Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Gravity train

A gravity train is a theoretical transportation concept in which a travels between two points on 's surface through a straight-line bored through the , propelled solely by without the need for engines or fuel. The accelerates downward due to as it descends toward the 's center and then decelerates symmetrically as it ascends to the destination, arriving with zero under ideal conditions. This idea assumes a frictionless environment, evacuated air to eliminate , and a uniform for simplified calculations, resulting in a remarkably consistent travel time of approximately 42 minutes for any pair of antipodal or non-antipodal surface points. The concept originated in the late 17th century when English scientist described it in a 1679 letter to , predating Newton's publication of the law of universal gravitation and drawing on early ideas about motion through the . Mathematically, the motion follows from Newton's shell theorem, which states that inside a uniform spherical shell, gravitational force is zero, while the net force within a solid sphere is proportional to the distance from the center, leading to along the tunnel. For a realistic, non-uniform , advanced models adjust the travel time slightly to 37–40 minutes along optimal brachistochrone paths, such as hypocycloids, but straight-line tunnels remain the baseline for theoretical analysis. Despite its elegance, practical implementation faces insurmountable challenges, including the immense engineering feats required to drill tunnels through and , extreme pressures and temperatures at depth, and the need for near-perfect conditions to minimize loss. The idea has inspired scientific discussions, educational projects like the Purdue Gravity Train initiative modeling routes from to France, and references, but it remains a highlighting principles of rather than a feasible .

Definition and Concept

Basic Principle

A gravity train is a theoretical transportation system for moving a vehicle between two points on the surface of a spherical celestial body, such as Earth, via a straight-line tunnel excavated through its interior, with propulsion provided exclusively by the body's gravitational field and no external energy input required. The vehicle, assumed to be a point mass or low-friction capsule, is released from rest at the starting point on the surface. In operation, the vehicle experiences an initial acceleration along the tunnel due to the component of gravitational force parallel to the path, directed toward the tunnel's lowest point: the Earth's center for a diametric tunnel connecting antipodal points, or the geometric midpoint for shorter chordal tunnels between non-antipodal locations. This acceleration increases the vehicle's speed until it reaches maximum velocity at the bottom, after which the gravitational component reverses direction, causing symmetric deceleration as the vehicle ascends to the exit point, arriving with zero velocity. The motion is idealized as frictionless, ignoring air resistance, tunnel wall friction, and other dissipative effects that would occur in practice. The model further assumes the spherical body has uniform mass density throughout, which linearizes the gravitational restoring force along the tunnel and enables analytical solutions. Under these conditions, the vehicle's path exhibits , similar to that of a undergoing small oscillations or a attached to a , where the is directly proportional to the from the equilibrium (lowest) point but opposite in direction. This oscillatory behavior ensures periodic motion if not damped, with the period independent of the tunnel's specific length for uniform density spheres. The term "gravity railroad" typically refers to 19th-century inclined-plane railways designed for freight transport, such as the constructed in 1827 in , which relied on to propel loaded coal cars downhill along surface slopes while using mules or animal power to haul empty cars uphill. These systems were engineered for efficiency in operations but operated entirely on the Earth's surface, following contoured terrain rather than straight subsurface paths. In contrast, vacuum-tube transit concepts, such as the gravity-vacuum transit proposed by engineer Lawrence K. Edwards in the 1960s, envisioned underground low-pressure tubes to minimize air resistance, with vehicles propelled primarily by gravity along inclined routes but supported by additional infrastructure like dynamic airlocks and potentially magnetic suspension systems. Similarly, modern initiatives like the Hyperloop, as detailed in Elon Musk's 2013 conceptual whitepaper, utilize near-vacuum tubes for pods accelerated by linear electric motors and levitated via magnetic bearings, emphasizing engineered propulsion over unassisted gravitational motion. The theoretical gravity train differs fundamentally by positing straight-line tunnels bored directly through a planetary body's interior, such as from one surface point to its antipode, where motion arises solely from the conversion of energy into in a frictionless , resulting in simple harmonic oscillation without any post-launch energy input. Unlike surface-based gravity railroads or vacuum-assisted systems, which depend on inclines, pumps for pressure maintenance, or electromagnetic aids, gravity trains exploit the uniform inside a spherical for bidirectional along chordal or diametric paths.

