With Depression, Anxiety ...
Mar 11, 2025 · The study aimed to determine the relationship between phubbing behavior and its association with depression, anxiety, and stress among college students.
[160]
the social and psychological effects of sms text messaging - PEARL
Jun 19, 2024 · The present results suggest that those who are socially anxious are more likely to prefer using their mobile to text rather than to talk, and ...
[161]
Text Messaging and Connectedness Within Close Interpersonal ...
Aug 7, 2025 · This study describes how respondents perceive and use text messages within close interpersonal dyads. Interviews with dyads resulted in three main themes.
[162]
The Efficacy of Text Messaging to Improve Social Connectedness ...
Aug 10, 2025 · This experimental study investigates the impact of short-messaging service (SMS)—text messaging—on social connectedness and group attitude ...<|separator|>
[163]
What are the effects of constant communication via text and social ...
Jul 6, 2023 · A lot of positive effects such as the ability to maintain relationships over longer distances when you aren't able to meet up as often.
[164]
The Power of Smart Texting Technology - TextMyGov
A study from Moorpark College highlights the exceptional effectiveness of text messages. With a staggering 45% response rate and an impressive 98% open rate, ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[165]
[PDF] Effectiveness, Advantages, and Applications of SMS in Higher ...
As demonstrated by the research highlights, expanding the use of text messaging on college campuses has the potential to revolutionize communication with ...
[166]
25 Years of Text Messaging in Health - PMC - NIH
Dec 17, 2024 · Indeed, studies assessing text message–based health interventions have shown them to be effective across sociodemographic and ethnic groups and ...
[167]
The Benefits of SMS for Emergency Alerts - Mailchimp
Learn why SMS is one of the most effective tools for emergency alerts: reliable, immediate, and accessible even without internet access.
[168]
Developing an Employee Text Messaging Program in a Local Public ...
Short message service (SMS) text messaging can be useful for communicating information to public health employees and improving workforce situational awareness ...
[169]
SMS in Disaster Management-Emergency SMS alerts | D7 Networks
Aug 20, 2025 · Boost disaster response with D7 Networks SMS alerts. Save time, stress, and hassle. Ideal for government and relief coordination.
[170]
Distracted Driving Dangers and Statistics | NHTSA
In 2023, 3,275 people were killed in motor vehicle crashes involving distracted drivers. The Issue. Get Involved.
[171]
Investigating the factors behind cellphone-distracted crashes
Research indicates that texting can significantly impair driving performance, leading to increased reaction times, lane deviations, and the likelihood of ...
[172]
Distracted Driving - Governors Highway Safety Association
In 2023, 3,275 people died and another 324,819 were injured in distraction-related crashes (Distracted Driving in 2023, National Highway Traffic Safety ...
[173]
Mobile phones on construction sites: managing the hazards - Lexology
Oct 31, 2016 · Mobile phone hazards include distracted driving, distracted machinery operation, impaired awareness, and potential fire/explosion risks from ...
[174]
Linking Mobile Devices and Workplace Safety [Webinar Transcript]
Jun 5, 2019 · We have to invoke a clear policy with teeth that prohibits texting and talking while operating any kind of motorized equipment. Limit or ...
[175]
Distracted Walking - OrthoInfo - AAOS
Texting accounted for 9% of injuries during the same period. Distracted pedestrians may have been a contributing factor in the 4,200 pedestrian deaths and ...
[176]
Texting while walking puts pedestrians in danger: UBC study
Oct 8, 2024 · New UBC research analyzing actual pedestrian interactions with vehicles on busy streets concludes that distracted pedestrians face higher safety risks.
[177]
Distracted Walking, Bicycling, and Driving: Systematic Review ... - NIH
When distracted by visually demanding tasks (e.g., texting), pedestrians waited longer, missed more opportunities to cross safely (Byington & Schwebel, 2013), ...
