Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Gravitational microlensing

Gravitational microlensing is an astronomical phenomenon in which the gravity of a foreground compact object, such as a star, planet, or black hole, bends and temporarily magnifies the light from a more distant background star, causing a characteristic brightening that lasts from days to months depending on the masses and relative velocities involved.^[1] This effect arises from Einstein's general theory of relativity, where massive objects warp spacetime, acting as natural lenses to focus light rays.^[2] The magnification follows the lens equation, \vec{\beta} = \vec{\theta} - \vec{\alpha}(\vec{\theta}), where \vec{\beta} is the source position, \vec{\theta} is the image position, and \vec{\alpha} is the deflection angle, leading to a peak amplification that can exceed 100 times for high-precision alignments.^[1] The concept was theoretically outlined by Albert Einstein in 1936 but gained practical prominence in 1986 when Bohdan Paczyński proposed using it to detect massive compact halo objects (MACHOs), hypothetical dark matter candidates like faint stars or black holes in the Milky Way's halo.^[3] The first candidate microlensing event toward the Galactic bulge was discovered in 1993 by the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE), confirming the viability of large-scale surveys monitoring millions of stars for unexplained brightness variations.^[4] These events produce achromatic, symmetric light curves that distinguish them from variable stars, with the timescale t_E = \theta_E / \mu_{\rm rel} (where \theta_E is the Einstein angular radius and \mu_{\rm rel} is the relative proper motion) providing constraints on the lens mass and distance.^[1] Beyond dark matter searches, which suggested MACHOs contribute only a fraction of the halo's mass, gravitational microlensing has revolutionized exoplanet detection by revealing planets via caustics and anomalies in the lens's light curve, particularly sensitive to worlds at separations of 1–10 AU.^[1] The first exoplanet found this way, OGLE-2003-BLG-235Lb, was announced in 2004, a cold Jupiter-mass planet orbiting a low-mass star roughly 17,000 light-years away.^[2] Surveys like OGLE, MOA, KMTNet, and upcoming missions such as NASA's Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope have detected over 300 microlensing exoplanets as of 2025, including Earth-mass candidates and rogue planets unbound to any star, offering unique insights into the frequency of wide-orbit and free-floating worlds that transit and radial-velocity methods often miss.^[2]^[5] Additionally, the technique probes stellar remnants, such as isolated black holes, and the structure of the Galactic bulge, with optical depths around $10^{-6} toward the bulge indicating millions of potential events per year in dense fields.^[1]

Principles of Gravitational Microlensing

Basic Mechanism

Gravitational microlensing refers to the transient brightening of a background star's light caused by the gravitational lensing effect of a foreground compact object, such as a star, brown dwarf, or planetary body, when the source, lens, and observer are nearly aligned along the line of sight. This alignment leads to a temporary increase in the observed flux of the background source, with amplification lasting from days to months depending on the relative velocities and masses involved. The lens remains unresolved because its angular Einstein radius—the characteristic scale of the lensing region—is typically on the order of milliarcseconds, far smaller than the seeing disk of ground-based telescopes, which is usually around 1 arcsecond. The underlying physical process stems from Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity, which predicts that massive objects curve spacetime, causing light rays from distant sources to deflect and converge toward the observer, much like a glass lens focuses light.^[6] In microlensing, this deflection amplifies the apparent brightness of the background star without altering its position or spectrum noticeably. The effect is most pronounced when the unlensed positions of the source and lens are separated by less than the Einstein radius, creating a small region of enhanced light gathering. In contrast to macrolensing by massive structures like galaxies or clusters, which produces resolvable multiple images, extended arcs, or Einstein rings visible on arcsecond scales, microlensing yields only a net flux variation because the image splitting occurs on unresolved sub-arcsecond scales. The amplification factor qualitatively increases as the impact parameter u—the normalized minimum angular separation between the lens and the source's line of sight—decreases; for instance, near-perfect alignment (u approaching 0) results in the highest magnification, while larger u leads to weaker effects. This dependence on alignment makes microlensing a probabilistic phenomenon, detectable only through precise photometric monitoring of dense stellar fields.

Light Curve Characteristics

In the point-source point-lens approximation, the light curve of a gravitational microlensing event exhibits a characteristic symmetric, bell-shaped profile, where the flux of the background source rises smoothly to a peak magnification before declining symmetrically back to the baseline level, assuming uniform rectilinear motion of the lens relative to the line of sight. This shape arises from the temporary increase in the apparent brightness of the source as the lens passes close to the line of sight, with the amplification depending on the angular separation between the lens and source images.^[3] The duration of the event is primarily characterized by the Einstein crossing time t_E, which represents the time taken for the relative motion to traverse the Einstein radius in the lens plane; typical values range from days to months depending on the lens mass, distance, and transverse velocity. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the light curve depends on the impact parameter u_0 and is approximately $2\sqrt{3} u_0 t_E \approx 3.46 u_0 t_E for u_0 \ll 1; for u_0 = 1, it is \approx 1.8 t_E. The Einstein crossing time t_E provides the primary measurable timescale for the event's longevity. The peak magnification A_{\max} occurs at the moment of closest approach and is approximated by A_{\max} \approx 1/u_0, where u_0 is the minimum impact parameter in units of the Einstein radius; for u_0 = 1, A_{\max} \approx 1.34, while closer alignments with u_0 \ll 1 can produce amplifications of thousands, making rare high-magnification events particularly detectable.^[3] In practice, observed light curves are normalized to the baseline flux, determined from the steady-state photometry well before and after the event to isolate the lensing signal from intrinsic source variability or blending with nearby stars. Detection thresholds in surveys typically require a maximum magnification exceeding 1.34 (corresponding to u_0 \leq 1) to distinguish the event from noise or other photometric fluctuations, ensuring reliable identification amid crowded fields. Deviations from perfect symmetry can arise from finite-source effects, where the extended size of the source star smooths the peak for high-magnification events, and limb darkening, which unevenly weights the brightness across the stellar disk and introduces subtle asymmetries in the rising and falling phases.

Mathematical Formulation

Lens Equation and Magnification

The lens equation in gravitational microlensing describes the mapping between the angular position of the unlensed source \vec{\beta} and the observed image positions \vec{\theta}, given by \vec{\theta} = \vec{\beta} + \vec{\alpha}(\vec{\theta}), where \vec{\alpha}(\vec{\theta}) is the deflection angle due to the lens. For small deflection angles in the weak-field limit, the deflection angle for a point mass lens approximates \vec{\alpha}(\vec{\theta}) \approx \frac{\theta_E^2}{\theta} \hat{\theta}, with \theta_E denoting the angular Einstein radius. This formulation assumes a thin lens approximation, where the lens is projected onto a plane perpendicular to the line of sight.^[7] For a point-mass lens and point-source emitter, the lens equation simplifies in normalized angular units, where positions are scaled by \theta_E, yielding u = y - \frac{1}{y} with u = \beta / \theta_E as the normalized source position and y = \theta / \theta_E as the normalized image position.^[7] Solving this quadratic equation produces two images at positions y_\pm = \frac{1}{2} \left( \sqrt{u^2 + 4} \pm u \right), one on each side of the lens, though both remain unresolved in microlensing due to their small angular separation. The major image (y_+) lies outside the Einstein ring, while the minor image (y_-) lies inside, with the minor image inverted in parity. The magnification arises from the distortion of the source's apparent shape and size by the lens, quantified as the inverse of the determinant of the Jacobian matrix of the lens mapping, A = \frac{1}{|\det J|}, where J_{ij} = \frac{\partial \beta_i}{\partial \theta_j}.^[7] For the point lens, the individual image magnifications are \mu_\pm = \frac{y_\pm^2}{y_\pm^2 - 1}, and the total unsigned magnification is the sum A(u) = |\mu_+| + |\mu_-|, which simplifies to the standard point-source point-lens formula:

A(u) = \frac{u^2 + 2}{u \sqrt{u^2 + 4}}.