History and Development

Origin of the Concept

The concept of a , involving travel through tunnels bored through a under the influence of alone, originated as a theoretical in the late amid early explorations of universal gravitation. , in a letter to Isaac Newton dated November 24, 1679, speculated on the motion of a body dropped into a hypothetical straight-line path through the Earth, suggesting it would accelerate toward the center and describing the trajectory as resembling an ellipse if gravity were constant inside the planet. This idea was part of Hooke's broader writings on . Newton replied on November 28, 1679, engaging with the speculation by sketching a spiral path for the falling body in a rotating frame and debating the deflection due to , which he calculated as eastward. Their exchange, continuing through early 1680, highlighted disagreements—Hooke favoring an elliptical path under constant force, while argued for based on varying —but it marked the first detailed intellectual discussion of motion in subterranean channels. This correspondence occurred against the backdrop of the Hooke- dispute over gravitational theory, with Hooke claiming priority in inverse-square ideas from his 1666 lecture. Newton's (1687) provided implicit support for the concept through Proposition 12 of Book I, the , which demonstrates that inside a spherically symmetric mass distribution, the is zero for a hollow shell and proportional to distance from the center for a solid uniform sphere—enabling in a diametric without explicitly proposing travel applications. Though not directly addressing tunnels, this mathematical framework, derived from the of gravitation, established the physical feasibility of oscillatory paths through planetary interiors as a tool for illustrating gravitational principles.

Historical Proposals

The concept of gravity trains gained traction in the 19th century through practical engineering applications and speculative theoretical proposals. Early precursors emerged in the form of , which utilized inclines to harness gravitational force for transporting goods without continuous engine power. A prominent example is the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company's , completed in 1829 in , , designed to haul from mines over the Moosic Mountains to canal boats; loaded cars descended under gravity while empty ones were pulled uphill by stationary engines or mules, demonstrating efficient use of terrain for industrial transport. Theoretical subsurface gravity trains were proposed around the same period, building on earlier mathematical explorations of motion through planetary interiors. In the , an anonymous group presented a detailed project for a straight-line gravity train through the Earth to the , envisioning rapid global transit powered solely by gravity; however, the academy deferred consideration due to the era's technological constraints. These ideas were influenced by prior calculations, such as those by in the late , who outlined the acceleration of objects falling through hypothetical Earth s in correspondence with , estimating transit times based on gravitational attraction. In the , renewed interest arose through scientific publications that analyzed gravity trains as potential future infrastructure. Physicist Paul Cooper's 1966 paper in the , titled "Through the Earth in Forty Minutes," rigorously modeled the dynamics of a frictionless in a diametric , calculating a 42-minute journey from pole to pole and advocating for its consideration in long-term , though it highlighted immense engineering barriers. Speculations like Cooper's were sometimes prompted by mentions in science fiction, which spurred physicists to verify the underlying orbital-like motion analogies. No full-scale gravity trains have been implemented, as proposals consistently stalled due to limitations in deep-drilling technology and the immense geological challenges of excavating straight-line tunnels through varying densities and high pressures. A brief modern analog appeared in 2022 when mining firm Fortescue announced the "," a battery-electric system for haulage that recharges downhill via to power uphill segments, but the project was scaled back in September 2025 amid high costs and it remains a surface-based, non-subsurface design. Over time, the notion evolved from 19th-century incline-based systems for resource extraction to idealized subsurface concepts for passenger transit, continuing to inform debates on sustainable, gravity-assisted .

Physics Fundamentals

Gravitational Field Inside a Sphere

The inside a spherical body of uniform density can be determined using , which relates the flux of the through a closed surface to the enclosed . For a sphere of radius R and uniform mass density \rho, consider a Gaussian surface that is a concentric sphere of radius r < R. The enclosed is then \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 \rho, and the symmetry implies a radial field uniform over this surface. Applying Gauss's law yields the magnitude of the gravitational acceleration g(r) at distance r from the center: g(r) = \frac{4}{3} \pi G \rho r directed toward the center, where G is the gravitational constant. This expression demonstrates that g(r) increases linearly with r, vanishing at the center (r = 0) and attaining its maximum value of \frac{4}{3} \pi G \rho R at the surface (r = R). At the center, the net field is zero, resulting in stable equilibrium for a test mass placed there, as contributions from all surrounding mass elements cancel out. In contrast, for points outside the sphere (r > R), the field behaves as if all mass were concentrated at , following the : g(r) = \frac{GM}{r^2}, where M = \frac{4}{3}\pi R^3 \rho is the total mass. Inside the sphere, however, the field is harmonic, meaning it is directly proportional to the displacement from , akin to a restoring force in . This analysis assumes a perfectly homogeneous density throughout the sphere, which simplifies the but approximates real planetary bodies like only to a . In 's case, the denser iron-nickel (surrounded by the less dense ) causes deviations: remains nearly constant through much of rather than increasing linearly, reaching a maximum at the core-mantle boundary before decreasing towards the center. The radial nature of inside a uniform is often illustrated in diagrams showing field lines converging toward , with arrow lengths (representing ) starting from zero at and growing proportionally outward to the surface, emphasizing the linear variation and spherical .