[178]
55+ Surprising Distracted Driving Statistics and Facts [2025] - Geotab
Jun 3, 2025 · Distracted drivers killed 3,275 people in motor vehicle crashes in 2023. Every 10% increase in distracted driving kills over 420 people and ...Distracted Driving Facts And... · Texting And Driving Facts · Driver Distraction...
[179]
The Dangers of Distracted Driving
Sep 23, 2025 · In 2023, there were 3,275 people killed and nearly 325,000 people injured in traffic crashes involving distracted drivers. Eight percent of ...
[180]
SMS encryption: Are your text messages secure? - Infobip
Jun 6, 2024 · Short messages sent through SMS are not end-to-end encrypted. Why? Simply put, SMS works like e-mail, where messages are sent from a device, transit through a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[181]
A Step by Step Guide to SS7 Attacks - FirstPoint
Apr 30, 2023 · SS7 attacks are mobile cyber attacks that exploit security vulnerabilities in the SS7 protocol to compromise and intercept voice and SMS communications on a ...
[182]
What Is The SS7 Exploit? How It Works & Examples - Twingate
Aug 7, 2024 · Through an SS7 exploit, attackers can remotely intercept voice and SMS communications, track device locations, and access personal information without ...
[183]
Why SS7 Attacks Are the Biggest Threat to Mobile Security ...
Oct 29, 2024 · Through vulnerabilities like those in SS7, attackers intercept 2FA codes, eavesdrop on calls, and read SMS messages – all without the target ...Why Ss7 Attacks Are The... · What Is Ss7 And Why Is It... · Common Ss7 Attacks: How They...
[184]
What is a SIM Swapping Scam? Protect Your Device ... - Verizon
If the SIM swap is successful, the criminal may intercept the customer's phone calls and text messages to receive one-time security codes from social media, ...
[185]
Understanding and Preventing SIM Swapping Attacks | Bitsight
Jul 2, 2025 · SIM swapping, also known as SIM hijacking, is a type of identity theft in which attackers deceive or bribe mobile carriers into transferring a victim's phone ...How SIM swapping works and... · Which threat actors leverage...
[186]
How to Communicate Securely on Your Mobile Device - CISA
Text messages and voice calls are vulnerable to interception by threat actors. ... If you have to use traditional voice calls and text messaging, do not share ...
[187]
What Is Smishing (SMS Phishing)? - IBM
Research shows that people are likelier to click links in text messages. Klaviyo reports that SMS click-through rates hover between 8.9% and 14.5%.What is smishing? · How smishing attacks work
[188]
Smishing in Cybersecurity: The Ultimate Guide to SMS Phishing
Apr 21, 2025 · And here's an eye-opening statistic: Americans received a record-setting 19.2 billion spam text messages in February 2025, according to ...
[189]
Law Enforcement Want Cell Providers to Store Texts
The carriers generally kept data like the phone numbers associated with the text for 90 days to 18 months; AT&T was an outlier, keeping it for as long as seven ...
[190]
Cell Phone Forensics: Powerful Tools Wielded By Federal ...
Jun 2, 2016 · Cellular service providers retain records of the parties to a text message and the date and time it was sent. They do not, however, retain the ...
[191]
SMS Security & Privacy Gaps Make It Clear Users Need a ...
Sep 27, 2023 · ... SMS can notably lead to: SMS Interception: Attackers can intercept SMS messages by exploiting vulnerabilities in mobile carrier networks.
[192]
Is Text Messaging Secure? A Deep Dive Into Text ... - DialMyCalls
Feb 26, 2025 · SMS is inherently unencrypted, unlike modern messaging apps such as WhatsApp, Signal, or iMessage, which use end-to-end encryption (E2EE) to ...
[193]
SMS-Based Attacks in Mobile Networks - P1 Security
Aug 20, 2025 · Even in 2025, SMS-based attacks remain one of the easiest ways for adversaries to exploit signaling vulnerabilities in SS7, SIGTRAN, Diameter, ...Why Sms Is A Prime Target · 5. Sms Flooding & Denial Of... · The Future Of Sms Security...<|separator|>
[194]
Smishing Statistics: SMS Phishing Trends & Stats (Updated 2025 Sep)
Jan 26, 2024 · Smishing attacks surged 328% in 2020, with 76% of businesses targeted. In 2023, the US had 484,500 attempts, and $20.6 billion was stolen ...