This expression, derived by Bohdan Paczyński in his foundational work on microlensing, captures the flux amplification as a function of the impact parameter u. Paczyński further provided asymptotic approximations for the magnification to characterize extreme regimes. For close alignments where u \ll 1, high magnification occurs with A(u) \approx \frac{1}{u}, leading to dramatic flux increases observable even for faint sources. Conversely, for large impact parameters u \gg 1, the perturbation is weak, and A(u) \approx 1 + \frac{2}{u^4}, where the excess flux diminishes rapidly. In practice, the observed flux variation \Delta F during a microlensing event is \Delta F = F_s [A(u) - 1], where F_s is the intrinsic source flux, but this must account for the baseline flux F_0, which includes unresolved "blended" light from nearby stars in crowded fields.^[7] The total measured flux is thus F(t) = F_0 + f_s [A(u(t)) - 1] F_s, with f_s \leq 1 as the blending fraction representing the fraction of baseline flux attributable to the lensed source; blending reduces the observed amplification, particularly for low-magnification events, and requires careful photometric modeling to infer true parameters.^[7]

Einstein Radius and Timescales

The angular Einstein radius, denoted \theta_E, represents the characteristic angular scale over which gravitational microlensing occurs for a point-mass lens. It is defined by the formula

\theta_E = \sqrt{\frac{4GM}{c^2} \frac{D_s - D_l}{D_l D_s}},

where G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the lens, c is the speed of light, D_l is the distance from the observer to the lens, and D_s is the distance from the observer to the source. This quantity arises from the geometry of general relativity applied to light deflection and sets the size of the Einstein ring formed when the lens, source, and observer are perfectly aligned. The value of \theta_E depends strongly on the lens mass (\theta_E \propto \sqrt{M}) and the relative distances (\theta_E \propto \sqrt{(D_s - D_l)/(D_l D_s)}), making it larger for more massive lenses or configurations where the lens is midway between observer and source. The physical Einstein radius r_E projects this angular scale into the lens plane, given by r_E = \theta_E D_l. This represents the radius of the Einstein ring as measured perpendicular to the line of sight at the lens distance and serves as the characteristic transverse distance over which significant lensing magnification occurs. For typical stellar-mass lenses (M \approx 0.3 M_\odot) toward the Galactic bulge, where D_l \approx 4 kpc and D_s \approx 8 kpc, r_E is on the order of 2 AU. Microlensing event timescales are determined by the relative motion between the lens and source. The Einstein crossing timescale t_E is defined as t_E = r_E / v_\perp, where v_\perp is the transverse relative velocity in the lens plane. This timescale characterizes the duration over which the source crosses the Einstein radius, with the full event crossing time often approximated as t_{cross} = 2 t_E. The dependence follows t_E \propto \sqrt{M} from the mass scaling of r_E, as well as on distances and velocity (t_E \propto 1 / v_\perp). For Galactic bulge events involving stellar lenses and typical relative velocities of \sim 200 km/s, t_E ranges from days to months, with a mean around 25 days.^[8] The optical depth \tau quantifies the overall probability that a source is microlensed at any given moment and is given by \tau \approx \int n(l) \pi r_E^2 \, dl, where n(l) is the number density of lenses along the line of sight. Equivalently, in angular terms, \tau \approx \pi \theta_E^2 N_*, with N_* the total number of potential lenses projected toward the source. For observations toward the Galactic bulge, measurements as of 2024 yield \tau \approx 1.75 \times 10^{-6} in central fields (|l| < 5^\circ), increasing toward higher latitudes.^[9] The probability of detecting a microlensing event during a monitoring campaign depends on the event rate \Gamma \approx 2 \tau / \langle t_E \rangle per source star (a rough approximation; the precise factor depends on the detection threshold and velocity distribution), so the expected number of events per star over observation time t_{obs} is P \approx \Gamma t_{obs}. For bulge monitoring over a season (t_{obs} \sim 150 days), this yields P \approx 10^{-5} per star, enabling detection of thousands of events across tens of millions of monitored sources.^[9]

Observational Techniques

Ground-Based Surveys

Ground-based surveys for gravitational microlensing employ wide-field imaging telescopes to monitor dense stellar fields, primarily targeting the Galactic bulge and the Magellanic Clouds, where the optical depth to lensing is high due to the alignment of numerous background sources with potential foreground lenses. These surveys conduct high-cadence photometry, typically sampling fields every 15-60 minutes over observing seasons lasting several months, to capture the short-duration flux variations characteristic of microlensing events. Fields are selected in the Galactic bulge at coordinates such as longitudes l = 0^\circ to $10^\circ and latitudes b = -3^\circ to -6^\circ, regions rich in red clump giants that serve as reliable source stars for measuring lensing parameters.^[7]^[10]^[11] A primary challenge in these observations is atmospheric seeing, which typically limits resolution to about 1 arcsecond, causing blending of nearby stars within the point-spread function (PSF) and reducing the detectability of faint source stars. Crowding in these fields exacerbates this issue, as the high stellar density leads to unresolved companions that can dilute the observed magnification signal by up to 50% or more in blended cases. To mitigate these effects, surveys utilize difference imaging techniques, which subtract a reference image from subsequent exposures to isolate flux changes from variable sources while suppressing systematic errors from seeing variations and instrumental effects.^[7]^[11] Data reduction involves PSF photometry applied to the difference images to measure precise flux increments, with the baseline flux established from pre-event data to normalize the light curve and account for blending. Real-time alert systems analyze ongoing photometry to detect candidate events, triggering notifications when the magnification exceeds a threshold of approximately 1.34 (corresponding to a source-lens separation of about one Einstein radius), enabling prompt follow-up observations to refine light curve sampling during peak phases. These methods have enabled the detection of thousands of microlensing events, providing robust datasets for astrophysical analysis despite ground-based limitations.^[12]^[13]^[11]

Space-Based and Pixel Lensing Methods

Space-based observations of gravitational microlensing offer significant advantages over ground-based approaches, including the absence of atmospheric distortion, which ensures a stable point spread function (PSF) for precise photometry, and the ability to provide continuous coverage without interruptions from weather or daylight cycles.^[14] These features enable high-fidelity measurements of light curve variations and astrometric shifts during events. For instance, the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) has been employed to observe resolved microlensing events, delivering high-resolution imaging that constrains lens masses through astrometric deviations with uncertainties as low as a few percent.^[14] Similarly, the Gaia mission facilitates astrometric microlensing detection by achieving positional precisions sufficient to identify centroid shifts in stellar positions, independent of assumptions about stellar internal physics.^[15] Pixel lensing, also known as pixel-scale lensing, extends microlensing to unresolved stellar populations in distant galaxies, such as the Andromeda Galaxy (M31), where individual sources cannot be spatially resolved due to crowding and distance.^[16] This method detects high-magnification events (typically with amplification factors greater than 10) by monitoring flux variations in individual pixels of the detector, rather than isolating single stars.^[16] In such events, the temporary brightening of a background star by a foreground lens produces a detectable excess flux localized to one or a few pixels, even amidst the blended light from millions of unresolved sources.^[17] Key techniques in pixel lensing include difference imaging, which subtracts a calibrated reference image from subsequent exposures on a pixel-by-pixel basis to isolate transient flux changes attributable to microlensing, and superpixel photometry, which aggregates nearby pixels to enhance signal-to-noise for faint variations while mitigating seeing-induced artifacts.^[17] Self-lensing scenarios, where lenses and sources reside within the same galaxy—such as bulge stars in M31 lensing disk or halo stars—contribute significantly to detectable events, as these involve stellar-mass objects without requiring dark matter candidates.^[18] This approach identifies flux excesses without source resolution, focusing on the integrated pixel response to the lensed amplification. Applications of pixel lensing to M31 involve monitoring dense fields containing approximately $10^6 unresolved stars per field of view, probing the distribution of stellar-mass lenses in the galaxy's halo and disk.^[19] Event rates in these surveys are low, on the order of $10^{-6} per star-year, primarily driven by self-lensing from visible stellar populations rather than hypothetical massive compact halo objects (MACHOs).^[19] These rates emphasize the method's sensitivity to compact objects in the halo, with predicted seasonal yields up to 100 events across the monitored fields under optimal conditions.^[19] Despite these capabilities, pixel lensing faces challenges such as inherently low event rates due to the requirement for close alignments and high magnifications, necessitating extensive monitoring over large sky areas.^[16] Addressing this demands telescopes with wide fields and large apertures, as proposed for the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, which could enhance detection efficiency through its high-resolution, broad-area imaging suited for extragalactic surveys.^[20]