Motion Dynamics in a Tunnel

In a straight tunnel bored through a spherically symmetric body such as , modeled with uniform , the motion of a frictionless object is governed by the component of the internal along the tunnel axis. The at a r from the body's is directed toward the with magnitude g(r) = g \frac{r}{R}, where g is the surface gravity and R is the . For a position along the tunnel, the component of this onto the tunnel direction yields an effective a that acts as a restoring toward the tunnel's , the point closest to the . The component of the along the tunnel direction results in a restoring exactly proportional to the s from the , a = -\frac{g}{R} s. Under the frictionless assumption, this linear restoring force results in (SHM) for the object along any straight chord tunnel connecting two surface points. The equation of motion is \frac{d^2 s}{dt^2} = -\omega^2 s, where \omega = \sqrt{g/R} is the , identical for all chords regardless of their length or orientation. The serves as the point, where the net force along the tunnel vanishes, and the object oscillates symmetrically around it with equal to half the tunnel length. Energy conservation dictates that the object's gravitational potential energy converts to during descent, reaching maximum velocity at the lowest () of the tunnel. The potential inside the body is , U(r) \propto r^2, ensuring the total remains constant and supporting the nature of the motion. For , assuming uniform , the full period—the time for a round trip through the tunnel and back—is approximately 84 minutes, equivalent to the of a hypothetical at the surface. Consequently, a one-way from one surface endpoint to the other takes half this duration, about 42 minutes.

Mathematical Derivations

Diametric Path Through the Center

The diametric path for a gravity train consists of a straight-line tunnel extending through the center of a spherical body such as Earth, with a total length of $2R, where R is the radius of the sphere. For a body of uniform density, the gravitational force on a mass m at a displacement x from the center (along the tunnel axis) arises solely from the mass enclosed within radius |x|, leading to a restoring acceleration proportional to -x. Specifically, the equation of motion is \frac{d^2 x}{dt^2} = -\frac{GM}{R^3} x, where G is the gravitational constant and M is the total mass of the sphere. This follows from Gauss's law for gravity, as the field inside a uniform sphere is g(x) = -\frac{GM}{R^3} x. The describes with \omega = \sqrt{\frac{GM}{R^3}}. The general solution for position is x(t) = A \cos(\omega t + \phi), where A is the and \phi is the constant; the corresponding is v(t) = -A \omega \sin(\omega t + \phi). For a train released from rest at the surface (x(0) = R, v(0) = 0), the constants are A = R and \phi = 0, yielding x(t) = R \cos(\omega t) and v(t) = -R \omega \sin(\omega t). The time to traverse from one surface point to the antipode (x = R to x = -R) corresponds to half the oscillation period, t = \frac{\pi}{\omega} = \pi \sqrt{\frac{R}{g}}, where g = \frac{GM}{R^2} is the surface gravity; for Earth (R \approx 6371 km, g \approx 9.81 m/s²), this yields approximately 42 minutes. The maximum speed occurs at the center (x = 0, when \omega t = \frac{\pi}{2}), given by v_{\max} = R \omega = \sqrt{\frac{GM}{R}} = \sqrt{g R} \approx 7.9 km/s for . At the center, the kinetic energy \frac{1}{2} m v_{\max}^2 = \frac{1}{2} m g R equals the loss in energy from the surface. For a uniform sphere, the potential at the surface is V(R) = -\frac{GM m}{R} and at the center is V(0) = -\frac{3 GM m}{2 R}, so the decrease \Delta V = V(0) - V(R) = -\frac{1}{2} \frac{GM m}{R} = -\frac{1}{2} m g R. This full conversion to assumes no , such as from air resistance or tunnel friction.

Chord Paths Between Arbitrary Points

In a gravity train along a straight-line connecting two arbitrary points on the surface of a uniform-density of radius R, the geometry is defined by the $2\alpha subtended by the chord at the 's , where \alpha ranges from 0 (diametric ) to \pi/2 (surface ). The is L = 2R \sin \alpha, and the radial distance from the to the chord's midpoint is d = R \cos \alpha. The gravitational acceleration along the chord, with displacement s measured from the midpoint (where s = 0), is a = -\frac{GM}{R^3} s, where G is the gravitational constant and M is the sphere's mass; this linear restoring force confirms simple harmonic motion (SHM) with angular frequency \omega = \sqrt{GM / R^3}. The one-way travel time from one endpoint to the other corresponds to half the period of the SHM, given by t = \frac{\pi}{\omega} = \pi \sqrt{\frac{R^3}{GM}}, which is independent of \alpha and thus the same for all chord lengths—approximately 42 minutes for Earth. The maximum speed occurs at the and equals v_{\max} = \omega \cdot (L/2) = \sqrt{GM / R^3} \cdot R \sin \alpha = \sqrt{g R} \sin \alpha, where g = GM / R^2 is ; this decreases with shorter chords, for example reaching about 3 /s for points separated by roughly 5000 along the surface.