[195]
New FTC Data Show Top Text Message Scams of 2024
Apr 16, 2025 · New data from the Federal Trade Commission show that in 2024, consumers reported losing $470 million to scams that started with text messages.
[196]
Investigating Worldwide SMS Scams, and Tens of Millions of Dollars ...
Jan 25, 2024 · SMS scams span the globe and most malicious messages are about package deliveries, banking, government, social media and other platform accounts ...
[197]
The True Cost of Spam and Scam Calls in America - Truecaller
Mar 12, 2024 · The average financial loss per victim was approximately $452. Hispanic and Black Americans were twice as likely to lose money to phone scams.
[198]
An Overview of 7726 User Reports: Uncovering SMS Scams ... - arXiv
Aug 7, 2025 · Using our methodological framework, we identify 35.12% of the unique text messages reported by users as spam, while 40.27% are scam text ...
[199]
The True Cost of SMS Phishing is More Than Fraud Losses - BioCatch
First, there is the operational costs such as an increase in calls to the contact centre. This one attack reportedly caused calls to surge 40% in one week.<|separator|>
[200]
SMS Compliance: SMS Marketing Laws & Regulations [2025]
Jul 7, 2023 · Key US laws include TCPA and CAN-SPAM, with additional state-level “mini-TCPA” rules. Other regions follow GDPR, CASL, or local spam laws.<|separator|>
[201]
SMS compliance in 2025: What to know before you send - Telnyx
Aug 1, 2025 · A guide to SMS compliance in 2025: Understand U.S. and global rules, opt-in best practices, and how to keep your business texts compliant.
[202]
Fighting SMS fraud and AIT | Bandwidth
Jun 5, 2024 · For consumers, the picture isn't any better; in 2022 alone, SMS scams cost consumers $330 million in the US—more than double the amount lost in ...
[203]
The Emerging Phenomenon of Nomophobia in Young Adults
Nomophobia is a significant issue among young smartphone users and an evolving behavioral problem that needs multifaceted interventions.
[204]
(PDF) Smartphone Addiction, Nomophobia, Depression, and Social ...
Jun 3, 2023 · This study explored the relationships of smartphone addiction, nomophobia, depression, and social appearance anxiety among college students.
[205]
[PDF] Socioemotional Characteristics of Cell Phone Addiction
The current study examines positive and negative emotions experienced when using cell phones and attachment anxiety as predictors of nomophobia. Participants (n ...
[206]
Hooked on technology: examining the co-occurrence ... - BMC Nursing
Jan 3, 2024 · This study explores the relationship between nomophobia and impulsive sensation-seeking among nursing students in Egypt.
[207]
Electronic Screen Use and Sleep Duration and Timing in Adults
Mar 27, 2025 · This cross-sectional study examines the association between screen use before bed and sleep outcomes among adults.
[208]
[PDF] Nighttime cell phone use and sleep quality in young adults
Cell phone use before bed is linked to higher odds of sleep latency, while use for emotionally charged content is linked to higher odds of sleep difficulty.<|control11|><|separator|>
[209]
Cell Phone-Related Lower Extremity Injuries While Walking
There were an estimated 13,264 cell phone-related lower extremity injuries while walking treated at US hospital EDs during 2000-2023; this represents 35.5% of ...
[210]
Texting on a Smartphone While Walking Affects Gait Parameters - NIH
Mar 5, 2023 · According to available studies, the increase in injuries in the United States over the course of one year (from 2009 to 2010) was 393 cases [15] ...
[211]
[PDF] The Role of Compulsive Texting in Adolescents' Academic Functioning
Dec 30, 2014 · Texting has the potential to impact study skills and performance in the classroom. Middle school, high school, and college students spend ⬍6 min ...