Historical Overview

Theoretical Predictions

Albert Einstein first predicted the deflection of light by a gravitational field in his 1911 paper, calculating a deflection angle of 0.83 arcseconds for rays grazing the Sun's surface based on the equivalence principle. In 1936, Einstein extended this analysis, confirming the deflection angle as 1.75 arcseconds for light rays tangent to the Sun in general relativity, though he noted that no significant amplification of light from background stars would occur due to the small angular size of the effect.^[21] Following these foundational predictions, Fritz Zwicky proposed in 1937 that entire galaxies could act as gravitational lenses, magnifying and distorting the images of more distant objects, potentially making faint nebulae observable.^[22] However, the concept of microlensing—where individual stars or compact objects cause transient brightenings—remained largely unexplored until the 1960s, as the required precision in astrometry and photometry was beyond contemporary capabilities. In the mid-1960s, Seymour Liebes analyzed the imaging properties of gravitational lenses formed by stars or galaxies, discussing how multiple images and magnification could arise in radio sources.^[23] Concurrently, Sjur Refsdal developed a detailed formalism for the gravitational lens effect, deriving magnification factors and proposing its use to measure stellar masses or cosmological parameters like the Hubble constant through observations of background supernovae. By 1973, William H. Press and James E. Gunn applied microlensing theory specifically to quasars, calculating the probability of stellar lenses in foreground galaxies causing detectable flux variations in quasar light curves, with optical depths on the order of 10^{-3} to 10^{-2} for typical systems. This work highlighted microlensing as a probe of quasar structure, though event rates were predicted to be low without dedicated monitoring. The modern era of microlensing predictions began with Bohdan Paczyński's 1986 proposal to search for massive compact halo objects (MACHOs) via microlensing of stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), estimating an optical depth of approximately 10^{-7} and event rates of about 10^{-6} per star per year for a halo fraction of MACHOs, with angular Einstein radii around 10 microarcseconds for solar-mass lenses at LMC distances.^[3] Early calculations of optical depth—the probability that a source is being lensed at any time—and event rates for both Galactic bulge and extragalactic fields, such as toward the LMC, built on these foundations, incorporating stellar density profiles and relative velocities to forecast detectable transients with monitoring campaigns.^[3]

Key Discoveries and Milestones

The first confirmed gravitational microlensing event was detected by the MACHO collaboration in 1993 toward the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), involving a star that brightened by approximately 30% over a duration of about one month, consistent with a lens mass of roughly 0.5 solar masses.^[24] This discovery, reported by Alcock et al., marked the initial observational evidence supporting the hypothesis that Massive Astrophysical Compact Halo Objects (MACHOs) could constitute a significant portion of the Galaxy's dark matter halo.^[24] Parallel efforts by the EROS collaboration yielded their first LMC microlensing candidate in the same year, with both teams announcing detections in September and October 1993, respectively.^[25] Throughout the 1990s, a surge in events—eight candidates from MACHO's first 2.1 years of data alone—bolstered the MACHO hypothesis, though subsequent analyses suggested these lenses were more likely foreground Milky Way stars than halo objects.^[26] EROS contributed additional events, reporting fewer than MACHO but confirming the phenomenon's viability for probing faint populations.^[27] In the 2000s, surveys shifted focus to the Galactic bulge, where denser stellar fields enabled higher event rates; the OGLE-III project alone identified 3718 standard microlensing events from 2001 to 2009.^[28] The MOA collaboration complemented this by monitoring the bulge starting in 2000, detecting dozens of events in its initial seasons and refining real-time analysis techniques.^[29] MicroFUN, established as a global follow-up network around 2006, enhanced anomaly detection in ongoing events, contributing to the accumulation of thousands of confirmed microlensing occurrences by 2010 across these efforts. A key early milestone was the 2004 announcement of the first exoplanet detected via microlensing, OGLE-2003-BLG-235Lb/MOA-2003-BLG-53Lb, a Neptune-mass planet (about 21 Earth masses) orbiting an M-dwarf star at roughly 3.6 AU, approximately 17,000 light-years away.^[30] This event, analyzed by Bond et al., demonstrated microlensing's sensitivity to low-mass companions in distant systems. Concurrently, planning for space-based microlensing advanced with the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) mission, initiated in 2010 and later renamed the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, aimed at surveying millions of bulge stars for exoplanets and dark matter constraints. Recent breakthroughs include the KMTNet survey's detection of six planets via sub-day anomalies in the 2023–2024 seasons, revealing low-mass companions with planet-to-star mass ratios indicative of wide-orbit (Jupiter-like) configurations. In April 2025, a super-Earth with a mass ratio between Earth and Neptune was identified through a microlensing event, orbiting its host beyond Saturn's distance and highlighting the prevalence of cold super-Earths in the Galaxy.^[31] Additionally, a 2024 microlensing event uncovered an Earth-mass planet orbiting a white dwarf, providing rare insights into planetary survival around post-main-sequence stars.^[32]

Special Cases and Extreme Events

Events Revealing Angular Einstein Radius

In gravitational microlensing, the angular Einstein radius \theta_E represents the characteristic angular scale of the lensing effect and is typically inferred indirectly from the event timescale t_E and relative proper motion. However, in rare cases, \theta_E can be measured directly through deviations in the light curve or astrometric signals, providing a pathway to determine the lens mass independently of other degeneracies. These measurements occur via two primary mechanisms: astrometric shifts in the photocenter of the source, which displace by amounts on the order of microarcseconds (\sim 100-1000 \, \muas) during the event, or finite-source effects that manifest as deviations in the light curve wings when the normalized source size \rho_* = \theta_* / \theta_E \lesssim 0.1, where \theta_* is the angular radius of the source. Astrometric measurements require sub-microarcsecond precision, achievable with space-based telescopes like the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), while finite-source effects demand high-cadence photometry and knowledge of the source's limb darkening to resolve small \rho_* values, often around 0.01 for giant sources in the Galactic bulge. A seminal example of \theta_E measurement via astrometry is the event OGLE-2011-BLG-0462, observed toward the Galactic bulge, where HST monitoring during the 2011 event detected a centroid shift of approximately 250 \muas, enabling a direct determination of \theta_E \approx 2.75 mas. This long-duration event (t_E \approx 43 days) was later confirmed as lensing by an isolated stellar-mass black hole of mass $7.1 \pm 1.3 \, M_\odot at a distance of 1.6 kpc, breaking the mass-distance degeneracy when combined with microlensing parallax data. Another approach, demonstrated in OGLE-2012-BLG-0950, involved post-event high-resolution imaging with HST and Keck adaptive optics to resolve the lens-source pair and measure their relative proper motion \mu_{\rm rel} = 7.64 \pm 0.52 mas yr^{-1}; using the event timescale t_E = 0.210 days, this yielded \theta_E = 1.60 \pm 0.11 mas. For finite-source effects, the event OGLE-2003-BLG-262 provided an early measurement of \theta_E = 195 \pm 17 \, \muas from limb-darkening deviations in the light curve wings, where \rho_* \approx 0.05, constraining the lens to a low-mass star or brown dwarf. These cases highlight how such events resolve the intrinsic lens properties without relying on blended light or flux measurements.^[33] The implications of direct \theta_E measurements are profound, as they allow the lens mass M to be calculated using the relation