Dependence on Planetary Radius

The travel time for a gravity train along a diametric path through a spherically symmetric of is half the period of , given by \frac{T}{2} = \pi \sqrt{\frac{3}{4\pi G \rho}}, where G is the gravitational constant and \rho is the average density of the body. This formula reveals that the period T depends solely on the density \rho, independent of the body's radius R. Consequently, for any uniform-density sphere, the one-way transit time across the full diameter remains constant regardless of the planet's size, as the gravitational restoring force scales proportionally with displacement from the center, yielding identical oscillatory behavior. For , with an average of approximately 5514 kg/m³, this yields a one-way travel time of about minutes. On the , the lower average of roughly 3340 kg/m³ results in longer times, approximately 53 minutes for a diametric journey. Gas giants like , despite their much larger radii, have an average of about 1326 kg/m³, leading to extended periods around 85 minutes due to the reduced gravitational strength per unit volume. In real celestial bodies with non-uniform density distributions, such as Earth—where denser material concentrates toward the core—the travel time for a diametric path is approximately 38 minutes, while for chord paths it ranges from about 38 to 42 minutes. For extremely high-density objects like neutron stars, with average densities on the order of $10^{17} kg/m³, the transit time would be extraordinarily brief, on the scale of milliseconds, highlighting the profound sensitivity to density. This density-dependent scaling implies that gravity train travel times are universal for uniform-density bodies of equivalent composition, enabling rapid inter-point transport across vastly different scales—from small asteroids to large planets—provided the density matches.

Feasibility and Challenges

Engineering and Technical Hurdles

Constructing a gravity train tunnel through Earth's interior poses insurmountable engineering challenges with current technology, primarily due to the vast scale and hostile subsurface environment. A straight-line tunnel connecting antipodal points would require excavating over 12,700 km, penetrating the crust, mantle, and core—depths more than 1,000 times greater than the deepest borehole ever drilled, the at 12.262 km. Drilling through such layers would encounter escalating temperatures exceeding 5,700°C in the core and pressures over 300 GPa, conditions that deform or melt conventional drill bits and equipment long before reaching significant depths. Maintaining structural integrity of the tunnel walls represents another critical barrier, as surrounding rock would undergo viscoelastic under gigapascal-level stresses, leading to gradual deformation and potential collapse over time. For efficient operation, the tunnel would need to operate in near-vacuum conditions to reduce aerodynamic drag at high velocities, but sustaining this vacuum against pervasive influxes of , magmatic fluids, and atmospheric gases through micro-fractures in the heterogeneous would demand unprecedented sealing technologies and continuous pumping systems. Vehicle design for a gravity train introduces further technical hurdles, requiring capsules capable of enduring peak speeds approaching 8 km/s while exposed to the intense heat, pressure, and corrosive chemistries of the deep interior. Passengers and cargo would face additional risks from residual emanating from radioactive isotopes like and concentrated in the mantle and crust, which contribute to geothermal . Realistic Earth conditions exacerbate these issues beyond idealized models. The planet's non-uniform density profile, derived from , slightly reduces theoretical transit times (e.g., to about minutes for a diametric ) but complicates the oscillatory motion, introducing perturbations that could destabilize vehicle guidance and tunnel alignment. Seismic activity, including earthquakes, would propagate amplified stresses through the tunnel structure, heightening the risk of fractures or catastrophic failure in an already fragile deep subsurface environment. Although provides the primary , practical implementation demands supplemental energy inputs: a small initial impulse to counteract surface and , plus robust braking mechanisms at endpoints to dissipate safely and prevent overshoot. These requirements underscore the gap between theoretical viability and engineering reality for gravity trains on .