[212]
The unexpected social consequences of diverting attention to our ...
Previous work has shown that phone use during social experiences, or “phubbing”, has detrimental effects on cognitive processing, well-being, and relationships.Missing: skills | Show results with:skills
[213]
[PDF] Dysfunctional Text Messaging as Related to Social Anxiety, Self ...
The literature review that follows presents a case for the relationship between text messaging and levels of social anxiety, self-esteem, emotional intelligence ...
[214]
Safeguarding A2P SMS Revenues in the Age of CPaaS and OTT ...
Aug 25, 2025 · Safeguarding A2P SMS Revenues in the CPaaS & OTT Era: How MNOs Can Protect Messaging Revenues with VOX Solutions.
[215]
Text Messaging History: When Did SMS Marketing Start - Attentive
Mar 22, 2022 · We've swapped T9 for GIF keyboards, and spending five cents per text for unlimited data plans. Text messaging is a part of our daily lives—and ...
[216]
Why Mobile Messaging Is Moving from SMS to OTT Chat - Vonage
Aug 23, 2025 · OTT chat is moving from SMS due to lower costs, always-on connectivity, network effects, and expanded features like group chats and media ...
[217]
SMS to Account for Only 32% of Global Mobile Messaging Revenue ...
SMS market share will drop to 32% by 2029, down from 45% in 2024, due to fraud, pricing, and richer alternatives, despite increased messaging traffic.
[218]
Texting lives on, despite rise of OTT: experts | Marketing Dive
SMS messaging revenue at wireless carriers is expected to decline by $23 billion over the next five years as OTT messaging applications gain popularity. But SMS ...Missing: dynamics | Show results with:dynamics
[219]
A2P Messaging Market Size & Share | Industry Report, 2030
The global A2P messaging market size was estimated at USD 71.50 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 74.27 billion in 2025. What is the A2P ...
[220]
The Real Cost of SMS Marketing Explained - CartBoss
Sep 21, 2025 · The cost for each individual text message sent. Carrier Surcharges, ~$0.002 – $0.005 per SMS, Fees from mobile carriers for network usage.
[221]
The Global State of SMS: Decline, Disruption, and the Path Forward
May 8, 2025 · SMS is declining due to fraud, high pricing, and better alternatives like network APIs and RBM, though it remains a fallback in some areas.
[222]
A2P & Business Messaging Market Report 2025-2030 - The Readable
Sep 16, 2025 · This report assesses the significant disruption in the market; including Rich Communication Services (RCS) support on iOS, SMS challenged with ...
[223]
A2P & Business Messaging Market 2025-2030 - Juniper Research
Jan 9, 2025 · The study will provide operators with recommendations on how to effectively monetise A2P SMS and RCS business messaging over the next few years.Missing: carriers | Show results with:carriers
[224]
Enterprise Revenue Maximization | Monetize Network Assets - Sinch
Sinch helps maximize revenue by creating new services, maximizing A2P SMS revenue, and using business intelligence to maintain optimum revenue extraction.
[225]
Premium Messaging Market Size | Industry Report, 2030
The global premium messaging market size was valued at USD 75.44 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 9.1% from 2025 to 2030.<|separator|>
[226]
How WhatsApp Makes Money - Investopedia
WhatsApp's primary revenue stream is its business API. This tool allows medium and large businesses to communicate with customers at scale.
[227]
[PDF] The Impact of OTT Providers - Synchronoss Technologies
The decimation of SMS was even faster. In 2011. OTT messaging traffic was less than 5% of all messaging globally. By 2013 OTT messaging had surpassed SMS as.
[228]
Operators stand to lose $3 billion in SMS business revenue
A report from Juniper Research asserts that operators will lose over $3 billion in SMS business messaging revenue globally over the next five years, ...
[229]
A2P & Business Messaging Market Report 2025-2030 - Business Wire
Sep 15, 2025 · The study will provide operators with recommendations on how to effectively monetise A2P SMS and RCS business messaging over the next few years.