M = \frac{\theta_E^2}{\kappa \pi_{\rm rel}},

where \kappa = 4G/(c^2 \, \rm AU) \approx 8.144 \, \rm mas^2 \, M_\odot^{-1} \, \rm pc^{-1} is a constant and \pi_{\rm rel} is the relative parallax between lens and source (in mas), often obtained from the microlensing parallax \pi_E = \pi_{\rm rel}/\theta_E. This breaks the fundamental degeneracy in single-lens events between mass, distance, and velocity, enabling precise characterization of isolated objects like black holes or free-floating planets. Such measurements have confirmed the first isolated stellar-mass black hole and refined planetary mass estimates in hybrid events.^[34] These events are exceedingly rare, with only a handful reported to date, owing to the need for exceptional astrometric precision (e.g., from HST or Gaia) or photometric resolution to detect subtle deviations; typical ground-based surveys lack the \sim 10 \, \muas accuracy required for astrometry, and finite-source effects are prominent in fewer than 1% of events with small \rho_*. By the 2020s, integration of Gaia data releases has expanded the sample, with astrometric microlensing candidates in Gaia DR3 yielding \theta_E constraints for approximately 10 events through combined photometric and proper motion analysis, including predictions for ongoing monitoring up to 2025. Future space missions like the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope are expected to increase detections by factors of 10 or more via routine high-precision astrometry.^[35]^[36]

Binary and Multiple Lens Systems

In binary gravitational microlensing, the lens consists of two point masses separated by a projected distance d, normalized as the dimensionless separation s = d / \theta_E in units of the angular Einstein radius \theta_E of the total lens mass.^[37] Unlike single-lens events that produce two images, binary lenses generate three images when the source is outside the caustics and five images when inside, due to the more complex deflection potential. Caustics emerge as curves in the source plane where the magnification formally diverges for a point source, arising from folds and cusps in the lens mapping; these structures dictate the topology of the magnification pattern and lead to characteristic perturbations in observed light curves.^[38] The light curves of binary microlensing events exhibit deviations from the symmetric Paczyński profile of single-lens events, primarily due to the source trajectory relative to the caustics. For close binaries (s < 1), a compact central caustic near the primary lens dominates high-magnification features, while wide binaries (s > 1) produce two planetary caustics offset along the binary axis, each resembling a small diamond-shaped structure for low mass ratios.^[39] Resonant configurations (s \approx 1) merge these into a single, extended central caustic with six cusps, amplifying perturbations across a broader range of trajectories.^[40] Planetary-like cases with small mass ratios q = m_2 / m_1 < 10^{-3} yield particularly subtle caustic signals, often detectable only near peak magnification.^[41] Modeling binary events requires fitting seven parameters: the event timescale t_E, reference time t_0 and impact parameter u_0, the binary separation s and mass ratio q, plus the source trajectory angle \alpha and potentially a blending fraction.^[37] These fits are typically performed using numerical methods such as ray-shooting, which traces rays from the observer through the lens plane to compute magnification maps, or inverse ray tracing, which maps source positions backward to determine image multiplicities and amplifications efficiently for complex topologies. Approximately 10% of detected microlensing events display light curve anomalies indicative of binary lenses, manifesting as asymmetric peaks, secondary bumps, or caustic crossings that deviate from single-lens expectations. A notable example is OGLE-2007-BLG-349, the first confirmed triple-lens event involving a close binary star system with a circumbinary companion, where the perturbed light curve revealed the multi-component nature through multiple caustic crossings.^[41] Multiple-lens systems beyond binaries, such as triples or higher-order configurations, are rare, comprising fewer than 1% of events due to the low probability of aligned multi-component lenses along the line of sight.^[42] These systems produce even more intricate caustics, often with overlapping topologies that heighten parameter degeneracies in fits, but they enable probes of stellar multiplicity populations in the Galactic bulge and disk.^[43]

Parallax and Finite-Source Effects

In gravitational microlensing, the parallax effect arises from the observer's annual motion due to Earth's orbit around the Sun, which projects a curved trajectory onto the lens-source plane over the duration of the event. This curvature modifies the source-lens separation vector \mathbf{u}(t) from the straight-line path assumed in the standard symmetric light curve model, introducing detectable deviations that depend on the relative positions of the lens, source, and observer. The relative parallax is quantified as \pi_\mathrm{rel} = \mathrm{AU} \left( \frac{1}{D_\mathrm{l}} - \frac{1}{D_\mathrm{s}} \right), where AU is one astronomical unit, and D_\mathrm{l} and D_\mathrm{s} are the distances to the lens and source, respectively.^[44] These parallax-induced deviations manifest as asymmetries in the light curve, particularly a preference for distortions aligned with the east-west direction of Earth's orbital velocity, allowing fits to the north and east components of the parallax vector, \pi_{\mathrm{rel},N} and \pi_{\mathrm{rel},E}. By incorporating this curvature, the parallax measurement breaks the intrinsic degeneracy between the minimum impact parameter u_0 and the Einstein crossing timescale t_E, enabling independent constraints on the lens velocity and geometry. Parallax signals are most prominent in long-duration events with t_E \gtrsim months, where the observer's displacement over the year is significant relative to the event timescale.^[45]^[46] The first detection of microlensing parallax was reported in 1995 for a Galactic bulge event by the MACHO collaboration, with t_E \approx 37 days (Alcock et al. 1995). An early example toward the Small Magellanic Cloud is MACHO 97-SMC-1, observed in 1997 with a timescale of approximately 120 days, where the fitted \pi_\mathrm{rel} \approx 0.13 mas indicated a lens distance of about 50 kpc, consistent with an extragalactic location. Recent analyses of KMTNet data from the 2023–2025 seasons have identified additional long-duration events with measurable parallax, such as those with t_E > 100 days, yielding \pi_\mathrm{rel} values on the order of 0.05–0.2 mas and refining lens distance estimates to within 10–20% precision.^[47] Finite-source effects become relevant when the angular size of the source star exceeds a small fraction of the angular Einstein radius, specifically for normalized source radii \rho_* = \theta_* / \theta_E > 0.01, where \theta_* is the source angular radius. In such cases, the light curve peak is smoothed rather than sharply peaked, as the lens no longer fully aligns with a point-like source, reducing the maximum magnification and altering the overall shape. The point-source approximation remains valid only for impact parameters u \gtrsim \rho_*; closer alignments require numerical integration over the source disk to compute the magnification accurately. These effects are particularly pronounced in high-magnification events involving giant stars, where \rho_* \approx 0.02–0.1, and are modeled using limb-darkened source profiles for precision.^[48]^[49]^[45] When parallax measurements are combined with independent determinations of the angular Einstein radius \theta_E—such as from finite-source fitting in high-magnification events—the lens mass and distances can be fully resolved via M = \frac{\theta_E^2}{\kappa \pi_\mathrm{rel}}, providing masses typically in the range 0.1–1 M_\odot for Galactic bulge events. This synergy has been applied in analyses of KMTNet events from 2023–2025, yielding mass-distance solutions for single-lens systems with uncertainties below 30%, enhancing insights into stellar populations along the line of sight.^[45]^[47]