Economic and Practical Limitations

The construction of a gravity train network on would entail enormous expenses, primarily due to the need for extensive, deep subterranean through challenging geological conditions. For instance, extrapolating from the Gotthard Base Tunnel's cost of approximately $12 billion for 57 kilometers—equating to about $210 million per kilometer—a single diametric spanning 's 12,742-kilometer could exceed $2.6 trillion, while a global network connecting major cities might surpass $100 trillion in speculative analyses based on similar mega-projects like the , which cost $15 billion for 50 kilometers or roughly $300 million per kilometer. These figures dwarf even ambitious endeavors such as the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (), estimated at $22-45 billion, highlighting the prohibitive scale for infrastructure alone. Operational challenges further compound the impracticality, including high maintenance demands in inaccessible environments prone to seismic activity, geothermal heat, and structural degradation over time. concerns are acute, as a —such as a or system malfunction—could strand passengers in extreme conditions, with limited evacuation options and risks amplified by the high velocities involved. Moreover, gravity trains offer low passenger throughput compared to established systems; for example, they would handle far fewer travelers per hour than or conventional , limiting economic returns despite zero energy needs. In comparison, alternatives like systems present more viable options for high-speed ground transport, with construction costs estimated at $75 million per kilometer for vacuum-tube designs—significantly lower than deep gravity tunnels—while enabling powered acceleration for shorter routes. trains, such as those in , achieve speeds over 500 km/h at costs around $50-100 million per kilometer, offering reliable service without the depth-related hazards. For intercontinental distances, remains superior, providing global connectivity at lower upfront costs and higher capacity, rendering gravity trains obsolete for practical deployment. Applications on other celestial bodies, such as the or Mars, appear marginally more feasible due to lower gravity, shallower tunneling requirements, and absence of a molten , potentially reducing heat and pressure issues. However, even these remain economically unviable in the near term; NASA's Flexible on a Track (FLOAT) initiative for lunar emphasizes over pure gravity systems, citing logistical benefits for resource hauling but underscoring high initial costs for extraterrestrial . Analogous surface-based concepts, like Fortescue Metals Group's paused downhill electric "gravity train" for in 2025, demonstrate partial viability for specialized, non-subsurface uses but were halted due to escalating expenses, reinforcing the overall barriers. Ultimately, while gravity trains embody theoretical elegance in leveraging planetary physics for transit, their astronomical costs, operational risks, and inferiority to modern alternatives ensure they remain a conceptual curiosity rather than a practical solution.

Cultural and Modern References

In Fiction and Media

The concept of gravity trains has inspired various depictions in science literature, often portraying them as efficient subsurface transportation systems powered by planetary gravity. In Hugo Gernsback's 1911 novel Ralph 124C 41+, a subterranean magnetic links to , envisioned as a high-speed marvel tunneling through the to enable rapid intercontinental travel. This early portrayal highlights the allure of subsurface motion for futuristic , blending scientific with imaginative , though powered by rather than gravity alone. In the late , John Varley's 1977 novel The Ophiuchi Hotline revisits and modernizes the underground gravity train idea, depicting advanced vessels that leverage gravitational forces for seamless subsurface journeys across planetary bodies. Varley's uses the train as a narrative device to explore intrigue, emphasizing the technology's potential for covert and swift transit while incorporating elements of and alien contact. Film adaptations have further popularized gravity trains through dramatic visualizations of subsurface travel. The 2012 remake of Total Recall, directed by Len Wiseman, features "The Fall," a massive gravity train that bores through the Earth's core to connect the United Federation of Britain with The Colony (a post-apocalyptic Australia), completing the journey in just 17 minutes via free-fall acceleration. These cinematic elements dramatize the perils and thrills of gravity-driven paths, often amplifying speeds and simplifying physics for narrative tension. Such fictional representations frequently exaggerate achievable velocities—realistic calculations suggest a diametric gravity train would take approximately 42 minutes to traverse the , not the shorter times depicted—or overlook challenges like uneven and , thereby inspiring in gravitational dynamics while prioritizing over strict scientific accuracy.