[230]
Global Business SMS Market Research Report 2025: Delving into
Oct 17, 2025 · The global market for Business SMS was estimated to be worth US$ 5300 million in 2024 and is forecast to a readjusted size of US$ 5981 ...
[231]
Mobile Operators face a collapse in A2P SMS revenues - CBS 42
Sep 10, 2025 · ReveNet is a leading provider of network revenue assurance solutions, helping operators worldwide protect and grow their A2P messaging revenues.
[232]
[PDF] Telephone Consumer Protection Act - PUBLIC NOTICE
Nov 18, 2016 · The TCPA prohibits autodialed calls or text messages, as well as prerecorded calls, unless made with the prior express consent of the called ...
[233]
Targeting and Eliminating Unlawful Text Messages, Implementation ...
Jan 26, 2024 · The TCPA also provides authority for the consent requirements and the codification that text messages are covered by the National DNC Registry.
[234]
FCC Adopts Its First Rules Focused on Scam Texting
Requires blocking of texts purporting to be from numbers on a reasonable DNO list and requires providers and other entities to maintain a point of contact ...
[235]
Urgent Reminder for Companies Using SMS Marketing in Texas to ...
Aug 25, 2025 · Urgent Reminder for Companies Using SMS Marketing in Texas to Register Under the Telephone Solicitation Act by September 1, 2025 New Obligations ...
[236]
State Laws on Distracted Driving - Ban on Hand-Held Devices and ...
Currently, 48 states, D.C., Puerto Rico, Guam and the U.S. Virgin Islands ban text messaging for all drivers. All but 2 have primary enforcement. Of the 2 state ...
[237]
Colorado Hands-Free Law
A new Colorado law went into effect on Jan. 1, 2025, that prohibits drivers from using a mobile electronic device while driving, though hands-free accessories ...
[238]
Wireless Emergency Alerts | FEMA.gov
Oct 18, 2023 · Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEAs) are short emergency messages from authorized federal, state, local, tribal and territorial public alerting ...Receiving Alerts Away From... · Not Receiving An Alert · Wea Enhancements...
[239]
Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA)
Sep 25, 2025 · WEA is a public safety system that allows customers who own compatible mobile devices to receive geographically targeted, text-like messages alerting them of ...
[240]
SMS Data Privacy Under GDPR: Best Practices Unveiled
Apr 2, 2024 · Discover expert insights on safeguarding SMS data under GDPR regulations. Learn essential best practices for ensuring privacy compliance in ...
[241]
SMS marketing regulations in the UK and EU: How to stay GDPR ...
If sending SMS communications to numbers outside the UK and EU, you must comply with the anti-spam laws relevant to the recipient's country. Thumbnail image ...
[242]
What Are the Penalties Associated with TCPA Violations? - DNC.com
TCPA penalties are up to $500 per violation, trebled to $1,500 for willful violations, with uncapped damages and multiple violations possible per call.Missing: SMS | Show results with:SMS
[243]
TCPA fines, violations, and penalties for text messages
Jan 22, 2024 · TCPA violations include unsolicited texts without consent, especially for marketing, and can result in fines of $500-$1,500 per text, or up to ...Missing: enforcement | Show results with:enforcement
[244]
Record Fines and Restrictive Rules: Agencies Take on the TCPA
Aug 21, 2023 · On Aug. 3, 2023, the FCC issued a nearly $300 million fine against an international network of companies for illegal robocalls regarding auto ...Missing: SMS | Show results with:SMS
[245]
Can You Sue Someone for Text Messages? - - The Hanrahan Firm
Defamation: You can sue for something said in a text message if it constitutes defamation-meaning the message contains a false statement of fact, was published ...
[246]
Federal Laws & Online Harassment
At the U.S. federal level, there are laws that address online abuse, including stalking, interstate threats, harassment via telecommunications, hacking, ...Missing: liability | Show results with:liability
[247]
When Text Messaging Goes Too Far: Potential Legal Actions
Dec 2, 2022 · If you are charged and convicted of harassment, sexual harassment, or cyberstalking, you will face the possibility of jail time, hefty fines, and legal fees.