Astrophysical Applications

Exoplanet Detection via Microlensing

In gravitational microlensing, exoplanets are detected as low-mass companions to the primary lens, acting as perturbers in binary lens systems where the planet-to-host mass ratio q = M_p / M_* typically ranges from $10^{-3} (Jupiter-mass planets) to $10^{-6} (Earth-mass planets).^[50] These planetary signals manifest as subtle deviations from the smooth light curve of a single-lens event, occurring in approximately 2% of monitored microlensing events due to the rarity of favorable source-lens alignments that cross planetary caustics.^[51] The detection relies on high-cadence photometry to capture these transient anomalies, which are independent of the planet's luminosity and sensitive to wide orbital separations. Planetary signals arise primarily from the source trajectory crossing one of two caustic types in the binary lens configuration. Central caustics form when the planet is positioned near the Einstein ring (projected separation s \approx 1), producing brief magnification spikes lasting hours due to the small size of the caustic structure, which scales with \sqrt{q}. In contrast, resonant caustics emerge for planets at intermediate separations (s \sim 0.6-1.6), where the planetary and central caustics merge into an extended topology spanning several days, resulting in broader bumps in the light curve that are easier to detect but require precise modeling to distinguish from binary stellar lenses.^[52] These features are analyzed using binary lens equation fitting, often incorporating follow-up observations to resolve degeneracies in parameters like s and q. Microlensing is particularly sensitive to "cold" planets beyond the snow line (1-10 AU from the host), where detection efficiencies peak for Neptune- to Saturn-mass worlds ($10-100 M_\oplus), as these produce measurable caustic perturbations without requiring close alignments.^[53] It can detect down to Earth-mass planets (q \sim 10^{-6}) if the source passes within the narrow caustic, though such events demand exceptional alignment and sub-hour cadence.^[54] This method uniquely probes host stars across a wide mass range, including M-dwarfs, and distances up to the Galactic bulge, complementing closer-in planet searches by other techniques. A notable early microlensing exoplanet detection, OGLE-2005-BLG-390Lb, was announced in 2006 as a 5.5 M_\oplus super-Earth orbiting an M-dwarf at roughly 2.6 AU, identified via a central caustic perturbation in a high-magnification event. Subsequent detections include six low-mass planets announced in 2025 from KMTNet 2023-2024 data, featuring sub-day anomalies consistent with central caustic crossings by planets of 3-20 M_\oplus, highlighting the survey's ability to capture ultra-short signals.^[55] A super-Earth with q \approx 10^{-4} at a Jupiter-like orbit was reported in April 2025, based on MOA and OGLE events indicating such worlds are common beyond the snow line.^[31] In 2024, an Earth-mass terrestrial planet (\sim 1 M_\oplus) was detected orbiting a white dwarf host via resonant caustic features, providing rare insight into post-main-sequence planetary survival.^[56] By November 2025, microlensing has yielded over 330 confirmed or candidate exoplanets, with the mass-ratio function dN/d\log q rising steeply toward lower q (Neptune-mass planets outnumbering Jupiters by factors of 3-10 beyond the snow line), favoring detections near the snow line where icy planet formation is efficient.^[54]^[51]^[57] This distribution underscores microlensing's role in revealing the demographics of cold, low-mass planets inaccessible to transit or radial-velocity methods.

Insights into Dark Matter and Galactic Structure

Gravitational microlensing surveys conducted in the 1990s and 2000s, such as the MACHO project targeting the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) and Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), provided key constraints on dark matter in the form of massive compact halo objects (MACHOs). These efforts detected a handful of candidate events, yielding a measured microlensing optical depth toward the LMC of \tau \approx 1.2 \times 10^{-7}, which aligns closely with expectations from known stellar populations in the Milky Way disk and Magellanic Clouds rather than a dominant halo MACHO component. This result limits the contribution of MACHOs with masses between 0.15 and 0.9 M_\odot to less than 20% of the Galactic dark matter halo, implying that any such objects are predominantly baryonic in origin. Microlensing statistics have also refined models of Galactic structure, particularly the bulge and bar. The event rate \Gamma is proportional to \int \rho_l(v) \, dv \, dl, where \rho_l is the lens density and v the relative velocity, allowing fits to observed rates that reveal a triaxial bar with an axis ratio of approximately 2:1:0.4 and a position angle of about 20–30 degrees relative to the Sun–Galactic center line. Furthermore, the distribution of Einstein radius crossing times t_E from bulge events peaks at around 20–25 days, corresponding to a lens mass function dominated by stars near 0.3 M_\odot, which supports a bottom-heavy initial mass function (IMF) for bulge lenses consistent with dynamical models.^[58]^[59] Self-lensing within the bulge accounts for a substantial fraction of events, with bulge-bulge lensing comprising roughly 30–60% depending on the line of sight, while disk-bulge events make up the rest; this partitioning constrains the bulge stellar density and IMF slope at low masses (\alpha \approx 2.3–2.6 for M < 1 \, M_\odot). Pixel lensing toward M31 has similarly limited MACHOs in its halo, with observed event rates from surveys like POINT-AGAPE and PLAN yielding upper bounds of less than 50% halo fraction for \sim 0.5 \, M_\odot objects, favoring stellar rather than dark compact lenses. Integrating Gaia data enhances these analyses by providing 3D kinematics, enabling precise lens distance and velocity determinations for improved halo profiling.^[60]^[18]^[35] Projections for the 2020s, including the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, anticipate microlensing optical depth measurements toward the bulge with \sim 10\% precision, offering refined tests of dark matter profiles and bar dynamics from thousands of events. Recent studies from 2023 further link microlensing to gravitational wave observations, demonstrating how stellar-mass lenses can distort waveforms from lensed binaries detectable by LIGO-Virgo, potentially yielding joint constraints on Galactic lens populations and dark matter substructure.^[61]

Current and Future Experiments

Ongoing Ground-Based Collaborations

The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE), initiated in 1992 and led by the Astronomical Observatory of the University of Warsaw, primarily utilizes the 1.3 m Warsaw Telescope at Las Campanas Observatory in Chile, supplemented by data from partner facilities for broader coverage. This long-running survey has amassed a substantial catalog of microlensing events, with a reanalysis of public data from OGLE-III and OGLE-IV phases revealing 11,727 events toward the Galactic bulge as of the early 2020s, and ongoing observations in 2025 continuing to add hundreds annually through its early warning system. OGLE's high-precision photometry particularly excels in monitoring the Galactic bulge for exoplanet signals, contributing pivotal data to the discovery of cold, distant planets orbiting bulge stars.^[62]^[63] The Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics (MOA) collaboration, based at the University of Canterbury and operational since 2000, employs the 1.8 m telescope at Mt. John Observatory in New Zealand for wide-field imaging across ~17 square degrees of the Galactic bulge. MOA's emphasis on broad sky coverage and frequent sampling makes it especially effective for detecting short-timescale microlensing events, which are indicative of low-mass lenses such as Earth-mass planets or free-floating objects; its 9-year MOA-II survey (2006–2014) alone yielded 3,525 such events with robust timescale measurements. By 2025, MOA remains active, integrating its data with other surveys to refine event parameters and probe Galactic structure.^[64]^[65] Launched in 2015, the Korea Microlensing Telescope Network (KMTNet), managed by the Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, features three identical 1.6 m telescopes at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (Chile), South African Astronomical Observatory, and Siding Spring Observatory (Australia), enabling near-continuous, high-cadence monitoring of ~16 square degrees in the Galactic bulge with sampling intervals as short as 10–30 minutes. This global network has significantly boosted the detection rate of planetary anomalies, including the identification of six microlensing planets via sub-day signals in the 2023–2024 season, highlighting its role in capturing fleeting caustic crossings essential for low-mass exoplanet characterization. KMTNet's dense temporal coverage complements the primary surveys by filling observational gaps and enhancing follow-up opportunities. Through the Microlensing Collaboration, OGLE, MOA, and KMTNet share real-time alerts and photometric data via platforms like the Early Warning System, fostering joint analyses that maximize event recovery and parameter precision. This cooperative framework has enabled the compilation and study of over 30,000 Galactic microlensing events by 2025, forming extensive catalogs that underpin population-level inferences on lenses and sources.^[62] Pixel lensing surveys toward the Andromeda Galaxy (M31) represent a specialized ground-based effort to detect microlensing in unresolved stellar fields, probing dark matter in extragalactic halos. The PAndromeda project, leveraging the 1.8 m Pan-STARRS1 telescope on Haleakalā, Hawaii, since 2010, conducts high-cadence monitoring of M31's disk and halo to identify flux variations from distant lenses, yielding candidate events at rates comparable to prior surveys and serving as a terrestrial precursor to space-based wide-field imaging missions. These observations focus on long-timescale events potentially attributable to massive compact halo objects, augmenting Galactic microlensing studies with intergalactic perspectives.^[66]