Contemporary Analogs and Proposals

In the realm of high-speed transportation, the concept, outlined in Elon Musk's 2013 white paper, proposes passenger pods traveling through low-pressure vacuum tubes using and linear induction motors, achieving speeds up to 760 mph while minimizing air resistance in a manner reminiscent of early gravity train principles. This design, though powered, draws from ideas that leverage enclosed tunnels for efficient transit, with ongoing developments including test tracks worldwide. China's advancements in technology serve as a partial analog, with a June 2025 test achieving 650 km/h (404 ) for a 1.1-ton vehicle over a 600-meter track, demonstrating ultra-high-speed potential in controlled environments akin to gravity-assisted systems. Earlier trials in 2024 reached 623 km/h (387 ) in a low-, highlighting progress toward commercial hyperloop-like networks without full reliance on alone. In mining operations, Fortescue Metals Group developed a battery-electric "gravity train" locomotive from 2022 to 2025, designed to haul iron ore downhill while recharging via , eliminating the need for external power and enabling zero-emission transport over Australia's routes. The system, dubbed the , completed a 685-mile in June 2025 but was paused in October 2025 due to escalating costs and technical hurdles, despite its potential to move over 200 million tons of ore annually. Similar gravity-powered concepts appear in global , including downhill ore conveyance in regions like South America's Andean operations, where elevation gradients naturally assist loaded trains uphill-empty returns. For extraterrestrial applications, has explored -based transport in lunar and Martian contexts, such as the 2024 Flexible on a (FLOAT) system, which uses unpowered magnetic robots levitating over flexible to navigate low-gravity environments without traditional propulsion. Proposals also leverage natural lava tubes—vast underground voids formed by ancient —for shielded transit networks, with studies indicating Martian tubes could span kilometers in diameter due to reduced gravity, potentially hosting rail systems for resource extraction or habitat connectivity. Related concepts, involving rotating space elevators with track-like infrastructure, extend these ideas to near-Earth transport but remain theoretical. Recent academic has advanced theoretical models of gravity trains, including a 2024 study on variable-mass systems where the train's affects periods in Earth-crossing tunnels, optimizing travel times under realistic mass variations. Published in the Revista Mexicana de Física E, this work analyzes energy and mass reduction during transit, confirming persists but with adjustments for practical implementation. As of 2025, no full-scale gravity train projects are operational worldwide, with efforts confined to prototypes, simulations, and niche applications like mining trials.