[248]
$$43.5M Verdict in Texting While Driving Lawsuit - McDonald Worley
The jury in the texting while driving lawsuit awarded the plaintiff $7.3 million for physical and mental pain, $2.9 million for impairment, over $1 million for ...
[249]
Can You Be Liable for Texting the Driver of a Vehicle?
Aug 19, 2024 · The law clearly states that the driver who is distracted by a text message is at fault if an accident occurs.
[250]
Proving Fault in Distracted Driving Lawsuits Using Phone Records
Jun 5, 2025 · In distracted driving lawsuits, cellphone records can help prove fault. Explore the legal intricacies of using phone data as evidence at ...
[251]
Is Texting in Violation of HIPAA? 2025 Update
Apr 8, 2025 · There are many factors that determine whether a message sent via a text service is texting in violation of HIPAA.Penalties For Texting In... · Other Considerations When... · Texting In Violation Of...
[252]
U.S. Carrier Penalties for Non-Compliant Messaging - Twilio Help ...
Tier 2: $1,000: illegal content (content must be legal federally and in all 50 states); Tier 3: $500: all other violations in commercial messaging including ...
[253]
Are Text Messages Legally Binding? - BoyarMiller
Yes, text messages can be legally binding if certain contract elements are met, such as a valid offer, acceptance, mutual assent, and adequate consideration.
[254]
Why Modern Human Interactions Are So Hard to Film - The Atlantic
Sep 7, 2016 · Text messaging is boring to watch. By Adrienne LaFrance. Text messages were a frequent plot driver on the teen television drama 'Gossip Girl.'
[255]
First use of on-screen text messages, like in Sherlock and House of ...
Feb 6, 2013 · The BBC's Sherlock (July 2010-) uses a novel visual trick to show the contents of an SMS message directly on the television screen.
[256]
Text messages for TV and film. What works and what doesn't.
Jan 22, 2024 · How do filmmakers like David Fincher show text messages on screen? Here are some great examples of creative messaging that works.
[257]
TV Characters Don't Have Text History. This Is Not OK - WIRED
Feb 16, 2021 · If a show includes a shot of a texting app, it looks like characters who are intimate have somehow never texted each other before.
[258]
From Starstruck to The Bear: why are text messages on TV so ...
Sep 13, 2023 · Characters' messages are often so tiny you're left squinting at the screen, or shown so fast it's like peering over a stranger's shoulder on the bus.
[259]
How should TV shows and movies depict texting? - The Verge
Jul 12, 2016 · There's still no foolproof way to depict a text-based chat on screen, and directors have been trying to find one for nearly two decades.
[260]
Fastest time to type a text message (SMS) on a touch-screen mobile ...
The fastest time to type a text message (SMS) using a touch-screen mobile phone is 17.00 seconds and was achieved by Marcel Fernandes Filho (Brazil)
[261]
Fastest touch-screen text message record officially broken with ...
May 19, 2014 · Marcel Fernandes Filho typed the standard Guinness World Records texting prompt in a blistering 17 seconds last week. · The razor-toothed ...
[262]
Most text messages received in one hour | Guinness World Records
The most text messages received in one hour is 19,649, and was achieved by Aleradah Organization for Talented People with Disability (Saudi Arabia) in Jeddah, ...Missing: SMS | Show results with:SMS
[263]
World Record texter sent 566,607 messages in one month
Feb 12, 2012 · Lidgren holds the world record with 566,607 text messages sent from his handset during a one month period. That comes out to 18,887 daily or ...Missing: SMS day<|separator|>
[264]
Most people sending a text message simultaneously
The most people sending a text message simultaneously is 2,193 and was achieved by National Speech & Debate Association (USA) in Overland Park, Kansas, ...Missing: day | Show results with:day
[265]
SMS and beyond: The 20 year evolution to IP Messaging services
Nov 7, 2012 · Although the first text message was sent in 1992, it was only a year later in 1993 when the first commercial deployment of a short message ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
[266]
A brief history of texting: 30 years of SMS - SimpleTexting
Mar 24, 2024 · We created a 30-year timeline of the history of texting from its inception, to widespread adoption, to modern-day SMS.Missing: expansion | Show results with:expansion<|separator|>
[267]
[PDF] The Evolution of Mobile Messaging: From SMS to RCS and Beyond
Nov 25, 2024 · Abstract. This study examines the evolution of mobile messaging technologies, tracing the progression from short.