Follow-Up and Anomaly Networks

Follow-up networks in gravitational microlensing provide intensive, targeted observations of ongoing events identified by wide-field surveys, enabling the detection and characterization of anomalies such as those caused by planetary companions or binary lenses. These networks coordinate global telescopes to achieve dense temporal sampling, often responding to real-time alerts from surveys like OGLE and MOA, which is crucial for resolving short-duration deviations from the standard single-lens light curve model. By focusing on high-magnification events, where planetary signals are most pronounced near caustics, these efforts enhance parameter precision, including mass ratios and separations, that would otherwise be unattainable with survey data alone.^[67]^[68] The Microlensing Follow-Up Network (MicroFUN), established as an informal consortium of professional and amateur astronomers, utilizes a global array of small- to medium-aperture telescopes for precision photometric monitoring of Galactic Bulge events. Operating since the early 2000s, MicroFUN receives real-time alerts from surveys and provides dense sampling—often multiple observations per hour during peak phases—to map caustic structures and anomalies indicative of planets. This citizen-science integration has enabled contributions to numerous event analyses, including the confirmation of planetary signals through extended coverage across time zones.^[67]^[69] Similarly, the Probing Lensing Anomalies NETwork (PLANET), initiated in 1995, employed semi-dedicated telescopes in Europe, South Africa, and Australia to deliver continuous, multi-site coverage with hourly cadence and photometric precision of 1-5%. Focused on probing planetary-mass perturbations, PLANET conducted frequent measurements to detect deviations from single-lens models, particularly short signals from Jovian-mass planets at several AU. Active through the 2010s, it evolved into collaborations like those with RoboNet, yielding detailed light curves that refined event parameters and supported early exoplanet confirmations.^[70]^[71]^[72] RoboNet, particularly its RoboNet-II phase starting in 2008, leverages a network of robotic 2-meter telescopes in Hawaii, Australia, and the Canary Islands for automated follow-up, often dedicating over 100 hours per high-priority event to achieve high signal-to-noise ratios. Integrated with the Automated Robotic Terrestrial Exoplanet Microlensing Search (ARTeMiS) system, it enables real-time anomaly assessment and scheduling via tools like eSTAR. This automation ensures efficient coverage of Galactic Bulge events, prioritizing those with potential planetary signals for extended monitoring.^[68]^[73] Anomaly detection within these networks relies on identifying significant deviations from the point-source point-lens model, typically quantified by a chi-squared difference (Δχ² > 100, equivalent to roughly 5σ or more after uncertainty rescaling) over at least five data points across two consecutive nights. Such triggers, often exceeding 1.5% photometric deviations, prompt intensified observations to confirm binary or planetary interpretations, as in the RoboTAP algorithm which prioritizes events based on planet detection probability. These protocols have been essential for distinguishing true anomalies from noise, facilitating the resolution of complex light curves.^[74]^[75] Collectively, these networks have significantly impacted microlensing science by contributing to the characterization of over 50 exoplanets, including low-mass worlds like the Earth-mass candidate OGLE-2005-BLG-390Lb detected via PLANET monitoring. Their follow-up efforts have resolved subtle planetary signals in events such as OGLE-2011-BLG-0265 (MicroFUN) and provided high-cadence data for binary systems, enhancing our understanding of exoplanet demographics. Recent applications include intensive monitoring of 2023-2024 season events like KMT-2023-BLG-0548, where sub-day anomalies revealed additional planets, demonstrating ongoing relevance for probing compact systems. With total microlensing exoplanets exceeding 300 as of 2025, these networks continue to play a key role.^[76]^[55]^[77]^[5]

Proposed Space-Based Missions

The Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, formerly known as WFIRST, is a flagship NASA mission scheduled for launch in late 2026, with preparations advancing steadily as of November 2025, including successful integration of its instruments and solar shields.^[78]^[79] Its Wide-Field Instrument features a 0.28 deg² field of view and will conduct the Galactic Exoplanet Survey as part of the six-season Galactic Bulge Time Domain Survey, monitoring the bulge at a 15-minute cadence over approximately 72 days per season.^[80] This design projects detection of around 10^5 microlensing events, enabling precise characterization of exoplanet demographics, including cold worlds down to Earth-mass at the snow line (1–10 au) and free-floating planets as low as 0.02 M⊕.^[81] Simulations indicate the mission could detect roughly 100 Earth-mass analogs in habitable zones, providing constraints on the frequency of such systems (η_Earth) through high-fidelity light curves and parallax measurements from its Sun-Earth L2 halo orbit at about 1.5 million km.^[82] The survey's extended baseline of over four years further supports mass and distance determinations for at least 40% of planet-hosting lenses with 20% precision, leveraging finite-source effects and lens flux.^[83] Space-based observations with Roman offer key advantages over ground-based efforts, including uninterrupted seasonal coverage without atmospheric interference, stable point-spread functions for lower photometric noise, and the ability to resolve crowded fields in the Galactic bulge.^[84] These enable sensitivity to low-mass perturbers and precise parallax for host characterization, projecting thousands of bound exoplanets and hundreds of free-floaters.^[80] The European Space Agency's Euclid mission, launched in 2023, includes limited microlensing capabilities as legacy science, primarily through its VIS and NISP instruments for monitoring unresolved sources toward the bulge and external galaxies like M31.^[85] It supports pixel lensing searches for faint lenses, potentially constraining dark matter fractions via optical depth (τ) measurements to ~1% in M31's halo by detecting flux anomalies in unresolved stellar populations.^[16] Joint operations with Roman could enhance early mass measurements for ~2000 events and detect ~130 Earth-mass free-floaters annually, though Euclid's primary focus on dark energy limits dedicated microlensing time to opportunistic modes.^[86] Conceptual missions like NASA's Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO), slated for the 2030s, incorporate microlensing elements via high-precision astrometry to measure stellar masses through centroid shifts in nearby lensing events, aiding exoplanet host characterization but not as a primary survey.^[87] Similarly, ESA's Ariel mission, planned for 2029, prioritizes transit spectroscopy of known exoplanets and lacks dedicated microlensing components.^[88] As of 2025, Roman remains the most advanced and fully funded proposal for a comprehensive space-based microlensing survey, with ongoing simulations validating its potential for ~100 Earth-analog detections.^[82]