References

  1. [1]
    Gravity Train | The Engines of Our Ingenuity - University of Houston
    Gravity will cause the train to accelerate downhill until the middle of the tunnel, at which point it will decelerate as it rises to the other end.Missing: concept definition
  2. [2]
    Gravity Train Project - Purdue Math
    Dec 7, 2013 · The Gravity Train Project proposes a train in a tunnel from West Lafayette to Paris, using gravity to travel without fuel, and the goal is to ...Missing: concept | Show results with:concept
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Gravity Train
    A gravity train uses gravity to move a train through the earth, with a calculated travel time of about 42 minutes.
  4. [4]
    3.3 Surface Integrals
    ... Robert Hooke (1635--1703) wrote about the gravity train idea in a letter to Isaac Newton. A gravity train was used in the 2012 movie Total Recall. refers to ...
  5. [5]
    The Gravity Tunnel in a Non-Uniform Earth
    No readable text found in the HTML.<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Chapter 13 - bingweb
    Advanced Problem: gravity train. First consider a body of mass m outside the Earth. (a) What is the magnitude and direction of the gravitational force for ...
  7. [7]
    Switchback Gravity Railroad
    The Switchback Gravity Railroad, built in 1827, was America's second oldest railroad. Built to haul coal from the mines at Summit Hill to the Lehigh river and ...
  8. [8]
    Mauch Chunk Switchback Railroad - www.rgusrail.com
    Nov 1, 2011 · Begun in January 1827, work on the gravity railroad was finished by April, largely because much of the grade was laid over the existing turnpike ...
  9. [9]
    This Month in Physics History | American Physical Society
    Edwards proposed a Bay Area Gravity-Vacuum Transit system for California in 1967, designed to run in tandem with San Francisco's BART system, then under ...Missing: Lawrence | Show results with:Lawrence
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Hyperloop Alpha - Tesla
    A high speed transportation system known as Hyperloop has been developed in this document. The work has detailed two versions of the Hyperloop: a passenger ...
  11. [11]
    Ask an Expert: All aboard the gravity train? - UNSW Sydney
    Aug 7, 2020 · In theory, gravity tunnels provide quick journeys between continents, and moreover, gravity trains don't need extra energy for locomotion.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] A body falling through the Earth: Newton, Hooke, and the History of ...
    Hooke agreed that the body would fall east, but disagreed with the part of Newton's sketch inside Earth. He stated that the path would “resemble an Elleipse” ...Missing: 1670s speculation rapid travel
  13. [13]
    Robert Hooke as an astronomer
    Again, in 1666, Hooke explained to the Royal Society his views on what made the planets revolve in closed orbits round the Sun.2' The idea of the solar system ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Isaac Newton vs. Robert Hooke on the law of universal gravitation
    Jan 14, 2019 · Thus, the question arises as to the extent to which Isaac Newton was "inspired" by Robert. Hooke's previous works, and to whom the priority of ...Missing: train | Show results with:train
  15. [15]
    Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica
    Dec 20, 2007 · Philosophers have viewed the Principia in the context of Einstein's new theory of gravity in his theory of general relativity.
  16. [16]
    How Newton Derived Shape of Earth | American Physical Society
    that is, the calculation of its shape, size, and surface gravity variation, part of a field later known ...
  17. [17]
    Émilie du Châtelet - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    May 29, 2013 · The final product, published in 1740, would include an Introduction followed by ten chapters on topics of metaphysics touching on issues such as ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] 1 Émilie Du Châtelet and the foundations of physical science ...
    Aug 10, 2015 · Du Châtelet's 1740 text Foundations of Physics tackles three of the major foundational issues facing natural philosophy in the early eighteenth ...
  19. [19]
    Delaware & Hudson Canal - National Park Service
    Jan 28, 2025 · Constructed from 1825 to 1829—with 16 miles of gravity railway and 108 locks over a 108-mile canal—it was built to transport anthracite coal ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Gravity Train Solution Let x(t) be the coordinate along the tunnel with ...
    In 1966 one US physicist (Paul Cooper) rediscovered the Gravity Train and published a paper in American Journal of Physics as a serious project of ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
  21. [21]
    A (Faster) Journey To The Center Of The Earth - Forbes
    Mar 27, 2015 · ... 1966 when Paul Cooper published “Through the Earth in Forty Minutes”, also in the American Journal of Physics. The basic idea is that a ...
  22. [22]
    Fortescue Infinity Train locomotive never needs fuel or charging
    Jun 21, 2025 · Fortescue Infinity Train made its first 685 mile trip from Perth to the Pilbara, marking a major milestone in decarbonization.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Using Gauss' Theorem: Spheres, Lines, Planes - Galileo and Einstein
    So, for the case of a uniformly charged (throughout the volume) sphere, outside the whole sphere the field is the same as if all the charge were at the center, ...
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    Gravity in Earth's Interior | The Physics Teacher - AIP Publishing
    Feb 1, 2020 · Gravity is approximately constant and equal to the surface value in the whole mantle, a shell having a thickness of about 3000 km, representing ...Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Brachistochrone inside the Earth: The Gravity Train - UNLV Physics
    Sep 26, 2008 · Find the Euler-Lagrange equation describing the brachistochrone curve for a particle moving inside a spherical Earth of uniform mass density ...Missing: seminal paper
  27. [27]
    Hole Through the Earth Example - HyperPhysics
    When this is analyzed in detail, you find that the gravity at any radius r less than REarth will be linearly proportional to the distance from the center.
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    [PDF] arXiv:2001.03279v1 [physics.pop-ph] 10 Jan 2020
    Jan 10, 2020 · A classical result by Cooper1 asserts that a gravity train has a simple harmonic motion and always needs a constant amount of time (roughly 42 ...Missing: arbitrary | Show results with:arbitrary