[268]
Text Messaging: Evolution, Functionality, and Cultural Impact
Feb 14, 2025 · The shift from carrier-based SMS to internet-based messaging has led to: Lower costs (no SMS charges); Better user experience (richer content ...
[269]
https://www.statista.com/chart/12109/sms-volume-in-the-united-states/
[270]
Evolution From SMS To IP Messaging - Entrepreneur
Jan 5, 2021 · IP messaging has begun transforming business-to-consumer interactions and will continue to do so in ways yet unimaginable.Missing: history timeline
[271]
RCS vs. OTT Messaging Apps: Similarities and Differences Explained
Nov 29, 2024 · A major advantage that RCS holds over OTT messaging apps is its ability to grab the user's attention by utilizing the phone's default messaging ...
[272]
RCS vs. SMS: Differences, & Which Is Better for Marketing | Vibes
Since the beginning of 2022, total RCS users have grown 36% annually, with just over 1.4B RCS users worldwide as of June 2024. Now that Apple supports RCS ...
[273]
How to use Magic Compose in Google Messages - Android Police
Magic Compose uses generative AI to suggest responses to text messages. It launched in May 2023 but is only available in a limited capacity through the Google ...
[274]
Try Google Messages. Keep what matters. - Android
Explore how you can customize chat bubbles and emojis, and utilize new AI features to take your RCS chats to another level.Missing: WhatsApp iMessage
[275]
Apple Intelligence is available today on iPhone, iPad, and Mac
Oct 28, 2024 · Users can now tap into Apple Intelligence to refine their writing; summarize notifications, mail, and messages; experience a more natural and capable Siri.Apple (CA) · Apple (AU) · Apple (IL) · Apple (UK)
[276]
Use Apple Intelligence in Messages on iPhone - Apple Support
Apple Intelligence allows you to get through your messages even faster with summaries that show you the key points of each conversation.
[277]
https://www.whatsapp.com/meta-ai
[278]
About Meta AI | WhatsApp Help Center
Meta AI through WhatsApp is an optional service from Meta that can answer your questions, teach you something, or help come up with new ideas.
[279]
New AI-Powered Scam Detection Features to Help Protect You on ...
Mar 4, 2025 · Scam Detection in Google Messages uses powerful Google AI to proactively address conversational scams by providing real-time detection even ...
[280]
How Google protects your privacy with spam detection
With real-time spam detection, Google Messages makes chatting easier and safer. Spam protection identifies different types of spam.
[281]
How AI Empowers Both Cyber Spammers and Defenders | Enea
Jul 17, 2025 · AI improves spam quality, making scam messages more believable and increasing the risk that targets will fall victim. Through AI, spammers can ...
[282]
Text Messaging: History, Features & Future Explained in 2025
Mar 10, 2025 · 1. AI-Powered Chatbots. Businesses are increasingly using AI-driven chatbots to handle customer inquiries via text messages. These bots can ...
[283]
Mastering AI Text Messaging: Transform Business Communication ...
Oct 16, 2025 · Conversational AI enhancements with advanced sentiment analysis and voice-to-text for hands-free interaction.Missing: 2024 | Show results with:2024
[284]
Most Companies Using AI Due to "Pressure from Competitors"
Mar 3, 2025 · 58% of businesses using AI started doing so because of “pressure from competitors,” our latest Tech.co research has found.