References

[1]
[PDF] Introduction to Gravitational Microlensing - arXiv
Nov 4, 2008 · The basic concepts of gravitational microlensing are introduced. We start with the lens equation, and then derive the image positions and ...
[2]
Microlensing - NASA Science
Gravitational lensing is an observational effect that occurs because the presence of mass warps the fabric of space-time, sort of like the dent a bowling ball ...
[3]
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...304....1P/abstract
[4]
DISCOVERY OF THE 1ST CANDIDATE MICROLENSING EVENT IN ...
We report the discovery of the first candidate microlensing event to be discovered in the direction of the Galactic Bulge. The peak brightness of the candidate ...
[5]
Lens-Like Action of a Star by the Deviation of Light in the ... - Science
Lens-Like Action of a Star by the Deviation of Light in the Gravitational Field. Albert EinsteinAuthors Info & Affiliations. Science. 4 Dec 1936. Vol 84, Issue ...
[6]
Microlensing Surveys for Exoplanets - Annual Reviews
Sep 22, 2012 · I review the fundamental concepts of microlensing planet searches and discuss their practical application.
[7]
[PDF] Galactic Bulge Microlensing Optical Depth from EROS-2 - arXiv
Jul 13, 2006 · The expected optical depth naturally has a strong dependence on the Galactic latitude, b, falling typically from τ ∼ 5 × 10−6 at (l ∼ 0, |b| = 1 ...
[8]
[PDF] Astrophysical applications of gravitational microlensing
The review starts with a theoretical overview of the field and then proceeds to discuss the scientific highlights. (1) Microlensing observations toward the ...
[9]
Alcock et al., Difference Image Analysis - IOP Science
... microlensing as standard PSF photometry because it does not give a baseline flux. This is not the case. For classical microlensing events, photometry can ...
[10]
New limits from microlensing on Galactic black holes in the mass ...
), sees its apparent luminosity magnified by a factor greater than 1.34. Assuming that the lens has a constant relative transverse velocity vT, u(t) is ...
[11]
Microlensing Constraints on the Mass of Single Stars from HST ...
Jul 14, 2017 · This demonstrates the power of astrometric microlensing as a tool to constrain the masses of stars, stellar remnants, and, in the future, ...
[12]
Predicted microlensing events from analysis of Gaia Data Release 2
Context. Astrometric microlensing can be used to make precise measurements of the masses of lens stars that are independent of their assumed internal physics.
[13]
[0912.2667] Pixel lensing: Microlensing towards M31 - arXiv
Dec 14, 2009 · Pixel lensing is gravitational microlensing of unresolved stars. The main target explored up to now has been the nearby galaxy of Andromeda, M31.
[14]
Theory of pixel lensing towards M31 — I. The density contribution ...
In this paper we investigate what we can learn from pixel-lensing observables about the MACHO mass and fractional contribution in M31 and the Galaxy
[15]
THE M31 PIXEL LENSING PLAN CAMPAIGN - IOP Science
We consider both “self lensing” and “MACHO lensing” lens populations, given by M31 stars and dark matter halo MACHOs, in M31 and the Milky Way, respectively.Missing: techniques | Show results with:techniques
[16]
[astro-ph/0002256] Theory of pixel lensing towards M31 I - arXiv
Feb 11, 2000 · For a maximum MACHO halo we predict an event rate in V of up to 100 per season for M31 and 40 per season for the Galaxy. However, the ...
[17]
Project Infrastructure Teams - Roman Space Telescope - NASA
Specifically, we will (1) confirm and/or reconfirm the five level-1 RGES science requirements, (2) improve the microlensing event rate and yield calculations by ...
[18]
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/86
[19]
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0002256
[20]
Gravitational Lenses | Phys. Rev. - Physical Review Link Manager
In the present paper, the imaging properties of the gravitational lens are discussed, and mechanisms whereby lens effects might manifest themselves are ...
[21]
Possible gravitational microlensing of a star in the Large Magellanic ...
Oct 1, 1993 · We are conducting a microlensing experiment to determine whether the dark matter halo of our Galaxy is made up of MACHOs.
[22]
Magellanic cloud gravitational microlensing results: What do they ...
They found eight microlensing events which indicated an optical depth of τLMC=2.9−0.9+1.4×10−7 which significantly exceeds the expected microlensing optical ...
[23]
The MACHO Project LMC Microlensing Results - IOP Science
Event 1 was our first discovery (Alcock et al. 1993), and has remained constant as expected in the following year. The star's spectrum is that of a normal clump ...
[24]
PHOTOMETRIC CONFIRMATION OF MACHO LARGE ...
The EROS collaboration has also monitored the LMC for microlensing events but has detected fewer events than MACHO and has reported an upper limit on the ...
[25]
OGLE-III MICROLENSING EVENTS AND THE STRUCTURE OF ...
The sample of standard microlensing events comprises 3718 unique events from 2001–2009 with 1409 events that had not been detected before in real-time by the ...Missing: MicroFUN | Show results with:MicroFUN
[26]
Microlensing optical depth towards the Galactic bulge from MOA ...
Abstract: We analyze the data of the gravitational microlensing survey carried out by by the MOA group during 2000 towards the Galactic Bulge (GB).Missing: MicroFUN | Show results with:MicroFUN
[27]
Microlensing events indicate that super-Earth exoplanets ... - Science
Apr 24, 2025 · Zang et al. identified a microlensing event due to an exoplanet with a planet/star mass ratio between those of Earth and Neptune.
[28]
This rocky planet around a white dwarf resembles Earth — 8 billion ...
Sep 26, 2024 · ... microlensing stars with planets to be white dwarfs,” Zhang said. The ... An Earth-Mass Planet and a Brown Dwarf in Orbit Around a White Dwarf ...
[29]
WFIRST Exoplanet Mass-measurement Method Finds a Planetary ...
WFIRST Exoplanet Mass-measurement Method Finds a Planetary Mass of 39 ± 8 M⊕ for OGLE-2012-BLG-0950Lb. A. Bhattacharya, J.-P. Beaulieu, D. P. Bennett, ...Abstract · Introduction · Keck AO PSF Fitting · Determination of Relative Lens...
[30]
Parameter degeneracies and (un)predictability of gravitational ...
Despite the fact that the time-scale tE≡θE/μ, where θE denotes the angular Einstein radius, and μ is the relative proper motion between lens and source star, is ...
[31]
Gaia Data Release 3 - Microlensing events from all over the sky
We present 363 Gaia microlensing events and discuss their properties. Of these, 90 have never been reported before and have not been discovered by other ...
[32]
Prediction of Astrometric-microlensing Events from Gaia eDR3 ...
We determined an Einstein radius of θE = (11.6 ± 1.5) mas. ... However, measuring the masses is the ultimate aim of observing the astrometric-microlensing events.
[33]
An alternative parameterisation for binary-lens caustic-crossing events
In the simplest case, modelling a binary-lens microlensing event requires seven parameters, which are classically the lens separa- tion d and mass ratio q ...
[34]
[PDF] GRAVITATIONAL MICROLENSING NEAR CAUSTICS. II. CUSPS B ...
ABSTRACT. We present a rigorous, detailed study of the generic, quantitative properties of gravitational lensing near cusp catastrophes.
[35]
Binary Microlensing Effects I. Caustics and the Flux Factor K
1. The structuresof the critical curves (a) and the corresponding caustics (b) for various ~y -parameter (0.0, 0.3, 0.6, 1.3, 2.0, and 2.5). · 2. The ...
[36]
Rapid analysis of binary lens gravitational microlensing light curves
The main features of LGM binary lens light curves constructed using the seven-parameter model are due to the close approach of the source that is being lensed, ...
[37]
THE FIRST CIRCUMBINARY PLANET FOUND BY MICROLENSING
We present the analysis of the first circumbinary planet microlensing event, OGLE-2007-BLG-349. This event has a strong planetary signal that is best fit ...
[38]
Triple-lens Gravitational Microlensing: Critical Curves for Arbitrary ...
Since the first observation of triple-lens gravitational microlensing in 2006, analyses of six more events have been published by the end of 2018.Missing: rare | Show results with:rare
[39]
[1901.08610] Triple-lens Gravitational Microlensing: Critical Curves ...
Jan 24, 2019 · In three events the lens was a star with two planets; four involved a binary star with a planet. Other possible triple lenses, such as triple ...Missing: rare | Show results with:rare
[40]
A parallax effect due to gravitational micro-lensing - Nature
Nov 13, 1986 · Here we discuss a parallax effect due to gravitational micro-lensing (star disturbances). We show that such an effect would most favourably be observed during ...Missing: seminal papers
[41]
Microlensing and Its Degeneracy Breakers: Parallax, Finite Source ...
Mar 3, 1997 · ... from Einstein's general theory of relativity [52]. Thus, one can derive the lens equation. θ I ( θ I − θ S ) = 4 G M c 2 D L S D O L ...
[42]
Acceleration and parallax effects in gravitational microlensing
In this paper, we have illustrated the effect of acceleration on microlensing light curves. We have studied whether the known parallax microlensing events ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[43]
Systematic Reanalysis of KMTNet Microlensing Events. II. Two New ...