  32. [32]
    How Big Is Earth? | Size, Diameter, & Mass - Britannica
    Earth's mass is about 5.97 ⨉ 1024 kilograms. Dividing this mass by Earth's volume results in an average density of approximately 5,517 kilograms per cubic meter ...
  33. [33]
    By the Numbers | Earth's Moon - Solar System Exploration - NASA
    AVERAGE ORBIT DISTANCE. Average of minimum and maximum distances from an ... DENSITY. 3.344g/cm3. oz/in3. g/cm3. 5.513g/cm3. oz/in3. g/cm3. MASS.
  34. [34]
    Mathematics: To Everywhere in 42 Minutes | TIME
    By crisscrossing the earth with subterranean tunnels, the freewheeling mathematician proposes in the current issue of the American Journal of Physics, man could ...Missing: Émilie du Châtelet<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Jupiter Fact Sheet - Radio Jove - NASA
    Jupiter's mass is 1,898.6 x 10^24 kg, its equatorial radius is 71,492 km, and its mean density is 1,326 kg/m^3. Its orbit period is 4,332.589 days.
  36. [36]
    The gravity tunnel in a non-uniform Earth - NASA ADS
    Numerically, it is found that the time taken to fall along the diameter is 38 min, compared to 42 min for a planet with uniform density.Missing: train | Show results with:train
  37. [37]
    Neutron Star | COSMOS
    Neutrons stars are extreme objects that measure between 10 and 20 km across. They have densities of 1017 kg/m3(the Earth has a density of around 5×103 kg/m3 ...
  38. [38]
    Exceptional Concentrations of Gold Nanoparticles in 1,7 Ga Fluid ...
    Jan 24, 2020 · In the drill core of the Kola super-deep borehole (SG-3, 12,262 m depth) gold-bearing rocks of Archaean age have been located at depths of 9,500 ...
  39. [39]
    Asteroid Mission Aims to Explore Mysteries of Earth's Core
    Oct 10, 2024 · The pressure at Earth's core measures about three million times the pressure of the atmosphere at the surface, and the temperature of Earth's ...
  40. [40]
    DEM simulation of rock creep in tunnels using Rate Process Theory
    The time-dependent (creep) behaviour of rocks affects the safety and stability of tunnels excavated in weak rocks and at great depths.Missing: train | Show results with:train
  41. [41]
    Key vacuum technology issues to be solved in evacuated tube ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · This pa-per lists some key vacuum technology issues in ETT: (1) how to construct ultra-large-scale vacuum chamber with lower cost and high ...
  42. [42]
    World's longest and deepest rail tunnel opens in Switzerland - BBC
    Jun 1, 2016 · The project, which cost more than $12bn (£8.3bn) to build, was endorsed by Swiss voters in a referendum in 1992. Voters then backed a proposal ...
  43. [43]
    This $15BN Undersea Tunnel Changed Europe Forever - The B1M
    Jan 17, 2024 · The USD $15BN undersea mega-tunnel connected two of the world's most important cities. It drew in 1,300 workers, stretched 50 kilometres under ...
  44. [44]
    A Critical Review of Hyperloop (Ultra-High Speed Rail) Technology
    The technology significantly builds on a much older idea variously known as “gravity vacuum tube,” “gravity vacuum transit,” or “high-speed tube transportation, ...
  45. [45]
    Flexible Levitation on a Track (FLOAT) - NASA TechPort - Project
    We want to build the first lunar railway system, which will provide reliable, autonomous, and efficient payload transport on the Moon.
  46. [46]
    Fortescue Halts Gravity Train Project Amid Rising Costs
    Oct 20, 2025 · Fortescue has paused its gravity train project due to high costs and technical challenges but continues to explore pathways toward full ...
  47. [47]
    Beyond the Tracks: The Locomotive in Science Fiction Literature
    The steam train was a quantum leap in how humans could harness the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  48. [48]
    The Science of Total Recall - Wolfram Blog
    Aug 13, 2012 · The point of the tunnel is that gravity does the hard work of accelerating passengers from one end to the other.
  49. [49]
    The Core (2003) - Moria Reviews
    Jun 9, 2003 · A CGI disaster film about a journey to the centre of the Earth to restart the magnetic core that is construed as a series of spectacular ...
  50. [50]
    Hyperloop for High-Speed Passenger Transport
    Nov 4, 2020 · Implementation: Published in August 2013, Elon Musk's paper proposed a route running from the Los Angeles region to the San Francisco Bay Area.
  51. [51]
    China breaks record with maglev train hitting 650 km/h in 7 seconds
    Jun 18, 2025 · The test data showed that the vehicle reached the remarkable speed in about 7 seconds with a running distance of 600 meters, Li Weichao, ...
  52. [52]
    Record-smashing Chinese maglev hyperloop train hits 387 mph and ...
    Feb 28, 2024 · China says its maglev hyperloop train has broken the world speed record in a test run, reaching a blistering 387 mph (623 km/h).
  53. [53]
    A Mining Company Built A Battery-Electric Train That Never Has To ...
    Jun 23, 2025 · Its beast has a 1.4 MWh battery, recharges on down slopes, and can reportedly fast-charge in as quickly as 30 minutes, and the idea of using ...
  54. [54]
    Electric vehicles tease a new energy source: Gravity - NBC News
    May 23, 2022 · One of Fortescue's ore trains near the Eliwana mine in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. The route is nearly 100 miles long.
  55. [55]
    Flexible Levitation on a Track (FLOAT) - NASA
    May 1, 2024 · The FLOAT system employs unpowered magnetic robots that levitate over a 3-layer flexible film track.
  56. [56]
    Lunar lava tube could shelter a future Moon base | Astronomy.com
    Jul 16, 2024 · A new study adds to the evidence that lunar caves are a viable plan to shelter future permanent outposts on the Moon.
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Technologies Enabling Exploration of Skylights, Lava Tubes and ...
    Due to the lesser gravity, it is predicted that lava tubes on Mars or the Moon may be much larger in diameter than those found on Earth (Coombs & Hawke ...
  58. [58]
    (PDF) Gravity train of variable mass - ResearchGate
    Jul 2, 2024 · We discuss the mass and energy reduction of the gravity train during travel and find the optimal conditions for economical travel. This study is ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
  59. [59]
    Gravity train of variable mass | Revista Mexicana de Física E
    Jul 1, 2024 · The gravity train is a virtual vehicle that travels in a tunnel across Earth, and its motion due to only gravity is a simple harmonic oscillator ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal<|control11|><|separator|>