The search successfully uncovers four new planet-like anomalies and recovers two previously known planetary signals.Missing: period | Show results with:period
[44]
[0901.1316] Finite source effects in microlensing: A precise, easy to ...
Jan 9, 2009 · The goal of this paper is to provide a numerically fast and stable description for the microlensing amplification of an extended source.Missing: gravitational seminal
[45]
https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1997/3/3/53
[46]
https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/339/4/925/1008349
[47]
The Exoplanet Mass-Ratio Function from the MOA-II Survey - arXiv
Dec 12, 2016 · We report the results of the statistical analysis of planetary signals discovered in MOA-II microlensing survey alert system events from 2007 to 2012.
[48]
Three faint-source microlensing planets detected via the resonant ...
The planet is located close to the Einsteinring, and this results in a single, six-sided resonant caustic. The caustic appears as the merging of the single ...
[49]
Microlensing Study Suggests Most Common Outer Planets Likely ...
Dec 15, 2016 · Gravitational microlensing takes advantage of the light-bending effects of massive objects predicted by Einstein's general theory of relativity.
[50]
[2407.06689] Finding planets via gravitational microlensing - arXiv
Jul 9, 2024 · More than 200 planets have been detected with gravitational microlensing, in addition to several free-floating planet and black hole candidates.
[51]
Six microlensing planets detected via sub-day signals during the ...
Notably, the angular Einstein radius measured for KMT-2024-BLG-2242, θE = 0.090 ± 0.021 mas, is significantly smaller than those of the other events. Combined ...
[52]
An Earth-Mass Planet and a Brown Dwarf in Orbit Around a White ...
Nevertheless, only a few gas-giant planets have been observed around white dwarfs (WDs) -- the end product left behind by a red giant. Here we ...
[53]
[astro-ph/9712177] The microlensing rate and mass function vs ...
We use a set of simple self-consistent bar models to investigate how the microlensing event rate varies as a function of axis ratio, bar angle and velocity ...Missing: gravitational structure peak 0.3 Msun
[54]
The Initial Mass Function of the Inner Galaxy Measured from OGLE ...
Jun 26, 2017 · We use the timescale distribution of ∼3000 microlensing events measured by the OGLE-III survey, together with accurate new made-to-measure dynamical models.Missing: t_E peak Msun
[55]
Microlensing constraints on the Galactic bulge initial mass function
We seek to probe the Galactic bulge IMF starting from microlensing observations. Methods.We analyse the recent results of the microlensing campaigns carried ...
[56]
Exploring the impact of microlensing on gravitational wave signals
In this study, we investigate the impact of microlensing on gravitational wave (GW) signals in the LIGO−Virgo sensitivity band.
[57]
A Reanalysis of Public Galactic Bulge Gravitational Microlensing ...
Apr 21, 2022 · The most recent full-scale analysis of OGLE-IV was presented in Mróz et al. ... (2015) and 5790 microlensing events from Mróz et al. (2019). 2.
[58]
ogle-iv early warning system - 2025 season
So far, the EWS system has detected 1524 candidate microlensing events in the 2025 observing season. The table given below provides interactive WWW access to ...Missing: Optical Gravitational
[59]
MOA-II 9 Yr Survey: Microlensing Event Rate & Optical Depth
Jan 22, 2025 · We present measurements of the microlensing optical depth and event rate toward the Galactic bulge using the data set from the 2006 to 2014 MOA-II survey.
[60]
MOA, Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics
MOA (Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics) is a Japan/NZ collaboration that makes observations on dark matter, extra-solar planets and stellar atmospheres ...
[61]
PAndromeda - first results from the high-cadence monitoring of M31 ...
٢٨‏/٠٩‏/٢٠١١ · We present light curves for 6 candidate microlensing events. This is a competitive rate compared to previous M31 microlensing surveys. We ...ناقصة: pixel 2025<|control11|><|separator|>
[62]
MicroFUN MICROLENSING FOLLOW - The Ohio State University
MicroFUN is an informal consortium of observers dedicated to photometric monitoring of interesting microlensing events in the Galactic Bulge.
[63]
[0808.0813] RoboNet-II: Follow-up observations of microlensing ...
Aug 6, 2008 · RoboNet-II uses a global network of robotic telescopes to perform follow-up observations of microlensing events in the Galactic Bulge.
[64]
Ground-based Follow-up Programs - Microlensing Source
The MicroFUN group is an outstanding example of partnership between professional and citizen scientist contributors, with targets selected and coordinated by a ...
[65]
The Planet Collaboration: Probing Lensing Anomalies - arXiv
Oct 16, 1996 · The Probing Lensing Anomalies NETwork (PLANET) is a worldwide collaboration of astronomers using semi-dedicated European, South African, and Australian ...
[66]
PLANET Microlensing Anomalies Survey - IOP Science
... magnification is extremely small (on the order of 1 × 10-6) for background ... alerts are crucial to the success of our intensive microlensing monitoring.
[67]
The PLANET microlensing follow-up network: results and prospects ...
From 42 well-sampled events between 1995 and 1999, we infer that less than 1/3 of M-dwarfs in the Galactic bulge have jupiter-mass companions at separations ...Introduction · Microlensing Surveys · Microlensing And Planets
[68]
ARTEMiS (Automated Robotic Terrestrial Exoplanet Microlensing ...
2004), PLANET (Probing Lensing Anomalies NETwork) established the first microlensing follow ... follow-up data. Most notably, several candidate planetary signals ...
[69]
RoboTAP: Target priorities for robotic microlensing observations
In this work, we determine the planet sensitivity of the RoboNet follow-up program and provide a working example of how a broker can be designed for a real-life ...
[70]
An anomaly detector with immediate feedback to hunt for planets of ...
This allows to schedule follow-up observations that provide an increased photometric accuracy, a denser event sampling, and/or coverage during epochs outside ...
[71]
[astro-ph/9910465] The PLANET microlensing follow-up network
Oct 26, 1999 · This means that a planet reveals its existence by producing a short signal at its quasi-instantaneous position, so that planets can be detected ...
[72]
Finding planets via gravitational microlensing - arXiv
Jul 9, 2024 · Gravitational microlensing is a unique technique to discover exoplanets because it doesn't rely on the host star brightness or the orbital ...
[73]
Roman's Telescope and Instruments are Joined - Universe Today
Jan 9, 2025 · Scheduled for launch in 2027, the Nancy Grace Roman Telescope is slowly being readied for operation. This week, NASA announced that they ...
[74]
Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope | STScI
The Roman Project is currently planning for observatory launch in late 2026. ... Roman Science Operations Center Newsletter. October 20, 2025. Graphic shows ...
[75]
[PDF] Predictions of the WFIRST Microlensing Survey. I. Bound Planet ...
In order for each planet detection to be useful for demographic studies, we not only need to detect a deviation from a single- lens microlensing light curve at ...
[76]
Predictions of the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope Galactic ...
The Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope (Roman) will conduct a Galactic Exoplanet Survey to discover bound and free-floating exoplanets using gravitational ...
[77]
Prospects for Constraining the Frequency of Earth-Analogs - HAL
We perform simulations of the Roman Galactic Exoplanet Survey to estimate its sensitivity to these systems. Roman's ability to estimate ηEarth will hinge on the ...<|separator|>
[78]
Predictions of the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope Galactic ...
Oct 15, 2025 · One requirement specifies that Roman must measure the masses and distances of 40% of detected planet hosts with 20% precision or better. To test ...
[79]
[PDF] Microlensing Searches for Exoplanets - Katja Poppenhaeger
Going to space for a microlensing survey comes with several advantages. (besides a stable PSF and uninterrupted coverage). First, WFIRST will rival Kepler in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[80]
Legacy Science - Euclid Consortium
Beyond the solar system Euclid will be able to use the microlensing effect to find extrasolar planets through brief increases in the light of background stars ...Missing: capabilities | Show results with:capabilities
[81]
Euclid-Roman joint microlensing survey: Early mass measurement ...
As a result, their sensitivity is severely affected by the combination of stellar crowding effects and seeing limitations caused by Earth's atmosphere.
[82]
Direct Measurements of Stellar Masses with the Habitable World ...
Background stars within ~1″ of a nearby massive object will have their centroids shift by about 1 mas due to microlensing. This provides mass measurements ...
[83]
ESA - Ariel - European Space Agency
ESA's mission Ariel, Atmospheric Remote-sensing Infrared Exoplanet Large-survey, will inspect the atmospheres of a thousand planets in our galaxy orbiting ...Missing: gravitational | Show results with:gravitational